<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:googleplay="http://www.google.com/schemas/play-podcasts/1.0" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:podcast="https://podcastindex.org/namespace/1.0">
  <channel>
    <atom:link href="https://feeds.simplecast.com/8d97jnFd" rel="self" title="MP3 Audio" type="application/atom+xml"/>
    <atom:link href="https://simplecast.superfeedr.com" rel="hub" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"/>
    <generator>https://simplecast.com</generator>
    <title>New Books in Law</title>
    <description>This podcast is a channel on the New Books Network. The New Books Network is an academic audio library dedicated to public education. In each episode you will hear scholars discuss their recently published research with another expert in their field.

Discover our 150+ channels and browse our 28,000+ episodes on our website: newbooksnetwork.com

Subscribe to our free weekly Substack newsletter to get informative, engaging content straight to your inbox: https://newbooksnetwork.substack.com/

Follow us on Instagram and Bluesky to learn about more our latest interviews: @newbooksnetwork


Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</description>
    <copyright>New Books Network</copyright>
    <language>en</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2026 08:00:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    
    <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com</link>
    <itunes:type>episodic</itunes:type>
    <itunes:summary>This podcast is a channel on the New Books Network. The New Books Network is an academic audio library dedicated to public education. In each episode you will hear scholars discuss their recently published research with another expert in their field.

Discover our 150+ channels and browse our 28,000+ episodes on our website: newbooksnetwork.com

Subscribe to our free weekly Substack newsletter to get informative, engaging content straight to your inbox: https://newbooksnetwork.substack.com/

Follow us on Instagram and Bluesky to learn about more our latest interviews: @newbooksnetwork


Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
    <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
    <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
    <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/2cf6a02f-0d83-47c7-a772-7eb4e1c50adb/e6c28e7a-ab2b-466a-9786-388a0c369343/3000x3000/ae1a67b1e26a70ce7206b645623e48a3.png?aid=rss_feed"/>
    <itunes:new-feed-url>https://feeds.simplecast.com/8d97jnFd</itunes:new-feed-url>
    <itunes:owner>
      <itunes:name>New Books Network</itunes:name>
      <itunes:email>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com</itunes:email>
    </itunes:owner>
    <itunes:category text="Science">
      <itunes:category text="Social Sciences"/>
    </itunes:category>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">88893b38-362f-46af-a924-2e5dd8dedf66</guid>
      <title>Sara C Bronin, &quot;Key to the City: How Zoning Shapes Our World&quot; (Norton, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>For those concerned with how city hall can shape the look and feel of a neighborhood, the mere mention of zoning may invite denunciation of zoning practices that contributed substantially to the housing crisis and so limited neighborhood development that you have to get in your car to pick up a quart of milk.</p><p>In her readable <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780393881660" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"><i>Key to the City: How Zoning Shapes Our World </i></a>(Norton, 2024), Sara Bronin, the Freda Alverson Professor of Law at George Washington University, points out if you want to put up a single-family house of around 2,500 square feet, then at a minimum you may be required to purchase a 43,350 square foot (one acre) lot on which you but nobody else can build. No wonder we have a housing shortage. And after you move in, you will likely find yourself living in a neighborhood zoned “residential,” that is without stores or businesses within walking distance. So it will be necessary to own a car for shopping and just about everything else.&nbsp;</p><p>In this conversation and in <i>Key to the City</i>, Professor Bronin suggests addressing the housing shortage by amending local zoning to make it possible to build several houses per acre. Then too neighborhoods currently zoned “residential” might re-designated for “mixed uses” so that one might walk to stores and restaurants. But Bronin cautions that however inviting the notion of strolling over to the grocery, café or bookstore, how would you feel if a gas station, used car lot or strip joint opened in your neighborhood?</p><p>By no means confined to the ivory tower, Professor Bronin, who served for seven years on Hartford’s Planning and Zoning Commission, recognizes that the underlying purpose of zoning––to protect the homeowner from unwanted intrusions––remains valid. And after showing how Hartford, Minneapolis, Tucson, and Baltimore went about revising their zoning ordinances, she concludes that zoning remains an essential tool for developing decent neighborhoods. She then implicitly invites us to take a walk around the block to consider what might be done to make our neighborhood all the better.&nbsp;&nbsp;﻿&nbsp; &nbsp;</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/sara-c-bronin-key-to-the-city-how-zoning-shapes-our-world-norton-2024-m0_fF9_F</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For those concerned with how city hall can shape the look and feel of a neighborhood, the mere mention of zoning may invite denunciation of zoning practices that contributed substantially to the housing crisis and so limited neighborhood development that you have to get in your car to pick up a quart of milk.</p><p>In her readable <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780393881660" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"><i>Key to the City: How Zoning Shapes Our World </i></a>(Norton, 2024), Sara Bronin, the Freda Alverson Professor of Law at George Washington University, points out if you want to put up a single-family house of around 2,500 square feet, then at a minimum you may be required to purchase a 43,350 square foot (one acre) lot on which you but nobody else can build. No wonder we have a housing shortage. And after you move in, you will likely find yourself living in a neighborhood zoned “residential,” that is without stores or businesses within walking distance. So it will be necessary to own a car for shopping and just about everything else.&nbsp;</p><p>In this conversation and in <i>Key to the City</i>, Professor Bronin suggests addressing the housing shortage by amending local zoning to make it possible to build several houses per acre. Then too neighborhoods currently zoned “residential” might re-designated for “mixed uses” so that one might walk to stores and restaurants. But Bronin cautions that however inviting the notion of strolling over to the grocery, café or bookstore, how would you feel if a gas station, used car lot or strip joint opened in your neighborhood?</p><p>By no means confined to the ivory tower, Professor Bronin, who served for seven years on Hartford’s Planning and Zoning Commission, recognizes that the underlying purpose of zoning––to protect the homeowner from unwanted intrusions––remains valid. And after showing how Hartford, Minneapolis, Tucson, and Baltimore went about revising their zoning ordinances, she concludes that zoning remains an essential tool for developing decent neighborhoods. She then implicitly invites us to take a walk around the block to consider what might be done to make our neighborhood all the better.&nbsp;&nbsp;﻿&nbsp; &nbsp;</p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="26902658" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/842a3c61-ab03-433d-ae20-7047b17883ba/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=842a3c61-ab03-433d-ae20-7047b17883ba&amp;awSourceEpisodeId=517bde3f-8829-4be5-a462-83c274c88322&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Sara C Bronin, &quot;Key to the City: How Zoning Shapes Our World&quot; (Norton, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:28:00</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>For those concerned with how city hall can shape the look and feel of a neighborhood, the mere mention of zoning may invite denunciation of zoning practices that contributed substantially to the housing crisis and so limited neighborhood development that you have to get in your car to pick up a quart of milk.

In her readable Key to the City: How Zoning Shapes Our World (Norton, 2024), Sara Bronin, the Freda Alverson Professor of Law at George Washington University, points out if you want to put up a single-family house of around 2,500 square feet, then at a minimum you may be required to purchase a 43,350 square foot (one acre) lot on which you but nobody else can build. No wonder we have a housing shortage. And after you move in, you will likely find yourself living in a neighborhood zoned “residential,” that is without stores or businesses within walking distance. So it will be necessary to own a car for shopping and just about everything else. 

In this conversation and in Key to the City, Professor Bronin suggests addressing the housing shortage by amending local zoning to make it possible to build several houses per acre. Then too neighborhoods currently zoned “residential” might re-designated for “mixed uses” so that one might walk to stores and restaurants. But Bronin cautions that however inviting the notion of strolling over to the grocery, café or bookstore, how would you feel if a gas station, used car lot or strip joint opened in your neighborhood?

By no means confined to the ivory tower, Professor Bronin, who served for seven years on Hartford’s Planning and Zoning Commission, recognizes that the underlying purpose of zoning––to protect the homeowner from unwanted intrusions––remains valid. And after showing how Hartford, Minneapolis, Tucson, and Baltimore went about revising their zoning ordinances, she concludes that zoning remains an essential tool for developing decent neighborhoods. She then implicitly invites us to take a walk around the block to consider what might be done to make our neighborhood all the better.  ﻿  </itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>For those concerned with how city hall can shape the look and feel of a neighborhood, the mere mention of zoning may invite denunciation of zoning practices that contributed substantially to the housing crisis and so limited neighborhood development that you have to get in your car to pick up a quart of milk.

In her readable Key to the City: How Zoning Shapes Our World (Norton, 2024), Sara Bronin, the Freda Alverson Professor of Law at George Washington University, points out if you want to put up a single-family house of around 2,500 square feet, then at a minimum you may be required to purchase a 43,350 square foot (one acre) lot on which you but nobody else can build. No wonder we have a housing shortage. And after you move in, you will likely find yourself living in a neighborhood zoned “residential,” that is without stores or businesses within walking distance. So it will be necessary to own a car for shopping and just about everything else. 

In this conversation and in Key to the City, Professor Bronin suggests addressing the housing shortage by amending local zoning to make it possible to build several houses per acre. Then too neighborhoods currently zoned “residential” might re-designated for “mixed uses” so that one might walk to stores and restaurants. But Bronin cautions that however inviting the notion of strolling over to the grocery, café or bookstore, how would you feel if a gas station, used car lot or strip joint opened in your neighborhood?

By no means confined to the ivory tower, Professor Bronin, who served for seven years on Hartford’s Planning and Zoning Commission, recognizes that the underlying purpose of zoning––to protect the homeowner from unwanted intrusions––remains valid. And after showing how Hartford, Minneapolis, Tucson, and Baltimore went about revising their zoning ordinances, she concludes that zoning remains an essential tool for developing decent neighborhoods. She then implicitly invites us to take a walk around the block to consider what might be done to make our neighborhood all the better.  ﻿  </itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1466</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">d12b2739-1bbe-4862-8c95-9bdc943763ac</guid>
      <title>Lee M. Panich and Gustavo Flores, &quot;We Will Receive Justice: Native Histories of the Collapse of the California Missions&quot; (U Nebraska Press, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781496248268" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"><i>We Will Receive Justice: Native Histories of the Collapse of the California Missions</i></a> (U Nebraska Press, 2026) by Dr. Lee M. Panich &amp; Gustavo Flores explores how Native people in the southern San Francisco Bay Area—the ancestors of today’s Ohlone community—navigated the collapse of the California mission system. The volume spans from Mexican independence in 1821 through the region’s annexation by the United States in 1846, as Native people from Mission Santa Clara and Mission San José fought for emancipation and restitution amid rapidly changing colonial circumstances.﻿&nbsp;</p><p>The narrative is driven by a reexamination of archives related to the Pueblo of San José, the territorial capital of Monterey, and early U.S. court cases regarding Mexican-era land grants, contextualized through an in-depth analysis of mission records that illuminate the complex social connections of Native individuals and families.&nbsp;<i>We Will Receive Justice</i> offers an ethnohistorical lens for viewing the Indigenous history of Mexican California, examining not simply the history of colonization but how Native people drew on cultural traditions and social relationships to create new lives for themselves in the wake of the Franciscan mission system.﻿&nbsp;</p><p><i>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</i><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><i> book</i></a><i> focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on&nbsp;</i><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><i>New Books with Miranda Melcher</i></a><i>, wherever you get your podcasts.</i></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/lee-m-panich-and-gustavo-flores-we-will-receive-justice-native-histories-of-the-collapse-of-the-california-missions-u-nebraska-press-2026-Zzp87jjG</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781496248268" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"><i>We Will Receive Justice: Native Histories of the Collapse of the California Missions</i></a> (U Nebraska Press, 2026) by Dr. Lee M. Panich &amp; Gustavo Flores explores how Native people in the southern San Francisco Bay Area—the ancestors of today’s Ohlone community—navigated the collapse of the California mission system. The volume spans from Mexican independence in 1821 through the region’s annexation by the United States in 1846, as Native people from Mission Santa Clara and Mission San José fought for emancipation and restitution amid rapidly changing colonial circumstances.﻿&nbsp;</p><p>The narrative is driven by a reexamination of archives related to the Pueblo of San José, the territorial capital of Monterey, and early U.S. court cases regarding Mexican-era land grants, contextualized through an in-depth analysis of mission records that illuminate the complex social connections of Native individuals and families.&nbsp;<i>We Will Receive Justice</i> offers an ethnohistorical lens for viewing the Indigenous history of Mexican California, examining not simply the history of colonization but how Native people drew on cultural traditions and social relationships to create new lives for themselves in the wake of the Franciscan mission system.﻿&nbsp;</p><p><i>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</i><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><i> book</i></a><i> focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on&nbsp;</i><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><i>New Books with Miranda Melcher</i></a><i>, wherever you get your podcasts.</i></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="51498788" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/8796e490-bb19-4707-a4d8-f21dfac8deeb/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=8796e490-bb19-4707-a4d8-f21dfac8deeb&amp;awSourceEpisodeId=22d25a5b-f46f-47c6-817d-d74ae96b4509&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Lee M. Panich and Gustavo Flores, &quot;We Will Receive Justice: Native Histories of the Collapse of the California Missions&quot; (U Nebraska Press, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:53:38</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>We Will Receive Justice: Native Histories of the Collapse of the California Missions (U Nebraska Press, 2026) by Dr. Lee M. Panich &amp; Gustavo Flores explores how Native people in the southern San Francisco Bay Area—the ancestors of today’s Ohlone community—navigated the collapse of the California mission system. The volume spans from Mexican independence in 1821 through the region’s annexation by the United States in 1846, as Native people from Mission Santa Clara and Mission San José fought for emancipation and restitution amid rapidly changing colonial circumstances.﻿ 

The narrative is driven by a reexamination of archives related to the Pueblo of San José, the territorial capital of Monterey, and early U.S. court cases regarding Mexican-era land grants, contextualized through an in-depth analysis of mission records that illuminate the complex social connections of Native individuals and families. We Will Receive Justice offers an ethnohistorical lens for viewing the Indigenous history of Mexican California, examining not simply the history of colonization but how Native people drew on cultural traditions and social relationships to create new lives for themselves in the wake of the Franciscan mission system.﻿ 

This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>We Will Receive Justice: Native Histories of the Collapse of the California Missions (U Nebraska Press, 2026) by Dr. Lee M. Panich &amp; Gustavo Flores explores how Native people in the southern San Francisco Bay Area—the ancestors of today’s Ohlone community—navigated the collapse of the California mission system. The volume spans from Mexican independence in 1821 through the region’s annexation by the United States in 1846, as Native people from Mission Santa Clara and Mission San José fought for emancipation and restitution amid rapidly changing colonial circumstances.﻿ 

The narrative is driven by a reexamination of archives related to the Pueblo of San José, the territorial capital of Monterey, and early U.S. court cases regarding Mexican-era land grants, contextualized through an in-depth analysis of mission records that illuminate the complex social connections of Native individuals and families. We Will Receive Justice offers an ethnohistorical lens for viewing the Indigenous history of Mexican California, examining not simply the history of colonization but how Native people drew on cultural traditions and social relationships to create new lives for themselves in the wake of the Franciscan mission system.﻿ 

This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1465</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">23ec53c0-b015-11f1-bc00-cbe719821071</guid>
      <title>Samantha Barbas, &quot;Hate Speech: The Legal and Cultural History of an American Dilemma&quot; (U California Press, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The United States has no hate speech laws; hate speech is generally considered to be free speech under the First Amendment. In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780520401983" rel="noopener noreferrer">Hate Speech: The Legal and Cultural History of an American Dilemma</a> (U California Press, 2026), acclaimed legal historian Samantha Barbas chronicles the country’s legal and cultural battles over the regulation of hate speech in the last hundred years. Charting the historical context for current debates, she ultimately argues that, however emotionally appealing they may seem, hate speech laws undermine civil rights and democracy.<br>The American policy on hate speech evolved from influences such as the civil rights movement, which contended that the most effective way to combat hate speech wasn’t through proposed laws. Rather than imposing restrictions, the US has developed an array of mechanisms other than law, including counterspeech and public education, that have been relatively effective at dealing with hate speakers and hate groups. Though not perfect, our method of addressing hate is less dangerous than government censorship and less likely to be weaponized against the powerless.﻿&nbsp;</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em> book</em></a><em> focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/samantha-barbas-hate-speech-the-legal-and-cultural-history-of-an-american-dilemma-u-california-press-2026-IN2YELCc</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The United States has no hate speech laws; hate speech is generally considered to be free speech under the First Amendment. In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780520401983" rel="noopener noreferrer">Hate Speech: The Legal and Cultural History of an American Dilemma</a> (U California Press, 2026), acclaimed legal historian Samantha Barbas chronicles the country’s legal and cultural battles over the regulation of hate speech in the last hundred years. Charting the historical context for current debates, she ultimately argues that, however emotionally appealing they may seem, hate speech laws undermine civil rights and democracy.<br>The American policy on hate speech evolved from influences such as the civil rights movement, which contended that the most effective way to combat hate speech wasn’t through proposed laws. Rather than imposing restrictions, the US has developed an array of mechanisms other than law, including counterspeech and public education, that have been relatively effective at dealing with hate speakers and hate groups. Though not perfect, our method of addressing hate is less dangerous than government censorship and less likely to be weaponized against the powerless.﻿&nbsp;</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em> book</em></a><em> focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="36748553" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/61ccc60f-0ca3-4815-9e8f-942a26ff106e/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=61ccc60f-0ca3-4815-9e8f-942a26ff106e&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Samantha Barbas, &quot;Hate Speech: The Legal and Cultural History of an American Dilemma&quot; (U California Press, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:38:14</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The United States has no hate speech laws; hate speech is generally considered to be free speech under the First Amendment. In Hate Speech: The Legal and Cultural History of an American Dilemma (U California Press, 2026), acclaimed legal historian Samantha Barbas chronicles the country’s legal and cultural battles over the regulation of hate speech in the last hundred years. Charting the historical context for current debates, she ultimately argues that, however emotionally appealing they may seem, hate speech laws undermine civil rights and democracy.The American policy on hate speech evolved from influences such as the civil rights movement, which contended that the most effective way to combat hate speech wasn’t through proposed laws. Rather than imposing restrictions, the US has developed an array of mechanisms other than law, including counterspeech and public education, that have been relatively effective at dealing with hate speakers and hate groups. Though not perfect, our method of addressing hate is less dangerous than government censorship and less likely to be weaponized against the powerless.﻿ 
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The United States has no hate speech laws; hate speech is generally considered to be free speech under the First Amendment. In Hate Speech: The Legal and Cultural History of an American Dilemma (U California Press, 2026), acclaimed legal historian Samantha Barbas chronicles the country’s legal and cultural battles over the regulation of hate speech in the last hundred years. Charting the historical context for current debates, she ultimately argues that, however emotionally appealing they may seem, hate speech laws undermine civil rights and democracy.The American policy on hate speech evolved from influences such as the civil rights movement, which contended that the most effective way to combat hate speech wasn’t through proposed laws. Rather than imposing restrictions, the US has developed an array of mechanisms other than law, including counterspeech and public education, that have been relatively effective at dealing with hate speakers and hate groups. Though not perfect, our method of addressing hate is less dangerous than government censorship and less likely to be weaponized against the powerless.﻿ 
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1743</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1389674a-b018-11f1-8266-237668ce7195</guid>
      <title>Tom Hulme, &quot;Belfastmen: An Intimate History of Life Before Gay Liberation&quot; (Cornell UP, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Professor Tom Hulme's second book reconstructs the erotic and romantic lives of queer men in Belfast across roughly seventy years, from the recriminalisation of sex between men in the 1880s to the emergence of a mainstream public debate about homosexuality in the 1950s. It follows men cruising the city centre, reading and passing around homosexual novels, forging relationships across the lines of class and religion, and navigating a world that was often more knowing and more tolerant than Northern Ireland's later reputation would suggest. Where we might expect only shame and fear, Hulme finds pride, defiance, and a guarded everyday acceptance, though one whose limits fell hard on those caught with much younger partners, and one that narrowed sharply after the Second World War.</p>
<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781501786464" rel="noopener noreferrer">Belfastmen: An Intimate History of Life Before Gay Liberation</a> (Cornell UP, 2026) is built from two very different archives, the criminal record of some sixty Belfast court cases and shaped by the violence of policing, and the extraordinary personal diaries of David Strain, forty-three volumes and perhaps two million words, brought into scholarly use here for the first time. Out of that pairing Hulme develops the book's broader argument, a case for intimate, emotionally invested methods in the history of sexuality, and two organising ideas: the "intimate queer city," in which Belfast's very scale and familiarity shaped how men met and loved, and the "queer Irish world," which places sailors, the docks, and migration between Belfast, Liverpool, and New York at the centre of the story. Along the way the book takes up religion and respectability, masculinity on trial, and the entanglement of queerness with the ethnonational and sectarian order of Ulster.</p>
<p>Belfastmen is published open access by Cornell University Press and can be read for free through the Cornell Open initiative.</p>
<p>About the author</p>
<p>Tom Hulme is a professor at Queen's University Belfast and a cultural historian of modern Britain and Ireland. He is Principal Investigator of the Arts and Humanities Research Council project <em>Queer Northern Ireland: Sexuality Before Liberation</em>, run with Professor Leanne McCormick, and the author of <em>After the Shock City: Urban Culture.</em> His work on queer history has appeared in <em>Irish Historical Studies</em>, <em>The History of the Family</em>, and the <em>Journal of the History of Sexuality</em>, and his research has been covered in the Guardian and the Irish Times.</p>
<p><br>About the host</p>
<p>Niall Herron is a PhD researcher in Anthropology at Queen's University Belfast. His ethnographic work examines queer experience during the Northern Ireland Troubles, taking the everyday as a focal point for how queerness and space were assembled across the period, and how sexuality, gender, region, ethnonational identity, and class were bound up together. His writing has appeared in the anthropology journal <em>Ethnos</em> and the academic queer history blog <em>NOTCHES</em>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/tom-hulme-belfastmen-an-intimate-history-of-life-before-gay-liberation-cornell-up-2026-k67D7OxE</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Professor Tom Hulme's second book reconstructs the erotic and romantic lives of queer men in Belfast across roughly seventy years, from the recriminalisation of sex between men in the 1880s to the emergence of a mainstream public debate about homosexuality in the 1950s. It follows men cruising the city centre, reading and passing around homosexual novels, forging relationships across the lines of class and religion, and navigating a world that was often more knowing and more tolerant than Northern Ireland's later reputation would suggest. Where we might expect only shame and fear, Hulme finds pride, defiance, and a guarded everyday acceptance, though one whose limits fell hard on those caught with much younger partners, and one that narrowed sharply after the Second World War.</p>
<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781501786464" rel="noopener noreferrer">Belfastmen: An Intimate History of Life Before Gay Liberation</a> (Cornell UP, 2026) is built from two very different archives, the criminal record of some sixty Belfast court cases and shaped by the violence of policing, and the extraordinary personal diaries of David Strain, forty-three volumes and perhaps two million words, brought into scholarly use here for the first time. Out of that pairing Hulme develops the book's broader argument, a case for intimate, emotionally invested methods in the history of sexuality, and two organising ideas: the "intimate queer city," in which Belfast's very scale and familiarity shaped how men met and loved, and the "queer Irish world," which places sailors, the docks, and migration between Belfast, Liverpool, and New York at the centre of the story. Along the way the book takes up religion and respectability, masculinity on trial, and the entanglement of queerness with the ethnonational and sectarian order of Ulster.</p>
<p>Belfastmen is published open access by Cornell University Press and can be read for free through the Cornell Open initiative.</p>
<p>About the author</p>
<p>Tom Hulme is a professor at Queen's University Belfast and a cultural historian of modern Britain and Ireland. He is Principal Investigator of the Arts and Humanities Research Council project <em>Queer Northern Ireland: Sexuality Before Liberation</em>, run with Professor Leanne McCormick, and the author of <em>After the Shock City: Urban Culture.</em> His work on queer history has appeared in <em>Irish Historical Studies</em>, <em>The History of the Family</em>, and the <em>Journal of the History of Sexuality</em>, and his research has been covered in the Guardian and the Irish Times.</p>
<p><br>About the host</p>
<p>Niall Herron is a PhD researcher in Anthropology at Queen's University Belfast. His ethnographic work examines queer experience during the Northern Ireland Troubles, taking the everyday as a focal point for how queerness and space were assembled across the period, and how sexuality, gender, region, ethnonational identity, and class were bound up together. His writing has appeared in the anthropology journal <em>Ethnos</em> and the academic queer history blog <em>NOTCHES</em>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="52078875" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/0ba273d3-c038-46b2-b3f5-99c06e6288cb/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=0ba273d3-c038-46b2-b3f5-99c06e6288cb&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Tom Hulme, &quot;Belfastmen: An Intimate History of Life Before Gay Liberation&quot; (Cornell UP, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:54:11</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Professor Tom Hulme&apos;s second book reconstructs the erotic and romantic lives of queer men in Belfast across roughly seventy years, from the recriminalisation of sex between men in the 1880s to the emergence of a mainstream public debate about homosexuality in the 1950s. It follows men cruising the city centre, reading and passing around homosexual novels, forging relationships across the lines of class and religion, and navigating a world that was often more knowing and more tolerant than Northern Ireland&apos;s later reputation would suggest. Where we might expect only shame and fear, Hulme finds pride, defiance, and a guarded everyday acceptance, though one whose limits fell hard on those caught with much younger partners, and one that narrowed sharply after the Second World War.
Belfastmen: An Intimate History of Life Before Gay Liberation (Cornell UP, 2026) is built from two very different archives, the criminal record of some sixty Belfast court cases and shaped by the violence of policing, and the extraordinary personal diaries of David Strain, forty-three volumes and perhaps two million words, brought into scholarly use here for the first time. Out of that pairing Hulme develops the book&apos;s broader argument, a case for intimate, emotionally invested methods in the history of sexuality, and two organising ideas: the &quot;intimate queer city,&quot; in which Belfast&apos;s very scale and familiarity shaped how men met and loved, and the &quot;queer Irish world,&quot; which places sailors, the docks, and migration between Belfast, Liverpool, and New York at the centre of the story. Along the way the book takes up religion and respectability, masculinity on trial, and the entanglement of queerness with the ethnonational and sectarian order of Ulster.
Belfastmen is published open access by Cornell University Press and can be read for free through the Cornell Open initiative.
About the author
Tom Hulme is a professor at Queen&apos;s University Belfast and a cultural historian of modern Britain and Ireland. He is Principal Investigator of the Arts and Humanities Research Council project Queer Northern Ireland: Sexuality Before Liberation, run with Professor Leanne McCormick, and the author of After the Shock City: Urban Culture. His work on queer history has appeared in Irish Historical Studies, The History of the Family, and the Journal of the History of Sexuality, and his research has been covered in the Guardian and the Irish Times.
About the host
Niall Herron is a PhD researcher in Anthropology at Queen&apos;s University Belfast. His ethnographic work examines queer experience during the Northern Ireland Troubles, taking the everyday as a focal point for how queerness and space were assembled across the period, and how sexuality, gender, region, ethnonational identity, and class were bound up together. His writing has appeared in the anthropology journal Ethnos and the academic queer history blog NOTCHES.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Professor Tom Hulme&apos;s second book reconstructs the erotic and romantic lives of queer men in Belfast across roughly seventy years, from the recriminalisation of sex between men in the 1880s to the emergence of a mainstream public debate about homosexuality in the 1950s. It follows men cruising the city centre, reading and passing around homosexual novels, forging relationships across the lines of class and religion, and navigating a world that was often more knowing and more tolerant than Northern Ireland&apos;s later reputation would suggest. Where we might expect only shame and fear, Hulme finds pride, defiance, and a guarded everyday acceptance, though one whose limits fell hard on those caught with much younger partners, and one that narrowed sharply after the Second World War.
Belfastmen: An Intimate History of Life Before Gay Liberation (Cornell UP, 2026) is built from two very different archives, the criminal record of some sixty Belfast court cases and shaped by the violence of policing, and the extraordinary personal diaries of David Strain, forty-three volumes and perhaps two million words, brought into scholarly use here for the first time. Out of that pairing Hulme develops the book&apos;s broader argument, a case for intimate, emotionally invested methods in the history of sexuality, and two organising ideas: the &quot;intimate queer city,&quot; in which Belfast&apos;s very scale and familiarity shaped how men met and loved, and the &quot;queer Irish world,&quot; which places sailors, the docks, and migration between Belfast, Liverpool, and New York at the centre of the story. Along the way the book takes up religion and respectability, masculinity on trial, and the entanglement of queerness with the ethnonational and sectarian order of Ulster.
Belfastmen is published open access by Cornell University Press and can be read for free through the Cornell Open initiative.
About the author
Tom Hulme is a professor at Queen&apos;s University Belfast and a cultural historian of modern Britain and Ireland. He is Principal Investigator of the Arts and Humanities Research Council project Queer Northern Ireland: Sexuality Before Liberation, run with Professor Leanne McCormick, and the author of After the Shock City: Urban Culture. His work on queer history has appeared in Irish Historical Studies, The History of the Family, and the Journal of the History of Sexuality, and his research has been covered in the Guardian and the Irish Times.
About the host
Niall Herron is a PhD researcher in Anthropology at Queen&apos;s University Belfast. His ethnographic work examines queer experience during the Northern Ireland Troubles, taking the everyday as a focal point for how queerness and space were assembled across the period, and how sexuality, gender, region, ethnonational identity, and class were bound up together. His writing has appeared in the anthropology journal Ethnos and the academic queer history blog NOTCHES.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1744</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">65c13cbc-adb2-11f1-a40b-1bb3e975cae4</guid>
      <title>Leda M Perez, &quot;Searching for Democracy: Women, Domestic Work, and Social Reproduction in Latin America&quot; (Temple UP, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>How can we achieve lasting social and political equality for women? Dr. Leda Pérez tackles this thorny question in&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781439927465" rel="noopener noreferrer">Searching for Democracy: Women, Domestic Work, and Social Reproduction in Latin America</a> (Temple University Press, 2026) by interrogating egalitarianism in Latin America, where nearly 20% of women work in domestic service. She examines how women’s participation in society, labor, and politics continues to be conditioned by their relationship to domestic and care work.</p>
<p>&nbsp;﻿Dr. Pérez argues that women’s relationship to these spheres of life is indicative of a nation’s development and democracy. She provides a comparative focus on the socio-cultural valuation of this labor and the experiences of women in Bolivia, Chile, Peru, and Uruguay, among other countries. Pérez asserts that it is only by changing sociocultural views on this “women’s work” that nations can create political change, foster equitable legislation, and ensure implementation of effective policies that benefit women.﻿&nbsp;</p>
<p><em>Searching for Democracy</em> shows why real and lasting equality cannot be achieved without fully enfranchising women in the lowest tiers of employment and closing the equality gap among women. Dr. Pérez’s models for gender equality are relevant for women around the world.﻿&nbsp;</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em> book</em></a><em> focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/leda-m-perez-searching-for-democracy-women-domestic-work-and-social-reproduction-in-latin-america-temple-up-2026-Pm46zwcB</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How can we achieve lasting social and political equality for women? Dr. Leda Pérez tackles this thorny question in&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781439927465" rel="noopener noreferrer">Searching for Democracy: Women, Domestic Work, and Social Reproduction in Latin America</a> (Temple University Press, 2026) by interrogating egalitarianism in Latin America, where nearly 20% of women work in domestic service. She examines how women’s participation in society, labor, and politics continues to be conditioned by their relationship to domestic and care work.</p>
<p>&nbsp;﻿Dr. Pérez argues that women’s relationship to these spheres of life is indicative of a nation’s development and democracy. She provides a comparative focus on the socio-cultural valuation of this labor and the experiences of women in Bolivia, Chile, Peru, and Uruguay, among other countries. Pérez asserts that it is only by changing sociocultural views on this “women’s work” that nations can create political change, foster equitable legislation, and ensure implementation of effective policies that benefit women.﻿&nbsp;</p>
<p><em>Searching for Democracy</em> shows why real and lasting equality cannot be achieved without fully enfranchising women in the lowest tiers of employment and closing the equality gap among women. Dr. Pérez’s models for gender equality are relevant for women around the world.﻿&nbsp;</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em> book</em></a><em> focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="56500853" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/9f543e0b-2260-4869-a3ce-512f93514a95/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=9f543e0b-2260-4869-a3ce-512f93514a95&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Leda M Perez, &quot;Searching for Democracy: Women, Domestic Work, and Social Reproduction in Latin America&quot; (Temple UP, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:58:47</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>How can we achieve lasting social and political equality for women? Dr. Leda Pérez tackles this thorny question in Searching for Democracy: Women, Domestic Work, and Social Reproduction in Latin America (Temple University Press, 2026) by interrogating egalitarianism in Latin America, where nearly 20% of women work in domestic service. She examines how women’s participation in society, labor, and politics continues to be conditioned by their relationship to domestic and care work.
 ﻿Dr. Pérez argues that women’s relationship to these spheres of life is indicative of a nation’s development and democracy. She provides a comparative focus on the socio-cultural valuation of this labor and the experiences of women in Bolivia, Chile, Peru, and Uruguay, among other countries. Pérez asserts that it is only by changing sociocultural views on this “women’s work” that nations can create political change, foster equitable legislation, and ensure implementation of effective policies that benefit women.﻿ 
Searching for Democracy shows why real and lasting equality cannot be achieved without fully enfranchising women in the lowest tiers of employment and closing the equality gap among women. Dr. Pérez’s models for gender equality are relevant for women around the world.﻿ 
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>How can we achieve lasting social and political equality for women? Dr. Leda Pérez tackles this thorny question in Searching for Democracy: Women, Domestic Work, and Social Reproduction in Latin America (Temple University Press, 2026) by interrogating egalitarianism in Latin America, where nearly 20% of women work in domestic service. She examines how women’s participation in society, labor, and politics continues to be conditioned by their relationship to domestic and care work.
 ﻿Dr. Pérez argues that women’s relationship to these spheres of life is indicative of a nation’s development and democracy. She provides a comparative focus on the socio-cultural valuation of this labor and the experiences of women in Bolivia, Chile, Peru, and Uruguay, among other countries. Pérez asserts that it is only by changing sociocultural views on this “women’s work” that nations can create political change, foster equitable legislation, and ensure implementation of effective policies that benefit women.﻿ 
Searching for Democracy shows why real and lasting equality cannot be achieved without fully enfranchising women in the lowest tiers of employment and closing the equality gap among women. Dr. Pérez’s models for gender equality are relevant for women around the world.﻿ 
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1741</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3be9d71c-adb4-11f1-9fad-7376b517510c</guid>
      <title>Janos Fiala-Butora, &quot;Implementing the Right to Decide Under the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: Supporting the Legal Capacity of All Persons with Disabilities&quot; (Hart, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781509980321" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Implementing the Right to Decide Under the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: Supporting the Legal Capacity of All Persons with Disabilities</em></a><em> </em>(Hart, 2025)<strong> </strong>addresses one of the most controversial questions in contemporary human rights law: how can persons with severe cognitive disabilities make their own decisions?<br>Historically, vulnerable persons have been considered incapable, and guardians were appointed to represent their interests, which has led to serious abuses. The Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD), adopted in 2006, requires that they receive support to make their own decisions. However, governments claim it is impossible to fully implement this international requirement.<br>In this book,<a href="https://research.universityofgalway.ie/en/persons/janos-fiala-butora/" rel="noopener noreferrer"> Dr Janos Fiala-Butora</a> tackles the issue of decision-making from both a legal and theoretical perspective. He explores how supported decision-making could incorporate safeguards to protect the vital interests of vulnerable persons in order to present a viable legal alternative to guardianship. The book accepts that some persons' abilities are very limited, but contends that guardianship is not the appropriate response, even in such cases. Instead, the book presents a unique Modified Support Framework, which can incorporate all persons with disabilities, fulfilling the goals of the CRPD.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/janos-fiala-butora-implementing-the-right-to-decide-under-the-convention-on-the-rights-of-persons-with-disabilities-supporting-the-legal-capacity-of-all-persons-with-disabilities-hart-2025-X_LF9E97</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781509980321" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Implementing the Right to Decide Under the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: Supporting the Legal Capacity of All Persons with Disabilities</em></a><em> </em>(Hart, 2025)<strong> </strong>addresses one of the most controversial questions in contemporary human rights law: how can persons with severe cognitive disabilities make their own decisions?<br>Historically, vulnerable persons have been considered incapable, and guardians were appointed to represent their interests, which has led to serious abuses. The Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD), adopted in 2006, requires that they receive support to make their own decisions. However, governments claim it is impossible to fully implement this international requirement.<br>In this book,<a href="https://research.universityofgalway.ie/en/persons/janos-fiala-butora/" rel="noopener noreferrer"> Dr Janos Fiala-Butora</a> tackles the issue of decision-making from both a legal and theoretical perspective. He explores how supported decision-making could incorporate safeguards to protect the vital interests of vulnerable persons in order to present a viable legal alternative to guardianship. The book accepts that some persons' abilities are very limited, but contends that guardianship is not the appropriate response, even in such cases. Instead, the book presents a unique Modified Support Framework, which can incorporate all persons with disabilities, fulfilling the goals of the CRPD.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="59240133" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/fa240836-b229-4c8b-ab9f-3ef7bb72eb61/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=fa240836-b229-4c8b-ab9f-3ef7bb72eb61&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Janos Fiala-Butora, &quot;Implementing the Right to Decide Under the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: Supporting the Legal Capacity of All Persons with Disabilities&quot; (Hart, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:01:40</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Implementing the Right to Decide Under the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: Supporting the Legal Capacity of All Persons with Disabilities (Hart, 2025) addresses one of the most controversial questions in contemporary human rights law: how can persons with severe cognitive disabilities make their own decisions?Historically, vulnerable persons have been considered incapable, and guardians were appointed to represent their interests, which has led to serious abuses. The Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD), adopted in 2006, requires that they receive support to make their own decisions. However, governments claim it is impossible to fully implement this international requirement.In this book, Dr Janos Fiala-Butora tackles the issue of decision-making from both a legal and theoretical perspective. He explores how supported decision-making could incorporate safeguards to protect the vital interests of vulnerable persons in order to present a viable legal alternative to guardianship. The book accepts that some persons&apos; abilities are very limited, but contends that guardianship is not the appropriate response, even in such cases. Instead, the book presents a unique Modified Support Framework, which can incorporate all persons with disabilities, fulfilling the goals of the CRPD.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Implementing the Right to Decide Under the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: Supporting the Legal Capacity of All Persons with Disabilities (Hart, 2025) addresses one of the most controversial questions in contemporary human rights law: how can persons with severe cognitive disabilities make their own decisions?Historically, vulnerable persons have been considered incapable, and guardians were appointed to represent their interests, which has led to serious abuses. The Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD), adopted in 2006, requires that they receive support to make their own decisions. However, governments claim it is impossible to fully implement this international requirement.In this book, Dr Janos Fiala-Butora tackles the issue of decision-making from both a legal and theoretical perspective. He explores how supported decision-making could incorporate safeguards to protect the vital interests of vulnerable persons in order to present a viable legal alternative to guardianship. The book accepts that some persons&apos; abilities are very limited, but contends that guardianship is not the appropriate response, even in such cases. Instead, the book presents a unique Modified Support Framework, which can incorporate all persons with disabilities, fulfilling the goals of the CRPD.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1742</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">12b6144c-ac05-11f1-814e-5bd94715ce0f</guid>
      <title>Charles Lachman, &quot;They Shall Not See the Dawn: The Manhunt for the Third Reich&apos;s Most Wanted&quot; (Diversion Books, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>May 1945. The Reich is in ruins. Hitler is dead. Yet for the US Army’s Counter Intelligence Corps, the real war has just begun.﻿&nbsp;</p>
<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9798895151075" rel="noopener noreferrer">They Shall Not See the Dawn: The Manhunt for the Third Reich's Most Wanted</a>&nbsp;(Diversion Books, 2026) by Charles Lachman is the true historical thriller following a secret unit of American agents, drawn from every walk of life, hunting Hitler’s inner circle—the dangerous henchmen still at large and feared to be carrying their Führer’s final political testament, orders for a guerilla resistance, and plans for rocket and nuclear programs hidden in mountain strongholds. It was a race against time to capture World War II’s most notorious Nazis before they could vanish or rally a new resistance.﻿&nbsp;</p>
<p>The CIC men leading the greatest manhunt in history were scholars, motivated college students, an actor, linguists, young draftees and refugees—men like Henry Kissinger—armed not just with guns, but with intellect, intuition, and sheer daring. Their quarry included Ernst Kaltenbrunner, the monstrous Gestapo chief; Julius Streicher, Hitler’s notorious “Jew-baiter”; Robert Ley, master of slave labor; and other high-ranking war criminals desperate to escape justice. Against all odds, the CIC brought them down, ensuring their places in the dock at Nuremberg.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/charles-lachman-they-shall-not-see-the-dawn-the-manhunt-for-the-third-reichs-most-wanted-diversion-books-2026-7lWrF11P</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>May 1945. The Reich is in ruins. Hitler is dead. Yet for the US Army’s Counter Intelligence Corps, the real war has just begun.﻿&nbsp;</p>
<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9798895151075" rel="noopener noreferrer">They Shall Not See the Dawn: The Manhunt for the Third Reich's Most Wanted</a>&nbsp;(Diversion Books, 2026) by Charles Lachman is the true historical thriller following a secret unit of American agents, drawn from every walk of life, hunting Hitler’s inner circle—the dangerous henchmen still at large and feared to be carrying their Führer’s final political testament, orders for a guerilla resistance, and plans for rocket and nuclear programs hidden in mountain strongholds. It was a race against time to capture World War II’s most notorious Nazis before they could vanish or rally a new resistance.﻿&nbsp;</p>
<p>The CIC men leading the greatest manhunt in history were scholars, motivated college students, an actor, linguists, young draftees and refugees—men like Henry Kissinger—armed not just with guns, but with intellect, intuition, and sheer daring. Their quarry included Ernst Kaltenbrunner, the monstrous Gestapo chief; Julius Streicher, Hitler’s notorious “Jew-baiter”; Robert Ley, master of slave labor; and other high-ranking war criminals desperate to escape justice. Against all odds, the CIC brought them down, ensuring their places in the dock at Nuremberg.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="32348757" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/a111f82b-b97e-42e7-9ca8-2e16aa7d1575/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=a111f82b-b97e-42e7-9ca8-2e16aa7d1575&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Charles Lachman, &quot;They Shall Not See the Dawn: The Manhunt for the Third Reich&apos;s Most Wanted&quot; (Diversion Books, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:33:37</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>May 1945. The Reich is in ruins. Hitler is dead. Yet for the US Army’s Counter Intelligence Corps, the real war has just begun.﻿ 
They Shall Not See the Dawn: The Manhunt for the Third Reich&apos;s Most Wanted (Diversion Books, 2026) by Charles Lachman is the true historical thriller following a secret unit of American agents, drawn from every walk of life, hunting Hitler’s inner circle—the dangerous henchmen still at large and feared to be carrying their Führer’s final political testament, orders for a guerilla resistance, and plans for rocket and nuclear programs hidden in mountain strongholds. It was a race against time to capture World War II’s most notorious Nazis before they could vanish or rally a new resistance.﻿ 
The CIC men leading the greatest manhunt in history were scholars, motivated college students, an actor, linguists, young draftees and refugees—men like Henry Kissinger—armed not just with guns, but with intellect, intuition, and sheer daring. Their quarry included Ernst Kaltenbrunner, the monstrous Gestapo chief; Julius Streicher, Hitler’s notorious “Jew-baiter”; Robert Ley, master of slave labor; and other high-ranking war criminals desperate to escape justice. Against all odds, the CIC brought them down, ensuring their places in the dock at Nuremberg.
 
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>May 1945. The Reich is in ruins. Hitler is dead. Yet for the US Army’s Counter Intelligence Corps, the real war has just begun.﻿ 
They Shall Not See the Dawn: The Manhunt for the Third Reich&apos;s Most Wanted (Diversion Books, 2026) by Charles Lachman is the true historical thriller following a secret unit of American agents, drawn from every walk of life, hunting Hitler’s inner circle—the dangerous henchmen still at large and feared to be carrying their Führer’s final political testament, orders for a guerilla resistance, and plans for rocket and nuclear programs hidden in mountain strongholds. It was a race against time to capture World War II’s most notorious Nazis before they could vanish or rally a new resistance.﻿ 
The CIC men leading the greatest manhunt in history were scholars, motivated college students, an actor, linguists, young draftees and refugees—men like Henry Kissinger—armed not just with guns, but with intellect, intuition, and sheer daring. Their quarry included Ernst Kaltenbrunner, the monstrous Gestapo chief; Julius Streicher, Hitler’s notorious “Jew-baiter”; Robert Ley, master of slave labor; and other high-ranking war criminals desperate to escape justice. Against all odds, the CIC brought them down, ensuring their places in the dock at Nuremberg.
 
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1740</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">be10170c-ac00-11f1-a79c-d3296a77ea76</guid>
      <title>Michelle Adams, &quot;The Containment: Detroit, the Supreme Court, and the Battle for Racial Justice in the North &quot; (FSG, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Winner of the MAAH Stone Book Award Winner of the 2025 Avern Cohn Award A New York Times Notable Book of 2025, A New Yorker Best Book of 2025 selection A Christian Science Monitor 25 Best Books of 2025 The epic story of Detroit’s struggle to integrate schools in its suburbs—and the defeat of desegregation in the North. In 1974, the Supreme Court issued a momentous decision: In the case of Milliken v. Bradley, the justices brought a halt to school desegregation across the North, and to the civil rights movement’s struggle for a truly equal education for all. How did this come about, and why? In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780374721787" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Containment: Detroit, the Supreme Court, and the Battle for Racial Justice in the North</a><em>&nbsp;</em>﻿﻿(FSG, 2025), the esteemed legal scholar Michelle Adams tells the epic story of the struggle to integrate Detroit schools—and what happened when it collided with Nixon-appointed justices committed to a judicial counterrevolution. Adams chronicles the devoted activists who tried to uplift Detroit's students amid the upheavals of riots, Black power, and white flight—and how their efforts led to federal judge Stephen Roth’s landmark order to achieve racial balance by tearing down the walls separating the city and its suburbs. The “metropolitan remedy” could have remade the landscape of racial justice. Instead, the Supreme Court ruled that the suburbs could not be a part of the effort to integrate—and thus upheld the inequalities that remain in place today. Adams tells this story via compelling portraits of a city under stress and of key figures—including Detroit’s first Black mayor, Coleman Young, and Justices Marshall, Rehnquist, and Powell. The result is a legal and historical drama that exposes the roots of today’s backlash against affirmative action and other efforts to fulfill the country’s promise.</p>
<p>My guest today is Michelle Adams. Michelle Adams is the Henry M. Butzel Professor of Law at the University of Michigan. The former codirector of the Floersheimer Center for Constitutional Democracy at the Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law, she served on the Biden administration’s Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court and as an expert commentator on the Netflix series Amend: The Fight for America and the Showtime series Deadlocked: How America Shaped the Supreme Court. Her writings have appeared in The New Yorker, The Yale Law Journal, California Law Review, and elsewhere. She was born and grew up in Detroit.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 9 Sep 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/michelle-adams-the-containment-detroit-the-supreme-court-and-the-battle-for-racial-justice-in-the-north-fsg-2025-dxd7TzXr</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Winner of the MAAH Stone Book Award Winner of the 2025 Avern Cohn Award A New York Times Notable Book of 2025, A New Yorker Best Book of 2025 selection A Christian Science Monitor 25 Best Books of 2025 The epic story of Detroit’s struggle to integrate schools in its suburbs—and the defeat of desegregation in the North. In 1974, the Supreme Court issued a momentous decision: In the case of Milliken v. Bradley, the justices brought a halt to school desegregation across the North, and to the civil rights movement’s struggle for a truly equal education for all. How did this come about, and why? In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780374721787" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Containment: Detroit, the Supreme Court, and the Battle for Racial Justice in the North</a><em>&nbsp;</em>﻿﻿(FSG, 2025), the esteemed legal scholar Michelle Adams tells the epic story of the struggle to integrate Detroit schools—and what happened when it collided with Nixon-appointed justices committed to a judicial counterrevolution. Adams chronicles the devoted activists who tried to uplift Detroit's students amid the upheavals of riots, Black power, and white flight—and how their efforts led to federal judge Stephen Roth’s landmark order to achieve racial balance by tearing down the walls separating the city and its suburbs. The “metropolitan remedy” could have remade the landscape of racial justice. Instead, the Supreme Court ruled that the suburbs could not be a part of the effort to integrate—and thus upheld the inequalities that remain in place today. Adams tells this story via compelling portraits of a city under stress and of key figures—including Detroit’s first Black mayor, Coleman Young, and Justices Marshall, Rehnquist, and Powell. The result is a legal and historical drama that exposes the roots of today’s backlash against affirmative action and other efforts to fulfill the country’s promise.</p>
<p>My guest today is Michelle Adams. Michelle Adams is the Henry M. Butzel Professor of Law at the University of Michigan. The former codirector of the Floersheimer Center for Constitutional Democracy at the Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law, she served on the Biden administration’s Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court and as an expert commentator on the Netflix series Amend: The Fight for America and the Showtime series Deadlocked: How America Shaped the Supreme Court. Her writings have appeared in The New Yorker, The Yale Law Journal, California Law Review, and elsewhere. She was born and grew up in Detroit.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="68466326" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/be82364a-98ff-4ac2-ab69-7bde4adafe12/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=be82364a-98ff-4ac2-ab69-7bde4adafe12&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Michelle Adams, &quot;The Containment: Detroit, the Supreme Court, and the Battle for Racial Justice in the North &quot; (FSG, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:11:16</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Winner of the MAAH Stone Book Award Winner of the 2025 Avern Cohn Award A New York Times Notable Book of 2025, A New Yorker Best Book of 2025 selection A Christian Science Monitor 25 Best Books of 2025 The epic story of Detroit’s struggle to integrate schools in its suburbs—and the defeat of desegregation in the North. In 1974, the Supreme Court issued a momentous decision: In the case of Milliken v. Bradley, the justices brought a halt to school desegregation across the North, and to the civil rights movement’s struggle for a truly equal education for all. How did this come about, and why? In The Containment: Detroit, the Supreme Court, and the Battle for Racial Justice in the North ﻿﻿(FSG, 2025), the esteemed legal scholar Michelle Adams tells the epic story of the struggle to integrate Detroit schools—and what happened when it collided with Nixon-appointed justices committed to a judicial counterrevolution. Adams chronicles the devoted activists who tried to uplift Detroit&apos;s students amid the upheavals of riots, Black power, and white flight—and how their efforts led to federal judge Stephen Roth’s landmark order to achieve racial balance by tearing down the walls separating the city and its suburbs. The “metropolitan remedy” could have remade the landscape of racial justice. Instead, the Supreme Court ruled that the suburbs could not be a part of the effort to integrate—and thus upheld the inequalities that remain in place today. Adams tells this story via compelling portraits of a city under stress and of key figures—including Detroit’s first Black mayor, Coleman Young, and Justices Marshall, Rehnquist, and Powell. The result is a legal and historical drama that exposes the roots of today’s backlash against affirmative action and other efforts to fulfill the country’s promise.
My guest today is Michelle Adams. Michelle Adams is the Henry M. Butzel Professor of Law at the University of Michigan. The former codirector of the Floersheimer Center for Constitutional Democracy at the Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law, she served on the Biden administration’s Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court and as an expert commentator on the Netflix series Amend: The Fight for America and the Showtime series Deadlocked: How America Shaped the Supreme Court. Her writings have appeared in The New Yorker, The Yale Law Journal, California Law Review, and elsewhere. She was born and grew up in Detroit.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Winner of the MAAH Stone Book Award Winner of the 2025 Avern Cohn Award A New York Times Notable Book of 2025, A New Yorker Best Book of 2025 selection A Christian Science Monitor 25 Best Books of 2025 The epic story of Detroit’s struggle to integrate schools in its suburbs—and the defeat of desegregation in the North. In 1974, the Supreme Court issued a momentous decision: In the case of Milliken v. Bradley, the justices brought a halt to school desegregation across the North, and to the civil rights movement’s struggle for a truly equal education for all. How did this come about, and why? In The Containment: Detroit, the Supreme Court, and the Battle for Racial Justice in the North ﻿﻿(FSG, 2025), the esteemed legal scholar Michelle Adams tells the epic story of the struggle to integrate Detroit schools—and what happened when it collided with Nixon-appointed justices committed to a judicial counterrevolution. Adams chronicles the devoted activists who tried to uplift Detroit&apos;s students amid the upheavals of riots, Black power, and white flight—and how their efforts led to federal judge Stephen Roth’s landmark order to achieve racial balance by tearing down the walls separating the city and its suburbs. The “metropolitan remedy” could have remade the landscape of racial justice. Instead, the Supreme Court ruled that the suburbs could not be a part of the effort to integrate—and thus upheld the inequalities that remain in place today. Adams tells this story via compelling portraits of a city under stress and of key figures—including Detroit’s first Black mayor, Coleman Young, and Justices Marshall, Rehnquist, and Powell. The result is a legal and historical drama that exposes the roots of today’s backlash against affirmative action and other efforts to fulfill the country’s promise.
My guest today is Michelle Adams. Michelle Adams is the Henry M. Butzel Professor of Law at the University of Michigan. The former codirector of the Floersheimer Center for Constitutional Democracy at the Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law, she served on the Biden administration’s Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court and as an expert commentator on the Netflix series Amend: The Fight for America and the Showtime series Deadlocked: How America Shaped the Supreme Court. Her writings have appeared in The New Yorker, The Yale Law Journal, California Law Review, and elsewhere. She was born and grew up in Detroit.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1739</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">631f8ca2-a768-11f1-8109-6f00239fb8b8</guid>
      <title>Mélanie Lamotte, &quot;By Flesh and Toil: How Sex, Race, and Labor Shaped the Early French Empire&quot; (Harvard UP, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>From the beginning of the seventeenth century, French colonies and trading posts sprawled across the Atlantic and Indian Oceans. In the first pan-imperial history of the early French Empire in the English language, Mélanie Lamotte shows how an increasingly cohesive legal culture came to govern the lives of enslaved and free people of African, Malagasy, South Asian, and Native American descent. She also illuminates the important role played by these populations in the development of the empire, from Louisiana to Guadeloupe, Senegambia, Madagascar, Isle Bourbon, and India.</p>
<p>The early French Empire has often been portrayed as a fragmented conglomerate of isolated colonies or regions. Yet Lamotte shows that racial policies issued by the metropole, as well as by officials in the Atlantic and Indian Oceans, significantly influenced one another. Rather than focusing on the actions of administrators, however, Lamotte also reveals the extensive influence of people on the ground—especially those of non-European descent. Through their sexuality and their labor, along with their socio-economic and political endeavors, they played a critical role in building the empire and setting its limits. As they sought justice for themselves, strove to protect their kin, and aimed to improve their social conditions, these individuals also pushed against the advancement of white dominion in unexpected ways.</p>
<p>Archivally rich and rigorously documented,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780674272835" rel="noopener noreferrer">By Flesh and Toil: How Sex, Race, and Labor Shaped the Early French Empire</a>&nbsp;(Harvard UP, 2026)illuminates the transoceanic connections that united the French colonial world—and recasts people of African, Malagasy, South Asian, and Native American descent as key actors in the story of empire-building.﻿﻿</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 7 Sep 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/melanie-lamotte-by-flesh-and-toil-how-sex-race-and-labor-shaped-the-early-french-empire-harvard-up-2026-w_cqKhPg-LMOlho5_</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the beginning of the seventeenth century, French colonies and trading posts sprawled across the Atlantic and Indian Oceans. In the first pan-imperial history of the early French Empire in the English language, Mélanie Lamotte shows how an increasingly cohesive legal culture came to govern the lives of enslaved and free people of African, Malagasy, South Asian, and Native American descent. She also illuminates the important role played by these populations in the development of the empire, from Louisiana to Guadeloupe, Senegambia, Madagascar, Isle Bourbon, and India.</p>
<p>The early French Empire has often been portrayed as a fragmented conglomerate of isolated colonies or regions. Yet Lamotte shows that racial policies issued by the metropole, as well as by officials in the Atlantic and Indian Oceans, significantly influenced one another. Rather than focusing on the actions of administrators, however, Lamotte also reveals the extensive influence of people on the ground—especially those of non-European descent. Through their sexuality and their labor, along with their socio-economic and political endeavors, they played a critical role in building the empire and setting its limits. As they sought justice for themselves, strove to protect their kin, and aimed to improve their social conditions, these individuals also pushed against the advancement of white dominion in unexpected ways.</p>
<p>Archivally rich and rigorously documented,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780674272835" rel="noopener noreferrer">By Flesh and Toil: How Sex, Race, and Labor Shaped the Early French Empire</a>&nbsp;(Harvard UP, 2026)illuminates the transoceanic connections that united the French colonial world—and recasts people of African, Malagasy, South Asian, and Native American descent as key actors in the story of empire-building.﻿﻿</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="37399966" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/224e8784-08b6-43f2-a1fe-bee46045f961/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=224e8784-08b6-43f2-a1fe-bee46045f961&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Mélanie Lamotte, &quot;By Flesh and Toil: How Sex, Race, and Labor Shaped the Early French Empire&quot; (Harvard UP, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:38:55</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>From the beginning of the seventeenth century, French colonies and trading posts sprawled across the Atlantic and Indian Oceans. In the first pan-imperial history of the early French Empire in the English language, Mélanie Lamotte shows how an increasingly cohesive legal culture came to govern the lives of enslaved and free people of African, Malagasy, South Asian, and Native American descent. She also illuminates the important role played by these populations in the development of the empire, from Louisiana to Guadeloupe, Senegambia, Madagascar, Isle Bourbon, and India.
The early French Empire has often been portrayed as a fragmented conglomerate of isolated colonies or regions. Yet Lamotte shows that racial policies issued by the metropole, as well as by officials in the Atlantic and Indian Oceans, significantly influenced one another. Rather than focusing on the actions of administrators, however, Lamotte also reveals the extensive influence of people on the ground—especially those of non-European descent. Through their sexuality and their labor, along with their socio-economic and political endeavors, they played a critical role in building the empire and setting its limits. As they sought justice for themselves, strove to protect their kin, and aimed to improve their social conditions, these individuals also pushed against the advancement of white dominion in unexpected ways.
Archivally rich and rigorously documented, By Flesh and Toil: How Sex, Race, and Labor Shaped the Early French Empire (Harvard UP, 2026)illuminates the transoceanic connections that united the French colonial world—and recasts people of African, Malagasy, South Asian, and Native American descent as key actors in the story of empire-building.﻿﻿
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>From the beginning of the seventeenth century, French colonies and trading posts sprawled across the Atlantic and Indian Oceans. In the first pan-imperial history of the early French Empire in the English language, Mélanie Lamotte shows how an increasingly cohesive legal culture came to govern the lives of enslaved and free people of African, Malagasy, South Asian, and Native American descent. She also illuminates the important role played by these populations in the development of the empire, from Louisiana to Guadeloupe, Senegambia, Madagascar, Isle Bourbon, and India.
The early French Empire has often been portrayed as a fragmented conglomerate of isolated colonies or regions. Yet Lamotte shows that racial policies issued by the metropole, as well as by officials in the Atlantic and Indian Oceans, significantly influenced one another. Rather than focusing on the actions of administrators, however, Lamotte also reveals the extensive influence of people on the ground—especially those of non-European descent. Through their sexuality and their labor, along with their socio-economic and political endeavors, they played a critical role in building the empire and setting its limits. As they sought justice for themselves, strove to protect their kin, and aimed to improve their social conditions, these individuals also pushed against the advancement of white dominion in unexpected ways.
Archivally rich and rigorously documented, By Flesh and Toil: How Sex, Race, and Labor Shaped the Early French Empire (Harvard UP, 2026)illuminates the transoceanic connections that united the French colonial world—and recasts people of African, Malagasy, South Asian, and Native American descent as key actors in the story of empire-building.﻿﻿
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1738</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4a27728c-a6c8-11f1-b227-7f1abbfae72d</guid>
      <title>Leah C. Stokes, &quot;The Carbon Wave: A Story of Democracy, Parenthood, and the Race to Protect Our Planet&quot; (MIT Press, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>They were perhaps an unlikely trio: professor Leah Stokes, the policy wonk Sonia Aggarwal in the White House, and the DC insider Adrian Deveny in the Senate, but together they crafted the boldest climate legislation of our time. In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780262054775" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Carbon Wave: A Story of Democracy, Parenthood, and the Race to Protect Our Planet</a><em>&nbsp;﻿</em>(MIT Press, 2026), Stokes chronicles the turbulent path of their climate bill as it veered between breakthrough and collapse—from the hopeful beginnings of the Green New Deal in 2018, to the bill’s near-certain defeat by Senator Joe Manchin in the winter of 2021, to the surprise passage of the landmark legislation in August 2022. During this critical time, the author was pregnant or in the NICU with her premature twins, and Aggarwal and Deveny were new parents too. Interlacing personal narratives with stories from Congress, the White House, and outside activists, Stokes shows how dogged perseverance and collective action can still bend the course of history. The book concludes with an update from the second Trump administration, explaining the parts of the bill that were—and were not—rolled back, and why we should remain hopeful that progress is still being made. Everyone has been told to shrink their carbon footprint and lighten their load on our planet by changing their behavior. But what if instead of making ourselves smaller, we joined with others to maximize our impact? That’s the carbon wave. And this book shows us how to make it.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 6 Sep 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/leah-c-stokes-the-carbon-wave-a-story-of-democracy-parenthood-and-the-race-to-protect-our-planet-mit-press-2026-i_7Ech78</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They were perhaps an unlikely trio: professor Leah Stokes, the policy wonk Sonia Aggarwal in the White House, and the DC insider Adrian Deveny in the Senate, but together they crafted the boldest climate legislation of our time. In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780262054775" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Carbon Wave: A Story of Democracy, Parenthood, and the Race to Protect Our Planet</a><em>&nbsp;﻿</em>(MIT Press, 2026), Stokes chronicles the turbulent path of their climate bill as it veered between breakthrough and collapse—from the hopeful beginnings of the Green New Deal in 2018, to the bill’s near-certain defeat by Senator Joe Manchin in the winter of 2021, to the surprise passage of the landmark legislation in August 2022. During this critical time, the author was pregnant or in the NICU with her premature twins, and Aggarwal and Deveny were new parents too. Interlacing personal narratives with stories from Congress, the White House, and outside activists, Stokes shows how dogged perseverance and collective action can still bend the course of history. The book concludes with an update from the second Trump administration, explaining the parts of the bill that were—and were not—rolled back, and why we should remain hopeful that progress is still being made. Everyone has been told to shrink their carbon footprint and lighten their load on our planet by changing their behavior. But what if instead of making ourselves smaller, we joined with others to maximize our impact? That’s the carbon wave. And this book shows us how to make it.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="36455869" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/6cdeade3-b098-4cce-bca9-4abaca068c37/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=6cdeade3-b098-4cce-bca9-4abaca068c37&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Leah C. Stokes, &quot;The Carbon Wave: A Story of Democracy, Parenthood, and the Race to Protect Our Planet&quot; (MIT Press, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:37:54</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>They were perhaps an unlikely trio: professor Leah Stokes, the policy wonk Sonia Aggarwal in the White House, and the DC insider Adrian Deveny in the Senate, but together they crafted the boldest climate legislation of our time. In The Carbon Wave: A Story of Democracy, Parenthood, and the Race to Protect Our Planet ﻿(MIT Press, 2026), Stokes chronicles the turbulent path of their climate bill as it veered between breakthrough and collapse—from the hopeful beginnings of the Green New Deal in 2018, to the bill’s near-certain defeat by Senator Joe Manchin in the winter of 2021, to the surprise passage of the landmark legislation in August 2022. During this critical time, the author was pregnant or in the NICU with her premature twins, and Aggarwal and Deveny were new parents too. Interlacing personal narratives with stories from Congress, the White House, and outside activists, Stokes shows how dogged perseverance and collective action can still bend the course of history. The book concludes with an update from the second Trump administration, explaining the parts of the bill that were—and were not—rolled back, and why we should remain hopeful that progress is still being made. Everyone has been told to shrink their carbon footprint and lighten their load on our planet by changing their behavior. But what if instead of making ourselves smaller, we joined with others to maximize our impact? That’s the carbon wave. And this book shows us how to make it.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>They were perhaps an unlikely trio: professor Leah Stokes, the policy wonk Sonia Aggarwal in the White House, and the DC insider Adrian Deveny in the Senate, but together they crafted the boldest climate legislation of our time. In The Carbon Wave: A Story of Democracy, Parenthood, and the Race to Protect Our Planet ﻿(MIT Press, 2026), Stokes chronicles the turbulent path of their climate bill as it veered between breakthrough and collapse—from the hopeful beginnings of the Green New Deal in 2018, to the bill’s near-certain defeat by Senator Joe Manchin in the winter of 2021, to the surprise passage of the landmark legislation in August 2022. During this critical time, the author was pregnant or in the NICU with her premature twins, and Aggarwal and Deveny were new parents too. Interlacing personal narratives with stories from Congress, the White House, and outside activists, Stokes shows how dogged perseverance and collective action can still bend the course of history. The book concludes with an update from the second Trump administration, explaining the parts of the bill that were—and were not—rolled back, and why we should remain hopeful that progress is still being made. Everyone has been told to shrink their carbon footprint and lighten their load on our planet by changing their behavior. But what if instead of making ourselves smaller, we joined with others to maximize our impact? That’s the carbon wave. And this book shows us how to make it.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1737</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e1a33260-a31f-11f1-9f9a-c3e4f872d276</guid>
      <title>Nikhil Kalyanpur, &quot;Legal Weapons of the Wealthy: The Offshoring of Elite Conflict in Emerging Markets&quot; (Cornell UP, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781501788185" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Legal Weapons of the Wealthy: The Offshoring of Elite Conflict in Emerging Markets</em></a>
(Cornell University Press, 2026), Dr. Nikhil Kalyanpur examines a 
striking feature of today's global legal order: the use of foreign 
courts by elites to settle domestic disputes. On the surface, the 
"outsourcing" of disputes by elites from countries with fragile 
judiciaries looks like a search for fair treatment unavailable at home. 
Yet extraterritorial dispute resolution varies across such countries. 
Russian plutocrats, for instance, frequently litigate abroad, whereas 
Chinese and South African ones rarely do.</p>
<p>﻿Dr. Kalyanpur argues 
that the pursuit of extraterritorial litigation depends on the balance 
of power between a state and its plutocracy. In contexts of state 
capture or state control, the transparency costs associated with 
transnational law deter plutocrats from seeking resolution abroad. But 
when the state and the plutocracy have relatively equal power, competing
 interests can lead to political clashes, with different actors 
asserting themselves. "Losers" of these clashes, locked out of their 
institutions, now have less to lose from those transparency costs and so
 seek resolution abroad. As these elites often escape with much of their
 wealth abroad, "winners" respond by weaponizing transnational legal 
institutions to seize rivals' offshore assets and ensure defeated rivals
 stay defeated.</p>
<p>﻿Through cases from Russia and elsewhere, Dr. 
Kalyanpur unravels the connections between offshore finance, 
transnational litigation, and intra-elite warfare. He exposes how 
liberal courts serve as arenas for emerging market power struggles, 
globalizing conflicts begun at home. As billionaires continue amassing 
unprecedented power across democracies and autocracies alike, <em>Legal Weapons of the Wealthy</em> lays out how the architects of the liberal economic order defeated themselves by enabling rule by the rich.</p>
<p>﻿<em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose </em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>book</em></a><em>
 focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty 
negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative 
analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find 
Miranda’s interviews on </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 4 Sep 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/nikhil-kalyanpur-legal-weapons-of-the-wealthy-the-offshoring-of-elite-conflict-in-emerging-markets-cornell-up-2026-mNM3_eke</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781501788185" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Legal Weapons of the Wealthy: The Offshoring of Elite Conflict in Emerging Markets</em></a>
(Cornell University Press, 2026), Dr. Nikhil Kalyanpur examines a 
striking feature of today's global legal order: the use of foreign 
courts by elites to settle domestic disputes. On the surface, the 
"outsourcing" of disputes by elites from countries with fragile 
judiciaries looks like a search for fair treatment unavailable at home. 
Yet extraterritorial dispute resolution varies across such countries. 
Russian plutocrats, for instance, frequently litigate abroad, whereas 
Chinese and South African ones rarely do.</p>
<p>﻿Dr. Kalyanpur argues 
that the pursuit of extraterritorial litigation depends on the balance 
of power between a state and its plutocracy. In contexts of state 
capture or state control, the transparency costs associated with 
transnational law deter plutocrats from seeking resolution abroad. But 
when the state and the plutocracy have relatively equal power, competing
 interests can lead to political clashes, with different actors 
asserting themselves. "Losers" of these clashes, locked out of their 
institutions, now have less to lose from those transparency costs and so
 seek resolution abroad. As these elites often escape with much of their
 wealth abroad, "winners" respond by weaponizing transnational legal 
institutions to seize rivals' offshore assets and ensure defeated rivals
 stay defeated.</p>
<p>﻿Through cases from Russia and elsewhere, Dr. 
Kalyanpur unravels the connections between offshore finance, 
transnational litigation, and intra-elite warfare. He exposes how 
liberal courts serve as arenas for emerging market power struggles, 
globalizing conflicts begun at home. As billionaires continue amassing 
unprecedented power across democracies and autocracies alike, <em>Legal Weapons of the Wealthy</em> lays out how the architects of the liberal economic order defeated themselves by enabling rule by the rich.</p>
<p>﻿<em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose </em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>book</em></a><em>
 focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty 
negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative 
analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find 
Miranda’s interviews on </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="31671841" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/182d7b23-7be0-4675-bc7d-df32a23e2cf2/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=182d7b23-7be0-4675-bc7d-df32a23e2cf2&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Nikhil Kalyanpur, &quot;Legal Weapons of the Wealthy: The Offshoring of Elite Conflict in Emerging Markets&quot; (Cornell UP, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:32:55</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In Legal Weapons of the Wealthy: The Offshoring of Elite Conflict in Emerging Markets
(Cornell University Press, 2026), Dr. Nikhil Kalyanpur examines a 
striking feature of today&apos;s global legal order: the use of foreign 
courts by elites to settle domestic disputes. On the surface, the 
&quot;outsourcing&quot; of disputes by elites from countries with fragile 
judiciaries looks like a search for fair treatment unavailable at home. 
Yet extraterritorial dispute resolution varies across such countries. 
Russian plutocrats, for instance, frequently litigate abroad, whereas 
Chinese and South African ones rarely do.
﻿Dr. Kalyanpur argues 
that the pursuit of extraterritorial litigation depends on the balance 
of power between a state and its plutocracy. In contexts of state 
capture or state control, the transparency costs associated with 
transnational law deter plutocrats from seeking resolution abroad. But 
when the state and the plutocracy have relatively equal power, competing
 interests can lead to political clashes, with different actors 
asserting themselves. &quot;Losers&quot; of these clashes, locked out of their 
institutions, now have less to lose from those transparency costs and so
 seek resolution abroad. As these elites often escape with much of their
 wealth abroad, &quot;winners&quot; respond by weaponizing transnational legal 
institutions to seize rivals&apos; offshore assets and ensure defeated rivals
 stay defeated.
﻿Through cases from Russia and elsewhere, Dr. 
Kalyanpur unravels the connections between offshore finance, 
transnational litigation, and intra-elite warfare. He exposes how 
liberal courts serve as arenas for emerging market power struggles, 
globalizing conflicts begun at home. As billionaires continue amassing 
unprecedented power across democracies and autocracies alike, Legal Weapons of the Wealthy lays out how the architects of the liberal economic order defeated themselves by enabling rule by the rich.
﻿This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book
 focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty 
negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative 
analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find 
Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In Legal Weapons of the Wealthy: The Offshoring of Elite Conflict in Emerging Markets
(Cornell University Press, 2026), Dr. Nikhil Kalyanpur examines a 
striking feature of today&apos;s global legal order: the use of foreign 
courts by elites to settle domestic disputes. On the surface, the 
&quot;outsourcing&quot; of disputes by elites from countries with fragile 
judiciaries looks like a search for fair treatment unavailable at home. 
Yet extraterritorial dispute resolution varies across such countries. 
Russian plutocrats, for instance, frequently litigate abroad, whereas 
Chinese and South African ones rarely do.
﻿Dr. Kalyanpur argues 
that the pursuit of extraterritorial litigation depends on the balance 
of power between a state and its plutocracy. In contexts of state 
capture or state control, the transparency costs associated with 
transnational law deter plutocrats from seeking resolution abroad. But 
when the state and the plutocracy have relatively equal power, competing
 interests can lead to political clashes, with different actors 
asserting themselves. &quot;Losers&quot; of these clashes, locked out of their 
institutions, now have less to lose from those transparency costs and so
 seek resolution abroad. As these elites often escape with much of their
 wealth abroad, &quot;winners&quot; respond by weaponizing transnational legal 
institutions to seize rivals&apos; offshore assets and ensure defeated rivals
 stay defeated.
﻿Through cases from Russia and elsewhere, Dr. 
Kalyanpur unravels the connections between offshore finance, 
transnational litigation, and intra-elite warfare. He exposes how 
liberal courts serve as arenas for emerging market power struggles, 
globalizing conflicts begun at home. As billionaires continue amassing 
unprecedented power across democracies and autocracies alike, Legal Weapons of the Wealthy lays out how the architects of the liberal economic order defeated themselves by enabling rule by the rich.
﻿This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book
 focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty 
negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative 
analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find 
Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1735</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">a19eea6c-a327-11f1-9f22-371ebdbea0bc</guid>
      <title>Valeria Vázquez Guevara, &quot;Truth Commissions and International Law: Jurisdiction, Representation, Authority&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><em></em><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009679978" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Truth Commissions and International Law: Jurisdiction, Representation, Authority</em></a>
 (Cambridge University Press, 2026) examines how truth commissions 
construct authoritative accounts of conflict, and how they account for 
the plurality of accounts across affected communities. Dr. Valeria 
Vázquez Guevara examines three of the earliest and most influential 
truth commissions: Argentina (1983–1984), Chile (1990–1991), and El 
Salvador (1992–1993), and examines how relevant cultural objects support
 or counter the official account for each. In doing so, she argues that 
these truth commissions drew on international law to authorise their 
accounts of violent conflict, and that this had the consequence of 
privileging an internationally-authorised truth over other truths, 
whilst simultaneously strengthening the authority of international law 
over the post-conflict state.</p>
<p>﻿By demonstrating how truth 
commissions turn to international law for authority, the book shows how 
this produces an official account of past violence and promises of 
future community, which fundamentally affects how communities live 
together in the aftermath of violent conflict.</p>
<p>﻿<em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose </em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>book</em></a><em>
 focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty 
negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative 
analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find 
Miranda’s interviews on </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 4 Sep 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/valeria-vazquez-guevara-truth-commissions-and-international-law-jurisdiction-representation-authority-cambridge-up-2026-b_quvTwQ</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em></em><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009679978" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Truth Commissions and International Law: Jurisdiction, Representation, Authority</em></a>
 (Cambridge University Press, 2026) examines how truth commissions 
construct authoritative accounts of conflict, and how they account for 
the plurality of accounts across affected communities. Dr. Valeria 
Vázquez Guevara examines three of the earliest and most influential 
truth commissions: Argentina (1983–1984), Chile (1990–1991), and El 
Salvador (1992–1993), and examines how relevant cultural objects support
 or counter the official account for each. In doing so, she argues that 
these truth commissions drew on international law to authorise their 
accounts of violent conflict, and that this had the consequence of 
privileging an internationally-authorised truth over other truths, 
whilst simultaneously strengthening the authority of international law 
over the post-conflict state.</p>
<p>﻿By demonstrating how truth 
commissions turn to international law for authority, the book shows how 
this produces an official account of past violence and promises of 
future community, which fundamentally affects how communities live 
together in the aftermath of violent conflict.</p>
<p>﻿<em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose </em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>book</em></a><em>
 focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty 
negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative 
analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find 
Miranda’s interviews on </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="44820089" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/c64afd43-3a81-4fc9-b3cf-4176cede8f64/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=c64afd43-3a81-4fc9-b3cf-4176cede8f64&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Valeria Vázquez Guevara, &quot;Truth Commissions and International Law: Jurisdiction, Representation, Authority&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:46:37</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Truth Commissions and International Law: Jurisdiction, Representation, Authority
 (Cambridge University Press, 2026) examines how truth commissions 
construct authoritative accounts of conflict, and how they account for 
the plurality of accounts across affected communities. Dr. Valeria 
Vázquez Guevara examines three of the earliest and most influential 
truth commissions: Argentina (1983–1984), Chile (1990–1991), and El 
Salvador (1992–1993), and examines how relevant cultural objects support
 or counter the official account for each. In doing so, she argues that 
these truth commissions drew on international law to authorise their 
accounts of violent conflict, and that this had the consequence of 
privileging an internationally-authorised truth over other truths, 
whilst simultaneously strengthening the authority of international law 
over the post-conflict state.
﻿By demonstrating how truth 
commissions turn to international law for authority, the book shows how 
this produces an official account of past violence and promises of 
future community, which fundamentally affects how communities live 
together in the aftermath of violent conflict.
﻿This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book
 focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty 
negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative 
analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find 
Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Truth Commissions and International Law: Jurisdiction, Representation, Authority
 (Cambridge University Press, 2026) examines how truth commissions 
construct authoritative accounts of conflict, and how they account for 
the plurality of accounts across affected communities. Dr. Valeria 
Vázquez Guevara examines three of the earliest and most influential 
truth commissions: Argentina (1983–1984), Chile (1990–1991), and El 
Salvador (1992–1993), and examines how relevant cultural objects support
 or counter the official account for each. In doing so, she argues that 
these truth commissions drew on international law to authorise their 
accounts of violent conflict, and that this had the consequence of 
privileging an internationally-authorised truth over other truths, 
whilst simultaneously strengthening the authority of international law 
over the post-conflict state.
﻿By demonstrating how truth 
commissions turn to international law for authority, the book shows how 
this produces an official account of past violence and promises of 
future community, which fundamentally affects how communities live 
together in the aftermath of violent conflict.
﻿This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book
 focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty 
negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative 
analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find 
Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1736</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e9f4bdf6-a515-11f1-8531-6701dd52f77a</guid>
      <title>Holly N. S. White, &quot;Constructing American Childhood: Age-Based Laws and the Illusion of Protection in the Early United States&quot; (U Virginia Press, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Edward Blum interviews Holly White on her new book&nbsp;<a href="https://www.upress.virginia.edu/title/10196" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Constructing American Childhood: Age-Based Laws and the Illusion of Protection in the Early United States</em></a>.</p>
<p>As of 2025, in the United States an eleven-year-old child can be charged with a federal crime while in many states it’s illegal to leave a twelve-year-old home alone. Twenty-six states allow children younger than sixteen to marry while the legal drinking age remains twenty-one. Are these age-based laws really protecting children, and if not, why do they exist? Holly White uncovers the answers to these questions through a history of America’s first age-based laws.</p>
<p>Analyzing trial records, newspapers, personal letters and diaries, as well as legal statutes from the founding era to the Civil War, White shows how restrictive age-based laws were implemented to benefit those who already held power. Over time, these new laws—coming out of child murder and rape trials as well as guardianship and underage marriage disputes—increasingly circumscribed the rights of young Americans in the early republic. As White shows, race, class, status, and gender influenced who came to benefit from the label of “child” in post-revolutionary America. In so doing,&nbsp;<em>Constructing American Childhood</em>&nbsp;explains why Americans continue to be guided by the age-based legal definitions of childhood and adulthood of our past.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 3 Sep 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/holly-n-s-white-constructing-american-childhood-age-based-laws-and-the-illusion-of-protection-in-the-early-united-states-u-virginia-press-2026-zC2qF7fM</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Edward Blum interviews Holly White on her new book&nbsp;<a href="https://www.upress.virginia.edu/title/10196" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Constructing American Childhood: Age-Based Laws and the Illusion of Protection in the Early United States</em></a>.</p>
<p>As of 2025, in the United States an eleven-year-old child can be charged with a federal crime while in many states it’s illegal to leave a twelve-year-old home alone. Twenty-six states allow children younger than sixteen to marry while the legal drinking age remains twenty-one. Are these age-based laws really protecting children, and if not, why do they exist? Holly White uncovers the answers to these questions through a history of America’s first age-based laws.</p>
<p>Analyzing trial records, newspapers, personal letters and diaries, as well as legal statutes from the founding era to the Civil War, White shows how restrictive age-based laws were implemented to benefit those who already held power. Over time, these new laws—coming out of child murder and rape trials as well as guardianship and underage marriage disputes—increasingly circumscribed the rights of young Americans in the early republic. As White shows, race, class, status, and gender influenced who came to benefit from the label of “child” in post-revolutionary America. In so doing,&nbsp;<em>Constructing American Childhood</em>&nbsp;explains why Americans continue to be guided by the age-based legal definitions of childhood and adulthood of our past.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="34200169" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/b6b9df4c-a6e6-404f-832f-4e37c8841683/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=b6b9df4c-a6e6-404f-832f-4e37c8841683&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Holly N. S. White, &quot;Constructing American Childhood: Age-Based Laws and the Illusion of Protection in the Early United States&quot; (U Virginia Press, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:35:35</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Edward Blum interviews Holly White on her new book Constructing American Childhood: Age-Based Laws and the Illusion of Protection in the Early United States.
As of 2025, in the United States an eleven-year-old child can be charged with a federal crime while in many states it’s illegal to leave a twelve-year-old home alone. Twenty-six states allow children younger than sixteen to marry while the legal drinking age remains twenty-one. Are these age-based laws really protecting children, and if not, why do they exist? Holly White uncovers the answers to these questions through a history of America’s first age-based laws.
Analyzing trial records, newspapers, personal letters and diaries, as well as legal statutes from the founding era to the Civil War, White shows how restrictive age-based laws were implemented to benefit those who already held power. Over time, these new laws—coming out of child murder and rape trials as well as guardianship and underage marriage disputes—increasingly circumscribed the rights of young Americans in the early republic. As White shows, race, class, status, and gender influenced who came to benefit from the label of “child” in post-revolutionary America. In so doing, Constructing American Childhood explains why Americans continue to be guided by the age-based legal definitions of childhood and adulthood of our past.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Edward Blum interviews Holly White on her new book Constructing American Childhood: Age-Based Laws and the Illusion of Protection in the Early United States.
As of 2025, in the United States an eleven-year-old child can be charged with a federal crime while in many states it’s illegal to leave a twelve-year-old home alone. Twenty-six states allow children younger than sixteen to marry while the legal drinking age remains twenty-one. Are these age-based laws really protecting children, and if not, why do they exist? Holly White uncovers the answers to these questions through a history of America’s first age-based laws.
Analyzing trial records, newspapers, personal letters and diaries, as well as legal statutes from the founding era to the Civil War, White shows how restrictive age-based laws were implemented to benefit those who already held power. Over time, these new laws—coming out of child murder and rape trials as well as guardianship and underage marriage disputes—increasingly circumscribed the rights of young Americans in the early republic. As White shows, race, class, status, and gender influenced who came to benefit from the label of “child” in post-revolutionary America. In so doing, Constructing American Childhood explains why Americans continue to be guided by the age-based legal definitions of childhood and adulthood of our past.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1733</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7f6c66ca-a513-11f1-8ad0-cf34330e3f50</guid>
      <title>Jonathan Quong, &quot;Political Philosophy: The Puzzle of Legitimate Injustice&quot; (Princeton UP, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Can laws be unjust and yet remain, in some sense, morally legitimate? In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691215648" rel="noopener noreferrer">Political Philosophy: The Puzzle of Legitimate Injustice</a>&nbsp;(Princeton UP, 2026), Jonathan Quong considers central issues in political philosophy through the lens of this single question. He explores and evaluates recent influential work on this topic and then proposes a novel approach of his own. The puzzle at the heart of his account is the phenomenon of legitimate injustice—laws and policies that are substantively unjust yet may be legitimately imposed by government officials. How can such laws be legitimate if, as some have argued, justice is the first virtue of social institutions?</p>
<p>Quong analyzes the work of those who deny that injustice committed by states can be legitimate simply by virtue of its democratic or procedural pedigree; the Kantian account of legitimate institutions and justice; instrumental approaches to political legitimacy; and the recent wave of work in democratic theory focused on its egalitarian character. Arguing that these analyses do not offer an adequate solution to the puzzle and that there are compelling reasons to revise or reject them, Quong lays out his view and explains the implications for more general theories of political morality. He argues that we can explain legitimate injustice by appeal to distributive justice. If political disagreement is inevitable, then unjust legislation is largely unavoidable; it constitutes a burden that must be distributed according to just principles. Quong’s novel and illuminating framework offers a unique introduction to crucial questions in political philosophy.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 3 Sep 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/jonathan-quong-political-philosophy-the-puzzle-of-legitimate-injustice-princeton-up-2026-KdX9O0N0</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can laws be unjust and yet remain, in some sense, morally legitimate? In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691215648" rel="noopener noreferrer">Political Philosophy: The Puzzle of Legitimate Injustice</a>&nbsp;(Princeton UP, 2026), Jonathan Quong considers central issues in political philosophy through the lens of this single question. He explores and evaluates recent influential work on this topic and then proposes a novel approach of his own. The puzzle at the heart of his account is the phenomenon of legitimate injustice—laws and policies that are substantively unjust yet may be legitimately imposed by government officials. How can such laws be legitimate if, as some have argued, justice is the first virtue of social institutions?</p>
<p>Quong analyzes the work of those who deny that injustice committed by states can be legitimate simply by virtue of its democratic or procedural pedigree; the Kantian account of legitimate institutions and justice; instrumental approaches to political legitimacy; and the recent wave of work in democratic theory focused on its egalitarian character. Arguing that these analyses do not offer an adequate solution to the puzzle and that there are compelling reasons to revise or reject them, Quong lays out his view and explains the implications for more general theories of political morality. He argues that we can explain legitimate injustice by appeal to distributive justice. If political disagreement is inevitable, then unjust legislation is largely unavoidable; it constitutes a burden that must be distributed according to just principles. Quong’s novel and illuminating framework offers a unique introduction to crucial questions in political philosophy.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="57758935" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/fc51c09e-b769-428b-b87d-2f1021f7699e/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=fc51c09e-b769-428b-b87d-2f1021f7699e&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Jonathan Quong, &quot;Political Philosophy: The Puzzle of Legitimate Injustice&quot; (Princeton UP, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:00:07</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Can laws be unjust and yet remain, in some sense, morally legitimate? In Political Philosophy: The Puzzle of Legitimate Injustice (Princeton UP, 2026), Jonathan Quong considers central issues in political philosophy through the lens of this single question. He explores and evaluates recent influential work on this topic and then proposes a novel approach of his own. The puzzle at the heart of his account is the phenomenon of legitimate injustice—laws and policies that are substantively unjust yet may be legitimately imposed by government officials. How can such laws be legitimate if, as some have argued, justice is the first virtue of social institutions?
Quong analyzes the work of those who deny that injustice committed by states can be legitimate simply by virtue of its democratic or procedural pedigree; the Kantian account of legitimate institutions and justice; instrumental approaches to political legitimacy; and the recent wave of work in democratic theory focused on its egalitarian character. Arguing that these analyses do not offer an adequate solution to the puzzle and that there are compelling reasons to revise or reject them, Quong lays out his view and explains the implications for more general theories of political morality. He argues that we can explain legitimate injustice by appeal to distributive justice. If political disagreement is inevitable, then unjust legislation is largely unavoidable; it constitutes a burden that must be distributed according to just principles. Quong’s novel and illuminating framework offers a unique introduction to crucial questions in political philosophy.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Can laws be unjust and yet remain, in some sense, morally legitimate? In Political Philosophy: The Puzzle of Legitimate Injustice (Princeton UP, 2026), Jonathan Quong considers central issues in political philosophy through the lens of this single question. He explores and evaluates recent influential work on this topic and then proposes a novel approach of his own. The puzzle at the heart of his account is the phenomenon of legitimate injustice—laws and policies that are substantively unjust yet may be legitimately imposed by government officials. How can such laws be legitimate if, as some have argued, justice is the first virtue of social institutions?
Quong analyzes the work of those who deny that injustice committed by states can be legitimate simply by virtue of its democratic or procedural pedigree; the Kantian account of legitimate institutions and justice; instrumental approaches to political legitimacy; and the recent wave of work in democratic theory focused on its egalitarian character. Arguing that these analyses do not offer an adequate solution to the puzzle and that there are compelling reasons to revise or reject them, Quong lays out his view and explains the implications for more general theories of political morality. He argues that we can explain legitimate injustice by appeal to distributive justice. If political disagreement is inevitable, then unjust legislation is largely unavoidable; it constitutes a burden that must be distributed according to just principles. Quong’s novel and illuminating framework offers a unique introduction to crucial questions in political philosophy.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1734</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">f88536ce-a133-11f1-a1b1-7be69ebac660</guid>
      <title>&quot;The Protocols of the Elders of Zion&quot; in Court: The Bern Trial (1933-1935) and the &quot;Antisemitic International&quot;</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Between 1933 and 1935, a trial was held in Bern against members of the Swiss extreme right-wing National Front who had distributed “The Protocols of the Elders of Zion,” a widely disseminated antisemitic publication that spread lies about Jews. The real target of the Jewish organizations that initiated the trial, however, was the pamphlet itself, its origin, its dissemination, and its use in Europe's fascist movements.</p>
<p>During the course of the trial, both sides received ample support in the form of material assistance and propaganda. The defendants and their supporters in Nazi Germany were able to rely on an extensive network that had been established in the early 1920s to combat “Judaeo-Bolshevism.” This conspiratorial “Antisemitic International” united German völkisch circles, Italian fascists, Russian monarchists, and French conspiracy theorists. On the other side, the plaintiffs actively sought to expose the “Protocols” as a forgery in the hope that this would counteract their impact.</p>
<p>In this lecture, Michael Hagemeister will use the Bern trial as a case study of Jewish legal self-defense in order to shed light on both the “Protocols of the Elders of Zion” and the concerted efforts against the “Antisemitic International” in the 1930s, which have received little attention from historians.</p>
<p><a href="https://yivo-institute.myshopify.com/products/the-perennial-conspiracy-theory-reflections-on-the-history-of-the-protocols-of-the-elders-of-zion" rel="noopener noreferrer">Read more</a>&nbsp;about Michael Hagemeister's research on&nbsp;<em>The Protocols of the Elders of Zion</em>.</p>
<p>This lecture originally took place on April 10, 2024.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 2 Sep 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/the-protocols-of-the-elders-of-zion-in-court-the-bern-trial-1933-1935-and-the-antisemitic-international-F0WiA2x7</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Between 1933 and 1935, a trial was held in Bern against members of the Swiss extreme right-wing National Front who had distributed “The Protocols of the Elders of Zion,” a widely disseminated antisemitic publication that spread lies about Jews. The real target of the Jewish organizations that initiated the trial, however, was the pamphlet itself, its origin, its dissemination, and its use in Europe's fascist movements.</p>
<p>During the course of the trial, both sides received ample support in the form of material assistance and propaganda. The defendants and their supporters in Nazi Germany were able to rely on an extensive network that had been established in the early 1920s to combat “Judaeo-Bolshevism.” This conspiratorial “Antisemitic International” united German völkisch circles, Italian fascists, Russian monarchists, and French conspiracy theorists. On the other side, the plaintiffs actively sought to expose the “Protocols” as a forgery in the hope that this would counteract their impact.</p>
<p>In this lecture, Michael Hagemeister will use the Bern trial as a case study of Jewish legal self-defense in order to shed light on both the “Protocols of the Elders of Zion” and the concerted efforts against the “Antisemitic International” in the 1930s, which have received little attention from historians.</p>
<p><a href="https://yivo-institute.myshopify.com/products/the-perennial-conspiracy-theory-reflections-on-the-history-of-the-protocols-of-the-elders-of-zion" rel="noopener noreferrer">Read more</a>&nbsp;about Michael Hagemeister's research on&nbsp;<em>The Protocols of the Elders of Zion</em>.</p>
<p>This lecture originally took place on April 10, 2024.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="65321448" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/e1645da3-cb9f-4d92-96b9-e8eddd598cc5/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=e1645da3-cb9f-4d92-96b9-e8eddd598cc5&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>&quot;The Protocols of the Elders of Zion&quot; in Court: The Bern Trial (1933-1935) and the &quot;Antisemitic International&quot;</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:08:00</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Between 1933 and 1935, a trial was held in Bern against members of the Swiss extreme right-wing National Front who had distributed “The Protocols of the Elders of Zion,” a widely disseminated antisemitic publication that spread lies about Jews. The real target of the Jewish organizations that initiated the trial, however, was the pamphlet itself, its origin, its dissemination, and its use in Europe&apos;s fascist movements.
During the course of the trial, both sides received ample support in the form of material assistance and propaganda. The defendants and their supporters in Nazi Germany were able to rely on an extensive network that had been established in the early 1920s to combat “Judaeo-Bolshevism.” This conspiratorial “Antisemitic International” united German völkisch circles, Italian fascists, Russian monarchists, and French conspiracy theorists. On the other side, the plaintiffs actively sought to expose the “Protocols” as a forgery in the hope that this would counteract their impact.
In this lecture, Michael Hagemeister will use the Bern trial as a case study of Jewish legal self-defense in order to shed light on both the “Protocols of the Elders of Zion” and the concerted efforts against the “Antisemitic International” in the 1930s, which have received little attention from historians.
Read more about Michael Hagemeister&apos;s research on The Protocols of the Elders of Zion.
This lecture originally took place on April 10, 2024.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Between 1933 and 1935, a trial was held in Bern against members of the Swiss extreme right-wing National Front who had distributed “The Protocols of the Elders of Zion,” a widely disseminated antisemitic publication that spread lies about Jews. The real target of the Jewish organizations that initiated the trial, however, was the pamphlet itself, its origin, its dissemination, and its use in Europe&apos;s fascist movements.
During the course of the trial, both sides received ample support in the form of material assistance and propaganda. The defendants and their supporters in Nazi Germany were able to rely on an extensive network that had been established in the early 1920s to combat “Judaeo-Bolshevism.” This conspiratorial “Antisemitic International” united German völkisch circles, Italian fascists, Russian monarchists, and French conspiracy theorists. On the other side, the plaintiffs actively sought to expose the “Protocols” as a forgery in the hope that this would counteract their impact.
In this lecture, Michael Hagemeister will use the Bern trial as a case study of Jewish legal self-defense in order to shed light on both the “Protocols of the Elders of Zion” and the concerted efforts against the “Antisemitic International” in the 1930s, which have received little attention from historians.
Read more about Michael Hagemeister&apos;s research on The Protocols of the Elders of Zion.
This lecture originally took place on April 10, 2024.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1732</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">d6c121d6-9f96-11f1-a3e3-abeb861c3eef</guid>
      <title>Alejandro E. Camacho and Brigham Daniels, &quot;Lessons for a Warming Planet: A Vital History of US Environmental Law&quot; (NYU Press, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The relationship between humans and the environment in the United States reflects tales of countless contrasting and overlapping trends, movements, and tensions. Law has cultivated both the planet’s biggest environmental threats and its most creative innovations for protecting human and ecological health. U.S. laws have driven both exploitation and&nbsp; temperance; destruction and restoration; and resistance and adaptation.</p>
<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781479802814" rel="noopener noreferrer">﻿</a><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781479802814" rel="noopener noreferrer">﻿Lessons for a Warming Planet: A Vital History of US Environmental Law</a>&nbsp;(NYU Press, 2026)&nbsp;showcases the fundamental role the law has served in reckoning with environmental harm in the United States. Authors Alejandro E. Camacho and Brigham Daniels explore the full arc of U.S. environmental legal history across five major periods in the United States, reaching as far back as North America’s colonization and ending with the present. Through this rich history, the book considers the ways leadership, social movements, political coalitions, information, and technologies have both been catalyzed by the law and have advanced environmental change.<br>Camacho and Daniels provide a fascinating and insightful history of environmental law. They ask readers to consider: What lessons can we draw from environmental legal history for contemporary challenges like climate change, AI, and emerging biotechnologies? In looking to the past,<em>&nbsp;Lessons for a Warming Planet</em>&nbsp;illustrates how prior generations each used legal imagination to navigate seemingly insurmountable environmental threats.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/alejandro-e-camacho-and-brigham-daniels-lessons-for-a-warming-planet-a-vital-history-of-us-environmental-law-nyu-press-2026-uVLPiwHV</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The relationship between humans and the environment in the United States reflects tales of countless contrasting and overlapping trends, movements, and tensions. Law has cultivated both the planet’s biggest environmental threats and its most creative innovations for protecting human and ecological health. U.S. laws have driven both exploitation and&nbsp; temperance; destruction and restoration; and resistance and adaptation.</p>
<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781479802814" rel="noopener noreferrer">﻿</a><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781479802814" rel="noopener noreferrer">﻿Lessons for a Warming Planet: A Vital History of US Environmental Law</a>&nbsp;(NYU Press, 2026)&nbsp;showcases the fundamental role the law has served in reckoning with environmental harm in the United States. Authors Alejandro E. Camacho and Brigham Daniels explore the full arc of U.S. environmental legal history across five major periods in the United States, reaching as far back as North America’s colonization and ending with the present. Through this rich history, the book considers the ways leadership, social movements, political coalitions, information, and technologies have both been catalyzed by the law and have advanced environmental change.<br>Camacho and Daniels provide a fascinating and insightful history of environmental law. They ask readers to consider: What lessons can we draw from environmental legal history for contemporary challenges like climate change, AI, and emerging biotechnologies? In looking to the past,<em>&nbsp;Lessons for a Warming Planet</em>&nbsp;illustrates how prior generations each used legal imagination to navigate seemingly insurmountable environmental threats.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="43144940" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/edcd1e37-f72f-43ed-bfee-be43afa54d77/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=edcd1e37-f72f-43ed-bfee-be43afa54d77&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Alejandro E. Camacho and Brigham Daniels, &quot;Lessons for a Warming Planet: A Vital History of US Environmental Law&quot; (NYU Press, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:44:53</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The relationship between humans and the environment in the United States reflects tales of countless contrasting and overlapping trends, movements, and tensions. Law has cultivated both the planet’s biggest environmental threats and its most creative innovations for protecting human and ecological health. U.S. laws have driven both exploitation and  temperance; destruction and restoration; and resistance and adaptation.
﻿﻿Lessons for a Warming Planet: A Vital History of US Environmental Law (NYU Press, 2026) showcases the fundamental role the law has served in reckoning with environmental harm in the United States. Authors Alejandro E. Camacho and Brigham Daniels explore the full arc of U.S. environmental legal history across five major periods in the United States, reaching as far back as North America’s colonization and ending with the present. Through this rich history, the book considers the ways leadership, social movements, political coalitions, information, and technologies have both been catalyzed by the law and have advanced environmental change.Camacho and Daniels provide a fascinating and insightful history of environmental law. They ask readers to consider: What lessons can we draw from environmental legal history for contemporary challenges like climate change, AI, and emerging biotechnologies? In looking to the past, Lessons for a Warming Planet illustrates how prior generations each used legal imagination to navigate seemingly insurmountable environmental threats.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The relationship between humans and the environment in the United States reflects tales of countless contrasting and overlapping trends, movements, and tensions. Law has cultivated both the planet’s biggest environmental threats and its most creative innovations for protecting human and ecological health. U.S. laws have driven both exploitation and  temperance; destruction and restoration; and resistance and adaptation.
﻿﻿Lessons for a Warming Planet: A Vital History of US Environmental Law (NYU Press, 2026) showcases the fundamental role the law has served in reckoning with environmental harm in the United States. Authors Alejandro E. Camacho and Brigham Daniels explore the full arc of U.S. environmental legal history across five major periods in the United States, reaching as far back as North America’s colonization and ending with the present. Through this rich history, the book considers the ways leadership, social movements, political coalitions, information, and technologies have both been catalyzed by the law and have advanced environmental change.Camacho and Daniels provide a fascinating and insightful history of environmental law. They ask readers to consider: What lessons can we draw from environmental legal history for contemporary challenges like climate change, AI, and emerging biotechnologies? In looking to the past, Lessons for a Warming Planet illustrates how prior generations each used legal imagination to navigate seemingly insurmountable environmental threats.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1730</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4eccb964-9fe3-11f1-a4c5-cfb3cf45c154</guid>
      <title>Reinhold Kramer and Tom Mitchell, &quot;&apos;PS: Burn after Reading&apos;: The Kellock-Taschereau Commission and Soviet Espionage&quot; (U Toronto Press, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>After
 Soviet cipher clerk Igor Gouzenko defected in 1945, Canada was shocked 
by the revelation that its own citizens were engaged in espionage for 
the Soviet Union. <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781049804668" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>"P.S. Burn after Reading": The Kellock-Taschereau Commission and Soviet Espionage in Canada</em></a>
 (University of Toronto Press, 2026) explores how the Canadian 
government used the controversial Kellock-Taschereau 
Commission—sometimes judiciously, sometimes not—to uncover and thwart 
domestic 
spies during the early days of the Cold War.</p>
<p>﻿Drawing
 on a wealth of sources, including the Commission’s extensive records, 
GRU documents turned over by Gouzenko, American Venona decrypts, Soviet 
KGB archives, and newly released British MI5 and MI6 files, authors Dr. 
Reinhold Kramer and Dr. Tom Mitchell provide a comprehensive account of 
the crisis. They reveal that, despite some civil liberties missteps, the
 government’s suspicions were largely justified.</p>
<p>﻿The
 book weaves together the evidence against the spies, the tradecraft of 
Soviet espionage, complex legal challenges faced by the state, and the 
political fallout. With access to hundreds of newly released British 
intelligence files, <em>P.S. Burn After Reading</em>
 offers both specialists and general readers fresh insights into the 
espionage crisis of 1945–46 and the pivotal role it played in exposing 
Canada’s postwar security and intelligence vulnerabilities.</p>
<p>﻿<em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose </em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>book</em></a><em>
 focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty 
negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative 
analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find 
Miranda’s interviews on </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em> ﻿</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/reinhold-kramer-and-tom-mitchell-ps-burn-after-reading-the-kellock-taschereau-commission-and-soviet-espionage-u-toronto-press-2026-DHVcPYjB</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After
 Soviet cipher clerk Igor Gouzenko defected in 1945, Canada was shocked 
by the revelation that its own citizens were engaged in espionage for 
the Soviet Union. <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781049804668" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>"P.S. Burn after Reading": The Kellock-Taschereau Commission and Soviet Espionage in Canada</em></a>
 (University of Toronto Press, 2026) explores how the Canadian 
government used the controversial Kellock-Taschereau 
Commission—sometimes judiciously, sometimes not—to uncover and thwart 
domestic 
spies during the early days of the Cold War.</p>
<p>﻿Drawing
 on a wealth of sources, including the Commission’s extensive records, 
GRU documents turned over by Gouzenko, American Venona decrypts, Soviet 
KGB archives, and newly released British MI5 and MI6 files, authors Dr. 
Reinhold Kramer and Dr. Tom Mitchell provide a comprehensive account of 
the crisis. They reveal that, despite some civil liberties missteps, the
 government’s suspicions were largely justified.</p>
<p>﻿The
 book weaves together the evidence against the spies, the tradecraft of 
Soviet espionage, complex legal challenges faced by the state, and the 
political fallout. With access to hundreds of newly released British 
intelligence files, <em>P.S. Burn After Reading</em>
 offers both specialists and general readers fresh insights into the 
espionage crisis of 1945–46 and the pivotal role it played in exposing 
Canada’s postwar security and intelligence vulnerabilities.</p>
<p>﻿<em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose </em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>book</em></a><em>
 focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty 
negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative 
analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find 
Miranda’s interviews on </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em> ﻿</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="55870748" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/95280c93-cfbb-43c5-b5f7-24760978991e/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=95280c93-cfbb-43c5-b5f7-24760978991e&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Reinhold Kramer and Tom Mitchell, &quot;&apos;PS: Burn after Reading&apos;: The Kellock-Taschereau Commission and Soviet Espionage&quot; (U Toronto Press, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:58:08</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>After
 Soviet cipher clerk Igor Gouzenko defected in 1945, Canada was shocked 
by the revelation that its own citizens were engaged in espionage for 
the Soviet Union. &quot;P.S. Burn after Reading&quot;: The Kellock-Taschereau Commission and Soviet Espionage in Canada
 (University of Toronto Press, 2026) explores how the Canadian 
government used the controversial Kellock-Taschereau 
Commission—sometimes judiciously, sometimes not—to uncover and thwart 
domestic 
spies during the early days of the Cold War.
﻿Drawing
 on a wealth of sources, including the Commission’s extensive records, 
GRU documents turned over by Gouzenko, American Venona decrypts, Soviet 
KGB archives, and newly released British MI5 and MI6 files, authors Dr. 
Reinhold Kramer and Dr. Tom Mitchell provide a comprehensive account of 
the crisis. They reveal that, despite some civil liberties missteps, the
 government’s suspicions were largely justified.
﻿The
 book weaves together the evidence against the spies, the tradecraft of 
Soviet espionage, complex legal challenges faced by the state, and the 
political fallout. With access to hundreds of newly released British 
intelligence files, P.S. Burn After Reading
 offers both specialists and general readers fresh insights into the 
espionage crisis of 1945–46 and the pivotal role it played in exposing 
Canada’s postwar security and intelligence vulnerabilities.
﻿This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book
 focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty 
negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative 
analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find 
Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts. ﻿
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>After
 Soviet cipher clerk Igor Gouzenko defected in 1945, Canada was shocked 
by the revelation that its own citizens were engaged in espionage for 
the Soviet Union. &quot;P.S. Burn after Reading&quot;: The Kellock-Taschereau Commission and Soviet Espionage in Canada
 (University of Toronto Press, 2026) explores how the Canadian 
government used the controversial Kellock-Taschereau 
Commission—sometimes judiciously, sometimes not—to uncover and thwart 
domestic 
spies during the early days of the Cold War.
﻿Drawing
 on a wealth of sources, including the Commission’s extensive records, 
GRU documents turned over by Gouzenko, American Venona decrypts, Soviet 
KGB archives, and newly released British MI5 and MI6 files, authors Dr. 
Reinhold Kramer and Dr. Tom Mitchell provide a comprehensive account of 
the crisis. They reveal that, despite some civil liberties missteps, the
 government’s suspicions were largely justified.
﻿The
 book weaves together the evidence against the spies, the tradecraft of 
Soviet espionage, complex legal challenges faced by the state, and the 
political fallout. With access to hundreds of newly released British 
intelligence files, P.S. Burn After Reading
 offers both specialists and general readers fresh insights into the 
espionage crisis of 1945–46 and the pivotal role it played in exposing 
Canada’s postwar security and intelligence vulnerabilities.
﻿This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book
 focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty 
negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative 
analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find 
Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts. ﻿
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1731</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">f545299e-9d8a-11f1-9129-cb85ff67d379</guid>
      <title>Diego Galego, &quot;Queering Public Policy: A Disruptive Yet Inclusive Framework for Policymaking&quot; (Palgrave Macmillan, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>For years, LGBTQ+ policies worldwide have been crafted based on 
heteronormative views, needs, and practices. However, this has gradually
 changed over the last two decades as LGBTQ+ individuals have become key
 players in the development of gender-based policies. Diego Galego's <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9783032167149" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Queering Public Policy: A Disruptive Yet Inclusive Framework for Policymaking</em></a>
 (Palgrave Macmillan, 2026) examines these political and social changes,
 evaluates how actors have successfully integrated LGBTQ+ needs into the
 mainstream policy agenda, and provides a comprehensive guide to 
understanding the policymaking processes from an LGBTQ+ perspective. 
Drawing on data from Brazil, Mexico, South Africa, and the USA, it 
presents a systematic framework for understanding "queering public 
policy" as a policy process. The final chapter offers a roadmap for 
scholars interested in exploring this evolving field further. This book 
will appeal to anyone interested in public policy, public 
administration, and queer studies.﻿</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/diego-galego-queering-public-policy-a-disruptive-yet-inclusive-framework-for-policymaking-palgrave-macmillan-2026-q9UHD4ua</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For years, LGBTQ+ policies worldwide have been crafted based on 
heteronormative views, needs, and practices. However, this has gradually
 changed over the last two decades as LGBTQ+ individuals have become key
 players in the development of gender-based policies. Diego Galego's <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9783032167149" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Queering Public Policy: A Disruptive Yet Inclusive Framework for Policymaking</em></a>
 (Palgrave Macmillan, 2026) examines these political and social changes,
 evaluates how actors have successfully integrated LGBTQ+ needs into the
 mainstream policy agenda, and provides a comprehensive guide to 
understanding the policymaking processes from an LGBTQ+ perspective. 
Drawing on data from Brazil, Mexico, South Africa, and the USA, it 
presents a systematic framework for understanding "queering public 
policy" as a policy process. The final chapter offers a roadmap for 
scholars interested in exploring this evolving field further. This book 
will appeal to anyone interested in public policy, public 
administration, and queer studies.﻿</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="68945882" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/f120907a-ec80-420a-8a05-45002c1a1ed3/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=f120907a-ec80-420a-8a05-45002c1a1ed3&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Diego Galego, &quot;Queering Public Policy: A Disruptive Yet Inclusive Framework for Policymaking&quot; (Palgrave Macmillan, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:11:47</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>For years, LGBTQ+ policies worldwide have been crafted based on 
heteronormative views, needs, and practices. However, this has gradually
 changed over the last two decades as LGBTQ+ individuals have become key
 players in the development of gender-based policies. Diego Galego&apos;s Queering Public Policy: A Disruptive Yet Inclusive Framework for Policymaking
 (Palgrave Macmillan, 2026) examines these political and social changes,
 evaluates how actors have successfully integrated LGBTQ+ needs into the
 mainstream policy agenda, and provides a comprehensive guide to 
understanding the policymaking processes from an LGBTQ+ perspective. 
Drawing on data from Brazil, Mexico, South Africa, and the USA, it 
presents a systematic framework for understanding &quot;queering public 
policy&quot; as a policy process. The final chapter offers a roadmap for 
scholars interested in exploring this evolving field further. This book 
will appeal to anyone interested in public policy, public 
administration, and queer studies.﻿
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>For years, LGBTQ+ policies worldwide have been crafted based on 
heteronormative views, needs, and practices. However, this has gradually
 changed over the last two decades as LGBTQ+ individuals have become key
 players in the development of gender-based policies. Diego Galego&apos;s Queering Public Policy: A Disruptive Yet Inclusive Framework for Policymaking
 (Palgrave Macmillan, 2026) examines these political and social changes,
 evaluates how actors have successfully integrated LGBTQ+ needs into the
 mainstream policy agenda, and provides a comprehensive guide to 
understanding the policymaking processes from an LGBTQ+ perspective. 
Drawing on data from Brazil, Mexico, South Africa, and the USA, it 
presents a systematic framework for understanding &quot;queering public 
policy&quot; as a policy process. The final chapter offers a roadmap for 
scholars interested in exploring this evolving field further. This book 
will appeal to anyone interested in public policy, public 
administration, and queer studies.﻿
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1728</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">a1e8494c-a1cd-11f1-8e95-0b03e4050371</guid>
      <title>Encore - Shai Lavi, &quot;Bioethics and Biopolitics in Israel: Socio-legal, Political and Empirical Analysis&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2019)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Once upon a time, or so we’ve been told, medical ethics were confined to the patient-doctor relationship. As long as doctors were true to their Hippocratic oaths, as long as they acted with compassion and wisdom, then all expectations were met.</p>
<p>Life is more complicated today, and so is healthcare: an undertaking, like all others, that is influenced by social, political, legal and cultural factors.</p>
<p>Nothing is value-free.</p>
<p>In&nbsp;<a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/1108714102/?tag=newbooinhis-20" rel="noopener noreferrer">Bioethics and Biopolitics in Israel: Socio-legal, Political and Empirical Analysis</a>&nbsp;(Cambridge University Press, 2019), Professor&nbsp;<a href="https://en-law.tau.ac.il/profile/slavi" rel="noopener noreferrer">Shai Lavi</a>&nbsp;and his colleagues have produced a groundbreaking work that offers a novel understanding of Israeli bioethics. It is a milestone in the comparative literature of bioethics.</p>
<p>Bringing together a range of experts, the book's interdisciplinary structure employs a contemporary, sociopolitical-oriented approach to bioethics issues, with an emphasis on empirical analysis, that will appeal not only to scholars of bioethics, but also to students of law, medicine, humanities, and social sciences around the world. Its focus on the development of bioethics in Israel serves as a template for cross-cultural and transcultural research into the moral, ethical, political and social aspects of bioethics.</p>
<p>This episode originally aired on 8/12/2019 and was republished on 8/28/2026.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/encore-shai-lavi-bioethics-and-biopolitics-in-israel-socio-legal-political-and-empirical-analysis-cambridge-up-2019-qSzGzUMU</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once upon a time, or so we’ve been told, medical ethics were confined to the patient-doctor relationship. As long as doctors were true to their Hippocratic oaths, as long as they acted with compassion and wisdom, then all expectations were met.</p>
<p>Life is more complicated today, and so is healthcare: an undertaking, like all others, that is influenced by social, political, legal and cultural factors.</p>
<p>Nothing is value-free.</p>
<p>In&nbsp;<a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/1108714102/?tag=newbooinhis-20" rel="noopener noreferrer">Bioethics and Biopolitics in Israel: Socio-legal, Political and Empirical Analysis</a>&nbsp;(Cambridge University Press, 2019), Professor&nbsp;<a href="https://en-law.tau.ac.il/profile/slavi" rel="noopener noreferrer">Shai Lavi</a>&nbsp;and his colleagues have produced a groundbreaking work that offers a novel understanding of Israeli bioethics. It is a milestone in the comparative literature of bioethics.</p>
<p>Bringing together a range of experts, the book's interdisciplinary structure employs a contemporary, sociopolitical-oriented approach to bioethics issues, with an emphasis on empirical analysis, that will appeal not only to scholars of bioethics, but also to students of law, medicine, humanities, and social sciences around the world. Its focus on the development of bioethics in Israel serves as a template for cross-cultural and transcultural research into the moral, ethical, political and social aspects of bioethics.</p>
<p>This episode originally aired on 8/12/2019 and was republished on 8/28/2026.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="48575613" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/4ef8dda9-483d-4547-80a8-c3490f28a17a/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=4ef8dda9-483d-4547-80a8-c3490f28a17a&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Encore - Shai Lavi, &quot;Bioethics and Biopolitics in Israel: Socio-legal, Political and Empirical Analysis&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2019)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:50:32</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Once upon a time, or so we’ve been told, medical ethics were confined to the patient-doctor relationship. As long as doctors were true to their Hippocratic oaths, as long as they acted with compassion and wisdom, then all expectations were met.
Life is more complicated today, and so is healthcare: an undertaking, like all others, that is influenced by social, political, legal and cultural factors.
Nothing is value-free.
In Bioethics and Biopolitics in Israel: Socio-legal, Political and Empirical Analysis (Cambridge University Press, 2019), Professor Shai Lavi and his colleagues have produced a groundbreaking work that offers a novel understanding of Israeli bioethics. It is a milestone in the comparative literature of bioethics.
Bringing together a range of experts, the book&apos;s interdisciplinary structure employs a contemporary, sociopolitical-oriented approach to bioethics issues, with an emphasis on empirical analysis, that will appeal not only to scholars of bioethics, but also to students of law, medicine, humanities, and social sciences around the world. Its focus on the development of bioethics in Israel serves as a template for cross-cultural and transcultural research into the moral, ethical, political and social aspects of bioethics.
This episode originally aired on 8/12/2019 and was republished on 8/28/2026.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Once upon a time, or so we’ve been told, medical ethics were confined to the patient-doctor relationship. As long as doctors were true to their Hippocratic oaths, as long as they acted with compassion and wisdom, then all expectations were met.
Life is more complicated today, and so is healthcare: an undertaking, like all others, that is influenced by social, political, legal and cultural factors.
Nothing is value-free.
In Bioethics and Biopolitics in Israel: Socio-legal, Political and Empirical Analysis (Cambridge University Press, 2019), Professor Shai Lavi and his colleagues have produced a groundbreaking work that offers a novel understanding of Israeli bioethics. It is a milestone in the comparative literature of bioethics.
Bringing together a range of experts, the book&apos;s interdisciplinary structure employs a contemporary, sociopolitical-oriented approach to bioethics issues, with an emphasis on empirical analysis, that will appeal not only to scholars of bioethics, but also to students of law, medicine, humanities, and social sciences around the world. Its focus on the development of bioethics in Israel serves as a template for cross-cultural and transcultural research into the moral, ethical, political and social aspects of bioethics.
This episode originally aired on 8/12/2019 and was republished on 8/28/2026.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>4</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">603d2a9a-9f97-11f1-b1ec-338b0b7281e2</guid>
      <title>Elizabeth J. Letourneau and Luke Malone, &quot;One in Five: Why Child Sexual Abuse Is Our Biggest Public Health Crisis—And What We Can Do to Stop It&quot; (Basic Books, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>One in five children will be sexually abused before their 
eighteenth birthday. This isn't a problem confined to a single country, 
city, or neighborhood. It's something that happens everywhere, and what 
it costs can be enormous: depression, PTSD, and elevated long-term risk 
for physical illness, including heart disease and cancer.</p>
<p>﻿In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781541603844" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>One in Five: Why Child Sexual Abuse Is Our Biggest Public Health Crisis—And What We Can Do to Stop It</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Basic
 Books, 2026), Elizabeth Letourneau and Luke Malone make the case that 
child sexual abuse is not inevitable. It is preventable, and at this 
moment in time, we have the tools to stop it before it begins.</p>
<p>﻿Letourneau
 and Malone don't stop at describing the problem.&nbsp;The book creates a 
clear picture of how much of the harm is caused by other children. They 
lay out a road map, built on years of research and real compassion, for 
keeping kids safe and reaching young people at risk of causing harm 
before anyone gets hurt.</p>
<p>﻿﻿In this episode of the New 
Books Network, we follow that road map and ask what changes when 
prevention rather than punishment becomes the organizing idea behind 
child safety. The conversation is energized and respectful of survivors 
and their families, and it projects an urgency that does not lose hope.</p>
<p>﻿I
 hope you find it worth your time. I think you will, if you are 
interested in what child sexual abuse prevention can look&nbsp;like in 2026.</p>
<p>﻿- Aniss Benelmouffok</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/elizabeth-j-letourneau-and-luke-malone-one-in-five-why-child-sexual-abuse-is-our-biggest-public-health-crisisand-what-we-can-do-to-stop-it-basic-books-2026-lEd2KMPD</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One in five children will be sexually abused before their 
eighteenth birthday. This isn't a problem confined to a single country, 
city, or neighborhood. It's something that happens everywhere, and what 
it costs can be enormous: depression, PTSD, and elevated long-term risk 
for physical illness, including heart disease and cancer.</p>
<p>﻿In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781541603844" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>One in Five: Why Child Sexual Abuse Is Our Biggest Public Health Crisis—And What We Can Do to Stop It</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Basic
 Books, 2026), Elizabeth Letourneau and Luke Malone make the case that 
child sexual abuse is not inevitable. It is preventable, and at this 
moment in time, we have the tools to stop it before it begins.</p>
<p>﻿Letourneau
 and Malone don't stop at describing the problem.&nbsp;The book creates a 
clear picture of how much of the harm is caused by other children. They 
lay out a road map, built on years of research and real compassion, for 
keeping kids safe and reaching young people at risk of causing harm 
before anyone gets hurt.</p>
<p>﻿﻿In this episode of the New 
Books Network, we follow that road map and ask what changes when 
prevention rather than punishment becomes the organizing idea behind 
child safety. The conversation is energized and respectful of survivors 
and their families, and it projects an urgency that does not lose hope.</p>
<p>﻿I
 hope you find it worth your time. I think you will, if you are 
interested in what child sexual abuse prevention can look&nbsp;like in 2026.</p>
<p>﻿- Aniss Benelmouffok</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="50906893" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/5264ef4a-2b39-4eee-bfc1-9c5bb540da96/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=5264ef4a-2b39-4eee-bfc1-9c5bb540da96&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Elizabeth J. Letourneau and Luke Malone, &quot;One in Five: Why Child Sexual Abuse Is Our Biggest Public Health Crisis—And What We Can Do to Stop It&quot; (Basic Books, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:52:58</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>One in five children will be sexually abused before their 
eighteenth birthday. This isn&apos;t a problem confined to a single country, 
city, or neighborhood. It&apos;s something that happens everywhere, and what 
it costs can be enormous: depression, PTSD, and elevated long-term risk 
for physical illness, including heart disease and cancer.
﻿In One in Five: Why Child Sexual Abuse Is Our Biggest Public Health Crisis—And What We Can Do to Stop It (Basic
 Books, 2026), Elizabeth Letourneau and Luke Malone make the case that 
child sexual abuse is not inevitable. It is preventable, and at this 
moment in time, we have the tools to stop it before it begins.
﻿Letourneau
 and Malone don&apos;t stop at describing the problem. The book creates a 
clear picture of how much of the harm is caused by other children. They 
lay out a road map, built on years of research and real compassion, for 
keeping kids safe and reaching young people at risk of causing harm 
before anyone gets hurt.
﻿﻿In this episode of the New 
Books Network, we follow that road map and ask what changes when 
prevention rather than punishment becomes the organizing idea behind 
child safety. The conversation is energized and respectful of survivors 
and their families, and it projects an urgency that does not lose hope.
﻿I
 hope you find it worth your time. I think you will, if you are 
interested in what child sexual abuse prevention can look like in 2026.
﻿- Aniss Benelmouffok
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>One in five children will be sexually abused before their 
eighteenth birthday. This isn&apos;t a problem confined to a single country, 
city, or neighborhood. It&apos;s something that happens everywhere, and what 
it costs can be enormous: depression, PTSD, and elevated long-term risk 
for physical illness, including heart disease and cancer.
﻿In One in Five: Why Child Sexual Abuse Is Our Biggest Public Health Crisis—And What We Can Do to Stop It (Basic
 Books, 2026), Elizabeth Letourneau and Luke Malone make the case that 
child sexual abuse is not inevitable. It is preventable, and at this 
moment in time, we have the tools to stop it before it begins.
﻿Letourneau
 and Malone don&apos;t stop at describing the problem. The book creates a 
clear picture of how much of the harm is caused by other children. They 
lay out a road map, built on years of research and real compassion, for 
keeping kids safe and reaching young people at risk of causing harm 
before anyone gets hurt.
﻿﻿In this episode of the New 
Books Network, we follow that road map and ask what changes when 
prevention rather than punishment becomes the organizing idea behind 
child safety. The conversation is energized and respectful of survivors 
and their families, and it projects an urgency that does not lose hope.
﻿I
 hope you find it worth your time. I think you will, if you are 
interested in what child sexual abuse prevention can look like in 2026.
﻿- Aniss Benelmouffok
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1729</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">86e622bc-9aa3-11f1-8380-cfef92b40614</guid>
      <title>Sandeep Vaheesan, &quot;Democracy in Power: A History of Electrification in the United States&quot; (U Chicago Press, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780226836393" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Democracy in Power: A History of Electrification in the United States</em></a> (University of Chicago Press, 2024), Sandeep Vaheesan&nbsp;recounts the rather overlooked story of how electricity spread across the U.S. economy during the 20th century. This book sheds careful light on the varied institutions and interests mediating the process, including investor-owned utilities and&nbsp;the&nbsp;rural electric cooperative. Vaheesan does not hesitate to critique the successes and failures cropping up&nbsp;along the way; rather, he lays them all bare in service of paving an actionable path toward the decarbonization and democratization of power.</p>
<p>﻿<a href="https://www.sandeepvaheesan.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Sandeep Vaheesan</a> is the legal director at the Open Markets Institute. He leads their legal research and advocacy, including the amicus program. He has written and spoken widely on antimonopoly law and policy and building a fair economy. Previously, he worked at the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and American Antitrust Institute.</p>
<p>﻿<a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/02amo/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Anna Olteanu</a> is a senior in the College of Social Studies at Wesleyan University, where she focuses on intellectual history. Her interests include political ecology, the history of economic thought, and literary criticism.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/sandeep-vaheesan-democracy-in-power-a-history-of-electrification-in-the-united-states-u-chicago-press-2024-5g5RP5Qw</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780226836393" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Democracy in Power: A History of Electrification in the United States</em></a> (University of Chicago Press, 2024), Sandeep Vaheesan&nbsp;recounts the rather overlooked story of how electricity spread across the U.S. economy during the 20th century. This book sheds careful light on the varied institutions and interests mediating the process, including investor-owned utilities and&nbsp;the&nbsp;rural electric cooperative. Vaheesan does not hesitate to critique the successes and failures cropping up&nbsp;along the way; rather, he lays them all bare in service of paving an actionable path toward the decarbonization and democratization of power.</p>
<p>﻿<a href="https://www.sandeepvaheesan.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Sandeep Vaheesan</a> is the legal director at the Open Markets Institute. He leads their legal research and advocacy, including the amicus program. He has written and spoken widely on antimonopoly law and policy and building a fair economy. Previously, he worked at the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and American Antitrust Institute.</p>
<p>﻿<a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/02amo/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Anna Olteanu</a> is a senior in the College of Social Studies at Wesleyan University, where she focuses on intellectual history. Her interests include political ecology, the history of economic thought, and literary criticism.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="48246421" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/845f416f-4337-43c8-b649-add2dea8ffee/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=845f416f-4337-43c8-b649-add2dea8ffee&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Sandeep Vaheesan, &quot;Democracy in Power: A History of Electrification in the United States&quot; (U Chicago Press, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:50:09</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In Democracy in Power: A History of Electrification in the United States (University of Chicago Press, 2024), Sandeep Vaheesan recounts the rather overlooked story of how electricity spread across the U.S. economy during the 20th century. This book sheds careful light on the varied institutions and interests mediating the process, including investor-owned utilities and the rural electric cooperative. Vaheesan does not hesitate to critique the successes and failures cropping up along the way; rather, he lays them all bare in service of paving an actionable path toward the decarbonization and democratization of power.
﻿Sandeep Vaheesan is the legal director at the Open Markets Institute. He leads their legal research and advocacy, including the amicus program. He has written and spoken widely on antimonopoly law and policy and building a fair economy. Previously, he worked at the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and American Antitrust Institute.
﻿Anna Olteanu is a senior in the College of Social Studies at Wesleyan University, where she focuses on intellectual history. Her interests include political ecology, the history of economic thought, and literary criticism.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In Democracy in Power: A History of Electrification in the United States (University of Chicago Press, 2024), Sandeep Vaheesan recounts the rather overlooked story of how electricity spread across the U.S. economy during the 20th century. This book sheds careful light on the varied institutions and interests mediating the process, including investor-owned utilities and the rural electric cooperative. Vaheesan does not hesitate to critique the successes and failures cropping up along the way; rather, he lays them all bare in service of paving an actionable path toward the decarbonization and democratization of power.
﻿Sandeep Vaheesan is the legal director at the Open Markets Institute. He leads their legal research and advocacy, including the amicus program. He has written and spoken widely on antimonopoly law and policy and building a fair economy. Previously, he worked at the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and American Antitrust Institute.
﻿Anna Olteanu is a senior in the College of Social Studies at Wesleyan University, where she focuses on intellectual history. Her interests include political ecology, the history of economic thought, and literary criticism.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1727</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ad44718e-97e7-11f1-83d2-f725fad3e05d</guid>
      <title>Utathya Chattopadhyaya, &quot;Ganja Matters: Empire and the Pursuits of Cannabis in British India&quot; (U California Press, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Ganja
 is the popular name in Hindustani, Bengali, and other South Asian 
languages for intoxicating substances produced from the plant species 
<em>Cannabis sativa L</em>. Starting in the eighteenth century, British India's 
colonial administrators sought ways to systematically tax and govern how
 ganja circulated from the farms of peasant families in rural Bengal to pipes, plates, and cups elsewhere in the subcontinent.</p>
<p>﻿<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780520425705" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Ganja Matters: Empire and the Pursuits of Cannabis in British India</em></a>
 (University of California Press, 2026) is an open-access book that 
follows the perpetual incongruity between regulatory efforts to pursue 
the plant through botanical observation, colonial reportage, and excise 
statistics and the leisurely, devotional, and creative ganja pursuits 
among people. Dr. Utathya Chattopadhyaya offers a social history of 
ganja in a multispecies framework that reveals how the cannabis plant 
co-constituted histories of empire, gender, subalternity, and labor
 under British rule. Against the weight of the criminalization and 
"drug-ness" of cannabis, Dr. Chattopadhyaya puts the multidirectional 
and polysemic history of ganja as plant matter at the center of 
analysis.</p>
<p>﻿<em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose </em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>book</em></a><em>
 focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty 
negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative 
analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find 
Miranda’s interviews on </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em> ﻿</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/utathya-chattopadhyaya-ganja-matters-empire-and-the-pursuits-of-cannabis-in-british-india-u-california-press-2026-6pF9ciOg</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ganja
 is the popular name in Hindustani, Bengali, and other South Asian 
languages for intoxicating substances produced from the plant species 
<em>Cannabis sativa L</em>. Starting in the eighteenth century, British India's 
colonial administrators sought ways to systematically tax and govern how
 ganja circulated from the farms of peasant families in rural Bengal to pipes, plates, and cups elsewhere in the subcontinent.</p>
<p>﻿<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780520425705" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Ganja Matters: Empire and the Pursuits of Cannabis in British India</em></a>
 (University of California Press, 2026) is an open-access book that 
follows the perpetual incongruity between regulatory efforts to pursue 
the plant through botanical observation, colonial reportage, and excise 
statistics and the leisurely, devotional, and creative ganja pursuits 
among people. Dr. Utathya Chattopadhyaya offers a social history of 
ganja in a multispecies framework that reveals how the cannabis plant 
co-constituted histories of empire, gender, subalternity, and labor
 under British rule. Against the weight of the criminalization and 
"drug-ness" of cannabis, Dr. Chattopadhyaya puts the multidirectional 
and polysemic history of ganja as plant matter at the center of 
analysis.</p>
<p>﻿<em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose </em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>book</em></a><em>
 focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty 
negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative 
analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find 
Miranda’s interviews on </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em> ﻿</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="52942914" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/60db0e51-0eb3-485d-9900-355ab40764fc/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=60db0e51-0eb3-485d-9900-355ab40764fc&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Utathya Chattopadhyaya, &quot;Ganja Matters: Empire and the Pursuits of Cannabis in British India&quot; (U California Press, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:55:05</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Ganja
 is the popular name in Hindustani, Bengali, and other South Asian 
languages for intoxicating substances produced from the plant species 
Cannabis sativa L. Starting in the eighteenth century, British India&apos;s 
colonial administrators sought ways to systematically tax and govern how
 ganja circulated from the farms of peasant families in rural Bengal to pipes, plates, and cups elsewhere in the subcontinent.
﻿Ganja Matters: Empire and the Pursuits of Cannabis in British India
 (University of California Press, 2026) is an open-access book that 
follows the perpetual incongruity between regulatory efforts to pursue 
the plant through botanical observation, colonial reportage, and excise 
statistics and the leisurely, devotional, and creative ganja pursuits 
among people. Dr. Utathya Chattopadhyaya offers a social history of 
ganja in a multispecies framework that reveals how the cannabis plant 
co-constituted histories of empire, gender, subalternity, and labor
 under British rule. Against the weight of the criminalization and 
&quot;drug-ness&quot; of cannabis, Dr. Chattopadhyaya puts the multidirectional 
and polysemic history of ganja as plant matter at the center of 
analysis.
﻿This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book
 focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty 
negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative 
analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find 
Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts. ﻿
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Ganja
 is the popular name in Hindustani, Bengali, and other South Asian 
languages for intoxicating substances produced from the plant species 
Cannabis sativa L. Starting in the eighteenth century, British India&apos;s 
colonial administrators sought ways to systematically tax and govern how
 ganja circulated from the farms of peasant families in rural Bengal to pipes, plates, and cups elsewhere in the subcontinent.
﻿Ganja Matters: Empire and the Pursuits of Cannabis in British India
 (University of California Press, 2026) is an open-access book that 
follows the perpetual incongruity between regulatory efforts to pursue 
the plant through botanical observation, colonial reportage, and excise 
statistics and the leisurely, devotional, and creative ganja pursuits 
among people. Dr. Utathya Chattopadhyaya offers a social history of 
ganja in a multispecies framework that reveals how the cannabis plant 
co-constituted histories of empire, gender, subalternity, and labor
 under British rule. Against the weight of the criminalization and 
&quot;drug-ness&quot; of cannabis, Dr. Chattopadhyaya puts the multidirectional 
and polysemic history of ganja as plant matter at the center of 
analysis.
﻿This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book
 focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty 
negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative 
analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find 
Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts. ﻿
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1726</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">d169d32c-94e7-11f1-99df-6f2bdfff4eb7</guid>
      <title>Matias E. Margulis, &quot;Shadow Negotiators: How UN Organizations Shape the Rules of World Trade for Food Security&quot; (Stanford UP, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><em></em><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781503633520" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Shadow Negotiators: How UN Organizations Shape the Rules of World Trade for Food Security</em></a>
 (Stanford University Press, 2023) by Dr. Matias E. Margulis is the 
first book to demonstrate that United Nations (UN) organizations have 
intervened to influence the discourse, agenda, and outcomes of 
international trade lawmaking at the World Trade Organization (WTO). 
While UN organizations lack a seat at the bargaining table at the WTO, 
Dr. Margulis argues that these organizations have acted as "shadow 
negotiators" engaged in political actions intended to alter the 
trajectory and results of multilateral trade negotiations. He draws on 
analysis of one of the most contested issues in global trade politics, 
agricultural trade liberalization, to demonstrate interventions by four 
different UN organizations—the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), 
the World Food Programme (WFP), the Office of the High Commissioner for 
Human Rights (OHCHR), and the Special Rapporteur on the Right to Food 
(SRRTF).</p>
<p>﻿By
 identifying several novel intervention strategies used by UN actors to 
shape the rules of global trade, this book shows that UN organizations 
chose to intervene in trade lawmaking not out of competition with the 
WTO or ideological resistance to trade liberalization, but out of 
concerns that specific trade rules could have negative consequences for 
world food security—an outcome these organizations viewed as undermining
 their social purpose to reduce world hunger and protect the human right
 to food.</p>
<p>﻿<em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em> book</em></a><em>
 focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty 
negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative 
analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find 
Miranda’s interviews on </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em> ﻿</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/matias-e-margulis-shadow-negotiators-how-un-organizations-shape-the-rules-of-world-trade-for-food-security-stanford-up-2023-Vr9mzqaF</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em></em><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781503633520" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Shadow Negotiators: How UN Organizations Shape the Rules of World Trade for Food Security</em></a>
 (Stanford University Press, 2023) by Dr. Matias E. Margulis is the 
first book to demonstrate that United Nations (UN) organizations have 
intervened to influence the discourse, agenda, and outcomes of 
international trade lawmaking at the World Trade Organization (WTO). 
While UN organizations lack a seat at the bargaining table at the WTO, 
Dr. Margulis argues that these organizations have acted as "shadow 
negotiators" engaged in political actions intended to alter the 
trajectory and results of multilateral trade negotiations. He draws on 
analysis of one of the most contested issues in global trade politics, 
agricultural trade liberalization, to demonstrate interventions by four 
different UN organizations—the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), 
the World Food Programme (WFP), the Office of the High Commissioner for 
Human Rights (OHCHR), and the Special Rapporteur on the Right to Food 
(SRRTF).</p>
<p>﻿By
 identifying several novel intervention strategies used by UN actors to 
shape the rules of global trade, this book shows that UN organizations 
chose to intervene in trade lawmaking not out of competition with the 
WTO or ideological resistance to trade liberalization, but out of 
concerns that specific trade rules could have negative consequences for 
world food security—an outcome these organizations viewed as undermining
 their social purpose to reduce world hunger and protect the human right
 to food.</p>
<p>﻿<em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em> book</em></a><em>
 focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty 
negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative 
analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find 
Miranda’s interviews on </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em> ﻿</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="48189066" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/55bf0055-5f9c-4c14-bf78-355ce02d8ebf/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=55bf0055-5f9c-4c14-bf78-355ce02d8ebf&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Matias E. Margulis, &quot;Shadow Negotiators: How UN Organizations Shape the Rules of World Trade for Food Security&quot; (Stanford UP, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:50:08</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Shadow Negotiators: How UN Organizations Shape the Rules of World Trade for Food Security
 (Stanford University Press, 2023) by Dr. Matias E. Margulis is the 
first book to demonstrate that United Nations (UN) organizations have 
intervened to influence the discourse, agenda, and outcomes of 
international trade lawmaking at the World Trade Organization (WTO). 
While UN organizations lack a seat at the bargaining table at the WTO, 
Dr. Margulis argues that these organizations have acted as &quot;shadow 
negotiators&quot; engaged in political actions intended to alter the 
trajectory and results of multilateral trade negotiations. He draws on 
analysis of one of the most contested issues in global trade politics, 
agricultural trade liberalization, to demonstrate interventions by four 
different UN organizations—the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), 
the World Food Programme (WFP), the Office of the High Commissioner for 
Human Rights (OHCHR), and the Special Rapporteur on the Right to Food 
(SRRTF).
﻿By
 identifying several novel intervention strategies used by UN actors to 
shape the rules of global trade, this book shows that UN organizations 
chose to intervene in trade lawmaking not out of competition with the 
WTO or ideological resistance to trade liberalization, but out of 
concerns that specific trade rules could have negative consequences for 
world food security—an outcome these organizations viewed as undermining
 their social purpose to reduce world hunger and protect the human right
 to food.
﻿This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book
 focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty 
negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative 
analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find 
Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts. ﻿
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Shadow Negotiators: How UN Organizations Shape the Rules of World Trade for Food Security
 (Stanford University Press, 2023) by Dr. Matias E. Margulis is the 
first book to demonstrate that United Nations (UN) organizations have 
intervened to influence the discourse, agenda, and outcomes of 
international trade lawmaking at the World Trade Organization (WTO). 
While UN organizations lack a seat at the bargaining table at the WTO, 
Dr. Margulis argues that these organizations have acted as &quot;shadow 
negotiators&quot; engaged in political actions intended to alter the 
trajectory and results of multilateral trade negotiations. He draws on 
analysis of one of the most contested issues in global trade politics, 
agricultural trade liberalization, to demonstrate interventions by four 
different UN organizations—the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), 
the World Food Programme (WFP), the Office of the High Commissioner for 
Human Rights (OHCHR), and the Special Rapporteur on the Right to Food 
(SRRTF).
﻿By
 identifying several novel intervention strategies used by UN actors to 
shape the rules of global trade, this book shows that UN organizations 
chose to intervene in trade lawmaking not out of competition with the 
WTO or ideological resistance to trade liberalization, but out of 
concerns that specific trade rules could have negative consequences for 
world food security—an outcome these organizations viewed as undermining
 their social purpose to reduce world hunger and protect the human right
 to food.
﻿This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book
 focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty 
negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative 
analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find 
Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts. ﻿
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1723</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5753436e-94e4-11f1-aeb5-6b34a140f3ca</guid>
      <title>James Loeffler, &quot;Exceptional Hatred: Antisemitism and the Fight over Free Speech in Modern America&quot; (Metropolitan Books, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>A leading historian’s revelatory exploration of antisemitism in the 
United States—from 1940s anti-Jewish riots until today—showing that it 
has long served as a frontline in our wars over freedom of speech and 
the nature of American liberalism Few issues are as vexed today as 
antisemitism and free speech. There is scarcely an arena—college 
campuses, congressional hearings, immigration courtrooms, social media 
platforms—where we are not polarized over what counts as antisemitism, 
which speech is protected by the First Amendment, and what the law 
should do about hatred. At a time of political crisis, antisemitism has 
become a point of ideological obsession. None of this is new. In a 
sweeping history of ideas and law, James Loeffler recovers the forgotten
 roots of our contemporary turmoil. From two antisemitic riots in 
postwar Chicago to a neo-Nazi march in 1970s Skokie, Illinois, and the 
Charlottesville Unite the Right rally in our own time, Loeffler explores
 the ways in which America’s courts have grappled with hatred, freedom, 
and the tensions at the heart of liberal democracy: Are some hatreds 
more dangerous than others? Is tolerating hate speech the price we must 
pay for free speech? And can liberalism ever make good on its promise to
 end hatred through law? Confronting these questions, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781250806086" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Exceptional Hatred: Antisemitism and the Fight over Free Speech in Modern America</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Metropolitan Books,&nbsp;2026)&nbsp;restores
 a missing history of hate speech, antisemitism, and the law, one that 
points to how we might protect difference without surrendering our 
principles of equality and freedom.</p>
<p>James Loeffler is an award-winning historian, and Felix Posen 
Professor of Modern Jewish History at Johns Hopkins University and the 
author of Rooted Cosmopolitans: Jews and Human Rights in the Twentieth 
Century. Previously he taught at the University of Virginia and served 
as Dean’s Visiting Scholar at Georgetown University Law Center. 
Currently a Kogod Senior Research Fellow at the Shalom Hartman Institute
 of North America, his writing has appeared in The Atlantic, The New 
York Times, The Washington Post, The Wall Street Journal, and The New 
Republic. </p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/james-loeffler-exceptional-hatred-antisemitism-and-the-fight-over-free-speech-in-modern-america-metropolitan-books-2026-QWxsHXME</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A leading historian’s revelatory exploration of antisemitism in the 
United States—from 1940s anti-Jewish riots until today—showing that it 
has long served as a frontline in our wars over freedom of speech and 
the nature of American liberalism Few issues are as vexed today as 
antisemitism and free speech. There is scarcely an arena—college 
campuses, congressional hearings, immigration courtrooms, social media 
platforms—where we are not polarized over what counts as antisemitism, 
which speech is protected by the First Amendment, and what the law 
should do about hatred. At a time of political crisis, antisemitism has 
become a point of ideological obsession. None of this is new. In a 
sweeping history of ideas and law, James Loeffler recovers the forgotten
 roots of our contemporary turmoil. From two antisemitic riots in 
postwar Chicago to a neo-Nazi march in 1970s Skokie, Illinois, and the 
Charlottesville Unite the Right rally in our own time, Loeffler explores
 the ways in which America’s courts have grappled with hatred, freedom, 
and the tensions at the heart of liberal democracy: Are some hatreds 
more dangerous than others? Is tolerating hate speech the price we must 
pay for free speech? And can liberalism ever make good on its promise to
 end hatred through law? Confronting these questions, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781250806086" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Exceptional Hatred: Antisemitism and the Fight over Free Speech in Modern America</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Metropolitan Books,&nbsp;2026)&nbsp;restores
 a missing history of hate speech, antisemitism, and the law, one that 
points to how we might protect difference without surrendering our 
principles of equality and freedom.</p>
<p>James Loeffler is an award-winning historian, and Felix Posen 
Professor of Modern Jewish History at Johns Hopkins University and the 
author of Rooted Cosmopolitans: Jews and Human Rights in the Twentieth 
Century. Previously he taught at the University of Virginia and served 
as Dean’s Visiting Scholar at Georgetown University Law Center. 
Currently a Kogod Senior Research Fellow at the Shalom Hartman Institute
 of North America, his writing has appeared in The Atlantic, The New 
York Times, The Washington Post, The Wall Street Journal, and The New 
Republic. </p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="57327700" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/40e514fa-9ca2-43ad-bfad-49f384e2c710/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=40e514fa-9ca2-43ad-bfad-49f384e2c710&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>James Loeffler, &quot;Exceptional Hatred: Antisemitism and the Fight over Free Speech in Modern America&quot; (Metropolitan Books, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:59:39</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>A leading historian’s revelatory exploration of antisemitism in the 
United States—from 1940s anti-Jewish riots until today—showing that it 
has long served as a frontline in our wars over freedom of speech and 
the nature of American liberalism Few issues are as vexed today as 
antisemitism and free speech. There is scarcely an arena—college 
campuses, congressional hearings, immigration courtrooms, social media 
platforms—where we are not polarized over what counts as antisemitism, 
which speech is protected by the First Amendment, and what the law 
should do about hatred. At a time of political crisis, antisemitism has 
become a point of ideological obsession. None of this is new. In a 
sweeping history of ideas and law, James Loeffler recovers the forgotten
 roots of our contemporary turmoil. From two antisemitic riots in 
postwar Chicago to a neo-Nazi march in 1970s Skokie, Illinois, and the 
Charlottesville Unite the Right rally in our own time, Loeffler explores
 the ways in which America’s courts have grappled with hatred, freedom, 
and the tensions at the heart of liberal democracy: Are some hatreds 
more dangerous than others? Is tolerating hate speech the price we must 
pay for free speech? And can liberalism ever make good on its promise to
 end hatred through law? Confronting these questions, Exceptional Hatred: Antisemitism and the Fight over Free Speech in Modern America (Metropolitan Books, 2026) restores
 a missing history of hate speech, antisemitism, and the law, one that 
points to how we might protect difference without surrendering our 
principles of equality and freedom.
James Loeffler is an award-winning historian, and Felix Posen 
Professor of Modern Jewish History at Johns Hopkins University and the 
author of Rooted Cosmopolitans: Jews and Human Rights in the Twentieth 
Century. Previously he taught at the University of Virginia and served 
as Dean’s Visiting Scholar at Georgetown University Law Center. 
Currently a Kogod Senior Research Fellow at the Shalom Hartman Institute
 of North America, his writing has appeared in The Atlantic, The New 
York Times, The Washington Post, The Wall Street Journal, and The New 
Republic. 
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>A leading historian’s revelatory exploration of antisemitism in the 
United States—from 1940s anti-Jewish riots until today—showing that it 
has long served as a frontline in our wars over freedom of speech and 
the nature of American liberalism Few issues are as vexed today as 
antisemitism and free speech. There is scarcely an arena—college 
campuses, congressional hearings, immigration courtrooms, social media 
platforms—where we are not polarized over what counts as antisemitism, 
which speech is protected by the First Amendment, and what the law 
should do about hatred. At a time of political crisis, antisemitism has 
become a point of ideological obsession. None of this is new. In a 
sweeping history of ideas and law, James Loeffler recovers the forgotten
 roots of our contemporary turmoil. From two antisemitic riots in 
postwar Chicago to a neo-Nazi march in 1970s Skokie, Illinois, and the 
Charlottesville Unite the Right rally in our own time, Loeffler explores
 the ways in which America’s courts have grappled with hatred, freedom, 
and the tensions at the heart of liberal democracy: Are some hatreds 
more dangerous than others? Is tolerating hate speech the price we must 
pay for free speech? And can liberalism ever make good on its promise to
 end hatred through law? Confronting these questions, Exceptional Hatred: Antisemitism and the Fight over Free Speech in Modern America (Metropolitan Books, 2026) restores
 a missing history of hate speech, antisemitism, and the law, one that 
points to how we might protect difference without surrendering our 
principles of equality and freedom.
James Loeffler is an award-winning historian, and Felix Posen 
Professor of Modern Jewish History at Johns Hopkins University and the 
author of Rooted Cosmopolitans: Jews and Human Rights in the Twentieth 
Century. Previously he taught at the University of Virginia and served 
as Dean’s Visiting Scholar at Georgetown University Law Center. 
Currently a Kogod Senior Research Fellow at the Shalom Hartman Institute
 of North America, his writing has appeared in The Atlantic, The New 
York Times, The Washington Post, The Wall Street Journal, and The New 
Republic. 
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1724</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">20c8e92a-955c-11f1-8917-3b718222f332</guid>
      <title>Rick Ramseyer, &quot;Girl Without a Country: The Untold Story of a Landmark Fight for U.S. Citizenship&quot; (Purdue UP, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Should willingness to kill be a requirement for U.S. citizenship?&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781626712614" rel="noopener noreferrer">Girl Without a Country: The Untold Story of a Landmark Fight for U.S. Citizenship</a>&nbsp;(Purdue University Press, 2026) by Rick Ramseyer tells the compelling, confounding story of Martha Graber—a Mennonite, registered nurse, and conscientious objector who in 1929 was twice denied citizenship because she refused to say she would take up arms to defend the United States. The unexpected denials, which came despite Martha's pledge to give her life for her adopted country, caught the attention of a diverse group of peace advocates, religious leaders, lawyers, and politicians, setting up a climactic third court appearance.</p>
<p>Martha’s nineteen-month fight for citizenship made national news, featuring dramatic testimony, historical insights, and interesting backstories that stretched from Alsace-Lorraine in western Europe to America’s heartland. Elegantly written by Martha’s maternal grandson with never-before-published details and closely connected with a controversial Supreme Court decision,&nbsp;<em>Girl Without a Country</em>&nbsp;surfaces an array of topical issues, ranging from immigration and naturalization to conscientious objection and patriotism. Perhaps most importantly, Martha’s story considers what it truly means to be an American.</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/rick-ramseyer-girl-without-a-country-the-untold-story-of-a-landmark-fight-for-u-s-citizenship-purdue-up-2026-EdrNKz9a</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Should willingness to kill be a requirement for U.S. citizenship?&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781626712614" rel="noopener noreferrer">Girl Without a Country: The Untold Story of a Landmark Fight for U.S. Citizenship</a>&nbsp;(Purdue University Press, 2026) by Rick Ramseyer tells the compelling, confounding story of Martha Graber—a Mennonite, registered nurse, and conscientious objector who in 1929 was twice denied citizenship because she refused to say she would take up arms to defend the United States. The unexpected denials, which came despite Martha's pledge to give her life for her adopted country, caught the attention of a diverse group of peace advocates, religious leaders, lawyers, and politicians, setting up a climactic third court appearance.</p>
<p>Martha’s nineteen-month fight for citizenship made national news, featuring dramatic testimony, historical insights, and interesting backstories that stretched from Alsace-Lorraine in western Europe to America’s heartland. Elegantly written by Martha’s maternal grandson with never-before-published details and closely connected with a controversial Supreme Court decision,&nbsp;<em>Girl Without a Country</em>&nbsp;surfaces an array of topical issues, ranging from immigration and naturalization to conscientious objection and patriotism. Perhaps most importantly, Martha’s story considers what it truly means to be an American.</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="24059499" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/d4ffe1e0-0be2-4a9e-bfcd-7790c8cfeacb/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=d4ffe1e0-0be2-4a9e-bfcd-7790c8cfeacb&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Rick Ramseyer, &quot;Girl Without a Country: The Untold Story of a Landmark Fight for U.S. Citizenship&quot; (Purdue UP, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:24:59</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Should willingness to kill be a requirement for U.S. citizenship? Girl Without a Country: The Untold Story of a Landmark Fight for U.S. Citizenship (Purdue University Press, 2026) by Rick Ramseyer tells the compelling, confounding story of Martha Graber—a Mennonite, registered nurse, and conscientious objector who in 1929 was twice denied citizenship because she refused to say she would take up arms to defend the United States. The unexpected denials, which came despite Martha&apos;s pledge to give her life for her adopted country, caught the attention of a diverse group of peace advocates, religious leaders, lawyers, and politicians, setting up a climactic third court appearance.
Martha’s nineteen-month fight for citizenship made national news, featuring dramatic testimony, historical insights, and interesting backstories that stretched from Alsace-Lorraine in western Europe to America’s heartland. Elegantly written by Martha’s maternal grandson with never-before-published details and closely connected with a controversial Supreme Court decision, Girl Without a Country surfaces an array of topical issues, ranging from immigration and naturalization to conscientious objection and patriotism. Perhaps most importantly, Martha’s story considers what it truly means to be an American.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Should willingness to kill be a requirement for U.S. citizenship? Girl Without a Country: The Untold Story of a Landmark Fight for U.S. Citizenship (Purdue University Press, 2026) by Rick Ramseyer tells the compelling, confounding story of Martha Graber—a Mennonite, registered nurse, and conscientious objector who in 1929 was twice denied citizenship because she refused to say she would take up arms to defend the United States. The unexpected denials, which came despite Martha&apos;s pledge to give her life for her adopted country, caught the attention of a diverse group of peace advocates, religious leaders, lawyers, and politicians, setting up a climactic third court appearance.
Martha’s nineteen-month fight for citizenship made national news, featuring dramatic testimony, historical insights, and interesting backstories that stretched from Alsace-Lorraine in western Europe to America’s heartland. Elegantly written by Martha’s maternal grandson with never-before-published details and closely connected with a controversial Supreme Court decision, Girl Without a Country surfaces an array of topical issues, ranging from immigration and naturalization to conscientious objection and patriotism. Perhaps most importantly, Martha’s story considers what it truly means to be an American.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1725</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">93b366d2-9556-11f1-9fe1-ef79b5afcde7</guid>
      <title>Kathleen J. Frydl, &quot;Liberalism and the Reinvention of the Modern Corporation&quot; (Oxford UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>This is a really good book.&nbsp;<em>Really good</em>.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197567401" rel="noopener noreferrer">Liberalism and the Reinvention of the Modern Corporation</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Oxford UP, 2025)&nbsp;takes the reader on a fascinating, and perhaps unexpected, journey through Catholic hospitals, the expansion of the carceral state, and corporate and union access to the protections of First Amendment freedom of speech. All the while, Kathleen J. Frydl is rigorously constructing an understanding and positioning of the modern corporation within the governmental structures and protections of the American political system. This is a deeply and thoroughly researched book, with details and information coming from legal decisions, law review articles, political theory, congressional acts, federal government notices, historical data and understanding, medical information, and texts in political science, sociology, and economics. It is indeed a tour de force, but the reader doesn’t really notice because it is such a propulsive and captivating narrative about how modern private corporations learned to capture and implement the advocacy practices that the social movements of the postwar period were using to make gains for previously disadvantaged groups (like African Americans, women, those with disabilities, and more).</p>
<p>Frydl lays out the foundation for the analysis within the framework of liberalism, classical liberalism and modern liberalism. She takes pains to explain these distinctions and how our understanding of liberalism has also contributed to some of the shifts and adjustments that have transpired. What does become clear in all of the case studies and details is that this is really a story about the United States Congress—not the Judiciary—and that Congress has been responsible for many of these changes, even if these actions seem to elide public attention and scrutiny. In fact, it is very difficult to detect Congress’s role in these instances, where Congress acted to essentially remove the Judiciary’s powers to deliberate in these policy realms.</p>
<p><a href="https://academic.oup.com/book/61777" rel="noopener noreferrer">Liberalism and the Reinvention of the Modern Corporation</a>&nbsp;is about corporate identity politics, and the ways in which corporations worked to fend off regulatory reform, while not exactly using the expected pathways. Since corporations, unlike, say women or African Americans, do not have a history of exclusion or disadvantage within the American political or economic systems, the concept of corporate identity politics seems a bit odd, but Frydl makes a strong case for this understanding, through the case studies of Catholic hospitals and regulatory reform that provides an avenue towards allowing for more religious freedoms and protections for the hospitals themselves; the legislative reforms with regard to criminal codes in the 1970s and 1980s that instituted harsher sentencing guidelines for individuals but much more lax responses to corporate infractions; and finally in a comparative study of corporate speech regulation and speech regulation of labor unions in the United States. Frydl tells the story from all perspectives and dimensions, including who was working behind the scenes to move these protections forward over the past fifty years.&nbsp;<a href="https://academic.oup.com/book/61777" rel="noopener noreferrer">Liberalism and the Reinvention of the Modern Corporation</a>&nbsp;is a very important analysis of the strengthening of the position of corporate entities within the political, legal, and economic systems in the United States.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/hosts/profile/a7ac4af9-1306-463f-baf9-00f1f4187dfd" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books in Political Science</em></a><em>&nbsp;channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of&nbsp;</em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700633883/the-politics-of-the-marvel-cinematic-universe/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume I: The Infinity Saga (</em></a><em>University Press of Kansas, 2022), and of&nbsp;</em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700640546/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume II: Into the Multiverse</em></a><em>&nbsp;(University Press of Kansas, 2025) as well as co-editor of the award winning book,&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.kentuckypress.com/9780813141015/women-and-the-white-house/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a><em>&nbsp;(University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She is also author of&nbsp;</em><a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/the-politics-of-military-base-closings-not-in-my-district-lilly-j-goren/5b373cc3d9af4474?ean=9780820455242&amp;bkshp-astro=t" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Politics of Military Base Closings: Not In My District</a><em>&nbsp;(Peter Lang Publishers, 2003). She can be reached&nbsp;</em><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/gorenlj.bsky.social" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>@gorenlj.bsky.social</em></a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/kathleen-j-frydl-liberalism-and-the-reinvention-of-the-modern-corporation-oxford-up-2025-XAZdx4oq</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a really good book.&nbsp;<em>Really good</em>.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197567401" rel="noopener noreferrer">Liberalism and the Reinvention of the Modern Corporation</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Oxford UP, 2025)&nbsp;takes the reader on a fascinating, and perhaps unexpected, journey through Catholic hospitals, the expansion of the carceral state, and corporate and union access to the protections of First Amendment freedom of speech. All the while, Kathleen J. Frydl is rigorously constructing an understanding and positioning of the modern corporation within the governmental structures and protections of the American political system. This is a deeply and thoroughly researched book, with details and information coming from legal decisions, law review articles, political theory, congressional acts, federal government notices, historical data and understanding, medical information, and texts in political science, sociology, and economics. It is indeed a tour de force, but the reader doesn’t really notice because it is such a propulsive and captivating narrative about how modern private corporations learned to capture and implement the advocacy practices that the social movements of the postwar period were using to make gains for previously disadvantaged groups (like African Americans, women, those with disabilities, and more).</p>
<p>Frydl lays out the foundation for the analysis within the framework of liberalism, classical liberalism and modern liberalism. She takes pains to explain these distinctions and how our understanding of liberalism has also contributed to some of the shifts and adjustments that have transpired. What does become clear in all of the case studies and details is that this is really a story about the United States Congress—not the Judiciary—and that Congress has been responsible for many of these changes, even if these actions seem to elide public attention and scrutiny. In fact, it is very difficult to detect Congress’s role in these instances, where Congress acted to essentially remove the Judiciary’s powers to deliberate in these policy realms.</p>
<p><a href="https://academic.oup.com/book/61777" rel="noopener noreferrer">Liberalism and the Reinvention of the Modern Corporation</a>&nbsp;is about corporate identity politics, and the ways in which corporations worked to fend off regulatory reform, while not exactly using the expected pathways. Since corporations, unlike, say women or African Americans, do not have a history of exclusion or disadvantage within the American political or economic systems, the concept of corporate identity politics seems a bit odd, but Frydl makes a strong case for this understanding, through the case studies of Catholic hospitals and regulatory reform that provides an avenue towards allowing for more religious freedoms and protections for the hospitals themselves; the legislative reforms with regard to criminal codes in the 1970s and 1980s that instituted harsher sentencing guidelines for individuals but much more lax responses to corporate infractions; and finally in a comparative study of corporate speech regulation and speech regulation of labor unions in the United States. Frydl tells the story from all perspectives and dimensions, including who was working behind the scenes to move these protections forward over the past fifty years.&nbsp;<a href="https://academic.oup.com/book/61777" rel="noopener noreferrer">Liberalism and the Reinvention of the Modern Corporation</a>&nbsp;is a very important analysis of the strengthening of the position of corporate entities within the political, legal, and economic systems in the United States.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/hosts/profile/a7ac4af9-1306-463f-baf9-00f1f4187dfd" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books in Political Science</em></a><em>&nbsp;channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of&nbsp;</em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700633883/the-politics-of-the-marvel-cinematic-universe/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume I: The Infinity Saga (</em></a><em>University Press of Kansas, 2022), and of&nbsp;</em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700640546/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume II: Into the Multiverse</em></a><em>&nbsp;(University Press of Kansas, 2025) as well as co-editor of the award winning book,&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.kentuckypress.com/9780813141015/women-and-the-white-house/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a><em>&nbsp;(University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She is also author of&nbsp;</em><a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/the-politics-of-military-base-closings-not-in-my-district-lilly-j-goren/5b373cc3d9af4474?ean=9780820455242&amp;bkshp-astro=t" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Politics of Military Base Closings: Not In My District</a><em>&nbsp;(Peter Lang Publishers, 2003). She can be reached&nbsp;</em><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/gorenlj.bsky.social" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>@gorenlj.bsky.social</em></a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="58715554" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/d3267c2c-9f18-4a46-91f8-acd2a2ce2ce5/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=d3267c2c-9f18-4a46-91f8-acd2a2ce2ce5&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Kathleen J. Frydl, &quot;Liberalism and the Reinvention of the Modern Corporation&quot; (Oxford UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:01:05</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>This is a really good book. Really good. Liberalism and the Reinvention of the Modern Corporation (Oxford UP, 2025) takes the reader on a fascinating, and perhaps unexpected, journey through Catholic hospitals, the expansion of the carceral state, and corporate and union access to the protections of First Amendment freedom of speech. All the while, Kathleen J. Frydl is rigorously constructing an understanding and positioning of the modern corporation within the governmental structures and protections of the American political system. This is a deeply and thoroughly researched book, with details and information coming from legal decisions, law review articles, political theory, congressional acts, federal government notices, historical data and understanding, medical information, and texts in political science, sociology, and economics. It is indeed a tour de force, but the reader doesn’t really notice because it is such a propulsive and captivating narrative about how modern private corporations learned to capture and implement the advocacy practices that the social movements of the postwar period were using to make gains for previously disadvantaged groups (like African Americans, women, those with disabilities, and more).
Frydl lays out the foundation for the analysis within the framework of liberalism, classical liberalism and modern liberalism. She takes pains to explain these distinctions and how our understanding of liberalism has also contributed to some of the shifts and adjustments that have transpired. What does become clear in all of the case studies and details is that this is really a story about the United States Congress—not the Judiciary—and that Congress has been responsible for many of these changes, even if these actions seem to elide public attention and scrutiny. In fact, it is very difficult to detect Congress’s role in these instances, where Congress acted to essentially remove the Judiciary’s powers to deliberate in these policy realms.
Liberalism and the Reinvention of the Modern Corporation is about corporate identity politics, and the ways in which corporations worked to fend off regulatory reform, while not exactly using the expected pathways. Since corporations, unlike, say women or African Americans, do not have a history of exclusion or disadvantage within the American political or economic systems, the concept of corporate identity politics seems a bit odd, but Frydl makes a strong case for this understanding, through the case studies of Catholic hospitals and regulatory reform that provides an avenue towards allowing for more religious freedoms and protections for the hospitals themselves; the legislative reforms with regard to criminal codes in the 1970s and 1980s that instituted harsher sentencing guidelines for individuals but much more lax responses to corporate infractions; and finally in a comparative study of corporate speech regulation and speech regulation of labor unions in the United States. Frydl tells the story from all perspectives and dimensions, including who was working behind the scenes to move these protections forward over the past fifty years. Liberalism and the Reinvention of the Modern Corporation is a very important analysis of the strengthening of the position of corporate entities within the political, legal, and economic systems in the United States.
Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the New Books in Political Science channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume I: The Infinity Saga (University Press of Kansas, 2022), and of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume II: Into the Multiverse (University Press of Kansas, 2025) as well as co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She is also author of The Politics of Military Base Closings: Not In My District (Peter Lang Publishers, 2003). She can be reached @gorenlj.bsky.social
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>This is a really good book. Really good. Liberalism and the Reinvention of the Modern Corporation (Oxford UP, 2025) takes the reader on a fascinating, and perhaps unexpected, journey through Catholic hospitals, the expansion of the carceral state, and corporate and union access to the protections of First Amendment freedom of speech. All the while, Kathleen J. Frydl is rigorously constructing an understanding and positioning of the modern corporation within the governmental structures and protections of the American political system. This is a deeply and thoroughly researched book, with details and information coming from legal decisions, law review articles, political theory, congressional acts, federal government notices, historical data and understanding, medical information, and texts in political science, sociology, and economics. It is indeed a tour de force, but the reader doesn’t really notice because it is such a propulsive and captivating narrative about how modern private corporations learned to capture and implement the advocacy practices that the social movements of the postwar period were using to make gains for previously disadvantaged groups (like African Americans, women, those with disabilities, and more).
Frydl lays out the foundation for the analysis within the framework of liberalism, classical liberalism and modern liberalism. She takes pains to explain these distinctions and how our understanding of liberalism has also contributed to some of the shifts and adjustments that have transpired. What does become clear in all of the case studies and details is that this is really a story about the United States Congress—not the Judiciary—and that Congress has been responsible for many of these changes, even if these actions seem to elide public attention and scrutiny. In fact, it is very difficult to detect Congress’s role in these instances, where Congress acted to essentially remove the Judiciary’s powers to deliberate in these policy realms.
Liberalism and the Reinvention of the Modern Corporation is about corporate identity politics, and the ways in which corporations worked to fend off regulatory reform, while not exactly using the expected pathways. Since corporations, unlike, say women or African Americans, do not have a history of exclusion or disadvantage within the American political or economic systems, the concept of corporate identity politics seems a bit odd, but Frydl makes a strong case for this understanding, through the case studies of Catholic hospitals and regulatory reform that provides an avenue towards allowing for more religious freedoms and protections for the hospitals themselves; the legislative reforms with regard to criminal codes in the 1970s and 1980s that instituted harsher sentencing guidelines for individuals but much more lax responses to corporate infractions; and finally in a comparative study of corporate speech regulation and speech regulation of labor unions in the United States. Frydl tells the story from all perspectives and dimensions, including who was working behind the scenes to move these protections forward over the past fifty years. Liberalism and the Reinvention of the Modern Corporation is a very important analysis of the strengthening of the position of corporate entities within the political, legal, and economic systems in the United States.
Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the New Books in Political Science channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume I: The Infinity Saga (University Press of Kansas, 2022), and of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume II: Into the Multiverse (University Press of Kansas, 2025) as well as co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She is also author of The Politics of Military Base Closings: Not In My District (Peter Lang Publishers, 2003). She can be reached @gorenlj.bsky.social
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1722</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">fea2d250-908a-11f1-ba5e-d7ec3f46a6ef</guid>
      <title>David N. Gellman, &quot;Liberty’s Chain: Slavery, Abolition, and the Jay Family of New York&quot; (Cornell UP, 2022)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Edward Blum interviews David N. Gellman on his book&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781501715846" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Liberty’s Chain: Slavery, Abolition, and the Jay Family of New York</em></a>&nbsp;﻿(Cornell UP, 2022).</p>
<p>In&nbsp;<em>Liberty's Chain</em>, David N. Gellman shows how the Jay family, abolitionists and slaveholders alike, embodied the contradictions of the revolutionary age.&nbsp;The Jays of New York were a preeminent founding family. John Jay, diplomat, Supreme Court justice, and coauthor of the Federalist Papers, and his children and grandchildren helped chart the course of the Early American Republic.<br><em>Liberty's Chain</em>&nbsp;forges a new path for thinking about slavery and the nation's founding. John Jay served as the inaugural president of a pioneering antislavery society. His descendants, especially his son William Jay and his grandson John Jay II, embraced radical abolitionism in the nineteenth century, the cause most likely to rend the nation. The scorn of their elite peers—and racist mobs—did not deter their commitment to end southern slavery and to combat northern injustice.<br>John Jay's personal dealings with African Americans ranged from callousness to caring. Across the generations, even as prominent Jays decried human servitude, enslaved people and formerly enslaved people served in Jay households. Abbe, Clarinda, Caesar Valentine, Zilpah Montgomery, and others lived difficult, often isolated, lives that tested their courage and the Jay family's principles.</p>
<p>The personal and the political intersect in this saga, as Gellman charts American values transmitted and transformed from the colonial and revolutionary eras to the Civil War, Reconstruction, and beyond. The Jays, as well as those who served them, demonstrated the elusiveness and the vitality of liberty's legacy. This remarkable family story forces us to grapple with what we mean by patriotism, conservatism, and radicalism. Their story speaks directly to our own divided times.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/david-n-gellman-libertys-chain-slavery-abolition-and-the-jay-family-of-new-york-cornell-up-2022-kTmxbH2T</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Edward Blum interviews David N. Gellman on his book&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781501715846" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Liberty’s Chain: Slavery, Abolition, and the Jay Family of New York</em></a>&nbsp;﻿(Cornell UP, 2022).</p>
<p>In&nbsp;<em>Liberty's Chain</em>, David N. Gellman shows how the Jay family, abolitionists and slaveholders alike, embodied the contradictions of the revolutionary age.&nbsp;The Jays of New York were a preeminent founding family. John Jay, diplomat, Supreme Court justice, and coauthor of the Federalist Papers, and his children and grandchildren helped chart the course of the Early American Republic.<br><em>Liberty's Chain</em>&nbsp;forges a new path for thinking about slavery and the nation's founding. John Jay served as the inaugural president of a pioneering antislavery society. His descendants, especially his son William Jay and his grandson John Jay II, embraced radical abolitionism in the nineteenth century, the cause most likely to rend the nation. The scorn of their elite peers—and racist mobs—did not deter their commitment to end southern slavery and to combat northern injustice.<br>John Jay's personal dealings with African Americans ranged from callousness to caring. Across the generations, even as prominent Jays decried human servitude, enslaved people and formerly enslaved people served in Jay households. Abbe, Clarinda, Caesar Valentine, Zilpah Montgomery, and others lived difficult, often isolated, lives that tested their courage and the Jay family's principles.</p>
<p>The personal and the political intersect in this saga, as Gellman charts American values transmitted and transformed from the colonial and revolutionary eras to the Civil War, Reconstruction, and beyond. The Jays, as well as those who served them, demonstrated the elusiveness and the vitality of liberty's legacy. This remarkable family story forces us to grapple with what we mean by patriotism, conservatism, and radicalism. Their story speaks directly to our own divided times.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="45671969" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/61872136-9fb5-405f-8337-6893722ab71d/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=61872136-9fb5-405f-8337-6893722ab71d&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>David N. Gellman, &quot;Liberty’s Chain: Slavery, Abolition, and the Jay Family of New York&quot; (Cornell UP, 2022)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:47:32</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Edward Blum interviews David N. Gellman on his book Liberty’s Chain: Slavery, Abolition, and the Jay Family of New York ﻿(Cornell UP, 2022).
In Liberty&apos;s Chain, David N. Gellman shows how the Jay family, abolitionists and slaveholders alike, embodied the contradictions of the revolutionary age. The Jays of New York were a preeminent founding family. John Jay, diplomat, Supreme Court justice, and coauthor of the Federalist Papers, and his children and grandchildren helped chart the course of the Early American Republic.Liberty&apos;s Chain forges a new path for thinking about slavery and the nation&apos;s founding. John Jay served as the inaugural president of a pioneering antislavery society. His descendants, especially his son William Jay and his grandson John Jay II, embraced radical abolitionism in the nineteenth century, the cause most likely to rend the nation. The scorn of their elite peers—and racist mobs—did not deter their commitment to end southern slavery and to combat northern injustice.John Jay&apos;s personal dealings with African Americans ranged from callousness to caring. Across the generations, even as prominent Jays decried human servitude, enslaved people and formerly enslaved people served in Jay households. Abbe, Clarinda, Caesar Valentine, Zilpah Montgomery, and others lived difficult, often isolated, lives that tested their courage and the Jay family&apos;s principles.
The personal and the political intersect in this saga, as Gellman charts American values transmitted and transformed from the colonial and revolutionary eras to the Civil War, Reconstruction, and beyond. The Jays, as well as those who served them, demonstrated the elusiveness and the vitality of liberty&apos;s legacy. This remarkable family story forces us to grapple with what we mean by patriotism, conservatism, and radicalism. Their story speaks directly to our own divided times.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Edward Blum interviews David N. Gellman on his book Liberty’s Chain: Slavery, Abolition, and the Jay Family of New York ﻿(Cornell UP, 2022).
In Liberty&apos;s Chain, David N. Gellman shows how the Jay family, abolitionists and slaveholders alike, embodied the contradictions of the revolutionary age. The Jays of New York were a preeminent founding family. John Jay, diplomat, Supreme Court justice, and coauthor of the Federalist Papers, and his children and grandchildren helped chart the course of the Early American Republic.Liberty&apos;s Chain forges a new path for thinking about slavery and the nation&apos;s founding. John Jay served as the inaugural president of a pioneering antislavery society. His descendants, especially his son William Jay and his grandson John Jay II, embraced radical abolitionism in the nineteenth century, the cause most likely to rend the nation. The scorn of their elite peers—and racist mobs—did not deter their commitment to end southern slavery and to combat northern injustice.John Jay&apos;s personal dealings with African Americans ranged from callousness to caring. Across the generations, even as prominent Jays decried human servitude, enslaved people and formerly enslaved people served in Jay households. Abbe, Clarinda, Caesar Valentine, Zilpah Montgomery, and others lived difficult, often isolated, lives that tested their courage and the Jay family&apos;s principles.
The personal and the political intersect in this saga, as Gellman charts American values transmitted and transformed from the colonial and revolutionary eras to the Civil War, Reconstruction, and beyond. The Jays, as well as those who served them, demonstrated the elusiveness and the vitality of liberty&apos;s legacy. This remarkable family story forces us to grapple with what we mean by patriotism, conservatism, and radicalism. Their story speaks directly to our own divided times.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1721</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9f92fb78-9134-11f1-b9d8-371b63aa939e</guid>
      <title>Yana Skorobogatov, &quot;Fate in My Hands: The Death Penalty in the Soviet Union&quot; (U Chicago Press, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In this episode, Alisa interviews Dr. Yana Skorobogatov about her book,<em> </em><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780226837314" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Fate in My Hands: The Death Penalty in the Soviet Union</em></a>
 (University of Chicago Press, 2026).&nbsp;From 1954 to 1991 in the Soviet 
Union, nearly 40,000 citizens were executed after the death penalty was 
reinstated as a punishment for homicide. <em>Fate in My Hands</em> 
introduces readers to the many citizens in this period—women and men of 
all ages and backgrounds—who found themselves on death row and tried to 
escape it in the only way available to them: asking for forgiveness. 
Examining the letters and objects the dead left behind, Skorobogatov 
recovers their voices and allows them to speak anew. The book is&nbsp;a 
striking portrait of life in the Soviet Union and the citizens who 
dreamed of new possibilities even as they faced their tragic end. Using a
 corpus of never-before-accessed criminal court records, <em>Fate in My Hands</em>
 brings readers not just into the police interrogation rooms, 
courthouses, and cells where the condemned awaited their fates, but into
 the homes, workplaces, and psychiatric hospitals where families and 
friends alike came together to pursue an elusive, bitter justice in the 
wake of violent tragedy.&nbsp;</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 8 Aug 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/yana-skorobogatov-fate-in-my-hands-the-death-penalty-in-the-soviet-union-u-chicago-press-2026-B6CUGCIw</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this episode, Alisa interviews Dr. Yana Skorobogatov about her book,<em> </em><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780226837314" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Fate in My Hands: The Death Penalty in the Soviet Union</em></a>
 (University of Chicago Press, 2026).&nbsp;From 1954 to 1991 in the Soviet 
Union, nearly 40,000 citizens were executed after the death penalty was 
reinstated as a punishment for homicide. <em>Fate in My Hands</em> 
introduces readers to the many citizens in this period—women and men of 
all ages and backgrounds—who found themselves on death row and tried to 
escape it in the only way available to them: asking for forgiveness. 
Examining the letters and objects the dead left behind, Skorobogatov 
recovers their voices and allows them to speak anew. The book is&nbsp;a 
striking portrait of life in the Soviet Union and the citizens who 
dreamed of new possibilities even as they faced their tragic end. Using a
 corpus of never-before-accessed criminal court records, <em>Fate in My Hands</em>
 brings readers not just into the police interrogation rooms, 
courthouses, and cells where the condemned awaited their fates, but into
 the homes, workplaces, and psychiatric hospitals where families and 
friends alike came together to pursue an elusive, bitter justice in the 
wake of violent tragedy.&nbsp;</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="60521800" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/681b0083-ea44-427f-8bfa-f875ebe7d0e5/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=681b0083-ea44-427f-8bfa-f875ebe7d0e5&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Yana Skorobogatov, &quot;Fate in My Hands: The Death Penalty in the Soviet Union&quot; (U Chicago Press, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:02:59</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this episode, Alisa interviews Dr. Yana Skorobogatov about her book, Fate in My Hands: The Death Penalty in the Soviet Union
 (University of Chicago Press, 2026). From 1954 to 1991 in the Soviet 
Union, nearly 40,000 citizens were executed after the death penalty was 
reinstated as a punishment for homicide. Fate in My Hands 
introduces readers to the many citizens in this period—women and men of 
all ages and backgrounds—who found themselves on death row and tried to 
escape it in the only way available to them: asking for forgiveness. 
Examining the letters and objects the dead left behind, Skorobogatov 
recovers their voices and allows them to speak anew. The book is a 
striking portrait of life in the Soviet Union and the citizens who 
dreamed of new possibilities even as they faced their tragic end. Using a
 corpus of never-before-accessed criminal court records, Fate in My Hands
 brings readers not just into the police interrogation rooms, 
courthouses, and cells where the condemned awaited their fates, but into
 the homes, workplaces, and psychiatric hospitals where families and 
friends alike came together to pursue an elusive, bitter justice in the 
wake of violent tragedy. 
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode, Alisa interviews Dr. Yana Skorobogatov about her book, Fate in My Hands: The Death Penalty in the Soviet Union
 (University of Chicago Press, 2026). From 1954 to 1991 in the Soviet 
Union, nearly 40,000 citizens were executed after the death penalty was 
reinstated as a punishment for homicide. Fate in My Hands 
introduces readers to the many citizens in this period—women and men of 
all ages and backgrounds—who found themselves on death row and tried to 
escape it in the only way available to them: asking for forgiveness. 
Examining the letters and objects the dead left behind, Skorobogatov 
recovers their voices and allows them to speak anew. The book is a 
striking portrait of life in the Soviet Union and the citizens who 
dreamed of new possibilities even as they faced their tragic end. Using a
 corpus of never-before-accessed criminal court records, Fate in My Hands
 brings readers not just into the police interrogation rooms, 
courthouses, and cells where the condemned awaited their fates, but into
 the homes, workplaces, and psychiatric hospitals where families and 
friends alike came together to pursue an elusive, bitter justice in the 
wake of violent tragedy. 
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1719</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6ec229da-9137-11f1-91f2-f735af7a5812</guid>
      <title>Ryan Schweitzer, &quot;Homosexuality in Central Asia: Stories of Hardship and Hope&quot; (B&amp;N Press, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><em>Homosexuality in Central Asia: Stories of Hardship and Hope</em> 
(Barnes and Noble Press, 2026) is Ryan Michael Schweitzer's collection 
of first-hand narratives from LGBTQ individuals across Kazakhstan, 
Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan. Drawing on years 
of fieldwork in the region, Schweitzer gathers stories of violence, 
blackmail, forced marriage, surveillance, and exile alongside quieter 
accounts of love, friendship, and endurance. Rather than presenting a 
single Central Asian LGBTQ experience, the book traces how legal status,
 state security apparatuses, family structure, and religious revival 
intersect differently in each country to shape what visibility and 
safety look like for queer people in the region. <br></p>
<p>
About the host</p>
<p>Cholpon Ramizova is a London-based creator and researcher. She holds a
 Master's in Migration, Mobility and Development from SOAS, University 
of London. Her thematic interests are in migration, displacement, 
identity, gender and nationalism—and in the ways these intersect within 
the Central Asia context. </p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 8 Aug 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/ryan-schweitzer-homosexuality-in-central-asia-stories-of-hardship-and-hope-b-n-press-2026-AooKKpK2</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Homosexuality in Central Asia: Stories of Hardship and Hope</em> 
(Barnes and Noble Press, 2026) is Ryan Michael Schweitzer's collection 
of first-hand narratives from LGBTQ individuals across Kazakhstan, 
Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan. Drawing on years 
of fieldwork in the region, Schweitzer gathers stories of violence, 
blackmail, forced marriage, surveillance, and exile alongside quieter 
accounts of love, friendship, and endurance. Rather than presenting a 
single Central Asian LGBTQ experience, the book traces how legal status,
 state security apparatuses, family structure, and religious revival 
intersect differently in each country to shape what visibility and 
safety look like for queer people in the region. <br></p>
<p>
About the host</p>
<p>Cholpon Ramizova is a London-based creator and researcher. She holds a
 Master's in Migration, Mobility and Development from SOAS, University 
of London. Her thematic interests are in migration, displacement, 
identity, gender and nationalism—and in the ways these intersect within 
the Central Asia context. </p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="44353614" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/d47b11a2-b084-4b2b-bb19-0a7872eb6e82/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=d47b11a2-b084-4b2b-bb19-0a7872eb6e82&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Ryan Schweitzer, &quot;Homosexuality in Central Asia: Stories of Hardship and Hope&quot; (B&amp;N Press, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:46:07</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Homosexuality in Central Asia: Stories of Hardship and Hope 
(Barnes and Noble Press, 2026) is Ryan Michael Schweitzer&apos;s collection 
of first-hand narratives from LGBTQ individuals across Kazakhstan, 
Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan. Drawing on years 
of fieldwork in the region, Schweitzer gathers stories of violence, 
blackmail, forced marriage, surveillance, and exile alongside quieter 
accounts of love, friendship, and endurance. Rather than presenting a 
single Central Asian LGBTQ experience, the book traces how legal status,
 state security apparatuses, family structure, and religious revival 
intersect differently in each country to shape what visibility and 
safety look like for queer people in the region. 
About the host
Cholpon Ramizova is a London-based creator and researcher. She holds a
 Master&apos;s in Migration, Mobility and Development from SOAS, University 
of London. Her thematic interests are in migration, displacement, 
identity, gender and nationalism—and in the ways these intersect within 
the Central Asia context. 
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Homosexuality in Central Asia: Stories of Hardship and Hope 
(Barnes and Noble Press, 2026) is Ryan Michael Schweitzer&apos;s collection 
of first-hand narratives from LGBTQ individuals across Kazakhstan, 
Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan. Drawing on years 
of fieldwork in the region, Schweitzer gathers stories of violence, 
blackmail, forced marriage, surveillance, and exile alongside quieter 
accounts of love, friendship, and endurance. Rather than presenting a 
single Central Asian LGBTQ experience, the book traces how legal status,
 state security apparatuses, family structure, and religious revival 
intersect differently in each country to shape what visibility and 
safety look like for queer people in the region. 
About the host
Cholpon Ramizova is a London-based creator and researcher. She holds a
 Master&apos;s in Migration, Mobility and Development from SOAS, University 
of London. Her thematic interests are in migration, displacement, 
identity, gender and nationalism—and in the ways these intersect within 
the Central Asia context. 
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1720</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">07b1b752-8d2b-11f1-87a9-33ab8d3316cb</guid>
      <title>Valena Beety, &quot;Pink Crime: Fighting Against the Criminalization of Motherhood, Pregnancy, and Queer Identity&quot; (New Press, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>A woman miscarries—and is charged with murder. A new mother tests 
positive for a drug her hospital administered—and loses custody of her 
newborn. Four women are convicted of horrific crimes against children 
they never touched, based on junk science and homophobia—and spend 
nearly twenty years in prison before being exonerated. A queer teenager 
takes a photo of a child’s diaper rash at work—and is sentenced to 126 
years. These cases are not aberrations. They are symptoms of a system 
that punishes women and queer people not for what they have done, but 
for who they are.</p>
<p>In the United States, nearly three-quarters of all wrongly convicted 
women were convicted of crimes that never occurred at all. In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781620979716" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Pink Crime: Fighting Against the Criminalization of Motherhood, Pregnancy, and Queer Identity</em></a>
(New Press, 2026), Dr. Valena Beety, co-founder of the Indiana Innocence
 Project and award-winning legal scholar cited by Justice Sonia 
Sotomayor, reveals how ordinary tragedies—a child’s sudden death, a 
husband who dies in his sleep—are transformed by prosecutors into 
murders that never happened. These “no crime” convictions 
disproportionately target women and queer people, whose identities are 
recast as evidence of guilt through bias, junk science, and entrenched 
stereotypes.</p>
<p>﻿Drawing on devastating real-life cases, Dr. Beety 
exposes how prosecutorial overreach, flawed forensic science, and 
cultural panic converge—and how fetal personhood laws, the fall of Roe 
v. Wade, and anti-LGBTQ+ legislation have dramatically expanded the 
reach of criminal law. What emerges is a chilling portrait of a legal 
system that increasingly criminalizes pregnancy outcomes, motherhood, 
and queer identity itself.</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>book</em></a><em>
 focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty 
negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative 
analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find 
Miranda’s interviews on </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 4 Aug 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/valena-beety-pink-crime-fighting-against-the-criminalization-of-motherhood-pregnancy-and-queer-identity-new-press-2026-SA3A7Ffu</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A woman miscarries—and is charged with murder. A new mother tests 
positive for a drug her hospital administered—and loses custody of her 
newborn. Four women are convicted of horrific crimes against children 
they never touched, based on junk science and homophobia—and spend 
nearly twenty years in prison before being exonerated. A queer teenager 
takes a photo of a child’s diaper rash at work—and is sentenced to 126 
years. These cases are not aberrations. They are symptoms of a system 
that punishes women and queer people not for what they have done, but 
for who they are.</p>
<p>In the United States, nearly three-quarters of all wrongly convicted 
women were convicted of crimes that never occurred at all. In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781620979716" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Pink Crime: Fighting Against the Criminalization of Motherhood, Pregnancy, and Queer Identity</em></a>
(New Press, 2026), Dr. Valena Beety, co-founder of the Indiana Innocence
 Project and award-winning legal scholar cited by Justice Sonia 
Sotomayor, reveals how ordinary tragedies—a child’s sudden death, a 
husband who dies in his sleep—are transformed by prosecutors into 
murders that never happened. These “no crime” convictions 
disproportionately target women and queer people, whose identities are 
recast as evidence of guilt through bias, junk science, and entrenched 
stereotypes.</p>
<p>﻿Drawing on devastating real-life cases, Dr. Beety 
exposes how prosecutorial overreach, flawed forensic science, and 
cultural panic converge—and how fetal personhood laws, the fall of Roe 
v. Wade, and anti-LGBTQ+ legislation have dramatically expanded the 
reach of criminal law. What emerges is a chilling portrait of a legal 
system that increasingly criminalizes pregnancy outcomes, motherhood, 
and queer identity itself.</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>book</em></a><em>
 focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty 
negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative 
analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find 
Miranda’s interviews on </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="25115344" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/bc4463e0-f8c7-496d-966d-453f10a99ddf/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=bc4463e0-f8c7-496d-966d-453f10a99ddf&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Valena Beety, &quot;Pink Crime: Fighting Against the Criminalization of Motherhood, Pregnancy, and Queer Identity&quot; (New Press, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:26:04</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>A woman miscarries—and is charged with murder. A new mother tests 
positive for a drug her hospital administered—and loses custody of her 
newborn. Four women are convicted of horrific crimes against children 
they never touched, based on junk science and homophobia—and spend 
nearly twenty years in prison before being exonerated. A queer teenager 
takes a photo of a child’s diaper rash at work—and is sentenced to 126 
years. These cases are not aberrations. They are symptoms of a system 
that punishes women and queer people not for what they have done, but 
for who they are.
In the United States, nearly three-quarters of all wrongly convicted 
women were convicted of crimes that never occurred at all. In Pink Crime: Fighting Against the Criminalization of Motherhood, Pregnancy, and Queer Identity
(New Press, 2026), Dr. Valena Beety, co-founder of the Indiana Innocence
 Project and award-winning legal scholar cited by Justice Sonia 
Sotomayor, reveals how ordinary tragedies—a child’s sudden death, a 
husband who dies in his sleep—are transformed by prosecutors into 
murders that never happened. These “no crime” convictions 
disproportionately target women and queer people, whose identities are 
recast as evidence of guilt through bias, junk science, and entrenched 
stereotypes.
﻿Drawing on devastating real-life cases, Dr. Beety 
exposes how prosecutorial overreach, flawed forensic science, and 
cultural panic converge—and how fetal personhood laws, the fall of Roe 
v. Wade, and anti-LGBTQ+ legislation have dramatically expanded the 
reach of criminal law. What emerges is a chilling portrait of a legal 
system that increasingly criminalizes pregnancy outcomes, motherhood, 
and queer identity itself.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book
 focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty 
negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative 
analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find 
Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>A woman miscarries—and is charged with murder. A new mother tests 
positive for a drug her hospital administered—and loses custody of her 
newborn. Four women are convicted of horrific crimes against children 
they never touched, based on junk science and homophobia—and spend 
nearly twenty years in prison before being exonerated. A queer teenager 
takes a photo of a child’s diaper rash at work—and is sentenced to 126 
years. These cases are not aberrations. They are symptoms of a system 
that punishes women and queer people not for what they have done, but 
for who they are.
In the United States, nearly three-quarters of all wrongly convicted 
women were convicted of crimes that never occurred at all. In Pink Crime: Fighting Against the Criminalization of Motherhood, Pregnancy, and Queer Identity
(New Press, 2026), Dr. Valena Beety, co-founder of the Indiana Innocence
 Project and award-winning legal scholar cited by Justice Sonia 
Sotomayor, reveals how ordinary tragedies—a child’s sudden death, a 
husband who dies in his sleep—are transformed by prosecutors into 
murders that never happened. These “no crime” convictions 
disproportionately target women and queer people, whose identities are 
recast as evidence of guilt through bias, junk science, and entrenched 
stereotypes.
﻿Drawing on devastating real-life cases, Dr. Beety 
exposes how prosecutorial overreach, flawed forensic science, and 
cultural panic converge—and how fetal personhood laws, the fall of Roe 
v. Wade, and anti-LGBTQ+ legislation have dramatically expanded the 
reach of criminal law. What emerges is a chilling portrait of a legal 
system that increasingly criminalizes pregnancy outcomes, motherhood, 
and queer identity itself.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book
 focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty 
negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative 
analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find 
Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1718</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">72ad6296-8c1c-11f1-a57a-bbe9aa48a3e0</guid>
      <title>Asher Emanuel, &quot;The Valley: Crime and Punishment in a New Zealand City&quot; (Bridget Williams Books, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><em>There were two days to Christmas
 and Lewis felt like everything was spinning out of control. He wondered
 what he would say to the judge this time. His client, Rikihana, was 
already on multiple shoplifting charges. What’s a few more? Lewis thought. These supermarkets were still making a killing.</em>﻿</p>
<p>It’s
 late 2020. Rikihana Wallace, a prolific shoplifter of no fixed abode, 
is back in prison with little chance of bail. Nathan Morley, unemployed,
 is facing burglary charges and hoping his other, as yet undetected, 
offences don’t catch up with him. Lewis Skerrett, their overstretched 
legal aid lawyer, is trying to do right by them both.</p>
<p>﻿The culmination of over two years of field research and hundreds of hours of interviews, <a href="https://www.bwb.co.nz/books/the-valley?srsltid=AfmBOooD7G19JF6Eyb4yWul56NPurWQQ0BmSA8EXSmJA0J75mHm8LakK" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Valley: Crime and Punishment in a New Zealand City</em></a>&nbsp;(Bridget Williams Books, 2026)&nbsp;follows
 these three Hutt Valley men through courtrooms, prison, hospital, 
rehab, boarding houses and welfare offices. Told largely in
 verbatim dialogue, this up-close and personal account brings the 
realities of the New Zealand criminal justice system to life through the
 voices of those who experience it first-hand. </p>
<p>Watch the book trailer <a href="https://youtu.be/CsriKVtUQoc?si=FYIm7TIXrw3yiAIX" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a>﻿ ﻿ <br></p>
<p>Asher
 Emanuel is a writer and lawyer based in Wellington. His exposure to the
 criminal justice system began when he was a judges’ clerk at the 
Wellington High Court after graduating from law school in 2015. He later
 worked as an investigator for the Inspector-General of Intelligence and
 Security and, as a lawyer, has assisted
 several government inquiries. His writing on justice and policy issues 
has appeared in The Spinoff, the New Zealand Herald, and specialist 
publications, and he is a former editor of Policy.nz, an election policy
 website. He began work on his first book, <em>The Valley</em>,
 in 2018 supported by grants from the Michael &amp; Suzanne Borrin 
Foundation. Asher now works as a civil legal aid lawyer focusing on 
public law and human rights cases. He is a longstanding member of the 
executive of the Aotearoa Legal Workers’ Union. Asher grew up in 
Auckland before moving to Wellington where he studied law and English 
literature. </p>
<p><em>Ed Amon has a Master of Indigenous Studies and is a PhD Candidate
 at the University of Auckland, New Zealand. He is a writer and a 
Stand-up Comedian. His main interests are indigenous studies, politics, 
history, and cricket. Follow him on twitter </em><a href="https://twitter.com/edamoned" rel="noopener noreferrer">@edamoned</a><em> or email him at </em><a href="mailto:edamonnz@gmail.com" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>edamonnz@gmail.com</em></a>  </p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 3 Aug 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/asher-emanuel-the-valley-crime-and-punishment-in-a-new-zealand-city-bridget-williams-books-2026-o7TS_feS</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>There were two days to Christmas
 and Lewis felt like everything was spinning out of control. He wondered
 what he would say to the judge this time. His client, Rikihana, was 
already on multiple shoplifting charges. What’s a few more? Lewis thought. These supermarkets were still making a killing.</em>﻿</p>
<p>It’s
 late 2020. Rikihana Wallace, a prolific shoplifter of no fixed abode, 
is back in prison with little chance of bail. Nathan Morley, unemployed,
 is facing burglary charges and hoping his other, as yet undetected, 
offences don’t catch up with him. Lewis Skerrett, their overstretched 
legal aid lawyer, is trying to do right by them both.</p>
<p>﻿The culmination of over two years of field research and hundreds of hours of interviews, <a href="https://www.bwb.co.nz/books/the-valley?srsltid=AfmBOooD7G19JF6Eyb4yWul56NPurWQQ0BmSA8EXSmJA0J75mHm8LakK" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Valley: Crime and Punishment in a New Zealand City</em></a>&nbsp;(Bridget Williams Books, 2026)&nbsp;follows
 these three Hutt Valley men through courtrooms, prison, hospital, 
rehab, boarding houses and welfare offices. Told largely in
 verbatim dialogue, this up-close and personal account brings the 
realities of the New Zealand criminal justice system to life through the
 voices of those who experience it first-hand. </p>
<p>Watch the book trailer <a href="https://youtu.be/CsriKVtUQoc?si=FYIm7TIXrw3yiAIX" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a>﻿ ﻿ <br></p>
<p>Asher
 Emanuel is a writer and lawyer based in Wellington. His exposure to the
 criminal justice system began when he was a judges’ clerk at the 
Wellington High Court after graduating from law school in 2015. He later
 worked as an investigator for the Inspector-General of Intelligence and
 Security and, as a lawyer, has assisted
 several government inquiries. His writing on justice and policy issues 
has appeared in The Spinoff, the New Zealand Herald, and specialist 
publications, and he is a former editor of Policy.nz, an election policy
 website. He began work on his first book, <em>The Valley</em>,
 in 2018 supported by grants from the Michael &amp; Suzanne Borrin 
Foundation. Asher now works as a civil legal aid lawyer focusing on 
public law and human rights cases. He is a longstanding member of the 
executive of the Aotearoa Legal Workers’ Union. Asher grew up in 
Auckland before moving to Wellington where he studied law and English 
literature. </p>
<p><em>Ed Amon has a Master of Indigenous Studies and is a PhD Candidate
 at the University of Auckland, New Zealand. He is a writer and a 
Stand-up Comedian. His main interests are indigenous studies, politics, 
history, and cricket. Follow him on twitter </em><a href="https://twitter.com/edamoned" rel="noopener noreferrer">@edamoned</a><em> or email him at </em><a href="mailto:edamonnz@gmail.com" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>edamonnz@gmail.com</em></a>  </p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="58555470" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/7e981472-633d-4950-96c8-7556aea7565d/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=7e981472-633d-4950-96c8-7556aea7565d&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Asher Emanuel, &quot;The Valley: Crime and Punishment in a New Zealand City&quot; (Bridget Williams Books, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:00:54</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>There were two days to Christmas
 and Lewis felt like everything was spinning out of control. He wondered
 what he would say to the judge this time. His client, Rikihana, was 
already on multiple shoplifting charges. What’s a few more? Lewis thought. These supermarkets were still making a killing.﻿
It’s
 late 2020. Rikihana Wallace, a prolific shoplifter of no fixed abode, 
is back in prison with little chance of bail. Nathan Morley, unemployed,
 is facing burglary charges and hoping his other, as yet undetected, 
offences don’t catch up with him. Lewis Skerrett, their overstretched 
legal aid lawyer, is trying to do right by them both.
﻿The culmination of over two years of field research and hundreds of hours of interviews, The Valley: Crime and Punishment in a New Zealand City (Bridget Williams Books, 2026) follows
 these three Hutt Valley men through courtrooms, prison, hospital, 
rehab, boarding houses and welfare offices. Told largely in
 verbatim dialogue, this up-close and personal account brings the 
realities of the New Zealand criminal justice system to life through the
 voices of those who experience it first-hand. 
Watch the book trailer here﻿ ﻿ 
Asher
 Emanuel is a writer and lawyer based in Wellington. His exposure to the
 criminal justice system began when he was a judges’ clerk at the 
Wellington High Court after graduating from law school in 2015. He later
 worked as an investigator for the Inspector-General of Intelligence and
 Security and, as a lawyer, has assisted
 several government inquiries. His writing on justice and policy issues 
has appeared in The Spinoff, the New Zealand Herald, and specialist 
publications, and he is a former editor of Policy.nz, an election policy
 website. He began work on his first book, The Valley,
 in 2018 supported by grants from the Michael &amp; Suzanne Borrin 
Foundation. Asher now works as a civil legal aid lawyer focusing on 
public law and human rights cases. He is a longstanding member of the 
executive of the Aotearoa Legal Workers’ Union. Asher grew up in 
Auckland before moving to Wellington where he studied law and English 
literature. 
Ed Amon has a Master of Indigenous Studies and is a PhD Candidate
 at the University of Auckland, New Zealand. He is a writer and a 
Stand-up Comedian. His main interests are indigenous studies, politics, 
history, and cricket. Follow him on twitter @edamoned or email him at edamonnz@gmail.com 
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>There were two days to Christmas
 and Lewis felt like everything was spinning out of control. He wondered
 what he would say to the judge this time. His client, Rikihana, was 
already on multiple shoplifting charges. What’s a few more? Lewis thought. These supermarkets were still making a killing.﻿
It’s
 late 2020. Rikihana Wallace, a prolific shoplifter of no fixed abode, 
is back in prison with little chance of bail. Nathan Morley, unemployed,
 is facing burglary charges and hoping his other, as yet undetected, 
offences don’t catch up with him. Lewis Skerrett, their overstretched 
legal aid lawyer, is trying to do right by them both.
﻿The culmination of over two years of field research and hundreds of hours of interviews, The Valley: Crime and Punishment in a New Zealand City (Bridget Williams Books, 2026) follows
 these three Hutt Valley men through courtrooms, prison, hospital, 
rehab, boarding houses and welfare offices. Told largely in
 verbatim dialogue, this up-close and personal account brings the 
realities of the New Zealand criminal justice system to life through the
 voices of those who experience it first-hand. 
Watch the book trailer here﻿ ﻿ 
Asher
 Emanuel is a writer and lawyer based in Wellington. His exposure to the
 criminal justice system began when he was a judges’ clerk at the 
Wellington High Court after graduating from law school in 2015. He later
 worked as an investigator for the Inspector-General of Intelligence and
 Security and, as a lawyer, has assisted
 several government inquiries. His writing on justice and policy issues 
has appeared in The Spinoff, the New Zealand Herald, and specialist 
publications, and he is a former editor of Policy.nz, an election policy
 website. He began work on his first book, The Valley,
 in 2018 supported by grants from the Michael &amp; Suzanne Borrin 
Foundation. Asher now works as a civil legal aid lawyer focusing on 
public law and human rights cases. He is a longstanding member of the 
executive of the Aotearoa Legal Workers’ Union. Asher grew up in 
Auckland before moving to Wellington where he studied law and English 
literature. 
Ed Amon has a Master of Indigenous Studies and is a PhD Candidate
 at the University of Auckland, New Zealand. He is a writer and a 
Stand-up Comedian. His main interests are indigenous studies, politics, 
history, and cricket. Follow him on twitter @edamoned or email him at edamonnz@gmail.com 
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1717</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e3d407a8-8a0b-11f1-aeab-ab7253b815ac</guid>
      <title>Steven K. Green, &quot;American Infidelity: The Gilded Age Battle Over Freethought, Free Love, and Feminism&quot; (Oxford UP, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Today I'm speaking with Steven K. Green, Fred H. Paulus Professor of Law and Affiliated Professor of History and Religious Studies at Willamette University. We are discussing his book,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197822265" rel="noopener noreferrer">American Infidelity: The Gilded Age Battle Over Freethought, Free Love, and Feminism</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Oxford University Press, 2026). Since the first permanent Protestant settlement in Jamestown in 1607, Protestant Christianity has waxed and waned through a series of revivals, migrations, and challenges from alternative faiths like Catholicism and Mormonism. The Gilded Age, from roughly 1870 to 1900, was a unique period for Protestantism in American history. Most Americans still subscribed to a Protestant faith, though threats began to arise not from other confessions, but rather from philosophical and scientific challengers. The so-called freethinkers represented a broad range of beliefs and ideas, being united by a mutual skepticism of religious conservatism and traditional sexual and gender mores.&nbsp;<em>American Infidelity</em>&nbsp;tells the story of this tug-of-war for the soul of a nation, with Christianity on one side and the legacy of thinkers like Thomas Paine on the other.</p>
<p><em>Caleb Zakarin is CEO and Publisher of the New Books Network.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/steven-k-green-american-infidelity-the-gilded-age-battle-over-freethought-free-love-and-feminism-oxford-up-2026-CH7X9xPD</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today I'm speaking with Steven K. Green, Fred H. Paulus Professor of Law and Affiliated Professor of History and Religious Studies at Willamette University. We are discussing his book,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197822265" rel="noopener noreferrer">American Infidelity: The Gilded Age Battle Over Freethought, Free Love, and Feminism</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Oxford University Press, 2026). Since the first permanent Protestant settlement in Jamestown in 1607, Protestant Christianity has waxed and waned through a series of revivals, migrations, and challenges from alternative faiths like Catholicism and Mormonism. The Gilded Age, from roughly 1870 to 1900, was a unique period for Protestantism in American history. Most Americans still subscribed to a Protestant faith, though threats began to arise not from other confessions, but rather from philosophical and scientific challengers. The so-called freethinkers represented a broad range of beliefs and ideas, being united by a mutual skepticism of religious conservatism and traditional sexual and gender mores.&nbsp;<em>American Infidelity</em>&nbsp;tells the story of this tug-of-war for the soul of a nation, with Christianity on one side and the legacy of thinkers like Thomas Paine on the other.</p>
<p><em>Caleb Zakarin is CEO and Publisher of the New Books Network.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="55356619" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/30f70c1a-15a4-41de-88c1-6de7641c469f/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=30f70c1a-15a4-41de-88c1-6de7641c469f&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Steven K. Green, &quot;American Infidelity: The Gilded Age Battle Over Freethought, Free Love, and Feminism&quot; (Oxford UP, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:57:25</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Today I&apos;m speaking with Steven K. Green, Fred H. Paulus Professor of Law and Affiliated Professor of History and Religious Studies at Willamette University. We are discussing his book, American Infidelity: The Gilded Age Battle Over Freethought, Free Love, and Feminism (Oxford University Press, 2026). Since the first permanent Protestant settlement in Jamestown in 1607, Protestant Christianity has waxed and waned through a series of revivals, migrations, and challenges from alternative faiths like Catholicism and Mormonism. The Gilded Age, from roughly 1870 to 1900, was a unique period for Protestantism in American history. Most Americans still subscribed to a Protestant faith, though threats began to arise not from other confessions, but rather from philosophical and scientific challengers. The so-called freethinkers represented a broad range of beliefs and ideas, being united by a mutual skepticism of religious conservatism and traditional sexual and gender mores. American Infidelity tells the story of this tug-of-war for the soul of a nation, with Christianity on one side and the legacy of thinkers like Thomas Paine on the other.
Caleb Zakarin is CEO and Publisher of the New Books Network.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Today I&apos;m speaking with Steven K. Green, Fred H. Paulus Professor of Law and Affiliated Professor of History and Religious Studies at Willamette University. We are discussing his book, American Infidelity: The Gilded Age Battle Over Freethought, Free Love, and Feminism (Oxford University Press, 2026). Since the first permanent Protestant settlement in Jamestown in 1607, Protestant Christianity has waxed and waned through a series of revivals, migrations, and challenges from alternative faiths like Catholicism and Mormonism. The Gilded Age, from roughly 1870 to 1900, was a unique period for Protestantism in American history. Most Americans still subscribed to a Protestant faith, though threats began to arise not from other confessions, but rather from philosophical and scientific challengers. The so-called freethinkers represented a broad range of beliefs and ideas, being united by a mutual skepticism of religious conservatism and traditional sexual and gender mores. American Infidelity tells the story of this tug-of-war for the soul of a nation, with Christianity on one side and the legacy of thinkers like Thomas Paine on the other.
Caleb Zakarin is CEO and Publisher of the New Books Network.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1716</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4797b4f4-8770-11f1-8208-83ed9d1098d2</guid>
      <title>Michelle Bigenho and Henry Stobart, &quot;Heritage Fever: Law and Cultural Politics in a Decolonizing State&quot; (Oxford UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The
 early twenty-first century ushered in a period of change in Bolivia. 
The country welcomed its first Indigenous president, a new constitution,
 and a profusion of laws that recognized individual music and dance 
expressions as intangible cultural heritage. Using cultural heritage 
lawmaking as a window through which to view the de-centered workings of the Indigenous-focused Plurinational Bolivian State, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197756041" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Heritage Fever: Law and Cultural Politics in a Decolonizing State</em></a>
 (Oxford University Press, 2025) by Dr. Michelle Bigenho and Dr. Henry 
Stobart unpacks the myriad motivations for heritage making in this this 
politically transformative moment. Heritage Fever reorients 
UNESCO-driven heritage debates towards a different set of questions—a pivot the authors call “heritage otherwise.”</p>
<p>These
 inquiries focus on how citizens use law to frame expressive culture and
 engage their new state. Through grounded case studies, Bigenho and 
Stobart reveal how competing claims over cultural expressions stimulate 
aficionado research and produce an abundance of cultural activities. 
Managing these productive conflicts often involves strategic uses of 
scale within the country's new political autonomies, even as old-style 
nationalisms lurk beneath a plurinational sheen. One case study highlights
 imagined Indigenous autonomy as bolstered by decolonizing 
historiography that predates the Plurinational State by several decades.</p>
<p>Privileging
 the stories told by those who championed or who were bureaucratically 
involved in the respective heritage-making campaigns, <em>Heritage Fever's</em>
 research draws from the authors' combined fieldwork in Bolivia over the
 last 30 years, recent multi-sited fieldwork conducted as a team, and 
ethnographic interviews conducted with Bolivians involved in 
heritage-making projects. Contributing to legal anthropology, critical 
heritage studies, ethnomusicology, and anthropology of the state, <em>Heritage Fever</em>
 looks beyond intellectual property frames, opens new perspectives on 
archival thinking, reflects on decolonizing practices in expertise and 
knowledge production, and uncovers the agency of mid-level citizens in a
 decolonizing state.</p>
<p>﻿<em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose </em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>book</em></a><em>
 focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty 
negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative 
analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find 
Miranda’s interviews on </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em> ﻿﻿</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/michelle-bigenho-and-henry-stobart-heritage-fever-law-and-cultural-politics-in-a-decolonizing-state-oxford-up-2025-6GIWGGxU</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The
 early twenty-first century ushered in a period of change in Bolivia. 
The country welcomed its first Indigenous president, a new constitution,
 and a profusion of laws that recognized individual music and dance 
expressions as intangible cultural heritage. Using cultural heritage 
lawmaking as a window through which to view the de-centered workings of the Indigenous-focused Plurinational Bolivian State, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197756041" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Heritage Fever: Law and Cultural Politics in a Decolonizing State</em></a>
 (Oxford University Press, 2025) by Dr. Michelle Bigenho and Dr. Henry 
Stobart unpacks the myriad motivations for heritage making in this this 
politically transformative moment. Heritage Fever reorients 
UNESCO-driven heritage debates towards a different set of questions—a pivot the authors call “heritage otherwise.”</p>
<p>These
 inquiries focus on how citizens use law to frame expressive culture and
 engage their new state. Through grounded case studies, Bigenho and 
Stobart reveal how competing claims over cultural expressions stimulate 
aficionado research and produce an abundance of cultural activities. 
Managing these productive conflicts often involves strategic uses of 
scale within the country's new political autonomies, even as old-style 
nationalisms lurk beneath a plurinational sheen. One case study highlights
 imagined Indigenous autonomy as bolstered by decolonizing 
historiography that predates the Plurinational State by several decades.</p>
<p>Privileging
 the stories told by those who championed or who were bureaucratically 
involved in the respective heritage-making campaigns, <em>Heritage Fever's</em>
 research draws from the authors' combined fieldwork in Bolivia over the
 last 30 years, recent multi-sited fieldwork conducted as a team, and 
ethnographic interviews conducted with Bolivians involved in 
heritage-making projects. Contributing to legal anthropology, critical 
heritage studies, ethnomusicology, and anthropology of the state, <em>Heritage Fever</em>
 looks beyond intellectual property frames, opens new perspectives on 
archival thinking, reflects on decolonizing practices in expertise and 
knowledge production, and uncovers the agency of mid-level citizens in a
 decolonizing state.</p>
<p>﻿<em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose </em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>book</em></a><em>
 focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty 
negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative 
analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find 
Miranda’s interviews on </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em> ﻿﻿</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="61676926" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/687f5318-bba4-4e4e-92c2-64946818b5b3/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=687f5318-bba4-4e4e-92c2-64946818b5b3&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Michelle Bigenho and Henry Stobart, &quot;Heritage Fever: Law and Cultural Politics in a Decolonizing State&quot; (Oxford UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:04:10</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The
 early twenty-first century ushered in a period of change in Bolivia. 
The country welcomed its first Indigenous president, a new constitution,
 and a profusion of laws that recognized individual music and dance 
expressions as intangible cultural heritage. Using cultural heritage 
lawmaking as a window through which to view the de-centered workings of the Indigenous-focused Plurinational Bolivian State, Heritage Fever: Law and Cultural Politics in a Decolonizing State
 (Oxford University Press, 2025) by Dr. Michelle Bigenho and Dr. Henry 
Stobart unpacks the myriad motivations for heritage making in this this 
politically transformative moment. Heritage Fever reorients 
UNESCO-driven heritage debates towards a different set of questions—a pivot the authors call “heritage otherwise.”
These
 inquiries focus on how citizens use law to frame expressive culture and
 engage their new state. Through grounded case studies, Bigenho and 
Stobart reveal how competing claims over cultural expressions stimulate 
aficionado research and produce an abundance of cultural activities. 
Managing these productive conflicts often involves strategic uses of 
scale within the country&apos;s new political autonomies, even as old-style 
nationalisms lurk beneath a plurinational sheen. One case study highlights
 imagined Indigenous autonomy as bolstered by decolonizing 
historiography that predates the Plurinational State by several decades.
Privileging
 the stories told by those who championed or who were bureaucratically 
involved in the respective heritage-making campaigns, Heritage Fever&apos;s
 research draws from the authors&apos; combined fieldwork in Bolivia over the
 last 30 years, recent multi-sited fieldwork conducted as a team, and 
ethnographic interviews conducted with Bolivians involved in 
heritage-making projects. Contributing to legal anthropology, critical 
heritage studies, ethnomusicology, and anthropology of the state, Heritage Fever
 looks beyond intellectual property frames, opens new perspectives on 
archival thinking, reflects on decolonizing practices in expertise and 
knowledge production, and uncovers the agency of mid-level citizens in a
 decolonizing state.
﻿This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book
 focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty 
negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative 
analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find 
Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts. ﻿﻿
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The
 early twenty-first century ushered in a period of change in Bolivia. 
The country welcomed its first Indigenous president, a new constitution,
 and a profusion of laws that recognized individual music and dance 
expressions as intangible cultural heritage. Using cultural heritage 
lawmaking as a window through which to view the de-centered workings of the Indigenous-focused Plurinational Bolivian State, Heritage Fever: Law and Cultural Politics in a Decolonizing State
 (Oxford University Press, 2025) by Dr. Michelle Bigenho and Dr. Henry 
Stobart unpacks the myriad motivations for heritage making in this this 
politically transformative moment. Heritage Fever reorients 
UNESCO-driven heritage debates towards a different set of questions—a pivot the authors call “heritage otherwise.”
These
 inquiries focus on how citizens use law to frame expressive culture and
 engage their new state. Through grounded case studies, Bigenho and 
Stobart reveal how competing claims over cultural expressions stimulate 
aficionado research and produce an abundance of cultural activities. 
Managing these productive conflicts often involves strategic uses of 
scale within the country&apos;s new political autonomies, even as old-style 
nationalisms lurk beneath a plurinational sheen. One case study highlights
 imagined Indigenous autonomy as bolstered by decolonizing 
historiography that predates the Plurinational State by several decades.
Privileging
 the stories told by those who championed or who were bureaucratically 
involved in the respective heritage-making campaigns, Heritage Fever&apos;s
 research draws from the authors&apos; combined fieldwork in Bolivia over the
 last 30 years, recent multi-sited fieldwork conducted as a team, and 
ethnographic interviews conducted with Bolivians involved in 
heritage-making projects. Contributing to legal anthropology, critical 
heritage studies, ethnomusicology, and anthropology of the state, Heritage Fever
 looks beyond intellectual property frames, opens new perspectives on 
archival thinking, reflects on decolonizing practices in expertise and 
knowledge production, and uncovers the agency of mid-level citizens in a
 decolonizing state.
﻿This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book
 focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty 
negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative 
analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find 
Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts. ﻿﻿
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1715</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">f5f96404-86b0-11f1-8b28-03107c9de4c6</guid>
      <title>Samuel Moyn, &quot;Gerontocracy in America: How the Old Are Hoarding Power and Wealth—and What to Do About It&quot; (FSG, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>A leading social critic identifies our least-discussed major crisis, and sets out to solve it.</p>
<p>As Americans debate President Biden’s infirmities and President Trump’s erratic behavior, we’ve neglected the bigger problem before us: a massive transfer of power and wealth to the oldest among us, and the curtailment of the prospects of the young. In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780374607647" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Gerontocracy in America: How the Old Are Hoarding Power and Wealth—and What to Do About It</em></a>&nbsp;(Farrar, Straus &amp; Giroux, 2026), the historian and social critic Samuel Moyn offers a piercing diagnosis of our age divide and its consequences. Even apart from the presidency, in legislatures, businesses, and the courts, the average leader’s age has risen dramatically. The elderly predominantly fund campaigns and dominate their agendas, often with the intent to block any challenge to their status. The tax code is rigged on their behalf, as is an economy geared to sheltering financial and housing assets. The United States was founded on the promise of generational renovation but has become an increasingly febrile country of old men.</p>
<p>﻿But it doesn’t need to be this way. With understanding and wit, Moyn shows how elder power can be dismantled. With strong safety nets in place, mandatory retirement ages can be established. The early transfer of assets between generations could be encouraged and young voters can be granted more voice. In such a world, the elderly themselves would be freed from power games to confront the existential opportunities of aging, while the young would find their path to starting out in life unblocked at 
last.﻿</p>
<p>Samuel Moyn is the Kent Professor of Law and History at Yale University. His books include <em>Humane: How the United States Abandoned Peace and Reinvented War</em>, <em>The Last Utopia</em>, and <em>Not Enough: Human Rights in an Unequal World</em>. Cohost of the <em>Digging a Hole</em> podcast, he is a frequent contributor to <em>The New York Times</em> and many other publications.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/samuel-moyn-gerontocracy-in-america-how-the-old-are-hoarding-power-and-wealthand-what-to-do-about-it-fsg-2026-x0ZhTion</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A leading social critic identifies our least-discussed major crisis, and sets out to solve it.</p>
<p>As Americans debate President Biden’s infirmities and President Trump’s erratic behavior, we’ve neglected the bigger problem before us: a massive transfer of power and wealth to the oldest among us, and the curtailment of the prospects of the young. In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780374607647" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Gerontocracy in America: How the Old Are Hoarding Power and Wealth—and What to Do About It</em></a>&nbsp;(Farrar, Straus &amp; Giroux, 2026), the historian and social critic Samuel Moyn offers a piercing diagnosis of our age divide and its consequences. Even apart from the presidency, in legislatures, businesses, and the courts, the average leader’s age has risen dramatically. The elderly predominantly fund campaigns and dominate their agendas, often with the intent to block any challenge to their status. The tax code is rigged on their behalf, as is an economy geared to sheltering financial and housing assets. The United States was founded on the promise of generational renovation but has become an increasingly febrile country of old men.</p>
<p>﻿But it doesn’t need to be this way. With understanding and wit, Moyn shows how elder power can be dismantled. With strong safety nets in place, mandatory retirement ages can be established. The early transfer of assets between generations could be encouraged and young voters can be granted more voice. In such a world, the elderly themselves would be freed from power games to confront the existential opportunities of aging, while the young would find their path to starting out in life unblocked at 
last.﻿</p>
<p>Samuel Moyn is the Kent Professor of Law and History at Yale University. His books include <em>Humane: How the United States Abandoned Peace and Reinvented War</em>, <em>The Last Utopia</em>, and <em>Not Enough: Human Rights in an Unequal World</em>. Cohost of the <em>Digging a Hole</em> podcast, he is a frequent contributor to <em>The New York Times</em> and many other publications.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="56803351" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/d92ff3ed-c4aa-41e6-9dea-06a6930849fa/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=d92ff3ed-c4aa-41e6-9dea-06a6930849fa&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Samuel Moyn, &quot;Gerontocracy in America: How the Old Are Hoarding Power and Wealth—and What to Do About It&quot; (FSG, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:59:05</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>A leading social critic identifies our least-discussed major crisis, and sets out to solve it.
As Americans debate President Biden’s infirmities and President Trump’s erratic behavior, we’ve neglected the bigger problem before us: a massive transfer of power and wealth to the oldest among us, and the curtailment of the prospects of the young. In Gerontocracy in America: How the Old Are Hoarding Power and Wealth—and What to Do About It (Farrar, Straus &amp; Giroux, 2026), the historian and social critic Samuel Moyn offers a piercing diagnosis of our age divide and its consequences. Even apart from the presidency, in legislatures, businesses, and the courts, the average leader’s age has risen dramatically. The elderly predominantly fund campaigns and dominate their agendas, often with the intent to block any challenge to their status. The tax code is rigged on their behalf, as is an economy geared to sheltering financial and housing assets. The United States was founded on the promise of generational renovation but has become an increasingly febrile country of old men.
﻿But it doesn’t need to be this way. With understanding and wit, Moyn shows how elder power can be dismantled. With strong safety nets in place, mandatory retirement ages can be established. The early transfer of assets between generations could be encouraged and young voters can be granted more voice. In such a world, the elderly themselves would be freed from power games to confront the existential opportunities of aging, while the young would find their path to starting out in life unblocked at 
last.﻿
Samuel Moyn is the Kent Professor of Law and History at Yale University. His books include Humane: How the United States Abandoned Peace and Reinvented War, The Last Utopia, and Not Enough: Human Rights in an Unequal World. Cohost of the Digging a Hole podcast, he is a frequent contributor to The New York Times and many other publications.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>A leading social critic identifies our least-discussed major crisis, and sets out to solve it.
As Americans debate President Biden’s infirmities and President Trump’s erratic behavior, we’ve neglected the bigger problem before us: a massive transfer of power and wealth to the oldest among us, and the curtailment of the prospects of the young. In Gerontocracy in America: How the Old Are Hoarding Power and Wealth—and What to Do About It (Farrar, Straus &amp; Giroux, 2026), the historian and social critic Samuel Moyn offers a piercing diagnosis of our age divide and its consequences. Even apart from the presidency, in legislatures, businesses, and the courts, the average leader’s age has risen dramatically. The elderly predominantly fund campaigns and dominate their agendas, often with the intent to block any challenge to their status. The tax code is rigged on their behalf, as is an economy geared to sheltering financial and housing assets. The United States was founded on the promise of generational renovation but has become an increasingly febrile country of old men.
﻿But it doesn’t need to be this way. With understanding and wit, Moyn shows how elder power can be dismantled. With strong safety nets in place, mandatory retirement ages can be established. The early transfer of assets between generations could be encouraged and young voters can be granted more voice. In such a world, the elderly themselves would be freed from power games to confront the existential opportunities of aging, while the young would find their path to starting out in life unblocked at 
last.﻿
Samuel Moyn is the Kent Professor of Law and History at Yale University. His books include Humane: How the United States Abandoned Peace and Reinvented War, The Last Utopia, and Not Enough: Human Rights in an Unequal World. Cohost of the Digging a Hole podcast, he is a frequent contributor to The New York Times and many other publications.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1713</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e03e9eda-86a7-11f1-9a59-6f24383d4a0a</guid>
      <title>Mitra Sharafi, &quot;Fear of the False: Forensic Science and the Law of Crime in Colonial South Asia&quot; (Cornell UP, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><em></em><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781501785986" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Fear of the False: Forensic Science and the Law of Crime in Colonial South Asia</em></a>
 (Cornell ﻿University Press, 2026) uncovers colonial South Asia's 
critical role in the development of forensic science. Around 1900, the 
government of British India created a web of institutions for the 
scientific detection of crime. Driven by anxieties about "native 
mendacity," newly minted forensic analysts focused on uncovering faked 
evidence planted by South Asians. These experts, joining toxicologists 
known as "chemical examiners," were supposed to extract objective, 
scientific truth in the service of British justice. But in trying to 
counteract the presumed tendency of colonized peoples to lie, the system
 enabled widespread misconduct by state experts, increasing the risk of 
wrongful convictions of South Asian defendants. Through scrupulously 
documented legal cases, Mitra Sharafi reveals that colonial dynamics put
 special pressure on the relationship between truth and justice. 
Examining falsity on both sides of the law through the use of testing to
 (mis)identify poisons, blood, and spermatozoa, as well as  debates over
 adversarialism and inquisitorialism in the colonial courtroom, Fear of 
the False explores advances in forensic science and shortcuts in 
criminal procedure against the backdrop of colonial mistrust.&nbsp;<em>Thanks
 to generous funding from the University of Wisconsin Law School, the 
ebook editions of this book are available as open access volumes through
 the Cornell Open initiative.</em></p>
<p><a href="https://law.wisc.edu/profiles/mitra.sharafi" rel="noopener noreferrer">Mitra Sharafi</a><em>
 is a legal historian whose research focuses on South Asia. She is the 
Evjue-Bascom Professor of Law at University of Wisconsin-Madison and 
currently serves as the president of the American Society for Legal 
History. She has been the host of the </em><a href="https://salh.law.wisc.edu/bibliography/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>South Asian Legal History Resources</em></a><em> website since 2010.</em></p>
<p><em>Saumya Dadoo is a PhD candidate at Columbia University's Department of Middle East, South Asian, and African Studies (MESAAS).</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/mitra-sharafi-fear-of-the-false-forensic-science-and-the-law-of-crime-in-colonial-south-asia-cornell-up-2026-g5GjIGBf</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em></em><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781501785986" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Fear of the False: Forensic Science and the Law of Crime in Colonial South Asia</em></a>
 (Cornell ﻿University Press, 2026) uncovers colonial South Asia's 
critical role in the development of forensic science. Around 1900, the 
government of British India created a web of institutions for the 
scientific detection of crime. Driven by anxieties about "native 
mendacity," newly minted forensic analysts focused on uncovering faked 
evidence planted by South Asians. These experts, joining toxicologists 
known as "chemical examiners," were supposed to extract objective, 
scientific truth in the service of British justice. But in trying to 
counteract the presumed tendency of colonized peoples to lie, the system
 enabled widespread misconduct by state experts, increasing the risk of 
wrongful convictions of South Asian defendants. Through scrupulously 
documented legal cases, Mitra Sharafi reveals that colonial dynamics put
 special pressure on the relationship between truth and justice. 
Examining falsity on both sides of the law through the use of testing to
 (mis)identify poisons, blood, and spermatozoa, as well as  debates over
 adversarialism and inquisitorialism in the colonial courtroom, Fear of 
the False explores advances in forensic science and shortcuts in 
criminal procedure against the backdrop of colonial mistrust.&nbsp;<em>Thanks
 to generous funding from the University of Wisconsin Law School, the 
ebook editions of this book are available as open access volumes through
 the Cornell Open initiative.</em></p>
<p><a href="https://law.wisc.edu/profiles/mitra.sharafi" rel="noopener noreferrer">Mitra Sharafi</a><em>
 is a legal historian whose research focuses on South Asia. She is the 
Evjue-Bascom Professor of Law at University of Wisconsin-Madison and 
currently serves as the president of the American Society for Legal 
History. She has been the host of the </em><a href="https://salh.law.wisc.edu/bibliography/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>South Asian Legal History Resources</em></a><em> website since 2010.</em></p>
<p><em>Saumya Dadoo is a PhD candidate at Columbia University's Department of Middle East, South Asian, and African Studies (MESAAS).</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="50904428" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/b06810fa-c878-4950-b4fc-e449ace32da4/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=b06810fa-c878-4950-b4fc-e449ace32da4&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Mitra Sharafi, &quot;Fear of the False: Forensic Science and the Law of Crime in Colonial South Asia&quot; (Cornell UP, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:52:57</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Fear of the False: Forensic Science and the Law of Crime in Colonial South Asia
 (Cornell ﻿University Press, 2026) uncovers colonial South Asia&apos;s 
critical role in the development of forensic science. Around 1900, the 
government of British India created a web of institutions for the 
scientific detection of crime. Driven by anxieties about &quot;native 
mendacity,&quot; newly minted forensic analysts focused on uncovering faked 
evidence planted by South Asians. These experts, joining toxicologists 
known as &quot;chemical examiners,&quot; were supposed to extract objective, 
scientific truth in the service of British justice. But in trying to 
counteract the presumed tendency of colonized peoples to lie, the system
 enabled widespread misconduct by state experts, increasing the risk of 
wrongful convictions of South Asian defendants. Through scrupulously 
documented legal cases, Mitra Sharafi reveals that colonial dynamics put
 special pressure on the relationship between truth and justice. 
Examining falsity on both sides of the law through the use of testing to
 (mis)identify poisons, blood, and spermatozoa, as well as debates over
 adversarialism and inquisitorialism in the colonial courtroom, Fear of 
the False explores advances in forensic science and shortcuts in 
criminal procedure against the backdrop of colonial mistrust. Thanks
 to generous funding from the University of Wisconsin Law School, the 
ebook editions of this book are available as open access volumes through
 the Cornell Open initiative.
Mitra Sharafi
 is a legal historian whose research focuses on South Asia. She is the 
Evjue-Bascom Professor of Law at University of Wisconsin-Madison and 
currently serves as the president of the American Society for Legal 
History. She has been the host of the South Asian Legal History Resources website since 2010.
Saumya Dadoo is a PhD candidate at Columbia University&apos;s Department of Middle East, South Asian, and African Studies (MESAAS).
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Fear of the False: Forensic Science and the Law of Crime in Colonial South Asia
 (Cornell ﻿University Press, 2026) uncovers colonial South Asia&apos;s 
critical role in the development of forensic science. Around 1900, the 
government of British India created a web of institutions for the 
scientific detection of crime. Driven by anxieties about &quot;native 
mendacity,&quot; newly minted forensic analysts focused on uncovering faked 
evidence planted by South Asians. These experts, joining toxicologists 
known as &quot;chemical examiners,&quot; were supposed to extract objective, 
scientific truth in the service of British justice. But in trying to 
counteract the presumed tendency of colonized peoples to lie, the system
 enabled widespread misconduct by state experts, increasing the risk of 
wrongful convictions of South Asian defendants. Through scrupulously 
documented legal cases, Mitra Sharafi reveals that colonial dynamics put
 special pressure on the relationship between truth and justice. 
Examining falsity on both sides of the law through the use of testing to
 (mis)identify poisons, blood, and spermatozoa, as well as debates over
 adversarialism and inquisitorialism in the colonial courtroom, Fear of 
the False explores advances in forensic science and shortcuts in 
criminal procedure against the backdrop of colonial mistrust. Thanks
 to generous funding from the University of Wisconsin Law School, the 
ebook editions of this book are available as open access volumes through
 the Cornell Open initiative.
Mitra Sharafi
 is a legal historian whose research focuses on South Asia. She is the 
Evjue-Bascom Professor of Law at University of Wisconsin-Madison and 
currently serves as the president of the American Society for Legal 
History. She has been the host of the South Asian Legal History Resources website since 2010.
Saumya Dadoo is a PhD candidate at Columbia University&apos;s Department of Middle East, South Asian, and African Studies (MESAAS).
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1714</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">793aeeb4-8bc0-11f1-9b26-1316773af218</guid>
      <title>Cast Out: A Call For A Forgiving Society in an Age of Incarceration</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780807021705" rel="noopener noreferrer">Cast Out: A Call For A Forgiving Society in an Age of Incarceration</a><em>&nbsp;</em>﻿(Beacon Press, 2026), civil rights lawyer Joseph Margulies insists that those who commit even the most heinous crimes are one of us and should be judged in a spirit of forgiveness. He explains that American society is too often unforgiving, preferring to cast out those we consider irredeemable by fixating narrowly on the question&nbsp;<em>What did they do?</em>&nbsp;and imagining that those who have done great wrongs have no past worth learning and no future worth preserving.<br>Through intimate interviews, his rich chapters bring to life 6 men and women, sharing their (sometimes brutal) crimes, the grim but all-too-human paths that led them there, and their evolution and insights. Eye-opening and unflinching,&nbsp;<em>Cast Out</em>&nbsp;makes us truly see those society locks away—the so-called “worst of the worst.” It challenges the reader to see us in them and them in us, and in that way, to recognize the humanity we all share.</p>
<p>Guest: Joseph Margulies is a writer, litigator, Professor of the Practice of Law and Government at Cornell University. He was Counsel of Record in Rasul v. Bush (2004), and in&nbsp;<em>Munaf v. Geren&nbsp;</em>(2008). His books include&nbsp;<em>Guantánamo and the Abuse of Presidential Power</em>; and&nbsp;<em>Cast Out.</em></p>
<p>Host:&nbsp;<a href="https://christinagessler.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. Christina Gessler</a>&nbsp;is an academic writing coach and editor. She is the creator, producer and host of the Academic Life podcast.</p>
<p>Playlist for listeners:</p>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-coroners-silence-death-records-and-the-hidden-victims-of-police-violence" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Coroner's Silence</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/ghost-in-the-criminal-justice-machine" rel="noopener noreferrer">Ghost In The Criminal Justice Machine</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/researching-racial-injustice" rel="noopener noreferrer">Hands Up Don't Shoot</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/freemans-challenge" rel="noopener noreferrer">Freemans Challenge</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-journal-of-higher-education-in-prison" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Journal Of Higher Education In Prison</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/education-behind-the-wall" rel="noopener noreferrer">Education Behind The Wall</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/secrets-of-the-killing-state" rel="noopener noreferrer">Secrets Of The Killing State</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/stitching-freedom" rel="noopener noreferrer">Stitching Freedom</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/a-conversation-with-the-director-of-the-emerson-prison-initiative" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Emerson Prison Initiative</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/melissa-valentine-the-names-of-all-the-flowers-a-memoir-the-feminist-press-2020" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Names Of All The Flowers</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/pink-crime-fighting-against-the-criminalization-of-motherhood-pregnancy-and-queer-identity" rel="noopener noreferrer">Pink Crime</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/brittany-friedman-carceral-apartheid-how-lies-and-white-supremacists-run-our-prisons-unc-press-2025" rel="noopener noreferrer">Carceral Apartheid</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/melissa-burch-the-criminal-record-complex-risk-race-and-the-struggle-for-work-in-america-princeton-up-2025" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Criminal Record Complex</a></li>
</ul>
<p>Welcome to Academic Life, the podcast for your academic journey—and beyond! Please join us again to learn from more experts inside and outside the academy, and around the world. Missed any of the 300+ Academic Life episodes? Find them&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/up-partners/academic-life" rel="noopener noreferrer">here.</a>&nbsp;And thank you for listening!</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/cast-out-a-call-for-a-forgiving-society-in-an-age-of-incarceration-zedOLGws</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780807021705" rel="noopener noreferrer">Cast Out: A Call For A Forgiving Society in an Age of Incarceration</a><em>&nbsp;</em>﻿(Beacon Press, 2026), civil rights lawyer Joseph Margulies insists that those who commit even the most heinous crimes are one of us and should be judged in a spirit of forgiveness. He explains that American society is too often unforgiving, preferring to cast out those we consider irredeemable by fixating narrowly on the question&nbsp;<em>What did they do?</em>&nbsp;and imagining that those who have done great wrongs have no past worth learning and no future worth preserving.<br>Through intimate interviews, his rich chapters bring to life 6 men and women, sharing their (sometimes brutal) crimes, the grim but all-too-human paths that led them there, and their evolution and insights. Eye-opening and unflinching,&nbsp;<em>Cast Out</em>&nbsp;makes us truly see those society locks away—the so-called “worst of the worst.” It challenges the reader to see us in them and them in us, and in that way, to recognize the humanity we all share.</p>
<p>Guest: Joseph Margulies is a writer, litigator, Professor of the Practice of Law and Government at Cornell University. He was Counsel of Record in Rasul v. Bush (2004), and in&nbsp;<em>Munaf v. Geren&nbsp;</em>(2008). His books include&nbsp;<em>Guantánamo and the Abuse of Presidential Power</em>; and&nbsp;<em>Cast Out.</em></p>
<p>Host:&nbsp;<a href="https://christinagessler.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. Christina Gessler</a>&nbsp;is an academic writing coach and editor. She is the creator, producer and host of the Academic Life podcast.</p>
<p>Playlist for listeners:</p>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-coroners-silence-death-records-and-the-hidden-victims-of-police-violence" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Coroner's Silence</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/ghost-in-the-criminal-justice-machine" rel="noopener noreferrer">Ghost In The Criminal Justice Machine</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/researching-racial-injustice" rel="noopener noreferrer">Hands Up Don't Shoot</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/freemans-challenge" rel="noopener noreferrer">Freemans Challenge</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-journal-of-higher-education-in-prison" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Journal Of Higher Education In Prison</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/education-behind-the-wall" rel="noopener noreferrer">Education Behind The Wall</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/secrets-of-the-killing-state" rel="noopener noreferrer">Secrets Of The Killing State</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/stitching-freedom" rel="noopener noreferrer">Stitching Freedom</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/a-conversation-with-the-director-of-the-emerson-prison-initiative" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Emerson Prison Initiative</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/melissa-valentine-the-names-of-all-the-flowers-a-memoir-the-feminist-press-2020" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Names Of All The Flowers</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/pink-crime-fighting-against-the-criminalization-of-motherhood-pregnancy-and-queer-identity" rel="noopener noreferrer">Pink Crime</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/brittany-friedman-carceral-apartheid-how-lies-and-white-supremacists-run-our-prisons-unc-press-2025" rel="noopener noreferrer">Carceral Apartheid</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/melissa-burch-the-criminal-record-complex-risk-race-and-the-struggle-for-work-in-america-princeton-up-2025" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Criminal Record Complex</a></li>
</ul>
<p>Welcome to Academic Life, the podcast for your academic journey—and beyond! Please join us again to learn from more experts inside and outside the academy, and around the world. Missed any of the 300+ Academic Life episodes? Find them&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/up-partners/academic-life" rel="noopener noreferrer">here.</a>&nbsp;And thank you for listening!</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="56507541" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/a32556b8-1ddf-45ad-8df6-8550137bcf9c/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=a32556b8-1ddf-45ad-8df6-8550137bcf9c&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Cast Out: A Call For A Forgiving Society in an Age of Incarceration</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:58:48</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In Cast Out: A Call For A Forgiving Society in an Age of Incarceration ﻿(Beacon Press, 2026), civil rights lawyer Joseph Margulies insists that those who commit even the most heinous crimes are one of us and should be judged in a spirit of forgiveness. He explains that American society is too often unforgiving, preferring to cast out those we consider irredeemable by fixating narrowly on the question What did they do? and imagining that those who have done great wrongs have no past worth learning and no future worth preserving.Through intimate interviews, his rich chapters bring to life 6 men and women, sharing their (sometimes brutal) crimes, the grim but all-too-human paths that led them there, and their evolution and insights. Eye-opening and unflinching, Cast Out makes us truly see those society locks away—the so-called “worst of the worst.” It challenges the reader to see us in them and them in us, and in that way, to recognize the humanity we all share.
Guest: Joseph Margulies is a writer, litigator, Professor of the Practice of Law and Government at Cornell University. He was Counsel of Record in Rasul v. Bush (2004), and in Munaf v. Geren (2008). His books include Guantánamo and the Abuse of Presidential Power; and Cast Out.
Host: Dr. Christina Gessler is an academic writing coach and editor. She is the creator, producer and host of the Academic Life podcast.
Playlist for listeners:
 The Coroner&apos;s Silence
 Ghost In The Criminal Justice Machine
 Hands Up Don&apos;t Shoot
 Freemans Challenge
 The Journal Of Higher Education In Prison
 Education Behind The Wall
 Secrets Of The Killing State
 Stitching Freedom
 The Emerson Prison Initiative
 The Names Of All The Flowers
 Pink Crime
 Carceral Apartheid
 The Criminal Record Complex
Welcome to Academic Life, the podcast for your academic journey—and beyond! Please join us again to learn from more experts inside and outside the academy, and around the world. Missed any of the 300+ Academic Life episodes? Find them here. And thank you for listening!
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In Cast Out: A Call For A Forgiving Society in an Age of Incarceration ﻿(Beacon Press, 2026), civil rights lawyer Joseph Margulies insists that those who commit even the most heinous crimes are one of us and should be judged in a spirit of forgiveness. He explains that American society is too often unforgiving, preferring to cast out those we consider irredeemable by fixating narrowly on the question What did they do? and imagining that those who have done great wrongs have no past worth learning and no future worth preserving.Through intimate interviews, his rich chapters bring to life 6 men and women, sharing their (sometimes brutal) crimes, the grim but all-too-human paths that led them there, and their evolution and insights. Eye-opening and unflinching, Cast Out makes us truly see those society locks away—the so-called “worst of the worst.” It challenges the reader to see us in them and them in us, and in that way, to recognize the humanity we all share.
Guest: Joseph Margulies is a writer, litigator, Professor of the Practice of Law and Government at Cornell University. He was Counsel of Record in Rasul v. Bush (2004), and in Munaf v. Geren (2008). His books include Guantánamo and the Abuse of Presidential Power; and Cast Out.
Host: Dr. Christina Gessler is an academic writing coach and editor. She is the creator, producer and host of the Academic Life podcast.
Playlist for listeners:
 The Coroner&apos;s Silence
 Ghost In The Criminal Justice Machine
 Hands Up Don&apos;t Shoot
 Freemans Challenge
 The Journal Of Higher Education In Prison
 Education Behind The Wall
 Secrets Of The Killing State
 Stitching Freedom
 The Emerson Prison Initiative
 The Names Of All The Flowers
 Pink Crime
 Carceral Apartheid
 The Criminal Record Complex
Welcome to Academic Life, the podcast for your academic journey—and beyond! Please join us again to learn from more experts inside and outside the academy, and around the world. Missed any of the 300+ Academic Life episodes? Find them here. And thank you for listening!
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1711</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2df705ac-851f-11f1-879e-3709018b4b2a</guid>
      <title>Dana Burchardt, &quot;The Authority of International Courts: A Behavioural Framework&quot; (Hart Publishing, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Why do some international courts wield broad authority while others face pushback or fade into irrelevance? <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781509992928" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Authority of International Courts: A Behavioural Framework</em></a>
 (Hart Publishing, 2026) by Dr. Dana Burchardt provides novel 
theoretical and empirical insights into this question. It offers a 
fresh, interdisciplinary perspective on the authority of international 
courts, drawing from law, political science and behavioural research.</p>
<p>﻿﻿It
 develops, in Part I, a theoretical model and analytical framework for 
assessing these questions. The model explains how authority 
relationships between courts and their audiences—such as states, NGOs,
 individual applicants, and domestic courts—are formed, maintained,
 or contested. In Part II, the book applies this analytical framework to
 in-depth case studies of two selected international courts: the 
European Court of Human Rights and the Court of Justice of the Economic 
Community of West African States. These studies not only provide deeper 
insights into the authority of these courts but also demonstrate
 how the analytical framework can be applied to other international 
courts to generate an enhanced understanding of international court 
authority.</p>
<p>﻿The
 book sheds new light on why some courts enjoy enduring authority and 
others face pushback, offering powerful tools for understanding the 
behaviour of international courts and their audiences.</p>
<p>﻿﻿<em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose </em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>book</em></a><em>
 focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty 
negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative 
analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find 
Miranda’s interviews on </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em> ﻿</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/dana-burchardt-the-authority-of-international-courts-a-behavioural-framework-hart-publishing-2026-59fhicBr</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do some international courts wield broad authority while others face pushback or fade into irrelevance? <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781509992928" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Authority of International Courts: A Behavioural Framework</em></a>
 (Hart Publishing, 2026) by Dr. Dana Burchardt provides novel 
theoretical and empirical insights into this question. It offers a 
fresh, interdisciplinary perspective on the authority of international 
courts, drawing from law, political science and behavioural research.</p>
<p>﻿﻿It
 develops, in Part I, a theoretical model and analytical framework for 
assessing these questions. The model explains how authority 
relationships between courts and their audiences—such as states, NGOs,
 individual applicants, and domestic courts—are formed, maintained,
 or contested. In Part II, the book applies this analytical framework to
 in-depth case studies of two selected international courts: the 
European Court of Human Rights and the Court of Justice of the Economic 
Community of West African States. These studies not only provide deeper 
insights into the authority of these courts but also demonstrate
 how the analytical framework can be applied to other international 
courts to generate an enhanced understanding of international court 
authority.</p>
<p>﻿The
 book sheds new light on why some courts enjoy enduring authority and 
others face pushback, offering powerful tools for understanding the 
behaviour of international courts and their audiences.</p>
<p>﻿﻿<em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose </em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>book</em></a><em>
 focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty 
negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative 
analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find 
Miranda’s interviews on </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em> ﻿</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="55830936" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/7c55b883-e03e-4a40-b21b-b7d829ee244b/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=7c55b883-e03e-4a40-b21b-b7d829ee244b&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Dana Burchardt, &quot;The Authority of International Courts: A Behavioural Framework&quot; (Hart Publishing, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:58:07</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Why do some international courts wield broad authority while others face pushback or fade into irrelevance? The Authority of International Courts: A Behavioural Framework
 (Hart Publishing, 2026) by Dr. Dana Burchardt provides novel 
theoretical and empirical insights into this question. It offers a 
fresh, interdisciplinary perspective on the authority of international 
courts, drawing from law, political science and behavioural research.
﻿﻿It
 develops, in Part I, a theoretical model and analytical framework for 
assessing these questions. The model explains how authority 
relationships between courts and their audiences—such as states, NGOs,
 individual applicants, and domestic courts—are formed, maintained,
 or contested. In Part II, the book applies this analytical framework to
 in-depth case studies of two selected international courts: the 
European Court of Human Rights and the Court of Justice of the Economic 
Community of West African States. These studies not only provide deeper 
insights into the authority of these courts but also demonstrate
 how the analytical framework can be applied to other international 
courts to generate an enhanced understanding of international court 
authority.
﻿The
 book sheds new light on why some courts enjoy enduring authority and 
others face pushback, offering powerful tools for understanding the 
behaviour of international courts and their audiences.
﻿﻿This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book
 focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty 
negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative 
analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find 
Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts. ﻿
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Why do some international courts wield broad authority while others face pushback or fade into irrelevance? The Authority of International Courts: A Behavioural Framework
 (Hart Publishing, 2026) by Dr. Dana Burchardt provides novel 
theoretical and empirical insights into this question. It offers a 
fresh, interdisciplinary perspective on the authority of international 
courts, drawing from law, political science and behavioural research.
﻿﻿It
 develops, in Part I, a theoretical model and analytical framework for 
assessing these questions. The model explains how authority 
relationships between courts and their audiences—such as states, NGOs,
 individual applicants, and domestic courts—are formed, maintained,
 or contested. In Part II, the book applies this analytical framework to
 in-depth case studies of two selected international courts: the 
European Court of Human Rights and the Court of Justice of the Economic 
Community of West African States. These studies not only provide deeper 
insights into the authority of these courts but also demonstrate
 how the analytical framework can be applied to other international 
courts to generate an enhanced understanding of international court 
authority.
﻿The
 book sheds new light on why some courts enjoy enduring authority and 
others face pushback, offering powerful tools for understanding the 
behaviour of international courts and their audiences.
﻿﻿This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book
 focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty 
negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative 
analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find 
Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts. ﻿
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1712</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">0d5cc384-8517-11f1-8e26-5744401f36a3</guid>
      <title>Debolina Dutta, &quot;A Jurisprudence of Conversations: Law, Life and Feminism in Post-colonial India&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Grounded in empirical studies, this book&nbsp;is both a history of the 
emergence of feminist jurisprudence in&nbsp;post-colonial India and a model 
of innovative legal research. The book inaugurates a creative practice 
of scholarly activism that engages a new way of thinking about law and 
feminist jurisprudence, one that is geared to acknowledge and take 
responsibility for the hierarchies in Indian academic practices. Its 
method of conversation and accountability continues the feminist 
tradition of taking reciprocity and the time and place of collaboration 
seriously. It helps make visible the specific ties between post-colonial
 life and law and joins the work of refusing and reimagining the 
hierarchical formation of legal knowledge in a caste-based Indian 
society. A significant contribution to the history and practice of 
feminist jurisprudence in post-colonial India, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009581561" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>A Jurisprudence of Conversations: Law, Life and Feminism in Post-colonial India</em></a><em> </em>﻿(Cambridge&nbsp;University Press, 2026)<em>&nbsp;</em>will appeal to both an academic and activist readership.</p>
<p>﻿<em>Debolina
 Dutta is a Research Fellow at Melbourne Law School's Centre of 
Excellence for the Elimination of Violence Against Women (CEVAW)</em></p>
<p><em>Saumya Dadoo is a PhD Candidate at MESAAS, Columbia University</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/debolina-dutta-a-jurisprudence-of-conversations-law-life-and-feminism-in-post-colonial-india-cambridge-up-2026-s_LRYQYZ</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Grounded in empirical studies, this book&nbsp;is both a history of the 
emergence of feminist jurisprudence in&nbsp;post-colonial India and a model 
of innovative legal research. The book inaugurates a creative practice 
of scholarly activism that engages a new way of thinking about law and 
feminist jurisprudence, one that is geared to acknowledge and take 
responsibility for the hierarchies in Indian academic practices. Its 
method of conversation and accountability continues the feminist 
tradition of taking reciprocity and the time and place of collaboration 
seriously. It helps make visible the specific ties between post-colonial
 life and law and joins the work of refusing and reimagining the 
hierarchical formation of legal knowledge in a caste-based Indian 
society. A significant contribution to the history and practice of 
feminist jurisprudence in post-colonial India, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009581561" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>A Jurisprudence of Conversations: Law, Life and Feminism in Post-colonial India</em></a><em> </em>﻿(Cambridge&nbsp;University Press, 2026)<em>&nbsp;</em>will appeal to both an academic and activist readership.</p>
<p>﻿<em>Debolina
 Dutta is a Research Fellow at Melbourne Law School's Centre of 
Excellence for the Elimination of Violence Against Women (CEVAW)</em></p>
<p><em>Saumya Dadoo is a PhD Candidate at MESAAS, Columbia University</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="110560181" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/5f8450db-7719-4858-93b0-8f701b85cd93/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=5f8450db-7719-4858-93b0-8f701b85cd93&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Debolina Dutta, &quot;A Jurisprudence of Conversations: Law, Life and Feminism in Post-colonial India&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:55:06</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Grounded in empirical studies, this book is both a history of the 
emergence of feminist jurisprudence in post-colonial India and a model 
of innovative legal research. The book inaugurates a creative practice 
of scholarly activism that engages a new way of thinking about law and 
feminist jurisprudence, one that is geared to acknowledge and take 
responsibility for the hierarchies in Indian academic practices. Its 
method of conversation and accountability continues the feminist 
tradition of taking reciprocity and the time and place of collaboration 
seriously. It helps make visible the specific ties between post-colonial
 life and law and joins the work of refusing and reimagining the 
hierarchical formation of legal knowledge in a caste-based Indian 
society. A significant contribution to the history and practice of 
feminist jurisprudence in post-colonial India, A Jurisprudence of Conversations: Law, Life and Feminism in Post-colonial India ﻿(Cambridge University Press, 2026) will appeal to both an academic and activist readership.
﻿Debolina
 Dutta is a Research Fellow at Melbourne Law School&apos;s Centre of 
Excellence for the Elimination of Violence Against Women (CEVAW)
Saumya Dadoo is a PhD Candidate at MESAAS, Columbia University
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Grounded in empirical studies, this book is both a history of the 
emergence of feminist jurisprudence in post-colonial India and a model 
of innovative legal research. The book inaugurates a creative practice 
of scholarly activism that engages a new way of thinking about law and 
feminist jurisprudence, one that is geared to acknowledge and take 
responsibility for the hierarchies in Indian academic practices. Its 
method of conversation and accountability continues the feminist 
tradition of taking reciprocity and the time and place of collaboration 
seriously. It helps make visible the specific ties between post-colonial
 life and law and joins the work of refusing and reimagining the 
hierarchical formation of legal knowledge in a caste-based Indian 
society. A significant contribution to the history and practice of 
feminist jurisprudence in post-colonial India, A Jurisprudence of Conversations: Law, Life and Feminism in Post-colonial India ﻿(Cambridge University Press, 2026) will appeal to both an academic and activist readership.
﻿Debolina
 Dutta is a Research Fellow at Melbourne Law School&apos;s Centre of 
Excellence for the Elimination of Violence Against Women (CEVAW)
Saumya Dadoo is a PhD Candidate at MESAAS, Columbia University
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1710</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3727fc18-81f9-11f1-a5df-6b050f8a6b27</guid>
      <title>Gabriella Soto, &quot;Border Afterlives: Migrant Deaths, Forensic Investigations, and the Politics of Haunting&quot; (U Arizona Press, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><em></em><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780816555079" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Border Afterlives:&nbsp;Migrant Deaths, Forensic Investigations, and the Politics of Haunting</em></a>&nbsp;(University of Arizona Press, 2026)&nbsp;begins
 with the undocumented individuals who die crossing the U.S.-Mexico 
border—deaths that are both preventable and politically produced.&nbsp;Moving
 between the practical and the philosophical, forensic anthropologist 
and author Gabriella&nbsp;Soto asks what it means to care for the dead and 
what society owes to those who die in its name. Through the lens of 
haunting, she explores how the dead continue to shape the living, not as
 objects of horror but as moral agents whose presence demands justice. 
Centered primarily in Arizona and South Texas,&nbsp;<em>Border Afterlives</em>
 offers a border-scale comparative account of forensic practices, 
critiques the limits of “best practices” in under-resourced systems, and
 calls for a re-imagining of forensic humanitarianism grounded in 
reciprocity and dignity, beyond human rights. This is a book that 
insists on remembering the dead.</p>
<p>﻿In this conversation, we discuss
 the difficult&nbsp;interplay between federal immigration&nbsp;policy and local 
practices of death care on the border, the implications of policies that
 cause increased death tolls, the politics of humanitarian immigration 
reform, and, finally, how allowing ourselves to be haunted by the slow 
mass casualties of the border can and should inspire us to act.</p>
<p>﻿<em>Gabriella
 Soto is a contemporary archaeologist who examines the material world to
 understand pressing social issues. Integrating ethnographic methods, 
GIS technology, and archival research, she specializes in migration 
materialities, focusing on Latinx migration and security at the 
US-Mexico border. Her work analyzes the material footprints of transit, 
forensic death investigations, and security and humanitarian 
infrastructure. An ACLS fellow whose work has also been funded by the 
Wenner-Gren Foundation, Soto is a research affiliate at the Binational 
Migration Institute and holds faculty affiliations at Arizona State 
University’s School of Transborder Studies, School of Interdisciplinary 
Forensics, and the Latinx Oral History Lab. Her research has appeared in
 American Anthropologist and Political Geography, and her article on 
migrant material culture won the American Anthropological Association’s 
Gordon R. Willey Paper Prize.  Dr. Soto is the author of Border 
Afterlives: Migrant Deaths, Forensic Investigations, and the Politics of
 Haunting (University of Arizona Press, 2026).</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/gabriella-soto-border-afterlives-migrant-deaths-forensic-investigations-and-the-politics-of-haunting-u-arizona-press-2026-dbv80age</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em></em><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780816555079" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Border Afterlives:&nbsp;Migrant Deaths, Forensic Investigations, and the Politics of Haunting</em></a>&nbsp;(University of Arizona Press, 2026)&nbsp;begins
 with the undocumented individuals who die crossing the U.S.-Mexico 
border—deaths that are both preventable and politically produced.&nbsp;Moving
 between the practical and the philosophical, forensic anthropologist 
and author Gabriella&nbsp;Soto asks what it means to care for the dead and 
what society owes to those who die in its name. Through the lens of 
haunting, she explores how the dead continue to shape the living, not as
 objects of horror but as moral agents whose presence demands justice. 
Centered primarily in Arizona and South Texas,&nbsp;<em>Border Afterlives</em>
 offers a border-scale comparative account of forensic practices, 
critiques the limits of “best practices” in under-resourced systems, and
 calls for a re-imagining of forensic humanitarianism grounded in 
reciprocity and dignity, beyond human rights. This is a book that 
insists on remembering the dead.</p>
<p>﻿In this conversation, we discuss
 the difficult&nbsp;interplay between federal immigration&nbsp;policy and local 
practices of death care on the border, the implications of policies that
 cause increased death tolls, the politics of humanitarian immigration 
reform, and, finally, how allowing ourselves to be haunted by the slow 
mass casualties of the border can and should inspire us to act.</p>
<p>﻿<em>Gabriella
 Soto is a contemporary archaeologist who examines the material world to
 understand pressing social issues. Integrating ethnographic methods, 
GIS technology, and archival research, she specializes in migration 
materialities, focusing on Latinx migration and security at the 
US-Mexico border. Her work analyzes the material footprints of transit, 
forensic death investigations, and security and humanitarian 
infrastructure. An ACLS fellow whose work has also been funded by the 
Wenner-Gren Foundation, Soto is a research affiliate at the Binational 
Migration Institute and holds faculty affiliations at Arizona State 
University’s School of Transborder Studies, School of Interdisciplinary 
Forensics, and the Latinx Oral History Lab. Her research has appeared in
 American Anthropologist and Political Geography, and her article on 
migrant material culture won the American Anthropological Association’s 
Gordon R. Willey Paper Prize.  Dr. Soto is the author of Border 
Afterlives: Migrant Deaths, Forensic Investigations, and the Politics of
 Haunting (University of Arizona Press, 2026).</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="66233365" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/98177f81-02b6-4221-a94b-3eda22294b9d/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=98177f81-02b6-4221-a94b-3eda22294b9d&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Gabriella Soto, &quot;Border Afterlives: Migrant Deaths, Forensic Investigations, and the Politics of Haunting&quot; (U Arizona Press, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:08:56</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Border Afterlives: Migrant Deaths, Forensic Investigations, and the Politics of Haunting (University of Arizona Press, 2026) begins
 with the undocumented individuals who die crossing the U.S.-Mexico 
border—deaths that are both preventable and politically produced. Moving
 between the practical and the philosophical, forensic anthropologist 
and author Gabriella Soto asks what it means to care for the dead and 
what society owes to those who die in its name. Through the lens of 
haunting, she explores how the dead continue to shape the living, not as
 objects of horror but as moral agents whose presence demands justice. 
Centered primarily in Arizona and South Texas, Border Afterlives
 offers a border-scale comparative account of forensic practices, 
critiques the limits of “best practices” in under-resourced systems, and
 calls for a re-imagining of forensic humanitarianism grounded in 
reciprocity and dignity, beyond human rights. This is a book that 
insists on remembering the dead.
﻿In this conversation, we discuss
 the difficult interplay between federal immigration policy and local 
practices of death care on the border, the implications of policies that
 cause increased death tolls, the politics of humanitarian immigration 
reform, and, finally, how allowing ourselves to be haunted by the slow 
mass casualties of the border can and should inspire us to act.
﻿Gabriella
 Soto is a contemporary archaeologist who examines the material world to
 understand pressing social issues. Integrating ethnographic methods, 
GIS technology, and archival research, she specializes in migration 
materialities, focusing on Latinx migration and security at the 
US-Mexico border. Her work analyzes the material footprints of transit, 
forensic death investigations, and security and humanitarian 
infrastructure. An ACLS fellow whose work has also been funded by the 
Wenner-Gren Foundation, Soto is a research affiliate at the Binational 
Migration Institute and holds faculty affiliations at Arizona State 
University’s School of Transborder Studies, School of Interdisciplinary 
Forensics, and the Latinx Oral History Lab. Her research has appeared in
 American Anthropologist and Political Geography, and her article on 
migrant material culture won the American Anthropological Association’s 
Gordon R. Willey Paper Prize. Dr. Soto is the author of Border 
Afterlives: Migrant Deaths, Forensic Investigations, and the Politics of
 Haunting (University of Arizona Press, 2026).
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Border Afterlives: Migrant Deaths, Forensic Investigations, and the Politics of Haunting (University of Arizona Press, 2026) begins
 with the undocumented individuals who die crossing the U.S.-Mexico 
border—deaths that are both preventable and politically produced. Moving
 between the practical and the philosophical, forensic anthropologist 
and author Gabriella Soto asks what it means to care for the dead and 
what society owes to those who die in its name. Through the lens of 
haunting, she explores how the dead continue to shape the living, not as
 objects of horror but as moral agents whose presence demands justice. 
Centered primarily in Arizona and South Texas, Border Afterlives
 offers a border-scale comparative account of forensic practices, 
critiques the limits of “best practices” in under-resourced systems, and
 calls for a re-imagining of forensic humanitarianism grounded in 
reciprocity and dignity, beyond human rights. This is a book that 
insists on remembering the dead.
﻿In this conversation, we discuss
 the difficult interplay between federal immigration policy and local 
practices of death care on the border, the implications of policies that
 cause increased death tolls, the politics of humanitarian immigration 
reform, and, finally, how allowing ourselves to be haunted by the slow 
mass casualties of the border can and should inspire us to act.
﻿Gabriella
 Soto is a contemporary archaeologist who examines the material world to
 understand pressing social issues. Integrating ethnographic methods, 
GIS technology, and archival research, she specializes in migration 
materialities, focusing on Latinx migration and security at the 
US-Mexico border. Her work analyzes the material footprints of transit, 
forensic death investigations, and security and humanitarian 
infrastructure. An ACLS fellow whose work has also been funded by the 
Wenner-Gren Foundation, Soto is a research affiliate at the Binational 
Migration Institute and holds faculty affiliations at Arizona State 
University’s School of Transborder Studies, School of Interdisciplinary 
Forensics, and the Latinx Oral History Lab. Her research has appeared in
 American Anthropologist and Political Geography, and her article on 
migrant material culture won the American Anthropological Association’s 
Gordon R. Willey Paper Prize. Dr. Soto is the author of Border 
Afterlives: Migrant Deaths, Forensic Investigations, and the Politics of
 Haunting (University of Arizona Press, 2026).
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1709</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">a726f7bc-8073-11f1-ab8b-8fd463b6836f</guid>
      <title>Renisa Mawani, &quot;Across Oceans of Law: The Komagata Maru and Jurisdiction in the Time of Empire&quot; (Duke UP, 2018)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In 1914 the British-built and Japanese-owned steamship <em>Komagata Maru</em>
 left Hong Kong for Vancouver carrying 376 Punjabi migrants. Chartered 
by railway contractor and purported rubber planter Gurdit Singh, the 
ship and its passengers were denied entry into Canada and two months 
later were deported to Calcutta. </p>
<p>In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780822370352" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Across Oceans of Law:&nbsp;</em></a><em></em><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780822370352" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Komagata Maru and Jurisdiction in the Time of Empire</em></a>&nbsp;(Duke University Press, 2018)&nbsp;Renisa Mawani retells this well-known story of the <em>Komagata Maru</em>.
 Drawing on "oceans as method"—a mode of thinking and writing that 
repositions land and sea—Mawani examines the historical and conceptual 
stakes of situating histories of Indian migration within maritime 
worlds. </p>
<p>Through close readings of the ship, the manifest, the trial, and the 
anticolonial writings of Singh and others, Mawani argues that the <em>Komagata Maru</em>'s
 landing raised urgent questions regarding the jurisdictional tensions 
between the common law and admiralty law, and, ultimately, the legal 
status of the sea. By following the movements of a single ship and 
bringing oceans into sharper view, Mawani traces British imperial power 
through racial, temporal, and legal contests and offers a novel method 
of writing colonial legal history.</p>
<p>The conversation also covers how the book, published in 2018, has 
shaped the author’s more recent work as well as how historical methods 
and approaches have evolved in the years since publication. </p>
<p><em>Helen Dewar is an historian of the Atlantic World and French 
colonization in North America in the 17th and 18th centuries. She is a 
professor of history at the Université de Montréal (Québec, Canada) and 
the author of </em><a href="https://www.mqup.ca/disputing-new-france-products-9780228008217.php" rel="noopener noreferrer">Disputing New France: Companies, Sovereignty and Law in the French Atlantic, 1598-1663 (McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2022)</a><em>.</em></p>
<p><a href="https://histoire.umontreal.ca/repertoire-departement/corps-professoral/professeur/in/in27121/sg/Helen%20Dewar/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Helen’s institutional website</em></a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/renisa-mawani-across-oceans-of-law-the-komagata-maru-and-jurisdiction-in-the-time-of-empire-duke-up-2018-RwRFPOHc-19Xf01j1</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In 1914 the British-built and Japanese-owned steamship <em>Komagata Maru</em>
 left Hong Kong for Vancouver carrying 376 Punjabi migrants. Chartered 
by railway contractor and purported rubber planter Gurdit Singh, the 
ship and its passengers were denied entry into Canada and two months 
later were deported to Calcutta. </p>
<p>In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780822370352" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Across Oceans of Law:&nbsp;</em></a><em></em><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780822370352" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Komagata Maru and Jurisdiction in the Time of Empire</em></a>&nbsp;(Duke University Press, 2018)&nbsp;Renisa Mawani retells this well-known story of the <em>Komagata Maru</em>.
 Drawing on "oceans as method"—a mode of thinking and writing that 
repositions land and sea—Mawani examines the historical and conceptual 
stakes of situating histories of Indian migration within maritime 
worlds. </p>
<p>Through close readings of the ship, the manifest, the trial, and the 
anticolonial writings of Singh and others, Mawani argues that the <em>Komagata Maru</em>'s
 landing raised urgent questions regarding the jurisdictional tensions 
between the common law and admiralty law, and, ultimately, the legal 
status of the sea. By following the movements of a single ship and 
bringing oceans into sharper view, Mawani traces British imperial power 
through racial, temporal, and legal contests and offers a novel method 
of writing colonial legal history.</p>
<p>The conversation also covers how the book, published in 2018, has 
shaped the author’s more recent work as well as how historical methods 
and approaches have evolved in the years since publication. </p>
<p><em>Helen Dewar is an historian of the Atlantic World and French 
colonization in North America in the 17th and 18th centuries. She is a 
professor of history at the Université de Montréal (Québec, Canada) and 
the author of </em><a href="https://www.mqup.ca/disputing-new-france-products-9780228008217.php" rel="noopener noreferrer">Disputing New France: Companies, Sovereignty and Law in the French Atlantic, 1598-1663 (McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2022)</a><em>.</em></p>
<p><a href="https://histoire.umontreal.ca/repertoire-departement/corps-professoral/professeur/in/in27121/sg/Helen%20Dewar/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Helen’s institutional website</em></a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="48360851" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/2df53a41-62ec-4646-9c56-b1c89e75793f/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=2df53a41-62ec-4646-9c56-b1c89e75793f&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Renisa Mawani, &quot;Across Oceans of Law: The Komagata Maru and Jurisdiction in the Time of Empire&quot; (Duke UP, 2018)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:50:17</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In 1914 the British-built and Japanese-owned steamship Komagata Maru
 left Hong Kong for Vancouver carrying 376 Punjabi migrants. Chartered 
by railway contractor and purported rubber planter Gurdit Singh, the 
ship and its passengers were denied entry into Canada and two months 
later were deported to Calcutta. 
In Across Oceans of Law: The Komagata Maru and Jurisdiction in the Time of Empire (Duke University Press, 2018) Renisa Mawani retells this well-known story of the Komagata Maru.
 Drawing on &quot;oceans as method&quot;—a mode of thinking and writing that 
repositions land and sea—Mawani examines the historical and conceptual 
stakes of situating histories of Indian migration within maritime 
worlds. 
Through close readings of the ship, the manifest, the trial, and the 
anticolonial writings of Singh and others, Mawani argues that the Komagata Maru&apos;s
 landing raised urgent questions regarding the jurisdictional tensions 
between the common law and admiralty law, and, ultimately, the legal 
status of the sea. By following the movements of a single ship and 
bringing oceans into sharper view, Mawani traces British imperial power 
through racial, temporal, and legal contests and offers a novel method 
of writing colonial legal history.
The conversation also covers how the book, published in 2018, has 
shaped the author’s more recent work as well as how historical methods 
and approaches have evolved in the years since publication. 
Helen Dewar is an historian of the Atlantic World and French 
colonization in North America in the 17th and 18th centuries. She is a 
professor of history at the Université de Montréal (Québec, Canada) and 
the author of Disputing New France: Companies, Sovereignty and Law in the French Atlantic, 1598-1663 (McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2022).
Helen’s institutional website
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In 1914 the British-built and Japanese-owned steamship Komagata Maru
 left Hong Kong for Vancouver carrying 376 Punjabi migrants. Chartered 
by railway contractor and purported rubber planter Gurdit Singh, the 
ship and its passengers were denied entry into Canada and two months 
later were deported to Calcutta. 
In Across Oceans of Law: The Komagata Maru and Jurisdiction in the Time of Empire (Duke University Press, 2018) Renisa Mawani retells this well-known story of the Komagata Maru.
 Drawing on &quot;oceans as method&quot;—a mode of thinking and writing that 
repositions land and sea—Mawani examines the historical and conceptual 
stakes of situating histories of Indian migration within maritime 
worlds. 
Through close readings of the ship, the manifest, the trial, and the 
anticolonial writings of Singh and others, Mawani argues that the Komagata Maru&apos;s
 landing raised urgent questions regarding the jurisdictional tensions 
between the common law and admiralty law, and, ultimately, the legal 
status of the sea. By following the movements of a single ship and 
bringing oceans into sharper view, Mawani traces British imperial power 
through racial, temporal, and legal contests and offers a novel method 
of writing colonial legal history.
The conversation also covers how the book, published in 2018, has 
shaped the author’s more recent work as well as how historical methods 
and approaches have evolved in the years since publication. 
Helen Dewar is an historian of the Atlantic World and French 
colonization in North America in the 17th and 18th centuries. She is a 
professor of history at the Université de Montréal (Québec, Canada) and 
the author of Disputing New France: Companies, Sovereignty and Law in the French Atlantic, 1598-1663 (McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2022).
Helen’s institutional website
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1707</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">a235fb9c-806c-11f1-a779-4fa928e22a4d</guid>
      <title>Sue Donaldson and Will Kymlicka, &quot;Animals and the Right to Politics&quot; (Oxford UP, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The assumption that only humans can engage in politics—that only 
humans are 'zoon politikon'—is foundational to the Western tradition of 
political philosophy. While there is increasing recognition of animals' 
moral status (both within moral philosophy and at the level of public 
opinion), animals are not recognized as political subjects. This 
carefully researched but accessibly written volume—following on from the
 authors' earlier book <em>Zoopolis</em>—argues that animals too have a 
right to politics: a right to be recognized as political subjects and 
agents, and as members of political communities entitled to collective 
self-determination. <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780198989004" rel="noopener noreferrer">⁠<em>Animals and the Right to Politics</em>⁠</a>
 (Oxford University Press, 2026) draws on recent scientific work on 
animal societies, cultures, and decision-making, as well as recent work 
by political theorists rethinking ideas of agency and 
community—especially the significance of emplaced and embodied 
encounters and relationships to the activity of politics. Sue Donaldson 
and Will Kymlicka draw a picture of what it would mean to create spaces 
and practices, not only for politics conducted by humans on behalf of 
animals, but also politics with and by animals on their own terms. It 
then explores how this approach could inform a wide range of 
contemporary debates in human-animal relations, including wildlife 
conservation, urban planning, and animal labour.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.queensu.ca/philosophy/people/sue-donaldson" rel="noopener noreferrer">⁠Sue Donaldson⁠</a>
 is a Canadian author and animal advocate. She has published more than 
40 academic articles, and is the co-author, with Will Kymlicka, of <em>Zoopolis: A Political Theory of Animal Rights</em>
 (Oxford University Press, 2011) which won the Canadian Philosophical 
Association Book Prize in 2013, and has been translated into 11 
languages. She is co-convenor of the Animals in Philosophy, Politics, 
Law and Ethics research group at Queen's University, Kingston, Canada.</p>
<p><a href="https://willkymlicka.ca/" rel="noopener noreferrer">⁠Will Kymlicka⁠</a> is the author of seven books published by Oxford University Press, including <em>Contemporary Political Philosophy</em> (2nd ed., 2001), <em>Multicultural Citizenship</em> (1996), and <em>Zoopolis: A Political Theory of Animal Rights</em>
 (co-authored with Sue Donaldson; 2011). He is currently the Canada 
Research Chair in Political Philosophy at Queen's University, a Fellow 
of the Royal Society of Canada and of the Canadian Institute for 
Advanced Research, an Officer of the Order of Canada, and a 
Corresponding Fellow of the British Academy. His works have been 
translated into 34 languages.</p>
<p><a href="https://sites.google.com/view/kyle-johannsen/" rel="noopener noreferrer">⁠Kyle Johannsen⁠</a> is Sessional Faculty Member in the Department of Philosophy at Trent University. His most recent authored book is <em>Wild Animal Ethics: The Moral and Political Problem of Wild Animal Suffering</em> (Routledge, 2021).</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/sue-donaldson-and-will-kymlicka-animals-and-the-right-to-politics-oxford-up-2026-_JPHIEZE</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The assumption that only humans can engage in politics—that only 
humans are 'zoon politikon'—is foundational to the Western tradition of 
political philosophy. While there is increasing recognition of animals' 
moral status (both within moral philosophy and at the level of public 
opinion), animals are not recognized as political subjects. This 
carefully researched but accessibly written volume—following on from the
 authors' earlier book <em>Zoopolis</em>—argues that animals too have a 
right to politics: a right to be recognized as political subjects and 
agents, and as members of political communities entitled to collective 
self-determination. <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780198989004" rel="noopener noreferrer">⁠<em>Animals and the Right to Politics</em>⁠</a>
 (Oxford University Press, 2026) draws on recent scientific work on 
animal societies, cultures, and decision-making, as well as recent work 
by political theorists rethinking ideas of agency and 
community—especially the significance of emplaced and embodied 
encounters and relationships to the activity of politics. Sue Donaldson 
and Will Kymlicka draw a picture of what it would mean to create spaces 
and practices, not only for politics conducted by humans on behalf of 
animals, but also politics with and by animals on their own terms. It 
then explores how this approach could inform a wide range of 
contemporary debates in human-animal relations, including wildlife 
conservation, urban planning, and animal labour.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.queensu.ca/philosophy/people/sue-donaldson" rel="noopener noreferrer">⁠Sue Donaldson⁠</a>
 is a Canadian author and animal advocate. She has published more than 
40 academic articles, and is the co-author, with Will Kymlicka, of <em>Zoopolis: A Political Theory of Animal Rights</em>
 (Oxford University Press, 2011) which won the Canadian Philosophical 
Association Book Prize in 2013, and has been translated into 11 
languages. She is co-convenor of the Animals in Philosophy, Politics, 
Law and Ethics research group at Queen's University, Kingston, Canada.</p>
<p><a href="https://willkymlicka.ca/" rel="noopener noreferrer">⁠Will Kymlicka⁠</a> is the author of seven books published by Oxford University Press, including <em>Contemporary Political Philosophy</em> (2nd ed., 2001), <em>Multicultural Citizenship</em> (1996), and <em>Zoopolis: A Political Theory of Animal Rights</em>
 (co-authored with Sue Donaldson; 2011). He is currently the Canada 
Research Chair in Political Philosophy at Queen's University, a Fellow 
of the Royal Society of Canada and of the Canadian Institute for 
Advanced Research, an Officer of the Order of Canada, and a 
Corresponding Fellow of the British Academy. His works have been 
translated into 34 languages.</p>
<p><a href="https://sites.google.com/view/kyle-johannsen/" rel="noopener noreferrer">⁠Kyle Johannsen⁠</a> is Sessional Faculty Member in the Department of Philosophy at Trent University. His most recent authored book is <em>Wild Animal Ethics: The Moral and Political Problem of Wild Animal Suffering</em> (Routledge, 2021).</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="98811377" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/044d601b-fd08-4e3b-8de5-f7604d1b7d51/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=044d601b-fd08-4e3b-8de5-f7604d1b7d51&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Sue Donaldson and Will Kymlicka, &quot;Animals and the Right to Politics&quot; (Oxford UP, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:42:52</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The assumption that only humans can engage in politics—that only 
humans are &apos;zoon politikon&apos;—is foundational to the Western tradition of 
political philosophy. While there is increasing recognition of animals&apos; 
moral status (both within moral philosophy and at the level of public 
opinion), animals are not recognized as political subjects. This 
carefully researched but accessibly written volume—following on from the
 authors&apos; earlier book Zoopolis—argues that animals too have a 
right to politics: a right to be recognized as political subjects and 
agents, and as members of political communities entitled to collective 
self-determination. ⁠Animals and the Right to Politics⁠
 (Oxford University Press, 2026) draws on recent scientific work on 
animal societies, cultures, and decision-making, as well as recent work 
by political theorists rethinking ideas of agency and 
community—especially the significance of emplaced and embodied 
encounters and relationships to the activity of politics. Sue Donaldson 
and Will Kymlicka draw a picture of what it would mean to create spaces 
and practices, not only for politics conducted by humans on behalf of 
animals, but also politics with and by animals on their own terms. It 
then explores how this approach could inform a wide range of 
contemporary debates in human-animal relations, including wildlife 
conservation, urban planning, and animal labour.
⁠Sue Donaldson⁠
 is a Canadian author and animal advocate. She has published more than 
40 academic articles, and is the co-author, with Will Kymlicka, of Zoopolis: A Political Theory of Animal Rights
 (Oxford University Press, 2011) which won the Canadian Philosophical 
Association Book Prize in 2013, and has been translated into 11 
languages. She is co-convenor of the Animals in Philosophy, Politics, 
Law and Ethics research group at Queen&apos;s University, Kingston, Canada.
⁠Will Kymlicka⁠ is the author of seven books published by Oxford University Press, including Contemporary Political Philosophy (2nd ed., 2001), Multicultural Citizenship (1996), and Zoopolis: A Political Theory of Animal Rights
 (co-authored with Sue Donaldson; 2011). He is currently the Canada 
Research Chair in Political Philosophy at Queen&apos;s University, a Fellow 
of the Royal Society of Canada and of the Canadian Institute for 
Advanced Research, an Officer of the Order of Canada, and a 
Corresponding Fellow of the British Academy. His works have been 
translated into 34 languages.
⁠Kyle Johannsen⁠ is Sessional Faculty Member in the Department of Philosophy at Trent University. His most recent authored book is Wild Animal Ethics: The Moral and Political Problem of Wild Animal Suffering (Routledge, 2021).
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The assumption that only humans can engage in politics—that only 
humans are &apos;zoon politikon&apos;—is foundational to the Western tradition of 
political philosophy. While there is increasing recognition of animals&apos; 
moral status (both within moral philosophy and at the level of public 
opinion), animals are not recognized as political subjects. This 
carefully researched but accessibly written volume—following on from the
 authors&apos; earlier book Zoopolis—argues that animals too have a 
right to politics: a right to be recognized as political subjects and 
agents, and as members of political communities entitled to collective 
self-determination. ⁠Animals and the Right to Politics⁠
 (Oxford University Press, 2026) draws on recent scientific work on 
animal societies, cultures, and decision-making, as well as recent work 
by political theorists rethinking ideas of agency and 
community—especially the significance of emplaced and embodied 
encounters and relationships to the activity of politics. Sue Donaldson 
and Will Kymlicka draw a picture of what it would mean to create spaces 
and practices, not only for politics conducted by humans on behalf of 
animals, but also politics with and by animals on their own terms. It 
then explores how this approach could inform a wide range of 
contemporary debates in human-animal relations, including wildlife 
conservation, urban planning, and animal labour.
⁠Sue Donaldson⁠
 is a Canadian author and animal advocate. She has published more than 
40 academic articles, and is the co-author, with Will Kymlicka, of Zoopolis: A Political Theory of Animal Rights
 (Oxford University Press, 2011) which won the Canadian Philosophical 
Association Book Prize in 2013, and has been translated into 11 
languages. She is co-convenor of the Animals in Philosophy, Politics, 
Law and Ethics research group at Queen&apos;s University, Kingston, Canada.
⁠Will Kymlicka⁠ is the author of seven books published by Oxford University Press, including Contemporary Political Philosophy (2nd ed., 2001), Multicultural Citizenship (1996), and Zoopolis: A Political Theory of Animal Rights
 (co-authored with Sue Donaldson; 2011). He is currently the Canada 
Research Chair in Political Philosophy at Queen&apos;s University, a Fellow 
of the Royal Society of Canada and of the Canadian Institute for 
Advanced Research, an Officer of the Order of Canada, and a 
Corresponding Fellow of the British Academy. His works have been 
translated into 34 languages.
⁠Kyle Johannsen⁠ is Sessional Faculty Member in the Department of Philosophy at Trent University. His most recent authored book is Wild Animal Ethics: The Moral and Political Problem of Wild Animal Suffering (Routledge, 2021).
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1708</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">a3d9431e-7c02-11f1-ab79-ebfe40970a29</guid>
      <title>What are the Limits of Political Speech? A Conversation with Erik J. Olsen</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9783111698250" rel="noopener noreferrer">A New Approach to Political Speech:&nbsp;Democratic Theory, Constitutional Law, and Public Liberty After January 6</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(de Gruyter, 2026)&nbsp;challenges conventional understandings of political speech and its relationship to democracy. Through a focused case study of Donald Trump's role in attempting to overturn the 2020 election and the prosecutions stemming from it, Erik Olsen develops a critique of the prevailing view that political speech is a private right that is only instrumentally related to political action. He advocates instead for a theoretical framework that treats political speech as a form of communicative action and balances the protection of free expression with the need to safeguard core democratic practices and processes. He thus outlines a more robust First Amendment jurisprudence that can better defend both public liberty and democratic institutions from authoritarian threats in the current era of democratic backsliding.</p>
<p>Erik J. Olsen is Professor Emeritus of Political Science at Seattle University.</p>
<p><em>Caleb Zakarin is CEO and Publisher of the New Books Network.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/what-are-the-limits-of-political-speech-a-conversation-with-erik-j-olsen-lyftpaoR</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9783111698250" rel="noopener noreferrer">A New Approach to Political Speech:&nbsp;Democratic Theory, Constitutional Law, and Public Liberty After January 6</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(de Gruyter, 2026)&nbsp;challenges conventional understandings of political speech and its relationship to democracy. Through a focused case study of Donald Trump's role in attempting to overturn the 2020 election and the prosecutions stemming from it, Erik Olsen develops a critique of the prevailing view that political speech is a private right that is only instrumentally related to political action. He advocates instead for a theoretical framework that treats political speech as a form of communicative action and balances the protection of free expression with the need to safeguard core democratic practices and processes. He thus outlines a more robust First Amendment jurisprudence that can better defend both public liberty and democratic institutions from authoritarian threats in the current era of democratic backsliding.</p>
<p>Erik J. Olsen is Professor Emeritus of Political Science at Seattle University.</p>
<p><em>Caleb Zakarin is CEO and Publisher of the New Books Network.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="70519823" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/41e26e7e-8146-4ba6-b255-dccad2c84580/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=41e26e7e-8146-4ba6-b255-dccad2c84580&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>What are the Limits of Political Speech? A Conversation with Erik J. Olsen</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:13:23</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>A New Approach to Political Speech: Democratic Theory, Constitutional Law, and Public Liberty After January 6 (de Gruyter, 2026) challenges conventional understandings of political speech and its relationship to democracy. Through a focused case study of Donald Trump&apos;s role in attempting to overturn the 2020 election and the prosecutions stemming from it, Erik Olsen develops a critique of the prevailing view that political speech is a private right that is only instrumentally related to political action. He advocates instead for a theoretical framework that treats political speech as a form of communicative action and balances the protection of free expression with the need to safeguard core democratic practices and processes. He thus outlines a more robust First Amendment jurisprudence that can better defend both public liberty and democratic institutions from authoritarian threats in the current era of democratic backsliding.
Erik J. Olsen is Professor Emeritus of Political Science at Seattle University.
Caleb Zakarin is CEO and Publisher of the New Books Network.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>A New Approach to Political Speech: Democratic Theory, Constitutional Law, and Public Liberty After January 6 (de Gruyter, 2026) challenges conventional understandings of political speech and its relationship to democracy. Through a focused case study of Donald Trump&apos;s role in attempting to overturn the 2020 election and the prosecutions stemming from it, Erik Olsen develops a critique of the prevailing view that political speech is a private right that is only instrumentally related to political action. He advocates instead for a theoretical framework that treats political speech as a form of communicative action and balances the protection of free expression with the need to safeguard core democratic practices and processes. He thus outlines a more robust First Amendment jurisprudence that can better defend both public liberty and democratic institutions from authoritarian threats in the current era of democratic backsliding.
Erik J. Olsen is Professor Emeritus of Political Science at Seattle University.
Caleb Zakarin is CEO and Publisher of the New Books Network.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1706</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">64acd29c-7a6c-11f1-b043-3728e9de8054</guid>
      <title>Are Capitalism and Democracy Fundamentally Incompatible? A Conversation with Mordecai Kurz</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Today I'm speaking with Mordecai Kurz, Joan Kenney Professor of Economics Emeritus at Stanford University. We are discussing his latest book,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780262053525" rel="noopener noreferrer">Private Power and Democracy's Decline: How to Make Capitalism Support Democracy</a><em>&nbsp;</em>﻿(MIT Press, 2026). After its high-water mark several decades ago, democracy's status continues to slide globally. Capitalism and democracy, which once seemed to complement each other, now appear at odds. Free-market policies and monopolistic technologies have enriched many while driving inequalities that harm workers. Many have opined on how to fix the political and economic problems of our day, from an embrace of radical libertarian policy to socialist ownership of the means of production. Mordecai Kurz's extensive study of capitalism and democracy charts a path for balancing economic and political freedom. Since the days of Adam Smith, technology has changed rapidly, necessitating new formulations that take into account the private power centers that exercise control much like monarchies did in the Age of Enlightenment. Despite the imbalance, capitalism still remains a driver of technological progress and innovation. How can we make both capitalism and democracy work for the good of everyone? I'm happy today to get the chance to speak with such an illustrious scholar and to learn a bit more about how to understand this defining puzzle of our age.</p>
<p><em>Caleb Zakarin is CEO and Publisher of the New Books Network.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 9 Jul 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/are-capitalism-and-democracy-fundamentally-incompatible-a-conversation-with-mordecai-kurz-X86mMWX4</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today I'm speaking with Mordecai Kurz, Joan Kenney Professor of Economics Emeritus at Stanford University. We are discussing his latest book,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780262053525" rel="noopener noreferrer">Private Power and Democracy's Decline: How to Make Capitalism Support Democracy</a><em>&nbsp;</em>﻿(MIT Press, 2026). After its high-water mark several decades ago, democracy's status continues to slide globally. Capitalism and democracy, which once seemed to complement each other, now appear at odds. Free-market policies and monopolistic technologies have enriched many while driving inequalities that harm workers. Many have opined on how to fix the political and economic problems of our day, from an embrace of radical libertarian policy to socialist ownership of the means of production. Mordecai Kurz's extensive study of capitalism and democracy charts a path for balancing economic and political freedom. Since the days of Adam Smith, technology has changed rapidly, necessitating new formulations that take into account the private power centers that exercise control much like monarchies did in the Age of Enlightenment. Despite the imbalance, capitalism still remains a driver of technological progress and innovation. How can we make both capitalism and democracy work for the good of everyone? I'm happy today to get the chance to speak with such an illustrious scholar and to learn a bit more about how to understand this defining puzzle of our age.</p>
<p><em>Caleb Zakarin is CEO and Publisher of the New Books Network.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="61808164" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/94832687-5918-4de1-8cb2-54dc3bd4b2ae/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=94832687-5918-4de1-8cb2-54dc3bd4b2ae&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Are Capitalism and Democracy Fundamentally Incompatible? A Conversation with Mordecai Kurz</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:04:20</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Today I&apos;m speaking with Mordecai Kurz, Joan Kenney Professor of Economics Emeritus at Stanford University. We are discussing his latest book, Private Power and Democracy&apos;s Decline: How to Make Capitalism Support Democracy ﻿(MIT Press, 2026). After its high-water mark several decades ago, democracy&apos;s status continues to slide globally. Capitalism and democracy, which once seemed to complement each other, now appear at odds. Free-market policies and monopolistic technologies have enriched many while driving inequalities that harm workers. Many have opined on how to fix the political and economic problems of our day, from an embrace of radical libertarian policy to socialist ownership of the means of production. Mordecai Kurz&apos;s extensive study of capitalism and democracy charts a path for balancing economic and political freedom. Since the days of Adam Smith, technology has changed rapidly, necessitating new formulations that take into account the private power centers that exercise control much like monarchies did in the Age of Enlightenment. Despite the imbalance, capitalism still remains a driver of technological progress and innovation. How can we make both capitalism and democracy work for the good of everyone? I&apos;m happy today to get the chance to speak with such an illustrious scholar and to learn a bit more about how to understand this defining puzzle of our age.
Caleb Zakarin is CEO and Publisher of the New Books Network.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Today I&apos;m speaking with Mordecai Kurz, Joan Kenney Professor of Economics Emeritus at Stanford University. We are discussing his latest book, Private Power and Democracy&apos;s Decline: How to Make Capitalism Support Democracy ﻿(MIT Press, 2026). After its high-water mark several decades ago, democracy&apos;s status continues to slide globally. Capitalism and democracy, which once seemed to complement each other, now appear at odds. Free-market policies and monopolistic technologies have enriched many while driving inequalities that harm workers. Many have opined on how to fix the political and economic problems of our day, from an embrace of radical libertarian policy to socialist ownership of the means of production. Mordecai Kurz&apos;s extensive study of capitalism and democracy charts a path for balancing economic and political freedom. Since the days of Adam Smith, technology has changed rapidly, necessitating new formulations that take into account the private power centers that exercise control much like monarchies did in the Age of Enlightenment. Despite the imbalance, capitalism still remains a driver of technological progress and innovation. How can we make both capitalism and democracy work for the good of everyone? I&apos;m happy today to get the chance to speak with such an illustrious scholar and to learn a bit more about how to understand this defining puzzle of our age.
Caleb Zakarin is CEO and Publisher of the New Books Network.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1705</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">15073e80-7567-11f1-9cf7-c712ef5fcb7b</guid>
      <title>Lila Corwin Berman, &quot;Who Is American? Belonging and the Question of Jewish Citizenship&quot; (Princeton UP, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The history of Jews in the United States is often told as if they 
immigrated, gained citizenship, and almost immediately achieved full 
legal rights. Yet this story fundamentally misses how citizenship rights
 worked for Jews and countless others who arrived on American shores. In
<em> </em><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691287744" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Who Is American? Belonging and the Question of Jewish Citizenship</em>,</a>&nbsp;Lila
 Corwin Berman draws on case law, statutes, and debates to argue that 
both the laws of American citizenship and Jews’ position in them changed
 repeatedly across the twentieth century. Courts, policymakers, and the 
public persistently asked what it meant to be Jewish under the law. Were
 Jews a race, a nationality, a religion—or some combination of each? The
 answer carried profound legal consequences. Not only did it determine 
Jews’ citizenship status, but it also affected the rights they could 
exercise. Just as significantly, the meaning of the categories under law
 changed over time, affecting Jews’ self-understanding, their political 
ideals, and their relationships to other groups of Americans.<br><em>Who Is American? </em>tells a history that resonates powerfully with
 today’s high-stakes battles over citizenship and rights. As Berman 
concludes, citizenship law has always been better at posing questions 
about the terms of belonging than at providing any ultimate resolution. 
The tangled story of Jewish citizenship demonstrates the limits of law 
and explains why the United States continues to fall into new and, 
often, unsettling debates about who is American.</p>
<p>Lila Corwin Berman is the Paul and Sylvia Steinberg Professor of 
American Jewish History at New York University, where she directs the 
Goldstein-Goren Center for American Jewish History. She is author of <em>The American Jewish Philanthropic Complex: The History of a Multibillion-Dollar Institution</em> (Princeton) and <em>Metropolitan Jews: Politics, Race, and Religion in Postwar Detroit</em>.</p>
<p>Geraldine Gudefin is a modern Jewish historian researching Jewish 
migrations, family life, and legal pluralism. She is currently a 
Visiting Scholar at the Centre for Asian Legal Studies at the National 
University of Singapore, and is completing a book titled <em>An Impossible Divorce? East European Jews and the Limits of Legal Pluralism in France, 1900-1939</em>.</p>
<p><u>Mentioned in this episode</u>:</p>
<ul>
  <li>Linda Bosniak, <em>The Citizen and the Alien: Dilemmas of Contemporary Membership </em>(Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2006). </li>
  <li>Lila Corwin Berman, <em>The American Jewish Philanthropic Complex: The History of a Multibillion Dollar Institution</em>
(Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2020).</li>
  <li>William E. 
Forbath, “Constitutionalism, Human Rights, and the Genealogy of Jewish 
American Liberalism,” in James Loeffler and Moria Paz, eds., <em>The Law of Strangers: Jewish Lawyers and International Law in the Twentieth Century</em> (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2019), 118-140.</li>
  <li>Ian Haney López, <em>White by Law: The Legal Construction of Race </em>(New York: New York University Press, 2006).</li>
  <li>Will Herberg, <em>Protestant—Catholic—Jew: An Essay in American Religious Sociology</em> (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1983).</li>
  <li>Benjamin Lawrance and Jacqueline Stevens, eds., <em>Citizenship in Question: Evidentiary Birthright and Statelessness</em> (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2017). </li>
  <li>David Sorkin, <em>Jewish Emancipation: A History Across Five Centuries</em> (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2019).</li>
  <li>Posen Library Jewish Studies Curriculum Initiative: <a href="https://www.posenlibrary.com/Jewish-Studies-Curriculum" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://www.posenlibrary.com/Jewish-Studies-Curriculum</a>
</li>
</ul><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 6 Jul 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/lila-corwin-berman-who-is-american-belonging-and-the-question-of-jewish-citizenship-princeton-up-2026-Q8p6GaUk</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The history of Jews in the United States is often told as if they 
immigrated, gained citizenship, and almost immediately achieved full 
legal rights. Yet this story fundamentally misses how citizenship rights
 worked for Jews and countless others who arrived on American shores. In
<em> </em><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691287744" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Who Is American? Belonging and the Question of Jewish Citizenship</em>,</a>&nbsp;Lila
 Corwin Berman draws on case law, statutes, and debates to argue that 
both the laws of American citizenship and Jews’ position in them changed
 repeatedly across the twentieth century. Courts, policymakers, and the 
public persistently asked what it meant to be Jewish under the law. Were
 Jews a race, a nationality, a religion—or some combination of each? The
 answer carried profound legal consequences. Not only did it determine 
Jews’ citizenship status, but it also affected the rights they could 
exercise. Just as significantly, the meaning of the categories under law
 changed over time, affecting Jews’ self-understanding, their political 
ideals, and their relationships to other groups of Americans.<br><em>Who Is American? </em>tells a history that resonates powerfully with
 today’s high-stakes battles over citizenship and rights. As Berman 
concludes, citizenship law has always been better at posing questions 
about the terms of belonging than at providing any ultimate resolution. 
The tangled story of Jewish citizenship demonstrates the limits of law 
and explains why the United States continues to fall into new and, 
often, unsettling debates about who is American.</p>
<p>Lila Corwin Berman is the Paul and Sylvia Steinberg Professor of 
American Jewish History at New York University, where she directs the 
Goldstein-Goren Center for American Jewish History. She is author of <em>The American Jewish Philanthropic Complex: The History of a Multibillion-Dollar Institution</em> (Princeton) and <em>Metropolitan Jews: Politics, Race, and Religion in Postwar Detroit</em>.</p>
<p>Geraldine Gudefin is a modern Jewish historian researching Jewish 
migrations, family life, and legal pluralism. She is currently a 
Visiting Scholar at the Centre for Asian Legal Studies at the National 
University of Singapore, and is completing a book titled <em>An Impossible Divorce? East European Jews and the Limits of Legal Pluralism in France, 1900-1939</em>.</p>
<p><u>Mentioned in this episode</u>:</p>
<ul>
  <li>Linda Bosniak, <em>The Citizen and the Alien: Dilemmas of Contemporary Membership </em>(Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2006). </li>
  <li>Lila Corwin Berman, <em>The American Jewish Philanthropic Complex: The History of a Multibillion Dollar Institution</em>
(Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2020).</li>
  <li>William E. 
Forbath, “Constitutionalism, Human Rights, and the Genealogy of Jewish 
American Liberalism,” in James Loeffler and Moria Paz, eds., <em>The Law of Strangers: Jewish Lawyers and International Law in the Twentieth Century</em> (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2019), 118-140.</li>
  <li>Ian Haney López, <em>White by Law: The Legal Construction of Race </em>(New York: New York University Press, 2006).</li>
  <li>Will Herberg, <em>Protestant—Catholic—Jew: An Essay in American Religious Sociology</em> (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1983).</li>
  <li>Benjamin Lawrance and Jacqueline Stevens, eds., <em>Citizenship in Question: Evidentiary Birthright and Statelessness</em> (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2017). </li>
  <li>David Sorkin, <em>Jewish Emancipation: A History Across Five Centuries</em> (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2019).</li>
  <li>Posen Library Jewish Studies Curriculum Initiative: <a href="https://www.posenlibrary.com/Jewish-Studies-Curriculum" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://www.posenlibrary.com/Jewish-Studies-Curriculum</a>
</li>
</ul><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="56333693" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/fc5d5b07-d7d4-4f93-aa62-30c07a219bee/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=fc5d5b07-d7d4-4f93-aa62-30c07a219bee&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Lila Corwin Berman, &quot;Who Is American? Belonging and the Question of Jewish Citizenship&quot; (Princeton UP, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:58:37</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The history of Jews in the United States is often told as if they 
immigrated, gained citizenship, and almost immediately achieved full 
legal rights. Yet this story fundamentally misses how citizenship rights
 worked for Jews and countless others who arrived on American shores. In
 Who Is American? Belonging and the Question of Jewish Citizenship, Lila
 Corwin Berman draws on case law, statutes, and debates to argue that 
both the laws of American citizenship and Jews’ position in them changed
 repeatedly across the twentieth century. Courts, policymakers, and the 
public persistently asked what it meant to be Jewish under the law. Were
 Jews a race, a nationality, a religion—or some combination of each? The
 answer carried profound legal consequences. Not only did it determine 
Jews’ citizenship status, but it also affected the rights they could 
exercise. Just as significantly, the meaning of the categories under law
 changed over time, affecting Jews’ self-understanding, their political 
ideals, and their relationships to other groups of Americans.Who Is American? tells a history that resonates powerfully with
 today’s high-stakes battles over citizenship and rights. As Berman 
concludes, citizenship law has always been better at posing questions 
about the terms of belonging than at providing any ultimate resolution. 
The tangled story of Jewish citizenship demonstrates the limits of law 
and explains why the United States continues to fall into new and, 
often, unsettling debates about who is American.
Lila Corwin Berman is the Paul and Sylvia Steinberg Professor of 
American Jewish History at New York University, where she directs the 
Goldstein-Goren Center for American Jewish History. She is author of The American Jewish Philanthropic Complex: The History of a Multibillion-Dollar Institution (Princeton) and Metropolitan Jews: Politics, Race, and Religion in Postwar Detroit.
Geraldine Gudefin is a modern Jewish historian researching Jewish 
migrations, family life, and legal pluralism. She is currently a 
Visiting Scholar at the Centre for Asian Legal Studies at the National 
University of Singapore, and is completing a book titled An Impossible Divorce? East European Jews and the Limits of Legal Pluralism in France, 1900-1939.
Mentioned in this episode:
 Linda Bosniak, The Citizen and the Alien: Dilemmas of Contemporary Membership (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2006). 
 Lila Corwin Berman, The American Jewish Philanthropic Complex: The History of a Multibillion Dollar Institution
(Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2020).
 William E. 
Forbath, “Constitutionalism, Human Rights, and the Genealogy of Jewish 
American Liberalism,” in James Loeffler and Moria Paz, eds., The Law of Strangers: Jewish Lawyers and International Law in the Twentieth Century (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2019), 118-140.
 Ian Haney López, White by Law: The Legal Construction of Race (New York: New York University Press, 2006).
 Will Herberg, Protestant—Catholic—Jew: An Essay in American Religious Sociology (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1983).
 Benjamin Lawrance and Jacqueline Stevens, eds., Citizenship in Question: Evidentiary Birthright and Statelessness (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2017). 
 David Sorkin, Jewish Emancipation: A History Across Five Centuries (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2019).
 Posen Library Jewish Studies Curriculum Initiative: https://www.posenlibrary.com/Jewish-Studies-Curriculum
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The history of Jews in the United States is often told as if they 
immigrated, gained citizenship, and almost immediately achieved full 
legal rights. Yet this story fundamentally misses how citizenship rights
 worked for Jews and countless others who arrived on American shores. In
 Who Is American? Belonging and the Question of Jewish Citizenship, Lila
 Corwin Berman draws on case law, statutes, and debates to argue that 
both the laws of American citizenship and Jews’ position in them changed
 repeatedly across the twentieth century. Courts, policymakers, and the 
public persistently asked what it meant to be Jewish under the law. Were
 Jews a race, a nationality, a religion—or some combination of each? The
 answer carried profound legal consequences. Not only did it determine 
Jews’ citizenship status, but it also affected the rights they could 
exercise. Just as significantly, the meaning of the categories under law
 changed over time, affecting Jews’ self-understanding, their political 
ideals, and their relationships to other groups of Americans.Who Is American? tells a history that resonates powerfully with
 today’s high-stakes battles over citizenship and rights. As Berman 
concludes, citizenship law has always been better at posing questions 
about the terms of belonging than at providing any ultimate resolution. 
The tangled story of Jewish citizenship demonstrates the limits of law 
and explains why the United States continues to fall into new and, 
often, unsettling debates about who is American.
Lila Corwin Berman is the Paul and Sylvia Steinberg Professor of 
American Jewish History at New York University, where she directs the 
Goldstein-Goren Center for American Jewish History. She is author of The American Jewish Philanthropic Complex: The History of a Multibillion-Dollar Institution (Princeton) and Metropolitan Jews: Politics, Race, and Religion in Postwar Detroit.
Geraldine Gudefin is a modern Jewish historian researching Jewish 
migrations, family life, and legal pluralism. She is currently a 
Visiting Scholar at the Centre for Asian Legal Studies at the National 
University of Singapore, and is completing a book titled An Impossible Divorce? East European Jews and the Limits of Legal Pluralism in France, 1900-1939.
Mentioned in this episode:
 Linda Bosniak, The Citizen and the Alien: Dilemmas of Contemporary Membership (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2006). 
 Lila Corwin Berman, The American Jewish Philanthropic Complex: The History of a Multibillion Dollar Institution
(Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2020).
 William E. 
Forbath, “Constitutionalism, Human Rights, and the Genealogy of Jewish 
American Liberalism,” in James Loeffler and Moria Paz, eds., The Law of Strangers: Jewish Lawyers and International Law in the Twentieth Century (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2019), 118-140.
 Ian Haney López, White by Law: The Legal Construction of Race (New York: New York University Press, 2006).
 Will Herberg, Protestant—Catholic—Jew: An Essay in American Religious Sociology (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1983).
 Benjamin Lawrance and Jacqueline Stevens, eds., Citizenship in Question: Evidentiary Birthright and Statelessness (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2017). 
 David Sorkin, Jewish Emancipation: A History Across Five Centuries (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2019).
 Posen Library Jewish Studies Curriculum Initiative: https://www.posenlibrary.com/Jewish-Studies-Curriculum
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1704</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">84cfbc14-7554-11f1-805e-1f6ca53e4852</guid>
      <title>Paul Osterman, &quot;Disposable Workers: The Transformation of Employment&quot; (Harvard UP, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>A revealing look at the decline in formal employment in favor of 
hiring contractors, freelancers, temps, and marginal workers, who are 
excluded from traditional benefits and career ladders.</p>
<p>Companies cannot exist without workers, but they are increasingly 
reluctant to have employees. Instead of providing the benefits and 
protections that have traditionally come with employee status, 
businesses are turning to tactics that let them treat people as 
interchangeable parts, to be used and discarded as needed. Drawing on an
 original survey of over 6,000 workers, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780674300248" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Disposable Workers:&nbsp;﻿The Transformation of Employment</em></a> (Harvard University Press, 2026)&nbsp;reveals
 the striking extent of this transformation across the occupational 
hierarchy, affecting everyone from janitors to nurses.</p>
<p>Paul Osterman identifies three distinct categories of disposable 
workers: contractors, freelancers, and marginal employees. The marginal 
category, unique to Osterman’s analysis, describes workers who are 
employees from a narrow legal standpoint but are held at arm’s length by
 their firm—left without job security, skill training, or opportunities 
for promotion. Many low-wage service workers toil in marginal jobs, but 
so do white-collar professionals such as adjunct university faculty and 
staff attorneys at law firms. When the three categories are added up, 
they account for more than 35 percent of the American workforce.</p>
<p>Not all disposable workers object to their arrangements. But most 
contractors and marginal employees would prefer standard employment, and
 there is a significant cost to their current status. In response, <em>Disposable Workers</em>
 offers a range of policy recommendations, including mechanisms to 
prevent over-reliance on contracting and freelancing as well as reforms 
to improve job quality for part-timers and marginal employees. As the 
deconstruction of employment affects more and more workers, the 
importance of such measures will only grow.</p>
<p>Paul Osterman is Professor Emeritus of Human Resources and Management
 at the MIT Sloan School of Management. His numerous books include <em>Good Jobs America, Who Will Care for Us?&nbsp;(</em>Russell Sage, 2011); and <em>The Truth about Middle Managers&nbsp;</em>(Harvard Business School Press, 2009),<em>&nbsp;Who Will Care For Us: Long Term Care and the Long Term Workforce </em>(Russell Sage,2017),<em>&nbsp;Gathering Power: The Future of Progressive Politics in America </em>(Beacon Press, 2003);<em> Securing Prosperity: The American Labor Market: How It Has Changed and What to Do About It </em>(Princeton University Press, 1999),<em> and Working In America: A Blueprint for the New Labor Market </em>(MIT Press, 2001).</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 5 Jul 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/paul-osterman-disposable-workers-the-transformation-of-employment-harvard-up-2026-Duo6OOLP</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A revealing look at the decline in formal employment in favor of 
hiring contractors, freelancers, temps, and marginal workers, who are 
excluded from traditional benefits and career ladders.</p>
<p>Companies cannot exist without workers, but they are increasingly 
reluctant to have employees. Instead of providing the benefits and 
protections that have traditionally come with employee status, 
businesses are turning to tactics that let them treat people as 
interchangeable parts, to be used and discarded as needed. Drawing on an
 original survey of over 6,000 workers, <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780674300248" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Disposable Workers:&nbsp;﻿The Transformation of Employment</em></a> (Harvard University Press, 2026)&nbsp;reveals
 the striking extent of this transformation across the occupational 
hierarchy, affecting everyone from janitors to nurses.</p>
<p>Paul Osterman identifies three distinct categories of disposable 
workers: contractors, freelancers, and marginal employees. The marginal 
category, unique to Osterman’s analysis, describes workers who are 
employees from a narrow legal standpoint but are held at arm’s length by
 their firm—left without job security, skill training, or opportunities 
for promotion. Many low-wage service workers toil in marginal jobs, but 
so do white-collar professionals such as adjunct university faculty and 
staff attorneys at law firms. When the three categories are added up, 
they account for more than 35 percent of the American workforce.</p>
<p>Not all disposable workers object to their arrangements. But most 
contractors and marginal employees would prefer standard employment, and
 there is a significant cost to their current status. In response, <em>Disposable Workers</em>
 offers a range of policy recommendations, including mechanisms to 
prevent over-reliance on contracting and freelancing as well as reforms 
to improve job quality for part-timers and marginal employees. As the 
deconstruction of employment affects more and more workers, the 
importance of such measures will only grow.</p>
<p>Paul Osterman is Professor Emeritus of Human Resources and Management
 at the MIT Sloan School of Management. His numerous books include <em>Good Jobs America, Who Will Care for Us?&nbsp;(</em>Russell Sage, 2011); and <em>The Truth about Middle Managers&nbsp;</em>(Harvard Business School Press, 2009),<em>&nbsp;Who Will Care For Us: Long Term Care and the Long Term Workforce </em>(Russell Sage,2017),<em>&nbsp;Gathering Power: The Future of Progressive Politics in America </em>(Beacon Press, 2003);<em> Securing Prosperity: The American Labor Market: How It Has Changed and What to Do About It </em>(Princeton University Press, 1999),<em> and Working In America: A Blueprint for the New Labor Market </em>(MIT Press, 2001).</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="47394326" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/dfcd3e94-d5e2-4e38-8f04-73567fd090ac/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=dfcd3e94-d5e2-4e38-8f04-73567fd090ac&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Paul Osterman, &quot;Disposable Workers: The Transformation of Employment&quot; (Harvard UP, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:49:16</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>A revealing look at the decline in formal employment in favor of 
hiring contractors, freelancers, temps, and marginal workers, who are 
excluded from traditional benefits and career ladders.
Companies cannot exist without workers, but they are increasingly 
reluctant to have employees. Instead of providing the benefits and 
protections that have traditionally come with employee status, 
businesses are turning to tactics that let them treat people as 
interchangeable parts, to be used and discarded as needed. Drawing on an
 original survey of over 6,000 workers, Disposable Workers: ﻿The Transformation of Employment (Harvard University Press, 2026) reveals
 the striking extent of this transformation across the occupational 
hierarchy, affecting everyone from janitors to nurses.
Paul Osterman identifies three distinct categories of disposable 
workers: contractors, freelancers, and marginal employees. The marginal 
category, unique to Osterman’s analysis, describes workers who are 
employees from a narrow legal standpoint but are held at arm’s length by
 their firm—left without job security, skill training, or opportunities 
for promotion. Many low-wage service workers toil in marginal jobs, but 
so do white-collar professionals such as adjunct university faculty and 
staff attorneys at law firms. When the three categories are added up, 
they account for more than 35 percent of the American workforce.
Not all disposable workers object to their arrangements. But most 
contractors and marginal employees would prefer standard employment, and
 there is a significant cost to their current status. In response, Disposable Workers
 offers a range of policy recommendations, including mechanisms to 
prevent over-reliance on contracting and freelancing as well as reforms 
to improve job quality for part-timers and marginal employees. As the 
deconstruction of employment affects more and more workers, the 
importance of such measures will only grow.
Paul Osterman is Professor Emeritus of Human Resources and Management
 at the MIT Sloan School of Management. His numerous books include Good Jobs America, Who Will Care for Us? (Russell Sage, 2011); and The Truth about Middle Managers (Harvard Business School Press, 2009), Who Will Care For Us: Long Term Care and the Long Term Workforce (Russell Sage,2017), Gathering Power: The Future of Progressive Politics in America (Beacon Press, 2003); Securing Prosperity: The American Labor Market: How It Has Changed and What to Do About It (Princeton University Press, 1999), and Working In America: A Blueprint for the New Labor Market (MIT Press, 2001).
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>A revealing look at the decline in formal employment in favor of 
hiring contractors, freelancers, temps, and marginal workers, who are 
excluded from traditional benefits and career ladders.
Companies cannot exist without workers, but they are increasingly 
reluctant to have employees. Instead of providing the benefits and 
protections that have traditionally come with employee status, 
businesses are turning to tactics that let them treat people as 
interchangeable parts, to be used and discarded as needed. Drawing on an
 original survey of over 6,000 workers, Disposable Workers: ﻿The Transformation of Employment (Harvard University Press, 2026) reveals
 the striking extent of this transformation across the occupational 
hierarchy, affecting everyone from janitors to nurses.
Paul Osterman identifies three distinct categories of disposable 
workers: contractors, freelancers, and marginal employees. The marginal 
category, unique to Osterman’s analysis, describes workers who are 
employees from a narrow legal standpoint but are held at arm’s length by
 their firm—left without job security, skill training, or opportunities 
for promotion. Many low-wage service workers toil in marginal jobs, but 
so do white-collar professionals such as adjunct university faculty and 
staff attorneys at law firms. When the three categories are added up, 
they account for more than 35 percent of the American workforce.
Not all disposable workers object to their arrangements. But most 
contractors and marginal employees would prefer standard employment, and
 there is a significant cost to their current status. In response, Disposable Workers
 offers a range of policy recommendations, including mechanisms to 
prevent over-reliance on contracting and freelancing as well as reforms 
to improve job quality for part-timers and marginal employees. As the 
deconstruction of employment affects more and more workers, the 
importance of such measures will only grow.
Paul Osterman is Professor Emeritus of Human Resources and Management
 at the MIT Sloan School of Management. His numerous books include Good Jobs America, Who Will Care for Us? (Russell Sage, 2011); and The Truth about Middle Managers (Harvard Business School Press, 2009), Who Will Care For Us: Long Term Care and the Long Term Workforce (Russell Sage,2017), Gathering Power: The Future of Progressive Politics in America (Beacon Press, 2003); Securing Prosperity: The American Labor Market: How It Has Changed and What to Do About It (Princeton University Press, 1999), and Working In America: A Blueprint for the New Labor Market (MIT Press, 2001).
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1703</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e1f35fb6-706a-11f1-96b2-dbefac954e09</guid>
      <title>Kate Dannies, &quot;Conscripting Breadwinner Soldiers in the Late Ottoman Empire: Family, Law and War&quot; (Edinburgh UP, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781399563055" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Conscripting Breadwinner Soldiers in the Late Ottoman Empire: Family, Law and War</em>&nbsp;</a>(Edinburgh UP, 2026) by Dr. Kate Dannies examines the gender and family dimensions of mobilisation for the First World War in the Ottoman Empire, situating the war in a long-nineteenth-century social history of Ottoman military reform for the first time. It focuses on the military legal concept of muinsizlik (sole breadwinning) and how this concept shaped Ottoman military policy – namely, how militarisation and mobilisation were supported by the exploitation of women’s care and social reproductive labour, as well as the extraction of material and physical resources from Ottoman families.</p>
<p>In exploring how war worked at the level of the body, the individual and the family, this book demonstrates how Ottoman society and war became imbricated through processes of militarisation that led to significant consequences during the First World War and its aftermath. Based on a gendered reading of Ottoman military and bureaucratic archives, it addresses a pivotal moment in the modern history of the Middle East that has long awaited further study from a bottom-up perspective.</p>
<p><br><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 1 Jul 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/kate-dannies-conscripting-breadwinner-soldiers-in-the-late-ottoman-empire-family-law-and-war-edinburgh-up-2026-RVI5LPe_</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781399563055" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Conscripting Breadwinner Soldiers in the Late Ottoman Empire: Family, Law and War</em>&nbsp;</a>(Edinburgh UP, 2026) by Dr. Kate Dannies examines the gender and family dimensions of mobilisation for the First World War in the Ottoman Empire, situating the war in a long-nineteenth-century social history of Ottoman military reform for the first time. It focuses on the military legal concept of muinsizlik (sole breadwinning) and how this concept shaped Ottoman military policy – namely, how militarisation and mobilisation were supported by the exploitation of women’s care and social reproductive labour, as well as the extraction of material and physical resources from Ottoman families.</p>
<p>In exploring how war worked at the level of the body, the individual and the family, this book demonstrates how Ottoman society and war became imbricated through processes of militarisation that led to significant consequences during the First World War and its aftermath. Based on a gendered reading of Ottoman military and bureaucratic archives, it addresses a pivotal moment in the modern history of the Middle East that has long awaited further study from a bottom-up perspective.</p>
<p><br><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="57588195" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/370f8c69-cbf3-492b-b815-4219c86ef641/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=370f8c69-cbf3-492b-b815-4219c86ef641&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Kate Dannies, &quot;Conscripting Breadwinner Soldiers in the Late Ottoman Empire: Family, Law and War&quot; (Edinburgh UP, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:59:56</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Conscripting Breadwinner Soldiers in the Late Ottoman Empire: Family, Law and War (Edinburgh UP, 2026) by Dr. Kate Dannies examines the gender and family dimensions of mobilisation for the First World War in the Ottoman Empire, situating the war in a long-nineteenth-century social history of Ottoman military reform for the first time. It focuses on the military legal concept of muinsizlik (sole breadwinning) and how this concept shaped Ottoman military policy – namely, how militarisation and mobilisation were supported by the exploitation of women’s care and social reproductive labour, as well as the extraction of material and physical resources from Ottoman families.
In exploring how war worked at the level of the body, the individual and the family, this book demonstrates how Ottoman society and war became imbricated through processes of militarisation that led to significant consequences during the First World War and its aftermath. Based on a gendered reading of Ottoman military and bureaucratic archives, it addresses a pivotal moment in the modern history of the Middle East that has long awaited further study from a bottom-up perspective.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Conscripting Breadwinner Soldiers in the Late Ottoman Empire: Family, Law and War (Edinburgh UP, 2026) by Dr. Kate Dannies examines the gender and family dimensions of mobilisation for the First World War in the Ottoman Empire, situating the war in a long-nineteenth-century social history of Ottoman military reform for the first time. It focuses on the military legal concept of muinsizlik (sole breadwinning) and how this concept shaped Ottoman military policy – namely, how militarisation and mobilisation were supported by the exploitation of women’s care and social reproductive labour, as well as the extraction of material and physical resources from Ottoman families.
In exploring how war worked at the level of the body, the individual and the family, this book demonstrates how Ottoman society and war became imbricated through processes of militarisation that led to significant consequences during the First World War and its aftermath. Based on a gendered reading of Ottoman military and bureaucratic archives, it addresses a pivotal moment in the modern history of the Middle East that has long awaited further study from a bottom-up perspective.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1701</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">caa3c264-7138-11f1-aa54-e361ce722e3d</guid>
      <title>Jeremy D. Popkin, &quot;The First Emancipation: The Forgotten History of Abolition in Revolutionary France&quot; (Princeton UP, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691287553" rel="noopener noreferrer">The First Emancipation﻿: The Forgotten History of Abolition in Revolutionary France</a>&nbsp;(Princeton UP, 2026)&nbsp;is a dramatic account of how slavery and race profoundly influenced the course of the French Revolution and had a central impact on the lives of key leaders, including Mirabeau, Robespierre, Toussaint Louverture, and Napoleon. Acclaimed historian Jeremy D. Popkin brings this often-forgotten story to life, highlighting the arguments put forward by French abolitionists and their opponents and the profound repercussions of the first abolition of slavery in a Western empire.<br>When the French revolutionaries passed the Declaration of the Rights of Man and Citizen in 1789, they immediately faced a burning question: did that document’s first article—“Men are born and remain free and equal in rights”—apply to the 800,000 enslaved Black people in the country’s colonies? Over the next dozen years, revolutionary leaders fought over this question.&nbsp;<em>The First Emancipation&nbsp;</em>tells how French lawmakers initially protected slavery in their constitution but reversed themselves in 1794, making France the first western country to abolish slavery throughout its empire. Yet only eight years later, in 1802, Napoleon tried to force the emancipated Black populations of the colonies back into slavery. His decision led to his first major military defeat and to the proclamation of the independence of the Black nation of Haiti, but also to the reestablishment of slavery in other French colonies, where it would not finally be abolished until 1848.<br>The story of how France emancipated its enslaved people and declared them full citizens only to return many of them to bondage,&nbsp;<em>The First Emancipation&nbsp;</em>reveals that the course of abolition in the modern world was more winding and halting than is often remembered.﻿</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 1 Jul 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/jeremy-d-popkin-the-first-emancipation-the-forgotten-history-of-abolition-in-revolutionary-france-princeton-up-2026-M8fmAkzp</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691287553" rel="noopener noreferrer">The First Emancipation﻿: The Forgotten History of Abolition in Revolutionary France</a>&nbsp;(Princeton UP, 2026)&nbsp;is a dramatic account of how slavery and race profoundly influenced the course of the French Revolution and had a central impact on the lives of key leaders, including Mirabeau, Robespierre, Toussaint Louverture, and Napoleon. Acclaimed historian Jeremy D. Popkin brings this often-forgotten story to life, highlighting the arguments put forward by French abolitionists and their opponents and the profound repercussions of the first abolition of slavery in a Western empire.<br>When the French revolutionaries passed the Declaration of the Rights of Man and Citizen in 1789, they immediately faced a burning question: did that document’s first article—“Men are born and remain free and equal in rights”—apply to the 800,000 enslaved Black people in the country’s colonies? Over the next dozen years, revolutionary leaders fought over this question.&nbsp;<em>The First Emancipation&nbsp;</em>tells how French lawmakers initially protected slavery in their constitution but reversed themselves in 1794, making France the first western country to abolish slavery throughout its empire. Yet only eight years later, in 1802, Napoleon tried to force the emancipated Black populations of the colonies back into slavery. His decision led to his first major military defeat and to the proclamation of the independence of the Black nation of Haiti, but also to the reestablishment of slavery in other French colonies, where it would not finally be abolished until 1848.<br>The story of how France emancipated its enslaved people and declared them full citizens only to return many of them to bondage,&nbsp;<em>The First Emancipation&nbsp;</em>reveals that the course of abolition in the modern world was more winding and halting than is often remembered.﻿</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="65895720" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/70225bcd-282b-48ed-ac59-bf76315acdf3/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=70225bcd-282b-48ed-ac59-bf76315acdf3&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Jeremy D. Popkin, &quot;The First Emancipation: The Forgotten History of Abolition in Revolutionary France&quot; (Princeton UP, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:08:35</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The First Emancipation﻿: The Forgotten History of Abolition in Revolutionary France (Princeton UP, 2026) is a dramatic account of how slavery and race profoundly influenced the course of the French Revolution and had a central impact on the lives of key leaders, including Mirabeau, Robespierre, Toussaint Louverture, and Napoleon. Acclaimed historian Jeremy D. Popkin brings this often-forgotten story to life, highlighting the arguments put forward by French abolitionists and their opponents and the profound repercussions of the first abolition of slavery in a Western empire.When the French revolutionaries passed the Declaration of the Rights of Man and Citizen in 1789, they immediately faced a burning question: did that document’s first article—“Men are born and remain free and equal in rights”—apply to the 800,000 enslaved Black people in the country’s colonies? Over the next dozen years, revolutionary leaders fought over this question. The First Emancipation tells how French lawmakers initially protected slavery in their constitution but reversed themselves in 1794, making France the first western country to abolish slavery throughout its empire. Yet only eight years later, in 1802, Napoleon tried to force the emancipated Black populations of the colonies back into slavery. His decision led to his first major military defeat and to the proclamation of the independence of the Black nation of Haiti, but also to the reestablishment of slavery in other French colonies, where it would not finally be abolished until 1848.The story of how France emancipated its enslaved people and declared them full citizens only to return many of them to bondage, The First Emancipation reveals that the course of abolition in the modern world was more winding and halting than is often remembered.﻿
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The First Emancipation﻿: The Forgotten History of Abolition in Revolutionary France (Princeton UP, 2026) is a dramatic account of how slavery and race profoundly influenced the course of the French Revolution and had a central impact on the lives of key leaders, including Mirabeau, Robespierre, Toussaint Louverture, and Napoleon. Acclaimed historian Jeremy D. Popkin brings this often-forgotten story to life, highlighting the arguments put forward by French abolitionists and their opponents and the profound repercussions of the first abolition of slavery in a Western empire.When the French revolutionaries passed the Declaration of the Rights of Man and Citizen in 1789, they immediately faced a burning question: did that document’s first article—“Men are born and remain free and equal in rights”—apply to the 800,000 enslaved Black people in the country’s colonies? Over the next dozen years, revolutionary leaders fought over this question. The First Emancipation tells how French lawmakers initially protected slavery in their constitution but reversed themselves in 1794, making France the first western country to abolish slavery throughout its empire. Yet only eight years later, in 1802, Napoleon tried to force the emancipated Black populations of the colonies back into slavery. His decision led to his first major military defeat and to the proclamation of the independence of the Black nation of Haiti, but also to the reestablishment of slavery in other French colonies, where it would not finally be abolished until 1848.The story of how France emancipated its enslaved people and declared them full citizens only to return many of them to bondage, The First Emancipation reveals that the course of abolition in the modern world was more winding and halting than is often remembered.﻿
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1702</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">0329f642-706e-11f1-92d1-2ff090120dbe</guid>
      <title>Daniel Krcmaric, &quot;Above the Law&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The United States has traditionally been a great promoter of international justice – forging the Nuremberg and Tokyo tribunals after World War II and leading the way in creating tribunals to address genocides in Yugoslavia and Rwanda after the Cold War. Yet the US views the International Criminal Court – the culmination of the tribunal-building process – as a dire threat.</p>
<p>The US voted against its establishment, passed legislation threatening to invade The Hague, and tried to destroy the ICC with economic sanctions. Delving into the uneasy relationship between the world's superpower and one of its most prominent international institutions,</p>
<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/above-the-law-the-united-states-and-the-international-criminal-court-daniel-krcmaric/23027096?ean=9781009698788&amp;next=t" rel="noopener noreferrer">Above the Law: The United States and the International Criminal Court</a>&nbsp;(Cambridge UP, 2026) explains how the desire to shield American soldiers from unwanted ICC scrutiny is the ultimate source of tension. Offering a sophisticated analysis of the ICC's track record that shows how American fears are overblown, Daniel Krcmaric argues that a more cooperative US policy toward the ICC would benefit both sides.</p>
<p>Our guest is&nbsp;<a href="https://sites.google.com/site/danielkrcmaric" rel="noopener noreferrer">Daniel Krcmaric</a>, an Associate Professor of Political Science and Law at Northwestern University.</p>
<p>Our host is&nbsp;<a href="https://www.eleonoramattiacci.com/home" rel="noopener noreferrer">Eleonora Mattiacci</a>, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. She is the author of "<a href="https://www.eleonoramattiacci.com/book-project-1" rel="noopener noreferrer">Volatile States in International Politics</a>" (Oxford University Press, 2023).</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/daniel-krcmaric-above-the-law-cambridge-up-2026-1VyHAQYy</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The United States has traditionally been a great promoter of international justice – forging the Nuremberg and Tokyo tribunals after World War II and leading the way in creating tribunals to address genocides in Yugoslavia and Rwanda after the Cold War. Yet the US views the International Criminal Court – the culmination of the tribunal-building process – as a dire threat.</p>
<p>The US voted against its establishment, passed legislation threatening to invade The Hague, and tried to destroy the ICC with economic sanctions. Delving into the uneasy relationship between the world's superpower and one of its most prominent international institutions,</p>
<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/above-the-law-the-united-states-and-the-international-criminal-court-daniel-krcmaric/23027096?ean=9781009698788&amp;next=t" rel="noopener noreferrer">Above the Law: The United States and the International Criminal Court</a>&nbsp;(Cambridge UP, 2026) explains how the desire to shield American soldiers from unwanted ICC scrutiny is the ultimate source of tension. Offering a sophisticated analysis of the ICC's track record that shows how American fears are overblown, Daniel Krcmaric argues that a more cooperative US policy toward the ICC would benefit both sides.</p>
<p>Our guest is&nbsp;<a href="https://sites.google.com/site/danielkrcmaric" rel="noopener noreferrer">Daniel Krcmaric</a>, an Associate Professor of Political Science and Law at Northwestern University.</p>
<p>Our host is&nbsp;<a href="https://www.eleonoramattiacci.com/home" rel="noopener noreferrer">Eleonora Mattiacci</a>, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. She is the author of "<a href="https://www.eleonoramattiacci.com/book-project-1" rel="noopener noreferrer">Volatile States in International Politics</a>" (Oxford University Press, 2023).</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="26047106" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/8331a557-e999-4d21-84f0-219ae93f6862/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=8331a557-e999-4d21-84f0-219ae93f6862&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Daniel Krcmaric, &quot;Above the Law&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:27:04</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The United States has traditionally been a great promoter of international justice – forging the Nuremberg and Tokyo tribunals after World War II and leading the way in creating tribunals to address genocides in Yugoslavia and Rwanda after the Cold War. Yet the US views the International Criminal Court – the culmination of the tribunal-building process – as a dire threat.
The US voted against its establishment, passed legislation threatening to invade The Hague, and tried to destroy the ICC with economic sanctions. Delving into the uneasy relationship between the world&apos;s superpower and one of its most prominent international institutions,
Above the Law: The United States and the International Criminal Court (Cambridge UP, 2026) explains how the desire to shield American soldiers from unwanted ICC scrutiny is the ultimate source of tension. Offering a sophisticated analysis of the ICC&apos;s track record that shows how American fears are overblown, Daniel Krcmaric argues that a more cooperative US policy toward the ICC would benefit both sides.
Our guest is Daniel Krcmaric, an Associate Professor of Political Science and Law at Northwestern University.
Our host is Eleonora Mattiacci, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. She is the author of &quot;Volatile States in International Politics&quot; (Oxford University Press, 2023).
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The United States has traditionally been a great promoter of international justice – forging the Nuremberg and Tokyo tribunals after World War II and leading the way in creating tribunals to address genocides in Yugoslavia and Rwanda after the Cold War. Yet the US views the International Criminal Court – the culmination of the tribunal-building process – as a dire threat.
The US voted against its establishment, passed legislation threatening to invade The Hague, and tried to destroy the ICC with economic sanctions. Delving into the uneasy relationship between the world&apos;s superpower and one of its most prominent international institutions,
Above the Law: The United States and the International Criminal Court (Cambridge UP, 2026) explains how the desire to shield American soldiers from unwanted ICC scrutiny is the ultimate source of tension. Offering a sophisticated analysis of the ICC&apos;s track record that shows how American fears are overblown, Daniel Krcmaric argues that a more cooperative US policy toward the ICC would benefit both sides.
Our guest is Daniel Krcmaric, an Associate Professor of Political Science and Law at Northwestern University.
Our host is Eleonora Mattiacci, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. She is the author of &quot;Volatile States in International Politics&quot; (Oxford University Press, 2023).
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1700</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">09aff462-6e11-11f1-97b7-238e34d2a5e1</guid>
      <title>Cyanne E. Loyle, &quot;Escaping Justice: Impunity for State Crimes in the Age of Accountability&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Now more than ever, the international community plays a central role in pressing governments to hold themselves to account. Despite pressure to adhere to global human rights norms, governments continue to benefit from impunity for their past crimes. In an age of accountability, how do states continue to escape justice?</p>
<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/escaping-justice-impunity-for-state-crimes-in-the-age-of-accountability/f9e6ba5e13c30f05?ean=9781009584968&amp;next=t" rel="noopener noreferrer">Escaping Justice: Impunity for State Crimes in the Age of Accountability</a>&nbsp;(Cambridge UP, 2025)presents a theory of strategic adaptation that explains the conditions under which governments adopt transitional justice without a genuine commitment to holding state forces to account. Cyanne E. Loyle develops this theory through in-depth fieldwork conducted over the last ten years in Rwanda, Uganda, and Northern Ireland. Research in each of these cases reveals a unique strategy of adaptation: coercion, containment, and concession.</p>
<p>Using evidence from these cases, Loyle traces the conditions under which a government pursues its chosen strategies and the outcomes of transitional justice.</p>
<p>Our guest is&nbsp;<a href="https://www.cyanneloyle.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Professor Cyanne Loyle</a>, who is the Political Science Board of Visitors Early Career Professor of Political Science at Penn State University and a Senior Researcher at the Peace Research Institute Oslo (PRIO).</p>
<p>Our host is&nbsp;<a href="https://www.eleonoramattiacci.com/home" rel="noopener noreferrer">Eleonora Mattiacci</a>, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. She is the author of "<a href="https://www.eleonoramattiacci.com/book-project-1" rel="noopener noreferrer">Volatile States in International Politics</a>" (Oxford University Press, 2023).</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/cyanne-e-loyle-escaping-justice-impunity-for-state-crimes-in-the-age-of-accountability-cambridge-up-2025-m_UBra35</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now more than ever, the international community plays a central role in pressing governments to hold themselves to account. Despite pressure to adhere to global human rights norms, governments continue to benefit from impunity for their past crimes. In an age of accountability, how do states continue to escape justice?</p>
<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/escaping-justice-impunity-for-state-crimes-in-the-age-of-accountability/f9e6ba5e13c30f05?ean=9781009584968&amp;next=t" rel="noopener noreferrer">Escaping Justice: Impunity for State Crimes in the Age of Accountability</a>&nbsp;(Cambridge UP, 2025)presents a theory of strategic adaptation that explains the conditions under which governments adopt transitional justice without a genuine commitment to holding state forces to account. Cyanne E. Loyle develops this theory through in-depth fieldwork conducted over the last ten years in Rwanda, Uganda, and Northern Ireland. Research in each of these cases reveals a unique strategy of adaptation: coercion, containment, and concession.</p>
<p>Using evidence from these cases, Loyle traces the conditions under which a government pursues its chosen strategies and the outcomes of transitional justice.</p>
<p>Our guest is&nbsp;<a href="https://www.cyanneloyle.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Professor Cyanne Loyle</a>, who is the Political Science Board of Visitors Early Career Professor of Political Science at Penn State University and a Senior Researcher at the Peace Research Institute Oslo (PRIO).</p>
<p>Our host is&nbsp;<a href="https://www.eleonoramattiacci.com/home" rel="noopener noreferrer">Eleonora Mattiacci</a>, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. She is the author of "<a href="https://www.eleonoramattiacci.com/book-project-1" rel="noopener noreferrer">Volatile States in International Politics</a>" (Oxford University Press, 2023).</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="26098614" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/4549b92f-8e93-4e31-9edd-2652224f246c/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=4549b92f-8e93-4e31-9edd-2652224f246c&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Cyanne E. Loyle, &quot;Escaping Justice: Impunity for State Crimes in the Age of Accountability&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:27:07</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Now more than ever, the international community plays a central role in pressing governments to hold themselves to account. Despite pressure to adhere to global human rights norms, governments continue to benefit from impunity for their past crimes. In an age of accountability, how do states continue to escape justice?
Escaping Justice: Impunity for State Crimes in the Age of Accountability (Cambridge UP, 2025)presents a theory of strategic adaptation that explains the conditions under which governments adopt transitional justice without a genuine commitment to holding state forces to account. Cyanne E. Loyle develops this theory through in-depth fieldwork conducted over the last ten years in Rwanda, Uganda, and Northern Ireland. Research in each of these cases reveals a unique strategy of adaptation: coercion, containment, and concession.
Using evidence from these cases, Loyle traces the conditions under which a government pursues its chosen strategies and the outcomes of transitional justice.
Our guest is Professor Cyanne Loyle, who is the Political Science Board of Visitors Early Career Professor of Political Science at Penn State University and a Senior Researcher at the Peace Research Institute Oslo (PRIO).
Our host is Eleonora Mattiacci, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. She is the author of &quot;Volatile States in International Politics&quot; (Oxford University Press, 2023).
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Now more than ever, the international community plays a central role in pressing governments to hold themselves to account. Despite pressure to adhere to global human rights norms, governments continue to benefit from impunity for their past crimes. In an age of accountability, how do states continue to escape justice?
Escaping Justice: Impunity for State Crimes in the Age of Accountability (Cambridge UP, 2025)presents a theory of strategic adaptation that explains the conditions under which governments adopt transitional justice without a genuine commitment to holding state forces to account. Cyanne E. Loyle develops this theory through in-depth fieldwork conducted over the last ten years in Rwanda, Uganda, and Northern Ireland. Research in each of these cases reveals a unique strategy of adaptation: coercion, containment, and concession.
Using evidence from these cases, Loyle traces the conditions under which a government pursues its chosen strategies and the outcomes of transitional justice.
Our guest is Professor Cyanne Loyle, who is the Political Science Board of Visitors Early Career Professor of Political Science at Penn State University and a Senior Researcher at the Peace Research Institute Oslo (PRIO).
Our host is Eleonora Mattiacci, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. She is the author of &quot;Volatile States in International Politics&quot; (Oxford University Press, 2023).
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1699</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">0d82ab5c-6baf-11f1-a0e7-3fe36d456258</guid>
      <title>Jonathon W. Penney, &quot;Chilling Effects: Repression, Conformity, and Power in the Digital Age&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781108485876" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;Chilling Effects: Repression, Conformity, and Power in the Digital Age</a>&nbsp;(Cambridge UP, 2025), Jonathon W. Penney explores the increasing weaponization of surveillance, censorship, and new technology to repress and control us. With corporations, governments, and extremist actors using big data, cyber-mobs, AI, and other threats to limit our rights and freedoms, concerns about chilling effects – or how these activities deter us from exercising our rights – have become urgent. Penney draws on law, privacy, and social science to present a new conformity theory that highlights the dangers of chilling effects and their potential to erode democracy and enable a more illiberal future. He critiques conventional theories and provides a framework for predicting, explaining, and evaluating chilling effects in a range of contexts. Urgent and timely, Chilling Effects sheds light on the repressive and conforming effects of technology, state, and corporate power, and offers a roadmap of how to respond to their weaponization today and in the future.</p>
<p>You can find more information about Jon at his website:&nbsp;<a href="https://jonpenney.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://jonpenney.com/</a></p>
<p><a href="https://jakec007.github.io/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Jake Chanenson</a>&nbsp;is a computer science Ph.D. student and law student at the University of Chicago. Broadly, Jake is interested in topics relating to HCI, privacy, and tech policy. Jake’s work has been published in top venues such as ACM’s CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/jonathon-w-penney-chilling-effects-repression-conformity-and-power-in-the-digital-age-cambridge-up-2025-_oJsv_CI</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781108485876" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;Chilling Effects: Repression, Conformity, and Power in the Digital Age</a>&nbsp;(Cambridge UP, 2025), Jonathon W. Penney explores the increasing weaponization of surveillance, censorship, and new technology to repress and control us. With corporations, governments, and extremist actors using big data, cyber-mobs, AI, and other threats to limit our rights and freedoms, concerns about chilling effects – or how these activities deter us from exercising our rights – have become urgent. Penney draws on law, privacy, and social science to present a new conformity theory that highlights the dangers of chilling effects and their potential to erode democracy and enable a more illiberal future. He critiques conventional theories and provides a framework for predicting, explaining, and evaluating chilling effects in a range of contexts. Urgent and timely, Chilling Effects sheds light on the repressive and conforming effects of technology, state, and corporate power, and offers a roadmap of how to respond to their weaponization today and in the future.</p>
<p>You can find more information about Jon at his website:&nbsp;<a href="https://jonpenney.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://jonpenney.com/</a></p>
<p><a href="https://jakec007.github.io/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Jake Chanenson</a>&nbsp;is a computer science Ph.D. student and law student at the University of Chicago. Broadly, Jake is interested in topics relating to HCI, privacy, and tech policy. Jake’s work has been published in top venues such as ACM’s CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="49880249" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/5165f479-f047-4e90-b227-b1ad1f8fabbb/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=5165f479-f047-4e90-b227-b1ad1f8fabbb&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Jonathon W. Penney, &quot;Chilling Effects: Repression, Conformity, and Power in the Digital Age&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:51:51</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In Chilling Effects: Repression, Conformity, and Power in the Digital Age (Cambridge UP, 2025), Jonathon W. Penney explores the increasing weaponization of surveillance, censorship, and new technology to repress and control us. With corporations, governments, and extremist actors using big data, cyber-mobs, AI, and other threats to limit our rights and freedoms, concerns about chilling effects – or how these activities deter us from exercising our rights – have become urgent. Penney draws on law, privacy, and social science to present a new conformity theory that highlights the dangers of chilling effects and their potential to erode democracy and enable a more illiberal future. He critiques conventional theories and provides a framework for predicting, explaining, and evaluating chilling effects in a range of contexts. Urgent and timely, Chilling Effects sheds light on the repressive and conforming effects of technology, state, and corporate power, and offers a roadmap of how to respond to their weaponization today and in the future.
You can find more information about Jon at his website: https://jonpenney.com/
Jake Chanenson is a computer science Ph.D. student and law student at the University of Chicago. Broadly, Jake is interested in topics relating to HCI, privacy, and tech policy. Jake’s work has been published in top venues such as ACM’s CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In Chilling Effects: Repression, Conformity, and Power in the Digital Age (Cambridge UP, 2025), Jonathon W. Penney explores the increasing weaponization of surveillance, censorship, and new technology to repress and control us. With corporations, governments, and extremist actors using big data, cyber-mobs, AI, and other threats to limit our rights and freedoms, concerns about chilling effects – or how these activities deter us from exercising our rights – have become urgent. Penney draws on law, privacy, and social science to present a new conformity theory that highlights the dangers of chilling effects and their potential to erode democracy and enable a more illiberal future. He critiques conventional theories and provides a framework for predicting, explaining, and evaluating chilling effects in a range of contexts. Urgent and timely, Chilling Effects sheds light on the repressive and conforming effects of technology, state, and corporate power, and offers a roadmap of how to respond to their weaponization today and in the future.
You can find more information about Jon at his website: https://jonpenney.com/
Jake Chanenson is a computer science Ph.D. student and law student at the University of Chicago. Broadly, Jake is interested in topics relating to HCI, privacy, and tech policy. Jake’s work has been published in top venues such as ACM’s CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1698</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">d85b3f8e-6965-11f1-86e0-3b3a95317f63</guid>
      <title>Pink Crime: Fighting Against the Criminalization of Motherhood, Pregnancy, and Queer Identity</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>A woman miscarries and is charged with murder. A new mother tests positive for a drug her hospital administers and loses custody of her newborn. Four women are convicted of horrific crimes against children they never touched, based on junk science and homophobia and spend nearly twenty years in prison before being exonerated. A queer teenager takes a photo of a child’s diaper rash at work and is sentenced to 126 years. These cases are not aberrations. They are symptoms of a system that punishes women and queer people not for what they have done, but for who they are. In the United States, nearly three-quarters of all wrongly convicted women were convicted of crimes that never occurred at all.</p>
<p>Valena Beety, co-founder of the Indiana Innocence Project and award-winning legal scholar cited by Justice Sonia Sotomayor, reveals how ordinary tragedies—a child’s sudden death, a husband who dies in his sleep—are transformed by prosecutors into murders that never happened. These “no crime” convictions disproportionately target women and queer people, whose identities are recast as evidence of guilt through bias, junk science, and entrenched stereotypes. Drawing on devastating real-life cases, Professor Beety exposes how prosecutorial overreach, flawed forensic science, and cultural panic converge—and how fetal personhood laws, the fall of Roe v. Wade, and anti-LGBTQ+ legislation have dramatically expanded the reach of criminal law. What emerges is a chilling portrait of a legal system that increasingly criminalizes pregnancy outcomes, motherhood, and queer identity itself.</p>
<p>Guest: A wrongful convictions litigator and former federal prosecutor,&nbsp;Valena Beety&nbsp;is the McKinney Professor of Law at Indiana University-Bloomington Maurer School of Law and a co-founder of the Indiana Innocence Project. Her coursebook&nbsp;<em>The Wrongful Convictions Reader</em>&nbsp;is used in classrooms nationwide to teach about wrongful convictions.</p>
<p>Host:&nbsp;<a href="https://christinagessler.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. Christina Gessler</a>&nbsp;is an academic writing coach and editor. She uses her Ph.D. in history to explore which stories we tell, and what happens to those we never tell. She is the creator, producer and show host of the Academic Life podcast.</p>
<p>Playlist for listeners:</p>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/abortion-and-reproductive-justice-an-essential-guide-for-resistance" rel="noopener noreferrer">Reproductive Justice</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/stitching-freedom" rel="noopener noreferrer">Stitching Freedom</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/b-l-johnson-and-m-m-quinlan-youre-doing-it-wrong-e2-80-afmothering-media-and-medical-expertise-rutgers-up-2019" rel="noopener noreferrer">You're Doing It Wrong</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/witchcraft-a-history-in-thirteen-trials" rel="noopener noreferrer">Witchcraft: A History In 13 Trials</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/a-conversation-about-reproductive-health-and-abortion-studies" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Turnaway Study</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-coroners-silence-death-records-and-the-hidden-victims-of-police-violence" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Coroner's Silence</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/ghost-in-the-criminal-justice-machine" rel="noopener noreferrer">Ghost in the Criminal Justice Machine</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/secrets-of-the-killing-state" rel="noopener noreferrer">Secrets of the Killing State</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/brittany-friedman-carceral-apartheid-how-lies-and-white-supremacists-run-our-prisons-unc-press-2025" rel="noopener noreferrer">Carceral Apartheid</a></li>
</ul>
<p>Welcome to Academic Life, the podcast for your academic journey—and beyond! Please join us again to learn from more experts inside and outside the academy, and around the world. Missed any of the 300+ Academic Life episodes? Find them&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/up-partners/academic-life" rel="noopener noreferrer">here.</a>&nbsp;And thank you for listening!</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/pink-crime-fighting-against-the-criminalization-of-motherhood-pregnancy-and-queer-identity-CrPxWYmK</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A woman miscarries and is charged with murder. A new mother tests positive for a drug her hospital administers and loses custody of her newborn. Four women are convicted of horrific crimes against children they never touched, based on junk science and homophobia and spend nearly twenty years in prison before being exonerated. A queer teenager takes a photo of a child’s diaper rash at work and is sentenced to 126 years. These cases are not aberrations. They are symptoms of a system that punishes women and queer people not for what they have done, but for who they are. In the United States, nearly three-quarters of all wrongly convicted women were convicted of crimes that never occurred at all.</p>
<p>Valena Beety, co-founder of the Indiana Innocence Project and award-winning legal scholar cited by Justice Sonia Sotomayor, reveals how ordinary tragedies—a child’s sudden death, a husband who dies in his sleep—are transformed by prosecutors into murders that never happened. These “no crime” convictions disproportionately target women and queer people, whose identities are recast as evidence of guilt through bias, junk science, and entrenched stereotypes. Drawing on devastating real-life cases, Professor Beety exposes how prosecutorial overreach, flawed forensic science, and cultural panic converge—and how fetal personhood laws, the fall of Roe v. Wade, and anti-LGBTQ+ legislation have dramatically expanded the reach of criminal law. What emerges is a chilling portrait of a legal system that increasingly criminalizes pregnancy outcomes, motherhood, and queer identity itself.</p>
<p>Guest: A wrongful convictions litigator and former federal prosecutor,&nbsp;Valena Beety&nbsp;is the McKinney Professor of Law at Indiana University-Bloomington Maurer School of Law and a co-founder of the Indiana Innocence Project. Her coursebook&nbsp;<em>The Wrongful Convictions Reader</em>&nbsp;is used in classrooms nationwide to teach about wrongful convictions.</p>
<p>Host:&nbsp;<a href="https://christinagessler.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. Christina Gessler</a>&nbsp;is an academic writing coach and editor. She uses her Ph.D. in history to explore which stories we tell, and what happens to those we never tell. She is the creator, producer and show host of the Academic Life podcast.</p>
<p>Playlist for listeners:</p>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/abortion-and-reproductive-justice-an-essential-guide-for-resistance" rel="noopener noreferrer">Reproductive Justice</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/stitching-freedom" rel="noopener noreferrer">Stitching Freedom</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/b-l-johnson-and-m-m-quinlan-youre-doing-it-wrong-e2-80-afmothering-media-and-medical-expertise-rutgers-up-2019" rel="noopener noreferrer">You're Doing It Wrong</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/witchcraft-a-history-in-thirteen-trials" rel="noopener noreferrer">Witchcraft: A History In 13 Trials</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/a-conversation-about-reproductive-health-and-abortion-studies" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Turnaway Study</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-coroners-silence-death-records-and-the-hidden-victims-of-police-violence" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Coroner's Silence</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/ghost-in-the-criminal-justice-machine" rel="noopener noreferrer">Ghost in the Criminal Justice Machine</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/secrets-of-the-killing-state" rel="noopener noreferrer">Secrets of the Killing State</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/brittany-friedman-carceral-apartheid-how-lies-and-white-supremacists-run-our-prisons-unc-press-2025" rel="noopener noreferrer">Carceral Apartheid</a></li>
</ul>
<p>Welcome to Academic Life, the podcast for your academic journey—and beyond! Please join us again to learn from more experts inside and outside the academy, and around the world. Missed any of the 300+ Academic Life episodes? Find them&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/up-partners/academic-life" rel="noopener noreferrer">here.</a>&nbsp;And thank you for listening!</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="44635149" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/d94f943a-288c-4339-9eba-7074f801dfd6/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=d94f943a-288c-4339-9eba-7074f801dfd6&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Pink Crime: Fighting Against the Criminalization of Motherhood, Pregnancy, and Queer Identity</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:46:26</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>A woman miscarries and is charged with murder. A new mother tests positive for a drug her hospital administers and loses custody of her newborn. Four women are convicted of horrific crimes against children they never touched, based on junk science and homophobia and spend nearly twenty years in prison before being exonerated. A queer teenager takes a photo of a child’s diaper rash at work and is sentenced to 126 years. These cases are not aberrations. They are symptoms of a system that punishes women and queer people not for what they have done, but for who they are. In the United States, nearly three-quarters of all wrongly convicted women were convicted of crimes that never occurred at all.
Valena Beety, co-founder of the Indiana Innocence Project and award-winning legal scholar cited by Justice Sonia Sotomayor, reveals how ordinary tragedies—a child’s sudden death, a husband who dies in his sleep—are transformed by prosecutors into murders that never happened. These “no crime” convictions disproportionately target women and queer people, whose identities are recast as evidence of guilt through bias, junk science, and entrenched stereotypes. Drawing on devastating real-life cases, Professor Beety exposes how prosecutorial overreach, flawed forensic science, and cultural panic converge—and how fetal personhood laws, the fall of Roe v. Wade, and anti-LGBTQ+ legislation have dramatically expanded the reach of criminal law. What emerges is a chilling portrait of a legal system that increasingly criminalizes pregnancy outcomes, motherhood, and queer identity itself.
Guest: A wrongful convictions litigator and former federal prosecutor, Valena Beety is the McKinney Professor of Law at Indiana University-Bloomington Maurer School of Law and a co-founder of the Indiana Innocence Project. Her coursebook The Wrongful Convictions Reader is used in classrooms nationwide to teach about wrongful convictions.
Host: Dr. Christina Gessler is an academic writing coach and editor. She uses her Ph.D. in history to explore which stories we tell, and what happens to those we never tell. She is the creator, producer and show host of the Academic Life podcast.
Playlist for listeners:
 Reproductive Justice
 Stitching Freedom
 You&apos;re Doing It Wrong
 Witchcraft: A History In 13 Trials
 The Turnaway Study
 The Coroner&apos;s Silence
 Ghost in the Criminal Justice Machine
 Secrets of the Killing State
 Carceral Apartheid
Welcome to Academic Life, the podcast for your academic journey—and beyond! Please join us again to learn from more experts inside and outside the academy, and around the world. Missed any of the 300+ Academic Life episodes? Find them here. And thank you for listening!
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>A woman miscarries and is charged with murder. A new mother tests positive for a drug her hospital administers and loses custody of her newborn. Four women are convicted of horrific crimes against children they never touched, based on junk science and homophobia and spend nearly twenty years in prison before being exonerated. A queer teenager takes a photo of a child’s diaper rash at work and is sentenced to 126 years. These cases are not aberrations. They are symptoms of a system that punishes women and queer people not for what they have done, but for who they are. In the United States, nearly three-quarters of all wrongly convicted women were convicted of crimes that never occurred at all.
Valena Beety, co-founder of the Indiana Innocence Project and award-winning legal scholar cited by Justice Sonia Sotomayor, reveals how ordinary tragedies—a child’s sudden death, a husband who dies in his sleep—are transformed by prosecutors into murders that never happened. These “no crime” convictions disproportionately target women and queer people, whose identities are recast as evidence of guilt through bias, junk science, and entrenched stereotypes. Drawing on devastating real-life cases, Professor Beety exposes how prosecutorial overreach, flawed forensic science, and cultural panic converge—and how fetal personhood laws, the fall of Roe v. Wade, and anti-LGBTQ+ legislation have dramatically expanded the reach of criminal law. What emerges is a chilling portrait of a legal system that increasingly criminalizes pregnancy outcomes, motherhood, and queer identity itself.
Guest: A wrongful convictions litigator and former federal prosecutor, Valena Beety is the McKinney Professor of Law at Indiana University-Bloomington Maurer School of Law and a co-founder of the Indiana Innocence Project. Her coursebook The Wrongful Convictions Reader is used in classrooms nationwide to teach about wrongful convictions.
Host: Dr. Christina Gessler is an academic writing coach and editor. She uses her Ph.D. in history to explore which stories we tell, and what happens to those we never tell. She is the creator, producer and show host of the Academic Life podcast.
Playlist for listeners:
 Reproductive Justice
 Stitching Freedom
 You&apos;re Doing It Wrong
 Witchcraft: A History In 13 Trials
 The Turnaway Study
 The Coroner&apos;s Silence
 Ghost in the Criminal Justice Machine
 Secrets of the Killing State
 Carceral Apartheid
Welcome to Academic Life, the podcast for your academic journey—and beyond! Please join us again to learn from more experts inside and outside the academy, and around the world. Missed any of the 300+ Academic Life episodes? Find them here. And thank you for listening!
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1696</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">cdcb8ade-6969-11f1-8c5c-6b54f428fc7d</guid>
      <title>Anna O. Law, &quot;Migration and the Origins of American Citizenship: African Americans, Native Americans, and Immigrants&quot; (Oxford UP, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Anna O. Law, the Herbert Kurz Chair in Constitutional Rights in the Department of Political Science at City University of New York-Brooklyn Campus, has a deeply researched and important new book that weaves together different approaches to understanding American citizenship, especially in context of immigration and migration in the first century of the U.S. republic.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197660089" rel="noopener noreferrer">Migration and the Origins of American Citizenship: African Americans, Native Americans, and Immigrants</a><em>﻿</em>&nbsp;(Oxford University Press, 2026)&nbsp;engages three different disciplines, including Political Science, History, and Legal Studies/Law, to unpack the many different approaches to citizenship in the new republic. Law noted as we spoke that she had not intended to write a book about slavery, but it was impossible to think about or understand immigration in the United States, especially in the first century of the United States, without examining the particular place and role of those who were enslaved, since they were also immigrants to the United States, though it was a forced immigration, against their will and without their consent. Part of what&nbsp;<a href="https://global.oup.com/academic/product/migration-and-the-origins-of-american-citizenship-9780197660096?lang=en&amp;cc=us" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Migration and the Origins of American Citizenship</em></a>&nbsp;focuses on is that prior to the Civil War and the post-war constitutional Amendments, immigration was a patchwork, designed state by state, without a national standard or structure. Thus, we see a form of federalism that shifts from the states to the national government after the 14th&nbsp;and 15th&nbsp;Amendments, and after a number of pieces of legislation passed in the 1880s by Congress. Immigration becomes a more centralized issue and process as Congress passed a raft of restrictive laws focused mostly on Chinese individuals. These moves took the power to manage immigration away from the individual states and nationalized policies and regulations.</p>
<p>At the same time, the story of American immigration is incomplete without understanding how the national government forcefully took land belonging to Native Americans and compelled their migration to other areas of the United States. In much the same way that we cannot understand immigration without understanding how slavery was intertwined with it, we also can’t understand immigration to the United States without the history of how newly arrived immigrants displaced Native Americans and were given stolen land through national and state level regulations and policies. This is another entire area of history, policy, law, and regulation that Law unpacks to explore the interaction between Native Americans, sovereignty, land claims, and federalism in context of American citizenship and the complexity of who was and was not considered to be a citizen.</p>
<p><a href="https://global.oup.com/academic/product/migration-and-the-origins-of-american-citizenship-9780197660096?lang=en&amp;cc=us" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Migration and the Origins of American Citizenship</em></a>&nbsp;is a masterful work that helps us understand the contemporary battles over citizenship. As the Supreme Court is set to make yet another determination of how the 14th&nbsp;Amendment is to be applied to individuals born in the United States, Law’s research and analysis has particular relevance and importance as we grapple with these ongoing disputes.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/hosts/profile/a7ac4af9-1306-463f-baf9-00f1f4187dfd" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books in Political Science</em></a><em>&nbsp;channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of&nbsp;</em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700633883/the-politics-of-the-marvel-cinematic-universe/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume I: The Infinity Saga (</em></a><em>University Press of Kansas, 2022), and of&nbsp;</em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700640546/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume II: Into the Multiverse</em></a><em>&nbsp;(University Press of Kansas, 2025) as well as co-editor of the award winning book,&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.kentuckypress.com/9780813141015/women-and-the-white-house/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a><em>&nbsp;(University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached&nbsp;</em><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/gorenlj.bsky.social" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>@gorenlj.bsky.social</em></a>﻿</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/anna-o-law-migration-and-the-origins-of-american-citizenship-african-americans-native-americans-and-immigrants-oxford-up-2026-kQqFvdzB-wjLPmXqo</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anna O. Law, the Herbert Kurz Chair in Constitutional Rights in the Department of Political Science at City University of New York-Brooklyn Campus, has a deeply researched and important new book that weaves together different approaches to understanding American citizenship, especially in context of immigration and migration in the first century of the U.S. republic.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197660089" rel="noopener noreferrer">Migration and the Origins of American Citizenship: African Americans, Native Americans, and Immigrants</a><em>﻿</em>&nbsp;(Oxford University Press, 2026)&nbsp;engages three different disciplines, including Political Science, History, and Legal Studies/Law, to unpack the many different approaches to citizenship in the new republic. Law noted as we spoke that she had not intended to write a book about slavery, but it was impossible to think about or understand immigration in the United States, especially in the first century of the United States, without examining the particular place and role of those who were enslaved, since they were also immigrants to the United States, though it was a forced immigration, against their will and without their consent. Part of what&nbsp;<a href="https://global.oup.com/academic/product/migration-and-the-origins-of-american-citizenship-9780197660096?lang=en&amp;cc=us" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Migration and the Origins of American Citizenship</em></a>&nbsp;focuses on is that prior to the Civil War and the post-war constitutional Amendments, immigration was a patchwork, designed state by state, without a national standard or structure. Thus, we see a form of federalism that shifts from the states to the national government after the 14th&nbsp;and 15th&nbsp;Amendments, and after a number of pieces of legislation passed in the 1880s by Congress. Immigration becomes a more centralized issue and process as Congress passed a raft of restrictive laws focused mostly on Chinese individuals. These moves took the power to manage immigration away from the individual states and nationalized policies and regulations.</p>
<p>At the same time, the story of American immigration is incomplete without understanding how the national government forcefully took land belonging to Native Americans and compelled their migration to other areas of the United States. In much the same way that we cannot understand immigration without understanding how slavery was intertwined with it, we also can’t understand immigration to the United States without the history of how newly arrived immigrants displaced Native Americans and were given stolen land through national and state level regulations and policies. This is another entire area of history, policy, law, and regulation that Law unpacks to explore the interaction between Native Americans, sovereignty, land claims, and federalism in context of American citizenship and the complexity of who was and was not considered to be a citizen.</p>
<p><a href="https://global.oup.com/academic/product/migration-and-the-origins-of-american-citizenship-9780197660096?lang=en&amp;cc=us" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Migration and the Origins of American Citizenship</em></a>&nbsp;is a masterful work that helps us understand the contemporary battles over citizenship. As the Supreme Court is set to make yet another determination of how the 14th&nbsp;Amendment is to be applied to individuals born in the United States, Law’s research and analysis has particular relevance and importance as we grapple with these ongoing disputes.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/hosts/profile/a7ac4af9-1306-463f-baf9-00f1f4187dfd" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books in Political Science</em></a><em>&nbsp;channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of&nbsp;</em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700633883/the-politics-of-the-marvel-cinematic-universe/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume I: The Infinity Saga (</em></a><em>University Press of Kansas, 2022), and of&nbsp;</em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700640546/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume II: Into the Multiverse</em></a><em>&nbsp;(University Press of Kansas, 2025) as well as co-editor of the award winning book,&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.kentuckypress.com/9780813141015/women-and-the-white-house/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a><em>&nbsp;(University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached&nbsp;</em><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/gorenlj.bsky.social" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>@gorenlj.bsky.social</em></a>﻿</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="42611571" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/a3e54060-d3b6-47de-881b-51f55aa9d2ca/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=a3e54060-d3b6-47de-881b-51f55aa9d2ca&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Anna O. Law, &quot;Migration and the Origins of American Citizenship: African Americans, Native Americans, and Immigrants&quot; (Oxford UP, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:44:19</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Anna O. Law, the Herbert Kurz Chair in Constitutional Rights in the Department of Political Science at City University of New York-Brooklyn Campus, has a deeply researched and important new book that weaves together different approaches to understanding American citizenship, especially in context of immigration and migration in the first century of the U.S. republic. Migration and the Origins of American Citizenship: African Americans, Native Americans, and Immigrants﻿ (Oxford University Press, 2026) engages three different disciplines, including Political Science, History, and Legal Studies/Law, to unpack the many different approaches to citizenship in the new republic. Law noted as we spoke that she had not intended to write a book about slavery, but it was impossible to think about or understand immigration in the United States, especially in the first century of the United States, without examining the particular place and role of those who were enslaved, since they were also immigrants to the United States, though it was a forced immigration, against their will and without their consent. Part of what Migration and the Origins of American Citizenship focuses on is that prior to the Civil War and the post-war constitutional Amendments, immigration was a patchwork, designed state by state, without a national standard or structure. Thus, we see a form of federalism that shifts from the states to the national government after the 14th and 15th Amendments, and after a number of pieces of legislation passed in the 1880s by Congress. Immigration becomes a more centralized issue and process as Congress passed a raft of restrictive laws focused mostly on Chinese individuals. These moves took the power to manage immigration away from the individual states and nationalized policies and regulations.
At the same time, the story of American immigration is incomplete without understanding how the national government forcefully took land belonging to Native Americans and compelled their migration to other areas of the United States. In much the same way that we cannot understand immigration without understanding how slavery was intertwined with it, we also can’t understand immigration to the United States without the history of how newly arrived immigrants displaced Native Americans and were given stolen land through national and state level regulations and policies. This is another entire area of history, policy, law, and regulation that Law unpacks to explore the interaction between Native Americans, sovereignty, land claims, and federalism in context of American citizenship and the complexity of who was and was not considered to be a citizen.
Migration and the Origins of American Citizenship is a masterful work that helps us understand the contemporary battles over citizenship. As the Supreme Court is set to make yet another determination of how the 14th Amendment is to be applied to individuals born in the United States, Law’s research and analysis has particular relevance and importance as we grapple with these ongoing disputes.
Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the New Books in Political Science channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume I: The Infinity Saga (University Press of Kansas, 2022), and of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume II: Into the Multiverse (University Press of Kansas, 2025) as well as co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached @gorenlj.bsky.social﻿
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Anna O. Law, the Herbert Kurz Chair in Constitutional Rights in the Department of Political Science at City University of New York-Brooklyn Campus, has a deeply researched and important new book that weaves together different approaches to understanding American citizenship, especially in context of immigration and migration in the first century of the U.S. republic. Migration and the Origins of American Citizenship: African Americans, Native Americans, and Immigrants﻿ (Oxford University Press, 2026) engages three different disciplines, including Political Science, History, and Legal Studies/Law, to unpack the many different approaches to citizenship in the new republic. Law noted as we spoke that she had not intended to write a book about slavery, but it was impossible to think about or understand immigration in the United States, especially in the first century of the United States, without examining the particular place and role of those who were enslaved, since they were also immigrants to the United States, though it was a forced immigration, against their will and without their consent. Part of what Migration and the Origins of American Citizenship focuses on is that prior to the Civil War and the post-war constitutional Amendments, immigration was a patchwork, designed state by state, without a national standard or structure. Thus, we see a form of federalism that shifts from the states to the national government after the 14th and 15th Amendments, and after a number of pieces of legislation passed in the 1880s by Congress. Immigration becomes a more centralized issue and process as Congress passed a raft of restrictive laws focused mostly on Chinese individuals. These moves took the power to manage immigration away from the individual states and nationalized policies and regulations.
At the same time, the story of American immigration is incomplete without understanding how the national government forcefully took land belonging to Native Americans and compelled their migration to other areas of the United States. In much the same way that we cannot understand immigration without understanding how slavery was intertwined with it, we also can’t understand immigration to the United States without the history of how newly arrived immigrants displaced Native Americans and were given stolen land through national and state level regulations and policies. This is another entire area of history, policy, law, and regulation that Law unpacks to explore the interaction between Native Americans, sovereignty, land claims, and federalism in context of American citizenship and the complexity of who was and was not considered to be a citizen.
Migration and the Origins of American Citizenship is a masterful work that helps us understand the contemporary battles over citizenship. As the Supreme Court is set to make yet another determination of how the 14th Amendment is to be applied to individuals born in the United States, Law’s research and analysis has particular relevance and importance as we grapple with these ongoing disputes.
Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the New Books in Political Science channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume I: The Infinity Saga (University Press of Kansas, 2022), and of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe Volume II: Into the Multiverse (University Press of Kansas, 2025) as well as co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached @gorenlj.bsky.social﻿
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1697</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">58dc41f6-689b-11f1-a130-0b3c9e5e34af</guid>
      <title>Jake Dyble, &quot;Managing Maritime Risk in Early Modern Europe: General Average in Law and Practice in Seventeenth-Century Tuscany&quot; (Boydell Press, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Commercial seafaring, both dangerous and with large amounts of capital at stake, was the source of the risk-management institutions that still undergird the global economy today. A key institution of early modern risk management was General Average, a procedure used to redistribute extraordinary costs arising from a maritime venture between all financially interested parties. For example, should one merchant’s cargo be jettisoned to lighten a ship in a storm, the loss would be shared pro rata by the shipper and all the cargo-owners. A risk-sharing practice, different from the risk-shifting of marine insurance which became established relatively late, General Average is still in widespread use.</p>
<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781837652822" rel="noopener noreferrer">Managing Maritime Risk in Early Modern Europe: General Average in Law and Practice in Seventeenth-Century Tuscany</a>&nbsp;(Boydell Press, 2025), Jake Dyble explores how General Average worked. It reveals the gap between General Average in law and how it worked on the ground. It shows how General Average partitioned a wide array of business costs, thereby performing a significant role in structuring maritime commerce, managing risk and promoting shipping and trade. In addition, the book discusses how far General Average was a feature of a supposedly ancient, universal, customary maritime law, and contributes to debates about the evolution of institutions in economic development.</p>
<p>Dr Jake Dyble is a postdoctoral researcher at the University of Padova, Italy.</p>
<p>This interview is conducted by Dr Lewis Wade, a Humboldt Research Fellow at the University of Bamberg. He is the author of the prize-winning&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781837650217" rel="noopener noreferrer">Privilege, Economy and State in Old Regime France&nbsp;</a>and can be found on Bluesky&nbsp;<a href="https://bsky.app/profile/wadehistory.bsky.social" rel="noopener noreferrer">@wadehistory.bsky.social</a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2026 09:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/jake-dyble-managing-maritime-risk-in-early-modern-europe-general-average-in-law-and-practice-in-seventeenth-century-tuscany-boydell-press-2025-bXwCqBFy</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Commercial seafaring, both dangerous and with large amounts of capital at stake, was the source of the risk-management institutions that still undergird the global economy today. A key institution of early modern risk management was General Average, a procedure used to redistribute extraordinary costs arising from a maritime venture between all financially interested parties. For example, should one merchant’s cargo be jettisoned to lighten a ship in a storm, the loss would be shared pro rata by the shipper and all the cargo-owners. A risk-sharing practice, different from the risk-shifting of marine insurance which became established relatively late, General Average is still in widespread use.</p>
<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781837652822" rel="noopener noreferrer">Managing Maritime Risk in Early Modern Europe: General Average in Law and Practice in Seventeenth-Century Tuscany</a>&nbsp;(Boydell Press, 2025), Jake Dyble explores how General Average worked. It reveals the gap between General Average in law and how it worked on the ground. It shows how General Average partitioned a wide array of business costs, thereby performing a significant role in structuring maritime commerce, managing risk and promoting shipping and trade. In addition, the book discusses how far General Average was a feature of a supposedly ancient, universal, customary maritime law, and contributes to debates about the evolution of institutions in economic development.</p>
<p>Dr Jake Dyble is a postdoctoral researcher at the University of Padova, Italy.</p>
<p>This interview is conducted by Dr Lewis Wade, a Humboldt Research Fellow at the University of Bamberg. He is the author of the prize-winning&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781837650217" rel="noopener noreferrer">Privilege, Economy and State in Old Regime France&nbsp;</a>and can be found on Bluesky&nbsp;<a href="https://bsky.app/profile/wadehistory.bsky.social" rel="noopener noreferrer">@wadehistory.bsky.social</a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="52248385" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/39314814-4e2c-4bbd-abe9-1a2c983e20e8/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=39314814-4e2c-4bbd-abe9-1a2c983e20e8&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Jake Dyble, &quot;Managing Maritime Risk in Early Modern Europe: General Average in Law and Practice in Seventeenth-Century Tuscany&quot; (Boydell Press, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:54:20</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Commercial seafaring, both dangerous and with large amounts of capital at stake, was the source of the risk-management institutions that still undergird the global economy today. A key institution of early modern risk management was General Average, a procedure used to redistribute extraordinary costs arising from a maritime venture between all financially interested parties. For example, should one merchant’s cargo be jettisoned to lighten a ship in a storm, the loss would be shared pro rata by the shipper and all the cargo-owners. A risk-sharing practice, different from the risk-shifting of marine insurance which became established relatively late, General Average is still in widespread use.
In Managing Maritime Risk in Early Modern Europe: General Average in Law and Practice in Seventeenth-Century Tuscany (Boydell Press, 2025), Jake Dyble explores how General Average worked. It reveals the gap between General Average in law and how it worked on the ground. It shows how General Average partitioned a wide array of business costs, thereby performing a significant role in structuring maritime commerce, managing risk and promoting shipping and trade. In addition, the book discusses how far General Average was a feature of a supposedly ancient, universal, customary maritime law, and contributes to debates about the evolution of institutions in economic development.
Dr Jake Dyble is a postdoctoral researcher at the University of Padova, Italy.
This interview is conducted by Dr Lewis Wade, a Humboldt Research Fellow at the University of Bamberg. He is the author of the prize-winning Privilege, Economy and State in Old Regime France and can be found on Bluesky @wadehistory.bsky.social.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Commercial seafaring, both dangerous and with large amounts of capital at stake, was the source of the risk-management institutions that still undergird the global economy today. A key institution of early modern risk management was General Average, a procedure used to redistribute extraordinary costs arising from a maritime venture between all financially interested parties. For example, should one merchant’s cargo be jettisoned to lighten a ship in a storm, the loss would be shared pro rata by the shipper and all the cargo-owners. A risk-sharing practice, different from the risk-shifting of marine insurance which became established relatively late, General Average is still in widespread use.
In Managing Maritime Risk in Early Modern Europe: General Average in Law and Practice in Seventeenth-Century Tuscany (Boydell Press, 2025), Jake Dyble explores how General Average worked. It reveals the gap between General Average in law and how it worked on the ground. It shows how General Average partitioned a wide array of business costs, thereby performing a significant role in structuring maritime commerce, managing risk and promoting shipping and trade. In addition, the book discusses how far General Average was a feature of a supposedly ancient, universal, customary maritime law, and contributes to debates about the evolution of institutions in economic development.
Dr Jake Dyble is a postdoctoral researcher at the University of Padova, Italy.
This interview is conducted by Dr Lewis Wade, a Humboldt Research Fellow at the University of Bamberg. He is the author of the prize-winning Privilege, Economy and State in Old Regime France and can be found on Bluesky @wadehistory.bsky.social.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1695</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2839f204-65b3-11f1-ae14-e7dc4e54d840</guid>
      <title>Stephanie Coontz, &quot;For Better and Worse: The Complicated Past and Challenging Future of Marriage&quot; (Viking, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Marriage rates have fallen dramatically since the 1970s. Yet far 
﻿from devaluing marriage, people still overwhelmingly describe marriage 
﻿as the highest commitment they can imagine. Most Americans say they <em>want</em>﻿
 to marry eventually, and couples who do marry have a lower chance of 
﻿divorce than at any time since the 1970s. Increasingly, though, people 
﻿tell pollsters they “have no idea” if they actually <em>will </em>end up married. And unlike in the past, young women are more uncertain than young men.</p>
<p>In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780593299098" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>For Better and Worse: The Complicated Past and Challenging Future of Marriage</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>﻿(Viking, 2026), Stephanie Coontz—author of the “rich, provocative, and entertaining” book <em>Marriage, A History</em>—unravels﻿ the roots of such paradoxical trends. Examining five critical periods ﻿of historical transformation, she reveals how shifting romantic ideals,&nbsp;﻿gender expectations, sexual mores, and cultural myths have bequeathed us﻿ a welter of contradictory beliefs, dysfunctional habits, and emotional ﻿earworms that make it hard to adjust our family relationships to the ﻿social and economic challenges of twenty-first-century life.</p>
<p>﻿Coontz﻿
 demonstrates that today’s widespread nostalgia for a seemingly more 
﻿stable past is an understandable reaction to heightened economic 
﻿insecurity and eroding social solidarities. But trying to reproduce a 
﻿largely imaginary golden age of marriage from the past simply locks us 
﻿into a restricted future.</p>
<p>Current public debates about marriage 
﻿are dominated by two diametrically opposed groups. One argues that 
﻿marriage is the only sure route to personal happiness and social 
﻿stability; the other, that marriage is inherently oppressive. Coontz 
﻿puts forward a radical middle ground, pointing to surprising new 
﻿research on the personal changes and the policy innovations that can 
﻿help people create successful relationships, in or out of marriage.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/stephanie-coontz-for-better-and-worse-the-complicated-past-and-challenging-future-of-marriage-viking-2026-MP_WfcCp</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marriage rates have fallen dramatically since the 1970s. Yet far 
﻿from devaluing marriage, people still overwhelmingly describe marriage 
﻿as the highest commitment they can imagine. Most Americans say they <em>want</em>﻿
 to marry eventually, and couples who do marry have a lower chance of 
﻿divorce than at any time since the 1970s. Increasingly, though, people 
﻿tell pollsters they “have no idea” if they actually <em>will </em>end up married. And unlike in the past, young women are more uncertain than young men.</p>
<p>In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780593299098" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>For Better and Worse: The Complicated Past and Challenging Future of Marriage</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>﻿(Viking, 2026), Stephanie Coontz—author of the “rich, provocative, and entertaining” book <em>Marriage, A History</em>—unravels﻿ the roots of such paradoxical trends. Examining five critical periods ﻿of historical transformation, she reveals how shifting romantic ideals,&nbsp;﻿gender expectations, sexual mores, and cultural myths have bequeathed us﻿ a welter of contradictory beliefs, dysfunctional habits, and emotional ﻿earworms that make it hard to adjust our family relationships to the ﻿social and economic challenges of twenty-first-century life.</p>
<p>﻿Coontz﻿
 demonstrates that today’s widespread nostalgia for a seemingly more 
﻿stable past is an understandable reaction to heightened economic 
﻿insecurity and eroding social solidarities. But trying to reproduce a 
﻿largely imaginary golden age of marriage from the past simply locks us 
﻿into a restricted future.</p>
<p>Current public debates about marriage 
﻿are dominated by two diametrically opposed groups. One argues that 
﻿marriage is the only sure route to personal happiness and social 
﻿stability; the other, that marriage is inherently oppressive. Coontz 
﻿puts forward a radical middle ground, pointing to surprising new 
﻿research on the personal changes and the policy innovations that can 
﻿help people create successful relationships, in or out of marriage.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="45494337" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/560a64de-5558-46b2-981d-3f6bede4b9da/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=560a64de-5558-46b2-981d-3f6bede4b9da&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Stephanie Coontz, &quot;For Better and Worse: The Complicated Past and Challenging Future of Marriage&quot; (Viking, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:47:18</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Marriage rates have fallen dramatically since the 1970s. Yet far 
﻿from devaluing marriage, people still overwhelmingly describe marriage 
﻿as the highest commitment they can imagine. Most Americans say they want﻿
 to marry eventually, and couples who do marry have a lower chance of 
﻿divorce than at any time since the 1970s. Increasingly, though, people 
﻿tell pollsters they “have no idea” if they actually will end up married. And unlike in the past, young women are more uncertain than young men.
In For Better and Worse: The Complicated Past and Challenging Future of Marriage ﻿(Viking, 2026), Stephanie Coontz—author of the “rich, provocative, and entertaining” book Marriage, A History—unravels﻿ the roots of such paradoxical trends. Examining five critical periods ﻿of historical transformation, she reveals how shifting romantic ideals, ﻿gender expectations, sexual mores, and cultural myths have bequeathed us﻿ a welter of contradictory beliefs, dysfunctional habits, and emotional ﻿earworms that make it hard to adjust our family relationships to the ﻿social and economic challenges of twenty-first-century life.
﻿Coontz﻿
 demonstrates that today’s widespread nostalgia for a seemingly more 
﻿stable past is an understandable reaction to heightened economic 
﻿insecurity and eroding social solidarities. But trying to reproduce a 
﻿largely imaginary golden age of marriage from the past simply locks us 
﻿into a restricted future.
Current public debates about marriage 
﻿are dominated by two diametrically opposed groups. One argues that 
﻿marriage is the only sure route to personal happiness and social 
﻿stability; the other, that marriage is inherently oppressive. Coontz 
﻿puts forward a radical middle ground, pointing to surprising new 
﻿research on the personal changes and the policy innovations that can 
﻿help people create successful relationships, in or out of marriage.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Marriage rates have fallen dramatically since the 1970s. Yet far 
﻿from devaluing marriage, people still overwhelmingly describe marriage 
﻿as the highest commitment they can imagine. Most Americans say they want﻿
 to marry eventually, and couples who do marry have a lower chance of 
﻿divorce than at any time since the 1970s. Increasingly, though, people 
﻿tell pollsters they “have no idea” if they actually will end up married. And unlike in the past, young women are more uncertain than young men.
In For Better and Worse: The Complicated Past and Challenging Future of Marriage ﻿(Viking, 2026), Stephanie Coontz—author of the “rich, provocative, and entertaining” book Marriage, A History—unravels﻿ the roots of such paradoxical trends. Examining five critical periods ﻿of historical transformation, she reveals how shifting romantic ideals, ﻿gender expectations, sexual mores, and cultural myths have bequeathed us﻿ a welter of contradictory beliefs, dysfunctional habits, and emotional ﻿earworms that make it hard to adjust our family relationships to the ﻿social and economic challenges of twenty-first-century life.
﻿Coontz﻿
 demonstrates that today’s widespread nostalgia for a seemingly more 
﻿stable past is an understandable reaction to heightened economic 
﻿insecurity and eroding social solidarities. But trying to reproduce a 
﻿largely imaginary golden age of marriage from the past simply locks us 
﻿into a restricted future.
Current public debates about marriage 
﻿are dominated by two diametrically opposed groups. One argues that 
﻿marriage is the only sure route to personal happiness and social 
﻿stability; the other, that marriage is inherently oppressive. Coontz 
﻿puts forward a radical middle ground, pointing to surprising new 
﻿research on the personal changes and the policy innovations that can 
﻿help people create successful relationships, in or out of marriage.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1694</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">06520bec-6020-11f1-bf21-f78ef79ff5c2</guid>
      <title>Ann Carlson, &quot;Smog and Sunshine: The Surprising Story of How Los Angeles Cleaned Up Its Air&quot; (U California Press, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Los Angeles and smog have been synonymous for decades. From the 1940s 
through the 1980s, children breathed air so heavy with lead that their 
blood was poisoned with it. In 1970, officials declared smog alerts on 
235 days. But the last smog alert happened in 2003, and lead has 
virtually disappeared from the air. This is the story of how Los Angeles
 cleaned up its air.</p>
<p>﻿In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780520387393" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Smog and Sunshine: The Surprising Story of How Los Angeles Cleaned Up Its Air</em></a> (University of California Press, 2026), environmental law expert and LA native Ann Carlson recounts the dramatic policy fights and the 
determined scientists, lawyers, and community members who worked 
alongside public officials to face off against major polluters and save 
their city. In a time of unprecedented climate change and skepticism
 about government and science, this book is an inspiring reminder of 
what concerned residents, individual leaders, and all levels of 
government can achieve by working together.</p>
<p>﻿<em>﻿This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em> book</em></a><em>
 focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty 
negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative 
analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find 
Miranda’s interviews on </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em> </p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 6 Jun 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/ann-carlson-smog-and-sunshine-the-surprising-story-of-how-los-angeles-cleaned-up-its-air-u-california-press-2026-Ecb70wo_</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Los Angeles and smog have been synonymous for decades. From the 1940s 
through the 1980s, children breathed air so heavy with lead that their 
blood was poisoned with it. In 1970, officials declared smog alerts on 
235 days. But the last smog alert happened in 2003, and lead has 
virtually disappeared from the air. This is the story of how Los Angeles
 cleaned up its air.</p>
<p>﻿In <a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780520387393" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Smog and Sunshine: The Surprising Story of How Los Angeles Cleaned Up Its Air</em></a> (University of California Press, 2026), environmental law expert and LA native Ann Carlson recounts the dramatic policy fights and the 
determined scientists, lawyers, and community members who worked 
alongside public officials to face off against major polluters and save 
their city. In a time of unprecedented climate change and skepticism
 about government and science, this book is an inspiring reminder of 
what concerned residents, individual leaders, and all levels of 
government can achieve by working together.</p>
<p>﻿<em>﻿This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em> book</em></a><em>
 focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty 
negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative 
analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find 
Miranda’s interviews on </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em> </p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="32363827" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/dc6780e1-fd1b-49cb-9ff9-bca361d5b028/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=dc6780e1-fd1b-49cb-9ff9-bca361d5b028&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Ann Carlson, &quot;Smog and Sunshine: The Surprising Story of How Los Angeles Cleaned Up Its Air&quot; (U California Press, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:33:39</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Los Angeles and smog have been synonymous for decades. From the 1940s 
through the 1980s, children breathed air so heavy with lead that their 
blood was poisoned with it. In 1970, officials declared smog alerts on 
235 days. But the last smog alert happened in 2003, and lead has 
virtually disappeared from the air. This is the story of how Los Angeles
 cleaned up its air.
﻿In Smog and Sunshine: The Surprising Story of How Los Angeles Cleaned Up Its Air (University of California Press, 2026), environmental law expert and LA native Ann Carlson recounts the dramatic policy fights and the 
determined scientists, lawyers, and community members who worked 
alongside public officials to face off against major polluters and save 
their city. In a time of unprecedented climate change and skepticism
 about government and science, this book is an inspiring reminder of 
what concerned residents, individual leaders, and all levels of 
government can achieve by working together.
﻿﻿This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book
 focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty 
negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative 
analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find 
Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts. 
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Los Angeles and smog have been synonymous for decades. From the 1940s 
through the 1980s, children breathed air so heavy with lead that their 
blood was poisoned with it. In 1970, officials declared smog alerts on 
235 days. But the last smog alert happened in 2003, and lead has 
virtually disappeared from the air. This is the story of how Los Angeles
 cleaned up its air.
﻿In Smog and Sunshine: The Surprising Story of How Los Angeles Cleaned Up Its Air (University of California Press, 2026), environmental law expert and LA native Ann Carlson recounts the dramatic policy fights and the 
determined scientists, lawyers, and community members who worked 
alongside public officials to face off against major polluters and save 
their city. In a time of unprecedented climate change and skepticism
 about government and science, this book is an inspiring reminder of 
what concerned residents, individual leaders, and all levels of 
government can achieve by working together.
﻿﻿This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book
 focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty 
negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative 
analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find 
Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts. 
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1693</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">016239ee-5f09-11f1-b143-e30feadf2700</guid>
      <title>Delia Duong Ba Wendel, &quot;Rwanda&apos;s Genocide Heritage: Between Justice and Sovereignty&quot; (Duke UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>﻿In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/%209781478032472" rel="noopener noreferrer">Rwanda's Genocide Heritage: Between Justice and Sovereignty</a>&nbsp;(Duke UP, 2025), Delia Duong Ba Wendel contends with the forms of justice and sovereignty enacted through sites of violent memory. Drawing from oral histories and a visual archive of memory work after the 1994 genocide in Rwanda, she explores the human rights and government priorities that preserved killing sites and victims' remains for public display. Rwanda's genocide memorials exemplify a global phenomenon that Wendel terms trauma heritage, wherein hidden or unrecognized violence is spatialized--made visible in public space--to demand justice and recognition. She argues that trauma heritage innovates on the form histories take by "writing" them into landscapes, constituting a reparative historiography from the Global South. Among those sites, Rwanda's genocide heritage comprises exceptionally visceral sites of truth-telling that highlight the politics of a past made present. Wendel demonstrates that such sites of memory require reckoning with the ethical and political dilemmas that arise from viewing violence as forms of repair and control.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 5 Jun 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/delia-duong-ba-wendel-rwandas-genocide-heritage-between-justice-and-sovereignty-duke-up-2025-CpPRiNKN</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>﻿In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/%209781478032472" rel="noopener noreferrer">Rwanda's Genocide Heritage: Between Justice and Sovereignty</a>&nbsp;(Duke UP, 2025), Delia Duong Ba Wendel contends with the forms of justice and sovereignty enacted through sites of violent memory. Drawing from oral histories and a visual archive of memory work after the 1994 genocide in Rwanda, she explores the human rights and government priorities that preserved killing sites and victims' remains for public display. Rwanda's genocide memorials exemplify a global phenomenon that Wendel terms trauma heritage, wherein hidden or unrecognized violence is spatialized--made visible in public space--to demand justice and recognition. She argues that trauma heritage innovates on the form histories take by "writing" them into landscapes, constituting a reparative historiography from the Global South. Among those sites, Rwanda's genocide heritage comprises exceptionally visceral sites of truth-telling that highlight the politics of a past made present. Wendel demonstrates that such sites of memory require reckoning with the ethical and political dilemmas that arise from viewing violence as forms of repair and control.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="57270675" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/217b909f-7e81-446a-aa1b-2ff82f280289/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=217b909f-7e81-446a-aa1b-2ff82f280289&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Delia Duong Ba Wendel, &quot;Rwanda&apos;s Genocide Heritage: Between Justice and Sovereignty&quot; (Duke UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:59:35</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>﻿In Rwanda&apos;s Genocide Heritage: Between Justice and Sovereignty (Duke UP, 2025), Delia Duong Ba Wendel contends with the forms of justice and sovereignty enacted through sites of violent memory. Drawing from oral histories and a visual archive of memory work after the 1994 genocide in Rwanda, she explores the human rights and government priorities that preserved killing sites and victims&apos; remains for public display. Rwanda&apos;s genocide memorials exemplify a global phenomenon that Wendel terms trauma heritage, wherein hidden or unrecognized violence is spatialized--made visible in public space--to demand justice and recognition. She argues that trauma heritage innovates on the form histories take by &quot;writing&quot; them into landscapes, constituting a reparative historiography from the Global South. Among those sites, Rwanda&apos;s genocide heritage comprises exceptionally visceral sites of truth-telling that highlight the politics of a past made present. Wendel demonstrates that such sites of memory require reckoning with the ethical and political dilemmas that arise from viewing violence as forms of repair and control.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>﻿In Rwanda&apos;s Genocide Heritage: Between Justice and Sovereignty (Duke UP, 2025), Delia Duong Ba Wendel contends with the forms of justice and sovereignty enacted through sites of violent memory. Drawing from oral histories and a visual archive of memory work after the 1994 genocide in Rwanda, she explores the human rights and government priorities that preserved killing sites and victims&apos; remains for public display. Rwanda&apos;s genocide memorials exemplify a global phenomenon that Wendel terms trauma heritage, wherein hidden or unrecognized violence is spatialized--made visible in public space--to demand justice and recognition. She argues that trauma heritage innovates on the form histories take by &quot;writing&quot; them into landscapes, constituting a reparative historiography from the Global South. Among those sites, Rwanda&apos;s genocide heritage comprises exceptionally visceral sites of truth-telling that highlight the politics of a past made present. Wendel demonstrates that such sites of memory require reckoning with the ethical and political dilemmas that arise from viewing violence as forms of repair and control.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1692</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">f65e2fcc-5e80-11f1-82cc-ff6dd1970aef</guid>
      <title>Lawrence Douglas, &quot;The Criminal State: War, Atrocity, and the Dream of International Justice&quot; (Princeton UP, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><em></em><a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/the-criminal-state-war-atrocity-and-the-dream-of-international-justice-lawrence-douglas/e0bd51262cb5ef14?ean=9780691180410&amp;next=t" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Criminal State: War, Atrocity, and the Dream of International Justice</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Princeton University Press, 2026)&nbsp;offers a gripping account of how law has confronted the most radical forms of state violence. Beautifully written, broad in scope, and bracingly original, it weaves history with political thought to trace the shifting legal response to state aggression and atrocities, from Leopold’s rule over the Congo to Putin’s war in Ukraine.</p>
<p>At its heart is Lawrence Douglas’s fresh interpretation of the law’s reckoning with Nazi aggression and atrocity. He shows how the Nuremberg trials challenged centuries of thought—rooted in Hobbes and other canonical thinkers—that shielded sovereigns from legal scrutiny. Yet Nuremberg’s bid to frame aggression as the cornerstone of a new order of international criminal law largely failed, giving way to a system now centrally concerned with crimes against humanity and genocide—while leaving unresolved the 
legality and effectiveness of using force to stop the worst violations 
of human rights.</p>
<p>Providing rare historical perspective on the dilemmas facing international courts, <em>The Criminal State</em> is a sweeping, provocative history of the struggle to bring perpetrators of state violence to justice.</p>
<p>﻿Our guest is <a href="https://www.amherst.edu/people/facstaff/lrdouglas" rel="noopener noreferrer">Professor Lawrence Douglas</a>, who is the James J. Grosfeld Professor of Law, Jurisprudence and Social Thought at Amherst College.</p>
<p>﻿Our host is <a href="https://www.eleonoramattiacci.com/home" rel="noopener noreferrer">Eleonora Mattiacci</a>, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. She is the author of "<a href="https://www.eleonoramattiacci.com/book-project-1" rel="noopener noreferrer">Volatile States in International Politics</a>" (Oxford University Press, 2023). </p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 3 Jun 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/lawrence-douglas-the-criminal-state-war-atrocity-and-the-dream-of-international-justice-princeton-up-2026-zuJX9Q3V</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em></em><a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/the-criminal-state-war-atrocity-and-the-dream-of-international-justice-lawrence-douglas/e0bd51262cb5ef14?ean=9780691180410&amp;next=t" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Criminal State: War, Atrocity, and the Dream of International Justice</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Princeton University Press, 2026)&nbsp;offers a gripping account of how law has confronted the most radical forms of state violence. Beautifully written, broad in scope, and bracingly original, it weaves history with political thought to trace the shifting legal response to state aggression and atrocities, from Leopold’s rule over the Congo to Putin’s war in Ukraine.</p>
<p>At its heart is Lawrence Douglas’s fresh interpretation of the law’s reckoning with Nazi aggression and atrocity. He shows how the Nuremberg trials challenged centuries of thought—rooted in Hobbes and other canonical thinkers—that shielded sovereigns from legal scrutiny. Yet Nuremberg’s bid to frame aggression as the cornerstone of a new order of international criminal law largely failed, giving way to a system now centrally concerned with crimes against humanity and genocide—while leaving unresolved the 
legality and effectiveness of using force to stop the worst violations 
of human rights.</p>
<p>Providing rare historical perspective on the dilemmas facing international courts, <em>The Criminal State</em> is a sweeping, provocative history of the struggle to bring perpetrators of state violence to justice.</p>
<p>﻿Our guest is <a href="https://www.amherst.edu/people/facstaff/lrdouglas" rel="noopener noreferrer">Professor Lawrence Douglas</a>, who is the James J. Grosfeld Professor of Law, Jurisprudence and Social Thought at Amherst College.</p>
<p>﻿Our host is <a href="https://www.eleonoramattiacci.com/home" rel="noopener noreferrer">Eleonora Mattiacci</a>, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. She is the author of "<a href="https://www.eleonoramattiacci.com/book-project-1" rel="noopener noreferrer">Volatile States in International Politics</a>" (Oxford University Press, 2023). </p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="45723303" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/372a5019-fa8f-4b04-b3d0-d962a6accf37/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=372a5019-fa8f-4b04-b3d0-d962a6accf37&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Lawrence Douglas, &quot;The Criminal State: War, Atrocity, and the Dream of International Justice&quot; (Princeton UP, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:47:34</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The Criminal State: War, Atrocity, and the Dream of International Justice (Princeton University Press, 2026) offers a gripping account of how law has confronted the most radical forms of state violence. Beautifully written, broad in scope, and bracingly original, it weaves history with political thought to trace the shifting legal response to state aggression and atrocities, from Leopold’s rule over the Congo to Putin’s war in Ukraine.
At its heart is Lawrence Douglas’s fresh interpretation of the law’s reckoning with Nazi aggression and atrocity. He shows how the Nuremberg trials challenged centuries of thought—rooted in Hobbes and other canonical thinkers—that shielded sovereigns from legal scrutiny. Yet Nuremberg’s bid to frame aggression as the cornerstone of a new order of international criminal law largely failed, giving way to a system now centrally concerned with crimes against humanity and genocide—while leaving unresolved the 
legality and effectiveness of using force to stop the worst violations 
of human rights.
Providing rare historical perspective on the dilemmas facing international courts, The Criminal State is a sweeping, provocative history of the struggle to bring perpetrators of state violence to justice.
﻿Our guest is Professor Lawrence Douglas, who is the James J. Grosfeld Professor of Law, Jurisprudence and Social Thought at Amherst College.
﻿Our host is Eleonora Mattiacci, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. She is the author of &quot;Volatile States in International Politics&quot; (Oxford University Press, 2023). 
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Criminal State: War, Atrocity, and the Dream of International Justice (Princeton University Press, 2026) offers a gripping account of how law has confronted the most radical forms of state violence. Beautifully written, broad in scope, and bracingly original, it weaves history with political thought to trace the shifting legal response to state aggression and atrocities, from Leopold’s rule over the Congo to Putin’s war in Ukraine.
At its heart is Lawrence Douglas’s fresh interpretation of the law’s reckoning with Nazi aggression and atrocity. He shows how the Nuremberg trials challenged centuries of thought—rooted in Hobbes and other canonical thinkers—that shielded sovereigns from legal scrutiny. Yet Nuremberg’s bid to frame aggression as the cornerstone of a new order of international criminal law largely failed, giving way to a system now centrally concerned with crimes against humanity and genocide—while leaving unresolved the 
legality and effectiveness of using force to stop the worst violations 
of human rights.
Providing rare historical perspective on the dilemmas facing international courts, The Criminal State is a sweeping, provocative history of the struggle to bring perpetrators of state violence to justice.
﻿Our guest is Professor Lawrence Douglas, who is the James J. Grosfeld Professor of Law, Jurisprudence and Social Thought at Amherst College.
﻿Our host is Eleonora Mattiacci, an Associate Professor of Political Science at Amherst College. She is the author of &quot;Volatile States in International Politics&quot; (Oxford University Press, 2023). 
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1691</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">30e3d92e-5aff-11f1-b96a-43c9e55db10f</guid>
      <title>Julie J. Park, &quot;Race, Class, and Affirmative Action: College Admissions in a New Era&quot; (Harvard Education Press, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9798895570456" rel="noopener noreferrer">In Race, Class, and Affirmative Action: College Admissions in a New Era</a>&nbsp;(Harvard Education Press, 2026), Julie J. Park offers deft analysis of the changes to college admissions and campus life since the US Supreme Court ruled to restrict race-conscious policies in two 2023 cases: Students for Fair Admissions (SFFA) v. Harvard and SFFA v. the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. Park offers clear explanations of the rulings, their historical context, and their implications for higher education policy. She highlights how the Supreme Court still allows campuses to consider the role of race in students' experiences and that numerous tools to advance diversity in admissions remain. In this lively, timely work, Park points out the swift and stark post-ruling shifts in campus demographics and grapples with questions of how to push toward a more equitable admissions system. She investigates alternative initiatives, such as test-optional and test-free admissions, percent plans, and others, weighing their merits and drawbacks. She also examines inequality affecting college applications themselves and offers ideas for reform. Integrating up-to-the minute research on admissions, standardized testing, enrollment management, and the campus racial climate, Park recommends actions that can advance equity-oriented access to higher education despite the current restrictions on race-conscious admissions. Park ends with a call to campus leaders, policymakers, and practitioners to reimagine selective college admissions and attendance and offers a glimpse of what the future could hold.</p>
<p>Julie J. Park is a professor in the College of Education at the University of Maryland, College Park. An expert on race and diversity in higher education, she served as a consulting expert in the landmark case Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard on the side of Harvard.</p>
<p><em>Caleb Zakarin is CEO and Publisher of the New Books Network.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/julie-j-park-race-class-and-affirmative-action-college-admissions-in-a-new-era-harvard-education-press-2026-21my7018</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9798895570456" rel="noopener noreferrer">In Race, Class, and Affirmative Action: College Admissions in a New Era</a>&nbsp;(Harvard Education Press, 2026), Julie J. Park offers deft analysis of the changes to college admissions and campus life since the US Supreme Court ruled to restrict race-conscious policies in two 2023 cases: Students for Fair Admissions (SFFA) v. Harvard and SFFA v. the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. Park offers clear explanations of the rulings, their historical context, and their implications for higher education policy. She highlights how the Supreme Court still allows campuses to consider the role of race in students' experiences and that numerous tools to advance diversity in admissions remain. In this lively, timely work, Park points out the swift and stark post-ruling shifts in campus demographics and grapples with questions of how to push toward a more equitable admissions system. She investigates alternative initiatives, such as test-optional and test-free admissions, percent plans, and others, weighing their merits and drawbacks. She also examines inequality affecting college applications themselves and offers ideas for reform. Integrating up-to-the minute research on admissions, standardized testing, enrollment management, and the campus racial climate, Park recommends actions that can advance equity-oriented access to higher education despite the current restrictions on race-conscious admissions. Park ends with a call to campus leaders, policymakers, and practitioners to reimagine selective college admissions and attendance and offers a glimpse of what the future could hold.</p>
<p>Julie J. Park is a professor in the College of Education at the University of Maryland, College Park. An expert on race and diversity in higher education, she served as a consulting expert in the landmark case Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard on the side of Harvard.</p>
<p><em>Caleb Zakarin is CEO and Publisher of the New Books Network.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="59635886" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/0264debb-d401-43af-a8d3-016b8df9be34/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=0264debb-d401-43af-a8d3-016b8df9be34&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Julie J. Park, &quot;Race, Class, and Affirmative Action: College Admissions in a New Era&quot; (Harvard Education Press, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:02:05</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In Race, Class, and Affirmative Action: College Admissions in a New Era (Harvard Education Press, 2026), Julie J. Park offers deft analysis of the changes to college admissions and campus life since the US Supreme Court ruled to restrict race-conscious policies in two 2023 cases: Students for Fair Admissions (SFFA) v. Harvard and SFFA v. the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. Park offers clear explanations of the rulings, their historical context, and their implications for higher education policy. She highlights how the Supreme Court still allows campuses to consider the role of race in students&apos; experiences and that numerous tools to advance diversity in admissions remain. In this lively, timely work, Park points out the swift and stark post-ruling shifts in campus demographics and grapples with questions of how to push toward a more equitable admissions system. She investigates alternative initiatives, such as test-optional and test-free admissions, percent plans, and others, weighing their merits and drawbacks. She also examines inequality affecting college applications themselves and offers ideas for reform. Integrating up-to-the minute research on admissions, standardized testing, enrollment management, and the campus racial climate, Park recommends actions that can advance equity-oriented access to higher education despite the current restrictions on race-conscious admissions. Park ends with a call to campus leaders, policymakers, and practitioners to reimagine selective college admissions and attendance and offers a glimpse of what the future could hold.
Julie J. Park is a professor in the College of Education at the University of Maryland, College Park. An expert on race and diversity in higher education, she served as a consulting expert in the landmark case Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard on the side of Harvard.
Caleb Zakarin is CEO and Publisher of the New Books Network.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In Race, Class, and Affirmative Action: College Admissions in a New Era (Harvard Education Press, 2026), Julie J. Park offers deft analysis of the changes to college admissions and campus life since the US Supreme Court ruled to restrict race-conscious policies in two 2023 cases: Students for Fair Admissions (SFFA) v. Harvard and SFFA v. the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. Park offers clear explanations of the rulings, their historical context, and their implications for higher education policy. She highlights how the Supreme Court still allows campuses to consider the role of race in students&apos; experiences and that numerous tools to advance diversity in admissions remain. In this lively, timely work, Park points out the swift and stark post-ruling shifts in campus demographics and grapples with questions of how to push toward a more equitable admissions system. She investigates alternative initiatives, such as test-optional and test-free admissions, percent plans, and others, weighing their merits and drawbacks. She also examines inequality affecting college applications themselves and offers ideas for reform. Integrating up-to-the minute research on admissions, standardized testing, enrollment management, and the campus racial climate, Park recommends actions that can advance equity-oriented access to higher education despite the current restrictions on race-conscious admissions. Park ends with a call to campus leaders, policymakers, and practitioners to reimagine selective college admissions and attendance and offers a glimpse of what the future could hold.
Julie J. Park is a professor in the College of Education at the University of Maryland, College Park. An expert on race and diversity in higher education, she served as a consulting expert in the landmark case Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard on the side of Harvard.
Caleb Zakarin is CEO and Publisher of the New Books Network.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1689</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">07f216f4-5b70-11f1-b3da-c3e9f4cb2387</guid>
      <title>David Petruccelli, &quot;A Scourge of Humanity: The Origins of Interpol and the End of Empire in Central and Eastern Europe&quot; (Oxford UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>As the First World War came to a chaotic end, Europeans feared that a wave of crime and anarchy would sweep across their continent. The upheavals of the war and of the subsequent violent breakup of the Habsburg, German, and Ottoman empires magnified longstanding fears that an increasingly interconnected world offered the enterprising and unscrupulous new opportunities to break the law and evade capture. New kinds of international criminals and criminal enterprises demanded novel forms of international cooperation. Thus was born the International Criminal Police Commission, known today as Interpol. In the 1920s and 1930s, Interpol's police officials and the lawyers who collaborated with them created lasting programs to combat counterfeiting, sex and drug trafficking, terrorism, and human smuggling, and other forms of international crime, which they labelled "a scourge of humanity."</p>
<p>﻿Drawing on press reports, police files, and criminal records in numerous languages and across multiple countries, in <a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/a-scourge-of-humanity-the-origins-of-interpol-and-the-end-of-empire-in-central-and-eastern-europe-assistant-professor-of-history-david-petruccelli/4356e8ec996dfd25?ean=9780197776131&amp;next=t" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>A Scourge of Humanity: The Origins of Interpol and the End of Empire in Central and Eastern Europe</em></a> (Oxford University Press, 2025), Dr. David Petruccelli explores the origins of Interpol and the role Central and Eastern European actors played in developing criminal policing and law during the interwar period to bring stability to their region and reshape international institutions and norms. He shows how legal experts replaced a liberal focus on individual rights with an emphasis on a collective of international societies and of police officers who looked to the international sphere as a space for eluding the constraints of the rule of law at home. In doing so, their initiatives posed an alternative to the imperial and liberal internationalist programs pursued by many Western Europeans and Americans and laid the groundwork for more radical forms of persecution during the Second World War.</p>
<p>While bringing to life the stories of individuals involved in shady activities across borders, <em>A Scourge of Humanity</em> explores the vigorous policing and harsh criminal laws established by Interpol to combat their crimes and highlights illiberal forms of internationalism that have left a lasting mark on our world.</p>
<p>﻿<em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>book</em></a><em>
 focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty 
negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative 
analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find 
Miranda’s interviews on </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em> </p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/david-petruccelli-a-scourge-of-humanity-the-origins-of-interpol-and-the-end-of-empire-in-central-and-eastern-europe-oxford-up-2025-yHv_OW2O</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As the First World War came to a chaotic end, Europeans feared that a wave of crime and anarchy would sweep across their continent. The upheavals of the war and of the subsequent violent breakup of the Habsburg, German, and Ottoman empires magnified longstanding fears that an increasingly interconnected world offered the enterprising and unscrupulous new opportunities to break the law and evade capture. New kinds of international criminals and criminal enterprises demanded novel forms of international cooperation. Thus was born the International Criminal Police Commission, known today as Interpol. In the 1920s and 1930s, Interpol's police officials and the lawyers who collaborated with them created lasting programs to combat counterfeiting, sex and drug trafficking, terrorism, and human smuggling, and other forms of international crime, which they labelled "a scourge of humanity."</p>
<p>﻿Drawing on press reports, police files, and criminal records in numerous languages and across multiple countries, in <a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/a-scourge-of-humanity-the-origins-of-interpol-and-the-end-of-empire-in-central-and-eastern-europe-assistant-professor-of-history-david-petruccelli/4356e8ec996dfd25?ean=9780197776131&amp;next=t" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>A Scourge of Humanity: The Origins of Interpol and the End of Empire in Central and Eastern Europe</em></a> (Oxford University Press, 2025), Dr. David Petruccelli explores the origins of Interpol and the role Central and Eastern European actors played in developing criminal policing and law during the interwar period to bring stability to their region and reshape international institutions and norms. He shows how legal experts replaced a liberal focus on individual rights with an emphasis on a collective of international societies and of police officers who looked to the international sphere as a space for eluding the constraints of the rule of law at home. In doing so, their initiatives posed an alternative to the imperial and liberal internationalist programs pursued by many Western Europeans and Americans and laid the groundwork for more radical forms of persecution during the Second World War.</p>
<p>While bringing to life the stories of individuals involved in shady activities across borders, <em>A Scourge of Humanity</em> explores the vigorous policing and harsh criminal laws established by Interpol to combat their crimes and highlights illiberal forms of internationalism that have left a lasting mark on our world.</p>
<p>﻿<em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>book</em></a><em>
 focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty 
negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative 
analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find 
Miranda’s interviews on </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em> </p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="61913575" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/a167133c-2410-489d-baa1-2764c6b5ed99/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=a167133c-2410-489d-baa1-2764c6b5ed99&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>David Petruccelli, &quot;A Scourge of Humanity: The Origins of Interpol and the End of Empire in Central and Eastern Europe&quot; (Oxford UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:04:24</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>As the First World War came to a chaotic end, Europeans feared that a wave of crime and anarchy would sweep across their continent. The upheavals of the war and of the subsequent violent breakup of the Habsburg, German, and Ottoman empires magnified longstanding fears that an increasingly interconnected world offered the enterprising and unscrupulous new opportunities to break the law and evade capture. New kinds of international criminals and criminal enterprises demanded novel forms of international cooperation. Thus was born the International Criminal Police Commission, known today as Interpol. In the 1920s and 1930s, Interpol&apos;s police officials and the lawyers who collaborated with them created lasting programs to combat counterfeiting, sex and drug trafficking, terrorism, and human smuggling, and other forms of international crime, which they labelled &quot;a scourge of humanity.&quot;
﻿Drawing on press reports, police files, and criminal records in numerous languages and across multiple countries, in A Scourge of Humanity: The Origins of Interpol and the End of Empire in Central and Eastern Europe (Oxford University Press, 2025), Dr. David Petruccelli explores the origins of Interpol and the role Central and Eastern European actors played in developing criminal policing and law during the interwar period to bring stability to their region and reshape international institutions and norms. He shows how legal experts replaced a liberal focus on individual rights with an emphasis on a collective of international societies and of police officers who looked to the international sphere as a space for eluding the constraints of the rule of law at home. In doing so, their initiatives posed an alternative to the imperial and liberal internationalist programs pursued by many Western Europeans and Americans and laid the groundwork for more radical forms of persecution during the Second World War.
While bringing to life the stories of individuals involved in shady activities across borders, A Scourge of Humanity explores the vigorous policing and harsh criminal laws established by Interpol to combat their crimes and highlights illiberal forms of internationalism that have left a lasting mark on our world.
﻿This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book
 focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty 
negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative 
analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find 
Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts. 
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>As the First World War came to a chaotic end, Europeans feared that a wave of crime and anarchy would sweep across their continent. The upheavals of the war and of the subsequent violent breakup of the Habsburg, German, and Ottoman empires magnified longstanding fears that an increasingly interconnected world offered the enterprising and unscrupulous new opportunities to break the law and evade capture. New kinds of international criminals and criminal enterprises demanded novel forms of international cooperation. Thus was born the International Criminal Police Commission, known today as Interpol. In the 1920s and 1930s, Interpol&apos;s police officials and the lawyers who collaborated with them created lasting programs to combat counterfeiting, sex and drug trafficking, terrorism, and human smuggling, and other forms of international crime, which they labelled &quot;a scourge of humanity.&quot;
﻿Drawing on press reports, police files, and criminal records in numerous languages and across multiple countries, in A Scourge of Humanity: The Origins of Interpol and the End of Empire in Central and Eastern Europe (Oxford University Press, 2025), Dr. David Petruccelli explores the origins of Interpol and the role Central and Eastern European actors played in developing criminal policing and law during the interwar period to bring stability to their region and reshape international institutions and norms. He shows how legal experts replaced a liberal focus on individual rights with an emphasis on a collective of international societies and of police officers who looked to the international sphere as a space for eluding the constraints of the rule of law at home. In doing so, their initiatives posed an alternative to the imperial and liberal internationalist programs pursued by many Western Europeans and Americans and laid the groundwork for more radical forms of persecution during the Second World War.
While bringing to life the stories of individuals involved in shady activities across borders, A Scourge of Humanity explores the vigorous policing and harsh criminal laws established by Interpol to combat their crimes and highlights illiberal forms of internationalism that have left a lasting mark on our world.
﻿This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book
 focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty 
negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative 
analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find 
Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts. 
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1690</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">037ef6a8-5a69-11f1-a828-239b2fcebbd3</guid>
      <title>Amy Thomas, &quot;Copyright, Contract, and Video Games: Terms of Play&quot; (Hart Publishing, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781509988068" rel="noopener noreferrer">Copyright, Contract, and Video Games: Terms of Play</a>&nbsp;<em>﻿</em>(Hart Publishing, 2026)&nbsp;uncovers how video game contracts act as monologues of power, moulding players to align with proprietary ideologies.</p>
<p>In the era of interactive technologies, the player emerges as a vital yet curiously overlooked figure. While copyright law governs the creation and distribution of these technologies, it sidesteps the player, leaving private contracts to define their role and obligations. Using video games as a case study, this book fills the gap left by copyright law, offering an innovative socio-legal methodology to interrogate and challenge harmful contractual norms.</p>
<p>By analysing contracts as a form of critical discourse, the book exposes the contradictions and idealisations embedded in these agreements, which often serve to reinforce industry priorities. It is an essential resource for scholars in intellectual property law, video game studies, and socio-legal research, contributing to pressing debates on user rights and the shifting balance of power in interactive industries.</p>
<p>With its fresh perspective on the interplay of copyright, contract, and cultural participation, the book redefines the player's role in a rapidly evolving digital landscape, offering new tools to understand and critique the legal frameworks shaping this most interactive of industries.</p>
<p>Amy Thomas is Lecturer in Intellectual Property and Information Law at the University of Glasgow, UK.</p>
<p>Rudolf Thomas Inderst (*1978) enjoys video games since 1985. He received a master’s degree in political science, American cultural studies as well as contemporary and recent history from Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich and holds two PhDs in game studies (LMU &amp; University of Passau). Currently, he's teaching as a professor for game design and game studies at the University of Applied Sciences Neu-Ulm, has submitted his third dissertation at the University of Vechta, holds the position as lead editor at the online journal TITEL kulturmagazin for the game section and is editor of the weekly game research newsletter Game Studies Watchlist.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/amy-thomas-copyright-contract-and-video-games-terms-of-play-hart-publishing-2026-GvDlYkrX</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781509988068" rel="noopener noreferrer">Copyright, Contract, and Video Games: Terms of Play</a>&nbsp;<em>﻿</em>(Hart Publishing, 2026)&nbsp;uncovers how video game contracts act as monologues of power, moulding players to align with proprietary ideologies.</p>
<p>In the era of interactive technologies, the player emerges as a vital yet curiously overlooked figure. While copyright law governs the creation and distribution of these technologies, it sidesteps the player, leaving private contracts to define their role and obligations. Using video games as a case study, this book fills the gap left by copyright law, offering an innovative socio-legal methodology to interrogate and challenge harmful contractual norms.</p>
<p>By analysing contracts as a form of critical discourse, the book exposes the contradictions and idealisations embedded in these agreements, which often serve to reinforce industry priorities. It is an essential resource for scholars in intellectual property law, video game studies, and socio-legal research, contributing to pressing debates on user rights and the shifting balance of power in interactive industries.</p>
<p>With its fresh perspective on the interplay of copyright, contract, and cultural participation, the book redefines the player's role in a rapidly evolving digital landscape, offering new tools to understand and critique the legal frameworks shaping this most interactive of industries.</p>
<p>Amy Thomas is Lecturer in Intellectual Property and Information Law at the University of Glasgow, UK.</p>
<p>Rudolf Thomas Inderst (*1978) enjoys video games since 1985. He received a master’s degree in political science, American cultural studies as well as contemporary and recent history from Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich and holds two PhDs in game studies (LMU &amp; University of Passau). Currently, he's teaching as a professor for game design and game studies at the University of Applied Sciences Neu-Ulm, has submitted his third dissertation at the University of Vechta, holds the position as lead editor at the online journal TITEL kulturmagazin for the game section and is editor of the weekly game research newsletter Game Studies Watchlist.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="24114775" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/f9ac076b-ad18-4024-ae67-e3d4275d8255/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=f9ac076b-ad18-4024-ae67-e3d4275d8255&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Amy Thomas, &quot;Copyright, Contract, and Video Games: Terms of Play&quot; (Hart Publishing, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:25:04</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Copyright, Contract, and Video Games: Terms of Play ﻿(Hart Publishing, 2026) uncovers how video game contracts act as monologues of power, moulding players to align with proprietary ideologies.
In the era of interactive technologies, the player emerges as a vital yet curiously overlooked figure. While copyright law governs the creation and distribution of these technologies, it sidesteps the player, leaving private contracts to define their role and obligations. Using video games as a case study, this book fills the gap left by copyright law, offering an innovative socio-legal methodology to interrogate and challenge harmful contractual norms.
By analysing contracts as a form of critical discourse, the book exposes the contradictions and idealisations embedded in these agreements, which often serve to reinforce industry priorities. It is an essential resource for scholars in intellectual property law, video game studies, and socio-legal research, contributing to pressing debates on user rights and the shifting balance of power in interactive industries.
With its fresh perspective on the interplay of copyright, contract, and cultural participation, the book redefines the player&apos;s role in a rapidly evolving digital landscape, offering new tools to understand and critique the legal frameworks shaping this most interactive of industries.
Amy Thomas is Lecturer in Intellectual Property and Information Law at the University of Glasgow, UK.
Rudolf Thomas Inderst (*1978) enjoys video games since 1985. He received a master’s degree in political science, American cultural studies as well as contemporary and recent history from Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich and holds two PhDs in game studies (LMU &amp; University of Passau). Currently, he&apos;s teaching as a professor for game design and game studies at the University of Applied Sciences Neu-Ulm, has submitted his third dissertation at the University of Vechta, holds the position as lead editor at the online journal TITEL kulturmagazin for the game section and is editor of the weekly game research newsletter Game Studies Watchlist.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Copyright, Contract, and Video Games: Terms of Play ﻿(Hart Publishing, 2026) uncovers how video game contracts act as monologues of power, moulding players to align with proprietary ideologies.
In the era of interactive technologies, the player emerges as a vital yet curiously overlooked figure. While copyright law governs the creation and distribution of these technologies, it sidesteps the player, leaving private contracts to define their role and obligations. Using video games as a case study, this book fills the gap left by copyright law, offering an innovative socio-legal methodology to interrogate and challenge harmful contractual norms.
By analysing contracts as a form of critical discourse, the book exposes the contradictions and idealisations embedded in these agreements, which often serve to reinforce industry priorities. It is an essential resource for scholars in intellectual property law, video game studies, and socio-legal research, contributing to pressing debates on user rights and the shifting balance of power in interactive industries.
With its fresh perspective on the interplay of copyright, contract, and cultural participation, the book redefines the player&apos;s role in a rapidly evolving digital landscape, offering new tools to understand and critique the legal frameworks shaping this most interactive of industries.
Amy Thomas is Lecturer in Intellectual Property and Information Law at the University of Glasgow, UK.
Rudolf Thomas Inderst (*1978) enjoys video games since 1985. He received a master’s degree in political science, American cultural studies as well as contemporary and recent history from Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich and holds two PhDs in game studies (LMU &amp; University of Passau). Currently, he&apos;s teaching as a professor for game design and game studies at the University of Applied Sciences Neu-Ulm, has submitted his third dissertation at the University of Vechta, holds the position as lead editor at the online journal TITEL kulturmagazin for the game section and is editor of the weekly game research newsletter Game Studies Watchlist.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1688</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">d2307b0a-575a-11f1-9ed0-5312ce4cac36</guid>
      <title>Claudia Smith Brinson, &quot;Stories of Struggle: The Clash over Civil Rights in South Carolina&quot; (U South Carolina Press, 2020)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781643364629" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Stories of Struggle: The Clash over Civil Rights in South Carolina</em></a>&nbsp;(U South Carolina Press, 2020), longtime journalist Claudia Smith Brinson details the lynchings, beatings, bombings, cross burnings, death threats, arson, and venomous hatred that black South Carolinians endured―as well as the astonishing courage, devotion, dignity, and compassion of those who risked their lives for equality.</p><p>Through extensive research and interviews with more than one hundred fifty civil rights activists, many of whom had never shared their stories with anyone, Brinson chronicles twenty pivotal years of petitioning, preaching, picketing, boycotting, marching, and holding sit-ins. Participants' use of nonviolent direct action altered the landscape of civil rights in South Carolina and reverberated throughout the South.</p><p>These firsthand accounts include those of the unsung petitioners who risked their lives by supporting Summerton's Briggs v. Elliot, a lawsuit that led to the historic Brown v. Board of Education decision; the thousands of students who were arrested and jailed in 1960 for protests in Rock Hill, Orangeburg, Denmark, Columbia, and Sumter; and the black female employees and leaders who defied a governor and his armed troops during the 1969 hospital strike in Charleston.</p><p>Brinson also highlights contributions made by remarkable but lesser-known activists, including James M. Hinton Sr., president of the South Carolina Conference of Branches of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People; Thomas W. Gaither, Congress of Racial Equality field secretary and scout for the Freedom Rides; Charles F. McDew, a South Carolina State College student and co-founder of the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee; and Mary Moultrie, grassroots leader of the 1969 hospital workers' strike.</p><p>These intimate stories of courage and conviction, both heartbreaking and inspiring, shine a light on the progress achieved by nonviolent civil rights activists while also revealing white South Carolinians' often violent resistance to change. Although significant racial disparities remain, the sacrifices of these brave men and women produced real progress―and hope for the future. For more information on this book, see storiesofstruggle.com</p><p><em>Matt Simmons is an Assistant Professor of History at Emmanuel University where he teaches course in U.S. and public history. His research interests focus on the intersection of labor and race in the twentieth-century American South. You can follow him on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://twitter.com/matthewfsimmons" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>X</em></a><em>&nbsp;@matthewfsimmons.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/claudia-smith-brinson-stories-of-struggle-the-clash-over-civil-rights-in-south-carolina-u-south-carolina-press-2020-rABXSsaX-y78o9hUo</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781643364629" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Stories of Struggle: The Clash over Civil Rights in South Carolina</em></a>&nbsp;(U South Carolina Press, 2020), longtime journalist Claudia Smith Brinson details the lynchings, beatings, bombings, cross burnings, death threats, arson, and venomous hatred that black South Carolinians endured―as well as the astonishing courage, devotion, dignity, and compassion of those who risked their lives for equality.</p><p>Through extensive research and interviews with more than one hundred fifty civil rights activists, many of whom had never shared their stories with anyone, Brinson chronicles twenty pivotal years of petitioning, preaching, picketing, boycotting, marching, and holding sit-ins. Participants' use of nonviolent direct action altered the landscape of civil rights in South Carolina and reverberated throughout the South.</p><p>These firsthand accounts include those of the unsung petitioners who risked their lives by supporting Summerton's Briggs v. Elliot, a lawsuit that led to the historic Brown v. Board of Education decision; the thousands of students who were arrested and jailed in 1960 for protests in Rock Hill, Orangeburg, Denmark, Columbia, and Sumter; and the black female employees and leaders who defied a governor and his armed troops during the 1969 hospital strike in Charleston.</p><p>Brinson also highlights contributions made by remarkable but lesser-known activists, including James M. Hinton Sr., president of the South Carolina Conference of Branches of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People; Thomas W. Gaither, Congress of Racial Equality field secretary and scout for the Freedom Rides; Charles F. McDew, a South Carolina State College student and co-founder of the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee; and Mary Moultrie, grassroots leader of the 1969 hospital workers' strike.</p><p>These intimate stories of courage and conviction, both heartbreaking and inspiring, shine a light on the progress achieved by nonviolent civil rights activists while also revealing white South Carolinians' often violent resistance to change. Although significant racial disparities remain, the sacrifices of these brave men and women produced real progress―and hope for the future. For more information on this book, see storiesofstruggle.com</p><p><em>Matt Simmons is an Assistant Professor of History at Emmanuel University where he teaches course in U.S. and public history. His research interests focus on the intersection of labor and race in the twentieth-century American South. You can follow him on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://twitter.com/matthewfsimmons" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>X</em></a><em>&nbsp;@matthewfsimmons.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="60974527" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/d06f0f0c-de7e-4bb2-a721-f031bcca31aa/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=d06f0f0c-de7e-4bb2-a721-f031bcca31aa&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Claudia Smith Brinson, &quot;Stories of Struggle: The Clash over Civil Rights in South Carolina&quot; (U South Carolina Press, 2020)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:03:30</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In Stories of Struggle: The Clash over Civil Rights in South Carolina (U South Carolina Press, 2020), longtime journalist Claudia Smith Brinson details the lynchings, beatings, bombings, cross burnings, death threats, arson, and venomous hatred that black South Carolinians endured―as well as the astonishing courage, devotion, dignity, and compassion of those who risked their lives for equality.
Through extensive research and interviews with more than one hundred fifty civil rights activists, many of whom had never shared their stories with anyone, Brinson chronicles twenty pivotal years of petitioning, preaching, picketing, boycotting, marching, and holding sit-ins. Participants&apos; use of nonviolent direct action altered the landscape of civil rights in South Carolina and reverberated throughout the South.
These firsthand accounts include those of the unsung petitioners who risked their lives by supporting Summerton&apos;s Briggs v. Elliot, a lawsuit that led to the historic Brown v. Board of Education decision; the thousands of students who were arrested and jailed in 1960 for protests in Rock Hill, Orangeburg, Denmark, Columbia, and Sumter; and the black female employees and leaders who defied a governor and his armed troops during the 1969 hospital strike in Charleston.
Brinson also highlights contributions made by remarkable but lesser-known activists, including James M. Hinton Sr., president of the South Carolina Conference of Branches of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People; Thomas W. Gaither, Congress of Racial Equality field secretary and scout for the Freedom Rides; Charles F. McDew, a South Carolina State College student and co-founder of the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee; and Mary Moultrie, grassroots leader of the 1969 hospital workers&apos; strike.
These intimate stories of courage and conviction, both heartbreaking and inspiring, shine a light on the progress achieved by nonviolent civil rights activists while also revealing white South Carolinians&apos; often violent resistance to change. Although significant racial disparities remain, the sacrifices of these brave men and women produced real progress―and hope for the future. For more information on this book, see storiesofstruggle.com
Matt Simmons is an Assistant Professor of History at Emmanuel University where he teaches course in U.S. and public history. His research interests focus on the intersection of labor and race in the twentieth-century American South. You can follow him on X @matthewfsimmons.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In Stories of Struggle: The Clash over Civil Rights in South Carolina (U South Carolina Press, 2020), longtime journalist Claudia Smith Brinson details the lynchings, beatings, bombings, cross burnings, death threats, arson, and venomous hatred that black South Carolinians endured―as well as the astonishing courage, devotion, dignity, and compassion of those who risked their lives for equality.
Through extensive research and interviews with more than one hundred fifty civil rights activists, many of whom had never shared their stories with anyone, Brinson chronicles twenty pivotal years of petitioning, preaching, picketing, boycotting, marching, and holding sit-ins. Participants&apos; use of nonviolent direct action altered the landscape of civil rights in South Carolina and reverberated throughout the South.
These firsthand accounts include those of the unsung petitioners who risked their lives by supporting Summerton&apos;s Briggs v. Elliot, a lawsuit that led to the historic Brown v. Board of Education decision; the thousands of students who were arrested and jailed in 1960 for protests in Rock Hill, Orangeburg, Denmark, Columbia, and Sumter; and the black female employees and leaders who defied a governor and his armed troops during the 1969 hospital strike in Charleston.
Brinson also highlights contributions made by remarkable but lesser-known activists, including James M. Hinton Sr., president of the South Carolina Conference of Branches of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People; Thomas W. Gaither, Congress of Racial Equality field secretary and scout for the Freedom Rides; Charles F. McDew, a South Carolina State College student and co-founder of the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee; and Mary Moultrie, grassroots leader of the 1969 hospital workers&apos; strike.
These intimate stories of courage and conviction, both heartbreaking and inspiring, shine a light on the progress achieved by nonviolent civil rights activists while also revealing white South Carolinians&apos; often violent resistance to change. Although significant racial disparities remain, the sacrifices of these brave men and women produced real progress―and hope for the future. For more information on this book, see storiesofstruggle.com
Matt Simmons is an Assistant Professor of History at Emmanuel University where he teaches course in U.S. and public history. His research interests focus on the intersection of labor and race in the twentieth-century American South. You can follow him on X @matthewfsimmons.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>61</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ca88c22a-553b-11f1-b6ef-871be454f246</guid>
      <title>Anna O. Law, &quot;Migration and the Origins of American Citizenship: African Americans, Native Americans, and Immigrants&quot; (Oxford UP, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Since the late nineteenth century, the US federal government has enjoyed exclusive authority to decide whether someone has the ability to enter and stay in US territory. But freedom of movement was not guaranteed in the British colonies or early US. By contrast, voluntary migrants were met with strict laws and policies created by colonies and states, which denied free mobility and settlement in their territories to unwanted populations.&nbsp;</p>
<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197660089" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Migration and the Origins of American Citizenship: African Americans, Native Americans, and Immigrants</em></a> (Oxford University Press, 2026) by Dr. Anna O. Law presents a story of constitutional development that traces the confluence of the logics of slavery and settler colonialism in early legal rulings and public policy about migration and citizenship. The book examines the division of labor between the national and state governments that endured for over a century, reasons why that arrangement changed in the late nineteenth century, and what the transformation meant for people subject to those regimes of control. Drawing into one study the migration policy histories of groups of people that are usually studied separately, and 
combining the methodologies of political science, history, and law, Dr. Law reveals the unmistakable effects of slavery and Native American dispossession in modern US immigration policy.&nbsp;</p>
<p>﻿<em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em> book</em></a><em> focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em> </p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/anna-o-law-migration-and-the-origins-of-american-citizenship-african-americans-native-americans-and-immigrants-oxford-up-2026-rIXHBecO</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since the late nineteenth century, the US federal government has enjoyed exclusive authority to decide whether someone has the ability to enter and stay in US territory. But freedom of movement was not guaranteed in the British colonies or early US. By contrast, voluntary migrants were met with strict laws and policies created by colonies and states, which denied free mobility and settlement in their territories to unwanted populations.&nbsp;</p>
<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197660089" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Migration and the Origins of American Citizenship: African Americans, Native Americans, and Immigrants</em></a> (Oxford University Press, 2026) by Dr. Anna O. Law presents a story of constitutional development that traces the confluence of the logics of slavery and settler colonialism in early legal rulings and public policy about migration and citizenship. The book examines the division of labor between the national and state governments that endured for over a century, reasons why that arrangement changed in the late nineteenth century, and what the transformation meant for people subject to those regimes of control. Drawing into one study the migration policy histories of groups of people that are usually studied separately, and 
combining the methodologies of political science, history, and law, Dr. Law reveals the unmistakable effects of slavery and Native American dispossession in modern US immigration policy.&nbsp;</p>
<p>﻿<em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em> book</em></a><em> focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on </em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em> </p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="34076111" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/efdf0e84-7f26-49a6-88f6-5cbb6eac4a32/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=efdf0e84-7f26-49a6-88f6-5cbb6eac4a32&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Anna O. Law, &quot;Migration and the Origins of American Citizenship: African Americans, Native Americans, and Immigrants&quot; (Oxford UP, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:35:27</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Since the late nineteenth century, the US federal government has enjoyed exclusive authority to decide whether someone has the ability to enter and stay in US territory. But freedom of movement was not guaranteed in the British colonies or early US. By contrast, voluntary migrants were met with strict laws and policies created by colonies and states, which denied free mobility and settlement in their territories to unwanted populations. 
Migration and the Origins of American Citizenship: African Americans, Native Americans, and Immigrants (Oxford University Press, 2026) by Dr. Anna O. Law presents a story of constitutional development that traces the confluence of the logics of slavery and settler colonialism in early legal rulings and public policy about migration and citizenship. The book examines the division of labor between the national and state governments that endured for over a century, reasons why that arrangement changed in the late nineteenth century, and what the transformation meant for people subject to those regimes of control. Drawing into one study the migration policy histories of groups of people that are usually studied separately, and 
combining the methodologies of political science, history, and law, Dr. Law reveals the unmistakable effects of slavery and Native American dispossession in modern US immigration policy. 
﻿This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts. 
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Since the late nineteenth century, the US federal government has enjoyed exclusive authority to decide whether someone has the ability to enter and stay in US territory. But freedom of movement was not guaranteed in the British colonies or early US. By contrast, voluntary migrants were met with strict laws and policies created by colonies and states, which denied free mobility and settlement in their territories to unwanted populations. 
Migration and the Origins of American Citizenship: African Americans, Native Americans, and Immigrants (Oxford University Press, 2026) by Dr. Anna O. Law presents a story of constitutional development that traces the confluence of the logics of slavery and settler colonialism in early legal rulings and public policy about migration and citizenship. The book examines the division of labor between the national and state governments that endured for over a century, reasons why that arrangement changed in the late nineteenth century, and what the transformation meant for people subject to those regimes of control. Drawing into one study the migration policy histories of groups of people that are usually studied separately, and 
combining the methodologies of political science, history, and law, Dr. Law reveals the unmistakable effects of slavery and Native American dispossession in modern US immigration policy. 
﻿This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts. 
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1687</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9be9472a-5458-11f1-8882-fffeaeb02f2d</guid>
      <title>Debating the Constitution: On Originalism&apos;s Most Pressing Quarrels with Sherif Girgis</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Here in Episode 8 of Season 5, I interview Professor&nbsp;<a href="https://law.nd.edu/directory/sherif-girgis/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Sherif Girgis</a>. A graduate of Princeton University, the University of Oxford, and Yale Law School, Girgis is a tenured professor of law at the Notre Dame Law School and a Spring 2026 visiting professor at Harvard Law School. A former law clerk to Justice Samuel Alito and member of the American Academy of the Arts and Letters, he is co-author of two books:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.encounterbooks.com/books/what-is-marriage-man-and-woman-a-defense/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>What is Marriage? Man, Woman, A Defense</em></a>&nbsp;(2012), and&nbsp;<a href="https://global.oup.com/academic/product/debating-religious-liberty-and-discrimination-9780190603076" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Debating Religious Liberty and Discrimination</em></a>&nbsp;(2017).</p>
<p>Using some of his&nbsp;<a href="https://scholarship.law.nd.edu/law_faculty_scholarship/1715/" rel="noopener noreferrer">recent</a>&nbsp;<a href="https://www.nyulawreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/98-NYU-L-Rev-1477.pdf" rel="noopener noreferrer">articles</a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a href="https://advancingamericanfreedom.com/the-future-of-originalism-professor-sherif-girgi/" rel="noopener noreferrer">speeches</a>—such as “The Future of Originalism” (2026)—we discuss the current state of constitutional jurisprudence. As an originalist and textualist reading of the Constitution has, thanks to advocacy groups like the Federalist Society, gone from a dissenting movement to the current governing theory of the Supreme Court, new problems have arisen that go beyond what early forerunners like Robert Bork and Antonin Scalia foresaw. We also discuss other (often competing) theories like living constitutionalism and living traditionalism, whether success has undone originalism, and what the future holds for this legal movement.</p>
<p>Hosted by Ryan Shinkel,&nbsp;<a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/podcast" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Madison’s Notes</em></a>&nbsp;is the podcast of Princeton University’s&nbsp;<a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/" rel="noopener noreferrer">James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions</a>. The transcript for this interview is available on our new&nbsp;<a href="https://substack.com/@madisonsnotes" rel="noopener noreferrer">Substack page</a>, “Madison’s Footnotes.”</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/debating-the-constitution-on-originalisms-most-pressing-quarrels-with-sherif-girgis-Uw5XCIvw</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here in Episode 8 of Season 5, I interview Professor&nbsp;<a href="https://law.nd.edu/directory/sherif-girgis/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Sherif Girgis</a>. A graduate of Princeton University, the University of Oxford, and Yale Law School, Girgis is a tenured professor of law at the Notre Dame Law School and a Spring 2026 visiting professor at Harvard Law School. A former law clerk to Justice Samuel Alito and member of the American Academy of the Arts and Letters, he is co-author of two books:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.encounterbooks.com/books/what-is-marriage-man-and-woman-a-defense/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>What is Marriage? Man, Woman, A Defense</em></a>&nbsp;(2012), and&nbsp;<a href="https://global.oup.com/academic/product/debating-religious-liberty-and-discrimination-9780190603076" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Debating Religious Liberty and Discrimination</em></a>&nbsp;(2017).</p>
<p>Using some of his&nbsp;<a href="https://scholarship.law.nd.edu/law_faculty_scholarship/1715/" rel="noopener noreferrer">recent</a>&nbsp;<a href="https://www.nyulawreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/98-NYU-L-Rev-1477.pdf" rel="noopener noreferrer">articles</a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a href="https://advancingamericanfreedom.com/the-future-of-originalism-professor-sherif-girgi/" rel="noopener noreferrer">speeches</a>—such as “The Future of Originalism” (2026)—we discuss the current state of constitutional jurisprudence. As an originalist and textualist reading of the Constitution has, thanks to advocacy groups like the Federalist Society, gone from a dissenting movement to the current governing theory of the Supreme Court, new problems have arisen that go beyond what early forerunners like Robert Bork and Antonin Scalia foresaw. We also discuss other (often competing) theories like living constitutionalism and living traditionalism, whether success has undone originalism, and what the future holds for this legal movement.</p>
<p>Hosted by Ryan Shinkel,&nbsp;<a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/podcast" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Madison’s Notes</em></a>&nbsp;is the podcast of Princeton University’s&nbsp;<a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/" rel="noopener noreferrer">James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions</a>. The transcript for this interview is available on our new&nbsp;<a href="https://substack.com/@madisonsnotes" rel="noopener noreferrer">Substack page</a>, “Madison’s Footnotes.”</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="59352675" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/d722fb1d-1f4f-463a-a404-e8f84680a44e/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=d722fb1d-1f4f-463a-a404-e8f84680a44e&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Debating the Constitution: On Originalism&apos;s Most Pressing Quarrels with Sherif Girgis</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:01:39</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Here in Episode 8 of Season 5, I interview Professor Sherif Girgis. A graduate of Princeton University, the University of Oxford, and Yale Law School, Girgis is a tenured professor of law at the Notre Dame Law School and a Spring 2026 visiting professor at Harvard Law School. A former law clerk to Justice Samuel Alito and member of the American Academy of the Arts and Letters, he is co-author of two books: What is Marriage? Man, Woman, A Defense (2012), and Debating Religious Liberty and Discrimination (2017).
Using some of his recent articles and speeches—such as “The Future of Originalism” (2026)—we discuss the current state of constitutional jurisprudence. As an originalist and textualist reading of the Constitution has, thanks to advocacy groups like the Federalist Society, gone from a dissenting movement to the current governing theory of the Supreme Court, new problems have arisen that go beyond what early forerunners like Robert Bork and Antonin Scalia foresaw. We also discuss other (often competing) theories like living constitutionalism and living traditionalism, whether success has undone originalism, and what the future holds for this legal movement.
Hosted by Ryan Shinkel, Madison’s Notes is the podcast of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions. The transcript for this interview is available on our new Substack page, “Madison’s Footnotes.”
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Here in Episode 8 of Season 5, I interview Professor Sherif Girgis. A graduate of Princeton University, the University of Oxford, and Yale Law School, Girgis is a tenured professor of law at the Notre Dame Law School and a Spring 2026 visiting professor at Harvard Law School. A former law clerk to Justice Samuel Alito and member of the American Academy of the Arts and Letters, he is co-author of two books: What is Marriage? Man, Woman, A Defense (2012), and Debating Religious Liberty and Discrimination (2017).
Using some of his recent articles and speeches—such as “The Future of Originalism” (2026)—we discuss the current state of constitutional jurisprudence. As an originalist and textualist reading of the Constitution has, thanks to advocacy groups like the Federalist Society, gone from a dissenting movement to the current governing theory of the Supreme Court, new problems have arisen that go beyond what early forerunners like Robert Bork and Antonin Scalia foresaw. We also discuss other (often competing) theories like living constitutionalism and living traditionalism, whether success has undone originalism, and what the future holds for this legal movement.
Hosted by Ryan Shinkel, Madison’s Notes is the podcast of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions. The transcript for this interview is available on our new Substack page, “Madison’s Footnotes.”
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1686</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">990828f4-5030-11f1-879e-ef561ae2e8a3</guid>
      <title>Justin Randolph, &quot;Mississippi Law: Policing and Reform in America’s Jim Crow Countryside (UNC Press, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Justin Randolph, assistant professor of history at Texas A&amp;M University, joins Michael Stauch to discuss&nbsp;﻿<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781469689487" rel="noopener noreferrer">Mississippi Law: Policing and Reform in America’s Jim Crow Countryside&nbsp;</a>(UNC Press, 2026),&nbsp;his new book on policing in Jim Crow Mississippi, told through the lens of that state’s highway patrol. Using oral history and a wide range of archival sources, Randolph narrates efforts by elites in Mississippi to modernize the police while maintaining social hierarchies, as well as efforts on the part of Black Mississippians to envision a world without police.</p>
<p>Highlights include:</p>
<ul>
  <li>What a focus on state-level policing adds to our understanding of policing;</li>
  <li>How the founding of the Mississippi highway patrol brought together various forms of policing in the Southwest, including the Texas rangers;</li>
  <li>A surprisingly robust discussion of cows, including Mississippi’s economic transformation to a center of cattle raising and the rise of cattlemen’s “Massive Resistance” in the 1950s;</li>
  <li>What Nina Simone revealed about policing in Mississippi, and the myth of Southern exceptionalism, in her song “Mississippi Goddam.”</li>
</ul>
<p>Guest:&nbsp;<a href="https://artsci.tamu.edu/history/contact/profiles/justin-randolph.html" rel="noopener noreferrer">Justin Randolph</a>&nbsp;is an assistant professor of history at Texas A&amp;M University, and his other research projects include histories of police desegregation, rural debt peonage, the Taser, and 9-1-1. His writing has appeared in scholarly outlets like the Journal of Southern History and Southern Cultures. He has also written for popular outlets such as The Washington Post, The Mississippi Encyclopedia, and the Mississippi Center for Investigative Reporting. He has received an American Council of Learned Societies (ACLS) Fellowship and prizes from both the Southern Historical Association and Agricultural History Society.</p>
<p>Host:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.michaelstauch.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Michael Stauch</a>&nbsp;is an associate professor of history at the University of Toledo and the author of&nbsp;<a href="https://www.pennpress.org/9781512827996/wildcat-of-the-streets/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Wildcat of the Streets: Detroit in the Age of Community Policing</em></a>, published by the University of Pennsylvania Press in 2025.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/justin-randolph-mississippi-law-policing-and-reform-in-americas-jim-crow-countryside-unc-press-2026-uMthvTNg</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Justin Randolph, assistant professor of history at Texas A&amp;M University, joins Michael Stauch to discuss&nbsp;﻿<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781469689487" rel="noopener noreferrer">Mississippi Law: Policing and Reform in America’s Jim Crow Countryside&nbsp;</a>(UNC Press, 2026),&nbsp;his new book on policing in Jim Crow Mississippi, told through the lens of that state’s highway patrol. Using oral history and a wide range of archival sources, Randolph narrates efforts by elites in Mississippi to modernize the police while maintaining social hierarchies, as well as efforts on the part of Black Mississippians to envision a world without police.</p>
<p>Highlights include:</p>
<ul>
  <li>What a focus on state-level policing adds to our understanding of policing;</li>
  <li>How the founding of the Mississippi highway patrol brought together various forms of policing in the Southwest, including the Texas rangers;</li>
  <li>A surprisingly robust discussion of cows, including Mississippi’s economic transformation to a center of cattle raising and the rise of cattlemen’s “Massive Resistance” in the 1950s;</li>
  <li>What Nina Simone revealed about policing in Mississippi, and the myth of Southern exceptionalism, in her song “Mississippi Goddam.”</li>
</ul>
<p>Guest:&nbsp;<a href="https://artsci.tamu.edu/history/contact/profiles/justin-randolph.html" rel="noopener noreferrer">Justin Randolph</a>&nbsp;is an assistant professor of history at Texas A&amp;M University, and his other research projects include histories of police desegregation, rural debt peonage, the Taser, and 9-1-1. His writing has appeared in scholarly outlets like the Journal of Southern History and Southern Cultures. He has also written for popular outlets such as The Washington Post, The Mississippi Encyclopedia, and the Mississippi Center for Investigative Reporting. He has received an American Council of Learned Societies (ACLS) Fellowship and prizes from both the Southern Historical Association and Agricultural History Society.</p>
<p>Host:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.michaelstauch.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Michael Stauch</a>&nbsp;is an associate professor of history at the University of Toledo and the author of&nbsp;<a href="https://www.pennpress.org/9781512827996/wildcat-of-the-streets/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Wildcat of the Streets: Detroit in the Age of Community Policing</em></a>, published by the University of Pennsylvania Press in 2025.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="67265276" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/329888c5-1663-43d8-b783-7c731a3dc0b9/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=329888c5-1663-43d8-b783-7c731a3dc0b9&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Justin Randolph, &quot;Mississippi Law: Policing and Reform in America’s Jim Crow Countryside (UNC Press, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:10:02</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Justin Randolph, assistant professor of history at Texas A&amp;M University, joins Michael Stauch to discuss ﻿Mississippi Law: Policing and Reform in America’s Jim Crow Countryside (UNC Press, 2026), his new book on policing in Jim Crow Mississippi, told through the lens of that state’s highway patrol. Using oral history and a wide range of archival sources, Randolph narrates efforts by elites in Mississippi to modernize the police while maintaining social hierarchies, as well as efforts on the part of Black Mississippians to envision a world without police.
Highlights include:
 What a focus on state-level policing adds to our understanding of policing;
 How the founding of the Mississippi highway patrol brought together various forms of policing in the Southwest, including the Texas rangers;
 A surprisingly robust discussion of cows, including Mississippi’s economic transformation to a center of cattle raising and the rise of cattlemen’s “Massive Resistance” in the 1950s;
 What Nina Simone revealed about policing in Mississippi, and the myth of Southern exceptionalism, in her song “Mississippi Goddam.”
Guest: Justin Randolph is an assistant professor of history at Texas A&amp;M University, and his other research projects include histories of police desegregation, rural debt peonage, the Taser, and 9-1-1. His writing has appeared in scholarly outlets like the Journal of Southern History and Southern Cultures. He has also written for popular outlets such as The Washington Post, The Mississippi Encyclopedia, and the Mississippi Center for Investigative Reporting. He has received an American Council of Learned Societies (ACLS) Fellowship and prizes from both the Southern Historical Association and Agricultural History Society.
Host: Michael Stauch is an associate professor of history at the University of Toledo and the author of Wildcat of the Streets: Detroit in the Age of Community Policing, published by the University of Pennsylvania Press in 2025.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Justin Randolph, assistant professor of history at Texas A&amp;M University, joins Michael Stauch to discuss ﻿Mississippi Law: Policing and Reform in America’s Jim Crow Countryside (UNC Press, 2026), his new book on policing in Jim Crow Mississippi, told through the lens of that state’s highway patrol. Using oral history and a wide range of archival sources, Randolph narrates efforts by elites in Mississippi to modernize the police while maintaining social hierarchies, as well as efforts on the part of Black Mississippians to envision a world without police.
Highlights include:
 What a focus on state-level policing adds to our understanding of policing;
 How the founding of the Mississippi highway patrol brought together various forms of policing in the Southwest, including the Texas rangers;
 A surprisingly robust discussion of cows, including Mississippi’s economic transformation to a center of cattle raising and the rise of cattlemen’s “Massive Resistance” in the 1950s;
 What Nina Simone revealed about policing in Mississippi, and the myth of Southern exceptionalism, in her song “Mississippi Goddam.”
Guest: Justin Randolph is an assistant professor of history at Texas A&amp;M University, and his other research projects include histories of police desegregation, rural debt peonage, the Taser, and 9-1-1. His writing has appeared in scholarly outlets like the Journal of Southern History and Southern Cultures. He has also written for popular outlets such as The Washington Post, The Mississippi Encyclopedia, and the Mississippi Center for Investigative Reporting. He has received an American Council of Learned Societies (ACLS) Fellowship and prizes from both the Southern Historical Association and Agricultural History Society.
Host: Michael Stauch is an associate professor of history at the University of Toledo and the author of Wildcat of the Streets: Detroit in the Age of Community Policing, published by the University of Pennsylvania Press in 2025.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1685</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ed82fd80-5032-11f1-91f4-fbd296fbdf44</guid>
      <title>Under the Tenement Rooftops: Immigrant and Migrant Families in New York</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The Tenement Museum preserves and interprets the personal stories of residents of two buildings on the Lower East Side of Manhattan. Ninety-seven Orchard Street opened in 1863 and housed a succession of European immigrants until the double blow of the Great Depression and the impact of the 1924 Johnson Reed Act forced the landlord to evict the tenants. Down the block, 103 Orchard, built in 1888, kept its doors open throughout the twentieth century, hosting Jewish and Italian immigrants in its early years, and Holocaust refugees, Puerto Rican migrants and Chinese immigrants in its later years. This program traces how immigration law impacted the residents of these buildings, and how they carved out new lives once they arrived. Census records, newspaper articles and oral histories—with a focus on YIVO primary sources—will be used to bring the families’ situations to life and situate them in their contexts.</p>
<p>This lecture originally took place on June 24, 2021.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/under-the-tenement-rooftops-immigrant-and-migrant-families-in-new-york-jRdMLDm5</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Tenement Museum preserves and interprets the personal stories of residents of two buildings on the Lower East Side of Manhattan. Ninety-seven Orchard Street opened in 1863 and housed a succession of European immigrants until the double blow of the Great Depression and the impact of the 1924 Johnson Reed Act forced the landlord to evict the tenants. Down the block, 103 Orchard, built in 1888, kept its doors open throughout the twentieth century, hosting Jewish and Italian immigrants in its early years, and Holocaust refugees, Puerto Rican migrants and Chinese immigrants in its later years. This program traces how immigration law impacted the residents of these buildings, and how they carved out new lives once they arrived. Census records, newspaper articles and oral histories—with a focus on YIVO primary sources—will be used to bring the families’ situations to life and situate them in their contexts.</p>
<p>This lecture originally took place on June 24, 2021.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="61849975" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/8b637e32-4884-40fe-a8ab-c810b21ee3b0/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=8b637e32-4884-40fe-a8ab-c810b21ee3b0&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Under the Tenement Rooftops: Immigrant and Migrant Families in New York</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:04:23</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The Tenement Museum preserves and interprets the personal stories of residents of two buildings on the Lower East Side of Manhattan. Ninety-seven Orchard Street opened in 1863 and housed a succession of European immigrants until the double blow of the Great Depression and the impact of the 1924 Johnson Reed Act forced the landlord to evict the tenants. Down the block, 103 Orchard, built in 1888, kept its doors open throughout the twentieth century, hosting Jewish and Italian immigrants in its early years, and Holocaust refugees, Puerto Rican migrants and Chinese immigrants in its later years. This program traces how immigration law impacted the residents of these buildings, and how they carved out new lives once they arrived. Census records, newspaper articles and oral histories—with a focus on YIVO primary sources—will be used to bring the families’ situations to life and situate them in their contexts.
This lecture originally took place on June 24, 2021.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Tenement Museum preserves and interprets the personal stories of residents of two buildings on the Lower East Side of Manhattan. Ninety-seven Orchard Street opened in 1863 and housed a succession of European immigrants until the double blow of the Great Depression and the impact of the 1924 Johnson Reed Act forced the landlord to evict the tenants. Down the block, 103 Orchard, built in 1888, kept its doors open throughout the twentieth century, hosting Jewish and Italian immigrants in its early years, and Holocaust refugees, Puerto Rican migrants and Chinese immigrants in its later years. This program traces how immigration law impacted the residents of these buildings, and how they carved out new lives once they arrived. Census records, newspaper articles and oral histories—with a focus on YIVO primary sources—will be used to bring the families’ situations to life and situate them in their contexts.
This lecture originally took place on June 24, 2021.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1684</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">da7941ba-49e1-11f1-b550-1fd269156145</guid>
      <title>Olivier Sylvain, &quot;Recovering the Internet: How Big Tech Took Control-And How We Can Take It Back&quot; (Columbia Global Reports, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781967190126" rel="noopener noreferrer">Recovering the Internet: How Big Tech Took Control-And How We Can Take It Back</a>&nbsp;(Columbia Global Reports,&nbsp;2026)is an indictment of how Big Tech cloaks ruthless commercial exploitation in the language of free speech. Olivier Sylvain, a leading legal scholar and former senior advisor at the Federal Trade Commission, exposes the incentives behind social media design, revealing how they trap users in cycles of addiction, misinformation, and harm—from fatal TikTok challenges to AI chatbot codependency.</p>
<p>With clarity and urgency, Sylvain dismantles the libertarian mythology that shaped internet law and calls for a new legal regime that protects users over platforms. Recovering the Internet is a powerful, original intervention into the most urgent policy debate of our time—what it will take to reclaim the digital public sphere.</p>
<p>Find out more&nbsp;<a href="https://globalreports.columbia.edu/books/reclaiming-the-internet" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a></p>
<p><a href="https://jakec007.github.io/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Jake Chanenson</a>&nbsp;is a computer science Ph.D. student and law student at the University of Chicago. Broadly, Jake is interested in topics relating to HCI, privacy, and tech policy. Jake’s work has been published in top venues such as ACM’s CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 9 May 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/olivier-sylvain-recovering-the-internet-how-big-tech-took-control-and-how-we-can-take-it-back-columbia-global-reports-2026-zGhaaE69</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781967190126" rel="noopener noreferrer">Recovering the Internet: How Big Tech Took Control-And How We Can Take It Back</a>&nbsp;(Columbia Global Reports,&nbsp;2026)is an indictment of how Big Tech cloaks ruthless commercial exploitation in the language of free speech. Olivier Sylvain, a leading legal scholar and former senior advisor at the Federal Trade Commission, exposes the incentives behind social media design, revealing how they trap users in cycles of addiction, misinformation, and harm—from fatal TikTok challenges to AI chatbot codependency.</p>
<p>With clarity and urgency, Sylvain dismantles the libertarian mythology that shaped internet law and calls for a new legal regime that protects users over platforms. Recovering the Internet is a powerful, original intervention into the most urgent policy debate of our time—what it will take to reclaim the digital public sphere.</p>
<p>Find out more&nbsp;<a href="https://globalreports.columbia.edu/books/reclaiming-the-internet" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a></p>
<p><a href="https://jakec007.github.io/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Jake Chanenson</a>&nbsp;is a computer science Ph.D. student and law student at the University of Chicago. Broadly, Jake is interested in topics relating to HCI, privacy, and tech policy. Jake’s work has been published in top venues such as ACM’s CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="31332677" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/881836dd-2f26-43d8-aab8-3ae7ab21f836/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=881836dd-2f26-43d8-aab8-3ae7ab21f836&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Olivier Sylvain, &quot;Recovering the Internet: How Big Tech Took Control-And How We Can Take It Back&quot; (Columbia Global Reports, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:32:32</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Recovering the Internet: How Big Tech Took Control-And How We Can Take It Back (Columbia Global Reports, 2026)is an indictment of how Big Tech cloaks ruthless commercial exploitation in the language of free speech. Olivier Sylvain, a leading legal scholar and former senior advisor at the Federal Trade Commission, exposes the incentives behind social media design, revealing how they trap users in cycles of addiction, misinformation, and harm—from fatal TikTok challenges to AI chatbot codependency.
With clarity and urgency, Sylvain dismantles the libertarian mythology that shaped internet law and calls for a new legal regime that protects users over platforms. Recovering the Internet is a powerful, original intervention into the most urgent policy debate of our time—what it will take to reclaim the digital public sphere.
Find out more here
Jake Chanenson is a computer science Ph.D. student and law student at the University of Chicago. Broadly, Jake is interested in topics relating to HCI, privacy, and tech policy. Jake’s work has been published in top venues such as ACM’s CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Recovering the Internet: How Big Tech Took Control-And How We Can Take It Back (Columbia Global Reports, 2026)is an indictment of how Big Tech cloaks ruthless commercial exploitation in the language of free speech. Olivier Sylvain, a leading legal scholar and former senior advisor at the Federal Trade Commission, exposes the incentives behind social media design, revealing how they trap users in cycles of addiction, misinformation, and harm—from fatal TikTok challenges to AI chatbot codependency.
With clarity and urgency, Sylvain dismantles the libertarian mythology that shaped internet law and calls for a new legal regime that protects users over platforms. Recovering the Internet is a powerful, original intervention into the most urgent policy debate of our time—what it will take to reclaim the digital public sphere.
Find out more here
Jake Chanenson is a computer science Ph.D. student and law student at the University of Chicago. Broadly, Jake is interested in topics relating to HCI, privacy, and tech policy. Jake’s work has been published in top venues such as ACM’s CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1682</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">a01a83e6-49da-11f1-806a-0b992f1d1a35</guid>
      <title>Mark Peterson, &quot;The Making and Breaking of the American Constitution: A Thousand-Year History&quot; (Princeton UP, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>A provocative new history of America's constitution and an urgent call to action for a nation confronted by challenges its founders could never have imagined</p>
<p>The American Revolution occurred at a time when Britain's constitutional order failed to adapt to the extraordinary growth of its colonies. The framers designed an American constitution to succeed where Britain's had faltered, planning for continuous population and territorial expansion that would eventually cross the continent. Yet by the end of the nineteenth century, it was already ill-suited for an increasingly urban, industrialized society, and the transformations of the twentieth century have pushed it to a breaking point.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691180014" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Making and Breaking of the American Constitution: A Thousand-Year History</a>&nbsp;(Princeton UP, 2026)&nbsp;charts the history and aims of the American constitution from its origins in an agrarian past to the grave crisis we face today.</p>
<p>Mark Peterson traces the American constitutional tradition to the control of land in medieval England, showing how the founders incorporated the aspirations of Magna Carta with the administrative principles of the Domesday Book, a meticulous survey and valuation of landed property commissioned by William the Conqueror. This framework encouraged the growth of democratic self-government in a young nation. It also institutionalized the colonization of territory and the expulsion of Indigenous peoples, establishing a legal blueprint for transforming tribal lands into revenue-yielding real estate for settlers. Peterson's riveting narrative paints an arresting picture of a dynamic republic whose frame of government has changed enormously to meet the challenges of the modern age but whose written constitution has changed very little.</p>
<p>Marking the 250th anniversary of American independence,&nbsp;<em>The Making and Breaking of the American Constitution</em>&nbsp;reveals how this widening disconnect threatens the very existence of our democracy. It calls for a constitution that sustains the ideals developed over the past thousand years while meeting the challenges of the future.</p>
<p>Mark Peterson&nbsp;is the Edmund S. Morgan Professor of History at Yale University. He is the author of&nbsp;<em>The City-State of Boston: The Rise and Fall of an Atlantic Power, 1630–1865</em>&nbsp;(Princeton) and&nbsp;<em>The Price of Redemption: The Spiritual Economy of Puritan New England</em>.</p>
<p>Mark Peterson traces the American constitutional tradition to the control of land in medieval England, showing how the founders incorporated the aspirations of Magna Carta with the administrative principles of the Domesday Book, a meticulous survey and valuation of landed property commissioned by William the Conqueror. This framework encouraged the growth of democratic self-government in a young nation. It also institutionalized the colonization of territory and the expulsion of Indigenous peoples, establishing a legal blueprint for transforming tribal lands into revenue-yielding real estate for settlers. Peterson’s riveting narrative paints an arresting picture of a dynamic republic whose frame of government has changed enormously to meet the challenges of the modern age but whose written constitution has changed very little.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 9 May 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/mark-peterson-the-making-and-breaking-of-the-american-constitution-a-thousand-year-history-princeton-up-2026-_SIPJEa0</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A provocative new history of America's constitution and an urgent call to action for a nation confronted by challenges its founders could never have imagined</p>
<p>The American Revolution occurred at a time when Britain's constitutional order failed to adapt to the extraordinary growth of its colonies. The framers designed an American constitution to succeed where Britain's had faltered, planning for continuous population and territorial expansion that would eventually cross the continent. Yet by the end of the nineteenth century, it was already ill-suited for an increasingly urban, industrialized society, and the transformations of the twentieth century have pushed it to a breaking point.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691180014" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Making and Breaking of the American Constitution: A Thousand-Year History</a>&nbsp;(Princeton UP, 2026)&nbsp;charts the history and aims of the American constitution from its origins in an agrarian past to the grave crisis we face today.</p>
<p>Mark Peterson traces the American constitutional tradition to the control of land in medieval England, showing how the founders incorporated the aspirations of Magna Carta with the administrative principles of the Domesday Book, a meticulous survey and valuation of landed property commissioned by William the Conqueror. This framework encouraged the growth of democratic self-government in a young nation. It also institutionalized the colonization of territory and the expulsion of Indigenous peoples, establishing a legal blueprint for transforming tribal lands into revenue-yielding real estate for settlers. Peterson's riveting narrative paints an arresting picture of a dynamic republic whose frame of government has changed enormously to meet the challenges of the modern age but whose written constitution has changed very little.</p>
<p>Marking the 250th anniversary of American independence,&nbsp;<em>The Making and Breaking of the American Constitution</em>&nbsp;reveals how this widening disconnect threatens the very existence of our democracy. It calls for a constitution that sustains the ideals developed over the past thousand years while meeting the challenges of the future.</p>
<p>Mark Peterson&nbsp;is the Edmund S. Morgan Professor of History at Yale University. He is the author of&nbsp;<em>The City-State of Boston: The Rise and Fall of an Atlantic Power, 1630–1865</em>&nbsp;(Princeton) and&nbsp;<em>The Price of Redemption: The Spiritual Economy of Puritan New England</em>.</p>
<p>Mark Peterson traces the American constitutional tradition to the control of land in medieval England, showing how the founders incorporated the aspirations of Magna Carta with the administrative principles of the Domesday Book, a meticulous survey and valuation of landed property commissioned by William the Conqueror. This framework encouraged the growth of democratic self-government in a young nation. It also institutionalized the colonization of territory and the expulsion of Indigenous peoples, establishing a legal blueprint for transforming tribal lands into revenue-yielding real estate for settlers. Peterson’s riveting narrative paints an arresting picture of a dynamic republic whose frame of government has changed enormously to meet the challenges of the modern age but whose written constitution has changed very little.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="63854714" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/b05d08a8-da05-4055-a51c-d1637063bc3d/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=b05d08a8-da05-4055-a51c-d1637063bc3d&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Mark Peterson, &quot;The Making and Breaking of the American Constitution: A Thousand-Year History&quot; (Princeton UP, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:06:27</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>A provocative new history of America&apos;s constitution and an urgent call to action for a nation confronted by challenges its founders could never have imagined
The American Revolution occurred at a time when Britain&apos;s constitutional order failed to adapt to the extraordinary growth of its colonies. The framers designed an American constitution to succeed where Britain&apos;s had faltered, planning for continuous population and territorial expansion that would eventually cross the continent. Yet by the end of the nineteenth century, it was already ill-suited for an increasingly urban, industrialized society, and the transformations of the twentieth century have pushed it to a breaking point. The Making and Breaking of the American Constitution: A Thousand-Year History (Princeton UP, 2026) charts the history and aims of the American constitution from its origins in an agrarian past to the grave crisis we face today.
Mark Peterson traces the American constitutional tradition to the control of land in medieval England, showing how the founders incorporated the aspirations of Magna Carta with the administrative principles of the Domesday Book, a meticulous survey and valuation of landed property commissioned by William the Conqueror. This framework encouraged the growth of democratic self-government in a young nation. It also institutionalized the colonization of territory and the expulsion of Indigenous peoples, establishing a legal blueprint for transforming tribal lands into revenue-yielding real estate for settlers. Peterson&apos;s riveting narrative paints an arresting picture of a dynamic republic whose frame of government has changed enormously to meet the challenges of the modern age but whose written constitution has changed very little.
Marking the 250th anniversary of American independence, The Making and Breaking of the American Constitution reveals how this widening disconnect threatens the very existence of our democracy. It calls for a constitution that sustains the ideals developed over the past thousand years while meeting the challenges of the future.
Mark Peterson is the Edmund S. Morgan Professor of History at Yale University. He is the author of The City-State of Boston: The Rise and Fall of an Atlantic Power, 1630–1865 (Princeton) and The Price of Redemption: The Spiritual Economy of Puritan New England.
Mark Peterson traces the American constitutional tradition to the control of land in medieval England, showing how the founders incorporated the aspirations of Magna Carta with the administrative principles of the Domesday Book, a meticulous survey and valuation of landed property commissioned by William the Conqueror. This framework encouraged the growth of democratic self-government in a young nation. It also institutionalized the colonization of territory and the expulsion of Indigenous peoples, establishing a legal blueprint for transforming tribal lands into revenue-yielding real estate for settlers. Peterson’s riveting narrative paints an arresting picture of a dynamic republic whose frame of government has changed enormously to meet the challenges of the modern age but whose written constitution has changed very little.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>A provocative new history of America&apos;s constitution and an urgent call to action for a nation confronted by challenges its founders could never have imagined
The American Revolution occurred at a time when Britain&apos;s constitutional order failed to adapt to the extraordinary growth of its colonies. The framers designed an American constitution to succeed where Britain&apos;s had faltered, planning for continuous population and territorial expansion that would eventually cross the continent. Yet by the end of the nineteenth century, it was already ill-suited for an increasingly urban, industrialized society, and the transformations of the twentieth century have pushed it to a breaking point. The Making and Breaking of the American Constitution: A Thousand-Year History (Princeton UP, 2026) charts the history and aims of the American constitution from its origins in an agrarian past to the grave crisis we face today.
Mark Peterson traces the American constitutional tradition to the control of land in medieval England, showing how the founders incorporated the aspirations of Magna Carta with the administrative principles of the Domesday Book, a meticulous survey and valuation of landed property commissioned by William the Conqueror. This framework encouraged the growth of democratic self-government in a young nation. It also institutionalized the colonization of territory and the expulsion of Indigenous peoples, establishing a legal blueprint for transforming tribal lands into revenue-yielding real estate for settlers. Peterson&apos;s riveting narrative paints an arresting picture of a dynamic republic whose frame of government has changed enormously to meet the challenges of the modern age but whose written constitution has changed very little.
Marking the 250th anniversary of American independence, The Making and Breaking of the American Constitution reveals how this widening disconnect threatens the very existence of our democracy. It calls for a constitution that sustains the ideals developed over the past thousand years while meeting the challenges of the future.
Mark Peterson is the Edmund S. Morgan Professor of History at Yale University. He is the author of The City-State of Boston: The Rise and Fall of an Atlantic Power, 1630–1865 (Princeton) and The Price of Redemption: The Spiritual Economy of Puritan New England.
Mark Peterson traces the American constitutional tradition to the control of land in medieval England, showing how the founders incorporated the aspirations of Magna Carta with the administrative principles of the Domesday Book, a meticulous survey and valuation of landed property commissioned by William the Conqueror. This framework encouraged the growth of democratic self-government in a young nation. It also institutionalized the colonization of territory and the expulsion of Indigenous peoples, establishing a legal blueprint for transforming tribal lands into revenue-yielding real estate for settlers. Peterson’s riveting narrative paints an arresting picture of a dynamic republic whose frame of government has changed enormously to meet the challenges of the modern age but whose written constitution has changed very little.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1683</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7fe6b2f0-471b-11f1-9294-cffdafc6d403</guid>
      <title>James Q. Whitman, &quot;Masters of Slaves to Lords of Lands: The Transformation of Ownership in the Western World&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>﻿Today we think of land as the paradigmatic example of property, while in the past, the paradigmatic example was often a slave. In this seminal work, James Q. Whitman asserts that there is no natural form of ownership. Whitman dives deep into the long Western history of this transformation in the legal imagination – the transformation from the ownership of humans and other living creatures to the ownership of land. This change extended over many centuries, coming to fruition only on the threshold of the modern era. It brought with it profound changes, not only in the way we understand ownership but also in the way we understand the state. Its most dramatic consequence arrived in the nineteenth century, with the final disappearance of the lawful private ownership of humans, which had been taken for granted for thousands of years.</p>
<p>James Q. Whitman is the Ford Foundation Professor of Comparative and Foreign Law at Yale Law School. He earned his B.A. and J.D. from Yale University and Law School and also holds an M.A. in European History from Columbia University and a Ph.D. in Intellectual History from the University of Chicago.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos" rel="noopener noreferrer">Morteza Hajizadeh</a>&nbsp;is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th&nbsp;and 19th&nbsp;Century British Literature.</p>
<p>YouTube Channel:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos</a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 4 May 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/james-q-whitman-masters-of-slaves-to-lords-of-lands-the-transformation-of-ownership-in-the-western-world-cambridge-up-2025-Qf7c6a4K</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>﻿Today we think of land as the paradigmatic example of property, while in the past, the paradigmatic example was often a slave. In this seminal work, James Q. Whitman asserts that there is no natural form of ownership. Whitman dives deep into the long Western history of this transformation in the legal imagination – the transformation from the ownership of humans and other living creatures to the ownership of land. This change extended over many centuries, coming to fruition only on the threshold of the modern era. It brought with it profound changes, not only in the way we understand ownership but also in the way we understand the state. Its most dramatic consequence arrived in the nineteenth century, with the final disappearance of the lawful private ownership of humans, which had been taken for granted for thousands of years.</p>
<p>James Q. Whitman is the Ford Foundation Professor of Comparative and Foreign Law at Yale Law School. He earned his B.A. and J.D. from Yale University and Law School and also holds an M.A. in European History from Columbia University and a Ph.D. in Intellectual History from the University of Chicago.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos" rel="noopener noreferrer">Morteza Hajizadeh</a>&nbsp;is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th&nbsp;and 19th&nbsp;Century British Literature.</p>
<p>YouTube Channel:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos</a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="52353047" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/c34c417f-77a3-4acd-bc36-21d3c1ff547d/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=c34c417f-77a3-4acd-bc36-21d3c1ff547d&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>James Q. Whitman, &quot;Masters of Slaves to Lords of Lands: The Transformation of Ownership in the Western World&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:54:28</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>﻿Today we think of land as the paradigmatic example of property, while in the past, the paradigmatic example was often a slave. In this seminal work, James Q. Whitman asserts that there is no natural form of ownership. Whitman dives deep into the long Western history of this transformation in the legal imagination – the transformation from the ownership of humans and other living creatures to the ownership of land. This change extended over many centuries, coming to fruition only on the threshold of the modern era. It brought with it profound changes, not only in the way we understand ownership but also in the way we understand the state. Its most dramatic consequence arrived in the nineteenth century, with the final disappearance of the lawful private ownership of humans, which had been taken for granted for thousands of years.
James Q. Whitman is the Ford Foundation Professor of Comparative and Foreign Law at Yale Law School. He earned his B.A. and J.D. from Yale University and Law School and also holds an M.A. in European History from Columbia University and a Ph.D. in Intellectual History from the University of Chicago.
Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature.
YouTube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>﻿Today we think of land as the paradigmatic example of property, while in the past, the paradigmatic example was often a slave. In this seminal work, James Q. Whitman asserts that there is no natural form of ownership. Whitman dives deep into the long Western history of this transformation in the legal imagination – the transformation from the ownership of humans and other living creatures to the ownership of land. This change extended over many centuries, coming to fruition only on the threshold of the modern era. It brought with it profound changes, not only in the way we understand ownership but also in the way we understand the state. Its most dramatic consequence arrived in the nineteenth century, with the final disappearance of the lawful private ownership of humans, which had been taken for granted for thousands of years.
James Q. Whitman is the Ford Foundation Professor of Comparative and Foreign Law at Yale Law School. He earned his B.A. and J.D. from Yale University and Law School and also holds an M.A. in European History from Columbia University and a Ph.D. in Intellectual History from the University of Chicago.
Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature.
YouTube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>605</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">fade0298-4454-11f1-99d7-bfae0e624003</guid>
      <title>Charles W. A. Prior, &quot;Treaty Ground: Diplomacy and the Politics of Sovereignty, from Roanoke to the Republic&quot; (U Nebraska Press, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781496244840" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Treaty Ground: Diplomacy and the Politics of Sovereignty, from Roanoke to the Republic</em>&nbsp;</a>(U Nebraska Press, 2026), Professor Charles W. A. Prior offers a new account of the sovereign claims of Native Americans, the Crown, and colonies in early America, arguing that Native American diplomacy shaped how sovereignty was negotiated and contested among all three, from Virginia’s founding to the ratification of the U.S. Constitution. Previous scholars have focused on the contested relationship between the British imperial state and the colonies it established along the Atlantic Coast without addressing how sovereign Native nations shaped the colonial process through warfare, diplomacy, trade, peace-making, and treaty-making.</p>
<p>Dr. Prior adopts a new interpretive framework for examining sovereignty in early America, arguing that the Native and colonial spaces of the Northeast were a treaty ground thickly layered with agreements and negotiated rules of interaction. Drawing on an extensive range of treaty records, writings on colonial and imperial affairs, letters, and official documents,&nbsp;<em>Treaty Ground</em>&nbsp;argues that sovereignty was negotiated within diplomacy and shaped the norms of war, the terms of peace and alliances, the rightful ownership of territory, and appropriate responses to treaty violations. This process in turn structured relations between the Crown and colonies and framed initial positions on how the power of congress related to that of the states.</p>
<p><em>Treaty Ground</em>&nbsp;offers historical depth to our understanding of how Native nations articulated Indigenous power within colonialism, cuts settler colonialism down to size, and expands contemporary understandings of the sovereign relationships between Native nations in the United States and Canada.</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 1 May 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/charles-w-a-prior-treaty-ground-diplomacy-and-the-politics-of-sovereignty-from-roanoke-to-the-republic-u-nebraska-press-2026-SXqIwqx9</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781496244840" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Treaty Ground: Diplomacy and the Politics of Sovereignty, from Roanoke to the Republic</em>&nbsp;</a>(U Nebraska Press, 2026), Professor Charles W. A. Prior offers a new account of the sovereign claims of Native Americans, the Crown, and colonies in early America, arguing that Native American diplomacy shaped how sovereignty was negotiated and contested among all three, from Virginia’s founding to the ratification of the U.S. Constitution. Previous scholars have focused on the contested relationship between the British imperial state and the colonies it established along the Atlantic Coast without addressing how sovereign Native nations shaped the colonial process through warfare, diplomacy, trade, peace-making, and treaty-making.</p>
<p>Dr. Prior adopts a new interpretive framework for examining sovereignty in early America, arguing that the Native and colonial spaces of the Northeast were a treaty ground thickly layered with agreements and negotiated rules of interaction. Drawing on an extensive range of treaty records, writings on colonial and imperial affairs, letters, and official documents,&nbsp;<em>Treaty Ground</em>&nbsp;argues that sovereignty was negotiated within diplomacy and shaped the norms of war, the terms of peace and alliances, the rightful ownership of territory, and appropriate responses to treaty violations. This process in turn structured relations between the Crown and colonies and framed initial positions on how the power of congress related to that of the states.</p>
<p><em>Treaty Ground</em>&nbsp;offers historical depth to our understanding of how Native nations articulated Indigenous power within colonialism, cuts settler colonialism down to size, and expands contemporary understandings of the sovereign relationships between Native nations in the United States and Canada.</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="62472204" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/1bd1ef12-ff39-448e-9b83-4c5bc64ce550/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=1bd1ef12-ff39-448e-9b83-4c5bc64ce550&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Charles W. A. Prior, &quot;Treaty Ground: Diplomacy and the Politics of Sovereignty, from Roanoke to the Republic&quot; (U Nebraska Press, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:05:00</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In Treaty Ground: Diplomacy and the Politics of Sovereignty, from Roanoke to the Republic (U Nebraska Press, 2026), Professor Charles W. A. Prior offers a new account of the sovereign claims of Native Americans, the Crown, and colonies in early America, arguing that Native American diplomacy shaped how sovereignty was negotiated and contested among all three, from Virginia’s founding to the ratification of the U.S. Constitution. Previous scholars have focused on the contested relationship between the British imperial state and the colonies it established along the Atlantic Coast without addressing how sovereign Native nations shaped the colonial process through warfare, diplomacy, trade, peace-making, and treaty-making.
Dr. Prior adopts a new interpretive framework for examining sovereignty in early America, arguing that the Native and colonial spaces of the Northeast were a treaty ground thickly layered with agreements and negotiated rules of interaction. Drawing on an extensive range of treaty records, writings on colonial and imperial affairs, letters, and official documents, Treaty Ground argues that sovereignty was negotiated within diplomacy and shaped the norms of war, the terms of peace and alliances, the rightful ownership of territory, and appropriate responses to treaty violations. This process in turn structured relations between the Crown and colonies and framed initial positions on how the power of congress related to that of the states.
Treaty Ground offers historical depth to our understanding of how Native nations articulated Indigenous power within colonialism, cuts settler colonialism down to size, and expands contemporary understandings of the sovereign relationships between Native nations in the United States and Canada.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In Treaty Ground: Diplomacy and the Politics of Sovereignty, from Roanoke to the Republic (U Nebraska Press, 2026), Professor Charles W. A. Prior offers a new account of the sovereign claims of Native Americans, the Crown, and colonies in early America, arguing that Native American diplomacy shaped how sovereignty was negotiated and contested among all three, from Virginia’s founding to the ratification of the U.S. Constitution. Previous scholars have focused on the contested relationship between the British imperial state and the colonies it established along the Atlantic Coast without addressing how sovereign Native nations shaped the colonial process through warfare, diplomacy, trade, peace-making, and treaty-making.
Dr. Prior adopts a new interpretive framework for examining sovereignty in early America, arguing that the Native and colonial spaces of the Northeast were a treaty ground thickly layered with agreements and negotiated rules of interaction. Drawing on an extensive range of treaty records, writings on colonial and imperial affairs, letters, and official documents, Treaty Ground argues that sovereignty was negotiated within diplomacy and shaped the norms of war, the terms of peace and alliances, the rightful ownership of territory, and appropriate responses to treaty violations. This process in turn structured relations between the Crown and colonies and framed initial positions on how the power of congress related to that of the states.
Treaty Ground offers historical depth to our understanding of how Native nations articulated Indigenous power within colonialism, cuts settler colonialism down to size, and expands contemporary understandings of the sovereign relationships between Native nations in the United States and Canada.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1679</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8085df32-445b-11f1-87e7-4f4b5c10914f</guid>
      <title>Roundtable on Genocide Studies on the occasion of the 20th Anniversary of Genocide Studies International</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>2026 marks the 20th&nbsp;year of publishing Genocide Studies International. The journal's first issue was a special issue on genocide in Darfur. Twenty years later, newspapers and podcasts are talking again about mass violence in Sudan.</p>
<p>So I thought it would be a good time to host a discussion among current and former editors of the journal about the state of genocide studies and about how academic journals can contribute to its goals. We talked about the nature of the field of genocide studies, about what it means to be a scholar in a field where activism is common, and about how GSI understands its purpose. And we say a bit to graduate students and early career academics about how to get an article published in GS.</p>
<p>If you're interested in this interview, I'd suggest looking back in the NBGS archives to look for discussions about the purpose of genocide education with Maureen Hiebert and Jim Waller and an interview with John Roth and Carol Rittner about their belief that Holocaust and Genocide education is failing to achieve that purpose.</p>
<p>Genocide Studies International is a journal of the Zoryan Institute and is published by University of Toronto Press. You can find more information about Zoryan here&nbsp;<a href="https://zoryaninstitute.org/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Home - Zoryan Institute</a>&nbsp;and suscribe to the journal here&nbsp;<a href="https://utppublishing.com/journal/gsi" rel="noopener noreferrer">Genocide Studies International Home | University of Toronto Press</a>﻿</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 1 May 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/roundtable-on-genocide-studies-on-the-occasion-of-the-20th-anniversary-of-genocide-studies-international-QmuJ66_C</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2026 marks the 20th&nbsp;year of publishing Genocide Studies International. The journal's first issue was a special issue on genocide in Darfur. Twenty years later, newspapers and podcasts are talking again about mass violence in Sudan.</p>
<p>So I thought it would be a good time to host a discussion among current and former editors of the journal about the state of genocide studies and about how academic journals can contribute to its goals. We talked about the nature of the field of genocide studies, about what it means to be a scholar in a field where activism is common, and about how GSI understands its purpose. And we say a bit to graduate students and early career academics about how to get an article published in GS.</p>
<p>If you're interested in this interview, I'd suggest looking back in the NBGS archives to look for discussions about the purpose of genocide education with Maureen Hiebert and Jim Waller and an interview with John Roth and Carol Rittner about their belief that Holocaust and Genocide education is failing to achieve that purpose.</p>
<p>Genocide Studies International is a journal of the Zoryan Institute and is published by University of Toronto Press. You can find more information about Zoryan here&nbsp;<a href="https://zoryaninstitute.org/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Home - Zoryan Institute</a>&nbsp;and suscribe to the journal here&nbsp;<a href="https://utppublishing.com/journal/gsi" rel="noopener noreferrer">Genocide Studies International Home | University of Toronto Press</a>﻿</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="60943134" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/51dd83e3-7821-4015-b364-78bd26bce638/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=51dd83e3-7821-4015-b364-78bd26bce638&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Roundtable on Genocide Studies on the occasion of the 20th Anniversary of Genocide Studies International</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:03:25</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>2026 marks the 20th year of publishing Genocide Studies International. The journal&apos;s first issue was a special issue on genocide in Darfur. Twenty years later, newspapers and podcasts are talking again about mass violence in Sudan.
So I thought it would be a good time to host a discussion among current and former editors of the journal about the state of genocide studies and about how academic journals can contribute to its goals. We talked about the nature of the field of genocide studies, about what it means to be a scholar in a field where activism is common, and about how GSI understands its purpose. And we say a bit to graduate students and early career academics about how to get an article published in GS.
If you&apos;re interested in this interview, I&apos;d suggest looking back in the NBGS archives to look for discussions about the purpose of genocide education with Maureen Hiebert and Jim Waller and an interview with John Roth and Carol Rittner about their belief that Holocaust and Genocide education is failing to achieve that purpose.
Genocide Studies International is a journal of the Zoryan Institute and is published by University of Toronto Press. You can find more information about Zoryan here Home - Zoryan Institute and suscribe to the journal here Genocide Studies International Home | University of Toronto Press﻿
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>2026 marks the 20th year of publishing Genocide Studies International. The journal&apos;s first issue was a special issue on genocide in Darfur. Twenty years later, newspapers and podcasts are talking again about mass violence in Sudan.
So I thought it would be a good time to host a discussion among current and former editors of the journal about the state of genocide studies and about how academic journals can contribute to its goals. We talked about the nature of the field of genocide studies, about what it means to be a scholar in a field where activism is common, and about how GSI understands its purpose. And we say a bit to graduate students and early career academics about how to get an article published in GS.
If you&apos;re interested in this interview, I&apos;d suggest looking back in the NBGS archives to look for discussions about the purpose of genocide education with Maureen Hiebert and Jim Waller and an interview with John Roth and Carol Rittner about their belief that Holocaust and Genocide education is failing to achieve that purpose.
Genocide Studies International is a journal of the Zoryan Institute and is published by University of Toronto Press. You can find more information about Zoryan here Home - Zoryan Institute and suscribe to the journal here Genocide Studies International Home | University of Toronto Press﻿
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1680</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">01f1824e-445a-11f1-ab79-07ca5a616878</guid>
      <title>Radio ReOrient 14:5: Racial Justice, Human Rights and Surveillance, with Alba Kapoor, hosted by Claudia Radiven and Amina Easat-Daas</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In this episode Claudia Radiven and Amina Easat-Daas were joined by Alba Kapoor. Kapoor is the racial justice lead at Amnesty International UK and previously led the policy team at the Runnymede Trust. Alba Kapoor shared the cutting edge work that Amnesty International UK is leading around racial justice, the surveilling of black and brown communities in the UK through existing policy infrastructure such as Prevent, or new and emergent facial recognition technologies. She also discussed forthcoming research from Amnesty examining the silencing of pro-Palestine narratives in academic contexts and the broader questions that this raises around freedoms and rights. Finally, Kapoor linked this to the pressing issues posed by the growth of the far-right in the UK.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 1 May 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/radio-reorient-14-5-racial-justice-human-rights-and-surveillance-with-alba-kapoor-hosted-by-claudia-radiven-and-amina-easat-daas-YprmH2Y6</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this episode Claudia Radiven and Amina Easat-Daas were joined by Alba Kapoor. Kapoor is the racial justice lead at Amnesty International UK and previously led the policy team at the Runnymede Trust. Alba Kapoor shared the cutting edge work that Amnesty International UK is leading around racial justice, the surveilling of black and brown communities in the UK through existing policy infrastructure such as Prevent, or new and emergent facial recognition technologies. She also discussed forthcoming research from Amnesty examining the silencing of pro-Palestine narratives in academic contexts and the broader questions that this raises around freedoms and rights. Finally, Kapoor linked this to the pressing issues posed by the growth of the far-right in the UK.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="50297135" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/4656094e-819c-4d30-8d95-0051824a9a2f/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=4656094e-819c-4d30-8d95-0051824a9a2f&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Radio ReOrient 14:5: Racial Justice, Human Rights and Surveillance, with Alba Kapoor, hosted by Claudia Radiven and Amina Easat-Daas</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:52:11</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this episode Claudia Radiven and Amina Easat-Daas were joined by Alba Kapoor. Kapoor is the racial justice lead at Amnesty International UK and previously led the policy team at the Runnymede Trust. Alba Kapoor shared the cutting edge work that Amnesty International UK is leading around racial justice, the surveilling of black and brown communities in the UK through existing policy infrastructure such as Prevent, or new and emergent facial recognition technologies. She also discussed forthcoming research from Amnesty examining the silencing of pro-Palestine narratives in academic contexts and the broader questions that this raises around freedoms and rights. Finally, Kapoor linked this to the pressing issues posed by the growth of the far-right in the UK.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode Claudia Radiven and Amina Easat-Daas were joined by Alba Kapoor. Kapoor is the racial justice lead at Amnesty International UK and previously led the policy team at the Runnymede Trust. Alba Kapoor shared the cutting edge work that Amnesty International UK is leading around racial justice, the surveilling of black and brown communities in the UK through existing policy infrastructure such as Prevent, or new and emergent facial recognition technologies. She also discussed forthcoming research from Amnesty examining the silencing of pro-Palestine narratives in academic contexts and the broader questions that this raises around freedoms and rights. Finally, Kapoor linked this to the pressing issues posed by the growth of the far-right in the UK.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1681</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">cd67bf2a-3e41-11f1-a191-33d7b1a83eb5</guid>
      <title>Nikki Luke, &quot;Electric Life: Utility Regulation and the Fight for Energy Democracy&quot; (MIT Press, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><em>Electric Life: Utility Regulation and the Fight for Energy Democracy</em>&nbsp;(MIT Press, 2026) by Dr. Nikki Luke traces the intertwined history of Atlanta’s racialized uneven development and growing electricity use to show how electricity infrastructure shapes everyday life. Nikki Luke looks at how quotidian relationships with the electric utility catalyze intersectional organizing for energy democracy. She also investigates the legal and material construction of the investor-owned utility as a regulated monopoly and the state public service commission that regulates it.<br>Contemporary organizing for energy democracy questions how the utility and the systems that govern it need to change to ensure energy affordability, provide remedy and reparation for enduring environmental and energy injustice, and build a just and equitable energy transition from fossil fuels. Bridging urban, environmental, and labor studies, the author demonstrates how these demands to change the utility emerge from the tradition of civil rights, labor, and environmental organizing for fair treatment from the utility, affordable energy, protection from pollution, and good jobs. The book is available Open Access.</p>
<p><br><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/nikki-luke-electric-life-utility-regulation-and-the-fight-for-energy-democracy-mit-press-2026-tySv9e50</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Electric Life: Utility Regulation and the Fight for Energy Democracy</em>&nbsp;(MIT Press, 2026) by Dr. Nikki Luke traces the intertwined history of Atlanta’s racialized uneven development and growing electricity use to show how electricity infrastructure shapes everyday life. Nikki Luke looks at how quotidian relationships with the electric utility catalyze intersectional organizing for energy democracy. She also investigates the legal and material construction of the investor-owned utility as a regulated monopoly and the state public service commission that regulates it.<br>Contemporary organizing for energy democracy questions how the utility and the systems that govern it need to change to ensure energy affordability, provide remedy and reparation for enduring environmental and energy injustice, and build a just and equitable energy transition from fossil fuels. Bridging urban, environmental, and labor studies, the author demonstrates how these demands to change the utility emerge from the tradition of civil rights, labor, and environmental organizing for fair treatment from the utility, affordable energy, protection from pollution, and good jobs. The book is available Open Access.</p>
<p><br><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="45991619" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/309eba0d-7a15-4704-bc09-e98a1224c1a0/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=309eba0d-7a15-4704-bc09-e98a1224c1a0&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Nikki Luke, &quot;Electric Life: Utility Regulation and the Fight for Energy Democracy&quot; (MIT Press, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:47:50</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Electric Life: Utility Regulation and the Fight for Energy Democracy (MIT Press, 2026) by Dr. Nikki Luke traces the intertwined history of Atlanta’s racialized uneven development and growing electricity use to show how electricity infrastructure shapes everyday life. Nikki Luke looks at how quotidian relationships with the electric utility catalyze intersectional organizing for energy democracy. She also investigates the legal and material construction of the investor-owned utility as a regulated monopoly and the state public service commission that regulates it.Contemporary organizing for energy democracy questions how the utility and the systems that govern it need to change to ensure energy affordability, provide remedy and reparation for enduring environmental and energy injustice, and build a just and equitable energy transition from fossil fuels. Bridging urban, environmental, and labor studies, the author demonstrates how these demands to change the utility emerge from the tradition of civil rights, labor, and environmental organizing for fair treatment from the utility, affordable energy, protection from pollution, and good jobs. The book is available Open Access.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Electric Life: Utility Regulation and the Fight for Energy Democracy (MIT Press, 2026) by Dr. Nikki Luke traces the intertwined history of Atlanta’s racialized uneven development and growing electricity use to show how electricity infrastructure shapes everyday life. Nikki Luke looks at how quotidian relationships with the electric utility catalyze intersectional organizing for energy democracy. She also investigates the legal and material construction of the investor-owned utility as a regulated monopoly and the state public service commission that regulates it.Contemporary organizing for energy democracy questions how the utility and the systems that govern it need to change to ensure energy affordability, provide remedy and reparation for enduring environmental and energy injustice, and build a just and equitable energy transition from fossil fuels. Bridging urban, environmental, and labor studies, the author demonstrates how these demands to change the utility emerge from the tradition of civil rights, labor, and environmental organizing for fair treatment from the utility, affordable energy, protection from pollution, and good jobs. The book is available Open Access.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>63</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9daed20c-3f6b-11f1-be1b-43350a1d37a2</guid>
      <title>How Bolsonaro was Convicted: The Role of the Judiciary During and After Autocratization</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Former Brazilian president Bolsonaro was found to have attempted a coup after losing the 2022 presidential elections, and he was convicted to 27 years in prison. Such a conviction is unusual both for Brazil and in global comparison and speaks to the difficult but crucial role the judiciary can play when an elected leader tries to concentrate power and exceed constitutional constraints. In this second PPP episode about Brazil (you can listen to the first one, on the role of the military,&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/militarization-and-democracy-in-contemporary-brazil#entry:435180@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a>), host Licia Cianetti talks to Luciano Da Ros and Manoel Gehrke about the role the courts played in Bolsonaro’s downfall, based on their recent article “<a href="https://www.journalofdemocracy.org/articles/how-to-bring-authoritarians-to-justice/" rel="noopener noreferrer">How to Bring Authoritarians to Justice</a>” published in the January 2026 issue of the Journal of Democracy.</p>
<p>Transcript&nbsp;<a href="https://cdn.craft.cloud/44c3b6c3-3307-4a13-a091-f99416660f91/assets/Da-Ros-and-Gehrke-Transcript.docx#asset:453589@1" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a></p>
<p>Guests:</p>
<p><a href="https://scholar.google.com/citations?hl=en&amp;user=vdDBvygAAAAJ&amp;view_op=list_works&amp;sortby=pubdate" rel="noopener noreferrer">Luciano Da Ros</a>&nbsp;is Associate Professor of political science at the Federal University of Santa Catarina, Brazil. His research explores the links between democracy, judicial politics, corruption and anticorruption, particularly in Latin America, and he is the co-author of the book&nbsp;<a href="https://www.rienner.com/title/Brazilian_Politics_on_Trial_Corruption_and_Reform_Under_Democracy" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Brazilian Politics on Trial: Corruption and Reform under Democracy</em></a>&nbsp;(Lynne Rienner, 2022).</p>
<p><a href="https://manoelgehrke.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Manoel Gehrke</a>&nbsp;is a Research Fellow at the University of Pisa, Italy, and former Research Fellow at CEDAR. He works on political accountability, contemporary threats to democracy, judicial politics, and the political economy of environmental degradation. He has published widely on the causes and consequences of prosecuting and convicting former heads of government.</p>
<p>Presenter:</p>
<p><a href="https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/staff/profiles/gov/cianetti-licia" rel="noopener noreferrer">Licia Cianetti</a>&nbsp;is Associate Professor at the University of Birmingham and Founding Deputy Director of CEDAR.</p>
<p>The People, Power, Politics podcast brings you the latest insights into the factors that are shaping and re-shaping our political world. It is brought to you by the&nbsp;<a href="https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/university/colleges/socsci/cedar/index.aspx" rel="noopener noreferrer">Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation (CEDAR)</a>&nbsp;based at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom. Follow us on LikedIn</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/how-bolsonaro-was-convicted-the-role-of-the-judiciary-during-and-after-autocratization-ygXr8mje</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Former Brazilian president Bolsonaro was found to have attempted a coup after losing the 2022 presidential elections, and he was convicted to 27 years in prison. Such a conviction is unusual both for Brazil and in global comparison and speaks to the difficult but crucial role the judiciary can play when an elected leader tries to concentrate power and exceed constitutional constraints. In this second PPP episode about Brazil (you can listen to the first one, on the role of the military,&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/militarization-and-democracy-in-contemporary-brazil#entry:435180@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a>), host Licia Cianetti talks to Luciano Da Ros and Manoel Gehrke about the role the courts played in Bolsonaro’s downfall, based on their recent article “<a href="https://www.journalofdemocracy.org/articles/how-to-bring-authoritarians-to-justice/" rel="noopener noreferrer">How to Bring Authoritarians to Justice</a>” published in the January 2026 issue of the Journal of Democracy.</p>
<p>Transcript&nbsp;<a href="https://cdn.craft.cloud/44c3b6c3-3307-4a13-a091-f99416660f91/assets/Da-Ros-and-Gehrke-Transcript.docx#asset:453589@1" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a></p>
<p>Guests:</p>
<p><a href="https://scholar.google.com/citations?hl=en&amp;user=vdDBvygAAAAJ&amp;view_op=list_works&amp;sortby=pubdate" rel="noopener noreferrer">Luciano Da Ros</a>&nbsp;is Associate Professor of political science at the Federal University of Santa Catarina, Brazil. His research explores the links between democracy, judicial politics, corruption and anticorruption, particularly in Latin America, and he is the co-author of the book&nbsp;<a href="https://www.rienner.com/title/Brazilian_Politics_on_Trial_Corruption_and_Reform_Under_Democracy" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Brazilian Politics on Trial: Corruption and Reform under Democracy</em></a>&nbsp;(Lynne Rienner, 2022).</p>
<p><a href="https://manoelgehrke.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Manoel Gehrke</a>&nbsp;is a Research Fellow at the University of Pisa, Italy, and former Research Fellow at CEDAR. He works on political accountability, contemporary threats to democracy, judicial politics, and the political economy of environmental degradation. He has published widely on the causes and consequences of prosecuting and convicting former heads of government.</p>
<p>Presenter:</p>
<p><a href="https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/staff/profiles/gov/cianetti-licia" rel="noopener noreferrer">Licia Cianetti</a>&nbsp;is Associate Professor at the University of Birmingham and Founding Deputy Director of CEDAR.</p>
<p>The People, Power, Politics podcast brings you the latest insights into the factors that are shaping and re-shaping our political world. It is brought to you by the&nbsp;<a href="https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/university/colleges/socsci/cedar/index.aspx" rel="noopener noreferrer">Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation (CEDAR)</a>&nbsp;based at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom. Follow us on LikedIn</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="34744649" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/6e52cbce-7d89-4ff5-927d-4e1164f90a00/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=6e52cbce-7d89-4ff5-927d-4e1164f90a00&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>How Bolsonaro was Convicted: The Role of the Judiciary During and After Autocratization</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:36:01</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Former Brazilian president Bolsonaro was found to have attempted a coup after losing the 2022 presidential elections, and he was convicted to 27 years in prison. Such a conviction is unusual both for Brazil and in global comparison and speaks to the difficult but crucial role the judiciary can play when an elected leader tries to concentrate power and exceed constitutional constraints. In this second PPP episode about Brazil (you can listen to the first one, on the role of the military, here), host Licia Cianetti talks to Luciano Da Ros and Manoel Gehrke about the role the courts played in Bolsonaro’s downfall, based on their recent article “How to Bring Authoritarians to Justice” published in the January 2026 issue of the Journal of Democracy.
Transcript here
Guests:
Luciano Da Ros is Associate Professor of political science at the Federal University of Santa Catarina, Brazil. His research explores the links between democracy, judicial politics, corruption and anticorruption, particularly in Latin America, and he is the co-author of the book Brazilian Politics on Trial: Corruption and Reform under Democracy (Lynne Rienner, 2022).
Manoel Gehrke is a Research Fellow at the University of Pisa, Italy, and former Research Fellow at CEDAR. He works on political accountability, contemporary threats to democracy, judicial politics, and the political economy of environmental degradation. He has published widely on the causes and consequences of prosecuting and convicting former heads of government.
Presenter:
Licia Cianetti is Associate Professor at the University of Birmingham and Founding Deputy Director of CEDAR.
The People, Power, Politics podcast brings you the latest insights into the factors that are shaping and re-shaping our political world. It is brought to you by the Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation (CEDAR) based at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom. Follow us on LikedIn
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Former Brazilian president Bolsonaro was found to have attempted a coup after losing the 2022 presidential elections, and he was convicted to 27 years in prison. Such a conviction is unusual both for Brazil and in global comparison and speaks to the difficult but crucial role the judiciary can play when an elected leader tries to concentrate power and exceed constitutional constraints. In this second PPP episode about Brazil (you can listen to the first one, on the role of the military, here), host Licia Cianetti talks to Luciano Da Ros and Manoel Gehrke about the role the courts played in Bolsonaro’s downfall, based on their recent article “How to Bring Authoritarians to Justice” published in the January 2026 issue of the Journal of Democracy.
Transcript here
Guests:
Luciano Da Ros is Associate Professor of political science at the Federal University of Santa Catarina, Brazil. His research explores the links between democracy, judicial politics, corruption and anticorruption, particularly in Latin America, and he is the co-author of the book Brazilian Politics on Trial: Corruption and Reform under Democracy (Lynne Rienner, 2022).
Manoel Gehrke is a Research Fellow at the University of Pisa, Italy, and former Research Fellow at CEDAR. He works on political accountability, contemporary threats to democracy, judicial politics, and the political economy of environmental degradation. He has published widely on the causes and consequences of prosecuting and convicting former heads of government.
Presenter:
Licia Cianetti is Associate Professor at the University of Birmingham and Founding Deputy Director of CEDAR.
The People, Power, Politics podcast brings you the latest insights into the factors that are shaping and re-shaping our political world. It is brought to you by the Centre for Elections, Democracy, Accountability and Representation (CEDAR) based at the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom. Follow us on LikedIn
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1678</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">f61397ee-3a01-11f1-bacd-13039bddb0b6</guid>
      <title>Masako Ichihara, &quot;Climate Change Litigation in Japan: Cases, Challenges, and Opportunities for Environmental Law&quot; (Brill, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><em>Climate Change Litigation in Japan: Cases, Challenges, and Opportunities for Environmental Law</em>&nbsp;(Brill, 2026) provides the details of Japanese climate litigation, positioning them both within the global trends of climate litigation and on the trajectory of Japanese past pollution lawsuits. It identifies the barriers that hinders the number of climate cases in Japan, a country known with a significant low litigation use. It then discusses the future prospects for climate change litigation in Japan by comparing with tobacco litigation in the United States. This original work makes a significant contribution to the international academic community, by describing Japan's climate cases, previously little known internationally.</p>
<p>Masako Ichihara, Ph.D. (2021), Kyoto Univeristy, is Program-specific Assistant Professor at the Unit of the Environment and Law, Center for Interdisciplinary Studies of Law and Policy, Kyoto University.</p>
<p><em>Caleb Zakarin is the CEO and Publisher of the New Books Network.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/masako-ichihara-climate-change-litigation-in-japan-cases-challenges-and-opportunities-for-environmental-law-brill-2026-h7fVMwY4</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Climate Change Litigation in Japan: Cases, Challenges, and Opportunities for Environmental Law</em>&nbsp;(Brill, 2026) provides the details of Japanese climate litigation, positioning them both within the global trends of climate litigation and on the trajectory of Japanese past pollution lawsuits. It identifies the barriers that hinders the number of climate cases in Japan, a country known with a significant low litigation use. It then discusses the future prospects for climate change litigation in Japan by comparing with tobacco litigation in the United States. This original work makes a significant contribution to the international academic community, by describing Japan's climate cases, previously little known internationally.</p>
<p>Masako Ichihara, Ph.D. (2021), Kyoto Univeristy, is Program-specific Assistant Professor at the Unit of the Environment and Law, Center for Interdisciplinary Studies of Law and Policy, Kyoto University.</p>
<p><em>Caleb Zakarin is the CEO and Publisher of the New Books Network.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="32058116" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/36dde457-a55c-4738-830b-e3d3cf5d866b/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=36dde457-a55c-4738-830b-e3d3cf5d866b&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Masako Ichihara, &quot;Climate Change Litigation in Japan: Cases, Challenges, and Opportunities for Environmental Law&quot; (Brill, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:33:16</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Climate Change Litigation in Japan: Cases, Challenges, and Opportunities for Environmental Law (Brill, 2026) provides the details of Japanese climate litigation, positioning them both within the global trends of climate litigation and on the trajectory of Japanese past pollution lawsuits. It identifies the barriers that hinders the number of climate cases in Japan, a country known with a significant low litigation use. It then discusses the future prospects for climate change litigation in Japan by comparing with tobacco litigation in the United States. This original work makes a significant contribution to the international academic community, by describing Japan&apos;s climate cases, previously little known internationally.
Masako Ichihara, Ph.D. (2021), Kyoto Univeristy, is Program-specific Assistant Professor at the Unit of the Environment and Law, Center for Interdisciplinary Studies of Law and Policy, Kyoto University.
Caleb Zakarin is the CEO and Publisher of the New Books Network.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Climate Change Litigation in Japan: Cases, Challenges, and Opportunities for Environmental Law (Brill, 2026) provides the details of Japanese climate litigation, positioning them both within the global trends of climate litigation and on the trajectory of Japanese past pollution lawsuits. It identifies the barriers that hinders the number of climate cases in Japan, a country known with a significant low litigation use. It then discusses the future prospects for climate change litigation in Japan by comparing with tobacco litigation in the United States. This original work makes a significant contribution to the international academic community, by describing Japan&apos;s climate cases, previously little known internationally.
Masako Ichihara, Ph.D. (2021), Kyoto Univeristy, is Program-specific Assistant Professor at the Unit of the Environment and Law, Center for Interdisciplinary Studies of Law and Policy, Kyoto University.
Caleb Zakarin is the CEO and Publisher of the New Books Network.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1677</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">23ec5d2e-396a-11f1-8c07-4b5e0200cfa6</guid>
      <title>Manuel Barcia, &quot;Pirate Imperialism: Trade, Abolition, and Global Suppression of Maritime Raiding, 1825–1870&quot; (Yale UP, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In the middle decades of the nineteenth century, imperial powers around the world came into direct confrontation with local resistance in the form of maritime raiding. From the Atlantic basin to the western Mediterranean Sea, the Persian Gulf and the east coast of Africa, and Southeast Asia and China, imperial powers claimed that progress was being held back by the barbarity and greed of pirates, who repeatedly attacked imperial vessels. The suppression of piracy, justified under the banner of spreading civilization and free trade and abolishing slavery and the slave trade, provided both western and non-western powers with a back door for territorial expansion and the enforcement of imperialist agendas.</p>
<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780300269451" rel="noopener noreferrer">Pirate Imperialism: Trade, Abolition, and Global Suppression of Maritime Raiding, 1825–1870</a>&nbsp;(Yale UP, 2026), Professor Manuel Barcia tells the story of these conflicts, showing how imperialist powers frequently used anti–maritime raiding efforts as excuses to cement western supremacy in various parts of the world, while simultaneously resorting to violent means that were indistinguishable from the methods of those they accused of being pirates.</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/manuel-barcia-pirate-imperialism-trade-abolition-and-global-suppression-of-maritime-raiding-18251870-yale-up-2026-wg9WRY5G</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the middle decades of the nineteenth century, imperial powers around the world came into direct confrontation with local resistance in the form of maritime raiding. From the Atlantic basin to the western Mediterranean Sea, the Persian Gulf and the east coast of Africa, and Southeast Asia and China, imperial powers claimed that progress was being held back by the barbarity and greed of pirates, who repeatedly attacked imperial vessels. The suppression of piracy, justified under the banner of spreading civilization and free trade and abolishing slavery and the slave trade, provided both western and non-western powers with a back door for territorial expansion and the enforcement of imperialist agendas.</p>
<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780300269451" rel="noopener noreferrer">Pirate Imperialism: Trade, Abolition, and Global Suppression of Maritime Raiding, 1825–1870</a>&nbsp;(Yale UP, 2026), Professor Manuel Barcia tells the story of these conflicts, showing how imperialist powers frequently used anti–maritime raiding efforts as excuses to cement western supremacy in various parts of the world, while simultaneously resorting to violent means that were indistinguishable from the methods of those they accused of being pirates.</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="34730804" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/6f966384-238c-43be-8207-0a8fc7b8abad/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=6f966384-238c-43be-8207-0a8fc7b8abad&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Manuel Barcia, &quot;Pirate Imperialism: Trade, Abolition, and Global Suppression of Maritime Raiding, 1825–1870&quot; (Yale UP, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:36:07</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In the middle decades of the nineteenth century, imperial powers around the world came into direct confrontation with local resistance in the form of maritime raiding. From the Atlantic basin to the western Mediterranean Sea, the Persian Gulf and the east coast of Africa, and Southeast Asia and China, imperial powers claimed that progress was being held back by the barbarity and greed of pirates, who repeatedly attacked imperial vessels. The suppression of piracy, justified under the banner of spreading civilization and free trade and abolishing slavery and the slave trade, provided both western and non-western powers with a back door for territorial expansion and the enforcement of imperialist agendas.
In Pirate Imperialism: Trade, Abolition, and Global Suppression of Maritime Raiding, 1825–1870 (Yale UP, 2026), Professor Manuel Barcia tells the story of these conflicts, showing how imperialist powers frequently used anti–maritime raiding efforts as excuses to cement western supremacy in various parts of the world, while simultaneously resorting to violent means that were indistinguishable from the methods of those they accused of being pirates.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In the middle decades of the nineteenth century, imperial powers around the world came into direct confrontation with local resistance in the form of maritime raiding. From the Atlantic basin to the western Mediterranean Sea, the Persian Gulf and the east coast of Africa, and Southeast Asia and China, imperial powers claimed that progress was being held back by the barbarity and greed of pirates, who repeatedly attacked imperial vessels. The suppression of piracy, justified under the banner of spreading civilization and free trade and abolishing slavery and the slave trade, provided both western and non-western powers with a back door for territorial expansion and the enforcement of imperialist agendas.
In Pirate Imperialism: Trade, Abolition, and Global Suppression of Maritime Raiding, 1825–1870 (Yale UP, 2026), Professor Manuel Barcia tells the story of these conflicts, showing how imperialist powers frequently used anti–maritime raiding efforts as excuses to cement western supremacy in various parts of the world, while simultaneously resorting to violent means that were indistinguishable from the methods of those they accused of being pirates.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1676</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">fc85b382-37d1-11f1-85fe-3f664610b417</guid>
      <title>Victor Li, &quot;Supreme Pressure: The Rejection of John J. Parker and the Birth of the Modern Supreme Court Confirmation Process&quot; (Palgrave Macmillan, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9783032078636" rel="noopener noreferrer">Supreme Pressure: The Rejection of John J. Parker and the Birth of the Modern Supreme Court Confirmation Process&nbsp;</a>(Palgrave Macmillan, 2025)﻿&nbsp;examines the 1930 Supreme Court nomination of John J. Parker, a turning point in American judicial politics. Alarmed by some of his past statements and opinions, labor and civil rights groups mounted a fierce campaign to block his confirmation. Not only was control of the Supreme Court hanging in the balance, but Parker's nomination symbolized a profound clash of ideologies, political agendas, economic doctrines, and interpretations of the Constitution. Their efforts sparked a dramatic Senate revolt, marking the first successful grassroots campaign to block a Supreme Court nominee.</p>
<p>By exploring the circumstances of Parker's rejection, this book traces how that battle laid the foundation for today's highly partisan and contentious confirmation process. The book also reintroduces Parker as a consequential but largely forgotten figure in American jurisprudence--one whose rulings helped shape the South's legal response to&nbsp;<em>Brown v. Board of Education</em>. Beyond the nomination fight, it delves into Parker's political campaigns, judicial opinions, and relationships with key public figures, charting his dramatic rise, humiliating defeat, and enduring influence.</p>
<p>Packed with intrigue, strategy, and the clash of competing ideologies, this is the story of how one nomination forever changed the rules of the game.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/victor-li-supreme-pressure-the-rejection-of-john-j-parker-and-the-birth-of-the-modern-supreme-court-confirmation-process-palgrave-macmillan-2025-vwMRFjmr</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9783032078636" rel="noopener noreferrer">Supreme Pressure: The Rejection of John J. Parker and the Birth of the Modern Supreme Court Confirmation Process&nbsp;</a>(Palgrave Macmillan, 2025)﻿&nbsp;examines the 1930 Supreme Court nomination of John J. Parker, a turning point in American judicial politics. Alarmed by some of his past statements and opinions, labor and civil rights groups mounted a fierce campaign to block his confirmation. Not only was control of the Supreme Court hanging in the balance, but Parker's nomination symbolized a profound clash of ideologies, political agendas, economic doctrines, and interpretations of the Constitution. Their efforts sparked a dramatic Senate revolt, marking the first successful grassroots campaign to block a Supreme Court nominee.</p>
<p>By exploring the circumstances of Parker's rejection, this book traces how that battle laid the foundation for today's highly partisan and contentious confirmation process. The book also reintroduces Parker as a consequential but largely forgotten figure in American jurisprudence--one whose rulings helped shape the South's legal response to&nbsp;<em>Brown v. Board of Education</em>. Beyond the nomination fight, it delves into Parker's political campaigns, judicial opinions, and relationships with key public figures, charting his dramatic rise, humiliating defeat, and enduring influence.</p>
<p>Packed with intrigue, strategy, and the clash of competing ideologies, this is the story of how one nomination forever changed the rules of the game.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="48791554" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/e129ce9f-83b1-4886-9b11-744c21fd2a50/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=e129ce9f-83b1-4886-9b11-744c21fd2a50&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Victor Li, &quot;Supreme Pressure: The Rejection of John J. Parker and the Birth of the Modern Supreme Court Confirmation Process&quot; (Palgrave Macmillan, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:50:46</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Supreme Pressure: The Rejection of John J. Parker and the Birth of the Modern Supreme Court Confirmation Process (Palgrave Macmillan, 2025)﻿ examines the 1930 Supreme Court nomination of John J. Parker, a turning point in American judicial politics. Alarmed by some of his past statements and opinions, labor and civil rights groups mounted a fierce campaign to block his confirmation. Not only was control of the Supreme Court hanging in the balance, but Parker&apos;s nomination symbolized a profound clash of ideologies, political agendas, economic doctrines, and interpretations of the Constitution. Their efforts sparked a dramatic Senate revolt, marking the first successful grassroots campaign to block a Supreme Court nominee.
By exploring the circumstances of Parker&apos;s rejection, this book traces how that battle laid the foundation for today&apos;s highly partisan and contentious confirmation process. The book also reintroduces Parker as a consequential but largely forgotten figure in American jurisprudence--one whose rulings helped shape the South&apos;s legal response to Brown v. Board of Education. Beyond the nomination fight, it delves into Parker&apos;s political campaigns, judicial opinions, and relationships with key public figures, charting his dramatic rise, humiliating defeat, and enduring influence.
Packed with intrigue, strategy, and the clash of competing ideologies, this is the story of how one nomination forever changed the rules of the game.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Supreme Pressure: The Rejection of John J. Parker and the Birth of the Modern Supreme Court Confirmation Process (Palgrave Macmillan, 2025)﻿ examines the 1930 Supreme Court nomination of John J. Parker, a turning point in American judicial politics. Alarmed by some of his past statements and opinions, labor and civil rights groups mounted a fierce campaign to block his confirmation. Not only was control of the Supreme Court hanging in the balance, but Parker&apos;s nomination symbolized a profound clash of ideologies, political agendas, economic doctrines, and interpretations of the Constitution. Their efforts sparked a dramatic Senate revolt, marking the first successful grassroots campaign to block a Supreme Court nominee.
By exploring the circumstances of Parker&apos;s rejection, this book traces how that battle laid the foundation for today&apos;s highly partisan and contentious confirmation process. The book also reintroduces Parker as a consequential but largely forgotten figure in American jurisprudence--one whose rulings helped shape the South&apos;s legal response to Brown v. Board of Education. Beyond the nomination fight, it delves into Parker&apos;s political campaigns, judicial opinions, and relationships with key public figures, charting his dramatic rise, humiliating defeat, and enduring influence.
Packed with intrigue, strategy, and the clash of competing ideologies, this is the story of how one nomination forever changed the rules of the game.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1675</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">69a5f34c-370e-11f1-a7e0-77e82e93b023</guid>
      <title>Lisa Siraganian, &quot;The Problem of Personhood: Giving Rights to Trees, Corporations, and Robots&quot; (Verso, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Over the last twenty-five years, the concept of per-sonhood has become central to many contentious debates. Corporations have won free speech protections, as if they were individuals. The right to life or freedom has been claimed on behalf of fetuses, trees, and elephants. The fund of human rights is spilling over into the nonhuman.<br>Lisa Siraganian’s&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781804293447" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Problem of Personhood: Giving Rights to Trees, Corporations, and Robots</a>&nbsp;(Verso, 2026) reveals the unsettling consequences of granting rights to imagined persons, such as Sophia the robot citizen or New Zealand’s Whanganui River. Synthesizing the political and phil­osophical debates on personhood and drawing on a varied cast of thinkers that includes Simone Weil, Hannah Arendt, and Dr. Seuss, Siraganian un­covers the disturbing impact of this contemporary development. Awarding rights to robots and rivers all too easily becomes a legal tool to turn people into capital. When robot Sophia is made a citizen, “she” is transformed into a subject in the law without the corre­sponding legal duties that protect us from her.<br>At the root of this trend is the US Supreme Court’s&nbsp;<em>Citizens United</em>&nbsp;ruling that grants First Amendment rights to corporations as if they were individuals. The result has not been the transformation of things into humans so much as humans into things, when animals and the environment would be better protected with reference to our humanity rather than to theirs.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.personhoodproblembook.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Lisa Siraganian</em></a>&nbsp;<em>is the J. R. Herbert Boone Chair in Humanities and Professor in the Department of Comparative Thought and Literature at Johns Hopkins University (Baltimore, Maryland, USA). Her work has won multiple awards and has been supported by fellowships from the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, the National Endowment of the Humanities, the American Council of Learned Societies, and the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation. Siraganian has written award-winning scholarly monographs that bridge literary criticism, art criticism, and legal and philosophical scholarship. More recently, she was the Editor of the&nbsp;</em>Norton Anthology of American Literature<em>, 10th edition, Volume D (1914-1945) (2022)</em>.</p>
<p><a href="https://humanrights.columbia.edu/directory/tim-wyman-mccarthy" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Tim Wyman-McCarthy</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a Lecturer in the discipline of Human Rights and Associate Director of Graduate Studies at the Institute for the Study of Human Rights and the Department of Sociology at Columbia University. He can be reached at&nbsp;</em><a href="mailto:tw2468@columbia.edu" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>tw2468@columbia.edu</em></a><em>.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/lisa-siraganian-the-problem-of-personhood-giving-rights-to-trees-corporations-and-robots-verso-2026-C2shLbIL</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over the last twenty-five years, the concept of per-sonhood has become central to many contentious debates. Corporations have won free speech protections, as if they were individuals. The right to life or freedom has been claimed on behalf of fetuses, trees, and elephants. The fund of human rights is spilling over into the nonhuman.<br>Lisa Siraganian’s&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781804293447" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Problem of Personhood: Giving Rights to Trees, Corporations, and Robots</a>&nbsp;(Verso, 2026) reveals the unsettling consequences of granting rights to imagined persons, such as Sophia the robot citizen or New Zealand’s Whanganui River. Synthesizing the political and phil­osophical debates on personhood and drawing on a varied cast of thinkers that includes Simone Weil, Hannah Arendt, and Dr. Seuss, Siraganian un­covers the disturbing impact of this contemporary development. Awarding rights to robots and rivers all too easily becomes a legal tool to turn people into capital. When robot Sophia is made a citizen, “she” is transformed into a subject in the law without the corre­sponding legal duties that protect us from her.<br>At the root of this trend is the US Supreme Court’s&nbsp;<em>Citizens United</em>&nbsp;ruling that grants First Amendment rights to corporations as if they were individuals. The result has not been the transformation of things into humans so much as humans into things, when animals and the environment would be better protected with reference to our humanity rather than to theirs.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.personhoodproblembook.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Lisa Siraganian</em></a>&nbsp;<em>is the J. R. Herbert Boone Chair in Humanities and Professor in the Department of Comparative Thought and Literature at Johns Hopkins University (Baltimore, Maryland, USA). Her work has won multiple awards and has been supported by fellowships from the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, the National Endowment of the Humanities, the American Council of Learned Societies, and the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation. Siraganian has written award-winning scholarly monographs that bridge literary criticism, art criticism, and legal and philosophical scholarship. More recently, she was the Editor of the&nbsp;</em>Norton Anthology of American Literature<em>, 10th edition, Volume D (1914-1945) (2022)</em>.</p>
<p><a href="https://humanrights.columbia.edu/directory/tim-wyman-mccarthy" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Tim Wyman-McCarthy</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a Lecturer in the discipline of Human Rights and Associate Director of Graduate Studies at the Institute for the Study of Human Rights and the Department of Sociology at Columbia University. He can be reached at&nbsp;</em><a href="mailto:tw2468@columbia.edu" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>tw2468@columbia.edu</em></a><em>.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="40350659" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/5eb9198a-9a14-40df-99a1-23e4ef8ff5bd/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=5eb9198a-9a14-40df-99a1-23e4ef8ff5bd&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Lisa Siraganian, &quot;The Problem of Personhood: Giving Rights to Trees, Corporations, and Robots&quot; (Verso, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:41:57</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Over the last twenty-five years, the concept of per-sonhood has become central to many contentious debates. Corporations have won free speech protections, as if they were individuals. The right to life or freedom has been claimed on behalf of fetuses, trees, and elephants. The fund of human rights is spilling over into the nonhuman.Lisa Siraganian’s The Problem of Personhood: Giving Rights to Trees, Corporations, and Robots (Verso, 2026) reveals the unsettling consequences of granting rights to imagined persons, such as Sophia the robot citizen or New Zealand’s Whanganui River. Synthesizing the political and phil­osophical debates on personhood and drawing on a varied cast of thinkers that includes Simone Weil, Hannah Arendt, and Dr. Seuss, Siraganian un­covers the disturbing impact of this contemporary development. Awarding rights to robots and rivers all too easily becomes a legal tool to turn people into capital. When robot Sophia is made a citizen, “she” is transformed into a subject in the law without the corre­sponding legal duties that protect us from her.At the root of this trend is the US Supreme Court’s Citizens United ruling that grants First Amendment rights to corporations as if they were individuals. The result has not been the transformation of things into humans so much as humans into things, when animals and the environment would be better protected with reference to our humanity rather than to theirs.
Lisa Siraganian is the J. R. Herbert Boone Chair in Humanities and Professor in the Department of Comparative Thought and Literature at Johns Hopkins University (Baltimore, Maryland, USA). Her work has won multiple awards and has been supported by fellowships from the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, the National Endowment of the Humanities, the American Council of Learned Societies, and the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation. Siraganian has written award-winning scholarly monographs that bridge literary criticism, art criticism, and legal and philosophical scholarship. More recently, she was the Editor of the Norton Anthology of American Literature, 10th edition, Volume D (1914-1945) (2022).
Tim Wyman-McCarthy is a Lecturer in the discipline of Human Rights and Associate Director of Graduate Studies at the Institute for the Study of Human Rights and the Department of Sociology at Columbia University. He can be reached at tw2468@columbia.edu.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Over the last twenty-five years, the concept of per-sonhood has become central to many contentious debates. Corporations have won free speech protections, as if they were individuals. The right to life or freedom has been claimed on behalf of fetuses, trees, and elephants. The fund of human rights is spilling over into the nonhuman.Lisa Siraganian’s The Problem of Personhood: Giving Rights to Trees, Corporations, and Robots (Verso, 2026) reveals the unsettling consequences of granting rights to imagined persons, such as Sophia the robot citizen or New Zealand’s Whanganui River. Synthesizing the political and phil­osophical debates on personhood and drawing on a varied cast of thinkers that includes Simone Weil, Hannah Arendt, and Dr. Seuss, Siraganian un­covers the disturbing impact of this contemporary development. Awarding rights to robots and rivers all too easily becomes a legal tool to turn people into capital. When robot Sophia is made a citizen, “she” is transformed into a subject in the law without the corre­sponding legal duties that protect us from her.At the root of this trend is the US Supreme Court’s Citizens United ruling that grants First Amendment rights to corporations as if they were individuals. The result has not been the transformation of things into humans so much as humans into things, when animals and the environment would be better protected with reference to our humanity rather than to theirs.
Lisa Siraganian is the J. R. Herbert Boone Chair in Humanities and Professor in the Department of Comparative Thought and Literature at Johns Hopkins University (Baltimore, Maryland, USA). Her work has won multiple awards and has been supported by fellowships from the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, the National Endowment of the Humanities, the American Council of Learned Societies, and the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation. Siraganian has written award-winning scholarly monographs that bridge literary criticism, art criticism, and legal and philosophical scholarship. More recently, she was the Editor of the Norton Anthology of American Literature, 10th edition, Volume D (1914-1945) (2022).
Tim Wyman-McCarthy is a Lecturer in the discipline of Human Rights and Associate Director of Graduate Studies at the Institute for the Study of Human Rights and the Department of Sociology at Columbia University. He can be reached at tw2468@columbia.edu.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1674</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">f8fdacfa-33e5-11f1-9446-67e698b0deb2</guid>
      <title>Tim Connor et al., &quot;Global Business and Local Struggle: Reimagining Non-Judicial Remedy for Human Rights&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In the quest for human rights justice for communities and workers whose rights are breached by transnational businesses, non-judicial mechanisms (NJMs) are often deployed, but how effective are they?&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009529396" rel="noopener noreferrer">Global Business and Local Struggle: Reimagining Non-Judicial Remedy for Human Rights</a>&nbsp;(Cambridge UP, 2025)&nbsp;creates a blueprint for reforming transnational human rights NJMs and for helping communities and workers to use them. Through 587 interviews with 1100 individuals over five years of research in Indonesia and India, the authors delve into the practical workings of NJMs in diverse industries and contexts. The findings reveal that while NJMs are limited in providing standalone remedies, they can play a valuable role within a broader regulatory ecosystem. Combining rich empirical data, multi-method analyses and a new theoretical framework, the authors argue for a multi-pronged approach to human rights redress. Their findings will advance both academic and policy debates about the merits and shortcomings of NJMs.</p>
<p>Interview with Tim Connor and Fiona Haines.</p>
<p>Interview by Caitlin Murphy, Lecturer, RMIT University and Fellow, Laureate Program on Global Corporations and International Law.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/tim-connor-et-al-global-business-and-local-struggle-reimagining-non-judicial-remedy-for-human-rights-cambridge-up-2025-diR2BOov</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the quest for human rights justice for communities and workers whose rights are breached by transnational businesses, non-judicial mechanisms (NJMs) are often deployed, but how effective are they?&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009529396" rel="noopener noreferrer">Global Business and Local Struggle: Reimagining Non-Judicial Remedy for Human Rights</a>&nbsp;(Cambridge UP, 2025)&nbsp;creates a blueprint for reforming transnational human rights NJMs and for helping communities and workers to use them. Through 587 interviews with 1100 individuals over five years of research in Indonesia and India, the authors delve into the practical workings of NJMs in diverse industries and contexts. The findings reveal that while NJMs are limited in providing standalone remedies, they can play a valuable role within a broader regulatory ecosystem. Combining rich empirical data, multi-method analyses and a new theoretical framework, the authors argue for a multi-pronged approach to human rights redress. Their findings will advance both academic and policy debates about the merits and shortcomings of NJMs.</p>
<p>Interview with Tim Connor and Fiona Haines.</p>
<p>Interview by Caitlin Murphy, Lecturer, RMIT University and Fellow, Laureate Program on Global Corporations and International Law.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="43892354" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/0a96deb8-c05a-4c7b-8125-dcfa741a9eee/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=0a96deb8-c05a-4c7b-8125-dcfa741a9eee&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Tim Connor et al., &quot;Global Business and Local Struggle: Reimagining Non-Judicial Remedy for Human Rights&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:45:41</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In the quest for human rights justice for communities and workers whose rights are breached by transnational businesses, non-judicial mechanisms (NJMs) are often deployed, but how effective are they? Global Business and Local Struggle: Reimagining Non-Judicial Remedy for Human Rights (Cambridge UP, 2025) creates a blueprint for reforming transnational human rights NJMs and for helping communities and workers to use them. Through 587 interviews with 1100 individuals over five years of research in Indonesia and India, the authors delve into the practical workings of NJMs in diverse industries and contexts. The findings reveal that while NJMs are limited in providing standalone remedies, they can play a valuable role within a broader regulatory ecosystem. Combining rich empirical data, multi-method analyses and a new theoretical framework, the authors argue for a multi-pronged approach to human rights redress. Their findings will advance both academic and policy debates about the merits and shortcomings of NJMs.
Interview with Tim Connor and Fiona Haines.
Interview by Caitlin Murphy, Lecturer, RMIT University and Fellow, Laureate Program on Global Corporations and International Law.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In the quest for human rights justice for communities and workers whose rights are breached by transnational businesses, non-judicial mechanisms (NJMs) are often deployed, but how effective are they? Global Business and Local Struggle: Reimagining Non-Judicial Remedy for Human Rights (Cambridge UP, 2025) creates a blueprint for reforming transnational human rights NJMs and for helping communities and workers to use them. Through 587 interviews with 1100 individuals over five years of research in Indonesia and India, the authors delve into the practical workings of NJMs in diverse industries and contexts. The findings reveal that while NJMs are limited in providing standalone remedies, they can play a valuable role within a broader regulatory ecosystem. Combining rich empirical data, multi-method analyses and a new theoretical framework, the authors argue for a multi-pronged approach to human rights redress. Their findings will advance both academic and policy debates about the merits and shortcomings of NJMs.
Interview with Tim Connor and Fiona Haines.
Interview by Caitlin Murphy, Lecturer, RMIT University and Fellow, Laureate Program on Global Corporations and International Law.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1673</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">d96c6102-3173-11f1-a56c-afd167d82fd9</guid>
      <title>Emotions of LGBT Rights</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In this episode of High Theory, Saronik talks to Senthorun Raj about the Emotions of LGBT Rights. Emotions from disgust and fear to love and joy shape the legal frameworks that attempt to govern human sexual behavior around the world. Sen cautions against dividing emotions into good and bad, but instead asks us to take a critical stance on all emotions, to understand how they shape our policies.</p>
<p>In the episode, we talk about Sara Ahmed, the Stonewall Riots, conversion therapy, and efforts to mandate for and against inclusive sex education. The transcript lives here as a&nbsp;<a href="http://hightheory.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/Emotions-of-LGBT-Rights-Transcript.docx" rel="noopener noreferrer">WordDoc</a>&nbsp;and here as a&nbsp;<a href="http://hightheory.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/Emotions-of-LGBT-Rights-Transcript.pdf" rel="noopener noreferrer">PDF</a>.</p>
<p>Sen’s book,&nbsp;<a href="https://edinburghuniversitypress.com/book-the-emotions-of-lgbt-rights-and-reforms.html" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Emotions of LGBT Rights and Reforms: Repairing Law</em></a>&nbsp;(Edinburgh University Press 2025) uses emotion as a novel analytic lens to understand, analyse, and critique the relationship between individual, interpersonal, and institutional conflicts over LGBT rights. Emotions are central to the pursuit, organisation, and contestation of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) rights in law. Drawing from critical legal theories, this book cultivates the concept of “emotional grammar” to show how emotions structure law reform pursuits by threading together Hansard, legislation, case law, law reform consultations, and statutory guidance. By doing so, it explains why addressing this emotional grammar is important for scholars, lawyers, judges, legislators, and activists seeking to navigate conflicts over LGBT rights and reforms that aim to repair the inequalities faced by LGBT people.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.mmu.ac.uk/staff/profile/dr-senthorun-raj#t-tabs_staff_profile-0" rel="noopener noreferrer">Senthorun Raj</a>&nbsp;is an academic human rights lawyer with expertise in issues of race, gender, sexuality, and culture. He works as a Reader in Human Rights Law at Manchester Metropolitan University. Sen’s research and teaching interests include LGBTIQ+ rights, emotion, culture, equalities and human rights law, legal education, and critical legal theory. His latest monograph,<a href="https://edinburghuniversitypress.com/book-the-emotions-of-lgbt-rights-and-reforms.html" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;</a>builds on his previous book,<a href="https://www.routledge.com/Feeling-Queer-Jurisprudence-Injury-Intimacy-Identity/Raj/p/book/9781032137513" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;</a><a href="https://www.routledge.com/Feeling-Queer-Jurisprudence-Injury-Intimacy-Identity/Raj/p/book/9781032137513" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Feeling Queer Jurisprudence: Injury, Intimacy, Identity</em></a>&nbsp;(Routledge, 2020), which explored the ways emotions shape legal judgments that enable progress for LGBT people. He is also the co-editor of&nbsp;<a href="https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-030-48830-7" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Queer Outside in Law: Recognising LGBTIQ People in the United Kingdom</em></a>&nbsp;(Palgrave, 2020) and<a href="https://counterpress.org.uk/publications/queer-judgments/" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;</a><a href="https://counterpress.org.uk/publications/queer-judgments/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Queer Judgments</em></a>&nbsp;(Counterpress, 2025).</p>
<p>The image for this episode is a coloured lithograph, from 1868, depicting a double rainbow, by René Henri Digeon after Étienne Antoine Eugène Ronjat. It was sourced by Lili Epstein for High Theory from the&nbsp;<a href="https://wellcomecollection.org/works/d8zdj7jx?wellcomeImagesUrl=/indexplus/image/V0025069.html" rel="noopener noreferrer">Wellcome Collection</a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 6 Apr 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/emotions-of-lgbt-rights-KNvo92ig</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this episode of High Theory, Saronik talks to Senthorun Raj about the Emotions of LGBT Rights. Emotions from disgust and fear to love and joy shape the legal frameworks that attempt to govern human sexual behavior around the world. Sen cautions against dividing emotions into good and bad, but instead asks us to take a critical stance on all emotions, to understand how they shape our policies.</p>
<p>In the episode, we talk about Sara Ahmed, the Stonewall Riots, conversion therapy, and efforts to mandate for and against inclusive sex education. The transcript lives here as a&nbsp;<a href="http://hightheory.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/Emotions-of-LGBT-Rights-Transcript.docx" rel="noopener noreferrer">WordDoc</a>&nbsp;and here as a&nbsp;<a href="http://hightheory.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/Emotions-of-LGBT-Rights-Transcript.pdf" rel="noopener noreferrer">PDF</a>.</p>
<p>Sen’s book,&nbsp;<a href="https://edinburghuniversitypress.com/book-the-emotions-of-lgbt-rights-and-reforms.html" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Emotions of LGBT Rights and Reforms: Repairing Law</em></a>&nbsp;(Edinburgh University Press 2025) uses emotion as a novel analytic lens to understand, analyse, and critique the relationship between individual, interpersonal, and institutional conflicts over LGBT rights. Emotions are central to the pursuit, organisation, and contestation of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) rights in law. Drawing from critical legal theories, this book cultivates the concept of “emotional grammar” to show how emotions structure law reform pursuits by threading together Hansard, legislation, case law, law reform consultations, and statutory guidance. By doing so, it explains why addressing this emotional grammar is important for scholars, lawyers, judges, legislators, and activists seeking to navigate conflicts over LGBT rights and reforms that aim to repair the inequalities faced by LGBT people.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.mmu.ac.uk/staff/profile/dr-senthorun-raj#t-tabs_staff_profile-0" rel="noopener noreferrer">Senthorun Raj</a>&nbsp;is an academic human rights lawyer with expertise in issues of race, gender, sexuality, and culture. He works as a Reader in Human Rights Law at Manchester Metropolitan University. Sen’s research and teaching interests include LGBTIQ+ rights, emotion, culture, equalities and human rights law, legal education, and critical legal theory. His latest monograph,<a href="https://edinburghuniversitypress.com/book-the-emotions-of-lgbt-rights-and-reforms.html" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;</a>builds on his previous book,<a href="https://www.routledge.com/Feeling-Queer-Jurisprudence-Injury-Intimacy-Identity/Raj/p/book/9781032137513" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;</a><a href="https://www.routledge.com/Feeling-Queer-Jurisprudence-Injury-Intimacy-Identity/Raj/p/book/9781032137513" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Feeling Queer Jurisprudence: Injury, Intimacy, Identity</em></a>&nbsp;(Routledge, 2020), which explored the ways emotions shape legal judgments that enable progress for LGBT people. He is also the co-editor of&nbsp;<a href="https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-030-48830-7" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Queer Outside in Law: Recognising LGBTIQ People in the United Kingdom</em></a>&nbsp;(Palgrave, 2020) and<a href="https://counterpress.org.uk/publications/queer-judgments/" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;</a><a href="https://counterpress.org.uk/publications/queer-judgments/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Queer Judgments</em></a>&nbsp;(Counterpress, 2025).</p>
<p>The image for this episode is a coloured lithograph, from 1868, depicting a double rainbow, by René Henri Digeon after Étienne Antoine Eugène Ronjat. It was sourced by Lili Epstein for High Theory from the&nbsp;<a href="https://wellcomecollection.org/works/d8zdj7jx?wellcomeImagesUrl=/indexplus/image/V0025069.html" rel="noopener noreferrer">Wellcome Collection</a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="19183251" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/6940726f-c50f-4452-9a68-0b2ae11d23bc/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=6940726f-c50f-4452-9a68-0b2ae11d23bc&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Emotions of LGBT Rights</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/2cf6a02f-0d83-47c7-a772-7eb4e1c50adb/e5b316b7-7d66-4c8a-85c3-1f0916be3b06/3000x3000/4e9ce13306e50ef093132ebbec82a4d7.jpg?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:19:34</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this episode of High Theory, Saronik talks to Senthorun Raj about the Emotions of LGBT Rights. Emotions from disgust and fear to love and joy shape the legal frameworks that attempt to govern human sexual behavior around the world. Sen cautions against dividing emotions into good and bad, but instead asks us to take a critical stance on all emotions, to understand how they shape our policies.
In the episode, we talk about Sara Ahmed, the Stonewall Riots, conversion therapy, and efforts to mandate for and against inclusive sex education. The transcript lives here as a WordDoc and here as a PDF.
Sen’s book, The Emotions of LGBT Rights and Reforms: Repairing Law (Edinburgh University Press 2025) uses emotion as a novel analytic lens to understand, analyse, and critique the relationship between individual, interpersonal, and institutional conflicts over LGBT rights. Emotions are central to the pursuit, organisation, and contestation of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) rights in law. Drawing from critical legal theories, this book cultivates the concept of “emotional grammar” to show how emotions structure law reform pursuits by threading together Hansard, legislation, case law, law reform consultations, and statutory guidance. By doing so, it explains why addressing this emotional grammar is important for scholars, lawyers, judges, legislators, and activists seeking to navigate conflicts over LGBT rights and reforms that aim to repair the inequalities faced by LGBT people.
Senthorun Raj is an academic human rights lawyer with expertise in issues of race, gender, sexuality, and culture. He works as a Reader in Human Rights Law at Manchester Metropolitan University. Sen’s research and teaching interests include LGBTIQ+ rights, emotion, culture, equalities and human rights law, legal education, and critical legal theory. His latest monograph, builds on his previous book, Feeling Queer Jurisprudence: Injury, Intimacy, Identity (Routledge, 2020), which explored the ways emotions shape legal judgments that enable progress for LGBT people. He is also the co-editor of The Queer Outside in Law: Recognising LGBTIQ People in the United Kingdom (Palgrave, 2020) and Queer Judgments (Counterpress, 2025).
The image for this episode is a coloured lithograph, from 1868, depicting a double rainbow, by René Henri Digeon after Étienne Antoine Eugène Ronjat. It was sourced by Lili Epstein for High Theory from the Wellcome Collection.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode of High Theory, Saronik talks to Senthorun Raj about the Emotions of LGBT Rights. Emotions from disgust and fear to love and joy shape the legal frameworks that attempt to govern human sexual behavior around the world. Sen cautions against dividing emotions into good and bad, but instead asks us to take a critical stance on all emotions, to understand how they shape our policies.
In the episode, we talk about Sara Ahmed, the Stonewall Riots, conversion therapy, and efforts to mandate for and against inclusive sex education. The transcript lives here as a WordDoc and here as a PDF.
Sen’s book, The Emotions of LGBT Rights and Reforms: Repairing Law (Edinburgh University Press 2025) uses emotion as a novel analytic lens to understand, analyse, and critique the relationship between individual, interpersonal, and institutional conflicts over LGBT rights. Emotions are central to the pursuit, organisation, and contestation of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) rights in law. Drawing from critical legal theories, this book cultivates the concept of “emotional grammar” to show how emotions structure law reform pursuits by threading together Hansard, legislation, case law, law reform consultations, and statutory guidance. By doing so, it explains why addressing this emotional grammar is important for scholars, lawyers, judges, legislators, and activists seeking to navigate conflicts over LGBT rights and reforms that aim to repair the inequalities faced by LGBT people.
Senthorun Raj is an academic human rights lawyer with expertise in issues of race, gender, sexuality, and culture. He works as a Reader in Human Rights Law at Manchester Metropolitan University. Sen’s research and teaching interests include LGBTIQ+ rights, emotion, culture, equalities and human rights law, legal education, and critical legal theory. His latest monograph, builds on his previous book, Feeling Queer Jurisprudence: Injury, Intimacy, Identity (Routledge, 2020), which explored the ways emotions shape legal judgments that enable progress for LGBT people. He is also the co-editor of The Queer Outside in Law: Recognising LGBTIQ People in the United Kingdom (Palgrave, 2020) and Queer Judgments (Counterpress, 2025).
The image for this episode is a coloured lithograph, from 1868, depicting a double rainbow, by René Henri Digeon after Étienne Antoine Eugène Ronjat. It was sourced by Lili Epstein for High Theory from the Wellcome Collection.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1672</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">87e58eba-2e5a-11f1-8b83-ef31fa321784</guid>
      <title>Susan Goodier and Karen Pastorello, &quot;Women Will Vote: Winning Suffrage in New York State&quot; (Cornell UP, 2017)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The book,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781501785009" rel="noopener noreferrer">Women Will Vote: Winning Suffrage in New York State</a>&nbsp;﻿(Cornell UP, 2017)&nbsp;is&nbsp;Susan Goodier and Karen Pastorello’s efforts to account for the origins and strategies of the women's suffrage movement in the New York State. The book dwelled on evolution of the women’s suffrage movement in the progressive era and discusses the various suffragist strategies employed in quest for women’s right to franchise from early legislative petitions to more innovative marketing approaches. It explains how the women’s suffrage movement evolved over time, using various tactics like petitions, parades, and door-to-door canvassing. The book highlights the diverse groups that supported the suffrage movement, including rural women, working-class immigrants, and African American women, all united by their common interest in gaining the right to vote. The book also acknowledges the different ideologies of the suffragist groups and their approaches to activism.﻿<br></p>
<p>Mariam Olugbodi is a university teacher and a writer, she is the author of the monograph titled: “Stylistic Features in the 2011 and 2012 Final Matches Commentaries in the UEFA Champions League”, published by Grin Verlag. Mariam’s greatest dream is seeing a world where knowledge is accessible to all. She does this through her volunteering roles on open knowledge platforms as a host and an editor. As part of her effort to maintain inclusion and diversity in knowledge transmission, she volunteers as a teacher in crises contexts. Learn more and connect with Mariam through her social links @&nbsp;<a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/olugbodi-mariam-801a52130/?originalSubdomain=ng" rel="noopener noreferrer">LinkedIn</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5027-6644" rel="noopener noreferrer">ORCID</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Margob28" rel="noopener noreferrer">Meta</a>﻿﻿</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 4 Apr 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/susan-goodier-and-karen-pastorello-women-will-vote-winning-suffrage-in-new-york-state-cornell-up-2017-z25uk7K_</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The book,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781501785009" rel="noopener noreferrer">Women Will Vote: Winning Suffrage in New York State</a>&nbsp;﻿(Cornell UP, 2017)&nbsp;is&nbsp;Susan Goodier and Karen Pastorello’s efforts to account for the origins and strategies of the women's suffrage movement in the New York State. The book dwelled on evolution of the women’s suffrage movement in the progressive era and discusses the various suffragist strategies employed in quest for women’s right to franchise from early legislative petitions to more innovative marketing approaches. It explains how the women’s suffrage movement evolved over time, using various tactics like petitions, parades, and door-to-door canvassing. The book highlights the diverse groups that supported the suffrage movement, including rural women, working-class immigrants, and African American women, all united by their common interest in gaining the right to vote. The book also acknowledges the different ideologies of the suffragist groups and their approaches to activism.﻿<br></p>
<p>Mariam Olugbodi is a university teacher and a writer, she is the author of the monograph titled: “Stylistic Features in the 2011 and 2012 Final Matches Commentaries in the UEFA Champions League”, published by Grin Verlag. Mariam’s greatest dream is seeing a world where knowledge is accessible to all. She does this through her volunteering roles on open knowledge platforms as a host and an editor. As part of her effort to maintain inclusion and diversity in knowledge transmission, she volunteers as a teacher in crises contexts. Learn more and connect with Mariam through her social links @&nbsp;<a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/olugbodi-mariam-801a52130/?originalSubdomain=ng" rel="noopener noreferrer">LinkedIn</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5027-6644" rel="noopener noreferrer">ORCID</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Margob28" rel="noopener noreferrer">Meta</a>﻿﻿</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="38602242" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/e82993c7-043d-45de-9f0a-0053e388e98b/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=e82993c7-043d-45de-9f0a-0053e388e98b&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Susan Goodier and Karen Pastorello, &quot;Women Will Vote: Winning Suffrage in New York State&quot; (Cornell UP, 2017)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:40:08</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The book, Women Will Vote: Winning Suffrage in New York State ﻿(Cornell UP, 2017) is Susan Goodier and Karen Pastorello’s efforts to account for the origins and strategies of the women&apos;s suffrage movement in the New York State. The book dwelled on evolution of the women’s suffrage movement in the progressive era and discusses the various suffragist strategies employed in quest for women’s right to franchise from early legislative petitions to more innovative marketing approaches. It explains how the women’s suffrage movement evolved over time, using various tactics like petitions, parades, and door-to-door canvassing. The book highlights the diverse groups that supported the suffrage movement, including rural women, working-class immigrants, and African American women, all united by their common interest in gaining the right to vote. The book also acknowledges the different ideologies of the suffragist groups and their approaches to activism.﻿
Mariam Olugbodi is a university teacher and a writer, she is the author of the monograph titled: “Stylistic Features in the 2011 and 2012 Final Matches Commentaries in the UEFA Champions League”, published by Grin Verlag. Mariam’s greatest dream is seeing a world where knowledge is accessible to all. She does this through her volunteering roles on open knowledge platforms as a host and an editor. As part of her effort to maintain inclusion and diversity in knowledge transmission, she volunteers as a teacher in crises contexts. Learn more and connect with Mariam through her social links @ LinkedIn | ORCID | Meta﻿﻿
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The book, Women Will Vote: Winning Suffrage in New York State ﻿(Cornell UP, 2017) is Susan Goodier and Karen Pastorello’s efforts to account for the origins and strategies of the women&apos;s suffrage movement in the New York State. The book dwelled on evolution of the women’s suffrage movement in the progressive era and discusses the various suffragist strategies employed in quest for women’s right to franchise from early legislative petitions to more innovative marketing approaches. It explains how the women’s suffrage movement evolved over time, using various tactics like petitions, parades, and door-to-door canvassing. The book highlights the diverse groups that supported the suffrage movement, including rural women, working-class immigrants, and African American women, all united by their common interest in gaining the right to vote. The book also acknowledges the different ideologies of the suffragist groups and their approaches to activism.﻿
Mariam Olugbodi is a university teacher and a writer, she is the author of the monograph titled: “Stylistic Features in the 2011 and 2012 Final Matches Commentaries in the UEFA Champions League”, published by Grin Verlag. Mariam’s greatest dream is seeing a world where knowledge is accessible to all. She does this through her volunteering roles on open knowledge platforms as a host and an editor. As part of her effort to maintain inclusion and diversity in knowledge transmission, she volunteers as a teacher in crises contexts. Learn more and connect with Mariam through her social links @ LinkedIn | ORCID | Meta﻿﻿
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1671</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">49d51fb0-2cb5-11f1-b06a-035aab492bb4</guid>
      <title>Robert Cribb and Sandra Wilson, &quot;Twelve Japanese War Criminals and One Who Got Away&quot; (U Hawaiʻi Press, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>“Japanese war crimes are notorious. During the Second World War, as Japanese forces overran Southeast Asia and the Pacific, they massacred, murdered, raped, and tortured Asians and Westerners who fell into their hands. They also mistreated hundreds of thousands of prisoners of war (POWs) and civilian internees. After the war ended in 1945, the victorious Allied powers conducted trials in which they brought Japanese perpetrators to justice, as they also did with Germans in Europe…</p>
<p>In this provocative new book,<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9798880702060" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;</a><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9798880702060" rel="noopener noreferrer">Twelve Japanese War Criminals and One Who Got Away</a>, published by University of&nbsp;Hawaiʻi&nbsp;Press (2026), historians Robert Cribb and Sandra Wilson analyse thirteen case studies of Japanese war crimes. They attempt to answer a crucial question with contemporary relevance, how does one become a war criminal?</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 1 Apr 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/robert-cribb-and-sandra-wilson-twelve-japanese-war-criminals-and-one-who-got-away-u-hawaii-press-2026-jdWeTh3_</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“Japanese war crimes are notorious. During the Second World War, as Japanese forces overran Southeast Asia and the Pacific, they massacred, murdered, raped, and tortured Asians and Westerners who fell into their hands. They also mistreated hundreds of thousands of prisoners of war (POWs) and civilian internees. After the war ended in 1945, the victorious Allied powers conducted trials in which they brought Japanese perpetrators to justice, as they also did with Germans in Europe…</p>
<p>In this provocative new book,<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9798880702060" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;</a><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9798880702060" rel="noopener noreferrer">Twelve Japanese War Criminals and One Who Got Away</a>, published by University of&nbsp;Hawaiʻi&nbsp;Press (2026), historians Robert Cribb and Sandra Wilson analyse thirteen case studies of Japanese war crimes. They attempt to answer a crucial question with contemporary relevance, how does one become a war criminal?</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="58224639" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/ac721fa8-92a8-4413-8684-d2ce1bab1a83/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=ac721fa8-92a8-4413-8684-d2ce1bab1a83&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Robert Cribb and Sandra Wilson, &quot;Twelve Japanese War Criminals and One Who Got Away&quot; (U Hawaiʻi Press, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:00:35</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>“Japanese war crimes are notorious. During the Second World War, as Japanese forces overran Southeast Asia and the Pacific, they massacred, murdered, raped, and tortured Asians and Westerners who fell into their hands. They also mistreated hundreds of thousands of prisoners of war (POWs) and civilian internees. After the war ended in 1945, the victorious Allied powers conducted trials in which they brought Japanese perpetrators to justice, as they also did with Germans in Europe…
In this provocative new book, Twelve Japanese War Criminals and One Who Got Away, published by University of Hawaiʻi Press (2026), historians Robert Cribb and Sandra Wilson analyse thirteen case studies of Japanese war crimes. They attempt to answer a crucial question with contemporary relevance, how does one become a war criminal?
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>“Japanese war crimes are notorious. During the Second World War, as Japanese forces overran Southeast Asia and the Pacific, they massacred, murdered, raped, and tortured Asians and Westerners who fell into their hands. They also mistreated hundreds of thousands of prisoners of war (POWs) and civilian internees. After the war ended in 1945, the victorious Allied powers conducted trials in which they brought Japanese perpetrators to justice, as they also did with Germans in Europe…
In this provocative new book, Twelve Japanese War Criminals and One Who Got Away, published by University of Hawaiʻi Press (2026), historians Robert Cribb and Sandra Wilson analyse thirteen case studies of Japanese war crimes. They attempt to answer a crucial question with contemporary relevance, how does one become a war criminal?
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1669</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">137ed6a8-2cbb-11f1-bdc1-03197e4dc145</guid>
      <title>Lee Ann S. Wang, &quot;The Violence of Protection: Policing, Immigration Law, and Asian American Women&quot; (Duke UP, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2fdukeupress.edu%2fthe-violence-of-protection&amp;c=E,1,YrrVGfIy60QsN-HA96vjIqfD31bxDQA8DGNsQyOZKaSjZWZORnoRRDH7zVHF1PHvSFyi0Mo8M6DkPNaqQbqbfG67OnFXwMfWQtOJLUAznBVaQ4A,&amp;typo=1" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Violence of Protection: Policing, Immigration Law, and Asian American Women</em></a>&nbsp;(Duke UP, 2026) examines U.S. laws designed to rescue immigrant survivors from gender and sexual violence only if they agree to cooperate with policing. Drawing upon ethnographic stories with legal and social service advocates who work with Asian immigrant women, the book engages abolition feminisms and antiblackness to critique "victim" as a genre of the human in law and produced through racial configurations of the model minority myth and the good/bad immigrant paradigm.</p>
<p>Author&nbsp;<a href="https://asianam.ucla.edu/person/lee-ann-s-wang/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Lee Ann S. Wang</a>&nbsp;is an Assistant Professor of Asian American Studies. She is also a Co-PI on the research initiative,&nbsp;<a href="https://crg.berkeley.edu/research/research-initiatives/anti-asian-violence-origins-and-trajectories-research-initiative" rel="noopener noreferrer">Anti-Asian Violence: Origins and Trajectories</a>, housed at UC Berkeley’s Center for Race and Gender.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 1 Apr 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/lee-ann-s-wang-the-violence-of-protection-policing-immigration-law-and-asian-american-women-duke-up-2026-azO6kLCF</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2fdukeupress.edu%2fthe-violence-of-protection&amp;c=E,1,YrrVGfIy60QsN-HA96vjIqfD31bxDQA8DGNsQyOZKaSjZWZORnoRRDH7zVHF1PHvSFyi0Mo8M6DkPNaqQbqbfG67OnFXwMfWQtOJLUAznBVaQ4A,&amp;typo=1" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Violence of Protection: Policing, Immigration Law, and Asian American Women</em></a>&nbsp;(Duke UP, 2026) examines U.S. laws designed to rescue immigrant survivors from gender and sexual violence only if they agree to cooperate with policing. Drawing upon ethnographic stories with legal and social service advocates who work with Asian immigrant women, the book engages abolition feminisms and antiblackness to critique "victim" as a genre of the human in law and produced through racial configurations of the model minority myth and the good/bad immigrant paradigm.</p>
<p>Author&nbsp;<a href="https://asianam.ucla.edu/person/lee-ann-s-wang/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Lee Ann S. Wang</a>&nbsp;is an Assistant Professor of Asian American Studies. She is also a Co-PI on the research initiative,&nbsp;<a href="https://crg.berkeley.edu/research/research-initiatives/anti-asian-violence-origins-and-trajectories-research-initiative" rel="noopener noreferrer">Anti-Asian Violence: Origins and Trajectories</a>, housed at UC Berkeley’s Center for Race and Gender.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="63785104" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/0ecb8edb-38ac-4edc-a302-3825a7eed107/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=0ecb8edb-38ac-4edc-a302-3825a7eed107&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Lee Ann S. Wang, &quot;The Violence of Protection: Policing, Immigration Law, and Asian American Women&quot; (Duke UP, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:06:22</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The Violence of Protection: Policing, Immigration Law, and Asian American Women (Duke UP, 2026) examines U.S. laws designed to rescue immigrant survivors from gender and sexual violence only if they agree to cooperate with policing. Drawing upon ethnographic stories with legal and social service advocates who work with Asian immigrant women, the book engages abolition feminisms and antiblackness to critique &quot;victim&quot; as a genre of the human in law and produced through racial configurations of the model minority myth and the good/bad immigrant paradigm.
Author Lee Ann S. Wang is an Assistant Professor of Asian American Studies. She is also a Co-PI on the research initiative, Anti-Asian Violence: Origins and Trajectories, housed at UC Berkeley’s Center for Race and Gender.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Violence of Protection: Policing, Immigration Law, and Asian American Women (Duke UP, 2026) examines U.S. laws designed to rescue immigrant survivors from gender and sexual violence only if they agree to cooperate with policing. Drawing upon ethnographic stories with legal and social service advocates who work with Asian immigrant women, the book engages abolition feminisms and antiblackness to critique &quot;victim&quot; as a genre of the human in law and produced through racial configurations of the model minority myth and the good/bad immigrant paradigm.
Author Lee Ann S. Wang is an Assistant Professor of Asian American Studies. She is also a Co-PI on the research initiative, Anti-Asian Violence: Origins and Trajectories, housed at UC Berkeley’s Center for Race and Gender.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1670</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4b9d238c-2c16-11f1-b10e-b7b958b00709</guid>
      <title>Jeanne-Marie Jackson, &quot;The Letter of the Law in J. E. Casely Hayford&apos;s West Africa&quot; (Princeton UP, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The African Gold Coast writer and statesman J. E. Casely Hayford (1866–1930) was a key figure in liberal anticolonial thought as well as African and British imperial literary and intellectual history. In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691270999" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Letter of the Law in J. E. Casely Hayford's West Africa</a>&nbsp;(Princeton UP, 2026)&nbsp;﻿Jeanne-Marie Jackson positions his career as an intriguing case study of anticolonial literature and politics. Jackson maps the contours of Casely Hayford’s thought through sustained attention to his written work within its Gold Coast and British imperial contexts, demonstrating the far-reaching conceptual and aesthetic resources of his elite legal background.<br>Treating Casely Hayford’s 1911 novel,&nbsp;<em>Ethiopia Unbound</em>, as a constitutional document and his legal writings as literary exemplars, Jackson breaks down artificial divisions between African textual traditions. The law, for Casely Hayford and his Fante nationalist peers, was intimately bound to the virtues they attached to textuality: clear-headedness, moderation, restraint, and public discernment. Jackson argues for this liberal disposition as a crucial and neglected part of anticolonial intellectual and political history. Colonial-era legal debates framed the rise of an influential, consummately modern Gold Coast leader deemed fit to steer ambitious new pan-African institutions, and, in Jackson’s telling, Casely Hayford emerges as his era’s most emblematic figure.</p>
<p>Jeanne-Marie Jackson is a Professor of English at Johns Hopkins University and the Director of the Alexander Grass Humanities Institute.</p>
<p>Elisa Prosperetti is an Assistant Professor of African and global history at NIE/NTU in Singapore.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/jeanne-marie-jackson-the-letter-of-the-law-in-j-e-casely-hayfords-west-africa-princeton-up-2026-yklBD2s0</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The African Gold Coast writer and statesman J. E. Casely Hayford (1866–1930) was a key figure in liberal anticolonial thought as well as African and British imperial literary and intellectual history. In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691270999" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Letter of the Law in J. E. Casely Hayford's West Africa</a>&nbsp;(Princeton UP, 2026)&nbsp;﻿Jeanne-Marie Jackson positions his career as an intriguing case study of anticolonial literature and politics. Jackson maps the contours of Casely Hayford’s thought through sustained attention to his written work within its Gold Coast and British imperial contexts, demonstrating the far-reaching conceptual and aesthetic resources of his elite legal background.<br>Treating Casely Hayford’s 1911 novel,&nbsp;<em>Ethiopia Unbound</em>, as a constitutional document and his legal writings as literary exemplars, Jackson breaks down artificial divisions between African textual traditions. The law, for Casely Hayford and his Fante nationalist peers, was intimately bound to the virtues they attached to textuality: clear-headedness, moderation, restraint, and public discernment. Jackson argues for this liberal disposition as a crucial and neglected part of anticolonial intellectual and political history. Colonial-era legal debates framed the rise of an influential, consummately modern Gold Coast leader deemed fit to steer ambitious new pan-African institutions, and, in Jackson’s telling, Casely Hayford emerges as his era’s most emblematic figure.</p>
<p>Jeanne-Marie Jackson is a Professor of English at Johns Hopkins University and the Director of the Alexander Grass Humanities Institute.</p>
<p>Elisa Prosperetti is an Assistant Professor of African and global history at NIE/NTU in Singapore.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="68120945" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/cdb298c0-b587-42b5-896f-63bfb7a1eada/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=cdb298c0-b587-42b5-896f-63bfb7a1eada&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Jeanne-Marie Jackson, &quot;The Letter of the Law in J. E. Casely Hayford&apos;s West Africa&quot; (Princeton UP, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:10:54</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The African Gold Coast writer and statesman J. E. Casely Hayford (1866–1930) was a key figure in liberal anticolonial thought as well as African and British imperial literary and intellectual history. In The Letter of the Law in J. E. Casely Hayford&apos;s West Africa (Princeton UP, 2026) ﻿Jeanne-Marie Jackson positions his career as an intriguing case study of anticolonial literature and politics. Jackson maps the contours of Casely Hayford’s thought through sustained attention to his written work within its Gold Coast and British imperial contexts, demonstrating the far-reaching conceptual and aesthetic resources of his elite legal background.Treating Casely Hayford’s 1911 novel, Ethiopia Unbound, as a constitutional document and his legal writings as literary exemplars, Jackson breaks down artificial divisions between African textual traditions. The law, for Casely Hayford and his Fante nationalist peers, was intimately bound to the virtues they attached to textuality: clear-headedness, moderation, restraint, and public discernment. Jackson argues for this liberal disposition as a crucial and neglected part of anticolonial intellectual and political history. Colonial-era legal debates framed the rise of an influential, consummately modern Gold Coast leader deemed fit to steer ambitious new pan-African institutions, and, in Jackson’s telling, Casely Hayford emerges as his era’s most emblematic figure.
Jeanne-Marie Jackson is a Professor of English at Johns Hopkins University and the Director of the Alexander Grass Humanities Institute.
Elisa Prosperetti is an Assistant Professor of African and global history at NIE/NTU in Singapore.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The African Gold Coast writer and statesman J. E. Casely Hayford (1866–1930) was a key figure in liberal anticolonial thought as well as African and British imperial literary and intellectual history. In The Letter of the Law in J. E. Casely Hayford&apos;s West Africa (Princeton UP, 2026) ﻿Jeanne-Marie Jackson positions his career as an intriguing case study of anticolonial literature and politics. Jackson maps the contours of Casely Hayford’s thought through sustained attention to his written work within its Gold Coast and British imperial contexts, demonstrating the far-reaching conceptual and aesthetic resources of his elite legal background.Treating Casely Hayford’s 1911 novel, Ethiopia Unbound, as a constitutional document and his legal writings as literary exemplars, Jackson breaks down artificial divisions between African textual traditions. The law, for Casely Hayford and his Fante nationalist peers, was intimately bound to the virtues they attached to textuality: clear-headedness, moderation, restraint, and public discernment. Jackson argues for this liberal disposition as a crucial and neglected part of anticolonial intellectual and political history. Colonial-era legal debates framed the rise of an influential, consummately modern Gold Coast leader deemed fit to steer ambitious new pan-African institutions, and, in Jackson’s telling, Casely Hayford emerges as his era’s most emblematic figure.
Jeanne-Marie Jackson is a Professor of English at Johns Hopkins University and the Director of the Alexander Grass Humanities Institute.
Elisa Prosperetti is an Assistant Professor of African and global history at NIE/NTU in Singapore.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1668</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">94702f96-2978-11f1-b330-ebc20d34e27b</guid>
      <title>Colloquies on European Civil Procedure: A Conversation with Marco de Benito</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>This volume brings law to life through a free and lively dialogue on the new Model European Rules of Civil Procedure. In it, some of Europe's leading jurists engage in a free-wheeling discussion of the most important issues in procedural law today. With its elegant style and unconventional intellectual approach, Colloquies stands out as a rare gem of comparative legal literature.</p>
<p>Marco de Benito holds the Jean Monnet Chair in European Civil Procedure at IE University. His research focuses on comparative civil procedure, international arbitration, private law, and legal history. He arbitrates and advises on international matters.</p>
<p><em>Caleb Zakarin is CEO and Publisher of the New Books Network.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/colloquies-on-european-civil-procedure-a-conversation-with-marco-de-benito-TochnR7l</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This volume brings law to life through a free and lively dialogue on the new Model European Rules of Civil Procedure. In it, some of Europe's leading jurists engage in a free-wheeling discussion of the most important issues in procedural law today. With its elegant style and unconventional intellectual approach, Colloquies stands out as a rare gem of comparative legal literature.</p>
<p>Marco de Benito holds the Jean Monnet Chair in European Civil Procedure at IE University. His research focuses on comparative civil procedure, international arbitration, private law, and legal history. He arbitrates and advises on international matters.</p>
<p><em>Caleb Zakarin is CEO and Publisher of the New Books Network.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="38500594" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/1323d1ff-746f-493a-9ce9-c9686fbe4043/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=1323d1ff-746f-493a-9ce9-c9686fbe4043&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Colloquies on European Civil Procedure: A Conversation with Marco de Benito</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:39:59</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>This volume brings law to life through a free and lively dialogue on the new Model European Rules of Civil Procedure. In it, some of Europe&apos;s leading jurists engage in a free-wheeling discussion of the most important issues in procedural law today. With its elegant style and unconventional intellectual approach, Colloquies stands out as a rare gem of comparative legal literature.
Marco de Benito holds the Jean Monnet Chair in European Civil Procedure at IE University. His research focuses on comparative civil procedure, international arbitration, private law, and legal history. He arbitrates and advises on international matters.
Caleb Zakarin is CEO and Publisher of the New Books Network.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>This volume brings law to life through a free and lively dialogue on the new Model European Rules of Civil Procedure. In it, some of Europe&apos;s leading jurists engage in a free-wheeling discussion of the most important issues in procedural law today. With its elegant style and unconventional intellectual approach, Colloquies stands out as a rare gem of comparative legal literature.
Marco de Benito holds the Jean Monnet Chair in European Civil Procedure at IE University. His research focuses on comparative civil procedure, international arbitration, private law, and legal history. He arbitrates and advises on international matters.
Caleb Zakarin is CEO and Publisher of the New Books Network.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1667</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">c05c2636-275d-11f1-80b1-379196bc7c48</guid>
      <title>Gijs Kruijtzer, &quot;Justifying Transgression:  Muslims, Christians, and the Law - 1200 to 1700&quot; (de Gruyter, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>How do people justify what others see as transgression? Taking that question to the Persian-Muslim and Latin-Christian worlds over the period 1200 to 1700,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9783111215907" rel="noopener noreferrer">Justifying Transgression: Muslims, Christians, and the Law - 1200 to 1700</a>(de Gruyter, 2023)&nbsp;shows that people in both these worlds invested considerable energy in worrying, debating, and writing about proscribed practices. It compares how people in the two worlds came to terms with the proscriptions of sodomy, idolatry, and usury. When historians speak of the gap between premodern practice and the legal theory of the time, they tend to ignore the myriad of justifications that filled this gap. Moreover, a focus on justification evens out many of the contrasts that have been alleged to exist between the two worlds, or the Muslim and Christian worlds more generally. The similarities outweigh the differences in the ways people came to terms with the various rules of divine law. The level of flexibility of the theologians and jurists in charge of divine law varied more over time and by topic than between the two worlds. Both worlds also saw the development of ever more sophisticated justifications. Amid the increasing complexity of justifications, a particular kind of reasoning emerged: that good outcomes are more important than upholding rules for their own sake.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/gijs-kruijtzer-justifying-transgression-muslims-christians-and-the-law-1200-to-1700-de-gruyter-2023-aUKz4qH9</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do people justify what others see as transgression? Taking that question to the Persian-Muslim and Latin-Christian worlds over the period 1200 to 1700,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9783111215907" rel="noopener noreferrer">Justifying Transgression: Muslims, Christians, and the Law - 1200 to 1700</a>(de Gruyter, 2023)&nbsp;shows that people in both these worlds invested considerable energy in worrying, debating, and writing about proscribed practices. It compares how people in the two worlds came to terms with the proscriptions of sodomy, idolatry, and usury. When historians speak of the gap between premodern practice and the legal theory of the time, they tend to ignore the myriad of justifications that filled this gap. Moreover, a focus on justification evens out many of the contrasts that have been alleged to exist between the two worlds, or the Muslim and Christian worlds more generally. The similarities outweigh the differences in the ways people came to terms with the various rules of divine law. The level of flexibility of the theologians and jurists in charge of divine law varied more over time and by topic than between the two worlds. Both worlds also saw the development of ever more sophisticated justifications. Amid the increasing complexity of justifications, a particular kind of reasoning emerged: that good outcomes are more important than upholding rules for their own sake.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="57386278" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/1ba3923b-adfc-49dd-aa45-34a333002ad9/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=1ba3923b-adfc-49dd-aa45-34a333002ad9&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Gijs Kruijtzer, &quot;Justifying Transgression:  Muslims, Christians, and the Law - 1200 to 1700&quot; (de Gruyter, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:59:43</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>How do people justify what others see as transgression? Taking that question to the Persian-Muslim and Latin-Christian worlds over the period 1200 to 1700, Justifying Transgression: Muslims, Christians, and the Law - 1200 to 1700(de Gruyter, 2023) shows that people in both these worlds invested considerable energy in worrying, debating, and writing about proscribed practices. It compares how people in the two worlds came to terms with the proscriptions of sodomy, idolatry, and usury. When historians speak of the gap between premodern practice and the legal theory of the time, they tend to ignore the myriad of justifications that filled this gap. Moreover, a focus on justification evens out many of the contrasts that have been alleged to exist between the two worlds, or the Muslim and Christian worlds more generally. The similarities outweigh the differences in the ways people came to terms with the various rules of divine law. The level of flexibility of the theologians and jurists in charge of divine law varied more over time and by topic than between the two worlds. Both worlds also saw the development of ever more sophisticated justifications. Amid the increasing complexity of justifications, a particular kind of reasoning emerged: that good outcomes are more important than upholding rules for their own sake.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>How do people justify what others see as transgression? Taking that question to the Persian-Muslim and Latin-Christian worlds over the period 1200 to 1700, Justifying Transgression: Muslims, Christians, and the Law - 1200 to 1700(de Gruyter, 2023) shows that people in both these worlds invested considerable energy in worrying, debating, and writing about proscribed practices. It compares how people in the two worlds came to terms with the proscriptions of sodomy, idolatry, and usury. When historians speak of the gap between premodern practice and the legal theory of the time, they tend to ignore the myriad of justifications that filled this gap. Moreover, a focus on justification evens out many of the contrasts that have been alleged to exist between the two worlds, or the Muslim and Christian worlds more generally. The similarities outweigh the differences in the ways people came to terms with the various rules of divine law. The level of flexibility of the theologians and jurists in charge of divine law varied more over time and by topic than between the two worlds. Both worlds also saw the development of ever more sophisticated justifications. Amid the increasing complexity of justifications, a particular kind of reasoning emerged: that good outcomes are more important than upholding rules for their own sake.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1665</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2ac998ae-2764-11f1-b9dc-aff50c1b88d6</guid>
      <title>Joanna Siekiera ed., &quot;NATO Stability Policing: Beneficial Tool in Filling the Security Gap and Establishing the Rule of Law, and a Safe and Secure Environment&quot; (NATO Stability Policing Centre Of Excellence, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Since the end of the Cold War and the resurgence of great power competition on the world stage, NATO has been in a period of transition to adapting to the new international security environment that is mark by great instability and violations of international law. These types of situation have in recent years have been labelled "grey-zone" style threats that can be dangerous but may avoid the official legal definition of warlike activity.&nbsp;<br>To combat this concerning&nbsp;situation has arisen the concept of "Stability Policing" that helps ensure that the rule of law is established and preserved in the long run. This includes the effective cooperation between military and civil law enforcement together to achieving long-term stability in troubled areas.&nbsp;<br>The&nbsp;NATO Stability Policing&nbsp;Centre Of Excellence&nbsp;commissioned its own extensive three volume&nbsp;study&nbsp;<em>NATO Stability Policing: Beneficial Tool in Filling the Security Gap and Establishing the Rule of Law, and a Safe and Secure Environment&nbsp;</em>(2024)edited by Dr. Joanna Siekiera to investigate the nature and challenges of such stability operations.&nbsp;<br>The three volumes are available online:<a href="https://www.nspcoe.org/books/the-stability-policing-trilogy-past/" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Stability Policing Trilogy Volume I&nbsp;– Past</a><a href="https://www.nspcoe.org/books/the-stability-policing-trilogy-present/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><br>The Stability Policing Trilogy Volume II – Present</a><a href="https://www.nspcoe.org/books/the-stability-policing-trilogy-future/" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Stabilit</a><a href="https://www.nspcoe.org/books/the-stability-policing-trilogy-future/" rel="noopener noreferrer">y Policing Trilogy Volume III&nbsp;– Future</a></p>
<p>Dr. Joanna Siekiera is an expert in international law, NATO consultant, trainer, and educator. She has previously been featured on the New Books Network for&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/joanna-siekiera-21st-century-as-the-pacific-century-culture-and-security-of-oceania-states-in-great-power-competition-warsaw-up-2023#entry:318586@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">21st Century as the Pacific Century. Culture and Security of Oceania States in Great Power Competition</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Warsaw University Press, 2023),&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/evolution-on-demand#entry:386832@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">Evolution on Demand: The Changing Roles of the U.S. Marine Corps in Twenty-first Century Conflicts and Beyond</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Marine Corps University Press, 2025), and&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/international-law-and-security-in-indo-pacific#entry:420246@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">International Law and Security in Indo-Pacific: Strategic Design for the Region</a>&nbsp;(Routledge, 2025).&nbsp;</p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/hosts/profile/80a6e543-4bd9-4fcc-bd76-5fb2e0083ef0" rel="noopener noreferrer">Stephen Satkiewicz</a><em>&nbsp;is an independent scholar with research areas spanning Civilizational Sciences, Social Complexity, Big History, Historical Sociology, Military History, War Studies, International Relations, Geopolitics, and Russian and East European history. He is currently the Book Review Editor for&nbsp;</em><a href="https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/ccr/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Comparative Civilizations Review</a><em>.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/joanna-siekiera-ed-nato-stability-policing-beneficial-tool-in-filling-the-security-gap-and-establishing-the-rule-of-law-and-a-safe-and-secure-environment-nato-stability-policing-centre-of-excellence-2024-f0WprZ86</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since the end of the Cold War and the resurgence of great power competition on the world stage, NATO has been in a period of transition to adapting to the new international security environment that is mark by great instability and violations of international law. These types of situation have in recent years have been labelled "grey-zone" style threats that can be dangerous but may avoid the official legal definition of warlike activity.&nbsp;<br>To combat this concerning&nbsp;situation has arisen the concept of "Stability Policing" that helps ensure that the rule of law is established and preserved in the long run. This includes the effective cooperation between military and civil law enforcement together to achieving long-term stability in troubled areas.&nbsp;<br>The&nbsp;NATO Stability Policing&nbsp;Centre Of Excellence&nbsp;commissioned its own extensive three volume&nbsp;study&nbsp;<em>NATO Stability Policing: Beneficial Tool in Filling the Security Gap and Establishing the Rule of Law, and a Safe and Secure Environment&nbsp;</em>(2024)edited by Dr. Joanna Siekiera to investigate the nature and challenges of such stability operations.&nbsp;<br>The three volumes are available online:<a href="https://www.nspcoe.org/books/the-stability-policing-trilogy-past/" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Stability Policing Trilogy Volume I&nbsp;– Past</a><a href="https://www.nspcoe.org/books/the-stability-policing-trilogy-present/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><br>The Stability Policing Trilogy Volume II – Present</a><a href="https://www.nspcoe.org/books/the-stability-policing-trilogy-future/" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Stabilit</a><a href="https://www.nspcoe.org/books/the-stability-policing-trilogy-future/" rel="noopener noreferrer">y Policing Trilogy Volume III&nbsp;– Future</a></p>
<p>Dr. Joanna Siekiera is an expert in international law, NATO consultant, trainer, and educator. She has previously been featured on the New Books Network for&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/joanna-siekiera-21st-century-as-the-pacific-century-culture-and-security-of-oceania-states-in-great-power-competition-warsaw-up-2023#entry:318586@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">21st Century as the Pacific Century. Culture and Security of Oceania States in Great Power Competition</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Warsaw University Press, 2023),&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/evolution-on-demand#entry:386832@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">Evolution on Demand: The Changing Roles of the U.S. Marine Corps in Twenty-first Century Conflicts and Beyond</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Marine Corps University Press, 2025), and&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/international-law-and-security-in-indo-pacific#entry:420246@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">International Law and Security in Indo-Pacific: Strategic Design for the Region</a>&nbsp;(Routledge, 2025).&nbsp;</p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/hosts/profile/80a6e543-4bd9-4fcc-bd76-5fb2e0083ef0" rel="noopener noreferrer">Stephen Satkiewicz</a><em>&nbsp;is an independent scholar with research areas spanning Civilizational Sciences, Social Complexity, Big History, Historical Sociology, Military History, War Studies, International Relations, Geopolitics, and Russian and East European history. He is currently the Book Review Editor for&nbsp;</em><a href="https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/ccr/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Comparative Civilizations Review</a><em>.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="68100421" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/d2761a7c-8d72-451f-aecd-43c4952cfab7/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=d2761a7c-8d72-451f-aecd-43c4952cfab7&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Joanna Siekiera ed., &quot;NATO Stability Policing: Beneficial Tool in Filling the Security Gap and Establishing the Rule of Law, and a Safe and Secure Environment&quot; (NATO Stability Policing Centre Of Excellence, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:10:52</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Since the end of the Cold War and the resurgence of great power competition on the world stage, NATO has been in a period of transition to adapting to the new international security environment that is mark by great instability and violations of international law. These types of situation have in recent years have been labelled &quot;grey-zone&quot; style threats that can be dangerous but may avoid the official legal definition of warlike activity. To combat this concerning situation has arisen the concept of &quot;Stability Policing&quot; that helps ensure that the rule of law is established and preserved in the long run. This includes the effective cooperation between military and civil law enforcement together to achieving long-term stability in troubled areas. The NATO Stability Policing Centre Of Excellence commissioned its own extensive three volume study NATO Stability Policing: Beneficial Tool in Filling the Security Gap and Establishing the Rule of Law, and a Safe and Secure Environment (2024)edited by Dr. Joanna Siekiera to investigate the nature and challenges of such stability operations. The three volumes are available online:The Stability Policing Trilogy Volume I – PastThe Stability Policing Trilogy Volume II – PresentThe Stability Policing Trilogy Volume III – Future
Dr. Joanna Siekiera is an expert in international law, NATO consultant, trainer, and educator. She has previously been featured on the New Books Network for 21st Century as the Pacific Century. Culture and Security of Oceania States in Great Power Competition (Warsaw University Press, 2023), Evolution on Demand: The Changing Roles of the U.S. Marine Corps in Twenty-first Century Conflicts and Beyond (Marine Corps University Press, 2025), and International Law and Security in Indo-Pacific: Strategic Design for the Region (Routledge, 2025). 
Stephen Satkiewicz is an independent scholar with research areas spanning Civilizational Sciences, Social Complexity, Big History, Historical Sociology, Military History, War Studies, International Relations, Geopolitics, and Russian and East European history. He is currently the Book Review Editor for Comparative Civilizations Review.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Since the end of the Cold War and the resurgence of great power competition on the world stage, NATO has been in a period of transition to adapting to the new international security environment that is mark by great instability and violations of international law. These types of situation have in recent years have been labelled &quot;grey-zone&quot; style threats that can be dangerous but may avoid the official legal definition of warlike activity. To combat this concerning situation has arisen the concept of &quot;Stability Policing&quot; that helps ensure that the rule of law is established and preserved in the long run. This includes the effective cooperation between military and civil law enforcement together to achieving long-term stability in troubled areas. The NATO Stability Policing Centre Of Excellence commissioned its own extensive three volume study NATO Stability Policing: Beneficial Tool in Filling the Security Gap and Establishing the Rule of Law, and a Safe and Secure Environment (2024)edited by Dr. Joanna Siekiera to investigate the nature and challenges of such stability operations. The three volumes are available online:The Stability Policing Trilogy Volume I – PastThe Stability Policing Trilogy Volume II – PresentThe Stability Policing Trilogy Volume III – Future
Dr. Joanna Siekiera is an expert in international law, NATO consultant, trainer, and educator. She has previously been featured on the New Books Network for 21st Century as the Pacific Century. Culture and Security of Oceania States in Great Power Competition (Warsaw University Press, 2023), Evolution on Demand: The Changing Roles of the U.S. Marine Corps in Twenty-first Century Conflicts and Beyond (Marine Corps University Press, 2025), and International Law and Security in Indo-Pacific: Strategic Design for the Region (Routledge, 2025). 
Stephen Satkiewicz is an independent scholar with research areas spanning Civilizational Sciences, Social Complexity, Big History, Historical Sociology, Military History, War Studies, International Relations, Geopolitics, and Russian and East European history. He is currently the Book Review Editor for Comparative Civilizations Review.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1666</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">f4f13dd0-2354-11f1-bd5f-a354bdaf50f2</guid>
      <title>Sidra Hamidi, &quot;After Fission: Recognition and Contestation in the Atomic Age&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Nuclear status is typically treated as a stable feature of a state's capacity to possess, use, or build nuclear weapons. Challenging this view,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009607155" rel="noopener noreferrer">After Fission: Recognition and Contestation in the Atomic Age</a>&nbsp;(Cambridge University Press, 2026) by Dr. Sidra Hamidi reveals how states contest their nuclear status in the atomic age. By examining the legal structure of the Non-Proliferation Treaty, technical ambiguities surrounding nuclear testing, and debates over rights and responsibilities in the global nuclear regime, Dr. Hamidi argues that a state's nuclear status is not simply a function of technical capability. Instead, states actively contest the way they want their nuclear status to be presented to the world, and powerful states like the US, either recognize or reject these formulations.</p>
<p>By analysing key diplomatic junctures in Indian, Israeli, Iranian, and North Korean nuclear history, this book presents a theory of when and how states contest their nuclear status which has key policy implications for negotiating with ostensible “rogues” such as Iran and North Korea.</p>
<p><br><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/sidra-hamidi-after-fission-recognition-and-contestation-in-the-atomic-age-cambridge-up-2026-P8HVIB68</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nuclear status is typically treated as a stable feature of a state's capacity to possess, use, or build nuclear weapons. Challenging this view,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009607155" rel="noopener noreferrer">After Fission: Recognition and Contestation in the Atomic Age</a>&nbsp;(Cambridge University Press, 2026) by Dr. Sidra Hamidi reveals how states contest their nuclear status in the atomic age. By examining the legal structure of the Non-Proliferation Treaty, technical ambiguities surrounding nuclear testing, and debates over rights and responsibilities in the global nuclear regime, Dr. Hamidi argues that a state's nuclear status is not simply a function of technical capability. Instead, states actively contest the way they want their nuclear status to be presented to the world, and powerful states like the US, either recognize or reject these formulations.</p>
<p>By analysing key diplomatic junctures in Indian, Israeli, Iranian, and North Korean nuclear history, this book presents a theory of when and how states contest their nuclear status which has key policy implications for negotiating with ostensible “rogues” such as Iran and North Korea.</p>
<p><br><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="50944411" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/7e2885aa-46cb-454f-8a6b-3ea651474935/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=7e2885aa-46cb-454f-8a6b-3ea651474935&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Sidra Hamidi, &quot;After Fission: Recognition and Contestation in the Atomic Age&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:53:00</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Nuclear status is typically treated as a stable feature of a state&apos;s capacity to possess, use, or build nuclear weapons. Challenging this view, After Fission: Recognition and Contestation in the Atomic Age (Cambridge University Press, 2026) by Dr. Sidra Hamidi reveals how states contest their nuclear status in the atomic age. By examining the legal structure of the Non-Proliferation Treaty, technical ambiguities surrounding nuclear testing, and debates over rights and responsibilities in the global nuclear regime, Dr. Hamidi argues that a state&apos;s nuclear status is not simply a function of technical capability. Instead, states actively contest the way they want their nuclear status to be presented to the world, and powerful states like the US, either recognize or reject these formulations.
By analysing key diplomatic junctures in Indian, Israeli, Iranian, and North Korean nuclear history, this book presents a theory of when and how states contest their nuclear status which has key policy implications for negotiating with ostensible “rogues” such as Iran and North Korea.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Nuclear status is typically treated as a stable feature of a state&apos;s capacity to possess, use, or build nuclear weapons. Challenging this view, After Fission: Recognition and Contestation in the Atomic Age (Cambridge University Press, 2026) by Dr. Sidra Hamidi reveals how states contest their nuclear status in the atomic age. By examining the legal structure of the Non-Proliferation Treaty, technical ambiguities surrounding nuclear testing, and debates over rights and responsibilities in the global nuclear regime, Dr. Hamidi argues that a state&apos;s nuclear status is not simply a function of technical capability. Instead, states actively contest the way they want their nuclear status to be presented to the world, and powerful states like the US, either recognize or reject these formulations.
By analysing key diplomatic junctures in Indian, Israeli, Iranian, and North Korean nuclear history, this book presents a theory of when and how states contest their nuclear status which has key policy implications for negotiating with ostensible “rogues” such as Iran and North Korea.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1663</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2a307098-2354-11f1-a198-9f3c00e29f28</guid>
      <title>Doug Crandell, &quot;Twenty-Two Cents an Hour: Disability Rights and the Fight to End Subminimum Wages&quot; (Cornell UP, 2022)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781501763588" rel="noopener noreferrer">Twenty-Two Cents an Hour:&nbsp;﻿﻿Disability Rights and the Fight to End Subminimum Wages</a><em>&nbsp;﻿</em>(Cornell UP, 2022),&nbsp;Doug Crandell uncovers the harsh reality of people with disabilities in the United States who are forced to work in unethical conditions for subminimum wages with little or no opportunity to advocate for themselves, while wealthy CEOs grow even wealthier as a direct result. As recently as 2016, the United States Congress enacted bipartisan legislation which continued to allow workers with disabilities to legally be paid far lower than the federal minimum wage. Drawing on ongoing federal Department of Justice lawsuits, the horrifying story of Henry's Turkey Farm in Iowa, and more, Crandell shows the history of the policies that have led to these unjust outcomes, examines who benefits from this legislation, and asks important questions about the rise of a disability industrial complex. Exposing this complex—which is rooted in profit, lobbying, and playing on the emotions of workers' parents and families, as well as the public—Crandell challenges readers to reexamine how we treat some of our most vulnerable fellow citizens. Twenty-Two Cents an Hour forces the reader to face the reality of this exploitation, and builds the framework needed for reform.</p>
<p>Doug Crandell is Public Service Faculty at the Institute on Human Development and Disability at the University of Georgia. For more than thirty years he has worked in disability advocacy, specifically the intersection of employment, economic justice, and much-needed systems change. Doug Crandell is the author of several book and novels, inlcuding most recently "They're Calling You Home."</p>
<p>My co-producer for this episode is Shea Tripp, a graduate student in the Department of Communication, Journalism and Public Relations at Oakland University.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/doug-crandell-twenty-two-cents-an-hour-disability-rights-and-the-fight-to-end-subminimum-wages-cornell-up-2022-nh5iOZIW</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781501763588" rel="noopener noreferrer">Twenty-Two Cents an Hour:&nbsp;﻿﻿Disability Rights and the Fight to End Subminimum Wages</a><em>&nbsp;﻿</em>(Cornell UP, 2022),&nbsp;Doug Crandell uncovers the harsh reality of people with disabilities in the United States who are forced to work in unethical conditions for subminimum wages with little or no opportunity to advocate for themselves, while wealthy CEOs grow even wealthier as a direct result. As recently as 2016, the United States Congress enacted bipartisan legislation which continued to allow workers with disabilities to legally be paid far lower than the federal minimum wage. Drawing on ongoing federal Department of Justice lawsuits, the horrifying story of Henry's Turkey Farm in Iowa, and more, Crandell shows the history of the policies that have led to these unjust outcomes, examines who benefits from this legislation, and asks important questions about the rise of a disability industrial complex. Exposing this complex—which is rooted in profit, lobbying, and playing on the emotions of workers' parents and families, as well as the public—Crandell challenges readers to reexamine how we treat some of our most vulnerable fellow citizens. Twenty-Two Cents an Hour forces the reader to face the reality of this exploitation, and builds the framework needed for reform.</p>
<p>Doug Crandell is Public Service Faculty at the Institute on Human Development and Disability at the University of Georgia. For more than thirty years he has worked in disability advocacy, specifically the intersection of employment, economic justice, and much-needed systems change. Doug Crandell is the author of several book and novels, inlcuding most recently "They're Calling You Home."</p>
<p>My co-producer for this episode is Shea Tripp, a graduate student in the Department of Communication, Journalism and Public Relations at Oakland University.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="57137360" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/a54e456d-dd21-4145-bcad-b90b9eeab6b8/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=a54e456d-dd21-4145-bcad-b90b9eeab6b8&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Doug Crandell, &quot;Twenty-Two Cents an Hour: Disability Rights and the Fight to End Subminimum Wages&quot; (Cornell UP, 2022)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:59:25</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In Twenty-Two Cents an Hour: ﻿﻿Disability Rights and the Fight to End Subminimum Wages ﻿(Cornell UP, 2022), Doug Crandell uncovers the harsh reality of people with disabilities in the United States who are forced to work in unethical conditions for subminimum wages with little or no opportunity to advocate for themselves, while wealthy CEOs grow even wealthier as a direct result. As recently as 2016, the United States Congress enacted bipartisan legislation which continued to allow workers with disabilities to legally be paid far lower than the federal minimum wage. Drawing on ongoing federal Department of Justice lawsuits, the horrifying story of Henry&apos;s Turkey Farm in Iowa, and more, Crandell shows the history of the policies that have led to these unjust outcomes, examines who benefits from this legislation, and asks important questions about the rise of a disability industrial complex. Exposing this complex—which is rooted in profit, lobbying, and playing on the emotions of workers&apos; parents and families, as well as the public—Crandell challenges readers to reexamine how we treat some of our most vulnerable fellow citizens. Twenty-Two Cents an Hour forces the reader to face the reality of this exploitation, and builds the framework needed for reform.
Doug Crandell is Public Service Faculty at the Institute on Human Development and Disability at the University of Georgia. For more than thirty years he has worked in disability advocacy, specifically the intersection of employment, economic justice, and much-needed systems change. Doug Crandell is the author of several book and novels, inlcuding most recently &quot;They&apos;re Calling You Home.&quot;
My co-producer for this episode is Shea Tripp, a graduate student in the Department of Communication, Journalism and Public Relations at Oakland University.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In Twenty-Two Cents an Hour: ﻿﻿Disability Rights and the Fight to End Subminimum Wages ﻿(Cornell UP, 2022), Doug Crandell uncovers the harsh reality of people with disabilities in the United States who are forced to work in unethical conditions for subminimum wages with little or no opportunity to advocate for themselves, while wealthy CEOs grow even wealthier as a direct result. As recently as 2016, the United States Congress enacted bipartisan legislation which continued to allow workers with disabilities to legally be paid far lower than the federal minimum wage. Drawing on ongoing federal Department of Justice lawsuits, the horrifying story of Henry&apos;s Turkey Farm in Iowa, and more, Crandell shows the history of the policies that have led to these unjust outcomes, examines who benefits from this legislation, and asks important questions about the rise of a disability industrial complex. Exposing this complex—which is rooted in profit, lobbying, and playing on the emotions of workers&apos; parents and families, as well as the public—Crandell challenges readers to reexamine how we treat some of our most vulnerable fellow citizens. Twenty-Two Cents an Hour forces the reader to face the reality of this exploitation, and builds the framework needed for reform.
Doug Crandell is Public Service Faculty at the Institute on Human Development and Disability at the University of Georgia. For more than thirty years he has worked in disability advocacy, specifically the intersection of employment, economic justice, and much-needed systems change. Doug Crandell is the author of several book and novels, inlcuding most recently &quot;They&apos;re Calling You Home.&quot;
My co-producer for this episode is Shea Tripp, a graduate student in the Department of Communication, Journalism and Public Relations at Oakland University.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1664</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">d374026c-22a2-11f1-92b7-0b6e9121ea46</guid>
      <title>Maria A. Sanchez, &quot;Deference and Divergence in Regional Human Rights Courts&quot; (Cornell UP, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781501785511" rel="noopener noreferrer">Deference and Divergence in Regional Human Rights Courts</a>&nbsp;(Cornell UP, 2026), Dr. Maria A. Sanchez tackles a central tension in global governance: how international human rights courts balance their mandates with the imperative to respect national sovereignty. Despite having similar mandates, the world's three regional human rights courts—the European Court of Human Rights, the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, and the African Court on Human and Peoples' Rights—interpret their authority differently, leading to uneven regional enforcement of global human rights principles.</p>
<p>Dr. Sanchez traces how the geopolitical dynamics of each court's founding moments have manifested in contemporary disparities across the courts' jurisprudences—focusing on disputes involving freedom of expression, personal integrity rights, and LGBTQ+ rights. Her findings expose a paradox: the courts that were founded in the most inhospitable environments for human rights have ended up asserting the most expansive authority over governments.</p>
<p>Deeply researched and insightful,&nbsp;<em>Deference and Divergence in Regional Human Rights Courts</em>&nbsp;speaks to when and how international institutions can leverage authority to intervene in domestic affairs.</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/maria-a-sanchez-deference-and-divergence-in-regional-human-rights-courts-cornell-up-2026-UsQ1apOa</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781501785511" rel="noopener noreferrer">Deference and Divergence in Regional Human Rights Courts</a>&nbsp;(Cornell UP, 2026), Dr. Maria A. Sanchez tackles a central tension in global governance: how international human rights courts balance their mandates with the imperative to respect national sovereignty. Despite having similar mandates, the world's three regional human rights courts—the European Court of Human Rights, the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, and the African Court on Human and Peoples' Rights—interpret their authority differently, leading to uneven regional enforcement of global human rights principles.</p>
<p>Dr. Sanchez traces how the geopolitical dynamics of each court's founding moments have manifested in contemporary disparities across the courts' jurisprudences—focusing on disputes involving freedom of expression, personal integrity rights, and LGBTQ+ rights. Her findings expose a paradox: the courts that were founded in the most inhospitable environments for human rights have ended up asserting the most expansive authority over governments.</p>
<p>Deeply researched and insightful,&nbsp;<em>Deference and Divergence in Regional Human Rights Courts</em>&nbsp;speaks to when and how international institutions can leverage authority to intervene in domestic affairs.</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="46274402" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/de10dfd5-3b07-4c31-aa5c-b210010c356d/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=de10dfd5-3b07-4c31-aa5c-b210010c356d&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Maria A. Sanchez, &quot;Deference and Divergence in Regional Human Rights Courts&quot; (Cornell UP, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:48:07</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In Deference and Divergence in Regional Human Rights Courts (Cornell UP, 2026), Dr. Maria A. Sanchez tackles a central tension in global governance: how international human rights courts balance their mandates with the imperative to respect national sovereignty. Despite having similar mandates, the world&apos;s three regional human rights courts—the European Court of Human Rights, the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, and the African Court on Human and Peoples&apos; Rights—interpret their authority differently, leading to uneven regional enforcement of global human rights principles.
Dr. Sanchez traces how the geopolitical dynamics of each court&apos;s founding moments have manifested in contemporary disparities across the courts&apos; jurisprudences—focusing on disputes involving freedom of expression, personal integrity rights, and LGBTQ+ rights. Her findings expose a paradox: the courts that were founded in the most inhospitable environments for human rights have ended up asserting the most expansive authority over governments.
Deeply researched and insightful, Deference and Divergence in Regional Human Rights Courts speaks to when and how international institutions can leverage authority to intervene in domestic affairs.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In Deference and Divergence in Regional Human Rights Courts (Cornell UP, 2026), Dr. Maria A. Sanchez tackles a central tension in global governance: how international human rights courts balance their mandates with the imperative to respect national sovereignty. Despite having similar mandates, the world&apos;s three regional human rights courts—the European Court of Human Rights, the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, and the African Court on Human and Peoples&apos; Rights—interpret their authority differently, leading to uneven regional enforcement of global human rights principles.
Dr. Sanchez traces how the geopolitical dynamics of each court&apos;s founding moments have manifested in contemporary disparities across the courts&apos; jurisprudences—focusing on disputes involving freedom of expression, personal integrity rights, and LGBTQ+ rights. Her findings expose a paradox: the courts that were founded in the most inhospitable environments for human rights have ended up asserting the most expansive authority over governments.
Deeply researched and insightful, Deference and Divergence in Regional Human Rights Courts speaks to when and how international institutions can leverage authority to intervene in domestic affairs.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1662</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ba8564ac-210e-11f1-88b2-3b4c9edf72be</guid>
      <title>Alex Powell, &quot;Queering UK Refugee Law: Sexual Diversity and Asylum Administration&quot; (Bristol UP, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Utilizing&nbsp;critical legal methodologies,&nbsp;Alex Powell's&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781529242577" rel="noopener noreferrer">Queering UK Refugee Law: Sexual Diversity and Asylum Administration</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Bristol UP, 2026) gives a vital and needed analysis of migration and queer life. With deep consideration to the role of systemic disbelief, experiences of dispersal away from urban areas,&nbsp;contemporary shifts in liberal human rights regimes, and even&nbsp;the impact on legal practitioners in the system,&nbsp;<em>Queering UK Refugee Law&nbsp;</em>offers insight into both refugee policy and practice.&nbsp;</p>
<p>Through interviews,&nbsp;analyses of case law, and&nbsp;a rigorous application of&nbsp;queer theory, Powell gives readers an understanding of not just UK asylum law, but the bureaucracies, policies, and assumptions that shape it. From narratives to state understandings of 'credibility,' Powell demonstrates not just barriers to asylum claims on the basis of sexuality, but broader concerns around normative state conceptions of identity.&nbsp;<em>Queering UK Refugee Law</em>&nbsp;is a timely and critical work on sexuality, migration, and its intersections.<br></p>
<p><a href="https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/law/people/alex-powell/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Alex Powell</a>&nbsp;is an Associate Professor in Law at Warwick Law School. His research focuses on&nbsp;law, gender, sexuality and migration, particularly in the UK.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.rinevieth.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><br>Rine Vieth</a>&nbsp;is an FRQ Postdoctoral Fellow at Université Laval. They are currently studying how anti-gender mobilization shapes migration policy, particularly in regards to asylum determinations in the UK and Canada.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/alex-powell-queering-uk-refugee-law-sexual-diversity-and-asylum-administration-bristol-up-2026-_hH0hTR2</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Utilizing&nbsp;critical legal methodologies,&nbsp;Alex Powell's&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781529242577" rel="noopener noreferrer">Queering UK Refugee Law: Sexual Diversity and Asylum Administration</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Bristol UP, 2026) gives a vital and needed analysis of migration and queer life. With deep consideration to the role of systemic disbelief, experiences of dispersal away from urban areas,&nbsp;contemporary shifts in liberal human rights regimes, and even&nbsp;the impact on legal practitioners in the system,&nbsp;<em>Queering UK Refugee Law&nbsp;</em>offers insight into both refugee policy and practice.&nbsp;</p>
<p>Through interviews,&nbsp;analyses of case law, and&nbsp;a rigorous application of&nbsp;queer theory, Powell gives readers an understanding of not just UK asylum law, but the bureaucracies, policies, and assumptions that shape it. From narratives to state understandings of 'credibility,' Powell demonstrates not just barriers to asylum claims on the basis of sexuality, but broader concerns around normative state conceptions of identity.&nbsp;<em>Queering UK Refugee Law</em>&nbsp;is a timely and critical work on sexuality, migration, and its intersections.<br></p>
<p><a href="https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/law/people/alex-powell/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Alex Powell</a>&nbsp;is an Associate Professor in Law at Warwick Law School. His research focuses on&nbsp;law, gender, sexuality and migration, particularly in the UK.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.rinevieth.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><br>Rine Vieth</a>&nbsp;is an FRQ Postdoctoral Fellow at Université Laval. They are currently studying how anti-gender mobilization shapes migration policy, particularly in regards to asylum determinations in the UK and Canada.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="54141782" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/80add4f1-3f4e-4b6a-bfe5-070790b2a050/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=80add4f1-3f4e-4b6a-bfe5-070790b2a050&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Alex Powell, &quot;Queering UK Refugee Law: Sexual Diversity and Asylum Administration&quot; (Bristol UP, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:56:19</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Utilizing critical legal methodologies, Alex Powell&apos;s Queering UK Refugee Law: Sexual Diversity and Asylum Administration (Bristol UP, 2026) gives a vital and needed analysis of migration and queer life. With deep consideration to the role of systemic disbelief, experiences of dispersal away from urban areas, contemporary shifts in liberal human rights regimes, and even the impact on legal practitioners in the system, Queering UK Refugee Law offers insight into both refugee policy and practice. 
Through interviews, analyses of case law, and a rigorous application of queer theory, Powell gives readers an understanding of not just UK asylum law, but the bureaucracies, policies, and assumptions that shape it. From narratives to state understandings of &apos;credibility,&apos; Powell demonstrates not just barriers to asylum claims on the basis of sexuality, but broader concerns around normative state conceptions of identity. Queering UK Refugee Law is a timely and critical work on sexuality, migration, and its intersections.
Alex Powell is an Associate Professor in Law at Warwick Law School. His research focuses on law, gender, sexuality and migration, particularly in the UK.
Rine Vieth is an FRQ Postdoctoral Fellow at Université Laval. They are currently studying how anti-gender mobilization shapes migration policy, particularly in regards to asylum determinations in the UK and Canada.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Utilizing critical legal methodologies, Alex Powell&apos;s Queering UK Refugee Law: Sexual Diversity and Asylum Administration (Bristol UP, 2026) gives a vital and needed analysis of migration and queer life. With deep consideration to the role of systemic disbelief, experiences of dispersal away from urban areas, contemporary shifts in liberal human rights regimes, and even the impact on legal practitioners in the system, Queering UK Refugee Law offers insight into both refugee policy and practice. 
Through interviews, analyses of case law, and a rigorous application of queer theory, Powell gives readers an understanding of not just UK asylum law, but the bureaucracies, policies, and assumptions that shape it. From narratives to state understandings of &apos;credibility,&apos; Powell demonstrates not just barriers to asylum claims on the basis of sexuality, but broader concerns around normative state conceptions of identity. Queering UK Refugee Law is a timely and critical work on sexuality, migration, and its intersections.
Alex Powell is an Associate Professor in Law at Warwick Law School. His research focuses on law, gender, sexuality and migration, particularly in the UK.
Rine Vieth is an FRQ Postdoctoral Fellow at Université Laval. They are currently studying how anti-gender mobilization shapes migration policy, particularly in regards to asylum determinations in the UK and Canada.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1660</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">b82d8c26-2108-11f1-b06b-533d1c62c3d5</guid>
      <title>Christopher Munn, &quot;Penalties of Empire: Capital Trials in Colonial Hong Kong&quot; (Hong Kong UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Who bore the burdens of empire?&nbsp;<br></p>
<p>Christopher Munn's&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9789888876884" rel="noopener noreferrer">Penalties of Empire: Capital Trials in Colonial Hong Kong</a>&nbsp;﻿(Hong Kong UP, 2025)&nbsp;explores how judges, juries, and lawyers strove to deliver justice during the 150 years when the death penalty was in force in Hong Kong. Nine main chapters focus on key capital trials in the first century of British rule. Among the cases are piracies, assassinations, and crimes of passion and desperation. These chapters describe the proceedings in court and the participants involved. They also explore the debates surrounding each case and the exercise or denial of mercy by governors. Two final chapters discuss the decline of the death penalty after World War II, its suspension after 1966, and the controversies leading to its formal abolition in 1993.&nbsp;<em>Penalties of Empire</em>&nbsp;traces the evolution of criminal justice at its highest levels. It also offers a prism for understanding some of the broader forces at work in Hong Kong’s history.</p>
<p>Christopher Munn&nbsp;<em>s</em>erved as an administrative officer in the Hong Kong Government and in various positions in the Hong Kong Monetary Authority. His publications include&nbsp;<em>Anglo-China: Chinese People and British Rule in Hong Kong, 1841–1880</em>&nbsp;and (with May Holdsworth)&nbsp;<em>Crime, Justice and Punishment in Colonial Hong Kong</em>.</p>
<p>Lucas Tse is Examination Fellow at All Souls College, Oxford.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/christopher-munn-penalties-of-empire-capital-trials-in-colonial-hong-kong-hong-kong-up-2025-QEeisi4b</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who bore the burdens of empire?&nbsp;<br></p>
<p>Christopher Munn's&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9789888876884" rel="noopener noreferrer">Penalties of Empire: Capital Trials in Colonial Hong Kong</a>&nbsp;﻿(Hong Kong UP, 2025)&nbsp;explores how judges, juries, and lawyers strove to deliver justice during the 150 years when the death penalty was in force in Hong Kong. Nine main chapters focus on key capital trials in the first century of British rule. Among the cases are piracies, assassinations, and crimes of passion and desperation. These chapters describe the proceedings in court and the participants involved. They also explore the debates surrounding each case and the exercise or denial of mercy by governors. Two final chapters discuss the decline of the death penalty after World War II, its suspension after 1966, and the controversies leading to its formal abolition in 1993.&nbsp;<em>Penalties of Empire</em>&nbsp;traces the evolution of criminal justice at its highest levels. It also offers a prism for understanding some of the broader forces at work in Hong Kong’s history.</p>
<p>Christopher Munn&nbsp;<em>s</em>erved as an administrative officer in the Hong Kong Government and in various positions in the Hong Kong Monetary Authority. His publications include&nbsp;<em>Anglo-China: Chinese People and British Rule in Hong Kong, 1841–1880</em>&nbsp;and (with May Holdsworth)&nbsp;<em>Crime, Justice and Punishment in Colonial Hong Kong</em>.</p>
<p>Lucas Tse is Examination Fellow at All Souls College, Oxford.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="70041606" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/9b2f3f57-9efe-4198-96b1-bbd8ea08510b/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=9b2f3f57-9efe-4198-96b1-bbd8ea08510b&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Christopher Munn, &quot;Penalties of Empire: Capital Trials in Colonial Hong Kong&quot; (Hong Kong UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:12:54</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Who bore the burdens of empire? 
Christopher Munn&apos;s Penalties of Empire: Capital Trials in Colonial Hong Kong ﻿(Hong Kong UP, 2025) explores how judges, juries, and lawyers strove to deliver justice during the 150 years when the death penalty was in force in Hong Kong. Nine main chapters focus on key capital trials in the first century of British rule. Among the cases are piracies, assassinations, and crimes of passion and desperation. These chapters describe the proceedings in court and the participants involved. They also explore the debates surrounding each case and the exercise or denial of mercy by governors. Two final chapters discuss the decline of the death penalty after World War II, its suspension after 1966, and the controversies leading to its formal abolition in 1993. Penalties of Empire traces the evolution of criminal justice at its highest levels. It also offers a prism for understanding some of the broader forces at work in Hong Kong’s history.
Christopher Munn served as an administrative officer in the Hong Kong Government and in various positions in the Hong Kong Monetary Authority. His publications include Anglo-China: Chinese People and British Rule in Hong Kong, 1841–1880 and (with May Holdsworth) Crime, Justice and Punishment in Colonial Hong Kong.
Lucas Tse is Examination Fellow at All Souls College, Oxford.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Who bore the burdens of empire? 
Christopher Munn&apos;s Penalties of Empire: Capital Trials in Colonial Hong Kong ﻿(Hong Kong UP, 2025) explores how judges, juries, and lawyers strove to deliver justice during the 150 years when the death penalty was in force in Hong Kong. Nine main chapters focus on key capital trials in the first century of British rule. Among the cases are piracies, assassinations, and crimes of passion and desperation. These chapters describe the proceedings in court and the participants involved. They also explore the debates surrounding each case and the exercise or denial of mercy by governors. Two final chapters discuss the decline of the death penalty after World War II, its suspension after 1966, and the controversies leading to its formal abolition in 1993. Penalties of Empire traces the evolution of criminal justice at its highest levels. It also offers a prism for understanding some of the broader forces at work in Hong Kong’s history.
Christopher Munn served as an administrative officer in the Hong Kong Government and in various positions in the Hong Kong Monetary Authority. His publications include Anglo-China: Chinese People and British Rule in Hong Kong, 1841–1880 and (with May Holdsworth) Crime, Justice and Punishment in Colonial Hong Kong.
Lucas Tse is Examination Fellow at All Souls College, Oxford.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1661</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">a46f6bf4-1b9b-11f1-ab81-cf6e343a0740</guid>
      <title>Michelle Adams, &quot;The Containment: Detroit, the Supreme Court, and the Battle for Racial Justice in the North&quot; (FSG Press, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In 1974, the Supreme Court issued a momentous decision: In the case of Milliken v. Bradley, the justices brought a halt to school desegregation across the North, and to the civil rights movement’s struggle for a truly equal education for all. How did this come about, and why?</p>
<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780374250423" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Containment: Detroit, the Supreme Court, and the Battle for Racial Justice in the North</a><em>&nbsp;</em>﻿﻿(FSG Press, 2025), the esteemed legal scholar Michelle Adams tells the epic story of the struggle to integrate Detroit schools—and what happened when it collided with Nixon-appointed justices committed to a judicial counterrevolution. Adams chronicles the devoted activists who tried to uplift Detroit's students amid the upheavals of riots, Black power, and white flight—and how their efforts led to federal judge Stephen Roth’s landmark order to achieve racial balance by tearing down the walls separating the city and its suburbs. The “metropolitan remedy” could have remade the landscape of racial justice. Instead, the Supreme Court ruled that the suburbs could not be a part of the effort to integrate—and thus upheld the inequalities that remain in place today.</p>
<p>Adams tells this story via compelling portraits of a city under stress and of key figures—including Detroit’s first Black mayor, Coleman Young, and Justices Marshall, Rehnquist, and Powell. The result is a legal and historical drama that exposes the roots of today’s backlash against affirmative action and other efforts to fulfill the country’s promise.</p>
<p><br></p>
<p>Guest: Michelle Adams is the Henry M. Butzel Professor of Law at the University of Michigan. The former codirector of the Floersheimer Center for Constitutional Democracy at the Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law, she served on the Biden administration’s Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court of the United States and as an expert commentator on the Netflix series Amend: The Fight for America and the Showtime series Deadlocked: How America Shaped the Supreme Court. Her writing has appeared in The New Yorker, The Yale Law Journal, California Law Review, and other publications. She was born and grew up in Detroit.</p>
<p>Host:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.michaelstauch.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Michael Stauch</a>&nbsp;is an associate professor of history at the University of Toledo and the author of&nbsp;<a href="https://www.pennpress.org/9781512827996/wildcat-of-the-streets/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Wildcat of the Streets: Detroit in the Age of Community Policing</em></a>, published by the University of Pennsylvania Press in 2025.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/michelle-adams-the-containment-detroit-the-supreme-court-and-the-battle-for-racial-justice-in-the-north-fsg-press-2025-vCv4cN66</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In 1974, the Supreme Court issued a momentous decision: In the case of Milliken v. Bradley, the justices brought a halt to school desegregation across the North, and to the civil rights movement’s struggle for a truly equal education for all. How did this come about, and why?</p>
<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780374250423" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Containment: Detroit, the Supreme Court, and the Battle for Racial Justice in the North</a><em>&nbsp;</em>﻿﻿(FSG Press, 2025), the esteemed legal scholar Michelle Adams tells the epic story of the struggle to integrate Detroit schools—and what happened when it collided with Nixon-appointed justices committed to a judicial counterrevolution. Adams chronicles the devoted activists who tried to uplift Detroit's students amid the upheavals of riots, Black power, and white flight—and how their efforts led to federal judge Stephen Roth’s landmark order to achieve racial balance by tearing down the walls separating the city and its suburbs. The “metropolitan remedy” could have remade the landscape of racial justice. Instead, the Supreme Court ruled that the suburbs could not be a part of the effort to integrate—and thus upheld the inequalities that remain in place today.</p>
<p>Adams tells this story via compelling portraits of a city under stress and of key figures—including Detroit’s first Black mayor, Coleman Young, and Justices Marshall, Rehnquist, and Powell. The result is a legal and historical drama that exposes the roots of today’s backlash against affirmative action and other efforts to fulfill the country’s promise.</p>
<p><br></p>
<p>Guest: Michelle Adams is the Henry M. Butzel Professor of Law at the University of Michigan. The former codirector of the Floersheimer Center for Constitutional Democracy at the Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law, she served on the Biden administration’s Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court of the United States and as an expert commentator on the Netflix series Amend: The Fight for America and the Showtime series Deadlocked: How America Shaped the Supreme Court. Her writing has appeared in The New Yorker, The Yale Law Journal, California Law Review, and other publications. She was born and grew up in Detroit.</p>
<p>Host:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.michaelstauch.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Michael Stauch</a>&nbsp;is an associate professor of history at the University of Toledo and the author of&nbsp;<a href="https://www.pennpress.org/9781512827996/wildcat-of-the-streets/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Wildcat of the Streets: Detroit in the Age of Community Policing</em></a>, published by the University of Pennsylvania Press in 2025.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="36697546" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/1d97b076-6a49-4d42-ac30-0acf717dbde4/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=1d97b076-6a49-4d42-ac30-0acf717dbde4&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Michelle Adams, &quot;The Containment: Detroit, the Supreme Court, and the Battle for Racial Justice in the North&quot; (FSG Press, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:38:10</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In 1974, the Supreme Court issued a momentous decision: In the case of Milliken v. Bradley, the justices brought a halt to school desegregation across the North, and to the civil rights movement’s struggle for a truly equal education for all. How did this come about, and why?
In The Containment: Detroit, the Supreme Court, and the Battle for Racial Justice in the North ﻿﻿(FSG Press, 2025), the esteemed legal scholar Michelle Adams tells the epic story of the struggle to integrate Detroit schools—and what happened when it collided with Nixon-appointed justices committed to a judicial counterrevolution. Adams chronicles the devoted activists who tried to uplift Detroit&apos;s students amid the upheavals of riots, Black power, and white flight—and how their efforts led to federal judge Stephen Roth’s landmark order to achieve racial balance by tearing down the walls separating the city and its suburbs. The “metropolitan remedy” could have remade the landscape of racial justice. Instead, the Supreme Court ruled that the suburbs could not be a part of the effort to integrate—and thus upheld the inequalities that remain in place today.
Adams tells this story via compelling portraits of a city under stress and of key figures—including Detroit’s first Black mayor, Coleman Young, and Justices Marshall, Rehnquist, and Powell. The result is a legal and historical drama that exposes the roots of today’s backlash against affirmative action and other efforts to fulfill the country’s promise.
Guest: Michelle Adams is the Henry M. Butzel Professor of Law at the University of Michigan. The former codirector of the Floersheimer Center for Constitutional Democracy at the Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law, she served on the Biden administration’s Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court of the United States and as an expert commentator on the Netflix series Amend: The Fight for America and the Showtime series Deadlocked: How America Shaped the Supreme Court. Her writing has appeared in The New Yorker, The Yale Law Journal, California Law Review, and other publications. She was born and grew up in Detroit.
Host: Michael Stauch is an associate professor of history at the University of Toledo and the author of Wildcat of the Streets: Detroit in the Age of Community Policing, published by the University of Pennsylvania Press in 2025.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In 1974, the Supreme Court issued a momentous decision: In the case of Milliken v. Bradley, the justices brought a halt to school desegregation across the North, and to the civil rights movement’s struggle for a truly equal education for all. How did this come about, and why?
In The Containment: Detroit, the Supreme Court, and the Battle for Racial Justice in the North ﻿﻿(FSG Press, 2025), the esteemed legal scholar Michelle Adams tells the epic story of the struggle to integrate Detroit schools—and what happened when it collided with Nixon-appointed justices committed to a judicial counterrevolution. Adams chronicles the devoted activists who tried to uplift Detroit&apos;s students amid the upheavals of riots, Black power, and white flight—and how their efforts led to federal judge Stephen Roth’s landmark order to achieve racial balance by tearing down the walls separating the city and its suburbs. The “metropolitan remedy” could have remade the landscape of racial justice. Instead, the Supreme Court ruled that the suburbs could not be a part of the effort to integrate—and thus upheld the inequalities that remain in place today.
Adams tells this story via compelling portraits of a city under stress and of key figures—including Detroit’s first Black mayor, Coleman Young, and Justices Marshall, Rehnquist, and Powell. The result is a legal and historical drama that exposes the roots of today’s backlash against affirmative action and other efforts to fulfill the country’s promise.
Guest: Michelle Adams is the Henry M. Butzel Professor of Law at the University of Michigan. The former codirector of the Floersheimer Center for Constitutional Democracy at the Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law, she served on the Biden administration’s Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court of the United States and as an expert commentator on the Netflix series Amend: The Fight for America and the Showtime series Deadlocked: How America Shaped the Supreme Court. Her writing has appeared in The New Yorker, The Yale Law Journal, California Law Review, and other publications. She was born and grew up in Detroit.
Host: Michael Stauch is an associate professor of history at the University of Toledo and the author of Wildcat of the Streets: Detroit in the Age of Community Policing, published by the University of Pennsylvania Press in 2025.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1659</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">514b7b5c-1920-11f1-b726-c79a82a537ec</guid>
      <title>Maud Anne Bracke, &quot;Reproductive Rights in Modern France: Reproductive Rights in Modern France: Feminism, Contraception, and Abortion, 1950-1980 (Oxford UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The introduction of the principle of women's reproductive liberty in France, tentatively by the family planning movement after 1960 and explicitly by the women's liberation movement after 1970, marked a deep shift, transforming public discourses. Yet this principle remained fiercely contested, and moderate and conservative actors responded by foregrounding notions of 'reproductive responsibility', or the expectation that individuals perform the 'right' sexual and family-making behaviour, benefiting not only themselves and their families, but the nation at large. Such responsibilisation underpinned the legal reforms of the 1960s-70s, framing a notion of reproductive citizenship based on a tension between individual rights and social norms.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780198938880" rel="noopener noreferrer">Reproductive Rights in Modern France:&nbsp;Feminism, Contraception, and Abortion, 1950-1980</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Oxford UP, 2025)&nbsp;breaks new ground by taking an intersectional approach to the defining moments of this period: the legalisation of contraception (the laws of 1967 and 1974) and the liberalisation of abortion (1975, 1979). Drawing on a wide range of sources and actors - including feminist and family planning movements, government actors, demographers, medical-professional organisations, disability rights groups, and key actors in the overseas departments - Maud Bracke demonstrates how the discourse of responsibilisation allowed actors to distinguish between citizens 'worthy' of reproductive rights and those seen as less worthy. Bracke analyses the distinct regulations regarding contraception in the overseas departments of Guadeloupe and Martinique, framed by racialised anti-natalism. The book also demonstrates that disability rights organisations contributed to the discrediting of the notion of 'eugenic abortion', used among experts and policy-makers until the early 1970s. Furthermore, Bracke goes on to highlight the silence in the feminist movement around both disability rights and race as part of its universalisation of women's conditions of oppression, and analyses the emergence of Black Feminism in late-1970s France. In so doing, the book offers a major contribution to the history of sex, gender, family life, healthcare, demography, and political debate in post-war France, and more generally.</p>
<p>Guest&nbsp;Dr. Maud Bracke is Professor of Modern European History at the University of Glasgow, and is also the author of&nbsp;<em>Which Socialism? Whose Detente? West European Communism and the Czechoslovak Crisis of 1968</em>&nbsp;in 2007 and&nbsp;<em>Women and the Reinvention of the Political: Feminism in Italy (1968-1983)&nbsp;</em>in 2014, as well as the co-editor of<em>&nbsp;Translating Feminism: Interdisciplinary Approaches to Text, Place and Agency</em>&nbsp;in 2021. In addition to authoring numerous journal articles and book chapters and co-editing several special issues of academic journalsb she is also an editor at the&nbsp;<em>Journal of Modern European History</em>&nbsp;and sits on various other editorial boards.&nbsp;</p>
<p>Host Gina Stamm is Associate Professor of French at The University of Alabama, with research concentrated on the environmental humanities and speculative literatures of the 20th and 21st centuries, from Surrealism to contemporary science fiction and feminist utopias, in Metropolitan France and the francophone Caribbean, with a book manuscript in progress on posthumanist ecological engagement in the surrealist movement.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 9 Mar 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/maud-anne-bracke-reproductive-rights-in-modern-france-reproductive-rights-in-modern-france-feminism-contraception-and-abortion-1950-1980-oxford-up-2025-ohP75eha</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The introduction of the principle of women's reproductive liberty in France, tentatively by the family planning movement after 1960 and explicitly by the women's liberation movement after 1970, marked a deep shift, transforming public discourses. Yet this principle remained fiercely contested, and moderate and conservative actors responded by foregrounding notions of 'reproductive responsibility', or the expectation that individuals perform the 'right' sexual and family-making behaviour, benefiting not only themselves and their families, but the nation at large. Such responsibilisation underpinned the legal reforms of the 1960s-70s, framing a notion of reproductive citizenship based on a tension between individual rights and social norms.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780198938880" rel="noopener noreferrer">Reproductive Rights in Modern France:&nbsp;Feminism, Contraception, and Abortion, 1950-1980</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Oxford UP, 2025)&nbsp;breaks new ground by taking an intersectional approach to the defining moments of this period: the legalisation of contraception (the laws of 1967 and 1974) and the liberalisation of abortion (1975, 1979). Drawing on a wide range of sources and actors - including feminist and family planning movements, government actors, demographers, medical-professional organisations, disability rights groups, and key actors in the overseas departments - Maud Bracke demonstrates how the discourse of responsibilisation allowed actors to distinguish between citizens 'worthy' of reproductive rights and those seen as less worthy. Bracke analyses the distinct regulations regarding contraception in the overseas departments of Guadeloupe and Martinique, framed by racialised anti-natalism. The book also demonstrates that disability rights organisations contributed to the discrediting of the notion of 'eugenic abortion', used among experts and policy-makers until the early 1970s. Furthermore, Bracke goes on to highlight the silence in the feminist movement around both disability rights and race as part of its universalisation of women's conditions of oppression, and analyses the emergence of Black Feminism in late-1970s France. In so doing, the book offers a major contribution to the history of sex, gender, family life, healthcare, demography, and political debate in post-war France, and more generally.</p>
<p>Guest&nbsp;Dr. Maud Bracke is Professor of Modern European History at the University of Glasgow, and is also the author of&nbsp;<em>Which Socialism? Whose Detente? West European Communism and the Czechoslovak Crisis of 1968</em>&nbsp;in 2007 and&nbsp;<em>Women and the Reinvention of the Political: Feminism in Italy (1968-1983)&nbsp;</em>in 2014, as well as the co-editor of<em>&nbsp;Translating Feminism: Interdisciplinary Approaches to Text, Place and Agency</em>&nbsp;in 2021. In addition to authoring numerous journal articles and book chapters and co-editing several special issues of academic journalsb she is also an editor at the&nbsp;<em>Journal of Modern European History</em>&nbsp;and sits on various other editorial boards.&nbsp;</p>
<p>Host Gina Stamm is Associate Professor of French at The University of Alabama, with research concentrated on the environmental humanities and speculative literatures of the 20th and 21st centuries, from Surrealism to contemporary science fiction and feminist utopias, in Metropolitan France and the francophone Caribbean, with a book manuscript in progress on posthumanist ecological engagement in the surrealist movement.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="69445790" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/eec8d83c-b507-41e3-a895-84dd8ece0450/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=eec8d83c-b507-41e3-a895-84dd8ece0450&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Maud Anne Bracke, &quot;Reproductive Rights in Modern France: Reproductive Rights in Modern France: Feminism, Contraception, and Abortion, 1950-1980 (Oxford UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:12:17</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The introduction of the principle of women&apos;s reproductive liberty in France, tentatively by the family planning movement after 1960 and explicitly by the women&apos;s liberation movement after 1970, marked a deep shift, transforming public discourses. Yet this principle remained fiercely contested, and moderate and conservative actors responded by foregrounding notions of &apos;reproductive responsibility&apos;, or the expectation that individuals perform the &apos;right&apos; sexual and family-making behaviour, benefiting not only themselves and their families, but the nation at large. Such responsibilisation underpinned the legal reforms of the 1960s-70s, framing a notion of reproductive citizenship based on a tension between individual rights and social norms. Reproductive Rights in Modern France: Feminism, Contraception, and Abortion, 1950-1980 (Oxford UP, 2025) breaks new ground by taking an intersectional approach to the defining moments of this period: the legalisation of contraception (the laws of 1967 and 1974) and the liberalisation of abortion (1975, 1979). Drawing on a wide range of sources and actors - including feminist and family planning movements, government actors, demographers, medical-professional organisations, disability rights groups, and key actors in the overseas departments - Maud Bracke demonstrates how the discourse of responsibilisation allowed actors to distinguish between citizens &apos;worthy&apos; of reproductive rights and those seen as less worthy. Bracke analyses the distinct regulations regarding contraception in the overseas departments of Guadeloupe and Martinique, framed by racialised anti-natalism. The book also demonstrates that disability rights organisations contributed to the discrediting of the notion of &apos;eugenic abortion&apos;, used among experts and policy-makers until the early 1970s. Furthermore, Bracke goes on to highlight the silence in the feminist movement around both disability rights and race as part of its universalisation of women&apos;s conditions of oppression, and analyses the emergence of Black Feminism in late-1970s France. In so doing, the book offers a major contribution to the history of sex, gender, family life, healthcare, demography, and political debate in post-war France, and more generally.
Guest Dr. Maud Bracke is Professor of Modern European History at the University of Glasgow, and is also the author of Which Socialism? Whose Detente? West European Communism and the Czechoslovak Crisis of 1968 in 2007 and Women and the Reinvention of the Political: Feminism in Italy (1968-1983) in 2014, as well as the co-editor of Translating Feminism: Interdisciplinary Approaches to Text, Place and Agency in 2021. In addition to authoring numerous journal articles and book chapters and co-editing several special issues of academic journalsb she is also an editor at the Journal of Modern European History and sits on various other editorial boards. 
Host Gina Stamm is Associate Professor of French at The University of Alabama, with research concentrated on the environmental humanities and speculative literatures of the 20th and 21st centuries, from Surrealism to contemporary science fiction and feminist utopias, in Metropolitan France and the francophone Caribbean, with a book manuscript in progress on posthumanist ecological engagement in the surrealist movement.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The introduction of the principle of women&apos;s reproductive liberty in France, tentatively by the family planning movement after 1960 and explicitly by the women&apos;s liberation movement after 1970, marked a deep shift, transforming public discourses. Yet this principle remained fiercely contested, and moderate and conservative actors responded by foregrounding notions of &apos;reproductive responsibility&apos;, or the expectation that individuals perform the &apos;right&apos; sexual and family-making behaviour, benefiting not only themselves and their families, but the nation at large. Such responsibilisation underpinned the legal reforms of the 1960s-70s, framing a notion of reproductive citizenship based on a tension between individual rights and social norms. Reproductive Rights in Modern France: Feminism, Contraception, and Abortion, 1950-1980 (Oxford UP, 2025) breaks new ground by taking an intersectional approach to the defining moments of this period: the legalisation of contraception (the laws of 1967 and 1974) and the liberalisation of abortion (1975, 1979). Drawing on a wide range of sources and actors - including feminist and family planning movements, government actors, demographers, medical-professional organisations, disability rights groups, and key actors in the overseas departments - Maud Bracke demonstrates how the discourse of responsibilisation allowed actors to distinguish between citizens &apos;worthy&apos; of reproductive rights and those seen as less worthy. Bracke analyses the distinct regulations regarding contraception in the overseas departments of Guadeloupe and Martinique, framed by racialised anti-natalism. The book also demonstrates that disability rights organisations contributed to the discrediting of the notion of &apos;eugenic abortion&apos;, used among experts and policy-makers until the early 1970s. Furthermore, Bracke goes on to highlight the silence in the feminist movement around both disability rights and race as part of its universalisation of women&apos;s conditions of oppression, and analyses the emergence of Black Feminism in late-1970s France. In so doing, the book offers a major contribution to the history of sex, gender, family life, healthcare, demography, and political debate in post-war France, and more generally.
Guest Dr. Maud Bracke is Professor of Modern European History at the University of Glasgow, and is also the author of Which Socialism? Whose Detente? West European Communism and the Czechoslovak Crisis of 1968 in 2007 and Women and the Reinvention of the Political: Feminism in Italy (1968-1983) in 2014, as well as the co-editor of Translating Feminism: Interdisciplinary Approaches to Text, Place and Agency in 2021. In addition to authoring numerous journal articles and book chapters and co-editing several special issues of academic journalsb she is also an editor at the Journal of Modern European History and sits on various other editorial boards. 
Host Gina Stamm is Associate Professor of French at The University of Alabama, with research concentrated on the environmental humanities and speculative literatures of the 20th and 21st centuries, from Surrealism to contemporary science fiction and feminist utopias, in Metropolitan France and the francophone Caribbean, with a book manuscript in progress on posthumanist ecological engagement in the surrealist movement.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1658</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">eb161880-1792-11f1-8cde-0bb778809c4b</guid>
      <title>Amy Littlefield, &quot;Killers of Roe: My Investigation Into the Mysterious Death of Abortion Rights&quot; (Legacy Lit, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://www.hachettebookgroup.com/titles/amy-littlefield/killers-of-roe/9781538769041/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Killers of Roe: My Investigation Into the Mysterious Death of Abortion Rights</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Legacy Lit, 2026)&nbsp;reporter&nbsp;<a href="https://www.amylittlefield.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Amy Littlefield</a>&nbsp;investigates the secret killers and hidden motives behind the death of abortion rights. They are going to kill people, investigative reporter for&nbsp;<em>The Nation&nbsp;</em>Littlefield knew, when the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade. As a journalist covering abortion for more than a decade, she had already chronicled many near-death experiences caused by anti-abortion policy. After the anti-abortion movement's staggering defeat of Roe, she became fascinated with their victory and why they seemed so much better organized than the pro-choice movement. She set out to investigate the murderers of Roe.&nbsp;<em>Killers of Roe&nbsp;</em>chronicles Littlefield's journey into the unexplored corners of the most successful social movement of our time. As in every good murder mystery, the killers turn out to be the people you least suspect, like a disgraced former Congressman obsessed with offshore tax evasion and an unknown suburban bureaucrat who wrote America's most diabolical anti-abortion policy. She reports from a sweaty presidential tour bus in DC, a chaotic Michigan courtroom where a former fetus thief is on trial, and a Texas town that rejects an abortion travel ban. She encounters surprising characters who shed light on how we got to this moment of authoritarian rule: from the pro-choice superfans she meets at the Reagan library to the Senator who couldn't stop kissing every woman he met. Along the way, Amy draws upon the stories of women who have died from anti-abortion policies and on her own experience as a mother to reveal the life-and-death stakes of America's abortion wars. At once clever and poignant reportage, this abortion whodunnit uncovers the deeper story of how we lost Roe--and how we can win back so much more.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 6 Mar 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/amy-littlefield-killers-of-roe-my-investigation-into-the-mysterious-death-of-abortion-rights-legacy-lit-2026-yD876Fzm</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://www.hachettebookgroup.com/titles/amy-littlefield/killers-of-roe/9781538769041/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Killers of Roe: My Investigation Into the Mysterious Death of Abortion Rights</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Legacy Lit, 2026)&nbsp;reporter&nbsp;<a href="https://www.amylittlefield.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Amy Littlefield</a>&nbsp;investigates the secret killers and hidden motives behind the death of abortion rights. They are going to kill people, investigative reporter for&nbsp;<em>The Nation&nbsp;</em>Littlefield knew, when the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade. As a journalist covering abortion for more than a decade, she had already chronicled many near-death experiences caused by anti-abortion policy. After the anti-abortion movement's staggering defeat of Roe, she became fascinated with their victory and why they seemed so much better organized than the pro-choice movement. She set out to investigate the murderers of Roe.&nbsp;<em>Killers of Roe&nbsp;</em>chronicles Littlefield's journey into the unexplored corners of the most successful social movement of our time. As in every good murder mystery, the killers turn out to be the people you least suspect, like a disgraced former Congressman obsessed with offshore tax evasion and an unknown suburban bureaucrat who wrote America's most diabolical anti-abortion policy. She reports from a sweaty presidential tour bus in DC, a chaotic Michigan courtroom where a former fetus thief is on trial, and a Texas town that rejects an abortion travel ban. She encounters surprising characters who shed light on how we got to this moment of authoritarian rule: from the pro-choice superfans she meets at the Reagan library to the Senator who couldn't stop kissing every woman he met. Along the way, Amy draws upon the stories of women who have died from anti-abortion policies and on her own experience as a mother to reveal the life-and-death stakes of America's abortion wars. At once clever and poignant reportage, this abortion whodunnit uncovers the deeper story of how we lost Roe--and how we can win back so much more.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="48423604" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/a6e63e28-b026-4f6b-b7a2-8c4ac0644844/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=a6e63e28-b026-4f6b-b7a2-8c4ac0644844&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Amy Littlefield, &quot;Killers of Roe: My Investigation Into the Mysterious Death of Abortion Rights&quot; (Legacy Lit, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:50:22</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In Killers of Roe: My Investigation Into the Mysterious Death of Abortion Rights (Legacy Lit, 2026) reporter Amy Littlefield investigates the secret killers and hidden motives behind the death of abortion rights. They are going to kill people, investigative reporter for The Nation Littlefield knew, when the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade. As a journalist covering abortion for more than a decade, she had already chronicled many near-death experiences caused by anti-abortion policy. After the anti-abortion movement&apos;s staggering defeat of Roe, she became fascinated with their victory and why they seemed so much better organized than the pro-choice movement. She set out to investigate the murderers of Roe. Killers of Roe chronicles Littlefield&apos;s journey into the unexplored corners of the most successful social movement of our time. As in every good murder mystery, the killers turn out to be the people you least suspect, like a disgraced former Congressman obsessed with offshore tax evasion and an unknown suburban bureaucrat who wrote America&apos;s most diabolical anti-abortion policy. She reports from a sweaty presidential tour bus in DC, a chaotic Michigan courtroom where a former fetus thief is on trial, and a Texas town that rejects an abortion travel ban. She encounters surprising characters who shed light on how we got to this moment of authoritarian rule: from the pro-choice superfans she meets at the Reagan library to the Senator who couldn&apos;t stop kissing every woman he met. Along the way, Amy draws upon the stories of women who have died from anti-abortion policies and on her own experience as a mother to reveal the life-and-death stakes of America&apos;s abortion wars. At once clever and poignant reportage, this abortion whodunnit uncovers the deeper story of how we lost Roe--and how we can win back so much more.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In Killers of Roe: My Investigation Into the Mysterious Death of Abortion Rights (Legacy Lit, 2026) reporter Amy Littlefield investigates the secret killers and hidden motives behind the death of abortion rights. They are going to kill people, investigative reporter for The Nation Littlefield knew, when the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade. As a journalist covering abortion for more than a decade, she had already chronicled many near-death experiences caused by anti-abortion policy. After the anti-abortion movement&apos;s staggering defeat of Roe, she became fascinated with their victory and why they seemed so much better organized than the pro-choice movement. She set out to investigate the murderers of Roe. Killers of Roe chronicles Littlefield&apos;s journey into the unexplored corners of the most successful social movement of our time. As in every good murder mystery, the killers turn out to be the people you least suspect, like a disgraced former Congressman obsessed with offshore tax evasion and an unknown suburban bureaucrat who wrote America&apos;s most diabolical anti-abortion policy. She reports from a sweaty presidential tour bus in DC, a chaotic Michigan courtroom where a former fetus thief is on trial, and a Texas town that rejects an abortion travel ban. She encounters surprising characters who shed light on how we got to this moment of authoritarian rule: from the pro-choice superfans she meets at the Reagan library to the Senator who couldn&apos;t stop kissing every woman he met. Along the way, Amy draws upon the stories of women who have died from anti-abortion policies and on her own experience as a mother to reveal the life-and-death stakes of America&apos;s abortion wars. At once clever and poignant reportage, this abortion whodunnit uncovers the deeper story of how we lost Roe--and how we can win back so much more.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1657</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2566e5be-15fe-11f1-a991-b774b2456118</guid>
      <title>David L. Eng, &quot;Reparations and the Human&quot; (Duke UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The Holocaust and the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki invoked in graphic terms the specter of total human destruction. In response, a new international order of reparations and human rights arose from the ashes of World War II. This legal regime sought to subrogate the sovereignty of the nation-state in order to defend the sovereignty of the human being. While the Holocaust’s history is settled—Nazis were perpetrators and Jews were victims—there remains little historical consensus as to the victims and perpetrators of the atomic bombings. In<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781478031864" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;</a><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781478031864" rel="noopener noreferrer">Reparations and the Human</a>&nbsp;(Duke UP, 2025),&nbsp;David L. Eng investigates a history of reparations across the Transpacific. He analyzes how concepts of reparation established during colonial settlement and the European Enlightenment shape contemporary configurations of the human and human rights, determining who can be recognized as victims, who must be seen as perpetrators, and who deserves repair. As demands for reparations now occupy center stage in debates concerning unresolved legacies of dispossession and Transatlantic slavery, Eng considers how the Cold War Transpacific provides a limit case for the politics of repair and definitions of the human.&nbsp;This book is a sweeping genealogical investigation that moves from seventeenth-century land dispossession in the Americas to the irradiated histories of the Cold War Transpacific, asking a fundamental question: who is considered deserving of repair?</p>
<p><a href="https://history.wisc.edu/people/acharya-deep/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Deep Acharya</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a PhD student and a George L. Mosse fellow of Modern European Cultural History at the University of Wisconsin-Madison working on the history of fatherhood in 20th century Germany.</em><br>﻿</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 3 Mar 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/david-l-eng-reparations-and-the-human-duke-up-2025-vNt10ssZ</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Holocaust and the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki invoked in graphic terms the specter of total human destruction. In response, a new international order of reparations and human rights arose from the ashes of World War II. This legal regime sought to subrogate the sovereignty of the nation-state in order to defend the sovereignty of the human being. While the Holocaust’s history is settled—Nazis were perpetrators and Jews were victims—there remains little historical consensus as to the victims and perpetrators of the atomic bombings. In<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781478031864" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;</a><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781478031864" rel="noopener noreferrer">Reparations and the Human</a>&nbsp;(Duke UP, 2025),&nbsp;David L. Eng investigates a history of reparations across the Transpacific. He analyzes how concepts of reparation established during colonial settlement and the European Enlightenment shape contemporary configurations of the human and human rights, determining who can be recognized as victims, who must be seen as perpetrators, and who deserves repair. As demands for reparations now occupy center stage in debates concerning unresolved legacies of dispossession and Transatlantic slavery, Eng considers how the Cold War Transpacific provides a limit case for the politics of repair and definitions of the human.&nbsp;This book is a sweeping genealogical investigation that moves from seventeenth-century land dispossession in the Americas to the irradiated histories of the Cold War Transpacific, asking a fundamental question: who is considered deserving of repair?</p>
<p><a href="https://history.wisc.edu/people/acharya-deep/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Deep Acharya</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a PhD student and a George L. Mosse fellow of Modern European Cultural History at the University of Wisconsin-Madison working on the history of fatherhood in 20th century Germany.</em><br>﻿</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="48775803" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/4e865102-0da6-443a-a0ae-61414f2804da/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=4e865102-0da6-443a-a0ae-61414f2804da&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>David L. Eng, &quot;Reparations and the Human&quot; (Duke UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:50:44</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The Holocaust and the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki invoked in graphic terms the specter of total human destruction. In response, a new international order of reparations and human rights arose from the ashes of World War II. This legal regime sought to subrogate the sovereignty of the nation-state in order to defend the sovereignty of the human being. While the Holocaust’s history is settled—Nazis were perpetrators and Jews were victims—there remains little historical consensus as to the victims and perpetrators of the atomic bombings. In Reparations and the Human (Duke UP, 2025), David L. Eng investigates a history of reparations across the Transpacific. He analyzes how concepts of reparation established during colonial settlement and the European Enlightenment shape contemporary configurations of the human and human rights, determining who can be recognized as victims, who must be seen as perpetrators, and who deserves repair. As demands for reparations now occupy center stage in debates concerning unresolved legacies of dispossession and Transatlantic slavery, Eng considers how the Cold War Transpacific provides a limit case for the politics of repair and definitions of the human. This book is a sweeping genealogical investigation that moves from seventeenth-century land dispossession in the Americas to the irradiated histories of the Cold War Transpacific, asking a fundamental question: who is considered deserving of repair?
Deep Acharya is a PhD student and a George L. Mosse fellow of Modern European Cultural History at the University of Wisconsin-Madison working on the history of fatherhood in 20th century Germany.﻿
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Holocaust and the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki invoked in graphic terms the specter of total human destruction. In response, a new international order of reparations and human rights arose from the ashes of World War II. This legal regime sought to subrogate the sovereignty of the nation-state in order to defend the sovereignty of the human being. While the Holocaust’s history is settled—Nazis were perpetrators and Jews were victims—there remains little historical consensus as to the victims and perpetrators of the atomic bombings. In Reparations and the Human (Duke UP, 2025), David L. Eng investigates a history of reparations across the Transpacific. He analyzes how concepts of reparation established during colonial settlement and the European Enlightenment shape contemporary configurations of the human and human rights, determining who can be recognized as victims, who must be seen as perpetrators, and who deserves repair. As demands for reparations now occupy center stage in debates concerning unresolved legacies of dispossession and Transatlantic slavery, Eng considers how the Cold War Transpacific provides a limit case for the politics of repair and definitions of the human. This book is a sweeping genealogical investigation that moves from seventeenth-century land dispossession in the Americas to the irradiated histories of the Cold War Transpacific, asking a fundamental question: who is considered deserving of repair?
Deep Acharya is a PhD student and a George L. Mosse fellow of Modern European Cultural History at the University of Wisconsin-Madison working on the history of fatherhood in 20th century Germany.﻿
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1656</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">97f6b0d0-12d6-11f1-a8bd-3332db8f9624</guid>
      <title>Zev Eleff et al. eds., &quot;The Oxford Handbook of Jewish Law&quot; (Oxford UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Jewish law, known as halakhah, is a unique legal system that has developed over a period of nearly two millennia, across multiple continents, and in innumerable different contexts. Dealing not only with ritual, Jewish law extends to virtually every aspect of life including ethics, business, war, and sex. This Handbook highlights foundational questions about the nature of Jewish law, emphasizing what distinguishes it from other legal systems and illuminating its vitality throughout history.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197508305" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Oxford Handbook of Jewish Law</em>&nbsp;﻿</a>(Oxford UP, 2025) navigates core issues such as halakhah's authority, its interpretation, and the meaningfulness of an ancient legal system in a modern period. With contributions from an interdisciplinary cast of authors, the Handbook spans law, history, sociology, and religion. Its chapters draw from a wide range of sources, including traditional texts such as Mishnah and Talmud, rabbinical codes, and legal opinions known as responsa. Moreover, chapters addressing pressing modern issues cover the material from diverse denominational perspectives. As halakhah remains deeply woven into the fabric of Jewish life and scholarship,&nbsp;<em>The Oxford Handbook of Jewish Law</em>&nbsp;offers readers an in-depth understanding of this rich and enduring legal tradition.</p>
<p>Zev Eleff is President and Professor of American Jewish history at Gratz College.</p>
<p>Roberta Rosenthal Kwall is the Raymond P. Niro Professor at DePaul University College of Law.</p>
<p>Chaim Saiman is Chair in Jewish Law at Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law.</p>
<p>Geraldine Gudefin is a modern Jewish historian researching Jewish migrations, family life, and legal pluralism. She is currently a Visiting Scholar at the Centre for Asian Legal Studies at the National University of Singapore, and is completing a book titled&nbsp;<em>An Impossible Divorce? East European Jews and the Limits of Legal Pluralism in France, 1900-1939</em>.</p>
<p>Mentioned in this episode:</p>
<ul>
  <li>Ronit Irshai and Tanya Zion-Waldoks,&nbsp;<em>Holy Rebellion: Religious Feminism and the Transformation of Judaism and Women's Rights in Israel</em>&nbsp;(Brandeis University Press, 2024).</li>
  <li>Shari Rabin and Michael R. Cohen (eds.),&nbsp;<em>The Oxford Handbook of American Jewish History&nbsp;</em>(Oxford University Press, 2025).</li>
  <li>Roberta Rosenthal Kwall,&nbsp;<em>Remix Judaism: Preserving Tradition in a Diverse World</em>&nbsp;(‎Rowman &amp; Littlefield Publishers, 2022).</li>
  <li>Chaim N. Saiman,&nbsp;<em>Halakhah: The Rabbinic Idea of Law</em>&nbsp;(Princeton University Press, 2018).</li>
  <li>Benjamin Steiner,&nbsp;<em>Translating the Ketubah: The Jewish Marriage Contract in America and England</em>&nbsp;(University Alabama Press, 2025).</li>
</ul>
<p>Essays from the&nbsp;<em>Oxford Handbook of Jewish Law</em>:</p>
<ul>
  <li>Chapter 15: Chaim Saiman, “Formalism in Jewish Law.”</li>
  <li>Chapter 19: Roberta Rosenthal Kwall, “Lawmaking in the Conservative Movement: A Balance of Law and Norms.”</li>
  <li>Chapter 21: Arye Edrei, “The Impact of Zionism on Jewish Law.”</li>
  <li>Chapter 24: Rachel Levmore and Steven Gotlib, “Divorce and Agunah: Halakhic Responses to Modernity.”</li>
  <li>Chapter 30: Zev Eleff, “Judaism and the Modern Family.”</li>
</ul><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/zev-eleff-et-al-eds-the-oxford-handbook-of-jewish-law-oxford-up-2025-f5hR29CJ</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jewish law, known as halakhah, is a unique legal system that has developed over a period of nearly two millennia, across multiple continents, and in innumerable different contexts. Dealing not only with ritual, Jewish law extends to virtually every aspect of life including ethics, business, war, and sex. This Handbook highlights foundational questions about the nature of Jewish law, emphasizing what distinguishes it from other legal systems and illuminating its vitality throughout history.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197508305" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Oxford Handbook of Jewish Law</em>&nbsp;﻿</a>(Oxford UP, 2025) navigates core issues such as halakhah's authority, its interpretation, and the meaningfulness of an ancient legal system in a modern period. With contributions from an interdisciplinary cast of authors, the Handbook spans law, history, sociology, and religion. Its chapters draw from a wide range of sources, including traditional texts such as Mishnah and Talmud, rabbinical codes, and legal opinions known as responsa. Moreover, chapters addressing pressing modern issues cover the material from diverse denominational perspectives. As halakhah remains deeply woven into the fabric of Jewish life and scholarship,&nbsp;<em>The Oxford Handbook of Jewish Law</em>&nbsp;offers readers an in-depth understanding of this rich and enduring legal tradition.</p>
<p>Zev Eleff is President and Professor of American Jewish history at Gratz College.</p>
<p>Roberta Rosenthal Kwall is the Raymond P. Niro Professor at DePaul University College of Law.</p>
<p>Chaim Saiman is Chair in Jewish Law at Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law.</p>
<p>Geraldine Gudefin is a modern Jewish historian researching Jewish migrations, family life, and legal pluralism. She is currently a Visiting Scholar at the Centre for Asian Legal Studies at the National University of Singapore, and is completing a book titled&nbsp;<em>An Impossible Divorce? East European Jews and the Limits of Legal Pluralism in France, 1900-1939</em>.</p>
<p>Mentioned in this episode:</p>
<ul>
  <li>Ronit Irshai and Tanya Zion-Waldoks,&nbsp;<em>Holy Rebellion: Religious Feminism and the Transformation of Judaism and Women's Rights in Israel</em>&nbsp;(Brandeis University Press, 2024).</li>
  <li>Shari Rabin and Michael R. Cohen (eds.),&nbsp;<em>The Oxford Handbook of American Jewish History&nbsp;</em>(Oxford University Press, 2025).</li>
  <li>Roberta Rosenthal Kwall,&nbsp;<em>Remix Judaism: Preserving Tradition in a Diverse World</em>&nbsp;(‎Rowman &amp; Littlefield Publishers, 2022).</li>
  <li>Chaim N. Saiman,&nbsp;<em>Halakhah: The Rabbinic Idea of Law</em>&nbsp;(Princeton University Press, 2018).</li>
  <li>Benjamin Steiner,&nbsp;<em>Translating the Ketubah: The Jewish Marriage Contract in America and England</em>&nbsp;(University Alabama Press, 2025).</li>
</ul>
<p>Essays from the&nbsp;<em>Oxford Handbook of Jewish Law</em>:</p>
<ul>
  <li>Chapter 15: Chaim Saiman, “Formalism in Jewish Law.”</li>
  <li>Chapter 19: Roberta Rosenthal Kwall, “Lawmaking in the Conservative Movement: A Balance of Law and Norms.”</li>
  <li>Chapter 21: Arye Edrei, “The Impact of Zionism on Jewish Law.”</li>
  <li>Chapter 24: Rachel Levmore and Steven Gotlib, “Divorce and Agunah: Halakhic Responses to Modernity.”</li>
  <li>Chapter 30: Zev Eleff, “Judaism and the Modern Family.”</li>
</ul><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="68401687" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/8fcd79c7-5fc5-4443-9645-b56da14dbac9/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=8fcd79c7-5fc5-4443-9645-b56da14dbac9&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Zev Eleff et al. eds., &quot;The Oxford Handbook of Jewish Law&quot; (Oxford UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:11:11</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Jewish law, known as halakhah, is a unique legal system that has developed over a period of nearly two millennia, across multiple continents, and in innumerable different contexts. Dealing not only with ritual, Jewish law extends to virtually every aspect of life including ethics, business, war, and sex. This Handbook highlights foundational questions about the nature of Jewish law, emphasizing what distinguishes it from other legal systems and illuminating its vitality throughout history. The Oxford Handbook of Jewish Law ﻿(Oxford UP, 2025) navigates core issues such as halakhah&apos;s authority, its interpretation, and the meaningfulness of an ancient legal system in a modern period. With contributions from an interdisciplinary cast of authors, the Handbook spans law, history, sociology, and religion. Its chapters draw from a wide range of sources, including traditional texts such as Mishnah and Talmud, rabbinical codes, and legal opinions known as responsa. Moreover, chapters addressing pressing modern issues cover the material from diverse denominational perspectives. As halakhah remains deeply woven into the fabric of Jewish life and scholarship, The Oxford Handbook of Jewish Law offers readers an in-depth understanding of this rich and enduring legal tradition.
Zev Eleff is President and Professor of American Jewish history at Gratz College.
Roberta Rosenthal Kwall is the Raymond P. Niro Professor at DePaul University College of Law.
Chaim Saiman is Chair in Jewish Law at Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law.
Geraldine Gudefin is a modern Jewish historian researching Jewish migrations, family life, and legal pluralism. She is currently a Visiting Scholar at the Centre for Asian Legal Studies at the National University of Singapore, and is completing a book titled An Impossible Divorce? East European Jews and the Limits of Legal Pluralism in France, 1900-1939.
Mentioned in this episode:
 Ronit Irshai and Tanya Zion-Waldoks, Holy Rebellion: Religious Feminism and the Transformation of Judaism and Women&apos;s Rights in Israel (Brandeis University Press, 2024).
 Shari Rabin and Michael R. Cohen (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of American Jewish History (Oxford University Press, 2025).
 Roberta Rosenthal Kwall, Remix Judaism: Preserving Tradition in a Diverse World (‎Rowman &amp; Littlefield Publishers, 2022).
 Chaim N. Saiman, Halakhah: The Rabbinic Idea of Law (Princeton University Press, 2018).
 Benjamin Steiner, Translating the Ketubah: The Jewish Marriage Contract in America and England (University Alabama Press, 2025).
Essays from the Oxford Handbook of Jewish Law:
 Chapter 15: Chaim Saiman, “Formalism in Jewish Law.”
 Chapter 19: Roberta Rosenthal Kwall, “Lawmaking in the Conservative Movement: A Balance of Law and Norms.”
 Chapter 21: Arye Edrei, “The Impact of Zionism on Jewish Law.”
 Chapter 24: Rachel Levmore and Steven Gotlib, “Divorce and Agunah: Halakhic Responses to Modernity.”
 Chapter 30: Zev Eleff, “Judaism and the Modern Family.”
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Jewish law, known as halakhah, is a unique legal system that has developed over a period of nearly two millennia, across multiple continents, and in innumerable different contexts. Dealing not only with ritual, Jewish law extends to virtually every aspect of life including ethics, business, war, and sex. This Handbook highlights foundational questions about the nature of Jewish law, emphasizing what distinguishes it from other legal systems and illuminating its vitality throughout history. The Oxford Handbook of Jewish Law ﻿(Oxford UP, 2025) navigates core issues such as halakhah&apos;s authority, its interpretation, and the meaningfulness of an ancient legal system in a modern period. With contributions from an interdisciplinary cast of authors, the Handbook spans law, history, sociology, and religion. Its chapters draw from a wide range of sources, including traditional texts such as Mishnah and Talmud, rabbinical codes, and legal opinions known as responsa. Moreover, chapters addressing pressing modern issues cover the material from diverse denominational perspectives. As halakhah remains deeply woven into the fabric of Jewish life and scholarship, The Oxford Handbook of Jewish Law offers readers an in-depth understanding of this rich and enduring legal tradition.
Zev Eleff is President and Professor of American Jewish history at Gratz College.
Roberta Rosenthal Kwall is the Raymond P. Niro Professor at DePaul University College of Law.
Chaim Saiman is Chair in Jewish Law at Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law.
Geraldine Gudefin is a modern Jewish historian researching Jewish migrations, family life, and legal pluralism. She is currently a Visiting Scholar at the Centre for Asian Legal Studies at the National University of Singapore, and is completing a book titled An Impossible Divorce? East European Jews and the Limits of Legal Pluralism in France, 1900-1939.
Mentioned in this episode:
 Ronit Irshai and Tanya Zion-Waldoks, Holy Rebellion: Religious Feminism and the Transformation of Judaism and Women&apos;s Rights in Israel (Brandeis University Press, 2024).
 Shari Rabin and Michael R. Cohen (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of American Jewish History (Oxford University Press, 2025).
 Roberta Rosenthal Kwall, Remix Judaism: Preserving Tradition in a Diverse World (‎Rowman &amp; Littlefield Publishers, 2022).
 Chaim N. Saiman, Halakhah: The Rabbinic Idea of Law (Princeton University Press, 2018).
 Benjamin Steiner, Translating the Ketubah: The Jewish Marriage Contract in America and England (University Alabama Press, 2025).
Essays from the Oxford Handbook of Jewish Law:
 Chapter 15: Chaim Saiman, “Formalism in Jewish Law.”
 Chapter 19: Roberta Rosenthal Kwall, “Lawmaking in the Conservative Movement: A Balance of Law and Norms.”
 Chapter 21: Arye Edrei, “The Impact of Zionism on Jewish Law.”
 Chapter 24: Rachel Levmore and Steven Gotlib, “Divorce and Agunah: Halakhic Responses to Modernity.”
 Chapter 30: Zev Eleff, “Judaism and the Modern Family.”
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1655</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">efb98458-0e37-11f1-bbaa-b31d0624982f</guid>
      <title>Jamila Michener and Mallory E. Sorelle, &quot;Uncivil Democracy: ﻿﻿How Access to Justice Shapes Political Power&quot; ﻿(Princeton UP, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Each year, as many as 250 million Americans face civil legal problems like eviction, debt collection, and substandard housing. These problems are disproportionately shouldered by racially and economically marginalized people, particularly women of color. Civil courts and legal aid organizations are supposed to protect their rights, yet more than 90 percent of low-income people receive inadequate or no legal assistance. Instead, access to justice is reserved for those who can afford its high price. For those who can’t, the repercussions can be devastating, from homelessness and loss of public benefits to broken families and diminished health.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691264462" rel="noopener noreferrer">Uncivil Democracy:&nbsp;﻿﻿How Access to Justice Shapes Political Power</a>&nbsp;﻿(Princeton UP, 2026)&nbsp;looks at the US civil justice system through the eyes of the people whose very citizenship is indelibly shaped by it. Jamila Michener and Mallory SoRelle show how civil legal problems, and the institutions meant to address them, greatly erode trust in the legal system among marginalized communities, undermining their broader sense of democratic citizenship and political standing. While legal representation offers vital protections, increased access to justice through an ever-growing supply of lawyers does not address the structural problems that generate demand for lawyers in the first place. Looking at cases involving unfair evictions and substandard housing, Michener and SoRelle demonstrate how community groups such as tenants’ unions can fill this justice gap and provide the means to build political power that transforms the conditions that create precarity. Drawing on eye-opening qualitative evidence and a wealth of historical and survey data, Uncivil Democracy explains why collective organizing holds the greatest promise for altering the systems that create civil legal problems and exercising the political power necessary for meaningful change.</p>
<p>Host Ursula Hackett is Reader in Politics at Royal Holloway, University of London, where she specialises in the study of public policymaking and litigation in the US. A former British Academy Mid-Career Fellow, she is the author of the award-winning book,<em>America’s Voucher Politics: How Elites Learned to Hide the State&nbsp;</em>(Cambridge University Press, 2020).</p>
<p>Jamila Michener is Professor of Government and Public Policy at Cornell University and inaugural director of the Center for Racial Justice and Equitable Futures. She is the author of the award-winning book, &nbsp;<em>Fragmented&nbsp;Democracy: Medicaid, Federalism, and Unequal Politics</em>&nbsp;(Cambridge University Press, 2018).</p>
<p>Mallory SoRelle is&nbsp;the Tony and Teddie Brown Associate Professor of Public Policy at the Sanford School of Public Policy at Duke University. She is the author of&nbsp;<em>Democracy Declined: The Failed Politics of Consumer Financial Protection</em>&nbsp;(University of Chicago Press, 2020), based on her award-winning doctoral dissertation.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/jamila-michener-and-mallory-e-sorelle-uncivil-democracy-how-access-to-justice-shapes-political-power-princeton-up-2026-57DErhL4</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Each year, as many as 250 million Americans face civil legal problems like eviction, debt collection, and substandard housing. These problems are disproportionately shouldered by racially and economically marginalized people, particularly women of color. Civil courts and legal aid organizations are supposed to protect their rights, yet more than 90 percent of low-income people receive inadequate or no legal assistance. Instead, access to justice is reserved for those who can afford its high price. For those who can’t, the repercussions can be devastating, from homelessness and loss of public benefits to broken families and diminished health.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691264462" rel="noopener noreferrer">Uncivil Democracy:&nbsp;﻿﻿How Access to Justice Shapes Political Power</a>&nbsp;﻿(Princeton UP, 2026)&nbsp;looks at the US civil justice system through the eyes of the people whose very citizenship is indelibly shaped by it. Jamila Michener and Mallory SoRelle show how civil legal problems, and the institutions meant to address them, greatly erode trust in the legal system among marginalized communities, undermining their broader sense of democratic citizenship and political standing. While legal representation offers vital protections, increased access to justice through an ever-growing supply of lawyers does not address the structural problems that generate demand for lawyers in the first place. Looking at cases involving unfair evictions and substandard housing, Michener and SoRelle demonstrate how community groups such as tenants’ unions can fill this justice gap and provide the means to build political power that transforms the conditions that create precarity. Drawing on eye-opening qualitative evidence and a wealth of historical and survey data, Uncivil Democracy explains why collective organizing holds the greatest promise for altering the systems that create civil legal problems and exercising the political power necessary for meaningful change.</p>
<p>Host Ursula Hackett is Reader in Politics at Royal Holloway, University of London, where she specialises in the study of public policymaking and litigation in the US. A former British Academy Mid-Career Fellow, she is the author of the award-winning book,<em>America’s Voucher Politics: How Elites Learned to Hide the State&nbsp;</em>(Cambridge University Press, 2020).</p>
<p>Jamila Michener is Professor of Government and Public Policy at Cornell University and inaugural director of the Center for Racial Justice and Equitable Futures. She is the author of the award-winning book, &nbsp;<em>Fragmented&nbsp;Democracy: Medicaid, Federalism, and Unequal Politics</em>&nbsp;(Cambridge University Press, 2018).</p>
<p>Mallory SoRelle is&nbsp;the Tony and Teddie Brown Associate Professor of Public Policy at the Sanford School of Public Policy at Duke University. She is the author of&nbsp;<em>Democracy Declined: The Failed Politics of Consumer Financial Protection</em>&nbsp;(University of Chicago Press, 2020), based on her award-winning doctoral dissertation.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="54179230" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/f011a100-7bbd-4a20-9a63-c44516d8da56/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=f011a100-7bbd-4a20-9a63-c44516d8da56&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Jamila Michener and Mallory E. Sorelle, &quot;Uncivil Democracy: ﻿﻿How Access to Justice Shapes Political Power&quot; ﻿(Princeton UP, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:56:22</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Each year, as many as 250 million Americans face civil legal problems like eviction, debt collection, and substandard housing. These problems are disproportionately shouldered by racially and economically marginalized people, particularly women of color. Civil courts and legal aid organizations are supposed to protect their rights, yet more than 90 percent of low-income people receive inadequate or no legal assistance. Instead, access to justice is reserved for those who can afford its high price. For those who can’t, the repercussions can be devastating, from homelessness and loss of public benefits to broken families and diminished health. Uncivil Democracy: ﻿﻿How Access to Justice Shapes Political Power ﻿(Princeton UP, 2026) looks at the US civil justice system through the eyes of the people whose very citizenship is indelibly shaped by it. Jamila Michener and Mallory SoRelle show how civil legal problems, and the institutions meant to address them, greatly erode trust in the legal system among marginalized communities, undermining their broader sense of democratic citizenship and political standing. While legal representation offers vital protections, increased access to justice through an ever-growing supply of lawyers does not address the structural problems that generate demand for lawyers in the first place. Looking at cases involving unfair evictions and substandard housing, Michener and SoRelle demonstrate how community groups such as tenants’ unions can fill this justice gap and provide the means to build political power that transforms the conditions that create precarity. Drawing on eye-opening qualitative evidence and a wealth of historical and survey data, Uncivil Democracy explains why collective organizing holds the greatest promise for altering the systems that create civil legal problems and exercising the political power necessary for meaningful change.
Host Ursula Hackett is Reader in Politics at Royal Holloway, University of London, where she specialises in the study of public policymaking and litigation in the US. A former British Academy Mid-Career Fellow, she is the author of the award-winning book,America’s Voucher Politics: How Elites Learned to Hide the State (Cambridge University Press, 2020).
Jamila Michener is Professor of Government and Public Policy at Cornell University and inaugural director of the Center for Racial Justice and Equitable Futures. She is the author of the award-winning book,  Fragmented Democracy: Medicaid, Federalism, and Unequal Politics (Cambridge University Press, 2018).
Mallory SoRelle is the Tony and Teddie Brown Associate Professor of Public Policy at the Sanford School of Public Policy at Duke University. She is the author of Democracy Declined: The Failed Politics of Consumer Financial Protection (University of Chicago Press, 2020), based on her award-winning doctoral dissertation.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Each year, as many as 250 million Americans face civil legal problems like eviction, debt collection, and substandard housing. These problems are disproportionately shouldered by racially and economically marginalized people, particularly women of color. Civil courts and legal aid organizations are supposed to protect their rights, yet more than 90 percent of low-income people receive inadequate or no legal assistance. Instead, access to justice is reserved for those who can afford its high price. For those who can’t, the repercussions can be devastating, from homelessness and loss of public benefits to broken families and diminished health. Uncivil Democracy: ﻿﻿How Access to Justice Shapes Political Power ﻿(Princeton UP, 2026) looks at the US civil justice system through the eyes of the people whose very citizenship is indelibly shaped by it. Jamila Michener and Mallory SoRelle show how civil legal problems, and the institutions meant to address them, greatly erode trust in the legal system among marginalized communities, undermining their broader sense of democratic citizenship and political standing. While legal representation offers vital protections, increased access to justice through an ever-growing supply of lawyers does not address the structural problems that generate demand for lawyers in the first place. Looking at cases involving unfair evictions and substandard housing, Michener and SoRelle demonstrate how community groups such as tenants’ unions can fill this justice gap and provide the means to build political power that transforms the conditions that create precarity. Drawing on eye-opening qualitative evidence and a wealth of historical and survey data, Uncivil Democracy explains why collective organizing holds the greatest promise for altering the systems that create civil legal problems and exercising the political power necessary for meaningful change.
Host Ursula Hackett is Reader in Politics at Royal Holloway, University of London, where she specialises in the study of public policymaking and litigation in the US. A former British Academy Mid-Career Fellow, she is the author of the award-winning book,America’s Voucher Politics: How Elites Learned to Hide the State (Cambridge University Press, 2020).
Jamila Michener is Professor of Government and Public Policy at Cornell University and inaugural director of the Center for Racial Justice and Equitable Futures. She is the author of the award-winning book,  Fragmented Democracy: Medicaid, Federalism, and Unequal Politics (Cambridge University Press, 2018).
Mallory SoRelle is the Tony and Teddie Brown Associate Professor of Public Policy at the Sanford School of Public Policy at Duke University. She is the author of Democracy Declined: The Failed Politics of Consumer Financial Protection (University of Chicago Press, 2020), based on her award-winning doctoral dissertation.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1654</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">eac19726-108d-11f1-a1d2-2fb85550b958</guid>
      <title>Andrea Mansker, &quot;Matchmaking and the Marriage Market in Postrevolutionary France&quot; (Cornell UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781501778070" rel="noopener noreferrer">Matchmaking and the Marriage Market in Postrevolutionary France</a>&nbsp;﻿(Cornell UP, 2024)&nbsp;gives an historical account of the evolution of the matchmaking business during the Second Empire in France. The book explores how the matchmaking industry at the Postrevolutionary France was shaped by commodified stories of hope and fantasy, including democratization of the matchmaking business, which aroused the interest of democratized French audience, including lower-middle-class individuals, through exaggerated advertisements in the media productions. The book also gives an exposition on the period of French Revolution and how it significantly altered family legislation and marriage practices, leading to increased freedom in spouse selection and the rise of professional matchmakers like Claude Viome. The book highlights how the revolutionary reforms impact on marriage of the French populace, including the age reduction policy for the majority and lifting of parental consent for marriage, as well as introducing divorce by mutual consent in 1792.</p>
<p>According to Andrea Mansker, the changes in age and divorce policy, combined with increased mobility and changing social patterns in Paris, encouraged young people across classes to demand more freedom in spouse selection, leading Claude Viome to market his services as a way to bypass traditional family negotiations in courtship. The book relates the1804 Civil Code, explaining how it preserved revolutionary reforms like equality before the law but restored traditional family structures by treating married women and children as legal minors under their husband's authority. It exposes how divorce became less common and eventually outlawed in 1816, and detailed the French Supreme Court's 1855 ruling against matchmaker contracts, which viewed marriage as a sacred agreement distinct from commercial transactions.&nbsp;﻿<br></p>
<p>Mariam Olugbodi is a university teacher and a writer, she is the author of the monograph titled: “Stylistic Features in the 2011 and 2012 Final Matches Commentaries in the UEFA Champions League”, published by Grin Verlag. Mariam’s greatest dream is seeing a world where knowledge is accessible to all. She does this through her volunteering roles on open knowledge platforms as a host and an editor. As part of her effort to maintain inclusion and diversity in knowledge transmission, she volunteers as a teacher in crises contexts. Learn more and connect with Mariam through her social links @&nbsp;|&nbsp;LinkedIn&nbsp;﻿<a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/olugbodi-mariam-801a52130/?originalSubdomain=ng" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a>﻿&nbsp;|&nbsp;ORCID&nbsp;<a href="https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5027-6644" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;Meta&nbsp;﻿<a href="https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Margob28" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a>﻿&nbsp;|</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/andrea-mansker-matchmaking-and-the-marriage-market-in-postrevolutionary-france-cornell-up-2024-2dOzPeLP</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781501778070" rel="noopener noreferrer">Matchmaking and the Marriage Market in Postrevolutionary France</a>&nbsp;﻿(Cornell UP, 2024)&nbsp;gives an historical account of the evolution of the matchmaking business during the Second Empire in France. The book explores how the matchmaking industry at the Postrevolutionary France was shaped by commodified stories of hope and fantasy, including democratization of the matchmaking business, which aroused the interest of democratized French audience, including lower-middle-class individuals, through exaggerated advertisements in the media productions. The book also gives an exposition on the period of French Revolution and how it significantly altered family legislation and marriage practices, leading to increased freedom in spouse selection and the rise of professional matchmakers like Claude Viome. The book highlights how the revolutionary reforms impact on marriage of the French populace, including the age reduction policy for the majority and lifting of parental consent for marriage, as well as introducing divorce by mutual consent in 1792.</p>
<p>According to Andrea Mansker, the changes in age and divorce policy, combined with increased mobility and changing social patterns in Paris, encouraged young people across classes to demand more freedom in spouse selection, leading Claude Viome to market his services as a way to bypass traditional family negotiations in courtship. The book relates the1804 Civil Code, explaining how it preserved revolutionary reforms like equality before the law but restored traditional family structures by treating married women and children as legal minors under their husband's authority. It exposes how divorce became less common and eventually outlawed in 1816, and detailed the French Supreme Court's 1855 ruling against matchmaker contracts, which viewed marriage as a sacred agreement distinct from commercial transactions.&nbsp;﻿<br></p>
<p>Mariam Olugbodi is a university teacher and a writer, she is the author of the monograph titled: “Stylistic Features in the 2011 and 2012 Final Matches Commentaries in the UEFA Champions League”, published by Grin Verlag. Mariam’s greatest dream is seeing a world where knowledge is accessible to all. She does this through her volunteering roles on open knowledge platforms as a host and an editor. As part of her effort to maintain inclusion and diversity in knowledge transmission, she volunteers as a teacher in crises contexts. Learn more and connect with Mariam through her social links @&nbsp;|&nbsp;LinkedIn&nbsp;﻿<a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/olugbodi-mariam-801a52130/?originalSubdomain=ng" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a>﻿&nbsp;|&nbsp;ORCID&nbsp;<a href="https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5027-6644" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;Meta&nbsp;﻿<a href="https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Margob28" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a>﻿&nbsp;|</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="44573851" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/a4119bf7-b95d-46c7-aca5-c4ef4b87dd1c/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=a4119bf7-b95d-46c7-aca5-c4ef4b87dd1c&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Andrea Mansker, &quot;Matchmaking and the Marriage Market in Postrevolutionary France&quot; (Cornell UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:46:22</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Matchmaking and the Marriage Market in Postrevolutionary France ﻿(Cornell UP, 2024) gives an historical account of the evolution of the matchmaking business during the Second Empire in France. The book explores how the matchmaking industry at the Postrevolutionary France was shaped by commodified stories of hope and fantasy, including democratization of the matchmaking business, which aroused the interest of democratized French audience, including lower-middle-class individuals, through exaggerated advertisements in the media productions. The book also gives an exposition on the period of French Revolution and how it significantly altered family legislation and marriage practices, leading to increased freedom in spouse selection and the rise of professional matchmakers like Claude Viome. The book highlights how the revolutionary reforms impact on marriage of the French populace, including the age reduction policy for the majority and lifting of parental consent for marriage, as well as introducing divorce by mutual consent in 1792.
According to Andrea Mansker, the changes in age and divorce policy, combined with increased mobility and changing social patterns in Paris, encouraged young people across classes to demand more freedom in spouse selection, leading Claude Viome to market his services as a way to bypass traditional family negotiations in courtship. The book relates the1804 Civil Code, explaining how it preserved revolutionary reforms like equality before the law but restored traditional family structures by treating married women and children as legal minors under their husband&apos;s authority. It exposes how divorce became less common and eventually outlawed in 1816, and detailed the French Supreme Court&apos;s 1855 ruling against matchmaker contracts, which viewed marriage as a sacred agreement distinct from commercial transactions. ﻿
Mariam Olugbodi is a university teacher and a writer, she is the author of the monograph titled: “Stylistic Features in the 2011 and 2012 Final Matches Commentaries in the UEFA Champions League”, published by Grin Verlag. Mariam’s greatest dream is seeing a world where knowledge is accessible to all. She does this through her volunteering roles on open knowledge platforms as a host and an editor. As part of her effort to maintain inclusion and diversity in knowledge transmission, she volunteers as a teacher in crises contexts. Learn more and connect with Mariam through her social links @ | LinkedIn ﻿here﻿ | ORCID here | Meta ﻿here﻿ |
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Matchmaking and the Marriage Market in Postrevolutionary France ﻿(Cornell UP, 2024) gives an historical account of the evolution of the matchmaking business during the Second Empire in France. The book explores how the matchmaking industry at the Postrevolutionary France was shaped by commodified stories of hope and fantasy, including democratization of the matchmaking business, which aroused the interest of democratized French audience, including lower-middle-class individuals, through exaggerated advertisements in the media productions. The book also gives an exposition on the period of French Revolution and how it significantly altered family legislation and marriage practices, leading to increased freedom in spouse selection and the rise of professional matchmakers like Claude Viome. The book highlights how the revolutionary reforms impact on marriage of the French populace, including the age reduction policy for the majority and lifting of parental consent for marriage, as well as introducing divorce by mutual consent in 1792.
According to Andrea Mansker, the changes in age and divorce policy, combined with increased mobility and changing social patterns in Paris, encouraged young people across classes to demand more freedom in spouse selection, leading Claude Viome to market his services as a way to bypass traditional family negotiations in courtship. The book relates the1804 Civil Code, explaining how it preserved revolutionary reforms like equality before the law but restored traditional family structures by treating married women and children as legal minors under their husband&apos;s authority. It exposes how divorce became less common and eventually outlawed in 1816, and detailed the French Supreme Court&apos;s 1855 ruling against matchmaker contracts, which viewed marriage as a sacred agreement distinct from commercial transactions. ﻿
Mariam Olugbodi is a university teacher and a writer, she is the author of the monograph titled: “Stylistic Features in the 2011 and 2012 Final Matches Commentaries in the UEFA Champions League”, published by Grin Verlag. Mariam’s greatest dream is seeing a world where knowledge is accessible to all. She does this through her volunteering roles on open knowledge platforms as a host and an editor. As part of her effort to maintain inclusion and diversity in knowledge transmission, she volunteers as a teacher in crises contexts. Learn more and connect with Mariam through her social links @ | LinkedIn ﻿here﻿ | ORCID here | Meta ﻿here﻿ |
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1653</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">f019385c-1027-11f1-a44c-533429de2110</guid>
      <title>Allison Powers, &quot;Arbitrating Empire: United States Expansion and the Transformation of International Law&quot; (Oxford UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780190093006" rel="noopener noreferrer">Arbitrating Empire: United States Expansion and the Transformation of International Law</a>&nbsp;(Oxford UP, 2024) by Dr. Allison Powers offers a new history of the emergence of the United States as a global power-one shaped as much by attempts to insulate the US government from international legal scrutiny as it was by efforts to project influence across the globe. Drawing on extensive archival research in the United States, Mexico, Panama, and the United Kingdom, the book traces how thousands of dispossessed residents of US-annexed territories petitioned international Claims Commissions between the 1870s and the 1930s to charge the United States with violating international legal protections for life and property.<br>Through attention to the consequences of their unexpected claims, Dr. Powers demonstrates how colonized subjects, refugees from slavery, and migrant workers transformed a series of tribunals designed to establish the legality of US imperial interventions into sites through which to challenge the legitimacy of US colonial governance. One of the first social histories of international law, the book argues that contests over meanings of sovereignty and state responsibility that would reshape the mid-twentieth-century international order were waged not only at diplomatic conferences, but also in Arizona copper mines, Texas cotton fields, Samoan port cities, Cuban sugar plantations, and the locks and stops of the Panama Canal.<br><em>Arbitrating Empire</em>&nbsp;uncovers how ordinary people used international law to hold the United States accountable for state-sanctioned violence during the decades when the nation was first becoming a global empire-and demonstrates why State Department attempts to erase their claims transformed international law in ways that continue to shield the US government from liability to this day.</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/allison-powers-arbitrating-empire-united-states-expansion-and-the-transformation-of-international-law-oxford-up-2024-6mJhe9uH</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780190093006" rel="noopener noreferrer">Arbitrating Empire: United States Expansion and the Transformation of International Law</a>&nbsp;(Oxford UP, 2024) by Dr. Allison Powers offers a new history of the emergence of the United States as a global power-one shaped as much by attempts to insulate the US government from international legal scrutiny as it was by efforts to project influence across the globe. Drawing on extensive archival research in the United States, Mexico, Panama, and the United Kingdom, the book traces how thousands of dispossessed residents of US-annexed territories petitioned international Claims Commissions between the 1870s and the 1930s to charge the United States with violating international legal protections for life and property.<br>Through attention to the consequences of their unexpected claims, Dr. Powers demonstrates how colonized subjects, refugees from slavery, and migrant workers transformed a series of tribunals designed to establish the legality of US imperial interventions into sites through which to challenge the legitimacy of US colonial governance. One of the first social histories of international law, the book argues that contests over meanings of sovereignty and state responsibility that would reshape the mid-twentieth-century international order were waged not only at diplomatic conferences, but also in Arizona copper mines, Texas cotton fields, Samoan port cities, Cuban sugar plantations, and the locks and stops of the Panama Canal.<br><em>Arbitrating Empire</em>&nbsp;uncovers how ordinary people used international law to hold the United States accountable for state-sanctioned violence during the decades when the nation was first becoming a global empire-and demonstrates why State Department attempts to erase their claims transformed international law in ways that continue to shield the US government from liability to this day.</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="40116887" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/4b5ab4c2-87f4-4f8f-84c6-e3973c612769/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=4b5ab4c2-87f4-4f8f-84c6-e3973c612769&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Allison Powers, &quot;Arbitrating Empire: United States Expansion and the Transformation of International Law&quot; (Oxford UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:41:44</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Arbitrating Empire: United States Expansion and the Transformation of International Law (Oxford UP, 2024) by Dr. Allison Powers offers a new history of the emergence of the United States as a global power-one shaped as much by attempts to insulate the US government from international legal scrutiny as it was by efforts to project influence across the globe. Drawing on extensive archival research in the United States, Mexico, Panama, and the United Kingdom, the book traces how thousands of dispossessed residents of US-annexed territories petitioned international Claims Commissions between the 1870s and the 1930s to charge the United States with violating international legal protections for life and property.Through attention to the consequences of their unexpected claims, Dr. Powers demonstrates how colonized subjects, refugees from slavery, and migrant workers transformed a series of tribunals designed to establish the legality of US imperial interventions into sites through which to challenge the legitimacy of US colonial governance. One of the first social histories of international law, the book argues that contests over meanings of sovereignty and state responsibility that would reshape the mid-twentieth-century international order were waged not only at diplomatic conferences, but also in Arizona copper mines, Texas cotton fields, Samoan port cities, Cuban sugar plantations, and the locks and stops of the Panama Canal.Arbitrating Empire uncovers how ordinary people used international law to hold the United States accountable for state-sanctioned violence during the decades when the nation was first becoming a global empire-and demonstrates why State Department attempts to erase their claims transformed international law in ways that continue to shield the US government from liability to this day.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Arbitrating Empire: United States Expansion and the Transformation of International Law (Oxford UP, 2024) by Dr. Allison Powers offers a new history of the emergence of the United States as a global power-one shaped as much by attempts to insulate the US government from international legal scrutiny as it was by efforts to project influence across the globe. Drawing on extensive archival research in the United States, Mexico, Panama, and the United Kingdom, the book traces how thousands of dispossessed residents of US-annexed territories petitioned international Claims Commissions between the 1870s and the 1930s to charge the United States with violating international legal protections for life and property.Through attention to the consequences of their unexpected claims, Dr. Powers demonstrates how colonized subjects, refugees from slavery, and migrant workers transformed a series of tribunals designed to establish the legality of US imperial interventions into sites through which to challenge the legitimacy of US colonial governance. One of the first social histories of international law, the book argues that contests over meanings of sovereignty and state responsibility that would reshape the mid-twentieth-century international order were waged not only at diplomatic conferences, but also in Arizona copper mines, Texas cotton fields, Samoan port cities, Cuban sugar plantations, and the locks and stops of the Panama Canal.Arbitrating Empire uncovers how ordinary people used international law to hold the United States accountable for state-sanctioned violence during the decades when the nation was first becoming a global empire-and demonstrates why State Department attempts to erase their claims transformed international law in ways that continue to shield the US government from liability to this day.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1652</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7774850c-0e9f-11f1-888e-ab360a147f78</guid>
      <title>Sally Frances Low, &quot;Colonial Law Making: Cambodia Under the French&quot; (NUS Press, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In 1863 the French established a protectorate over the kingdom of Cambodia. The protectorate, along with Vietnam and Laos, later became part of the colonial state of French Indochina. Part of the French ‘civilizing mission’ in Cambodia involved reforming Cambodian law and legal processes.&nbsp;</p><p>Sally Low’s pioneering study,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9789813252448" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Colonial Law Making: Cambodia under the French</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(NUS Press, 2023), tells the story of the encounter between what she calls two different legal and social ‘cosmologies’: Cambodia’s indigenous legal tradition and modern French legal thinking. While the French claimed they were modernizing Cambodian law, in fact they imposed many elements of French law. Initially, they dispossessed the king of much of his judicial authority. But ironically, the French reform of Cambodian law retained the monarchy as the semi-divine source of law, and royal power was subsequently legally embedded into new national institutions, the law, and the constitutions. At independence in 1953, 90 years after the French began their protectorate, Cambodia’s King Sihanouk inherited this legal apparatus which had done so much to enhance the power of the executive over the judiciary.</p><p><em>﻿Patrick Jory teaches Southeast Asian History in the School of Historical and Philosophical Inquiry at the University of Queensland. He can be reached at: p.jory@uq.edu.au.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/sally-frances-low-colonial-law-making-cambodia-under-the-french-nus-press-2023-GOYZ_xAF-yzVtKejU</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In 1863 the French established a protectorate over the kingdom of Cambodia. The protectorate, along with Vietnam and Laos, later became part of the colonial state of French Indochina. Part of the French ‘civilizing mission’ in Cambodia involved reforming Cambodian law and legal processes.&nbsp;</p><p>Sally Low’s pioneering study,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9789813252448" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Colonial Law Making: Cambodia under the French</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(NUS Press, 2023), tells the story of the encounter between what she calls two different legal and social ‘cosmologies’: Cambodia’s indigenous legal tradition and modern French legal thinking. While the French claimed they were modernizing Cambodian law, in fact they imposed many elements of French law. Initially, they dispossessed the king of much of his judicial authority. But ironically, the French reform of Cambodian law retained the monarchy as the semi-divine source of law, and royal power was subsequently legally embedded into new national institutions, the law, and the constitutions. At independence in 1953, 90 years after the French began their protectorate, Cambodia’s King Sihanouk inherited this legal apparatus which had done so much to enhance the power of the executive over the judiciary.</p><p><em>﻿Patrick Jory teaches Southeast Asian History in the School of Historical and Philosophical Inquiry at the University of Queensland. He can be reached at: p.jory@uq.edu.au.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="43978187" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/17901205-58c2-4155-80f7-779c8078c78a/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=17901205-58c2-4155-80f7-779c8078c78a&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Sally Frances Low, &quot;Colonial Law Making: Cambodia Under the French&quot; (NUS Press, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:45:48</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In 1863 the French established a protectorate over the kingdom of Cambodia. The protectorate, along with Vietnam and Laos, later became part of the colonial state of French Indochina. Part of the French ‘civilizing mission’ in Cambodia involved reforming Cambodian law and legal processes. 
Sally Low’s pioneering study, Colonial Law Making: Cambodia under the French (NUS Press, 2023), tells the story of the encounter between what she calls two different legal and social ‘cosmologies’: Cambodia’s indigenous legal tradition and modern French legal thinking. While the French claimed they were modernizing Cambodian law, in fact they imposed many elements of French law. Initially, they dispossessed the king of much of his judicial authority. But ironically, the French reform of Cambodian law retained the monarchy as the semi-divine source of law, and royal power was subsequently legally embedded into new national institutions, the law, and the constitutions. At independence in 1953, 90 years after the French began their protectorate, Cambodia’s King Sihanouk inherited this legal apparatus which had done so much to enhance the power of the executive over the judiciary.
﻿Patrick Jory teaches Southeast Asian History in the School of Historical and Philosophical Inquiry at the University of Queensland. He can be reached at: p.jory@uq.edu.au.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In 1863 the French established a protectorate over the kingdom of Cambodia. The protectorate, along with Vietnam and Laos, later became part of the colonial state of French Indochina. Part of the French ‘civilizing mission’ in Cambodia involved reforming Cambodian law and legal processes. 
Sally Low’s pioneering study, Colonial Law Making: Cambodia under the French (NUS Press, 2023), tells the story of the encounter between what she calls two different legal and social ‘cosmologies’: Cambodia’s indigenous legal tradition and modern French legal thinking. While the French claimed they were modernizing Cambodian law, in fact they imposed many elements of French law. Initially, they dispossessed the king of much of his judicial authority. But ironically, the French reform of Cambodian law retained the monarchy as the semi-divine source of law, and royal power was subsequently legally embedded into new national institutions, the law, and the constitutions. At independence in 1953, 90 years after the French began their protectorate, Cambodia’s King Sihanouk inherited this legal apparatus which had done so much to enhance the power of the executive over the judiciary.
﻿Patrick Jory teaches Southeast Asian History in the School of Historical and Philosophical Inquiry at the University of Queensland. He can be reached at: p.jory@uq.edu.au.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>137</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">97766dca-0b07-11f1-97d1-5f976ccf41af</guid>
      <title>Mélanie Lamotte, &quot;By Flesh and Toil: How Sex, Race, and Labor Shaped the Early French Empire&quot; (Harvard UP, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>From the beginning of the seventeenth century, French colonies and trading posts sprawled across the Atlantic and Indian Oceans. In the first pan-imperial history of the early French Empire in the English language, Mélanie Lamotte shows how an increasingly cohesive legal culture came to govern the lives of enslaved and free people of African, Malagasy, South Asian, and Native American descent. She also illuminates the important role played by these populations in the development of the empire, from Louisiana to Guadeloupe, Senegambia, Madagascar, Isle Bourbon, and India.</p>
<p>The early French Empire has often been portrayed as a fragmented conglomerate of isolated colonies or regions. Yet Lamotte shows that racial policies issued by the metropole, as well as by officials in the Atlantic and Indian Oceans, significantly influenced one another. Rather than focusing on the actions of administrators, however, Lamotte also reveals the extensive influence of people on the ground—especially those of non-European descent. Through their sexuality and their labor, along with their socio-economic and political endeavors, they played a critical role in building the empire and setting its limits. As they sought justice for themselves, strove to protect their kin, and aimed to improve their social conditions, these individuals also pushed against the advancement of white dominion in unexpected ways.</p>
<p>Archivally rich and rigorously documented,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780674272835" rel="noopener noreferrer">By Flesh and Toil: How Sex, Race, and Labor Shaped the Early French Empire</a>&nbsp;(Harvard UP, 2026)&nbsp;illuminates the transoceanic connections that united the French colonial world—and recasts people of African, Malagasy, South Asian, and Native American descent as key actors in the story of empire-building.</p>
<p>This interview is conducted by Dr Lewis Wade, a Humboldt Research Fellow at the University of Bamberg. He is the author of the prize-winning&nbsp;<a href="https://boydellandbrewer.com/9781837650217/privilege-economy-and-state-in-old-regime-france/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Privilege, Economy and State in Old Regime France</em></a>&nbsp;and can be found on Bluesky&nbsp;<a href="https://bsky.app/profile/wadehistory.bsky.social" rel="noopener noreferrer">@wadehistory.bsky.social</a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/melanie-lamotte-by-flesh-and-toil-how-sex-race-and-labor-shaped-the-early-french-empire-harvard-up-2026-KvMjRpn1</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the beginning of the seventeenth century, French colonies and trading posts sprawled across the Atlantic and Indian Oceans. In the first pan-imperial history of the early French Empire in the English language, Mélanie Lamotte shows how an increasingly cohesive legal culture came to govern the lives of enslaved and free people of African, Malagasy, South Asian, and Native American descent. She also illuminates the important role played by these populations in the development of the empire, from Louisiana to Guadeloupe, Senegambia, Madagascar, Isle Bourbon, and India.</p>
<p>The early French Empire has often been portrayed as a fragmented conglomerate of isolated colonies or regions. Yet Lamotte shows that racial policies issued by the metropole, as well as by officials in the Atlantic and Indian Oceans, significantly influenced one another. Rather than focusing on the actions of administrators, however, Lamotte also reveals the extensive influence of people on the ground—especially those of non-European descent. Through their sexuality and their labor, along with their socio-economic and political endeavors, they played a critical role in building the empire and setting its limits. As they sought justice for themselves, strove to protect their kin, and aimed to improve their social conditions, these individuals also pushed against the advancement of white dominion in unexpected ways.</p>
<p>Archivally rich and rigorously documented,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780674272835" rel="noopener noreferrer">By Flesh and Toil: How Sex, Race, and Labor Shaped the Early French Empire</a>&nbsp;(Harvard UP, 2026)&nbsp;illuminates the transoceanic connections that united the French colonial world—and recasts people of African, Malagasy, South Asian, and Native American descent as key actors in the story of empire-building.</p>
<p>This interview is conducted by Dr Lewis Wade, a Humboldt Research Fellow at the University of Bamberg. He is the author of the prize-winning&nbsp;<a href="https://boydellandbrewer.com/9781837650217/privilege-economy-and-state-in-old-regime-france/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Privilege, Economy and State in Old Regime France</em></a>&nbsp;and can be found on Bluesky&nbsp;<a href="https://bsky.app/profile/wadehistory.bsky.social" rel="noopener noreferrer">@wadehistory.bsky.social</a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="26545879" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/11393dde-8831-4f3a-ac36-56ad41db5950/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=11393dde-8831-4f3a-ac36-56ad41db5950&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Mélanie Lamotte, &quot;By Flesh and Toil: How Sex, Race, and Labor Shaped the Early French Empire&quot; (Harvard UP, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:27:34</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>From the beginning of the seventeenth century, French colonies and trading posts sprawled across the Atlantic and Indian Oceans. In the first pan-imperial history of the early French Empire in the English language, Mélanie Lamotte shows how an increasingly cohesive legal culture came to govern the lives of enslaved and free people of African, Malagasy, South Asian, and Native American descent. She also illuminates the important role played by these populations in the development of the empire, from Louisiana to Guadeloupe, Senegambia, Madagascar, Isle Bourbon, and India.
The early French Empire has often been portrayed as a fragmented conglomerate of isolated colonies or regions. Yet Lamotte shows that racial policies issued by the metropole, as well as by officials in the Atlantic and Indian Oceans, significantly influenced one another. Rather than focusing on the actions of administrators, however, Lamotte also reveals the extensive influence of people on the ground—especially those of non-European descent. Through their sexuality and their labor, along with their socio-economic and political endeavors, they played a critical role in building the empire and setting its limits. As they sought justice for themselves, strove to protect their kin, and aimed to improve their social conditions, these individuals also pushed against the advancement of white dominion in unexpected ways.
Archivally rich and rigorously documented, By Flesh and Toil: How Sex, Race, and Labor Shaped the Early French Empire (Harvard UP, 2026) illuminates the transoceanic connections that united the French colonial world—and recasts people of African, Malagasy, South Asian, and Native American descent as key actors in the story of empire-building.
This interview is conducted by Dr Lewis Wade, a Humboldt Research Fellow at the University of Bamberg. He is the author of the prize-winning Privilege, Economy and State in Old Regime France and can be found on Bluesky @wadehistory.bsky.social.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>From the beginning of the seventeenth century, French colonies and trading posts sprawled across the Atlantic and Indian Oceans. In the first pan-imperial history of the early French Empire in the English language, Mélanie Lamotte shows how an increasingly cohesive legal culture came to govern the lives of enslaved and free people of African, Malagasy, South Asian, and Native American descent. She also illuminates the important role played by these populations in the development of the empire, from Louisiana to Guadeloupe, Senegambia, Madagascar, Isle Bourbon, and India.
The early French Empire has often been portrayed as a fragmented conglomerate of isolated colonies or regions. Yet Lamotte shows that racial policies issued by the metropole, as well as by officials in the Atlantic and Indian Oceans, significantly influenced one another. Rather than focusing on the actions of administrators, however, Lamotte also reveals the extensive influence of people on the ground—especially those of non-European descent. Through their sexuality and their labor, along with their socio-economic and political endeavors, they played a critical role in building the empire and setting its limits. As they sought justice for themselves, strove to protect their kin, and aimed to improve their social conditions, these individuals also pushed against the advancement of white dominion in unexpected ways.
Archivally rich and rigorously documented, By Flesh and Toil: How Sex, Race, and Labor Shaped the Early French Empire (Harvard UP, 2026) illuminates the transoceanic connections that united the French colonial world—and recasts people of African, Malagasy, South Asian, and Native American descent as key actors in the story of empire-building.
This interview is conducted by Dr Lewis Wade, a Humboldt Research Fellow at the University of Bamberg. He is the author of the prize-winning Privilege, Economy and State in Old Regime France and can be found on Bluesky @wadehistory.bsky.social.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1651</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">cdcb3df4-0b04-11f1-88eb-97afc4ec00ea</guid>
      <title>Trump, the UN Charter, and the Strange Politics of International Law</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>International law scholars are often among the sharpest critics of the Trump administration—but what if the usual story misses something essential? In this episode, RBI interim director Eli Karetny speaks with NYU international law professor Robert Howse about Trump’s complicated relationship with the UN Charter system, from Gaza to Venezuela and Iran. The conversation also turns to political theory: Leo Strauss’s reputation as a neoconservative godfather, the shadow of Carl Schmitt, and how today’s MAGA New Right recycles older anxieties about liberalism, virtue, and masculinity.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/trump-the-un-charter-and-the-strange-politics-of-international-law-2H_UHz5J</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>International law scholars are often among the sharpest critics of the Trump administration—but what if the usual story misses something essential? In this episode, RBI interim director Eli Karetny speaks with NYU international law professor Robert Howse about Trump’s complicated relationship with the UN Charter system, from Gaza to Venezuela and Iran. The conversation also turns to political theory: Leo Strauss’s reputation as a neoconservative godfather, the shadow of Carl Schmitt, and how today’s MAGA New Right recycles older anxieties about liberalism, virtue, and masculinity.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="58363603" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/f454ffef-9aa6-4c45-8bac-230dd9b4a5d7/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=f454ffef-9aa6-4c45-8bac-230dd9b4a5d7&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Trump, the UN Charter, and the Strange Politics of International Law</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:00:33</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>International law scholars are often among the sharpest critics of the Trump administration—but what if the usual story misses something essential? In this episode, RBI interim director Eli Karetny speaks with NYU international law professor Robert Howse about Trump’s complicated relationship with the UN Charter system, from Gaza to Venezuela and Iran. The conversation also turns to political theory: Leo Strauss’s reputation as a neoconservative godfather, the shadow of Carl Schmitt, and how today’s MAGA New Right recycles older anxieties about liberalism, virtue, and masculinity.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>International law scholars are often among the sharpest critics of the Trump administration—but what if the usual story misses something essential? In this episode, RBI interim director Eli Karetny speaks with NYU international law professor Robert Howse about Trump’s complicated relationship with the UN Charter system, from Gaza to Venezuela and Iran. The conversation also turns to political theory: Leo Strauss’s reputation as a neoconservative godfather, the shadow of Carl Schmitt, and how today’s MAGA New Right recycles older anxieties about liberalism, virtue, and masculinity.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1650</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">95de03ea-07d5-11f1-be88-3f177c7a9122</guid>
      <title>Lys Kulamadayil, &quot;Pathology of Plenty: Natural Resources in International Law&quot; (Bloomsbury 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781509969623" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Pathology of Plenty: Natural Resources in International Law</em></a>&nbsp;(Bloomsbury 2025), Lys Kulamadayil offers a crucial examination of how international law shapes the exploitation of natural resources in post-colonial States. Kulamadayil reveals how international legal rules can be constitutive, punitive, remedial in creating the paradox of plenty in resource-rich States.</p>
<p>The book revisits the making of foundational principles like sovereignty over natural resources and economic self-determination as applied during decolonisation; explores how humanitarian frameworks have justified extraction of public natural resources; and traces the proliferation of international treaties that protect foreign property rights. The book also zooms in on legal paradigms ranging from contract law to anti-corruption, human rights, and criminal law, arguing that these frameworks often work together to create the&nbsp;<em>pathology of plenty</em>.</p>
<p>Through this interrogation, the book points to proposals to escape siloed ways of thinking about natural resources and embrace an intersectoral and anti-carceral thinking instead.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.graduateinstitute.ch/discover-institute/lys-kulamadayil" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Lys Kulamadayil</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a Swiss National Science Foundation Ambizione Fellow at the Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies in Geneva and the Principal Investigator of the&nbsp;project&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.graduateinstitute.ch/research-centres/global-governance-centre/law-colour-code-locating-race-and-racism-international" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Law by Colour Code: Locating Race and Racism in International Law</em></a><em>.</em></p>
<p><a href="https://www.soas.ac.uk/about/raghavi-viswanath" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Raghavi Viswanath</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a postdoctoral researcher and teaching fellow at SOAS, University of London. Her research, supported by the Leverhulme Trust, examines how pastoralists claim grazing rights under India’s Forest Rights Act 2006 and how the everyday processes of staking such claims has been impacted by the authoritarian turn in India.&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/raghavi-viswanath-b2524253/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>LinkedIn</em></a><em>. Email:</em><a href="mailto:rv13@soas.ac.uk" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>rv13@soas.ac.uk</em></a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/lys-kulamadayil-pathology-of-plenty-natural-resources-in-international-law-bloomsbury-2025-Y4aDAE1U</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781509969623" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Pathology of Plenty: Natural Resources in International Law</em></a>&nbsp;(Bloomsbury 2025), Lys Kulamadayil offers a crucial examination of how international law shapes the exploitation of natural resources in post-colonial States. Kulamadayil reveals how international legal rules can be constitutive, punitive, remedial in creating the paradox of plenty in resource-rich States.</p>
<p>The book revisits the making of foundational principles like sovereignty over natural resources and economic self-determination as applied during decolonisation; explores how humanitarian frameworks have justified extraction of public natural resources; and traces the proliferation of international treaties that protect foreign property rights. The book also zooms in on legal paradigms ranging from contract law to anti-corruption, human rights, and criminal law, arguing that these frameworks often work together to create the&nbsp;<em>pathology of plenty</em>.</p>
<p>Through this interrogation, the book points to proposals to escape siloed ways of thinking about natural resources and embrace an intersectoral and anti-carceral thinking instead.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.graduateinstitute.ch/discover-institute/lys-kulamadayil" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Lys Kulamadayil</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a Swiss National Science Foundation Ambizione Fellow at the Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies in Geneva and the Principal Investigator of the&nbsp;project&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.graduateinstitute.ch/research-centres/global-governance-centre/law-colour-code-locating-race-and-racism-international" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Law by Colour Code: Locating Race and Racism in International Law</em></a><em>.</em></p>
<p><a href="https://www.soas.ac.uk/about/raghavi-viswanath" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Raghavi Viswanath</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a postdoctoral researcher and teaching fellow at SOAS, University of London. Her research, supported by the Leverhulme Trust, examines how pastoralists claim grazing rights under India’s Forest Rights Act 2006 and how the everyday processes of staking such claims has been impacted by the authoritarian turn in India.&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/raghavi-viswanath-b2524253/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>LinkedIn</em></a><em>. Email:</em><a href="mailto:rv13@soas.ac.uk" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>rv13@soas.ac.uk</em></a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="64224163" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/0148ba76-8539-4ea4-9175-1dbd14ec42f4/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=0148ba76-8539-4ea4-9175-1dbd14ec42f4&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Lys Kulamadayil, &quot;Pathology of Plenty: Natural Resources in International Law&quot; (Bloomsbury 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:06:52</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In Pathology of Plenty: Natural Resources in International Law (Bloomsbury 2025), Lys Kulamadayil offers a crucial examination of how international law shapes the exploitation of natural resources in post-colonial States. Kulamadayil reveals how international legal rules can be constitutive, punitive, remedial in creating the paradox of plenty in resource-rich States.
The book revisits the making of foundational principles like sovereignty over natural resources and economic self-determination as applied during decolonisation; explores how humanitarian frameworks have justified extraction of public natural resources; and traces the proliferation of international treaties that protect foreign property rights. The book also zooms in on legal paradigms ranging from contract law to anti-corruption, human rights, and criminal law, arguing that these frameworks often work together to create the pathology of plenty.
Through this interrogation, the book points to proposals to escape siloed ways of thinking about natural resources and embrace an intersectoral and anti-carceral thinking instead.
Lys Kulamadayil is a Swiss National Science Foundation Ambizione Fellow at the Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies in Geneva and the Principal Investigator of the project Law by Colour Code: Locating Race and Racism in International Law.
Raghavi Viswanath is a postdoctoral researcher and teaching fellow at SOAS, University of London. Her research, supported by the Leverhulme Trust, examines how pastoralists claim grazing rights under India’s Forest Rights Act 2006 and how the everyday processes of staking such claims has been impacted by the authoritarian turn in India. LinkedIn. Email:rv13@soas.ac.uk
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In Pathology of Plenty: Natural Resources in International Law (Bloomsbury 2025), Lys Kulamadayil offers a crucial examination of how international law shapes the exploitation of natural resources in post-colonial States. Kulamadayil reveals how international legal rules can be constitutive, punitive, remedial in creating the paradox of plenty in resource-rich States.
The book revisits the making of foundational principles like sovereignty over natural resources and economic self-determination as applied during decolonisation; explores how humanitarian frameworks have justified extraction of public natural resources; and traces the proliferation of international treaties that protect foreign property rights. The book also zooms in on legal paradigms ranging from contract law to anti-corruption, human rights, and criminal law, arguing that these frameworks often work together to create the pathology of plenty.
Through this interrogation, the book points to proposals to escape siloed ways of thinking about natural resources and embrace an intersectoral and anti-carceral thinking instead.
Lys Kulamadayil is a Swiss National Science Foundation Ambizione Fellow at the Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies in Geneva and the Principal Investigator of the project Law by Colour Code: Locating Race and Racism in International Law.
Raghavi Viswanath is a postdoctoral researcher and teaching fellow at SOAS, University of London. Her research, supported by the Leverhulme Trust, examines how pastoralists claim grazing rights under India’s Forest Rights Act 2006 and how the everyday processes of staking such claims has been impacted by the authoritarian turn in India. LinkedIn. Email:rv13@soas.ac.uk
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1649</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">b9c62dea-0204-11f1-8b51-07f9f3449039</guid>
      <title>Charles Alistair McCrary, &quot;Sincerely Held: American Secularism and Its Believers&quot; (U Chicago Press, 2022)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>"Sincerely held religious belief" is now a common phrase in discussions of American religious freedom, from opinions handed down by the US Supreme Court to local controversies. The "sincerity test" of religious belief has become a cornerstone of US jurisprudence, framing what counts as legitimate grounds for First Amendment claims in the eyes of the law. In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780226817958" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Sincerely Held: American Secularism and Its Believers</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(U Chicago Press, 2022), Charles McCrary provides an original account of how sincerely held religious belief became the primary standard for determining what legally counts as authentic religion.</p><p>McCrary skillfully traces the interlocking histories of American sincerity, religion, and secularism starting in the mid-nineteenth century. He analyzes a diverse archive, including Herman Melville's novel&nbsp;<em>The Confidence-Man</em>, vice-suppressing police, Spiritualist women accused of being fortune-tellers, eclectic conscientious objectors, secularization theorists, Black revolutionaries, and anti-LGBTQ litigants. Across this history<em>,&nbsp;</em>McCrary reveals how sincerity and sincerely held religious belief developed as technologies of secular governance, determining what does and doesn't entitle a person to receive protections from the state.</p><p>This fresh analysis of secularism in the United States invites further reflection on the role of sincerity in public life and religious studies scholarship, asking why sincerity has come to matter so much in a supposedly "post-truth" era.</p><p>Dr. Charles McCrary is a scholar of American religion, focusing on secularism, religious freedom, race, and science.&nbsp;His work has been published in academic journals including the&nbsp;<em>Journal of the American Academy of Religion</em>,&nbsp;<em>Religion &amp; American Culture</em>, and&nbsp;<em>Religion</em>. He also has written for popular outlets such as&nbsp;<em>Religion &amp; Politics</em>,&nbsp;<em>The Revealer</em>, and&nbsp;<em>The New Republic,&nbsp;</em>many of which are linked in the show notes of this episode. Before coming to ASU, he was a postdoctoral research associate at the John C. Danforth Center on Religion and Politics at Washington University in St. Louis.</p><p>Read more by Charles McCrary:</p><ul>
<li>"<a href="https://religionandpolitics.org/2022/04/12/the-supreme-court-and-the-strange-politics-of-the-sincere-believer/" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Supreme Court and the Strange Politics of the 'Sincere Believer</a>,'"&nbsp;<em>Religion &amp; Politics</em>, Apr. 2022</li>
<li>"<a href="https://newrepublic.com/article/165942/sincerely-held-religious-belief-law" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Antisocial Strain of Sincere Religious Beliefs Is on the Rise</a>,"&nbsp;<em>The New Republic</em>, Apr. 2022</li>
<li>"<a href="https://newrepublic.com/article/163779/covid-anti-vaccine-religious-exemption" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Baffling Legal Standard Fueling Religious Objections to Vaccine Mandates</a>,"&nbsp;<em>The New Republic</em>, Sept. 2021</li>
</ul><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 9 Feb 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/charles-alistair-mccrary-sincerely-held-american-secularism-and-its-believers-u-chicago-press-2022-l47pEPgF-thSiu1Q2</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"Sincerely held religious belief" is now a common phrase in discussions of American religious freedom, from opinions handed down by the US Supreme Court to local controversies. The "sincerity test" of religious belief has become a cornerstone of US jurisprudence, framing what counts as legitimate grounds for First Amendment claims in the eyes of the law. In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780226817958" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Sincerely Held: American Secularism and Its Believers</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(U Chicago Press, 2022), Charles McCrary provides an original account of how sincerely held religious belief became the primary standard for determining what legally counts as authentic religion.</p><p>McCrary skillfully traces the interlocking histories of American sincerity, religion, and secularism starting in the mid-nineteenth century. He analyzes a diverse archive, including Herman Melville's novel&nbsp;<em>The Confidence-Man</em>, vice-suppressing police, Spiritualist women accused of being fortune-tellers, eclectic conscientious objectors, secularization theorists, Black revolutionaries, and anti-LGBTQ litigants. Across this history<em>,&nbsp;</em>McCrary reveals how sincerity and sincerely held religious belief developed as technologies of secular governance, determining what does and doesn't entitle a person to receive protections from the state.</p><p>This fresh analysis of secularism in the United States invites further reflection on the role of sincerity in public life and religious studies scholarship, asking why sincerity has come to matter so much in a supposedly "post-truth" era.</p><p>Dr. Charles McCrary is a scholar of American religion, focusing on secularism, religious freedom, race, and science.&nbsp;His work has been published in academic journals including the&nbsp;<em>Journal of the American Academy of Religion</em>,&nbsp;<em>Religion &amp; American Culture</em>, and&nbsp;<em>Religion</em>. He also has written for popular outlets such as&nbsp;<em>Religion &amp; Politics</em>,&nbsp;<em>The Revealer</em>, and&nbsp;<em>The New Republic,&nbsp;</em>many of which are linked in the show notes of this episode. Before coming to ASU, he was a postdoctoral research associate at the John C. Danforth Center on Religion and Politics at Washington University in St. Louis.</p><p>Read more by Charles McCrary:</p><ul>
<li>"<a href="https://religionandpolitics.org/2022/04/12/the-supreme-court-and-the-strange-politics-of-the-sincere-believer/" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Supreme Court and the Strange Politics of the 'Sincere Believer</a>,'"&nbsp;<em>Religion &amp; Politics</em>, Apr. 2022</li>
<li>"<a href="https://newrepublic.com/article/165942/sincerely-held-religious-belief-law" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Antisocial Strain of Sincere Religious Beliefs Is on the Rise</a>,"&nbsp;<em>The New Republic</em>, Apr. 2022</li>
<li>"<a href="https://newrepublic.com/article/163779/covid-anti-vaccine-religious-exemption" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Baffling Legal Standard Fueling Religious Objections to Vaccine Mandates</a>,"&nbsp;<em>The New Republic</em>, Sept. 2021</li>
</ul><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="50433813" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/5b6ac883-2285-4868-a1c3-29b2e9928dcd/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=5b6ac883-2285-4868-a1c3-29b2e9928dcd&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Charles Alistair McCrary, &quot;Sincerely Held: American Secularism and Its Believers&quot; (U Chicago Press, 2022)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:52:30</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>&quot;Sincerely held religious belief&quot; is now a common phrase in discussions of American religious freedom, from opinions handed down by the US Supreme Court to local controversies. The &quot;sincerity test&quot; of religious belief has become a cornerstone of US jurisprudence, framing what counts as legitimate grounds for First Amendment claims in the eyes of the law. In Sincerely Held: American Secularism and Its Believers (U Chicago Press, 2022), Charles McCrary provides an original account of how sincerely held religious belief became the primary standard for determining what legally counts as authentic religion.
McCrary skillfully traces the interlocking histories of American sincerity, religion, and secularism starting in the mid-nineteenth century. He analyzes a diverse archive, including Herman Melville&apos;s novel The Confidence-Man, vice-suppressing police, Spiritualist women accused of being fortune-tellers, eclectic conscientious objectors, secularization theorists, Black revolutionaries, and anti-LGBTQ litigants. Across this history, McCrary reveals how sincerity and sincerely held religious belief developed as technologies of secular governance, determining what does and doesn&apos;t entitle a person to receive protections from the state.
This fresh analysis of secularism in the United States invites further reflection on the role of sincerity in public life and religious studies scholarship, asking why sincerity has come to matter so much in a supposedly &quot;post-truth&quot; era.
Dr. Charles McCrary is a scholar of American religion, focusing on secularism, religious freedom, race, and science. His work has been published in academic journals including the Journal of the American Academy of Religion, Religion &amp; American Culture, and Religion. He also has written for popular outlets such as Religion &amp; Politics, The Revealer, and The New Republic, many of which are linked in the show notes of this episode. Before coming to ASU, he was a postdoctoral research associate at the John C. Danforth Center on Religion and Politics at Washington University in St. Louis.
Read more by Charles McCrary:
&quot;The Supreme Court and the Strange Politics of the &apos;Sincere Believer,&apos;&quot; Religion &amp; Politics, Apr. 2022
&quot;The Antisocial Strain of Sincere Religious Beliefs Is on the Rise,&quot; The New Republic, Apr. 2022
&quot;The Baffling Legal Standard Fueling Religious Objections to Vaccine Mandates,&quot; The New Republic, Sept. 2021
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>&quot;Sincerely held religious belief&quot; is now a common phrase in discussions of American religious freedom, from opinions handed down by the US Supreme Court to local controversies. The &quot;sincerity test&quot; of religious belief has become a cornerstone of US jurisprudence, framing what counts as legitimate grounds for First Amendment claims in the eyes of the law. In Sincerely Held: American Secularism and Its Believers (U Chicago Press, 2022), Charles McCrary provides an original account of how sincerely held religious belief became the primary standard for determining what legally counts as authentic religion.
McCrary skillfully traces the interlocking histories of American sincerity, religion, and secularism starting in the mid-nineteenth century. He analyzes a diverse archive, including Herman Melville&apos;s novel The Confidence-Man, vice-suppressing police, Spiritualist women accused of being fortune-tellers, eclectic conscientious objectors, secularization theorists, Black revolutionaries, and anti-LGBTQ litigants. Across this history, McCrary reveals how sincerity and sincerely held religious belief developed as technologies of secular governance, determining what does and doesn&apos;t entitle a person to receive protections from the state.
This fresh analysis of secularism in the United States invites further reflection on the role of sincerity in public life and religious studies scholarship, asking why sincerity has come to matter so much in a supposedly &quot;post-truth&quot; era.
Dr. Charles McCrary is a scholar of American religion, focusing on secularism, religious freedom, race, and science. His work has been published in academic journals including the Journal of the American Academy of Religion, Religion &amp; American Culture, and Religion. He also has written for popular outlets such as Religion &amp; Politics, The Revealer, and The New Republic, many of which are linked in the show notes of this episode. Before coming to ASU, he was a postdoctoral research associate at the John C. Danforth Center on Religion and Politics at Washington University in St. Louis.
Read more by Charles McCrary:
&quot;The Supreme Court and the Strange Politics of the &apos;Sincere Believer,&apos;&quot; Religion &amp; Politics, Apr. 2022
&quot;The Antisocial Strain of Sincere Religious Beliefs Is on the Rise,&quot; The New Republic, Apr. 2022
&quot;The Baffling Legal Standard Fueling Religious Objections to Vaccine Mandates,&quot; The New Republic, Sept. 2021
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>236</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">bbefc66c-b1d1-11ec-8c58-cb84e9adad99</guid>
      <title>Jacob Mchangama, &quot;Free Speech: A History from Socrates to Social Media&quot; (Basic Books, 2022)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://justitia-int.org/en/about-justitia/jacob-mchangama/" rel="noopener noreferrer">﻿Jacob Mchangama</a>, founder and director of the think tank Justitia, has written a one-volume history of freedom of thought, which ranges from the lone Demosthenes of 4th-century BCE Athens to the recent controversies regarding Donald Trump. In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781541600492" rel="noopener noreferrer">﻿<em>Free Speech: A History from Socrates to Social Media</em></a>&nbsp;(Basic Books, 2022)﻿,&nbsp;Mchangama argues that the history of freedom of thought has recurrent themes, such as a free speech entropy: the perception of rulers or governments that if speech is not restricted then social or political decline or disorder is inevitable. Mchangama also notes how restrictions usually have the unintended effect of emboldening the speakers and making the forbidden speech even more attractive to potential listeners. This history also reveals advocates of free speech less familiar to Western readers, such as the ninth-century Persian scholar Ibn al-Rawandi, a theologian and later skeptic whose life illustrates the debates possible in medieval Islam. Mchangama reviews the modern debates regarding freedom of thought and the latest iterations of arguments about whether free speech will lead to social decline and chaos. Mchangama is a champion of free speech but his history provides a fair minded account of the concerns of speech restrictionists throughout history.</p><p><em>﻿</em><a href="https://www.montclair.edu/profilepages/view_profile.php?username=drakei" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Ian J. Drake</em></a><em>&nbsp;is Associate Professor of Jurisprudence, Montclair State University.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 8 Feb 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/jacob-mchangama-free-speech-a-history-from-socrates-to-social-media-basic-books-2022-Sbrj1abQ</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://justitia-int.org/en/about-justitia/jacob-mchangama/" rel="noopener noreferrer">﻿Jacob Mchangama</a>, founder and director of the think tank Justitia, has written a one-volume history of freedom of thought, which ranges from the lone Demosthenes of 4th-century BCE Athens to the recent controversies regarding Donald Trump. In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781541600492" rel="noopener noreferrer">﻿<em>Free Speech: A History from Socrates to Social Media</em></a>&nbsp;(Basic Books, 2022)﻿,&nbsp;Mchangama argues that the history of freedom of thought has recurrent themes, such as a free speech entropy: the perception of rulers or governments that if speech is not restricted then social or political decline or disorder is inevitable. Mchangama also notes how restrictions usually have the unintended effect of emboldening the speakers and making the forbidden speech even more attractive to potential listeners. This history also reveals advocates of free speech less familiar to Western readers, such as the ninth-century Persian scholar Ibn al-Rawandi, a theologian and later skeptic whose life illustrates the debates possible in medieval Islam. Mchangama reviews the modern debates regarding freedom of thought and the latest iterations of arguments about whether free speech will lead to social decline and chaos. Mchangama is a champion of free speech but his history provides a fair minded account of the concerns of speech restrictionists throughout history.</p><p><em>﻿</em><a href="https://www.montclair.edu/profilepages/view_profile.php?username=drakei" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Ian J. Drake</em></a><em>&nbsp;is Associate Professor of Jurisprudence, Montclair State University.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="34384817" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/9181039e-4e9f-414c-8045-7d3ef3355cca/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=9181039e-4e9f-414c-8045-7d3ef3355cca&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Jacob Mchangama, &quot;Free Speech: A History from Socrates to Social Media&quot; (Basic Books, 2022)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:35:48</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>﻿Jacob Mchangama, founder and director of the think tank Justitia, has written a one-volume history of freedom of thought, which ranges from the lone Demosthenes of 4th-century BCE Athens to the recent controversies regarding Donald Trump. In ﻿Free Speech: A History from Socrates to Social Media (Basic Books, 2022)﻿, Mchangama argues that the history of freedom of thought has recurrent themes, such as a free speech entropy: the perception of rulers or governments that if speech is not restricted then social or political decline or disorder is inevitable. Mchangama also notes how restrictions usually have the unintended effect of emboldening the speakers and making the forbidden speech even more attractive to potential listeners. This history also reveals advocates of free speech less familiar to Western readers, such as the ninth-century Persian scholar Ibn al-Rawandi, a theologian and later skeptic whose life illustrates the debates possible in medieval Islam. Mchangama reviews the modern debates regarding freedom of thought and the latest iterations of arguments about whether free speech will lead to social decline and chaos. Mchangama is a champion of free speech but his history provides a fair minded account of the concerns of speech restrictionists throughout history.
﻿Ian J. Drake is Associate Professor of Jurisprudence, Montclair State University.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>﻿Jacob Mchangama, founder and director of the think tank Justitia, has written a one-volume history of freedom of thought, which ranges from the lone Demosthenes of 4th-century BCE Athens to the recent controversies regarding Donald Trump. In ﻿Free Speech: A History from Socrates to Social Media (Basic Books, 2022)﻿, Mchangama argues that the history of freedom of thought has recurrent themes, such as a free speech entropy: the perception of rulers or governments that if speech is not restricted then social or political decline or disorder is inevitable. Mchangama also notes how restrictions usually have the unintended effect of emboldening the speakers and making the forbidden speech even more attractive to potential listeners. This history also reveals advocates of free speech less familiar to Western readers, such as the ninth-century Persian scholar Ibn al-Rawandi, a theologian and later skeptic whose life illustrates the debates possible in medieval Islam. Mchangama reviews the modern debates regarding freedom of thought and the latest iterations of arguments about whether free speech will lead to social decline and chaos. Mchangama is a champion of free speech but his history provides a fair minded account of the concerns of speech restrictionists throughout history.
﻿Ian J. Drake is Associate Professor of Jurisprudence, Montclair State University.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>155</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4d0d1b14-ffa2-11f0-9c94-6fa045bbee18</guid>
      <title>Jessica Lake, &quot;Special Damage: The Slander of Women and the Gendered History of Defamation Law&quot; (Stanford UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In 1788, Mary Smith was ruined and banished from "civilised" society when her neighbor accused her of carrying a bastard child. To silence the ruinous rumors and vindicate her name, Smith sued him for defamation. But in court, she faced the onerous burden, entrenched within English law of sexual slander, of proving "special damage." Smith should have lost her case, but her action set off a remarkable reform movement.</p>
<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781503644700" rel="noopener noreferrer">Special Damage: The Slander of Women and the Gendered History of Defamation Law</a>&nbsp;(Stanford University Press, 2025), Dr. Jessica Lake offers a comparative legal history of gendered hate speech, verbal abuse, and sexual harassment across 19th-century America, Australia, and England. Drawing upon original archival material, she tracks the creation of the Slander of Women reforms that made it easier for women to sue when called "whores." Dr. Lake reveals, for the first time, the cases brought by women that spurred and benefitted from these reforms. In doing so, she details how debates about women, speech, and reputation circulated through transnational common law networks, connecting countries, colonies, and continents.</p>
<p>The Slander of Women movement furthered legal protections for women, but also created links between ideas of whiteness, femininity, chastity, and civilization.&nbsp;<em>Special Damage</em>&nbsp;tells a compelling story that questions the costs and compromises of legal progress in a patriarchal and unequal "civilised" New World.</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 2 Feb 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/jessica-lake-special-damage-the-slander-of-women-and-the-gendered-history-of-defamation-law-stanford-up-2025-vDiCOi3j</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In 1788, Mary Smith was ruined and banished from "civilised" society when her neighbor accused her of carrying a bastard child. To silence the ruinous rumors and vindicate her name, Smith sued him for defamation. But in court, she faced the onerous burden, entrenched within English law of sexual slander, of proving "special damage." Smith should have lost her case, but her action set off a remarkable reform movement.</p>
<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781503644700" rel="noopener noreferrer">Special Damage: The Slander of Women and the Gendered History of Defamation Law</a>&nbsp;(Stanford University Press, 2025), Dr. Jessica Lake offers a comparative legal history of gendered hate speech, verbal abuse, and sexual harassment across 19th-century America, Australia, and England. Drawing upon original archival material, she tracks the creation of the Slander of Women reforms that made it easier for women to sue when called "whores." Dr. Lake reveals, for the first time, the cases brought by women that spurred and benefitted from these reforms. In doing so, she details how debates about women, speech, and reputation circulated through transnational common law networks, connecting countries, colonies, and continents.</p>
<p>The Slander of Women movement furthered legal protections for women, but also created links between ideas of whiteness, femininity, chastity, and civilization.&nbsp;<em>Special Damage</em>&nbsp;tells a compelling story that questions the costs and compromises of legal progress in a patriarchal and unequal "civilised" New World.</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="56252691" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/8b521018-126e-4428-9074-df2382929687/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=8b521018-126e-4428-9074-df2382929687&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Jessica Lake, &quot;Special Damage: The Slander of Women and the Gendered History of Defamation Law&quot; (Stanford UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:58:33</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In 1788, Mary Smith was ruined and banished from &quot;civilised&quot; society when her neighbor accused her of carrying a bastard child. To silence the ruinous rumors and vindicate her name, Smith sued him for defamation. But in court, she faced the onerous burden, entrenched within English law of sexual slander, of proving &quot;special damage.&quot; Smith should have lost her case, but her action set off a remarkable reform movement.
In Special Damage: The Slander of Women and the Gendered History of Defamation Law (Stanford University Press, 2025), Dr. Jessica Lake offers a comparative legal history of gendered hate speech, verbal abuse, and sexual harassment across 19th-century America, Australia, and England. Drawing upon original archival material, she tracks the creation of the Slander of Women reforms that made it easier for women to sue when called &quot;whores.&quot; Dr. Lake reveals, for the first time, the cases brought by women that spurred and benefitted from these reforms. In doing so, she details how debates about women, speech, and reputation circulated through transnational common law networks, connecting countries, colonies, and continents.
The Slander of Women movement furthered legal protections for women, but also created links between ideas of whiteness, femininity, chastity, and civilization. Special Damage tells a compelling story that questions the costs and compromises of legal progress in a patriarchal and unequal &quot;civilised&quot; New World.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In 1788, Mary Smith was ruined and banished from &quot;civilised&quot; society when her neighbor accused her of carrying a bastard child. To silence the ruinous rumors and vindicate her name, Smith sued him for defamation. But in court, she faced the onerous burden, entrenched within English law of sexual slander, of proving &quot;special damage.&quot; Smith should have lost her case, but her action set off a remarkable reform movement.
In Special Damage: The Slander of Women and the Gendered History of Defamation Law (Stanford University Press, 2025), Dr. Jessica Lake offers a comparative legal history of gendered hate speech, verbal abuse, and sexual harassment across 19th-century America, Australia, and England. Drawing upon original archival material, she tracks the creation of the Slander of Women reforms that made it easier for women to sue when called &quot;whores.&quot; Dr. Lake reveals, for the first time, the cases brought by women that spurred and benefitted from these reforms. In doing so, she details how debates about women, speech, and reputation circulated through transnational common law networks, connecting countries, colonies, and continents.
The Slander of Women movement furthered legal protections for women, but also created links between ideas of whiteness, femininity, chastity, and civilization. Special Damage tells a compelling story that questions the costs and compromises of legal progress in a patriarchal and unequal &quot;civilised&quot; New World.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1648</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">d374fa12-fcde-11f0-a2f6-73c3ef45d145</guid>
      <title>Michael Stambolis-Ruhstorfer, &quot;By the Power Vested in Me: How Experts Shape Same-Sex Marriage Debates&quot; (Columbia UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In both the United States and France, each side of the legal battle over same-sex marriage and parenthood relied heavily on experts. Despite the similarity of issues, however, lawmakers in each country turned to different sets of authorities: from economists and psychoanalysts to priests and ordinary people. They even prized different types of expertise—empirical research in the United States versus abstract theory in France.<br>Exploring the legalization of same-sex marriage in the United States and France,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.michaelstambolis.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Michael Stambolis-Ruhstorfer</a>&nbsp;sheds new light on the power of experts to influence high-stakes democratic debates. Drawing on extensive interviews and ethnographic observation, Michael Stambolis-Ruhstorfer traces the divergences between the two countries, showing why some experts are ubiquitous in one but absent in the other. He argues that lawmakers, judges, lawyers, journalists, and activists covet something only experts can provide: the credibility and aura of authority, or “expert capital,” which they deploy to advance their agendas. Expert capital is not derived from scientific or technical merit alone but is produced through cultural norms, material resources, and social relationships, which vary greatly across national contexts.<br>Through the story of the fight over gay rights,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780231202237" rel="noopener noreferrer">By the Power Vested in Me: How Experts Shape Same-Sex Marriage Debates</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Columbia UP, 2025) reveals how and why certain experts—but not others—obtain the authority to shape public opinion and policy. At a time of soaring public distrust in experts, this book offers new ways to understand the contested political role of expertise and its consequences.</p>
<p>Michael O. Johnston, Ph.D. is an Associate Professor of Sociology at William Penn University, where he specializes in the cultural and interpretive study of space, behavior, and identity. His scholarship examines how designed environments shape social interaction, connectedness, and moral life across diverse settings. He is the author of&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/the-social-construction-of-a-cultural-spectacle-floatzilla-michael-o-johnston/94ce27c27664fba1?ean=9781666929720&amp;next=t" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Social Construction of a Cultural Spectacle: Floatzilla</a>&nbsp;(Lexington Books, 2023) and&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/community-media-representations-of-place-and-identity-at-tug-fest-reconstructing-the-mississippi-river-michael-o-johnston/d580c6ec9b0a790c?ean=9781666908770&amp;next=t" rel="noopener noreferrer">Community Media Representations of Place and Identity at Tug Fest: Reconstructing the Mississippi River</a>&nbsp;(Lexington Books, 2022). His current research projects include the study of escape rooms as emotion-structured environments, temporal urban environments in rural historical towns, student experiences of hanging out and being at home while at college and university, and a more recent study on the making of rodeo. To learn more about his work, visit his&nbsp;<a href="https://profjohnston.weebly.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">personal website</a>,&nbsp;<a href="https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=nPdv1bEAAAAJ&amp;hl=en" rel="noopener noreferrer">Google Scholar</a>&nbsp;profile, or connect with him on Bluesky (@professorjohnst.bsky.social) or Twitter/X (@ProfessorJohnst). He can also be reached directly by&nbsp;<a href="mailto:johnstonmo@wmpenn.edu" rel="noopener noreferrer">email</a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/michael-stambolis-ruhstorfer-by-the-power-vested-in-me-how-experts-shape-same-sex-marriage-debates-columbia-up-2025-LGfci_Gp</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In both the United States and France, each side of the legal battle over same-sex marriage and parenthood relied heavily on experts. Despite the similarity of issues, however, lawmakers in each country turned to different sets of authorities: from economists and psychoanalysts to priests and ordinary people. They even prized different types of expertise—empirical research in the United States versus abstract theory in France.<br>Exploring the legalization of same-sex marriage in the United States and France,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.michaelstambolis.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Michael Stambolis-Ruhstorfer</a>&nbsp;sheds new light on the power of experts to influence high-stakes democratic debates. Drawing on extensive interviews and ethnographic observation, Michael Stambolis-Ruhstorfer traces the divergences between the two countries, showing why some experts are ubiquitous in one but absent in the other. He argues that lawmakers, judges, lawyers, journalists, and activists covet something only experts can provide: the credibility and aura of authority, or “expert capital,” which they deploy to advance their agendas. Expert capital is not derived from scientific or technical merit alone but is produced through cultural norms, material resources, and social relationships, which vary greatly across national contexts.<br>Through the story of the fight over gay rights,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780231202237" rel="noopener noreferrer">By the Power Vested in Me: How Experts Shape Same-Sex Marriage Debates</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Columbia UP, 2025) reveals how and why certain experts—but not others—obtain the authority to shape public opinion and policy. At a time of soaring public distrust in experts, this book offers new ways to understand the contested political role of expertise and its consequences.</p>
<p>Michael O. Johnston, Ph.D. is an Associate Professor of Sociology at William Penn University, where he specializes in the cultural and interpretive study of space, behavior, and identity. His scholarship examines how designed environments shape social interaction, connectedness, and moral life across diverse settings. He is the author of&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/the-social-construction-of-a-cultural-spectacle-floatzilla-michael-o-johnston/94ce27c27664fba1?ean=9781666929720&amp;next=t" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Social Construction of a Cultural Spectacle: Floatzilla</a>&nbsp;(Lexington Books, 2023) and&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/community-media-representations-of-place-and-identity-at-tug-fest-reconstructing-the-mississippi-river-michael-o-johnston/d580c6ec9b0a790c?ean=9781666908770&amp;next=t" rel="noopener noreferrer">Community Media Representations of Place and Identity at Tug Fest: Reconstructing the Mississippi River</a>&nbsp;(Lexington Books, 2022). His current research projects include the study of escape rooms as emotion-structured environments, temporal urban environments in rural historical towns, student experiences of hanging out and being at home while at college and university, and a more recent study on the making of rodeo. To learn more about his work, visit his&nbsp;<a href="https://profjohnston.weebly.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">personal website</a>,&nbsp;<a href="https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=nPdv1bEAAAAJ&amp;hl=en" rel="noopener noreferrer">Google Scholar</a>&nbsp;profile, or connect with him on Bluesky (@professorjohnst.bsky.social) or Twitter/X (@ProfessorJohnst). He can also be reached directly by&nbsp;<a href="mailto:johnstonmo@wmpenn.edu" rel="noopener noreferrer">email</a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="50068448" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/37a57563-7347-4076-ac52-b8279e4e540e/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=37a57563-7347-4076-ac52-b8279e4e540e&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Michael Stambolis-Ruhstorfer, &quot;By the Power Vested in Me: How Experts Shape Same-Sex Marriage Debates&quot; (Columbia UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:52:06</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In both the United States and France, each side of the legal battle over same-sex marriage and parenthood relied heavily on experts. Despite the similarity of issues, however, lawmakers in each country turned to different sets of authorities: from economists and psychoanalysts to priests and ordinary people. They even prized different types of expertise—empirical research in the United States versus abstract theory in France.Exploring the legalization of same-sex marriage in the United States and France, Michael Stambolis-Ruhstorfer sheds new light on the power of experts to influence high-stakes democratic debates. Drawing on extensive interviews and ethnographic observation, Michael Stambolis-Ruhstorfer traces the divergences between the two countries, showing why some experts are ubiquitous in one but absent in the other. He argues that lawmakers, judges, lawyers, journalists, and activists covet something only experts can provide: the credibility and aura of authority, or “expert capital,” which they deploy to advance their agendas. Expert capital is not derived from scientific or technical merit alone but is produced through cultural norms, material resources, and social relationships, which vary greatly across national contexts.Through the story of the fight over gay rights, By the Power Vested in Me: How Experts Shape Same-Sex Marriage Debates (Columbia UP, 2025) reveals how and why certain experts—but not others—obtain the authority to shape public opinion and policy. At a time of soaring public distrust in experts, this book offers new ways to understand the contested political role of expertise and its consequences.
Michael O. Johnston, Ph.D. is an Associate Professor of Sociology at William Penn University, where he specializes in the cultural and interpretive study of space, behavior, and identity. His scholarship examines how designed environments shape social interaction, connectedness, and moral life across diverse settings. He is the author of The Social Construction of a Cultural Spectacle: Floatzilla (Lexington Books, 2023) and Community Media Representations of Place and Identity at Tug Fest: Reconstructing the Mississippi River (Lexington Books, 2022). His current research projects include the study of escape rooms as emotion-structured environments, temporal urban environments in rural historical towns, student experiences of hanging out and being at home while at college and university, and a more recent study on the making of rodeo. To learn more about his work, visit his personal website, Google Scholar profile, or connect with him on Bluesky (@professorjohnst.bsky.social) or Twitter/X (@ProfessorJohnst). He can also be reached directly by email.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In both the United States and France, each side of the legal battle over same-sex marriage and parenthood relied heavily on experts. Despite the similarity of issues, however, lawmakers in each country turned to different sets of authorities: from economists and psychoanalysts to priests and ordinary people. They even prized different types of expertise—empirical research in the United States versus abstract theory in France.Exploring the legalization of same-sex marriage in the United States and France, Michael Stambolis-Ruhstorfer sheds new light on the power of experts to influence high-stakes democratic debates. Drawing on extensive interviews and ethnographic observation, Michael Stambolis-Ruhstorfer traces the divergences between the two countries, showing why some experts are ubiquitous in one but absent in the other. He argues that lawmakers, judges, lawyers, journalists, and activists covet something only experts can provide: the credibility and aura of authority, or “expert capital,” which they deploy to advance their agendas. Expert capital is not derived from scientific or technical merit alone but is produced through cultural norms, material resources, and social relationships, which vary greatly across national contexts.Through the story of the fight over gay rights, By the Power Vested in Me: How Experts Shape Same-Sex Marriage Debates (Columbia UP, 2025) reveals how and why certain experts—but not others—obtain the authority to shape public opinion and policy. At a time of soaring public distrust in experts, this book offers new ways to understand the contested political role of expertise and its consequences.
Michael O. Johnston, Ph.D. is an Associate Professor of Sociology at William Penn University, where he specializes in the cultural and interpretive study of space, behavior, and identity. His scholarship examines how designed environments shape social interaction, connectedness, and moral life across diverse settings. He is the author of The Social Construction of a Cultural Spectacle: Floatzilla (Lexington Books, 2023) and Community Media Representations of Place and Identity at Tug Fest: Reconstructing the Mississippi River (Lexington Books, 2022). His current research projects include the study of escape rooms as emotion-structured environments, temporal urban environments in rural historical towns, student experiences of hanging out and being at home while at college and university, and a more recent study on the making of rodeo. To learn more about his work, visit his personal website, Google Scholar profile, or connect with him on Bluesky (@professorjohnst.bsky.social) or Twitter/X (@ProfessorJohnst). He can also be reached directly by email.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1647</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">591d2400-fc0d-11f0-a97e-0fdb7e886898</guid>
      <title>Ghost in the Criminal Justice Machine</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Despite reform efforts that have grown in scope and intensity over the last two decades, the machine of American mass incarceration continues to flourish. In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781620977880" rel="noopener noreferrer">Ghost in the Criminal Justice Machine:&nbsp;﻿﻿Reform, White Supremacy, and an Abolitionist Future</a>, formerly incarcerated activist and organizer Emile Suotonye DeWeaver argues that the root of the problem is white supremacy.</p>
<p>During twenty-one years in prison, DeWeaver covertly organized to pass legislation impacting juveniles in California’s criminal legal system; was a culture writer for&nbsp;<em>Easy Street Magazine</em>; and co-founded Prison Renaissance, an organization centering incarcerated voices and incarcerated leadership. DeWeaver draws on these experiences to interrogate the central premise of reform efforts, including prisoner rehabilitation programs, arguing that they demand self-abnegation, entrench white supremacy, and ignore the role of structural oppression.</p>
<p>DeWeaver intervenes in contemporary debates on criminal justice and racial justice efforts with his eye-opening discussion of the tools we need to end white supremacy—both within and outside the carceral setting.&nbsp;<em>Ghost in the Criminal Justice Machine</em>&nbsp;adds a sharp and unique perspective to the growing discourse on racial justice, incarceration, and abolition.</p>
<p>This episode considers: parole boards; hidden factors that extend sentences; how power is structured; why most reforms repackage inequality; and ways to restructure power.</p>
<p>Our guest is: Emile Suotonye DeWeaver, who is a formerly-incarcerated activist and a 2022 Soros Justice Fellow. California’s Governor Brown commuted his life sentence after twenty-one years for his community work. He has written for publications including the&nbsp;<em>San Francisco Chronicle</em>, the&nbsp;<em>San Jose Mercury News</em>,&nbsp;<em>Colorlines</em>,&nbsp;<em>The Appeal</em>,&nbsp;<em>The Rumpus</em>, and&nbsp;<em>Seventh Wave</em>.</p>
<p>Our host is:&nbsp;<a href="https://christinagessler.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. Christina Gessler</a>, who is an academic writing coach and editor. She is the creator, producer and show host of the Academic Life podcast.</p>
<p>Playlist for listeners:</p>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/researching-racial-injustice" rel="noopener noreferrer">Hands Up, Don't Shoot</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/freemans-challenge" rel="noopener noreferrer">Freemans Challenge</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/stitching-freedom" rel="noopener noreferrer">Stitching Freedom</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/education-behind-the-wall" rel="noopener noreferrer">Education Behind The Wall</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/what-might-be" rel="noopener noreferrer">What Might Be</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/brittany-friedman-carceral-apartheid-how-lies-and-white-supremacists-run-our-prisons-unc-press-2025" rel="noopener noreferrer">Carceral Apartheid</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/no-common-ground" rel="noopener noreferrer">No Common Ground</a></li>
</ul>
<p>Welcome to Academic Life, the podcast for your academic journey—and beyond! You help support the show by downloading and sharing episodes. Join us again to learn from more experts inside and outside the academy, and around the world. Missed any of the 300+ Academic Life episodes? Find them&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/up-partners/academic-life" rel="noopener noreferrer">here.</a>&nbsp;And thank you for listening!</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/ghost-in-the-criminal-justice-machine-1QRKElKk</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Despite reform efforts that have grown in scope and intensity over the last two decades, the machine of American mass incarceration continues to flourish. In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781620977880" rel="noopener noreferrer">Ghost in the Criminal Justice Machine:&nbsp;﻿﻿Reform, White Supremacy, and an Abolitionist Future</a>, formerly incarcerated activist and organizer Emile Suotonye DeWeaver argues that the root of the problem is white supremacy.</p>
<p>During twenty-one years in prison, DeWeaver covertly organized to pass legislation impacting juveniles in California’s criminal legal system; was a culture writer for&nbsp;<em>Easy Street Magazine</em>; and co-founded Prison Renaissance, an organization centering incarcerated voices and incarcerated leadership. DeWeaver draws on these experiences to interrogate the central premise of reform efforts, including prisoner rehabilitation programs, arguing that they demand self-abnegation, entrench white supremacy, and ignore the role of structural oppression.</p>
<p>DeWeaver intervenes in contemporary debates on criminal justice and racial justice efforts with his eye-opening discussion of the tools we need to end white supremacy—both within and outside the carceral setting.&nbsp;<em>Ghost in the Criminal Justice Machine</em>&nbsp;adds a sharp and unique perspective to the growing discourse on racial justice, incarceration, and abolition.</p>
<p>This episode considers: parole boards; hidden factors that extend sentences; how power is structured; why most reforms repackage inequality; and ways to restructure power.</p>
<p>Our guest is: Emile Suotonye DeWeaver, who is a formerly-incarcerated activist and a 2022 Soros Justice Fellow. California’s Governor Brown commuted his life sentence after twenty-one years for his community work. He has written for publications including the&nbsp;<em>San Francisco Chronicle</em>, the&nbsp;<em>San Jose Mercury News</em>,&nbsp;<em>Colorlines</em>,&nbsp;<em>The Appeal</em>,&nbsp;<em>The Rumpus</em>, and&nbsp;<em>Seventh Wave</em>.</p>
<p>Our host is:&nbsp;<a href="https://christinagessler.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. Christina Gessler</a>, who is an academic writing coach and editor. She is the creator, producer and show host of the Academic Life podcast.</p>
<p>Playlist for listeners:</p>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/researching-racial-injustice" rel="noopener noreferrer">Hands Up, Don't Shoot</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/freemans-challenge" rel="noopener noreferrer">Freemans Challenge</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/stitching-freedom" rel="noopener noreferrer">Stitching Freedom</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/education-behind-the-wall" rel="noopener noreferrer">Education Behind The Wall</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/what-might-be" rel="noopener noreferrer">What Might Be</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/brittany-friedman-carceral-apartheid-how-lies-and-white-supremacists-run-our-prisons-unc-press-2025" rel="noopener noreferrer">Carceral Apartheid</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/no-common-ground" rel="noopener noreferrer">No Common Ground</a></li>
</ul>
<p>Welcome to Academic Life, the podcast for your academic journey—and beyond! You help support the show by downloading and sharing episodes. Join us again to learn from more experts inside and outside the academy, and around the world. Missed any of the 300+ Academic Life episodes? Find them&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/up-partners/academic-life" rel="noopener noreferrer">here.</a>&nbsp;And thank you for listening!</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="39933334" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/fd436b81-fa9c-43e9-9c8b-10f113e6c0b1/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=fd436b81-fa9c-43e9-9c8b-10f113e6c0b1&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Ghost in the Criminal Justice Machine</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:41:33</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Despite reform efforts that have grown in scope and intensity over the last two decades, the machine of American mass incarceration continues to flourish. In Ghost in the Criminal Justice Machine: ﻿﻿Reform, White Supremacy, and an Abolitionist Future, formerly incarcerated activist and organizer Emile Suotonye DeWeaver argues that the root of the problem is white supremacy.
During twenty-one years in prison, DeWeaver covertly organized to pass legislation impacting juveniles in California’s criminal legal system; was a culture writer for Easy Street Magazine; and co-founded Prison Renaissance, an organization centering incarcerated voices and incarcerated leadership. DeWeaver draws on these experiences to interrogate the central premise of reform efforts, including prisoner rehabilitation programs, arguing that they demand self-abnegation, entrench white supremacy, and ignore the role of structural oppression.
DeWeaver intervenes in contemporary debates on criminal justice and racial justice efforts with his eye-opening discussion of the tools we need to end white supremacy—both within and outside the carceral setting. Ghost in the Criminal Justice Machine adds a sharp and unique perspective to the growing discourse on racial justice, incarceration, and abolition.
This episode considers: parole boards; hidden factors that extend sentences; how power is structured; why most reforms repackage inequality; and ways to restructure power.
Our guest is: Emile Suotonye DeWeaver, who is a formerly-incarcerated activist and a 2022 Soros Justice Fellow. California’s Governor Brown commuted his life sentence after twenty-one years for his community work. He has written for publications including the San Francisco Chronicle, the San Jose Mercury News, Colorlines, The Appeal, The Rumpus, and Seventh Wave.
Our host is: Dr. Christina Gessler, who is an academic writing coach and editor. She is the creator, producer and show host of the Academic Life podcast.
Playlist for listeners:
 Hands Up, Don&apos;t Shoot
 Freemans Challenge
 Stitching Freedom
 Education Behind The Wall
 What Might Be
 Carceral Apartheid
 No Common Ground
Welcome to Academic Life, the podcast for your academic journey—and beyond! You help support the show by downloading and sharing episodes. Join us again to learn from more experts inside and outside the academy, and around the world. Missed any of the 300+ Academic Life episodes? Find them here. And thank you for listening!
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Despite reform efforts that have grown in scope and intensity over the last two decades, the machine of American mass incarceration continues to flourish. In Ghost in the Criminal Justice Machine: ﻿﻿Reform, White Supremacy, and an Abolitionist Future, formerly incarcerated activist and organizer Emile Suotonye DeWeaver argues that the root of the problem is white supremacy.
During twenty-one years in prison, DeWeaver covertly organized to pass legislation impacting juveniles in California’s criminal legal system; was a culture writer for Easy Street Magazine; and co-founded Prison Renaissance, an organization centering incarcerated voices and incarcerated leadership. DeWeaver draws on these experiences to interrogate the central premise of reform efforts, including prisoner rehabilitation programs, arguing that they demand self-abnegation, entrench white supremacy, and ignore the role of structural oppression.
DeWeaver intervenes in contemporary debates on criminal justice and racial justice efforts with his eye-opening discussion of the tools we need to end white supremacy—both within and outside the carceral setting. Ghost in the Criminal Justice Machine adds a sharp and unique perspective to the growing discourse on racial justice, incarceration, and abolition.
This episode considers: parole boards; hidden factors that extend sentences; how power is structured; why most reforms repackage inequality; and ways to restructure power.
Our guest is: Emile Suotonye DeWeaver, who is a formerly-incarcerated activist and a 2022 Soros Justice Fellow. California’s Governor Brown commuted his life sentence after twenty-one years for his community work. He has written for publications including the San Francisco Chronicle, the San Jose Mercury News, Colorlines, The Appeal, The Rumpus, and Seventh Wave.
Our host is: Dr. Christina Gessler, who is an academic writing coach and editor. She is the creator, producer and show host of the Academic Life podcast.
Playlist for listeners:
 Hands Up, Don&apos;t Shoot
 Freemans Challenge
 Stitching Freedom
 Education Behind The Wall
 What Might Be
 Carceral Apartheid
 No Common Ground
Welcome to Academic Life, the podcast for your academic journey—and beyond! You help support the show by downloading and sharing episodes. Join us again to learn from more experts inside and outside the academy, and around the world. Missed any of the 300+ Academic Life episodes? Find them here. And thank you for listening!
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1646</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">50de2022-fa83-11f0-8a21-a70fa3080cbf</guid>
      <title>Karin Wulf, &quot;Lineage: Genealogy and the Power of Connection in Early America&quot; (Oxford UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In eighteenth-century America, genealogy was more than a simple record of family ties—it was a powerful force that shaped society.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197553220" rel="noopener noreferrer">Lineage: Genealogy and the Power of Connection in Early America</a>&nbsp;(Oxford UP, 2025) by Dr. Karin Wulf delves into an era where individuals, families, and institutions meticulously documented their connections. Whether driven by personal passion or mandated by churches, local governments, and courts, these records appeared in diverse forms-from handwritten notes and account books to intricate silk threads and enduring stone carvings.<br>Family connections wielded significant influence across governmental, legal, religious, cultural, and social spheres. In the American context, these ties also defined the boundaries of slavery and freedom, with a child\'s status often determined by their mother, despite the prevailing patriarchy. This book reveals the profound importance of genealogy that was chronicled by family records, cultural artifacts, and court documents. These materials, created by both enslaved individuals seeking freedom and founding fathers seeking status, demonstrate the culturally and historically specific nature of genealogical interest.<br>Even as the American Revolution transformed society, the significance of genealogy endured. The legacy of lineage from the colonial period continued to shape the early United States, underscoring the enduring importance of family connections.&nbsp;<em>Lineage</em>&nbsp;offers a deep understanding of genealogy as a foundational element of American history, illuminating its vital role from the colonial era through the birth of the nation.</p>
<p><br><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/karin-wulf-lineage-genealogy-and-the-power-of-connection-in-early-america-oxford-up-2025-pJqLxwVm</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In eighteenth-century America, genealogy was more than a simple record of family ties—it was a powerful force that shaped society.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197553220" rel="noopener noreferrer">Lineage: Genealogy and the Power of Connection in Early America</a>&nbsp;(Oxford UP, 2025) by Dr. Karin Wulf delves into an era where individuals, families, and institutions meticulously documented their connections. Whether driven by personal passion or mandated by churches, local governments, and courts, these records appeared in diverse forms-from handwritten notes and account books to intricate silk threads and enduring stone carvings.<br>Family connections wielded significant influence across governmental, legal, religious, cultural, and social spheres. In the American context, these ties also defined the boundaries of slavery and freedom, with a child\'s status often determined by their mother, despite the prevailing patriarchy. This book reveals the profound importance of genealogy that was chronicled by family records, cultural artifacts, and court documents. These materials, created by both enslaved individuals seeking freedom and founding fathers seeking status, demonstrate the culturally and historically specific nature of genealogical interest.<br>Even as the American Revolution transformed society, the significance of genealogy endured. The legacy of lineage from the colonial period continued to shape the early United States, underscoring the enduring importance of family connections.&nbsp;<em>Lineage</em>&nbsp;offers a deep understanding of genealogy as a foundational element of American history, illuminating its vital role from the colonial era through the birth of the nation.</p>
<p><br><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="41013041" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/84bacb3e-cba4-40fc-b2c6-45e0dbe83034/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=84bacb3e-cba4-40fc-b2c6-45e0dbe83034&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Karin Wulf, &quot;Lineage: Genealogy and the Power of Connection in Early America&quot; (Oxford UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:42:40</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In eighteenth-century America, genealogy was more than a simple record of family ties—it was a powerful force that shaped society. Lineage: Genealogy and the Power of Connection in Early America (Oxford UP, 2025) by Dr. Karin Wulf delves into an era where individuals, families, and institutions meticulously documented their connections. Whether driven by personal passion or mandated by churches, local governments, and courts, these records appeared in diverse forms-from handwritten notes and account books to intricate silk threads and enduring stone carvings.Family connections wielded significant influence across governmental, legal, religious, cultural, and social spheres. In the American context, these ties also defined the boundaries of slavery and freedom, with a child\&apos;s status often determined by their mother, despite the prevailing patriarchy. This book reveals the profound importance of genealogy that was chronicled by family records, cultural artifacts, and court documents. These materials, created by both enslaved individuals seeking freedom and founding fathers seeking status, demonstrate the culturally and historically specific nature of genealogical interest.Even as the American Revolution transformed society, the significance of genealogy endured. The legacy of lineage from the colonial period continued to shape the early United States, underscoring the enduring importance of family connections. Lineage offers a deep understanding of genealogy as a foundational element of American history, illuminating its vital role from the colonial era through the birth of the nation.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In eighteenth-century America, genealogy was more than a simple record of family ties—it was a powerful force that shaped society. Lineage: Genealogy and the Power of Connection in Early America (Oxford UP, 2025) by Dr. Karin Wulf delves into an era where individuals, families, and institutions meticulously documented their connections. Whether driven by personal passion or mandated by churches, local governments, and courts, these records appeared in diverse forms-from handwritten notes and account books to intricate silk threads and enduring stone carvings.Family connections wielded significant influence across governmental, legal, religious, cultural, and social spheres. In the American context, these ties also defined the boundaries of slavery and freedom, with a child\&apos;s status often determined by their mother, despite the prevailing patriarchy. This book reveals the profound importance of genealogy that was chronicled by family records, cultural artifacts, and court documents. These materials, created by both enslaved individuals seeking freedom and founding fathers seeking status, demonstrate the culturally and historically specific nature of genealogical interest.Even as the American Revolution transformed society, the significance of genealogy endured. The legacy of lineage from the colonial period continued to shape the early United States, underscoring the enduring importance of family connections. Lineage offers a deep understanding of genealogy as a foundational element of American history, illuminating its vital role from the colonial era through the birth of the nation.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1645</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">c2d7bcaa-f7d2-11f0-8eb5-0f86efb1e3ae</guid>
      <title>George Fisher, &quot;Beware Euphoria: The Moral Roots and Racial Myths of America&apos;s War on Drugs&quot; (Oxford UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>George Fisher, the Judge John Crown Professor of Law at Stanford Law School, just released his new book&nbsp;<a href="https://global.oup.com/academic/product/beware-euphoria-9780197688489" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Beware Euphoria: The Moral Roots and Racial Myths of America’s Drug War</em></a>, with Oxford University Press. George has been teaching and writing in the realms of evidence, prosecution practice, and criminal legal history since 1995. He began practice as a prosecutor in Massachusetts and later taught at the law schools of Boston College, Harvard, and Yale.&nbsp;<em>Beware Euphoria&nbsp;</em>is the most recent among a slew of other books, articles, and essays that he’s published over the years, and perhaps the most contrarian. In this interview, George discusses his research methods and how he came to the conclusion that the history of America’s drug war, while racially motivated, was not meant to target minorities, but protect the morals and health of America’s white youth.</p><p><a href="http://www.emilydufton.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Emily Dufton</em></a><em>&nbsp;is the author of</em><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780465096169" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;Grass Roots: The Rise and Fall and Rise of Marijuana in America&nbsp;</em></a><em>(Basic Books, 2017). A drug historian and writer, her second book, on the development of the opioid addiction medication industry, is under contract with the University of Chicago Press.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/george-fisher-beware-euphoria-the-moral-roots-and-racial-myths-of-americas-war-on-drugs-oxford-up-2024-sukv_qaT-uYFAByzR</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>George Fisher, the Judge John Crown Professor of Law at Stanford Law School, just released his new book&nbsp;<a href="https://global.oup.com/academic/product/beware-euphoria-9780197688489" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Beware Euphoria: The Moral Roots and Racial Myths of America’s Drug War</em></a>, with Oxford University Press. George has been teaching and writing in the realms of evidence, prosecution practice, and criminal legal history since 1995. He began practice as a prosecutor in Massachusetts and later taught at the law schools of Boston College, Harvard, and Yale.&nbsp;<em>Beware Euphoria&nbsp;</em>is the most recent among a slew of other books, articles, and essays that he’s published over the years, and perhaps the most contrarian. In this interview, George discusses his research methods and how he came to the conclusion that the history of America’s drug war, while racially motivated, was not meant to target minorities, but protect the morals and health of America’s white youth.</p><p><a href="http://www.emilydufton.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Emily Dufton</em></a><em>&nbsp;is the author of</em><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780465096169" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;Grass Roots: The Rise and Fall and Rise of Marijuana in America&nbsp;</em></a><em>(Basic Books, 2017). A drug historian and writer, her second book, on the development of the opioid addiction medication industry, is under contract with the University of Chicago Press.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="56988798" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/5c5cea2d-df5b-493f-ae89-b10a8e673b1d/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=5c5cea2d-df5b-493f-ae89-b10a8e673b1d&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>George Fisher, &quot;Beware Euphoria: The Moral Roots and Racial Myths of America&apos;s War on Drugs&quot; (Oxford UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:59:21</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>George Fisher, the Judge John Crown Professor of Law at Stanford Law School, just released his new book Beware Euphoria: The Moral Roots and Racial Myths of America’s Drug War, with Oxford University Press. George has been teaching and writing in the realms of evidence, prosecution practice, and criminal legal history since 1995. He began practice as a prosecutor in Massachusetts and later taught at the law schools of Boston College, Harvard, and Yale. Beware Euphoria is the most recent among a slew of other books, articles, and essays that he’s published over the years, and perhaps the most contrarian. In this interview, George discusses his research methods and how he came to the conclusion that the history of America’s drug war, while racially motivated, was not meant to target minorities, but protect the morals and health of America’s white youth.
Emily Dufton is the author of Grass Roots: The Rise and Fall and Rise of Marijuana in America (Basic Books, 2017). A drug historian and writer, her second book, on the development of the opioid addiction medication industry, is under contract with the University of Chicago Press.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>George Fisher, the Judge John Crown Professor of Law at Stanford Law School, just released his new book Beware Euphoria: The Moral Roots and Racial Myths of America’s Drug War, with Oxford University Press. George has been teaching and writing in the realms of evidence, prosecution practice, and criminal legal history since 1995. He began practice as a prosecutor in Massachusetts and later taught at the law schools of Boston College, Harvard, and Yale. Beware Euphoria is the most recent among a slew of other books, articles, and essays that he’s published over the years, and perhaps the most contrarian. In this interview, George discusses his research methods and how he came to the conclusion that the history of America’s drug war, while racially motivated, was not meant to target minorities, but protect the morals and health of America’s white youth.
Emily Dufton is the author of Grass Roots: The Rise and Fall and Rise of Marijuana in America (Basic Books, 2017). A drug historian and writer, her second book, on the development of the opioid addiction medication industry, is under contract with the University of Chicago Press.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>60</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">a69dcffe-f771-11f0-a076-6bd722a21e19</guid>
      <title>Simon Devereaux, &quot;Execution, State and Society in England, 1660–1900&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009392150" rel="noopener noreferrer">Execution, State and Society in England, 1660–1900</a>&nbsp;(Cambridge UP, 2023) by Dr. Simon Devereaux provides the first comprehensive account of execution practices in England and their extraordinary transformation from 1660 to 1900. Agonizing execution rituals were once common. Male traitors were hanged, disembowelled while still alive, then decapitated and quartered. Female traitors were burned alive. And common criminals slowly choked to death beneath wooden crossbeams erected at the margins of towns. Some of their bodies were either left to rot on roadside gibbets or dissected by anatomy instructors. Two centuries later, only murderers and traitors were executed – both by hanging – and they died alone, usually quickly, and behind prison walls. In this major contribution to the history of crime and punishment in England, Dr. Devereaux reveals how urban growth, and the unique public culture it produced, challenged and largely displaced those traditional elites who valued the old 'Bloody Code' as an instrument of their rule.</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/simon-devereaux-execution-state-and-society-in-england-16601900-cambridge-up-2023-Ly4jtAIX</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009392150" rel="noopener noreferrer">Execution, State and Society in England, 1660–1900</a>&nbsp;(Cambridge UP, 2023) by Dr. Simon Devereaux provides the first comprehensive account of execution practices in England and their extraordinary transformation from 1660 to 1900. Agonizing execution rituals were once common. Male traitors were hanged, disembowelled while still alive, then decapitated and quartered. Female traitors were burned alive. And common criminals slowly choked to death beneath wooden crossbeams erected at the margins of towns. Some of their bodies were either left to rot on roadside gibbets or dissected by anatomy instructors. Two centuries later, only murderers and traitors were executed – both by hanging – and they died alone, usually quickly, and behind prison walls. In this major contribution to the history of crime and punishment in England, Dr. Devereaux reveals how urban growth, and the unique public culture it produced, challenged and largely displaced those traditional elites who valued the old 'Bloody Code' as an instrument of their rule.</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="46492390" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/b3514ec5-97bc-496e-a7cd-47fd2373e734/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=b3514ec5-97bc-496e-a7cd-47fd2373e734&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Simon Devereaux, &quot;Execution, State and Society in England, 1660–1900&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:48:22</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Execution, State and Society in England, 1660–1900 (Cambridge UP, 2023) by Dr. Simon Devereaux provides the first comprehensive account of execution practices in England and their extraordinary transformation from 1660 to 1900. Agonizing execution rituals were once common. Male traitors were hanged, disembowelled while still alive, then decapitated and quartered. Female traitors were burned alive. And common criminals slowly choked to death beneath wooden crossbeams erected at the margins of towns. Some of their bodies were either left to rot on roadside gibbets or dissected by anatomy instructors. Two centuries later, only murderers and traitors were executed – both by hanging – and they died alone, usually quickly, and behind prison walls. In this major contribution to the history of crime and punishment in England, Dr. Devereaux reveals how urban growth, and the unique public culture it produced, challenged and largely displaced those traditional elites who valued the old &apos;Bloody Code&apos; as an instrument of their rule.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Execution, State and Society in England, 1660–1900 (Cambridge UP, 2023) by Dr. Simon Devereaux provides the first comprehensive account of execution practices in England and their extraordinary transformation from 1660 to 1900. Agonizing execution rituals were once common. Male traitors were hanged, disembowelled while still alive, then decapitated and quartered. Female traitors were burned alive. And common criminals slowly choked to death beneath wooden crossbeams erected at the margins of towns. Some of their bodies were either left to rot on roadside gibbets or dissected by anatomy instructors. Two centuries later, only murderers and traitors were executed – both by hanging – and they died alone, usually quickly, and behind prison walls. In this major contribution to the history of crime and punishment in England, Dr. Devereaux reveals how urban growth, and the unique public culture it produced, challenged and largely displaced those traditional elites who valued the old &apos;Bloody Code&apos; as an instrument of their rule.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1643</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3c967d62-f830-11f0-a7fb-d3e453a81059</guid>
      <title>Matteo Gatti, &quot;Corporate Power and the Politics of Change&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009704496" rel="noopener noreferrer">Corporate Power and the Politics of Change</a>&nbsp;(Cambridge UP, 2025), Matteo Gatti examines how corporations have taken on roles traditionally reserved for governments - advocating on social issues, setting internal norms, and stepping in where public institutions fall short. This phenomenon, called corporate governing, takes two forms: socioeconomic advocacy, when companies take public stances, and government substitution, when they deliver services or protections the state does not provide. Drawing on legal doctrine and insights from the social sciences, Gatti shows how this shift reflects broader pressures within firms and deep dysfunction outside them. The rise of corporate governing has also triggered political, legal, and cultural backlash that challenges its legitimacy and reach. Clear-eyed and timely, this book offers a framework for understanding how corporate power reshapes policymaking and what that means for business and democracy.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/matteo-gatti-corporate-power-and-the-politics-of-change-cambridge-up-2025-GCK2CQIK</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009704496" rel="noopener noreferrer">Corporate Power and the Politics of Change</a>&nbsp;(Cambridge UP, 2025), Matteo Gatti examines how corporations have taken on roles traditionally reserved for governments - advocating on social issues, setting internal norms, and stepping in where public institutions fall short. This phenomenon, called corporate governing, takes two forms: socioeconomic advocacy, when companies take public stances, and government substitution, when they deliver services or protections the state does not provide. Drawing on legal doctrine and insights from the social sciences, Gatti shows how this shift reflects broader pressures within firms and deep dysfunction outside them. The rise of corporate governing has also triggered political, legal, and cultural backlash that challenges its legitimacy and reach. Clear-eyed and timely, this book offers a framework for understanding how corporate power reshapes policymaking and what that means for business and democracy.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="28344752" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/bcb6646c-257b-476a-80f8-131fb5670718/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=bcb6646c-257b-476a-80f8-131fb5670718&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Matteo Gatti, &quot;Corporate Power and the Politics of Change&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:29:27</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In Corporate Power and the Politics of Change (Cambridge UP, 2025), Matteo Gatti examines how corporations have taken on roles traditionally reserved for governments - advocating on social issues, setting internal norms, and stepping in where public institutions fall short. This phenomenon, called corporate governing, takes two forms: socioeconomic advocacy, when companies take public stances, and government substitution, when they deliver services or protections the state does not provide. Drawing on legal doctrine and insights from the social sciences, Gatti shows how this shift reflects broader pressures within firms and deep dysfunction outside them. The rise of corporate governing has also triggered political, legal, and cultural backlash that challenges its legitimacy and reach. Clear-eyed and timely, this book offers a framework for understanding how corporate power reshapes policymaking and what that means for business and democracy.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In Corporate Power and the Politics of Change (Cambridge UP, 2025), Matteo Gatti examines how corporations have taken on roles traditionally reserved for governments - advocating on social issues, setting internal norms, and stepping in where public institutions fall short. This phenomenon, called corporate governing, takes two forms: socioeconomic advocacy, when companies take public stances, and government substitution, when they deliver services or protections the state does not provide. Drawing on legal doctrine and insights from the social sciences, Gatti shows how this shift reflects broader pressures within firms and deep dysfunction outside them. The rise of corporate governing has also triggered political, legal, and cultural backlash that challenges its legitimacy and reach. Clear-eyed and timely, this book offers a framework for understanding how corporate power reshapes policymaking and what that means for business and democracy.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1644</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2ad538fe-f74d-11f0-9027-1b5822c6be38</guid>
      <title>Zainab Saleh, &quot;Political Undesirables: Citizenship, Denaturalization, and Reclamation in Iraq&quot; (﻿Stanford UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781503644649" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Political Undesirables:&nbsp;﻿﻿Citizenship, Denaturalization, and Reclamation in Iraq</em>&nbsp;</a>(﻿Stanford UP, 2025)&nbsp;considers the legal making and unmaking of citizenship in Iraq, focusing on the mass denaturalization and deportation of Iraqi Jews in 1950–51 and Iraqis of Iranian origin in the early 1980s. Since the formation of the modern state of Iraq under British rule in 1921, practices of denaturalization and expulsion of citizens have been mobilized by ruling elites to curb political opposition. Iraqi politicians, under both monarchical and republican rule, routinely employed the rhetoric of threats to national security, treason, and foreignness to uproot citizens they deemed politically undesirable.</p>
<p>Using archival documents, ethnographic research, and literary and autobiographical works, Zainab Saleh shows how citizenship laws can serve as a mechanism to discipline the population. As she argues, these laws enforce commitment to the state's political order and normative values, and eliminate dissenting citizens through charges of betrayal of the homeland. Citizenship in Iraq, thus, has functioned as a privilege closely linked to loyalty to the state, rather than as a right enjoyed unconditionally. With the rise of nativism, right-wing nationalism, and authoritarianism all over the world, this book offers a timely examination of how citizenship can become a tool to silence opposition and produce precarity through denaturalization.</p>
<p>Zainab Saleh&nbsp;is Associate Professor of Anthropology at Haverford College. She is the author of&nbsp;<em>Return to Ruin: Iraqi Narratives of Exile and Nostalgia</em>&nbsp;(Stanford, 2020).</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/zainab-saleh-political-undesirables-citizenship-denaturalization-and-reclamation-in-iraq-stanford-up-2025-usV1OGrx</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781503644649" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Political Undesirables:&nbsp;﻿﻿Citizenship, Denaturalization, and Reclamation in Iraq</em>&nbsp;</a>(﻿Stanford UP, 2025)&nbsp;considers the legal making and unmaking of citizenship in Iraq, focusing on the mass denaturalization and deportation of Iraqi Jews in 1950–51 and Iraqis of Iranian origin in the early 1980s. Since the formation of the modern state of Iraq under British rule in 1921, practices of denaturalization and expulsion of citizens have been mobilized by ruling elites to curb political opposition. Iraqi politicians, under both monarchical and republican rule, routinely employed the rhetoric of threats to national security, treason, and foreignness to uproot citizens they deemed politically undesirable.</p>
<p>Using archival documents, ethnographic research, and literary and autobiographical works, Zainab Saleh shows how citizenship laws can serve as a mechanism to discipline the population. As she argues, these laws enforce commitment to the state's political order and normative values, and eliminate dissenting citizens through charges of betrayal of the homeland. Citizenship in Iraq, thus, has functioned as a privilege closely linked to loyalty to the state, rather than as a right enjoyed unconditionally. With the rise of nativism, right-wing nationalism, and authoritarianism all over the world, this book offers a timely examination of how citizenship can become a tool to silence opposition and produce precarity through denaturalization.</p>
<p>Zainab Saleh&nbsp;is Associate Professor of Anthropology at Haverford College. She is the author of&nbsp;<em>Return to Ruin: Iraqi Narratives of Exile and Nostalgia</em>&nbsp;(Stanford, 2020).</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="40115190" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/d4235769-2478-4092-a9cc-3d878e897d54/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=d4235769-2478-4092-a9cc-3d878e897d54&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Zainab Saleh, &quot;Political Undesirables: Citizenship, Denaturalization, and Reclamation in Iraq&quot; (﻿Stanford UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:41:43</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Political Undesirables: ﻿﻿Citizenship, Denaturalization, and Reclamation in Iraq (﻿Stanford UP, 2025) considers the legal making and unmaking of citizenship in Iraq, focusing on the mass denaturalization and deportation of Iraqi Jews in 1950–51 and Iraqis of Iranian origin in the early 1980s. Since the formation of the modern state of Iraq under British rule in 1921, practices of denaturalization and expulsion of citizens have been mobilized by ruling elites to curb political opposition. Iraqi politicians, under both monarchical and republican rule, routinely employed the rhetoric of threats to national security, treason, and foreignness to uproot citizens they deemed politically undesirable.
Using archival documents, ethnographic research, and literary and autobiographical works, Zainab Saleh shows how citizenship laws can serve as a mechanism to discipline the population. As she argues, these laws enforce commitment to the state&apos;s political order and normative values, and eliminate dissenting citizens through charges of betrayal of the homeland. Citizenship in Iraq, thus, has functioned as a privilege closely linked to loyalty to the state, rather than as a right enjoyed unconditionally. With the rise of nativism, right-wing nationalism, and authoritarianism all over the world, this book offers a timely examination of how citizenship can become a tool to silence opposition and produce precarity through denaturalization.
Zainab Saleh is Associate Professor of Anthropology at Haverford College. She is the author of Return to Ruin: Iraqi Narratives of Exile and Nostalgia (Stanford, 2020).
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Political Undesirables: ﻿﻿Citizenship, Denaturalization, and Reclamation in Iraq (﻿Stanford UP, 2025) considers the legal making and unmaking of citizenship in Iraq, focusing on the mass denaturalization and deportation of Iraqi Jews in 1950–51 and Iraqis of Iranian origin in the early 1980s. Since the formation of the modern state of Iraq under British rule in 1921, practices of denaturalization and expulsion of citizens have been mobilized by ruling elites to curb political opposition. Iraqi politicians, under both monarchical and republican rule, routinely employed the rhetoric of threats to national security, treason, and foreignness to uproot citizens they deemed politically undesirable.
Using archival documents, ethnographic research, and literary and autobiographical works, Zainab Saleh shows how citizenship laws can serve as a mechanism to discipline the population. As she argues, these laws enforce commitment to the state&apos;s political order and normative values, and eliminate dissenting citizens through charges of betrayal of the homeland. Citizenship in Iraq, thus, has functioned as a privilege closely linked to loyalty to the state, rather than as a right enjoyed unconditionally. With the rise of nativism, right-wing nationalism, and authoritarianism all over the world, this book offers a timely examination of how citizenship can become a tool to silence opposition and produce precarity through denaturalization.
Zainab Saleh is Associate Professor of Anthropology at Haverford College. She is the author of Return to Ruin: Iraqi Narratives of Exile and Nostalgia (Stanford, 2020).
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1642</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2bf3e384-f68a-11f0-9a7b-2b3f456b255a</guid>
      <title>Terence Keel, &quot;The Coroner’s Silence: Death Records and the Hidden Victims of Police Violence&quot; (Beacon Press, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Each year, police officers kill over 1,000 people they’ve sworn to protect and serve. While some cases, like George Floyd’s and Sandra Bland’s, capture national attention, most victims remain nameless, their stories untold.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780807017517" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Coroner’s Silence: Death Records and the Hidden Victims of Police Violence</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Beacon Press, 2025) reveals a disturbing truth about these cases: coroners and other death investigators are often complicit in obscuring the violent circumstances of in-custody deaths.<br>Through rigorous research—including critical records analysis, public health studies, and interviews with victims’ families—this book unmasks the systemic failures within forensic medicine. Terence Keel shows how incomplete autopsy reports, mishandled medical documents, and strategically lost evidence effectively shield law enforcement from accountability.<br><em>The Coroner’s Silence</em>&nbsp;uncovers how the current system of death investigation operates as a mechanism of institutional safeguarding. By highlighting the structural powerlessness of coroners and their disconnection from the communities most affected by police violence, Keel demonstrates how bureaucratic processes can render human suffering invisible.<br>True accountability requires more than procedural reform. It demands a fundamental reimagining of how we investigate, document, and understand deaths at the hands of state institutions.&nbsp;<em>The Coroner’s Silence</em>&nbsp;is a crucial intervention that challenges us to confront the deeply ingrained mechanisms that perpetuate systemic violence.</p>
<p>You can Terrence Keel at his&nbsp;<a href="https://www.terencekeel.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">website</a>.</p>
<p>Find host, Sullivan Summer, at her&nbsp;<a href="https://sullivansummer.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">website</a>, on&nbsp;<a href="https://www.instagram.com/thesullivansummer/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Instagram</a>, and on&nbsp;<a href="https://sullivansummer.substack.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Substack</a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/terence-keel-the-coroners-silence-death-records-and-the-hidden-victims-of-police-violence-beacon-press-2025-b4kxkXQP</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Each year, police officers kill over 1,000 people they’ve sworn to protect and serve. While some cases, like George Floyd’s and Sandra Bland’s, capture national attention, most victims remain nameless, their stories untold.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780807017517" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Coroner’s Silence: Death Records and the Hidden Victims of Police Violence</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Beacon Press, 2025) reveals a disturbing truth about these cases: coroners and other death investigators are often complicit in obscuring the violent circumstances of in-custody deaths.<br>Through rigorous research—including critical records analysis, public health studies, and interviews with victims’ families—this book unmasks the systemic failures within forensic medicine. Terence Keel shows how incomplete autopsy reports, mishandled medical documents, and strategically lost evidence effectively shield law enforcement from accountability.<br><em>The Coroner’s Silence</em>&nbsp;uncovers how the current system of death investigation operates as a mechanism of institutional safeguarding. By highlighting the structural powerlessness of coroners and their disconnection from the communities most affected by police violence, Keel demonstrates how bureaucratic processes can render human suffering invisible.<br>True accountability requires more than procedural reform. It demands a fundamental reimagining of how we investigate, document, and understand deaths at the hands of state institutions.&nbsp;<em>The Coroner’s Silence</em>&nbsp;is a crucial intervention that challenges us to confront the deeply ingrained mechanisms that perpetuate systemic violence.</p>
<p>You can Terrence Keel at his&nbsp;<a href="https://www.terencekeel.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">website</a>.</p>
<p>Find host, Sullivan Summer, at her&nbsp;<a href="https://sullivansummer.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">website</a>, on&nbsp;<a href="https://www.instagram.com/thesullivansummer/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Instagram</a>, and on&nbsp;<a href="https://sullivansummer.substack.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Substack</a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="51497786" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/33f5096b-49b8-4c4a-838c-c08a0a27239f/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=33f5096b-49b8-4c4a-838c-c08a0a27239f&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Terence Keel, &quot;The Coroner’s Silence: Death Records and the Hidden Victims of Police Violence&quot; (Beacon Press, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:53:35</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Each year, police officers kill over 1,000 people they’ve sworn to protect and serve. While some cases, like George Floyd’s and Sandra Bland’s, capture national attention, most victims remain nameless, their stories untold. The Coroner’s Silence: Death Records and the Hidden Victims of Police Violence (Beacon Press, 2025) reveals a disturbing truth about these cases: coroners and other death investigators are often complicit in obscuring the violent circumstances of in-custody deaths.Through rigorous research—including critical records analysis, public health studies, and interviews with victims’ families—this book unmasks the systemic failures within forensic medicine. Terence Keel shows how incomplete autopsy reports, mishandled medical documents, and strategically lost evidence effectively shield law enforcement from accountability.The Coroner’s Silence uncovers how the current system of death investigation operates as a mechanism of institutional safeguarding. By highlighting the structural powerlessness of coroners and their disconnection from the communities most affected by police violence, Keel demonstrates how bureaucratic processes can render human suffering invisible.True accountability requires more than procedural reform. It demands a fundamental reimagining of how we investigate, document, and understand deaths at the hands of state institutions. The Coroner’s Silence is a crucial intervention that challenges us to confront the deeply ingrained mechanisms that perpetuate systemic violence.
You can Terrence Keel at his website.
Find host, Sullivan Summer, at her website, on Instagram, and on Substack.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Each year, police officers kill over 1,000 people they’ve sworn to protect and serve. While some cases, like George Floyd’s and Sandra Bland’s, capture national attention, most victims remain nameless, their stories untold. The Coroner’s Silence: Death Records and the Hidden Victims of Police Violence (Beacon Press, 2025) reveals a disturbing truth about these cases: coroners and other death investigators are often complicit in obscuring the violent circumstances of in-custody deaths.Through rigorous research—including critical records analysis, public health studies, and interviews with victims’ families—this book unmasks the systemic failures within forensic medicine. Terence Keel shows how incomplete autopsy reports, mishandled medical documents, and strategically lost evidence effectively shield law enforcement from accountability.The Coroner’s Silence uncovers how the current system of death investigation operates as a mechanism of institutional safeguarding. By highlighting the structural powerlessness of coroners and their disconnection from the communities most affected by police violence, Keel demonstrates how bureaucratic processes can render human suffering invisible.True accountability requires more than procedural reform. It demands a fundamental reimagining of how we investigate, document, and understand deaths at the hands of state institutions. The Coroner’s Silence is a crucial intervention that challenges us to confront the deeply ingrained mechanisms that perpetuate systemic violence.
You can Terrence Keel at his website.
Find host, Sullivan Summer, at her website, on Instagram, and on Substack.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1641</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">68871a5e-f5af-11f0-9e06-3f9c5e54ce62</guid>
      <title>Emilie Connolly, &quot;Vested Interests: Trusteeship and Native Dispossession in the United States&quot; (Princeton UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>From the earliest days of its founding, the United States set its sights on Native territory. Amid better-known “Indian wars,” the federal government quietly built an empire by treaty, offering payments to Native peoples for their land. Routinely inadequate, these payments were nonetheless pivotal because federal officials chose not to deliver them as a lump sum. Instead, the government kept the bulk of payments owed to Native nations under its own control as a trustee, and made access to future installments contingent on Native compliance. In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691240121" rel="noopener noreferrer">Vested Interests: Trusteeship and Native Dispossession in the United States</a>&nbsp;(Princeton UP, 2025), Dr. Emilie Connolly describes how a system of “fiduciary colonialism” seized a continent from its original inhabitants—and, ironically, furnished Native peoples with financial resources that sustained their nations.<br>Connolly documents two centuries of dispossession in the guise of fiduciary benevolence. Acting as both dispossessor and trustee, the federal government invested Native wealth in state bonds that financed banks, canals, and other infrastructural projects that enabled the country to expand further westward. Meanwhile, Native peoples protected the money they did receive for future generations, investing it in their own institutions and mounting legal challenges to hold their trustees accountable. Still, federal trusteeship placed tight constraints on Native economies with the aim of containing Native power, forcing nations to endure through sheer resilience and ingenuity. By chronicling the long history of Native land dispossession through financial paternalism,&nbsp;<em>Vested Interests</em>&nbsp;reveals the unequal dividends of colonialism in the United States.</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/emilie-connolly-vested-interests-trusteeship-and-native-dispossession-in-the-united-states-princeton-up-2025-EaBr8ucL</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the earliest days of its founding, the United States set its sights on Native territory. Amid better-known “Indian wars,” the federal government quietly built an empire by treaty, offering payments to Native peoples for their land. Routinely inadequate, these payments were nonetheless pivotal because federal officials chose not to deliver them as a lump sum. Instead, the government kept the bulk of payments owed to Native nations under its own control as a trustee, and made access to future installments contingent on Native compliance. In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691240121" rel="noopener noreferrer">Vested Interests: Trusteeship and Native Dispossession in the United States</a>&nbsp;(Princeton UP, 2025), Dr. Emilie Connolly describes how a system of “fiduciary colonialism” seized a continent from its original inhabitants—and, ironically, furnished Native peoples with financial resources that sustained their nations.<br>Connolly documents two centuries of dispossession in the guise of fiduciary benevolence. Acting as both dispossessor and trustee, the federal government invested Native wealth in state bonds that financed banks, canals, and other infrastructural projects that enabled the country to expand further westward. Meanwhile, Native peoples protected the money they did receive for future generations, investing it in their own institutions and mounting legal challenges to hold their trustees accountable. Still, federal trusteeship placed tight constraints on Native economies with the aim of containing Native power, forcing nations to endure through sheer resilience and ingenuity. By chronicling the long history of Native land dispossession through financial paternalism,&nbsp;<em>Vested Interests</em>&nbsp;reveals the unequal dividends of colonialism in the United States.</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="49287439" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/2abb966b-039b-47cf-a7e3-b534b1d143b1/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=2abb966b-039b-47cf-a7e3-b534b1d143b1&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Emilie Connolly, &quot;Vested Interests: Trusteeship and Native Dispossession in the United States&quot; (Princeton UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:51:15</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>From the earliest days of its founding, the United States set its sights on Native territory. Amid better-known “Indian wars,” the federal government quietly built an empire by treaty, offering payments to Native peoples for their land. Routinely inadequate, these payments were nonetheless pivotal because federal officials chose not to deliver them as a lump sum. Instead, the government kept the bulk of payments owed to Native nations under its own control as a trustee, and made access to future installments contingent on Native compliance. In Vested Interests: Trusteeship and Native Dispossession in the United States (Princeton UP, 2025), Dr. Emilie Connolly describes how a system of “fiduciary colonialism” seized a continent from its original inhabitants—and, ironically, furnished Native peoples with financial resources that sustained their nations.Connolly documents two centuries of dispossession in the guise of fiduciary benevolence. Acting as both dispossessor and trustee, the federal government invested Native wealth in state bonds that financed banks, canals, and other infrastructural projects that enabled the country to expand further westward. Meanwhile, Native peoples protected the money they did receive for future generations, investing it in their own institutions and mounting legal challenges to hold their trustees accountable. Still, federal trusteeship placed tight constraints on Native economies with the aim of containing Native power, forcing nations to endure through sheer resilience and ingenuity. By chronicling the long history of Native land dispossession through financial paternalism, Vested Interests reveals the unequal dividends of colonialism in the United States.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>From the earliest days of its founding, the United States set its sights on Native territory. Amid better-known “Indian wars,” the federal government quietly built an empire by treaty, offering payments to Native peoples for their land. Routinely inadequate, these payments were nonetheless pivotal because federal officials chose not to deliver them as a lump sum. Instead, the government kept the bulk of payments owed to Native nations under its own control as a trustee, and made access to future installments contingent on Native compliance. In Vested Interests: Trusteeship and Native Dispossession in the United States (Princeton UP, 2025), Dr. Emilie Connolly describes how a system of “fiduciary colonialism” seized a continent from its original inhabitants—and, ironically, furnished Native peoples with financial resources that sustained their nations.Connolly documents two centuries of dispossession in the guise of fiduciary benevolence. Acting as both dispossessor and trustee, the federal government invested Native wealth in state bonds that financed banks, canals, and other infrastructural projects that enabled the country to expand further westward. Meanwhile, Native peoples protected the money they did receive for future generations, investing it in their own institutions and mounting legal challenges to hold their trustees accountable. Still, federal trusteeship placed tight constraints on Native economies with the aim of containing Native power, forcing nations to endure through sheer resilience and ingenuity. By chronicling the long history of Native land dispossession through financial paternalism, Vested Interests reveals the unequal dividends of colonialism in the United States.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1640</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7ad5d1a4-f290-11f0-9f78-7b839e898afe</guid>
      <title>Amanda G. Madden, &quot;Civil Blood: Vendetta Violence and the Civic Elites in Early Modern Italy&quot; (Cornell UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781501781919" rel="noopener noreferrer">Civil Blood: Vendetta Violence and the Civic Elites in Early Modern Italy</a>&nbsp;(Cornell UP, 2025) is a study of the practice of vendetta among the civic elites in sixteenth-century Italy and illustrates the complex and integral role that vendetta violence played in civic life and state formation on the winding path to state centralization. At many temporal, geographic, and political points in early modern Italy, vendetta appears to have not only disrupted but also constituted the processes by which the modern state emerged.</p>
<p>Dr. Amanda G. Madden examines vendetta as both central to politics and as an engine of change and illustrates the degree to which key phenomena of the period—state centralization, growing bureaucracies, institutional reforms, and the process of state formation—were interpenetrated by, and not simply opposed to, ongoing factional violence among civic elites.</p>
<p>Dr. Madden further illuminates in&nbsp;<em>Civil Blood</em>&nbsp;how elites utilized violent enmities to maintain a grip on political control and negotiated with the duke concerning political power and civic prerogatives. As a result, ruling elites not only defined their own place in governance but also shaped the function and definition of government.</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/amanda-g-madden-civil-blood-vendetta-violence-and-the-civic-elites-in-early-modern-italy-cornell-up-2025-ZqDd2cg3</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781501781919" rel="noopener noreferrer">Civil Blood: Vendetta Violence and the Civic Elites in Early Modern Italy</a>&nbsp;(Cornell UP, 2025) is a study of the practice of vendetta among the civic elites in sixteenth-century Italy and illustrates the complex and integral role that vendetta violence played in civic life and state formation on the winding path to state centralization. At many temporal, geographic, and political points in early modern Italy, vendetta appears to have not only disrupted but also constituted the processes by which the modern state emerged.</p>
<p>Dr. Amanda G. Madden examines vendetta as both central to politics and as an engine of change and illustrates the degree to which key phenomena of the period—state centralization, growing bureaucracies, institutional reforms, and the process of state formation—were interpenetrated by, and not simply opposed to, ongoing factional violence among civic elites.</p>
<p>Dr. Madden further illuminates in&nbsp;<em>Civil Blood</em>&nbsp;how elites utilized violent enmities to maintain a grip on political control and negotiated with the duke concerning political power and civic prerogatives. As a result, ruling elites not only defined their own place in governance but also shaped the function and definition of government.</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="47773332" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/dbc24aa5-1d56-41da-a83d-e52fc7bcd3db/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=dbc24aa5-1d56-41da-a83d-e52fc7bcd3db&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Amanda G. Madden, &quot;Civil Blood: Vendetta Violence and the Civic Elites in Early Modern Italy&quot; (Cornell UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:49:42</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Civil Blood: Vendetta Violence and the Civic Elites in Early Modern Italy (Cornell UP, 2025) is a study of the practice of vendetta among the civic elites in sixteenth-century Italy and illustrates the complex and integral role that vendetta violence played in civic life and state formation on the winding path to state centralization. At many temporal, geographic, and political points in early modern Italy, vendetta appears to have not only disrupted but also constituted the processes by which the modern state emerged.
Dr. Amanda G. Madden examines vendetta as both central to politics and as an engine of change and illustrates the degree to which key phenomena of the period—state centralization, growing bureaucracies, institutional reforms, and the process of state formation—were interpenetrated by, and not simply opposed to, ongoing factional violence among civic elites.
Dr. Madden further illuminates in Civil Blood how elites utilized violent enmities to maintain a grip on political control and negotiated with the duke concerning political power and civic prerogatives. As a result, ruling elites not only defined their own place in governance but also shaped the function and definition of government.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Civil Blood: Vendetta Violence and the Civic Elites in Early Modern Italy (Cornell UP, 2025) is a study of the practice of vendetta among the civic elites in sixteenth-century Italy and illustrates the complex and integral role that vendetta violence played in civic life and state formation on the winding path to state centralization. At many temporal, geographic, and political points in early modern Italy, vendetta appears to have not only disrupted but also constituted the processes by which the modern state emerged.
Dr. Amanda G. Madden examines vendetta as both central to politics and as an engine of change and illustrates the degree to which key phenomena of the period—state centralization, growing bureaucracies, institutional reforms, and the process of state formation—were interpenetrated by, and not simply opposed to, ongoing factional violence among civic elites.
Dr. Madden further illuminates in Civil Blood how elites utilized violent enmities to maintain a grip on political control and negotiated with the duke concerning political power and civic prerogatives. As a result, ruling elites not only defined their own place in governance but also shaped the function and definition of government.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1639</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">fb009d1a-f28a-11f0-820e-4fcd3a26a7ba</guid>
      <title>A. Mechele Dickerson, &quot;The Middle-Class New Deal: Restoring Upward Mobility and the American Dream&quot; (U California Press, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>An expansive policy blueprint for meaningfully expanding the middle class for the first time in a century The US middle class was a product of state and federal policies enacted in the wake of the Great Depression. But since the 1980s, lawmakers have undermined what they once built, shredding the social safety net and instituting laws that virtually guarantee downward mobility for all but the most privileged. How can we restore what has been lost? Rigorous and highly readable,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780520423398" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Middle-Class New Deal: Restoring Upward Mobility and the American Dream</a>&nbsp;(U California Press, 2026)&nbsp;breaks down the policies that have decimated working families and proposes reforms to reverse this trend. As Mechele Dickerson shows, part of the problem is that politicians disingenuously conflate the middle class with the "White lower rich." Such propaganda hides how state and federal lawmakers consistently favor education, labor, housing, and consumer-credit laws that erode the bank accounts of lower- and middle-income people--especially those who are not White and don't have college degrees. Weaving together the latest research with the personal stories of Americans struggling to make ends meet, Dickerson provides a clarion call for political leaders to enact a bold agenda like the one that created the middle class almost a century ago.</p>
<p>A. Mechele Dickerson is&nbsp;the Arthur L. Moller Chair in Bankruptcy and Practice and University Distinguished Teaching Professor at University of Texas School of Law. Professor Dickerson is a nationally recognized scholar on financial vulnerability, consumer debt, housing affordability, and racial and economic disparities. She regularly teaches Remedies and Federal Civil Procedure at the School of Law, has taught a class on civil procedural disputes that arose between the two Trump presidencies, and has taught numerous cross-listed interdisciplinary graduate-level courses on the American middle-class and the COVID pandemic. She is also the author of&nbsp;<em>Homeownership and America's Financial Underclass: Flawed Premises, Broken Promises, New Prescriptions</em>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/a-mechele-dickerson-the-middle-class-new-deal-restoring-upward-mobility-and-the-american-dream-u-california-press-2026-hV3z8mvi</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An expansive policy blueprint for meaningfully expanding the middle class for the first time in a century The US middle class was a product of state and federal policies enacted in the wake of the Great Depression. But since the 1980s, lawmakers have undermined what they once built, shredding the social safety net and instituting laws that virtually guarantee downward mobility for all but the most privileged. How can we restore what has been lost? Rigorous and highly readable,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780520423398" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Middle-Class New Deal: Restoring Upward Mobility and the American Dream</a>&nbsp;(U California Press, 2026)&nbsp;breaks down the policies that have decimated working families and proposes reforms to reverse this trend. As Mechele Dickerson shows, part of the problem is that politicians disingenuously conflate the middle class with the "White lower rich." Such propaganda hides how state and federal lawmakers consistently favor education, labor, housing, and consumer-credit laws that erode the bank accounts of lower- and middle-income people--especially those who are not White and don't have college degrees. Weaving together the latest research with the personal stories of Americans struggling to make ends meet, Dickerson provides a clarion call for political leaders to enact a bold agenda like the one that created the middle class almost a century ago.</p>
<p>A. Mechele Dickerson is&nbsp;the Arthur L. Moller Chair in Bankruptcy and Practice and University Distinguished Teaching Professor at University of Texas School of Law. Professor Dickerson is a nationally recognized scholar on financial vulnerability, consumer debt, housing affordability, and racial and economic disparities. She regularly teaches Remedies and Federal Civil Procedure at the School of Law, has taught a class on civil procedural disputes that arose between the two Trump presidencies, and has taught numerous cross-listed interdisciplinary graduate-level courses on the American middle-class and the COVID pandemic. She is also the author of&nbsp;<em>Homeownership and America's Financial Underclass: Flawed Premises, Broken Promises, New Prescriptions</em>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="54217212" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/13e6d778-00c1-4391-8a48-d2119f5e6e3a/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=13e6d778-00c1-4391-8a48-d2119f5e6e3a&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>A. Mechele Dickerson, &quot;The Middle-Class New Deal: Restoring Upward Mobility and the American Dream&quot; (U California Press, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:56:24</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>An expansive policy blueprint for meaningfully expanding the middle class for the first time in a century The US middle class was a product of state and federal policies enacted in the wake of the Great Depression. But since the 1980s, lawmakers have undermined what they once built, shredding the social safety net and instituting laws that virtually guarantee downward mobility for all but the most privileged. How can we restore what has been lost? Rigorous and highly readable, The Middle-Class New Deal: Restoring Upward Mobility and the American Dream (U California Press, 2026) breaks down the policies that have decimated working families and proposes reforms to reverse this trend. As Mechele Dickerson shows, part of the problem is that politicians disingenuously conflate the middle class with the &quot;White lower rich.&quot; Such propaganda hides how state and federal lawmakers consistently favor education, labor, housing, and consumer-credit laws that erode the bank accounts of lower- and middle-income people--especially those who are not White and don&apos;t have college degrees. Weaving together the latest research with the personal stories of Americans struggling to make ends meet, Dickerson provides a clarion call for political leaders to enact a bold agenda like the one that created the middle class almost a century ago.
A. Mechele Dickerson is the Arthur L. Moller Chair in Bankruptcy and Practice and University Distinguished Teaching Professor at University of Texas School of Law. Professor Dickerson is a nationally recognized scholar on financial vulnerability, consumer debt, housing affordability, and racial and economic disparities. She regularly teaches Remedies and Federal Civil Procedure at the School of Law, has taught a class on civil procedural disputes that arose between the two Trump presidencies, and has taught numerous cross-listed interdisciplinary graduate-level courses on the American middle-class and the COVID pandemic. She is also the author of Homeownership and America&apos;s Financial Underclass: Flawed Premises, Broken Promises, New Prescriptions.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>An expansive policy blueprint for meaningfully expanding the middle class for the first time in a century The US middle class was a product of state and federal policies enacted in the wake of the Great Depression. But since the 1980s, lawmakers have undermined what they once built, shredding the social safety net and instituting laws that virtually guarantee downward mobility for all but the most privileged. How can we restore what has been lost? Rigorous and highly readable, The Middle-Class New Deal: Restoring Upward Mobility and the American Dream (U California Press, 2026) breaks down the policies that have decimated working families and proposes reforms to reverse this trend. As Mechele Dickerson shows, part of the problem is that politicians disingenuously conflate the middle class with the &quot;White lower rich.&quot; Such propaganda hides how state and federal lawmakers consistently favor education, labor, housing, and consumer-credit laws that erode the bank accounts of lower- and middle-income people--especially those who are not White and don&apos;t have college degrees. Weaving together the latest research with the personal stories of Americans struggling to make ends meet, Dickerson provides a clarion call for political leaders to enact a bold agenda like the one that created the middle class almost a century ago.
A. Mechele Dickerson is the Arthur L. Moller Chair in Bankruptcy and Practice and University Distinguished Teaching Professor at University of Texas School of Law. Professor Dickerson is a nationally recognized scholar on financial vulnerability, consumer debt, housing affordability, and racial and economic disparities. She regularly teaches Remedies and Federal Civil Procedure at the School of Law, has taught a class on civil procedural disputes that arose between the two Trump presidencies, and has taught numerous cross-listed interdisciplinary graduate-level courses on the American middle-class and the COVID pandemic. She is also the author of Homeownership and America&apos;s Financial Underclass: Flawed Premises, Broken Promises, New Prescriptions.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1638</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">b7674a26-ef02-11f0-bd0d-0f72f8aad539</guid>
      <title>Stephen Skowronek, &quot;The Adaptability Paradox: Political Inclusion and Constitutional Resilience&quot; (U Chicago Press, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Has American democracy outstripped its constitutional accommodations? Faith in the resilience and adaptability of the US Constitution rests on a long history of finding new ways to make the system work. In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780226844862" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Adaptability Paradox:&nbsp;Political Inclusion and Constitutional Resilience</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(University of Chicago Press, 2025), political scientist Stephen Skowronek examines the rearrangements that regenerated the American government in the past and brings that experience to bear on our current predicament. He shows how a constitution framed in writing some 230 years ago can run into serious difficulties directly related to its long and impressive history of adaptation. Skowronek connects questions about the Constitution’s adaptability to the challenges of democratization. For most of American history, serial rearrangements of constitutional relationships widened the government’s purview as a national democracy without giving either nationalism or democracy free rein. Skowronek argues that the politics of adaptation shifted fundamentally with the “Rights Revolution” of the 1960s and `70s when American national democracy approached the inclusion of all its citizens on equal footing. Since then, power and authority have been reconfigured in ways that have steadily magnified conflicts over the essentials of good order. Conservatives aim to dismantle a Constitution that progressives are intent on building upon, and the consensus necessary for a constitutional democracy to function effectively has all but evaporated. No longer a socially bound framework for national action, the Constitution has become an abstract matrix of possibilities, a disembodied opportunity structure open to starkly different, mutually unacceptable futures. Rather than being liberated by this unbound Constitution, the American people now appear entrapped by it. Is it possible that the development of American democracy has exhausted the adaptive capacities of the Constitution? A timely reminder that constitutional democracies do not survive on faith alone, The Adaptability Paradox is a sober appraisal of the unfamiliar ground on which we now tread.</p>
<p>Professor Stephen Skowronek is&nbsp;Pelatiah Perit Professor of Political Science and Professor in the Institution for Social and Policy Studies at Yale University.&nbsp;He is the author of many books on American Political Development, the presidency, and the administrative state.</p>
<p>Dr Ursula Hackett is Reader in Politics at Royal Holloway, University of London. She is the author of America's Voucher Politics: How Elites Learned to Hide the State (Cambridge University&nbsp;Press, 2020)</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/stephen-skowronek-the-adaptability-paradox-political-inclusion-and-constitutional-resilience-u-chicago-press-2025-7tZfsf5r</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has American democracy outstripped its constitutional accommodations? Faith in the resilience and adaptability of the US Constitution rests on a long history of finding new ways to make the system work. In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780226844862" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Adaptability Paradox:&nbsp;Political Inclusion and Constitutional Resilience</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(University of Chicago Press, 2025), political scientist Stephen Skowronek examines the rearrangements that regenerated the American government in the past and brings that experience to bear on our current predicament. He shows how a constitution framed in writing some 230 years ago can run into serious difficulties directly related to its long and impressive history of adaptation. Skowronek connects questions about the Constitution’s adaptability to the challenges of democratization. For most of American history, serial rearrangements of constitutional relationships widened the government’s purview as a national democracy without giving either nationalism or democracy free rein. Skowronek argues that the politics of adaptation shifted fundamentally with the “Rights Revolution” of the 1960s and `70s when American national democracy approached the inclusion of all its citizens on equal footing. Since then, power and authority have been reconfigured in ways that have steadily magnified conflicts over the essentials of good order. Conservatives aim to dismantle a Constitution that progressives are intent on building upon, and the consensus necessary for a constitutional democracy to function effectively has all but evaporated. No longer a socially bound framework for national action, the Constitution has become an abstract matrix of possibilities, a disembodied opportunity structure open to starkly different, mutually unacceptable futures. Rather than being liberated by this unbound Constitution, the American people now appear entrapped by it. Is it possible that the development of American democracy has exhausted the adaptive capacities of the Constitution? A timely reminder that constitutional democracies do not survive on faith alone, The Adaptability Paradox is a sober appraisal of the unfamiliar ground on which we now tread.</p>
<p>Professor Stephen Skowronek is&nbsp;Pelatiah Perit Professor of Political Science and Professor in the Institution for Social and Policy Studies at Yale University.&nbsp;He is the author of many books on American Political Development, the presidency, and the administrative state.</p>
<p>Dr Ursula Hackett is Reader in Politics at Royal Holloway, University of London. She is the author of America's Voucher Politics: How Elites Learned to Hide the State (Cambridge University&nbsp;Press, 2020)</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="40983901" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/0509ff1e-93c1-4f08-8c75-f86c3fd845f1/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=0509ff1e-93c1-4f08-8c75-f86c3fd845f1&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Stephen Skowronek, &quot;The Adaptability Paradox: Political Inclusion and Constitutional Resilience&quot; (U Chicago Press, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:42:37</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Has American democracy outstripped its constitutional accommodations? Faith in the resilience and adaptability of the US Constitution rests on a long history of finding new ways to make the system work. In The Adaptability Paradox: Political Inclusion and Constitutional Resilience (University of Chicago Press, 2025), political scientist Stephen Skowronek examines the rearrangements that regenerated the American government in the past and brings that experience to bear on our current predicament. He shows how a constitution framed in writing some 230 years ago can run into serious difficulties directly related to its long and impressive history of adaptation. Skowronek connects questions about the Constitution’s adaptability to the challenges of democratization. For most of American history, serial rearrangements of constitutional relationships widened the government’s purview as a national democracy without giving either nationalism or democracy free rein. Skowronek argues that the politics of adaptation shifted fundamentally with the “Rights Revolution” of the 1960s and `70s when American national democracy approached the inclusion of all its citizens on equal footing. Since then, power and authority have been reconfigured in ways that have steadily magnified conflicts over the essentials of good order. Conservatives aim to dismantle a Constitution that progressives are intent on building upon, and the consensus necessary for a constitutional democracy to function effectively has all but evaporated. No longer a socially bound framework for national action, the Constitution has become an abstract matrix of possibilities, a disembodied opportunity structure open to starkly different, mutually unacceptable futures. Rather than being liberated by this unbound Constitution, the American people now appear entrapped by it. Is it possible that the development of American democracy has exhausted the adaptive capacities of the Constitution? A timely reminder that constitutional democracies do not survive on faith alone, The Adaptability Paradox is a sober appraisal of the unfamiliar ground on which we now tread.
Professor Stephen Skowronek is Pelatiah Perit Professor of Political Science and Professor in the Institution for Social and Policy Studies at Yale University. He is the author of many books on American Political Development, the presidency, and the administrative state.
Dr Ursula Hackett is Reader in Politics at Royal Holloway, University of London. She is the author of America&apos;s Voucher Politics: How Elites Learned to Hide the State (Cambridge University Press, 2020)
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Has American democracy outstripped its constitutional accommodations? Faith in the resilience and adaptability of the US Constitution rests on a long history of finding new ways to make the system work. In The Adaptability Paradox: Political Inclusion and Constitutional Resilience (University of Chicago Press, 2025), political scientist Stephen Skowronek examines the rearrangements that regenerated the American government in the past and brings that experience to bear on our current predicament. He shows how a constitution framed in writing some 230 years ago can run into serious difficulties directly related to its long and impressive history of adaptation. Skowronek connects questions about the Constitution’s adaptability to the challenges of democratization. For most of American history, serial rearrangements of constitutional relationships widened the government’s purview as a national democracy without giving either nationalism or democracy free rein. Skowronek argues that the politics of adaptation shifted fundamentally with the “Rights Revolution” of the 1960s and `70s when American national democracy approached the inclusion of all its citizens on equal footing. Since then, power and authority have been reconfigured in ways that have steadily magnified conflicts over the essentials of good order. Conservatives aim to dismantle a Constitution that progressives are intent on building upon, and the consensus necessary for a constitutional democracy to function effectively has all but evaporated. No longer a socially bound framework for national action, the Constitution has become an abstract matrix of possibilities, a disembodied opportunity structure open to starkly different, mutually unacceptable futures. Rather than being liberated by this unbound Constitution, the American people now appear entrapped by it. Is it possible that the development of American democracy has exhausted the adaptive capacities of the Constitution? A timely reminder that constitutional democracies do not survive on faith alone, The Adaptability Paradox is a sober appraisal of the unfamiliar ground on which we now tread.
Professor Stephen Skowronek is Pelatiah Perit Professor of Political Science and Professor in the Institution for Social and Policy Studies at Yale University. He is the author of many books on American Political Development, the presidency, and the administrative state.
Dr Ursula Hackett is Reader in Politics at Royal Holloway, University of London. She is the author of America&apos;s Voucher Politics: How Elites Learned to Hide the State (Cambridge University Press, 2020)
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1637</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5057bb9e-eda0-11f0-ad13-d74dabffb093</guid>
      <title>Anna Sergi, &quot;How to Recognize the Mafia Abroad: Critical Notes on ‘ndrangheta Mobility&quot; (Policy Press, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The influence and spread of clans and families within the ‘ndrangheta - the Calabrian mafia - is international yet recognising their activities is not always easy, especially when considering mafia groups’ apparent ability to ‘disappear’ when abroad.&nbsp;<em>How to Recognize the Mafia Abroad: Critical Notes on ‘ndrangheta Mobility</em>&nbsp;(Bristol University Press, 2025) by Professor Anna Sergi challenges existing myths about the mobility of this mafia group, emphasizing mafias' interconnectivity and ubiquity both at home and abroad, while providing practical tools for law enforcement and organized crime practitioners.</p>
<p>It considers potential biases around ethnicities and surnames and the intergenerational diversification of mafias – for example, the use of encryption technologies. Combining theory with case studies drawn from Dr. Sergi’s extensive fieldwork, the book sets out the policy and practice implications for combatting organized crime.</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/anna-sergi-how-to-recognize-the-mafia-abroad-critical-notes-on-ndrangheta-mobility-policy-press-2025-_M0lQ5x1</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The influence and spread of clans and families within the ‘ndrangheta - the Calabrian mafia - is international yet recognising their activities is not always easy, especially when considering mafia groups’ apparent ability to ‘disappear’ when abroad.&nbsp;<em>How to Recognize the Mafia Abroad: Critical Notes on ‘ndrangheta Mobility</em>&nbsp;(Bristol University Press, 2025) by Professor Anna Sergi challenges existing myths about the mobility of this mafia group, emphasizing mafias' interconnectivity and ubiquity both at home and abroad, while providing practical tools for law enforcement and organized crime practitioners.</p>
<p>It considers potential biases around ethnicities and surnames and the intergenerational diversification of mafias – for example, the use of encryption technologies. Combining theory with case studies drawn from Dr. Sergi’s extensive fieldwork, the book sets out the policy and practice implications for combatting organized crime.</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="50509794" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/744f906b-5a13-4425-a97b-26b818b2d1ea/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=744f906b-5a13-4425-a97b-26b818b2d1ea&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Anna Sergi, &quot;How to Recognize the Mafia Abroad: Critical Notes on ‘ndrangheta Mobility&quot; (Policy Press, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:52:33</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The influence and spread of clans and families within the ‘ndrangheta - the Calabrian mafia - is international yet recognising their activities is not always easy, especially when considering mafia groups’ apparent ability to ‘disappear’ when abroad. How to Recognize the Mafia Abroad: Critical Notes on ‘ndrangheta Mobility (Bristol University Press, 2025) by Professor Anna Sergi challenges existing myths about the mobility of this mafia group, emphasizing mafias&apos; interconnectivity and ubiquity both at home and abroad, while providing practical tools for law enforcement and organized crime practitioners.
It considers potential biases around ethnicities and surnames and the intergenerational diversification of mafias – for example, the use of encryption technologies. Combining theory with case studies drawn from Dr. Sergi’s extensive fieldwork, the book sets out the policy and practice implications for combatting organized crime.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The influence and spread of clans and families within the ‘ndrangheta - the Calabrian mafia - is international yet recognising their activities is not always easy, especially when considering mafia groups’ apparent ability to ‘disappear’ when abroad. How to Recognize the Mafia Abroad: Critical Notes on ‘ndrangheta Mobility (Bristol University Press, 2025) by Professor Anna Sergi challenges existing myths about the mobility of this mafia group, emphasizing mafias&apos; interconnectivity and ubiquity both at home and abroad, while providing practical tools for law enforcement and organized crime practitioners.
It considers potential biases around ethnicities and surnames and the intergenerational diversification of mafias – for example, the use of encryption technologies. Combining theory with case studies drawn from Dr. Sergi’s extensive fieldwork, the book sets out the policy and practice implications for combatting organized crime.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>39</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2fde0876-ee1f-11f0-8f9a-1314e54324b5</guid>
      <title>Heather Smith-Cannoy et al., &quot;Sex Trafficking and Human Rights: The Status of Women and State Responses&quot; (Georgetown UP, 2022)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Human trafficking for the sex trade is a form of modern-day slavery that ensnares thousands of victims each year, disproportionately affecting women and girls. While the international community has developed an impressive edifice of human rights law, these laws are not equally recognized or enforced by all countries.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/sex-trafficking-and-human-rights-the-status-of-women-and-state-responses-heather-smith-cannoy/18509517?ean=9781647122614" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Sex Trafficking and Human Rights</em></a>&nbsp;demonstrates that state responsiveness to human trafficking is shaped by the political, social, cultural, and economic rights afforded to women in that state. While combatting human trafficking is a multiscalar problem with a host of conflating variables, this book shows that a common theme in the effectiveness of state response is the degree to which women and girls are perceived as, and actually are, full citizens. By analyzing human trafficking cases in India, Thailand, Russia, Nigeria, and Brazil, they shed light on the factors that make some women and girls more susceptible to traffickers than others.</p><p>Heather Smith-Cannoy (PhD, UC San Diego, 2007) is a Professor of Political Science/Social Justice and Human Rights at the New College of Interdisciplinary Arts and Sciences at Arizona State University. She is currently serving as the Interim Director of the School of Social and Behavioral Sciences. Her work explores when and under what conditions international law impacts the human rights of the most marginalized populations, focusing on both the opportunities and the challenges associated with this body of law. She has also focused on the role that international law can play in advancing the legal rights of sex trafficking victims. She has published 4 books and more than 15 articles and book chapters.</p><p>Patricia C. Rodda is the Assistant Professor of Political Science at Carroll University in Waukesha, Wisconsin. She teaches international relations, comparative politics, international law, conflict and security and political theory. Her research often focuses on vulnerable populations and the challenges they face seeking human rights protections. She is currently working on a new book project that investigates the institutions and interests that facilitate or obstruct the adoption of women’s rights in Muslim-majority states.</p><p>Charles “Tony” Smith is a Professor in Political Science and Law at the University of California-Irvine (PhD UCSD 2004; JD UF 1987). His research concerns how institutions and the strategic interactions of political actors relate to the contestation over rights, law, and democracy. He has authored or co-authored eight books including&nbsp;<em>Sex Trafficking and Human Rights: The Status of Women and State Responses&nbsp;</em>(Georgetown University Press 2022) and&nbsp;<em>The Politics of Perverts: The Political Attitudes and Actions of Non-Traditional Sexual Minorities&nbsp;</em>(NYU Press 2024) and published over 40 articles and chapters. He is currently the Editor in Chief of&nbsp;<em>Political Research Quarterly.</em></p><p><a href="https://labdelaa.expressions.syr.edu/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Lamis Abdelaaty</em></a><em>&nbsp;is an associate professor of political science at the Maxwell School of Syracuse University. She is the author of&nbsp;</em><a href="https://global.oup.com/academic/product/discrimination-and-delegation-9780197530061" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Discrimination and Delegation: Explaining State Responses to Refugees</em></a><em>&nbsp;(Oxford University Press, 2021). Email her comments at&nbsp;</em><a href="mailto:labdelaa@syr.edu" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>labdelaa@syr.edu</em></a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/heather-smith-cannoy-et-al-sex-trafficking-and-human-rights-the-status-of-women-and-state-responses-georgetown-up-2022-IM7nimXG-fHsFGYWf</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Human trafficking for the sex trade is a form of modern-day slavery that ensnares thousands of victims each year, disproportionately affecting women and girls. While the international community has developed an impressive edifice of human rights law, these laws are not equally recognized or enforced by all countries.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/sex-trafficking-and-human-rights-the-status-of-women-and-state-responses-heather-smith-cannoy/18509517?ean=9781647122614" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Sex Trafficking and Human Rights</em></a>&nbsp;demonstrates that state responsiveness to human trafficking is shaped by the political, social, cultural, and economic rights afforded to women in that state. While combatting human trafficking is a multiscalar problem with a host of conflating variables, this book shows that a common theme in the effectiveness of state response is the degree to which women and girls are perceived as, and actually are, full citizens. By analyzing human trafficking cases in India, Thailand, Russia, Nigeria, and Brazil, they shed light on the factors that make some women and girls more susceptible to traffickers than others.</p><p>Heather Smith-Cannoy (PhD, UC San Diego, 2007) is a Professor of Political Science/Social Justice and Human Rights at the New College of Interdisciplinary Arts and Sciences at Arizona State University. She is currently serving as the Interim Director of the School of Social and Behavioral Sciences. Her work explores when and under what conditions international law impacts the human rights of the most marginalized populations, focusing on both the opportunities and the challenges associated with this body of law. She has also focused on the role that international law can play in advancing the legal rights of sex trafficking victims. She has published 4 books and more than 15 articles and book chapters.</p><p>Patricia C. Rodda is the Assistant Professor of Political Science at Carroll University in Waukesha, Wisconsin. She teaches international relations, comparative politics, international law, conflict and security and political theory. Her research often focuses on vulnerable populations and the challenges they face seeking human rights protections. She is currently working on a new book project that investigates the institutions and interests that facilitate or obstruct the adoption of women’s rights in Muslim-majority states.</p><p>Charles “Tony” Smith is a Professor in Political Science and Law at the University of California-Irvine (PhD UCSD 2004; JD UF 1987). His research concerns how institutions and the strategic interactions of political actors relate to the contestation over rights, law, and democracy. He has authored or co-authored eight books including&nbsp;<em>Sex Trafficking and Human Rights: The Status of Women and State Responses&nbsp;</em>(Georgetown University Press 2022) and&nbsp;<em>The Politics of Perverts: The Political Attitudes and Actions of Non-Traditional Sexual Minorities&nbsp;</em>(NYU Press 2024) and published over 40 articles and chapters. He is currently the Editor in Chief of&nbsp;<em>Political Research Quarterly.</em></p><p><a href="https://labdelaa.expressions.syr.edu/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Lamis Abdelaaty</em></a><em>&nbsp;is an associate professor of political science at the Maxwell School of Syracuse University. She is the author of&nbsp;</em><a href="https://global.oup.com/academic/product/discrimination-and-delegation-9780197530061" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Discrimination and Delegation: Explaining State Responses to Refugees</em></a><em>&nbsp;(Oxford University Press, 2021). Email her comments at&nbsp;</em><a href="mailto:labdelaa@syr.edu" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>labdelaa@syr.edu</em></a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="53305106" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/8f84104c-30aa-4a34-a41e-c07bdbbd0720/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=8f84104c-30aa-4a34-a41e-c07bdbbd0720&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Heather Smith-Cannoy et al., &quot;Sex Trafficking and Human Rights: The Status of Women and State Responses&quot; (Georgetown UP, 2022)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:55:31</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Human trafficking for the sex trade is a form of modern-day slavery that ensnares thousands of victims each year, disproportionately affecting women and girls. While the international community has developed an impressive edifice of human rights law, these laws are not equally recognized or enforced by all countries. Sex Trafficking and Human Rights demonstrates that state responsiveness to human trafficking is shaped by the political, social, cultural, and economic rights afforded to women in that state. While combatting human trafficking is a multiscalar problem with a host of conflating variables, this book shows that a common theme in the effectiveness of state response is the degree to which women and girls are perceived as, and actually are, full citizens. By analyzing human trafficking cases in India, Thailand, Russia, Nigeria, and Brazil, they shed light on the factors that make some women and girls more susceptible to traffickers than others.
Heather Smith-Cannoy (PhD, UC San Diego, 2007) is a Professor of Political Science/Social Justice and Human Rights at the New College of Interdisciplinary Arts and Sciences at Arizona State University. She is currently serving as the Interim Director of the School of Social and Behavioral Sciences. Her work explores when and under what conditions international law impacts the human rights of the most marginalized populations, focusing on both the opportunities and the challenges associated with this body of law. She has also focused on the role that international law can play in advancing the legal rights of sex trafficking victims. She has published 4 books and more than 15 articles and book chapters.
Patricia C. Rodda is the Assistant Professor of Political Science at Carroll University in Waukesha, Wisconsin. She teaches international relations, comparative politics, international law, conflict and security and political theory. Her research often focuses on vulnerable populations and the challenges they face seeking human rights protections. She is currently working on a new book project that investigates the institutions and interests that facilitate or obstruct the adoption of women’s rights in Muslim-majority states.
Charles “Tony” Smith is a Professor in Political Science and Law at the University of California-Irvine (PhD UCSD 2004; JD UF 1987). His research concerns how institutions and the strategic interactions of political actors relate to the contestation over rights, law, and democracy. He has authored or co-authored eight books including Sex Trafficking and Human Rights: The Status of Women and State Responses (Georgetown University Press 2022) and The Politics of Perverts: The Political Attitudes and Actions of Non-Traditional Sexual Minorities (NYU Press 2024) and published over 40 articles and chapters. He is currently the Editor in Chief of Political Research Quarterly.
Lamis Abdelaaty is an associate professor of political science at the Maxwell School of Syracuse University. She is the author of Discrimination and Delegation: Explaining State Responses to Refugees (Oxford University Press, 2021). Email her comments at labdelaa@syr.edu
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Human trafficking for the sex trade is a form of modern-day slavery that ensnares thousands of victims each year, disproportionately affecting women and girls. While the international community has developed an impressive edifice of human rights law, these laws are not equally recognized or enforced by all countries. Sex Trafficking and Human Rights demonstrates that state responsiveness to human trafficking is shaped by the political, social, cultural, and economic rights afforded to women in that state. While combatting human trafficking is a multiscalar problem with a host of conflating variables, this book shows that a common theme in the effectiveness of state response is the degree to which women and girls are perceived as, and actually are, full citizens. By analyzing human trafficking cases in India, Thailand, Russia, Nigeria, and Brazil, they shed light on the factors that make some women and girls more susceptible to traffickers than others.
Heather Smith-Cannoy (PhD, UC San Diego, 2007) is a Professor of Political Science/Social Justice and Human Rights at the New College of Interdisciplinary Arts and Sciences at Arizona State University. She is currently serving as the Interim Director of the School of Social and Behavioral Sciences. Her work explores when and under what conditions international law impacts the human rights of the most marginalized populations, focusing on both the opportunities and the challenges associated with this body of law. She has also focused on the role that international law can play in advancing the legal rights of sex trafficking victims. She has published 4 books and more than 15 articles and book chapters.
Patricia C. Rodda is the Assistant Professor of Political Science at Carroll University in Waukesha, Wisconsin. She teaches international relations, comparative politics, international law, conflict and security and political theory. Her research often focuses on vulnerable populations and the challenges they face seeking human rights protections. She is currently working on a new book project that investigates the institutions and interests that facilitate or obstruct the adoption of women’s rights in Muslim-majority states.
Charles “Tony” Smith is a Professor in Political Science and Law at the University of California-Irvine (PhD UCSD 2004; JD UF 1987). His research concerns how institutions and the strategic interactions of political actors relate to the contestation over rights, law, and democracy. He has authored or co-authored eight books including Sex Trafficking and Human Rights: The Status of Women and State Responses (Georgetown University Press 2022) and The Politics of Perverts: The Political Attitudes and Actions of Non-Traditional Sexual Minorities (NYU Press 2024) and published over 40 articles and chapters. He is currently the Editor in Chief of Political Research Quarterly.
Lamis Abdelaaty is an associate professor of political science at the Maxwell School of Syracuse University. She is the author of Discrimination and Delegation: Explaining State Responses to Refugees (Oxford University Press, 2021). Email her comments at labdelaa@syr.edu
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>686</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">c2ea1b34-ecce-11f0-91e4-4bb6331337c7</guid>
      <title>J. Logan Smilges, &quot;Crip Negativity&quot; (U of Minnesota Press, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In the thirty years since the Americans with Disabilities Act was signed into law, the lives of disabled people have not improved nearly as much as activists and politicians had hoped. In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781517915582" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Crip Negativity</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(U of Minnesota Press, 2023), J. Logan Smilges shows us what’s gone wrong and what we can do to fix it.</p><p>Leveling a strong critique of the category of disability and liberal disability politics, Smilges asks and imagines what horizons might exist for the liberation of those oppressed by ableism—beyond access and inclusion. Inspired by models of negativity in queer studies, Black studies, and crip theory, Smilges proposes that bad crip feelings might help all of us to care gently for one another, even as we demand more from the world than we currently believe to be possible.</p><p>J. Logan Smilges (they/them) is assistant professor of English language and literatures at the University of British Columbia and author of&nbsp;<em>Queer Silence: On Disability and Rhetorical Absence</em>&nbsp;(Minnesota, 2022).</p><p><a href="https://cjarrard717.wixsite.com/website" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Clayton Jarrard</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a Research Project Coordinator at the University of Kansas Center for Research, contributing to initiatives at the nexus of research, policy implementation, and community efforts. His scholarly engagement spans the subject areas of Cultural Anthropology, Queer Studies, Disability Studies, Mad Studies, and Religious Studies. Clayton is also a host for the&nbsp;</em><a href="https://open.spotify.com/show/0X98h0FENG1hptiHFA1o5b?si=183b40d21ac94919/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Un/Livable Cultures podcast</em></a><em>.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/j-logan-smilges-crip-negativity-u-of-minnesota-press-2023-YCC2AprU-ngjL2Mbi</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the thirty years since the Americans with Disabilities Act was signed into law, the lives of disabled people have not improved nearly as much as activists and politicians had hoped. In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781517915582" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Crip Negativity</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(U of Minnesota Press, 2023), J. Logan Smilges shows us what’s gone wrong and what we can do to fix it.</p><p>Leveling a strong critique of the category of disability and liberal disability politics, Smilges asks and imagines what horizons might exist for the liberation of those oppressed by ableism—beyond access and inclusion. Inspired by models of negativity in queer studies, Black studies, and crip theory, Smilges proposes that bad crip feelings might help all of us to care gently for one another, even as we demand more from the world than we currently believe to be possible.</p><p>J. Logan Smilges (they/them) is assistant professor of English language and literatures at the University of British Columbia and author of&nbsp;<em>Queer Silence: On Disability and Rhetorical Absence</em>&nbsp;(Minnesota, 2022).</p><p><a href="https://cjarrard717.wixsite.com/website" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Clayton Jarrard</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a Research Project Coordinator at the University of Kansas Center for Research, contributing to initiatives at the nexus of research, policy implementation, and community efforts. His scholarly engagement spans the subject areas of Cultural Anthropology, Queer Studies, Disability Studies, Mad Studies, and Religious Studies. Clayton is also a host for the&nbsp;</em><a href="https://open.spotify.com/show/0X98h0FENG1hptiHFA1o5b?si=183b40d21ac94919/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Un/Livable Cultures podcast</em></a><em>.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="52179158" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/bf1d4593-d8dd-40e3-99c6-0fd69aa765fb/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=bf1d4593-d8dd-40e3-99c6-0fd69aa765fb&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>J. Logan Smilges, &quot;Crip Negativity&quot; (U of Minnesota Press, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:54:21</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In the thirty years since the Americans with Disabilities Act was signed into law, the lives of disabled people have not improved nearly as much as activists and politicians had hoped. In Crip Negativity (U of Minnesota Press, 2023), J. Logan Smilges shows us what’s gone wrong and what we can do to fix it.
Leveling a strong critique of the category of disability and liberal disability politics, Smilges asks and imagines what horizons might exist for the liberation of those oppressed by ableism—beyond access and inclusion. Inspired by models of negativity in queer studies, Black studies, and crip theory, Smilges proposes that bad crip feelings might help all of us to care gently for one another, even as we demand more from the world than we currently believe to be possible.
J. Logan Smilges (they/them) is assistant professor of English language and literatures at the University of British Columbia and author of Queer Silence: On Disability and Rhetorical Absence (Minnesota, 2022).
Clayton Jarrard is a Research Project Coordinator at the University of Kansas Center for Research, contributing to initiatives at the nexus of research, policy implementation, and community efforts. His scholarly engagement spans the subject areas of Cultural Anthropology, Queer Studies, Disability Studies, Mad Studies, and Religious Studies. Clayton is also a host for the Un/Livable Cultures podcast.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In the thirty years since the Americans with Disabilities Act was signed into law, the lives of disabled people have not improved nearly as much as activists and politicians had hoped. In Crip Negativity (U of Minnesota Press, 2023), J. Logan Smilges shows us what’s gone wrong and what we can do to fix it.
Leveling a strong critique of the category of disability and liberal disability politics, Smilges asks and imagines what horizons might exist for the liberation of those oppressed by ableism—beyond access and inclusion. Inspired by models of negativity in queer studies, Black studies, and crip theory, Smilges proposes that bad crip feelings might help all of us to care gently for one another, even as we demand more from the world than we currently believe to be possible.
J. Logan Smilges (they/them) is assistant professor of English language and literatures at the University of British Columbia and author of Queer Silence: On Disability and Rhetorical Absence (Minnesota, 2022).
Clayton Jarrard is a Research Project Coordinator at the University of Kansas Center for Research, contributing to initiatives at the nexus of research, policy implementation, and community efforts. His scholarly engagement spans the subject areas of Cultural Anthropology, Queer Studies, Disability Studies, Mad Studies, and Religious Studies. Clayton is also a host for the Un/Livable Cultures podcast.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>25</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">92e43cb8-eccd-11f0-b85e-eb1c0bbd390a</guid>
      <title>Sarah Kunz, &quot;Expatriate: Following a Migration Category&quot; (Manchester UP, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Who are expatriates? How do they differ from other migrants? And why should we care about such distinctions?&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781526154293" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Expatriate: Following a Migration Category</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Manchester University Press, 2023) by Dr. Sarah Kunz interrogates the contested category of 'the expatriate' to explore its history and politics, its making and lived experience. Drawing on ethnographic and archival research, the book offers a critical reading of International Human Resource Management literature, explores the work and history of the Expatriate Archive Centre in The Hague, and studies the usage and significance of the category in Kenyan history and present-day 'expat Nairobi'. Doing so, the book traces the figure of the expatriate from the mid-twentieth-century era of decolonisation to today's heated debates about migration.</p><p>The expatriate emerges as a malleable and contested category, of shifting meaning and changing membership, and as passionately embraced by some as it is rejected by others. Dr. Kunz situates the changing usage of the term in the context of social, political and economic struggle and explores the material and discursive work the expatriate performs in negotiating social inequalities and power relations. Migration, the book argues, is a key terrain on which colonial power relations have been reproduced and translated, and migration categories are at the heart of the insidious ways that intersecting material and symbolic inequalities are enacted today. Any project for social justice needs to dissect and interrogate categories like the expatriate, and this book offers analytical and methodical strategies to advance this project.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose doctoral work focused on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 9 Jan 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/sarah-kunz-expatriate-following-a-migration-category-manchester-up-2023-NtPVRvLn</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who are expatriates? How do they differ from other migrants? And why should we care about such distinctions?&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781526154293" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Expatriate: Following a Migration Category</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Manchester University Press, 2023) by Dr. Sarah Kunz interrogates the contested category of 'the expatriate' to explore its history and politics, its making and lived experience. Drawing on ethnographic and archival research, the book offers a critical reading of International Human Resource Management literature, explores the work and history of the Expatriate Archive Centre in The Hague, and studies the usage and significance of the category in Kenyan history and present-day 'expat Nairobi'. Doing so, the book traces the figure of the expatriate from the mid-twentieth-century era of decolonisation to today's heated debates about migration.</p><p>The expatriate emerges as a malleable and contested category, of shifting meaning and changing membership, and as passionately embraced by some as it is rejected by others. Dr. Kunz situates the changing usage of the term in the context of social, political and economic struggle and explores the material and discursive work the expatriate performs in negotiating social inequalities and power relations. Migration, the book argues, is a key terrain on which colonial power relations have been reproduced and translated, and migration categories are at the heart of the insidious ways that intersecting material and symbolic inequalities are enacted today. Any project for social justice needs to dissect and interrogate categories like the expatriate, and this book offers analytical and methodical strategies to advance this project.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose doctoral work focused on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="58901087" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/09a30d19-ace6-4ed6-b0e4-1a21f81b560c/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=09a30d19-ace6-4ed6-b0e4-1a21f81b560c&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Sarah Kunz, &quot;Expatriate: Following a Migration Category&quot; (Manchester UP, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:01:21</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Who are expatriates? How do they differ from other migrants? And why should we care about such distinctions? Expatriate: Following a Migration Category (Manchester University Press, 2023) by Dr. Sarah Kunz interrogates the contested category of &apos;the expatriate&apos; to explore its history and politics, its making and lived experience. Drawing on ethnographic and archival research, the book offers a critical reading of International Human Resource Management literature, explores the work and history of the Expatriate Archive Centre in The Hague, and studies the usage and significance of the category in Kenyan history and present-day &apos;expat Nairobi&apos;. Doing so, the book traces the figure of the expatriate from the mid-twentieth-century era of decolonisation to today&apos;s heated debates about migration.
The expatriate emerges as a malleable and contested category, of shifting meaning and changing membership, and as passionately embraced by some as it is rejected by others. Dr. Kunz situates the changing usage of the term in the context of social, political and economic struggle and explores the material and discursive work the expatriate performs in negotiating social inequalities and power relations. Migration, the book argues, is a key terrain on which colonial power relations have been reproduced and translated, and migration categories are at the heart of the insidious ways that intersecting material and symbolic inequalities are enacted today. Any project for social justice needs to dissect and interrogate categories like the expatriate, and this book offers analytical and methodical strategies to advance this project.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose doctoral work focused on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Who are expatriates? How do they differ from other migrants? And why should we care about such distinctions? Expatriate: Following a Migration Category (Manchester University Press, 2023) by Dr. Sarah Kunz interrogates the contested category of &apos;the expatriate&apos; to explore its history and politics, its making and lived experience. Drawing on ethnographic and archival research, the book offers a critical reading of International Human Resource Management literature, explores the work and history of the Expatriate Archive Centre in The Hague, and studies the usage and significance of the category in Kenyan history and present-day &apos;expat Nairobi&apos;. Doing so, the book traces the figure of the expatriate from the mid-twentieth-century era of decolonisation to today&apos;s heated debates about migration.
The expatriate emerges as a malleable and contested category, of shifting meaning and changing membership, and as passionately embraced by some as it is rejected by others. Dr. Kunz situates the changing usage of the term in the context of social, political and economic struggle and explores the material and discursive work the expatriate performs in negotiating social inequalities and power relations. Migration, the book argues, is a key terrain on which colonial power relations have been reproduced and translated, and migration categories are at the heart of the insidious ways that intersecting material and symbolic inequalities are enacted today. Any project for social justice needs to dissect and interrogate categories like the expatriate, and this book offers analytical and methodical strategies to advance this project.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose doctoral work focused on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>271</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">105d5e0e-42c1-11ee-953d-fb58cf1f7a9c</guid>
      <title>Chris Dietz, &quot;Self-Declaration in the Legal Recognition of Gender&quot; (Routledge, 2022)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780367255169" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Self-Declaration in the Legal Recognition of Gender</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Routledge, 2023)&nbsp;is a socio-legal study that offers a critique of what it means to self-declare with regard to legal gender. Based on empirical research conducted in Denmark, the book engages in some of the most controversial issues surrounding trans and gender diverse rights. The theoretical analysis draws upon legal consciousness, affect theory, vulnerability and governmentality, to cross jurisdictional boundaries between law and medicine. The book reflects on the limits of progress that&nbsp;legislative&nbsp;reform may make, and the way that increased regulation can actually limit access to rights protections. Broadly transferrable beyond its specific field, this&nbsp;book will be useful to socio-legal scholars, feminist scholars, trans scholars, policy makers and practitioners.</p><p><a href="https://essl.leeds.ac.uk/law/staff/190/dr-chris-dietz" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr Chris Dietz</a>&nbsp;is a Lecturer at the Centre for Law &amp; Social Justice at The University of Leeds.&nbsp;</p><p><a href="https://twitter.com/janerichardshk?lang=en" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Jane Richards</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a doctoral student at the University of Hong Kong. You can find her on twitter where she follows all things related to human rights and Hong Kong politics @JaneRichardsHK</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 7 Jan 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/chris-dietz-self-declaration-in-the-legal-recognition-of-gender-routledge-2022-x7uDN6cN</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780367255169" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Self-Declaration in the Legal Recognition of Gender</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Routledge, 2023)&nbsp;is a socio-legal study that offers a critique of what it means to self-declare with regard to legal gender. Based on empirical research conducted in Denmark, the book engages in some of the most controversial issues surrounding trans and gender diverse rights. The theoretical analysis draws upon legal consciousness, affect theory, vulnerability and governmentality, to cross jurisdictional boundaries between law and medicine. The book reflects on the limits of progress that&nbsp;legislative&nbsp;reform may make, and the way that increased regulation can actually limit access to rights protections. Broadly transferrable beyond its specific field, this&nbsp;book will be useful to socio-legal scholars, feminist scholars, trans scholars, policy makers and practitioners.</p><p><a href="https://essl.leeds.ac.uk/law/staff/190/dr-chris-dietz" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr Chris Dietz</a>&nbsp;is a Lecturer at the Centre for Law &amp; Social Justice at The University of Leeds.&nbsp;</p><p><a href="https://twitter.com/janerichardshk?lang=en" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Jane Richards</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a doctoral student at the University of Hong Kong. You can find her on twitter where she follows all things related to human rights and Hong Kong politics @JaneRichardsHK</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="71667427" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/67887c00-a407-4030-8785-c6f08f71c57a/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=67887c00-a407-4030-8785-c6f08f71c57a&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Chris Dietz, &quot;Self-Declaration in the Legal Recognition of Gender&quot; (Routledge, 2022)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:14:39</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Self-Declaration in the Legal Recognition of Gender (Routledge, 2023) is a socio-legal study that offers a critique of what it means to self-declare with regard to legal gender. Based on empirical research conducted in Denmark, the book engages in some of the most controversial issues surrounding trans and gender diverse rights. The theoretical analysis draws upon legal consciousness, affect theory, vulnerability and governmentality, to cross jurisdictional boundaries between law and medicine. The book reflects on the limits of progress that legislative reform may make, and the way that increased regulation can actually limit access to rights protections. Broadly transferrable beyond its specific field, this book will be useful to socio-legal scholars, feminist scholars, trans scholars, policy makers and practitioners.
Dr Chris Dietz is a Lecturer at the Centre for Law &amp; Social Justice at The University of Leeds. 
Jane Richards is a doctoral student at the University of Hong Kong. You can find her on twitter where she follows all things related to human rights and Hong Kong politics @JaneRichardsHK
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Self-Declaration in the Legal Recognition of Gender (Routledge, 2023) is a socio-legal study that offers a critique of what it means to self-declare with regard to legal gender. Based on empirical research conducted in Denmark, the book engages in some of the most controversial issues surrounding trans and gender diverse rights. The theoretical analysis draws upon legal consciousness, affect theory, vulnerability and governmentality, to cross jurisdictional boundaries between law and medicine. The book reflects on the limits of progress that legislative reform may make, and the way that increased regulation can actually limit access to rights protections. Broadly transferrable beyond its specific field, this book will be useful to socio-legal scholars, feminist scholars, trans scholars, policy makers and practitioners.
Dr Chris Dietz is a Lecturer at the Centre for Law &amp; Social Justice at The University of Leeds. 
Jane Richards is a doctoral student at the University of Hong Kong. You can find her on twitter where she follows all things related to human rights and Hong Kong politics @JaneRichardsHK
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>196</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">abbbc360-e826-11f0-929f-ab5543732ea7</guid>
      <title>David Morris, &quot;Stealing The Future: Sam Bankman-Fried, Elite Fraud, and the Cult of Techno-Utopia&quot; (Watkins Media, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><em>Stealing the Future</em>&nbsp;is the first book to tell the true and full story of Sam Bankman-Fried and his historic crimes. It chronicles the $11 billion FTX fraud with the detail and nuance of a financial fraud expert and cryptocurrency insider – but unlike any book before it, it also traces the ideas that enabled the crime. “Effective Altruism” and related tendencies, such as longtermism and transhumanism, remain dangerously influential in today’s Silicon Valley. Despite Bankman-Fried’s pose as a cuddly liberal philanthropist, they are now center stage in the global rise of the far right, and also lie at the heart of OpenAI, the tech darling that took FTX’s place as the face of the future.</p>
<p>In this interview, Morris explains how some of the key thought processes that drive today's techno-billionaires and how we can spot the next fraudsters in our midst.&nbsp;</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 6 Jan 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/david-morris-stealing-the-future-sam-bankman-fried-elite-fraud-and-the-cult-of-techno-utopia-watkins-media-2025-jA5Rl8ca</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Stealing the Future</em>&nbsp;is the first book to tell the true and full story of Sam Bankman-Fried and his historic crimes. It chronicles the $11 billion FTX fraud with the detail and nuance of a financial fraud expert and cryptocurrency insider – but unlike any book before it, it also traces the ideas that enabled the crime. “Effective Altruism” and related tendencies, such as longtermism and transhumanism, remain dangerously influential in today’s Silicon Valley. Despite Bankman-Fried’s pose as a cuddly liberal philanthropist, they are now center stage in the global rise of the far right, and also lie at the heart of OpenAI, the tech darling that took FTX’s place as the face of the future.</p>
<p>In this interview, Morris explains how some of the key thought processes that drive today's techno-billionaires and how we can spot the next fraudsters in our midst.&nbsp;</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="57835225" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/3d8cfcb5-3cd1-4af0-9f94-da5f667994f8/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=3d8cfcb5-3cd1-4af0-9f94-da5f667994f8&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>David Morris, &quot;Stealing The Future: Sam Bankman-Fried, Elite Fraud, and the Cult of Techno-Utopia&quot; (Watkins Media, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:00:12</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Stealing the Future is the first book to tell the true and full story of Sam Bankman-Fried and his historic crimes. It chronicles the $11 billion FTX fraud with the detail and nuance of a financial fraud expert and cryptocurrency insider – but unlike any book before it, it also traces the ideas that enabled the crime. “Effective Altruism” and related tendencies, such as longtermism and transhumanism, remain dangerously influential in today’s Silicon Valley. Despite Bankman-Fried’s pose as a cuddly liberal philanthropist, they are now center stage in the global rise of the far right, and also lie at the heart of OpenAI, the tech darling that took FTX’s place as the face of the future.
In this interview, Morris explains how some of the key thought processes that drive today&apos;s techno-billionaires and how we can spot the next fraudsters in our midst. 
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Stealing the Future is the first book to tell the true and full story of Sam Bankman-Fried and his historic crimes. It chronicles the $11 billion FTX fraud with the detail and nuance of a financial fraud expert and cryptocurrency insider – but unlike any book before it, it also traces the ideas that enabled the crime. “Effective Altruism” and related tendencies, such as longtermism and transhumanism, remain dangerously influential in today’s Silicon Valley. Despite Bankman-Fried’s pose as a cuddly liberal philanthropist, they are now center stage in the global rise of the far right, and also lie at the heart of OpenAI, the tech darling that took FTX’s place as the face of the future.
In this interview, Morris explains how some of the key thought processes that drive today&apos;s techno-billionaires and how we can spot the next fraudsters in our midst. 
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>195</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">0936bff4-e7f0-11f0-8f89-1fadf4c6b9bb</guid>
      <title>Jason Isralowitz, &quot;Nothing to Fear: Alfred Hitchcock and the Wrong Men&quot; (Fayetteville Mafia Press, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In 1956, Alfred Hitchcock focused his lens on an issue that cuts to the heart of our criminal justice system: the risk of wrongful conviction. The result was&nbsp;<em>The Wrong Man</em>, a bracing drama based on the real-life false arrest of Queens musician Christopher “Manny” Balestrero. Manny's ordeal is part of a larger story of other miscarriages of justice in the first half of the twentieth century.&nbsp;</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781949024425" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Nothing to Fear: Alfred Hitchcock and the Wrong Men</em></a>&nbsp;(Fayetteville Mafia Press, 2023),&nbsp;attorney Jason Isralowitz tells this story in a revelatory book that situates both the Balestrero case and its cinematic counterpart in their historical context. Drawing from archival records, Isralowitz delivers a gripping account of Manny’ s trial and new insights into an errant prosecution. He then examines how Hitchcock’ s film bears witness to issues that animate the contemporary innocence movement. Given the hundreds of exonerations of the wrongfully convicted in recent years, this genre-bending work of true crime and film history is a must-read.</p><p>Jason Isralowitz is a partner in the New York office of Hogan Lovells. A Queens native, Jason graduated from Boston University’s College of Communication with a bachelor’s in journalism and holds a J.D. from the University of Pennsylvania Law School. He has practiced law in Manhattan since 1993. Jason lives in Summit, New Jersey with his wife, Jennifer.</p><p><em>Daniel Moran earned his B.A. and M.A. in English from Rutgers University and his Ph.D. in History from Drew University. The author of Creating Flannery O’Connor: Her Critics, Her Publishers, Her Readers, he teaches research and writing at Rutgers and co-hosts the podcast Fifteen-Minute Film Fanatics, found at&nbsp;</em><a href="https://fifteenminutefilm.podbean.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>https://fifteenminutefilm.podb...</em></a><em>&nbsp;and on Twitter @15MinFilm.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 5 Jan 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/jason-isralowitz-nothing-to-fear-alfred-hitchcock-and-the-wrong-men-fayetteville-mafia-press-2023-q2Cc2UQA-UxfYCM4J</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In 1956, Alfred Hitchcock focused his lens on an issue that cuts to the heart of our criminal justice system: the risk of wrongful conviction. The result was&nbsp;<em>The Wrong Man</em>, a bracing drama based on the real-life false arrest of Queens musician Christopher “Manny” Balestrero. Manny's ordeal is part of a larger story of other miscarriages of justice in the first half of the twentieth century.&nbsp;</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781949024425" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Nothing to Fear: Alfred Hitchcock and the Wrong Men</em></a>&nbsp;(Fayetteville Mafia Press, 2023),&nbsp;attorney Jason Isralowitz tells this story in a revelatory book that situates both the Balestrero case and its cinematic counterpart in their historical context. Drawing from archival records, Isralowitz delivers a gripping account of Manny’ s trial and new insights into an errant prosecution. He then examines how Hitchcock’ s film bears witness to issues that animate the contemporary innocence movement. Given the hundreds of exonerations of the wrongfully convicted in recent years, this genre-bending work of true crime and film history is a must-read.</p><p>Jason Isralowitz is a partner in the New York office of Hogan Lovells. A Queens native, Jason graduated from Boston University’s College of Communication with a bachelor’s in journalism and holds a J.D. from the University of Pennsylvania Law School. He has practiced law in Manhattan since 1993. Jason lives in Summit, New Jersey with his wife, Jennifer.</p><p><em>Daniel Moran earned his B.A. and M.A. in English from Rutgers University and his Ph.D. in History from Drew University. The author of Creating Flannery O’Connor: Her Critics, Her Publishers, Her Readers, he teaches research and writing at Rutgers and co-hosts the podcast Fifteen-Minute Film Fanatics, found at&nbsp;</em><a href="https://fifteenminutefilm.podbean.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>https://fifteenminutefilm.podb...</em></a><em>&nbsp;and on Twitter @15MinFilm.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="55169121" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/cc522af3-2fbb-4408-a52e-1c9a7e5bcffc/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=cc522af3-2fbb-4408-a52e-1c9a7e5bcffc&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Jason Isralowitz, &quot;Nothing to Fear: Alfred Hitchcock and the Wrong Men&quot; (Fayetteville Mafia Press, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:57:27</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In 1956, Alfred Hitchcock focused his lens on an issue that cuts to the heart of our criminal justice system: the risk of wrongful conviction. The result was The Wrong Man, a bracing drama based on the real-life false arrest of Queens musician Christopher “Manny” Balestrero. Manny&apos;s ordeal is part of a larger story of other miscarriages of justice in the first half of the twentieth century. 
In Nothing to Fear: Alfred Hitchcock and the Wrong Men (Fayetteville Mafia Press, 2023), attorney Jason Isralowitz tells this story in a revelatory book that situates both the Balestrero case and its cinematic counterpart in their historical context. Drawing from archival records, Isralowitz delivers a gripping account of Manny’ s trial and new insights into an errant prosecution. He then examines how Hitchcock’ s film bears witness to issues that animate the contemporary innocence movement. Given the hundreds of exonerations of the wrongfully convicted in recent years, this genre-bending work of true crime and film history is a must-read.
Jason Isralowitz is a partner in the New York office of Hogan Lovells. A Queens native, Jason graduated from Boston University’s College of Communication with a bachelor’s in journalism and holds a J.D. from the University of Pennsylvania Law School. He has practiced law in Manhattan since 1993. Jason lives in Summit, New Jersey with his wife, Jennifer.
Daniel Moran earned his B.A. and M.A. in English from Rutgers University and his Ph.D. in History from Drew University. The author of Creating Flannery O’Connor: Her Critics, Her Publishers, Her Readers, he teaches research and writing at Rutgers and co-hosts the podcast Fifteen-Minute Film Fanatics, found at https://fifteenminutefilm.podb... and on Twitter @15MinFilm.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In 1956, Alfred Hitchcock focused his lens on an issue that cuts to the heart of our criminal justice system: the risk of wrongful conviction. The result was The Wrong Man, a bracing drama based on the real-life false arrest of Queens musician Christopher “Manny” Balestrero. Manny&apos;s ordeal is part of a larger story of other miscarriages of justice in the first half of the twentieth century. 
In Nothing to Fear: Alfred Hitchcock and the Wrong Men (Fayetteville Mafia Press, 2023), attorney Jason Isralowitz tells this story in a revelatory book that situates both the Balestrero case and its cinematic counterpart in their historical context. Drawing from archival records, Isralowitz delivers a gripping account of Manny’ s trial and new insights into an errant prosecution. He then examines how Hitchcock’ s film bears witness to issues that animate the contemporary innocence movement. Given the hundreds of exonerations of the wrongfully convicted in recent years, this genre-bending work of true crime and film history is a must-read.
Jason Isralowitz is a partner in the New York office of Hogan Lovells. A Queens native, Jason graduated from Boston University’s College of Communication with a bachelor’s in journalism and holds a J.D. from the University of Pennsylvania Law School. He has practiced law in Manhattan since 1993. Jason lives in Summit, New Jersey with his wife, Jennifer.
Daniel Moran earned his B.A. and M.A. in English from Rutgers University and his Ph.D. in History from Drew University. The author of Creating Flannery O’Connor: Her Critics, Her Publishers, Her Readers, he teaches research and writing at Rutgers and co-hosts the podcast Fifteen-Minute Film Fanatics, found at https://fifteenminutefilm.podb... and on Twitter @15MinFilm.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>152</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3f6d721a-58a1-11ee-87a4-a3963101cc69</guid>
      <title>James Greenwood-Reeves, &quot;Justifying Violent Protest: Law and Morality in Democratic States&quot; (Routledge, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Was the use of violence on January 6th Capitol attacks legitimate? Is the use of&nbsp;violence morally justified by members of Extinction Rebellion or Just Stop Oil campaigners?&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781032226934" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Justifying Violent Protest: Law and Morality in Democratic States</em></a>&nbsp;(Routledge, 2023)&nbsp;addresses these issues head on, to make a radical, but compelling argument in favour of the legitimate use of violence in protest in liberal democracies. Grounded in theories of constitutional morality, the book makes the case that when states make illogical or unjust laws, citizens have morally justifiable reasons to disobey. Violence can act as moral dialogue - both expressively and directly - to denounce unjust laws, particularly in cases where civil disobedience does not go far enough. This book considers recent protest movements, of which&nbsp;the use of violent protest has been central to citizens demands. It examines the activism of the Hong Kong pro-democracy protests, Extinction Rebellion, Black Lives Matter movement, and other contemporary international movements.&nbsp;</p><p>This book could not be more timely.&nbsp;In a world where citizens' rights to protest are being increasingly curtailed, and climate destruction is becoming an increasing matter of urgency, Greenwood-Reeves&nbsp;addresses the legitimacy of violent protest and ultimate importance in upholding liberal democracy.&nbsp;</p><p><a href="https://essl.leeds.ac.uk/law/staff/2132/dr-james-greenwood-reeves" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr James Greenwood-Reeves</a>&nbsp;is a Lecturer in Law at The University of Leeds. One of his current projects&nbsp;@lawsadrag</p><p><em>﻿</em><a href="https://twitter.com/janerichardshk?lang=en" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Jane Richards</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a doctoral student at the University of Hong Kong. You can find her on twitter where she follows all things related to human rights and Hong Kong politics @JaneRichardsHK</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 4 Jan 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/james-greenwood-reeves-justifying-violent-protest-law-and-morality-in-democratic-states-routledge-2023-2pk_lwVg</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Was the use of violence on January 6th Capitol attacks legitimate? Is the use of&nbsp;violence morally justified by members of Extinction Rebellion or Just Stop Oil campaigners?&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781032226934" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Justifying Violent Protest: Law and Morality in Democratic States</em></a>&nbsp;(Routledge, 2023)&nbsp;addresses these issues head on, to make a radical, but compelling argument in favour of the legitimate use of violence in protest in liberal democracies. Grounded in theories of constitutional morality, the book makes the case that when states make illogical or unjust laws, citizens have morally justifiable reasons to disobey. Violence can act as moral dialogue - both expressively and directly - to denounce unjust laws, particularly in cases where civil disobedience does not go far enough. This book considers recent protest movements, of which&nbsp;the use of violent protest has been central to citizens demands. It examines the activism of the Hong Kong pro-democracy protests, Extinction Rebellion, Black Lives Matter movement, and other contemporary international movements.&nbsp;</p><p>This book could not be more timely.&nbsp;In a world where citizens' rights to protest are being increasingly curtailed, and climate destruction is becoming an increasing matter of urgency, Greenwood-Reeves&nbsp;addresses the legitimacy of violent protest and ultimate importance in upholding liberal democracy.&nbsp;</p><p><a href="https://essl.leeds.ac.uk/law/staff/2132/dr-james-greenwood-reeves" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr James Greenwood-Reeves</a>&nbsp;is a Lecturer in Law at The University of Leeds. One of his current projects&nbsp;@lawsadrag</p><p><em>﻿</em><a href="https://twitter.com/janerichardshk?lang=en" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Jane Richards</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a doctoral student at the University of Hong Kong. You can find her on twitter where she follows all things related to human rights and Hong Kong politics @JaneRichardsHK</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="71410547" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/e396a8c6-dfe2-4f64-bebb-8b562ab53789/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=e396a8c6-dfe2-4f64-bebb-8b562ab53789&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>James Greenwood-Reeves, &quot;Justifying Violent Protest: Law and Morality in Democratic States&quot; (Routledge, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:14:22</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Was the use of violence on January 6th Capitol attacks legitimate? Is the use of violence morally justified by members of Extinction Rebellion or Just Stop Oil campaigners? Justifying Violent Protest: Law and Morality in Democratic States (Routledge, 2023) addresses these issues head on, to make a radical, but compelling argument in favour of the legitimate use of violence in protest in liberal democracies. Grounded in theories of constitutional morality, the book makes the case that when states make illogical or unjust laws, citizens have morally justifiable reasons to disobey. Violence can act as moral dialogue - both expressively and directly - to denounce unjust laws, particularly in cases where civil disobedience does not go far enough. This book considers recent protest movements, of which the use of violent protest has been central to citizens demands. It examines the activism of the Hong Kong pro-democracy protests, Extinction Rebellion, Black Lives Matter movement, and other contemporary international movements. 
This book could not be more timely. In a world where citizens&apos; rights to protest are being increasingly curtailed, and climate destruction is becoming an increasing matter of urgency, Greenwood-Reeves addresses the legitimacy of violent protest and ultimate importance in upholding liberal democracy. 
Dr James Greenwood-Reeves is a Lecturer in Law at The University of Leeds. One of his current projects @lawsadrag
﻿Jane Richards is a doctoral student at the University of Hong Kong. You can find her on twitter where she follows all things related to human rights and Hong Kong politics @JaneRichardsHK
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Was the use of violence on January 6th Capitol attacks legitimate? Is the use of violence morally justified by members of Extinction Rebellion or Just Stop Oil campaigners? Justifying Violent Protest: Law and Morality in Democratic States (Routledge, 2023) addresses these issues head on, to make a radical, but compelling argument in favour of the legitimate use of violence in protest in liberal democracies. Grounded in theories of constitutional morality, the book makes the case that when states make illogical or unjust laws, citizens have morally justifiable reasons to disobey. Violence can act as moral dialogue - both expressively and directly - to denounce unjust laws, particularly in cases where civil disobedience does not go far enough. This book considers recent protest movements, of which the use of violent protest has been central to citizens demands. It examines the activism of the Hong Kong pro-democracy protests, Extinction Rebellion, Black Lives Matter movement, and other contemporary international movements. 
This book could not be more timely. In a world where citizens&apos; rights to protest are being increasingly curtailed, and climate destruction is becoming an increasing matter of urgency, Greenwood-Reeves addresses the legitimacy of violent protest and ultimate importance in upholding liberal democracy. 
Dr James Greenwood-Reeves is a Lecturer in Law at The University of Leeds. One of his current projects @lawsadrag
﻿Jane Richards is a doctoral student at the University of Hong Kong. You can find her on twitter where she follows all things related to human rights and Hong Kong politics @JaneRichardsHK
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>198</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">0ad3fea0-e71c-11f0-9f90-27457e9c6b9b</guid>
      <title>Deana Heath and Jinee Lokaneeta, &quot;Policing and Violence in India: Colonial Origins and Contemporary Realities&quot; (Speaking Tiger, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Why does Indias police force, created under British rule, still echo the priorities of a bygone empire? And what is it about this institution, tasked with maintaining the law and order, that has led to a normalization of daily violence? These are the key questions that inform the analyses in this volume by lawyers, academics and activists. Divided into four broad sections, it begins by looking at the origins of the modern police force in the 1860s and demonstrates their role in maintaining socio-cultural, economic and political hierarchies even in post-Independence India. The second section explores how the law and legal infrastructure, as well as the bureaucracy in India, work to effectively facilitate police violence and to further marginalize and criminalize certain groups, like lower castes and Muslims. The penultimate section complicates this picture, examining how police violence is shaped by historical ambivalence towards democracy, the personal and systemic dynamics between police personnel and the accused, and the fraught identity of police in conflict zones like Kashmir, where authority is both granted and withheld by the state. The final section contains interviews of and reflections by prominent critics of police violence, including former Haryana DGP V.N. Rai and Abdul Wahid Shaikh, falsely accused of involvement in the 2006 Mumbai blasts. Questioning its foundational purpose and envisioning pathways to accountability and reform, Policing and Violence in India ignites a long-overdue conversation about the nature of policing in India.<br></p>
<p>Deana Heath is Professor of Indian and Colonial History at the University of Liverpool. She has written widely on issues relating to policing and violence in colonial India, particularly on torture and sexual violence. Her latest book,&nbsp;<em>Colonial Terror: Torture and State Violence in Colonial India</em>, was published by Oxford University Press in 2021.<br></p>
<p>Jinee Lokaneeta is Professor in Political Science and International Relations at Drew University, New Jersey. She is the author of&nbsp;<em>The Truth Machines: Policing, Violence, and Scientific Interrogations in India</em>, published in 2020 by the University of Michigan Press and Orient Blackswan, and&nbsp;<em>Transnational Torture: Law, Violence, and State Power in the United States and India</em>, published by New York University Press in 2011 and Orient Blackswan in 2012.<br></p>
<p>Shailza Sharma is an Assistant Professor at Jindal Global Law School, O.P. Jindal Global University.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 2 Jan 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/deana-heath-and-jinee-lokaneeta-policing-and-violence-in-india-colonial-origins-and-contemporary-realities-speaking-tiger-2025-BoMdSIKd</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why does Indias police force, created under British rule, still echo the priorities of a bygone empire? And what is it about this institution, tasked with maintaining the law and order, that has led to a normalization of daily violence? These are the key questions that inform the analyses in this volume by lawyers, academics and activists. Divided into four broad sections, it begins by looking at the origins of the modern police force in the 1860s and demonstrates their role in maintaining socio-cultural, economic and political hierarchies even in post-Independence India. The second section explores how the law and legal infrastructure, as well as the bureaucracy in India, work to effectively facilitate police violence and to further marginalize and criminalize certain groups, like lower castes and Muslims. The penultimate section complicates this picture, examining how police violence is shaped by historical ambivalence towards democracy, the personal and systemic dynamics between police personnel and the accused, and the fraught identity of police in conflict zones like Kashmir, where authority is both granted and withheld by the state. The final section contains interviews of and reflections by prominent critics of police violence, including former Haryana DGP V.N. Rai and Abdul Wahid Shaikh, falsely accused of involvement in the 2006 Mumbai blasts. Questioning its foundational purpose and envisioning pathways to accountability and reform, Policing and Violence in India ignites a long-overdue conversation about the nature of policing in India.<br></p>
<p>Deana Heath is Professor of Indian and Colonial History at the University of Liverpool. She has written widely on issues relating to policing and violence in colonial India, particularly on torture and sexual violence. Her latest book,&nbsp;<em>Colonial Terror: Torture and State Violence in Colonial India</em>, was published by Oxford University Press in 2021.<br></p>
<p>Jinee Lokaneeta is Professor in Political Science and International Relations at Drew University, New Jersey. She is the author of&nbsp;<em>The Truth Machines: Policing, Violence, and Scientific Interrogations in India</em>, published in 2020 by the University of Michigan Press and Orient Blackswan, and&nbsp;<em>Transnational Torture: Law, Violence, and State Power in the United States and India</em>, published by New York University Press in 2011 and Orient Blackswan in 2012.<br></p>
<p>Shailza Sharma is an Assistant Professor at Jindal Global Law School, O.P. Jindal Global University.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="41875986" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/652881b5-e50f-4fe2-aeab-c9aefe145073/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=652881b5-e50f-4fe2-aeab-c9aefe145073&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Deana Heath and Jinee Lokaneeta, &quot;Policing and Violence in India: Colonial Origins and Contemporary Realities&quot; (Speaking Tiger, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:43:33</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Why does Indias police force, created under British rule, still echo the priorities of a bygone empire? And what is it about this institution, tasked with maintaining the law and order, that has led to a normalization of daily violence? These are the key questions that inform the analyses in this volume by lawyers, academics and activists. Divided into four broad sections, it begins by looking at the origins of the modern police force in the 1860s and demonstrates their role in maintaining socio-cultural, economic and political hierarchies even in post-Independence India. The second section explores how the law and legal infrastructure, as well as the bureaucracy in India, work to effectively facilitate police violence and to further marginalize and criminalize certain groups, like lower castes and Muslims. The penultimate section complicates this picture, examining how police violence is shaped by historical ambivalence towards democracy, the personal and systemic dynamics between police personnel and the accused, and the fraught identity of police in conflict zones like Kashmir, where authority is both granted and withheld by the state. The final section contains interviews of and reflections by prominent critics of police violence, including former Haryana DGP V.N. Rai and Abdul Wahid Shaikh, falsely accused of involvement in the 2006 Mumbai blasts. Questioning its foundational purpose and envisioning pathways to accountability and reform, Policing and Violence in India ignites a long-overdue conversation about the nature of policing in India.
Deana Heath is Professor of Indian and Colonial History at the University of Liverpool. She has written widely on issues relating to policing and violence in colonial India, particularly on torture and sexual violence. Her latest book, Colonial Terror: Torture and State Violence in Colonial India, was published by Oxford University Press in 2021.
Jinee Lokaneeta is Professor in Political Science and International Relations at Drew University, New Jersey. She is the author of The Truth Machines: Policing, Violence, and Scientific Interrogations in India, published in 2020 by the University of Michigan Press and Orient Blackswan, and Transnational Torture: Law, Violence, and State Power in the United States and India, published by New York University Press in 2011 and Orient Blackswan in 2012.
Shailza Sharma is an Assistant Professor at Jindal Global Law School, O.P. Jindal Global University.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Why does Indias police force, created under British rule, still echo the priorities of a bygone empire? And what is it about this institution, tasked with maintaining the law and order, that has led to a normalization of daily violence? These are the key questions that inform the analyses in this volume by lawyers, academics and activists. Divided into four broad sections, it begins by looking at the origins of the modern police force in the 1860s and demonstrates their role in maintaining socio-cultural, economic and political hierarchies even in post-Independence India. The second section explores how the law and legal infrastructure, as well as the bureaucracy in India, work to effectively facilitate police violence and to further marginalize and criminalize certain groups, like lower castes and Muslims. The penultimate section complicates this picture, examining how police violence is shaped by historical ambivalence towards democracy, the personal and systemic dynamics between police personnel and the accused, and the fraught identity of police in conflict zones like Kashmir, where authority is both granted and withheld by the state. The final section contains interviews of and reflections by prominent critics of police violence, including former Haryana DGP V.N. Rai and Abdul Wahid Shaikh, falsely accused of involvement in the 2006 Mumbai blasts. Questioning its foundational purpose and envisioning pathways to accountability and reform, Policing and Violence in India ignites a long-overdue conversation about the nature of policing in India.
Deana Heath is Professor of Indian and Colonial History at the University of Liverpool. She has written widely on issues relating to policing and violence in colonial India, particularly on torture and sexual violence. Her latest book, Colonial Terror: Torture and State Violence in Colonial India, was published by Oxford University Press in 2021.
Jinee Lokaneeta is Professor in Political Science and International Relations at Drew University, New Jersey. She is the author of The Truth Machines: Policing, Violence, and Scientific Interrogations in India, published in 2020 by the University of Michigan Press and Orient Blackswan, and Transnational Torture: Law, Violence, and State Power in the United States and India, published by New York University Press in 2011 and Orient Blackswan in 2012.
Shailza Sharma is an Assistant Professor at Jindal Global Law School, O.P. Jindal Global University.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>304</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6b64acd6-e5c0-11f0-84de-27dc493c81ad</guid>
      <title>Dagmar Schafer, &quot;Ownership of Knowledge: Beyond Intellectual Property&quot; (MIT Press, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780262545594" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Ownership of Knowledge: Beyond Intellectual Property&nbsp;</em></a>(MIT Press, 2023) provides a framework for knowledge ownership that challenges the mechanisms of inequality in modern society.</p><p>Scholars of science, technology, medicine, and law have all tended to emphasize knowledge as the sum of human understanding, and its ownership as possession by law. Breaking with traditional discourse on knowledge property as something that concerns mainly words and intellectual history, or science and law, Dagmar Schäfer, Annapurna Mamidipudi, and Marius Buning propose technology as a central heuristic for studying the many implications of knowledge ownership.</p><p>Toward this end, they focus on the notions of knowledge and ownership in courtrooms, workshops, policy, and research practices, while also shedding light on scholarship itself as a powerful tool for making explicit the politics inherent in knowledge practices and social order. The book presents case studies showing how diverse knowledge economies are created and how inequalities arise from them. Unlike scholars who have fragmented this discourse across the disciplines of anthropology, sociology, and history, the editors highlight recent developments in the emerging field of the global history of knowledge—as science, as economy, and as culture. The case studies reveal how notions of knowing and owning emerge because they reciprocally produce and determine each other's limits and possibilities; that is, how we know inevitably affects how we can own what we know; and how we own always impacts how and what we are able to know.</p><p><a href="https://linktr.ee/jenhoyer" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Jen Hoyer</em></a><em>&nbsp;is Technical Services and Electronic Resources Librarian at</em><a href="http://www.citytech.cuny.edu/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;CUNY New York City College of Technology</em></a><em>. Jen edits for&nbsp;</em><a href="http://partnershipjournal.ca/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Partnership Journal</em></a><em>&nbsp;and organizes with the&nbsp;</em><a href="https://tpscollective.org/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>TPS Collective</em></a><em>. She is co-author of</em><a href="https://www.abc-clio.com/products/a6435p/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;What Primary Sources Teach: Lessons for Every Classroom</em></a><em>&nbsp;and</em><a href="https://litwinbooks.com/books/6722/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;The Social Movement Archive</em></a><em>.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 1 Jan 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/dagmar-schafer-ownership-of-knowledge-beyond-intellectual-property-mit-press-2023-yKf_Gtvc-0N_q7S_v</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780262545594" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Ownership of Knowledge: Beyond Intellectual Property&nbsp;</em></a>(MIT Press, 2023) provides a framework for knowledge ownership that challenges the mechanisms of inequality in modern society.</p><p>Scholars of science, technology, medicine, and law have all tended to emphasize knowledge as the sum of human understanding, and its ownership as possession by law. Breaking with traditional discourse on knowledge property as something that concerns mainly words and intellectual history, or science and law, Dagmar Schäfer, Annapurna Mamidipudi, and Marius Buning propose technology as a central heuristic for studying the many implications of knowledge ownership.</p><p>Toward this end, they focus on the notions of knowledge and ownership in courtrooms, workshops, policy, and research practices, while also shedding light on scholarship itself as a powerful tool for making explicit the politics inherent in knowledge practices and social order. The book presents case studies showing how diverse knowledge economies are created and how inequalities arise from them. Unlike scholars who have fragmented this discourse across the disciplines of anthropology, sociology, and history, the editors highlight recent developments in the emerging field of the global history of knowledge—as science, as economy, and as culture. The case studies reveal how notions of knowing and owning emerge because they reciprocally produce and determine each other's limits and possibilities; that is, how we know inevitably affects how we can own what we know; and how we own always impacts how and what we are able to know.</p><p><a href="https://linktr.ee/jenhoyer" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Jen Hoyer</em></a><em>&nbsp;is Technical Services and Electronic Resources Librarian at</em><a href="http://www.citytech.cuny.edu/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;CUNY New York City College of Technology</em></a><em>. Jen edits for&nbsp;</em><a href="http://partnershipjournal.ca/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Partnership Journal</em></a><em>&nbsp;and organizes with the&nbsp;</em><a href="https://tpscollective.org/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>TPS Collective</em></a><em>. She is co-author of</em><a href="https://www.abc-clio.com/products/a6435p/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;What Primary Sources Teach: Lessons for Every Classroom</em></a><em>&nbsp;and</em><a href="https://litwinbooks.com/books/6722/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;The Social Movement Archive</em></a><em>.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="40506611" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/932ff6ad-27f0-4fce-87ce-0bc2b41aa01f/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=932ff6ad-27f0-4fce-87ce-0bc2b41aa01f&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Dagmar Schafer, &quot;Ownership of Knowledge: Beyond Intellectual Property&quot; (MIT Press, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:42:11</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Ownership of Knowledge: Beyond Intellectual Property (MIT Press, 2023) provides a framework for knowledge ownership that challenges the mechanisms of inequality in modern society.
Scholars of science, technology, medicine, and law have all tended to emphasize knowledge as the sum of human understanding, and its ownership as possession by law. Breaking with traditional discourse on knowledge property as something that concerns mainly words and intellectual history, or science and law, Dagmar Schäfer, Annapurna Mamidipudi, and Marius Buning propose technology as a central heuristic for studying the many implications of knowledge ownership.
Toward this end, they focus on the notions of knowledge and ownership in courtrooms, workshops, policy, and research practices, while also shedding light on scholarship itself as a powerful tool for making explicit the politics inherent in knowledge practices and social order. The book presents case studies showing how diverse knowledge economies are created and how inequalities arise from them. Unlike scholars who have fragmented this discourse across the disciplines of anthropology, sociology, and history, the editors highlight recent developments in the emerging field of the global history of knowledge—as science, as economy, and as culture. The case studies reveal how notions of knowing and owning emerge because they reciprocally produce and determine each other&apos;s limits and possibilities; that is, how we know inevitably affects how we can own what we know; and how we own always impacts how and what we are able to know.
Jen Hoyer is Technical Services and Electronic Resources Librarian at CUNY New York City College of Technology. Jen edits for Partnership Journal and organizes with the TPS Collective. She is co-author of What Primary Sources Teach: Lessons for Every Classroom and The Social Movement Archive.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Ownership of Knowledge: Beyond Intellectual Property (MIT Press, 2023) provides a framework for knowledge ownership that challenges the mechanisms of inequality in modern society.
Scholars of science, technology, medicine, and law have all tended to emphasize knowledge as the sum of human understanding, and its ownership as possession by law. Breaking with traditional discourse on knowledge property as something that concerns mainly words and intellectual history, or science and law, Dagmar Schäfer, Annapurna Mamidipudi, and Marius Buning propose technology as a central heuristic for studying the many implications of knowledge ownership.
Toward this end, they focus on the notions of knowledge and ownership in courtrooms, workshops, policy, and research practices, while also shedding light on scholarship itself as a powerful tool for making explicit the politics inherent in knowledge practices and social order. The book presents case studies showing how diverse knowledge economies are created and how inequalities arise from them. Unlike scholars who have fragmented this discourse across the disciplines of anthropology, sociology, and history, the editors highlight recent developments in the emerging field of the global history of knowledge—as science, as economy, and as culture. The case studies reveal how notions of knowing and owning emerge because they reciprocally produce and determine each other&apos;s limits and possibilities; that is, how we know inevitably affects how we can own what we know; and how we own always impacts how and what we are able to know.
Jen Hoyer is Technical Services and Electronic Resources Librarian at CUNY New York City College of Technology. Jen edits for Partnership Journal and organizes with the TPS Collective. She is co-author of What Primary Sources Teach: Lessons for Every Classroom and The Social Movement Archive.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>14</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">eed0d46c-e5a9-11f0-980d-1b5c3bafca10</guid>
      <title>J. Barton Scott, &quot;Slandering the Sacred: Blasphemy Law and Religious Affect in Colonial India&quot; (U Chicago Press, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Why is religion today so often associated with giving and taking offense? To answer this question,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780226824901" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Slandering the Sacred: Blasphemy Law and Religious Affect in Colonial India</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(U Chicago Press, 2023) invites us to consider how colonial infrastructures shaped our globalized world. Through the origin and afterlives of a 1927 British imperial law (Section 295A of the Indian Penal Code), J. Barton Scott weaves a globe-trotting narrative about secularism, empire, insult, and outrage. Decentering white martyrs to free thought, his story calls for new histories of blasphemy that return these thinkers to their imperial context, dismantle the cultural boundaries of the West, and transgress the borders between the secular and the sacred as well as the public and the private.</p><p><em>Raj Balkaran is a scholar of Sanskrit narrative texts. He teaches at the Oxford Centre for Hindu Studies and at his own virtual School of Indian Wisdom. For information see&nbsp;</em><a href="https://rajbalkaran.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>rajbalkaran.com.</em></a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/j-barton-scott-slandering-the-sacred-blasphemy-law-and-religious-affect-in-colonial-india-u-chicago-press-2023-iLudE8DW-pwkM4VxU</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is religion today so often associated with giving and taking offense? To answer this question,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780226824901" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Slandering the Sacred: Blasphemy Law and Religious Affect in Colonial India</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(U Chicago Press, 2023) invites us to consider how colonial infrastructures shaped our globalized world. Through the origin and afterlives of a 1927 British imperial law (Section 295A of the Indian Penal Code), J. Barton Scott weaves a globe-trotting narrative about secularism, empire, insult, and outrage. Decentering white martyrs to free thought, his story calls for new histories of blasphemy that return these thinkers to their imperial context, dismantle the cultural boundaries of the West, and transgress the borders between the secular and the sacred as well as the public and the private.</p><p><em>Raj Balkaran is a scholar of Sanskrit narrative texts. He teaches at the Oxford Centre for Hindu Studies and at his own virtual School of Indian Wisdom. For information see&nbsp;</em><a href="https://rajbalkaran.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>rajbalkaran.com.</em></a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="26621675" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/50a01dec-c639-4752-b738-ecd4d44f41b1/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=50a01dec-c639-4752-b738-ecd4d44f41b1&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>J. Barton Scott, &quot;Slandering the Sacred: Blasphemy Law and Religious Affect in Colonial India&quot; (U Chicago Press, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:27:43</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Why is religion today so often associated with giving and taking offense? To answer this question, Slandering the Sacred: Blasphemy Law and Religious Affect in Colonial India (U Chicago Press, 2023) invites us to consider how colonial infrastructures shaped our globalized world. Through the origin and afterlives of a 1927 British imperial law (Section 295A of the Indian Penal Code), J. Barton Scott weaves a globe-trotting narrative about secularism, empire, insult, and outrage. Decentering white martyrs to free thought, his story calls for new histories of blasphemy that return these thinkers to their imperial context, dismantle the cultural boundaries of the West, and transgress the borders between the secular and the sacred as well as the public and the private.
Raj Balkaran is a scholar of Sanskrit narrative texts. He teaches at the Oxford Centre for Hindu Studies and at his own virtual School of Indian Wisdom. For information see rajbalkaran.com.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Why is religion today so often associated with giving and taking offense? To answer this question, Slandering the Sacred: Blasphemy Law and Religious Affect in Colonial India (U Chicago Press, 2023) invites us to consider how colonial infrastructures shaped our globalized world. Through the origin and afterlives of a 1927 British imperial law (Section 295A of the Indian Penal Code), J. Barton Scott weaves a globe-trotting narrative about secularism, empire, insult, and outrage. Decentering white martyrs to free thought, his story calls for new histories of blasphemy that return these thinkers to their imperial context, dismantle the cultural boundaries of the West, and transgress the borders between the secular and the sacred as well as the public and the private.
Raj Balkaran is a scholar of Sanskrit narrative texts. He teaches at the Oxford Centre for Hindu Studies and at his own virtual School of Indian Wisdom. For information see rajbalkaran.com.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>266</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">766f9708-e282-11f0-bc07-b3821f170e3c</guid>
      <title>Danielle Allen, &quot;Justice by Means of Democracy&quot; (U Chicago Press, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Danielle Allen, the James Bryant Conant University Professor and the Director of the Edmond and Lily Safra Center for Ethics at Harvard University, has a new book,&nbsp;<a href="https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/J/bo192735333.html" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Justice by Means of Democracy</em></a>, that explores the foundational understanding of how humans best flourish, in particular in regard to the governmental system under which they live. Allen, author of many books that focus on questions of democracy and justice, also works on democratic reform and renovation at&nbsp;<a href="https://partnersindemocracy.us/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Partners in Democracy</a>. Thus, Dr. Allen integrates both scholarship and democratic activism into her work as an academic and as an activist.&nbsp;<a href="https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/J/bo192735333.html" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Justice by Means of Democracy</em></a>&nbsp;examines these different threads as well; what is justice, and how does democracy work towards achieving justice? And what is the role of the citizen in these pursuits?</p><p>Allen opens up her discussion weaving together a number of threads, since politics, economics, civic engagement, and citizenship are all part of the whole when we consider both justice and democracy. Growing out of the ideal that democracy is a very good system for individuals to move forward together, and to achieve their full flourishing, complexities arise from issues like inequality, inequity, and how liberty is structured within the governmental system. Part of Allen’s framing comes from John Rawl’s&nbsp;<em>Theory of Justice</em>&nbsp;and his connection of justice and democracy—but she is pushing further in terms of the role of power and thinking about power and power sharing within democracies and democratic institutions.&nbsp;<a href="https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/J/bo192735333.html" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Justice by Means of Democracy</em></a>&nbsp;also wrestles with the abstract ideas of negative and positive liberty, and what this actually means in practice, particularly in the United States. In fact, the book thinks about what it means to be a citizen in a democracy, and what that requires from each individual. Allen explained in our conversation that while we often discuss “work/life balance” in terms of our personal and professional lives, what we should be discussing and focusing on is our “work-life civic balance” – since being civically involved takes time, takes effort, but is required for democracy to function and to remain intact. We are living through some of the breakages within our democratic systems of government, not just in the United States, but in other democracies as well. And part of the reason for these breakages is the failure of democratic practice by the people themselves. Allen’s own activism is focused on restoring and reinvigorating democratic practice, so that citizens become more used to the “habit” of democracy and civic engagement.</p><p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-editor of&nbsp;</em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700633883/the-politics-of-the-marvel-cinematic-universe/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe</em></a><em>&nbsp;(University Press of Kansas, 2022), as well as co-editor of the award winning book,</em><a href="https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/081314101X/ref=dbs_a_def_rwt_bibl_vppi_i0" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/danielle-allen-justice-by-means-of-democracy-u-chicago-press-2023-1LRYNZAz-jo1hpRuB</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Danielle Allen, the James Bryant Conant University Professor and the Director of the Edmond and Lily Safra Center for Ethics at Harvard University, has a new book,&nbsp;<a href="https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/J/bo192735333.html" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Justice by Means of Democracy</em></a>, that explores the foundational understanding of how humans best flourish, in particular in regard to the governmental system under which they live. Allen, author of many books that focus on questions of democracy and justice, also works on democratic reform and renovation at&nbsp;<a href="https://partnersindemocracy.us/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Partners in Democracy</a>. Thus, Dr. Allen integrates both scholarship and democratic activism into her work as an academic and as an activist.&nbsp;<a href="https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/J/bo192735333.html" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Justice by Means of Democracy</em></a>&nbsp;examines these different threads as well; what is justice, and how does democracy work towards achieving justice? And what is the role of the citizen in these pursuits?</p><p>Allen opens up her discussion weaving together a number of threads, since politics, economics, civic engagement, and citizenship are all part of the whole when we consider both justice and democracy. Growing out of the ideal that democracy is a very good system for individuals to move forward together, and to achieve their full flourishing, complexities arise from issues like inequality, inequity, and how liberty is structured within the governmental system. Part of Allen’s framing comes from John Rawl’s&nbsp;<em>Theory of Justice</em>&nbsp;and his connection of justice and democracy—but she is pushing further in terms of the role of power and thinking about power and power sharing within democracies and democratic institutions.&nbsp;<a href="https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/J/bo192735333.html" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Justice by Means of Democracy</em></a>&nbsp;also wrestles with the abstract ideas of negative and positive liberty, and what this actually means in practice, particularly in the United States. In fact, the book thinks about what it means to be a citizen in a democracy, and what that requires from each individual. Allen explained in our conversation that while we often discuss “work/life balance” in terms of our personal and professional lives, what we should be discussing and focusing on is our “work-life civic balance” – since being civically involved takes time, takes effort, but is required for democracy to function and to remain intact. We are living through some of the breakages within our democratic systems of government, not just in the United States, but in other democracies as well. And part of the reason for these breakages is the failure of democratic practice by the people themselves. Allen’s own activism is focused on restoring and reinvigorating democratic practice, so that citizens become more used to the “habit” of democracy and civic engagement.</p><p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-editor of&nbsp;</em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700633883/the-politics-of-the-marvel-cinematic-universe/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe</em></a><em>&nbsp;(University Press of Kansas, 2022), as well as co-editor of the award winning book,</em><a href="https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/081314101X/ref=dbs_a_def_rwt_bibl_vppi_i0" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="50878281" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/4a6111fd-e69a-4c12-ad50-499dce6260d6/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=4a6111fd-e69a-4c12-ad50-499dce6260d6&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Danielle Allen, &quot;Justice by Means of Democracy&quot; (U Chicago Press, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:52:59</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Danielle Allen, the James Bryant Conant University Professor and the Director of the Edmond and Lily Safra Center for Ethics at Harvard University, has a new book, Justice by Means of Democracy, that explores the foundational understanding of how humans best flourish, in particular in regard to the governmental system under which they live. Allen, author of many books that focus on questions of democracy and justice, also works on democratic reform and renovation at Partners in Democracy. Thus, Dr. Allen integrates both scholarship and democratic activism into her work as an academic and as an activist. Justice by Means of Democracy examines these different threads as well; what is justice, and how does democracy work towards achieving justice? And what is the role of the citizen in these pursuits?
Allen opens up her discussion weaving together a number of threads, since politics, economics, civic engagement, and citizenship are all part of the whole when we consider both justice and democracy. Growing out of the ideal that democracy is a very good system for individuals to move forward together, and to achieve their full flourishing, complexities arise from issues like inequality, inequity, and how liberty is structured within the governmental system. Part of Allen’s framing comes from John Rawl’s Theory of Justice and his connection of justice and democracy—but she is pushing further in terms of the role of power and thinking about power and power sharing within democracies and democratic institutions. Justice by Means of Democracy also wrestles with the abstract ideas of negative and positive liberty, and what this actually means in practice, particularly in the United States. In fact, the book thinks about what it means to be a citizen in a democracy, and what that requires from each individual. Allen explained in our conversation that while we often discuss “work/life balance” in terms of our personal and professional lives, what we should be discussing and focusing on is our “work-life civic balance” – since being civically involved takes time, takes effort, but is required for democracy to function and to remain intact. We are living through some of the breakages within our democratic systems of government, not just in the United States, but in other democracies as well. And part of the reason for these breakages is the failure of democratic practice by the people themselves. Allen’s own activism is focused on restoring and reinvigorating democratic practice, so that citizens become more used to the “habit” of democracy and civic engagement.
Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-editor of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe (University Press of Kansas, 2022), as well as co-editor of the award winning book,Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Danielle Allen, the James Bryant Conant University Professor and the Director of the Edmond and Lily Safra Center for Ethics at Harvard University, has a new book, Justice by Means of Democracy, that explores the foundational understanding of how humans best flourish, in particular in regard to the governmental system under which they live. Allen, author of many books that focus on questions of democracy and justice, also works on democratic reform and renovation at Partners in Democracy. Thus, Dr. Allen integrates both scholarship and democratic activism into her work as an academic and as an activist. Justice by Means of Democracy examines these different threads as well; what is justice, and how does democracy work towards achieving justice? And what is the role of the citizen in these pursuits?
Allen opens up her discussion weaving together a number of threads, since politics, economics, civic engagement, and citizenship are all part of the whole when we consider both justice and democracy. Growing out of the ideal that democracy is a very good system for individuals to move forward together, and to achieve their full flourishing, complexities arise from issues like inequality, inequity, and how liberty is structured within the governmental system. Part of Allen’s framing comes from John Rawl’s Theory of Justice and his connection of justice and democracy—but she is pushing further in terms of the role of power and thinking about power and power sharing within democracies and democratic institutions. Justice by Means of Democracy also wrestles with the abstract ideas of negative and positive liberty, and what this actually means in practice, particularly in the United States. In fact, the book thinks about what it means to be a citizen in a democracy, and what that requires from each individual. Allen explained in our conversation that while we often discuss “work/life balance” in terms of our personal and professional lives, what we should be discussing and focusing on is our “work-life civic balance” – since being civically involved takes time, takes effort, but is required for democracy to function and to remain intact. We are living through some of the breakages within our democratic systems of government, not just in the United States, but in other democracies as well. And part of the reason for these breakages is the failure of democratic practice by the people themselves. Allen’s own activism is focused on restoring and reinvigorating democratic practice, so that citizens become more used to the “habit” of democracy and civic engagement.
Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-editor of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe (University Press of Kansas, 2022), as well as co-editor of the award winning book,Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>663</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3ffd6e42-74d0-11ee-8254-578b749e087f</guid>
      <title>Agata Fijalkowski, &quot;Law, Visual Culture, and the Show Trial&quot; (Routledge, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Addressing the relationship between law and the visual, this book examines the importance of photography in Central, East, and Southeast European show trials.</p><p>The dispensation of justice during communist rule in Albania, East Germany, and Poland was reliant on legal propaganda, making the visual a fundamental part of the legitimacy of the law. Analysing photographs of trials,&nbsp;Agata Fijalkowski's&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780367429607" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Law, Visual Culture, and the Show Trial</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Routledge, 2023)&nbsp;examines how this message was conveyed to audiences watching and participating in the spectacle of show trials. The book traces how this use of the visual was exported from the Soviet Union and imposed upon its satellite states in the immediate aftermath of the Second World War. It shows how the legal actors and political authorities embraced new photographic technologies to advance their legal propaganda and legal photography. Drawing on contemporary theoretical work in the area, the book then challenges straightforward accounts of the relationship between law and the visual, critically engaging entrenched legal historical narratives, in relation to three different protagonists, to offer the possibility of reclaiming and rewriting past accounts. As its analysis demonstrates, the power of images can also be subversive; and, as such, the cases it addresses contribute to the discourse on visual epistemology and open onto contemporary questions about law and its inherent performativity.</p><p><a href="https://essl.leeds.ac.uk/law/staff/1332/mr-alex-batesmith" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Alex Batesmith</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a Lecturer in Legal Profession in the School of Law at the University of Leeds, and a former barrister and UN war crimes prosecutor, with teaching and research interests in international criminal law, cause lawyering and the legal profession, and law and emotion.&nbsp;</em>Twitter: @batesmith.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/batesmith/" rel="noopener noreferrer">LinkedIn</a>.&nbsp;</p><p><em>His recent publications include:</em></p><ul>
<li>
<a href="https://counterpress.org.uk/publications/aesthetics-and-counter-aesthetics-of-international-justice/#1634466943999-1d22caf9-d8076232-5aaf4645-b1c7" rel="noopener noreferrer">“‘Poetic Justice Products’: International Justice, Victim Counter-Aesthetics, and the Spectre of the Show Trial”</a>&nbsp;in Christine Schwöbel-Patel and Rob Knox (eds)&nbsp;<em>Aesthetics and Counter-Aesthetics of International Justice</em>&nbsp;(Counterpress, forthcoming 2023, ISBN 978-1-910761-17-5)</li>
<li>
<a href="https://www.routledge.com/Leading-Works-on-the-Legal-Profession/Newman/p/book/9781032182803" rel="noopener noreferrer">"Lawyers who want to make the world a better place – Scheingold and Sarat’s Something to Believe In: Politics, Professionalism, and Cause Lawyering"&nbsp;</a>in D. Newman (ed.)&nbsp;<em>Leading Works on the Legal Profession&nbsp;</em>(Routledge, July 2023), ISBN 978-1-032182-80-3)</li>
<li>
<a href="https://academic.oup.com/jicj/article-abstract/19/4/803/6459130?redirectedFrom=fulltext" rel="noopener noreferrer">“International Prosecutors as Cause Lawyers"&nbsp;</a>(2021)&nbsp;<em>Journal of International Criminal Justice&nbsp;</em>19(4) 803-830 (ISSN 1478-1387)</li>
</ul><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/agata-fijalkowski-law-visual-culture-and-the-show-trial-routledge-2023-4x1WnqGz</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Addressing the relationship between law and the visual, this book examines the importance of photography in Central, East, and Southeast European show trials.</p><p>The dispensation of justice during communist rule in Albania, East Germany, and Poland was reliant on legal propaganda, making the visual a fundamental part of the legitimacy of the law. Analysing photographs of trials,&nbsp;Agata Fijalkowski's&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780367429607" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Law, Visual Culture, and the Show Trial</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Routledge, 2023)&nbsp;examines how this message was conveyed to audiences watching and participating in the spectacle of show trials. The book traces how this use of the visual was exported from the Soviet Union and imposed upon its satellite states in the immediate aftermath of the Second World War. It shows how the legal actors and political authorities embraced new photographic technologies to advance their legal propaganda and legal photography. Drawing on contemporary theoretical work in the area, the book then challenges straightforward accounts of the relationship between law and the visual, critically engaging entrenched legal historical narratives, in relation to three different protagonists, to offer the possibility of reclaiming and rewriting past accounts. As its analysis demonstrates, the power of images can also be subversive; and, as such, the cases it addresses contribute to the discourse on visual epistemology and open onto contemporary questions about law and its inherent performativity.</p><p><a href="https://essl.leeds.ac.uk/law/staff/1332/mr-alex-batesmith" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Alex Batesmith</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a Lecturer in Legal Profession in the School of Law at the University of Leeds, and a former barrister and UN war crimes prosecutor, with teaching and research interests in international criminal law, cause lawyering and the legal profession, and law and emotion.&nbsp;</em>Twitter: @batesmith.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/batesmith/" rel="noopener noreferrer">LinkedIn</a>.&nbsp;</p><p><em>His recent publications include:</em></p><ul>
<li>
<a href="https://counterpress.org.uk/publications/aesthetics-and-counter-aesthetics-of-international-justice/#1634466943999-1d22caf9-d8076232-5aaf4645-b1c7" rel="noopener noreferrer">“‘Poetic Justice Products’: International Justice, Victim Counter-Aesthetics, and the Spectre of the Show Trial”</a>&nbsp;in Christine Schwöbel-Patel and Rob Knox (eds)&nbsp;<em>Aesthetics and Counter-Aesthetics of International Justice</em>&nbsp;(Counterpress, forthcoming 2023, ISBN 978-1-910761-17-5)</li>
<li>
<a href="https://www.routledge.com/Leading-Works-on-the-Legal-Profession/Newman/p/book/9781032182803" rel="noopener noreferrer">"Lawyers who want to make the world a better place – Scheingold and Sarat’s Something to Believe In: Politics, Professionalism, and Cause Lawyering"&nbsp;</a>in D. Newman (ed.)&nbsp;<em>Leading Works on the Legal Profession&nbsp;</em>(Routledge, July 2023), ISBN 978-1-032182-80-3)</li>
<li>
<a href="https://academic.oup.com/jicj/article-abstract/19/4/803/6459130?redirectedFrom=fulltext" rel="noopener noreferrer">“International Prosecutors as Cause Lawyers"&nbsp;</a>(2021)&nbsp;<em>Journal of International Criminal Justice&nbsp;</em>19(4) 803-830 (ISSN 1478-1387)</li>
</ul><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="69472446" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/2d16f295-829f-4b74-a954-9232a69b1e8f/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=2d16f295-829f-4b74-a954-9232a69b1e8f&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Agata Fijalkowski, &quot;Law, Visual Culture, and the Show Trial&quot; (Routledge, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:12:21</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Addressing the relationship between law and the visual, this book examines the importance of photography in Central, East, and Southeast European show trials.
The dispensation of justice during communist rule in Albania, East Germany, and Poland was reliant on legal propaganda, making the visual a fundamental part of the legitimacy of the law. Analysing photographs of trials, Agata Fijalkowski&apos;s Law, Visual Culture, and the Show Trial (Routledge, 2023) examines how this message was conveyed to audiences watching and participating in the spectacle of show trials. The book traces how this use of the visual was exported from the Soviet Union and imposed upon its satellite states in the immediate aftermath of the Second World War. It shows how the legal actors and political authorities embraced new photographic technologies to advance their legal propaganda and legal photography. Drawing on contemporary theoretical work in the area, the book then challenges straightforward accounts of the relationship between law and the visual, critically engaging entrenched legal historical narratives, in relation to three different protagonists, to offer the possibility of reclaiming and rewriting past accounts. As its analysis demonstrates, the power of images can also be subversive; and, as such, the cases it addresses contribute to the discourse on visual epistemology and open onto contemporary questions about law and its inherent performativity.
Alex Batesmith is a Lecturer in Legal Profession in the School of Law at the University of Leeds, and a former barrister and UN war crimes prosecutor, with teaching and research interests in international criminal law, cause lawyering and the legal profession, and law and emotion. Twitter: @batesmith. LinkedIn. 
His recent publications include:
“‘Poetic Justice Products’: International Justice, Victim Counter-Aesthetics, and the Spectre of the Show Trial” in Christine Schwöbel-Patel and Rob Knox (eds) Aesthetics and Counter-Aesthetics of International Justice (Counterpress, forthcoming 2023, ISBN 978-1-910761-17-5)
&quot;Lawyers who want to make the world a better place – Scheingold and Sarat’s Something to Believe In: Politics, Professionalism, and Cause Lawyering&quot; in D. Newman (ed.) Leading Works on the Legal Profession (Routledge, July 2023), ISBN 978-1-032182-80-3)
“International Prosecutors as Cause Lawyers&quot; (2021) Journal of International Criminal Justice 19(4) 803-830 (ISSN 1478-1387)
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Addressing the relationship between law and the visual, this book examines the importance of photography in Central, East, and Southeast European show trials.
The dispensation of justice during communist rule in Albania, East Germany, and Poland was reliant on legal propaganda, making the visual a fundamental part of the legitimacy of the law. Analysing photographs of trials, Agata Fijalkowski&apos;s Law, Visual Culture, and the Show Trial (Routledge, 2023) examines how this message was conveyed to audiences watching and participating in the spectacle of show trials. The book traces how this use of the visual was exported from the Soviet Union and imposed upon its satellite states in the immediate aftermath of the Second World War. It shows how the legal actors and political authorities embraced new photographic technologies to advance their legal propaganda and legal photography. Drawing on contemporary theoretical work in the area, the book then challenges straightforward accounts of the relationship between law and the visual, critically engaging entrenched legal historical narratives, in relation to three different protagonists, to offer the possibility of reclaiming and rewriting past accounts. As its analysis demonstrates, the power of images can also be subversive; and, as such, the cases it addresses contribute to the discourse on visual epistemology and open onto contemporary questions about law and its inherent performativity.
Alex Batesmith is a Lecturer in Legal Profession in the School of Law at the University of Leeds, and a former barrister and UN war crimes prosecutor, with teaching and research interests in international criminal law, cause lawyering and the legal profession, and law and emotion. Twitter: @batesmith. LinkedIn. 
His recent publications include:
“‘Poetic Justice Products’: International Justice, Victim Counter-Aesthetics, and the Spectre of the Show Trial” in Christine Schwöbel-Patel and Rob Knox (eds) Aesthetics and Counter-Aesthetics of International Justice (Counterpress, forthcoming 2023, ISBN 978-1-910761-17-5)
&quot;Lawyers who want to make the world a better place – Scheingold and Sarat’s Something to Believe In: Politics, Professionalism, and Cause Lawyering&quot; in D. Newman (ed.) Leading Works on the Legal Profession (Routledge, July 2023), ISBN 978-1-032182-80-3)
“International Prosecutors as Cause Lawyers&quot; (2021) Journal of International Criminal Justice 19(4) 803-830 (ISSN 1478-1387)
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>202</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">371693f6-e285-11f0-b190-1f7aaacae773</guid>
      <title>Marion Gibson, &quot;Witchcraft: A History in Thirteen Trials&quot; (Scribner, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Witchfinder General, Salem, Malleus Maleficarum. The world of witch-hunts and witch trials sounds archaic and fanciful, these terms relics of an unenlightened, brutal age. However, we often hear ‘witch-hunt’ in today’s media, and the misogyny that shaped witch trials is all too familiar. Three women were prosecuted under a version of the 1735 Witchcraft Act as recently as 2018.</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781668002421" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Witchcraft: A History in Thirteen Trials</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Simon &amp; Schuster, 2023), Professor Marion Gibson uses thirteen significant trials to tell the global history of witchcraft and witch-hunts. As well as exploring the origins of witch-hunts through some of the most famous trials from the Middle Ages to the eighteenth century, it takes us in new and surprising directions. It shows us how witchcraft was reimagined by lawyers and radical historians in France, how suspicions of sorcery led to murder in Jazz Age Pennsylvania, the effects of colonialism and Christian missionary zeal on ‘witches’ in Africa, and how even today a witch trial can come in many guises.</p><p>Professor Gibson also tells the stories of the ‘witches’ – mostly women like Helena Scheuberin, Anny Sampson and Joan Wright, whose stories have too often been overshadowed by those of the powerful men, such as King James I and ‘Witchfinder General’ Matthew Hopkins, who hounded them.</p><p>Once a tool invented by demonologists to hurt and silence their enemies, witch trials have been twisted and transformed over the course of history and the lines between witch and witch-hunter blurred. For the fortunate, a witch-hunt is just a metaphor, but, as this book makes clear, witches are truly still on trial.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose doctoral work focused on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/marion-gibson-witchcraft-a-history-in-thirteen-trials-scribner-2023-SkT2XoMQ-UjF8VNjy</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Witchfinder General, Salem, Malleus Maleficarum. The world of witch-hunts and witch trials sounds archaic and fanciful, these terms relics of an unenlightened, brutal age. However, we often hear ‘witch-hunt’ in today’s media, and the misogyny that shaped witch trials is all too familiar. Three women were prosecuted under a version of the 1735 Witchcraft Act as recently as 2018.</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781668002421" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Witchcraft: A History in Thirteen Trials</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Simon &amp; Schuster, 2023), Professor Marion Gibson uses thirteen significant trials to tell the global history of witchcraft and witch-hunts. As well as exploring the origins of witch-hunts through some of the most famous trials from the Middle Ages to the eighteenth century, it takes us in new and surprising directions. It shows us how witchcraft was reimagined by lawyers and radical historians in France, how suspicions of sorcery led to murder in Jazz Age Pennsylvania, the effects of colonialism and Christian missionary zeal on ‘witches’ in Africa, and how even today a witch trial can come in many guises.</p><p>Professor Gibson also tells the stories of the ‘witches’ – mostly women like Helena Scheuberin, Anny Sampson and Joan Wright, whose stories have too often been overshadowed by those of the powerful men, such as King James I and ‘Witchfinder General’ Matthew Hopkins, who hounded them.</p><p>Once a tool invented by demonologists to hurt and silence their enemies, witch trials have been twisted and transformed over the course of history and the lines between witch and witch-hunter blurred. For the fortunate, a witch-hunt is just a metaphor, but, as this book makes clear, witches are truly still on trial.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose doctoral work focused on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="44820495" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/19b23384-823e-4754-a230-8d9fd695261a/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=19b23384-823e-4754-a230-8d9fd695261a&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Marion Gibson, &quot;Witchcraft: A History in Thirteen Trials&quot; (Scribner, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:46:41</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Witchfinder General, Salem, Malleus Maleficarum. The world of witch-hunts and witch trials sounds archaic and fanciful, these terms relics of an unenlightened, brutal age. However, we often hear ‘witch-hunt’ in today’s media, and the misogyny that shaped witch trials is all too familiar. Three women were prosecuted under a version of the 1735 Witchcraft Act as recently as 2018.
In Witchcraft: A History in Thirteen Trials (Simon &amp; Schuster, 2023), Professor Marion Gibson uses thirteen significant trials to tell the global history of witchcraft and witch-hunts. As well as exploring the origins of witch-hunts through some of the most famous trials from the Middle Ages to the eighteenth century, it takes us in new and surprising directions. It shows us how witchcraft was reimagined by lawyers and radical historians in France, how suspicions of sorcery led to murder in Jazz Age Pennsylvania, the effects of colonialism and Christian missionary zeal on ‘witches’ in Africa, and how even today a witch trial can come in many guises.
Professor Gibson also tells the stories of the ‘witches’ – mostly women like Helena Scheuberin, Anny Sampson and Joan Wright, whose stories have too often been overshadowed by those of the powerful men, such as King James I and ‘Witchfinder General’ Matthew Hopkins, who hounded them.
Once a tool invented by demonologists to hurt and silence their enemies, witch trials have been twisted and transformed over the course of history and the lines between witch and witch-hunter blurred. For the fortunate, a witch-hunt is just a metaphor, but, as this book makes clear, witches are truly still on trial.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose doctoral work focused on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Witchfinder General, Salem, Malleus Maleficarum. The world of witch-hunts and witch trials sounds archaic and fanciful, these terms relics of an unenlightened, brutal age. However, we often hear ‘witch-hunt’ in today’s media, and the misogyny that shaped witch trials is all too familiar. Three women were prosecuted under a version of the 1735 Witchcraft Act as recently as 2018.
In Witchcraft: A History in Thirteen Trials (Simon &amp; Schuster, 2023), Professor Marion Gibson uses thirteen significant trials to tell the global history of witchcraft and witch-hunts. As well as exploring the origins of witch-hunts through some of the most famous trials from the Middle Ages to the eighteenth century, it takes us in new and surprising directions. It shows us how witchcraft was reimagined by lawyers and radical historians in France, how suspicions of sorcery led to murder in Jazz Age Pennsylvania, the effects of colonialism and Christian missionary zeal on ‘witches’ in Africa, and how even today a witch trial can come in many guises.
Professor Gibson also tells the stories of the ‘witches’ – mostly women like Helena Scheuberin, Anny Sampson and Joan Wright, whose stories have too often been overshadowed by those of the powerful men, such as King James I and ‘Witchfinder General’ Matthew Hopkins, who hounded them.
Once a tool invented by demonologists to hurt and silence their enemies, witch trials have been twisted and transformed over the course of history and the lines between witch and witch-hunter blurred. For the fortunate, a witch-hunt is just a metaphor, but, as this book makes clear, witches are truly still on trial.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose doctoral work focused on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1364</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">0feced26-df05-11f0-86e1-2fcced619c7e</guid>
      <title>Alastair McClure, &quot;Trials of Sovereignty: Mercy, Violence, and the Making of Criminal Law in British India, 1857-1922&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009553544" rel="noopener noreferrer">Trials of Sovereignty: Mercy, Violence, and the Making of Criminal Law in British India, 1857-1922</a>&nbsp;(Cambridge UP, 2024)&nbsp;offers the first legal history of mercy and discretion in nineteenth and twentieth-century India. Through a study of large-scale amnesties, the prerogative powers of pardon, executive commutation, and judicial sentencing practices, Alastair McClure argues that discretion&nbsp;represented a vital facet of colonial rule. In a bloody penal order, officials and judges consistently offered reduced sentences and pardons for select subjects, encouraging others to approach state institutions and confer the colonial state with greater legitimacy. Mercy was always a contested expression of sovereign power that risked exposing colonial weakness. This vulnerability was gradually recognized by colonial subjects who deployed a range of legal and political strategies to interrogate state power and question the lofty promises of British&nbsp;colonial justice. By the early twentieth century, the decision to break the law and reject imperial overtures of mercy had developed into a crucial expression of anticolonial politics.<br>.<a href="https://history.hku.hk/staff-a-mcclure/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><br>Alastair McClure</a><em>&nbsp;is Assistant Professor in the Department of History at the University of Hong&nbsp;Kong.&nbsp;</em><br><em>.</em><br><em>Saumya Dadoo is a Ph.D Candidate at MESAAS, Columbia University.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/alastair-mcclure-trials-of-sovereignty-mercy-violence-and-the-making-of-criminal-law-in-british-india-1857-1922-cambridge-up-2024-_eRY3GXL</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009553544" rel="noopener noreferrer">Trials of Sovereignty: Mercy, Violence, and the Making of Criminal Law in British India, 1857-1922</a>&nbsp;(Cambridge UP, 2024)&nbsp;offers the first legal history of mercy and discretion in nineteenth and twentieth-century India. Through a study of large-scale amnesties, the prerogative powers of pardon, executive commutation, and judicial sentencing practices, Alastair McClure argues that discretion&nbsp;represented a vital facet of colonial rule. In a bloody penal order, officials and judges consistently offered reduced sentences and pardons for select subjects, encouraging others to approach state institutions and confer the colonial state with greater legitimacy. Mercy was always a contested expression of sovereign power that risked exposing colonial weakness. This vulnerability was gradually recognized by colonial subjects who deployed a range of legal and political strategies to interrogate state power and question the lofty promises of British&nbsp;colonial justice. By the early twentieth century, the decision to break the law and reject imperial overtures of mercy had developed into a crucial expression of anticolonial politics.<br>.<a href="https://history.hku.hk/staff-a-mcclure/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><br>Alastair McClure</a><em>&nbsp;is Assistant Professor in the Department of History at the University of Hong&nbsp;Kong.&nbsp;</em><br><em>.</em><br><em>Saumya Dadoo is a Ph.D Candidate at MESAAS, Columbia University.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="51888379" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/9170d2c6-9b95-4220-9aa3-fc5195e8101b/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=9170d2c6-9b95-4220-9aa3-fc5195e8101b&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Alastair McClure, &quot;Trials of Sovereignty: Mercy, Violence, and the Making of Criminal Law in British India, 1857-1922&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:53:59</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Trials of Sovereignty: Mercy, Violence, and the Making of Criminal Law in British India, 1857-1922 (Cambridge UP, 2024) offers the first legal history of mercy and discretion in nineteenth and twentieth-century India. Through a study of large-scale amnesties, the prerogative powers of pardon, executive commutation, and judicial sentencing practices, Alastair McClure argues that discretion represented a vital facet of colonial rule. In a bloody penal order, officials and judges consistently offered reduced sentences and pardons for select subjects, encouraging others to approach state institutions and confer the colonial state with greater legitimacy. Mercy was always a contested expression of sovereign power that risked exposing colonial weakness. This vulnerability was gradually recognized by colonial subjects who deployed a range of legal and political strategies to interrogate state power and question the lofty promises of British colonial justice. By the early twentieth century, the decision to break the law and reject imperial overtures of mercy had developed into a crucial expression of anticolonial politics..Alastair McClure is Assistant Professor in the Department of History at the University of Hong Kong. .Saumya Dadoo is a Ph.D Candidate at MESAAS, Columbia University.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Trials of Sovereignty: Mercy, Violence, and the Making of Criminal Law in British India, 1857-1922 (Cambridge UP, 2024) offers the first legal history of mercy and discretion in nineteenth and twentieth-century India. Through a study of large-scale amnesties, the prerogative powers of pardon, executive commutation, and judicial sentencing practices, Alastair McClure argues that discretion represented a vital facet of colonial rule. In a bloody penal order, officials and judges consistently offered reduced sentences and pardons for select subjects, encouraging others to approach state institutions and confer the colonial state with greater legitimacy. Mercy was always a contested expression of sovereign power that risked exposing colonial weakness. This vulnerability was gradually recognized by colonial subjects who deployed a range of legal and political strategies to interrogate state power and question the lofty promises of British colonial justice. By the early twentieth century, the decision to break the law and reject imperial overtures of mercy had developed into a crucial expression of anticolonial politics..Alastair McClure is Assistant Professor in the Department of History at the University of Hong Kong. .Saumya Dadoo is a Ph.D Candidate at MESAAS, Columbia University.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1636</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5aa11752-dea1-11f0-ba68-7355411df1ab</guid>
      <title>Jonathan Sumption, &quot;The Challenges of Democracy: And the Rule of Law&quot; (Profile Books, 2026)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Across the globe, democracy is in crisis - in the UK alone, it has been rocked by Brexit, the pandemic and successive attempts by governments to bypass legal norms.<br></p>
<p>But how did this happen, and where might we go from here?<br></p>
<p>Jonathan Sumption cuts through the political noise with acute analysis of the state of democracy today - from the vulnerabilities of international law to the deepening suppression of democracy activism in Hong Kong, and from the complexities of human rights legislation to the defence of freedom of speech.<br></p>
<p>Timely, incisive and wholly original,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781805222521" rel="noopener noreferrer">Challenges of Democracy:&nbsp;And the Rule of Law</a>&nbsp;(Profile Books, 2026) applies the brilliance of 'the cleverest man in Britain' to the most urgent and far-reaching political issue of our day.</p>
<p>Jonathan Sumption is a British judge and historian, who served as a Supreme Court Justice for six years. He is the author of the Sunday Times Bestseller Trials of the State, Law in a Time of Crisis, and Divided Houses, which won the 2009 Wolfson History Prize.</p>
<p><em>Charles Coutinho, PH. D., Associate Fellow of the Royal Historical Society, received his doctorate from New York University. His area of specialization is 19th and 20th-century European, American diplomatic and political history. He has written for Chatham House’s&nbsp;International Affairs, the Institute of Historical Research's&nbsp;Reviews in History&nbsp;and the University of Rouen's online periodical&nbsp;Cercles.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/jonathan-sumption-the-challenges-of-democracy-and-the-rule-of-law-profile-books-2026-BsxZh9bh</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Across the globe, democracy is in crisis - in the UK alone, it has been rocked by Brexit, the pandemic and successive attempts by governments to bypass legal norms.<br></p>
<p>But how did this happen, and where might we go from here?<br></p>
<p>Jonathan Sumption cuts through the political noise with acute analysis of the state of democracy today - from the vulnerabilities of international law to the deepening suppression of democracy activism in Hong Kong, and from the complexities of human rights legislation to the defence of freedom of speech.<br></p>
<p>Timely, incisive and wholly original,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781805222521" rel="noopener noreferrer">Challenges of Democracy:&nbsp;And the Rule of Law</a>&nbsp;(Profile Books, 2026) applies the brilliance of 'the cleverest man in Britain' to the most urgent and far-reaching political issue of our day.</p>
<p>Jonathan Sumption is a British judge and historian, who served as a Supreme Court Justice for six years. He is the author of the Sunday Times Bestseller Trials of the State, Law in a Time of Crisis, and Divided Houses, which won the 2009 Wolfson History Prize.</p>
<p><em>Charles Coutinho, PH. D., Associate Fellow of the Royal Historical Society, received his doctorate from New York University. His area of specialization is 19th and 20th-century European, American diplomatic and political history. He has written for Chatham House’s&nbsp;International Affairs, the Institute of Historical Research's&nbsp;Reviews in History&nbsp;and the University of Rouen's online periodical&nbsp;Cercles.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="30135873" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/9ae9c459-995b-4dad-ab09-de9e4ba5d44d/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=9ae9c459-995b-4dad-ab09-de9e4ba5d44d&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Jonathan Sumption, &quot;The Challenges of Democracy: And the Rule of Law&quot; (Profile Books, 2026)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:31:19</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Across the globe, democracy is in crisis - in the UK alone, it has been rocked by Brexit, the pandemic and successive attempts by governments to bypass legal norms.
But how did this happen, and where might we go from here?
Jonathan Sumption cuts through the political noise with acute analysis of the state of democracy today - from the vulnerabilities of international law to the deepening suppression of democracy activism in Hong Kong, and from the complexities of human rights legislation to the defence of freedom of speech.
Timely, incisive and wholly original, Challenges of Democracy: And the Rule of Law (Profile Books, 2026) applies the brilliance of &apos;the cleverest man in Britain&apos; to the most urgent and far-reaching political issue of our day.
Jonathan Sumption is a British judge and historian, who served as a Supreme Court Justice for six years. He is the author of the Sunday Times Bestseller Trials of the State, Law in a Time of Crisis, and Divided Houses, which won the 2009 Wolfson History Prize.
Charles Coutinho, PH. D., Associate Fellow of the Royal Historical Society, received his doctorate from New York University. His area of specialization is 19th and 20th-century European, American diplomatic and political history. He has written for Chatham House’s International Affairs, the Institute of Historical Research&apos;s Reviews in History and the University of Rouen&apos;s online periodical Cercles.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Across the globe, democracy is in crisis - in the UK alone, it has been rocked by Brexit, the pandemic and successive attempts by governments to bypass legal norms.
But how did this happen, and where might we go from here?
Jonathan Sumption cuts through the political noise with acute analysis of the state of democracy today - from the vulnerabilities of international law to the deepening suppression of democracy activism in Hong Kong, and from the complexities of human rights legislation to the defence of freedom of speech.
Timely, incisive and wholly original, Challenges of Democracy: And the Rule of Law (Profile Books, 2026) applies the brilliance of &apos;the cleverest man in Britain&apos; to the most urgent and far-reaching political issue of our day.
Jonathan Sumption is a British judge and historian, who served as a Supreme Court Justice for six years. He is the author of the Sunday Times Bestseller Trials of the State, Law in a Time of Crisis, and Divided Houses, which won the 2009 Wolfson History Prize.
Charles Coutinho, PH. D., Associate Fellow of the Royal Historical Society, received his doctorate from New York University. His area of specialization is 19th and 20th-century European, American diplomatic and political history. He has written for Chatham House’s International Affairs, the Institute of Historical Research&apos;s Reviews in History and the University of Rouen&apos;s online periodical Cercles.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1634</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">141827a2-defc-11f0-b2bb-679142ddbb4b</guid>
      <title>Robin F. Hansen, &quot;Prison Born: Incarceration and Motherhood in the Colonial Shadow&quot; (U Regina Press, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>With rigorous scrutiny and deep care, Robin Hansen's&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781779400079" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Prison Born:&nbsp;Incarceration and Motherhood in the Colonial Shadow</em>&nbsp;</a>(U Regina Press, 2024)&nbsp;offers crucial insight into the intersections of ongoing colonial harms facing Indigenous mothers in Canada. Building from an unplanned call to Hansen&nbsp;from a pregnant, incarcerated Indigenous woman in 2016,&nbsp;<em>Prison Born</em>&nbsp;highlights how custodial prison sentences cause discriminatory and swift harm—automatically separating mothers from their children, immediately after birth.</p>
<p>Using Access to Information requests along with extensive research, Hansen examines the legal rights of these women—the majority of whom are Indigenous—and finds that Jacquie and her son are by no means alone: automatic mother-infant separation without due process remains the norm in most jurisdictions in Canada.&nbsp;<em>Prison Born</em>&nbsp;calls attention to the colonial and gendered assumptions that continue to underpin the legal system—assumptions that so frequently lead to the violation of the rights and denial of personhood for children and their mothers.﻿<br></p>
<p><a href="https://law.usask.ca/people/faculty/robin-hansen.php" rel="noopener noreferrer">Robin Hansen</a>&nbsp;is an Associate Professor&nbsp;in the Faculty of Law at the University of Saskatoon. Her research focuses on legal personhood; public and private international law; and systems theory of law.<a href="https://www.rinevieth.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><br>Rine Vieth</a>&nbsp;is an FRQ&nbsp;Postdoctoral Fellow at Université Laval. They&nbsp;are currently&nbsp;studying how anti-gender mobilization shapes migration policy, particularly in regards to asylum determinations in the UK and Canada.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/robin-f-hansen-prison-born-incarceration-and-motherhood-in-the-colonial-shadow-u-regina-press-2024-N2f4GAmn</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With rigorous scrutiny and deep care, Robin Hansen's&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781779400079" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Prison Born:&nbsp;Incarceration and Motherhood in the Colonial Shadow</em>&nbsp;</a>(U Regina Press, 2024)&nbsp;offers crucial insight into the intersections of ongoing colonial harms facing Indigenous mothers in Canada. Building from an unplanned call to Hansen&nbsp;from a pregnant, incarcerated Indigenous woman in 2016,&nbsp;<em>Prison Born</em>&nbsp;highlights how custodial prison sentences cause discriminatory and swift harm—automatically separating mothers from their children, immediately after birth.</p>
<p>Using Access to Information requests along with extensive research, Hansen examines the legal rights of these women—the majority of whom are Indigenous—and finds that Jacquie and her son are by no means alone: automatic mother-infant separation without due process remains the norm in most jurisdictions in Canada.&nbsp;<em>Prison Born</em>&nbsp;calls attention to the colonial and gendered assumptions that continue to underpin the legal system—assumptions that so frequently lead to the violation of the rights and denial of personhood for children and their mothers.﻿<br></p>
<p><a href="https://law.usask.ca/people/faculty/robin-hansen.php" rel="noopener noreferrer">Robin Hansen</a>&nbsp;is an Associate Professor&nbsp;in the Faculty of Law at the University of Saskatoon. Her research focuses on legal personhood; public and private international law; and systems theory of law.<a href="https://www.rinevieth.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><br>Rine Vieth</a>&nbsp;is an FRQ&nbsp;Postdoctoral Fellow at Université Laval. They&nbsp;are currently&nbsp;studying how anti-gender mobilization shapes migration policy, particularly in regards to asylum determinations in the UK and Canada.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="36012864" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/fcc482ac-0f80-476f-8259-b5f017009fa0/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=fcc482ac-0f80-476f-8259-b5f017009fa0&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Robin F. Hansen, &quot;Prison Born: Incarceration and Motherhood in the Colonial Shadow&quot; (U Regina Press, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:37:26</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>With rigorous scrutiny and deep care, Robin Hansen&apos;s Prison Born: Incarceration and Motherhood in the Colonial Shadow (U Regina Press, 2024) offers crucial insight into the intersections of ongoing colonial harms facing Indigenous mothers in Canada. Building from an unplanned call to Hansen from a pregnant, incarcerated Indigenous woman in 2016, Prison Born highlights how custodial prison sentences cause discriminatory and swift harm—automatically separating mothers from their children, immediately after birth.
Using Access to Information requests along with extensive research, Hansen examines the legal rights of these women—the majority of whom are Indigenous—and finds that Jacquie and her son are by no means alone: automatic mother-infant separation without due process remains the norm in most jurisdictions in Canada. Prison Born calls attention to the colonial and gendered assumptions that continue to underpin the legal system—assumptions that so frequently lead to the violation of the rights and denial of personhood for children and their mothers.﻿
Robin Hansen is an Associate Professor in the Faculty of Law at the University of Saskatoon. Her research focuses on legal personhood; public and private international law; and systems theory of law.Rine Vieth is an FRQ Postdoctoral Fellow at Université Laval. They are currently studying how anti-gender mobilization shapes migration policy, particularly in regards to asylum determinations in the UK and Canada.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>With rigorous scrutiny and deep care, Robin Hansen&apos;s Prison Born: Incarceration and Motherhood in the Colonial Shadow (U Regina Press, 2024) offers crucial insight into the intersections of ongoing colonial harms facing Indigenous mothers in Canada. Building from an unplanned call to Hansen from a pregnant, incarcerated Indigenous woman in 2016, Prison Born highlights how custodial prison sentences cause discriminatory and swift harm—automatically separating mothers from their children, immediately after birth.
Using Access to Information requests along with extensive research, Hansen examines the legal rights of these women—the majority of whom are Indigenous—and finds that Jacquie and her son are by no means alone: automatic mother-infant separation without due process remains the norm in most jurisdictions in Canada. Prison Born calls attention to the colonial and gendered assumptions that continue to underpin the legal system—assumptions that so frequently lead to the violation of the rights and denial of personhood for children and their mothers.﻿
Robin Hansen is an Associate Professor in the Faculty of Law at the University of Saskatoon. Her research focuses on legal personhood; public and private international law; and systems theory of law.Rine Vieth is an FRQ Postdoctoral Fellow at Université Laval. They are currently studying how anti-gender mobilization shapes migration policy, particularly in regards to asylum determinations in the UK and Canada.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1635</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6fdeb26c-dda4-11f0-bba4-936c15df4b01</guid>
      <title>Douglas Morris, &quot;Legal Sabotage: Ernst Fraenkel in Hitler&apos;s Germany&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2020)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>During the mid-1930s, Germans opposed to Adolf Hitler had only a limited range of options available to them for resisting the Nazi regime. One of the most creative and successful challengers in this effort was Ernst Fraenkel, who as an attorney sought to use the law as a means of opposing Nazi oppression. In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781108835008" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Legal Sabotage: Ernst Fraenkel in Hitler’s Germany</em></a>&nbsp;(Cambridge University Press, 2020), Douglas G. Morris describes the ways in which Frankel stood up to the Nazis and what understandings he drew from that experience. As a veteran of the First World War, Fraenkel survived the initial purge resulting from the implementation of measures designed to bar Jews from practicing law in the Third Reich. Though his legal practice suffered, Fraenkel persisted in defending people prosecuted by the Nazis, and enjoyed success in a number of cases. While the increased restrictions and growing reach of the police state ultimately forced Fraenkel to emigrate in 1938, his experiences as a lawyer played a major role in the development of the “dual state” theory of dictatorship, the only analysis of totalitarianism written from within Nazi Germany and the cornerstone of Fraenkel’s contributions to the field of political science.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Dec 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/douglas-morris-legal-sabotage-ernst-fraenkel-in-hitlers-germany-cambridge-up-2020-UObD6Ebf-fnP_mGYV</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>During the mid-1930s, Germans opposed to Adolf Hitler had only a limited range of options available to them for resisting the Nazi regime. One of the most creative and successful challengers in this effort was Ernst Fraenkel, who as an attorney sought to use the law as a means of opposing Nazi oppression. In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781108835008" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Legal Sabotage: Ernst Fraenkel in Hitler’s Germany</em></a>&nbsp;(Cambridge University Press, 2020), Douglas G. Morris describes the ways in which Frankel stood up to the Nazis and what understandings he drew from that experience. As a veteran of the First World War, Fraenkel survived the initial purge resulting from the implementation of measures designed to bar Jews from practicing law in the Third Reich. Though his legal practice suffered, Fraenkel persisted in defending people prosecuted by the Nazis, and enjoyed success in a number of cases. While the increased restrictions and growing reach of the police state ultimately forced Fraenkel to emigrate in 1938, his experiences as a lawyer played a major role in the development of the “dual state” theory of dictatorship, the only analysis of totalitarianism written from within Nazi Germany and the cornerstone of Fraenkel’s contributions to the field of political science.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="60767670" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/51487b5d-c285-4982-898b-956269e21402/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=51487b5d-c285-4982-898b-956269e21402&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Douglas Morris, &quot;Legal Sabotage: Ernst Fraenkel in Hitler&apos;s Germany&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2020)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:03:16</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>During the mid-1930s, Germans opposed to Adolf Hitler had only a limited range of options available to them for resisting the Nazi regime. One of the most creative and successful challengers in this effort was Ernst Fraenkel, who as an attorney sought to use the law as a means of opposing Nazi oppression. In Legal Sabotage: Ernst Fraenkel in Hitler’s Germany (Cambridge University Press, 2020), Douglas G. Morris describes the ways in which Frankel stood up to the Nazis and what understandings he drew from that experience. As a veteran of the First World War, Fraenkel survived the initial purge resulting from the implementation of measures designed to bar Jews from practicing law in the Third Reich. Though his legal practice suffered, Fraenkel persisted in defending people prosecuted by the Nazis, and enjoyed success in a number of cases. While the increased restrictions and growing reach of the police state ultimately forced Fraenkel to emigrate in 1938, his experiences as a lawyer played a major role in the development of the “dual state” theory of dictatorship, the only analysis of totalitarianism written from within Nazi Germany and the cornerstone of Fraenkel’s contributions to the field of political science.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>During the mid-1930s, Germans opposed to Adolf Hitler had only a limited range of options available to them for resisting the Nazi regime. One of the most creative and successful challengers in this effort was Ernst Fraenkel, who as an attorney sought to use the law as a means of opposing Nazi oppression. In Legal Sabotage: Ernst Fraenkel in Hitler’s Germany (Cambridge University Press, 2020), Douglas G. Morris describes the ways in which Frankel stood up to the Nazis and what understandings he drew from that experience. As a veteran of the First World War, Fraenkel survived the initial purge resulting from the implementation of measures designed to bar Jews from practicing law in the Third Reich. Though his legal practice suffered, Fraenkel persisted in defending people prosecuted by the Nazis, and enjoyed success in a number of cases. While the increased restrictions and growing reach of the police state ultimately forced Fraenkel to emigrate in 1938, his experiences as a lawyer played a major role in the development of the “dual state” theory of dictatorship, the only analysis of totalitarianism written from within Nazi Germany and the cornerstone of Fraenkel’s contributions to the field of political science.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>192</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">c3afd856-db5d-11f0-b93e-8ba7a4d4ee60</guid>
      <title>Joanna Siekiera, &quot;International Law and Security in Indo-Pacific: Strategic Design for the Region&quot; (Routledge, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/international-law-and-security-in-indo-pacific-strategic-design-for-the-region-joanna-siekiera/4c5d3c3b3f712c04?ean=9781032892115&amp;next=t" rel="noopener noreferrer">International Law and Security in Indo-Pacific: Strategic Design for the Region</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Routledge, 2025) edited by&nbsp;Dr. Joanna Siekiera&nbsp;uses an interdisciplinary approach to discuss international law and conflict in the Indo-Pacific region, covering topics such as maritime security, climate change and international relations.</p>
<p>Detailing how international relations and particular state interests govern regional and global partnerships, the book provides suggestions for the future of the Indo-Pacific region. Exploring how conflict within the region has international repercussions, topics covered include the role of South-East Asian countries, and the role of statehood of small islands in Oceania. Detailing harmonization of laws and policies in the context of international security and maritime law, the book focuses on the impact of climate change and other topical issues such as cyber security and the protection of cultural identity.</p>
<p>The book will be of interest to researchers in the field of international law, law of the sea, international relations and security.<br><strong>Dr. Joanna Siekiera</strong>&nbsp;is an expert in international law, NATO consultant, trainer, and educator. She currently works as the Assistant Professor at the War Studies University in Warsaw, Poland. She is also a fellow at the U.S. Marine Corps University in Quantico and supports various military institutions as a legal SME and course facilitator.<br><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/hosts/profile/80a6e543-4bd9-4fcc-bd76-5fb2e0083ef0" rel="noopener noreferrer">Stephen Satkiewicz</a><em>&nbsp;is an independent scholar with research areas spanning Civilizational Sciences, Social Complexity, Big History, Historical Sociology, Military History, War Studies, International Relations, Geopolitics, and Russian and East European history.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/joanna-siekiera-international-law-and-security-in-indo-pacific-strategic-design-for-the-region-routledge-2025-fju1NVw8</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/international-law-and-security-in-indo-pacific-strategic-design-for-the-region-joanna-siekiera/4c5d3c3b3f712c04?ean=9781032892115&amp;next=t" rel="noopener noreferrer">International Law and Security in Indo-Pacific: Strategic Design for the Region</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Routledge, 2025) edited by&nbsp;Dr. Joanna Siekiera&nbsp;uses an interdisciplinary approach to discuss international law and conflict in the Indo-Pacific region, covering topics such as maritime security, climate change and international relations.</p>
<p>Detailing how international relations and particular state interests govern regional and global partnerships, the book provides suggestions for the future of the Indo-Pacific region. Exploring how conflict within the region has international repercussions, topics covered include the role of South-East Asian countries, and the role of statehood of small islands in Oceania. Detailing harmonization of laws and policies in the context of international security and maritime law, the book focuses on the impact of climate change and other topical issues such as cyber security and the protection of cultural identity.</p>
<p>The book will be of interest to researchers in the field of international law, law of the sea, international relations and security.<br><strong>Dr. Joanna Siekiera</strong>&nbsp;is an expert in international law, NATO consultant, trainer, and educator. She currently works as the Assistant Professor at the War Studies University in Warsaw, Poland. She is also a fellow at the U.S. Marine Corps University in Quantico and supports various military institutions as a legal SME and course facilitator.<br><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/hosts/profile/80a6e543-4bd9-4fcc-bd76-5fb2e0083ef0" rel="noopener noreferrer">Stephen Satkiewicz</a><em>&nbsp;is an independent scholar with research areas spanning Civilizational Sciences, Social Complexity, Big History, Historical Sociology, Military History, War Studies, International Relations, Geopolitics, and Russian and East European history.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="59990295" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/99474bf3-13cd-4fcf-8280-7d9fecf53e2a/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=99474bf3-13cd-4fcf-8280-7d9fecf53e2a&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Joanna Siekiera, &quot;International Law and Security in Indo-Pacific: Strategic Design for the Region&quot; (Routledge, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:02:26</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>International Law and Security in Indo-Pacific: Strategic Design for the Region (Routledge, 2025) edited by Dr. Joanna Siekiera uses an interdisciplinary approach to discuss international law and conflict in the Indo-Pacific region, covering topics such as maritime security, climate change and international relations.
Detailing how international relations and particular state interests govern regional and global partnerships, the book provides suggestions for the future of the Indo-Pacific region. Exploring how conflict within the region has international repercussions, topics covered include the role of South-East Asian countries, and the role of statehood of small islands in Oceania. Detailing harmonization of laws and policies in the context of international security and maritime law, the book focuses on the impact of climate change and other topical issues such as cyber security and the protection of cultural identity.
The book will be of interest to researchers in the field of international law, law of the sea, international relations and security.Dr. Joanna Siekiera is an expert in international law, NATO consultant, trainer, and educator. She currently works as the Assistant Professor at the War Studies University in Warsaw, Poland. She is also a fellow at the U.S. Marine Corps University in Quantico and supports various military institutions as a legal SME and course facilitator.Stephen Satkiewicz is an independent scholar with research areas spanning Civilizational Sciences, Social Complexity, Big History, Historical Sociology, Military History, War Studies, International Relations, Geopolitics, and Russian and East European history.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>International Law and Security in Indo-Pacific: Strategic Design for the Region (Routledge, 2025) edited by Dr. Joanna Siekiera uses an interdisciplinary approach to discuss international law and conflict in the Indo-Pacific region, covering topics such as maritime security, climate change and international relations.
Detailing how international relations and particular state interests govern regional and global partnerships, the book provides suggestions for the future of the Indo-Pacific region. Exploring how conflict within the region has international repercussions, topics covered include the role of South-East Asian countries, and the role of statehood of small islands in Oceania. Detailing harmonization of laws and policies in the context of international security and maritime law, the book focuses on the impact of climate change and other topical issues such as cyber security and the protection of cultural identity.
The book will be of interest to researchers in the field of international law, law of the sea, international relations and security.Dr. Joanna Siekiera is an expert in international law, NATO consultant, trainer, and educator. She currently works as the Assistant Professor at the War Studies University in Warsaw, Poland. She is also a fellow at the U.S. Marine Corps University in Quantico and supports various military institutions as a legal SME and course facilitator.Stephen Satkiewicz is an independent scholar with research areas spanning Civilizational Sciences, Social Complexity, Big History, Historical Sociology, Military History, War Studies, International Relations, Geopolitics, and Russian and East European history.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>153</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2fbe8538-d951-11f0-8df9-a798f4c5b59d</guid>
      <title>Yan-ho Lai, &quot;Legal Resistance Under Authoritarianism: The Struggle for the Rule of Law in Hong Kong&quot; (Amsterdam UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Today I spoke with Senior Fellow at the Centre for Asian Law, University of Georgetown,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.ericyanholai.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr Yan-ho Lai (Eric)&nbsp;</a>about his book,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9789048558438" rel="noopener noreferrer">Legal Resistance under Authoritarianism:&nbsp;The Struggle for the Rule of Law in Hong Kong</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Amsterdam UP,&nbsp;2025). We spoke about the complexities of&nbsp;authoritarian consolidation by Beijing in the Special Administrative Region of Hong Kong, and the role that lawyers have played in defending the rule of law. Uniquely positioned as both a Hong Konger and also an academic now outside Hong Kong, Dr Lai's work draws on some 77 qualitative interviews up to the period when the National Security Law was introduced in 2020. By&nbsp;documenting a&nbsp;unique transitional period in Hong Kong, this book serves as&nbsp;an important counterpoint to the dominant sovereign narrative and gives voice to many who are otherwise unrepresented. However, the learnings are inherently transferable in terms of bringing understanding of the role that lawyers play in defending the rule of law in situations of encroaching authoritarianism.&nbsp;</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/yan-ho-lai-legal-resistance-under-authoritarianism-the-struggle-for-the-rule-of-law-in-hong-kong-amsterdam-up-2025-a_14cT7Z</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today I spoke with Senior Fellow at the Centre for Asian Law, University of Georgetown,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.ericyanholai.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr Yan-ho Lai (Eric)&nbsp;</a>about his book,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9789048558438" rel="noopener noreferrer">Legal Resistance under Authoritarianism:&nbsp;The Struggle for the Rule of Law in Hong Kong</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Amsterdam UP,&nbsp;2025). We spoke about the complexities of&nbsp;authoritarian consolidation by Beijing in the Special Administrative Region of Hong Kong, and the role that lawyers have played in defending the rule of law. Uniquely positioned as both a Hong Konger and also an academic now outside Hong Kong, Dr Lai's work draws on some 77 qualitative interviews up to the period when the National Security Law was introduced in 2020. By&nbsp;documenting a&nbsp;unique transitional period in Hong Kong, this book serves as&nbsp;an important counterpoint to the dominant sovereign narrative and gives voice to many who are otherwise unrepresented. However, the learnings are inherently transferable in terms of bringing understanding of the role that lawyers play in defending the rule of law in situations of encroaching authoritarianism.&nbsp;</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="61654624" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/8758e181-0ed7-4054-90df-6c25fa7319b4/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=8758e181-0ed7-4054-90df-6c25fa7319b4&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Yan-ho Lai, &quot;Legal Resistance Under Authoritarianism: The Struggle for the Rule of Law in Hong Kong&quot; (Amsterdam UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:04:11</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Today I spoke with Senior Fellow at the Centre for Asian Law, University of Georgetown, Dr Yan-ho Lai (Eric) about his book, Legal Resistance under Authoritarianism: The Struggle for the Rule of Law in Hong Kong (Amsterdam UP, 2025). We spoke about the complexities of authoritarian consolidation by Beijing in the Special Administrative Region of Hong Kong, and the role that lawyers have played in defending the rule of law. Uniquely positioned as both a Hong Konger and also an academic now outside Hong Kong, Dr Lai&apos;s work draws on some 77 qualitative interviews up to the period when the National Security Law was introduced in 2020. By documenting a unique transitional period in Hong Kong, this book serves as an important counterpoint to the dominant sovereign narrative and gives voice to many who are otherwise unrepresented. However, the learnings are inherently transferable in terms of bringing understanding of the role that lawyers play in defending the rule of law in situations of encroaching authoritarianism. 
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Today I spoke with Senior Fellow at the Centre for Asian Law, University of Georgetown, Dr Yan-ho Lai (Eric) about his book, Legal Resistance under Authoritarianism: The Struggle for the Rule of Law in Hong Kong (Amsterdam UP, 2025). We spoke about the complexities of authoritarian consolidation by Beijing in the Special Administrative Region of Hong Kong, and the role that lawyers have played in defending the rule of law. Uniquely positioned as both a Hong Konger and also an academic now outside Hong Kong, Dr Lai&apos;s work draws on some 77 qualitative interviews up to the period when the National Security Law was introduced in 2020. By documenting a unique transitional period in Hong Kong, this book serves as an important counterpoint to the dominant sovereign narrative and gives voice to many who are otherwise unrepresented. However, the learnings are inherently transferable in terms of bringing understanding of the role that lawyers play in defending the rule of law in situations of encroaching authoritarianism. 
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1633</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ded82380-d65e-11f0-b95a-6f5c59a9e79b</guid>
      <title>Negar Mansouri and Daniel R. Quiroga-Villamarín eds., &quot;Ways of Seeing International Organisations: New Perspectives for International Institutional Law&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2025</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>For decades, the field of scholarship that studies the law and practice of international organisations -also known as 'international institutional law'- has been marked by an intellectual quietism. Most of the scholarship tends to focus narrowly on providing 'legal' answers to 'legal' questions. For that reason, perspectives rarely engage with the insights of critical traditions of legal thought (for instance, feminist, postcolonial, or political economy-oriented perspectives) or with interdisciplinary contributions produced outside the field.</p>
<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009552622" rel="noopener noreferrer">Ways of Seeing International Organisations: New Perspectives for International Institutional Law</a>&nbsp;(Cambridge UP, 2025) edited by Dr. Negar Mansouri &amp; Dr. Daniel R. Quiroga-Villamarín challenges the narrow gaze of the field by bringing together authors across multiple disciplines to reflect on the need for 'new' perspectives in international institutional law. Highlighting the limits of mainstream approaches, the authors instead interrogate international organisations as pivots in processes of world-making. To achieve this, the volume is organised around four fundamental themes: expertise; structure; performance; and capital. This title is also available as Open Access on Cambridge Core.</p>
<p>﻿﻿<em>﻿This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/negar-mansouri-and-daniel-r-quiroga-villamarin-eds-ways-of-seeing-international-organisations-new-perspectives-for-international-institutional-law-cambridge-up-2025-LC5ucQr9</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For decades, the field of scholarship that studies the law and practice of international organisations -also known as 'international institutional law'- has been marked by an intellectual quietism. Most of the scholarship tends to focus narrowly on providing 'legal' answers to 'legal' questions. For that reason, perspectives rarely engage with the insights of critical traditions of legal thought (for instance, feminist, postcolonial, or political economy-oriented perspectives) or with interdisciplinary contributions produced outside the field.</p>
<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009552622" rel="noopener noreferrer">Ways of Seeing International Organisations: New Perspectives for International Institutional Law</a>&nbsp;(Cambridge UP, 2025) edited by Dr. Negar Mansouri &amp; Dr. Daniel R. Quiroga-Villamarín challenges the narrow gaze of the field by bringing together authors across multiple disciplines to reflect on the need for 'new' perspectives in international institutional law. Highlighting the limits of mainstream approaches, the authors instead interrogate international organisations as pivots in processes of world-making. To achieve this, the volume is organised around four fundamental themes: expertise; structure; performance; and capital. This title is also available as Open Access on Cambridge Core.</p>
<p>﻿﻿<em>﻿This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="46327639" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/61e961a2-d3cd-436e-9b27-a8c5f5a2f631/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=61e961a2-d3cd-436e-9b27-a8c5f5a2f631&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Negar Mansouri and Daniel R. Quiroga-Villamarín eds., &quot;Ways of Seeing International Organisations: New Perspectives for International Institutional Law&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2025</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:48:13</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>For decades, the field of scholarship that studies the law and practice of international organisations -also known as &apos;international institutional law&apos;- has been marked by an intellectual quietism. Most of the scholarship tends to focus narrowly on providing &apos;legal&apos; answers to &apos;legal&apos; questions. For that reason, perspectives rarely engage with the insights of critical traditions of legal thought (for instance, feminist, postcolonial, or political economy-oriented perspectives) or with interdisciplinary contributions produced outside the field.
Ways of Seeing International Organisations: New Perspectives for International Institutional Law (Cambridge UP, 2025) edited by Dr. Negar Mansouri &amp; Dr. Daniel R. Quiroga-Villamarín challenges the narrow gaze of the field by bringing together authors across multiple disciplines to reflect on the need for &apos;new&apos; perspectives in international institutional law. Highlighting the limits of mainstream approaches, the authors instead interrogate international organisations as pivots in processes of world-making. To achieve this, the volume is organised around four fundamental themes: expertise; structure; performance; and capital. This title is also available as Open Access on Cambridge Core.
﻿﻿﻿This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>For decades, the field of scholarship that studies the law and practice of international organisations -also known as &apos;international institutional law&apos;- has been marked by an intellectual quietism. Most of the scholarship tends to focus narrowly on providing &apos;legal&apos; answers to &apos;legal&apos; questions. For that reason, perspectives rarely engage with the insights of critical traditions of legal thought (for instance, feminist, postcolonial, or political economy-oriented perspectives) or with interdisciplinary contributions produced outside the field.
Ways of Seeing International Organisations: New Perspectives for International Institutional Law (Cambridge UP, 2025) edited by Dr. Negar Mansouri &amp; Dr. Daniel R. Quiroga-Villamarín challenges the narrow gaze of the field by bringing together authors across multiple disciplines to reflect on the need for &apos;new&apos; perspectives in international institutional law. Highlighting the limits of mainstream approaches, the authors instead interrogate international organisations as pivots in processes of world-making. To achieve this, the volume is organised around four fundamental themes: expertise; structure; performance; and capital. This title is also available as Open Access on Cambridge Core.
﻿﻿﻿This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1632</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4211f8c4-d4b9-11f0-9118-effef747e674</guid>
      <title>Rachel Jean-Baptiste, &quot;Multiracial Identities in Colonial French Africa: Race, Childhood, and Citizenship&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Despite increasingly hardened visions of racial difference in colonial governance in French Africa after World War I, interracial sexual relationships persisted, resulting in the births of thousands of children. These children, mostly born to African women and European men, sparked significant debate in French society about the status of multiracial people, debates historians have termed 'the métis problem.'</p>
<p>Drawing on extensive archival and oral history research in Gabon, Republic of Congo, Senegal, and France, in&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781108733311" rel="noopener noreferrer">Multiracial Identities in Colonial French Africa: Race, Childhood, and Citizenship</a>&nbsp;(Cambridge UP, 2023) Dr. Rachel Jean-Baptiste investigates the fluctuating identities of métis. Crucially, she centres claims by métis themselves to access French social and citizenship rights amidst the refusal by fathers to recognize their lineage, and in the context of changing African racial thought and practice. In this original history of race-making, belonging, and rights, Dr. Jean-Baptiste demonstrates the diverse ways in which métis individuals and collectives carved out visions of racial belonging as children and citizens in Africa, Europe, and internationally.</p>
<p><br><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/rachel-jean-baptiste-multiracial-identities-in-colonial-french-africa-race-childhood-and-citizenship-cambridge-up-2023-8D8rGi9U</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Despite increasingly hardened visions of racial difference in colonial governance in French Africa after World War I, interracial sexual relationships persisted, resulting in the births of thousands of children. These children, mostly born to African women and European men, sparked significant debate in French society about the status of multiracial people, debates historians have termed 'the métis problem.'</p>
<p>Drawing on extensive archival and oral history research in Gabon, Republic of Congo, Senegal, and France, in&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781108733311" rel="noopener noreferrer">Multiracial Identities in Colonial French Africa: Race, Childhood, and Citizenship</a>&nbsp;(Cambridge UP, 2023) Dr. Rachel Jean-Baptiste investigates the fluctuating identities of métis. Crucially, she centres claims by métis themselves to access French social and citizenship rights amidst the refusal by fathers to recognize their lineage, and in the context of changing African racial thought and practice. In this original history of race-making, belonging, and rights, Dr. Jean-Baptiste demonstrates the diverse ways in which métis individuals and collectives carved out visions of racial belonging as children and citizens in Africa, Europe, and internationally.</p>
<p><br><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="56041603" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/61a5c339-b5f7-4afc-b4ca-eb45654bc4c1/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=61a5c339-b5f7-4afc-b4ca-eb45654bc4c1&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Rachel Jean-Baptiste, &quot;Multiracial Identities in Colonial French Africa: Race, Childhood, and Citizenship&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:58:19</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Despite increasingly hardened visions of racial difference in colonial governance in French Africa after World War I, interracial sexual relationships persisted, resulting in the births of thousands of children. These children, mostly born to African women and European men, sparked significant debate in French society about the status of multiracial people, debates historians have termed &apos;the métis problem.&apos;
Drawing on extensive archival and oral history research in Gabon, Republic of Congo, Senegal, and France, in Multiracial Identities in Colonial French Africa: Race, Childhood, and Citizenship (Cambridge UP, 2023) Dr. Rachel Jean-Baptiste investigates the fluctuating identities of métis. Crucially, she centres claims by métis themselves to access French social and citizenship rights amidst the refusal by fathers to recognize their lineage, and in the context of changing African racial thought and practice. In this original history of race-making, belonging, and rights, Dr. Jean-Baptiste demonstrates the diverse ways in which métis individuals and collectives carved out visions of racial belonging as children and citizens in Africa, Europe, and internationally.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Despite increasingly hardened visions of racial difference in colonial governance in French Africa after World War I, interracial sexual relationships persisted, resulting in the births of thousands of children. These children, mostly born to African women and European men, sparked significant debate in French society about the status of multiracial people, debates historians have termed &apos;the métis problem.&apos;
Drawing on extensive archival and oral history research in Gabon, Republic of Congo, Senegal, and France, in Multiracial Identities in Colonial French Africa: Race, Childhood, and Citizenship (Cambridge UP, 2023) Dr. Rachel Jean-Baptiste investigates the fluctuating identities of métis. Crucially, she centres claims by métis themselves to access French social and citizenship rights amidst the refusal by fathers to recognize their lineage, and in the context of changing African racial thought and practice. In this original history of race-making, belonging, and rights, Dr. Jean-Baptiste demonstrates the diverse ways in which métis individuals and collectives carved out visions of racial belonging as children and citizens in Africa, Europe, and internationally.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1631</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8d709f3c-d3a1-11f0-bd80-ff95304577f3</guid>
      <title>Peace A. Medie, &quot;Global Norms and Local Action: The Campaigns to End Violence Against Women in Africa&quot; (Oxford UP, 2020)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/books/global-norms-and-local-action-the-campaigns-to-end-violence-against-women-in-africa/9780190922962" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Global Norms and Local Action: The Campaigns to End Violence against Women in Africa</em></a>&nbsp;(Oxford UP, 2020),&nbsp;Peace A. Medie studies the domestic implementation of international norms by examining how and why two post-conflict states in Africa, Liberia and Côte d'Ivoire, have differed in their responses to rape and domestic violence. Specifically, she looks at the roles of the United Nations and women's movements in the establishment of specialized criminal justice sector agencies, and the referral of cases for prosecution. She argues that variation in implementation in Liberia and Côte d'Ivoire can be explained by the levels of international and domestic pressures that states face and by the favorability of domestic political and institutional conditions. Medie's study is based on interviews with over 300 policymakers, bureaucrats, staff at the UN and NGOs, police officers, and survivors of domestic violence and rape — an unprecedented depth of research into women's rights and gender violence norm implementation in post-conflict countries. Furthermore, through her interviews with survivors of violence, Medie explains not only how states implement anti-rape and anti-domestic violence norms, but also how women experience and are affected by these norms. She draws on this research to recommend that states adopt a holistic approach to addressing violence against women.</p><p>Peace A. Medie is an award-winning scholar and a writer. She is associate professor in politics at the University of Bristol. She studies state and non-state actors’ responses to gender-based violence and other forms of insecurity in countries in Africa. She is author of ‘<em>Global Norms and Local Action: The Campaigns to End Violence Against Women in Africa’&nbsp;</em>(OUP 2020). Her debut novel,&nbsp;<em>His Only Wife</em>, was a&nbsp;<em>New York Times</em>&nbsp;Notable Book of 2020 and a&nbsp;<em>Time Magazine</em>&nbsp;Must-Read Book of 2020. Her second novel,&nbsp;<em>Nightbloom</em>, will be published in June 2023.</p><p><a href="https://labdelaa.expressions.syr.edu/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Lamis Abdelaaty</em></a><em>&nbsp;is an associate professor of political science at the Maxwell School of Syracuse University. She is the author of&nbsp;</em><a href="https://global.oup.com/academic/product/discrimination-and-delegation-9780197530061" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Discrimination and Delegation: Explaining State Responses to Refugees</em></a><em>&nbsp;(Oxford University Press, 2021). Email her comments at&nbsp;</em><a href="mailto:labdelaa@syr.edu" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>labdelaa@syr.edu</em></a><em>&nbsp;or tweet to&nbsp;</em><a href="https://twitter.com/LAbdelaaty" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>@LAbdelaaty</em></a><em>.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 8 Dec 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/peace-a-medie-global-norms-and-local-action-the-campaigns-to-end-violence-against-women-in-africa-oxford-up-2020-Bm_HuFtJ-smmnR7Hk</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/books/global-norms-and-local-action-the-campaigns-to-end-violence-against-women-in-africa/9780190922962" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Global Norms and Local Action: The Campaigns to End Violence against Women in Africa</em></a>&nbsp;(Oxford UP, 2020),&nbsp;Peace A. Medie studies the domestic implementation of international norms by examining how and why two post-conflict states in Africa, Liberia and Côte d'Ivoire, have differed in their responses to rape and domestic violence. Specifically, she looks at the roles of the United Nations and women's movements in the establishment of specialized criminal justice sector agencies, and the referral of cases for prosecution. She argues that variation in implementation in Liberia and Côte d'Ivoire can be explained by the levels of international and domestic pressures that states face and by the favorability of domestic political and institutional conditions. Medie's study is based on interviews with over 300 policymakers, bureaucrats, staff at the UN and NGOs, police officers, and survivors of domestic violence and rape — an unprecedented depth of research into women's rights and gender violence norm implementation in post-conflict countries. Furthermore, through her interviews with survivors of violence, Medie explains not only how states implement anti-rape and anti-domestic violence norms, but also how women experience and are affected by these norms. She draws on this research to recommend that states adopt a holistic approach to addressing violence against women.</p><p>Peace A. Medie is an award-winning scholar and a writer. She is associate professor in politics at the University of Bristol. She studies state and non-state actors’ responses to gender-based violence and other forms of insecurity in countries in Africa. She is author of ‘<em>Global Norms and Local Action: The Campaigns to End Violence Against Women in Africa’&nbsp;</em>(OUP 2020). Her debut novel,&nbsp;<em>His Only Wife</em>, was a&nbsp;<em>New York Times</em>&nbsp;Notable Book of 2020 and a&nbsp;<em>Time Magazine</em>&nbsp;Must-Read Book of 2020. Her second novel,&nbsp;<em>Nightbloom</em>, will be published in June 2023.</p><p><a href="https://labdelaa.expressions.syr.edu/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Lamis Abdelaaty</em></a><em>&nbsp;is an associate professor of political science at the Maxwell School of Syracuse University. She is the author of&nbsp;</em><a href="https://global.oup.com/academic/product/discrimination-and-delegation-9780197530061" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Discrimination and Delegation: Explaining State Responses to Refugees</em></a><em>&nbsp;(Oxford University Press, 2021). Email her comments at&nbsp;</em><a href="mailto:labdelaa@syr.edu" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>labdelaa@syr.edu</em></a><em>&nbsp;or tweet to&nbsp;</em><a href="https://twitter.com/LAbdelaaty" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>@LAbdelaaty</em></a><em>.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="56983478" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/616ded0d-42b9-4640-b750-a90bf65aa16d/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=616ded0d-42b9-4640-b750-a90bf65aa16d&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Peace A. Medie, &quot;Global Norms and Local Action: The Campaigns to End Violence Against Women in Africa&quot; (Oxford UP, 2020)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:59:21</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In Global Norms and Local Action: The Campaigns to End Violence against Women in Africa (Oxford UP, 2020), Peace A. Medie studies the domestic implementation of international norms by examining how and why two post-conflict states in Africa, Liberia and Côte d&apos;Ivoire, have differed in their responses to rape and domestic violence. Specifically, she looks at the roles of the United Nations and women&apos;s movements in the establishment of specialized criminal justice sector agencies, and the referral of cases for prosecution. She argues that variation in implementation in Liberia and Côte d&apos;Ivoire can be explained by the levels of international and domestic pressures that states face and by the favorability of domestic political and institutional conditions. Medie&apos;s study is based on interviews with over 300 policymakers, bureaucrats, staff at the UN and NGOs, police officers, and survivors of domestic violence and rape — an unprecedented depth of research into women&apos;s rights and gender violence norm implementation in post-conflict countries. Furthermore, through her interviews with survivors of violence, Medie explains not only how states implement anti-rape and anti-domestic violence norms, but also how women experience and are affected by these norms. She draws on this research to recommend that states adopt a holistic approach to addressing violence against women.
Peace A. Medie is an award-winning scholar and a writer. She is associate professor in politics at the University of Bristol. She studies state and non-state actors’ responses to gender-based violence and other forms of insecurity in countries in Africa. She is author of ‘Global Norms and Local Action: The Campaigns to End Violence Against Women in Africa’ (OUP 2020). Her debut novel, His Only Wife, was a New York Times Notable Book of 2020 and a Time Magazine Must-Read Book of 2020. Her second novel, Nightbloom, will be published in June 2023.
Lamis Abdelaaty is an associate professor of political science at the Maxwell School of Syracuse University. She is the author of Discrimination and Delegation: Explaining State Responses to Refugees (Oxford University Press, 2021). Email her comments at labdelaa@syr.edu or tweet to @LAbdelaaty.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In Global Norms and Local Action: The Campaigns to End Violence against Women in Africa (Oxford UP, 2020), Peace A. Medie studies the domestic implementation of international norms by examining how and why two post-conflict states in Africa, Liberia and Côte d&apos;Ivoire, have differed in their responses to rape and domestic violence. Specifically, she looks at the roles of the United Nations and women&apos;s movements in the establishment of specialized criminal justice sector agencies, and the referral of cases for prosecution. She argues that variation in implementation in Liberia and Côte d&apos;Ivoire can be explained by the levels of international and domestic pressures that states face and by the favorability of domestic political and institutional conditions. Medie&apos;s study is based on interviews with over 300 policymakers, bureaucrats, staff at the UN and NGOs, police officers, and survivors of domestic violence and rape — an unprecedented depth of research into women&apos;s rights and gender violence norm implementation in post-conflict countries. Furthermore, through her interviews with survivors of violence, Medie explains not only how states implement anti-rape and anti-domestic violence norms, but also how women experience and are affected by these norms. She draws on this research to recommend that states adopt a holistic approach to addressing violence against women.
Peace A. Medie is an award-winning scholar and a writer. She is associate professor in politics at the University of Bristol. She studies state and non-state actors’ responses to gender-based violence and other forms of insecurity in countries in Africa. She is author of ‘Global Norms and Local Action: The Campaigns to End Violence Against Women in Africa’ (OUP 2020). Her debut novel, His Only Wife, was a New York Times Notable Book of 2020 and a Time Magazine Must-Read Book of 2020. Her second novel, Nightbloom, will be published in June 2023.
Lamis Abdelaaty is an associate professor of political science at the Maxwell School of Syracuse University. She is the author of Discrimination and Delegation: Explaining State Responses to Refugees (Oxford University Press, 2021). Email her comments at labdelaa@syr.edu or tweet to @LAbdelaaty.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>625</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">39cd9b9e-cf4d-11f0-9ef3-178ea5280346</guid>
      <title>Elizabeth Chika Tippett, &quot;The Master-Servant Doctrine: How Old Legal Rules Haunt the Modern Workplace&quot; (U California Press, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The field of employment law used to be called "master-servant law." Even if this term has fallen out of favor, a central truth has not changed: modern employment law still draws on centuries-old ideas about the rights and obligations of workers.</p>
<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780520382336" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Master-Servant Doctrine: How Old Legal Rules Haunt the Modern Workplace</a>&nbsp;(U California Press, 2025), Elizabeth Chika Tippett combines historical context with contemporary case studies and interviews to reveal how modern law and management practices are steeped in three core master-servant principles: the right to control, the right to govern, and the duty of support. With each chapter tackling a different aspect of the workplace—including pay, time management, firing, and benefits—this startling and original story of employment law offers fresh insights for legal scholars, historians, attorneys, advocates, and anyone who's ever worked a terrible job.</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 3 Dec 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/elizabeth-chika-tippett-the-master-servant-doctrine-how-old-legal-rules-haunt-the-modern-workplace-u-california-press-2025-iGsxGUY7</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The field of employment law used to be called "master-servant law." Even if this term has fallen out of favor, a central truth has not changed: modern employment law still draws on centuries-old ideas about the rights and obligations of workers.</p>
<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780520382336" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Master-Servant Doctrine: How Old Legal Rules Haunt the Modern Workplace</a>&nbsp;(U California Press, 2025), Elizabeth Chika Tippett combines historical context with contemporary case studies and interviews to reveal how modern law and management practices are steeped in three core master-servant principles: the right to control, the right to govern, and the duty of support. With each chapter tackling a different aspect of the workplace—including pay, time management, firing, and benefits—this startling and original story of employment law offers fresh insights for legal scholars, historians, attorneys, advocates, and anyone who's ever worked a terrible job.</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="39847632" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/9080ef23-cc8f-4730-b6b1-bb45b7920f1b/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=9080ef23-cc8f-4730-b6b1-bb45b7920f1b&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Elizabeth Chika Tippett, &quot;The Master-Servant Doctrine: How Old Legal Rules Haunt the Modern Workplace&quot; (U California Press, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:41:28</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The field of employment law used to be called &quot;master-servant law.&quot; Even if this term has fallen out of favor, a central truth has not changed: modern employment law still draws on centuries-old ideas about the rights and obligations of workers.
In The Master-Servant Doctrine: How Old Legal Rules Haunt the Modern Workplace (U California Press, 2025), Elizabeth Chika Tippett combines historical context with contemporary case studies and interviews to reveal how modern law and management practices are steeped in three core master-servant principles: the right to control, the right to govern, and the duty of support. With each chapter tackling a different aspect of the workplace—including pay, time management, firing, and benefits—this startling and original story of employment law offers fresh insights for legal scholars, historians, attorneys, advocates, and anyone who&apos;s ever worked a terrible job.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The field of employment law used to be called &quot;master-servant law.&quot; Even if this term has fallen out of favor, a central truth has not changed: modern employment law still draws on centuries-old ideas about the rights and obligations of workers.
In The Master-Servant Doctrine: How Old Legal Rules Haunt the Modern Workplace (U California Press, 2025), Elizabeth Chika Tippett combines historical context with contemporary case studies and interviews to reveal how modern law and management practices are steeped in three core master-servant principles: the right to control, the right to govern, and the duty of support. With each chapter tackling a different aspect of the workplace—including pay, time management, firing, and benefits—this startling and original story of employment law offers fresh insights for legal scholars, historians, attorneys, advocates, and anyone who&apos;s ever worked a terrible job.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1630</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2adcede4-ce06-11f0-986e-6b6d27624e42</guid>
      <title>Philip Pettit, &quot;The State&quot; (Princeton UP, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691182209" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The State</em></a>&nbsp;(Princeton University Press, 2023), the prominent political philosopher Philip Pettit embarks on a massive undertaking, offering a major new account of the foundations of the state and the nature of justice. In doing so, Pettit builds a new theory of what the state is and what it ought to be, addresses the normative question of how justice serves as a measure of the success of a state, and the way it should operate in relation to its citizens and other people.</p><p>Philip Pettit is L.S. Rockefeller University Professor of Human Values at Princeton University and Distinguished Professor of Philosophy at the Australian National University, Canberra.</p><p><em>Caleb Zakarin is the Assistant Editor of the New Books Network.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 1 Dec 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/philip-pettit-the-state-princeton-up-2023-DtekBE_R-6bfOoweM</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691182209" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The State</em></a>&nbsp;(Princeton University Press, 2023), the prominent political philosopher Philip Pettit embarks on a massive undertaking, offering a major new account of the foundations of the state and the nature of justice. In doing so, Pettit builds a new theory of what the state is and what it ought to be, addresses the normative question of how justice serves as a measure of the success of a state, and the way it should operate in relation to its citizens and other people.</p><p>Philip Pettit is L.S. Rockefeller University Professor of Human Values at Princeton University and Distinguished Professor of Philosophy at the Australian National University, Canberra.</p><p><em>Caleb Zakarin is the Assistant Editor of the New Books Network.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="38841187" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/9fea09a9-88fc-4b63-a760-4c681974ecb8/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=9fea09a9-88fc-4b63-a760-4c681974ecb8&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Philip Pettit, &quot;The State&quot; (Princeton UP, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:40:27</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In The State (Princeton University Press, 2023), the prominent political philosopher Philip Pettit embarks on a massive undertaking, offering a major new account of the foundations of the state and the nature of justice. In doing so, Pettit builds a new theory of what the state is and what it ought to be, addresses the normative question of how justice serves as a measure of the success of a state, and the way it should operate in relation to its citizens and other people.
Philip Pettit is L.S. Rockefeller University Professor of Human Values at Princeton University and Distinguished Professor of Philosophy at the Australian National University, Canberra.
Caleb Zakarin is the Assistant Editor of the New Books Network.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In The State (Princeton University Press, 2023), the prominent political philosopher Philip Pettit embarks on a massive undertaking, offering a major new account of the foundations of the state and the nature of justice. In doing so, Pettit builds a new theory of what the state is and what it ought to be, addresses the normative question of how justice serves as a measure of the success of a state, and the way it should operate in relation to its citizens and other people.
Philip Pettit is L.S. Rockefeller University Professor of Human Values at Princeton University and Distinguished Professor of Philosophy at the Australian National University, Canberra.
Caleb Zakarin is the Assistant Editor of the New Books Network.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>658</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">a3a914ce-ca3b-11f0-98c1-a78cac89065c</guid>
      <title>Jake Monaghan, &quot;Just Policing&quot; (Oxford UP, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Policing is a source of perennial conflict and philosophical disagreement. Current political developments in the United States have only increased the urgency of this topic. Today we welcome philosopher Jake Monaghan to discuss his book,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197610725" rel="noopener noreferrer">Just Policing</a>&nbsp;(Oxford UP, 2023), which applies interdisciplinary insights to examine the morality of policing.</p>
<p>Though the injustices of our world seemingly require some kind of policing, the police are often sources of injustice themselves. But this is not always the result of intentionally or negligently bad policing. Sometimes it is an unavoidable result of the injustices that emerge from interactions with other social systems. This raises an important question of just policing: how should police respond to the injustices built into the system?&nbsp;<em>Just Policing</em>&nbsp;attempts an answer, offering a theory of just policing in non-ideal contexts.</p>
<p>Monaghan argues that police discretion is not only unavoidable, but in light of non-ideal circumstances, valuable. This claim conflicts with a widespread but inchoate view of just policing, the legalist view that finds justice in faithful enforcement of the criminal code.</p>
<p>But the criminal code leaves policing seriously underdetermined; full enforcement is neither possible nor desirable. Police need an alternative normative framework for evaluating and guiding their exercise of power.</p>
<p><em>Just Policing</em>&nbsp;critiques popular approaches to police abolitionism while defending normative limits on police power. The book offers a defense of police discretion against common objections and evaluates controversial issues in order maintenance, such as the policing of "vice" and homelessness, democratic control over policing, community policing initiatives, police collaborations and alternatives like mental health response teams, and possibilities for structural reform.</p>
<p><a href="https://jakemonaghan.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Jake Monaghan</a>&nbsp;is Assistant Professor of Philosophy at the University of Southern California. He earned his Ph.D. in philosophy at the University of Buffalo. His research is primarily in moral and political philosophy.</p>
<p>He is interviewed by Tom McInerney, an international lawyer, scholar, and strategist, who has worked to advance rule of law and development internationally for 25 years. He has taught in the Rule of Law for Development Program at Loyola University Chicago School of Law since 2011. He writes the&nbsp;<a href="https://tommcinerney.substack.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Rights, Regulation and Rule of Law</a>&nbsp;newsletter on Substack.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/jake-monaghan-just-policing-oxford-up-2023-UJVvL05z-IPBxiXUk</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Policing is a source of perennial conflict and philosophical disagreement. Current political developments in the United States have only increased the urgency of this topic. Today we welcome philosopher Jake Monaghan to discuss his book,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197610725" rel="noopener noreferrer">Just Policing</a>&nbsp;(Oxford UP, 2023), which applies interdisciplinary insights to examine the morality of policing.</p>
<p>Though the injustices of our world seemingly require some kind of policing, the police are often sources of injustice themselves. But this is not always the result of intentionally or negligently bad policing. Sometimes it is an unavoidable result of the injustices that emerge from interactions with other social systems. This raises an important question of just policing: how should police respond to the injustices built into the system?&nbsp;<em>Just Policing</em>&nbsp;attempts an answer, offering a theory of just policing in non-ideal contexts.</p>
<p>Monaghan argues that police discretion is not only unavoidable, but in light of non-ideal circumstances, valuable. This claim conflicts with a widespread but inchoate view of just policing, the legalist view that finds justice in faithful enforcement of the criminal code.</p>
<p>But the criminal code leaves policing seriously underdetermined; full enforcement is neither possible nor desirable. Police need an alternative normative framework for evaluating and guiding their exercise of power.</p>
<p><em>Just Policing</em>&nbsp;critiques popular approaches to police abolitionism while defending normative limits on police power. The book offers a defense of police discretion against common objections and evaluates controversial issues in order maintenance, such as the policing of "vice" and homelessness, democratic control over policing, community policing initiatives, police collaborations and alternatives like mental health response teams, and possibilities for structural reform.</p>
<p><a href="https://jakemonaghan.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Jake Monaghan</a>&nbsp;is Assistant Professor of Philosophy at the University of Southern California. He earned his Ph.D. in philosophy at the University of Buffalo. His research is primarily in moral and political philosophy.</p>
<p>He is interviewed by Tom McInerney, an international lawyer, scholar, and strategist, who has worked to advance rule of law and development internationally for 25 years. He has taught in the Rule of Law for Development Program at Loyola University Chicago School of Law since 2011. He writes the&nbsp;<a href="https://tommcinerney.substack.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Rights, Regulation and Rule of Law</a>&nbsp;newsletter on Substack.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="58478746" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/c969de13-b1bf-4f42-b575-f9958fdb4e3c/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=c969de13-b1bf-4f42-b575-f9958fdb4e3c&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Jake Monaghan, &quot;Just Policing&quot; (Oxford UP, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:00:54</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Policing is a source of perennial conflict and philosophical disagreement. Current political developments in the United States have only increased the urgency of this topic. Today we welcome philosopher Jake Monaghan to discuss his book, Just Policing (Oxford UP, 2023), which applies interdisciplinary insights to examine the morality of policing.
Though the injustices of our world seemingly require some kind of policing, the police are often sources of injustice themselves. But this is not always the result of intentionally or negligently bad policing. Sometimes it is an unavoidable result of the injustices that emerge from interactions with other social systems. This raises an important question of just policing: how should police respond to the injustices built into the system? Just Policing attempts an answer, offering a theory of just policing in non-ideal contexts.
Monaghan argues that police discretion is not only unavoidable, but in light of non-ideal circumstances, valuable. This claim conflicts with a widespread but inchoate view of just policing, the legalist view that finds justice in faithful enforcement of the criminal code.
But the criminal code leaves policing seriously underdetermined; full enforcement is neither possible nor desirable. Police need an alternative normative framework for evaluating and guiding their exercise of power.
Just Policing critiques popular approaches to police abolitionism while defending normative limits on police power. The book offers a defense of police discretion against common objections and evaluates controversial issues in order maintenance, such as the policing of &quot;vice&quot; and homelessness, democratic control over policing, community policing initiatives, police collaborations and alternatives like mental health response teams, and possibilities for structural reform.
Jake Monaghan is Assistant Professor of Philosophy at the University of Southern California. He earned his Ph.D. in philosophy at the University of Buffalo. His research is primarily in moral and political philosophy.
He is interviewed by Tom McInerney, an international lawyer, scholar, and strategist, who has worked to advance rule of law and development internationally for 25 years. He has taught in the Rule of Law for Development Program at Loyola University Chicago School of Law since 2011. He writes the Rights, Regulation and Rule of Law newsletter on Substack.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Policing is a source of perennial conflict and philosophical disagreement. Current political developments in the United States have only increased the urgency of this topic. Today we welcome philosopher Jake Monaghan to discuss his book, Just Policing (Oxford UP, 2023), which applies interdisciplinary insights to examine the morality of policing.
Though the injustices of our world seemingly require some kind of policing, the police are often sources of injustice themselves. But this is not always the result of intentionally or negligently bad policing. Sometimes it is an unavoidable result of the injustices that emerge from interactions with other social systems. This raises an important question of just policing: how should police respond to the injustices built into the system? Just Policing attempts an answer, offering a theory of just policing in non-ideal contexts.
Monaghan argues that police discretion is not only unavoidable, but in light of non-ideal circumstances, valuable. This claim conflicts with a widespread but inchoate view of just policing, the legalist view that finds justice in faithful enforcement of the criminal code.
But the criminal code leaves policing seriously underdetermined; full enforcement is neither possible nor desirable. Police need an alternative normative framework for evaluating and guiding their exercise of power.
Just Policing critiques popular approaches to police abolitionism while defending normative limits on police power. The book offers a defense of police discretion against common objections and evaluates controversial issues in order maintenance, such as the policing of &quot;vice&quot; and homelessness, democratic control over policing, community policing initiatives, police collaborations and alternatives like mental health response teams, and possibilities for structural reform.
Jake Monaghan is Assistant Professor of Philosophy at the University of Southern California. He earned his Ph.D. in philosophy at the University of Buffalo. His research is primarily in moral and political philosophy.
He is interviewed by Tom McInerney, an international lawyer, scholar, and strategist, who has worked to advance rule of law and development internationally for 25 years. He has taught in the Rule of Law for Development Program at Loyola University Chicago School of Law since 2011. He writes the Rights, Regulation and Rule of Law newsletter on Substack.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>29</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">474c8e1a-c7eb-11f0-bed7-8bff12cc0294</guid>
      <title>John A. Camacho and Zack Hamilton, &quot;Sports Chaos: Exploring the Reasons Behind Expert Business, Legal, and Moral Decisions&quot; (2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>What happens when sports decision-making collides with business interests, legal battles, and moral dilemmas? Sports Chaos dives into the unpredictable world where experts, executives, and athletes must navigate high-stakes choices that shape the future of sports. From billion-dollar deals to ethical debates over owner and athlete behavior, this book unpacks The Colliding Reasons Problem, real-life cases where business, law, and morality clash in the sports industry. With insights from professionals across these fields, the authors explore how to balance profits, rules, and fairness through a new decision process called The Decision Dynamics Process. If you’ve ever been curious about sports behind the headlines, Sports Chaos will change the way you view the decisions shaping your favorite teams and athletes. Don’t just watch the game—understand the forces driving it. Grab your copy of Sports Chaos today and explore the hidden dynamics behind sports decisions!</p>
<p><em>Paul Knepper covered the New York Knicks for Bleacher Report. His first book was The Knicks of the Nineties: Ewing, Oakley, Starks and the Brawlers That Almost Won It All. His next book, Moses Malone: The Life of a Basketball Prophet, is now available. You can reach Paul at paulknepper@gmail.com and follow him on Twitter @paulieknep.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/john-a-camacho-and-zack-hamilton-sports-chaos-exploring-the-reasons-behind-expert-business-legal-and-moral-decisions-2025-NWbu93so</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What happens when sports decision-making collides with business interests, legal battles, and moral dilemmas? Sports Chaos dives into the unpredictable world where experts, executives, and athletes must navigate high-stakes choices that shape the future of sports. From billion-dollar deals to ethical debates over owner and athlete behavior, this book unpacks The Colliding Reasons Problem, real-life cases where business, law, and morality clash in the sports industry. With insights from professionals across these fields, the authors explore how to balance profits, rules, and fairness through a new decision process called The Decision Dynamics Process. If you’ve ever been curious about sports behind the headlines, Sports Chaos will change the way you view the decisions shaping your favorite teams and athletes. Don’t just watch the game—understand the forces driving it. Grab your copy of Sports Chaos today and explore the hidden dynamics behind sports decisions!</p>
<p><em>Paul Knepper covered the New York Knicks for Bleacher Report. His first book was The Knicks of the Nineties: Ewing, Oakley, Starks and the Brawlers That Almost Won It All. His next book, Moses Malone: The Life of a Basketball Prophet, is now available. You can reach Paul at paulknepper@gmail.com and follow him on Twitter @paulieknep.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="53478301" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/39f9ab7a-4798-4aa3-a763-51f334c98d77/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=39f9ab7a-4798-4aa3-a763-51f334c98d77&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>John A. Camacho and Zack Hamilton, &quot;Sports Chaos: Exploring the Reasons Behind Expert Business, Legal, and Moral Decisions&quot; (2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:55:41</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>What happens when sports decision-making collides with business interests, legal battles, and moral dilemmas? Sports Chaos dives into the unpredictable world where experts, executives, and athletes must navigate high-stakes choices that shape the future of sports. From billion-dollar deals to ethical debates over owner and athlete behavior, this book unpacks The Colliding Reasons Problem, real-life cases where business, law, and morality clash in the sports industry. With insights from professionals across these fields, the authors explore how to balance profits, rules, and fairness through a new decision process called The Decision Dynamics Process. If you’ve ever been curious about sports behind the headlines, Sports Chaos will change the way you view the decisions shaping your favorite teams and athletes. Don’t just watch the game—understand the forces driving it. Grab your copy of Sports Chaos today and explore the hidden dynamics behind sports decisions!
Paul Knepper covered the New York Knicks for Bleacher Report. His first book was The Knicks of the Nineties: Ewing, Oakley, Starks and the Brawlers That Almost Won It All. His next book, Moses Malone: The Life of a Basketball Prophet, is now available. You can reach Paul at paulknepper@gmail.com and follow him on Twitter @paulieknep.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>What happens when sports decision-making collides with business interests, legal battles, and moral dilemmas? Sports Chaos dives into the unpredictable world where experts, executives, and athletes must navigate high-stakes choices that shape the future of sports. From billion-dollar deals to ethical debates over owner and athlete behavior, this book unpacks The Colliding Reasons Problem, real-life cases where business, law, and morality clash in the sports industry. With insights from professionals across these fields, the authors explore how to balance profits, rules, and fairness through a new decision process called The Decision Dynamics Process. If you’ve ever been curious about sports behind the headlines, Sports Chaos will change the way you view the decisions shaping your favorite teams and athletes. Don’t just watch the game—understand the forces driving it. Grab your copy of Sports Chaos today and explore the hidden dynamics behind sports decisions!
Paul Knepper covered the New York Knicks for Bleacher Report. His first book was The Knicks of the Nineties: Ewing, Oakley, Starks and the Brawlers That Almost Won It All. His next book, Moses Malone: The Life of a Basketball Prophet, is now available. You can reach Paul at paulknepper@gmail.com and follow him on Twitter @paulieknep.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1629</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3d45f3c6-c6a0-11f0-82a3-6b52e4b5644a</guid>
      <title>Arpitha Kodiveri, &quot;Governing Forests: State, Law and Citizenship in India’s Forests&quot; (Melbourne UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780522879568" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Governing Forests: State, Law and Citizenship in India’s Forests</em></a>&nbsp;(Melbourne UP, 2024), Arpitha Kodiveri unpacks the fraught and shifting relationship between the Indian State, forest-dwelling communities, and forest conservation regimes.</p>
<p>The book builds on years of fieldwork across the Indian states of Uttar Pradesh, Rajasthan, Gujarat, Odisha, and Karnataka with forest-dwelling communities, Adivasi and Dalit activists, lawyers, and bureaucrats, to tell a turbulent story of battling for environmental justice. Kodiveri traces the continuing rhetorics of conservation and sovereignty in the forest practices of the colonial and the postcolonial Indian State, the entanglements between the climate crisis, resource extractivism, and eco-casteism, and credits the forest-dwelling communities for finding courageous and creative ways of securing their access and stewardship of forest resources.</p>
<p><em>Governing Forests</em>&nbsp;hopes for the possibility of “healing of historical antagonisms” between conservationists and forest dwellers through a co-productive model Kodiveri calls “negotiated sovereignty”, a governance paradigm rooted in a jurisprudence of care and repair.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.vassar.edu/faculty/akodiveri" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Arpitha Kodiveri</em></a><em>&nbsp;is an environmental law and justice scholar and assistant professor of political science at Vassar College.</em></p>
<p><a href="https://www.soas.ac.uk/about/raghavi-viswanath" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Raghavi Viswanath</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a postdoctoral researcher and teaching fellow at SOAS, University of London. Her research, supported by the Leverhulme Trust, examines how pastoralists claim grazing rights under India’s Forest Rights Act 2006 and how the everyday processes of staking such claims has been impacted by the authoritarian turn in India.&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/raghavi-viswanath-b2524253/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>LinkedIn</em></a><em>. Email:</em><a href="mailto:rv13@soas.ac.uk" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>rv13@soas.ac.uk</em></a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/arpitha-kodiveri-governing-forests-state-law-and-citizenship-in-indias-forests-melbourne-up-2024-sZE69KKQ</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780522879568" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Governing Forests: State, Law and Citizenship in India’s Forests</em></a>&nbsp;(Melbourne UP, 2024), Arpitha Kodiveri unpacks the fraught and shifting relationship between the Indian State, forest-dwelling communities, and forest conservation regimes.</p>
<p>The book builds on years of fieldwork across the Indian states of Uttar Pradesh, Rajasthan, Gujarat, Odisha, and Karnataka with forest-dwelling communities, Adivasi and Dalit activists, lawyers, and bureaucrats, to tell a turbulent story of battling for environmental justice. Kodiveri traces the continuing rhetorics of conservation and sovereignty in the forest practices of the colonial and the postcolonial Indian State, the entanglements between the climate crisis, resource extractivism, and eco-casteism, and credits the forest-dwelling communities for finding courageous and creative ways of securing their access and stewardship of forest resources.</p>
<p><em>Governing Forests</em>&nbsp;hopes for the possibility of “healing of historical antagonisms” between conservationists and forest dwellers through a co-productive model Kodiveri calls “negotiated sovereignty”, a governance paradigm rooted in a jurisprudence of care and repair.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.vassar.edu/faculty/akodiveri" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Arpitha Kodiveri</em></a><em>&nbsp;is an environmental law and justice scholar and assistant professor of political science at Vassar College.</em></p>
<p><a href="https://www.soas.ac.uk/about/raghavi-viswanath" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Raghavi Viswanath</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a postdoctoral researcher and teaching fellow at SOAS, University of London. Her research, supported by the Leverhulme Trust, examines how pastoralists claim grazing rights under India’s Forest Rights Act 2006 and how the everyday processes of staking such claims has been impacted by the authoritarian turn in India.&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/raghavi-viswanath-b2524253/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>LinkedIn</em></a><em>. Email:</em><a href="mailto:rv13@soas.ac.uk" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>rv13@soas.ac.uk</em></a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="105407216" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/521e20dd-3eaa-432b-8669-a381b2469c6f/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=521e20dd-3eaa-432b-8669-a381b2469c6f&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Arpitha Kodiveri, &quot;Governing Forests: State, Law and Citizenship in India’s Forests&quot; (Melbourne UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:49:46</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In Governing Forests: State, Law and Citizenship in India’s Forests (Melbourne UP, 2024), Arpitha Kodiveri unpacks the fraught and shifting relationship between the Indian State, forest-dwelling communities, and forest conservation regimes.
The book builds on years of fieldwork across the Indian states of Uttar Pradesh, Rajasthan, Gujarat, Odisha, and Karnataka with forest-dwelling communities, Adivasi and Dalit activists, lawyers, and bureaucrats, to tell a turbulent story of battling for environmental justice. Kodiveri traces the continuing rhetorics of conservation and sovereignty in the forest practices of the colonial and the postcolonial Indian State, the entanglements between the climate crisis, resource extractivism, and eco-casteism, and credits the forest-dwelling communities for finding courageous and creative ways of securing their access and stewardship of forest resources.
Governing Forests hopes for the possibility of “healing of historical antagonisms” between conservationists and forest dwellers through a co-productive model Kodiveri calls “negotiated sovereignty”, a governance paradigm rooted in a jurisprudence of care and repair.
Arpitha Kodiveri is an environmental law and justice scholar and assistant professor of political science at Vassar College.
Raghavi Viswanath is a postdoctoral researcher and teaching fellow at SOAS, University of London. Her research, supported by the Leverhulme Trust, examines how pastoralists claim grazing rights under India’s Forest Rights Act 2006 and how the everyday processes of staking such claims has been impacted by the authoritarian turn in India. LinkedIn. Email:rv13@soas.ac.uk
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In Governing Forests: State, Law and Citizenship in India’s Forests (Melbourne UP, 2024), Arpitha Kodiveri unpacks the fraught and shifting relationship between the Indian State, forest-dwelling communities, and forest conservation regimes.
The book builds on years of fieldwork across the Indian states of Uttar Pradesh, Rajasthan, Gujarat, Odisha, and Karnataka with forest-dwelling communities, Adivasi and Dalit activists, lawyers, and bureaucrats, to tell a turbulent story of battling for environmental justice. Kodiveri traces the continuing rhetorics of conservation and sovereignty in the forest practices of the colonial and the postcolonial Indian State, the entanglements between the climate crisis, resource extractivism, and eco-casteism, and credits the forest-dwelling communities for finding courageous and creative ways of securing their access and stewardship of forest resources.
Governing Forests hopes for the possibility of “healing of historical antagonisms” between conservationists and forest dwellers through a co-productive model Kodiveri calls “negotiated sovereignty”, a governance paradigm rooted in a jurisprudence of care and repair.
Arpitha Kodiveri is an environmental law and justice scholar and assistant professor of political science at Vassar College.
Raghavi Viswanath is a postdoctoral researcher and teaching fellow at SOAS, University of London. Her research, supported by the Leverhulme Trust, examines how pastoralists claim grazing rights under India’s Forest Rights Act 2006 and how the everyday processes of staking such claims has been impacted by the authoritarian turn in India. LinkedIn. Email:rv13@soas.ac.uk
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1628</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">c2855a68-bf98-11f0-8ad0-6770c13e1389</guid>
      <title>David Garland, &quot;Law and Order Leviathan: America’s Extraordinary Regime of Policing and Punishment&quot; (Princeton UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The United States has long been an international outlier, with a powerful business class, a weak social state, and an exceptional gun culture. In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691271217" rel="noopener noreferrer">Law and Order Leviathan: America’s Extraordinary Regime of Policing and Punishment</a>&nbsp;(Princeton UP, 2025), David Garland shows how, after the 1960s, American-style capitalism disrupted poor communities and depleted social controls, giving rise to violence and social problems at levels altogether unknown in other affluent nations. Aggressive policing and punishment became the default response.<br>Garland shows that America lags behind comparable nations in protections for working people. He identifies the structural sources of America’s penal state and the community-level processes through which political economy impacts crime and policing. He argues that there is nothing paradoxical in America’s reliance on coercive state controls; the nation’s vaunted liberalism is largely an economic liberalism devoted to free markets and corporate power rather than to individual dignity and flourishing. Fear of violent crime and distrust of others ensure public support for this coercive Leviathan; racism enables indifference to its harms.<br>Interviewee: David Garland is the Arthur T Vanderbilt Professor of Law and Professor of Sociology at New York University and an Honorary Professor at Edinburgh University.</p>
<p>Host: Schneur Zalman Newfield is an Associate Professor of Sociology and Jewish Studies at Hunter College, City University of New York, and the author of&nbsp;<em>Degrees of Separation: Identity Formation While Leaving Ultra-Orthodox Judaism</em>&nbsp;(Temple University Press). Visit him online at ZalmanNewfield.com.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/david-garland-law-and-order-leviathan-americas-extraordinary-regime-of-policing-and-punishment-princeton-up-2025-q3rLUjJu</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The United States has long been an international outlier, with a powerful business class, a weak social state, and an exceptional gun culture. In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691271217" rel="noopener noreferrer">Law and Order Leviathan: America’s Extraordinary Regime of Policing and Punishment</a>&nbsp;(Princeton UP, 2025), David Garland shows how, after the 1960s, American-style capitalism disrupted poor communities and depleted social controls, giving rise to violence and social problems at levels altogether unknown in other affluent nations. Aggressive policing and punishment became the default response.<br>Garland shows that America lags behind comparable nations in protections for working people. He identifies the structural sources of America’s penal state and the community-level processes through which political economy impacts crime and policing. He argues that there is nothing paradoxical in America’s reliance on coercive state controls; the nation’s vaunted liberalism is largely an economic liberalism devoted to free markets and corporate power rather than to individual dignity and flourishing. Fear of violent crime and distrust of others ensure public support for this coercive Leviathan; racism enables indifference to its harms.<br>Interviewee: David Garland is the Arthur T Vanderbilt Professor of Law and Professor of Sociology at New York University and an Honorary Professor at Edinburgh University.</p>
<p>Host: Schneur Zalman Newfield is an Associate Professor of Sociology and Jewish Studies at Hunter College, City University of New York, and the author of&nbsp;<em>Degrees of Separation: Identity Formation While Leaving Ultra-Orthodox Judaism</em>&nbsp;(Temple University Press). Visit him online at ZalmanNewfield.com.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="60549813" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/99c80f63-c7ed-4281-9ce5-43d235dab5bf/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=99c80f63-c7ed-4281-9ce5-43d235dab5bf&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>David Garland, &quot;Law and Order Leviathan: America’s Extraordinary Regime of Policing and Punishment&quot; (Princeton UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:03:01</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The United States has long been an international outlier, with a powerful business class, a weak social state, and an exceptional gun culture. In Law and Order Leviathan: America’s Extraordinary Regime of Policing and Punishment (Princeton UP, 2025), David Garland shows how, after the 1960s, American-style capitalism disrupted poor communities and depleted social controls, giving rise to violence and social problems at levels altogether unknown in other affluent nations. Aggressive policing and punishment became the default response.Garland shows that America lags behind comparable nations in protections for working people. He identifies the structural sources of America’s penal state and the community-level processes through which political economy impacts crime and policing. He argues that there is nothing paradoxical in America’s reliance on coercive state controls; the nation’s vaunted liberalism is largely an economic liberalism devoted to free markets and corporate power rather than to individual dignity and flourishing. Fear of violent crime and distrust of others ensure public support for this coercive Leviathan; racism enables indifference to its harms.Interviewee: David Garland is the Arthur T Vanderbilt Professor of Law and Professor of Sociology at New York University and an Honorary Professor at Edinburgh University.
Host: Schneur Zalman Newfield is an Associate Professor of Sociology and Jewish Studies at Hunter College, City University of New York, and the author of Degrees of Separation: Identity Formation While Leaving Ultra-Orthodox Judaism (Temple University Press). Visit him online at ZalmanNewfield.com.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The United States has long been an international outlier, with a powerful business class, a weak social state, and an exceptional gun culture. In Law and Order Leviathan: America’s Extraordinary Regime of Policing and Punishment (Princeton UP, 2025), David Garland shows how, after the 1960s, American-style capitalism disrupted poor communities and depleted social controls, giving rise to violence and social problems at levels altogether unknown in other affluent nations. Aggressive policing and punishment became the default response.Garland shows that America lags behind comparable nations in protections for working people. He identifies the structural sources of America’s penal state and the community-level processes through which political economy impacts crime and policing. He argues that there is nothing paradoxical in America’s reliance on coercive state controls; the nation’s vaunted liberalism is largely an economic liberalism devoted to free markets and corporate power rather than to individual dignity and flourishing. Fear of violent crime and distrust of others ensure public support for this coercive Leviathan; racism enables indifference to its harms.Interviewee: David Garland is the Arthur T Vanderbilt Professor of Law and Professor of Sociology at New York University and an Honorary Professor at Edinburgh University.
Host: Schneur Zalman Newfield is an Associate Professor of Sociology and Jewish Studies at Hunter College, City University of New York, and the author of Degrees of Separation: Identity Formation While Leaving Ultra-Orthodox Judaism (Temple University Press). Visit him online at ZalmanNewfield.com.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1626</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">667be6c8-c02f-11f0-bc63-83a53d4164ec</guid>
      <title>John Jackson, &quot;Special Advocates in the Adversarial System&quot; (Routledge, 2020)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><em></em><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781138242012" rel="noopener noreferrer">S</a><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781138242012" rel="noopener noreferrer">pecial Advocates in the Adversarial System&nbsp;</a>(Routledge,&nbsp;2020) uncovers the little known phenomenon&nbsp;of Special Advocates who represent the best interests of an excluded party&nbsp;in closed trials. Professor John Jackson's empirical analysis draws into question the commitment of legal-systems to long-held principles of adversarial justice, due process and even human rights protections in trials that relate to&nbsp;immigration, national security, civil and criminal proceedings. In its comparative approach, the book&nbsp;tackles issues of accountability and the&nbsp;ethical concerns&nbsp;surrounding the appointment and prevalence of the special advocate system. This book will shock lawyers and scholars alike and is an important contribution to considerations of the administration of justice.&nbsp;</p>
<p>Professor&nbsp;<a href="https://www.nottingham.ac.uk/law/people/j.jackson" rel="noopener noreferrer">John Jackson</a>&nbsp;is an Emeritus Professor of Comparative Criminal Law and Procedure at The University of Nottingham.&nbsp;</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/john-jackson-special-advocates-in-the-adversarial-system-routledge-2020-hXBzp2Bu</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em></em><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781138242012" rel="noopener noreferrer">S</a><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781138242012" rel="noopener noreferrer">pecial Advocates in the Adversarial System&nbsp;</a>(Routledge,&nbsp;2020) uncovers the little known phenomenon&nbsp;of Special Advocates who represent the best interests of an excluded party&nbsp;in closed trials. Professor John Jackson's empirical analysis draws into question the commitment of legal-systems to long-held principles of adversarial justice, due process and even human rights protections in trials that relate to&nbsp;immigration, national security, civil and criminal proceedings. In its comparative approach, the book&nbsp;tackles issues of accountability and the&nbsp;ethical concerns&nbsp;surrounding the appointment and prevalence of the special advocate system. This book will shock lawyers and scholars alike and is an important contribution to considerations of the administration of justice.&nbsp;</p>
<p>Professor&nbsp;<a href="https://www.nottingham.ac.uk/law/people/j.jackson" rel="noopener noreferrer">John Jackson</a>&nbsp;is an Emeritus Professor of Comparative Criminal Law and Procedure at The University of Nottingham.&nbsp;</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="71317471" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/2a0ab3dc-391b-4d01-a73e-7aaebac012d9/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=2a0ab3dc-391b-4d01-a73e-7aaebac012d9&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>John Jackson, &quot;Special Advocates in the Adversarial System&quot; (Routledge, 2020)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:14:16</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Special Advocates in the Adversarial System (Routledge, 2020) uncovers the little known phenomenon of Special Advocates who represent the best interests of an excluded party in closed trials. Professor John Jackson&apos;s empirical analysis draws into question the commitment of legal-systems to long-held principles of adversarial justice, due process and even human rights protections in trials that relate to immigration, national security, civil and criminal proceedings. In its comparative approach, the book tackles issues of accountability and the ethical concerns surrounding the appointment and prevalence of the special advocate system. This book will shock lawyers and scholars alike and is an important contribution to considerations of the administration of justice. 
Professor John Jackson is an Emeritus Professor of Comparative Criminal Law and Procedure at The University of Nottingham. 
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Special Advocates in the Adversarial System (Routledge, 2020) uncovers the little known phenomenon of Special Advocates who represent the best interests of an excluded party in closed trials. Professor John Jackson&apos;s empirical analysis draws into question the commitment of legal-systems to long-held principles of adversarial justice, due process and even human rights protections in trials that relate to immigration, national security, civil and criminal proceedings. In its comparative approach, the book tackles issues of accountability and the ethical concerns surrounding the appointment and prevalence of the special advocate system. This book will shock lawyers and scholars alike and is an important contribution to considerations of the administration of justice. 
Professor John Jackson is an Emeritus Professor of Comparative Criminal Law and Procedure at The University of Nottingham. 
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1627</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3892354a-bed2-11f0-b49d-e3e71b89da5b</guid>
      <title>Anand P. Vaidya, &quot;Future of the Forest: Struggles over Land and Law in India&quot; (Cornell UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781501780509" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Future of the Forest: Struggles over Land and Law in India</em></a>&nbsp;(Cornell UP, 2025), Anand P. Vaidya tells the story of the making and unmaking of India’s Forest Rights Act 2006, a law enacted to secure the largest redistribution of property in independent India by recognising the tenure and use rights of millions of landless forest dwellers.</p>
<p>Beginning with the devastating destruction of a north Indian village Vaidya calls Ramnagar, inhabited by landless Dalits and Adivasis, the book follows the interventions of activists, forest dwelling communities, political parties, and corporations during the drafting of the law and traces how each of these coalitions shapes the law’s implementation. Vaidya shows how this ambitious law became a battleground of competing legal potentialities — at once a tool of exclusion, dividing forest dwellers along caste and class lines, and yet a platform for resistance, enabling forest dwellers to challenge State domination.</p>
<p>A multi-scalar study,&nbsp;<em>Future of the Forest</em>&nbsp;is attentive to the everyday politics of staking a forest rights claim, revealing how the law opens space for fluid (and often extralegal) interpretations, shifting political authority, and diverging aspirations.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.reed.edu/anthro/faculty/vaidya.html" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Anand Vaidya</em></a><em>&nbsp;is Associate Professor of Anthropology at Reed College.</em></p>
<p><a href="https://www.soas.ac.uk/about/raghavi-viswanath" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Raghavi Viswanath</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a postdoctoral researcher and teaching fellow at SOAS, University of London. Her research, supported by the Leverhulme Trust, examines how pastoralists claim grazing rights under India’s Forest Rights Act 2006 and how the everyday processes of staking such claims has been impacted by the authoritarian turn in India.</em>&nbsp;<a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/raghavi-viswanath-b2524253/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>LinkedIn</em></a>.&nbsp;<u><em>Email:</em></u><em>&nbsp;</em><a href="mailto:rv13@soas.ac.uk" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>rv13@soas.ac.uk</em></a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/anand-p-vaidya-future-of-the-forest-struggles-over-land-and-law-in-india-cornell-up-2025-geptZCtd</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781501780509" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Future of the Forest: Struggles over Land and Law in India</em></a>&nbsp;(Cornell UP, 2025), Anand P. Vaidya tells the story of the making and unmaking of India’s Forest Rights Act 2006, a law enacted to secure the largest redistribution of property in independent India by recognising the tenure and use rights of millions of landless forest dwellers.</p>
<p>Beginning with the devastating destruction of a north Indian village Vaidya calls Ramnagar, inhabited by landless Dalits and Adivasis, the book follows the interventions of activists, forest dwelling communities, political parties, and corporations during the drafting of the law and traces how each of these coalitions shapes the law’s implementation. Vaidya shows how this ambitious law became a battleground of competing legal potentialities — at once a tool of exclusion, dividing forest dwellers along caste and class lines, and yet a platform for resistance, enabling forest dwellers to challenge State domination.</p>
<p>A multi-scalar study,&nbsp;<em>Future of the Forest</em>&nbsp;is attentive to the everyday politics of staking a forest rights claim, revealing how the law opens space for fluid (and often extralegal) interpretations, shifting political authority, and diverging aspirations.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.reed.edu/anthro/faculty/vaidya.html" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Anand Vaidya</em></a><em>&nbsp;is Associate Professor of Anthropology at Reed College.</em></p>
<p><a href="https://www.soas.ac.uk/about/raghavi-viswanath" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Raghavi Viswanath</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a postdoctoral researcher and teaching fellow at SOAS, University of London. Her research, supported by the Leverhulme Trust, examines how pastoralists claim grazing rights under India’s Forest Rights Act 2006 and how the everyday processes of staking such claims has been impacted by the authoritarian turn in India.</em>&nbsp;<a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/raghavi-viswanath-b2524253/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>LinkedIn</em></a>.&nbsp;<u><em>Email:</em></u><em>&nbsp;</em><a href="mailto:rv13@soas.ac.uk" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>rv13@soas.ac.uk</em></a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="75303546" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/2cb64d03-dba8-4464-b6ab-dbc714256096/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=2cb64d03-dba8-4464-b6ab-dbc714256096&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Anand P. Vaidya, &quot;Future of the Forest: Struggles over Land and Law in India&quot; (Cornell UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:18:26</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In Future of the Forest: Struggles over Land and Law in India (Cornell UP, 2025), Anand P. Vaidya tells the story of the making and unmaking of India’s Forest Rights Act 2006, a law enacted to secure the largest redistribution of property in independent India by recognising the tenure and use rights of millions of landless forest dwellers.
Beginning with the devastating destruction of a north Indian village Vaidya calls Ramnagar, inhabited by landless Dalits and Adivasis, the book follows the interventions of activists, forest dwelling communities, political parties, and corporations during the drafting of the law and traces how each of these coalitions shapes the law’s implementation. Vaidya shows how this ambitious law became a battleground of competing legal potentialities — at once a tool of exclusion, dividing forest dwellers along caste and class lines, and yet a platform for resistance, enabling forest dwellers to challenge State domination.
A multi-scalar study, Future of the Forest is attentive to the everyday politics of staking a forest rights claim, revealing how the law opens space for fluid (and often extralegal) interpretations, shifting political authority, and diverging aspirations.
Anand Vaidya is Associate Professor of Anthropology at Reed College.
Raghavi Viswanath is a postdoctoral researcher and teaching fellow at SOAS, University of London. Her research, supported by the Leverhulme Trust, examines how pastoralists claim grazing rights under India’s Forest Rights Act 2006 and how the everyday processes of staking such claims has been impacted by the authoritarian turn in India. LinkedIn. Email: rv13@soas.ac.uk
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In Future of the Forest: Struggles over Land and Law in India (Cornell UP, 2025), Anand P. Vaidya tells the story of the making and unmaking of India’s Forest Rights Act 2006, a law enacted to secure the largest redistribution of property in independent India by recognising the tenure and use rights of millions of landless forest dwellers.
Beginning with the devastating destruction of a north Indian village Vaidya calls Ramnagar, inhabited by landless Dalits and Adivasis, the book follows the interventions of activists, forest dwelling communities, political parties, and corporations during the drafting of the law and traces how each of these coalitions shapes the law’s implementation. Vaidya shows how this ambitious law became a battleground of competing legal potentialities — at once a tool of exclusion, dividing forest dwellers along caste and class lines, and yet a platform for resistance, enabling forest dwellers to challenge State domination.
A multi-scalar study, Future of the Forest is attentive to the everyday politics of staking a forest rights claim, revealing how the law opens space for fluid (and often extralegal) interpretations, shifting political authority, and diverging aspirations.
Anand Vaidya is Associate Professor of Anthropology at Reed College.
Raghavi Viswanath is a postdoctoral researcher and teaching fellow at SOAS, University of London. Her research, supported by the Leverhulme Trust, examines how pastoralists claim grazing rights under India’s Forest Rights Act 2006 and how the everyday processes of staking such claims has been impacted by the authoritarian turn in India. LinkedIn. Email: rv13@soas.ac.uk
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1625</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">bd0fdf42-beb5-11f0-9b9e-97bc1bb6e4b8</guid>
      <title>Meg Groff, &quot;Not If I Can Help It&quot; (Rivertown Books, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Meg Groff's memoir&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781953943477" rel="noopener noreferrer">Not If I Can Help It</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Rivertown Books, 2025) recounts&nbsp;some of the most harrowing, infuriating, yet inspiring stories from Groff’s work as a Legal Aid attorney representing women and children whose only resource is the sheer courage they exhibit every day.&nbsp;Groff dedicated forty years of her life to fighting for justice for victims of domestic violence in rural and suburban Pennsylvania.&nbsp;Against the odds, Groff won hundreds of exhilarating courtroom victories—and also suffered some heartbreaking defeats. In&nbsp;<em>Not If I Can Help It</em>, she brings these stories to life with vivid detail, deep empathy, surprising humor, and the boundless passion for justice that has driven her life and work. Readers who care about law, human rights, and the struggles of ordinary people will be captivated and inspired by this powerful book and the sobering insights it offers about the American way of justice.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/meg-groff-not-if-i-can-help-it-rivertown-books-2025-JGEOCWOZ</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Meg Groff's memoir&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781953943477" rel="noopener noreferrer">Not If I Can Help It</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Rivertown Books, 2025) recounts&nbsp;some of the most harrowing, infuriating, yet inspiring stories from Groff’s work as a Legal Aid attorney representing women and children whose only resource is the sheer courage they exhibit every day.&nbsp;Groff dedicated forty years of her life to fighting for justice for victims of domestic violence in rural and suburban Pennsylvania.&nbsp;Against the odds, Groff won hundreds of exhilarating courtroom victories—and also suffered some heartbreaking defeats. In&nbsp;<em>Not If I Can Help It</em>, she brings these stories to life with vivid detail, deep empathy, surprising humor, and the boundless passion for justice that has driven her life and work. Readers who care about law, human rights, and the struggles of ordinary people will be captivated and inspired by this powerful book and the sobering insights it offers about the American way of justice.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="37775523" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/aca66839-f0a8-44f4-ba5a-5b85ab9b5e9d/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=aca66839-f0a8-44f4-ba5a-5b85ab9b5e9d&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Meg Groff, &quot;Not If I Can Help It&quot; (Rivertown Books, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:39:20</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Meg Groff&apos;s memoir Not If I Can Help It (Rivertown Books, 2025) recounts some of the most harrowing, infuriating, yet inspiring stories from Groff’s work as a Legal Aid attorney representing women and children whose only resource is the sheer courage they exhibit every day. Groff dedicated forty years of her life to fighting for justice for victims of domestic violence in rural and suburban Pennsylvania. Against the odds, Groff won hundreds of exhilarating courtroom victories—and also suffered some heartbreaking defeats. In Not If I Can Help It, she brings these stories to life with vivid detail, deep empathy, surprising humor, and the boundless passion for justice that has driven her life and work. Readers who care about law, human rights, and the struggles of ordinary people will be captivated and inspired by this powerful book and the sobering insights it offers about the American way of justice.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Meg Groff&apos;s memoir Not If I Can Help It (Rivertown Books, 2025) recounts some of the most harrowing, infuriating, yet inspiring stories from Groff’s work as a Legal Aid attorney representing women and children whose only resource is the sheer courage they exhibit every day. Groff dedicated forty years of her life to fighting for justice for victims of domestic violence in rural and suburban Pennsylvania. Against the odds, Groff won hundreds of exhilarating courtroom victories—and also suffered some heartbreaking defeats. In Not If I Can Help It, she brings these stories to life with vivid detail, deep empathy, surprising humor, and the boundless passion for justice that has driven her life and work. Readers who care about law, human rights, and the struggles of ordinary people will be captivated and inspired by this powerful book and the sobering insights it offers about the American way of justice.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1624</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">a1ba790e-b8e4-11f0-9ce5-c70a21ae133a</guid>
      <title>Joshua Castellino, &quot;Calibrating Colonial Crime: Reparations and The Crime of Unjust Enrichment&quot; (Policy Press, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>While decolonization liberated territories, it left the root causes of historical injustice unaddressed. Governance change did not address past wrongs and transferred injustice through political and financial architectures.</p>
<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781529241822" rel="noopener noreferrer">Calibrating Colonial Crime: Reparations and The Crime of Unjust Enrichment</a>&nbsp;(Bristol University Press/Policy Press, 2024) Dr. Joshua Castellino presents a five-point plan aimed at system redress through reparations that addresses the colonially induced climate crisis through equitable and sustainable means.</p>
<p>In highlighting the structural legacy of colonial crimes, Dr. Castellino provides insights into the complexities of contemporary societies, showing how legal frameworks could foster a fairer, more just world.</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 4 Nov 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/joshua-castellino-calibrating-colonial-crime-reparations-and-the-crime-of-unjust-enrichment-policy-press-2025-tOIl7R5U</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While decolonization liberated territories, it left the root causes of historical injustice unaddressed. Governance change did not address past wrongs and transferred injustice through political and financial architectures.</p>
<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781529241822" rel="noopener noreferrer">Calibrating Colonial Crime: Reparations and The Crime of Unjust Enrichment</a>&nbsp;(Bristol University Press/Policy Press, 2024) Dr. Joshua Castellino presents a five-point plan aimed at system redress through reparations that addresses the colonially induced climate crisis through equitable and sustainable means.</p>
<p>In highlighting the structural legacy of colonial crimes, Dr. Castellino provides insights into the complexities of contemporary societies, showing how legal frameworks could foster a fairer, more just world.</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="51989122" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/35ad78ae-f9e7-460f-bdc4-388e00e22739/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=35ad78ae-f9e7-460f-bdc4-388e00e22739&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Joshua Castellino, &quot;Calibrating Colonial Crime: Reparations and The Crime of Unjust Enrichment&quot; (Policy Press, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:54:09</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>While decolonization liberated territories, it left the root causes of historical injustice unaddressed. Governance change did not address past wrongs and transferred injustice through political and financial architectures.
In Calibrating Colonial Crime: Reparations and The Crime of Unjust Enrichment (Bristol University Press/Policy Press, 2024) Dr. Joshua Castellino presents a five-point plan aimed at system redress through reparations that addresses the colonially induced climate crisis through equitable and sustainable means.
In highlighting the structural legacy of colonial crimes, Dr. Castellino provides insights into the complexities of contemporary societies, showing how legal frameworks could foster a fairer, more just world.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>While decolonization liberated territories, it left the root causes of historical injustice unaddressed. Governance change did not address past wrongs and transferred injustice through political and financial architectures.
In Calibrating Colonial Crime: Reparations and The Crime of Unjust Enrichment (Bristol University Press/Policy Press, 2024) Dr. Joshua Castellino presents a five-point plan aimed at system redress through reparations that addresses the colonially induced climate crisis through equitable and sustainable means.
In highlighting the structural legacy of colonial crimes, Dr. Castellino provides insights into the complexities of contemporary societies, showing how legal frameworks could foster a fairer, more just world.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1623</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ee5c2c36-b604-11f0-835d-6bd17348ee2e</guid>
      <title>Linda Upham-Bornstein, &quot;&apos;Mr. Taxpayer versus Mr. Tax Spender&apos;: Taxpayers’ Associations, Pocketbook Politics, and the Law during the Great Depression&quot; (Temple UP, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>During the Great Depression, the proliferation of local taxpayers’ associations was dramatic and unprecedented. The justly concerned members of these organizations examined the operations of state, city, and county governments, then pressed local officials for operational and fiscal reforms. These associations aimed to reduce the cost of state and local governments to make operations more efficient and less expensive.</p>
<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781439923740" rel="noopener noreferrer">"Mr. Taxpayer versus Mr. Tax Spender": Taxpayers’ Associations, Pocketbook Politics, and the Law during the Great Depression</a>&nbsp;(Temple UP, 2023) by Dr. Linda Upham-Bornstein presents a comprehensive overview of these grassroots taxpayers’ leagues beginning in the 1860s and shows how they evolved during their heyday in the 1930s. Dr. Upham-Bornstein chronicles the ways these taxpayers associations organized as well as the tools they used—constructive economy, political efforts, tax strikes, and tax revolt through litigation—to achieve their objectives.</p>
<p>Taxpayer activity was a direct consequence of—and a response to—the economic crisis of the Great Depression and the expansion of the size and scope of government.&nbsp;<em>“Mr. Taxpayer versus Mr. Tax Spender”</em>&nbsp;connects collective tax resistance in the 1930s to the populist tradition in American politics and to other broad impulses in American political and legal history.</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 2 Nov 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/linda-upham-bornstein-mr-taxpayer-versus-mr-tax-spender-taxpayers-associations-pocketbook-politics-and-the-law-during-the-great-depression-temple-up-2023-gXma3LNw</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>During the Great Depression, the proliferation of local taxpayers’ associations was dramatic and unprecedented. The justly concerned members of these organizations examined the operations of state, city, and county governments, then pressed local officials for operational and fiscal reforms. These associations aimed to reduce the cost of state and local governments to make operations more efficient and less expensive.</p>
<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781439923740" rel="noopener noreferrer">"Mr. Taxpayer versus Mr. Tax Spender": Taxpayers’ Associations, Pocketbook Politics, and the Law during the Great Depression</a>&nbsp;(Temple UP, 2023) by Dr. Linda Upham-Bornstein presents a comprehensive overview of these grassroots taxpayers’ leagues beginning in the 1860s and shows how they evolved during their heyday in the 1930s. Dr. Upham-Bornstein chronicles the ways these taxpayers associations organized as well as the tools they used—constructive economy, political efforts, tax strikes, and tax revolt through litigation—to achieve their objectives.</p>
<p>Taxpayer activity was a direct consequence of—and a response to—the economic crisis of the Great Depression and the expansion of the size and scope of government.&nbsp;<em>“Mr. Taxpayer versus Mr. Tax Spender”</em>&nbsp;connects collective tax resistance in the 1930s to the populist tradition in American politics and to other broad impulses in American political and legal history.</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="41293416" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/a4c9f738-a84a-4473-9876-3e7ce185f028/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=a4c9f738-a84a-4473-9876-3e7ce185f028&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Linda Upham-Bornstein, &quot;&apos;Mr. Taxpayer versus Mr. Tax Spender&apos;: Taxpayers’ Associations, Pocketbook Politics, and the Law during the Great Depression&quot; (Temple UP, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:43:00</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>During the Great Depression, the proliferation of local taxpayers’ associations was dramatic and unprecedented. The justly concerned members of these organizations examined the operations of state, city, and county governments, then pressed local officials for operational and fiscal reforms. These associations aimed to reduce the cost of state and local governments to make operations more efficient and less expensive.
&quot;Mr. Taxpayer versus Mr. Tax Spender&quot;: Taxpayers’ Associations, Pocketbook Politics, and the Law during the Great Depression (Temple UP, 2023) by Dr. Linda Upham-Bornstein presents a comprehensive overview of these grassroots taxpayers’ leagues beginning in the 1860s and shows how they evolved during their heyday in the 1930s. Dr. Upham-Bornstein chronicles the ways these taxpayers associations organized as well as the tools they used—constructive economy, political efforts, tax strikes, and tax revolt through litigation—to achieve their objectives.
Taxpayer activity was a direct consequence of—and a response to—the economic crisis of the Great Depression and the expansion of the size and scope of government. “Mr. Taxpayer versus Mr. Tax Spender” connects collective tax resistance in the 1930s to the populist tradition in American politics and to other broad impulses in American political and legal history.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>During the Great Depression, the proliferation of local taxpayers’ associations was dramatic and unprecedented. The justly concerned members of these organizations examined the operations of state, city, and county governments, then pressed local officials for operational and fiscal reforms. These associations aimed to reduce the cost of state and local governments to make operations more efficient and less expensive.
&quot;Mr. Taxpayer versus Mr. Tax Spender&quot;: Taxpayers’ Associations, Pocketbook Politics, and the Law during the Great Depression (Temple UP, 2023) by Dr. Linda Upham-Bornstein presents a comprehensive overview of these grassroots taxpayers’ leagues beginning in the 1860s and shows how they evolved during their heyday in the 1930s. Dr. Upham-Bornstein chronicles the ways these taxpayers associations organized as well as the tools they used—constructive economy, political efforts, tax strikes, and tax revolt through litigation—to achieve their objectives.
Taxpayer activity was a direct consequence of—and a response to—the economic crisis of the Great Depression and the expansion of the size and scope of government. “Mr. Taxpayer versus Mr. Tax Spender” connects collective tax resistance in the 1930s to the populist tradition in American politics and to other broad impulses in American political and legal history.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1622</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">cf046f56-b55f-11f0-8946-bb21b943045d</guid>
      <title>Louise Nyholm Kallestrup, &quot;The Construction of Witchcraft in Early Modern Denmark, 1536-1617&quot; (Routledge, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Louise Nyholm Kallestrup joins Jana Byars to talk about her new book,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/the-construction-of-witchcraft-in-early-modern-denmark-1536-1617-louise-nyholm-kallestrup/150b4a63a1dcb43b?ean=9780815395416&amp;next=t&amp;next=t" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Construction of Witchcraft in Early Modern Denmark, 1536-1617</a>&nbsp;(Routledge, 2025)&nbsp;This book examines how the experience of witchcraft developed and evolved from the Lutheran Evangelical Reformation of Denmark 1536 to the celebration of the Lutheran centennial of 1617. As well as exploring witchcraft, this volume is a portrait of Denmark and how religion and politics in the 16th and 17th centuries were impossible to separate. It was in this period from 1536 to 1617 that witchcraft went from an offence condemned in the Bible and prohibited in the medieval Law of Jutland, to being described in detail as the worst of crimes. Witchcraft evolved from being defined as imposing harm to someone or something, to being a mockery of God. Approaching the theme from the new history of experience, this book refers to process as the construction of witchcraft as a crime. Contributions draw on a wide range of textual and visual sources, and bring together court records, sermons, legal regulations and correspondence with pamphlets, devotional literature and demonological treaties. The book is the first of its kind that aims to explain how this development occurred. This volume is useful for undergraduates, postgraduates and scholars, as well as non-specialist readers interested in the history of witchcraft, magic and alchemy, women's and gender history and European history.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 1 Nov 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/louise-nyholm-kallestrup-the-construction-of-witchcraft-in-early-modern-denmark-1536-1617-routledge-2025-DszPzGc5</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Louise Nyholm Kallestrup joins Jana Byars to talk about her new book,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/the-construction-of-witchcraft-in-early-modern-denmark-1536-1617-louise-nyholm-kallestrup/150b4a63a1dcb43b?ean=9780815395416&amp;next=t&amp;next=t" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Construction of Witchcraft in Early Modern Denmark, 1536-1617</a>&nbsp;(Routledge, 2025)&nbsp;This book examines how the experience of witchcraft developed and evolved from the Lutheran Evangelical Reformation of Denmark 1536 to the celebration of the Lutheran centennial of 1617. As well as exploring witchcraft, this volume is a portrait of Denmark and how religion and politics in the 16th and 17th centuries were impossible to separate. It was in this period from 1536 to 1617 that witchcraft went from an offence condemned in the Bible and prohibited in the medieval Law of Jutland, to being described in detail as the worst of crimes. Witchcraft evolved from being defined as imposing harm to someone or something, to being a mockery of God. Approaching the theme from the new history of experience, this book refers to process as the construction of witchcraft as a crime. Contributions draw on a wide range of textual and visual sources, and bring together court records, sermons, legal regulations and correspondence with pamphlets, devotional literature and demonological treaties. The book is the first of its kind that aims to explain how this development occurred. This volume is useful for undergraduates, postgraduates and scholars, as well as non-specialist readers interested in the history of witchcraft, magic and alchemy, women's and gender history and European history.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="44145096" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/3496863c-34b6-46ed-9ca2-fd922d0347fb/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=3496863c-34b6-46ed-9ca2-fd922d0347fb&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Louise Nyholm Kallestrup, &quot;The Construction of Witchcraft in Early Modern Denmark, 1536-1617&quot; (Routledge, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:45:58</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Louise Nyholm Kallestrup joins Jana Byars to talk about her new book, The Construction of Witchcraft in Early Modern Denmark, 1536-1617 (Routledge, 2025) This book examines how the experience of witchcraft developed and evolved from the Lutheran Evangelical Reformation of Denmark 1536 to the celebration of the Lutheran centennial of 1617. As well as exploring witchcraft, this volume is a portrait of Denmark and how religion and politics in the 16th and 17th centuries were impossible to separate. It was in this period from 1536 to 1617 that witchcraft went from an offence condemned in the Bible and prohibited in the medieval Law of Jutland, to being described in detail as the worst of crimes. Witchcraft evolved from being defined as imposing harm to someone or something, to being a mockery of God. Approaching the theme from the new history of experience, this book refers to process as the construction of witchcraft as a crime. Contributions draw on a wide range of textual and visual sources, and bring together court records, sermons, legal regulations and correspondence with pamphlets, devotional literature and demonological treaties. The book is the first of its kind that aims to explain how this development occurred. This volume is useful for undergraduates, postgraduates and scholars, as well as non-specialist readers interested in the history of witchcraft, magic and alchemy, women&apos;s and gender history and European history.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Louise Nyholm Kallestrup joins Jana Byars to talk about her new book, The Construction of Witchcraft in Early Modern Denmark, 1536-1617 (Routledge, 2025) This book examines how the experience of witchcraft developed and evolved from the Lutheran Evangelical Reformation of Denmark 1536 to the celebration of the Lutheran centennial of 1617. As well as exploring witchcraft, this volume is a portrait of Denmark and how religion and politics in the 16th and 17th centuries were impossible to separate. It was in this period from 1536 to 1617 that witchcraft went from an offence condemned in the Bible and prohibited in the medieval Law of Jutland, to being described in detail as the worst of crimes. Witchcraft evolved from being defined as imposing harm to someone or something, to being a mockery of God. Approaching the theme from the new history of experience, this book refers to process as the construction of witchcraft as a crime. Contributions draw on a wide range of textual and visual sources, and bring together court records, sermons, legal regulations and correspondence with pamphlets, devotional literature and demonological treaties. The book is the first of its kind that aims to explain how this development occurred. This volume is useful for undergraduates, postgraduates and scholars, as well as non-specialist readers interested in the history of witchcraft, magic and alchemy, women&apos;s and gender history and European history.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1621</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">0f6ab44a-b4ef-11f0-93ca-2fbf37b68541</guid>
      <title>Tamar Mitts, &quot;Safe Havens for Hate: The Challenge of Moderating Online Extremism&quot; (Princeton UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Content moderation on social media has become one of the most daunting challenges of our time. Nowhere is the need for action more urgent than in the fight against terrorism and extremism. Yet despite mass content takedowns, account suspensions, and mounting pressure on technology companies to do more, hate thrives online.&nbsp;<em>Safe Havens for Hate: The Challenge of Moderating Online Extremism</em>&nbsp;(Princeton University Press, 2025) looks at how content moderation shapes the tactics of harmful content producers on a wide range of social media platforms.<br>Drawing on a wealth of original data on more than a hundred militant and hate organizations around the world, Dr. Tamar Mitts shows how differing moderation standards across platforms create safe havens that allow these actors to organize, launch campaigns, and mobilize supporters. She reveals how the structure of the information environment shapes the cross-platform activity of extremist organizations and movements such as the Islamic State, the Proud Boys, the Oath Keepers, and QAnon, and highlights the need to consider the online ecosystem, not just individual platforms, when developing strategies to combat extremism.<br>Taking readers to the frontlines of the digital battleground where dangerous organizations operate,&nbsp;<em>Safe Havens for Hate</em>&nbsp;sheds critical light on how governments and technology companies grapple with the tension between censorship and free speech when faced with violence, hate, and extremism.</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/tamar-mitts-safe-havens-for-hate-the-challenge-of-moderating-online-extremism-princeton-up-2025-pgCG2P5s</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Content moderation on social media has become one of the most daunting challenges of our time. Nowhere is the need for action more urgent than in the fight against terrorism and extremism. Yet despite mass content takedowns, account suspensions, and mounting pressure on technology companies to do more, hate thrives online.&nbsp;<em>Safe Havens for Hate: The Challenge of Moderating Online Extremism</em>&nbsp;(Princeton University Press, 2025) looks at how content moderation shapes the tactics of harmful content producers on a wide range of social media platforms.<br>Drawing on a wealth of original data on more than a hundred militant and hate organizations around the world, Dr. Tamar Mitts shows how differing moderation standards across platforms create safe havens that allow these actors to organize, launch campaigns, and mobilize supporters. She reveals how the structure of the information environment shapes the cross-platform activity of extremist organizations and movements such as the Islamic State, the Proud Boys, the Oath Keepers, and QAnon, and highlights the need to consider the online ecosystem, not just individual platforms, when developing strategies to combat extremism.<br>Taking readers to the frontlines of the digital battleground where dangerous organizations operate,&nbsp;<em>Safe Havens for Hate</em>&nbsp;sheds critical light on how governments and technology companies grapple with the tension between censorship and free speech when faced with violence, hate, and extremism.</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="43426672" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/5ea6b642-6108-4e86-9941-b2ef5e7bb748/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=5ea6b642-6108-4e86-9941-b2ef5e7bb748&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Tamar Mitts, &quot;Safe Havens for Hate: The Challenge of Moderating Online Extremism&quot; (Princeton UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:45:13</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Content moderation on social media has become one of the most daunting challenges of our time. Nowhere is the need for action more urgent than in the fight against terrorism and extremism. Yet despite mass content takedowns, account suspensions, and mounting pressure on technology companies to do more, hate thrives online. Safe Havens for Hate: The Challenge of Moderating Online Extremism (Princeton University Press, 2025) looks at how content moderation shapes the tactics of harmful content producers on a wide range of social media platforms.Drawing on a wealth of original data on more than a hundred militant and hate organizations around the world, Dr. Tamar Mitts shows how differing moderation standards across platforms create safe havens that allow these actors to organize, launch campaigns, and mobilize supporters. She reveals how the structure of the information environment shapes the cross-platform activity of extremist organizations and movements such as the Islamic State, the Proud Boys, the Oath Keepers, and QAnon, and highlights the need to consider the online ecosystem, not just individual platforms, when developing strategies to combat extremism.Taking readers to the frontlines of the digital battleground where dangerous organizations operate, Safe Havens for Hate sheds critical light on how governments and technology companies grapple with the tension between censorship and free speech when faced with violence, hate, and extremism.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Content moderation on social media has become one of the most daunting challenges of our time. Nowhere is the need for action more urgent than in the fight against terrorism and extremism. Yet despite mass content takedowns, account suspensions, and mounting pressure on technology companies to do more, hate thrives online. Safe Havens for Hate: The Challenge of Moderating Online Extremism (Princeton University Press, 2025) looks at how content moderation shapes the tactics of harmful content producers on a wide range of social media platforms.Drawing on a wealth of original data on more than a hundred militant and hate organizations around the world, Dr. Tamar Mitts shows how differing moderation standards across platforms create safe havens that allow these actors to organize, launch campaigns, and mobilize supporters. She reveals how the structure of the information environment shapes the cross-platform activity of extremist organizations and movements such as the Islamic State, the Proud Boys, the Oath Keepers, and QAnon, and highlights the need to consider the online ecosystem, not just individual platforms, when developing strategies to combat extremism.Taking readers to the frontlines of the digital battleground where dangerous organizations operate, Safe Havens for Hate sheds critical light on how governments and technology companies grapple with the tension between censorship and free speech when faced with violence, hate, and extremism.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>403</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">26ed1558-b27a-11f0-b9d6-970f88d0a489</guid>
      <title>Amanda Laury Kleintop, &quot;Counting the Cost of Freedom: The Fight Over Compensated Emancipation After the Civil War&quot; (UNC Press, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>During the Civil War, the U.S. federal government abolished slavery without reimbursing enslavers, diminishing the white South’s wealth by nearly 50 percent. After the Confederacy’s defeat, white Southerners demanded federal compensation for the financial value of formerly enslaved people and fought for other policies that would recognize abolition’s costs during Reconstruction. As Amanda Laury Kleintop shows in&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781469688657" rel="noopener noreferrer">Counting the Cost of Freedom:&nbsp;The Fight Over Compensated Emancipation After the Civil War</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(University of North Carolina Press, 2025), their persistence eventually led to the creation of Section 4 of the Fourteenth Amendment, which abolished the right to profit from property in people. Surprisingly, former Confederates responded by using Lost Cause history-making to obscure the fact that they had demanded financial redress in the first place. The largely successful efforts of white Southerners to erase this history continues to generate false understandings today.&nbsp;Kleintop draws from an impressive array of archival sources to uncover this lost history. In doing so, she demonstrates how this legal battle also undermined efforts by formerly enslaved people to receive reparations for themselves and their descendants—a debate that persists in today’s national dialogue.</p>
<p>Amanda Laury Kleintop is assistant professor of history at Elon University.</p>
<p><em>Ryan Tripp is an adjunct for universities and California community colleges.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/amanda-laury-kleintop-counting-the-cost-of-freedom-the-fight-over-compensated-emancipation-after-the-civil-war-unc-press-2025-v2Izja0O</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>During the Civil War, the U.S. federal government abolished slavery without reimbursing enslavers, diminishing the white South’s wealth by nearly 50 percent. After the Confederacy’s defeat, white Southerners demanded federal compensation for the financial value of formerly enslaved people and fought for other policies that would recognize abolition’s costs during Reconstruction. As Amanda Laury Kleintop shows in&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781469688657" rel="noopener noreferrer">Counting the Cost of Freedom:&nbsp;The Fight Over Compensated Emancipation After the Civil War</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(University of North Carolina Press, 2025), their persistence eventually led to the creation of Section 4 of the Fourteenth Amendment, which abolished the right to profit from property in people. Surprisingly, former Confederates responded by using Lost Cause history-making to obscure the fact that they had demanded financial redress in the first place. The largely successful efforts of white Southerners to erase this history continues to generate false understandings today.&nbsp;Kleintop draws from an impressive array of archival sources to uncover this lost history. In doing so, she demonstrates how this legal battle also undermined efforts by formerly enslaved people to receive reparations for themselves and their descendants—a debate that persists in today’s national dialogue.</p>
<p>Amanda Laury Kleintop is assistant professor of history at Elon University.</p>
<p><em>Ryan Tripp is an adjunct for universities and California community colleges.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="54011353" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/b1a6a7a5-61ba-44da-8a55-d466b090a0c7/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=b1a6a7a5-61ba-44da-8a55-d466b090a0c7&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Amanda Laury Kleintop, &quot;Counting the Cost of Freedom: The Fight Over Compensated Emancipation After the Civil War&quot; (UNC Press, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:56:15</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>During the Civil War, the U.S. federal government abolished slavery without reimbursing enslavers, diminishing the white South’s wealth by nearly 50 percent. After the Confederacy’s defeat, white Southerners demanded federal compensation for the financial value of formerly enslaved people and fought for other policies that would recognize abolition’s costs during Reconstruction. As Amanda Laury Kleintop shows in Counting the Cost of Freedom: The Fight Over Compensated Emancipation After the Civil War (University of North Carolina Press, 2025), their persistence eventually led to the creation of Section 4 of the Fourteenth Amendment, which abolished the right to profit from property in people. Surprisingly, former Confederates responded by using Lost Cause history-making to obscure the fact that they had demanded financial redress in the first place. The largely successful efforts of white Southerners to erase this history continues to generate false understandings today. Kleintop draws from an impressive array of archival sources to uncover this lost history. In doing so, she demonstrates how this legal battle also undermined efforts by formerly enslaved people to receive reparations for themselves and their descendants—a debate that persists in today’s national dialogue.
Amanda Laury Kleintop is assistant professor of history at Elon University.
Ryan Tripp is an adjunct for universities and California community colleges.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>During the Civil War, the U.S. federal government abolished slavery without reimbursing enslavers, diminishing the white South’s wealth by nearly 50 percent. After the Confederacy’s defeat, white Southerners demanded federal compensation for the financial value of formerly enslaved people and fought for other policies that would recognize abolition’s costs during Reconstruction. As Amanda Laury Kleintop shows in Counting the Cost of Freedom: The Fight Over Compensated Emancipation After the Civil War (University of North Carolina Press, 2025), their persistence eventually led to the creation of Section 4 of the Fourteenth Amendment, which abolished the right to profit from property in people. Surprisingly, former Confederates responded by using Lost Cause history-making to obscure the fact that they had demanded financial redress in the first place. The largely successful efforts of white Southerners to erase this history continues to generate false understandings today. Kleintop draws from an impressive array of archival sources to uncover this lost history. In doing so, she demonstrates how this legal battle also undermined efforts by formerly enslaved people to receive reparations for themselves and their descendants—a debate that persists in today’s national dialogue.
Amanda Laury Kleintop is assistant professor of history at Elon University.
Ryan Tripp is an adjunct for universities and California community colleges.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1620</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">bde27eb0-aec1-11f0-aec4-132ef58f665f</guid>
      <title>Nathan E. Sanders and Bruce Schneier, &quot;Rewiring Democracy: How AI Will Transform Our Politics, Government, and Citizenship&quot; (MIT Press, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>AI is changing democracy. We still get to decide how.<br>AI’s impact on democracy will go far beyond headline-grabbing political deepfakes and automated misinformation. Everywhere it will be used, it will create risks and opportunities to shake up long-standing power structures.<br>In this highly readable and advisedly optimistic book,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780262049948" rel="noopener noreferrer">Rewiring Democracy:&nbsp;How AI Will Transform Our Politics, Government, and Citizenship</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(MIT Press, 2025), security technologist Bruce Schneier and data scientist Nathan Sanders cut through the AI hype and examine the myriad ways that AI is transforming every aspect of democracy—for both good and ill.<br>The authors describe how the sophistication of AI will fulfill demands from lawmakers for more complex legislation, reducing deference to the executive branch and altering the balance of power between lawmakers and administrators. They show how the scale and scope of AI is enhancing civil servants’ ability to shape private-sector behavior, automating either the enforcement or neglect of industry regulations. They also explain how both lawyers and judges will leverage the speed of AI, upending how we think about law enforcement, litigation, and dispute resolution.<br>Whether these outcomes enhance or degrade democracy depends on how we shape the development and use of AI technologies. Powerful players in private industry and public life are already using AI to increase their influence, and AIs built by corporations don’t deliver the fairness and trust required by democratic governance. But, steered in the right direction, AI’s broad capabilities can augment democratic processes and help citizens build consensus, express their voice, and shake up long-standing power structures.<br>Democracy is facing new challenges worldwide, and AI has become a part of that. It can inform, empower, and engage citizens. It can also disinform, disempower, and disengage them. The choice is up to us. Schneier and Sanders blaze the path forward, showing us how we can use AI to make democracy stronger and more participatory.</p>
<p>Nathan E. Sanders is a data scientist focused on making policymaking more participatory. His research spans machine learning, astrophysics, public health, environmental justice, and more. He has served in fellowships at the Massachusetts legislature and the Berkman-Klein Center at Harvard University.</p>
<p><em>Caleb Zakarin is editor of the New Books Network.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/nathan-e-sanders-and-bruce-schneier-rewiring-democracy-how-ai-will-transform-our-politics-government-and-citizenship-mit-press-2025-ioHLtjym</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AI is changing democracy. We still get to decide how.<br>AI’s impact on democracy will go far beyond headline-grabbing political deepfakes and automated misinformation. Everywhere it will be used, it will create risks and opportunities to shake up long-standing power structures.<br>In this highly readable and advisedly optimistic book,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780262049948" rel="noopener noreferrer">Rewiring Democracy:&nbsp;How AI Will Transform Our Politics, Government, and Citizenship</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(MIT Press, 2025), security technologist Bruce Schneier and data scientist Nathan Sanders cut through the AI hype and examine the myriad ways that AI is transforming every aspect of democracy—for both good and ill.<br>The authors describe how the sophistication of AI will fulfill demands from lawmakers for more complex legislation, reducing deference to the executive branch and altering the balance of power between lawmakers and administrators. They show how the scale and scope of AI is enhancing civil servants’ ability to shape private-sector behavior, automating either the enforcement or neglect of industry regulations. They also explain how both lawyers and judges will leverage the speed of AI, upending how we think about law enforcement, litigation, and dispute resolution.<br>Whether these outcomes enhance or degrade democracy depends on how we shape the development and use of AI technologies. Powerful players in private industry and public life are already using AI to increase their influence, and AIs built by corporations don’t deliver the fairness and trust required by democratic governance. But, steered in the right direction, AI’s broad capabilities can augment democratic processes and help citizens build consensus, express their voice, and shake up long-standing power structures.<br>Democracy is facing new challenges worldwide, and AI has become a part of that. It can inform, empower, and engage citizens. It can also disinform, disempower, and disengage them. The choice is up to us. Schneier and Sanders blaze the path forward, showing us how we can use AI to make democracy stronger and more participatory.</p>
<p>Nathan E. Sanders is a data scientist focused on making policymaking more participatory. His research spans machine learning, astrophysics, public health, environmental justice, and more. He has served in fellowships at the Massachusetts legislature and the Berkman-Klein Center at Harvard University.</p>
<p><em>Caleb Zakarin is editor of the New Books Network.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="42714503" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/ab60b933-f588-43d6-ac75-9a36520a98da/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=ab60b933-f588-43d6-ac75-9a36520a98da&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Nathan E. Sanders and Bruce Schneier, &quot;Rewiring Democracy: How AI Will Transform Our Politics, Government, and Citizenship&quot; (MIT Press, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:44:29</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>AI is changing democracy. We still get to decide how.AI’s impact on democracy will go far beyond headline-grabbing political deepfakes and automated misinformation. Everywhere it will be used, it will create risks and opportunities to shake up long-standing power structures.In this highly readable and advisedly optimistic book, Rewiring Democracy: How AI Will Transform Our Politics, Government, and Citizenship (MIT Press, 2025), security technologist Bruce Schneier and data scientist Nathan Sanders cut through the AI hype and examine the myriad ways that AI is transforming every aspect of democracy—for both good and ill.The authors describe how the sophistication of AI will fulfill demands from lawmakers for more complex legislation, reducing deference to the executive branch and altering the balance of power between lawmakers and administrators. They show how the scale and scope of AI is enhancing civil servants’ ability to shape private-sector behavior, automating either the enforcement or neglect of industry regulations. They also explain how both lawyers and judges will leverage the speed of AI, upending how we think about law enforcement, litigation, and dispute resolution.Whether these outcomes enhance or degrade democracy depends on how we shape the development and use of AI technologies. Powerful players in private industry and public life are already using AI to increase their influence, and AIs built by corporations don’t deliver the fairness and trust required by democratic governance. But, steered in the right direction, AI’s broad capabilities can augment democratic processes and help citizens build consensus, express their voice, and shake up long-standing power structures.Democracy is facing new challenges worldwide, and AI has become a part of that. It can inform, empower, and engage citizens. It can also disinform, disempower, and disengage them. The choice is up to us. Schneier and Sanders blaze the path forward, showing us how we can use AI to make democracy stronger and more participatory.
Nathan E. Sanders is a data scientist focused on making policymaking more participatory. His research spans machine learning, astrophysics, public health, environmental justice, and more. He has served in fellowships at the Massachusetts legislature and the Berkman-Klein Center at Harvard University.
Caleb Zakarin is editor of the New Books Network.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>AI is changing democracy. We still get to decide how.AI’s impact on democracy will go far beyond headline-grabbing political deepfakes and automated misinformation. Everywhere it will be used, it will create risks and opportunities to shake up long-standing power structures.In this highly readable and advisedly optimistic book, Rewiring Democracy: How AI Will Transform Our Politics, Government, and Citizenship (MIT Press, 2025), security technologist Bruce Schneier and data scientist Nathan Sanders cut through the AI hype and examine the myriad ways that AI is transforming every aspect of democracy—for both good and ill.The authors describe how the sophistication of AI will fulfill demands from lawmakers for more complex legislation, reducing deference to the executive branch and altering the balance of power between lawmakers and administrators. They show how the scale and scope of AI is enhancing civil servants’ ability to shape private-sector behavior, automating either the enforcement or neglect of industry regulations. They also explain how both lawyers and judges will leverage the speed of AI, upending how we think about law enforcement, litigation, and dispute resolution.Whether these outcomes enhance or degrade democracy depends on how we shape the development and use of AI technologies. Powerful players in private industry and public life are already using AI to increase their influence, and AIs built by corporations don’t deliver the fairness and trust required by democratic governance. But, steered in the right direction, AI’s broad capabilities can augment democratic processes and help citizens build consensus, express their voice, and shake up long-standing power structures.Democracy is facing new challenges worldwide, and AI has become a part of that. It can inform, empower, and engage citizens. It can also disinform, disempower, and disengage them. The choice is up to us. Schneier and Sanders blaze the path forward, showing us how we can use AI to make democracy stronger and more participatory.
Nathan E. Sanders is a data scientist focused on making policymaking more participatory. His research spans machine learning, astrophysics, public health, environmental justice, and more. He has served in fellowships at the Massachusetts legislature and the Berkman-Klein Center at Harvard University.
Caleb Zakarin is editor of the New Books Network.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1618</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">32b0a9d8-af03-11f0-be2f-9f228b758b07</guid>
      <title>Robert C. Bird, &quot;Legal Knowledge in Organizations: A Source of Strategic and Competitive Advantage&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009596695" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Legal Knowledge in Organizations: A Source of Strategic and Competitive Advantage</em>&nbsp;</a>(Cambridge UP, 2025)&nbsp;offers a step-by-step guide on how to utilize the law as a source of value in organizations. Robert C. Bird demonstrates how legal knowledge can be a valuable asset for firms, providing them with a sustainable competitive advantage that is difficult for rivals to imitate. Bird presents a five-part framework that outlines how firms can use legal knowledge in competitive markets and how they can avoid misusing it. Chapters also highlight how firms can cultivate legal knowledge and apply novel risk tools to overcome unexpected legal threats. The book emphasizes the importance of ethical values in business decisions and shows how managers and lawyers can build an ethical practice of legal knowledge that benefits both business and society. With the help of numerous visuals, this book makes it easy for readers to leverage legal knowledge and apply it to specific business contexts.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/robert-c-bird-legal-knowledge-in-organizations-a-source-of-strategic-and-competitive-advantage-cambridge-up-2025-pCTnuQ5R</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009596695" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Legal Knowledge in Organizations: A Source of Strategic and Competitive Advantage</em>&nbsp;</a>(Cambridge UP, 2025)&nbsp;offers a step-by-step guide on how to utilize the law as a source of value in organizations. Robert C. Bird demonstrates how legal knowledge can be a valuable asset for firms, providing them with a sustainable competitive advantage that is difficult for rivals to imitate. Bird presents a five-part framework that outlines how firms can use legal knowledge in competitive markets and how they can avoid misusing it. Chapters also highlight how firms can cultivate legal knowledge and apply novel risk tools to overcome unexpected legal threats. The book emphasizes the importance of ethical values in business decisions and shows how managers and lawyers can build an ethical practice of legal knowledge that benefits both business and society. With the help of numerous visuals, this book makes it easy for readers to leverage legal knowledge and apply it to specific business contexts.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="53464183" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/3ec0aedb-d99a-4b84-8e7a-7e00bc40f773/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=3ec0aedb-d99a-4b84-8e7a-7e00bc40f773&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Robert C. Bird, &quot;Legal Knowledge in Organizations: A Source of Strategic and Competitive Advantage&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:55:41</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Legal Knowledge in Organizations: A Source of Strategic and Competitive Advantage (Cambridge UP, 2025) offers a step-by-step guide on how to utilize the law as a source of value in organizations. Robert C. Bird demonstrates how legal knowledge can be a valuable asset for firms, providing them with a sustainable competitive advantage that is difficult for rivals to imitate. Bird presents a five-part framework that outlines how firms can use legal knowledge in competitive markets and how they can avoid misusing it. Chapters also highlight how firms can cultivate legal knowledge and apply novel risk tools to overcome unexpected legal threats. The book emphasizes the importance of ethical values in business decisions and shows how managers and lawyers can build an ethical practice of legal knowledge that benefits both business and society. With the help of numerous visuals, this book makes it easy for readers to leverage legal knowledge and apply it to specific business contexts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Legal Knowledge in Organizations: A Source of Strategic and Competitive Advantage (Cambridge UP, 2025) offers a step-by-step guide on how to utilize the law as a source of value in organizations. Robert C. Bird demonstrates how legal knowledge can be a valuable asset for firms, providing them with a sustainable competitive advantage that is difficult for rivals to imitate. Bird presents a five-part framework that outlines how firms can use legal knowledge in competitive markets and how they can avoid misusing it. Chapters also highlight how firms can cultivate legal knowledge and apply novel risk tools to overcome unexpected legal threats. The book emphasizes the importance of ethical values in business decisions and shows how managers and lawyers can build an ethical practice of legal knowledge that benefits both business and society. With the help of numerous visuals, this book makes it easy for readers to leverage legal knowledge and apply it to specific business contexts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1619</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">46e25e92-ab98-11f0-9914-53932d46d856</guid>
      <title>Elisabeth R. Anker, &quot;Ugly Freedoms&quot; (Duke UP, 2022)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Freedom is often considered the cornerstone of the American political project. The 1776 revolutionaries declared it an inalienable right that could neither be taken nor granted, a sacred concept upon which the nation was established. The concept and actualization of freedom are also to be defended by the state. However, when such a concept has been arrogated, litigated, and delegitimized by a state that ignores its very definition, the concept of freedom comes under critical examination. Political theorist Elisabeth R. Anker, Associate Professor of American Studies and Political Science at George Washington University, has a new book dissecting the core of this conception of freedom.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781478017783" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Ugly Freedoms</em></a>&nbsp;(Duke UP, 2022)&nbsp;explores who defined and continues to define freedom, she also examines freedom’s rhetorical capacity, and thus its potential for weaponization. Anker illuminates how the tainted gestation of freedom birthed a status quo based on the individualistic and conditional conception of ‘freedom’ that has long been tangoing with white supremacy, colonialism, climate destruction, capitalism, and exploitation. Such a dance is by design and has been constant throughout U.S. history.</p><p>Anker establishes that for democratic government to take hold in the United States, racial domination and violence transpired, limiting the freedoms of some individuals in order to establish a governmental system that is based, in theory, on protecting liberty and freedom. This is the kind of tension that Anker explains as “ugly freedom.” Thus, American freedom,&nbsp;<em>our freedom</em>, has embedded in it the role of colonialism, imperialism, enslavement, and land theft. The shocking stains of slavery produced freedom of prosperity and leisure for white people through direct dehumanization of Black and Brown people—this is what Anker is talking about within the concept of&nbsp;<em>ugly freedom</em>. This has also been manifested through more contemporary rhetoric regarding imperial wars like those in the Philippines, Vietnam, Afghanistan, and Iraq, destroying infrastructure and lives in those countries for the capital prosperity of the imperial core. These&nbsp;<em>ugly freedoms</em>&nbsp;legitimize the economic exploitation of the masses in the name of individual success for the few. Thus, ugly freedom examines the acts of freedom that rely on violence and brutality—this challenges how we often imagine freedom to be.&nbsp;<em>Ugly Freedom</em>&nbsp;explores the connection between politics and aesthetics as well, taking up an array of historical events, political theories and concepts, different forms of art, televisual productions, poetry, music, and biology to illustrate the compounding violence of the few in the name of freedom. The cultural artifacts interrogated were controversial in their own right, and Anker explores them to help understand which kinds of freedom are worth fighting for and which kinds of freedom must be fought against. Through a critical lens, Anker shifts the perception of freedom to help restore justice to its foundational value—one that is less dependent on the individual or individual heroics, and more enveloping of the community and shared collaboration.</p><p><em>Emma R. Handschke assisted in the production of this podcast.</em></p><p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-editor of the award winning book,</em><a href="https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/081314101X/ref=dbs_a_def_rwt_bibl_vppi_i0" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;<em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a><em>&nbsp;(University Press of Kentucky, 2012), as well as co-editor of</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/us/mad-men-and-politics-9781501306358/" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;<em>Mad Men and Politics: Nostalgia and the Remaking of Modern America</em></a><em>&nbsp;(Bloomsbury Academic, 2015). Email her comments at lgoren@carrollu.edu or tweet to</em><a href="https://twitter.com/gorenlj" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;<em>@gorenlj</em></a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/elisabeth-r-anker-ugly-freedoms-duke-up-2022-oXupsMLd</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Freedom is often considered the cornerstone of the American political project. The 1776 revolutionaries declared it an inalienable right that could neither be taken nor granted, a sacred concept upon which the nation was established. The concept and actualization of freedom are also to be defended by the state. However, when such a concept has been arrogated, litigated, and delegitimized by a state that ignores its very definition, the concept of freedom comes under critical examination. Political theorist Elisabeth R. Anker, Associate Professor of American Studies and Political Science at George Washington University, has a new book dissecting the core of this conception of freedom.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781478017783" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Ugly Freedoms</em></a>&nbsp;(Duke UP, 2022)&nbsp;explores who defined and continues to define freedom, she also examines freedom’s rhetorical capacity, and thus its potential for weaponization. Anker illuminates how the tainted gestation of freedom birthed a status quo based on the individualistic and conditional conception of ‘freedom’ that has long been tangoing with white supremacy, colonialism, climate destruction, capitalism, and exploitation. Such a dance is by design and has been constant throughout U.S. history.</p><p>Anker establishes that for democratic government to take hold in the United States, racial domination and violence transpired, limiting the freedoms of some individuals in order to establish a governmental system that is based, in theory, on protecting liberty and freedom. This is the kind of tension that Anker explains as “ugly freedom.” Thus, American freedom,&nbsp;<em>our freedom</em>, has embedded in it the role of colonialism, imperialism, enslavement, and land theft. The shocking stains of slavery produced freedom of prosperity and leisure for white people through direct dehumanization of Black and Brown people—this is what Anker is talking about within the concept of&nbsp;<em>ugly freedom</em>. This has also been manifested through more contemporary rhetoric regarding imperial wars like those in the Philippines, Vietnam, Afghanistan, and Iraq, destroying infrastructure and lives in those countries for the capital prosperity of the imperial core. These&nbsp;<em>ugly freedoms</em>&nbsp;legitimize the economic exploitation of the masses in the name of individual success for the few. Thus, ugly freedom examines the acts of freedom that rely on violence and brutality—this challenges how we often imagine freedom to be.&nbsp;<em>Ugly Freedom</em>&nbsp;explores the connection between politics and aesthetics as well, taking up an array of historical events, political theories and concepts, different forms of art, televisual productions, poetry, music, and biology to illustrate the compounding violence of the few in the name of freedom. The cultural artifacts interrogated were controversial in their own right, and Anker explores them to help understand which kinds of freedom are worth fighting for and which kinds of freedom must be fought against. Through a critical lens, Anker shifts the perception of freedom to help restore justice to its foundational value—one that is less dependent on the individual or individual heroics, and more enveloping of the community and shared collaboration.</p><p><em>Emma R. Handschke assisted in the production of this podcast.</em></p><p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-editor of the award winning book,</em><a href="https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/081314101X/ref=dbs_a_def_rwt_bibl_vppi_i0" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;<em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a><em>&nbsp;(University Press of Kentucky, 2012), as well as co-editor of</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/us/mad-men-and-politics-9781501306358/" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;<em>Mad Men and Politics: Nostalgia and the Remaking of Modern America</em></a><em>&nbsp;(Bloomsbury Academic, 2015). Email her comments at lgoren@carrollu.edu or tweet to</em><a href="https://twitter.com/gorenlj" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;<em>@gorenlj</em></a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="55119857" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/9f0e93fa-2845-4064-b3de-0fd869a5cce6/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=9f0e93fa-2845-4064-b3de-0fd869a5cce6&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Elisabeth R. Anker, &quot;Ugly Freedoms&quot; (Duke UP, 2022)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:57:24</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Freedom is often considered the cornerstone of the American political project. The 1776 revolutionaries declared it an inalienable right that could neither be taken nor granted, a sacred concept upon which the nation was established. The concept and actualization of freedom are also to be defended by the state. However, when such a concept has been arrogated, litigated, and delegitimized by a state that ignores its very definition, the concept of freedom comes under critical examination. Political theorist Elisabeth R. Anker, Associate Professor of American Studies and Political Science at George Washington University, has a new book dissecting the core of this conception of freedom. Ugly Freedoms (Duke UP, 2022) explores who defined and continues to define freedom, she also examines freedom’s rhetorical capacity, and thus its potential for weaponization. Anker illuminates how the tainted gestation of freedom birthed a status quo based on the individualistic and conditional conception of ‘freedom’ that has long been tangoing with white supremacy, colonialism, climate destruction, capitalism, and exploitation. Such a dance is by design and has been constant throughout U.S. history.
Anker establishes that for democratic government to take hold in the United States, racial domination and violence transpired, limiting the freedoms of some individuals in order to establish a governmental system that is based, in theory, on protecting liberty and freedom. This is the kind of tension that Anker explains as “ugly freedom.” Thus, American freedom, our freedom, has embedded in it the role of colonialism, imperialism, enslavement, and land theft. The shocking stains of slavery produced freedom of prosperity and leisure for white people through direct dehumanization of Black and Brown people—this is what Anker is talking about within the concept of ugly freedom. This has also been manifested through more contemporary rhetoric regarding imperial wars like those in the Philippines, Vietnam, Afghanistan, and Iraq, destroying infrastructure and lives in those countries for the capital prosperity of the imperial core. These ugly freedoms legitimize the economic exploitation of the masses in the name of individual success for the few. Thus, ugly freedom examines the acts of freedom that rely on violence and brutality—this challenges how we often imagine freedom to be. Ugly Freedom explores the connection between politics and aesthetics as well, taking up an array of historical events, political theories and concepts, different forms of art, televisual productions, poetry, music, and biology to illustrate the compounding violence of the few in the name of freedom. The cultural artifacts interrogated were controversial in their own right, and Anker explores them to help understand which kinds of freedom are worth fighting for and which kinds of freedom must be fought against. Through a critical lens, Anker shifts the perception of freedom to help restore justice to its foundational value—one that is less dependent on the individual or individual heroics, and more enveloping of the community and shared collaboration.
Emma R. Handschke assisted in the production of this podcast.
Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kentucky, 2012), as well as co-editor of Mad Men and Politics: Nostalgia and the Remaking of Modern America (Bloomsbury Academic, 2015). Email her comments at lgoren@carrollu.edu or tweet to @gorenlj.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Freedom is often considered the cornerstone of the American political project. The 1776 revolutionaries declared it an inalienable right that could neither be taken nor granted, a sacred concept upon which the nation was established. The concept and actualization of freedom are also to be defended by the state. However, when such a concept has been arrogated, litigated, and delegitimized by a state that ignores its very definition, the concept of freedom comes under critical examination. Political theorist Elisabeth R. Anker, Associate Professor of American Studies and Political Science at George Washington University, has a new book dissecting the core of this conception of freedom. Ugly Freedoms (Duke UP, 2022) explores who defined and continues to define freedom, she also examines freedom’s rhetorical capacity, and thus its potential for weaponization. Anker illuminates how the tainted gestation of freedom birthed a status quo based on the individualistic and conditional conception of ‘freedom’ that has long been tangoing with white supremacy, colonialism, climate destruction, capitalism, and exploitation. Such a dance is by design and has been constant throughout U.S. history.
Anker establishes that for democratic government to take hold in the United States, racial domination and violence transpired, limiting the freedoms of some individuals in order to establish a governmental system that is based, in theory, on protecting liberty and freedom. This is the kind of tension that Anker explains as “ugly freedom.” Thus, American freedom, our freedom, has embedded in it the role of colonialism, imperialism, enslavement, and land theft. The shocking stains of slavery produced freedom of prosperity and leisure for white people through direct dehumanization of Black and Brown people—this is what Anker is talking about within the concept of ugly freedom. This has also been manifested through more contemporary rhetoric regarding imperial wars like those in the Philippines, Vietnam, Afghanistan, and Iraq, destroying infrastructure and lives in those countries for the capital prosperity of the imperial core. These ugly freedoms legitimize the economic exploitation of the masses in the name of individual success for the few. Thus, ugly freedom examines the acts of freedom that rely on violence and brutality—this challenges how we often imagine freedom to be. Ugly Freedom explores the connection between politics and aesthetics as well, taking up an array of historical events, political theories and concepts, different forms of art, televisual productions, poetry, music, and biology to illustrate the compounding violence of the few in the name of freedom. The cultural artifacts interrogated were controversial in their own right, and Anker explores them to help understand which kinds of freedom are worth fighting for and which kinds of freedom must be fought against. Through a critical lens, Anker shifts the perception of freedom to help restore justice to its foundational value—one that is less dependent on the individual or individual heroics, and more enveloping of the community and shared collaboration.
Emma R. Handschke assisted in the production of this podcast.
Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kentucky, 2012), as well as co-editor of Mad Men and Politics: Nostalgia and the Remaking of Modern America (Bloomsbury Academic, 2015). Email her comments at lgoren@carrollu.edu or tweet to @gorenlj.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>613</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">dbaec5f2-aa75-11f0-a71c-2ff8361bf89f</guid>
      <title>Kelley Helmstutler Di Dio, &quot;Shipping Sculptures from Early Modern Italy: The Mechanics, Costs, Risks, and Rewards&quot; (Brepols, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781915487452" rel="noopener noreferrer">Shipping Sculptures from Early Modern Italy: The Mechanics, Costs, Risks, and Rewards</a>&nbsp;(Brepols, 2025) by Dr. Kelley Helmstutler Di Dio focuses on enormous amounts of sculptures moved from Italy to Spain from ca. 1500-1750. An analysis of an important body of unpublished archival documentation regarding the practical issues involved in making and transporting sculpture, provide the basis for this study of the development of technologies, infrastructure, and labor organization necessary to make such challenging transports of moving sculptures by land and sea possible.</p>
<p>Artists, patrons, and agents had the eventual movement to a destination at the center of decision making when new sculptures were commissioned to send. Sending antiquities or second-hand works required even more planning and care. Divided into a series of case studies of major sculptures,&nbsp;<em>Shipping Sculptures</em>&nbsp;offers a new approach to the study of cross-cultural artistic exchange, state gifts, collecting and patronage, by examining the practical details of object movement over challenging geographies.﻿<br></p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/kelley-helmstutler-di-dio-shipping-sculptures-from-early-modern-italy-the-mechanics-costs-risks-and-rewards-brepols-2025-Q_e72nYL</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781915487452" rel="noopener noreferrer">Shipping Sculptures from Early Modern Italy: The Mechanics, Costs, Risks, and Rewards</a>&nbsp;(Brepols, 2025) by Dr. Kelley Helmstutler Di Dio focuses on enormous amounts of sculptures moved from Italy to Spain from ca. 1500-1750. An analysis of an important body of unpublished archival documentation regarding the practical issues involved in making and transporting sculpture, provide the basis for this study of the development of technologies, infrastructure, and labor organization necessary to make such challenging transports of moving sculptures by land and sea possible.</p>
<p>Artists, patrons, and agents had the eventual movement to a destination at the center of decision making when new sculptures were commissioned to send. Sending antiquities or second-hand works required even more planning and care. Divided into a series of case studies of major sculptures,&nbsp;<em>Shipping Sculptures</em>&nbsp;offers a new approach to the study of cross-cultural artistic exchange, state gifts, collecting and patronage, by examining the practical details of object movement over challenging geographies.﻿<br></p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="49115618" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/5375c877-de3f-42e7-9ebc-f62b16d7005a/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=5375c877-de3f-42e7-9ebc-f62b16d7005a&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Kelley Helmstutler Di Dio, &quot;Shipping Sculptures from Early Modern Italy: The Mechanics, Costs, Risks, and Rewards&quot; (Brepols, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:51:09</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Shipping Sculptures from Early Modern Italy: The Mechanics, Costs, Risks, and Rewards (Brepols, 2025) by Dr. Kelley Helmstutler Di Dio focuses on enormous amounts of sculptures moved from Italy to Spain from ca. 1500-1750. An analysis of an important body of unpublished archival documentation regarding the practical issues involved in making and transporting sculpture, provide the basis for this study of the development of technologies, infrastructure, and labor organization necessary to make such challenging transports of moving sculptures by land and sea possible.
Artists, patrons, and agents had the eventual movement to a destination at the center of decision making when new sculptures were commissioned to send. Sending antiquities or second-hand works required even more planning and care. Divided into a series of case studies of major sculptures, Shipping Sculptures offers a new approach to the study of cross-cultural artistic exchange, state gifts, collecting and patronage, by examining the practical details of object movement over challenging geographies.﻿
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Shipping Sculptures from Early Modern Italy: The Mechanics, Costs, Risks, and Rewards (Brepols, 2025) by Dr. Kelley Helmstutler Di Dio focuses on enormous amounts of sculptures moved from Italy to Spain from ca. 1500-1750. An analysis of an important body of unpublished archival documentation regarding the practical issues involved in making and transporting sculpture, provide the basis for this study of the development of technologies, infrastructure, and labor organization necessary to make such challenging transports of moving sculptures by land and sea possible.
Artists, patrons, and agents had the eventual movement to a destination at the center of decision making when new sculptures were commissioned to send. Sending antiquities or second-hand works required even more planning and care. Divided into a series of case studies of major sculptures, Shipping Sculptures offers a new approach to the study of cross-cultural artistic exchange, state gifts, collecting and patronage, by examining the practical details of object movement over challenging geographies.﻿
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1617</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">f2dac7ee-a98f-11f0-98aa-bfba420885a0</guid>
      <title>Rehan Abeyratne, &quot;Courts and LGBTQ+ Rights in an Age of Judicial Retrenchment&quot; (Oxford UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Democratic backsliding, culture wars and partisan politics in the past two decades has seen the&nbsp;regression of human rights protections in the courts and across societies. However, having made incremental gains in constitutional courts,&nbsp;LGBTQ+ rights operate as somewhat of&nbsp;a paradox. In this pivotal work, Professor Rehan Abeyratne makes an argument that the progress made in LGBTQ+ rights protection obscures an increased shift towards authoritarian legality in the courts and beyond. Case studies of three&nbsp;apex courts - the U.S. Supreme Court, the Supreme Court of India, and the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal - provide insight into the erosion of democracy and the rule of law across&nbsp;these jurisdictions.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780198888277" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Courts and&nbsp; LGBTQ+ Rights in an Age of Judicial Retrenchment</em></a>&nbsp;(Oxford&nbsp;﻿UP,&nbsp;2025) is an important work and&nbsp;should serve as a warning sign to constitutional lawyers, human rights scholars and anybody interested in the values that underpin liberal democracy as to the the limited ability of constitutional courts&nbsp;to protect&nbsp;rights in the current climate.&nbsp;&nbsp;</p>
<p><a href="https://researchers.westernsydney.edu.au/en/persons/rehan-abeyratne" rel="noopener noreferrer">Professor Rehan Abeyratne</a>&nbsp;is&nbsp;is Professor and Associate Dean (Higher Degree Research) at Western Sydney University School of Law, where he teaches Government and Public Law, Legal Research and Methodology, and Comparative Law: Legal Systems of the World. He also coordinates the School of Law's Honours Program. Professor Abeyratne holds a PhD from Monash University, a JD from Harvard Law School, and a BA (Hons.) in Political Science from Brown University. He researches comparative constitutional law and has published several books and articles in world leading journals.&nbsp;Most of Prof. Abeyratne's research can be freely accessed on SSRN, Academia, and Google Scholar.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/rehan-abeyratne-courts-and-lgbtq-rights-in-an-age-of-judicial-retrenchment-oxford-up-2025-NiY364iF</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Democratic backsliding, culture wars and partisan politics in the past two decades has seen the&nbsp;regression of human rights protections in the courts and across societies. However, having made incremental gains in constitutional courts,&nbsp;LGBTQ+ rights operate as somewhat of&nbsp;a paradox. In this pivotal work, Professor Rehan Abeyratne makes an argument that the progress made in LGBTQ+ rights protection obscures an increased shift towards authoritarian legality in the courts and beyond. Case studies of three&nbsp;apex courts - the U.S. Supreme Court, the Supreme Court of India, and the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal - provide insight into the erosion of democracy and the rule of law across&nbsp;these jurisdictions.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780198888277" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Courts and&nbsp; LGBTQ+ Rights in an Age of Judicial Retrenchment</em></a>&nbsp;(Oxford&nbsp;﻿UP,&nbsp;2025) is an important work and&nbsp;should serve as a warning sign to constitutional lawyers, human rights scholars and anybody interested in the values that underpin liberal democracy as to the the limited ability of constitutional courts&nbsp;to protect&nbsp;rights in the current climate.&nbsp;&nbsp;</p>
<p><a href="https://researchers.westernsydney.edu.au/en/persons/rehan-abeyratne" rel="noopener noreferrer">Professor Rehan Abeyratne</a>&nbsp;is&nbsp;is Professor and Associate Dean (Higher Degree Research) at Western Sydney University School of Law, where he teaches Government and Public Law, Legal Research and Methodology, and Comparative Law: Legal Systems of the World. He also coordinates the School of Law's Honours Program. Professor Abeyratne holds a PhD from Monash University, a JD from Harvard Law School, and a BA (Hons.) in Political Science from Brown University. He researches comparative constitutional law and has published several books and articles in world leading journals.&nbsp;Most of Prof. Abeyratne's research can be freely accessed on SSRN, Academia, and Google Scholar.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="62645458" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/3cc21533-b908-41ce-acb0-b0d3fb5cf468/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=3cc21533-b908-41ce-acb0-b0d3fb5cf468&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Rehan Abeyratne, &quot;Courts and LGBTQ+ Rights in an Age of Judicial Retrenchment&quot; (Oxford UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:05:15</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Democratic backsliding, culture wars and partisan politics in the past two decades has seen the regression of human rights protections in the courts and across societies. However, having made incremental gains in constitutional courts, LGBTQ+ rights operate as somewhat of a paradox. In this pivotal work, Professor Rehan Abeyratne makes an argument that the progress made in LGBTQ+ rights protection obscures an increased shift towards authoritarian legality in the courts and beyond. Case studies of three apex courts - the U.S. Supreme Court, the Supreme Court of India, and the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal - provide insight into the erosion of democracy and the rule of law across these jurisdictions. Courts and  LGBTQ+ Rights in an Age of Judicial Retrenchment (Oxford ﻿UP, 2025) is an important work and should serve as a warning sign to constitutional lawyers, human rights scholars and anybody interested in the values that underpin liberal democracy as to the the limited ability of constitutional courts to protect rights in the current climate.  
Professor Rehan Abeyratne is is Professor and Associate Dean (Higher Degree Research) at Western Sydney University School of Law, where he teaches Government and Public Law, Legal Research and Methodology, and Comparative Law: Legal Systems of the World. He also coordinates the School of Law&apos;s Honours Program. Professor Abeyratne holds a PhD from Monash University, a JD from Harvard Law School, and a BA (Hons.) in Political Science from Brown University. He researches comparative constitutional law and has published several books and articles in world leading journals. Most of Prof. Abeyratne&apos;s research can be freely accessed on SSRN, Academia, and Google Scholar.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Democratic backsliding, culture wars and partisan politics in the past two decades has seen the regression of human rights protections in the courts and across societies. However, having made incremental gains in constitutional courts, LGBTQ+ rights operate as somewhat of a paradox. In this pivotal work, Professor Rehan Abeyratne makes an argument that the progress made in LGBTQ+ rights protection obscures an increased shift towards authoritarian legality in the courts and beyond. Case studies of three apex courts - the U.S. Supreme Court, the Supreme Court of India, and the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal - provide insight into the erosion of democracy and the rule of law across these jurisdictions. Courts and  LGBTQ+ Rights in an Age of Judicial Retrenchment (Oxford ﻿UP, 2025) is an important work and should serve as a warning sign to constitutional lawyers, human rights scholars and anybody interested in the values that underpin liberal democracy as to the the limited ability of constitutional courts to protect rights in the current climate.  
Professor Rehan Abeyratne is is Professor and Associate Dean (Higher Degree Research) at Western Sydney University School of Law, where he teaches Government and Public Law, Legal Research and Methodology, and Comparative Law: Legal Systems of the World. He also coordinates the School of Law&apos;s Honours Program. Professor Abeyratne holds a PhD from Monash University, a JD from Harvard Law School, and a BA (Hons.) in Political Science from Brown University. He researches comparative constitutional law and has published several books and articles in world leading journals. Most of Prof. Abeyratne&apos;s research can be freely accessed on SSRN, Academia, and Google Scholar.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1616</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5b0bf682-a7ae-11f0-b524-2b5d6b69cd31</guid>
      <title>Future of the Forest: Struggles over Land and Law in India</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>How did India’s landmark Forest Rights Act come into being? And what difference has it made to the lives of historically marginalized forest-dwelling communities? These questions are at the heart of Anand Vaidya’s new monograph&nbsp;<em>Future of the forest: Struggles over land and law in India&nbsp;</em>that we discuss in this episode<em>. Future of the forest</em>&nbsp;offers a compelling account of the making, implementation, and partial unravelling of the Forest Rights Act, and traces the complex ways in which collective action and mobilization have shaped the use and impact of this potentially revolutionary legislation.</p>
<p>Anand P. Vaidya is an Associate Professor of Anthropology at Reed College.</p>
<p>Kenneth Bo Nielsen is an Associate Professor of Social Anthropology at the University of Oslo where he also heads the Centre for South Asian Democracy.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/future-of-the-forest-struggles-over-land-and-law-in-india-QpGt4XIw</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How did India’s landmark Forest Rights Act come into being? And what difference has it made to the lives of historically marginalized forest-dwelling communities? These questions are at the heart of Anand Vaidya’s new monograph&nbsp;<em>Future of the forest: Struggles over land and law in India&nbsp;</em>that we discuss in this episode<em>. Future of the forest</em>&nbsp;offers a compelling account of the making, implementation, and partial unravelling of the Forest Rights Act, and traces the complex ways in which collective action and mobilization have shaped the use and impact of this potentially revolutionary legislation.</p>
<p>Anand P. Vaidya is an Associate Professor of Anthropology at Reed College.</p>
<p>Kenneth Bo Nielsen is an Associate Professor of Social Anthropology at the University of Oslo where he also heads the Centre for South Asian Democracy.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="30492454" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/cb15567f-fd73-4b3b-93ef-d79a3a044d5f/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=cb15567f-fd73-4b3b-93ef-d79a3a044d5f&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Future of the Forest: Struggles over Land and Law in India</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:31:45</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>How did India’s landmark Forest Rights Act come into being? And what difference has it made to the lives of historically marginalized forest-dwelling communities? These questions are at the heart of Anand Vaidya’s new monograph Future of the forest: Struggles over land and law in India that we discuss in this episode. Future of the forest offers a compelling account of the making, implementation, and partial unravelling of the Forest Rights Act, and traces the complex ways in which collective action and mobilization have shaped the use and impact of this potentially revolutionary legislation.
Anand P. Vaidya is an Associate Professor of Anthropology at Reed College.
Kenneth Bo Nielsen is an Associate Professor of Social Anthropology at the University of Oslo where he also heads the Centre for South Asian Democracy.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>How did India’s landmark Forest Rights Act come into being? And what difference has it made to the lives of historically marginalized forest-dwelling communities? These questions are at the heart of Anand Vaidya’s new monograph Future of the forest: Struggles over land and law in India that we discuss in this episode. Future of the forest offers a compelling account of the making, implementation, and partial unravelling of the Forest Rights Act, and traces the complex ways in which collective action and mobilization have shaped the use and impact of this potentially revolutionary legislation.
Anand P. Vaidya is an Associate Professor of Anthropology at Reed College.
Kenneth Bo Nielsen is an Associate Professor of Social Anthropology at the University of Oslo where he also heads the Centre for South Asian Democracy.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>258</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ad076792-a4e2-11f0-bbd9-bb1dc064cb44</guid>
      <title>S. Orestis Palermos, &quot;Cyborg Rights: Extending Cognition, Ethics, and the Law&quot; (Routledge, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Until recently, no one could access the detailed contents of your mind directly the way only you can. This level of protection of our mental data was guaranteed by the way we are built biologically – and it can no longer be taken for granted. In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781032957531" rel="noopener noreferrer">Cyborg Rights: Extending Cognition, Ethics, and the Law</a>&nbsp;(Routledge, 2025)&nbsp;S. Orestis Palermos considers the ethical and legal implications of the extended mind thesis – the idea that information-processing technologies are not merely tools but literal parts of our minds. While this thesis remains controversial, there is little doubt that technological devices can push information that coheres in an integrated way with your thoughts – for example, when your phone presents photographs of last year’s holiday on today’s anniversary. Such mind extensions create new vulnerabilities to invasions of mental privacy, freedom of thought, and protection from personal assault. Palermos, who is assistant professor of philosophy at the University of Ioannina, articulates these new problems and explores what levels of protection we should adopt in the face of them, up to the point of making it technologically impossible to access or manipulate your extended mental contents.&nbsp;﻿</p>
<p>S. Orestis Palermos is&nbsp;Assistant Professor of Philosophy at University of Ioannina, in Greece.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/s-orestis-palermos-cyborg-rights-extending-cognition-ethics-and-the-law-routledge-2025-j2dxyyXB</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Until recently, no one could access the detailed contents of your mind directly the way only you can. This level of protection of our mental data was guaranteed by the way we are built biologically – and it can no longer be taken for granted. In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781032957531" rel="noopener noreferrer">Cyborg Rights: Extending Cognition, Ethics, and the Law</a>&nbsp;(Routledge, 2025)&nbsp;S. Orestis Palermos considers the ethical and legal implications of the extended mind thesis – the idea that information-processing technologies are not merely tools but literal parts of our minds. While this thesis remains controversial, there is little doubt that technological devices can push information that coheres in an integrated way with your thoughts – for example, when your phone presents photographs of last year’s holiday on today’s anniversary. Such mind extensions create new vulnerabilities to invasions of mental privacy, freedom of thought, and protection from personal assault. Palermos, who is assistant professor of philosophy at the University of Ioannina, articulates these new problems and explores what levels of protection we should adopt in the face of them, up to the point of making it technologically impossible to access or manipulate your extended mental contents.&nbsp;﻿</p>
<p>S. Orestis Palermos is&nbsp;Assistant Professor of Philosophy at University of Ioannina, in Greece.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="54597565" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/e67d2620-70a0-41df-843f-d5556e6887dc/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=e67d2620-70a0-41df-843f-d5556e6887dc&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>S. Orestis Palermos, &quot;Cyborg Rights: Extending Cognition, Ethics, and the Law&quot; (Routledge, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:56:52</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Until recently, no one could access the detailed contents of your mind directly the way only you can. This level of protection of our mental data was guaranteed by the way we are built biologically – and it can no longer be taken for granted. In Cyborg Rights: Extending Cognition, Ethics, and the Law (Routledge, 2025) S. Orestis Palermos considers the ethical and legal implications of the extended mind thesis – the idea that information-processing technologies are not merely tools but literal parts of our minds. While this thesis remains controversial, there is little doubt that technological devices can push information that coheres in an integrated way with your thoughts – for example, when your phone presents photographs of last year’s holiday on today’s anniversary. Such mind extensions create new vulnerabilities to invasions of mental privacy, freedom of thought, and protection from personal assault. Palermos, who is assistant professor of philosophy at the University of Ioannina, articulates these new problems and explores what levels of protection we should adopt in the face of them, up to the point of making it technologically impossible to access or manipulate your extended mental contents. ﻿
S. Orestis Palermos is Assistant Professor of Philosophy at University of Ioannina, in Greece.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Until recently, no one could access the detailed contents of your mind directly the way only you can. This level of protection of our mental data was guaranteed by the way we are built biologically – and it can no longer be taken for granted. In Cyborg Rights: Extending Cognition, Ethics, and the Law (Routledge, 2025) S. Orestis Palermos considers the ethical and legal implications of the extended mind thesis – the idea that information-processing technologies are not merely tools but literal parts of our minds. While this thesis remains controversial, there is little doubt that technological devices can push information that coheres in an integrated way with your thoughts – for example, when your phone presents photographs of last year’s holiday on today’s anniversary. Such mind extensions create new vulnerabilities to invasions of mental privacy, freedom of thought, and protection from personal assault. Palermos, who is assistant professor of philosophy at the University of Ioannina, articulates these new problems and explores what levels of protection we should adopt in the face of them, up to the point of making it technologically impossible to access or manipulate your extended mental contents. ﻿
S. Orestis Palermos is Assistant Professor of Philosophy at University of Ioannina, in Greece.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1615</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">d9148b9c-a354-11f0-b2be-23e50025ca8f</guid>
      <title>Miranda Spieler, &quot;Slaves in Paris: Hidden Lives and Fugitive Histories&quot; (Harvard UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In the decades leading up to the French Revolution, when Paris was celebrated as an oasis of liberty, slaves fled there, hoping to be freed. They pictured Paris as a refuge from France’s notorious slave-trading ports.</p>
<p>The French were late to the slave trade, but they dominated the global market in enslaved people by the late 1780s. This explosive growth transformed Paris, the cultural capital of the Enlightenment, into a dangerous place for people in bondage. Those seeking freedom in Paris faced manhunts, arrest, and deportation. Some put their faith in lawyers, believing the city’s courts would free them. Examining the lives of those whose dashed hopes and creative persistence capture the spirit of the era, in&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780674986541" rel="noopener noreferrer">Slaves in Paris: Hidden Lives and Fugitive Histories</a>&nbsp;(Harvard University Press, 2025), Dr. Miranda Spieler brings to light a hidden story of slavery and the struggle for freedom.</p>
<p>Fugitive slaves collided with spying networks, nosy neighbors, and overlapping judicial authorities. Their clandestine lives left a paper trail. In a feat of historical detective work, Dr. Spieler retraces their steps and brings to light the new racialized legal culture that permeated every aspect of everyday life. She pieces together vivid, granular portraits of men, women, and children who came from Africa, the Caribbean, and the Indian Ocean. We learn of their strategies and hiding places, their family histories and relationships to well-known Enlightenment figures.&nbsp;<em>Slaves in Paris</em>&nbsp;is a history of hunted people. It is also a tribute to their resilience.</p>
<p><br><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 8 Oct 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/miranda-spieler-slaves-in-paris-hidden-lives-and-fugitive-histories-harvard-up-2025-__xP_3MD</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the decades leading up to the French Revolution, when Paris was celebrated as an oasis of liberty, slaves fled there, hoping to be freed. They pictured Paris as a refuge from France’s notorious slave-trading ports.</p>
<p>The French were late to the slave trade, but they dominated the global market in enslaved people by the late 1780s. This explosive growth transformed Paris, the cultural capital of the Enlightenment, into a dangerous place for people in bondage. Those seeking freedom in Paris faced manhunts, arrest, and deportation. Some put their faith in lawyers, believing the city’s courts would free them. Examining the lives of those whose dashed hopes and creative persistence capture the spirit of the era, in&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780674986541" rel="noopener noreferrer">Slaves in Paris: Hidden Lives and Fugitive Histories</a>&nbsp;(Harvard University Press, 2025), Dr. Miranda Spieler brings to light a hidden story of slavery and the struggle for freedom.</p>
<p>Fugitive slaves collided with spying networks, nosy neighbors, and overlapping judicial authorities. Their clandestine lives left a paper trail. In a feat of historical detective work, Dr. Spieler retraces their steps and brings to light the new racialized legal culture that permeated every aspect of everyday life. She pieces together vivid, granular portraits of men, women, and children who came from Africa, the Caribbean, and the Indian Ocean. We learn of their strategies and hiding places, their family histories and relationships to well-known Enlightenment figures.&nbsp;<em>Slaves in Paris</em>&nbsp;is a history of hunted people. It is also a tribute to their resilience.</p>
<p><br><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="47819961" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/0c467550-fec4-441a-9082-64fe8ecd3126/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=0c467550-fec4-441a-9082-64fe8ecd3126&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Miranda Spieler, &quot;Slaves in Paris: Hidden Lives and Fugitive Histories&quot; (Harvard UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:49:48</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In the decades leading up to the French Revolution, when Paris was celebrated as an oasis of liberty, slaves fled there, hoping to be freed. They pictured Paris as a refuge from France’s notorious slave-trading ports.
The French were late to the slave trade, but they dominated the global market in enslaved people by the late 1780s. This explosive growth transformed Paris, the cultural capital of the Enlightenment, into a dangerous place for people in bondage. Those seeking freedom in Paris faced manhunts, arrest, and deportation. Some put their faith in lawyers, believing the city’s courts would free them. Examining the lives of those whose dashed hopes and creative persistence capture the spirit of the era, in Slaves in Paris: Hidden Lives and Fugitive Histories (Harvard University Press, 2025), Dr. Miranda Spieler brings to light a hidden story of slavery and the struggle for freedom.
Fugitive slaves collided with spying networks, nosy neighbors, and overlapping judicial authorities. Their clandestine lives left a paper trail. In a feat of historical detective work, Dr. Spieler retraces their steps and brings to light the new racialized legal culture that permeated every aspect of everyday life. She pieces together vivid, granular portraits of men, women, and children who came from Africa, the Caribbean, and the Indian Ocean. We learn of their strategies and hiding places, their family histories and relationships to well-known Enlightenment figures. Slaves in Paris is a history of hunted people. It is also a tribute to their resilience.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In the decades leading up to the French Revolution, when Paris was celebrated as an oasis of liberty, slaves fled there, hoping to be freed. They pictured Paris as a refuge from France’s notorious slave-trading ports.
The French were late to the slave trade, but they dominated the global market in enslaved people by the late 1780s. This explosive growth transformed Paris, the cultural capital of the Enlightenment, into a dangerous place for people in bondage. Those seeking freedom in Paris faced manhunts, arrest, and deportation. Some put their faith in lawyers, believing the city’s courts would free them. Examining the lives of those whose dashed hopes and creative persistence capture the spirit of the era, in Slaves in Paris: Hidden Lives and Fugitive Histories (Harvard University Press, 2025), Dr. Miranda Spieler brings to light a hidden story of slavery and the struggle for freedom.
Fugitive slaves collided with spying networks, nosy neighbors, and overlapping judicial authorities. Their clandestine lives left a paper trail. In a feat of historical detective work, Dr. Spieler retraces their steps and brings to light the new racialized legal culture that permeated every aspect of everyday life. She pieces together vivid, granular portraits of men, women, and children who came from Africa, the Caribbean, and the Indian Ocean. We learn of their strategies and hiding places, their family histories and relationships to well-known Enlightenment figures. Slaves in Paris is a history of hunted people. It is also a tribute to their resilience.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1614</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">a7d625c6-9f40-11f0-b1aa-1b6c8e7ecb9d</guid>
      <title>Deepa Das Acevedo, &quot;The War on Tenure&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>As academia increasingly comes under attack in the United States,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009596831" rel="noopener noreferrer">The War on Tenure</a>&nbsp;(Cambridge UP, 2025)&nbsp;steps in to demystify what professors do and to explain the importance of tenure for their work. Deepa Das Acevedo takes readers on a backstage tour of tenure-stream academia to reveal hidden dynamics and obstacles. She challenges the common belief that tenure is only important for the protection of academic freedom. Instead, she argues that the security and autonomy provided by tenure are also essential to the performance of work that students, administrators, parents, politicians, and taxpayers value. Going further, Das Acevedo shows that tenure exists on a spectrum of comparable employment contracts, and she debunks the notion that tenure warps the incentives of professors. Ultimately,&nbsp;<em>The War on Tenure</em>&nbsp;demonstrates that the job security tenure provides is not nearly as unusual, undesirable, or unwarranted as critics claim.</p>
<p>Deepa Das Acevedo, JD, PhD is an Associate Professor of Law at Emory University.</p>
<p>Host: Dr. Michael LaMagna is the Information Literacy Program &amp; Library Services Coordinator and Professor of Library Services at Delaware County Community College.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 3 Oct 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/deepa-das-acevedo-the-war-on-tenure-cambridge-up-2025-VolicsZY</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As academia increasingly comes under attack in the United States,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009596831" rel="noopener noreferrer">The War on Tenure</a>&nbsp;(Cambridge UP, 2025)&nbsp;steps in to demystify what professors do and to explain the importance of tenure for their work. Deepa Das Acevedo takes readers on a backstage tour of tenure-stream academia to reveal hidden dynamics and obstacles. She challenges the common belief that tenure is only important for the protection of academic freedom. Instead, she argues that the security and autonomy provided by tenure are also essential to the performance of work that students, administrators, parents, politicians, and taxpayers value. Going further, Das Acevedo shows that tenure exists on a spectrum of comparable employment contracts, and she debunks the notion that tenure warps the incentives of professors. Ultimately,&nbsp;<em>The War on Tenure</em>&nbsp;demonstrates that the job security tenure provides is not nearly as unusual, undesirable, or unwarranted as critics claim.</p>
<p>Deepa Das Acevedo, JD, PhD is an Associate Professor of Law at Emory University.</p>
<p>Host: Dr. Michael LaMagna is the Information Literacy Program &amp; Library Services Coordinator and Professor of Library Services at Delaware County Community College.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="56676763" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/68445a21-14e6-493b-8fbc-c20a26b1a183/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=68445a21-14e6-493b-8fbc-c20a26b1a183&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Deepa Das Acevedo, &quot;The War on Tenure&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:59:02</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>As academia increasingly comes under attack in the United States, The War on Tenure (Cambridge UP, 2025) steps in to demystify what professors do and to explain the importance of tenure for their work. Deepa Das Acevedo takes readers on a backstage tour of tenure-stream academia to reveal hidden dynamics and obstacles. She challenges the common belief that tenure is only important for the protection of academic freedom. Instead, she argues that the security and autonomy provided by tenure are also essential to the performance of work that students, administrators, parents, politicians, and taxpayers value. Going further, Das Acevedo shows that tenure exists on a spectrum of comparable employment contracts, and she debunks the notion that tenure warps the incentives of professors. Ultimately, The War on Tenure demonstrates that the job security tenure provides is not nearly as unusual, undesirable, or unwarranted as critics claim.
Deepa Das Acevedo, JD, PhD is an Associate Professor of Law at Emory University.
Host: Dr. Michael LaMagna is the Information Literacy Program &amp; Library Services Coordinator and Professor of Library Services at Delaware County Community College.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>As academia increasingly comes under attack in the United States, The War on Tenure (Cambridge UP, 2025) steps in to demystify what professors do and to explain the importance of tenure for their work. Deepa Das Acevedo takes readers on a backstage tour of tenure-stream academia to reveal hidden dynamics and obstacles. She challenges the common belief that tenure is only important for the protection of academic freedom. Instead, she argues that the security and autonomy provided by tenure are also essential to the performance of work that students, administrators, parents, politicians, and taxpayers value. Going further, Das Acevedo shows that tenure exists on a spectrum of comparable employment contracts, and she debunks the notion that tenure warps the incentives of professors. Ultimately, The War on Tenure demonstrates that the job security tenure provides is not nearly as unusual, undesirable, or unwarranted as critics claim.
Deepa Das Acevedo, JD, PhD is an Associate Professor of Law at Emory University.
Host: Dr. Michael LaMagna is the Information Literacy Program &amp; Library Services Coordinator and Professor of Library Services at Delaware County Community College.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1612</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">764cf1de-9f1c-11f0-9265-a3e40303d662</guid>
      <title>Raymond J. McKoski, &quot;David Davis, Abraham Lincoln&apos;s Favorite Judge&quot; (U Illinois Press, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>One of Abraham Lincoln's staunchest and most effective allies, Judge David Davis masterminded the floor fight that gave Lincoln the presidential nomination at the 1860 Republican National Convention. This history-changing event emerged from a long friendship between the two men. It also altered the course of Davis's career, as Lincoln named him to the U.S. Supreme Court in 1862.</p>
<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780252046636" rel="noopener noreferrer">David Davis, Abraham Lincoln's Favorite Judge</a>&nbsp;(University of Illinois Press, 2025),&nbsp;Raymond J. McKoski offers a biography of Davis's public life, his impact on the presidency and judiciary, and his personal, professional, and political relationships with Lincoln. Davis lent his vast network of connections, organizational and leadership abilities, and personal persuasiveness to help Lincoln's political rise. When Davis became a judge, he honed an ability to hear each case with complete impartiality, a practice that endeared him to Lincoln but one day put him at odds with the president over important Civil War-era rulings. McKoski details these cases while providing an in-depth account of Davis's role in Lincoln's two unsuccessful campaigns for U.S. Senate and the fateful run for the presidency.</p>
<p>Raymond J. McKoski is a retired Illinois Circuit Judge and adjunct professor at the University of Illinois Chicago School of Law.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 3 Oct 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/raymond-j-mckoski-david-davis-abraham-lincolns-favorite-judge-u-illinois-press-2025-QCkYv5or</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of Abraham Lincoln's staunchest and most effective allies, Judge David Davis masterminded the floor fight that gave Lincoln the presidential nomination at the 1860 Republican National Convention. This history-changing event emerged from a long friendship between the two men. It also altered the course of Davis's career, as Lincoln named him to the U.S. Supreme Court in 1862.</p>
<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780252046636" rel="noopener noreferrer">David Davis, Abraham Lincoln's Favorite Judge</a>&nbsp;(University of Illinois Press, 2025),&nbsp;Raymond J. McKoski offers a biography of Davis's public life, his impact on the presidency and judiciary, and his personal, professional, and political relationships with Lincoln. Davis lent his vast network of connections, organizational and leadership abilities, and personal persuasiveness to help Lincoln's political rise. When Davis became a judge, he honed an ability to hear each case with complete impartiality, a practice that endeared him to Lincoln but one day put him at odds with the president over important Civil War-era rulings. McKoski details these cases while providing an in-depth account of Davis's role in Lincoln's two unsuccessful campaigns for U.S. Senate and the fateful run for the presidency.</p>
<p>Raymond J. McKoski is a retired Illinois Circuit Judge and adjunct professor at the University of Illinois Chicago School of Law.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="56688607" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/db38d9ea-9262-4510-b3f9-9e68f4927316/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=db38d9ea-9262-4510-b3f9-9e68f4927316&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Raymond J. McKoski, &quot;David Davis, Abraham Lincoln&apos;s Favorite Judge&quot; (U Illinois Press, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:59:02</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>One of Abraham Lincoln&apos;s staunchest and most effective allies, Judge David Davis masterminded the floor fight that gave Lincoln the presidential nomination at the 1860 Republican National Convention. This history-changing event emerged from a long friendship between the two men. It also altered the course of Davis&apos;s career, as Lincoln named him to the U.S. Supreme Court in 1862.
In David Davis, Abraham Lincoln&apos;s Favorite Judge (University of Illinois Press, 2025), Raymond J. McKoski offers a biography of Davis&apos;s public life, his impact on the presidency and judiciary, and his personal, professional, and political relationships with Lincoln. Davis lent his vast network of connections, organizational and leadership abilities, and personal persuasiveness to help Lincoln&apos;s political rise. When Davis became a judge, he honed an ability to hear each case with complete impartiality, a practice that endeared him to Lincoln but one day put him at odds with the president over important Civil War-era rulings. McKoski details these cases while providing an in-depth account of Davis&apos;s role in Lincoln&apos;s two unsuccessful campaigns for U.S. Senate and the fateful run for the presidency.
Raymond J. McKoski is a retired Illinois Circuit Judge and adjunct professor at the University of Illinois Chicago School of Law.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>One of Abraham Lincoln&apos;s staunchest and most effective allies, Judge David Davis masterminded the floor fight that gave Lincoln the presidential nomination at the 1860 Republican National Convention. This history-changing event emerged from a long friendship between the two men. It also altered the course of Davis&apos;s career, as Lincoln named him to the U.S. Supreme Court in 1862.
In David Davis, Abraham Lincoln&apos;s Favorite Judge (University of Illinois Press, 2025), Raymond J. McKoski offers a biography of Davis&apos;s public life, his impact on the presidency and judiciary, and his personal, professional, and political relationships with Lincoln. Davis lent his vast network of connections, organizational and leadership abilities, and personal persuasiveness to help Lincoln&apos;s political rise. When Davis became a judge, he honed an ability to hear each case with complete impartiality, a practice that endeared him to Lincoln but one day put him at odds with the president over important Civil War-era rulings. McKoski details these cases while providing an in-depth account of Davis&apos;s role in Lincoln&apos;s two unsuccessful campaigns for U.S. Senate and the fateful run for the presidency.
Raymond J. McKoski is a retired Illinois Circuit Judge and adjunct professor at the University of Illinois Chicago School of Law.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1613</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">22a7505c-9e1c-11f0-b67b-536d9bc4c916</guid>
      <title>Greg Lukianoff and Nadine Strossen, &quot;The War on Words: 10 Arguments Against Free Speech—And Why They Fail&quot; (Heresy Press, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781949846829" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The War on Words: 10 Arguments Against Free Speech—And Why They Fail</em></a>&nbsp;(Heresy Press, 2025)&nbsp;constitutes a bulwark against the persistent censorial efforts from both the political left and right. At a time when conformist pressures threaten viewpoint diversity, and when political attacks on free expression are mounting, this book is a valuable resource for all who seek to understand and defend the right that is central to both individual liberty and our democratic self-government. This concise volume is organized around 10 claims that proponents of speech restrictions regularly assert, such as: “words are violence,” “free speech is right-wing,” and “hate speech isn’t free speech.” In lively, clear, and persuasive prose, the authors examine the flaws in these pro-censorship assertions. The book also includes an insightful introduction by Jacob Mchangama, shedding additional light on the topic from historical and international perspectives.</p>
<p>Greg Lukianoff is an attorney, New York Times best-selling author, and the President and CEO of the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE).</p>
<p>Nadine Strossen is the John Marshall Harlan II Professor of Law Emerita at New York Law School and was the national President of the American Civil Liberties Union from 1991 to 2008. She is a Senior Fellow at FIRE and serves on the advisory boards of the ACLU, Academic Freedom Alliance, Heterodox Academy, and National Coalition Against Censorship.</p>
<p><em>Caleb Zakarin is editor of the New Books Network.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 2 Oct 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/greg-lukianoff-and-nadine-strossen-the-war-on-words-10-arguments-against-free-speechand-why-they-fail-heresy-press-2025-OzHReH9q</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781949846829" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The War on Words: 10 Arguments Against Free Speech—And Why They Fail</em></a>&nbsp;(Heresy Press, 2025)&nbsp;constitutes a bulwark against the persistent censorial efforts from both the political left and right. At a time when conformist pressures threaten viewpoint diversity, and when political attacks on free expression are mounting, this book is a valuable resource for all who seek to understand and defend the right that is central to both individual liberty and our democratic self-government. This concise volume is organized around 10 claims that proponents of speech restrictions regularly assert, such as: “words are violence,” “free speech is right-wing,” and “hate speech isn’t free speech.” In lively, clear, and persuasive prose, the authors examine the flaws in these pro-censorship assertions. The book also includes an insightful introduction by Jacob Mchangama, shedding additional light on the topic from historical and international perspectives.</p>
<p>Greg Lukianoff is an attorney, New York Times best-selling author, and the President and CEO of the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE).</p>
<p>Nadine Strossen is the John Marshall Harlan II Professor of Law Emerita at New York Law School and was the national President of the American Civil Liberties Union from 1991 to 2008. She is a Senior Fellow at FIRE and serves on the advisory boards of the ACLU, Academic Freedom Alliance, Heterodox Academy, and National Coalition Against Censorship.</p>
<p><em>Caleb Zakarin is editor of the New Books Network.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="47854478" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/db4f495e-d0f9-4379-8e33-8a669db2adfa/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=db4f495e-d0f9-4379-8e33-8a669db2adfa&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Greg Lukianoff and Nadine Strossen, &quot;The War on Words: 10 Arguments Against Free Speech—And Why They Fail&quot; (Heresy Press, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:49:50</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The War on Words: 10 Arguments Against Free Speech—And Why They Fail (Heresy Press, 2025) constitutes a bulwark against the persistent censorial efforts from both the political left and right. At a time when conformist pressures threaten viewpoint diversity, and when political attacks on free expression are mounting, this book is a valuable resource for all who seek to understand and defend the right that is central to both individual liberty and our democratic self-government. This concise volume is organized around 10 claims that proponents of speech restrictions regularly assert, such as: “words are violence,” “free speech is right-wing,” and “hate speech isn’t free speech.” In lively, clear, and persuasive prose, the authors examine the flaws in these pro-censorship assertions. The book also includes an insightful introduction by Jacob Mchangama, shedding additional light on the topic from historical and international perspectives.
Greg Lukianoff is an attorney, New York Times best-selling author, and the President and CEO of the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE).
Nadine Strossen is the John Marshall Harlan II Professor of Law Emerita at New York Law School and was the national President of the American Civil Liberties Union from 1991 to 2008. She is a Senior Fellow at FIRE and serves on the advisory boards of the ACLU, Academic Freedom Alliance, Heterodox Academy, and National Coalition Against Censorship.
Caleb Zakarin is editor of the New Books Network.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The War on Words: 10 Arguments Against Free Speech—And Why They Fail (Heresy Press, 2025) constitutes a bulwark against the persistent censorial efforts from both the political left and right. At a time when conformist pressures threaten viewpoint diversity, and when political attacks on free expression are mounting, this book is a valuable resource for all who seek to understand and defend the right that is central to both individual liberty and our democratic self-government. This concise volume is organized around 10 claims that proponents of speech restrictions regularly assert, such as: “words are violence,” “free speech is right-wing,” and “hate speech isn’t free speech.” In lively, clear, and persuasive prose, the authors examine the flaws in these pro-censorship assertions. The book also includes an insightful introduction by Jacob Mchangama, shedding additional light on the topic from historical and international perspectives.
Greg Lukianoff is an attorney, New York Times best-selling author, and the President and CEO of the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE).
Nadine Strossen is the John Marshall Harlan II Professor of Law Emerita at New York Law School and was the national President of the American Civil Liberties Union from 1991 to 2008. She is a Senior Fellow at FIRE and serves on the advisory boards of the ACLU, Academic Freedom Alliance, Heterodox Academy, and National Coalition Against Censorship.
Caleb Zakarin is editor of the New Books Network.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1611</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">db62aeb4-9bb2-11f0-88af-2318fb4e1f62</guid>
      <title>Rosemary Admiral, &quot;Living Law: Women and Legality in Marinid Morocco&quot; (Syracuse UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Dr. Rosemary Admiral provides a groundbreaking history of women’s legal engagement in Marinid Morocco between the thirteenth and fifteenth centuries that fundamentally challenges contemporary assumptions about women’s relationships to Islamic legal traditions. Drawing on a rich collection of fatwas (legal documents) from Fez and surrounding areas, Dr. Admiral demonstrates how women—some without formal education—strategically navigated complex legal landscapes to protect their interests, expand their rights, and reshape social dynamics.</p>
<p>Contrary to prevailing narratives that portray Islamic law as a monolithic, oppressive system, the book shows how women actively co-produced legal interpretations. They used sophisticated strategies like contract stipulations, exploring plurality in legal opinions, and consulting local scholars to renegotiate marriage terms and expand their rights. These women did not view the legal system as an enemy, but as an instrument for challenging misdeeds and addressing community needs.</p>
<p>Dr. Admiral draws attention to the historical practice and implementation of the Maliki school of Islamic law in an area that remained outside of Ottoman control. She highlights women’s engagement with Islamic law as deeply embedded in support systems encompassing families, communities, and legal structures, and makes visible women’s agency and power.</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/rosemary-admiral-living-law-women-and-legality-in-marinid-morocco-syracuse-up-2025-HTArOo_S</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dr. Rosemary Admiral provides a groundbreaking history of women’s legal engagement in Marinid Morocco between the thirteenth and fifteenth centuries that fundamentally challenges contemporary assumptions about women’s relationships to Islamic legal traditions. Drawing on a rich collection of fatwas (legal documents) from Fez and surrounding areas, Dr. Admiral demonstrates how women—some without formal education—strategically navigated complex legal landscapes to protect their interests, expand their rights, and reshape social dynamics.</p>
<p>Contrary to prevailing narratives that portray Islamic law as a monolithic, oppressive system, the book shows how women actively co-produced legal interpretations. They used sophisticated strategies like contract stipulations, exploring plurality in legal opinions, and consulting local scholars to renegotiate marriage terms and expand their rights. These women did not view the legal system as an enemy, but as an instrument for challenging misdeeds and addressing community needs.</p>
<p>Dr. Admiral draws attention to the historical practice and implementation of the Maliki school of Islamic law in an area that remained outside of Ottoman control. She highlights women’s engagement with Islamic law as deeply embedded in support systems encompassing families, communities, and legal structures, and makes visible women’s agency and power.</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="44410843" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/d4e3943a-7e1c-4172-a8d2-dcb6839379d9/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=d4e3943a-7e1c-4172-a8d2-dcb6839379d9&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Rosemary Admiral, &quot;Living Law: Women and Legality in Marinid Morocco&quot; (Syracuse UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:46:15</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Dr. Rosemary Admiral provides a groundbreaking history of women’s legal engagement in Marinid Morocco between the thirteenth and fifteenth centuries that fundamentally challenges contemporary assumptions about women’s relationships to Islamic legal traditions. Drawing on a rich collection of fatwas (legal documents) from Fez and surrounding areas, Dr. Admiral demonstrates how women—some without formal education—strategically navigated complex legal landscapes to protect their interests, expand their rights, and reshape social dynamics.
Contrary to prevailing narratives that portray Islamic law as a monolithic, oppressive system, the book shows how women actively co-produced legal interpretations. They used sophisticated strategies like contract stipulations, exploring plurality in legal opinions, and consulting local scholars to renegotiate marriage terms and expand their rights. These women did not view the legal system as an enemy, but as an instrument for challenging misdeeds and addressing community needs.
Dr. Admiral draws attention to the historical practice and implementation of the Maliki school of Islamic law in an area that remained outside of Ottoman control. She highlights women’s engagement with Islamic law as deeply embedded in support systems encompassing families, communities, and legal structures, and makes visible women’s agency and power.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Dr. Rosemary Admiral provides a groundbreaking history of women’s legal engagement in Marinid Morocco between the thirteenth and fifteenth centuries that fundamentally challenges contemporary assumptions about women’s relationships to Islamic legal traditions. Drawing on a rich collection of fatwas (legal documents) from Fez and surrounding areas, Dr. Admiral demonstrates how women—some without formal education—strategically navigated complex legal landscapes to protect their interests, expand their rights, and reshape social dynamics.
Contrary to prevailing narratives that portray Islamic law as a monolithic, oppressive system, the book shows how women actively co-produced legal interpretations. They used sophisticated strategies like contract stipulations, exploring plurality in legal opinions, and consulting local scholars to renegotiate marriage terms and expand their rights. These women did not view the legal system as an enemy, but as an instrument for challenging misdeeds and addressing community needs.
Dr. Admiral draws attention to the historical practice and implementation of the Maliki school of Islamic law in an area that remained outside of Ottoman control. She highlights women’s engagement with Islamic law as deeply embedded in support systems encompassing families, communities, and legal structures, and makes visible women’s agency and power.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>100</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">39a1098a-313a-11ed-b52b-271801de9842</guid>
      <title>Brad Snyder, &quot;Democratic Justice: Felix Frankfurter, the Supreme Court, and the Making of the Liberal Establishment&quot; (Norton, 2022)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The conventional wisdom about Felix Frankfurter--Harvard law professor and Supreme Court justice--is that he struggled to fill the seat once held by Oliver Wendell Holmes. Scholars have portrayed Frankfurter as a judicial failure, a liberal lawyer turned conservative justice, and the Warren Court's principal villain. And yet none of these characterizations rings true.</p><p>A pro-government, pro-civil rights liberal who rejected shifting political labels, Frankfurter advocated for judicial restraint--he believed that people should seek change not from the courts but through the democratic political process. Indeed, he knew American presidents from Theodore Roosevelt to Lyndon Johnson, advised Franklin Roosevelt, and inspired his students and law clerks to enter government service.</p><p>Organized around presidential administrations and major political and world events, this definitive biography chronicles Frankfurter's impact on American life. As a young government lawyer, he befriended Theodore Roosevelt, Louis Brandeis, and Holmes. As a Harvard law professor, he earned fame as a civil libertarian, Zionist, and New Deal power broker. As a justice, he hired the first African American law clerk and helped the Court achieve unanimity in outlawing racially segregated schools in&nbsp;<em>Brown v. Board of Education</em>.</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781324004875" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Democratic Justice: Felix Frankfurter, the Supreme Court, and the Making of the Liberal Establishment&nbsp;</em></a>(Norton, 2022), Brad Snyder offers a full and fascinating portrait of the remarkable life and legacy of a long misunderstood American figure. This is the biography of an Austrian Jewish immigrant who arrived in the United States at age eleven speaking not a word of English, who by age twenty-six befriended former president Theodore Roosevelt, and who by age fifty was one of Franklin Roosevelt's most trusted advisers. It is the story of a man devoted to democratic ideals, a natural orator and often overbearing justice, whose passion allowed him to amass highly influential friends and helped create the liberal establishment.</p><p><em>﻿</em><a href="http://www.williamdomnarski.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>William Domnarski</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a longtime lawyer who before and during has been a literary guy, with a Ph.D. in English. He's written five books on judges, lawyers, and courts, two with Oxford, one with Illinois, one with Michigan, and one with the American Bar Association.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/brad-snyder-democratic-justice-felix-frankfurter-the-supreme-court-and-the-making-of-the-liberal-establishment-norton-2022-_twXH6kk</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The conventional wisdom about Felix Frankfurter--Harvard law professor and Supreme Court justice--is that he struggled to fill the seat once held by Oliver Wendell Holmes. Scholars have portrayed Frankfurter as a judicial failure, a liberal lawyer turned conservative justice, and the Warren Court's principal villain. And yet none of these characterizations rings true.</p><p>A pro-government, pro-civil rights liberal who rejected shifting political labels, Frankfurter advocated for judicial restraint--he believed that people should seek change not from the courts but through the democratic political process. Indeed, he knew American presidents from Theodore Roosevelt to Lyndon Johnson, advised Franklin Roosevelt, and inspired his students and law clerks to enter government service.</p><p>Organized around presidential administrations and major political and world events, this definitive biography chronicles Frankfurter's impact on American life. As a young government lawyer, he befriended Theodore Roosevelt, Louis Brandeis, and Holmes. As a Harvard law professor, he earned fame as a civil libertarian, Zionist, and New Deal power broker. As a justice, he hired the first African American law clerk and helped the Court achieve unanimity in outlawing racially segregated schools in&nbsp;<em>Brown v. Board of Education</em>.</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781324004875" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Democratic Justice: Felix Frankfurter, the Supreme Court, and the Making of the Liberal Establishment&nbsp;</em></a>(Norton, 2022), Brad Snyder offers a full and fascinating portrait of the remarkable life and legacy of a long misunderstood American figure. This is the biography of an Austrian Jewish immigrant who arrived in the United States at age eleven speaking not a word of English, who by age twenty-six befriended former president Theodore Roosevelt, and who by age fifty was one of Franklin Roosevelt's most trusted advisers. It is the story of a man devoted to democratic ideals, a natural orator and often overbearing justice, whose passion allowed him to amass highly influential friends and helped create the liberal establishment.</p><p><em>﻿</em><a href="http://www.williamdomnarski.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>William Domnarski</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a longtime lawyer who before and during has been a literary guy, with a Ph.D. in English. He's written five books on judges, lawyers, and courts, two with Oxford, one with Illinois, one with Michigan, and one with the American Bar Association.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="77255052" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/d77ae66e-69d1-4e2d-8694-1b0b5fe888fe/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=d77ae66e-69d1-4e2d-8694-1b0b5fe888fe&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Brad Snyder, &quot;Democratic Justice: Felix Frankfurter, the Supreme Court, and the Making of the Liberal Establishment&quot; (Norton, 2022)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:20:28</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The conventional wisdom about Felix Frankfurter--Harvard law professor and Supreme Court justice--is that he struggled to fill the seat once held by Oliver Wendell Holmes. Scholars have portrayed Frankfurter as a judicial failure, a liberal lawyer turned conservative justice, and the Warren Court&apos;s principal villain. And yet none of these characterizations rings true.
A pro-government, pro-civil rights liberal who rejected shifting political labels, Frankfurter advocated for judicial restraint--he believed that people should seek change not from the courts but through the democratic political process. Indeed, he knew American presidents from Theodore Roosevelt to Lyndon Johnson, advised Franklin Roosevelt, and inspired his students and law clerks to enter government service.
Organized around presidential administrations and major political and world events, this definitive biography chronicles Frankfurter&apos;s impact on American life. As a young government lawyer, he befriended Theodore Roosevelt, Louis Brandeis, and Holmes. As a Harvard law professor, he earned fame as a civil libertarian, Zionist, and New Deal power broker. As a justice, he hired the first African American law clerk and helped the Court achieve unanimity in outlawing racially segregated schools in Brown v. Board of Education.
In Democratic Justice: Felix Frankfurter, the Supreme Court, and the Making of the Liberal Establishment (Norton, 2022), Brad Snyder offers a full and fascinating portrait of the remarkable life and legacy of a long misunderstood American figure. This is the biography of an Austrian Jewish immigrant who arrived in the United States at age eleven speaking not a word of English, who by age twenty-six befriended former president Theodore Roosevelt, and who by age fifty was one of Franklin Roosevelt&apos;s most trusted advisers. It is the story of a man devoted to democratic ideals, a natural orator and often overbearing justice, whose passion allowed him to amass highly influential friends and helped create the liberal establishment.
﻿William Domnarski is a longtime lawyer who before and during has been a literary guy, with a Ph.D. in English. He&apos;s written five books on judges, lawyers, and courts, two with Oxford, one with Illinois, one with Michigan, and one with the American Bar Association.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The conventional wisdom about Felix Frankfurter--Harvard law professor and Supreme Court justice--is that he struggled to fill the seat once held by Oliver Wendell Holmes. Scholars have portrayed Frankfurter as a judicial failure, a liberal lawyer turned conservative justice, and the Warren Court&apos;s principal villain. And yet none of these characterizations rings true.
A pro-government, pro-civil rights liberal who rejected shifting political labels, Frankfurter advocated for judicial restraint--he believed that people should seek change not from the courts but through the democratic political process. Indeed, he knew American presidents from Theodore Roosevelt to Lyndon Johnson, advised Franklin Roosevelt, and inspired his students and law clerks to enter government service.
Organized around presidential administrations and major political and world events, this definitive biography chronicles Frankfurter&apos;s impact on American life. As a young government lawyer, he befriended Theodore Roosevelt, Louis Brandeis, and Holmes. As a Harvard law professor, he earned fame as a civil libertarian, Zionist, and New Deal power broker. As a justice, he hired the first African American law clerk and helped the Court achieve unanimity in outlawing racially segregated schools in Brown v. Board of Education.
In Democratic Justice: Felix Frankfurter, the Supreme Court, and the Making of the Liberal Establishment (Norton, 2022), Brad Snyder offers a full and fascinating portrait of the remarkable life and legacy of a long misunderstood American figure. This is the biography of an Austrian Jewish immigrant who arrived in the United States at age eleven speaking not a word of English, who by age twenty-six befriended former president Theodore Roosevelt, and who by age fifty was one of Franklin Roosevelt&apos;s most trusted advisers. It is the story of a man devoted to democratic ideals, a natural orator and often overbearing justice, whose passion allowed him to amass highly influential friends and helped create the liberal establishment.
﻿William Domnarski is a longtime lawyer who before and during has been a literary guy, with a Ph.D. in English. He&apos;s written five books on judges, lawyers, and courts, two with Oxford, one with Illinois, one with Michigan, and one with the American Bar Association.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>165</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">c2be6c8c-987d-11f0-8e9f-f7f874be6408</guid>
      <title>Jacinto Cuvi, &quot;The Edge of the Law: Street Vendors and the Erosion of Citizenship in São Paulo&quot; (U Chicago Press, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>How street vendors tangle with the law in São Paulo, Brazil.</p>
<p>With a little initiative and very little startup money, an outgoing individual might sell you a number of delights and conveniences familiar to city dwellers—from cold water bottles while you’re sitting in traffic to a popsicle from a cart on a summer afternoon in the park. Such vendors form a significant share of the workforce in São Paulo, Brazil, but their ubiquity belies perpetual struggle. Some have the right to practice their trade; others do not. All of them strive to make it—or stay afloat.<br>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780226840895" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Edge of the Law: Street Vendors and the Erosion of Citizenship in São Paulo</a>, (U Chicago Press, 2025)&nbsp;<a href="https://www.bing.com/ck/a?!&amp;&amp;p=c2e0f064a68bee8c24e2260b3fdd58cf2fd0010bc4760b4c1706ea9f958dd3c7JmltdHM9MTc1ODQ5OTIwMA&amp;ptn=3&amp;ver=2&amp;hsh=4&amp;fclid=291cf835-b095-6c53-1358-edf4b1fa6d68&amp;psq=Jacinto+cuvi+sociology+sao+paulo&amp;u=a1aHR0cHM6Ly9qYWNpbnRvY3V2aS5jb20v" rel="noopener noreferrer">Jacinto Cuvi</a>&nbsp;introduces us to the world of street vendors and teases out the relationship between the construction of legality and the experience of citizenship. As São Paulo’s city government undertakes a large-scale plan to cancel street vending licenses and evict street vendors, Cuvi reveals how the rights of informal workers can be revoked or withheld and how the lines can be redrawn between work that is “legal” and work that takes place under constant fear of law enforcement. Alongside the mechanics of disenfranchisement, Cuvi captures the lived experience of criminalization, dissecting the distribution of (shallow) rights among vendors who continually reinvent strategies to eke out a living while dealing with the constraints and pressures of informal citizenship at the edge of the law.</p>
<p>Michael O. Johnston, Ph.D. is a Assistant Professor of Sociology at William Penn University. He is the author of The Social Construction of a Cultural Spectacle: Floatzilla (Lexington Books, 2023) and Community Media Representations of Place and Identity at Tug Fest: Reconstructing the Mississippi River (Lexington Books, 2022). His general area of study is at the intersection of space, behavior, and identity. He is currently conducting research about: escape rooms, the use of urban design in downtown historical neighborhoods of rural communities, and a study on belongingness in college and university. To learn more about Michael O. Johnston you can go to his personal website, Google Scholar, Bluesky (@professorjohnst.bsky.social), Twitter (@ProfessorJohnst), or by email</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/jacinto-cuvi-the-edge-of-the-law-street-vendors-and-the-erosion-of-citizenship-in-sao-paulo-u-chicago-press-2025-E8wb6odI</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How street vendors tangle with the law in São Paulo, Brazil.</p>
<p>With a little initiative and very little startup money, an outgoing individual might sell you a number of delights and conveniences familiar to city dwellers—from cold water bottles while you’re sitting in traffic to a popsicle from a cart on a summer afternoon in the park. Such vendors form a significant share of the workforce in São Paulo, Brazil, but their ubiquity belies perpetual struggle. Some have the right to practice their trade; others do not. All of them strive to make it—or stay afloat.<br>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780226840895" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Edge of the Law: Street Vendors and the Erosion of Citizenship in São Paulo</a>, (U Chicago Press, 2025)&nbsp;<a href="https://www.bing.com/ck/a?!&amp;&amp;p=c2e0f064a68bee8c24e2260b3fdd58cf2fd0010bc4760b4c1706ea9f958dd3c7JmltdHM9MTc1ODQ5OTIwMA&amp;ptn=3&amp;ver=2&amp;hsh=4&amp;fclid=291cf835-b095-6c53-1358-edf4b1fa6d68&amp;psq=Jacinto+cuvi+sociology+sao+paulo&amp;u=a1aHR0cHM6Ly9qYWNpbnRvY3V2aS5jb20v" rel="noopener noreferrer">Jacinto Cuvi</a>&nbsp;introduces us to the world of street vendors and teases out the relationship between the construction of legality and the experience of citizenship. As São Paulo’s city government undertakes a large-scale plan to cancel street vending licenses and evict street vendors, Cuvi reveals how the rights of informal workers can be revoked or withheld and how the lines can be redrawn between work that is “legal” and work that takes place under constant fear of law enforcement. Alongside the mechanics of disenfranchisement, Cuvi captures the lived experience of criminalization, dissecting the distribution of (shallow) rights among vendors who continually reinvent strategies to eke out a living while dealing with the constraints and pressures of informal citizenship at the edge of the law.</p>
<p>Michael O. Johnston, Ph.D. is a Assistant Professor of Sociology at William Penn University. He is the author of The Social Construction of a Cultural Spectacle: Floatzilla (Lexington Books, 2023) and Community Media Representations of Place and Identity at Tug Fest: Reconstructing the Mississippi River (Lexington Books, 2022). His general area of study is at the intersection of space, behavior, and identity. He is currently conducting research about: escape rooms, the use of urban design in downtown historical neighborhoods of rural communities, and a study on belongingness in college and university. To learn more about Michael O. Johnston you can go to his personal website, Google Scholar, Bluesky (@professorjohnst.bsky.social), Twitter (@ProfessorJohnst), or by email</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="43506205" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/098b8287-5a51-4662-8e59-e91b018e26e2/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=098b8287-5a51-4662-8e59-e91b018e26e2&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Jacinto Cuvi, &quot;The Edge of the Law: Street Vendors and the Erosion of Citizenship in São Paulo&quot; (U Chicago Press, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:45:18</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>How street vendors tangle with the law in São Paulo, Brazil.
With a little initiative and very little startup money, an outgoing individual might sell you a number of delights and conveniences familiar to city dwellers—from cold water bottles while you’re sitting in traffic to a popsicle from a cart on a summer afternoon in the park. Such vendors form a significant share of the workforce in São Paulo, Brazil, but their ubiquity belies perpetual struggle. Some have the right to practice their trade; others do not. All of them strive to make it—or stay afloat.In The Edge of the Law: Street Vendors and the Erosion of Citizenship in São Paulo, (U Chicago Press, 2025) Jacinto Cuvi introduces us to the world of street vendors and teases out the relationship between the construction of legality and the experience of citizenship. As São Paulo’s city government undertakes a large-scale plan to cancel street vending licenses and evict street vendors, Cuvi reveals how the rights of informal workers can be revoked or withheld and how the lines can be redrawn between work that is “legal” and work that takes place under constant fear of law enforcement. Alongside the mechanics of disenfranchisement, Cuvi captures the lived experience of criminalization, dissecting the distribution of (shallow) rights among vendors who continually reinvent strategies to eke out a living while dealing with the constraints and pressures of informal citizenship at the edge of the law.
Michael O. Johnston, Ph.D. is a Assistant Professor of Sociology at William Penn University. He is the author of The Social Construction of a Cultural Spectacle: Floatzilla (Lexington Books, 2023) and Community Media Representations of Place and Identity at Tug Fest: Reconstructing the Mississippi River (Lexington Books, 2022). His general area of study is at the intersection of space, behavior, and identity. He is currently conducting research about: escape rooms, the use of urban design in downtown historical neighborhoods of rural communities, and a study on belongingness in college and university. To learn more about Michael O. Johnston you can go to his personal website, Google Scholar, Bluesky (@professorjohnst.bsky.social), Twitter (@ProfessorJohnst), or by email
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>How street vendors tangle with the law in São Paulo, Brazil.
With a little initiative and very little startup money, an outgoing individual might sell you a number of delights and conveniences familiar to city dwellers—from cold water bottles while you’re sitting in traffic to a popsicle from a cart on a summer afternoon in the park. Such vendors form a significant share of the workforce in São Paulo, Brazil, but their ubiquity belies perpetual struggle. Some have the right to practice their trade; others do not. All of them strive to make it—or stay afloat.In The Edge of the Law: Street Vendors and the Erosion of Citizenship in São Paulo, (U Chicago Press, 2025) Jacinto Cuvi introduces us to the world of street vendors and teases out the relationship between the construction of legality and the experience of citizenship. As São Paulo’s city government undertakes a large-scale plan to cancel street vending licenses and evict street vendors, Cuvi reveals how the rights of informal workers can be revoked or withheld and how the lines can be redrawn between work that is “legal” and work that takes place under constant fear of law enforcement. Alongside the mechanics of disenfranchisement, Cuvi captures the lived experience of criminalization, dissecting the distribution of (shallow) rights among vendors who continually reinvent strategies to eke out a living while dealing with the constraints and pressures of informal citizenship at the edge of the law.
Michael O. Johnston, Ph.D. is a Assistant Professor of Sociology at William Penn University. He is the author of The Social Construction of a Cultural Spectacle: Floatzilla (Lexington Books, 2023) and Community Media Representations of Place and Identity at Tug Fest: Reconstructing the Mississippi River (Lexington Books, 2022). His general area of study is at the intersection of space, behavior, and identity. He is currently conducting research about: escape rooms, the use of urban design in downtown historical neighborhoods of rural communities, and a study on belongingness in college and university. To learn more about Michael O. Johnston you can go to his personal website, Google Scholar, Bluesky (@professorjohnst.bsky.social), Twitter (@ProfessorJohnst), or by email
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1610</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">341bbf92-920c-11f0-9e60-bf00fb9d8d28</guid>
      <title>Celene Reynolds, &quot;Unlawful Advances: How Feminists Transformed Title IX&quot; (Princeton UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>When the US Congress enacted Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, no one expected it to become a prominent tool for confronting sexual harassment in schools. Title IX is the civil rights law that prohibits education programs from discriminating “on the basis of sex.” At the time, however, the term “sexual harassment” was not yet in use; this kind of misconduct was simply accepted as part of life for girls and women at schools and universities. In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691206349" rel="noopener noreferrer">Unlawful Advances:&nbsp;How Feminists Transformed Title IX</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Princeton UP, 2025), Celene Reynolds shows how the women claiming protection under Title IX made sexual harassment into a form of sex discrimination barred by the law. Working together, feminist students and lawyers fundamentally changed the right to equal opportunity in education and schools’ obligations to ensure it.</p>
<p>Drawing on meticulously documented case studies, Reynolds explains how Title IX was applied to sexual harassment, linking the actions of feminists at Cornell, Yale, and Berkeley. Through analyses of key lawsuits and an original dataset of federal Title IX complaints, she traces the evolution of sexual harassment policy in education—from the early applications at elite universities to the growing sexual harassment bureaucracies on campuses today—and how the work of these feminists has forever shaped the law, university governance, and gender relations on campus. Reynolds argues that our political and interpretive struggle over this application of Title IX is far from finished. Her account illuminates this ongoing effort, as well as the more general process by which citizens can transform not only the laws that govern us, but also the very meaning of equality under American law.</p>
<p>New Books in Women’s History Podcast</p>
<p>Jane Scimeca, Professor of History at Brookdale Community College, website&nbsp;<a href="http://www.janescimeca.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a><br></p>
<p>@janescimeca.bsky.social</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/celene-reynolds-unlawful-advances-how-feminists-transformed-title-ix-princeton-up-2025-KfS47AAg</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When the US Congress enacted Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, no one expected it to become a prominent tool for confronting sexual harassment in schools. Title IX is the civil rights law that prohibits education programs from discriminating “on the basis of sex.” At the time, however, the term “sexual harassment” was not yet in use; this kind of misconduct was simply accepted as part of life for girls and women at schools and universities. In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691206349" rel="noopener noreferrer">Unlawful Advances:&nbsp;How Feminists Transformed Title IX</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Princeton UP, 2025), Celene Reynolds shows how the women claiming protection under Title IX made sexual harassment into a form of sex discrimination barred by the law. Working together, feminist students and lawyers fundamentally changed the right to equal opportunity in education and schools’ obligations to ensure it.</p>
<p>Drawing on meticulously documented case studies, Reynolds explains how Title IX was applied to sexual harassment, linking the actions of feminists at Cornell, Yale, and Berkeley. Through analyses of key lawsuits and an original dataset of federal Title IX complaints, she traces the evolution of sexual harassment policy in education—from the early applications at elite universities to the growing sexual harassment bureaucracies on campuses today—and how the work of these feminists has forever shaped the law, university governance, and gender relations on campus. Reynolds argues that our political and interpretive struggle over this application of Title IX is far from finished. Her account illuminates this ongoing effort, as well as the more general process by which citizens can transform not only the laws that govern us, but also the very meaning of equality under American law.</p>
<p>New Books in Women’s History Podcast</p>
<p>Jane Scimeca, Professor of History at Brookdale Community College, website&nbsp;<a href="http://www.janescimeca.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a><br></p>
<p>@janescimeca.bsky.social</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="40889555" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/d64c5d09-ad80-4cdc-b0aa-2b8db5fd24f3/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=d64c5d09-ad80-4cdc-b0aa-2b8db5fd24f3&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Celene Reynolds, &quot;Unlawful Advances: How Feminists Transformed Title IX&quot; (Princeton UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:42:35</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>When the US Congress enacted Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, no one expected it to become a prominent tool for confronting sexual harassment in schools. Title IX is the civil rights law that prohibits education programs from discriminating “on the basis of sex.” At the time, however, the term “sexual harassment” was not yet in use; this kind of misconduct was simply accepted as part of life for girls and women at schools and universities. In Unlawful Advances: How Feminists Transformed Title IX (Princeton UP, 2025), Celene Reynolds shows how the women claiming protection under Title IX made sexual harassment into a form of sex discrimination barred by the law. Working together, feminist students and lawyers fundamentally changed the right to equal opportunity in education and schools’ obligations to ensure it.
Drawing on meticulously documented case studies, Reynolds explains how Title IX was applied to sexual harassment, linking the actions of feminists at Cornell, Yale, and Berkeley. Through analyses of key lawsuits and an original dataset of federal Title IX complaints, she traces the evolution of sexual harassment policy in education—from the early applications at elite universities to the growing sexual harassment bureaucracies on campuses today—and how the work of these feminists has forever shaped the law, university governance, and gender relations on campus. Reynolds argues that our political and interpretive struggle over this application of Title IX is far from finished. Her account illuminates this ongoing effort, as well as the more general process by which citizens can transform not only the laws that govern us, but also the very meaning of equality under American law.
New Books in Women’s History Podcast
Jane Scimeca, Professor of History at Brookdale Community College, website here
@janescimeca.bsky.social
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>When the US Congress enacted Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, no one expected it to become a prominent tool for confronting sexual harassment in schools. Title IX is the civil rights law that prohibits education programs from discriminating “on the basis of sex.” At the time, however, the term “sexual harassment” was not yet in use; this kind of misconduct was simply accepted as part of life for girls and women at schools and universities. In Unlawful Advances: How Feminists Transformed Title IX (Princeton UP, 2025), Celene Reynolds shows how the women claiming protection under Title IX made sexual harassment into a form of sex discrimination barred by the law. Working together, feminist students and lawyers fundamentally changed the right to equal opportunity in education and schools’ obligations to ensure it.
Drawing on meticulously documented case studies, Reynolds explains how Title IX was applied to sexual harassment, linking the actions of feminists at Cornell, Yale, and Berkeley. Through analyses of key lawsuits and an original dataset of federal Title IX complaints, she traces the evolution of sexual harassment policy in education—from the early applications at elite universities to the growing sexual harassment bureaucracies on campuses today—and how the work of these feminists has forever shaped the law, university governance, and gender relations on campus. Reynolds argues that our political and interpretive struggle over this application of Title IX is far from finished. Her account illuminates this ongoing effort, as well as the more general process by which citizens can transform not only the laws that govern us, but also the very meaning of equality under American law.
New Books in Women’s History Podcast
Jane Scimeca, Professor of History at Brookdale Community College, website here
@janescimeca.bsky.social
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1608</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">038c49fe-920d-11f0-b1f9-0b299c84af75</guid>
      <title>Rebecca Nagle, &quot;By the Fire We Carry: The Generations-Long Fight for Justice on Native Land&quot; (Harper, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In 2020, the US Supreme Court ruled, in a surprise decision, that treaties still on the books as US law meant that the Muscogee people of Oklahoma maintained legal jurisdiction over a large portion of the state; in short, that much of Oklahoma remained Indian Country.&nbsp;<em>McGirt v. Oklahoma</em>&nbsp;has been fought over in the court system since, but the implications are ongoing, in Oklahoma and elsewhere. In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780063112049" rel="noopener noreferrer">By the Fire We Carry:&nbsp;The Generations-Long Fight for Justice on Native Land﻿</a>&nbsp;﻿(Harper, 2024),&nbsp;award winning journalist, writer, and podcaster Rebecca Nagle tracks this story back hundreds of years, through the history of the Muscogee and other Southeastern&nbsp;Indigenous nations, to the era of removal in the 1830s, and up through the present day. This includes the case of Patrick Murphy, and the murder that kickstarted&nbsp;<em>McGirt's</em>&nbsp;surprising and unlikely trek through the courts. A powerful of story of what can happen when people simply follow the laws as written, Nagle argues that Indigenous resistance, resilience, and power as just as much of the story of the West as disposession and land loss.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/rebecca-nagle-by-the-fire-we-carry-the-generations-long-fight-for-justice-on-native-land-harper-2024-72pQW_Qj</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In 2020, the US Supreme Court ruled, in a surprise decision, that treaties still on the books as US law meant that the Muscogee people of Oklahoma maintained legal jurisdiction over a large portion of the state; in short, that much of Oklahoma remained Indian Country.&nbsp;<em>McGirt v. Oklahoma</em>&nbsp;has been fought over in the court system since, but the implications are ongoing, in Oklahoma and elsewhere. In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780063112049" rel="noopener noreferrer">By the Fire We Carry:&nbsp;The Generations-Long Fight for Justice on Native Land﻿</a>&nbsp;﻿(Harper, 2024),&nbsp;award winning journalist, writer, and podcaster Rebecca Nagle tracks this story back hundreds of years, through the history of the Muscogee and other Southeastern&nbsp;Indigenous nations, to the era of removal in the 1830s, and up through the present day. This includes the case of Patrick Murphy, and the murder that kickstarted&nbsp;<em>McGirt's</em>&nbsp;surprising and unlikely trek through the courts. A powerful of story of what can happen when people simply follow the laws as written, Nagle argues that Indigenous resistance, resilience, and power as just as much of the story of the West as disposession and land loss.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="35092471" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/015a96f8-285e-4e5d-b9a4-51a56b70cffa/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=015a96f8-285e-4e5d-b9a4-51a56b70cffa&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Rebecca Nagle, &quot;By the Fire We Carry: The Generations-Long Fight for Justice on Native Land&quot; (Harper, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:36:33</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In 2020, the US Supreme Court ruled, in a surprise decision, that treaties still on the books as US law meant that the Muscogee people of Oklahoma maintained legal jurisdiction over a large portion of the state; in short, that much of Oklahoma remained Indian Country. McGirt v. Oklahoma has been fought over in the court system since, but the implications are ongoing, in Oklahoma and elsewhere. In By the Fire We Carry: The Generations-Long Fight for Justice on Native Land﻿ ﻿(Harper, 2024), award winning journalist, writer, and podcaster Rebecca Nagle tracks this story back hundreds of years, through the history of the Muscogee and other Southeastern Indigenous nations, to the era of removal in the 1830s, and up through the present day. This includes the case of Patrick Murphy, and the murder that kickstarted McGirt&apos;s surprising and unlikely trek through the courts. A powerful of story of what can happen when people simply follow the laws as written, Nagle argues that Indigenous resistance, resilience, and power as just as much of the story of the West as disposession and land loss.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In 2020, the US Supreme Court ruled, in a surprise decision, that treaties still on the books as US law meant that the Muscogee people of Oklahoma maintained legal jurisdiction over a large portion of the state; in short, that much of Oklahoma remained Indian Country. McGirt v. Oklahoma has been fought over in the court system since, but the implications are ongoing, in Oklahoma and elsewhere. In By the Fire We Carry: The Generations-Long Fight for Justice on Native Land﻿ ﻿(Harper, 2024), award winning journalist, writer, and podcaster Rebecca Nagle tracks this story back hundreds of years, through the history of the Muscogee and other Southeastern Indigenous nations, to the era of removal in the 1830s, and up through the present day. This includes the case of Patrick Murphy, and the murder that kickstarted McGirt&apos;s surprising and unlikely trek through the courts. A powerful of story of what can happen when people simply follow the laws as written, Nagle argues that Indigenous resistance, resilience, and power as just as much of the story of the West as disposession and land loss.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1609</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8c8b3efa-91da-11f0-828c-7303fd75d4e7</guid>
      <title>Katherine Eva Maich, &quot;Bringing Law Home: Gender, Race, and Household Labor Rights&quot; (Stanford UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The personal nature of domestic labor, and its location in the privacy of the employer's home, means that domestic workers have long struggled for equitable and consistent labor rights. The dominant discourse regards the home as separate from work, so envisioning what its legal regulation would look like is remarkably challenging.</p>
<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781503642201" rel="noopener noreferrer">Bringing Law Home: Gender, Race, and Household Labor Rights</a>&nbsp;(Stanford University Press, 2025), Dr. Katherine Eva Maich offers a uniquely comparative and historical study of labor struggles for domestic workers in New York City and Lima, Peru. She argues that if the home is to be a place of work then it must also be captured in the legal infrastructures that regulate work. Yet, even progressive labor laws for domestic workers in each city are stifled by historically entrenched patterns of gendered racialization and labor informality. Peruvian law extends to household workers only half of the labor protections afforded to other occupations. In New York City, the law grants negligible protections and deliberately eschews language around immigration. Dr. Maich finds that coloniality is deeply embedded in contemporary relations of service, revealing important distinctions in how we understand power, domination, and inequality in the home and the workplace.</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/katherine-eva-maich-bringing-law-home-gender-race-and-household-labor-rights-stanford-up-2025-a_De6m_s</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The personal nature of domestic labor, and its location in the privacy of the employer's home, means that domestic workers have long struggled for equitable and consistent labor rights. The dominant discourse regards the home as separate from work, so envisioning what its legal regulation would look like is remarkably challenging.</p>
<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781503642201" rel="noopener noreferrer">Bringing Law Home: Gender, Race, and Household Labor Rights</a>&nbsp;(Stanford University Press, 2025), Dr. Katherine Eva Maich offers a uniquely comparative and historical study of labor struggles for domestic workers in New York City and Lima, Peru. She argues that if the home is to be a place of work then it must also be captured in the legal infrastructures that regulate work. Yet, even progressive labor laws for domestic workers in each city are stifled by historically entrenched patterns of gendered racialization and labor informality. Peruvian law extends to household workers only half of the labor protections afforded to other occupations. In New York City, the law grants negligible protections and deliberately eschews language around immigration. Dr. Maich finds that coloniality is deeply embedded in contemporary relations of service, revealing important distinctions in how we understand power, domination, and inequality in the home and the workplace.</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="43126007" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/66d1ce10-fd61-481a-a018-4f56abc49f68/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=66d1ce10-fd61-481a-a018-4f56abc49f68&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Katherine Eva Maich, &quot;Bringing Law Home: Gender, Race, and Household Labor Rights&quot; (Stanford UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:44:55</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The personal nature of domestic labor, and its location in the privacy of the employer&apos;s home, means that domestic workers have long struggled for equitable and consistent labor rights. The dominant discourse regards the home as separate from work, so envisioning what its legal regulation would look like is remarkably challenging.
In Bringing Law Home: Gender, Race, and Household Labor Rights (Stanford University Press, 2025), Dr. Katherine Eva Maich offers a uniquely comparative and historical study of labor struggles for domestic workers in New York City and Lima, Peru. She argues that if the home is to be a place of work then it must also be captured in the legal infrastructures that regulate work. Yet, even progressive labor laws for domestic workers in each city are stifled by historically entrenched patterns of gendered racialization and labor informality. Peruvian law extends to household workers only half of the labor protections afforded to other occupations. In New York City, the law grants negligible protections and deliberately eschews language around immigration. Dr. Maich finds that coloniality is deeply embedded in contemporary relations of service, revealing important distinctions in how we understand power, domination, and inequality in the home and the workplace.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The personal nature of domestic labor, and its location in the privacy of the employer&apos;s home, means that domestic workers have long struggled for equitable and consistent labor rights. The dominant discourse regards the home as separate from work, so envisioning what its legal regulation would look like is remarkably challenging.
In Bringing Law Home: Gender, Race, and Household Labor Rights (Stanford University Press, 2025), Dr. Katherine Eva Maich offers a uniquely comparative and historical study of labor struggles for domestic workers in New York City and Lima, Peru. She argues that if the home is to be a place of work then it must also be captured in the legal infrastructures that regulate work. Yet, even progressive labor laws for domestic workers in each city are stifled by historically entrenched patterns of gendered racialization and labor informality. Peruvian law extends to household workers only half of the labor protections afforded to other occupations. In New York City, the law grants negligible protections and deliberately eschews language around immigration. Dr. Maich finds that coloniality is deeply embedded in contemporary relations of service, revealing important distinctions in how we understand power, domination, and inequality in the home and the workplace.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1606</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">46659bd2-91e4-11f0-9270-8b161f39973c</guid>
      <title>Julien Mailland on &quot;The Game That Never Ends: How Lawyers Shape the Videogame Industry&quot;</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Peoples &amp; Things host, Lee Vinsel, talks with Julien Mailland, Associate Professor of Media Management, Law, and Policy at The Media School of Indiana University Bloomington, about his book, <em>The Game That Never Ends: How Lawyers Shape the Videogame Industry</em>. The book examines key moments, beginning in the 1970s, in which legal decisions influenced how the videogame industry worked, how law shaped business and technology strategy and vice versa. The conversation touches on the book’s three major themes: intellectual property, freedom of speech, and international law. The pair also discuss Mailland’s new project, a geopolitical history of the best-selling videogame of all time, Tetris.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/julien-mailland-on-the-game-that-never-ends-how-lawyers-shape-the-videogame-industry-ne4pozNl</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peoples &amp; Things host, Lee Vinsel, talks with Julien Mailland, Associate Professor of Media Management, Law, and Policy at The Media School of Indiana University Bloomington, about his book, <em>The Game That Never Ends: How Lawyers Shape the Videogame Industry</em>. The book examines key moments, beginning in the 1970s, in which legal decisions influenced how the videogame industry worked, how law shaped business and technology strategy and vice versa. The conversation touches on the book’s three major themes: intellectual property, freedom of speech, and international law. The pair also discuss Mailland’s new project, a geopolitical history of the best-selling videogame of all time, Tetris.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="64017244" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/49ae92c1-602a-4d4e-a9cc-be238f5a8d21/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=49ae92c1-602a-4d4e-a9cc-be238f5a8d21&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Julien Mailland on &quot;The Game That Never Ends: How Lawyers Shape the Videogame Industry&quot;</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:06:40</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Peoples &amp; Things host, Lee Vinsel, talks with Julien Mailland, Associate Professor of Media Management, Law, and Policy at The Media School of Indiana University Bloomington, about his book, The Game That Never Ends: How Lawyers Shape the Videogame Industry. The book examines key moments, beginning in the 1970s, in which legal decisions influenced how the videogame industry worked, how law shaped business and technology strategy and vice versa. The conversation touches on the book’s three major themes: intellectual property, freedom of speech, and international law. The pair also discuss Mailland’s new project, a geopolitical history of the best-selling videogame of all time, Tetris.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Peoples &amp; Things host, Lee Vinsel, talks with Julien Mailland, Associate Professor of Media Management, Law, and Policy at The Media School of Indiana University Bloomington, about his book, The Game That Never Ends: How Lawyers Shape the Videogame Industry. The book examines key moments, beginning in the 1970s, in which legal decisions influenced how the videogame industry worked, how law shaped business and technology strategy and vice versa. The conversation touches on the book’s three major themes: intellectual property, freedom of speech, and international law. The pair also discuss Mailland’s new project, a geopolitical history of the best-selling videogame of all time, Tetris.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1607</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">033b39de-8dfc-11f0-9669-4fa8fdfb5df3</guid>
      <title>Rose Casey, &quot;Aesthetic Impropriety: Property Law and Postcolonial Style&quot; (Fordham UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781531510633" rel="noopener noreferrer">Aesthetic Impropriety: Property Law and Postcolonial Style&nbsp;</a>(Fordham UP, 2025)&nbsp;analyzes vanguard legal actions and literary innovations to reveal contemporary reforms to property law that are undoing law’s colonial legacies. Casey traces precise legal histories across distinct jurisdictions throughout the anglophone world, revealing the connection between land law and petroleum extraction in the Niger Delta, inheritance and divorce laws and gender inequality in India, intellectual property law and Indigenous dispossession in South Africa, and admiralty law and racialized non-personhood in the English Atlantic. In response to these manifold forms of dispossession, significant reforms are underway, including through common lawsuits, statutory reform, and proposed changes to legal doctrine.</p>
<p>﻿Casey develops the concept of aesthetic impropriety to identify shared structures of thought across legal and literary venues. She shows that writers of poetry and prose are also transforming harmful property laws: in Nigeria, Ben Okri and Chigozie Obioma have articulated symbiotic ecological relationships that are also evidenced in recent actions against petroleum companies; in India, Arundhati Roy’s challenge to divorce laws has preempted similar attempts at reform in Parliament; in South Africa, Zoë Wicomb theorized protections for Indigenous modes of creative production nineteen years before they were signed into law; and in the Americas, M. NourbeSe Philip has proposed a novel method of achieving justice for the one hundred fifty enslaved people who were killed in the 1781&nbsp;<em>Zong</em>&nbsp;massacre.<br><em>Aesthetic Impropriety</em>&nbsp;makes a convincing case for literature’s generative capacities and registers the enduring significance of the postcolonial as a necessary framework for understanding globalized inequality in the twenty-first century. By analyzing shared legal and aesthetic transformations,&nbsp;<em>Aesthetic Impropriety</em>&nbsp;argues that law and literature play vital roles in creating anticolonial world orders.</p>
<p>Arnab Dutta Roy&nbsp;is Assistant Professor of World Literature and Postcolonial Theory at Florida Gulf Coast University.﻿</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/rose-casey-aesthetic-impropriety-property-law-and-postcolonial-style-fordham-up-2025-SdRB7_6b</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781531510633" rel="noopener noreferrer">Aesthetic Impropriety: Property Law and Postcolonial Style&nbsp;</a>(Fordham UP, 2025)&nbsp;analyzes vanguard legal actions and literary innovations to reveal contemporary reforms to property law that are undoing law’s colonial legacies. Casey traces precise legal histories across distinct jurisdictions throughout the anglophone world, revealing the connection between land law and petroleum extraction in the Niger Delta, inheritance and divorce laws and gender inequality in India, intellectual property law and Indigenous dispossession in South Africa, and admiralty law and racialized non-personhood in the English Atlantic. In response to these manifold forms of dispossession, significant reforms are underway, including through common lawsuits, statutory reform, and proposed changes to legal doctrine.</p>
<p>﻿Casey develops the concept of aesthetic impropriety to identify shared structures of thought across legal and literary venues. She shows that writers of poetry and prose are also transforming harmful property laws: in Nigeria, Ben Okri and Chigozie Obioma have articulated symbiotic ecological relationships that are also evidenced in recent actions against petroleum companies; in India, Arundhati Roy’s challenge to divorce laws has preempted similar attempts at reform in Parliament; in South Africa, Zoë Wicomb theorized protections for Indigenous modes of creative production nineteen years before they were signed into law; and in the Americas, M. NourbeSe Philip has proposed a novel method of achieving justice for the one hundred fifty enslaved people who were killed in the 1781&nbsp;<em>Zong</em>&nbsp;massacre.<br><em>Aesthetic Impropriety</em>&nbsp;makes a convincing case for literature’s generative capacities and registers the enduring significance of the postcolonial as a necessary framework for understanding globalized inequality in the twenty-first century. By analyzing shared legal and aesthetic transformations,&nbsp;<em>Aesthetic Impropriety</em>&nbsp;argues that law and literature play vital roles in creating anticolonial world orders.</p>
<p>Arnab Dutta Roy&nbsp;is Assistant Professor of World Literature and Postcolonial Theory at Florida Gulf Coast University.﻿</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="51062062" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/a8dfce70-fe4d-4fa5-8db5-bf8afda00d03/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=a8dfce70-fe4d-4fa5-8db5-bf8afda00d03&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Rose Casey, &quot;Aesthetic Impropriety: Property Law and Postcolonial Style&quot; (Fordham UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:53:11</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Aesthetic Impropriety: Property Law and Postcolonial Style (Fordham UP, 2025) analyzes vanguard legal actions and literary innovations to reveal contemporary reforms to property law that are undoing law’s colonial legacies. Casey traces precise legal histories across distinct jurisdictions throughout the anglophone world, revealing the connection between land law and petroleum extraction in the Niger Delta, inheritance and divorce laws and gender inequality in India, intellectual property law and Indigenous dispossession in South Africa, and admiralty law and racialized non-personhood in the English Atlantic. In response to these manifold forms of dispossession, significant reforms are underway, including through common lawsuits, statutory reform, and proposed changes to legal doctrine.
﻿Casey develops the concept of aesthetic impropriety to identify shared structures of thought across legal and literary venues. She shows that writers of poetry and prose are also transforming harmful property laws: in Nigeria, Ben Okri and Chigozie Obioma have articulated symbiotic ecological relationships that are also evidenced in recent actions against petroleum companies; in India, Arundhati Roy’s challenge to divorce laws has preempted similar attempts at reform in Parliament; in South Africa, Zoë Wicomb theorized protections for Indigenous modes of creative production nineteen years before they were signed into law; and in the Americas, M. NourbeSe Philip has proposed a novel method of achieving justice for the one hundred fifty enslaved people who were killed in the 1781 Zong massacre.Aesthetic Impropriety makes a convincing case for literature’s generative capacities and registers the enduring significance of the postcolonial as a necessary framework for understanding globalized inequality in the twenty-first century. By analyzing shared legal and aesthetic transformations, Aesthetic Impropriety argues that law and literature play vital roles in creating anticolonial world orders.
Arnab Dutta Roy is Assistant Professor of World Literature and Postcolonial Theory at Florida Gulf Coast University.﻿
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Aesthetic Impropriety: Property Law and Postcolonial Style (Fordham UP, 2025) analyzes vanguard legal actions and literary innovations to reveal contemporary reforms to property law that are undoing law’s colonial legacies. Casey traces precise legal histories across distinct jurisdictions throughout the anglophone world, revealing the connection between land law and petroleum extraction in the Niger Delta, inheritance and divorce laws and gender inequality in India, intellectual property law and Indigenous dispossession in South Africa, and admiralty law and racialized non-personhood in the English Atlantic. In response to these manifold forms of dispossession, significant reforms are underway, including through common lawsuits, statutory reform, and proposed changes to legal doctrine.
﻿Casey develops the concept of aesthetic impropriety to identify shared structures of thought across legal and literary venues. She shows that writers of poetry and prose are also transforming harmful property laws: in Nigeria, Ben Okri and Chigozie Obioma have articulated symbiotic ecological relationships that are also evidenced in recent actions against petroleum companies; in India, Arundhati Roy’s challenge to divorce laws has preempted similar attempts at reform in Parliament; in South Africa, Zoë Wicomb theorized protections for Indigenous modes of creative production nineteen years before they were signed into law; and in the Americas, M. NourbeSe Philip has proposed a novel method of achieving justice for the one hundred fifty enslaved people who were killed in the 1781 Zong massacre.Aesthetic Impropriety makes a convincing case for literature’s generative capacities and registers the enduring significance of the postcolonial as a necessary framework for understanding globalized inequality in the twenty-first century. By analyzing shared legal and aesthetic transformations, Aesthetic Impropriety argues that law and literature play vital roles in creating anticolonial world orders.
Arnab Dutta Roy is Assistant Professor of World Literature and Postcolonial Theory at Florida Gulf Coast University.﻿
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1605</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">53658776-8c89-11f0-a8fd-4f9478bb3590</guid>
      <title>Maria R. Montalvo, &quot;Enslaved Archives: Slavery, Law, and the Production of the Past&quot; (Johns Hopkins UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Explores the relationship between the production of enslaved property and the production of the past in the antebellum United States.</p>
<p>It is extraordinarily difficult for historians to reconstruct the lives of individual enslaved people. Records--where they exist--are often fragmentary, biased, or untrue. In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781421449463" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Enslaved Archives: Slavery, Law, and the Production of the Past</em>&nbsp;</a>(Johns Hopkins UP, 2024),&nbsp;Maria R. Montalvo investigates the legal records, including contracts and court records, that American antebellum enslavers produced and preserved to illuminate enslavers' capitalistic motivations for shaping the histories of enslaved people. The documentary archive was not simply a by-product of the business of slavery, but also a necessary tool that enslavers used to exploit the people they enslaved.</p>
<p>Building on Montalvo's analysis of more than 18,000 sets of court records,&nbsp;<em>Enslaved Archives&nbsp;</em>is a close study of what we can and cannot learn about enslaved individuals from the written record. By examining five lawsuits in Louisiana, Montalvo deconstructs enslavers' cases--the legal arguments and rhetorical strategies they used to produce information and shape perceptions of enslaved people. Commodifying enslaved people was not simply a matter of effectively exploiting their labor. Enslavers also needed to control information about those people. Enslavers' narratives--carefully manipulated, prone to omissions, and sometimes false--often survive as the only account of an enslaved individual's life.</p>
<p>In working to historicize the people at the center of enslavers' manipulations, Montalvo outlines the possibilities and limits of the archive, providing a glimpse of the historical and contemporary consequences of commodification.&nbsp;<em>Enslaved Archives</em>&nbsp;makes a significant intervention in the history of enslaved people, legal history, and the history of slavery and capitalism by adding a qualitative dimension to the analysis of how enslavers created and maintained power.﻿</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 9 Sep 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/maria-r-montalvo-enslaved-archives-slavery-law-and-the-production-of-the-past-johns-hopkins-up-2024-88peJlLP</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Explores the relationship between the production of enslaved property and the production of the past in the antebellum United States.</p>
<p>It is extraordinarily difficult for historians to reconstruct the lives of individual enslaved people. Records--where they exist--are often fragmentary, biased, or untrue. In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781421449463" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Enslaved Archives: Slavery, Law, and the Production of the Past</em>&nbsp;</a>(Johns Hopkins UP, 2024),&nbsp;Maria R. Montalvo investigates the legal records, including contracts and court records, that American antebellum enslavers produced and preserved to illuminate enslavers' capitalistic motivations for shaping the histories of enslaved people. The documentary archive was not simply a by-product of the business of slavery, but also a necessary tool that enslavers used to exploit the people they enslaved.</p>
<p>Building on Montalvo's analysis of more than 18,000 sets of court records,&nbsp;<em>Enslaved Archives&nbsp;</em>is a close study of what we can and cannot learn about enslaved individuals from the written record. By examining five lawsuits in Louisiana, Montalvo deconstructs enslavers' cases--the legal arguments and rhetorical strategies they used to produce information and shape perceptions of enslaved people. Commodifying enslaved people was not simply a matter of effectively exploiting their labor. Enslavers also needed to control information about those people. Enslavers' narratives--carefully manipulated, prone to omissions, and sometimes false--often survive as the only account of an enslaved individual's life.</p>
<p>In working to historicize the people at the center of enslavers' manipulations, Montalvo outlines the possibilities and limits of the archive, providing a glimpse of the historical and contemporary consequences of commodification.&nbsp;<em>Enslaved Archives</em>&nbsp;makes a significant intervention in the history of enslaved people, legal history, and the history of slavery and capitalism by adding a qualitative dimension to the analysis of how enslavers created and maintained power.﻿</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="78993736" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/26faa8e6-0ba5-41ba-9b35-d18b8d6264bd/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=26faa8e6-0ba5-41ba-9b35-d18b8d6264bd&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Maria R. Montalvo, &quot;Enslaved Archives: Slavery, Law, and the Production of the Past&quot; (Johns Hopkins UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:22:16</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Explores the relationship between the production of enslaved property and the production of the past in the antebellum United States.
It is extraordinarily difficult for historians to reconstruct the lives of individual enslaved people. Records--where they exist--are often fragmentary, biased, or untrue. In Enslaved Archives: Slavery, Law, and the Production of the Past (Johns Hopkins UP, 2024), Maria R. Montalvo investigates the legal records, including contracts and court records, that American antebellum enslavers produced and preserved to illuminate enslavers&apos; capitalistic motivations for shaping the histories of enslaved people. The documentary archive was not simply a by-product of the business of slavery, but also a necessary tool that enslavers used to exploit the people they enslaved.
Building on Montalvo&apos;s analysis of more than 18,000 sets of court records, Enslaved Archives is a close study of what we can and cannot learn about enslaved individuals from the written record. By examining five lawsuits in Louisiana, Montalvo deconstructs enslavers&apos; cases--the legal arguments and rhetorical strategies they used to produce information and shape perceptions of enslaved people. Commodifying enslaved people was not simply a matter of effectively exploiting their labor. Enslavers also needed to control information about those people. Enslavers&apos; narratives--carefully manipulated, prone to omissions, and sometimes false--often survive as the only account of an enslaved individual&apos;s life.
In working to historicize the people at the center of enslavers&apos; manipulations, Montalvo outlines the possibilities and limits of the archive, providing a glimpse of the historical and contemporary consequences of commodification. Enslaved Archives makes a significant intervention in the history of enslaved people, legal history, and the history of slavery and capitalism by adding a qualitative dimension to the analysis of how enslavers created and maintained power.﻿
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Explores the relationship between the production of enslaved property and the production of the past in the antebellum United States.
It is extraordinarily difficult for historians to reconstruct the lives of individual enslaved people. Records--where they exist--are often fragmentary, biased, or untrue. In Enslaved Archives: Slavery, Law, and the Production of the Past (Johns Hopkins UP, 2024), Maria R. Montalvo investigates the legal records, including contracts and court records, that American antebellum enslavers produced and preserved to illuminate enslavers&apos; capitalistic motivations for shaping the histories of enslaved people. The documentary archive was not simply a by-product of the business of slavery, but also a necessary tool that enslavers used to exploit the people they enslaved.
Building on Montalvo&apos;s analysis of more than 18,000 sets of court records, Enslaved Archives is a close study of what we can and cannot learn about enslaved individuals from the written record. By examining five lawsuits in Louisiana, Montalvo deconstructs enslavers&apos; cases--the legal arguments and rhetorical strategies they used to produce information and shape perceptions of enslaved people. Commodifying enslaved people was not simply a matter of effectively exploiting their labor. Enslavers also needed to control information about those people. Enslavers&apos; narratives--carefully manipulated, prone to omissions, and sometimes false--often survive as the only account of an enslaved individual&apos;s life.
In working to historicize the people at the center of enslavers&apos; manipulations, Montalvo outlines the possibilities and limits of the archive, providing a glimpse of the historical and contemporary consequences of commodification. Enslaved Archives makes a significant intervention in the history of enslaved people, legal history, and the history of slavery and capitalism by adding a qualitative dimension to the analysis of how enslavers created and maintained power.﻿
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1604</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">d77fa2f0-89d5-11f0-820d-8745bc9b0410</guid>
      <title>Karen Bartlett, &quot;Escape from Kabul: The Afghan Women Judges Who Fled the Taliban and Those They Left Behind&quot; (New Press, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In this episode, New Books Network Host Nina Bo Wagner&nbsp;speaks with Karen Bartlett about&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781620978733" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Escape From Kabul: A True Story of Sisterhood and Defiance</a>&nbsp;(The New Press and Duckworth, 2025).</p>
<p>The book follows Afghan women judges who fought for justice in the courtroom, then fought to escape with their lives. Across twenty years of U.S.-backed government, Afghan women obtained legal degrees, became judges, and set out to transform their country. Their work, however, posed an existential threat to everything the Taliban believed in. When the United States withdrew in August 2021, the women judges of Afghanistan faced mortal danger.</p>
<p>Journalist Karen Bartlett goes beyond their escape, and&nbsp;talks about the Afghan women judges’ backgrounds, the cases they were tie breakers on, and the importance of the international network of women judges who helped them evacuate in 2021.</p>
<p>Bartlett critiques the abandonment of Afghanistan by the West, and warns people not to normalise or be complacent to the Taliban regime which is still strongly opposed within the country. She also calls for the international community to take accountability for women judges who are still left in limbo or trapped in Afghanistan.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 5 Sep 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/karen-bartlett-escape-from-kabul-the-afghan-women-judges-who-fled-the-taliban-and-those-they-left-behind-new-press-2025-LcyPXKQn</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this episode, New Books Network Host Nina Bo Wagner&nbsp;speaks with Karen Bartlett about&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781620978733" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Escape From Kabul: A True Story of Sisterhood and Defiance</a>&nbsp;(The New Press and Duckworth, 2025).</p>
<p>The book follows Afghan women judges who fought for justice in the courtroom, then fought to escape with their lives. Across twenty years of U.S.-backed government, Afghan women obtained legal degrees, became judges, and set out to transform their country. Their work, however, posed an existential threat to everything the Taliban believed in. When the United States withdrew in August 2021, the women judges of Afghanistan faced mortal danger.</p>
<p>Journalist Karen Bartlett goes beyond their escape, and&nbsp;talks about the Afghan women judges’ backgrounds, the cases they were tie breakers on, and the importance of the international network of women judges who helped them evacuate in 2021.</p>
<p>Bartlett critiques the abandonment of Afghanistan by the West, and warns people not to normalise or be complacent to the Taliban regime which is still strongly opposed within the country. She also calls for the international community to take accountability for women judges who are still left in limbo or trapped in Afghanistan.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="55011263" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/7ca169b8-a8fb-406c-86c5-747055cc6c44/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=7ca169b8-a8fb-406c-86c5-747055cc6c44&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Karen Bartlett, &quot;Escape from Kabul: The Afghan Women Judges Who Fled the Taliban and Those They Left Behind&quot; (New Press, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:57:18</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this episode, New Books Network Host Nina Bo Wagner speaks with Karen Bartlett about The Escape From Kabul: A True Story of Sisterhood and Defiance (The New Press and Duckworth, 2025).
The book follows Afghan women judges who fought for justice in the courtroom, then fought to escape with their lives. Across twenty years of U.S.-backed government, Afghan women obtained legal degrees, became judges, and set out to transform their country. Their work, however, posed an existential threat to everything the Taliban believed in. When the United States withdrew in August 2021, the women judges of Afghanistan faced mortal danger.
Journalist Karen Bartlett goes beyond their escape, and talks about the Afghan women judges’ backgrounds, the cases they were tie breakers on, and the importance of the international network of women judges who helped them evacuate in 2021.
Bartlett critiques the abandonment of Afghanistan by the West, and warns people not to normalise or be complacent to the Taliban regime which is still strongly opposed within the country. She also calls for the international community to take accountability for women judges who are still left in limbo or trapped in Afghanistan.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode, New Books Network Host Nina Bo Wagner speaks with Karen Bartlett about The Escape From Kabul: A True Story of Sisterhood and Defiance (The New Press and Duckworth, 2025).
The book follows Afghan women judges who fought for justice in the courtroom, then fought to escape with their lives. Across twenty years of U.S.-backed government, Afghan women obtained legal degrees, became judges, and set out to transform their country. Their work, however, posed an existential threat to everything the Taliban believed in. When the United States withdrew in August 2021, the women judges of Afghanistan faced mortal danger.
Journalist Karen Bartlett goes beyond their escape, and talks about the Afghan women judges’ backgrounds, the cases they were tie breakers on, and the importance of the international network of women judges who helped them evacuate in 2021.
Bartlett critiques the abandonment of Afghanistan by the West, and warns people not to normalise or be complacent to the Taliban regime which is still strongly opposed within the country. She also calls for the international community to take accountability for women judges who are still left in limbo or trapped in Afghanistan.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1603</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">48de46a0-84fd-11f0-95d9-03e865e48ffd</guid>
      <title>Brendan A. Shanahan, &quot;Disparate Regimes: Nativist Politics, Alienage Law, and Citizenship Rights in the United States, 1865-1965&quot; (Oxford UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Historians have well described how US immigration policy increasingly fell under the purview of federal law and national politics in the mid-to-late nineteenth century. It is far less understood that the rights of noncitizen immigrants in the country remained primarily contested in the realms of state politics and law until the mid-to-late twentieth century. Such state-level political debates often centered on whether noncitizen immigrants should vote, count as part of the polity for the purposes of state legislative representation, work in public and publicly funded employment, or obtain professional licensure.<br>Enacted state alienage laws were rarely self-executing, and immigrants and their allies regularly challenged nativist restrictions in court, on the job, by appealing to lawmakers and the public, and even via diplomacy. Battles over the passage, implementation, and constitutionality of such policies at times aligned with and sometimes clashed against contemporaneous efforts to expand rights to marginalized Americans, particularly US-born women.&nbsp;</p>
<p>Often considered separately or treated as topics of marginal importance,&nbsp;<em>Disparate Regimes: Nativist Politics, Alienage Law, and Citizenship Rights in the United States, 1865–1965</em>&nbsp;(Oxford University Press, 2025) by Dr. Brendan A. Shanahan underscores the centrality of nativist state politics and alienage policies to the history of American immigration and citizenship from the late nineteenth to the mid-twentieth centuries. It argues that the proliferation of these debates and laws produced veritable disparate regimes of citizenship rights in the American political economy on a state-by-state basis. It further illustrates how nativist state politics and alienage policies helped to invent and concretize the idea that citizenship rights meant citizen-only rights in law, practice, and popular perception in the United States.</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 1 Sep 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/brendan-a-shanahan-disparate-regimes-nativist-politics-alienage-law-and-citizenship-rights-in-the-united-states-1865-1965-oxford-up-2025-8TnH8kbq</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Historians have well described how US immigration policy increasingly fell under the purview of federal law and national politics in the mid-to-late nineteenth century. It is far less understood that the rights of noncitizen immigrants in the country remained primarily contested in the realms of state politics and law until the mid-to-late twentieth century. Such state-level political debates often centered on whether noncitizen immigrants should vote, count as part of the polity for the purposes of state legislative representation, work in public and publicly funded employment, or obtain professional licensure.<br>Enacted state alienage laws were rarely self-executing, and immigrants and their allies regularly challenged nativist restrictions in court, on the job, by appealing to lawmakers and the public, and even via diplomacy. Battles over the passage, implementation, and constitutionality of such policies at times aligned with and sometimes clashed against contemporaneous efforts to expand rights to marginalized Americans, particularly US-born women.&nbsp;</p>
<p>Often considered separately or treated as topics of marginal importance,&nbsp;<em>Disparate Regimes: Nativist Politics, Alienage Law, and Citizenship Rights in the United States, 1865–1965</em>&nbsp;(Oxford University Press, 2025) by Dr. Brendan A. Shanahan underscores the centrality of nativist state politics and alienage policies to the history of American immigration and citizenship from the late nineteenth to the mid-twentieth centuries. It argues that the proliferation of these debates and laws produced veritable disparate regimes of citizenship rights in the American political economy on a state-by-state basis. It further illustrates how nativist state politics and alienage policies helped to invent and concretize the idea that citizenship rights meant citizen-only rights in law, practice, and popular perception in the United States.</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="75386781" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/0185d1ac-b94d-4095-8935-b65c2e4d0b11/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=0185d1ac-b94d-4095-8935-b65c2e4d0b11&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Brendan A. Shanahan, &quot;Disparate Regimes: Nativist Politics, Alienage Law, and Citizenship Rights in the United States, 1865-1965&quot; (Oxford UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:18:31</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Historians have well described how US immigration policy increasingly fell under the purview of federal law and national politics in the mid-to-late nineteenth century. It is far less understood that the rights of noncitizen immigrants in the country remained primarily contested in the realms of state politics and law until the mid-to-late twentieth century. Such state-level political debates often centered on whether noncitizen immigrants should vote, count as part of the polity for the purposes of state legislative representation, work in public and publicly funded employment, or obtain professional licensure.Enacted state alienage laws were rarely self-executing, and immigrants and their allies regularly challenged nativist restrictions in court, on the job, by appealing to lawmakers and the public, and even via diplomacy. Battles over the passage, implementation, and constitutionality of such policies at times aligned with and sometimes clashed against contemporaneous efforts to expand rights to marginalized Americans, particularly US-born women. 
Often considered separately or treated as topics of marginal importance, Disparate Regimes: Nativist Politics, Alienage Law, and Citizenship Rights in the United States, 1865–1965 (Oxford University Press, 2025) by Dr. Brendan A. Shanahan underscores the centrality of nativist state politics and alienage policies to the history of American immigration and citizenship from the late nineteenth to the mid-twentieth centuries. It argues that the proliferation of these debates and laws produced veritable disparate regimes of citizenship rights in the American political economy on a state-by-state basis. It further illustrates how nativist state politics and alienage policies helped to invent and concretize the idea that citizenship rights meant citizen-only rights in law, practice, and popular perception in the United States.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Historians have well described how US immigration policy increasingly fell under the purview of federal law and national politics in the mid-to-late nineteenth century. It is far less understood that the rights of noncitizen immigrants in the country remained primarily contested in the realms of state politics and law until the mid-to-late twentieth century. Such state-level political debates often centered on whether noncitizen immigrants should vote, count as part of the polity for the purposes of state legislative representation, work in public and publicly funded employment, or obtain professional licensure.Enacted state alienage laws were rarely self-executing, and immigrants and their allies regularly challenged nativist restrictions in court, on the job, by appealing to lawmakers and the public, and even via diplomacy. Battles over the passage, implementation, and constitutionality of such policies at times aligned with and sometimes clashed against contemporaneous efforts to expand rights to marginalized Americans, particularly US-born women. 
Often considered separately or treated as topics of marginal importance, Disparate Regimes: Nativist Politics, Alienage Law, and Citizenship Rights in the United States, 1865–1965 (Oxford University Press, 2025) by Dr. Brendan A. Shanahan underscores the centrality of nativist state politics and alienage policies to the history of American immigration and citizenship from the late nineteenth to the mid-twentieth centuries. It argues that the proliferation of these debates and laws produced veritable disparate regimes of citizenship rights in the American political economy on a state-by-state basis. It further illustrates how nativist state politics and alienage policies helped to invent and concretize the idea that citizenship rights meant citizen-only rights in law, practice, and popular perception in the United States.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>251</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">56702632-8451-11f0-aff1-2f278adfec13</guid>
      <title>Margaret E. Roberts, &quot;Censored: Distraction and Diversion Inside China’s Great Firewall&quot; (Princeton UP, 2020)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>We often think of censorship as governments removing material or harshly punishing people who spread or access information. But <a href="http://www.margaretroberts.net/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Margaret E. Roberts</a>’ new book <a href="https://www.amazon.com/dp/0691204004/?tag=newbooinhis-20" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Censored: Distraction and Diversion Inside China’s Great Firewall</em></a> (Princeton University Press, 2020) reveals the nuances of censorship in the age of the internet.</p><p>She identifies 3 types of censorship: fear (threatening punishment to deter the spread or access of information); friction (increasing the time or money necessary to access information); and flooding (publishing information to distract, confuse, or dilute). Roberts shows how China customizes repression by using friction and flooding (censorship that is porous) to deter the majority of citizens whose busy schedules and general lack of interest in politics make it difficult to spend extra time and money accessing information. Highly motivated elites (e.g. journalists, activists) who are willing to spend the extra time and money to overcome the boundaries of both friction and flooding meanwhile may face fear and punishment. The two groups end up with very different information – complicating political coordination between the majority and elites.</p><p>Roberts’s highly accessible book negotiates two extreme positions (the internet will bring government accountability v. extreme censorship) to provide a more nuanced understanding of digital politics, the politics of repression, and political communication. Even if there <em>is</em> better information available, governments can create friction on distribution or flood the internet with propaganda. Looking at how China manages censorship provides insights not only for other authoritarian governments but also democratic governments. Liberal democracies might not use fear but they can affect access and availability – and they may find themselves (as the United States did in the 2016 presidential election) subject to flooding from external sources. The podcast includes Roberts’ insights on how the Chinese censored information on COVID-19 and the effect that had on the public.</p><p><em>Foreign Affairs</em> named <em>Censored</em> one of its Best Books of 2018 and it was also honored with the Goldsmith Award and the Best Book in Human Rights Section and Information Technology and Politics section of the American Political Science Association.</p><p><a href="https://www.sju.edu/faculty/susan-liebell#_ga=2.125106634.1318472952.1578330950-502593983.1578330950" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Susan</em> Liebell<em>&nbsp;</em></a><em>is associate professor of political science at Saint Joseph’s University in Philadelphia. She is the author of </em><a href="https://www.amazon.com/Democracy-Intelligent-Design-Evolution-Liebell-dp-1138999482/dp/1138999482/ref=mt_paperback?_encoding=UTF8&amp;me=&amp;qid=" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Democracy, Intelligent Design, and Evolution: Science for Citizenship</em></a><em> (Routledge, 2013).</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/margaret-e-roberts-censored-distraction-and-diversion-inside-chinas-great-firewall-princeton-up-2020-0CO1k_Y5-6LPwwnOb</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We often think of censorship as governments removing material or harshly punishing people who spread or access information. But <a href="http://www.margaretroberts.net/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Margaret E. Roberts</a>’ new book <a href="https://www.amazon.com/dp/0691204004/?tag=newbooinhis-20" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Censored: Distraction and Diversion Inside China’s Great Firewall</em></a> (Princeton University Press, 2020) reveals the nuances of censorship in the age of the internet.</p><p>She identifies 3 types of censorship: fear (threatening punishment to deter the spread or access of information); friction (increasing the time or money necessary to access information); and flooding (publishing information to distract, confuse, or dilute). Roberts shows how China customizes repression by using friction and flooding (censorship that is porous) to deter the majority of citizens whose busy schedules and general lack of interest in politics make it difficult to spend extra time and money accessing information. Highly motivated elites (e.g. journalists, activists) who are willing to spend the extra time and money to overcome the boundaries of both friction and flooding meanwhile may face fear and punishment. The two groups end up with very different information – complicating political coordination between the majority and elites.</p><p>Roberts’s highly accessible book negotiates two extreme positions (the internet will bring government accountability v. extreme censorship) to provide a more nuanced understanding of digital politics, the politics of repression, and political communication. Even if there <em>is</em> better information available, governments can create friction on distribution or flood the internet with propaganda. Looking at how China manages censorship provides insights not only for other authoritarian governments but also democratic governments. Liberal democracies might not use fear but they can affect access and availability – and they may find themselves (as the United States did in the 2016 presidential election) subject to flooding from external sources. The podcast includes Roberts’ insights on how the Chinese censored information on COVID-19 and the effect that had on the public.</p><p><em>Foreign Affairs</em> named <em>Censored</em> one of its Best Books of 2018 and it was also honored with the Goldsmith Award and the Best Book in Human Rights Section and Information Technology and Politics section of the American Political Science Association.</p><p><a href="https://www.sju.edu/faculty/susan-liebell#_ga=2.125106634.1318472952.1578330950-502593983.1578330950" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Susan</em> Liebell<em>&nbsp;</em></a><em>is associate professor of political science at Saint Joseph’s University in Philadelphia. She is the author of </em><a href="https://www.amazon.com/Democracy-Intelligent-Design-Evolution-Liebell-dp-1138999482/dp/1138999482/ref=mt_paperback?_encoding=UTF8&amp;me=&amp;qid=" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Democracy, Intelligent Design, and Evolution: Science for Citizenship</em></a><em> (Routledge, 2013).</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="45291684" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/8f064f38-f9d2-463e-98e4-17610471a2a2/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=8f064f38-f9d2-463e-98e4-17610471a2a2&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Margaret E. Roberts, &quot;Censored: Distraction and Diversion Inside China’s Great Firewall&quot; (Princeton UP, 2020)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:47:10</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>We often think of censorship as governments removing material or harshly punishing people who spread or access information. But Margaret E. Roberts’ new book Censored: Distraction and Diversion Inside China’s Great Firewall (Princeton University Press, 2020) reveals the nuances of censorship in the age of the internet.
She identifies 3 types of censorship: fear (threatening punishment to deter the spread or access of information); friction (increasing the time or money necessary to access information); and flooding (publishing information to distract, confuse, or dilute). Roberts shows how China customizes repression by using friction and flooding (censorship that is porous) to deter the majority of citizens whose busy schedules and general lack of interest in politics make it difficult to spend extra time and money accessing information. Highly motivated elites (e.g. journalists, activists) who are willing to spend the extra time and money to overcome the boundaries of both friction and flooding meanwhile may face fear and punishment. The two groups end up with very different information – complicating political coordination between the majority and elites.
Roberts’s highly accessible book negotiates two extreme positions (the internet will bring government accountability v. extreme censorship) to provide a more nuanced understanding of digital politics, the politics of repression, and political communication. Even if there is better information available, governments can create friction on distribution or flood the internet with propaganda. Looking at how China manages censorship provides insights not only for other authoritarian governments but also democratic governments. Liberal democracies might not use fear but they can affect access and availability – and they may find themselves (as the United States did in the 2016 presidential election) subject to flooding from external sources. The podcast includes Roberts’ insights on how the Chinese censored information on COVID-19 and the effect that had on the public.
Foreign Affairs named Censored one of its Best Books of 2018 and it was also honored with the Goldsmith Award and the Best Book in Human Rights Section and Information Technology and Politics section of the American Political Science Association.
Susan Liebell is associate professor of political science at Saint Joseph’s University in Philadelphia. She is the author of Democracy, Intelligent Design, and Evolution: Science for Citizenship (Routledge, 2013).
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>We often think of censorship as governments removing material or harshly punishing people who spread or access information. But Margaret E. Roberts’ new book Censored: Distraction and Diversion Inside China’s Great Firewall (Princeton University Press, 2020) reveals the nuances of censorship in the age of the internet.
She identifies 3 types of censorship: fear (threatening punishment to deter the spread or access of information); friction (increasing the time or money necessary to access information); and flooding (publishing information to distract, confuse, or dilute). Roberts shows how China customizes repression by using friction and flooding (censorship that is porous) to deter the majority of citizens whose busy schedules and general lack of interest in politics make it difficult to spend extra time and money accessing information. Highly motivated elites (e.g. journalists, activists) who are willing to spend the extra time and money to overcome the boundaries of both friction and flooding meanwhile may face fear and punishment. The two groups end up with very different information – complicating political coordination between the majority and elites.
Roberts’s highly accessible book negotiates two extreme positions (the internet will bring government accountability v. extreme censorship) to provide a more nuanced understanding of digital politics, the politics of repression, and political communication. Even if there is better information available, governments can create friction on distribution or flood the internet with propaganda. Looking at how China manages censorship provides insights not only for other authoritarian governments but also democratic governments. Liberal democracies might not use fear but they can affect access and availability – and they may find themselves (as the United States did in the 2016 presidential election) subject to flooding from external sources. The podcast includes Roberts’ insights on how the Chinese censored information on COVID-19 and the effect that had on the public.
Foreign Affairs named Censored one of its Best Books of 2018 and it was also honored with the Goldsmith Award and the Best Book in Human Rights Section and Information Technology and Politics section of the American Political Science Association.
Susan Liebell is associate professor of political science at Saint Joseph’s University in Philadelphia. She is the author of Democracy, Intelligent Design, and Evolution: Science for Citizenship (Routledge, 2013).
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>415</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">da7f6700-849f-11f0-9147-c7dbc015808d</guid>
      <title>David Bosco, &quot;The Poseidon Project: The Struggle to Govern the World&apos;s Oceans&quot; (Oxford UP, 2021)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Oceanic Studies. An interdisciplinary podcast that examines the past, present, and future of ocean governance&nbsp;﻿<br></p>
<p>In 1609, the Dutch lawyer Hugo Grotius rejected the idea that even powerful rulers could own the oceans. "A ship sailing through the sea," he wrote, "leaves behind it no more legal right than it does a track." A philosophical and legal battle ensued, but Grotius's view ultimately prevailed. To this day, "freedom of the seas" remains an important legal principle and a powerful rhetorical tool.<br>Yet in recent decades, freedom of the seas has eroded in multiple ways and for a variety of reasons. During the world wars of the 20th century, combatants imposed unprecedented restrictions on maritime commerce, leaving international rules in tatters. National governments have steadily expanded their reach into the oceans. More recently, environmental concerns have led to new international restrictions on high seas fishing. Today's most dangerous maritime disputes-including China's push for control of the South China Sea-are occurring against the backdrop of major changes in the way the world treats the oceans.</p>
<p>As David Bosco shows in&nbsp;<a href="https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-poseidon-project-9780190265649?cc=sg&amp;lang=en&amp;" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Poseidon Project: The Struggle to Govern the World's Oceans&nbsp;</a>(Oxford UP, 2021),&nbsp;the history of humanity's attempt to create rules for the oceans is alive and relevant. Tracing the roots of the law of the sea and the background to current maritime disputes, he shows that building effective ocean rules while preserving maritime freedoms remains a daunting task. Bosco analyzes how fragile international institutions and determined activists are struggling for relevance in a world still dominated by national governments. As maritime tensions develop,&nbsp;<em>The Poseidon Project</em>&nbsp;will serve as an essential guide to the continuing challenge of ocean governance.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/david-bosco-the-poseidon-project-the-struggle-to-govern-the-worlds-oceans-oxford-up-2021-EjvkY00p</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oceanic Studies. An interdisciplinary podcast that examines the past, present, and future of ocean governance&nbsp;﻿<br></p>
<p>In 1609, the Dutch lawyer Hugo Grotius rejected the idea that even powerful rulers could own the oceans. "A ship sailing through the sea," he wrote, "leaves behind it no more legal right than it does a track." A philosophical and legal battle ensued, but Grotius's view ultimately prevailed. To this day, "freedom of the seas" remains an important legal principle and a powerful rhetorical tool.<br>Yet in recent decades, freedom of the seas has eroded in multiple ways and for a variety of reasons. During the world wars of the 20th century, combatants imposed unprecedented restrictions on maritime commerce, leaving international rules in tatters. National governments have steadily expanded their reach into the oceans. More recently, environmental concerns have led to new international restrictions on high seas fishing. Today's most dangerous maritime disputes-including China's push for control of the South China Sea-are occurring against the backdrop of major changes in the way the world treats the oceans.</p>
<p>As David Bosco shows in&nbsp;<a href="https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-poseidon-project-9780190265649?cc=sg&amp;lang=en&amp;" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Poseidon Project: The Struggle to Govern the World's Oceans&nbsp;</a>(Oxford UP, 2021),&nbsp;the history of humanity's attempt to create rules for the oceans is alive and relevant. Tracing the roots of the law of the sea and the background to current maritime disputes, he shows that building effective ocean rules while preserving maritime freedoms remains a daunting task. Bosco analyzes how fragile international institutions and determined activists are struggling for relevance in a world still dominated by national governments. As maritime tensions develop,&nbsp;<em>The Poseidon Project</em>&nbsp;will serve as an essential guide to the continuing challenge of ocean governance.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="57584438" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/a7ce54af-23bc-45f1-9d53-255e503b28d6/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=a7ce54af-23bc-45f1-9d53-255e503b28d6&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>David Bosco, &quot;The Poseidon Project: The Struggle to Govern the World&apos;s Oceans&quot; (Oxford UP, 2021)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:59:58</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Oceanic Studies. An interdisciplinary podcast that examines the past, present, and future of ocean governance ﻿
In 1609, the Dutch lawyer Hugo Grotius rejected the idea that even powerful rulers could own the oceans. &quot;A ship sailing through the sea,&quot; he wrote, &quot;leaves behind it no more legal right than it does a track.&quot; A philosophical and legal battle ensued, but Grotius&apos;s view ultimately prevailed. To this day, &quot;freedom of the seas&quot; remains an important legal principle and a powerful rhetorical tool.Yet in recent decades, freedom of the seas has eroded in multiple ways and for a variety of reasons. During the world wars of the 20th century, combatants imposed unprecedented restrictions on maritime commerce, leaving international rules in tatters. National governments have steadily expanded their reach into the oceans. More recently, environmental concerns have led to new international restrictions on high seas fishing. Today&apos;s most dangerous maritime disputes-including China&apos;s push for control of the South China Sea-are occurring against the backdrop of major changes in the way the world treats the oceans.
As David Bosco shows in The Poseidon Project: The Struggle to Govern the World&apos;s Oceans (Oxford UP, 2021), the history of humanity&apos;s attempt to create rules for the oceans is alive and relevant. Tracing the roots of the law of the sea and the background to current maritime disputes, he shows that building effective ocean rules while preserving maritime freedoms remains a daunting task. Bosco analyzes how fragile international institutions and determined activists are struggling for relevance in a world still dominated by national governments. As maritime tensions develop, The Poseidon Project will serve as an essential guide to the continuing challenge of ocean governance.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Oceanic Studies. An interdisciplinary podcast that examines the past, present, and future of ocean governance ﻿
In 1609, the Dutch lawyer Hugo Grotius rejected the idea that even powerful rulers could own the oceans. &quot;A ship sailing through the sea,&quot; he wrote, &quot;leaves behind it no more legal right than it does a track.&quot; A philosophical and legal battle ensued, but Grotius&apos;s view ultimately prevailed. To this day, &quot;freedom of the seas&quot; remains an important legal principle and a powerful rhetorical tool.Yet in recent decades, freedom of the seas has eroded in multiple ways and for a variety of reasons. During the world wars of the 20th century, combatants imposed unprecedented restrictions on maritime commerce, leaving international rules in tatters. National governments have steadily expanded their reach into the oceans. More recently, environmental concerns have led to new international restrictions on high seas fishing. Today&apos;s most dangerous maritime disputes-including China&apos;s push for control of the South China Sea-are occurring against the backdrop of major changes in the way the world treats the oceans.
As David Bosco shows in The Poseidon Project: The Struggle to Govern the World&apos;s Oceans (Oxford UP, 2021), the history of humanity&apos;s attempt to create rules for the oceans is alive and relevant. Tracing the roots of the law of the sea and the background to current maritime disputes, he shows that building effective ocean rules while preserving maritime freedoms remains a daunting task. Bosco analyzes how fragile international institutions and determined activists are struggling for relevance in a world still dominated by national governments. As maritime tensions develop, The Poseidon Project will serve as an essential guide to the continuing challenge of ocean governance.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1601</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4f0c2c8c-849d-11f0-844e-4b4d64173cc7</guid>
      <title>Yong-Shik Lee, &quot;Law and Development: Theory and Practice, 2nd edition&quot; (Routledge, 2021)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780367546861" rel="noopener noreferrer">Law and Development: Theory and Practice, 2nd edition</a>&nbsp;(Routledge, 2021)&nbsp;examines the theory and practice of law and development. It introduces the General Theory of Law and Development, an innovative approach which explains the mechanisms by which law impacts development. This book analyzes the process of economic development in South Korea, South Africa, and the United States from legal and institutional perspectives. The book also explains why the concept of "development" is not only relevant to developing countries but to developed economies as well.</p>
<p>The new edition includes five new chapters addressing the relationships between law and economic development in several key areas, including property rights, political governance, business transactions, state industrial promotion, and international trade and development.</p>
<p>This interview covers the main themes of this book, covers some of his papers, the relationship of his work to other scholars, and serves as a foundation for understanding Dr. Lee’s work more broadly. His latest book,&nbsp;<em>Sustainable Peace in Northeast Asia&nbsp;</em>will be the subject of a second interview.</p>
<p>Yong-Shik Lee&nbsp;is a scholar in law and development, and is currently Director of the&nbsp;<a href="https://lawanddevelopment.net/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Law and Development Institute</a>&nbsp;and a Professor at West Virginia University. Dr. Lee graduated in economics from the University of California at Berkeley and received law degrees from the University of Cambridge. Previous books include&nbsp;<em>Reclaiming Development in the World Trading System</em>;&nbsp;<em>Microtrade: A New System of Trade Toward Poverty Elimination</em>;&nbsp;<em>Law and Development Perspective on International Trade Law</em>; and&nbsp;<em>Safeguard Measures in World Trade: The Legal Analysis</em>. His latest book,&nbsp;<em>Sustainable Peace in Northeast Asia</em>, was published by Anthem Press.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/yong-shik-lee-law-and-development-theory-and-practice-2nd-edition-routledge-2021-AaWzkl9P</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780367546861" rel="noopener noreferrer">Law and Development: Theory and Practice, 2nd edition</a>&nbsp;(Routledge, 2021)&nbsp;examines the theory and practice of law and development. It introduces the General Theory of Law and Development, an innovative approach which explains the mechanisms by which law impacts development. This book analyzes the process of economic development in South Korea, South Africa, and the United States from legal and institutional perspectives. The book also explains why the concept of "development" is not only relevant to developing countries but to developed economies as well.</p>
<p>The new edition includes five new chapters addressing the relationships between law and economic development in several key areas, including property rights, political governance, business transactions, state industrial promotion, and international trade and development.</p>
<p>This interview covers the main themes of this book, covers some of his papers, the relationship of his work to other scholars, and serves as a foundation for understanding Dr. Lee’s work more broadly. His latest book,&nbsp;<em>Sustainable Peace in Northeast Asia&nbsp;</em>will be the subject of a second interview.</p>
<p>Yong-Shik Lee&nbsp;is a scholar in law and development, and is currently Director of the&nbsp;<a href="https://lawanddevelopment.net/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Law and Development Institute</a>&nbsp;and a Professor at West Virginia University. Dr. Lee graduated in economics from the University of California at Berkeley and received law degrees from the University of Cambridge. Previous books include&nbsp;<em>Reclaiming Development in the World Trading System</em>;&nbsp;<em>Microtrade: A New System of Trade Toward Poverty Elimination</em>;&nbsp;<em>Law and Development Perspective on International Trade Law</em>; and&nbsp;<em>Safeguard Measures in World Trade: The Legal Analysis</em>. His latest book,&nbsp;<em>Sustainable Peace in Northeast Asia</em>, was published by Anthem Press.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="75519056" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/a9dff697-4add-47b8-b5fa-eb7d95ed42f3/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=a9dff697-4add-47b8-b5fa-eb7d95ed42f3&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Yong-Shik Lee, &quot;Law and Development: Theory and Practice, 2nd edition&quot; (Routledge, 2021)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:18:39</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Law and Development: Theory and Practice, 2nd edition (Routledge, 2021) examines the theory and practice of law and development. It introduces the General Theory of Law and Development, an innovative approach which explains the mechanisms by which law impacts development. This book analyzes the process of economic development in South Korea, South Africa, and the United States from legal and institutional perspectives. The book also explains why the concept of &quot;development&quot; is not only relevant to developing countries but to developed economies as well.
The new edition includes five new chapters addressing the relationships between law and economic development in several key areas, including property rights, political governance, business transactions, state industrial promotion, and international trade and development.
This interview covers the main themes of this book, covers some of his papers, the relationship of his work to other scholars, and serves as a foundation for understanding Dr. Lee’s work more broadly. His latest book, Sustainable Peace in Northeast Asia will be the subject of a second interview.
Yong-Shik Lee is a scholar in law and development, and is currently Director of the Law and Development Institute and a Professor at West Virginia University. Dr. Lee graduated in economics from the University of California at Berkeley and received law degrees from the University of Cambridge. Previous books include Reclaiming Development in the World Trading System; Microtrade: A New System of Trade Toward Poverty Elimination; Law and Development Perspective on International Trade Law; and Safeguard Measures in World Trade: The Legal Analysis. His latest book, Sustainable Peace in Northeast Asia, was published by Anthem Press.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Law and Development: Theory and Practice, 2nd edition (Routledge, 2021) examines the theory and practice of law and development. It introduces the General Theory of Law and Development, an innovative approach which explains the mechanisms by which law impacts development. This book analyzes the process of economic development in South Korea, South Africa, and the United States from legal and institutional perspectives. The book also explains why the concept of &quot;development&quot; is not only relevant to developing countries but to developed economies as well.
The new edition includes five new chapters addressing the relationships between law and economic development in several key areas, including property rights, political governance, business transactions, state industrial promotion, and international trade and development.
This interview covers the main themes of this book, covers some of his papers, the relationship of his work to other scholars, and serves as a foundation for understanding Dr. Lee’s work more broadly. His latest book, Sustainable Peace in Northeast Asia will be the subject of a second interview.
Yong-Shik Lee is a scholar in law and development, and is currently Director of the Law and Development Institute and a Professor at West Virginia University. Dr. Lee graduated in economics from the University of California at Berkeley and received law degrees from the University of Cambridge. Previous books include Reclaiming Development in the World Trading System; Microtrade: A New System of Trade Toward Poverty Elimination; Law and Development Perspective on International Trade Law; and Safeguard Measures in World Trade: The Legal Analysis. His latest book, Sustainable Peace in Northeast Asia, was published by Anthem Press.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1602</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">621c9cfe-832a-11f0-a213-7ffcf26e2f68</guid>
      <title>Lindsey N. Kingston, &quot;Fully Human: Personhood, Citizenship, and Rights&quot; (Oxford UP, 2019)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.webster.edu/arts-and-sciences/faculty/kingston.html" rel="noopener noreferrer">Lindsey N. Kingston</a>’s new book, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/0190918268/?tag=newbooinhis-20" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Fully Human: Personhood, Citizenship, and Rights </em></a>(Oxford UP, 2019) interrogates the idea of citizenship itself, what it means, how it works, how it is applied and understood, and where there are clear gaps in that application. This is a wide-ranging, rigorously researched examination of citizenship, statelessness, and human movement. And it is vitally relevant to contemporary discussions of immigration, supranationalism, understandings of national borders, and concepts of belonging. Not only does Kingston delve into theoretical concepts of citizenship and statelessness, she also integrates analyses of various kinds of hierarchies of personhood in context of these broader issues. The research also includes explorations of nomadic people, indigenous nations, and "second class" citizens in the United States within this theoretical framework of citizenship and statelessness. This careful and broad analysis defines the novel idea of ‘functional citizenship’, which is both theoretical and practical in considering citizenship and statelessness in our modern world. <em>Fully Human</em> focuses on the promises and protections that are outlined in the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights, unpacking the protection gaps and difficulties that have become clearer and more acute in this era of globalization and security concerns, and highlighting some of the key problems with the current human rights regimes that are in place.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/lindsey-n-kingston-fully-human-personhood-citizenship-and-rights-oxford-up-2019-LzEoRDx5-9iF339iu</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.webster.edu/arts-and-sciences/faculty/kingston.html" rel="noopener noreferrer">Lindsey N. Kingston</a>’s new book, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/0190918268/?tag=newbooinhis-20" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Fully Human: Personhood, Citizenship, and Rights </em></a>(Oxford UP, 2019) interrogates the idea of citizenship itself, what it means, how it works, how it is applied and understood, and where there are clear gaps in that application. This is a wide-ranging, rigorously researched examination of citizenship, statelessness, and human movement. And it is vitally relevant to contemporary discussions of immigration, supranationalism, understandings of national borders, and concepts of belonging. Not only does Kingston delve into theoretical concepts of citizenship and statelessness, she also integrates analyses of various kinds of hierarchies of personhood in context of these broader issues. The research also includes explorations of nomadic people, indigenous nations, and "second class" citizens in the United States within this theoretical framework of citizenship and statelessness. This careful and broad analysis defines the novel idea of ‘functional citizenship’, which is both theoretical and practical in considering citizenship and statelessness in our modern world. <em>Fully Human</em> focuses on the promises and protections that are outlined in the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights, unpacking the protection gaps and difficulties that have become clearer and more acute in this era of globalization and security concerns, and highlighting some of the key problems with the current human rights regimes that are in place.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="49122729" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/7bb8ddaf-c997-4c19-9203-03c083ffb525/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=7bb8ddaf-c997-4c19-9203-03c083ffb525&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Lindsey N. Kingston, &quot;Fully Human: Personhood, Citizenship, and Rights&quot; (Oxford UP, 2019)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:51:10</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Lindsey N. Kingston’s new book, Fully Human: Personhood, Citizenship, and Rights (Oxford UP, 2019) interrogates the idea of citizenship itself, what it means, how it works, how it is applied and understood, and where there are clear gaps in that application. This is a wide-ranging, rigorously researched examination of citizenship, statelessness, and human movement. And it is vitally relevant to contemporary discussions of immigration, supranationalism, understandings of national borders, and concepts of belonging. Not only does Kingston delve into theoretical concepts of citizenship and statelessness, she also integrates analyses of various kinds of hierarchies of personhood in context of these broader issues. The research also includes explorations of nomadic people, indigenous nations, and &quot;second class&quot; citizens in the United States within this theoretical framework of citizenship and statelessness. This careful and broad analysis defines the novel idea of ‘functional citizenship’, which is both theoretical and practical in considering citizenship and statelessness in our modern world. Fully Human focuses on the promises and protections that are outlined in the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights, unpacking the protection gaps and difficulties that have become clearer and more acute in this era of globalization and security concerns, and highlighting some of the key problems with the current human rights regimes that are in place.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Lindsey N. Kingston’s new book, Fully Human: Personhood, Citizenship, and Rights (Oxford UP, 2019) interrogates the idea of citizenship itself, what it means, how it works, how it is applied and understood, and where there are clear gaps in that application. This is a wide-ranging, rigorously researched examination of citizenship, statelessness, and human movement. And it is vitally relevant to contemporary discussions of immigration, supranationalism, understandings of national borders, and concepts of belonging. Not only does Kingston delve into theoretical concepts of citizenship and statelessness, she also integrates analyses of various kinds of hierarchies of personhood in context of these broader issues. The research also includes explorations of nomadic people, indigenous nations, and &quot;second class&quot; citizens in the United States within this theoretical framework of citizenship and statelessness. This careful and broad analysis defines the novel idea of ‘functional citizenship’, which is both theoretical and practical in considering citizenship and statelessness in our modern world. Fully Human focuses on the promises and protections that are outlined in the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights, unpacking the protection gaps and difficulties that have become clearer and more acute in this era of globalization and security concerns, and highlighting some of the key problems with the current human rights regimes that are in place.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>343</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4ce56c8a-8320-11f0-ac3e-0b1a1497c022</guid>
      <title>Faisal Chaudhry, &quot;South Asia, the British Empire, and the Rise of Classical Legal Thought: Toward a Historical Ontology of the Law&quot; (Oxford UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780198916482" rel="noopener noreferrer">South Asia, the British Empire, and the Rise of Classical Legal Thought: Toward a Historical Ontology of the Law</a>&nbsp;(Oxford UP, 2024)&nbsp;considers the legal history of colonial rule in South Asia from 1757 to the early 20th century. It traces a shift in the conceptualization of sovereignty, land control, and adjudicatory rectification, arguing that under the East India Company the focus was on 'the laws' factoring into the administration of justice more than 'the law' as an infinitely generative norm system. This accompanied a discourse about rendering property 'absolute' defined in terms of a certainty of controlling land's rent-and made administrable mainly as a duty of revenue payment--rather than any right of ostensibly physical dominion. Leaving property external to its ontology of 'the laws, ' the Company's regime thus differed significantly from its counterparts in the Anglo-common-law mainstream, where an ostensibly unitary, physical, and disaggregable notion of the property right was becoming a stand in for a notion of legal right in general already by the late 18th century. Only after 1858, under Crown rule, did conditions in the subcontinent ripen for 'the law' to emerge as a purportedly free-standing institutional fact. A key but neglected factor in this transformation was the rise of classical legal thought, which finally enabled property's internalization into 'the law' and underwrote status and contract becoming the other key elements of the Raj's new legal ontology. Formulating a historical ontological approach to jurisprudence, the book deploys a running distinction between the doctrinal discourse of (the) law and ordinary-language discourse about (the) law that carries implications for legal theory well beyond South Asia.</p>
<p><a href="https://lsa.umich.edu/history/people/graduate-students/arighna-gupta.html" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Arighna Gupta&nbsp;</em></a><em>is a doctoral candidate in history at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. His dissertation attempts to trace early-colonial genealogies of popular sovereignty located at the interstices of monarchical, religious, and colonial sovereignties in India and present-day Bangladesh.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/faisal-chaudhry-south-asia-the-british-empire-and-the-rise-of-classical-legal-thought-toward-a-historical-ontology-of-the-law-oxford-up-2024-t_wh_Guv</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780198916482" rel="noopener noreferrer">South Asia, the British Empire, and the Rise of Classical Legal Thought: Toward a Historical Ontology of the Law</a>&nbsp;(Oxford UP, 2024)&nbsp;considers the legal history of colonial rule in South Asia from 1757 to the early 20th century. It traces a shift in the conceptualization of sovereignty, land control, and adjudicatory rectification, arguing that under the East India Company the focus was on 'the laws' factoring into the administration of justice more than 'the law' as an infinitely generative norm system. This accompanied a discourse about rendering property 'absolute' defined in terms of a certainty of controlling land's rent-and made administrable mainly as a duty of revenue payment--rather than any right of ostensibly physical dominion. Leaving property external to its ontology of 'the laws, ' the Company's regime thus differed significantly from its counterparts in the Anglo-common-law mainstream, where an ostensibly unitary, physical, and disaggregable notion of the property right was becoming a stand in for a notion of legal right in general already by the late 18th century. Only after 1858, under Crown rule, did conditions in the subcontinent ripen for 'the law' to emerge as a purportedly free-standing institutional fact. A key but neglected factor in this transformation was the rise of classical legal thought, which finally enabled property's internalization into 'the law' and underwrote status and contract becoming the other key elements of the Raj's new legal ontology. Formulating a historical ontological approach to jurisprudence, the book deploys a running distinction between the doctrinal discourse of (the) law and ordinary-language discourse about (the) law that carries implications for legal theory well beyond South Asia.</p>
<p><a href="https://lsa.umich.edu/history/people/graduate-students/arighna-gupta.html" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Arighna Gupta&nbsp;</em></a><em>is a doctoral candidate in history at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. His dissertation attempts to trace early-colonial genealogies of popular sovereignty located at the interstices of monarchical, religious, and colonial sovereignties in India and present-day Bangladesh.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="70151976" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/05befd7e-e1c0-4b88-8abc-d1c1ac0402aa/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=05befd7e-e1c0-4b88-8abc-d1c1ac0402aa&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Faisal Chaudhry, &quot;South Asia, the British Empire, and the Rise of Classical Legal Thought: Toward a Historical Ontology of the Law&quot; (Oxford UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:13:04</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>South Asia, the British Empire, and the Rise of Classical Legal Thought: Toward a Historical Ontology of the Law (Oxford UP, 2024) considers the legal history of colonial rule in South Asia from 1757 to the early 20th century. It traces a shift in the conceptualization of sovereignty, land control, and adjudicatory rectification, arguing that under the East India Company the focus was on &apos;the laws&apos; factoring into the administration of justice more than &apos;the law&apos; as an infinitely generative norm system. This accompanied a discourse about rendering property &apos;absolute&apos; defined in terms of a certainty of controlling land&apos;s rent-and made administrable mainly as a duty of revenue payment--rather than any right of ostensibly physical dominion. Leaving property external to its ontology of &apos;the laws, &apos; the Company&apos;s regime thus differed significantly from its counterparts in the Anglo-common-law mainstream, where an ostensibly unitary, physical, and disaggregable notion of the property right was becoming a stand in for a notion of legal right in general already by the late 18th century. Only after 1858, under Crown rule, did conditions in the subcontinent ripen for &apos;the law&apos; to emerge as a purportedly free-standing institutional fact. A key but neglected factor in this transformation was the rise of classical legal thought, which finally enabled property&apos;s internalization into &apos;the law&apos; and underwrote status and contract becoming the other key elements of the Raj&apos;s new legal ontology. Formulating a historical ontological approach to jurisprudence, the book deploys a running distinction between the doctrinal discourse of (the) law and ordinary-language discourse about (the) law that carries implications for legal theory well beyond South Asia.
Arighna Gupta is a doctoral candidate in history at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. His dissertation attempts to trace early-colonial genealogies of popular sovereignty located at the interstices of monarchical, religious, and colonial sovereignties in India and present-day Bangladesh.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>South Asia, the British Empire, and the Rise of Classical Legal Thought: Toward a Historical Ontology of the Law (Oxford UP, 2024) considers the legal history of colonial rule in South Asia from 1757 to the early 20th century. It traces a shift in the conceptualization of sovereignty, land control, and adjudicatory rectification, arguing that under the East India Company the focus was on &apos;the laws&apos; factoring into the administration of justice more than &apos;the law&apos; as an infinitely generative norm system. This accompanied a discourse about rendering property &apos;absolute&apos; defined in terms of a certainty of controlling land&apos;s rent-and made administrable mainly as a duty of revenue payment--rather than any right of ostensibly physical dominion. Leaving property external to its ontology of &apos;the laws, &apos; the Company&apos;s regime thus differed significantly from its counterparts in the Anglo-common-law mainstream, where an ostensibly unitary, physical, and disaggregable notion of the property right was becoming a stand in for a notion of legal right in general already by the late 18th century. Only after 1858, under Crown rule, did conditions in the subcontinent ripen for &apos;the law&apos; to emerge as a purportedly free-standing institutional fact. A key but neglected factor in this transformation was the rise of classical legal thought, which finally enabled property&apos;s internalization into &apos;the law&apos; and underwrote status and contract becoming the other key elements of the Raj&apos;s new legal ontology. Formulating a historical ontological approach to jurisprudence, the book deploys a running distinction between the doctrinal discourse of (the) law and ordinary-language discourse about (the) law that carries implications for legal theory well beyond South Asia.
Arighna Gupta is a doctoral candidate in history at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. His dissertation attempts to trace early-colonial genealogies of popular sovereignty located at the interstices of monarchical, religious, and colonial sovereignties in India and present-day Bangladesh.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1600</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">08fc7f84-4832-11e9-8d04-bf910e1c56d3</guid>
      <title>Steve Luxenberg, &quot;Separate: The Story of Plessy v. Ferguson, and America’s Journey from Slavery to Segregation&quot; (Norton, 2019)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.steveluxenberg.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Steve Luxenberg</a> has created an unusual history of the famous Supreme Court case <em>Plessy v. Ferguson </em>and the 19th century’s segregationist practices in his book <a href="https://aax-us-east.amazon-adsystem.com/x/c/QvAj4ybKUQU5e7YVF_jM-xIAAAFpfmHpfwEAAAFKAfNnhac/https://www.amazon.com/dp/0393239373/?creativeASIN=0393239373&amp;linkCode=w61&amp;imprToken=70vL3d36Jj70CZCL-DYJSA&amp;slotNum=0&amp;tag=newbooinhis-20" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Separate: The Story of Plessy v. Ferguson, and America’s Journey from Slavery to Segregation</em></a> (Norton, 2019)&nbsp; It is unusual because it is chiefly an ensemble biography of Henry Brown, John Marshall Harlan, and Albion Tourgee, three men intimately connected with the <em>Plessy</em> case.&nbsp; The book covers the Antebellum period youth of the three men, each from a different part of the young nation and each encountering freedmen, slaves, and the institution of slavery in different social and political contexts.&nbsp; We follow these men through the Civil War, Reconstruction, and the post-Reconstruction period leading up to the Plessy decision.&nbsp; The <em>Plessy</em> case helped solidify official, state-enforced segregationist practices throughout the United States.&nbsp; It made the now-infamous phrase “separate but equal” a constitutional doctrine that was the law of the land until the 1950s and 1960s.</p><p><em>Ian J. Drake is an Associate Professor of Political Science and Law at Montclair State University. His scholarly interests include American legal and constitutional history and political theory.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/steve-luxenberg-separate-the-story-of-plessy-v-ferguson-and-americas-journey-from-slavery-to-segregation-norton-2019-8Pmua5Ne</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.steveluxenberg.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Steve Luxenberg</a> has created an unusual history of the famous Supreme Court case <em>Plessy v. Ferguson </em>and the 19th century’s segregationist practices in his book <a href="https://aax-us-east.amazon-adsystem.com/x/c/QvAj4ybKUQU5e7YVF_jM-xIAAAFpfmHpfwEAAAFKAfNnhac/https://www.amazon.com/dp/0393239373/?creativeASIN=0393239373&amp;linkCode=w61&amp;imprToken=70vL3d36Jj70CZCL-DYJSA&amp;slotNum=0&amp;tag=newbooinhis-20" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Separate: The Story of Plessy v. Ferguson, and America’s Journey from Slavery to Segregation</em></a> (Norton, 2019)&nbsp; It is unusual because it is chiefly an ensemble biography of Henry Brown, John Marshall Harlan, and Albion Tourgee, three men intimately connected with the <em>Plessy</em> case.&nbsp; The book covers the Antebellum period youth of the three men, each from a different part of the young nation and each encountering freedmen, slaves, and the institution of slavery in different social and political contexts.&nbsp; We follow these men through the Civil War, Reconstruction, and the post-Reconstruction period leading up to the Plessy decision.&nbsp; The <em>Plessy</em> case helped solidify official, state-enforced segregationist practices throughout the United States.&nbsp; It made the now-infamous phrase “separate but equal” a constitutional doctrine that was the law of the land until the 1950s and 1960s.</p><p><em>Ian J. Drake is an Associate Professor of Political Science and Law at Montclair State University. His scholarly interests include American legal and constitutional history and political theory.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="46330028" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/829aeb31-bc74-460e-9242-490f5a249de4/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=829aeb31-bc74-460e-9242-490f5a249de4&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Steve Luxenberg, &quot;Separate: The Story of Plessy v. Ferguson, and America’s Journey from Slavery to Segregation&quot; (Norton, 2019)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:48:14</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Steve Luxenberg has created an unusual history of the famous Supreme Court case Plessy v. Ferguson and the 19th century’s segregationist practices in his book Separate: The Story of Plessy v. Ferguson, and America’s Journey from Slavery to Segregation (Norton, 2019)  It is unusual because it is chiefly an ensemble biography of Henry Brown, John Marshall Harlan, and Albion Tourgee, three men intimately connected with the Plessy case.  The book covers the Antebellum period youth of the three men, each from a different part of the young nation and each encountering freedmen, slaves, and the institution of slavery in different social and political contexts.  We follow these men through the Civil War, Reconstruction, and the post-Reconstruction period leading up to the Plessy decision.  The Plessy case helped solidify official, state-enforced segregationist practices throughout the United States.  It made the now-infamous phrase “separate but equal” a constitutional doctrine that was the law of the land until the 1950s and 1960s.
Ian J. Drake is an Associate Professor of Political Science and Law at Montclair State University. His scholarly interests include American legal and constitutional history and political theory.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Steve Luxenberg has created an unusual history of the famous Supreme Court case Plessy v. Ferguson and the 19th century’s segregationist practices in his book Separate: The Story of Plessy v. Ferguson, and America’s Journey from Slavery to Segregation (Norton, 2019)  It is unusual because it is chiefly an ensemble biography of Henry Brown, John Marshall Harlan, and Albion Tourgee, three men intimately connected with the Plessy case.  The book covers the Antebellum period youth of the three men, each from a different part of the young nation and each encountering freedmen, slaves, and the institution of slavery in different social and political contexts.  We follow these men through the Civil War, Reconstruction, and the post-Reconstruction period leading up to the Plessy decision.  The Plessy case helped solidify official, state-enforced segregationist practices throughout the United States.  It made the now-infamous phrase “separate but equal” a constitutional doctrine that was the law of the land until the 1950s and 1960s.
Ian J. Drake is an Associate Professor of Political Science and Law at Montclair State University. His scholarly interests include American legal and constitutional history and political theory.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>68</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">88bb0dde-8030-11f0-9edd-13fe492a8b89</guid>
      <title>Timothy Messer-Kruse, &quot;Slavery’s Fugitives and the Making of the United States Constitution&quot; (LSU Press, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780807182765" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Slavery's Fugitives</em>&nbsp;</a><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780807182765" rel="noopener noreferrer">and the Making of the United States Constitution</a>&nbsp;(LSU Press, 2024)&nbsp;unearths a long-hidden factor that led to the Constitutional Convention in 1787. While historians have generally acknowledged that patriot leaders assembled in response to postwar economic chaos, the threat of popular insurgencies, and the inability of the states to agree on how to fund the national government, Timothy Messer-Kruse suggests that scholars have discounted Americans' desire to compel Britain to return fugitives from slavery as a driving force behind the convention.</p>
<p>During the Revolutionary War, British governors offered freedom to enslaved Americans who joined the king's army. Thousands responded by fleeing to English camps. After the British defeat at Yorktown, American diplomats demanded the surrender of fugitive slaves. When British generals refused, several states confiscated Loyalist estates and blocked payment of English creditors, hoping to apply enough pressure on the Crown to hand over the runaways. State laws conflicting with the 1783 Treaty of Paris violated the Articles of Confederation--the young nation's first constitution--but Congress, lacking an executive branch or a federal judiciary, had no means to obligate states to comply.</p>
<p>The standoff over the escaped slaves quickly escalated following the Revolution as Britain failed to abandon the western forts it occupied and took steps to curtail American commerce. More than any other single matter, the impasse over the return of enslaved Americans threatened to hamper the nation's ability to expand westward, develop its commercial economy, and establish itself as a power among the courts of Europe. Messer-Kruse argues that the issue encouraged the founders to consider the prospect of scrapping the Articles of Confederation and drafting a superseding document that would dramatically increase federal authority--the Constitution.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/timothy-messer-kruse-slaverys-fugitives-and-the-making-of-the-united-states-constitution-lsu-press-2024-QYMZu6sB</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780807182765" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Slavery's Fugitives</em>&nbsp;</a><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780807182765" rel="noopener noreferrer">and the Making of the United States Constitution</a>&nbsp;(LSU Press, 2024)&nbsp;unearths a long-hidden factor that led to the Constitutional Convention in 1787. While historians have generally acknowledged that patriot leaders assembled in response to postwar economic chaos, the threat of popular insurgencies, and the inability of the states to agree on how to fund the national government, Timothy Messer-Kruse suggests that scholars have discounted Americans' desire to compel Britain to return fugitives from slavery as a driving force behind the convention.</p>
<p>During the Revolutionary War, British governors offered freedom to enslaved Americans who joined the king's army. Thousands responded by fleeing to English camps. After the British defeat at Yorktown, American diplomats demanded the surrender of fugitive slaves. When British generals refused, several states confiscated Loyalist estates and blocked payment of English creditors, hoping to apply enough pressure on the Crown to hand over the runaways. State laws conflicting with the 1783 Treaty of Paris violated the Articles of Confederation--the young nation's first constitution--but Congress, lacking an executive branch or a federal judiciary, had no means to obligate states to comply.</p>
<p>The standoff over the escaped slaves quickly escalated following the Revolution as Britain failed to abandon the western forts it occupied and took steps to curtail American commerce. More than any other single matter, the impasse over the return of enslaved Americans threatened to hamper the nation's ability to expand westward, develop its commercial economy, and establish itself as a power among the courts of Europe. Messer-Kruse argues that the issue encouraged the founders to consider the prospect of scrapping the Articles of Confederation and drafting a superseding document that would dramatically increase federal authority--the Constitution.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="58293853" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/0875bed6-6e56-41d3-b4dc-1a9c9d5b15d8/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=0875bed6-6e56-41d3-b4dc-1a9c9d5b15d8&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Timothy Messer-Kruse, &quot;Slavery’s Fugitives and the Making of the United States Constitution&quot; (LSU Press, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:00:43</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Slavery&apos;s Fugitives and the Making of the United States Constitution (LSU Press, 2024) unearths a long-hidden factor that led to the Constitutional Convention in 1787. While historians have generally acknowledged that patriot leaders assembled in response to postwar economic chaos, the threat of popular insurgencies, and the inability of the states to agree on how to fund the national government, Timothy Messer-Kruse suggests that scholars have discounted Americans&apos; desire to compel Britain to return fugitives from slavery as a driving force behind the convention.
During the Revolutionary War, British governors offered freedom to enslaved Americans who joined the king&apos;s army. Thousands responded by fleeing to English camps. After the British defeat at Yorktown, American diplomats demanded the surrender of fugitive slaves. When British generals refused, several states confiscated Loyalist estates and blocked payment of English creditors, hoping to apply enough pressure on the Crown to hand over the runaways. State laws conflicting with the 1783 Treaty of Paris violated the Articles of Confederation--the young nation&apos;s first constitution--but Congress, lacking an executive branch or a federal judiciary, had no means to obligate states to comply.
The standoff over the escaped slaves quickly escalated following the Revolution as Britain failed to abandon the western forts it occupied and took steps to curtail American commerce. More than any other single matter, the impasse over the return of enslaved Americans threatened to hamper the nation&apos;s ability to expand westward, develop its commercial economy, and establish itself as a power among the courts of Europe. Messer-Kruse argues that the issue encouraged the founders to consider the prospect of scrapping the Articles of Confederation and drafting a superseding document that would dramatically increase federal authority--the Constitution.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Slavery&apos;s Fugitives and the Making of the United States Constitution (LSU Press, 2024) unearths a long-hidden factor that led to the Constitutional Convention in 1787. While historians have generally acknowledged that patriot leaders assembled in response to postwar economic chaos, the threat of popular insurgencies, and the inability of the states to agree on how to fund the national government, Timothy Messer-Kruse suggests that scholars have discounted Americans&apos; desire to compel Britain to return fugitives from slavery as a driving force behind the convention.
During the Revolutionary War, British governors offered freedom to enslaved Americans who joined the king&apos;s army. Thousands responded by fleeing to English camps. After the British defeat at Yorktown, American diplomats demanded the surrender of fugitive slaves. When British generals refused, several states confiscated Loyalist estates and blocked payment of English creditors, hoping to apply enough pressure on the Crown to hand over the runaways. State laws conflicting with the 1783 Treaty of Paris violated the Articles of Confederation--the young nation&apos;s first constitution--but Congress, lacking an executive branch or a federal judiciary, had no means to obligate states to comply.
The standoff over the escaped slaves quickly escalated following the Revolution as Britain failed to abandon the western forts it occupied and took steps to curtail American commerce. More than any other single matter, the impasse over the return of enslaved Americans threatened to hamper the nation&apos;s ability to expand westward, develop its commercial economy, and establish itself as a power among the courts of Europe. Messer-Kruse argues that the issue encouraged the founders to consider the prospect of scrapping the Articles of Confederation and drafting a superseding document that would dramatically increase federal authority--the Constitution.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1599</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6f41fa60-7da7-11f0-a6c5-1392a028b930</guid>
      <title>Citizenship Stripping: You Are Not American</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Over the last two centuries, the US government has revoked citizenship to cast out its unwanted, suppress dissent, and deny civil rights to all considered “un-American”—whether due to their race, ethnicity, marriage partner, or beliefs. Drawing on the narratives of those who have struggled to be treated as full members of “We the People,” law professor Amanda Frost exposes a hidden history of discrimination and xenophobia that continues to this day.<br>The Supreme Court’s rejection of Black citizenship in&nbsp;<em>Dred Scott</em>&nbsp;was among the first and most notorious examples of citizenship stripping, but the phenomenon did not end there. Women who married noncitizens, persecuted racial groups, labor leaders, and political activists were all denied their citizenship, and sometimes deported, by a government that wanted to redefine the meaning of “American.”&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780807051429" rel="noopener noreferrer">You Are Not American: Citizenship Stripping from Dred Scott to the Dreamers</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Beacon ﻿Press, 2021)&nbsp;grapples with what it means to be American and the issues surrounding membership, identity, belonging, and exclusion that still occupy and divide the nation in the twenty-first century.</p>
<p>Our guest is: Professor Amanda Frost, who writes and teaches in the fields of immigration and citizenship law, federal courts and jurisdiction, and judicial ethics. Her scholarship has been cited by dozens of state and federal courts, including the U.S. Supreme Court, and she has been invited to testify on the topics of her articles before both the House and Senate Judiciary Committees.&nbsp;﻿<em>You Are Not American</em>﻿ w﻿as named a “New &amp; Noteworthy” book by The New York Times Book Review, and shortlisted for the Mark Lynton History Prize. She is writing a book on birthright citizenship, publishing in 2026.</p>
<p>Our host is:&nbsp;<a href="https://christinagessler.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. Christina Gessler</a>, who works as a developmental editor, dissertation and writing coach for scholars in the humanities. She is the producer of the Academic Life podcast, and writes the show’s newsletter with weekly bonus material on her Substack found&nbsp;<a href="https://christinagessler.substack.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a>.</p>
<p>Playlist:</p>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/dear-miss-perkins-a-story-of-frances-perkinss-efforts-to-aid-refugees-from-nazi-germany" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dear Miss Perkins</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/secret-harvests" rel="noopener noreferrer">Secret Harvests</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/who-gets-believed" rel="noopener noreferrer">Who Gets Believed</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/we-take-our-cities-with-us" rel="noopener noreferrer">We Take Our Cities With Us</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/exploring-public-facing-humanities" rel="noopener noreferrer">The House on Henry Street</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/immigration-realities" rel="noopener noreferrer">Immigration Realities</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-ungrateful-refugee" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Ungrateful Refugee</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/sin-padres-ni-papeles-2" rel="noopener noreferrer">Sin Padres Ni Papeles</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/reunited" rel="noopener noreferrer">Reunited</a></li>
</ul>
<p>Welcome to Academic Life, the podcast for your academic journey—and beyond! Please join us again to learn from more experts inside and outside the academy, and around the world. Missed any of the 275+ Academic Life episodes? Find them&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/up-partners/academic-life" rel="noopener noreferrer">here.</a>&nbsp;And thank you for listening!</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/citizenship-stripping-you-are-not-american-T4IDlxkq</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over the last two centuries, the US government has revoked citizenship to cast out its unwanted, suppress dissent, and deny civil rights to all considered “un-American”—whether due to their race, ethnicity, marriage partner, or beliefs. Drawing on the narratives of those who have struggled to be treated as full members of “We the People,” law professor Amanda Frost exposes a hidden history of discrimination and xenophobia that continues to this day.<br>The Supreme Court’s rejection of Black citizenship in&nbsp;<em>Dred Scott</em>&nbsp;was among the first and most notorious examples of citizenship stripping, but the phenomenon did not end there. Women who married noncitizens, persecuted racial groups, labor leaders, and political activists were all denied their citizenship, and sometimes deported, by a government that wanted to redefine the meaning of “American.”&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780807051429" rel="noopener noreferrer">You Are Not American: Citizenship Stripping from Dred Scott to the Dreamers</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Beacon ﻿Press, 2021)&nbsp;grapples with what it means to be American and the issues surrounding membership, identity, belonging, and exclusion that still occupy and divide the nation in the twenty-first century.</p>
<p>Our guest is: Professor Amanda Frost, who writes and teaches in the fields of immigration and citizenship law, federal courts and jurisdiction, and judicial ethics. Her scholarship has been cited by dozens of state and federal courts, including the U.S. Supreme Court, and she has been invited to testify on the topics of her articles before both the House and Senate Judiciary Committees.&nbsp;﻿<em>You Are Not American</em>﻿ w﻿as named a “New &amp; Noteworthy” book by The New York Times Book Review, and shortlisted for the Mark Lynton History Prize. She is writing a book on birthright citizenship, publishing in 2026.</p>
<p>Our host is:&nbsp;<a href="https://christinagessler.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. Christina Gessler</a>, who works as a developmental editor, dissertation and writing coach for scholars in the humanities. She is the producer of the Academic Life podcast, and writes the show’s newsletter with weekly bonus material on her Substack found&nbsp;<a href="https://christinagessler.substack.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a>.</p>
<p>Playlist:</p>
<ul>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/dear-miss-perkins-a-story-of-frances-perkinss-efforts-to-aid-refugees-from-nazi-germany" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dear Miss Perkins</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/secret-harvests" rel="noopener noreferrer">Secret Harvests</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/who-gets-believed" rel="noopener noreferrer">Who Gets Believed</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/we-take-our-cities-with-us" rel="noopener noreferrer">We Take Our Cities With Us</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/exploring-public-facing-humanities" rel="noopener noreferrer">The House on Henry Street</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/immigration-realities" rel="noopener noreferrer">Immigration Realities</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-ungrateful-refugee" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Ungrateful Refugee</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/sin-padres-ni-papeles-2" rel="noopener noreferrer">Sin Padres Ni Papeles</a></li>
  <li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/reunited" rel="noopener noreferrer">Reunited</a></li>
</ul>
<p>Welcome to Academic Life, the podcast for your academic journey—and beyond! Please join us again to learn from more experts inside and outside the academy, and around the world. Missed any of the 275+ Academic Life episodes? Find them&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/up-partners/academic-life" rel="noopener noreferrer">here.</a>&nbsp;And thank you for listening!</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="48828073" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/faba14e8-6a6b-4320-aeea-550e09ad602d/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=faba14e8-6a6b-4320-aeea-550e09ad602d&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Citizenship Stripping: You Are Not American</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:50:51</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Over the last two centuries, the US government has revoked citizenship to cast out its unwanted, suppress dissent, and deny civil rights to all considered “un-American”—whether due to their race, ethnicity, marriage partner, or beliefs. Drawing on the narratives of those who have struggled to be treated as full members of “We the People,” law professor Amanda Frost exposes a hidden history of discrimination and xenophobia that continues to this day.The Supreme Court’s rejection of Black citizenship in Dred Scott was among the first and most notorious examples of citizenship stripping, but the phenomenon did not end there. Women who married noncitizens, persecuted racial groups, labor leaders, and political activists were all denied their citizenship, and sometimes deported, by a government that wanted to redefine the meaning of “American.” You Are Not American: Citizenship Stripping from Dred Scott to the Dreamers (Beacon ﻿Press, 2021) grapples with what it means to be American and the issues surrounding membership, identity, belonging, and exclusion that still occupy and divide the nation in the twenty-first century.
Our guest is: Professor Amanda Frost, who writes and teaches in the fields of immigration and citizenship law, federal courts and jurisdiction, and judicial ethics. Her scholarship has been cited by dozens of state and federal courts, including the U.S. Supreme Court, and she has been invited to testify on the topics of her articles before both the House and Senate Judiciary Committees. ﻿You Are Not American﻿ w﻿as named a “New &amp; Noteworthy” book by The New York Times Book Review, and shortlisted for the Mark Lynton History Prize. She is writing a book on birthright citizenship, publishing in 2026.
Our host is: Dr. Christina Gessler, who works as a developmental editor, dissertation and writing coach for scholars in the humanities. She is the producer of the Academic Life podcast, and writes the show’s newsletter with weekly bonus material on her Substack found here.
Playlist:
 Dear Miss Perkins
 Secret Harvests
 Who Gets Believed
 We Take Our Cities With Us
 The House on Henry Street
 Immigration Realities
 The Ungrateful Refugee
 Sin Padres Ni Papeles
 Reunited
Welcome to Academic Life, the podcast for your academic journey—and beyond! Please join us again to learn from more experts inside and outside the academy, and around the world. Missed any of the 275+ Academic Life episodes? Find them here. And thank you for listening!
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Over the last two centuries, the US government has revoked citizenship to cast out its unwanted, suppress dissent, and deny civil rights to all considered “un-American”—whether due to their race, ethnicity, marriage partner, or beliefs. Drawing on the narratives of those who have struggled to be treated as full members of “We the People,” law professor Amanda Frost exposes a hidden history of discrimination and xenophobia that continues to this day.The Supreme Court’s rejection of Black citizenship in Dred Scott was among the first and most notorious examples of citizenship stripping, but the phenomenon did not end there. Women who married noncitizens, persecuted racial groups, labor leaders, and political activists were all denied their citizenship, and sometimes deported, by a government that wanted to redefine the meaning of “American.” You Are Not American: Citizenship Stripping from Dred Scott to the Dreamers (Beacon ﻿Press, 2021) grapples with what it means to be American and the issues surrounding membership, identity, belonging, and exclusion that still occupy and divide the nation in the twenty-first century.
Our guest is: Professor Amanda Frost, who writes and teaches in the fields of immigration and citizenship law, federal courts and jurisdiction, and judicial ethics. Her scholarship has been cited by dozens of state and federal courts, including the U.S. Supreme Court, and she has been invited to testify on the topics of her articles before both the House and Senate Judiciary Committees. ﻿You Are Not American﻿ w﻿as named a “New &amp; Noteworthy” book by The New York Times Book Review, and shortlisted for the Mark Lynton History Prize. She is writing a book on birthright citizenship, publishing in 2026.
Our host is: Dr. Christina Gessler, who works as a developmental editor, dissertation and writing coach for scholars in the humanities. She is the producer of the Academic Life podcast, and writes the show’s newsletter with weekly bonus material on her Substack found here.
Playlist:
 Dear Miss Perkins
 Secret Harvests
 Who Gets Believed
 We Take Our Cities With Us
 The House on Henry Street
 Immigration Realities
 The Ungrateful Refugee
 Sin Padres Ni Papeles
 Reunited
Welcome to Academic Life, the podcast for your academic journey—and beyond! Please join us again to learn from more experts inside and outside the academy, and around the world. Missed any of the 275+ Academic Life episodes? Find them here. And thank you for listening!
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1598</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">d9bf2206-78b5-11f0-86b6-af570e340139</guid>
      <title>Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos, &quot;The Human Dimension of International Law&quot; (Brill, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://brill.com/display/title/72623" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Human Dimension of International Law</a>&nbsp;(Brill, 2025)&nbsp;offers a vision of international law through the protection of human rights and the values they embody. This approach is particularly timely in light of recent international developments. For the first time, the International Court of Justice is seized of the main legal aspects of serious contemporary crises (Ukraine, Gaza Strip, Syria, Myanmar, etc.), on the basis of human rights instruments, with the participation of dozens of States. In this context, the book analyzes the multiple interactions between general international law and human rights. The former influences the latter, positively or restrictively, as illustrated by the issue of jurisdictional immunities. Conversely, human rights exert an influence on the evolution of general international law, sometimes gently, sometimes drastically. They contributed to the development of the sources of international law, several institutions related to the external relations of the State, the law of the sea, the theory of the subjects of international law, the concept of international responsibility, the system of collective security, as well as the structure and character of the discipline.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/linos-alexandre-sicilianos-the-human-dimension-of-international-law-brill-2025-XsvXNlza</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://brill.com/display/title/72623" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Human Dimension of International Law</a>&nbsp;(Brill, 2025)&nbsp;offers a vision of international law through the protection of human rights and the values they embody. This approach is particularly timely in light of recent international developments. For the first time, the International Court of Justice is seized of the main legal aspects of serious contemporary crises (Ukraine, Gaza Strip, Syria, Myanmar, etc.), on the basis of human rights instruments, with the participation of dozens of States. In this context, the book analyzes the multiple interactions between general international law and human rights. The former influences the latter, positively or restrictively, as illustrated by the issue of jurisdictional immunities. Conversely, human rights exert an influence on the evolution of general international law, sometimes gently, sometimes drastically. They contributed to the development of the sources of international law, several institutions related to the external relations of the State, the law of the sea, the theory of the subjects of international law, the concept of international responsibility, the system of collective security, as well as the structure and character of the discipline.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="29904392" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/92bcaf06-c30a-4b19-be5e-17c21c52ba9a/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=92bcaf06-c30a-4b19-be5e-17c21c52ba9a&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos, &quot;The Human Dimension of International Law&quot; (Brill, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:31:08</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The Human Dimension of International Law (Brill, 2025) offers a vision of international law through the protection of human rights and the values they embody. This approach is particularly timely in light of recent international developments. For the first time, the International Court of Justice is seized of the main legal aspects of serious contemporary crises (Ukraine, Gaza Strip, Syria, Myanmar, etc.), on the basis of human rights instruments, with the participation of dozens of States. In this context, the book analyzes the multiple interactions between general international law and human rights. The former influences the latter, positively or restrictively, as illustrated by the issue of jurisdictional immunities. Conversely, human rights exert an influence on the evolution of general international law, sometimes gently, sometimes drastically. They contributed to the development of the sources of international law, several institutions related to the external relations of the State, the law of the sea, the theory of the subjects of international law, the concept of international responsibility, the system of collective security, as well as the structure and character of the discipline.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Human Dimension of International Law (Brill, 2025) offers a vision of international law through the protection of human rights and the values they embody. This approach is particularly timely in light of recent international developments. For the first time, the International Court of Justice is seized of the main legal aspects of serious contemporary crises (Ukraine, Gaza Strip, Syria, Myanmar, etc.), on the basis of human rights instruments, with the participation of dozens of States. In this context, the book analyzes the multiple interactions between general international law and human rights. The former influences the latter, positively or restrictively, as illustrated by the issue of jurisdictional immunities. Conversely, human rights exert an influence on the evolution of general international law, sometimes gently, sometimes drastically. They contributed to the development of the sources of international law, several institutions related to the external relations of the State, the law of the sea, the theory of the subjects of international law, the concept of international responsibility, the system of collective security, as well as the structure and character of the discipline.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1597</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">c9c8923c-78bb-11f0-8e0e-fb4b62ffcdd8</guid>
      <title>Peter Hart-Brinson, &quot;The Gay Marriage Generation: How the LGBTQ Movement Transformed American Culture&quot; (NYU Press, 2018)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>How and why did public opinions about gay marriage shift? In his new book, <a href="https://aax-us-east.amazon-adsystem.com/x/c/QgzRcgXDHPANwzSLq84B_uYAAAFnwpZeYAEAAAFKAbFBMmo/https://www.amazon.com/dp/1479826235/?creativeASIN=1479826235&amp;linkCode=w61&amp;imprToken=sJ1HkZdnpoEHpJmiG98UPw&amp;slotNum=0&amp;tag=newbooinhis-20" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Gay Marriage Generation: How the LGBTQ Movement Transformed American Culture </em></a>(New York University Press, 2018), <a href="https://people.uwec.edu/hartbrin/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Peter Hart-Brinson</a> explores this question and more through public opinion data and interviews with two generations of Americans. By using these mixed methods of analysis, Hart-Brinson dissects generational change of attitudes toward gay marriage through interpretive, historical, and demographic analyses. This book contributes to the literature by building upon previous work and moving the discussion of generational change and attitudes forward. Concepts that are important for the book include differences between orientation and attraction, a difference in how the two generations Hart-Brinson interviewed speak about gay marriage. This book is accessible to a wide audience and will be of interest to family and public opinion scholars, as well as anyone interested in public attitudes or gay marriage specifically. This book would be a great addition to any graduate level course on families, as it gives a solid background of the history of the LGBTQ movement as well as attitudes shifts toward gay marriage.</p><p><a href="http://thespattersearch.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Sarah E. Patterson</em></a><em> is a postdoc at the University of Western Ontario. You can tweet her at @spattersearch.</em></p><p><br></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/peter-hart-brinson-the-gay-marriage-generation-how-the-lgbtq-movement-transformed-american-culture-nyu-press-2018-0ZNOv2Wk-IMqHBsoZ</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How and why did public opinions about gay marriage shift? In his new book, <a href="https://aax-us-east.amazon-adsystem.com/x/c/QgzRcgXDHPANwzSLq84B_uYAAAFnwpZeYAEAAAFKAbFBMmo/https://www.amazon.com/dp/1479826235/?creativeASIN=1479826235&amp;linkCode=w61&amp;imprToken=sJ1HkZdnpoEHpJmiG98UPw&amp;slotNum=0&amp;tag=newbooinhis-20" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Gay Marriage Generation: How the LGBTQ Movement Transformed American Culture </em></a>(New York University Press, 2018), <a href="https://people.uwec.edu/hartbrin/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Peter Hart-Brinson</a> explores this question and more through public opinion data and interviews with two generations of Americans. By using these mixed methods of analysis, Hart-Brinson dissects generational change of attitudes toward gay marriage through interpretive, historical, and demographic analyses. This book contributes to the literature by building upon previous work and moving the discussion of generational change and attitudes forward. Concepts that are important for the book include differences between orientation and attraction, a difference in how the two generations Hart-Brinson interviewed speak about gay marriage. This book is accessible to a wide audience and will be of interest to family and public opinion scholars, as well as anyone interested in public attitudes or gay marriage specifically. This book would be a great addition to any graduate level course on families, as it gives a solid background of the history of the LGBTQ movement as well as attitudes shifts toward gay marriage.</p><p><a href="http://thespattersearch.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Sarah E. Patterson</em></a><em> is a postdoc at the University of Western Ontario. You can tweet her at @spattersearch.</em></p><p><br></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="40806574" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/09342713-fb23-48f0-9a98-4c3f0fdd1860/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=09342713-fb23-48f0-9a98-4c3f0fdd1860&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Peter Hart-Brinson, &quot;The Gay Marriage Generation: How the LGBTQ Movement Transformed American Culture&quot; (NYU Press, 2018)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:42:30</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>How and why did public opinions about gay marriage shift? In his new book, The Gay Marriage Generation: How the LGBTQ Movement Transformed American Culture (New York University Press, 2018), Peter Hart-Brinson explores this question and more through public opinion data and interviews with two generations of Americans. By using these mixed methods of analysis, Hart-Brinson dissects generational change of attitudes toward gay marriage through interpretive, historical, and demographic analyses. This book contributes to the literature by building upon previous work and moving the discussion of generational change and attitudes forward. Concepts that are important for the book include differences between orientation and attraction, a difference in how the two generations Hart-Brinson interviewed speak about gay marriage. This book is accessible to a wide audience and will be of interest to family and public opinion scholars, as well as anyone interested in public attitudes or gay marriage specifically. This book would be a great addition to any graduate level course on families, as it gives a solid background of the history of the LGBTQ movement as well as attitudes shifts toward gay marriage.
Sarah E. Patterson is a postdoc at the University of Western Ontario. You can tweet her at @spattersearch.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>How and why did public opinions about gay marriage shift? In his new book, The Gay Marriage Generation: How the LGBTQ Movement Transformed American Culture (New York University Press, 2018), Peter Hart-Brinson explores this question and more through public opinion data and interviews with two generations of Americans. By using these mixed methods of analysis, Hart-Brinson dissects generational change of attitudes toward gay marriage through interpretive, historical, and demographic analyses. This book contributes to the literature by building upon previous work and moving the discussion of generational change and attitudes forward. Concepts that are important for the book include differences between orientation and attraction, a difference in how the two generations Hart-Brinson interviewed speak about gay marriage. This book is accessible to a wide audience and will be of interest to family and public opinion scholars, as well as anyone interested in public attitudes or gay marriage specifically. This book would be a great addition to any graduate level course on families, as it gives a solid background of the history of the LGBTQ movement as well as attitudes shifts toward gay marriage.
Sarah E. Patterson is a postdoc at the University of Western Ontario. You can tweet her at @spattersearch.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>95</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">f989a9ae-77e7-11f0-979f-efae653a64e9</guid>
      <title>James Kimmel, Jr., &quot;The Science of Revenge: Understanding the World&apos;s Deadliest Addiction—and How to Overcome It&quot; (Random House, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>There is a hidden addiction plaguing humanity right now: revenge. Researchers have identified retaliation in response to real and imagined grievances as the root cause of most forms of human aggression and violence. From vicious tweets to road rage, murder-suicide, and armed insurrection, perpetrators almost always see themselves as victims seeking justice. Chillingly, recent behavioral and neuroimaging studies of the human brain show that harboring a personal grievance triggers revenge desires and activates the neural pleasure and reward circuitry of&nbsp;<em>addiction</em>.<br>Although this behavior is ancient and seems inevitable, by understanding retaliation and violence as an addictive brain-biological process, we can control deadly revenge cravings and save lives. In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780593796511" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Science of Revenge: Understanding the World's Deadliest Addiction—and How to Overcome It</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Random House, 2025)<em>,</em>&nbsp;Yale violence researcher and psychiatry lecturer James Kimmel, Jr., JD, uncovers the truth behind why we want to hurt the people who hurt us, what happens when it gets out of hand, and how to stop it.<br>Weaving neuroscience, psychology, sociology, law, and human history with captivating storytelling, Dr. Kimmel reveals the neurological mechanisms and prevalence of revenge addiction. He shines an unsparing light on humanity’s pathological obsession with revenge throughout history; his own struggle with revenge addiction that almost led him to commit a mass shooting; America’s growing addiction to revenge as a special brand of justice; and the startlingly similar addictive behaviors and motivations of childhood bullies, abusive partners, aggrieved employees, sparring politicians, street gang members, violent extremists, mass killers, and tyrannical dictators. He also reveals the amazing, healing changes that take place inside your brain and body when you practice forgiveness. Emphasizing the necessity of proven public health approaches and personal solutions for every level of revenge addiction, he offers urgent, actionable information and novel methods for preventing and treating violence.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.jameskimmeljr.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">James Kimmel, Jr.</a>&nbsp;is an assistant clinical professor in psychiatry at the Yale School of Medicine, a lawyer, and the founder and co-director of the Yale Collaborative for Motive Control Studies.</p>
<p><em>Caleb Zakarin is editor of the New Books Network.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/james-kimmel-jr-the-science-of-revenge-understanding-the-worlds-deadliest-addictionand-how-to-overcome-it-random-house-2025-ZpjNezO7</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a hidden addiction plaguing humanity right now: revenge. Researchers have identified retaliation in response to real and imagined grievances as the root cause of most forms of human aggression and violence. From vicious tweets to road rage, murder-suicide, and armed insurrection, perpetrators almost always see themselves as victims seeking justice. Chillingly, recent behavioral and neuroimaging studies of the human brain show that harboring a personal grievance triggers revenge desires and activates the neural pleasure and reward circuitry of&nbsp;<em>addiction</em>.<br>Although this behavior is ancient and seems inevitable, by understanding retaliation and violence as an addictive brain-biological process, we can control deadly revenge cravings and save lives. In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780593796511" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Science of Revenge: Understanding the World's Deadliest Addiction—and How to Overcome It</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Random House, 2025)<em>,</em>&nbsp;Yale violence researcher and psychiatry lecturer James Kimmel, Jr., JD, uncovers the truth behind why we want to hurt the people who hurt us, what happens when it gets out of hand, and how to stop it.<br>Weaving neuroscience, psychology, sociology, law, and human history with captivating storytelling, Dr. Kimmel reveals the neurological mechanisms and prevalence of revenge addiction. He shines an unsparing light on humanity’s pathological obsession with revenge throughout history; his own struggle with revenge addiction that almost led him to commit a mass shooting; America’s growing addiction to revenge as a special brand of justice; and the startlingly similar addictive behaviors and motivations of childhood bullies, abusive partners, aggrieved employees, sparring politicians, street gang members, violent extremists, mass killers, and tyrannical dictators. He also reveals the amazing, healing changes that take place inside your brain and body when you practice forgiveness. Emphasizing the necessity of proven public health approaches and personal solutions for every level of revenge addiction, he offers urgent, actionable information and novel methods for preventing and treating violence.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.jameskimmeljr.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">James Kimmel, Jr.</a>&nbsp;is an assistant clinical professor in psychiatry at the Yale School of Medicine, a lawyer, and the founder and co-director of the Yale Collaborative for Motive Control Studies.</p>
<p><em>Caleb Zakarin is editor of the New Books Network.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="46792068" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/29093059-5fe1-4723-9fa6-41e5762066f9/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=29093059-5fe1-4723-9fa6-41e5762066f9&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>James Kimmel, Jr., &quot;The Science of Revenge: Understanding the World&apos;s Deadliest Addiction—and How to Overcome It&quot; (Random House, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:48:44</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>There is a hidden addiction plaguing humanity right now: revenge. Researchers have identified retaliation in response to real and imagined grievances as the root cause of most forms of human aggression and violence. From vicious tweets to road rage, murder-suicide, and armed insurrection, perpetrators almost always see themselves as victims seeking justice. Chillingly, recent behavioral and neuroimaging studies of the human brain show that harboring a personal grievance triggers revenge desires and activates the neural pleasure and reward circuitry of addiction.Although this behavior is ancient and seems inevitable, by understanding retaliation and violence as an addictive brain-biological process, we can control deadly revenge cravings and save lives. In The Science of Revenge: Understanding the World&apos;s Deadliest Addiction—and How to Overcome It (Random House, 2025), Yale violence researcher and psychiatry lecturer James Kimmel, Jr., JD, uncovers the truth behind why we want to hurt the people who hurt us, what happens when it gets out of hand, and how to stop it.Weaving neuroscience, psychology, sociology, law, and human history with captivating storytelling, Dr. Kimmel reveals the neurological mechanisms and prevalence of revenge addiction. He shines an unsparing light on humanity’s pathological obsession with revenge throughout history; his own struggle with revenge addiction that almost led him to commit a mass shooting; America’s growing addiction to revenge as a special brand of justice; and the startlingly similar addictive behaviors and motivations of childhood bullies, abusive partners, aggrieved employees, sparring politicians, street gang members, violent extremists, mass killers, and tyrannical dictators. He also reveals the amazing, healing changes that take place inside your brain and body when you practice forgiveness. Emphasizing the necessity of proven public health approaches and personal solutions for every level of revenge addiction, he offers urgent, actionable information and novel methods for preventing and treating violence.
James Kimmel, Jr. is an assistant clinical professor in psychiatry at the Yale School of Medicine, a lawyer, and the founder and co-director of the Yale Collaborative for Motive Control Studies.
Caleb Zakarin is editor of the New Books Network.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>There is a hidden addiction plaguing humanity right now: revenge. Researchers have identified retaliation in response to real and imagined grievances as the root cause of most forms of human aggression and violence. From vicious tweets to road rage, murder-suicide, and armed insurrection, perpetrators almost always see themselves as victims seeking justice. Chillingly, recent behavioral and neuroimaging studies of the human brain show that harboring a personal grievance triggers revenge desires and activates the neural pleasure and reward circuitry of addiction.Although this behavior is ancient and seems inevitable, by understanding retaliation and violence as an addictive brain-biological process, we can control deadly revenge cravings and save lives. In The Science of Revenge: Understanding the World&apos;s Deadliest Addiction—and How to Overcome It (Random House, 2025), Yale violence researcher and psychiatry lecturer James Kimmel, Jr., JD, uncovers the truth behind why we want to hurt the people who hurt us, what happens when it gets out of hand, and how to stop it.Weaving neuroscience, psychology, sociology, law, and human history with captivating storytelling, Dr. Kimmel reveals the neurological mechanisms and prevalence of revenge addiction. He shines an unsparing light on humanity’s pathological obsession with revenge throughout history; his own struggle with revenge addiction that almost led him to commit a mass shooting; America’s growing addiction to revenge as a special brand of justice; and the startlingly similar addictive behaviors and motivations of childhood bullies, abusive partners, aggrieved employees, sparring politicians, street gang members, violent extremists, mass killers, and tyrannical dictators. He also reveals the amazing, healing changes that take place inside your brain and body when you practice forgiveness. Emphasizing the necessity of proven public health approaches and personal solutions for every level of revenge addiction, he offers urgent, actionable information and novel methods for preventing and treating violence.
James Kimmel, Jr. is an assistant clinical professor in psychiatry at the Yale School of Medicine, a lawyer, and the founder and co-director of the Yale Collaborative for Motive Control Studies.
Caleb Zakarin is editor of the New Books Network.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1596</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">275a0804-75fb-11f0-8dc1-73b2629e910c</guid>
      <title>Ryan Griffiths, &quot;The Disunited States: Threats of Secession in Red and Blue America and Why They Won&apos;t Work&quot; (Oxford UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Is the breakup of an increasingly polarized America into separate red and blue countries even possible?</p>
<p>There is a growing interest in American secession. In February 2023, Marjorie Taylor Greene tweeted that "We need a national divorce...We need to separate by red states and blue states." Recent movements like Yes California have called for a national divorce along political lines. A 2023 Axios poll shows that 20 percent of Americans favor a national divorce. These trends show a sincere interest in American secession, and they will likely increase in the aftermath of the 2024 Presidential election.</p>
<p>Proponents of secession make three arguments: the two sides have irreconcilable differences; secession is a legal right; and smaller political units are better. Through interviews with secessionist advocates in America, Ryan Griffiths explores the case for why Red America and Blue America should split up.</p>
<p>But as&nbsp;<em>The Disunited States</em>&nbsp;shows, these arguments are fundamentally incorrect. Secession is the wrong solution to the problem of polarization. Red and Blue America are not neatly sorted and geographically concentrated. Splitting the two parts would require a dangerous unmixing of the population, one that could spiral into violence and state collapse. Drawing on his expertise on secessionism worldwide, he shows how the process has played out internationally-and usually disastrously. Ultimately, this book will disabuse readers of the belief that secession will fix America's problems. Rather than focus on national divorce as a solution, the better course of action is to seek common ground.</p>
<p>Ryan D. Griffiths is a Professor in the Department of Political Science at the Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affairs, Syracuse University. His research focuses on the dynamics of secession and the study of sovereignty, state systems, and international orders. He teaches on topics related to nationalism, international relations, and international relations theory.</p>
<p>Daniel Moran’s writing about literature and film can be found on&nbsp;<a href="https://pagesandframes.substack.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Pages and Frames</em></a>. He earned his B.A. and M.A. in English from Rutgers University and his Ph.D. in History from Drew University. The author of&nbsp;<a href="https://ugapress.org/book/9780820352930/creating-flannery-oconnor/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Creating Flannery O’Connor: Her Critics, Her Publishers, Her Readers</em></a>, he teaches research and writing and co-hosts the long-running p</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/ryan-griffiths-the-disunited-states-threats-of-secession-in-red-and-blue-america-and-why-they-won-t-work-oxford-up-2025-_TYZyfkj</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is the breakup of an increasingly polarized America into separate red and blue countries even possible?</p>
<p>There is a growing interest in American secession. In February 2023, Marjorie Taylor Greene tweeted that "We need a national divorce...We need to separate by red states and blue states." Recent movements like Yes California have called for a national divorce along political lines. A 2023 Axios poll shows that 20 percent of Americans favor a national divorce. These trends show a sincere interest in American secession, and they will likely increase in the aftermath of the 2024 Presidential election.</p>
<p>Proponents of secession make three arguments: the two sides have irreconcilable differences; secession is a legal right; and smaller political units are better. Through interviews with secessionist advocates in America, Ryan Griffiths explores the case for why Red America and Blue America should split up.</p>
<p>But as&nbsp;<em>The Disunited States</em>&nbsp;shows, these arguments are fundamentally incorrect. Secession is the wrong solution to the problem of polarization. Red and Blue America are not neatly sorted and geographically concentrated. Splitting the two parts would require a dangerous unmixing of the population, one that could spiral into violence and state collapse. Drawing on his expertise on secessionism worldwide, he shows how the process has played out internationally-and usually disastrously. Ultimately, this book will disabuse readers of the belief that secession will fix America's problems. Rather than focus on national divorce as a solution, the better course of action is to seek common ground.</p>
<p>Ryan D. Griffiths is a Professor in the Department of Political Science at the Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affairs, Syracuse University. His research focuses on the dynamics of secession and the study of sovereignty, state systems, and international orders. He teaches on topics related to nationalism, international relations, and international relations theory.</p>
<p>Daniel Moran’s writing about literature and film can be found on&nbsp;<a href="https://pagesandframes.substack.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Pages and Frames</em></a>. He earned his B.A. and M.A. in English from Rutgers University and his Ph.D. in History from Drew University. The author of&nbsp;<a href="https://ugapress.org/book/9780820352930/creating-flannery-oconnor/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Creating Flannery O’Connor: Her Critics, Her Publishers, Her Readers</em></a>, he teaches research and writing and co-hosts the long-running p</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="57720895" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/8f539f5a-0b6a-4bda-99be-7a9993176908/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=8f539f5a-0b6a-4bda-99be-7a9993176908&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Ryan Griffiths, &quot;The Disunited States: Threats of Secession in Red and Blue America and Why They Won&apos;t Work&quot; (Oxford UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:00:07</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Is the breakup of an increasingly polarized America into separate red and blue countries even possible?
There is a growing interest in American secession. In February 2023, Marjorie Taylor Greene tweeted that &quot;We need a national divorce...We need to separate by red states and blue states.&quot; Recent movements like Yes California have called for a national divorce along political lines. A 2023 Axios poll shows that 20 percent of Americans favor a national divorce. These trends show a sincere interest in American secession, and they will likely increase in the aftermath of the 2024 Presidential election.
Proponents of secession make three arguments: the two sides have irreconcilable differences; secession is a legal right; and smaller political units are better. Through interviews with secessionist advocates in America, Ryan Griffiths explores the case for why Red America and Blue America should split up.
But as The Disunited States shows, these arguments are fundamentally incorrect. Secession is the wrong solution to the problem of polarization. Red and Blue America are not neatly sorted and geographically concentrated. Splitting the two parts would require a dangerous unmixing of the population, one that could spiral into violence and state collapse. Drawing on his expertise on secessionism worldwide, he shows how the process has played out internationally-and usually disastrously. Ultimately, this book will disabuse readers of the belief that secession will fix America&apos;s problems. Rather than focus on national divorce as a solution, the better course of action is to seek common ground.
Ryan D. Griffiths is a Professor in the Department of Political Science at the Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affairs, Syracuse University. His research focuses on the dynamics of secession and the study of sovereignty, state systems, and international orders. He teaches on topics related to nationalism, international relations, and international relations theory.
Daniel Moran’s writing about literature and film can be found on Pages and Frames. He earned his B.A. and M.A. in English from Rutgers University and his Ph.D. in History from Drew University. The author of Creating Flannery O’Connor: Her Critics, Her Publishers, Her Readers, he teaches research and writing and co-hosts the long-running p
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Is the breakup of an increasingly polarized America into separate red and blue countries even possible?
There is a growing interest in American secession. In February 2023, Marjorie Taylor Greene tweeted that &quot;We need a national divorce...We need to separate by red states and blue states.&quot; Recent movements like Yes California have called for a national divorce along political lines. A 2023 Axios poll shows that 20 percent of Americans favor a national divorce. These trends show a sincere interest in American secession, and they will likely increase in the aftermath of the 2024 Presidential election.
Proponents of secession make three arguments: the two sides have irreconcilable differences; secession is a legal right; and smaller political units are better. Through interviews with secessionist advocates in America, Ryan Griffiths explores the case for why Red America and Blue America should split up.
But as The Disunited States shows, these arguments are fundamentally incorrect. Secession is the wrong solution to the problem of polarization. Red and Blue America are not neatly sorted and geographically concentrated. Splitting the two parts would require a dangerous unmixing of the population, one that could spiral into violence and state collapse. Drawing on his expertise on secessionism worldwide, he shows how the process has played out internationally-and usually disastrously. Ultimately, this book will disabuse readers of the belief that secession will fix America&apos;s problems. Rather than focus on national divorce as a solution, the better course of action is to seek common ground.
Ryan D. Griffiths is a Professor in the Department of Political Science at the Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affairs, Syracuse University. His research focuses on the dynamics of secession and the study of sovereignty, state systems, and international orders. He teaches on topics related to nationalism, international relations, and international relations theory.
Daniel Moran’s writing about literature and film can be found on Pages and Frames. He earned his B.A. and M.A. in English from Rutgers University and his Ph.D. in History from Drew University. The author of Creating Flannery O’Connor: Her Critics, Her Publishers, Her Readers, he teaches research and writing and co-hosts the long-running p
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>210</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://newbooksnetwork.com/?p=60464</guid>
      <title>Terri Diane Halperin, “The Alien and Sedition Acts of 1798: Testing the Constitution” (Johns Hopkins UP, 2016)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In <a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/1421419696/?tag=newbooinhis-20" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Alien and Sedition Acts of 1798: Testing the Constitution </a>(Johns Hopkins University Press, 2016), <a href="http://dailyhistory.org/The_Alien_and_Sedition_Acts_of_1798:_Interview_with_Terri_Halperin" rel="noopener noreferrer">Terri Diane Halperin</a> has provided a political history of the 1790s and explained the origins of one of the most contentious free speech events in American history. The Alien and Seditions Acts, which were actually four laws enacted in 1798, dramatically tested the principles of free speech in the young republic. Halperin explains the political origins of the controversy, which began in the earliest days the George Washington’s administration. Although the Federalists, led by Alexander Hamilton, George Washington, and John Adams, and the Democratic-Republicans (or Jeffersonians), led by Jefferson and James Madison, had already established their differences on the national stage regarding the Constitution, foreign affairs would create further cleavages between these groups. Halperin investigates and analyzes how the French Revolution was celebrated and feared in America. When France descended into civil war and instigated European wars, the United States feared being drawn into the conflicts. The Federalists developed an affinity for Britain’s rejection of the Terror and resistance to France, while the Democratic-Republicans celebrated the promise of the French Revolution, even though most deplored the violence of the Terror. French and Irish immigrants were welcomed by the Jeffersonians and feared by the Federalists.</p><p>
Halperin demonstrates how dissent against American foreign policy, usually through the many newspapers published in America, was viewed as subversive and threatening to America’s reputation and national security. The Federalists, who dominated the national government during the 1790s, conceived of federal criminal laws to quash dissent. Halperin explains how both sides had their dearly held beliefs: the Federalists thought Jeffersonian newspaper editors would encourage rebellions against federal power or foreign powers efforts to acquire land in the New World; the Jeffersonians claimed that dissent was legitimate and pointed to the First Amendment’s free speech clause as a right that allowed criticism of government. My conversation with Halperin covers all of these events and reveals the importance of the debate over free speech in the early Republic.</p><p>
</p><p>
Ian J. Drake is an Associate Professor of Political Science and Law at Montclair State University. His scholarly interests include American legal and constitutional history and political theory.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 9 Aug 2025 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/terri-diane-halperin-the-alien-and-sedition-acts-of-1798-testing-the-constitution-johns-hopkins-up-2016-qpdWAxY0</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In <a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/1421419696/?tag=newbooinhis-20" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Alien and Sedition Acts of 1798: Testing the Constitution </a>(Johns Hopkins University Press, 2016), <a href="http://dailyhistory.org/The_Alien_and_Sedition_Acts_of_1798:_Interview_with_Terri_Halperin" rel="noopener noreferrer">Terri Diane Halperin</a> has provided a political history of the 1790s and explained the origins of one of the most contentious free speech events in American history. The Alien and Seditions Acts, which were actually four laws enacted in 1798, dramatically tested the principles of free speech in the young republic. Halperin explains the political origins of the controversy, which began in the earliest days the George Washington’s administration. Although the Federalists, led by Alexander Hamilton, George Washington, and John Adams, and the Democratic-Republicans (or Jeffersonians), led by Jefferson and James Madison, had already established their differences on the national stage regarding the Constitution, foreign affairs would create further cleavages between these groups. Halperin investigates and analyzes how the French Revolution was celebrated and feared in America. When France descended into civil war and instigated European wars, the United States feared being drawn into the conflicts. The Federalists developed an affinity for Britain’s rejection of the Terror and resistance to France, while the Democratic-Republicans celebrated the promise of the French Revolution, even though most deplored the violence of the Terror. French and Irish immigrants were welcomed by the Jeffersonians and feared by the Federalists.</p><p>
Halperin demonstrates how dissent against American foreign policy, usually through the many newspapers published in America, was viewed as subversive and threatening to America’s reputation and national security. The Federalists, who dominated the national government during the 1790s, conceived of federal criminal laws to quash dissent. Halperin explains how both sides had their dearly held beliefs: the Federalists thought Jeffersonian newspaper editors would encourage rebellions against federal power or foreign powers efforts to acquire land in the New World; the Jeffersonians claimed that dissent was legitimate and pointed to the First Amendment’s free speech clause as a right that allowed criticism of government. My conversation with Halperin covers all of these events and reveals the importance of the debate over free speech in the early Republic.</p><p>
</p><p>
Ian J. Drake is an Associate Professor of Political Science and Law at Montclair State University. His scholarly interests include American legal and constitutional history and political theory.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="56431219" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/8618a45c-f056-4f82-8df8-40566984e3ca/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=8618a45c-f056-4f82-8df8-40566984e3ca&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Terri Diane Halperin, “The Alien and Sedition Acts of 1798: Testing the Constitution” (Johns Hopkins UP, 2016)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:58:46</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In The Alien and Sedition Acts of 1798: Testing the Constitution (Johns Hopkins University Press, 2016), Terri Diane Halperin has provided a political history of the 1790s and explained the origins of one of the most contentious free speech events in American history. The Alien and Seditions Acts, which were actually four laws enacted in 1798, dramatically tested the principles of free speech in the young republic. Halperin explains the political origins of the controversy, which began in the earliest days the George Washington’s administration. Although the Federalists, led by Alexander Hamilton, George Washington, and John Adams, and the Democratic-Republicans (or Jeffersonians), led by Jefferson and James Madison, had already established their differences on the national stage regarding the Constitution, foreign affairs would create further cleavages between these groups. Halperin investigates and analyzes how the French Revolution was celebrated and feared in America. When France descended into civil war and instigated European wars, the United States feared being drawn into the conflicts. The Federalists developed an affinity for Britain’s rejection of the Terror and resistance to France, while the Democratic-Republicans celebrated the promise of the French Revolution, even though most deplored the violence of the Terror. French and Irish immigrants were welcomed by the Jeffersonians and feared by the Federalists.
Halperin demonstrates how dissent against American foreign policy, usually through the many newspapers published in America, was viewed as subversive and threatening to America’s reputation and national security. The Federalists, who dominated the national government during the 1790s, conceived of federal criminal laws to quash dissent. Halperin explains how both sides had their dearly held beliefs: the Federalists thought Jeffersonian newspaper editors would encourage rebellions against federal power or foreign powers efforts to acquire land in the New World; the Jeffersonians claimed that dissent was legitimate and pointed to the First Amendment’s free speech clause as a right that allowed criticism of government. My conversation with Halperin covers all of these events and reveals the importance of the debate over free speech in the early Republic.
Ian J. Drake is an Associate Professor of Political Science and Law at Montclair State University. His scholarly interests include American legal and constitutional history and political theory.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In The Alien and Sedition Acts of 1798: Testing the Constitution (Johns Hopkins University Press, 2016), Terri Diane Halperin has provided a political history of the 1790s and explained the origins of one of the most contentious free speech events in American history. The Alien and Seditions Acts, which were actually four laws enacted in 1798, dramatically tested the principles of free speech in the young republic. Halperin explains the political origins of the controversy, which began in the earliest days the George Washington’s administration. Although the Federalists, led by Alexander Hamilton, George Washington, and John Adams, and the Democratic-Republicans (or Jeffersonians), led by Jefferson and James Madison, had already established their differences on the national stage regarding the Constitution, foreign affairs would create further cleavages between these groups. Halperin investigates and analyzes how the French Revolution was celebrated and feared in America. When France descended into civil war and instigated European wars, the United States feared being drawn into the conflicts. The Federalists developed an affinity for Britain’s rejection of the Terror and resistance to France, while the Democratic-Republicans celebrated the promise of the French Revolution, even though most deplored the violence of the Terror. French and Irish immigrants were welcomed by the Jeffersonians and feared by the Federalists.
Halperin demonstrates how dissent against American foreign policy, usually through the many newspapers published in America, was viewed as subversive and threatening to America’s reputation and national security. The Federalists, who dominated the national government during the 1790s, conceived of federal criminal laws to quash dissent. Halperin explains how both sides had their dearly held beliefs: the Federalists thought Jeffersonian newspaper editors would encourage rebellions against federal power or foreign powers efforts to acquire land in the New World; the Jeffersonians claimed that dissent was legitimate and pointed to the First Amendment’s free speech clause as a right that allowed criticism of government. My conversation with Halperin covers all of these events and reveals the importance of the debate over free speech in the early Republic.
Ian J. Drake is an Associate Professor of Political Science and Law at Montclair State University. His scholarly interests include American legal and constitutional history and political theory.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>42</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e7e9d45c-73d3-11f0-914a-ab62c5d6c498</guid>
      <title>Lewis A. Grossman, &quot;Choose Your Medicine: Freedom of Therapeutic Choice in America&quot; (Oxford UP, 2021)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Throughout American history, lawmakers have limited the range of treatments available to patients, often with the backing of the medical establishment. The country's history is also, however, brimming with social movements that have condemned such restrictions as violations of fundamental American liberties. This fierce conflict is one of the defining features of the social history of medicine in the United States.&nbsp;</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780190612757" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Choose Your Medicine: Freedom of Therapeutic Choice in America</em></a>&nbsp;(Oxford UP, 2021), Lewis A. Grossman presents a compelling look at how persistent but evolving notions of a right to therapeutic choice have affected American health policy, law, and regulation from the Revolution through the Trump Era. Grossman grounds his analysis in historical examples ranging from unschooled supporters of botanical medicine in the early nineteenth century to sophisticated cancer patient advocacy groups in the twenty-first. He vividly describes how activists and lawyers have resisted a wide variety of legal constraints on therapeutic choice, including medical licensing statutes, FDA limitations on unapproved drugs and alternative remedies, abortion restrictions, and prohibitions against medical marijuana and physician-assisted suicide. Grossman also considers the relationship between these campaigns for desired treatments and widespread opposition to state-compelled health measures such as vaccines and face masks. From the streets of San Francisco to the US Supreme Court, Choose Your Medicine examines an underexplored theme of American history, politics, and law that is more relevant today than ever.</p><p><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/stephenpimpare/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Stephen Pimpare</em></a><em>&nbsp;is director of the Public Service &amp; Nonprofit Leadership program and Faculty Fellow at the Carsey School of Public Policy at the University of New Hampshire.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 9 Aug 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/lewis-a-grossman-choose-your-medicine-freedom-of-therapeutic-choice-in-america-oxford-up-2021-_Seg_v_B-daPRAb_t</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Throughout American history, lawmakers have limited the range of treatments available to patients, often with the backing of the medical establishment. The country's history is also, however, brimming with social movements that have condemned such restrictions as violations of fundamental American liberties. This fierce conflict is one of the defining features of the social history of medicine in the United States.&nbsp;</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780190612757" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Choose Your Medicine: Freedom of Therapeutic Choice in America</em></a>&nbsp;(Oxford UP, 2021), Lewis A. Grossman presents a compelling look at how persistent but evolving notions of a right to therapeutic choice have affected American health policy, law, and regulation from the Revolution through the Trump Era. Grossman grounds his analysis in historical examples ranging from unschooled supporters of botanical medicine in the early nineteenth century to sophisticated cancer patient advocacy groups in the twenty-first. He vividly describes how activists and lawyers have resisted a wide variety of legal constraints on therapeutic choice, including medical licensing statutes, FDA limitations on unapproved drugs and alternative remedies, abortion restrictions, and prohibitions against medical marijuana and physician-assisted suicide. Grossman also considers the relationship between these campaigns for desired treatments and widespread opposition to state-compelled health measures such as vaccines and face masks. From the streets of San Francisco to the US Supreme Court, Choose Your Medicine examines an underexplored theme of American history, politics, and law that is more relevant today than ever.</p><p><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/stephenpimpare/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Stephen Pimpare</em></a><em>&nbsp;is director of the Public Service &amp; Nonprofit Leadership program and Faculty Fellow at the Carsey School of Public Policy at the University of New Hampshire.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="41435385" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/fc065ca9-afca-4956-bee5-d249efe8b8de/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=fc065ca9-afca-4956-bee5-d249efe8b8de&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Lewis A. Grossman, &quot;Choose Your Medicine: Freedom of Therapeutic Choice in America&quot; (Oxford UP, 2021)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:43:08</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Throughout American history, lawmakers have limited the range of treatments available to patients, often with the backing of the medical establishment. The country&apos;s history is also, however, brimming with social movements that have condemned such restrictions as violations of fundamental American liberties. This fierce conflict is one of the defining features of the social history of medicine in the United States. 
In Choose Your Medicine: Freedom of Therapeutic Choice in America (Oxford UP, 2021), Lewis A. Grossman presents a compelling look at how persistent but evolving notions of a right to therapeutic choice have affected American health policy, law, and regulation from the Revolution through the Trump Era. Grossman grounds his analysis in historical examples ranging from unschooled supporters of botanical medicine in the early nineteenth century to sophisticated cancer patient advocacy groups in the twenty-first. He vividly describes how activists and lawyers have resisted a wide variety of legal constraints on therapeutic choice, including medical licensing statutes, FDA limitations on unapproved drugs and alternative remedies, abortion restrictions, and prohibitions against medical marijuana and physician-assisted suicide. Grossman also considers the relationship between these campaigns for desired treatments and widespread opposition to state-compelled health measures such as vaccines and face masks. From the streets of San Francisco to the US Supreme Court, Choose Your Medicine examines an underexplored theme of American history, politics, and law that is more relevant today than ever.
Stephen Pimpare is director of the Public Service &amp; Nonprofit Leadership program and Faculty Fellow at the Carsey School of Public Policy at the University of New Hampshire.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Throughout American history, lawmakers have limited the range of treatments available to patients, often with the backing of the medical establishment. The country&apos;s history is also, however, brimming with social movements that have condemned such restrictions as violations of fundamental American liberties. This fierce conflict is one of the defining features of the social history of medicine in the United States. 
In Choose Your Medicine: Freedom of Therapeutic Choice in America (Oxford UP, 2021), Lewis A. Grossman presents a compelling look at how persistent but evolving notions of a right to therapeutic choice have affected American health policy, law, and regulation from the Revolution through the Trump Era. Grossman grounds his analysis in historical examples ranging from unschooled supporters of botanical medicine in the early nineteenth century to sophisticated cancer patient advocacy groups in the twenty-first. He vividly describes how activists and lawyers have resisted a wide variety of legal constraints on therapeutic choice, including medical licensing statutes, FDA limitations on unapproved drugs and alternative remedies, abortion restrictions, and prohibitions against medical marijuana and physician-assisted suicide. Grossman also considers the relationship between these campaigns for desired treatments and widespread opposition to state-compelled health measures such as vaccines and face masks. From the streets of San Francisco to the US Supreme Court, Choose Your Medicine examines an underexplored theme of American history, politics, and law that is more relevant today than ever.
Stephen Pimpare is director of the Public Service &amp; Nonprofit Leadership program and Faculty Fellow at the Carsey School of Public Policy at the University of New Hampshire.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>124</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3f81ecf0-719e-11f0-bc37-97a72845cf3f</guid>
      <title>Jean-Marc Coicaud, &quot;The Law and Politics of International Legitimacy&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781107008274" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Law and Politics of International Legitimacy</a>&nbsp;(Cambridge University Press, 2025)&nbsp;examines the significance of the issue of political legitimacy at the international level, focusing on international law. It adopts a descriptive, critical, and reconstructive approach. In order to do so, the book clarifies what political legitimacy is in general and in the context of international law. The book analyzes how international law contributes to a sense of legitimacy through notions such as international membership, international rights holding, fundamental principles and hierarchy of rights holding, rightful conduct, and international authority. In addition, the book stresses the severe limitations of the legitimacy of international law and of the current international order that it contributes to regulate and manage. This leads the book to identify the conditions under which international order and international law could overcome their problems of legitimacy and become more legitimate. The book is interdisciplinary in nature, mobilizing international law, political and legal theory, philosophy, history, and political science.<br></p>
<p>Jean-Marc Coicaud is Distinguished Professor of Law and Global Affairs, Rutgers School of Law, New Jersey, USA and Fellow, Academia Europaea. He is also Fudan Distinguished Chair Professor at Fudan Institute for Advanced Studies in Social Sciences (Shanghai, China).</p>
<p><em>Leo Bader is a senior at Wesleyan University studying political theory and history.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 5 Aug 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/jean-marc-coicaud-the-law-and-politics-of-international-legitimacy-cambridge-up-2025-9pQa3Z0I</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781107008274" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Law and Politics of International Legitimacy</a>&nbsp;(Cambridge University Press, 2025)&nbsp;examines the significance of the issue of political legitimacy at the international level, focusing on international law. It adopts a descriptive, critical, and reconstructive approach. In order to do so, the book clarifies what political legitimacy is in general and in the context of international law. The book analyzes how international law contributes to a sense of legitimacy through notions such as international membership, international rights holding, fundamental principles and hierarchy of rights holding, rightful conduct, and international authority. In addition, the book stresses the severe limitations of the legitimacy of international law and of the current international order that it contributes to regulate and manage. This leads the book to identify the conditions under which international order and international law could overcome their problems of legitimacy and become more legitimate. The book is interdisciplinary in nature, mobilizing international law, political and legal theory, philosophy, history, and political science.<br></p>
<p>Jean-Marc Coicaud is Distinguished Professor of Law and Global Affairs, Rutgers School of Law, New Jersey, USA and Fellow, Academia Europaea. He is also Fudan Distinguished Chair Professor at Fudan Institute for Advanced Studies in Social Sciences (Shanghai, China).</p>
<p><em>Leo Bader is a senior at Wesleyan University studying political theory and history.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="40480744" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/d7495935-78e1-45bb-8753-321197b6b85c/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=d7495935-78e1-45bb-8753-321197b6b85c&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Jean-Marc Coicaud, &quot;The Law and Politics of International Legitimacy&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:42:09</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The Law and Politics of International Legitimacy (Cambridge University Press, 2025) examines the significance of the issue of political legitimacy at the international level, focusing on international law. It adopts a descriptive, critical, and reconstructive approach. In order to do so, the book clarifies what political legitimacy is in general and in the context of international law. The book analyzes how international law contributes to a sense of legitimacy through notions such as international membership, international rights holding, fundamental principles and hierarchy of rights holding, rightful conduct, and international authority. In addition, the book stresses the severe limitations of the legitimacy of international law and of the current international order that it contributes to regulate and manage. This leads the book to identify the conditions under which international order and international law could overcome their problems of legitimacy and become more legitimate. The book is interdisciplinary in nature, mobilizing international law, political and legal theory, philosophy, history, and political science.
Jean-Marc Coicaud is Distinguished Professor of Law and Global Affairs, Rutgers School of Law, New Jersey, USA and Fellow, Academia Europaea. He is also Fudan Distinguished Chair Professor at Fudan Institute for Advanced Studies in Social Sciences (Shanghai, China).
Leo Bader is a senior at Wesleyan University studying political theory and history.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Law and Politics of International Legitimacy (Cambridge University Press, 2025) examines the significance of the issue of political legitimacy at the international level, focusing on international law. It adopts a descriptive, critical, and reconstructive approach. In order to do so, the book clarifies what political legitimacy is in general and in the context of international law. The book analyzes how international law contributes to a sense of legitimacy through notions such as international membership, international rights holding, fundamental principles and hierarchy of rights holding, rightful conduct, and international authority. In addition, the book stresses the severe limitations of the legitimacy of international law and of the current international order that it contributes to regulate and manage. This leads the book to identify the conditions under which international order and international law could overcome their problems of legitimacy and become more legitimate. The book is interdisciplinary in nature, mobilizing international law, political and legal theory, philosophy, history, and political science.
Jean-Marc Coicaud is Distinguished Professor of Law and Global Affairs, Rutgers School of Law, New Jersey, USA and Fellow, Academia Europaea. He is also Fudan Distinguished Chair Professor at Fudan Institute for Advanced Studies in Social Sciences (Shanghai, China).
Leo Bader is a senior at Wesleyan University studying political theory and history.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1595</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">eda8466e-6954-11f0-8419-13f619b71bb5</guid>
      <title>Michael Stauch, &quot;Wildcat of the Streets: Detroit in the Age of Community Policing&quot; (U Pennsylvania Press, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The criminalization of Black youth was central to policing in urban America during the civil rights era and continued in Detroit even after the rise of Black political control in the 1970s.&nbsp;<em>Wildcat of the Streets</em>&nbsp;documents how the “community policing” approach of Mayor Coleman Young (1974–1993)—including neighborhood police stations, affirmative action hiring policies, and public participation in law enforcement initiatives—transformed Detroit, long considered the nation’s symbol of racial inequality and urban crisis, into a crucial site of experimentation in policing while continuing to subject many Black Detroiters to police brutality and repression.</p>
<p>In response, young people in the 1970s and 1980s drew on the city’s storied history of labor radicalism as well as contemporary shopfloor struggles to wage a “wildcat of the streets,” consisting of street disturbances, decentralized gang activity, and complex organizations of the informal economy. In this revelatory new history of the social life of cities, Michael Stauch mines a series of evocative interviews conducted with the participants to trace how Black youth made claims for political equality over and against the new order of community policing.</p>
<p>Centering the perspective of criminalized and crime-committing young people,&nbsp;<em>Wildcat of the Streets</em>&nbsp;is an original interpretation of police reform, the long struggle for Black liberation, and the politics of cities in the age of community policing.</p>
<p><strong>Guest:</strong>&nbsp;Michael Stauch (he/him) is an Associate Professor at the University of Toledo. He historian of the modern United States with a focus on policing, politics, and the intersection of race, labor, and youth in social movements.</p>
<p><strong>Host:</strong>&nbsp;<a href="https://scholars.duke.edu/person/Jenna.Pittman" rel="noopener noreferrer">Jenna Pittman&nbsp;</a>(she/her), a Ph.D. student in the Department of History at Duke University. She studies modern European history, political economy, and Germany from 1945-1990.</p>
<p>Scholars@Duke:&nbsp;<a href="https://scholars.duke.edu/person/Jenna.Pittman" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://scholars.duke.edu/pers...</a></p>
<p>Linktree:&nbsp;<a href="https://linktr.ee/jennapittman" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://linktr.ee/jennapittman</a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/michael-stauch-wildcat-of-the-streets-detroit-in-the-age-of-community-policing-u-pennsylvania-press-2025-5f3_zgqF</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The criminalization of Black youth was central to policing in urban America during the civil rights era and continued in Detroit even after the rise of Black political control in the 1970s.&nbsp;<em>Wildcat of the Streets</em>&nbsp;documents how the “community policing” approach of Mayor Coleman Young (1974–1993)—including neighborhood police stations, affirmative action hiring policies, and public participation in law enforcement initiatives—transformed Detroit, long considered the nation’s symbol of racial inequality and urban crisis, into a crucial site of experimentation in policing while continuing to subject many Black Detroiters to police brutality and repression.</p>
<p>In response, young people in the 1970s and 1980s drew on the city’s storied history of labor radicalism as well as contemporary shopfloor struggles to wage a “wildcat of the streets,” consisting of street disturbances, decentralized gang activity, and complex organizations of the informal economy. In this revelatory new history of the social life of cities, Michael Stauch mines a series of evocative interviews conducted with the participants to trace how Black youth made claims for political equality over and against the new order of community policing.</p>
<p>Centering the perspective of criminalized and crime-committing young people,&nbsp;<em>Wildcat of the Streets</em>&nbsp;is an original interpretation of police reform, the long struggle for Black liberation, and the politics of cities in the age of community policing.</p>
<p><strong>Guest:</strong>&nbsp;Michael Stauch (he/him) is an Associate Professor at the University of Toledo. He historian of the modern United States with a focus on policing, politics, and the intersection of race, labor, and youth in social movements.</p>
<p><strong>Host:</strong>&nbsp;<a href="https://scholars.duke.edu/person/Jenna.Pittman" rel="noopener noreferrer">Jenna Pittman&nbsp;</a>(she/her), a Ph.D. student in the Department of History at Duke University. She studies modern European history, political economy, and Germany from 1945-1990.</p>
<p>Scholars@Duke:&nbsp;<a href="https://scholars.duke.edu/person/Jenna.Pittman" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://scholars.duke.edu/pers...</a></p>
<p>Linktree:&nbsp;<a href="https://linktr.ee/jennapittman" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://linktr.ee/jennapittman</a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="58952320" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/117de562-82c0-489e-a52f-834216ff05c8/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=117de562-82c0-489e-a52f-834216ff05c8&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Michael Stauch, &quot;Wildcat of the Streets: Detroit in the Age of Community Policing&quot; (U Pennsylvania Press, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:01:24</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The criminalization of Black youth was central to policing in urban America during the civil rights era and continued in Detroit even after the rise of Black political control in the 1970s. Wildcat of the Streets documents how the “community policing” approach of Mayor Coleman Young (1974–1993)—including neighborhood police stations, affirmative action hiring policies, and public participation in law enforcement initiatives—transformed Detroit, long considered the nation’s symbol of racial inequality and urban crisis, into a crucial site of experimentation in policing while continuing to subject many Black Detroiters to police brutality and repression.
In response, young people in the 1970s and 1980s drew on the city’s storied history of labor radicalism as well as contemporary shopfloor struggles to wage a “wildcat of the streets,” consisting of street disturbances, decentralized gang activity, and complex organizations of the informal economy. In this revelatory new history of the social life of cities, Michael Stauch mines a series of evocative interviews conducted with the participants to trace how Black youth made claims for political equality over and against the new order of community policing.
Centering the perspective of criminalized and crime-committing young people, Wildcat of the Streets is an original interpretation of police reform, the long struggle for Black liberation, and the politics of cities in the age of community policing.
Guest: Michael Stauch (he/him) is an Associate Professor at the University of Toledo. He historian of the modern United States with a focus on policing, politics, and the intersection of race, labor, and youth in social movements.
Host: Jenna Pittman (she/her), a Ph.D. student in the Department of History at Duke University. She studies modern European history, political economy, and Germany from 1945-1990.
Scholars@Duke: https://scholars.duke.edu/pers...
Linktree: https://linktr.ee/jennapittman
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The criminalization of Black youth was central to policing in urban America during the civil rights era and continued in Detroit even after the rise of Black political control in the 1970s. Wildcat of the Streets documents how the “community policing” approach of Mayor Coleman Young (1974–1993)—including neighborhood police stations, affirmative action hiring policies, and public participation in law enforcement initiatives—transformed Detroit, long considered the nation’s symbol of racial inequality and urban crisis, into a crucial site of experimentation in policing while continuing to subject many Black Detroiters to police brutality and repression.
In response, young people in the 1970s and 1980s drew on the city’s storied history of labor radicalism as well as contemporary shopfloor struggles to wage a “wildcat of the streets,” consisting of street disturbances, decentralized gang activity, and complex organizations of the informal economy. In this revelatory new history of the social life of cities, Michael Stauch mines a series of evocative interviews conducted with the participants to trace how Black youth made claims for political equality over and against the new order of community policing.
Centering the perspective of criminalized and crime-committing young people, Wildcat of the Streets is an original interpretation of police reform, the long struggle for Black liberation, and the politics of cities in the age of community policing.
Guest: Michael Stauch (he/him) is an Associate Professor at the University of Toledo. He historian of the modern United States with a focus on policing, politics, and the intersection of race, labor, and youth in social movements.
Host: Jenna Pittman (she/her), a Ph.D. student in the Department of History at Duke University. She studies modern European history, political economy, and Germany from 1945-1990.
Scholars@Duke: https://scholars.duke.edu/pers...
Linktree: https://linktr.ee/jennapittman
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1594</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">08a9cbc6-68bb-11f0-a4a3-737f04376710</guid>
      <title>Robert Hutchinson, &quot;After Nuremberg: American Clemency for Nazi War Criminals&quot; (Yale UP, 2022)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Robert Hutchinson's&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780300255300" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>After Nuremberg: American Clemency for Nazi War Criminals</em></a>&nbsp;(Yale UP, 2022) is about the fleeting nature of American punishment for German war criminals convicted at the twelve Nuremberg trials of 1946–1949. Because of repeated American grants of clemency and parole, ninety-seven of the 142 Germans convicted at the Nuremberg trials, many of them major offenders, regained their freedom years, sometimes decades, ahead of schedule. High-ranking Nazi plunderers, kidnappers, slave laborers, and mass murderers all walked free by 1958. High Commissioner for Occupied Germany John J. McCloy and his successors articulated a vision of impartial American justice as inspiring and legitimizing their actions, as they concluded that German war criminals were entitled to all the remedies American laws offered to better their conditions and reduce their sentences. Based on extensive archival research (including newly declassified material), this book explains how American policy makers’ best intentions resulted in a series of decisions from 1949–1958 that produced a self-perpetuating bureaucracy of clemency and parole that “rehabilitated” unrepentant German abettors and perpetrators of theft, slavery, and murder while lending salience to the most reactionary elements in West German political discourse.</p><p><em>Nicholas Misukanis is a doctoral candidate in the history department at the University of Maryland - College Park. He studies modern European and Middle Eastern history with a special emphasis on Germany and the role energy autonomy played in foreign and domestic German politics during the twentieth century. He is currently working on his dissertation which analyzes why the West German government failed to convince the public to embrace nuclear energy and the ramifications this had on German politics between 1973 and 1986. His work has been published in Commonweal, America: The Jesuit Review, The United States’ Naval Academy’s Tell Me Another and Studies on Asia. He can be reached at&nbsp;Misukani@umd.edu.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/robert-hutchinson-after-nuremberg-american-clemency-for-nazi-war-criminals-yale-up-2022-TrvcAM2v</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robert Hutchinson's&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780300255300" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>After Nuremberg: American Clemency for Nazi War Criminals</em></a>&nbsp;(Yale UP, 2022) is about the fleeting nature of American punishment for German war criminals convicted at the twelve Nuremberg trials of 1946–1949. Because of repeated American grants of clemency and parole, ninety-seven of the 142 Germans convicted at the Nuremberg trials, many of them major offenders, regained their freedom years, sometimes decades, ahead of schedule. High-ranking Nazi plunderers, kidnappers, slave laborers, and mass murderers all walked free by 1958. High Commissioner for Occupied Germany John J. McCloy and his successors articulated a vision of impartial American justice as inspiring and legitimizing their actions, as they concluded that German war criminals were entitled to all the remedies American laws offered to better their conditions and reduce their sentences. Based on extensive archival research (including newly declassified material), this book explains how American policy makers’ best intentions resulted in a series of decisions from 1949–1958 that produced a self-perpetuating bureaucracy of clemency and parole that “rehabilitated” unrepentant German abettors and perpetrators of theft, slavery, and murder while lending salience to the most reactionary elements in West German political discourse.</p><p><em>Nicholas Misukanis is a doctoral candidate in the history department at the University of Maryland - College Park. He studies modern European and Middle Eastern history with a special emphasis on Germany and the role energy autonomy played in foreign and domestic German politics during the twentieth century. He is currently working on his dissertation which analyzes why the West German government failed to convince the public to embrace nuclear energy and the ramifications this had on German politics between 1973 and 1986. His work has been published in Commonweal, America: The Jesuit Review, The United States’ Naval Academy’s Tell Me Another and Studies on Asia. He can be reached at&nbsp;Misukani@umd.edu.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="52451720" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/09280711-a518-4d6f-8a6c-6a0be9f318b6/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=09280711-a518-4d6f-8a6c-6a0be9f318b6&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Robert Hutchinson, &quot;After Nuremberg: American Clemency for Nazi War Criminals&quot; (Yale UP, 2022)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:54:38</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Robert Hutchinson&apos;s After Nuremberg: American Clemency for Nazi War Criminals (Yale UP, 2022) is about the fleeting nature of American punishment for German war criminals convicted at the twelve Nuremberg trials of 1946–1949. Because of repeated American grants of clemency and parole, ninety-seven of the 142 Germans convicted at the Nuremberg trials, many of them major offenders, regained their freedom years, sometimes decades, ahead of schedule. High-ranking Nazi plunderers, kidnappers, slave laborers, and mass murderers all walked free by 1958. High Commissioner for Occupied Germany John J. McCloy and his successors articulated a vision of impartial American justice as inspiring and legitimizing their actions, as they concluded that German war criminals were entitled to all the remedies American laws offered to better their conditions and reduce their sentences. Based on extensive archival research (including newly declassified material), this book explains how American policy makers’ best intentions resulted in a series of decisions from 1949–1958 that produced a self-perpetuating bureaucracy of clemency and parole that “rehabilitated” unrepentant German abettors and perpetrators of theft, slavery, and murder while lending salience to the most reactionary elements in West German political discourse.
Nicholas Misukanis is a doctoral candidate in the history department at the University of Maryland - College Park. He studies modern European and Middle Eastern history with a special emphasis on Germany and the role energy autonomy played in foreign and domestic German politics during the twentieth century. He is currently working on his dissertation which analyzes why the West German government failed to convince the public to embrace nuclear energy and the ramifications this had on German politics between 1973 and 1986. His work has been published in Commonweal, America: The Jesuit Review, The United States’ Naval Academy’s Tell Me Another and Studies on Asia. He can be reached at Misukani@umd.edu.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Robert Hutchinson&apos;s After Nuremberg: American Clemency for Nazi War Criminals (Yale UP, 2022) is about the fleeting nature of American punishment for German war criminals convicted at the twelve Nuremberg trials of 1946–1949. Because of repeated American grants of clemency and parole, ninety-seven of the 142 Germans convicted at the Nuremberg trials, many of them major offenders, regained their freedom years, sometimes decades, ahead of schedule. High-ranking Nazi plunderers, kidnappers, slave laborers, and mass murderers all walked free by 1958. High Commissioner for Occupied Germany John J. McCloy and his successors articulated a vision of impartial American justice as inspiring and legitimizing their actions, as they concluded that German war criminals were entitled to all the remedies American laws offered to better their conditions and reduce their sentences. Based on extensive archival research (including newly declassified material), this book explains how American policy makers’ best intentions resulted in a series of decisions from 1949–1958 that produced a self-perpetuating bureaucracy of clemency and parole that “rehabilitated” unrepentant German abettors and perpetrators of theft, slavery, and murder while lending salience to the most reactionary elements in West German political discourse.
Nicholas Misukanis is a doctoral candidate in the history department at the University of Maryland - College Park. He studies modern European and Middle Eastern history with a special emphasis on Germany and the role energy autonomy played in foreign and domestic German politics during the twentieth century. He is currently working on his dissertation which analyzes why the West German government failed to convince the public to embrace nuclear energy and the ramifications this had on German politics between 1973 and 1986. His work has been published in Commonweal, America: The Jesuit Review, The United States’ Naval Academy’s Tell Me Another and Studies on Asia. He can be reached at Misukani@umd.edu.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>140</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">96ac4d70-670a-11f0-ab3d-87b13673e8c4</guid>
      <title>Christopher T. Fleming, &quot;Equity and Trusts in Sanskrit Jurisprudence&quot; (British Academy, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>This monograph outlines the core principles of equity and trusts in Sanskrit jurisprudence (Dharmaśāstra) and traces their application in the practical legal administration of religious and charitable endowments throughout Indian history. Dharmaśāstra describes phenomena that, in Anglo-American jurisprudence, are associated with courts of equity: the management of religious and charitable trusts; and the guardianship of those who lack legal capacity. Drawing on Sanskrit jurisprudential and philosophical texts, ancient inscriptions, Persian legal documents, colonial-era law reports, and contemporary case law,&nbsp;<em>Equity and Trusts in Sanskrit Jurisprudence</em>&nbsp;demonstrates that India's rulers have drawn on rich and venerable Sanskrit jurisprudential principles of equity and trusts in their efforts to regulate religious and charitable endowments. This book presents the history of India as a history of trusts, revealing how the contemporary law of Hindu religious endowments is subtended by a rich mélange of Sanskritic, Persianate, British, and constitutional jurisprudential principles.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/christopher-t-fleming-equity-and-trusts-in-sanskrit-jurisprudence-british-academy-2025-_HJsh8OO</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This monograph outlines the core principles of equity and trusts in Sanskrit jurisprudence (Dharmaśāstra) and traces their application in the practical legal administration of religious and charitable endowments throughout Indian history. Dharmaśāstra describes phenomena that, in Anglo-American jurisprudence, are associated with courts of equity: the management of religious and charitable trusts; and the guardianship of those who lack legal capacity. Drawing on Sanskrit jurisprudential and philosophical texts, ancient inscriptions, Persian legal documents, colonial-era law reports, and contemporary case law,&nbsp;<em>Equity and Trusts in Sanskrit Jurisprudence</em>&nbsp;demonstrates that India's rulers have drawn on rich and venerable Sanskrit jurisprudential principles of equity and trusts in their efforts to regulate religious and charitable endowments. This book presents the history of India as a history of trusts, revealing how the contemporary law of Hindu religious endowments is subtended by a rich mélange of Sanskritic, Persianate, British, and constitutional jurisprudential principles.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="52691806" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/c94064f8-e73a-4f6f-9681-6ca9de8c942e/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=c94064f8-e73a-4f6f-9681-6ca9de8c942e&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Christopher T. Fleming, &quot;Equity and Trusts in Sanskrit Jurisprudence&quot; (British Academy, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:54:53</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>This monograph outlines the core principles of equity and trusts in Sanskrit jurisprudence (Dharmaśāstra) and traces their application in the practical legal administration of religious and charitable endowments throughout Indian history. Dharmaśāstra describes phenomena that, in Anglo-American jurisprudence, are associated with courts of equity: the management of religious and charitable trusts; and the guardianship of those who lack legal capacity. Drawing on Sanskrit jurisprudential and philosophical texts, ancient inscriptions, Persian legal documents, colonial-era law reports, and contemporary case law, Equity and Trusts in Sanskrit Jurisprudence demonstrates that India&apos;s rulers have drawn on rich and venerable Sanskrit jurisprudential principles of equity and trusts in their efforts to regulate religious and charitable endowments. This book presents the history of India as a history of trusts, revealing how the contemporary law of Hindu religious endowments is subtended by a rich mélange of Sanskritic, Persianate, British, and constitutional jurisprudential principles.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>This monograph outlines the core principles of equity and trusts in Sanskrit jurisprudence (Dharmaśāstra) and traces their application in the practical legal administration of religious and charitable endowments throughout Indian history. Dharmaśāstra describes phenomena that, in Anglo-American jurisprudence, are associated with courts of equity: the management of religious and charitable trusts; and the guardianship of those who lack legal capacity. Drawing on Sanskrit jurisprudential and philosophical texts, ancient inscriptions, Persian legal documents, colonial-era law reports, and contemporary case law, Equity and Trusts in Sanskrit Jurisprudence demonstrates that India&apos;s rulers have drawn on rich and venerable Sanskrit jurisprudential principles of equity and trusts in their efforts to regulate religious and charitable endowments. This book presents the history of India as a history of trusts, revealing how the contemporary law of Hindu religious endowments is subtended by a rich mélange of Sanskritic, Persianate, British, and constitutional jurisprudential principles.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>284</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">d30a5f22-63e1-11f0-b4c5-579e7cff234e</guid>
      <title>Carol Nackenoff and Julie Novkov, &quot;American by Birth: Wong Kim Ark and the Battle for Citizenship&quot; (UP of Kansas, 2021)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>All nations make rules -- through their constitutions, legislatures, bureaucratic practices – about who counts as a citizen.&nbsp;<em>American by Birth</em>&nbsp;examines the role of the Supreme Court – particularly a ruling from 1898 that is still precedent today.&nbsp;<em>Wong Kim Ark v. United States&nbsp;</em>interpreted the language of the 14th Amendment to answer whether a man born in the United States was a citizen. The Court ruled in favor of Wong Kim Ark and held that the 14th Amendment extends to children of immigrants who were born in the United States. Using the work of legal scholars, political scientists, and historians, Drs. Julie L. Novkov and Carol Nackenoff provide an extended biography of Wong Kim Ark and the historic 1898 landmark case – but also a biography of US Citizenship from the colonies to the present.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780700631926" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>American by Birth: Wong Kim Ark and the Battle for Citizenship</em></a>&nbsp;(UP of Kansas, 2021)&nbsp;concludes with an impressive chapter that contextualizes birthright citizenship globally and within the context of American politics and scholarly debates – with an emphasis on the vulnerability of birthright citizenship to indirect and direct change.</p><p><a href="https://www.albany.edu/rockefeller/faculty/julie-novkov" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. Julie L. Novkov</a>&nbsp;is Professor of Political Science and Women’s, Gender, and Sexuality Studies and interim dean of Rockefeller college at the University at Albany, SUNY. She is the author of&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/books/racial-union-law-intimacy-and-the-white-state-in-alabama-1865-1954/9780472068852" rel="noopener noreferrer">Racial Union: Law, Intimacy, and the White State in Alabama, 1865-1954</a>&nbsp;(UMichigan, 2008).</p><p><a href="https://www.swarthmore.edu/carol-nackenoff" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. Carol Nackenoff</a>&nbsp;is Richter Professor emeritus of Political Science at Swarthmore College. She is the author of&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/books/fictional-republic-horatio-alger-and-american-political-discourse/9780195079234" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Fictional Republic: Horatio Alger and American Political Discourse</em>&nbsp;</a>(Oxford, 1994).</p><p>They are also co-editors of&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/books/stating-the-family-new-directions-in-the-study-of-american-politics/9780700629237" rel="noopener noreferrer">Stating the Family: New Directions in the Study of American Politics&nbsp;</a>(University Press of Kansas, 2020) and&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/books/statebuilding-from-the-margins-between-reconstruction-and-the-new-deal/9780812245714" rel="noopener noreferrer">Statebuilding from the Margins: Between Reconstruction and the New Deal</a>&nbsp;(University of Pennsylvania Press, 2014)</p><p>Two resources mentioned in the podcast: Tian Atlas Xu’s&nbsp;<a href="https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5406/jamerethnhist.41.issue-1" rel="noopener noreferrer">“Immigration Attorneys and Chinese Exclusion Law Enforcement: The Case of San Francisco, 1882–1930”</a>&nbsp;and</p><p><a href="https://balkin.blogspot.com/2021/11/how-america-became-american.html" rel="noopener noreferrer">the symposium on&nbsp;<em>American by Birth</em></a>.</p><p>Daniella Campos assisted with this podcast.</p><p><a href="https://www.sju.edu/faculty/susan-liebell#_ga=2.125106634.1318472952.1578330950-502593983.1578330950" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Susan Liebell&nbsp;</em></a><em>is Dirk Warren '50 Professor of Political Science at Saint Joseph’s University in Philadelphia.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/carol-nackenoff-and-julie-novkov-american-by-birth-wong-kim-ark-and-the-battle-for-citizenship-up-of-kansas-2021-ebyn_EPA-kCxAUyN9</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All nations make rules -- through their constitutions, legislatures, bureaucratic practices – about who counts as a citizen.&nbsp;<em>American by Birth</em>&nbsp;examines the role of the Supreme Court – particularly a ruling from 1898 that is still precedent today.&nbsp;<em>Wong Kim Ark v. United States&nbsp;</em>interpreted the language of the 14th Amendment to answer whether a man born in the United States was a citizen. The Court ruled in favor of Wong Kim Ark and held that the 14th Amendment extends to children of immigrants who were born in the United States. Using the work of legal scholars, political scientists, and historians, Drs. Julie L. Novkov and Carol Nackenoff provide an extended biography of Wong Kim Ark and the historic 1898 landmark case – but also a biography of US Citizenship from the colonies to the present.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780700631926" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>American by Birth: Wong Kim Ark and the Battle for Citizenship</em></a>&nbsp;(UP of Kansas, 2021)&nbsp;concludes with an impressive chapter that contextualizes birthright citizenship globally and within the context of American politics and scholarly debates – with an emphasis on the vulnerability of birthright citizenship to indirect and direct change.</p><p><a href="https://www.albany.edu/rockefeller/faculty/julie-novkov" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. Julie L. Novkov</a>&nbsp;is Professor of Political Science and Women’s, Gender, and Sexuality Studies and interim dean of Rockefeller college at the University at Albany, SUNY. She is the author of&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/books/racial-union-law-intimacy-and-the-white-state-in-alabama-1865-1954/9780472068852" rel="noopener noreferrer">Racial Union: Law, Intimacy, and the White State in Alabama, 1865-1954</a>&nbsp;(UMichigan, 2008).</p><p><a href="https://www.swarthmore.edu/carol-nackenoff" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. Carol Nackenoff</a>&nbsp;is Richter Professor emeritus of Political Science at Swarthmore College. She is the author of&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/books/fictional-republic-horatio-alger-and-american-political-discourse/9780195079234" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Fictional Republic: Horatio Alger and American Political Discourse</em>&nbsp;</a>(Oxford, 1994).</p><p>They are also co-editors of&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/books/stating-the-family-new-directions-in-the-study-of-american-politics/9780700629237" rel="noopener noreferrer">Stating the Family: New Directions in the Study of American Politics&nbsp;</a>(University Press of Kansas, 2020) and&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/books/statebuilding-from-the-margins-between-reconstruction-and-the-new-deal/9780812245714" rel="noopener noreferrer">Statebuilding from the Margins: Between Reconstruction and the New Deal</a>&nbsp;(University of Pennsylvania Press, 2014)</p><p>Two resources mentioned in the podcast: Tian Atlas Xu’s&nbsp;<a href="https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5406/jamerethnhist.41.issue-1" rel="noopener noreferrer">“Immigration Attorneys and Chinese Exclusion Law Enforcement: The Case of San Francisco, 1882–1930”</a>&nbsp;and</p><p><a href="https://balkin.blogspot.com/2021/11/how-america-became-american.html" rel="noopener noreferrer">the symposium on&nbsp;<em>American by Birth</em></a>.</p><p>Daniella Campos assisted with this podcast.</p><p><a href="https://www.sju.edu/faculty/susan-liebell#_ga=2.125106634.1318472952.1578330950-502593983.1578330950" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Susan Liebell&nbsp;</em></a><em>is Dirk Warren '50 Professor of Political Science at Saint Joseph’s University in Philadelphia.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="74080054" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/91973750-9688-450e-9c50-cd5b93457d76/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=91973750-9688-450e-9c50-cd5b93457d76&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Carol Nackenoff and Julie Novkov, &quot;American by Birth: Wong Kim Ark and the Battle for Citizenship&quot; (UP of Kansas, 2021)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:17:08</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>All nations make rules -- through their constitutions, legislatures, bureaucratic practices – about who counts as a citizen. American by Birth examines the role of the Supreme Court – particularly a ruling from 1898 that is still precedent today. Wong Kim Ark v. United States interpreted the language of the 14th Amendment to answer whether a man born in the United States was a citizen. The Court ruled in favor of Wong Kim Ark and held that the 14th Amendment extends to children of immigrants who were born in the United States. Using the work of legal scholars, political scientists, and historians, Drs. Julie L. Novkov and Carol Nackenoff provide an extended biography of Wong Kim Ark and the historic 1898 landmark case – but also a biography of US Citizenship from the colonies to the present. American by Birth: Wong Kim Ark and the Battle for Citizenship (UP of Kansas, 2021) concludes with an impressive chapter that contextualizes birthright citizenship globally and within the context of American politics and scholarly debates – with an emphasis on the vulnerability of birthright citizenship to indirect and direct change.
Dr. Julie L. Novkov is Professor of Political Science and Women’s, Gender, and Sexuality Studies and interim dean of Rockefeller college at the University at Albany, SUNY. She is the author of Racial Union: Law, Intimacy, and the White State in Alabama, 1865-1954 (UMichigan, 2008).
Dr. Carol Nackenoff is Richter Professor emeritus of Political Science at Swarthmore College. She is the author of The Fictional Republic: Horatio Alger and American Political Discourse (Oxford, 1994).
They are also co-editors of Stating the Family: New Directions in the Study of American Politics (University Press of Kansas, 2020) and Statebuilding from the Margins: Between Reconstruction and the New Deal (University of Pennsylvania Press, 2014)
Two resources mentioned in the podcast: Tian Atlas Xu’s “Immigration Attorneys and Chinese Exclusion Law Enforcement: The Case of San Francisco, 1882–1930” and
the symposium on American by Birth.
Daniella Campos assisted with this podcast.
Susan Liebell is Dirk Warren &apos;50 Professor of Political Science at Saint Joseph’s University in Philadelphia.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>All nations make rules -- through their constitutions, legislatures, bureaucratic practices – about who counts as a citizen. American by Birth examines the role of the Supreme Court – particularly a ruling from 1898 that is still precedent today. Wong Kim Ark v. United States interpreted the language of the 14th Amendment to answer whether a man born in the United States was a citizen. The Court ruled in favor of Wong Kim Ark and held that the 14th Amendment extends to children of immigrants who were born in the United States. Using the work of legal scholars, political scientists, and historians, Drs. Julie L. Novkov and Carol Nackenoff provide an extended biography of Wong Kim Ark and the historic 1898 landmark case – but also a biography of US Citizenship from the colonies to the present. American by Birth: Wong Kim Ark and the Battle for Citizenship (UP of Kansas, 2021) concludes with an impressive chapter that contextualizes birthright citizenship globally and within the context of American politics and scholarly debates – with an emphasis on the vulnerability of birthright citizenship to indirect and direct change.
Dr. Julie L. Novkov is Professor of Political Science and Women’s, Gender, and Sexuality Studies and interim dean of Rockefeller college at the University at Albany, SUNY. She is the author of Racial Union: Law, Intimacy, and the White State in Alabama, 1865-1954 (UMichigan, 2008).
Dr. Carol Nackenoff is Richter Professor emeritus of Political Science at Swarthmore College. She is the author of The Fictional Republic: Horatio Alger and American Political Discourse (Oxford, 1994).
They are also co-editors of Stating the Family: New Directions in the Study of American Politics (University Press of Kansas, 2020) and Statebuilding from the Margins: Between Reconstruction and the New Deal (University of Pennsylvania Press, 2014)
Two resources mentioned in the podcast: Tian Atlas Xu’s “Immigration Attorneys and Chinese Exclusion Law Enforcement: The Case of San Francisco, 1882–1930” and
the symposium on American by Birth.
Daniella Campos assisted with this podcast.
Susan Liebell is Dirk Warren &apos;50 Professor of Political Science at Saint Joseph’s University in Philadelphia.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>562</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">816ada14-63f2-11f0-8450-272a6ac0ee5a</guid>
      <title>Ben Westhoff, &quot;Fentanyl, Inc.: How Rogue Chemists Are Creating the Deadliest Wave of the Opioid Epidemic&quot; (Grove Press, 2019)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.benwesthoff.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Ben Westhoff</a>&nbsp;is an award-winning investigative journalist whose best-selling 2019 book&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780802157379" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Fentanyl, Inc.: How Rogue Chemists Are Creating the Deadliest Wave of the Opioid Epidemic</em></a>&nbsp;(Grove Press, 2019),&nbsp;was one of the first to take fentanyl seriously as both a social phenomenon and a national threat. Since its release, Westhoff has become a policy expert, advising top government officials on the fentanyl crisis, and continuing to follow the story on his&nbsp;<a href="https://benwesthoff.substack.com/p/the-kingpin" rel="noopener noreferrer">Substack</a>&nbsp;account. The author of two previous nonfiction books and numerous articles in outlets like the&nbsp;<em>Atlantic, The Guardian,&nbsp;</em>and the<em>&nbsp;Wall Street Journal</em>, Westhoff’s fourth book,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.hachettebooks.com/titles/ben-westhoff/little-brother/9780306923166/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Little Brother: Love, Tragedy, and My Search for the Truth</em></a>&nbsp;comes out this spring.</p><p><a href="http://www.emilydufton.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Emily Dufton</em></a><em>&nbsp;is the author of&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.basicbooks.com/titles/emily-dufton/grass-roots/9780465096169/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Grass Roots: The Rise and Fall and Rise of Marijuana in America</em></a><em>&nbsp;(Basic Books, 2017). A drug historian and writer, her second book, on the development of the opioid addiction medication industry, is under contract with the University of Chicago Press.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/ben-westhoff-fentanyl-inc-how-rogue-chemists-are-creating-the-deadliest-wave-of-the-opioid-epidemic-grove-press-2019-Bb7D_xYA</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.benwesthoff.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Ben Westhoff</a>&nbsp;is an award-winning investigative journalist whose best-selling 2019 book&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780802157379" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Fentanyl, Inc.: How Rogue Chemists Are Creating the Deadliest Wave of the Opioid Epidemic</em></a>&nbsp;(Grove Press, 2019),&nbsp;was one of the first to take fentanyl seriously as both a social phenomenon and a national threat. Since its release, Westhoff has become a policy expert, advising top government officials on the fentanyl crisis, and continuing to follow the story on his&nbsp;<a href="https://benwesthoff.substack.com/p/the-kingpin" rel="noopener noreferrer">Substack</a>&nbsp;account. The author of two previous nonfiction books and numerous articles in outlets like the&nbsp;<em>Atlantic, The Guardian,&nbsp;</em>and the<em>&nbsp;Wall Street Journal</em>, Westhoff’s fourth book,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.hachettebooks.com/titles/ben-westhoff/little-brother/9780306923166/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Little Brother: Love, Tragedy, and My Search for the Truth</em></a>&nbsp;comes out this spring.</p><p><a href="http://www.emilydufton.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Emily Dufton</em></a><em>&nbsp;is the author of&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.basicbooks.com/titles/emily-dufton/grass-roots/9780465096169/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Grass Roots: The Rise and Fall and Rise of Marijuana in America</em></a><em>&nbsp;(Basic Books, 2017). A drug historian and writer, her second book, on the development of the opioid addiction medication industry, is under contract with the University of Chicago Press.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="40641762" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/8c5f0116-1e0b-473d-af22-944835772753/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=8c5f0116-1e0b-473d-af22-944835772753&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Ben Westhoff, &quot;Fentanyl, Inc.: How Rogue Chemists Are Creating the Deadliest Wave of the Opioid Epidemic&quot; (Grove Press, 2019)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:42:18</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Ben Westhoff is an award-winning investigative journalist whose best-selling 2019 book Fentanyl, Inc.: How Rogue Chemists Are Creating the Deadliest Wave of the Opioid Epidemic (Grove Press, 2019), was one of the first to take fentanyl seriously as both a social phenomenon and a national threat. Since its release, Westhoff has become a policy expert, advising top government officials on the fentanyl crisis, and continuing to follow the story on his Substack account. The author of two previous nonfiction books and numerous articles in outlets like the Atlantic, The Guardian, and the Wall Street Journal, Westhoff’s fourth book, Little Brother: Love, Tragedy, and My Search for the Truth comes out this spring.
Emily Dufton is the author of Grass Roots: The Rise and Fall and Rise of Marijuana in America (Basic Books, 2017). A drug historian and writer, her second book, on the development of the opioid addiction medication industry, is under contract with the University of Chicago Press.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Ben Westhoff is an award-winning investigative journalist whose best-selling 2019 book Fentanyl, Inc.: How Rogue Chemists Are Creating the Deadliest Wave of the Opioid Epidemic (Grove Press, 2019), was one of the first to take fentanyl seriously as both a social phenomenon and a national threat. Since its release, Westhoff has become a policy expert, advising top government officials on the fentanyl crisis, and continuing to follow the story on his Substack account. The author of two previous nonfiction books and numerous articles in outlets like the Atlantic, The Guardian, and the Wall Street Journal, Westhoff’s fourth book, Little Brother: Love, Tragedy, and My Search for the Truth comes out this spring.
Emily Dufton is the author of Grass Roots: The Rise and Fall and Rise of Marijuana in America (Basic Books, 2017). A drug historian and writer, her second book, on the development of the opioid addiction medication industry, is under contract with the University of Chicago Press.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>42</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">35a7500e-613a-11f0-ba9e-db61c8219f8a</guid>
      <title>Simon Butt, &quot;Judicial Dysfunction in Indonesia&quot; (Melbourne UP, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Indonesia's judicial system has long been described as dysfunctional. Many of its problems developed out of decades of authoritarian rule, which began in the last few years of the reign of Indonesia's first president, Soekarno. By the time President Soeharto's regime fell in 1998, the judiciary had virtually collapsed. Judicial dependence on government, inefficiency and corruption were commonly seen as the main indicators of poor performance, resulting in very low levels of public trust in the courts. To address these problems, reformists focused on improving judicial independence. Yet while independence is a basic prerequisite for adequate judicial performance, much depends on how this independence is exercised.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780522879926" rel="noopener noreferrer">Judicial Dysfunction in Indonesia</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Melbourne UP, 2023)&nbsp;demonstrates that Indonesian courts have tended to act without accountability and offers detailed analysis of highly controversial decisions by Indonesian courts, many of which have been of major political significance, both domestically and internationally. It sets out in concrete terms, for the first time, how bribes are negotiated and paid to judges and demonstrates that judges have issued poor decisions and engaged in corruption and other misconduct, largely without fear of retribution. Further, it explores unsafe convictions and public pressure as a threat to judicial independence.&nbsp;<em>Judicial Dysfunction in Indonesia</em>&nbsp;shines a sorely needed empirical light on the Indonesian judicial system, and is an essential resource for readers, scholars and students of Indonesian law and society.</p>
<p>Simon Butt is&nbsp;Professor of Indonesian Law and Director of the Centre for Asian and Pacific Law at the University of Sydney.</p>
<p><em>Professor&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.sydney.edu.au/arts/about/our-people/academic-staff/michele-ford.html" rel="noopener noreferrer">Michele Ford</a><em>&nbsp;is Professor of Southeast Asian Studies at the University of Sydney, Australia.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/simon-butt-judicial-dysfunction-in-indonesia-melbourne-up-2023-DZr5BhrK</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indonesia's judicial system has long been described as dysfunctional. Many of its problems developed out of decades of authoritarian rule, which began in the last few years of the reign of Indonesia's first president, Soekarno. By the time President Soeharto's regime fell in 1998, the judiciary had virtually collapsed. Judicial dependence on government, inefficiency and corruption were commonly seen as the main indicators of poor performance, resulting in very low levels of public trust in the courts. To address these problems, reformists focused on improving judicial independence. Yet while independence is a basic prerequisite for adequate judicial performance, much depends on how this independence is exercised.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780522879926" rel="noopener noreferrer">Judicial Dysfunction in Indonesia</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Melbourne UP, 2023)&nbsp;demonstrates that Indonesian courts have tended to act without accountability and offers detailed analysis of highly controversial decisions by Indonesian courts, many of which have been of major political significance, both domestically and internationally. It sets out in concrete terms, for the first time, how bribes are negotiated and paid to judges and demonstrates that judges have issued poor decisions and engaged in corruption and other misconduct, largely without fear of retribution. Further, it explores unsafe convictions and public pressure as a threat to judicial independence.&nbsp;<em>Judicial Dysfunction in Indonesia</em>&nbsp;shines a sorely needed empirical light on the Indonesian judicial system, and is an essential resource for readers, scholars and students of Indonesian law and society.</p>
<p>Simon Butt is&nbsp;Professor of Indonesian Law and Director of the Centre for Asian and Pacific Law at the University of Sydney.</p>
<p><em>Professor&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.sydney.edu.au/arts/about/our-people/academic-staff/michele-ford.html" rel="noopener noreferrer">Michele Ford</a><em>&nbsp;is Professor of Southeast Asian Studies at the University of Sydney, Australia.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="38791785" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/602b8c28-336d-46d4-8101-67689c91319f/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=602b8c28-336d-46d4-8101-67689c91319f&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Simon Butt, &quot;Judicial Dysfunction in Indonesia&quot; (Melbourne UP, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:40:24</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Indonesia&apos;s judicial system has long been described as dysfunctional. Many of its problems developed out of decades of authoritarian rule, which began in the last few years of the reign of Indonesia&apos;s first president, Soekarno. By the time President Soeharto&apos;s regime fell in 1998, the judiciary had virtually collapsed. Judicial dependence on government, inefficiency and corruption were commonly seen as the main indicators of poor performance, resulting in very low levels of public trust in the courts. To address these problems, reformists focused on improving judicial independence. Yet while independence is a basic prerequisite for adequate judicial performance, much depends on how this independence is exercised. Judicial Dysfunction in Indonesia (Melbourne UP, 2023) demonstrates that Indonesian courts have tended to act without accountability and offers detailed analysis of highly controversial decisions by Indonesian courts, many of which have been of major political significance, both domestically and internationally. It sets out in concrete terms, for the first time, how bribes are negotiated and paid to judges and demonstrates that judges have issued poor decisions and engaged in corruption and other misconduct, largely without fear of retribution. Further, it explores unsafe convictions and public pressure as a threat to judicial independence. Judicial Dysfunction in Indonesia shines a sorely needed empirical light on the Indonesian judicial system, and is an essential resource for readers, scholars and students of Indonesian law and society.
Simon Butt is Professor of Indonesian Law and Director of the Centre for Asian and Pacific Law at the University of Sydney.
Professor Michele Ford is Professor of Southeast Asian Studies at the University of Sydney, Australia.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Indonesia&apos;s judicial system has long been described as dysfunctional. Many of its problems developed out of decades of authoritarian rule, which began in the last few years of the reign of Indonesia&apos;s first president, Soekarno. By the time President Soeharto&apos;s regime fell in 1998, the judiciary had virtually collapsed. Judicial dependence on government, inefficiency and corruption were commonly seen as the main indicators of poor performance, resulting in very low levels of public trust in the courts. To address these problems, reformists focused on improving judicial independence. Yet while independence is a basic prerequisite for adequate judicial performance, much depends on how this independence is exercised. Judicial Dysfunction in Indonesia (Melbourne UP, 2023) demonstrates that Indonesian courts have tended to act without accountability and offers detailed analysis of highly controversial decisions by Indonesian courts, many of which have been of major political significance, both domestically and internationally. It sets out in concrete terms, for the first time, how bribes are negotiated and paid to judges and demonstrates that judges have issued poor decisions and engaged in corruption and other misconduct, largely without fear of retribution. Further, it explores unsafe convictions and public pressure as a threat to judicial independence. Judicial Dysfunction in Indonesia shines a sorely needed empirical light on the Indonesian judicial system, and is an essential resource for readers, scholars and students of Indonesian law and society.
Simon Butt is Professor of Indonesian Law and Director of the Centre for Asian and Pacific Law at the University of Sydney.
Professor Michele Ford is Professor of Southeast Asian Studies at the University of Sydney, Australia.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1545</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">56ba1d24-5e94-11f0-8f5d-63480dced5b6</guid>
      <title>Emma Marris, &quot;Wild Souls: Freedom and Flourishing in the Non-Human World&quot; (Bloomsbury, 2021)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/us/wild-souls-9781635574944" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Wild Souls: Freedom and Flourishing in the Non-Human World</em></a>&nbsp;(Bloomsbury Publishing, 2021),&nbsp;<a href="https://www.emmamarris.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Emma Marris</a>&nbsp;wrestles with big ethical questions facing the conservation field. Emma takes us through several experiences that informed the book, exposing us to relevant on-the-ground decisions impacting the life or death of animals. When the interests of individual animals conflict with the goals of biodiversity preservation, is it okay to kill? Are any animals truly wild now that humans have directly altered so much of their habitat? How do we balance the rights of introduced species with those already established within an ecosystem? To start engaging these, and other questions, Emma takes us through a needed crash course in ethics, specifically environmental ethics. Much like her previous work, we are exposed to new ways of thinking about old problems. Listening in will not disappoint.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/emma-marris-wild-souls-freedom-and-flourishing-in-the-non-human-world-bloomsbury-2021-lpycRSg7-LHNHn1Ka</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/us/wild-souls-9781635574944" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Wild Souls: Freedom and Flourishing in the Non-Human World</em></a>&nbsp;(Bloomsbury Publishing, 2021),&nbsp;<a href="https://www.emmamarris.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Emma Marris</a>&nbsp;wrestles with big ethical questions facing the conservation field. Emma takes us through several experiences that informed the book, exposing us to relevant on-the-ground decisions impacting the life or death of animals. When the interests of individual animals conflict with the goals of biodiversity preservation, is it okay to kill? Are any animals truly wild now that humans have directly altered so much of their habitat? How do we balance the rights of introduced species with those already established within an ecosystem? To start engaging these, and other questions, Emma takes us through a needed crash course in ethics, specifically environmental ethics. Much like her previous work, we are exposed to new ways of thinking about old problems. Listening in will not disappoint.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="51047968" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/28f855fe-814a-4881-93c0-92e00a2e0897/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=28f855fe-814a-4881-93c0-92e00a2e0897&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Emma Marris, &quot;Wild Souls: Freedom and Flourishing in the Non-Human World&quot; (Bloomsbury, 2021)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:53:07</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In Wild Souls: Freedom and Flourishing in the Non-Human World (Bloomsbury Publishing, 2021), Emma Marris wrestles with big ethical questions facing the conservation field. Emma takes us through several experiences that informed the book, exposing us to relevant on-the-ground decisions impacting the life or death of animals. When the interests of individual animals conflict with the goals of biodiversity preservation, is it okay to kill? Are any animals truly wild now that humans have directly altered so much of their habitat? How do we balance the rights of introduced species with those already established within an ecosystem? To start engaging these, and other questions, Emma takes us through a needed crash course in ethics, specifically environmental ethics. Much like her previous work, we are exposed to new ways of thinking about old problems. Listening in will not disappoint.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In Wild Souls: Freedom and Flourishing in the Non-Human World (Bloomsbury Publishing, 2021), Emma Marris wrestles with big ethical questions facing the conservation field. Emma takes us through several experiences that informed the book, exposing us to relevant on-the-ground decisions impacting the life or death of animals. When the interests of individual animals conflict with the goals of biodiversity preservation, is it okay to kill? Are any animals truly wild now that humans have directly altered so much of their habitat? How do we balance the rights of introduced species with those already established within an ecosystem? To start engaging these, and other questions, Emma takes us through a needed crash course in ethics, specifically environmental ethics. Much like her previous work, we are exposed to new ways of thinking about old problems. Listening in will not disappoint.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>295</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3991c456-5e4c-11f0-b44a-9bc444fca854</guid>
      <title>Alexander Lian, &quot;Stereoscopic Law: Oliver Wendell Holmes and Legal Education&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2020)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>A unique and thorough work of intellectual history and legal scholarship&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781108465441" rel="noopener noreferrer">Stereoscopic Law: Oliver Wendell Holmes and Legal Education</a>&nbsp;(Cambridge University Press, 2020) by Alexander Lian, a practicing commercial litigator, reconstructs Oliver Wendell Holmes’ as a pioneering legal pedagogue and sophisticated theoretician of law and the ‘reality of practice’. Lian advances the thesis that the most famous article in American jurisprudence, Oliver Wendell Holmes's “The Path of the Law,” presents Holmes' perspective on legal education. Through meticulous analysis, Lian cogently shows that Holmes’ ‘theory of legal study’ broke down artificial barriers between theory and practice. For contemporary legal educators—and anyone interested in the history of America’s legal tradition—Stereoscopic Law reformulates Holmes’ fundamental message: the law must be seen, taught, and practiced three-dimensionally.</p>
<p>Alexandar Lian practices commercial litigation in Miami, FL. Since 2008, he has been a solo practitioner. Alexander Lian is a graduate of both the Graduate and Law Schools of Vanderbilt University. He has represented clients in a variety of contested matters ranging from high dollar contract disputes and real property disputes to the prosecution and collection of large judgments totaling in the millions. He is also a Florida Supreme Court Qualified Arbitrator and, formerly, president of COLBAR (Colombian American Bar Association).</p>
<p>Ayushi Singh is a graduate student at IIT Gandhinagar, India.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/alexander-lian-stereoscopic-law-oliver-wendell-holmes-and-legal-education-cambridge-up-2020-OBT3krs_</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A unique and thorough work of intellectual history and legal scholarship&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781108465441" rel="noopener noreferrer">Stereoscopic Law: Oliver Wendell Holmes and Legal Education</a>&nbsp;(Cambridge University Press, 2020) by Alexander Lian, a practicing commercial litigator, reconstructs Oliver Wendell Holmes’ as a pioneering legal pedagogue and sophisticated theoretician of law and the ‘reality of practice’. Lian advances the thesis that the most famous article in American jurisprudence, Oliver Wendell Holmes's “The Path of the Law,” presents Holmes' perspective on legal education. Through meticulous analysis, Lian cogently shows that Holmes’ ‘theory of legal study’ broke down artificial barriers between theory and practice. For contemporary legal educators—and anyone interested in the history of America’s legal tradition—Stereoscopic Law reformulates Holmes’ fundamental message: the law must be seen, taught, and practiced three-dimensionally.</p>
<p>Alexandar Lian practices commercial litigation in Miami, FL. Since 2008, he has been a solo practitioner. Alexander Lian is a graduate of both the Graduate and Law Schools of Vanderbilt University. He has represented clients in a variety of contested matters ranging from high dollar contract disputes and real property disputes to the prosecution and collection of large judgments totaling in the millions. He is also a Florida Supreme Court Qualified Arbitrator and, formerly, president of COLBAR (Colombian American Bar Association).</p>
<p>Ayushi Singh is a graduate student at IIT Gandhinagar, India.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="33074137" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/ed00ab04-8a61-40fd-b238-f31cb22d141b/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=ed00ab04-8a61-40fd-b238-f31cb22d141b&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Alexander Lian, &quot;Stereoscopic Law: Oliver Wendell Holmes and Legal Education&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2020)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:34:26</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>A unique and thorough work of intellectual history and legal scholarship Stereoscopic Law: Oliver Wendell Holmes and Legal Education (Cambridge University Press, 2020) by Alexander Lian, a practicing commercial litigator, reconstructs Oliver Wendell Holmes’ as a pioneering legal pedagogue and sophisticated theoretician of law and the ‘reality of practice’. Lian advances the thesis that the most famous article in American jurisprudence, Oliver Wendell Holmes&apos;s “The Path of the Law,” presents Holmes&apos; perspective on legal education. Through meticulous analysis, Lian cogently shows that Holmes’ ‘theory of legal study’ broke down artificial barriers between theory and practice. For contemporary legal educators—and anyone interested in the history of America’s legal tradition—Stereoscopic Law reformulates Holmes’ fundamental message: the law must be seen, taught, and practiced three-dimensionally.
Alexandar Lian practices commercial litigation in Miami, FL. Since 2008, he has been a solo practitioner. Alexander Lian is a graduate of both the Graduate and Law Schools of Vanderbilt University. He has represented clients in a variety of contested matters ranging from high dollar contract disputes and real property disputes to the prosecution and collection of large judgments totaling in the millions. He is also a Florida Supreme Court Qualified Arbitrator and, formerly, president of COLBAR (Colombian American Bar Association).
Ayushi Singh is a graduate student at IIT Gandhinagar, India.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>A unique and thorough work of intellectual history and legal scholarship Stereoscopic Law: Oliver Wendell Holmes and Legal Education (Cambridge University Press, 2020) by Alexander Lian, a practicing commercial litigator, reconstructs Oliver Wendell Holmes’ as a pioneering legal pedagogue and sophisticated theoretician of law and the ‘reality of practice’. Lian advances the thesis that the most famous article in American jurisprudence, Oliver Wendell Holmes&apos;s “The Path of the Law,” presents Holmes&apos; perspective on legal education. Through meticulous analysis, Lian cogently shows that Holmes’ ‘theory of legal study’ broke down artificial barriers between theory and practice. For contemporary legal educators—and anyone interested in the history of America’s legal tradition—Stereoscopic Law reformulates Holmes’ fundamental message: the law must be seen, taught, and practiced three-dimensionally.
Alexandar Lian practices commercial litigation in Miami, FL. Since 2008, he has been a solo practitioner. Alexander Lian is a graduate of both the Graduate and Law Schools of Vanderbilt University. He has represented clients in a variety of contested matters ranging from high dollar contract disputes and real property disputes to the prosecution and collection of large judgments totaling in the millions. He is also a Florida Supreme Court Qualified Arbitrator and, formerly, president of COLBAR (Colombian American Bar Association).
Ayushi Singh is a graduate student at IIT Gandhinagar, India.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1544</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">27452726-5e5a-11f0-9f15-ff8e430cf802</guid>
      <title>David S. Wall, &quot;Cybercrime: The Transformation of Crime in the Information Age&quot; (Polity, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>How has the digital revolution transformed criminal opportunities and behaviour? What is different about cybercrime compared with traditional criminal activity? What impact might cybercrime have on public security?</p>
<p>In this updated edition of his authoritative and field-defining text, cybercrime expert David Wall carefully examines these and other important issues. Incorporating analysis of the latest technological advances and their criminological implications, he disentangles what is really known about cybercrime today.</p>
<p>An ecosystem of specialists has emerged to facilitate cybercrime, reducing individual offenders’ level of risk and increasing the scale of crimes involved. This is a world where digital and networked technologies have effectively democratized crime by enabling almost anybody to carry out crimes that were previously the preserve of either traditional organized crime groups or a privileged coterie of powerful people. Against this background, the author scrutinizes the regulatory challenges that cybercrime poses for the criminal (and civil) justice processes, at both the national and the international levels.</p>
<p>This book offers the most intellectually robust account of cybercrime currently available. It is suitable for use on courses across the social sciences, and in computer science, and will appeal to advanced undergraduate and graduate students.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/david-s-wall-cybercrime-the-transformation-of-crime-in-the-information-age-polity-2024-ezI_segl</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How has the digital revolution transformed criminal opportunities and behaviour? What is different about cybercrime compared with traditional criminal activity? What impact might cybercrime have on public security?</p>
<p>In this updated edition of his authoritative and field-defining text, cybercrime expert David Wall carefully examines these and other important issues. Incorporating analysis of the latest technological advances and their criminological implications, he disentangles what is really known about cybercrime today.</p>
<p>An ecosystem of specialists has emerged to facilitate cybercrime, reducing individual offenders’ level of risk and increasing the scale of crimes involved. This is a world where digital and networked technologies have effectively democratized crime by enabling almost anybody to carry out crimes that were previously the preserve of either traditional organized crime groups or a privileged coterie of powerful people. Against this background, the author scrutinizes the regulatory challenges that cybercrime poses for the criminal (and civil) justice processes, at both the national and the international levels.</p>
<p>This book offers the most intellectually robust account of cybercrime currently available. It is suitable for use on courses across the social sciences, and in computer science, and will appeal to advanced undergraduate and graduate students.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="24996461" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/3529cbe6-75b6-4125-b131-bc2d5a2143b9/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=3529cbe6-75b6-4125-b131-bc2d5a2143b9&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>David S. Wall, &quot;Cybercrime: The Transformation of Crime in the Information Age&quot; (Polity, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:26:02</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>How has the digital revolution transformed criminal opportunities and behaviour? What is different about cybercrime compared with traditional criminal activity? What impact might cybercrime have on public security?
In this updated edition of his authoritative and field-defining text, cybercrime expert David Wall carefully examines these and other important issues. Incorporating analysis of the latest technological advances and their criminological implications, he disentangles what is really known about cybercrime today.
An ecosystem of specialists has emerged to facilitate cybercrime, reducing individual offenders’ level of risk and increasing the scale of crimes involved. This is a world where digital and networked technologies have effectively democratized crime by enabling almost anybody to carry out crimes that were previously the preserve of either traditional organized crime groups or a privileged coterie of powerful people. Against this background, the author scrutinizes the regulatory challenges that cybercrime poses for the criminal (and civil) justice processes, at both the national and the international levels.
This book offers the most intellectually robust account of cybercrime currently available. It is suitable for use on courses across the social sciences, and in computer science, and will appeal to advanced undergraduate and graduate students.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>How has the digital revolution transformed criminal opportunities and behaviour? What is different about cybercrime compared with traditional criminal activity? What impact might cybercrime have on public security?
In this updated edition of his authoritative and field-defining text, cybercrime expert David Wall carefully examines these and other important issues. Incorporating analysis of the latest technological advances and their criminological implications, he disentangles what is really known about cybercrime today.
An ecosystem of specialists has emerged to facilitate cybercrime, reducing individual offenders’ level of risk and increasing the scale of crimes involved. This is a world where digital and networked technologies have effectively democratized crime by enabling almost anybody to carry out crimes that were previously the preserve of either traditional organized crime groups or a privileged coterie of powerful people. Against this background, the author scrutinizes the regulatory challenges that cybercrime poses for the criminal (and civil) justice processes, at both the national and the international levels.
This book offers the most intellectually robust account of cybercrime currently available. It is suitable for use on courses across the social sciences, and in computer science, and will appeal to advanced undergraduate and graduate students.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>148</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7f3113a6-5b16-11f0-9517-873f8f10d698</guid>
      <title>Chinese Conceptualisation of the Rule of Law – a Conversation with Dr. Martin Lavicka</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>What does the 'rule of law' really mean in China? How does it shape the country’s politics, both at home and on the world stage? And why should it matter to the rest of us when universal norms are being challenged?</p>
<p><a href="https://portal.research.lu.se/en/persons/tabita-rosendal-ebbesen" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. Tabita Rosendal</a>&nbsp;from the Centre for East and South-East Asian Studies at Lund University, talks to Dr. Martin Lavicka, a scholar of Chinese studies, about his latest project on the rule of law in the Chinese context.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Martin-Lavicka" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. Martin Lavicka</a>&nbsp;is a visiting research fellow at the Department of History and the Centre of East and South-East Asian Studies, Lund University. Martin is the PI of the project CLAW: Chinese Conceptualisation of the Rule of Law: Challenges for the International Legal Order. Martin’s research has been supported by the OP JAC Project “MSCA Fellowships at Palacký University II.” CZ.02.01.01/00/22_010/0006945 at Palacký University Olomouc, Czech Republic.</p>
<p>Episode producer:&nbsp;<a href="https://portal.research.lu.se/en/persons/julia-olsson" rel="noopener noreferrer">Julia Olsson</a></p>
<p>Links:</p>
<p><a href="https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Martin-Lavicka" rel="noopener noreferrer">ResearchGate profile</a></p>
<p><a href="https://upol.academia.edu/MartinLavicka" rel="noopener noreferrer">AcademiaEdu profile</a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.researchgate.net/publication/390475838_Rule_of_Law_with_Chinese_Characteristics_A_Contested_Landscape" rel="noopener noreferrer">Martin’s latest article “Rule of Law with Chinese Characteristics: A Contested Landscape”</a></p>
<p>The Nordic Asia Podcast is a collaboration sharing expertise on Asia across the Nordic region, brought to you by the following academic partners:</p>
<ul>
  <li>Asia Centre, University of Tartu (Estonia)</li>
  <li>Asian studies, University of Helsinki (Finland)</li>
  <li>Centre for Asian Studies, Vytautas Magnus University (Lithuania)</li>
  <li>Centre for East and South-East Asian Studies, Lund University (Sweden)</li>
  <li>Centre for East Asian Studies, University of Turku (Finland)</li>
  <li>Norwegian Network for Asian Studies</li>
</ul>
<p>This podcast was recorded in May 2025 in the wonderful podcast studio at Altitude, Collab Arena in The Loop.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 8 Jul 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/chinese-conceptualisation-of-the-rule-of-law-a-conversation-with-dr-martin-lavicka-zCcarf_6</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What does the 'rule of law' really mean in China? How does it shape the country’s politics, both at home and on the world stage? And why should it matter to the rest of us when universal norms are being challenged?</p>
<p><a href="https://portal.research.lu.se/en/persons/tabita-rosendal-ebbesen" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. Tabita Rosendal</a>&nbsp;from the Centre for East and South-East Asian Studies at Lund University, talks to Dr. Martin Lavicka, a scholar of Chinese studies, about his latest project on the rule of law in the Chinese context.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Martin-Lavicka" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. Martin Lavicka</a>&nbsp;is a visiting research fellow at the Department of History and the Centre of East and South-East Asian Studies, Lund University. Martin is the PI of the project CLAW: Chinese Conceptualisation of the Rule of Law: Challenges for the International Legal Order. Martin’s research has been supported by the OP JAC Project “MSCA Fellowships at Palacký University II.” CZ.02.01.01/00/22_010/0006945 at Palacký University Olomouc, Czech Republic.</p>
<p>Episode producer:&nbsp;<a href="https://portal.research.lu.se/en/persons/julia-olsson" rel="noopener noreferrer">Julia Olsson</a></p>
<p>Links:</p>
<p><a href="https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Martin-Lavicka" rel="noopener noreferrer">ResearchGate profile</a></p>
<p><a href="https://upol.academia.edu/MartinLavicka" rel="noopener noreferrer">AcademiaEdu profile</a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.researchgate.net/publication/390475838_Rule_of_Law_with_Chinese_Characteristics_A_Contested_Landscape" rel="noopener noreferrer">Martin’s latest article “Rule of Law with Chinese Characteristics: A Contested Landscape”</a></p>
<p>The Nordic Asia Podcast is a collaboration sharing expertise on Asia across the Nordic region, brought to you by the following academic partners:</p>
<ul>
  <li>Asia Centre, University of Tartu (Estonia)</li>
  <li>Asian studies, University of Helsinki (Finland)</li>
  <li>Centre for Asian Studies, Vytautas Magnus University (Lithuania)</li>
  <li>Centre for East and South-East Asian Studies, Lund University (Sweden)</li>
  <li>Centre for East Asian Studies, University of Turku (Finland)</li>
  <li>Norwegian Network for Asian Studies</li>
</ul>
<p>This podcast was recorded in May 2025 in the wonderful podcast studio at Altitude, Collab Arena in The Loop.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="22456107" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/b8e7b316-9ab0-49a0-a316-d8179b562486/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=b8e7b316-9ab0-49a0-a316-d8179b562486&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Chinese Conceptualisation of the Rule of Law – a Conversation with Dr. Martin Lavicka</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:23:23</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>What does the &apos;rule of law&apos; really mean in China? How does it shape the country’s politics, both at home and on the world stage? And why should it matter to the rest of us when universal norms are being challenged?
Dr. Tabita Rosendal from the Centre for East and South-East Asian Studies at Lund University, talks to Dr. Martin Lavicka, a scholar of Chinese studies, about his latest project on the rule of law in the Chinese context.
Dr. Martin Lavicka is a visiting research fellow at the Department of History and the Centre of East and South-East Asian Studies, Lund University. Martin is the PI of the project CLAW: Chinese Conceptualisation of the Rule of Law: Challenges for the International Legal Order. Martin’s research has been supported by the OP JAC Project “MSCA Fellowships at Palacký University II.” CZ.02.01.01/00/22_010/0006945 at Palacký University Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Episode producer: Julia Olsson
Links:
ResearchGate profile
AcademiaEdu profile
Martin’s latest article “Rule of Law with Chinese Characteristics: A Contested Landscape”
The Nordic Asia Podcast is a collaboration sharing expertise on Asia across the Nordic region, brought to you by the following academic partners:
 Asia Centre, University of Tartu (Estonia)
 Asian studies, University of Helsinki (Finland)
 Centre for Asian Studies, Vytautas Magnus University (Lithuania)
 Centre for East and South-East Asian Studies, Lund University (Sweden)
 Centre for East Asian Studies, University of Turku (Finland)
 Norwegian Network for Asian Studies
This podcast was recorded in May 2025 in the wonderful podcast studio at Altitude, Collab Arena in The Loop.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>What does the &apos;rule of law&apos; really mean in China? How does it shape the country’s politics, both at home and on the world stage? And why should it matter to the rest of us when universal norms are being challenged?
Dr. Tabita Rosendal from the Centre for East and South-East Asian Studies at Lund University, talks to Dr. Martin Lavicka, a scholar of Chinese studies, about his latest project on the rule of law in the Chinese context.
Dr. Martin Lavicka is a visiting research fellow at the Department of History and the Centre of East and South-East Asian Studies, Lund University. Martin is the PI of the project CLAW: Chinese Conceptualisation of the Rule of Law: Challenges for the International Legal Order. Martin’s research has been supported by the OP JAC Project “MSCA Fellowships at Palacký University II.” CZ.02.01.01/00/22_010/0006945 at Palacký University Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Episode producer: Julia Olsson
Links:
ResearchGate profile
AcademiaEdu profile
Martin’s latest article “Rule of Law with Chinese Characteristics: A Contested Landscape”
The Nordic Asia Podcast is a collaboration sharing expertise on Asia across the Nordic region, brought to you by the following academic partners:
 Asia Centre, University of Tartu (Estonia)
 Asian studies, University of Helsinki (Finland)
 Centre for Asian Studies, Vytautas Magnus University (Lithuania)
 Centre for East and South-East Asian Studies, Lund University (Sweden)
 Centre for East Asian Studies, University of Turku (Finland)
 Norwegian Network for Asian Studies
This podcast was recorded in May 2025 in the wonderful podcast studio at Altitude, Collab Arena in The Loop.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1543</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">665f0258-5af2-11f0-9fd2-1fee7af720bb</guid>
      <title>Rachel Killean and Lauren Dempster, &quot;Green Transitional Justice&quot; (Routledge, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In this episode, host Alex Batesmith sits down with Dr Rachel Killean and Dr Lauren Dempster to discuss their groundbreaking new book,<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781032206219" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;</a><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781032206219" rel="noopener noreferrer">Green Transitional Justice</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Routledge, 2025).&nbsp;The conversation explores the urgent need to rethink transitional justice (TJ) in light of the environmental crises facing post-conflict societies.</p>
<p>Dr Killean and Dr Dempster begin by explaining what drew them to the intersection of TJ and environmental harm. Their book emerges from a shared concern that traditional TJ mechanisms—designed to address human rights violations in post-conflict settings—have largely ignored the profound and lasting harms inflicted on Nature. They deliberately use the term “harms against Nature” to signal a shift away from anthropocentric language and to foreground the agency and value of the natural world.</p>
<p>The book is structured around four major critiques of the TJ field. First, the authors argue that knowledge production in TJ is shaped by Eurocentric and neocolonial perspectives, often marginalising Indigenous and feminist epistemologies. They advocate for a more inclusive approach that recognises lived experience, interconnectivity, and the importance of naming environmental harm. Second, they critique the dominance of “anthropocentric legalism” in TJ—where legal frameworks and human rights discourses prioritise human victims and overlook ecological damage. This, they argue, limits the field’s ability to respond meaningfully to environmental destruction. The third critique addresses how TJ mechanisms often leave structural inequalities intact. Concepts like “slow violence” and “crimes of the powerful” help illuminate how environmental harms are ongoing and systemic, not just episodic. The authors call for a shift toward transformative environmental justice, drawing on thinkers like Nancy Fraser to propose a model that includes redistribution, recognition, and representation. Finally, the book challenges the neoliberal underpinnings of TJ, particularly its alignment with economic growth and extractivism. Instead, Killean and Dempster explore alternative worldviews—<em>buen vivir</em>,&nbsp;<em>Ubuntu</em>, and&nbsp;<em>ecological swaraj</em>—that offer more holistic, communitarian approaches to justice.</p>
<p>In closing, the authors outline six guiding principles for “greening” TJ, including decolonising justice, recognising non-human victimhood, and rejecting neoliberal inevitability. While acknowledging the challenges of such a radical reimagining, they remain hopeful that the field can evolve to meet the intertwined needs of people and planet.</p>
<p>Alex Batesmith is an Associate Professor in Legal Professions in the School of Law at the University of Leeds, and a former barrister and UN war crimes prosecutor.</p>
<p>His University of Leeds profile page can be found&nbsp;<a href="https://essl.leeds.ac.uk/law/staff/1332/mr-alex-batesmith" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a>﻿</p>
<p>Bluesky: @batesmith.bsky.social</p>
<p>LinkedIn:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/batesmith/" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://www.linkedin.com/in/batesmith/</a></p>
<p>﻿His recent publications include:</p>
<ul>
  <li>
<a href="https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/law-and-society-review/article/closeted-cause-lawyering-in-authoritarian-cambodia/C01C779F38021BDC769FE5808FF9288D)" rel="noopener noreferrer">‘“Closeted” Cause Lawyers in Authoritarian Cambodia’</a>&nbsp;(with Kieran McEvoy)&nbsp;<em>Law and Society Review</em>&nbsp;(2025) 1-33 DOI:10.1017/lsr.2025.29 (open access)</li>
  <li>
<a href="https://www.routledge.com/The-Incoherence-of-Human-Rights-in-International-Law-Absence-Emergence-and-Limitations/Ashley-Butler/p/book/9781032638034#:~:text=This%20book%20explores%20this%20incoherent,how%20it%20may%20be%20remedied." rel="noopener noreferrer">“Cambodia and the progressivist ‘imaginary’: The limitations of international(ised) criminal tribunals as mechanisms for implementing human rights”&nbsp;</a>in Louisa Ashley and Nicolette Butler (eds),<em>&nbsp;The Incoherence of Human Rights in International Law: Absence, Emergence and Limitations&nbsp;</em>(Routledge, 2024&nbsp;<strong>ISBN13:&nbsp;</strong>978-1-032638-03-4)</li>
  <li>
<a href="https://counterpress.org.uk/publications/aesthetics-and-counter-aesthetics-of-international-justice/#1634466943999-1d22caf9-d8076232-5aaf4645-b1c7" rel="noopener noreferrer">“‘Poetic Justice Products’: International Justice, Victim Counter-Aesthetics, and the Spectre of the Show Trial”</a>&nbsp;in Christine Schwöbel-Patel and Rob Knox (eds)&nbsp;<em>Aesthetics and Counter-Aesthetics of International Justice</em>&nbsp;(Counterpress, 2024 ISBN 978-1-910761-17-5)</li>
  <li>
<a href="https://www.routledge.com/Leading-Works-on-the-Legal-Profession/Newman/p/book/9781032182803" rel="noopener noreferrer">"Lawyers who want to make the world a better place – Scheingold and Sarat’s Something to Believe In: Politics, Professionalism, and Cause Lawyering"&nbsp;</a>in D. Newman (ed.)&nbsp;<em>Leading Works on the Legal Profession&nbsp;</em>(Routledge, July 2023), ISBN 978-1-032182-80-3)</li>
</ul><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 7 Jul 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/rachel-killean-and-lauren-dempster-green-transitional-justice-routledge-2025-PcLPxkcA</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this episode, host Alex Batesmith sits down with Dr Rachel Killean and Dr Lauren Dempster to discuss their groundbreaking new book,<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781032206219" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;</a><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781032206219" rel="noopener noreferrer">Green Transitional Justice</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Routledge, 2025).&nbsp;The conversation explores the urgent need to rethink transitional justice (TJ) in light of the environmental crises facing post-conflict societies.</p>
<p>Dr Killean and Dr Dempster begin by explaining what drew them to the intersection of TJ and environmental harm. Their book emerges from a shared concern that traditional TJ mechanisms—designed to address human rights violations in post-conflict settings—have largely ignored the profound and lasting harms inflicted on Nature. They deliberately use the term “harms against Nature” to signal a shift away from anthropocentric language and to foreground the agency and value of the natural world.</p>
<p>The book is structured around four major critiques of the TJ field. First, the authors argue that knowledge production in TJ is shaped by Eurocentric and neocolonial perspectives, often marginalising Indigenous and feminist epistemologies. They advocate for a more inclusive approach that recognises lived experience, interconnectivity, and the importance of naming environmental harm. Second, they critique the dominance of “anthropocentric legalism” in TJ—where legal frameworks and human rights discourses prioritise human victims and overlook ecological damage. This, they argue, limits the field’s ability to respond meaningfully to environmental destruction. The third critique addresses how TJ mechanisms often leave structural inequalities intact. Concepts like “slow violence” and “crimes of the powerful” help illuminate how environmental harms are ongoing and systemic, not just episodic. The authors call for a shift toward transformative environmental justice, drawing on thinkers like Nancy Fraser to propose a model that includes redistribution, recognition, and representation. Finally, the book challenges the neoliberal underpinnings of TJ, particularly its alignment with economic growth and extractivism. Instead, Killean and Dempster explore alternative worldviews—<em>buen vivir</em>,&nbsp;<em>Ubuntu</em>, and&nbsp;<em>ecological swaraj</em>—that offer more holistic, communitarian approaches to justice.</p>
<p>In closing, the authors outline six guiding principles for “greening” TJ, including decolonising justice, recognising non-human victimhood, and rejecting neoliberal inevitability. While acknowledging the challenges of such a radical reimagining, they remain hopeful that the field can evolve to meet the intertwined needs of people and planet.</p>
<p>Alex Batesmith is an Associate Professor in Legal Professions in the School of Law at the University of Leeds, and a former barrister and UN war crimes prosecutor.</p>
<p>His University of Leeds profile page can be found&nbsp;<a href="https://essl.leeds.ac.uk/law/staff/1332/mr-alex-batesmith" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a>﻿</p>
<p>Bluesky: @batesmith.bsky.social</p>
<p>LinkedIn:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/batesmith/" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://www.linkedin.com/in/batesmith/</a></p>
<p>﻿His recent publications include:</p>
<ul>
  <li>
<a href="https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/law-and-society-review/article/closeted-cause-lawyering-in-authoritarian-cambodia/C01C779F38021BDC769FE5808FF9288D)" rel="noopener noreferrer">‘“Closeted” Cause Lawyers in Authoritarian Cambodia’</a>&nbsp;(with Kieran McEvoy)&nbsp;<em>Law and Society Review</em>&nbsp;(2025) 1-33 DOI:10.1017/lsr.2025.29 (open access)</li>
  <li>
<a href="https://www.routledge.com/The-Incoherence-of-Human-Rights-in-International-Law-Absence-Emergence-and-Limitations/Ashley-Butler/p/book/9781032638034#:~:text=This%20book%20explores%20this%20incoherent,how%20it%20may%20be%20remedied." rel="noopener noreferrer">“Cambodia and the progressivist ‘imaginary’: The limitations of international(ised) criminal tribunals as mechanisms for implementing human rights”&nbsp;</a>in Louisa Ashley and Nicolette Butler (eds),<em>&nbsp;The Incoherence of Human Rights in International Law: Absence, Emergence and Limitations&nbsp;</em>(Routledge, 2024&nbsp;<strong>ISBN13:&nbsp;</strong>978-1-032638-03-4)</li>
  <li>
<a href="https://counterpress.org.uk/publications/aesthetics-and-counter-aesthetics-of-international-justice/#1634466943999-1d22caf9-d8076232-5aaf4645-b1c7" rel="noopener noreferrer">“‘Poetic Justice Products’: International Justice, Victim Counter-Aesthetics, and the Spectre of the Show Trial”</a>&nbsp;in Christine Schwöbel-Patel and Rob Knox (eds)&nbsp;<em>Aesthetics and Counter-Aesthetics of International Justice</em>&nbsp;(Counterpress, 2024 ISBN 978-1-910761-17-5)</li>
  <li>
<a href="https://www.routledge.com/Leading-Works-on-the-Legal-Profession/Newman/p/book/9781032182803" rel="noopener noreferrer">"Lawyers who want to make the world a better place – Scheingold and Sarat’s Something to Believe In: Politics, Professionalism, and Cause Lawyering"&nbsp;</a>in D. Newman (ed.)&nbsp;<em>Leading Works on the Legal Profession&nbsp;</em>(Routledge, July 2023), ISBN 978-1-032182-80-3)</li>
</ul><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="65279263" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/1fca41c3-c438-4765-b0fc-f5d53a65c3cc/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=1fca41c3-c438-4765-b0fc-f5d53a65c3cc&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Rachel Killean and Lauren Dempster, &quot;Green Transitional Justice&quot; (Routledge, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:07:59</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this episode, host Alex Batesmith sits down with Dr Rachel Killean and Dr Lauren Dempster to discuss their groundbreaking new book, Green Transitional Justice (Routledge, 2025). The conversation explores the urgent need to rethink transitional justice (TJ) in light of the environmental crises facing post-conflict societies.
Dr Killean and Dr Dempster begin by explaining what drew them to the intersection of TJ and environmental harm. Their book emerges from a shared concern that traditional TJ mechanisms—designed to address human rights violations in post-conflict settings—have largely ignored the profound and lasting harms inflicted on Nature. They deliberately use the term “harms against Nature” to signal a shift away from anthropocentric language and to foreground the agency and value of the natural world.
The book is structured around four major critiques of the TJ field. First, the authors argue that knowledge production in TJ is shaped by Eurocentric and neocolonial perspectives, often marginalising Indigenous and feminist epistemologies. They advocate for a more inclusive approach that recognises lived experience, interconnectivity, and the importance of naming environmental harm. Second, they critique the dominance of “anthropocentric legalism” in TJ—where legal frameworks and human rights discourses prioritise human victims and overlook ecological damage. This, they argue, limits the field’s ability to respond meaningfully to environmental destruction. The third critique addresses how TJ mechanisms often leave structural inequalities intact. Concepts like “slow violence” and “crimes of the powerful” help illuminate how environmental harms are ongoing and systemic, not just episodic. The authors call for a shift toward transformative environmental justice, drawing on thinkers like Nancy Fraser to propose a model that includes redistribution, recognition, and representation. Finally, the book challenges the neoliberal underpinnings of TJ, particularly its alignment with economic growth and extractivism. Instead, Killean and Dempster explore alternative worldviews—buen vivir, Ubuntu, and ecological swaraj—that offer more holistic, communitarian approaches to justice.
In closing, the authors outline six guiding principles for “greening” TJ, including decolonising justice, recognising non-human victimhood, and rejecting neoliberal inevitability. While acknowledging the challenges of such a radical reimagining, they remain hopeful that the field can evolve to meet the intertwined needs of people and planet.
Alex Batesmith is an Associate Professor in Legal Professions in the School of Law at the University of Leeds, and a former barrister and UN war crimes prosecutor.
His University of Leeds profile page can be found here﻿
Bluesky: @batesmith.bsky.social
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/batesmith/
﻿His recent publications include:
‘“Closeted” Cause Lawyers in Authoritarian Cambodia’ (with Kieran McEvoy) Law and Society Review (2025) 1-33 DOI:10.1017/lsr.2025.29 (open access)
“Cambodia and the progressivist ‘imaginary’: The limitations of international(ised) criminal tribunals as mechanisms for implementing human rights” in Louisa Ashley and Nicolette Butler (eds), The Incoherence of Human Rights in International Law: Absence, Emergence and Limitations (Routledge, 2024 ISBN13: 978-1-032638-03-4)
“‘Poetic Justice Products’: International Justice, Victim Counter-Aesthetics, and the Spectre of the Show Trial” in Christine Schwöbel-Patel and Rob Knox (eds) Aesthetics and Counter-Aesthetics of International Justice (Counterpress, 2024 ISBN 978-1-910761-17-5)
&quot;Lawyers who want to make the world a better place – Scheingold and Sarat’s Something to Believe In: Politics, Professionalism, and Cause Lawyering&quot; in D. Newman (ed.) Leading Works on the Legal Profession (Routledge, July 2023), ISBN 978-1-032182-80-3)
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode, host Alex Batesmith sits down with Dr Rachel Killean and Dr Lauren Dempster to discuss their groundbreaking new book, Green Transitional Justice (Routledge, 2025). The conversation explores the urgent need to rethink transitional justice (TJ) in light of the environmental crises facing post-conflict societies.
Dr Killean and Dr Dempster begin by explaining what drew them to the intersection of TJ and environmental harm. Their book emerges from a shared concern that traditional TJ mechanisms—designed to address human rights violations in post-conflict settings—have largely ignored the profound and lasting harms inflicted on Nature. They deliberately use the term “harms against Nature” to signal a shift away from anthropocentric language and to foreground the agency and value of the natural world.
The book is structured around four major critiques of the TJ field. First, the authors argue that knowledge production in TJ is shaped by Eurocentric and neocolonial perspectives, often marginalising Indigenous and feminist epistemologies. They advocate for a more inclusive approach that recognises lived experience, interconnectivity, and the importance of naming environmental harm. Second, they critique the dominance of “anthropocentric legalism” in TJ—where legal frameworks and human rights discourses prioritise human victims and overlook ecological damage. This, they argue, limits the field’s ability to respond meaningfully to environmental destruction. The third critique addresses how TJ mechanisms often leave structural inequalities intact. Concepts like “slow violence” and “crimes of the powerful” help illuminate how environmental harms are ongoing and systemic, not just episodic. The authors call for a shift toward transformative environmental justice, drawing on thinkers like Nancy Fraser to propose a model that includes redistribution, recognition, and representation. Finally, the book challenges the neoliberal underpinnings of TJ, particularly its alignment with economic growth and extractivism. Instead, Killean and Dempster explore alternative worldviews—buen vivir, Ubuntu, and ecological swaraj—that offer more holistic, communitarian approaches to justice.
In closing, the authors outline six guiding principles for “greening” TJ, including decolonising justice, recognising non-human victimhood, and rejecting neoliberal inevitability. While acknowledging the challenges of such a radical reimagining, they remain hopeful that the field can evolve to meet the intertwined needs of people and planet.
Alex Batesmith is an Associate Professor in Legal Professions in the School of Law at the University of Leeds, and a former barrister and UN war crimes prosecutor.
His University of Leeds profile page can be found here﻿
Bluesky: @batesmith.bsky.social
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/batesmith/
﻿His recent publications include:
‘“Closeted” Cause Lawyers in Authoritarian Cambodia’ (with Kieran McEvoy) Law and Society Review (2025) 1-33 DOI:10.1017/lsr.2025.29 (open access)
“Cambodia and the progressivist ‘imaginary’: The limitations of international(ised) criminal tribunals as mechanisms for implementing human rights” in Louisa Ashley and Nicolette Butler (eds), The Incoherence of Human Rights in International Law: Absence, Emergence and Limitations (Routledge, 2024 ISBN13: 978-1-032638-03-4)
“‘Poetic Justice Products’: International Justice, Victim Counter-Aesthetics, and the Spectre of the Show Trial” in Christine Schwöbel-Patel and Rob Knox (eds) Aesthetics and Counter-Aesthetics of International Justice (Counterpress, 2024 ISBN 978-1-910761-17-5)
&quot;Lawyers who want to make the world a better place – Scheingold and Sarat’s Something to Believe In: Politics, Professionalism, and Cause Lawyering&quot; in D. Newman (ed.) Leading Works on the Legal Profession (Routledge, July 2023), ISBN 978-1-032182-80-3)
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1542</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">884427f2-56bc-11f0-8682-d7514d580269</guid>
      <title>Secrets of the Killing State</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In the popular imagination, lethal injection is a slight pinch and a swift nodding off to forever-sleep. It is performed by well-qualified medical professionals. It is regulated and carefully conducted. And it provides a “humane” death. In reality, however, not one of those things is true.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781479832965" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Secrets of the Killing State:&nbsp;The Untold Story of Lethal Injection</em></a>&nbsp;(NYU Press, 2025)&nbsp;presents the view of lethal injection that states have worked hard to hide. The story told here is bigger than the executions themselves. Fake science, torturous drugs, inept executioners, prison problems, and decades of state secrecy have created an execution method hard-wired to go wrong in countless ways.<br>The story of lethal injection is a story of gross incompetence, law breaking, torturous deaths, and a stunning indifference to the way in which human beings die at the hands of the state. These are the secrets of the killing state—all that we know from litigation files, scientific studies, investigative journalism, autopsy reports, interviews, and scholarship across a number of fields. Death penalty expert Corinna Barrett Lain uses this groundbreaking journey into the dark reality of lethal injection to shine a light on the American death penalty more broadly and show that the state at its most powerful moment is also the state at its worst.</p>
<p>Our guest is: Professor Corinna Barrett Lain, who is S. D. Roberts &amp; Sandra Moore Professor of Law at University of Richmond School of Law.</p>
<p>Our host is:&nbsp;<a href="https://christinagessler.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. Christina Gessler</a>, who is the producer of the Academic Life podcast.</p>
<p>Playlist for listeners:</p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-journal-of-higher-education-in-prison#entry:156475@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Journal of Higher Education in Prison</a></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/researching-racial-injustice#entry:39399@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">Hands Up, Don't Shoot</a></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/freemans-challenge#entry:326110@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">Freemans Challenge</a></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/brittany-friedman-carceral-apartheid-how-lies-and-white-supremacists-run-our-prisons-unc-press-2025#entry:401619@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">Carceral Apartheid</a></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/stitching-freedom#entry:300506@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">Stitching Freedom</a></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/education-behind-the-wall#entry:206799@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">Education Behind The Wall</a></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/a-conversation-with-the-director-of-the-emerson-prison-initiative#entry:117361@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">A Conversation About The Emerson Prison Initiative</a></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/teaching-about-race-and-racism-in-the-college-classroom#entry:103132@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">Teaching About Race and Racism in the College Classroom</a></p>
<p>Welcome to Academic Life, the podcast for your academic journey—and beyond! You can support the show by downloading and sharing episodes. Join us again to learn from more experts inside and outside the academy, and around the world. Missed any of the 250+ Academic Life episodes? Find them&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/up-partners/academic-life" rel="noopener noreferrer">here.</a>&nbsp;And thank you for listening!</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 3 Jul 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/secrets-of-the-killing-state-DsI_NrdX</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the popular imagination, lethal injection is a slight pinch and a swift nodding off to forever-sleep. It is performed by well-qualified medical professionals. It is regulated and carefully conducted. And it provides a “humane” death. In reality, however, not one of those things is true.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781479832965" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Secrets of the Killing State:&nbsp;The Untold Story of Lethal Injection</em></a>&nbsp;(NYU Press, 2025)&nbsp;presents the view of lethal injection that states have worked hard to hide. The story told here is bigger than the executions themselves. Fake science, torturous drugs, inept executioners, prison problems, and decades of state secrecy have created an execution method hard-wired to go wrong in countless ways.<br>The story of lethal injection is a story of gross incompetence, law breaking, torturous deaths, and a stunning indifference to the way in which human beings die at the hands of the state. These are the secrets of the killing state—all that we know from litigation files, scientific studies, investigative journalism, autopsy reports, interviews, and scholarship across a number of fields. Death penalty expert Corinna Barrett Lain uses this groundbreaking journey into the dark reality of lethal injection to shine a light on the American death penalty more broadly and show that the state at its most powerful moment is also the state at its worst.</p>
<p>Our guest is: Professor Corinna Barrett Lain, who is S. D. Roberts &amp; Sandra Moore Professor of Law at University of Richmond School of Law.</p>
<p>Our host is:&nbsp;<a href="https://christinagessler.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. Christina Gessler</a>, who is the producer of the Academic Life podcast.</p>
<p>Playlist for listeners:</p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-journal-of-higher-education-in-prison#entry:156475@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Journal of Higher Education in Prison</a></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/researching-racial-injustice#entry:39399@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">Hands Up, Don't Shoot</a></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/freemans-challenge#entry:326110@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">Freemans Challenge</a></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/brittany-friedman-carceral-apartheid-how-lies-and-white-supremacists-run-our-prisons-unc-press-2025#entry:401619@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">Carceral Apartheid</a></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/stitching-freedom#entry:300506@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">Stitching Freedom</a></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/education-behind-the-wall#entry:206799@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">Education Behind The Wall</a></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/a-conversation-with-the-director-of-the-emerson-prison-initiative#entry:117361@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">A Conversation About The Emerson Prison Initiative</a></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/teaching-about-race-and-racism-in-the-college-classroom#entry:103132@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">Teaching About Race and Racism in the College Classroom</a></p>
<p>Welcome to Academic Life, the podcast for your academic journey—and beyond! You can support the show by downloading and sharing episodes. Join us again to learn from more experts inside and outside the academy, and around the world. Missed any of the 250+ Academic Life episodes? Find them&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/up-partners/academic-life" rel="noopener noreferrer">here.</a>&nbsp;And thank you for listening!</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="63294199" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/49310602-70cc-44c2-af40-e47f0b3c2f80/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=49310602-70cc-44c2-af40-e47f0b3c2f80&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Secrets of the Killing State</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:05:55</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In the popular imagination, lethal injection is a slight pinch and a swift nodding off to forever-sleep. It is performed by well-qualified medical professionals. It is regulated and carefully conducted. And it provides a “humane” death. In reality, however, not one of those things is true. Secrets of the Killing State: The Untold Story of Lethal Injection (NYU Press, 2025) presents the view of lethal injection that states have worked hard to hide. The story told here is bigger than the executions themselves. Fake science, torturous drugs, inept executioners, prison problems, and decades of state secrecy have created an execution method hard-wired to go wrong in countless ways.The story of lethal injection is a story of gross incompetence, law breaking, torturous deaths, and a stunning indifference to the way in which human beings die at the hands of the state. These are the secrets of the killing state—all that we know from litigation files, scientific studies, investigative journalism, autopsy reports, interviews, and scholarship across a number of fields. Death penalty expert Corinna Barrett Lain uses this groundbreaking journey into the dark reality of lethal injection to shine a light on the American death penalty more broadly and show that the state at its most powerful moment is also the state at its worst.
Our guest is: Professor Corinna Barrett Lain, who is S. D. Roberts &amp; Sandra Moore Professor of Law at University of Richmond School of Law.
Our host is: Dr. Christina Gessler, who is the producer of the Academic Life podcast.
Playlist for listeners:
The Journal of Higher Education in Prison
Hands Up, Don&apos;t Shoot
Freemans Challenge
Carceral Apartheid
Stitching Freedom
Education Behind The Wall
A Conversation About The Emerson Prison Initiative
Teaching About Race and Racism in the College Classroom
Welcome to Academic Life, the podcast for your academic journey—and beyond! You can support the show by downloading and sharing episodes. Join us again to learn from more experts inside and outside the academy, and around the world. Missed any of the 250+ Academic Life episodes? Find them here. And thank you for listening!
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In the popular imagination, lethal injection is a slight pinch and a swift nodding off to forever-sleep. It is performed by well-qualified medical professionals. It is regulated and carefully conducted. And it provides a “humane” death. In reality, however, not one of those things is true. Secrets of the Killing State: The Untold Story of Lethal Injection (NYU Press, 2025) presents the view of lethal injection that states have worked hard to hide. The story told here is bigger than the executions themselves. Fake science, torturous drugs, inept executioners, prison problems, and decades of state secrecy have created an execution method hard-wired to go wrong in countless ways.The story of lethal injection is a story of gross incompetence, law breaking, torturous deaths, and a stunning indifference to the way in which human beings die at the hands of the state. These are the secrets of the killing state—all that we know from litigation files, scientific studies, investigative journalism, autopsy reports, interviews, and scholarship across a number of fields. Death penalty expert Corinna Barrett Lain uses this groundbreaking journey into the dark reality of lethal injection to shine a light on the American death penalty more broadly and show that the state at its most powerful moment is also the state at its worst.
Our guest is: Professor Corinna Barrett Lain, who is S. D. Roberts &amp; Sandra Moore Professor of Law at University of Richmond School of Law.
Our host is: Dr. Christina Gessler, who is the producer of the Academic Life podcast.
Playlist for listeners:
The Journal of Higher Education in Prison
Hands Up, Don&apos;t Shoot
Freemans Challenge
Carceral Apartheid
Stitching Freedom
Education Behind The Wall
A Conversation About The Emerson Prison Initiative
Teaching About Race and Racism in the College Classroom
Welcome to Academic Life, the podcast for your academic journey—and beyond! You can support the show by downloading and sharing episodes. Join us again to learn from more experts inside and outside the academy, and around the world. Missed any of the 250+ Academic Life episodes? Find them here. And thank you for listening!
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1540</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">67229b38-5790-11f0-aeb5-4f4fa8606a93</guid>
      <title>Daanika Kamal, &quot;Domestic Violence in Pakistan: The Legal Construction of &apos;Bad&apos; and &apos;Mad&apos; Women&quot; (Oxford UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Pakistani women are increasingly pursuing legal avenues against acts of domestic violence. Their claims, however, are often dismissed through character allegations that label them as 'bad' women in need of control, or 'mad' women not to be trusted.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780198953449" rel="noopener noreferrer">Domestic Violence in Pakistan: The Legal Construction of 'Bad' and 'Mad' Women</a>&nbsp;(Oxford University Press, 2025) by Dr. Daanika Kamal explores why the subjectivities of women victims are constructed in particular ways, and how these subjectivities are captured and negotiated in the Pakistani legal system.<br>Drawing on feminist poststructuralist accounts relating to the use of gendering strategies in institutional and disciplinary settings and based on an analysis of over a hundred case files and judgements, seventy-two interviews, and court observations in three cities of Pakistan, this book shadows the experiences of women victims of domestic violence in both criminal law and family law proceedings. It captures and offers empirical insights in relation to gendered subject formation in discursive spaces; ranging from the use of societal narratives that minimise and silence women's harms, to the deployment of police mechanisms that assist in maintaining the 'secrecy' of familial violence, and the application and enactment of boilerplate lawyerly strategies to present alternative legal 'truths.'<br>Amidst regulations of the public versus the private and understandings of rights versus duties, Domestic Violence in Pakistan explores how these practices construct the victim-subject of domestic violence in a way that not only subjectivise her, but also secure her within the field of that subjectification; setting her up to be viewed by the judiciary through the lens of the allegations applied to her.</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 3 Jul 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/daanika-kamal-domestic-violence-in-pakistan-the-legal-construction-of-bad-and-mad-women-oxford-up-2025-PyxqqlGo</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pakistani women are increasingly pursuing legal avenues against acts of domestic violence. Their claims, however, are often dismissed through character allegations that label them as 'bad' women in need of control, or 'mad' women not to be trusted.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780198953449" rel="noopener noreferrer">Domestic Violence in Pakistan: The Legal Construction of 'Bad' and 'Mad' Women</a>&nbsp;(Oxford University Press, 2025) by Dr. Daanika Kamal explores why the subjectivities of women victims are constructed in particular ways, and how these subjectivities are captured and negotiated in the Pakistani legal system.<br>Drawing on feminist poststructuralist accounts relating to the use of gendering strategies in institutional and disciplinary settings and based on an analysis of over a hundred case files and judgements, seventy-two interviews, and court observations in three cities of Pakistan, this book shadows the experiences of women victims of domestic violence in both criminal law and family law proceedings. It captures and offers empirical insights in relation to gendered subject formation in discursive spaces; ranging from the use of societal narratives that minimise and silence women's harms, to the deployment of police mechanisms that assist in maintaining the 'secrecy' of familial violence, and the application and enactment of boilerplate lawyerly strategies to present alternative legal 'truths.'<br>Amidst regulations of the public versus the private and understandings of rights versus duties, Domestic Violence in Pakistan explores how these practices construct the victim-subject of domestic violence in a way that not only subjectivise her, but also secure her within the field of that subjectification; setting her up to be viewed by the judiciary through the lens of the allegations applied to her.</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="50481714" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/eaa7426f-b817-4fc3-80b9-027019168886/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=eaa7426f-b817-4fc3-80b9-027019168886&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Daanika Kamal, &quot;Domestic Violence in Pakistan: The Legal Construction of &apos;Bad&apos; and &apos;Mad&apos; Women&quot; (Oxford UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:52:34</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Pakistani women are increasingly pursuing legal avenues against acts of domestic violence. Their claims, however, are often dismissed through character allegations that label them as &apos;bad&apos; women in need of control, or &apos;mad&apos; women not to be trusted. Domestic Violence in Pakistan: The Legal Construction of &apos;Bad&apos; and &apos;Mad&apos; Women (Oxford University Press, 2025) by Dr. Daanika Kamal explores why the subjectivities of women victims are constructed in particular ways, and how these subjectivities are captured and negotiated in the Pakistani legal system.Drawing on feminist poststructuralist accounts relating to the use of gendering strategies in institutional and disciplinary settings and based on an analysis of over a hundred case files and judgements, seventy-two interviews, and court observations in three cities of Pakistan, this book shadows the experiences of women victims of domestic violence in both criminal law and family law proceedings. It captures and offers empirical insights in relation to gendered subject formation in discursive spaces; ranging from the use of societal narratives that minimise and silence women&apos;s harms, to the deployment of police mechanisms that assist in maintaining the &apos;secrecy&apos; of familial violence, and the application and enactment of boilerplate lawyerly strategies to present alternative legal &apos;truths.&apos;Amidst regulations of the public versus the private and understandings of rights versus duties, Domestic Violence in Pakistan explores how these practices construct the victim-subject of domestic violence in a way that not only subjectivise her, but also secure her within the field of that subjectification; setting her up to be viewed by the judiciary through the lens of the allegations applied to her.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Pakistani women are increasingly pursuing legal avenues against acts of domestic violence. Their claims, however, are often dismissed through character allegations that label them as &apos;bad&apos; women in need of control, or &apos;mad&apos; women not to be trusted. Domestic Violence in Pakistan: The Legal Construction of &apos;Bad&apos; and &apos;Mad&apos; Women (Oxford University Press, 2025) by Dr. Daanika Kamal explores why the subjectivities of women victims are constructed in particular ways, and how these subjectivities are captured and negotiated in the Pakistani legal system.Drawing on feminist poststructuralist accounts relating to the use of gendering strategies in institutional and disciplinary settings and based on an analysis of over a hundred case files and judgements, seventy-two interviews, and court observations in three cities of Pakistan, this book shadows the experiences of women victims of domestic violence in both criminal law and family law proceedings. It captures and offers empirical insights in relation to gendered subject formation in discursive spaces; ranging from the use of societal narratives that minimise and silence women&apos;s harms, to the deployment of police mechanisms that assist in maintaining the &apos;secrecy&apos; of familial violence, and the application and enactment of boilerplate lawyerly strategies to present alternative legal &apos;truths.&apos;Amidst regulations of the public versus the private and understandings of rights versus duties, Domestic Violence in Pakistan explores how these practices construct the victim-subject of domestic violence in a way that not only subjectivise her, but also secure her within the field of that subjectification; setting her up to be viewed by the judiciary through the lens of the allegations applied to her.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1541</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">db0e2486-5515-11f0-a612-1310625f55ec</guid>
      <title>Paul R. Beckett, &quot;An Anatomy of Tax Havens: Europe, the Caribbean and the United States of America&quot; (de Gruyter, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Tax havens in offshore lands like Switzerland, the Cayman Islands and the Bahamas were once considered a rarity, the preserve of the super-rich. Today, they are big business available to the masses. Their goal? To avoid&nbsp;<em>any</em>&nbsp;form of accountability. Own nothing. Possess everything. Be answerable to no one. Where are these tax havens? What forms can they take? What future lies in store for them, and why should we care?﻿</p>
<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9783110996678" rel="noopener noreferrer">An Anatomy of Tax Havens: Europe, the Caribbean and the United States of America</a><em>&nbsp;</em>﻿(de Gruyter, 2023)&nbsp;answers these questions, and more, in the first comparative study in one volume of European, Caribbean and United States tax havens.﻿</p>
<p>It examines their simple origin to the extreme forms some take today, delving into the murky subculture that has deliberately made them impenetrably obscure. Uniquely, it combines detailed technical expertise (regulatory regimes, financial crime, legal and equitable structuring) with an analysis of their impact on domestic and global political, economic, environmental and social concerns.﻿</p>
<p><em>An Anatomy of Tax Havens</em>&nbsp;is a fascinating, informative read for a broad readership; from legal, accountancy and tax practitioners to compliance regulators, law enforcement agencies, and students and researchers interested in business studies, taxation, and crime.</p>
<p>﻿Paul R. Beckett&nbsp;is a Lawyer and Academic, specializing in company, commercial and trust law; banking and fund management; cryptocurrencies and the blockchain. He practices on the Isle of Man.</p>
<p><em>Caleb Zakarin is editor of the New Books Network.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/paul-r-beckett-an-anatomy-of-tax-havens-europe-the-caribbean-and-the-united-states-of-america-de-gruyter-2023-TnmL2167</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tax havens in offshore lands like Switzerland, the Cayman Islands and the Bahamas were once considered a rarity, the preserve of the super-rich. Today, they are big business available to the masses. Their goal? To avoid&nbsp;<em>any</em>&nbsp;form of accountability. Own nothing. Possess everything. Be answerable to no one. Where are these tax havens? What forms can they take? What future lies in store for them, and why should we care?﻿</p>
<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9783110996678" rel="noopener noreferrer">An Anatomy of Tax Havens: Europe, the Caribbean and the United States of America</a><em>&nbsp;</em>﻿(de Gruyter, 2023)&nbsp;answers these questions, and more, in the first comparative study in one volume of European, Caribbean and United States tax havens.﻿</p>
<p>It examines their simple origin to the extreme forms some take today, delving into the murky subculture that has deliberately made them impenetrably obscure. Uniquely, it combines detailed technical expertise (regulatory regimes, financial crime, legal and equitable structuring) with an analysis of their impact on domestic and global political, economic, environmental and social concerns.﻿</p>
<p><em>An Anatomy of Tax Havens</em>&nbsp;is a fascinating, informative read for a broad readership; from legal, accountancy and tax practitioners to compliance regulators, law enforcement agencies, and students and researchers interested in business studies, taxation, and crime.</p>
<p>﻿Paul R. Beckett&nbsp;is a Lawyer and Academic, specializing in company, commercial and trust law; banking and fund management; cryptocurrencies and the blockchain. He practices on the Isle of Man.</p>
<p><em>Caleb Zakarin is editor of the New Books Network.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="60228211" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/b65bbca2-207a-45e3-a1cc-24649a87470b/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=b65bbca2-207a-45e3-a1cc-24649a87470b&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Paul R. Beckett, &quot;An Anatomy of Tax Havens: Europe, the Caribbean and the United States of America&quot; (de Gruyter, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:02:44</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Tax havens in offshore lands like Switzerland, the Cayman Islands and the Bahamas were once considered a rarity, the preserve of the super-rich. Today, they are big business available to the masses. Their goal? To avoid any form of accountability. Own nothing. Possess everything. Be answerable to no one. Where are these tax havens? What forms can they take? What future lies in store for them, and why should we care?﻿
An Anatomy of Tax Havens: Europe, the Caribbean and the United States of America ﻿(de Gruyter, 2023) answers these questions, and more, in the first comparative study in one volume of European, Caribbean and United States tax havens.﻿
It examines their simple origin to the extreme forms some take today, delving into the murky subculture that has deliberately made them impenetrably obscure. Uniquely, it combines detailed technical expertise (regulatory regimes, financial crime, legal and equitable structuring) with an analysis of their impact on domestic and global political, economic, environmental and social concerns.﻿
An Anatomy of Tax Havens is a fascinating, informative read for a broad readership; from legal, accountancy and tax practitioners to compliance regulators, law enforcement agencies, and students and researchers interested in business studies, taxation, and crime.
﻿Paul R. Beckett is a Lawyer and Academic, specializing in company, commercial and trust law; banking and fund management; cryptocurrencies and the blockchain. He practices on the Isle of Man.
Caleb Zakarin is editor of the New Books Network.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Tax havens in offshore lands like Switzerland, the Cayman Islands and the Bahamas were once considered a rarity, the preserve of the super-rich. Today, they are big business available to the masses. Their goal? To avoid any form of accountability. Own nothing. Possess everything. Be answerable to no one. Where are these tax havens? What forms can they take? What future lies in store for them, and why should we care?﻿
An Anatomy of Tax Havens: Europe, the Caribbean and the United States of America ﻿(de Gruyter, 2023) answers these questions, and more, in the first comparative study in one volume of European, Caribbean and United States tax havens.﻿
It examines their simple origin to the extreme forms some take today, delving into the murky subculture that has deliberately made them impenetrably obscure. Uniquely, it combines detailed technical expertise (regulatory regimes, financial crime, legal and equitable structuring) with an analysis of their impact on domestic and global political, economic, environmental and social concerns.﻿
An Anatomy of Tax Havens is a fascinating, informative read for a broad readership; from legal, accountancy and tax practitioners to compliance regulators, law enforcement agencies, and students and researchers interested in business studies, taxation, and crime.
﻿Paul R. Beckett is a Lawyer and Academic, specializing in company, commercial and trust law; banking and fund management; cryptocurrencies and the blockchain. He practices on the Isle of Man.
Caleb Zakarin is editor of the New Books Network.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1538</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1c08e9f6-5513-11f0-9b44-87a8ba9acdcc</guid>
      <title>Yonatan Y. Brafman, &quot;Critique of Halakhic Reason: Divine Commandments and Social Normativity&quot; (Oxford UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>For centuries, Jewish thinkers have asked two parallel questions. First, what is the reasoning behind an individual commandment and second, why bother heeding a command at all, something Dr. Brafman terms “reasons for” vs “reasons of” the commandments. In his newest book,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197767931" rel="noopener noreferrer">Critique of Halakhic Reason: Divine Commandments and Social Normativity</a><em>&nbsp;</em>﻿(Oxford UP, 2024), Dr. Brafman looks closely at the second of these questions. After considering answers from some of the most important Jewish thinkers of the 20th&nbsp;century, Joseph Soloveitchik, Yeshayahu Leibowitz, and Eliezer Berkovits, Dr. Brafman introduces his own system of thought. For him, the reasons for the commandments depend on a number of factors. We don’t follow them blindly. And they don’t always have to adhere to perfect and pure reason. Instead they are, to use a term he employs throughout is book, “constructed” based on any number of factors including our relationship with God and the norms that exist within our society. In conversation with some of the most important secular legal theorist and philosophers of the past 100 years, Dr Brafman charts a new course in Jewish theology, both defending and reimagining the place of our obligation to&nbsp;<em>halakhah</em>, Jewish law, for the 21st&nbsp;century.</p>
<p>Professor Yonatan Brafman is Associate Professor of Modern Judaism in the Department of Religion, with a secondary appointment in the Department of Literary and Cultural Studies at Tufts University.</p>
<p>Rabbi Marc Katz is the Senior Rabbi at Temple Ner Tamid in Bloomfield, NJ. He is most recently the author of&nbsp;<a href="https://jps.org/books/yochanans-gamble/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Yochanan’s Gamble: Judaism’s Pragmatic Approach to Life (JPS)</em></a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/yonatan-y-brafman-critique-of-halakhic-reason-divine-commandments-and-social-normativity-oxford-up-2024-1gF_Wl2N</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For centuries, Jewish thinkers have asked two parallel questions. First, what is the reasoning behind an individual commandment and second, why bother heeding a command at all, something Dr. Brafman terms “reasons for” vs “reasons of” the commandments. In his newest book,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197767931" rel="noopener noreferrer">Critique of Halakhic Reason: Divine Commandments and Social Normativity</a><em>&nbsp;</em>﻿(Oxford UP, 2024), Dr. Brafman looks closely at the second of these questions. After considering answers from some of the most important Jewish thinkers of the 20th&nbsp;century, Joseph Soloveitchik, Yeshayahu Leibowitz, and Eliezer Berkovits, Dr. Brafman introduces his own system of thought. For him, the reasons for the commandments depend on a number of factors. We don’t follow them blindly. And they don’t always have to adhere to perfect and pure reason. Instead they are, to use a term he employs throughout is book, “constructed” based on any number of factors including our relationship with God and the norms that exist within our society. In conversation with some of the most important secular legal theorist and philosophers of the past 100 years, Dr Brafman charts a new course in Jewish theology, both defending and reimagining the place of our obligation to&nbsp;<em>halakhah</em>, Jewish law, for the 21st&nbsp;century.</p>
<p>Professor Yonatan Brafman is Associate Professor of Modern Judaism in the Department of Religion, with a secondary appointment in the Department of Literary and Cultural Studies at Tufts University.</p>
<p>Rabbi Marc Katz is the Senior Rabbi at Temple Ner Tamid in Bloomfield, NJ. He is most recently the author of&nbsp;<a href="https://jps.org/books/yochanans-gamble/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Yochanan’s Gamble: Judaism’s Pragmatic Approach to Life (JPS)</em></a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="55290555" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/906aa77b-4276-4a7d-936c-53133309c720/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=906aa77b-4276-4a7d-936c-53133309c720&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Yonatan Y. Brafman, &quot;Critique of Halakhic Reason: Divine Commandments and Social Normativity&quot; (Oxford UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:57:35</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>For centuries, Jewish thinkers have asked two parallel questions. First, what is the reasoning behind an individual commandment and second, why bother heeding a command at all, something Dr. Brafman terms “reasons for” vs “reasons of” the commandments. In his newest book, Critique of Halakhic Reason: Divine Commandments and Social Normativity ﻿(Oxford UP, 2024), Dr. Brafman looks closely at the second of these questions. After considering answers from some of the most important Jewish thinkers of the 20th century, Joseph Soloveitchik, Yeshayahu Leibowitz, and Eliezer Berkovits, Dr. Brafman introduces his own system of thought. For him, the reasons for the commandments depend on a number of factors. We don’t follow them blindly. And they don’t always have to adhere to perfect and pure reason. Instead they are, to use a term he employs throughout is book, “constructed” based on any number of factors including our relationship with God and the norms that exist within our society. In conversation with some of the most important secular legal theorist and philosophers of the past 100 years, Dr Brafman charts a new course in Jewish theology, both defending and reimagining the place of our obligation to halakhah, Jewish law, for the 21st century.
Professor Yonatan Brafman is Associate Professor of Modern Judaism in the Department of Religion, with a secondary appointment in the Department of Literary and Cultural Studies at Tufts University.
Rabbi Marc Katz is the Senior Rabbi at Temple Ner Tamid in Bloomfield, NJ. He is most recently the author of Yochanan’s Gamble: Judaism’s Pragmatic Approach to Life (JPS)
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>For centuries, Jewish thinkers have asked two parallel questions. First, what is the reasoning behind an individual commandment and second, why bother heeding a command at all, something Dr. Brafman terms “reasons for” vs “reasons of” the commandments. In his newest book, Critique of Halakhic Reason: Divine Commandments and Social Normativity ﻿(Oxford UP, 2024), Dr. Brafman looks closely at the second of these questions. After considering answers from some of the most important Jewish thinkers of the 20th century, Joseph Soloveitchik, Yeshayahu Leibowitz, and Eliezer Berkovits, Dr. Brafman introduces his own system of thought. For him, the reasons for the commandments depend on a number of factors. We don’t follow them blindly. And they don’t always have to adhere to perfect and pure reason. Instead they are, to use a term he employs throughout is book, “constructed” based on any number of factors including our relationship with God and the norms that exist within our society. In conversation with some of the most important secular legal theorist and philosophers of the past 100 years, Dr Brafman charts a new course in Jewish theology, both defending and reimagining the place of our obligation to halakhah, Jewish law, for the 21st century.
Professor Yonatan Brafman is Associate Professor of Modern Judaism in the Department of Religion, with a secondary appointment in the Department of Literary and Cultural Studies at Tufts University.
Rabbi Marc Katz is the Senior Rabbi at Temple Ner Tamid in Bloomfield, NJ. He is most recently the author of Yochanan’s Gamble: Judaism’s Pragmatic Approach to Life (JPS)
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1539</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">96c5b164-5230-11f0-8ff9-ef2fc1fcb2b8</guid>
      <title>Jennifer R. Nájera, &quot;Learning to Lead: Undocumented Students Mobilizing Education&quot; (Duke UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781478030539" rel="noopener noreferrer">Learning to Lead:&nbsp;Undocumented Students Mobilizing Education</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Duke University Press, 2024),&nbsp;Jennifer R. Nájera explores the intersections of education and activism among undocumented students at the University of California, Riverside. Taking an expansive view of education, Nájera shows how students’ experiences in college—both in and out of the classroom—can affect their activism and advocacy work. Students learn from their families, communities, peers, and student and political organizations. In these different spaces, they learn how to navigate community and college life as undocumented people. Students are able to engage campus organizations where they can cultivate their leadership skills and—importantly—learn that they are not alone. These students embody and mobilize their education through both large and small political actions such as protests, workshops for financial aid applications, and Know Your Rights events. As students create community with each other, they come to understand that their individual experiences of illegality are part of a larger structure of legal violence. This type of education empowers students to make their way to and through college, change their communities, and ultimately assert their humanity.</p>
<p>Jennifer R. Nájera is Associate Professor of Ethnic Studies at the University of California, Riverside.</p>
<p><a href="https://history.byu.edu/directory/david-james-gonzales" rel="noopener noreferrer">David-James Gonzales</a><em>&nbsp;(DJ) is Assistant Professor of History at Brigham Young University. He is a historian of migration, urbanization, and social movements in the U.S., and specializes in Latina/o/x politics and social movements.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/jennifer-r-najera-learning-to-lead-undocumented-students-mobilizing-education-duke-up-2024-rzpj0zpg</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781478030539" rel="noopener noreferrer">Learning to Lead:&nbsp;Undocumented Students Mobilizing Education</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Duke University Press, 2024),&nbsp;Jennifer R. Nájera explores the intersections of education and activism among undocumented students at the University of California, Riverside. Taking an expansive view of education, Nájera shows how students’ experiences in college—both in and out of the classroom—can affect their activism and advocacy work. Students learn from their families, communities, peers, and student and political organizations. In these different spaces, they learn how to navigate community and college life as undocumented people. Students are able to engage campus organizations where they can cultivate their leadership skills and—importantly—learn that they are not alone. These students embody and mobilize their education through both large and small political actions such as protests, workshops for financial aid applications, and Know Your Rights events. As students create community with each other, they come to understand that their individual experiences of illegality are part of a larger structure of legal violence. This type of education empowers students to make their way to and through college, change their communities, and ultimately assert their humanity.</p>
<p>Jennifer R. Nájera is Associate Professor of Ethnic Studies at the University of California, Riverside.</p>
<p><a href="https://history.byu.edu/directory/david-james-gonzales" rel="noopener noreferrer">David-James Gonzales</a><em>&nbsp;(DJ) is Assistant Professor of History at Brigham Young University. He is a historian of migration, urbanization, and social movements in the U.S., and specializes in Latina/o/x politics and social movements.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="70584879" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/8032def2-13ce-47d4-a741-5f1d13b2c8f8/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=8032def2-13ce-47d4-a741-5f1d13b2c8f8&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Jennifer R. Nájera, &quot;Learning to Lead: Undocumented Students Mobilizing Education&quot; (Duke UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:13:31</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In Learning to Lead: Undocumented Students Mobilizing Education (Duke University Press, 2024), Jennifer R. Nájera explores the intersections of education and activism among undocumented students at the University of California, Riverside. Taking an expansive view of education, Nájera shows how students’ experiences in college—both in and out of the classroom—can affect their activism and advocacy work. Students learn from their families, communities, peers, and student and political organizations. In these different spaces, they learn how to navigate community and college life as undocumented people. Students are able to engage campus organizations where they can cultivate their leadership skills and—importantly—learn that they are not alone. These students embody and mobilize their education through both large and small political actions such as protests, workshops for financial aid applications, and Know Your Rights events. As students create community with each other, they come to understand that their individual experiences of illegality are part of a larger structure of legal violence. This type of education empowers students to make their way to and through college, change their communities, and ultimately assert their humanity.
Jennifer R. Nájera is Associate Professor of Ethnic Studies at the University of California, Riverside.
David-James Gonzales (DJ) is Assistant Professor of History at Brigham Young University. He is a historian of migration, urbanization, and social movements in the U.S., and specializes in Latina/o/x politics and social movements.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In Learning to Lead: Undocumented Students Mobilizing Education (Duke University Press, 2024), Jennifer R. Nájera explores the intersections of education and activism among undocumented students at the University of California, Riverside. Taking an expansive view of education, Nájera shows how students’ experiences in college—both in and out of the classroom—can affect their activism and advocacy work. Students learn from their families, communities, peers, and student and political organizations. In these different spaces, they learn how to navigate community and college life as undocumented people. Students are able to engage campus organizations where they can cultivate their leadership skills and—importantly—learn that they are not alone. These students embody and mobilize their education through both large and small political actions such as protests, workshops for financial aid applications, and Know Your Rights events. As students create community with each other, they come to understand that their individual experiences of illegality are part of a larger structure of legal violence. This type of education empowers students to make their way to and through college, change their communities, and ultimately assert their humanity.
Jennifer R. Nájera is Associate Professor of Ethnic Studies at the University of California, Riverside.
David-James Gonzales (DJ) is Assistant Professor of History at Brigham Young University. He is a historian of migration, urbanization, and social movements in the U.S., and specializes in Latina/o/x politics and social movements.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1537</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4c89c0d4-4daa-11f0-835f-279ef7177126</guid>
      <title>Vivian Kong, &quot;Multiracial Britishness: Global Networks in Hong Kong, 1910–45&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>What does it mean to be British? To answer this,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009202947" rel="noopener noreferrer">Multiracial Britishness: Global Networks in Hong Kong, 1910–45</a>&nbsp;(Cambridge UP, 2023) by Dr. Vivian Kong takes us to an underexplored site of Britishness – the former British colony of Hong Kong. Vivian Kong asks how colonial hierarchies, the racial and cultural diversity of the British Empire, and global ideologies complicate the meaning of being British. Using multi-lingual sources and oral history, Dr. Kong traces the experiences of multiracial residents in 1910-45 Hong Kong.</p>
<p>Guiding us through Hong Kong's global networks, and the colony's co-existing exclusive and cosmopolitan social spaces, this book uncovers the long history of multiracial Britishness. Dr. Kong argues that Britishness existed in the colony in multiple, hyphenated forms – as a racial category, but also as privileges, a means of survival, and a form of cultural and national belonging. This book offers us an important reminder that multiracial inhabitants of the British Empire were just as active in the making of Britishness as the British state and white Britons.</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/vivian-kong-multiracial-britishness-global-networks-in-hong-kong-191045-cambridge-up-2023-VqlLZOG9</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What does it mean to be British? To answer this,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009202947" rel="noopener noreferrer">Multiracial Britishness: Global Networks in Hong Kong, 1910–45</a>&nbsp;(Cambridge UP, 2023) by Dr. Vivian Kong takes us to an underexplored site of Britishness – the former British colony of Hong Kong. Vivian Kong asks how colonial hierarchies, the racial and cultural diversity of the British Empire, and global ideologies complicate the meaning of being British. Using multi-lingual sources and oral history, Dr. Kong traces the experiences of multiracial residents in 1910-45 Hong Kong.</p>
<p>Guiding us through Hong Kong's global networks, and the colony's co-existing exclusive and cosmopolitan social spaces, this book uncovers the long history of multiracial Britishness. Dr. Kong argues that Britishness existed in the colony in multiple, hyphenated forms – as a racial category, but also as privileges, a means of survival, and a form of cultural and national belonging. This book offers us an important reminder that multiracial inhabitants of the British Empire were just as active in the making of Britishness as the British state and white Britons.</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="57371522" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/d4b05b9e-bb06-4c63-8e2a-dc980ce4c48f/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=d4b05b9e-bb06-4c63-8e2a-dc980ce4c48f&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Vivian Kong, &quot;Multiracial Britishness: Global Networks in Hong Kong, 1910–45&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:59:45</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>What does it mean to be British? To answer this, Multiracial Britishness: Global Networks in Hong Kong, 1910–45 (Cambridge UP, 2023) by Dr. Vivian Kong takes us to an underexplored site of Britishness – the former British colony of Hong Kong. Vivian Kong asks how colonial hierarchies, the racial and cultural diversity of the British Empire, and global ideologies complicate the meaning of being British. Using multi-lingual sources and oral history, Dr. Kong traces the experiences of multiracial residents in 1910-45 Hong Kong.
Guiding us through Hong Kong&apos;s global networks, and the colony&apos;s co-existing exclusive and cosmopolitan social spaces, this book uncovers the long history of multiracial Britishness. Dr. Kong argues that Britishness existed in the colony in multiple, hyphenated forms – as a racial category, but also as privileges, a means of survival, and a form of cultural and national belonging. This book offers us an important reminder that multiracial inhabitants of the British Empire were just as active in the making of Britishness as the British state and white Britons.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>What does it mean to be British? To answer this, Multiracial Britishness: Global Networks in Hong Kong, 1910–45 (Cambridge UP, 2023) by Dr. Vivian Kong takes us to an underexplored site of Britishness – the former British colony of Hong Kong. Vivian Kong asks how colonial hierarchies, the racial and cultural diversity of the British Empire, and global ideologies complicate the meaning of being British. Using multi-lingual sources and oral history, Dr. Kong traces the experiences of multiracial residents in 1910-45 Hong Kong.
Guiding us through Hong Kong&apos;s global networks, and the colony&apos;s co-existing exclusive and cosmopolitan social spaces, this book uncovers the long history of multiracial Britishness. Dr. Kong argues that Britishness existed in the colony in multiple, hyphenated forms – as a racial category, but also as privileges, a means of survival, and a form of cultural and national belonging. This book offers us an important reminder that multiracial inhabitants of the British Empire were just as active in the making of Britishness as the British state and white Britons.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1536</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">60ca828c-4ca5-11f0-b0d9-e38be14bfc07</guid>
      <title>Judicial Territory: Law, Capital, and the Expansion of American Empire with Shaina Potts</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In this episode, we sit down with Shaina Potts, author of&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781478026488" rel="noopener noreferrer">Judicial Territory: Law, Capital, and the Expansion of American Empire</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Duke University Press, 2024)—a groundbreaking book that reveals how U.S. courts have quietly become instruments of global economic governance. Drawing on legal geography and a sharp understanding of finance and political economy, Shaina uncovers how American judicial authority has extended beyond borders to discipline postcolonial states, enforce the primacy of private property, and protect the rights of foreign investors. This legal reach—what she calls&nbsp;<em>judicial territory</em>—has been a crucial, yet overlooked, pillar of U.S. empire and the liberal international order.</p>
<p>The conversation unpacks how doctrines like foreign sovereign immunity and the act of state doctrine have enabled courts in New York and elsewhere to shape global capital flows, often treating foreign governments like private firms. Through detailed case studies—such as a startling instance where a U.S. court orders Ghana to seize an Argentine ship—we trace the long arc of legal imperialism from the Cold War through today’s multipolar tensions. We also ask: Could China or Russia create alternative legal geographies of power? What does the future hold for judicial authority in fields like tech regulation, climate, and global finance?</p>
<p><strong>GUEST BIO:&nbsp;</strong>Dr. Shaina Potts is an economic, legal, and political geographer and Associate Professor at UCLA. She focuses on the articulation of international political economy, geopolitics, and law. In the age of globalization, cross-border economic processes are often treated as placeless, ubiquitous flows, making nation-states and borders increasingly obsolete. Her work shows, in contrast, how transnational economic relations are inscribed in concrete and geographically specific legal and institutional practices and that states remain central to producing and governing this activity. Much of her research combines analyses of technical, economic, and legal processes with extensive historical and geopolitical contextualization to show how the perpetuation of North-South economic inequalities is shaped by the micro-operations of contracts, financial transactions, and law. A strand of her research focuses on financial geographies of sovereign debt, with a focus on debt crises in the Global South.</p>
<p>More on Shaina and research is available here:&nbsp;<a href="https://geog.ucla.edu/person/shaina-potts/" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://geog.ucla.edu/person/shaina-potts/</a></p>
<p><strong>LINKS TO RESOURCES:</strong></p>
<ul>
  <li>
<em>Judicial Territory: Law, Capital, and the Expansion of American Empire</em>:&nbsp;<a href="https://dukeupress.edu/judicial-territory" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://dukeupress.edu/judicial-territory</a>
</li>
  <li>Long-form essay on Shaina Potts'&nbsp;<em>Judicial Territory&nbsp;</em>by Ilias Alami:&nbsp;<a href="https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0308518X251342660" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0308518X251342660</a>
</li>
  <li>
<em>The Spectre of State Capitalism</em>&nbsp;by Ilias Alami and Adam Dixon:&nbsp;<a href="https://academic.oup.com/book/57552" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://academic.oup.com/book/57552</a>
</li>
</ul>
<p><em>Corporate Sovereignty Law and Government under Capitalism</em>&nbsp;by Joshua Barkan -&nbsp;<a href="https://www.upress.umn.edu/9780816674275/corporate-sovereignty/" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://www.upress.umn.edu/9780816674275/corporate-sovereignty/</a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/judicial-territory-law-capital-and-the-expansion-of-american-empire-with-shaina-potts-6gen_Zgr</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this episode, we sit down with Shaina Potts, author of&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781478026488" rel="noopener noreferrer">Judicial Territory: Law, Capital, and the Expansion of American Empire</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Duke University Press, 2024)—a groundbreaking book that reveals how U.S. courts have quietly become instruments of global economic governance. Drawing on legal geography and a sharp understanding of finance and political economy, Shaina uncovers how American judicial authority has extended beyond borders to discipline postcolonial states, enforce the primacy of private property, and protect the rights of foreign investors. This legal reach—what she calls&nbsp;<em>judicial territory</em>—has been a crucial, yet overlooked, pillar of U.S. empire and the liberal international order.</p>
<p>The conversation unpacks how doctrines like foreign sovereign immunity and the act of state doctrine have enabled courts in New York and elsewhere to shape global capital flows, often treating foreign governments like private firms. Through detailed case studies—such as a startling instance where a U.S. court orders Ghana to seize an Argentine ship—we trace the long arc of legal imperialism from the Cold War through today’s multipolar tensions. We also ask: Could China or Russia create alternative legal geographies of power? What does the future hold for judicial authority in fields like tech regulation, climate, and global finance?</p>
<p><strong>GUEST BIO:&nbsp;</strong>Dr. Shaina Potts is an economic, legal, and political geographer and Associate Professor at UCLA. She focuses on the articulation of international political economy, geopolitics, and law. In the age of globalization, cross-border economic processes are often treated as placeless, ubiquitous flows, making nation-states and borders increasingly obsolete. Her work shows, in contrast, how transnational economic relations are inscribed in concrete and geographically specific legal and institutional practices and that states remain central to producing and governing this activity. Much of her research combines analyses of technical, economic, and legal processes with extensive historical and geopolitical contextualization to show how the perpetuation of North-South economic inequalities is shaped by the micro-operations of contracts, financial transactions, and law. A strand of her research focuses on financial geographies of sovereign debt, with a focus on debt crises in the Global South.</p>
<p>More on Shaina and research is available here:&nbsp;<a href="https://geog.ucla.edu/person/shaina-potts/" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://geog.ucla.edu/person/shaina-potts/</a></p>
<p><strong>LINKS TO RESOURCES:</strong></p>
<ul>
  <li>
<em>Judicial Territory: Law, Capital, and the Expansion of American Empire</em>:&nbsp;<a href="https://dukeupress.edu/judicial-territory" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://dukeupress.edu/judicial-territory</a>
</li>
  <li>Long-form essay on Shaina Potts'&nbsp;<em>Judicial Territory&nbsp;</em>by Ilias Alami:&nbsp;<a href="https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0308518X251342660" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0308518X251342660</a>
</li>
  <li>
<em>The Spectre of State Capitalism</em>&nbsp;by Ilias Alami and Adam Dixon:&nbsp;<a href="https://academic.oup.com/book/57552" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://academic.oup.com/book/57552</a>
</li>
</ul>
<p><em>Corporate Sovereignty Law and Government under Capitalism</em>&nbsp;by Joshua Barkan -&nbsp;<a href="https://www.upress.umn.edu/9780816674275/corporate-sovereignty/" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://www.upress.umn.edu/9780816674275/corporate-sovereignty/</a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="40937013" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/149a9bd5-7384-4293-aa23-47bfd06b2d6a/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=149a9bd5-7384-4293-aa23-47bfd06b2d6a&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Judicial Territory: Law, Capital, and the Expansion of American Empire with Shaina Potts</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:42:38</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this episode, we sit down with Shaina Potts, author of Judicial Territory: Law, Capital, and the Expansion of American Empire (Duke University Press, 2024)—a groundbreaking book that reveals how U.S. courts have quietly become instruments of global economic governance. Drawing on legal geography and a sharp understanding of finance and political economy, Shaina uncovers how American judicial authority has extended beyond borders to discipline postcolonial states, enforce the primacy of private property, and protect the rights of foreign investors. This legal reach—what she calls judicial territory—has been a crucial, yet overlooked, pillar of U.S. empire and the liberal international order.
The conversation unpacks how doctrines like foreign sovereign immunity and the act of state doctrine have enabled courts in New York and elsewhere to shape global capital flows, often treating foreign governments like private firms. Through detailed case studies—such as a startling instance where a U.S. court orders Ghana to seize an Argentine ship—we trace the long arc of legal imperialism from the Cold War through today’s multipolar tensions. We also ask: Could China or Russia create alternative legal geographies of power? What does the future hold for judicial authority in fields like tech regulation, climate, and global finance?
GUEST BIO: Dr. Shaina Potts is an economic, legal, and political geographer and Associate Professor at UCLA. She focuses on the articulation of international political economy, geopolitics, and law. In the age of globalization, cross-border economic processes are often treated as placeless, ubiquitous flows, making nation-states and borders increasingly obsolete. Her work shows, in contrast, how transnational economic relations are inscribed in concrete and geographically specific legal and institutional practices and that states remain central to producing and governing this activity. Much of her research combines analyses of technical, economic, and legal processes with extensive historical and geopolitical contextualization to show how the perpetuation of North-South economic inequalities is shaped by the micro-operations of contracts, financial transactions, and law. A strand of her research focuses on financial geographies of sovereign debt, with a focus on debt crises in the Global South.
More on Shaina and research is available here: https://geog.ucla.edu/person/shaina-potts/
LINKS TO RESOURCES:
Judicial Territory: Law, Capital, and the Expansion of American Empire: https://dukeupress.edu/judicial-territory
 Long-form essay on Shaina Potts&apos; Judicial Territory by Ilias Alami: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0308518X251342660
The Spectre of State Capitalism by Ilias Alami and Adam Dixon: https://academic.oup.com/book/57552
Corporate Sovereignty Law and Government under Capitalism by Joshua Barkan - https://www.upress.umn.edu/9780816674275/corporate-sovereignty/
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode, we sit down with Shaina Potts, author of Judicial Territory: Law, Capital, and the Expansion of American Empire (Duke University Press, 2024)—a groundbreaking book that reveals how U.S. courts have quietly become instruments of global economic governance. Drawing on legal geography and a sharp understanding of finance and political economy, Shaina uncovers how American judicial authority has extended beyond borders to discipline postcolonial states, enforce the primacy of private property, and protect the rights of foreign investors. This legal reach—what she calls judicial territory—has been a crucial, yet overlooked, pillar of U.S. empire and the liberal international order.
The conversation unpacks how doctrines like foreign sovereign immunity and the act of state doctrine have enabled courts in New York and elsewhere to shape global capital flows, often treating foreign governments like private firms. Through detailed case studies—such as a startling instance where a U.S. court orders Ghana to seize an Argentine ship—we trace the long arc of legal imperialism from the Cold War through today’s multipolar tensions. We also ask: Could China or Russia create alternative legal geographies of power? What does the future hold for judicial authority in fields like tech regulation, climate, and global finance?
GUEST BIO: Dr. Shaina Potts is an economic, legal, and political geographer and Associate Professor at UCLA. She focuses on the articulation of international political economy, geopolitics, and law. In the age of globalization, cross-border economic processes are often treated as placeless, ubiquitous flows, making nation-states and borders increasingly obsolete. Her work shows, in contrast, how transnational economic relations are inscribed in concrete and geographically specific legal and institutional practices and that states remain central to producing and governing this activity. Much of her research combines analyses of technical, economic, and legal processes with extensive historical and geopolitical contextualization to show how the perpetuation of North-South economic inequalities is shaped by the micro-operations of contracts, financial transactions, and law. A strand of her research focuses on financial geographies of sovereign debt, with a focus on debt crises in the Global South.
More on Shaina and research is available here: https://geog.ucla.edu/person/shaina-potts/
LINKS TO RESOURCES:
Judicial Territory: Law, Capital, and the Expansion of American Empire: https://dukeupress.edu/judicial-territory
 Long-form essay on Shaina Potts&apos; Judicial Territory by Ilias Alami: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0308518X251342660
The Spectre of State Capitalism by Ilias Alami and Adam Dixon: https://academic.oup.com/book/57552
Corporate Sovereignty Law and Government under Capitalism by Joshua Barkan - https://www.upress.umn.edu/9780816674275/corporate-sovereignty/
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1535</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e0a09604-4a8e-11f0-9a8a-b3612c9944ee</guid>
      <title>Mark Somos, Matthew Cleary, Pablo Dufour, Edward Jones Corredera, and Emanuele Salerno, &quot;The Unseen History of International Law&quot; (Oxford UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780198952060" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Unseen History of International Law</em>&nbsp;</a>(Oxford University Press, 2025) locates and describes almost one thousand surviving copies of the first nine editions of Hugo Grotius' De iure belli ac pacis (IBP) published between 1625 and 1650. Meticulously reconstructing the publishing history of these first nine editions and cataloguing copies across hundreds of collections,&nbsp;<em>The Unseen History</em>&nbsp;provides fundamental data for reconstructing the impact of IBP across time and space. The authors, Dr. Mark Somos, Dr. Matthew Cleary, Dr. Pablo Dufour, Dr. Edward Jones Corredera, and Dr. Emanuele Salerno, also examined annotations that thousands of owners and readers have left in IBP copies over four centuries, offering original insights into the development of international law.<br>Grotius'&nbsp;<em>De iure belli ac pacis</em>&nbsp;has been commonly regarded as the foundation of modern international law since its first appearance in 1625. Most major international law scholars have engaged with IBP, often owning and richly annotating their own copies. At key moments - including the demise of the Holy Roman Empire, the fall of Napoleon, and the end of both world wars - IBP was reissued with new commentaries by multinational projects devoted to restarting the international order. Despite the enormous literature on IBP's reception and influence, we cannot fully understand its impact without uncovering the history of IBP as a physical object, with hundreds of thousands of unpublished annotations arguing or agreeing with the text, updating and adapting its contents.<br>Approaching Grotius' seminal work as a physical vehicle of the author's, the publishers', owners', and readers' engagement,&nbsp;<em>The Unseen History</em>&nbsp;radically expands and revises our understanding not only of IBP, but also of the academic discipline and lived practice of modern international law over the last four centuries. In addition to delving into the first nine editions' printing history, descriptive bibliography, and both Grotius' and the publishers' marketing and donation strategies, the book explores Grotius' subsequent impact on pro-slavery and abolitionist litigation as a case study of how the census' original findings can be applied to specific areas of reception.</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;new book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/mark-somos-matthew-cleary-pablo-dufour-edward-jones-corredera-and-emanuele-salerno-the-unseen-history-of-international-law-oxford-up-2025-8Q2xlft7</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780198952060" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Unseen History of International Law</em>&nbsp;</a>(Oxford University Press, 2025) locates and describes almost one thousand surviving copies of the first nine editions of Hugo Grotius' De iure belli ac pacis (IBP) published between 1625 and 1650. Meticulously reconstructing the publishing history of these first nine editions and cataloguing copies across hundreds of collections,&nbsp;<em>The Unseen History</em>&nbsp;provides fundamental data for reconstructing the impact of IBP across time and space. The authors, Dr. Mark Somos, Dr. Matthew Cleary, Dr. Pablo Dufour, Dr. Edward Jones Corredera, and Dr. Emanuele Salerno, also examined annotations that thousands of owners and readers have left in IBP copies over four centuries, offering original insights into the development of international law.<br>Grotius'&nbsp;<em>De iure belli ac pacis</em>&nbsp;has been commonly regarded as the foundation of modern international law since its first appearance in 1625. Most major international law scholars have engaged with IBP, often owning and richly annotating their own copies. At key moments - including the demise of the Holy Roman Empire, the fall of Napoleon, and the end of both world wars - IBP was reissued with new commentaries by multinational projects devoted to restarting the international order. Despite the enormous literature on IBP's reception and influence, we cannot fully understand its impact without uncovering the history of IBP as a physical object, with hundreds of thousands of unpublished annotations arguing or agreeing with the text, updating and adapting its contents.<br>Approaching Grotius' seminal work as a physical vehicle of the author's, the publishers', owners', and readers' engagement,&nbsp;<em>The Unseen History</em>&nbsp;radically expands and revises our understanding not only of IBP, but also of the academic discipline and lived practice of modern international law over the last four centuries. In addition to delving into the first nine editions' printing history, descriptive bibliography, and both Grotius' and the publishers' marketing and donation strategies, the book explores Grotius' subsequent impact on pro-slavery and abolitionist litigation as a case study of how the census' original findings can be applied to specific areas of reception.</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;new book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="55556070" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/9e3443bb-7e34-4102-9b6e-b0ca95ed32a7/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=9e3443bb-7e34-4102-9b6e-b0ca95ed32a7&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Mark Somos, Matthew Cleary, Pablo Dufour, Edward Jones Corredera, and Emanuele Salerno, &quot;The Unseen History of International Law&quot; (Oxford UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:57:52</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The Unseen History of International Law (Oxford University Press, 2025) locates and describes almost one thousand surviving copies of the first nine editions of Hugo Grotius&apos; De iure belli ac pacis (IBP) published between 1625 and 1650. Meticulously reconstructing the publishing history of these first nine editions and cataloguing copies across hundreds of collections, The Unseen History provides fundamental data for reconstructing the impact of IBP across time and space. The authors, Dr. Mark Somos, Dr. Matthew Cleary, Dr. Pablo Dufour, Dr. Edward Jones Corredera, and Dr. Emanuele Salerno, also examined annotations that thousands of owners and readers have left in IBP copies over four centuries, offering original insights into the development of international law.Grotius&apos; De iure belli ac pacis has been commonly regarded as the foundation of modern international law since its first appearance in 1625. Most major international law scholars have engaged with IBP, often owning and richly annotating their own copies. At key moments - including the demise of the Holy Roman Empire, the fall of Napoleon, and the end of both world wars - IBP was reissued with new commentaries by multinational projects devoted to restarting the international order. Despite the enormous literature on IBP&apos;s reception and influence, we cannot fully understand its impact without uncovering the history of IBP as a physical object, with hundreds of thousands of unpublished annotations arguing or agreeing with the text, updating and adapting its contents.Approaching Grotius&apos; seminal work as a physical vehicle of the author&apos;s, the publishers&apos;, owners&apos;, and readers&apos; engagement, The Unseen History radically expands and revises our understanding not only of IBP, but also of the academic discipline and lived practice of modern international law over the last four centuries. In addition to delving into the first nine editions&apos; printing history, descriptive bibliography, and both Grotius&apos; and the publishers&apos; marketing and donation strategies, the book explores Grotius&apos; subsequent impact on pro-slavery and abolitionist litigation as a case study of how the census&apos; original findings can be applied to specific areas of reception.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Unseen History of International Law (Oxford University Press, 2025) locates and describes almost one thousand surviving copies of the first nine editions of Hugo Grotius&apos; De iure belli ac pacis (IBP) published between 1625 and 1650. Meticulously reconstructing the publishing history of these first nine editions and cataloguing copies across hundreds of collections, The Unseen History provides fundamental data for reconstructing the impact of IBP across time and space. The authors, Dr. Mark Somos, Dr. Matthew Cleary, Dr. Pablo Dufour, Dr. Edward Jones Corredera, and Dr. Emanuele Salerno, also examined annotations that thousands of owners and readers have left in IBP copies over four centuries, offering original insights into the development of international law.Grotius&apos; De iure belli ac pacis has been commonly regarded as the foundation of modern international law since its first appearance in 1625. Most major international law scholars have engaged with IBP, often owning and richly annotating their own copies. At key moments - including the demise of the Holy Roman Empire, the fall of Napoleon, and the end of both world wars - IBP was reissued with new commentaries by multinational projects devoted to restarting the international order. Despite the enormous literature on IBP&apos;s reception and influence, we cannot fully understand its impact without uncovering the history of IBP as a physical object, with hundreds of thousands of unpublished annotations arguing or agreeing with the text, updating and adapting its contents.Approaching Grotius&apos; seminal work as a physical vehicle of the author&apos;s, the publishers&apos;, owners&apos;, and readers&apos; engagement, The Unseen History radically expands and revises our understanding not only of IBP, but also of the academic discipline and lived practice of modern international law over the last four centuries. In addition to delving into the first nine editions&apos; printing history, descriptive bibliography, and both Grotius&apos; and the publishers&apos; marketing and donation strategies, the book explores Grotius&apos; subsequent impact on pro-slavery and abolitionist litigation as a case study of how the census&apos; original findings can be applied to specific areas of reception.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1534</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">d15a5774-44f9-11f0-98fb-3785db7f4a88</guid>
      <title>The Freedom Academy</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>When Professor Asha Rangappa began posting online about the lessons she was teaching in the Yale University course on Russian intelligence and information warfare, the public took notice. Many reached out for a copy of the syllabus, and began lamenting that they couldn’t take her course. This led to the creation of a series of free lessons and presentations for the public through&nbsp;<a href="https://asharangappa.substack.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Freedom Academy&nbsp;</a>– which is Professor Rangappa’s popular Substack.</p>
<p>In this episode, we unpack key concepts taught by The Freedom Academy, including: how propaganda reaches us; the Alien Enemies Act of 1798; due process; civic literacy; the characteristics of truth tellers; transparency and accountability as pillars of democracy; and what happens when public trust erodes.</p>
<p>Our guest is: Asha Rangappa, who is assistant dean and a senior lecturer at Yale University’s Jackson School of Global Affairs and a former Associate Dean at Yale Law School. Prior to her current position, Asha served as a Special Agent in the New York Division of the FBI, specializing in counterintelligence investigations. Her work involved assessing threats to national security, conducting classified investigations on suspected foreign agents and performing undercover work. While in the FBI, Asha gained experience in electronic surveillance, interview and interrogation techniques, firearms and the use of deadly force. She received her law degree from Yale Law School where she was a Coker Fellow in Constitutional Law, and served as a law clerk to the Honorable Juan R. Torruella on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit in San Juan, Puerto Rico. She is admitted to the State Bar of New York (2003) and Connecticut (2003). Asha has published op-eds in&nbsp;<em>The New York Times</em>,&nbsp;<em>The Wall Street Journal</em>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<em>The Washington Post</em>&nbsp;among others and is currently a legal contributor for ABC News. She is on the board of editors of&nbsp;<em>Just Securit</em>y and a member of the Council of Foreign Relations. She created the popular Substack called The Freedom Academy.</p>
<p>Our host is:&nbsp;<a href="https://christinagessler.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. Christina Gessler</a>, who is the producer and show host of the Academic Life podcast. She holds a PhD in history, which she uses to explore what stories we tell and what happens to those we never tell. She works as a developmental editor for scholarly projects.</p>
<p>Playlist for listeners:</p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/immigration-realities" rel="noopener noreferrer">Immigration Realities</a></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/understanding-disinformation" rel="noopener noreferrer">Understanding Disinformation</a></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-ungrateful-refugee" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Ungrateful Refugee</a></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/where-is-home" rel="noopener noreferrer">Where is home?</a></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/who-gets-believed" rel="noopener noreferrer">Who gets believed?</a></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/belonging-the-science-of-creating-connection-and-bridging-divides" rel="noopener noreferrer">Belonging</a></p>
<p>Welcome to Academic Life, the podcast for your academic journey—and beyond! You can support the show by downloading and sharing episodes. Join us again to learn from more experts inside and outside the academy, and around the world. Missed any of the 250+ Academic Life episodes? Find them&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/up-partners/academic-life" rel="noopener noreferrer">here.</a>&nbsp;And thank you for listening!</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/the-freedom-academy-1tf_HkQX</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When Professor Asha Rangappa began posting online about the lessons she was teaching in the Yale University course on Russian intelligence and information warfare, the public took notice. Many reached out for a copy of the syllabus, and began lamenting that they couldn’t take her course. This led to the creation of a series of free lessons and presentations for the public through&nbsp;<a href="https://asharangappa.substack.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Freedom Academy&nbsp;</a>– which is Professor Rangappa’s popular Substack.</p>
<p>In this episode, we unpack key concepts taught by The Freedom Academy, including: how propaganda reaches us; the Alien Enemies Act of 1798; due process; civic literacy; the characteristics of truth tellers; transparency and accountability as pillars of democracy; and what happens when public trust erodes.</p>
<p>Our guest is: Asha Rangappa, who is assistant dean and a senior lecturer at Yale University’s Jackson School of Global Affairs and a former Associate Dean at Yale Law School. Prior to her current position, Asha served as a Special Agent in the New York Division of the FBI, specializing in counterintelligence investigations. Her work involved assessing threats to national security, conducting classified investigations on suspected foreign agents and performing undercover work. While in the FBI, Asha gained experience in electronic surveillance, interview and interrogation techniques, firearms and the use of deadly force. She received her law degree from Yale Law School where she was a Coker Fellow in Constitutional Law, and served as a law clerk to the Honorable Juan R. Torruella on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit in San Juan, Puerto Rico. She is admitted to the State Bar of New York (2003) and Connecticut (2003). Asha has published op-eds in&nbsp;<em>The New York Times</em>,&nbsp;<em>The Wall Street Journal</em>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<em>The Washington Post</em>&nbsp;among others and is currently a legal contributor for ABC News. She is on the board of editors of&nbsp;<em>Just Securit</em>y and a member of the Council of Foreign Relations. She created the popular Substack called The Freedom Academy.</p>
<p>Our host is:&nbsp;<a href="https://christinagessler.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. Christina Gessler</a>, who is the producer and show host of the Academic Life podcast. She holds a PhD in history, which she uses to explore what stories we tell and what happens to those we never tell. She works as a developmental editor for scholarly projects.</p>
<p>Playlist for listeners:</p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/immigration-realities" rel="noopener noreferrer">Immigration Realities</a></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/understanding-disinformation" rel="noopener noreferrer">Understanding Disinformation</a></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-ungrateful-refugee" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Ungrateful Refugee</a></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/where-is-home" rel="noopener noreferrer">Where is home?</a></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/who-gets-believed" rel="noopener noreferrer">Who gets believed?</a></p>
<p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/belonging-the-science-of-creating-connection-and-bridging-divides" rel="noopener noreferrer">Belonging</a></p>
<p>Welcome to Academic Life, the podcast for your academic journey—and beyond! You can support the show by downloading and sharing episodes. Join us again to learn from more experts inside and outside the academy, and around the world. Missed any of the 250+ Academic Life episodes? Find them&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/up-partners/academic-life" rel="noopener noreferrer">here.</a>&nbsp;And thank you for listening!</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="47612973" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/2b989ee3-8f4d-4cd9-aebd-2665edb5f49f/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=2b989ee3-8f4d-4cd9-aebd-2665edb5f49f&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>The Freedom Academy</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:49:35</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>When Professor Asha Rangappa began posting online about the lessons she was teaching in the Yale University course on Russian intelligence and information warfare, the public took notice. Many reached out for a copy of the syllabus, and began lamenting that they couldn’t take her course. This led to the creation of a series of free lessons and presentations for the public through The Freedom Academy – which is Professor Rangappa’s popular Substack.
In this episode, we unpack key concepts taught by The Freedom Academy, including: how propaganda reaches us; the Alien Enemies Act of 1798; due process; civic literacy; the characteristics of truth tellers; transparency and accountability as pillars of democracy; and what happens when public trust erodes.
Our guest is: Asha Rangappa, who is assistant dean and a senior lecturer at Yale University’s Jackson School of Global Affairs and a former Associate Dean at Yale Law School. Prior to her current position, Asha served as a Special Agent in the New York Division of the FBI, specializing in counterintelligence investigations. Her work involved assessing threats to national security, conducting classified investigations on suspected foreign agents and performing undercover work. While in the FBI, Asha gained experience in electronic surveillance, interview and interrogation techniques, firearms and the use of deadly force. She received her law degree from Yale Law School where she was a Coker Fellow in Constitutional Law, and served as a law clerk to the Honorable Juan R. Torruella on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit in San Juan, Puerto Rico. She is admitted to the State Bar of New York (2003) and Connecticut (2003). Asha has published op-eds in The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal and The Washington Post among others and is currently a legal contributor for ABC News. She is on the board of editors of Just Security and a member of the Council of Foreign Relations. She created the popular Substack called The Freedom Academy.
Our host is: Dr. Christina Gessler, who is the producer and show host of the Academic Life podcast. She holds a PhD in history, which she uses to explore what stories we tell and what happens to those we never tell. She works as a developmental editor for scholarly projects.
Playlist for listeners:
Immigration Realities
Understanding Disinformation
The Ungrateful Refugee
Where is home?
Who gets believed?
Belonging
Welcome to Academic Life, the podcast for your academic journey—and beyond! You can support the show by downloading and sharing episodes. Join us again to learn from more experts inside and outside the academy, and around the world. Missed any of the 250+ Academic Life episodes? Find them here. And thank you for listening!
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>When Professor Asha Rangappa began posting online about the lessons she was teaching in the Yale University course on Russian intelligence and information warfare, the public took notice. Many reached out for a copy of the syllabus, and began lamenting that they couldn’t take her course. This led to the creation of a series of free lessons and presentations for the public through The Freedom Academy – which is Professor Rangappa’s popular Substack.
In this episode, we unpack key concepts taught by The Freedom Academy, including: how propaganda reaches us; the Alien Enemies Act of 1798; due process; civic literacy; the characteristics of truth tellers; transparency and accountability as pillars of democracy; and what happens when public trust erodes.
Our guest is: Asha Rangappa, who is assistant dean and a senior lecturer at Yale University’s Jackson School of Global Affairs and a former Associate Dean at Yale Law School. Prior to her current position, Asha served as a Special Agent in the New York Division of the FBI, specializing in counterintelligence investigations. Her work involved assessing threats to national security, conducting classified investigations on suspected foreign agents and performing undercover work. While in the FBI, Asha gained experience in electronic surveillance, interview and interrogation techniques, firearms and the use of deadly force. She received her law degree from Yale Law School where she was a Coker Fellow in Constitutional Law, and served as a law clerk to the Honorable Juan R. Torruella on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit in San Juan, Puerto Rico. She is admitted to the State Bar of New York (2003) and Connecticut (2003). Asha has published op-eds in The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal and The Washington Post among others and is currently a legal contributor for ABC News. She is on the board of editors of Just Security and a member of the Council of Foreign Relations. She created the popular Substack called The Freedom Academy.
Our host is: Dr. Christina Gessler, who is the producer and show host of the Academic Life podcast. She holds a PhD in history, which she uses to explore what stories we tell and what happens to those we never tell. She works as a developmental editor for scholarly projects.
Playlist for listeners:
Immigration Realities
Understanding Disinformation
The Ungrateful Refugee
Where is home?
Who gets believed?
Belonging
Welcome to Academic Life, the podcast for your academic journey—and beyond! You can support the show by downloading and sharing episodes. Join us again to learn from more experts inside and outside the academy, and around the world. Missed any of the 250+ Academic Life episodes? Find them here. And thank you for listening!
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1533</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5967e8da-40f8-11f0-a60e-9fd5c7b000a3</guid>
      <title>Brando Simeo Starkey, &quot;Their Accomplices Wore Robes: How the Supreme Court Chained Black America to the Bottom of a Racial Caste System&quot; (Doubleday, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780385547383" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Their Accomplices Wore Robes:&nbsp;﻿How the Supreme Court Chained Black America to the Bottom of a Racial Caste System</em>&nbsp;</a>(Doubleday, 2025)&nbsp;takes readers from the Civil War era to the present and describes how the Supreme Court, even more than the presidency or Congress, aligned with the enemies of Black progress to undermine the promise of the Constitution’s Thirteenth, Fourteenth, and Fifteenth Amendments.<br>The Reconstruction Amendments, which sought to abolish slavery, establish equal protection under the law, and protect voting rights, converted the Constitution into a potent anti-caste document. But in the years since, the Supreme Court has refused to allow the amendments to fulfill that promise. Time and again, when petitioned to make the nation’s founding conceit, that all men are created equal, real for Black Americans, the nine black robes have chosen white supremacy over racial fairness.</p>
<p><em>Their Accomplices Wore Robes</em>&nbsp;brings to life dozens of cases and their rich casts of characters to explain how America arrived at this point and how society might arrive somewhere better, even as today’s federal courts lurch rightward.</p>
<p>Brando Simeo Starkey is a writer and scholar. A graduate of Harvard Law School and a member of the New York Bar, he taught law at Villanova Law School and wrote for several years for ESPN’s The Undefeated (now Andscape). Born and raised in Cincinnati, he lives in Southern California with his wife and two sons. You can find him online at&nbsp;<a href="https://thebraveverse.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Braveverse</a>, and on his&nbsp;<a href="https://www.youtube.com/@TheBraveverse" rel="noopener noreferrer">YouTube channel</a>&nbsp;of the same name.</p>
<p>You can find the host, Sullivan Summer,&nbsp;<a href="https://sullivansummer.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">online</a>, on&nbsp;<a href="https://www.instagram.com/thesullivansummer/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Instagram</a>, and at&nbsp;<a href="https://sullivansummer.substack.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Substack</a>, where she and Brando continue their conversation.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 6 Jun 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/brando-simeo-starkey-their-accomplices-wore-robes-how-the-supreme-court-chained-black-america-to-the-bottom-of-a-racial-caste-system-doubleday-2025-Izw9FI9y</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780385547383" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Their Accomplices Wore Robes:&nbsp;﻿How the Supreme Court Chained Black America to the Bottom of a Racial Caste System</em>&nbsp;</a>(Doubleday, 2025)&nbsp;takes readers from the Civil War era to the present and describes how the Supreme Court, even more than the presidency or Congress, aligned with the enemies of Black progress to undermine the promise of the Constitution’s Thirteenth, Fourteenth, and Fifteenth Amendments.<br>The Reconstruction Amendments, which sought to abolish slavery, establish equal protection under the law, and protect voting rights, converted the Constitution into a potent anti-caste document. But in the years since, the Supreme Court has refused to allow the amendments to fulfill that promise. Time and again, when petitioned to make the nation’s founding conceit, that all men are created equal, real for Black Americans, the nine black robes have chosen white supremacy over racial fairness.</p>
<p><em>Their Accomplices Wore Robes</em>&nbsp;brings to life dozens of cases and their rich casts of characters to explain how America arrived at this point and how society might arrive somewhere better, even as today’s federal courts lurch rightward.</p>
<p>Brando Simeo Starkey is a writer and scholar. A graduate of Harvard Law School and a member of the New York Bar, he taught law at Villanova Law School and wrote for several years for ESPN’s The Undefeated (now Andscape). Born and raised in Cincinnati, he lives in Southern California with his wife and two sons. You can find him online at&nbsp;<a href="https://thebraveverse.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Braveverse</a>, and on his&nbsp;<a href="https://www.youtube.com/@TheBraveverse" rel="noopener noreferrer">YouTube channel</a>&nbsp;of the same name.</p>
<p>You can find the host, Sullivan Summer,&nbsp;<a href="https://sullivansummer.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">online</a>, on&nbsp;<a href="https://www.instagram.com/thesullivansummer/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Instagram</a>, and at&nbsp;<a href="https://sullivansummer.substack.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Substack</a>, where she and Brando continue their conversation.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="52721617" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/b1f030e1-44a1-4ea1-b2d6-39090df5f108/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=b1f030e1-44a1-4ea1-b2d6-39090df5f108&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Brando Simeo Starkey, &quot;Their Accomplices Wore Robes: How the Supreme Court Chained Black America to the Bottom of a Racial Caste System&quot; (Doubleday, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:54:54</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Their Accomplices Wore Robes: ﻿How the Supreme Court Chained Black America to the Bottom of a Racial Caste System (Doubleday, 2025) takes readers from the Civil War era to the present and describes how the Supreme Court, even more than the presidency or Congress, aligned with the enemies of Black progress to undermine the promise of the Constitution’s Thirteenth, Fourteenth, and Fifteenth Amendments.The Reconstruction Amendments, which sought to abolish slavery, establish equal protection under the law, and protect voting rights, converted the Constitution into a potent anti-caste document. But in the years since, the Supreme Court has refused to allow the amendments to fulfill that promise. Time and again, when petitioned to make the nation’s founding conceit, that all men are created equal, real for Black Americans, the nine black robes have chosen white supremacy over racial fairness.
Their Accomplices Wore Robes brings to life dozens of cases and their rich casts of characters to explain how America arrived at this point and how society might arrive somewhere better, even as today’s federal courts lurch rightward.
Brando Simeo Starkey is a writer and scholar. A graduate of Harvard Law School and a member of the New York Bar, he taught law at Villanova Law School and wrote for several years for ESPN’s The Undefeated (now Andscape). Born and raised in Cincinnati, he lives in Southern California with his wife and two sons. You can find him online at The Braveverse, and on his YouTube channel of the same name.
You can find the host, Sullivan Summer, online, on Instagram, and at Substack, where she and Brando continue their conversation.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Their Accomplices Wore Robes: ﻿How the Supreme Court Chained Black America to the Bottom of a Racial Caste System (Doubleday, 2025) takes readers from the Civil War era to the present and describes how the Supreme Court, even more than the presidency or Congress, aligned with the enemies of Black progress to undermine the promise of the Constitution’s Thirteenth, Fourteenth, and Fifteenth Amendments.The Reconstruction Amendments, which sought to abolish slavery, establish equal protection under the law, and protect voting rights, converted the Constitution into a potent anti-caste document. But in the years since, the Supreme Court has refused to allow the amendments to fulfill that promise. Time and again, when petitioned to make the nation’s founding conceit, that all men are created equal, real for Black Americans, the nine black robes have chosen white supremacy over racial fairness.
Their Accomplices Wore Robes brings to life dozens of cases and their rich casts of characters to explain how America arrived at this point and how society might arrive somewhere better, even as today’s federal courts lurch rightward.
Brando Simeo Starkey is a writer and scholar. A graduate of Harvard Law School and a member of the New York Bar, he taught law at Villanova Law School and wrote for several years for ESPN’s The Undefeated (now Andscape). Born and raised in Cincinnati, he lives in Southern California with his wife and two sons. You can find him online at The Braveverse, and on his YouTube channel of the same name.
You can find the host, Sullivan Summer, online, on Instagram, and at Substack, where she and Brando continue their conversation.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1532</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2567b94a-3f89-11f0-a756-d7ee8ba89d89</guid>
      <title>Anthony C. Infanti, &quot;The Human Toll: Taxation and Slavery in Colonial America&quot; (NYU Press, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781479829866" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Human Toll: Taxation and Slavery in Colonial America</a>&nbsp;(NYU Press, 2025) by Anthony C. Infanti documents how the American colonies used tax law to dehumanize enslaved persons, taxing them alongside valuable commodities upon their forced arrival and then as wealth-generating assets in the hands of slaveholders. Dr. Infanti examines how taxation also proved to be an important component for subjugating and controlling enslaved persons, both through its shaping of the composition of new arrivals to the colonies and through its funding of financial compensation to slaveholders for the destruction of their “property” to ensure their cooperation in the administration of capital punishment. The variety of tax mechanisms chosen to fund slaveholder compensation payments conveyed messages about who was thought to benefit from—and, therefore, who should shoulder the burden of—slaveholder compensation while opening a revealing window into these colonial societies.<br>While the story of colonial tax law is intrinsically linked to advancing slavery and racism, Infanti reveals how several colonies used the power of taxation as a means of curtailing the slave trade. Though often self-interested, these efforts show how taxation can be used not only in the service of evil but also to correct societal injustices. Providing a fascinating account of slavery’s economic entrenchment through the history of American tax law,<em>&nbsp;The Human Toll</em>&nbsp;urges us to consider the lessons that fiscal history holds for those working in the reparations movement today.</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 3 Jun 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/anthony-c-infanti-the-human-toll-taxation-and-slavery-in-colonial-america-nyu-press-2025-Ub3JcdOZ</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781479829866" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Human Toll: Taxation and Slavery in Colonial America</a>&nbsp;(NYU Press, 2025) by Anthony C. Infanti documents how the American colonies used tax law to dehumanize enslaved persons, taxing them alongside valuable commodities upon their forced arrival and then as wealth-generating assets in the hands of slaveholders. Dr. Infanti examines how taxation also proved to be an important component for subjugating and controlling enslaved persons, both through its shaping of the composition of new arrivals to the colonies and through its funding of financial compensation to slaveholders for the destruction of their “property” to ensure their cooperation in the administration of capital punishment. The variety of tax mechanisms chosen to fund slaveholder compensation payments conveyed messages about who was thought to benefit from—and, therefore, who should shoulder the burden of—slaveholder compensation while opening a revealing window into these colonial societies.<br>While the story of colonial tax law is intrinsically linked to advancing slavery and racism, Infanti reveals how several colonies used the power of taxation as a means of curtailing the slave trade. Though often self-interested, these efforts show how taxation can be used not only in the service of evil but also to correct societal injustices. Providing a fascinating account of slavery’s economic entrenchment through the history of American tax law,<em>&nbsp;The Human Toll</em>&nbsp;urges us to consider the lessons that fiscal history holds for those working in the reparations movement today.</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="56677354" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/abd418f6-b33d-4d53-8d43-872fb5f252e1/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=abd418f6-b33d-4d53-8d43-872fb5f252e1&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Anthony C. Infanti, &quot;The Human Toll: Taxation and Slavery in Colonial America&quot; (NYU Press, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:59:02</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The Human Toll: Taxation and Slavery in Colonial America (NYU Press, 2025) by Anthony C. Infanti documents how the American colonies used tax law to dehumanize enslaved persons, taxing them alongside valuable commodities upon their forced arrival and then as wealth-generating assets in the hands of slaveholders. Dr. Infanti examines how taxation also proved to be an important component for subjugating and controlling enslaved persons, both through its shaping of the composition of new arrivals to the colonies and through its funding of financial compensation to slaveholders for the destruction of their “property” to ensure their cooperation in the administration of capital punishment. The variety of tax mechanisms chosen to fund slaveholder compensation payments conveyed messages about who was thought to benefit from—and, therefore, who should shoulder the burden of—slaveholder compensation while opening a revealing window into these colonial societies.While the story of colonial tax law is intrinsically linked to advancing slavery and racism, Infanti reveals how several colonies used the power of taxation as a means of curtailing the slave trade. Though often self-interested, these efforts show how taxation can be used not only in the service of evil but also to correct societal injustices. Providing a fascinating account of slavery’s economic entrenchment through the history of American tax law, The Human Toll urges us to consider the lessons that fiscal history holds for those working in the reparations movement today.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Human Toll: Taxation and Slavery in Colonial America (NYU Press, 2025) by Anthony C. Infanti documents how the American colonies used tax law to dehumanize enslaved persons, taxing them alongside valuable commodities upon their forced arrival and then as wealth-generating assets in the hands of slaveholders. Dr. Infanti examines how taxation also proved to be an important component for subjugating and controlling enslaved persons, both through its shaping of the composition of new arrivals to the colonies and through its funding of financial compensation to slaveholders for the destruction of their “property” to ensure their cooperation in the administration of capital punishment. The variety of tax mechanisms chosen to fund slaveholder compensation payments conveyed messages about who was thought to benefit from—and, therefore, who should shoulder the burden of—slaveholder compensation while opening a revealing window into these colonial societies.While the story of colonial tax law is intrinsically linked to advancing slavery and racism, Infanti reveals how several colonies used the power of taxation as a means of curtailing the slave trade. Though often self-interested, these efforts show how taxation can be used not only in the service of evil but also to correct societal injustices. Providing a fascinating account of slavery’s economic entrenchment through the history of American tax law, The Human Toll urges us to consider the lessons that fiscal history holds for those working in the reparations movement today.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1531</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">687b4de8-3d3e-11f0-baa4-d3391d9e6108</guid>
      <title>Carol A. Heimer, &quot;Governing the Global Clinic: HIV and the Legal Transformation of Medicine&quot; (University of Chicago Press, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>HIV emerged in the world at a time when medicine and healthcare were undergoing two major transformations: globalization and a turn toward legally inflected, rule-based ways of doing things. It accelerated both trends. While pestilence and disease are generally considered the domain of biological sciences and medicine, social arrangements—and law in particular—are also crucial.</p>
<p>Drawing on years of research in HIV clinics in the United States, Thailand, South Africa, and Uganda,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780226838625" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Governing the Global Clinic: HIV and the Legal Transformation of Medicine</em>&nbsp;</a>(University of Chicago Press, 2025) by Dr. Carol Heimer examines how growing norms of legalized accountability have altered the work of healthcare systems and how the effects of legalization vary across different national contexts. A key feature of legalism is universalistic language, but, in practice, rules are usually imported from richer countries (especially the United States) to poorer ones that have less adequate infrastructure and fewer resources with which to implement them. Challenging readers to reconsider the impulse to use law to organize and govern social life,&nbsp;<em>Governing the Global Clinic</em>&nbsp;poses difficult questions: When do rules solve problems, and when do they create new problems? When do rules become decoupled from ethics, and when do they lead to deeper moral commitments? When do rules reduce inequality? And when do they reflect, reproduce, and even amplify inequality?</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 2 Jun 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/carol-a-heimer-governing-the-global-clinic-hiv-and-the-legal-transformation-of-medicine-university-of-chicago-press-2025-xu6_2zN1</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HIV emerged in the world at a time when medicine and healthcare were undergoing two major transformations: globalization and a turn toward legally inflected, rule-based ways of doing things. It accelerated both trends. While pestilence and disease are generally considered the domain of biological sciences and medicine, social arrangements—and law in particular—are also crucial.</p>
<p>Drawing on years of research in HIV clinics in the United States, Thailand, South Africa, and Uganda,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780226838625" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Governing the Global Clinic: HIV and the Legal Transformation of Medicine</em>&nbsp;</a>(University of Chicago Press, 2025) by Dr. Carol Heimer examines how growing norms of legalized accountability have altered the work of healthcare systems and how the effects of legalization vary across different national contexts. A key feature of legalism is universalistic language, but, in practice, rules are usually imported from richer countries (especially the United States) to poorer ones that have less adequate infrastructure and fewer resources with which to implement them. Challenging readers to reconsider the impulse to use law to organize and govern social life,&nbsp;<em>Governing the Global Clinic</em>&nbsp;poses difficult questions: When do rules solve problems, and when do they create new problems? When do rules become decoupled from ethics, and when do they lead to deeper moral commitments? When do rules reduce inequality? And when do they reflect, reproduce, and even amplify inequality?</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="55458509" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/127cf42c-c6cc-4a35-b658-a06a3866585b/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=127cf42c-c6cc-4a35-b658-a06a3866585b&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Carol A. Heimer, &quot;Governing the Global Clinic: HIV and the Legal Transformation of Medicine&quot; (University of Chicago Press, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:57:45</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>HIV emerged in the world at a time when medicine and healthcare were undergoing two major transformations: globalization and a turn toward legally inflected, rule-based ways of doing things. It accelerated both trends. While pestilence and disease are generally considered the domain of biological sciences and medicine, social arrangements—and law in particular—are also crucial.
Drawing on years of research in HIV clinics in the United States, Thailand, South Africa, and Uganda, Governing the Global Clinic: HIV and the Legal Transformation of Medicine (University of Chicago Press, 2025) by Dr. Carol Heimer examines how growing norms of legalized accountability have altered the work of healthcare systems and how the effects of legalization vary across different national contexts. A key feature of legalism is universalistic language, but, in practice, rules are usually imported from richer countries (especially the United States) to poorer ones that have less adequate infrastructure and fewer resources with which to implement them. Challenging readers to reconsider the impulse to use law to organize and govern social life, Governing the Global Clinic poses difficult questions: When do rules solve problems, and when do they create new problems? When do rules become decoupled from ethics, and when do they lead to deeper moral commitments? When do rules reduce inequality? And when do they reflect, reproduce, and even amplify inequality?
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>HIV emerged in the world at a time when medicine and healthcare were undergoing two major transformations: globalization and a turn toward legally inflected, rule-based ways of doing things. It accelerated both trends. While pestilence and disease are generally considered the domain of biological sciences and medicine, social arrangements—and law in particular—are also crucial.
Drawing on years of research in HIV clinics in the United States, Thailand, South Africa, and Uganda, Governing the Global Clinic: HIV and the Legal Transformation of Medicine (University of Chicago Press, 2025) by Dr. Carol Heimer examines how growing norms of legalized accountability have altered the work of healthcare systems and how the effects of legalization vary across different national contexts. A key feature of legalism is universalistic language, but, in practice, rules are usually imported from richer countries (especially the United States) to poorer ones that have less adequate infrastructure and fewer resources with which to implement them. Challenging readers to reconsider the impulse to use law to organize and govern social life, Governing the Global Clinic poses difficult questions: When do rules solve problems, and when do they create new problems? When do rules become decoupled from ethics, and when do they lead to deeper moral commitments? When do rules reduce inequality? And when do they reflect, reproduce, and even amplify inequality?
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1530</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8efe3fd0-3bcb-11f0-a2a0-3fc22966c785</guid>
      <title>S4 E40 Interpretations of the Second Amendment: A Conversation with Joel Alicea</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The Supreme Court’s ruling in 2022 changed the established methodology for evaluating Second Amendment cases. What was the existing methodology, and what does this shift signify for future interpretations?</p>
<p>We sit down with Joel Alicea, Professor of Law and Director, the Center for the Constitution and the Catholic Intellectual Tradition at the Columbus School of Law at the Catholic University of America.</p>
<p>We discuss the implication of the Supreme Court's 2022 decision in&nbsp;<em>New York State Rifle &amp; Pistol Association v. Bruen</em>&nbsp;and the new methodology relates to originalist interpretations. He answers questions on how courts define “tradition” when using it as legal reasoning, and the limitations it can pose. Finally, Alicea offers a nuanced perspective on the application of gun rights in America with recognition of America’s complicated relationship with firearms.</p>
<p><a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/podcast" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Madison’s Notes</em></a>&nbsp;is the podcast of Princeton&nbsp;<a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions</em></a><em>.</em></p>
<p><em>Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/s4-e40-interpretations-of-the-second-amendment-a-conversation-with-joel-alicea-zGV7_sJ4</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Supreme Court’s ruling in 2022 changed the established methodology for evaluating Second Amendment cases. What was the existing methodology, and what does this shift signify for future interpretations?</p>
<p>We sit down with Joel Alicea, Professor of Law and Director, the Center for the Constitution and the Catholic Intellectual Tradition at the Columbus School of Law at the Catholic University of America.</p>
<p>We discuss the implication of the Supreme Court's 2022 decision in&nbsp;<em>New York State Rifle &amp; Pistol Association v. Bruen</em>&nbsp;and the new methodology relates to originalist interpretations. He answers questions on how courts define “tradition” when using it as legal reasoning, and the limitations it can pose. Finally, Alicea offers a nuanced perspective on the application of gun rights in America with recognition of America’s complicated relationship with firearms.</p>
<p><a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/podcast" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Madison’s Notes</em></a>&nbsp;is the podcast of Princeton&nbsp;<a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions</em></a><em>.</em></p>
<p><em>Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="36145834" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/be3b0de8-8d1f-4d80-a6ad-957bb59ca2fb/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=be3b0de8-8d1f-4d80-a6ad-957bb59ca2fb&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>S4 E40 Interpretations of the Second Amendment: A Conversation with Joel Alicea</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:37:38</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The Supreme Court’s ruling in 2022 changed the established methodology for evaluating Second Amendment cases. What was the existing methodology, and what does this shift signify for future interpretations?
We sit down with Joel Alicea, Professor of Law and Director, the Center for the Constitution and the Catholic Intellectual Tradition at the Columbus School of Law at the Catholic University of America.
We discuss the implication of the Supreme Court&apos;s 2022 decision in New York State Rifle &amp; Pistol Association v. Bruen and the new methodology relates to originalist interpretations. He answers questions on how courts define “tradition” when using it as legal reasoning, and the limitations it can pose. Finally, Alicea offers a nuanced perspective on the application of gun rights in America with recognition of America’s complicated relationship with firearms.
Madison’s Notes is the podcast of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions.
Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Supreme Court’s ruling in 2022 changed the established methodology for evaluating Second Amendment cases. What was the existing methodology, and what does this shift signify for future interpretations?
We sit down with Joel Alicea, Professor of Law and Director, the Center for the Constitution and the Catholic Intellectual Tradition at the Columbus School of Law at the Catholic University of America.
We discuss the implication of the Supreme Court&apos;s 2022 decision in New York State Rifle &amp; Pistol Association v. Bruen and the new methodology relates to originalist interpretations. He answers questions on how courts define “tradition” when using it as legal reasoning, and the limitations it can pose. Finally, Alicea offers a nuanced perspective on the application of gun rights in America with recognition of America’s complicated relationship with firearms.
Madison’s Notes is the podcast of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions.
Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1529</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ecf4dd14-33e3-11f0-8c12-6b2c18a1597d</guid>
      <title>Postcript: Calibrating the Outrage-Democratic Erosion, Legality, and Politics</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>We’ve been focusing on the dynamics of democratic backsliding in the United States and beyond. In this episode of&nbsp;<em>Postscript: Conversations on Politics and Political Science</em>, Susan talks the co-founder and co-director of the Democratic Erosion Consortium, Dr. Robert Blair about how the Consortium offers FREE resources to teachers, students, journalists, policy makers, and any interested person – including shared syllabus, readings, assignments, YouTube virtual roundtables, and policy briefs. Rob defines democratic erosion and offers critical insights on the importance of interdisciplinarity, calibrating outrage, and distinguishing between policy disputes and the erosion of democracy. He offers a clear-headed analysis of what is legal v. what breaks down democracy that is not to be missed. We conclude with thoughts on what&nbsp;<em>everyone&nbsp;</em>can do protect democracy.</p>
<p><a href="https://democratic-erosion.org/team/robert-blair/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. Robert Blair</a>&nbsp;is Associate Professor of Political Science and International and Public Affairs at Brown University and co-founder and co-director of the&nbsp;<a href="https://democratic-erosion.org/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Democratic Erosion Consortium</a>. He studies the consolidation of state authority after civil war, with an emphasis on rule of law and security institutions, as well as the causes and consequences of democratic backsliding. His book,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781108799812" rel="noopener noreferrer">Peacekeeping, Policing, and the Rule of Law after Civil War</a>, was published in 2020 with Cambridge University Press and his articles appear in political science outlets such as&nbsp;<em>American Political Science Review, American Journal of Political Science</em>,&nbsp;<em>Journal of Politics, Comparative Political Studies,&nbsp;</em>and&nbsp;<em>International Organization&nbsp;</em>but also science journals such as&nbsp;<em>Science</em>,&nbsp;<em>Nature Human</em>&nbsp;<em>Behaviour</em>, or&nbsp;<em>Current Opinion in Psychology</em>.</p>
<p>Mentioned:</p>
<ul>
  <li>
<a href="https://www.insidehighered.com/opinion/views/2025/04/07/federal-grant-cuts-researchers-own-words-opinion" rel="noopener noreferrer">Inside Higher Ed piece on grants terminated by the Trump administration</a>, including one that funded the Democratic Erosion Consortium</li>
  <li>“<a href="https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/ps-political-science-and-politics/article/an-eventsbased-approach-to-understanding-democratic-erosion/C480012CCF036A733DAD3A1766B2E2C0" rel="noopener noreferrer">An Events-Based Approach to Understanding Democratic Erosion</a>,”&nbsp;<em>P/S Political Science &amp; Politics</em>&nbsp;by Rob, Hannah Baron, Jessica Gottlieb, and Laura Paler summarizes their data collection efforts on democratic backsliding</li>
  <li>A&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/admin/entries/episodes/%E2%80%A2%09https:/www.cambridge.org/core/journals/ps-political-science-and-politics/issue/12A606668335B19419BDDCBE19E68266" rel="noopener noreferrer">special issue of&nbsp;<em>P/S Political Science &amp; Politics</em></a>&nbsp;on the study of democratic backsliding</li>
  <li>An academic article on&nbsp;<a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352250X2300177X?dgcid=author" rel="noopener noreferrer">combatting misinformation from&nbsp;<em>Current Opinion in Psychology</em></a>&nbsp;by Rob, Jessica Gottlieb, Brendan Nyhan, Laura Paler, Pablo Argote, and Charlene J. Stainfield</li>
  <li>
<a href="https://democratic-erosion.org/about/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Democratic Erosion Project website</a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a href="https://democratic-erosion.org/dataset/" rel="noopener noreferrer">data set</a>
</li>
  <li>Chris Geidner,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.lawdork.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Law Dork: Supreme Court, Law, Politics, and More</a>&nbsp;Substack</li>
  <li>Center for Systemic Peace’s&nbsp;<a href="https://www.systemicpeace.org/polityproject.html" rel="noopener noreferrer">Polity Project</a>&nbsp;coding authority characteristics of states in the world system</li>
  <li>University of Notre Dame’s&nbsp;<a href="https://kellogg.nd.edu/research/major-research-initiatives/varieties-democracy-project" rel="noopener noreferrer">V-Dem Project</a>&nbsp;measuring democracy</li>
  <li>Rob mentioned Brazil as a fruitful comparison for the US. He is particularly focused on how the courts can defend democratic institutions and processes – and how hard it can be to know where to draw the line between courts protecting vs. assailing democracy, and to know when the line has been crossed. Two gift articles from&nbsp;<em>The New York Times</em>&nbsp;<a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/16/world/americas/brazil-supreme-court-expanded-powers-democracy.html?unlocked_article_code=1.G08.ol7k.kKcFGSvQfcKo&amp;smid=url-share" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2022/09/26/world/americas/bolsonaro-brazil-supreme-court.html?unlocked_article_code=1.G08.lToi.uaQSQR1dYRgi&amp;smid=url-share" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a>.</li>
  <li>Contact info for Rob:&nbsp;<a href="mailto:robert_blair@brown.edu" rel="noopener noreferrer">robert_blair@brown.edu</a>
</li>
  <li>Follow Rob and Democratic Erosion Consortium on social media: @robert_a_blair on X, @DemErosionDEC on X, @robertblair.bsky.social on BlueSky, @demerosiondec.bsky.social on BlueSky</li>
</ul><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/postcript-calibrating-the-outrage-democratic-erosion-legality-and-politics-_PXDCsc2</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We’ve been focusing on the dynamics of democratic backsliding in the United States and beyond. In this episode of&nbsp;<em>Postscript: Conversations on Politics and Political Science</em>, Susan talks the co-founder and co-director of the Democratic Erosion Consortium, Dr. Robert Blair about how the Consortium offers FREE resources to teachers, students, journalists, policy makers, and any interested person – including shared syllabus, readings, assignments, YouTube virtual roundtables, and policy briefs. Rob defines democratic erosion and offers critical insights on the importance of interdisciplinarity, calibrating outrage, and distinguishing between policy disputes and the erosion of democracy. He offers a clear-headed analysis of what is legal v. what breaks down democracy that is not to be missed. We conclude with thoughts on what&nbsp;<em>everyone&nbsp;</em>can do protect democracy.</p>
<p><a href="https://democratic-erosion.org/team/robert-blair/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. Robert Blair</a>&nbsp;is Associate Professor of Political Science and International and Public Affairs at Brown University and co-founder and co-director of the&nbsp;<a href="https://democratic-erosion.org/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Democratic Erosion Consortium</a>. He studies the consolidation of state authority after civil war, with an emphasis on rule of law and security institutions, as well as the causes and consequences of democratic backsliding. His book,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781108799812" rel="noopener noreferrer">Peacekeeping, Policing, and the Rule of Law after Civil War</a>, was published in 2020 with Cambridge University Press and his articles appear in political science outlets such as&nbsp;<em>American Political Science Review, American Journal of Political Science</em>,&nbsp;<em>Journal of Politics, Comparative Political Studies,&nbsp;</em>and&nbsp;<em>International Organization&nbsp;</em>but also science journals such as&nbsp;<em>Science</em>,&nbsp;<em>Nature Human</em>&nbsp;<em>Behaviour</em>, or&nbsp;<em>Current Opinion in Psychology</em>.</p>
<p>Mentioned:</p>
<ul>
  <li>
<a href="https://www.insidehighered.com/opinion/views/2025/04/07/federal-grant-cuts-researchers-own-words-opinion" rel="noopener noreferrer">Inside Higher Ed piece on grants terminated by the Trump administration</a>, including one that funded the Democratic Erosion Consortium</li>
  <li>“<a href="https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/ps-political-science-and-politics/article/an-eventsbased-approach-to-understanding-democratic-erosion/C480012CCF036A733DAD3A1766B2E2C0" rel="noopener noreferrer">An Events-Based Approach to Understanding Democratic Erosion</a>,”&nbsp;<em>P/S Political Science &amp; Politics</em>&nbsp;by Rob, Hannah Baron, Jessica Gottlieb, and Laura Paler summarizes their data collection efforts on democratic backsliding</li>
  <li>A&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/admin/entries/episodes/%E2%80%A2%09https:/www.cambridge.org/core/journals/ps-political-science-and-politics/issue/12A606668335B19419BDDCBE19E68266" rel="noopener noreferrer">special issue of&nbsp;<em>P/S Political Science &amp; Politics</em></a>&nbsp;on the study of democratic backsliding</li>
  <li>An academic article on&nbsp;<a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352250X2300177X?dgcid=author" rel="noopener noreferrer">combatting misinformation from&nbsp;<em>Current Opinion in Psychology</em></a>&nbsp;by Rob, Jessica Gottlieb, Brendan Nyhan, Laura Paler, Pablo Argote, and Charlene J. Stainfield</li>
  <li>
<a href="https://democratic-erosion.org/about/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Democratic Erosion Project website</a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a href="https://democratic-erosion.org/dataset/" rel="noopener noreferrer">data set</a>
</li>
  <li>Chris Geidner,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.lawdork.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Law Dork: Supreme Court, Law, Politics, and More</a>&nbsp;Substack</li>
  <li>Center for Systemic Peace’s&nbsp;<a href="https://www.systemicpeace.org/polityproject.html" rel="noopener noreferrer">Polity Project</a>&nbsp;coding authority characteristics of states in the world system</li>
  <li>University of Notre Dame’s&nbsp;<a href="https://kellogg.nd.edu/research/major-research-initiatives/varieties-democracy-project" rel="noopener noreferrer">V-Dem Project</a>&nbsp;measuring democracy</li>
  <li>Rob mentioned Brazil as a fruitful comparison for the US. He is particularly focused on how the courts can defend democratic institutions and processes – and how hard it can be to know where to draw the line between courts protecting vs. assailing democracy, and to know when the line has been crossed. Two gift articles from&nbsp;<em>The New York Times</em>&nbsp;<a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/16/world/americas/brazil-supreme-court-expanded-powers-democracy.html?unlocked_article_code=1.G08.ol7k.kKcFGSvQfcKo&amp;smid=url-share" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2022/09/26/world/americas/bolsonaro-brazil-supreme-court.html?unlocked_article_code=1.G08.lToi.uaQSQR1dYRgi&amp;smid=url-share" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a>.</li>
  <li>Contact info for Rob:&nbsp;<a href="mailto:robert_blair@brown.edu" rel="noopener noreferrer">robert_blair@brown.edu</a>
</li>
  <li>Follow Rob and Democratic Erosion Consortium on social media: @robert_a_blair on X, @DemErosionDEC on X, @robertblair.bsky.social on BlueSky, @demerosiondec.bsky.social on BlueSky</li>
</ul><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="37140056" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/e3089da3-9ebf-41a7-a107-e628a978548b/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=e3089da3-9ebf-41a7-a107-e628a978548b&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Postcript: Calibrating the Outrage-Democratic Erosion, Legality, and Politics</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:38:40</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>We’ve been focusing on the dynamics of democratic backsliding in the United States and beyond. In this episode of Postscript: Conversations on Politics and Political Science, Susan talks the co-founder and co-director of the Democratic Erosion Consortium, Dr. Robert Blair about how the Consortium offers FREE resources to teachers, students, journalists, policy makers, and any interested person – including shared syllabus, readings, assignments, YouTube virtual roundtables, and policy briefs. Rob defines democratic erosion and offers critical insights on the importance of interdisciplinarity, calibrating outrage, and distinguishing between policy disputes and the erosion of democracy. He offers a clear-headed analysis of what is legal v. what breaks down democracy that is not to be missed. We conclude with thoughts on what everyone can do protect democracy.
Dr. Robert Blair is Associate Professor of Political Science and International and Public Affairs at Brown University and co-founder and co-director of the Democratic Erosion Consortium. He studies the consolidation of state authority after civil war, with an emphasis on rule of law and security institutions, as well as the causes and consequences of democratic backsliding. His book, Peacekeeping, Policing, and the Rule of Law after Civil War, was published in 2020 with Cambridge University Press and his articles appear in political science outlets such as American Political Science Review, American Journal of Political Science, Journal of Politics, Comparative Political Studies, and International Organization but also science journals such as Science, Nature Human Behaviour, or Current Opinion in Psychology.
Mentioned:
Inside Higher Ed piece on grants terminated by the Trump administration, including one that funded the Democratic Erosion Consortium
 “An Events-Based Approach to Understanding Democratic Erosion,” P/S Political Science &amp; Politics by Rob, Hannah Baron, Jessica Gottlieb, and Laura Paler summarizes their data collection efforts on democratic backsliding
 A special issue of P/S Political Science &amp; Politics on the study of democratic backsliding
 An academic article on combatting misinformation from Current Opinion in Psychology by Rob, Jessica Gottlieb, Brendan Nyhan, Laura Paler, Pablo Argote, and Charlene J. Stainfield
Democratic Erosion Project website and data set
 Chris Geidner, Law Dork: Supreme Court, Law, Politics, and More Substack
 Center for Systemic Peace’s Polity Project coding authority characteristics of states in the world system
 University of Notre Dame’s V-Dem Project measuring democracy
 Rob mentioned Brazil as a fruitful comparison for the US. He is particularly focused on how the courts can defend democratic institutions and processes – and how hard it can be to know where to draw the line between courts protecting vs. assailing democracy, and to know when the line has been crossed. Two gift articles from The New York Times here and here.
 Contact info for Rob: robert_blair@brown.edu
 Follow Rob and Democratic Erosion Consortium on social media: @robert_a_blair on X, @DemErosionDEC on X, @robertblair.bsky.social on BlueSky, @demerosiondec.bsky.social on BlueSky
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>We’ve been focusing on the dynamics of democratic backsliding in the United States and beyond. In this episode of Postscript: Conversations on Politics and Political Science, Susan talks the co-founder and co-director of the Democratic Erosion Consortium, Dr. Robert Blair about how the Consortium offers FREE resources to teachers, students, journalists, policy makers, and any interested person – including shared syllabus, readings, assignments, YouTube virtual roundtables, and policy briefs. Rob defines democratic erosion and offers critical insights on the importance of interdisciplinarity, calibrating outrage, and distinguishing between policy disputes and the erosion of democracy. He offers a clear-headed analysis of what is legal v. what breaks down democracy that is not to be missed. We conclude with thoughts on what everyone can do protect democracy.
Dr. Robert Blair is Associate Professor of Political Science and International and Public Affairs at Brown University and co-founder and co-director of the Democratic Erosion Consortium. He studies the consolidation of state authority after civil war, with an emphasis on rule of law and security institutions, as well as the causes and consequences of democratic backsliding. His book, Peacekeeping, Policing, and the Rule of Law after Civil War, was published in 2020 with Cambridge University Press and his articles appear in political science outlets such as American Political Science Review, American Journal of Political Science, Journal of Politics, Comparative Political Studies, and International Organization but also science journals such as Science, Nature Human Behaviour, or Current Opinion in Psychology.
Mentioned:
Inside Higher Ed piece on grants terminated by the Trump administration, including one that funded the Democratic Erosion Consortium
 “An Events-Based Approach to Understanding Democratic Erosion,” P/S Political Science &amp; Politics by Rob, Hannah Baron, Jessica Gottlieb, and Laura Paler summarizes their data collection efforts on democratic backsliding
 A special issue of P/S Political Science &amp; Politics on the study of democratic backsliding
 An academic article on combatting misinformation from Current Opinion in Psychology by Rob, Jessica Gottlieb, Brendan Nyhan, Laura Paler, Pablo Argote, and Charlene J. Stainfield
Democratic Erosion Project website and data set
 Chris Geidner, Law Dork: Supreme Court, Law, Politics, and More Substack
 Center for Systemic Peace’s Polity Project coding authority characteristics of states in the world system
 University of Notre Dame’s V-Dem Project measuring democracy
 Rob mentioned Brazil as a fruitful comparison for the US. He is particularly focused on how the courts can defend democratic institutions and processes – and how hard it can be to know where to draw the line between courts protecting vs. assailing democracy, and to know when the line has been crossed. Two gift articles from The New York Times here and here.
 Contact info for Rob: robert_blair@brown.edu
 Follow Rob and Democratic Erosion Consortium on social media: @robert_a_blair on X, @DemErosionDEC on X, @robertblair.bsky.social on BlueSky, @demerosiondec.bsky.social on BlueSky
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1528</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5ea2be2e-3662-11f0-9e6a-9bb184f20b74</guid>
      <title>Executive Power and the President Who Would Not Be King: A Conversation with Michael McConnell</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In this episode of&nbsp;<em>Madison’s Notes</em>, Michael McConnell examines the gap between the Founders’ vision of a limited presidency and today’s expansive executive power. Drawing on his book&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691234199" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The President Who Would Not Be King</em>&nbsp;</a>(Princeton University Press, 2022), we discuss how the Constitution’s safeguards against monarchical authority have eroded over the past century—and what steps might restore balance to our system of government. From war powers to administrative overreach, the conversation tackles the urgent question: How did we get here, and what can be done?</p>
<p>Michael McConnell is a renowned constitutional scholar, Stanford Law professor, and former federal judge on the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals. A leading voice on originalism and separation of powers, his work bridges historical intent and modern legal debates, making him the perfect guide for this critical discussion.</p>
<p><a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/podcast" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Madison’s Notes</em></a>&nbsp;is the podcast of Princeton&nbsp;<a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions</em></a><em>.</em></p>
<p><em>Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/executive-power-and-the-president-who-would-not-be-king-a-conversation-with-michael-mcconnell-SBDIDz7p</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this episode of&nbsp;<em>Madison’s Notes</em>, Michael McConnell examines the gap between the Founders’ vision of a limited presidency and today’s expansive executive power. Drawing on his book&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691234199" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The President Who Would Not Be King</em>&nbsp;</a>(Princeton University Press, 2022), we discuss how the Constitution’s safeguards against monarchical authority have eroded over the past century—and what steps might restore balance to our system of government. From war powers to administrative overreach, the conversation tackles the urgent question: How did we get here, and what can be done?</p>
<p>Michael McConnell is a renowned constitutional scholar, Stanford Law professor, and former federal judge on the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals. A leading voice on originalism and separation of powers, his work bridges historical intent and modern legal debates, making him the perfect guide for this critical discussion.</p>
<p><a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/podcast" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Madison’s Notes</em></a>&nbsp;is the podcast of Princeton&nbsp;<a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions</em></a><em>.</em></p>
<p><em>Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="48330692" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/6ef8738b-e196-4769-ad8b-8b7d74d39bc6/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=6ef8738b-e196-4769-ad8b-8b7d74d39bc6&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Executive Power and the President Who Would Not Be King: A Conversation with Michael McConnell</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:50:20</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this episode of Madison’s Notes, Michael McConnell examines the gap between the Founders’ vision of a limited presidency and today’s expansive executive power. Drawing on his book The President Who Would Not Be King (Princeton University Press, 2022), we discuss how the Constitution’s safeguards against monarchical authority have eroded over the past century—and what steps might restore balance to our system of government. From war powers to administrative overreach, the conversation tackles the urgent question: How did we get here, and what can be done?
Michael McConnell is a renowned constitutional scholar, Stanford Law professor, and former federal judge on the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals. A leading voice on originalism and separation of powers, his work bridges historical intent and modern legal debates, making him the perfect guide for this critical discussion.
Madison’s Notes is the podcast of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions.
Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode of Madison’s Notes, Michael McConnell examines the gap between the Founders’ vision of a limited presidency and today’s expansive executive power. Drawing on his book The President Who Would Not Be King (Princeton University Press, 2022), we discuss how the Constitution’s safeguards against monarchical authority have eroded over the past century—and what steps might restore balance to our system of government. From war powers to administrative overreach, the conversation tackles the urgent question: How did we get here, and what can be done?
Michael McConnell is a renowned constitutional scholar, Stanford Law professor, and former federal judge on the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals. A leading voice on originalism and separation of powers, his work bridges historical intent and modern legal debates, making him the perfect guide for this critical discussion.
Madison’s Notes is the podcast of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions.
Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>151</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">c3f787e4-333f-11f0-b4d3-4ba3ad4f7a03</guid>
      <title>Nicholas Barry et al., &quot;Constitutional Conventions: Theories, Practices and Dynamics&quot; (Routledge, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781032828336" rel="noopener noreferrer">Constitutional Conventions: Theories, Practices and Dynamics</a>&nbsp;(Routledge, 2025)&nbsp;is&nbsp;an excellent edited volume exploring the various ways in which governments and constitutional structures operate in the spaces that are not necessarily articulated in law, edict, or formal documents. This is not a text about the folks who gathered together in 1787 in Philadelphia, or even those who wrote new constitutional structures after the fall of the Berlin Wall. Conventions means the rules that govern the interactions between political actors and the governments they inhabit. In many ways, this refers to the kinds of norms that have grown up around different parts of the systems of government. The strength and endurance of those rules or norms can change over time and in response to crises or dynamic changes.&nbsp;<em>Constitutional Conventions: Theories, Practices, and Dynamics&nbsp;</em>explores these thick and thin dimensions of the governing structures from a comparative perspective, taking up Anglo and American systems in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia. The book also examines the cases of Hungary and Czechia (the Czech Republic), two post-Cold War systems; and finally, also, China.</p>
<p>In considering these constitutional conventions, we can think of them as structures or engagement that is not enforced by the courts, since these are not, per se, written constitutional laws. In long standing liberal democracies, there is an inclination towards adhering to conventions. But when these conventions are under strain, how they work, or maintain “regular order” becomes a critical test within the established governmental systems.&nbsp;<em>Constitutional Conventions</em>&nbsp;provides another dimension of significant interest in the discussion of how China works within these kinds of conventions within the process in which political individuals come up through the governmental and party systems and move into leadership roles. The comparative case study of Hungary and Czechia indicates that even in somewhat similar structures, the conventions and norms are not always the same.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.routledge.com/Constitutional-Conventions-Theories-Practices-and-Dynamics/Barry-Miragliotta-Nwokora-Patapan/p/book/9781032828336?srsltid=AfmBOopd_4GSkR9uwK27O2f_wM-kDWm-YGv_sgM76YI5jKAvdlzYRZnt" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Constitutional Conventions: Theories, Practices, and Dynamics</em></a>&nbsp;is an important analysis of the ways in which governmental structures work beyond what is written or built as the official system. The discussions cover theoretical, practical, and comparative dimensions of our understandings of the processes and functions of governments.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-editor of&nbsp;</em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700633883/the-politics-of-the-marvel-cinematic-universe/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe</em></a><em>&nbsp;(University Press of Kansas, 2022), as well as co-editor of the award winning book,</em><a href="https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/081314101X/ref=dbs_a_def_rwt_bibl_vppi_i0" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;</a><a href="https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/081314101X/ref=dbs_a_def_rwt_bibl_vppi_i0" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a><em>&nbsp;(University Press of Kentucky, 2012), Email her comments at lgoren@carrollu.edu or send her missives at Bluesky&nbsp;</em><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/gorenlj.bsky.social" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>@gorenlj</em></a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/nicholas-barry-et-al-constitutional-conventions-theories-practices-and-dynamics-routledge-2025-TcK0_qZa</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781032828336" rel="noopener noreferrer">Constitutional Conventions: Theories, Practices and Dynamics</a>&nbsp;(Routledge, 2025)&nbsp;is&nbsp;an excellent edited volume exploring the various ways in which governments and constitutional structures operate in the spaces that are not necessarily articulated in law, edict, or formal documents. This is not a text about the folks who gathered together in 1787 in Philadelphia, or even those who wrote new constitutional structures after the fall of the Berlin Wall. Conventions means the rules that govern the interactions between political actors and the governments they inhabit. In many ways, this refers to the kinds of norms that have grown up around different parts of the systems of government. The strength and endurance of those rules or norms can change over time and in response to crises or dynamic changes.&nbsp;<em>Constitutional Conventions: Theories, Practices, and Dynamics&nbsp;</em>explores these thick and thin dimensions of the governing structures from a comparative perspective, taking up Anglo and American systems in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia. The book also examines the cases of Hungary and Czechia (the Czech Republic), two post-Cold War systems; and finally, also, China.</p>
<p>In considering these constitutional conventions, we can think of them as structures or engagement that is not enforced by the courts, since these are not, per se, written constitutional laws. In long standing liberal democracies, there is an inclination towards adhering to conventions. But when these conventions are under strain, how they work, or maintain “regular order” becomes a critical test within the established governmental systems.&nbsp;<em>Constitutional Conventions</em>&nbsp;provides another dimension of significant interest in the discussion of how China works within these kinds of conventions within the process in which political individuals come up through the governmental and party systems and move into leadership roles. The comparative case study of Hungary and Czechia indicates that even in somewhat similar structures, the conventions and norms are not always the same.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.routledge.com/Constitutional-Conventions-Theories-Practices-and-Dynamics/Barry-Miragliotta-Nwokora-Patapan/p/book/9781032828336?srsltid=AfmBOopd_4GSkR9uwK27O2f_wM-kDWm-YGv_sgM76YI5jKAvdlzYRZnt" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Constitutional Conventions: Theories, Practices, and Dynamics</em></a>&nbsp;is an important analysis of the ways in which governmental structures work beyond what is written or built as the official system. The discussions cover theoretical, practical, and comparative dimensions of our understandings of the processes and functions of governments.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-editor of&nbsp;</em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700633883/the-politics-of-the-marvel-cinematic-universe/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe</em></a><em>&nbsp;(University Press of Kansas, 2022), as well as co-editor of the award winning book,</em><a href="https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/081314101X/ref=dbs_a_def_rwt_bibl_vppi_i0" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;</a><a href="https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/081314101X/ref=dbs_a_def_rwt_bibl_vppi_i0" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a><em>&nbsp;(University Press of Kentucky, 2012), Email her comments at lgoren@carrollu.edu or send her missives at Bluesky&nbsp;</em><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/gorenlj.bsky.social" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>@gorenlj</em></a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="43997051" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/a87fedcf-c1cc-4f9d-b067-450ca67d976d/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=a87fedcf-c1cc-4f9d-b067-450ca67d976d&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Nicholas Barry et al., &quot;Constitutional Conventions: Theories, Practices and Dynamics&quot; (Routledge, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:45:49</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Constitutional Conventions: Theories, Practices and Dynamics (Routledge, 2025) is an excellent edited volume exploring the various ways in which governments and constitutional structures operate in the spaces that are not necessarily articulated in law, edict, or formal documents. This is not a text about the folks who gathered together in 1787 in Philadelphia, or even those who wrote new constitutional structures after the fall of the Berlin Wall. Conventions means the rules that govern the interactions between political actors and the governments they inhabit. In many ways, this refers to the kinds of norms that have grown up around different parts of the systems of government. The strength and endurance of those rules or norms can change over time and in response to crises or dynamic changes. Constitutional Conventions: Theories, Practices, and Dynamics explores these thick and thin dimensions of the governing structures from a comparative perspective, taking up Anglo and American systems in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia. The book also examines the cases of Hungary and Czechia (the Czech Republic), two post-Cold War systems; and finally, also, China.
In considering these constitutional conventions, we can think of them as structures or engagement that is not enforced by the courts, since these are not, per se, written constitutional laws. In long standing liberal democracies, there is an inclination towards adhering to conventions. But when these conventions are under strain, how they work, or maintain “regular order” becomes a critical test within the established governmental systems. Constitutional Conventions provides another dimension of significant interest in the discussion of how China works within these kinds of conventions within the process in which political individuals come up through the governmental and party systems and move into leadership roles. The comparative case study of Hungary and Czechia indicates that even in somewhat similar structures, the conventions and norms are not always the same.
Constitutional Conventions: Theories, Practices, and Dynamics is an important analysis of the ways in which governmental structures work beyond what is written or built as the official system. The discussions cover theoretical, practical, and comparative dimensions of our understandings of the processes and functions of governments.
Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-editor of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe (University Press of Kansas, 2022), as well as co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kentucky, 2012), Email her comments at lgoren@carrollu.edu or send her missives at Bluesky @gorenlj.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Constitutional Conventions: Theories, Practices and Dynamics (Routledge, 2025) is an excellent edited volume exploring the various ways in which governments and constitutional structures operate in the spaces that are not necessarily articulated in law, edict, or formal documents. This is not a text about the folks who gathered together in 1787 in Philadelphia, or even those who wrote new constitutional structures after the fall of the Berlin Wall. Conventions means the rules that govern the interactions between political actors and the governments they inhabit. In many ways, this refers to the kinds of norms that have grown up around different parts of the systems of government. The strength and endurance of those rules or norms can change over time and in response to crises or dynamic changes. Constitutional Conventions: Theories, Practices, and Dynamics explores these thick and thin dimensions of the governing structures from a comparative perspective, taking up Anglo and American systems in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia. The book also examines the cases of Hungary and Czechia (the Czech Republic), two post-Cold War systems; and finally, also, China.
In considering these constitutional conventions, we can think of them as structures or engagement that is not enforced by the courts, since these are not, per se, written constitutional laws. In long standing liberal democracies, there is an inclination towards adhering to conventions. But when these conventions are under strain, how they work, or maintain “regular order” becomes a critical test within the established governmental systems. Constitutional Conventions provides another dimension of significant interest in the discussion of how China works within these kinds of conventions within the process in which political individuals come up through the governmental and party systems and move into leadership roles. The comparative case study of Hungary and Czechia indicates that even in somewhat similar structures, the conventions and norms are not always the same.
Constitutional Conventions: Theories, Practices, and Dynamics is an important analysis of the ways in which governmental structures work beyond what is written or built as the official system. The discussions cover theoretical, practical, and comparative dimensions of our understandings of the processes and functions of governments.
Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-editor of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe (University Press of Kansas, 2022), as well as co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kentucky, 2012), Email her comments at lgoren@carrollu.edu or send her missives at Bluesky @gorenlj.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>767</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">93f351f4-3335-11f0-abc4-2fd298daf141</guid>
      <title>Tamara Lea Spira, &quot;Queering Families: Reproductive Justice in Precarious Times&quot; (U California Press, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Envisioning queer futures where we lovingly wager everything for the world's children, the planet, and all living beings against all odds, and in increasingly precarious times. Tamara Lea Spira's&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/admin/entries/episodes/undefined/a/12343/9780520386204" rel="noopener noreferrer">Queering Families: Reproductive Justice in Precarious Times</a>&nbsp;(U California Press, 2025)&nbsp;traces the shifting dominant meanings of queer family from the late twentieth century to today. With this book, Spira highlights the growing embrace of normative family structures by LGBTQ+ movements--calling into question how many queers, once deemed unfit to parent, have become contradictory agents within the US empire's racial and colonial agendas. Simultaneously, Queering Families celebrates the rich history of queer reproductive justice, from the radical movements of the 1970s through the present, led by Black, decolonial, and queer of color feminist activists. Ultimately, Spira argues that queering reproductive justice impels us to build communities of care to cherish and uphold the lives of those who, defying normativity's violent stranglehold, are deemed to be unworthy of life. She issues the call to lovingly wager a future for the world's children, the planet, and all living beings against all odds, and in increasingly perilous times.</p>
<p>Shui-yin Sharon Yam is Professor of Writing, Rhetoric, and Digital Studies at the University of Kentucky. She is the author of&nbsp;<a href="https://ohiostatepress.org/books/titles/9780814214091.html" rel="noopener noreferrer">Inconvenient Strangers:&nbsp;Transnational Subjects and the Politics of Citizenship</a><em>&nbsp;</em>and more recently,<a href="https://www.press.jhu.edu/books/title/53812/doing-gender-justice" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;<em>Doing Gender Justice: Queering Reproduction, Kin and Care&nbsp;</em></a>(co-authored withe Natalie Fixmer-Oraiz).</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/tamara-lea-spira-queering-families-reproductive-justice-in-precarious-times-u-california-press-2025-27V9ovlE</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Envisioning queer futures where we lovingly wager everything for the world's children, the planet, and all living beings against all odds, and in increasingly precarious times. Tamara Lea Spira's&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/admin/entries/episodes/undefined/a/12343/9780520386204" rel="noopener noreferrer">Queering Families: Reproductive Justice in Precarious Times</a>&nbsp;(U California Press, 2025)&nbsp;traces the shifting dominant meanings of queer family from the late twentieth century to today. With this book, Spira highlights the growing embrace of normative family structures by LGBTQ+ movements--calling into question how many queers, once deemed unfit to parent, have become contradictory agents within the US empire's racial and colonial agendas. Simultaneously, Queering Families celebrates the rich history of queer reproductive justice, from the radical movements of the 1970s through the present, led by Black, decolonial, and queer of color feminist activists. Ultimately, Spira argues that queering reproductive justice impels us to build communities of care to cherish and uphold the lives of those who, defying normativity's violent stranglehold, are deemed to be unworthy of life. She issues the call to lovingly wager a future for the world's children, the planet, and all living beings against all odds, and in increasingly perilous times.</p>
<p>Shui-yin Sharon Yam is Professor of Writing, Rhetoric, and Digital Studies at the University of Kentucky. She is the author of&nbsp;<a href="https://ohiostatepress.org/books/titles/9780814214091.html" rel="noopener noreferrer">Inconvenient Strangers:&nbsp;Transnational Subjects and the Politics of Citizenship</a><em>&nbsp;</em>and more recently,<a href="https://www.press.jhu.edu/books/title/53812/doing-gender-justice" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;<em>Doing Gender Justice: Queering Reproduction, Kin and Care&nbsp;</em></a>(co-authored withe Natalie Fixmer-Oraiz).</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="56080995" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/6f9efa41-cf59-4298-acad-da4e717aab0b/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=6f9efa41-cf59-4298-acad-da4e717aab0b&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Tamara Lea Spira, &quot;Queering Families: Reproductive Justice in Precarious Times&quot; (U California Press, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:58:24</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Envisioning queer futures where we lovingly wager everything for the world&apos;s children, the planet, and all living beings against all odds, and in increasingly precarious times. Tamara Lea Spira&apos;s Queering Families: Reproductive Justice in Precarious Times (U California Press, 2025) traces the shifting dominant meanings of queer family from the late twentieth century to today. With this book, Spira highlights the growing embrace of normative family structures by LGBTQ+ movements--calling into question how many queers, once deemed unfit to parent, have become contradictory agents within the US empire&apos;s racial and colonial agendas. Simultaneously, Queering Families celebrates the rich history of queer reproductive justice, from the radical movements of the 1970s through the present, led by Black, decolonial, and queer of color feminist activists. Ultimately, Spira argues that queering reproductive justice impels us to build communities of care to cherish and uphold the lives of those who, defying normativity&apos;s violent stranglehold, are deemed to be unworthy of life. She issues the call to lovingly wager a future for the world&apos;s children, the planet, and all living beings against all odds, and in increasingly perilous times.
Shui-yin Sharon Yam is Professor of Writing, Rhetoric, and Digital Studies at the University of Kentucky. She is the author of Inconvenient Strangers: Transnational Subjects and the Politics of Citizenship and more recently, Doing Gender Justice: Queering Reproduction, Kin and Care (co-authored withe Natalie Fixmer-Oraiz).
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Envisioning queer futures where we lovingly wager everything for the world&apos;s children, the planet, and all living beings against all odds, and in increasingly precarious times. Tamara Lea Spira&apos;s Queering Families: Reproductive Justice in Precarious Times (U California Press, 2025) traces the shifting dominant meanings of queer family from the late twentieth century to today. With this book, Spira highlights the growing embrace of normative family structures by LGBTQ+ movements--calling into question how many queers, once deemed unfit to parent, have become contradictory agents within the US empire&apos;s racial and colonial agendas. Simultaneously, Queering Families celebrates the rich history of queer reproductive justice, from the radical movements of the 1970s through the present, led by Black, decolonial, and queer of color feminist activists. Ultimately, Spira argues that queering reproductive justice impels us to build communities of care to cherish and uphold the lives of those who, defying normativity&apos;s violent stranglehold, are deemed to be unworthy of life. She issues the call to lovingly wager a future for the world&apos;s children, the planet, and all living beings against all odds, and in increasingly perilous times.
Shui-yin Sharon Yam is Professor of Writing, Rhetoric, and Digital Studies at the University of Kentucky. She is the author of Inconvenient Strangers: Transnational Subjects and the Politics of Citizenship and more recently, Doing Gender Justice: Queering Reproduction, Kin and Care (co-authored withe Natalie Fixmer-Oraiz).
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>252</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ff716c6a-327f-11f0-b468-d38b26397e3c</guid>
      <title>Dionne Koller, &quot;More Than Play: How Law, Policy, and Politics Shape American Youth Sport&quot; (U California Press, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Tens of millions of children in the United States participate in youth sport, a pastime widely believed to be part of a good childhood. Yet most children who enter youth sport are driven to quit by the time they enter adolescence, and many more are sidelined by its high financial burdens. Until now, there has been little legal scholarly attention paid to youth sport or its reform. In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780520399266" rel="noopener noreferrer">More Than Play: How Law, Policy, and Politics Shape American Youth Sport</a>&nbsp;(University of California Press, 2025) Dr. Dionne Koller sets the stage for a different approach by illuminating the law and policy assumptions supporting a model that puts children's bodies to work in an activity that generates significant surplus value. In doing so, she identifies the wide array of beneficiaries who have a stake in a system that is much more than just play—and the political choices that protect these parties' interests at children's expense.</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/dionne-koller-more-than-play-how-law-policy-and-politics-shape-american-youth-sport-u-california-press-2025-Fjwo3zx5</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tens of millions of children in the United States participate in youth sport, a pastime widely believed to be part of a good childhood. Yet most children who enter youth sport are driven to quit by the time they enter adolescence, and many more are sidelined by its high financial burdens. Until now, there has been little legal scholarly attention paid to youth sport or its reform. In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780520399266" rel="noopener noreferrer">More Than Play: How Law, Policy, and Politics Shape American Youth Sport</a>&nbsp;(University of California Press, 2025) Dr. Dionne Koller sets the stage for a different approach by illuminating the law and policy assumptions supporting a model that puts children's bodies to work in an activity that generates significant surplus value. In doing so, she identifies the wide array of beneficiaries who have a stake in a system that is much more than just play—and the political choices that protect these parties' interests at children's expense.</p>
<p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="27966723" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/13cd879a-b045-4cfc-aaec-7e0b66b06059/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=13cd879a-b045-4cfc-aaec-7e0b66b06059&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Dionne Koller, &quot;More Than Play: How Law, Policy, and Politics Shape American Youth Sport&quot; (U California Press, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:29:07</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Tens of millions of children in the United States participate in youth sport, a pastime widely believed to be part of a good childhood. Yet most children who enter youth sport are driven to quit by the time they enter adolescence, and many more are sidelined by its high financial burdens. Until now, there has been little legal scholarly attention paid to youth sport or its reform. In More Than Play: How Law, Policy, and Politics Shape American Youth Sport (University of California Press, 2025) Dr. Dionne Koller sets the stage for a different approach by illuminating the law and policy assumptions supporting a model that puts children&apos;s bodies to work in an activity that generates significant surplus value. In doing so, she identifies the wide array of beneficiaries who have a stake in a system that is much more than just play—and the political choices that protect these parties&apos; interests at children&apos;s expense.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Tens of millions of children in the United States participate in youth sport, a pastime widely believed to be part of a good childhood. Yet most children who enter youth sport are driven to quit by the time they enter adolescence, and many more are sidelined by its high financial burdens. Until now, there has been little legal scholarly attention paid to youth sport or its reform. In More Than Play: How Law, Policy, and Politics Shape American Youth Sport (University of California Press, 2025) Dr. Dionne Koller sets the stage for a different approach by illuminating the law and policy assumptions supporting a model that puts children&apos;s bodies to work in an activity that generates significant surplus value. In doing so, she identifies the wide array of beneficiaries who have a stake in a system that is much more than just play—and the political choices that protect these parties&apos; interests at children&apos;s expense.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>291</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">49ada9b6-2f6e-11f0-99a3-035ebc45e041</guid>
      <title>Jeanne Sheehan, &quot;American Democracy in Crisis: The Case for Rethinking Madisonian Government Post January 6&quot; (Palgrave Macmillan, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9783031667107" rel="noopener noreferrer">American Democracy in Crisis: The Case for Rethinking Madisonian Government Post January 6</a>&nbsp;(Palgrave Macmillan, 2024) analyzes the roots of widespread disenchantment with American government. While blame often falls on the individuals in office, they are not operating in isolation. Rather they are working within a system designed by the Framers with one goal in mind, protectionism. Although the Framers got much right, their commitment to protection of liberty led them to design a system replete with divisions of power. Whatever its merits at the founding, the government today is frequently described as dysfunctional and far too often unresponsive to the majority, unaccountable, and unable to deliver for its people.&nbsp;</p>
<p>For those disillusioned with the current state of government and committed to effectuating meaningful change, this book advocates in favor of a fundamental reassessment of the system's primary objectives, followed by deliberation as to how it should be restructured accordingly. It not only presents specific reform proposals, but it ends with a stark warning: until and unless we embrace reasoned structural reform, we cannot be surprised if at some point the people become so frustrated that they either disengage, fight back, or seek solace in autocratic alternatives.&nbsp;</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/jeanne-sheehan-american-democracy-in-crisis-the-case-for-rethinking-madisonian-government-post-january-6-palgrave-macmillan-2024-cllOriNl</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9783031667107" rel="noopener noreferrer">American Democracy in Crisis: The Case for Rethinking Madisonian Government Post January 6</a>&nbsp;(Palgrave Macmillan, 2024) analyzes the roots of widespread disenchantment with American government. While blame often falls on the individuals in office, they are not operating in isolation. Rather they are working within a system designed by the Framers with one goal in mind, protectionism. Although the Framers got much right, their commitment to protection of liberty led them to design a system replete with divisions of power. Whatever its merits at the founding, the government today is frequently described as dysfunctional and far too often unresponsive to the majority, unaccountable, and unable to deliver for its people.&nbsp;</p>
<p>For those disillusioned with the current state of government and committed to effectuating meaningful change, this book advocates in favor of a fundamental reassessment of the system's primary objectives, followed by deliberation as to how it should be restructured accordingly. It not only presents specific reform proposals, but it ends with a stark warning: until and unless we embrace reasoned structural reform, we cannot be surprised if at some point the people become so frustrated that they either disengage, fight back, or seek solace in autocratic alternatives.&nbsp;</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="33102823" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/5a902d07-5b99-4fa2-848b-29d9a1efa06a/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=5a902d07-5b99-4fa2-848b-29d9a1efa06a&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Jeanne Sheehan, &quot;American Democracy in Crisis: The Case for Rethinking Madisonian Government Post January 6&quot; (Palgrave Macmillan, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:34:28</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>American Democracy in Crisis: The Case for Rethinking Madisonian Government Post January 6 (Palgrave Macmillan, 2024) analyzes the roots of widespread disenchantment with American government. While blame often falls on the individuals in office, they are not operating in isolation. Rather they are working within a system designed by the Framers with one goal in mind, protectionism. Although the Framers got much right, their commitment to protection of liberty led them to design a system replete with divisions of power. Whatever its merits at the founding, the government today is frequently described as dysfunctional and far too often unresponsive to the majority, unaccountable, and unable to deliver for its people. 
For those disillusioned with the current state of government and committed to effectuating meaningful change, this book advocates in favor of a fundamental reassessment of the system&apos;s primary objectives, followed by deliberation as to how it should be restructured accordingly. It not only presents specific reform proposals, but it ends with a stark warning: until and unless we embrace reasoned structural reform, we cannot be surprised if at some point the people become so frustrated that they either disengage, fight back, or seek solace in autocratic alternatives. 
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>American Democracy in Crisis: The Case for Rethinking Madisonian Government Post January 6 (Palgrave Macmillan, 2024) analyzes the roots of widespread disenchantment with American government. While blame often falls on the individuals in office, they are not operating in isolation. Rather they are working within a system designed by the Framers with one goal in mind, protectionism. Although the Framers got much right, their commitment to protection of liberty led them to design a system replete with divisions of power. Whatever its merits at the founding, the government today is frequently described as dysfunctional and far too often unresponsive to the majority, unaccountable, and unable to deliver for its people. 
For those disillusioned with the current state of government and committed to effectuating meaningful change, this book advocates in favor of a fundamental reassessment of the system&apos;s primary objectives, followed by deliberation as to how it should be restructured accordingly. It not only presents specific reform proposals, but it ends with a stark warning: until and unless we embrace reasoned structural reform, we cannot be surprised if at some point the people become so frustrated that they either disengage, fight back, or seek solace in autocratic alternatives. 
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>208</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">cfe7cac6-2e96-11f0-afdf-d7024fecd6d5</guid>
      <title>Jennifer Holt, &quot;Cloud Policy: A History of Regulating Pipelines, Platforms, and Data&quot; (MIT Press, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>How the United States' regulation of broadband pipelines, digital platforms, and data—together understood as “the cloud”—has eroded civil liberties, democratic principles, and the foundation of the public interest over the past century.</p>
<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780262548069" rel="noopener noreferrer">Cloud Policy: A History of Regulating Pipelines, Platforms, and Data</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(MIT Press, 2024) is a policy history that chronicles how the past century of regulating media infrastructure in the United States has eroded global civil liberties as well as democratic principles and the foundation of the public interest. Jennifer Holt explores the long arc of regulating broadband pipelines, digital platforms, and the data centers that serve as the cloud's storage facilities—an evolution that is connected to the development of nineteenth- and twentieth-century media and networks, including railroads, highways, telephony, radio, and television. In the process,&nbsp;<em>Cloud Policy&nbsp;</em>unearths the lasting inscriptions of policy written for an analog era and markets that no longer exist on the contemporary governance of digital cloud infrastructure.<br><em>Cloud Policy</em>&nbsp;brings together numerous perspectives that have thus far remained largely siloed in their respective fields of law, policy, economics, and media studies. The resulting interdisciplinary argument reveals a properly scaled view of the massive challenge facing policymakers today. Holt also addresses the evolving role of the state in the regulation of global cloud infrastructure and the growing influence of corporate gatekeepers and private sector self-governance. Cloud policy's trajectory, as Holt explains, has enacted a transformation in the cultural valuation of infrastructure as civic good, turning it into a tool of commercial profit generation. Despite these current predicaments, the book's historical lens ultimately helps the reader to envision restorative interventions and new forms of activism to create a more equitable future for infrastructure policy.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/jennifer-holt-cloud-policy-a-history-of-regulating-pipelines-platforms-and-data-mit-press-2024-jm7KP9G3</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How the United States' regulation of broadband pipelines, digital platforms, and data—together understood as “the cloud”—has eroded civil liberties, democratic principles, and the foundation of the public interest over the past century.</p>
<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780262548069" rel="noopener noreferrer">Cloud Policy: A History of Regulating Pipelines, Platforms, and Data</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(MIT Press, 2024) is a policy history that chronicles how the past century of regulating media infrastructure in the United States has eroded global civil liberties as well as democratic principles and the foundation of the public interest. Jennifer Holt explores the long arc of regulating broadband pipelines, digital platforms, and the data centers that serve as the cloud's storage facilities—an evolution that is connected to the development of nineteenth- and twentieth-century media and networks, including railroads, highways, telephony, radio, and television. In the process,&nbsp;<em>Cloud Policy&nbsp;</em>unearths the lasting inscriptions of policy written for an analog era and markets that no longer exist on the contemporary governance of digital cloud infrastructure.<br><em>Cloud Policy</em>&nbsp;brings together numerous perspectives that have thus far remained largely siloed in their respective fields of law, policy, economics, and media studies. The resulting interdisciplinary argument reveals a properly scaled view of the massive challenge facing policymakers today. Holt also addresses the evolving role of the state in the regulation of global cloud infrastructure and the growing influence of corporate gatekeepers and private sector self-governance. Cloud policy's trajectory, as Holt explains, has enacted a transformation in the cultural valuation of infrastructure as civic good, turning it into a tool of commercial profit generation. Despite these current predicaments, the book's historical lens ultimately helps the reader to envision restorative interventions and new forms of activism to create a more equitable future for infrastructure policy.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="63137147" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/ce86119b-8108-49a5-b958-5742ad8b0cee/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=ce86119b-8108-49a5-b958-5742ad8b0cee&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Jennifer Holt, &quot;Cloud Policy: A History of Regulating Pipelines, Platforms, and Data&quot; (MIT Press, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:05:45</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>How the United States&apos; regulation of broadband pipelines, digital platforms, and data—together understood as “the cloud”—has eroded civil liberties, democratic principles, and the foundation of the public interest over the past century.
Cloud Policy: A History of Regulating Pipelines, Platforms, and Data (MIT Press, 2024) is a policy history that chronicles how the past century of regulating media infrastructure in the United States has eroded global civil liberties as well as democratic principles and the foundation of the public interest. Jennifer Holt explores the long arc of regulating broadband pipelines, digital platforms, and the data centers that serve as the cloud&apos;s storage facilities—an evolution that is connected to the development of nineteenth- and twentieth-century media and networks, including railroads, highways, telephony, radio, and television. In the process, Cloud Policy unearths the lasting inscriptions of policy written for an analog era and markets that no longer exist on the contemporary governance of digital cloud infrastructure.Cloud Policy brings together numerous perspectives that have thus far remained largely siloed in their respective fields of law, policy, economics, and media studies. The resulting interdisciplinary argument reveals a properly scaled view of the massive challenge facing policymakers today. Holt also addresses the evolving role of the state in the regulation of global cloud infrastructure and the growing influence of corporate gatekeepers and private sector self-governance. Cloud policy&apos;s trajectory, as Holt explains, has enacted a transformation in the cultural valuation of infrastructure as civic good, turning it into a tool of commercial profit generation. Despite these current predicaments, the book&apos;s historical lens ultimately helps the reader to envision restorative interventions and new forms of activism to create a more equitable future for infrastructure policy.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>How the United States&apos; regulation of broadband pipelines, digital platforms, and data—together understood as “the cloud”—has eroded civil liberties, democratic principles, and the foundation of the public interest over the past century.
Cloud Policy: A History of Regulating Pipelines, Platforms, and Data (MIT Press, 2024) is a policy history that chronicles how the past century of regulating media infrastructure in the United States has eroded global civil liberties as well as democratic principles and the foundation of the public interest. Jennifer Holt explores the long arc of regulating broadband pipelines, digital platforms, and the data centers that serve as the cloud&apos;s storage facilities—an evolution that is connected to the development of nineteenth- and twentieth-century media and networks, including railroads, highways, telephony, radio, and television. In the process, Cloud Policy unearths the lasting inscriptions of policy written for an analog era and markets that no longer exist on the contemporary governance of digital cloud infrastructure.Cloud Policy brings together numerous perspectives that have thus far remained largely siloed in their respective fields of law, policy, economics, and media studies. The resulting interdisciplinary argument reveals a properly scaled view of the massive challenge facing policymakers today. Holt also addresses the evolving role of the state in the regulation of global cloud infrastructure and the growing influence of corporate gatekeepers and private sector self-governance. Cloud policy&apos;s trajectory, as Holt explains, has enacted a transformation in the cultural valuation of infrastructure as civic good, turning it into a tool of commercial profit generation. Despite these current predicaments, the book&apos;s historical lens ultimately helps the reader to envision restorative interventions and new forms of activism to create a more equitable future for infrastructure policy.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1527</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">d67a3aca-2db2-11f0-acfd-eb8574e66c34</guid>
      <title>Constitutional Crisis or a Stalemate?</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>At the 100 day mark of Donald Trump’s second term as president, the political scientists at&nbsp;<em>Bright Line Watch</em>&nbsp;released their 25th&nbsp;report on the state of American democracy entitled “Threats to democracy and academic freedom after Trump’s second first 100 days.” Based on polling both experts (760 political scientists) and the public (representative sample of 2000 Americans), the Bright Line Watch researchers find that the Trump administration has challenged constitutional and democratic norms on a wide range of issues, including the&nbsp;<a href="https://harvardlawreview.org/blog/2025/04/president-trump-in-the-era-of-exclusive-powers/" rel="noopener noreferrer">scope of executive power</a>&nbsp;and the&nbsp;<a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2025/04/17/opinion/ross-douthat-interesting-times-jack-goldsmith.html" rel="noopener noreferrer">authority of courts to check it</a>,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.npr.org/2025/04/07/nx-s1-5327154/free-speech-trump-first-amendment" rel="noopener noreferrer">individual freedom of expression</a>,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.chicagotribune.com/2025/04/18/column-donald-trump-due-process-el-salvador-prison-shackelford/" rel="noopener noreferrer">due process</a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a href="https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/torture-in-el-salvador-with-u-s-taxpayer-dollars-habeas-petition-directly-challenges-mans-indefinite-detention-in-notorious-legal-black-hole-foreign-prison/" rel="noopener noreferrer">habeas corpus</a>,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/apr/18/people-detained-deported-trump-immigration-crackdown" rel="noopener noreferrer">immigration</a>, and&nbsp;<a href="https://www.nytimes.com/article/trump-university-college.html" rel="noopener noreferrer">academic freedom</a>. In this episode of&nbsp;<em>POSTSCRIPT: Conversations on Politics and Political Science</em>, two of&nbsp;<em>Bright Line Watch</em>’s co-directors analyze the latest report – and what it means for American democracy. Topics include democratic performance, threats to democracy and academic freedom and self-censorship.</p>
<p><a href="https://sites.dartmouth.edu/jcarey/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. John Carey</a>&nbsp;(he/him) is the Wentworth Professor in the Social Sciences at Dartmouth College. He is the author of 6 books and dozens of articles on democratic institutions, representation, and political beliefs.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.gretchenhelmke.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. Gretchen Helmke</a>&nbsp;is the Thomas H. Jackson Distinguished University Professor in the Department of Political Science and faculty director of the Democracy Center at the University of Rochester. Her research focuses on democracy and the rule of law in Latin America and the United States. Her new co-authored article definition and measuring democratic norms is forthcoming in the&nbsp;<em>Annual Review of Political Science</em>. She has been named a Guggenheim Fellow for 2025.</p>
<p>Mentioned:</p>
<ul>
  <li>Bright Line Watch’s April 2025 report,&nbsp;<a href="https://brightlinewatch.org/threats-to-democracy-and-academic-freedom-after-trumps-second-first-100-days/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Threats to Democracy and Academic Freedom after Trump's Second First 100 Days</a>&nbsp;(based on parallel surveys of 760 political scientists and a representative sample of 2,000 Americans fielded in April).</li>
</ul>
<ul>
  <li>
<a href="https://brightlinewatch.org/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Bright Line Watch homepage</a>&nbsp;with data and past reports</li>
  <li>John Carey on&nbsp;<a href="https://www.npr.org/2025/04/22/nx-s1-5340753/trump-democracy-authoritarianism-competive-survey-political-scientist" rel="noopener noreferrer">NPR’s&nbsp;<em>All Things Considered</em></a>, 4/22 discussing the latest report.</li>
  <li><a href="https://adamprzeworski.substack.com/p/week-11" rel="noopener noreferrer">Adam Przeworski’s Substack Diary (free to subscribe and read)</a></li>
  <li>
<a href="https://democratic-erosion.org/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Democratic Erosion Project</a>&nbsp;(with dataset that Gretchen mentioned)</li>
  <li>Susan’s New Books Network&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/postscript-political-scientists-ring-alarm-bell-over-trumps-second-administration#entry:390044@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">conversation with Dr. Sue Stokes on the importance of integrating comparative politics and American politic</a>s.</li>
</ul><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/constitutional-crisis-or-a-stalemate-oS9AN6GX</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the 100 day mark of Donald Trump’s second term as president, the political scientists at&nbsp;<em>Bright Line Watch</em>&nbsp;released their 25th&nbsp;report on the state of American democracy entitled “Threats to democracy and academic freedom after Trump’s second first 100 days.” Based on polling both experts (760 political scientists) and the public (representative sample of 2000 Americans), the Bright Line Watch researchers find that the Trump administration has challenged constitutional and democratic norms on a wide range of issues, including the&nbsp;<a href="https://harvardlawreview.org/blog/2025/04/president-trump-in-the-era-of-exclusive-powers/" rel="noopener noreferrer">scope of executive power</a>&nbsp;and the&nbsp;<a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2025/04/17/opinion/ross-douthat-interesting-times-jack-goldsmith.html" rel="noopener noreferrer">authority of courts to check it</a>,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.npr.org/2025/04/07/nx-s1-5327154/free-speech-trump-first-amendment" rel="noopener noreferrer">individual freedom of expression</a>,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.chicagotribune.com/2025/04/18/column-donald-trump-due-process-el-salvador-prison-shackelford/" rel="noopener noreferrer">due process</a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a href="https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/torture-in-el-salvador-with-u-s-taxpayer-dollars-habeas-petition-directly-challenges-mans-indefinite-detention-in-notorious-legal-black-hole-foreign-prison/" rel="noopener noreferrer">habeas corpus</a>,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/apr/18/people-detained-deported-trump-immigration-crackdown" rel="noopener noreferrer">immigration</a>, and&nbsp;<a href="https://www.nytimes.com/article/trump-university-college.html" rel="noopener noreferrer">academic freedom</a>. In this episode of&nbsp;<em>POSTSCRIPT: Conversations on Politics and Political Science</em>, two of&nbsp;<em>Bright Line Watch</em>’s co-directors analyze the latest report – and what it means for American democracy. Topics include democratic performance, threats to democracy and academic freedom and self-censorship.</p>
<p><a href="https://sites.dartmouth.edu/jcarey/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. John Carey</a>&nbsp;(he/him) is the Wentworth Professor in the Social Sciences at Dartmouth College. He is the author of 6 books and dozens of articles on democratic institutions, representation, and political beliefs.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.gretchenhelmke.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. Gretchen Helmke</a>&nbsp;is the Thomas H. Jackson Distinguished University Professor in the Department of Political Science and faculty director of the Democracy Center at the University of Rochester. Her research focuses on democracy and the rule of law in Latin America and the United States. Her new co-authored article definition and measuring democratic norms is forthcoming in the&nbsp;<em>Annual Review of Political Science</em>. She has been named a Guggenheim Fellow for 2025.</p>
<p>Mentioned:</p>
<ul>
  <li>Bright Line Watch’s April 2025 report,&nbsp;<a href="https://brightlinewatch.org/threats-to-democracy-and-academic-freedom-after-trumps-second-first-100-days/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Threats to Democracy and Academic Freedom after Trump's Second First 100 Days</a>&nbsp;(based on parallel surveys of 760 political scientists and a representative sample of 2,000 Americans fielded in April).</li>
</ul>
<ul>
  <li>
<a href="https://brightlinewatch.org/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Bright Line Watch homepage</a>&nbsp;with data and past reports</li>
  <li>John Carey on&nbsp;<a href="https://www.npr.org/2025/04/22/nx-s1-5340753/trump-democracy-authoritarianism-competive-survey-political-scientist" rel="noopener noreferrer">NPR’s&nbsp;<em>All Things Considered</em></a>, 4/22 discussing the latest report.</li>
  <li><a href="https://adamprzeworski.substack.com/p/week-11" rel="noopener noreferrer">Adam Przeworski’s Substack Diary (free to subscribe and read)</a></li>
  <li>
<a href="https://democratic-erosion.org/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Democratic Erosion Project</a>&nbsp;(with dataset that Gretchen mentioned)</li>
  <li>Susan’s New Books Network&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/postscript-political-scientists-ring-alarm-bell-over-trumps-second-administration#entry:390044@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">conversation with Dr. Sue Stokes on the importance of integrating comparative politics and American politic</a>s.</li>
</ul><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="42981755" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/84c69bf2-7b59-4b28-b48d-1cbddd254f9b/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=84c69bf2-7b59-4b28-b48d-1cbddd254f9b&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Constitutional Crisis or a Stalemate?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:44:46</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>At the 100 day mark of Donald Trump’s second term as president, the political scientists at Bright Line Watch released their 25th report on the state of American democracy entitled “Threats to democracy and academic freedom after Trump’s second first 100 days.” Based on polling both experts (760 political scientists) and the public (representative sample of 2000 Americans), the Bright Line Watch researchers find that the Trump administration has challenged constitutional and democratic norms on a wide range of issues, including the scope of executive power and the authority of courts to check it, individual freedom of expression, due process and habeas corpus, immigration, and academic freedom. In this episode of POSTSCRIPT: Conversations on Politics and Political Science, two of Bright Line Watch’s co-directors analyze the latest report – and what it means for American democracy. Topics include democratic performance, threats to democracy and academic freedom and self-censorship.
Dr. John Carey (he/him) is the Wentworth Professor in the Social Sciences at Dartmouth College. He is the author of 6 books and dozens of articles on democratic institutions, representation, and political beliefs.
Dr. Gretchen Helmke is the Thomas H. Jackson Distinguished University Professor in the Department of Political Science and faculty director of the Democracy Center at the University of Rochester. Her research focuses on democracy and the rule of law in Latin America and the United States. Her new co-authored article definition and measuring democratic norms is forthcoming in the Annual Review of Political Science. She has been named a Guggenheim Fellow for 2025.
Mentioned:
 Bright Line Watch’s April 2025 report, Threats to Democracy and Academic Freedom after Trump&apos;s Second First 100 Days (based on parallel surveys of 760 political scientists and a representative sample of 2,000 Americans fielded in April).
Bright Line Watch homepage with data and past reports
 John Carey on NPR’s All Things Considered, 4/22 discussing the latest report.
 Adam Przeworski’s Substack Diary (free to subscribe and read)
Democratic Erosion Project (with dataset that Gretchen mentioned)
 Susan’s New Books Network conversation with Dr. Sue Stokes on the importance of integrating comparative politics and American politics.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>At the 100 day mark of Donald Trump’s second term as president, the political scientists at Bright Line Watch released their 25th report on the state of American democracy entitled “Threats to democracy and academic freedom after Trump’s second first 100 days.” Based on polling both experts (760 political scientists) and the public (representative sample of 2000 Americans), the Bright Line Watch researchers find that the Trump administration has challenged constitutional and democratic norms on a wide range of issues, including the scope of executive power and the authority of courts to check it, individual freedom of expression, due process and habeas corpus, immigration, and academic freedom. In this episode of POSTSCRIPT: Conversations on Politics and Political Science, two of Bright Line Watch’s co-directors analyze the latest report – and what it means for American democracy. Topics include democratic performance, threats to democracy and academic freedom and self-censorship.
Dr. John Carey (he/him) is the Wentworth Professor in the Social Sciences at Dartmouth College. He is the author of 6 books and dozens of articles on democratic institutions, representation, and political beliefs.
Dr. Gretchen Helmke is the Thomas H. Jackson Distinguished University Professor in the Department of Political Science and faculty director of the Democracy Center at the University of Rochester. Her research focuses on democracy and the rule of law in Latin America and the United States. Her new co-authored article definition and measuring democratic norms is forthcoming in the Annual Review of Political Science. She has been named a Guggenheim Fellow for 2025.
Mentioned:
 Bright Line Watch’s April 2025 report, Threats to Democracy and Academic Freedom after Trump&apos;s Second First 100 Days (based on parallel surveys of 760 political scientists and a representative sample of 2,000 Americans fielded in April).
Bright Line Watch homepage with data and past reports
 John Carey on NPR’s All Things Considered, 4/22 discussing the latest report.
 Adam Przeworski’s Substack Diary (free to subscribe and read)
Democratic Erosion Project (with dataset that Gretchen mentioned)
 Susan’s New Books Network conversation with Dr. Sue Stokes on the importance of integrating comparative politics and American politics.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>41</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8a021672-2b7d-11f0-88d8-639a7c5da871</guid>
      <title>Lara Montesinos Coleman, &quot;Struggles for the Human: Violent Legality and the Politics of Rights&quot; (Duke UP, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781478025566" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Struggles for the Human: Violent Legality and the Politics of Rights</em>&nbsp;</a>(Duke University Press 2024), Lara Montesinos Coleman blends ethnography, political philosophy, and critical theory to reorient debates on human rights through attention to understandings of legality, ethics, and humanity in anticapitalist and decolonial struggle. Drawing on her extensive involvement with grassroots social movements in Colombia, Coleman observes that mainstream expressions of human rights have become counterparts to capitalist violence, even as this discourse disavows capitalism’s deadly implications. She rejects claims that human rights are inherently tied to capitalism, liberalism, or colonialism, instead showing how human rights can be used to combat these forces. Coleman demonstrates that social justice struggles that are rooted in marginalized communities’ lived experiences can reframe human rights in order to challenge oppressive power structures and offer a blueprint for constructing alternative political economies. By examining the practice of redefining human rights away from abstract universals and contextualizing them within concrete struggles for justice, Coleman reveals the transformative potential of human rights and invites readers to question and reshape dominant legal and ethical narratives.</p>
<p><a href="https://profiles.sussex.ac.uk/p259636-lara-montesinos-coleman" rel="noopener noreferrer">Lara Montesinos Coleman</a>&nbsp;is Professor of International Law, Ethics and Political Economy at the University of Sussex, where she also teaches on the MA in Human Rights. She is author of&nbsp;<em>Struggles for the Human: Violent Legality and the Politics of Rights</em>, published by Duke University Press in 2024 and shortlisted for the Susan Strange Best Book Prize, awarded for an outstanding book published in any field of International Studies<em>.</em></p>
<p><a href="https://humanrightscolumbia.org/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Tim Wyman-McCarthy</a>&nbsp;is a Lecturer in the discipline of Human Rights and Associate Director of Graduate Studies at the Institute for the Study of Human Rights and the Department of Sociology at Columbia University. He can be reached at&nbsp;<a href="mailto:tw2468@columbia.edu" rel="noopener noreferrer">tw2468@columbia.edu</a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/lara-montesinos-coleman-struggles-for-the-human-violent-legality-and-the-politics-of-rights-duke-up-2023-Z1XtGsCA</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781478025566" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Struggles for the Human: Violent Legality and the Politics of Rights</em>&nbsp;</a>(Duke University Press 2024), Lara Montesinos Coleman blends ethnography, political philosophy, and critical theory to reorient debates on human rights through attention to understandings of legality, ethics, and humanity in anticapitalist and decolonial struggle. Drawing on her extensive involvement with grassroots social movements in Colombia, Coleman observes that mainstream expressions of human rights have become counterparts to capitalist violence, even as this discourse disavows capitalism’s deadly implications. She rejects claims that human rights are inherently tied to capitalism, liberalism, or colonialism, instead showing how human rights can be used to combat these forces. Coleman demonstrates that social justice struggles that are rooted in marginalized communities’ lived experiences can reframe human rights in order to challenge oppressive power structures and offer a blueprint for constructing alternative political economies. By examining the practice of redefining human rights away from abstract universals and contextualizing them within concrete struggles for justice, Coleman reveals the transformative potential of human rights and invites readers to question and reshape dominant legal and ethical narratives.</p>
<p><a href="https://profiles.sussex.ac.uk/p259636-lara-montesinos-coleman" rel="noopener noreferrer">Lara Montesinos Coleman</a>&nbsp;is Professor of International Law, Ethics and Political Economy at the University of Sussex, where she also teaches on the MA in Human Rights. She is author of&nbsp;<em>Struggles for the Human: Violent Legality and the Politics of Rights</em>, published by Duke University Press in 2024 and shortlisted for the Susan Strange Best Book Prize, awarded for an outstanding book published in any field of International Studies<em>.</em></p>
<p><a href="https://humanrightscolumbia.org/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Tim Wyman-McCarthy</a>&nbsp;is a Lecturer in the discipline of Human Rights and Associate Director of Graduate Studies at the Institute for the Study of Human Rights and the Department of Sociology at Columbia University. He can be reached at&nbsp;<a href="mailto:tw2468@columbia.edu" rel="noopener noreferrer">tw2468@columbia.edu</a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="62814347" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/05f0a304-55c9-4bad-a761-729cb0040d68/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=05f0a304-55c9-4bad-a761-729cb0040d68&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Lara Montesinos Coleman, &quot;Struggles for the Human: Violent Legality and the Politics of Rights&quot; (Duke UP, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:05:25</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In Struggles for the Human: Violent Legality and the Politics of Rights (Duke University Press 2024), Lara Montesinos Coleman blends ethnography, political philosophy, and critical theory to reorient debates on human rights through attention to understandings of legality, ethics, and humanity in anticapitalist and decolonial struggle. Drawing on her extensive involvement with grassroots social movements in Colombia, Coleman observes that mainstream expressions of human rights have become counterparts to capitalist violence, even as this discourse disavows capitalism’s deadly implications. She rejects claims that human rights are inherently tied to capitalism, liberalism, or colonialism, instead showing how human rights can be used to combat these forces. Coleman demonstrates that social justice struggles that are rooted in marginalized communities’ lived experiences can reframe human rights in order to challenge oppressive power structures and offer a blueprint for constructing alternative political economies. By examining the practice of redefining human rights away from abstract universals and contextualizing them within concrete struggles for justice, Coleman reveals the transformative potential of human rights and invites readers to question and reshape dominant legal and ethical narratives.
Lara Montesinos Coleman is Professor of International Law, Ethics and Political Economy at the University of Sussex, where she also teaches on the MA in Human Rights. She is author of Struggles for the Human: Violent Legality and the Politics of Rights, published by Duke University Press in 2024 and shortlisted for the Susan Strange Best Book Prize, awarded for an outstanding book published in any field of International Studies.
Tim Wyman-McCarthy is a Lecturer in the discipline of Human Rights and Associate Director of Graduate Studies at the Institute for the Study of Human Rights and the Department of Sociology at Columbia University. He can be reached at tw2468@columbia.edu.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In Struggles for the Human: Violent Legality and the Politics of Rights (Duke University Press 2024), Lara Montesinos Coleman blends ethnography, political philosophy, and critical theory to reorient debates on human rights through attention to understandings of legality, ethics, and humanity in anticapitalist and decolonial struggle. Drawing on her extensive involvement with grassroots social movements in Colombia, Coleman observes that mainstream expressions of human rights have become counterparts to capitalist violence, even as this discourse disavows capitalism’s deadly implications. She rejects claims that human rights are inherently tied to capitalism, liberalism, or colonialism, instead showing how human rights can be used to combat these forces. Coleman demonstrates that social justice struggles that are rooted in marginalized communities’ lived experiences can reframe human rights in order to challenge oppressive power structures and offer a blueprint for constructing alternative political economies. By examining the practice of redefining human rights away from abstract universals and contextualizing them within concrete struggles for justice, Coleman reveals the transformative potential of human rights and invites readers to question and reshape dominant legal and ethical narratives.
Lara Montesinos Coleman is Professor of International Law, Ethics and Political Economy at the University of Sussex, where she also teaches on the MA in Human Rights. She is author of Struggles for the Human: Violent Legality and the Politics of Rights, published by Duke University Press in 2024 and shortlisted for the Susan Strange Best Book Prize, awarded for an outstanding book published in any field of International Studies.
Tim Wyman-McCarthy is a Lecturer in the discipline of Human Rights and Associate Director of Graduate Studies at the Institute for the Study of Human Rights and the Department of Sociology at Columbia University. He can be reached at tw2468@columbia.edu.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>66</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">de37719e-2b53-11f0-9584-df330ee5127d</guid>
      <title>Jake Monaghan, &quot;Just Policing&quot; (Oxford UP, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Policing is a source of perennial conflict and philosophical disagreement. Current political developments in the United States have only increased the urgency of this topic. Today we welcome philosopher Jake Monaghan to discuss his book,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197610725" rel="noopener noreferrer">Just Policing</a>&nbsp;(Oxford UP, 2023), which applies interdisciplinary insights to examine the morality of policing.</p>
<p>Though the injustices of our world seemingly require some kind of policing, the police are often sources of injustice themselves. But this is not always the result of intentionally or negligently bad policing. Sometimes it is an unavoidable result of the injustices that emerge from interactions with other social systems. This raises an important question of just policing: how should police respond to the injustices built into the system?&nbsp;<em>Just Policing</em>&nbsp;attempts an answer, offering a theory of just policing in non-ideal contexts.</p>
<p>Monaghan argues that police discretion is not only unavoidable, but in light of non-ideal circumstances, valuable. This claim conflicts with a widespread but inchoate view of just policing, the legalist view that finds justice in faithful enforcement of the criminal code.</p>
<p>But the criminal code leaves policing seriously underdetermined; full enforcement is neither possible nor desirable. Police need an alternative normative framework for evaluating and guiding their exercise of power.</p>
<p><em>Just Policing</em>&nbsp;critiques popular approaches to police abolitionism while defending normative limits on police power. The book offers a defense of police discretion against common objections and evaluates controversial issues in order maintenance, such as the policing of "vice" and homelessness, democratic control over policing, community policing initiatives, police collaborations and alternatives like mental health response teams, and possibilities for structural reform.</p>
<p><a href="https://jakemonaghan.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Jake Monaghan</a>&nbsp;is Assistant Professor of Philosophy at the University of Southern California. He earned his Ph.D. in philosophy at the University of Buffalo. His research is primarily in moral and political philosophy.</p>
<p>He is interviewed by Tom McInerney, an international lawyer, scholar, and strategist, who has worked to advance rule of law and development internationally for 25 years. He has taught in the Rule of Law for Development Program at Loyola University Chicago School of Law since 2011. He writes the&nbsp;<a href="https://tommcinerney.substack.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Rights, Regulation and Rule of Law</a>&nbsp;newsletter on Substack.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 9 May 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/jake-monaghan-just-policing-oxford-up-2023-V7HcJA3d</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Policing is a source of perennial conflict and philosophical disagreement. Current political developments in the United States have only increased the urgency of this topic. Today we welcome philosopher Jake Monaghan to discuss his book,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197610725" rel="noopener noreferrer">Just Policing</a>&nbsp;(Oxford UP, 2023), which applies interdisciplinary insights to examine the morality of policing.</p>
<p>Though the injustices of our world seemingly require some kind of policing, the police are often sources of injustice themselves. But this is not always the result of intentionally or negligently bad policing. Sometimes it is an unavoidable result of the injustices that emerge from interactions with other social systems. This raises an important question of just policing: how should police respond to the injustices built into the system?&nbsp;<em>Just Policing</em>&nbsp;attempts an answer, offering a theory of just policing in non-ideal contexts.</p>
<p>Monaghan argues that police discretion is not only unavoidable, but in light of non-ideal circumstances, valuable. This claim conflicts with a widespread but inchoate view of just policing, the legalist view that finds justice in faithful enforcement of the criminal code.</p>
<p>But the criminal code leaves policing seriously underdetermined; full enforcement is neither possible nor desirable. Police need an alternative normative framework for evaluating and guiding their exercise of power.</p>
<p><em>Just Policing</em>&nbsp;critiques popular approaches to police abolitionism while defending normative limits on police power. The book offers a defense of police discretion against common objections and evaluates controversial issues in order maintenance, such as the policing of "vice" and homelessness, democratic control over policing, community policing initiatives, police collaborations and alternatives like mental health response teams, and possibilities for structural reform.</p>
<p><a href="https://jakemonaghan.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Jake Monaghan</a>&nbsp;is Assistant Professor of Philosophy at the University of Southern California. He earned his Ph.D. in philosophy at the University of Buffalo. His research is primarily in moral and political philosophy.</p>
<p>He is interviewed by Tom McInerney, an international lawyer, scholar, and strategist, who has worked to advance rule of law and development internationally for 25 years. He has taught in the Rule of Law for Development Program at Loyola University Chicago School of Law since 2011. He writes the&nbsp;<a href="https://tommcinerney.substack.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Rights, Regulation and Rule of Law</a>&nbsp;newsletter on Substack.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="58277290" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/3a7c6743-9f34-40f1-8ec6-9e8950bb9f79/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=3a7c6743-9f34-40f1-8ec6-9e8950bb9f79&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Jake Monaghan, &quot;Just Policing&quot; (Oxford UP, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:00:42</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Policing is a source of perennial conflict and philosophical disagreement. Current political developments in the United States have only increased the urgency of this topic. Today we welcome philosopher Jake Monaghan to discuss his book, Just Policing (Oxford UP, 2023), which applies interdisciplinary insights to examine the morality of policing.
Though the injustices of our world seemingly require some kind of policing, the police are often sources of injustice themselves. But this is not always the result of intentionally or negligently bad policing. Sometimes it is an unavoidable result of the injustices that emerge from interactions with other social systems. This raises an important question of just policing: how should police respond to the injustices built into the system? Just Policing attempts an answer, offering a theory of just policing in non-ideal contexts.
Monaghan argues that police discretion is not only unavoidable, but in light of non-ideal circumstances, valuable. This claim conflicts with a widespread but inchoate view of just policing, the legalist view that finds justice in faithful enforcement of the criminal code.
But the criminal code leaves policing seriously underdetermined; full enforcement is neither possible nor desirable. Police need an alternative normative framework for evaluating and guiding their exercise of power.
Just Policing critiques popular approaches to police abolitionism while defending normative limits on police power. The book offers a defense of police discretion against common objections and evaluates controversial issues in order maintenance, such as the policing of &quot;vice&quot; and homelessness, democratic control over policing, community policing initiatives, police collaborations and alternatives like mental health response teams, and possibilities for structural reform.
Jake Monaghan is Assistant Professor of Philosophy at the University of Southern California. He earned his Ph.D. in philosophy at the University of Buffalo. His research is primarily in moral and political philosophy.
He is interviewed by Tom McInerney, an international lawyer, scholar, and strategist, who has worked to advance rule of law and development internationally for 25 years. He has taught in the Rule of Law for Development Program at Loyola University Chicago School of Law since 2011. He writes the Rights, Regulation and Rule of Law newsletter on Substack.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Policing is a source of perennial conflict and philosophical disagreement. Current political developments in the United States have only increased the urgency of this topic. Today we welcome philosopher Jake Monaghan to discuss his book, Just Policing (Oxford UP, 2023), which applies interdisciplinary insights to examine the morality of policing.
Though the injustices of our world seemingly require some kind of policing, the police are often sources of injustice themselves. But this is not always the result of intentionally or negligently bad policing. Sometimes it is an unavoidable result of the injustices that emerge from interactions with other social systems. This raises an important question of just policing: how should police respond to the injustices built into the system? Just Policing attempts an answer, offering a theory of just policing in non-ideal contexts.
Monaghan argues that police discretion is not only unavoidable, but in light of non-ideal circumstances, valuable. This claim conflicts with a widespread but inchoate view of just policing, the legalist view that finds justice in faithful enforcement of the criminal code.
But the criminal code leaves policing seriously underdetermined; full enforcement is neither possible nor desirable. Police need an alternative normative framework for evaluating and guiding their exercise of power.
Just Policing critiques popular approaches to police abolitionism while defending normative limits on police power. The book offers a defense of police discretion against common objections and evaluates controversial issues in order maintenance, such as the policing of &quot;vice&quot; and homelessness, democratic control over policing, community policing initiatives, police collaborations and alternatives like mental health response teams, and possibilities for structural reform.
Jake Monaghan is Assistant Professor of Philosophy at the University of Southern California. He earned his Ph.D. in philosophy at the University of Buffalo. His research is primarily in moral and political philosophy.
He is interviewed by Tom McInerney, an international lawyer, scholar, and strategist, who has worked to advance rule of law and development internationally for 25 years. He has taught in the Rule of Law for Development Program at Loyola University Chicago School of Law since 2011. He writes the Rights, Regulation and Rule of Law newsletter on Substack.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>29</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2cfb45ac-2aba-11f0-ae65-3fe83d3be72d</guid>
      <title>Mark Fallon, &quot;Unjustifiable Means: The Inside Story of How the CIA, Pentagon, and US Government Conspired to Torture&quot; (Regan Arts, 2017)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>From busting drug lords to leading the Pentagon task force charged with bringing the 9/11 terrorists to justice, Mark Fallon has spent his career on the front lines of U.S. national security.</p>
<p>My first guest is one of the most fascinating people I've interviewed. Former&nbsp;<a href="http://markfallon.us/" rel="noopener noreferrer">NCIS Special Agent in Charge Mark Fallon</a>&nbsp;is a national security consultant, scholar, and expert in counterintelligence and counterterrorism who's been involved in some of the most significant terrorism investigations in U.S. history. Mark served more than thirty years in government—twenty-seven with the NCIS and two as a Senior Executive within the Department of Homeland Security. He received numerous awards and medals for his service, including the Department of Defense Counterintelligence Award for Outstanding Achievement and the U.S. Secret Service Director Honors Award.<br></p>
<p>As an NCIS Special Agent, Mark operated undercover in some of the most dangerous places in the world—from infiltrating drug rings in Thailand to capturing poachers in Kenya. He takes us inside his undercover operations and describes his strategy for a successful mission.</p>
<p>We talked about the interview and interrogation techniques that actually work (hint: they involve rapport and, occasionally, French fries), and the moment his wife discovered details of an undercover operation.</p>
<p>In the wake of the 9/11 terrorist attacks, Mark was appointed Deputy Commander and Special Agent in Charge of the Pentagon task force, responsible for investigating terrorists for possible trials before military commissions. His critically acclaimed book,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781942872795" rel="noopener noreferrer">Unjustifiable Means: The Inside Story of How the CIA, Pentagon, and US Government Conspired to Torture</a>&nbsp;(Regan Arts, 2017) offers a gripping account of the leadership challenges he faced while trying to bring terrorists to justice without compromising his oath to protect and defend the Constitution.</p>
<p>Mark opens up about what it takes to lead under pressure, the duty to disobey an unlawful order, and why interrogators make the best first dates He shares leadership lessons that extend far beyond national security—tools for navigating crisis, conflict, and high-stakes decisions in any field.</p>
<p>Today, as founder of ClubFed, Mark serves as an international security consultant and continues his mission for improving the practice of interviews and interrogations.</p>
<p>Pulitzer Prize–winning investigative reporter Bill Dedman calls Mark Fallon&nbsp;<em>"the Serpico in the war on terror,"</em>&nbsp;and high-ranking officials call him an American hero who’s made the world safer.&nbsp;Listen to the podcast—and you'll understand why.</p>
<p>Pamela Hamilton is the award-winning author of&nbsp;<a href="https://www.amazon.com/Lady-Be-Good-Times-Dorothy/dp/1646632729" rel="noopener noreferrer">Lady Be Good: The Life and Times of Dorothy Hale</a><em>,&nbsp;</em>Kirkus Best Book of the Year and Publishers Weekly Editor's Pick.&nbsp;As a&nbsp;producer with&nbsp;NBC News for nearly 15 years, she&nbsp;interviewed prominent figures in business, entertainment, lifestyle,&nbsp;and the arts.&nbsp;Visit&nbsp;<a href="https://pamelalhamilton.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">www.pamelalhamilton.com</a>&nbsp;to learn more&nbsp;— and sign up to be notified when new episodes are released.&nbsp;Connect on&nbsp;Instagram and Facebook @pamelahamiltonauthor.</p>
<p><em>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; "We told them 'You may not, you&nbsp;must&nbsp;not—you have a duty not to obey an unlawful order."</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 8 May 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/mark-fallon-unjustifiable-means-the-inside-story-of-how-the-cia-pentagon-and-us-government-conspired-to-torture-regan-arts-2017-YwPKgrZY</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From busting drug lords to leading the Pentagon task force charged with bringing the 9/11 terrorists to justice, Mark Fallon has spent his career on the front lines of U.S. national security.</p>
<p>My first guest is one of the most fascinating people I've interviewed. Former&nbsp;<a href="http://markfallon.us/" rel="noopener noreferrer">NCIS Special Agent in Charge Mark Fallon</a>&nbsp;is a national security consultant, scholar, and expert in counterintelligence and counterterrorism who's been involved in some of the most significant terrorism investigations in U.S. history. Mark served more than thirty years in government—twenty-seven with the NCIS and two as a Senior Executive within the Department of Homeland Security. He received numerous awards and medals for his service, including the Department of Defense Counterintelligence Award for Outstanding Achievement and the U.S. Secret Service Director Honors Award.<br></p>
<p>As an NCIS Special Agent, Mark operated undercover in some of the most dangerous places in the world—from infiltrating drug rings in Thailand to capturing poachers in Kenya. He takes us inside his undercover operations and describes his strategy for a successful mission.</p>
<p>We talked about the interview and interrogation techniques that actually work (hint: they involve rapport and, occasionally, French fries), and the moment his wife discovered details of an undercover operation.</p>
<p>In the wake of the 9/11 terrorist attacks, Mark was appointed Deputy Commander and Special Agent in Charge of the Pentagon task force, responsible for investigating terrorists for possible trials before military commissions. His critically acclaimed book,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781942872795" rel="noopener noreferrer">Unjustifiable Means: The Inside Story of How the CIA, Pentagon, and US Government Conspired to Torture</a>&nbsp;(Regan Arts, 2017) offers a gripping account of the leadership challenges he faced while trying to bring terrorists to justice without compromising his oath to protect and defend the Constitution.</p>
<p>Mark opens up about what it takes to lead under pressure, the duty to disobey an unlawful order, and why interrogators make the best first dates He shares leadership lessons that extend far beyond national security—tools for navigating crisis, conflict, and high-stakes decisions in any field.</p>
<p>Today, as founder of ClubFed, Mark serves as an international security consultant and continues his mission for improving the practice of interviews and interrogations.</p>
<p>Pulitzer Prize–winning investigative reporter Bill Dedman calls Mark Fallon&nbsp;<em>"the Serpico in the war on terror,"</em>&nbsp;and high-ranking officials call him an American hero who’s made the world safer.&nbsp;Listen to the podcast—and you'll understand why.</p>
<p>Pamela Hamilton is the award-winning author of&nbsp;<a href="https://www.amazon.com/Lady-Be-Good-Times-Dorothy/dp/1646632729" rel="noopener noreferrer">Lady Be Good: The Life and Times of Dorothy Hale</a><em>,&nbsp;</em>Kirkus Best Book of the Year and Publishers Weekly Editor's Pick.&nbsp;As a&nbsp;producer with&nbsp;NBC News for nearly 15 years, she&nbsp;interviewed prominent figures in business, entertainment, lifestyle,&nbsp;and the arts.&nbsp;Visit&nbsp;<a href="https://pamelalhamilton.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">www.pamelalhamilton.com</a>&nbsp;to learn more&nbsp;— and sign up to be notified when new episodes are released.&nbsp;Connect on&nbsp;Instagram and Facebook @pamelahamiltonauthor.</p>
<p><em>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; "We told them 'You may not, you&nbsp;must&nbsp;not—you have a duty not to obey an unlawful order."</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="48065407" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/ddf50735-a0ca-4e11-abfc-1a8c166471b2/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=ddf50735-a0ca-4e11-abfc-1a8c166471b2&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Mark Fallon, &quot;Unjustifiable Means: The Inside Story of How the CIA, Pentagon, and US Government Conspired to Torture&quot; (Regan Arts, 2017)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:50:03</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>From busting drug lords to leading the Pentagon task force charged with bringing the 9/11 terrorists to justice, Mark Fallon has spent his career on the front lines of U.S. national security.
My first guest is one of the most fascinating people I&apos;ve interviewed. Former NCIS Special Agent in Charge Mark Fallon is a national security consultant, scholar, and expert in counterintelligence and counterterrorism who&apos;s been involved in some of the most significant terrorism investigations in U.S. history. Mark served more than thirty years in government—twenty-seven with the NCIS and two as a Senior Executive within the Department of Homeland Security. He received numerous awards and medals for his service, including the Department of Defense Counterintelligence Award for Outstanding Achievement and the U.S. Secret Service Director Honors Award.
As an NCIS Special Agent, Mark operated undercover in some of the most dangerous places in the world—from infiltrating drug rings in Thailand to capturing poachers in Kenya. He takes us inside his undercover operations and describes his strategy for a successful mission.
We talked about the interview and interrogation techniques that actually work (hint: they involve rapport and, occasionally, French fries), and the moment his wife discovered details of an undercover operation.
In the wake of the 9/11 terrorist attacks, Mark was appointed Deputy Commander and Special Agent in Charge of the Pentagon task force, responsible for investigating terrorists for possible trials before military commissions. His critically acclaimed book, Unjustifiable Means: The Inside Story of How the CIA, Pentagon, and US Government Conspired to Torture (Regan Arts, 2017) offers a gripping account of the leadership challenges he faced while trying to bring terrorists to justice without compromising his oath to protect and defend the Constitution.
Mark opens up about what it takes to lead under pressure, the duty to disobey an unlawful order, and why interrogators make the best first dates He shares leadership lessons that extend far beyond national security—tools for navigating crisis, conflict, and high-stakes decisions in any field.
Today, as founder of ClubFed, Mark serves as an international security consultant and continues his mission for improving the practice of interviews and interrogations.
Pulitzer Prize–winning investigative reporter Bill Dedman calls Mark Fallon &quot;the Serpico in the war on terror,&quot; and high-ranking officials call him an American hero who’s made the world safer. Listen to the podcast—and you&apos;ll understand why.
Pamela Hamilton is the award-winning author of Lady Be Good: The Life and Times of Dorothy Hale, Kirkus Best Book of the Year and Publishers Weekly Editor&apos;s Pick. As a producer with NBC News for nearly 15 years, she interviewed prominent figures in business, entertainment, lifestyle, and the arts. Visit www.pamelalhamilton.com to learn more — and sign up to be notified when new episodes are released. Connect on Instagram and Facebook @pamelahamiltonauthor.
                 &quot;We told them &apos;You may not, you must not—you have a duty not to obey an unlawful order.&quot;
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>From busting drug lords to leading the Pentagon task force charged with bringing the 9/11 terrorists to justice, Mark Fallon has spent his career on the front lines of U.S. national security.
My first guest is one of the most fascinating people I&apos;ve interviewed. Former NCIS Special Agent in Charge Mark Fallon is a national security consultant, scholar, and expert in counterintelligence and counterterrorism who&apos;s been involved in some of the most significant terrorism investigations in U.S. history. Mark served more than thirty years in government—twenty-seven with the NCIS and two as a Senior Executive within the Department of Homeland Security. He received numerous awards and medals for his service, including the Department of Defense Counterintelligence Award for Outstanding Achievement and the U.S. Secret Service Director Honors Award.
As an NCIS Special Agent, Mark operated undercover in some of the most dangerous places in the world—from infiltrating drug rings in Thailand to capturing poachers in Kenya. He takes us inside his undercover operations and describes his strategy for a successful mission.
We talked about the interview and interrogation techniques that actually work (hint: they involve rapport and, occasionally, French fries), and the moment his wife discovered details of an undercover operation.
In the wake of the 9/11 terrorist attacks, Mark was appointed Deputy Commander and Special Agent in Charge of the Pentagon task force, responsible for investigating terrorists for possible trials before military commissions. His critically acclaimed book, Unjustifiable Means: The Inside Story of How the CIA, Pentagon, and US Government Conspired to Torture (Regan Arts, 2017) offers a gripping account of the leadership challenges he faced while trying to bring terrorists to justice without compromising his oath to protect and defend the Constitution.
Mark opens up about what it takes to lead under pressure, the duty to disobey an unlawful order, and why interrogators make the best first dates He shares leadership lessons that extend far beyond national security—tools for navigating crisis, conflict, and high-stakes decisions in any field.
Today, as founder of ClubFed, Mark serves as an international security consultant and continues his mission for improving the practice of interviews and interrogations.
Pulitzer Prize–winning investigative reporter Bill Dedman calls Mark Fallon &quot;the Serpico in the war on terror,&quot; and high-ranking officials call him an American hero who’s made the world safer. Listen to the podcast—and you&apos;ll understand why.
Pamela Hamilton is the award-winning author of Lady Be Good: The Life and Times of Dorothy Hale, Kirkus Best Book of the Year and Publishers Weekly Editor&apos;s Pick. As a producer with NBC News for nearly 15 years, she interviewed prominent figures in business, entertainment, lifestyle, and the arts. Visit www.pamelalhamilton.com to learn more — and sign up to be notified when new episodes are released. Connect on Instagram and Facebook @pamelahamiltonauthor.
                 &quot;We told them &apos;You may not, you must not—you have a duty not to obey an unlawful order.&quot;
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>115</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">b789401e-29c2-11f0-8729-47784d9da9b3</guid>
      <title>Maïa Pal, &quot;Jurisdictional Accumulation: An Early Modern History of Law, Empires, and Capital&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2020)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>With rigorous attention to history and empire, Maïa&nbsp;Pal's&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781108739573" rel="noopener noreferrer">Jurisdictional Accumulation: An Early Modern History of Law, Empires, and Capital</a>&nbsp;(Cambridge UP, 2020)&nbsp;is a unique analysis of imperial expansion. Through an analysis of&nbsp;ambassadors and consuls in the Mediterranean—and attention to Castilian, French, Dutch, and British empires—Pal's multifaceted conceptualization of jurisdictional analysis gathers together law and&nbsp;capital in the early modern period. A compelling application of political Marxist frameworks,&nbsp;<em>Jurisdictional Accumulation</em>&nbsp;is a multidisciplinary approach to thinking through extraterritoriality and its implications.</p>
<p>Through archival work, theorization, and legal analyses, Pal offers us a novel way to better understand the links between capital, law, and imperial authority.<br></p>
<p><a href="https://www.brookes.ac.uk/profiles/staff/maia-pal" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. Maïa Pal</a>&nbsp;is a Senior Lecturer in International Relations at Oxford Brookes University. Her research brings together international relations theory, international political economy, and histories of international law, and focuses on early modern overseas consuls, imperialism, and empire.<a href="https://www.rinevieth.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><br>Rine Vieth</a>&nbsp;is an FRQSC Postdoctoral Fellow at Université Laval. Interested in how people experience state legal regimes, their research centres around questions of law, migration, gender, and religion.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 6 May 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/maia-pal-jurisdictional-accumulation-an-early-modern-history-of-law-empires-and-capital-cambridge-up-2020-KawvTKyK</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With rigorous attention to history and empire, Maïa&nbsp;Pal's&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781108739573" rel="noopener noreferrer">Jurisdictional Accumulation: An Early Modern History of Law, Empires, and Capital</a>&nbsp;(Cambridge UP, 2020)&nbsp;is a unique analysis of imperial expansion. Through an analysis of&nbsp;ambassadors and consuls in the Mediterranean—and attention to Castilian, French, Dutch, and British empires—Pal's multifaceted conceptualization of jurisdictional analysis gathers together law and&nbsp;capital in the early modern period. A compelling application of political Marxist frameworks,&nbsp;<em>Jurisdictional Accumulation</em>&nbsp;is a multidisciplinary approach to thinking through extraterritoriality and its implications.</p>
<p>Through archival work, theorization, and legal analyses, Pal offers us a novel way to better understand the links between capital, law, and imperial authority.<br></p>
<p><a href="https://www.brookes.ac.uk/profiles/staff/maia-pal" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. Maïa Pal</a>&nbsp;is a Senior Lecturer in International Relations at Oxford Brookes University. Her research brings together international relations theory, international political economy, and histories of international law, and focuses on early modern overseas consuls, imperialism, and empire.<a href="https://www.rinevieth.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><br>Rine Vieth</a>&nbsp;is an FRQSC Postdoctoral Fellow at Université Laval. Interested in how people experience state legal regimes, their research centres around questions of law, migration, gender, and religion.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="38085426" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/b86ee911-f430-44b6-9a31-60f3fb09b4df/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=b86ee911-f430-44b6-9a31-60f3fb09b4df&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Maïa Pal, &quot;Jurisdictional Accumulation: An Early Modern History of Law, Empires, and Capital&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2020)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:39:40</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>With rigorous attention to history and empire, Maïa Pal&apos;s Jurisdictional Accumulation: An Early Modern History of Law, Empires, and Capital (Cambridge UP, 2020) is a unique analysis of imperial expansion. Through an analysis of ambassadors and consuls in the Mediterranean—and attention to Castilian, French, Dutch, and British empires—Pal&apos;s multifaceted conceptualization of jurisdictional analysis gathers together law and capital in the early modern period. A compelling application of political Marxist frameworks, Jurisdictional Accumulation is a multidisciplinary approach to thinking through extraterritoriality and its implications.
Through archival work, theorization, and legal analyses, Pal offers us a novel way to better understand the links between capital, law, and imperial authority.
Dr. Maïa Pal is a Senior Lecturer in International Relations at Oxford Brookes University. Her research brings together international relations theory, international political economy, and histories of international law, and focuses on early modern overseas consuls, imperialism, and empire.Rine Vieth is an FRQSC Postdoctoral Fellow at Université Laval. Interested in how people experience state legal regimes, their research centres around questions of law, migration, gender, and religion.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>With rigorous attention to history and empire, Maïa Pal&apos;s Jurisdictional Accumulation: An Early Modern History of Law, Empires, and Capital (Cambridge UP, 2020) is a unique analysis of imperial expansion. Through an analysis of ambassadors and consuls in the Mediterranean—and attention to Castilian, French, Dutch, and British empires—Pal&apos;s multifaceted conceptualization of jurisdictional analysis gathers together law and capital in the early modern period. A compelling application of political Marxist frameworks, Jurisdictional Accumulation is a multidisciplinary approach to thinking through extraterritoriality and its implications.
Through archival work, theorization, and legal analyses, Pal offers us a novel way to better understand the links between capital, law, and imperial authority.
Dr. Maïa Pal is a Senior Lecturer in International Relations at Oxford Brookes University. Her research brings together international relations theory, international political economy, and histories of international law, and focuses on early modern overseas consuls, imperialism, and empire.Rine Vieth is an FRQSC Postdoctoral Fellow at Université Laval. Interested in how people experience state legal regimes, their research centres around questions of law, migration, gender, and religion.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>65</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2af705c2-237e-11f0-98a6-bbcab4e3e484</guid>
      <title>Stephen H. Legomsky, &quot;Reimagining the American Union: The Case for Abolishing State Government&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Since American president Donald Trump was elected to a second term, it is common to hear citizens, journalists, and public officials distinguish between the laws and leaders of&nbsp;<em>their states&nbsp;</em>and the national government. Those who oppose Trump’s policies with regard to reproductive rights, gun violence, LGBTQ+, education, police, and voting often present state constitutions, courts, laws, culture, and leaders as a bulwark against Trump’s autocratic rule.&nbsp;</p>
<p>But Professor Stephen H. Legomsky sees it differently. His new book,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009581417" rel="noopener noreferrer">Reimagining the American Union: The Case for Abolishing State Government</a>&nbsp;(Cambridge University Press 2025) argues that – if we care about democracy – we should imagine an America without state government. No longer a union of arbitrarily constructed states, the country would become a union of one American people.&nbsp;<em>Reimagining the American Union</em>&nbsp;understands state government as the root cause of the gravest threats to American democracy. While some of those threats are baked into the Constitution, the book argues that others are the product of state legislatures abusing their powers through gerrymanders, voter suppression, and other less-publicized manipulations that often target African-Americans and other minority voters.&nbsp;<em>Reimagining the American Union</em>&nbsp;interrogates how having national, state and local legislative bodies, taxation, bureaucracy, and regulation wastes taxpayer money and burdens the citizenry. After assessing the supposed benefits of state government, Professor Legomsky argues for a new, unitary American republic with only national and local governments.</p>
<p><a href="https://law.washu.edu/faculty-staff-directory/profile/stephen-h-legomsky/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Stephen H. Legomsky</a>&nbsp;is the John S. Lehmann University Professor Emeritus at the Washington University School of Law. Professor Legomsky has published scholarly books on immigration and refugee law, courts, and constitutional law. He served in the Obama Administration as Chief Counsel of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and later as Senior Counselor to Secretary of Homeland Security Jeh Johnson. He was a member of President-Elect Biden’s transition team, has testified often before Congress, and has worked with state, local, UN, and foreign governments.</p>
<p>Mentioned:</p>
<ul>
  <li>Cambridge University press is offering&nbsp;<a href="https://image.updates.cambridge.org/lib/fe97157477670d7d70/m/1/1390b6eb-0817-43a7-b02c-ec9159377789.pdf" rel="noopener noreferrer">a 20% discount here</a>&nbsp;(until October)</li>
  <li>Susan’s NBN interview with Richard Kreitner on&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/break-it-up#entry:47208@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Break It Up: Secession, Division, and The Secret History of America’s Imperfect Union</em></a>
</li>
  <li>Jonathan A. Rodden’s&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/why-cities-lose-the-deep-roots-of-the-urban-rural-political-divide-jonathan-a-rodden/18068047?ean=9781541644274&amp;next=t" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Why Cities Lose: The Deep Roots of the Urban-Rural Political Divide</em></a>&nbsp;(Basic Books 2019)</li>
  <li>
<a href="https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2002/07/29/framed-up" rel="noopener noreferrer">Hendrik Hertzberg’s review</a>&nbsp;of Robert A. Dahl’s&nbsp;<em>How Democratic Is the American Constitution</em>&nbsp;(Yale)</li>
  <li>
<a href="https://www.oyez.org/cases/2012/12-96" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Shelby County v. Holder</em></a>, the Supreme Court case that overturned the Voting Rights Act of 1965’s pre-clearance requirement for historically discriminating districts</li>
</ul><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 5 May 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/stephen-h-legomsky-reimagining-the-american-union-the-case-for-abolishing-state-government-cambridge-up-2024-2T2em3WJ</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since American president Donald Trump was elected to a second term, it is common to hear citizens, journalists, and public officials distinguish between the laws and leaders of&nbsp;<em>their states&nbsp;</em>and the national government. Those who oppose Trump’s policies with regard to reproductive rights, gun violence, LGBTQ+, education, police, and voting often present state constitutions, courts, laws, culture, and leaders as a bulwark against Trump’s autocratic rule.&nbsp;</p>
<p>But Professor Stephen H. Legomsky sees it differently. His new book,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009581417" rel="noopener noreferrer">Reimagining the American Union: The Case for Abolishing State Government</a>&nbsp;(Cambridge University Press 2025) argues that – if we care about democracy – we should imagine an America without state government. No longer a union of arbitrarily constructed states, the country would become a union of one American people.&nbsp;<em>Reimagining the American Union</em>&nbsp;understands state government as the root cause of the gravest threats to American democracy. While some of those threats are baked into the Constitution, the book argues that others are the product of state legislatures abusing their powers through gerrymanders, voter suppression, and other less-publicized manipulations that often target African-Americans and other minority voters.&nbsp;<em>Reimagining the American Union</em>&nbsp;interrogates how having national, state and local legislative bodies, taxation, bureaucracy, and regulation wastes taxpayer money and burdens the citizenry. After assessing the supposed benefits of state government, Professor Legomsky argues for a new, unitary American republic with only national and local governments.</p>
<p><a href="https://law.washu.edu/faculty-staff-directory/profile/stephen-h-legomsky/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Stephen H. Legomsky</a>&nbsp;is the John S. Lehmann University Professor Emeritus at the Washington University School of Law. Professor Legomsky has published scholarly books on immigration and refugee law, courts, and constitutional law. He served in the Obama Administration as Chief Counsel of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and later as Senior Counselor to Secretary of Homeland Security Jeh Johnson. He was a member of President-Elect Biden’s transition team, has testified often before Congress, and has worked with state, local, UN, and foreign governments.</p>
<p>Mentioned:</p>
<ul>
  <li>Cambridge University press is offering&nbsp;<a href="https://image.updates.cambridge.org/lib/fe97157477670d7d70/m/1/1390b6eb-0817-43a7-b02c-ec9159377789.pdf" rel="noopener noreferrer">a 20% discount here</a>&nbsp;(until October)</li>
  <li>Susan’s NBN interview with Richard Kreitner on&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/break-it-up#entry:47208@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Break It Up: Secession, Division, and The Secret History of America’s Imperfect Union</em></a>
</li>
  <li>Jonathan A. Rodden’s&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/why-cities-lose-the-deep-roots-of-the-urban-rural-political-divide-jonathan-a-rodden/18068047?ean=9781541644274&amp;next=t" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Why Cities Lose: The Deep Roots of the Urban-Rural Political Divide</em></a>&nbsp;(Basic Books 2019)</li>
  <li>
<a href="https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2002/07/29/framed-up" rel="noopener noreferrer">Hendrik Hertzberg’s review</a>&nbsp;of Robert A. Dahl’s&nbsp;<em>How Democratic Is the American Constitution</em>&nbsp;(Yale)</li>
  <li>
<a href="https://www.oyez.org/cases/2012/12-96" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Shelby County v. Holder</em></a>, the Supreme Court case that overturned the Voting Rights Act of 1965’s pre-clearance requirement for historically discriminating districts</li>
</ul><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="51373189" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/eebf83bd-76b5-4ae4-bdba-53234e3d69af/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=eebf83bd-76b5-4ae4-bdba-53234e3d69af&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Stephen H. Legomsky, &quot;Reimagining the American Union: The Case for Abolishing State Government&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:53:30</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Since American president Donald Trump was elected to a second term, it is common to hear citizens, journalists, and public officials distinguish between the laws and leaders of their states and the national government. Those who oppose Trump’s policies with regard to reproductive rights, gun violence, LGBTQ+, education, police, and voting often present state constitutions, courts, laws, culture, and leaders as a bulwark against Trump’s autocratic rule. 
But Professor Stephen H. Legomsky sees it differently. His new book, Reimagining the American Union: The Case for Abolishing State Government (Cambridge University Press 2025) argues that – if we care about democracy – we should imagine an America without state government. No longer a union of arbitrarily constructed states, the country would become a union of one American people. Reimagining the American Union understands state government as the root cause of the gravest threats to American democracy. While some of those threats are baked into the Constitution, the book argues that others are the product of state legislatures abusing their powers through gerrymanders, voter suppression, and other less-publicized manipulations that often target African-Americans and other minority voters. Reimagining the American Union interrogates how having national, state and local legislative bodies, taxation, bureaucracy, and regulation wastes taxpayer money and burdens the citizenry. After assessing the supposed benefits of state government, Professor Legomsky argues for a new, unitary American republic with only national and local governments.
Stephen H. Legomsky is the John S. Lehmann University Professor Emeritus at the Washington University School of Law. Professor Legomsky has published scholarly books on immigration and refugee law, courts, and constitutional law. He served in the Obama Administration as Chief Counsel of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and later as Senior Counselor to Secretary of Homeland Security Jeh Johnson. He was a member of President-Elect Biden’s transition team, has testified often before Congress, and has worked with state, local, UN, and foreign governments.
Mentioned:
 Cambridge University press is offering a 20% discount here (until October)
 Susan’s NBN interview with Richard Kreitner on Break It Up: Secession, Division, and The Secret History of America’s Imperfect Union
 Jonathan A. Rodden’s Why Cities Lose: The Deep Roots of the Urban-Rural Political Divide (Basic Books 2019)
Hendrik Hertzberg’s review of Robert A. Dahl’s How Democratic Is the American Constitution (Yale)
Shelby County v. Holder, the Supreme Court case that overturned the Voting Rights Act of 1965’s pre-clearance requirement for historically discriminating districts
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Since American president Donald Trump was elected to a second term, it is common to hear citizens, journalists, and public officials distinguish between the laws and leaders of their states and the national government. Those who oppose Trump’s policies with regard to reproductive rights, gun violence, LGBTQ+, education, police, and voting often present state constitutions, courts, laws, culture, and leaders as a bulwark against Trump’s autocratic rule. 
But Professor Stephen H. Legomsky sees it differently. His new book, Reimagining the American Union: The Case for Abolishing State Government (Cambridge University Press 2025) argues that – if we care about democracy – we should imagine an America without state government. No longer a union of arbitrarily constructed states, the country would become a union of one American people. Reimagining the American Union understands state government as the root cause of the gravest threats to American democracy. While some of those threats are baked into the Constitution, the book argues that others are the product of state legislatures abusing their powers through gerrymanders, voter suppression, and other less-publicized manipulations that often target African-Americans and other minority voters. Reimagining the American Union interrogates how having national, state and local legislative bodies, taxation, bureaucracy, and regulation wastes taxpayer money and burdens the citizenry. After assessing the supposed benefits of state government, Professor Legomsky argues for a new, unitary American republic with only national and local governments.
Stephen H. Legomsky is the John S. Lehmann University Professor Emeritus at the Washington University School of Law. Professor Legomsky has published scholarly books on immigration and refugee law, courts, and constitutional law. He served in the Obama Administration as Chief Counsel of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and later as Senior Counselor to Secretary of Homeland Security Jeh Johnson. He was a member of President-Elect Biden’s transition team, has testified often before Congress, and has worked with state, local, UN, and foreign governments.
Mentioned:
 Cambridge University press is offering a 20% discount here (until October)
 Susan’s NBN interview with Richard Kreitner on Break It Up: Secession, Division, and The Secret History of America’s Imperfect Union
 Jonathan A. Rodden’s Why Cities Lose: The Deep Roots of the Urban-Rural Political Divide (Basic Books 2019)
Hendrik Hertzberg’s review of Robert A. Dahl’s How Democratic Is the American Constitution (Yale)
Shelby County v. Holder, the Supreme Court case that overturned the Voting Rights Act of 1965’s pre-clearance requirement for historically discriminating districts
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>768</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9c39ea44-2377-11f0-8545-73f5e3c91835</guid>
      <title>Caitlin Killian, &quot;Understanding Reproduction in Social Contexts&quot; (Bloomsbury, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In today's post-<em>Roe v. Wade</em>&nbsp;world, U.S. maternal mortality is on the rise and laws regarding contraception, involuntary sterilization, access to reproductive health services, and criminalization of people who are gestating are changing by the minute. Today I’m joined by Dr. Caitlin Killian, the editor of and one of the contributors to a new book from Bloomsbury Academic,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9798881801533" rel="noopener noreferrer">Understanding Reproduction in Social Contexts: A Reader</a>. I’m also pleased to host two of the chapter authors, Drs. Nancy Hiemstra and Jaya Keaney.</p>
<p>Using a reproductive justice framework,&nbsp;<em>Understanding Reproduction in Social Contexts&nbsp;</em>walks students through the social landscape around reproduction through the life course. Chapters by cutting-edge reproductive scholars, practitioners, and advocates address the social control of fertility and pregnancy, the promises and perils of assisted reproductive technologies, experiences of pregnancy, miscarriage, abortion, and birth, and how individuals make sense of and respond to the cultural, social, and political forces that condition their reproductive lives. The book takes an intersectional approach and considers how gender, sexuality, fatness, disability, class, race, and immigration status impact both an individual's health and the healthcare they receive. The reader includes timely topics such as increased legal limitations on abortion, transpeople and reproduction, and new developments in assisted reproduction and family formation. The book can support undergraduate and graduate courses on families, gender, public health, reproduction, and sexuality – and I’m pleased to have contributed a chapter.</p>
<p><a href="http://caitlinkillian.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. Caitlin Killian</a>&nbsp;is a Professor of Sociology at Drew University specializing in gender, families, reproduction, and immigration. We featured her book,&nbsp;<em>Failing Moms: Social Condemnation and Criminalization of Mothers</em>&nbsp;(Polity 2023) previously on New Books Network. Her articles have appeared in&nbsp;<em>Contexts</em>&nbsp;magazine and&nbsp;<em>The Conversation</em>, as well as numerous academic journals, and she has done work for the United Nations on sexual and reproductive health and rights and on Syrian refugee women</p>
<p><a href="https://www.stonybrook.edu/commcms/wgss/people/nancyhiemstra" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. Nancy Hiemstra</a>&nbsp;is a political, cultural, and feminist geographer and Associate Professor in the Department of Women's, Gender, and Sexuality Studies at Stony Brook University. Her scholarship focuses on how border and immigration policies shape patterns and consequences of human mobility. Her 2019 book&nbsp;<em>Detain and Deport: The Chaotic U.S. Immigration Enforcement Regime&nbsp;</em>examined the U.S. detention and deportation system, and her forthcoming book (with Deirdre Conlon)&nbsp;<em>Immigration Detention Inc: The Big Business of Locking Up Migrants&nbsp;</em>scrutinizes how profit making goals drive the expanding use of detention.</p>
<p><a href="https://findanexpert.unimelb.edu.au/profile/955699-jaya-keaney" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr Jaya Keaney</a>&nbsp;is Lecturer in Gender Studies in the School of Social and Political Sciences at the University of Melbourne. She writes, researches, and teaches in the fields of feminist technoscience, queer and feminist theory, and cultural studies. Her research across these fields explores reproduction, racism, and queer feminist practices of embodiment and inheritance. Jaya is the author of&nbsp;<a href="https://www.dukeupress.edu/making-gaybies" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Making Gaybies: Queer Reproduction and Multiracial Feeling</em></a>&nbsp;(Duke University Press, 2023), which was a finalist for the 2024 Rachel Carson Prize. Her writing has also appeared in journals such as&nbsp;<em>Body and Society,</em>&nbsp;<em>Science Technology &amp; Human Values,&nbsp;</em>and the Duke University Press edited collection&nbsp;<em>Long Term: Essays on Queer Commitment&nbsp;</em>(2021).</p>
<p>Mentioned:</p>
<ul>
  <li>Susan’s interview with Caitlin on&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/failing-moms#entry:286921@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Failing Moms: The Social Condemnation and Criminalization of Mothers</em></a>&nbsp;(Polity, 2024).</li>
</ul><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/caitlin-killian-understanding-reproduction-in-social-contexts-bloomsbury-2025-Kvx8XinB</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In today's post-<em>Roe v. Wade</em>&nbsp;world, U.S. maternal mortality is on the rise and laws regarding contraception, involuntary sterilization, access to reproductive health services, and criminalization of people who are gestating are changing by the minute. Today I’m joined by Dr. Caitlin Killian, the editor of and one of the contributors to a new book from Bloomsbury Academic,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9798881801533" rel="noopener noreferrer">Understanding Reproduction in Social Contexts: A Reader</a>. I’m also pleased to host two of the chapter authors, Drs. Nancy Hiemstra and Jaya Keaney.</p>
<p>Using a reproductive justice framework,&nbsp;<em>Understanding Reproduction in Social Contexts&nbsp;</em>walks students through the social landscape around reproduction through the life course. Chapters by cutting-edge reproductive scholars, practitioners, and advocates address the social control of fertility and pregnancy, the promises and perils of assisted reproductive technologies, experiences of pregnancy, miscarriage, abortion, and birth, and how individuals make sense of and respond to the cultural, social, and political forces that condition their reproductive lives. The book takes an intersectional approach and considers how gender, sexuality, fatness, disability, class, race, and immigration status impact both an individual's health and the healthcare they receive. The reader includes timely topics such as increased legal limitations on abortion, transpeople and reproduction, and new developments in assisted reproduction and family formation. The book can support undergraduate and graduate courses on families, gender, public health, reproduction, and sexuality – and I’m pleased to have contributed a chapter.</p>
<p><a href="http://caitlinkillian.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. Caitlin Killian</a>&nbsp;is a Professor of Sociology at Drew University specializing in gender, families, reproduction, and immigration. We featured her book,&nbsp;<em>Failing Moms: Social Condemnation and Criminalization of Mothers</em>&nbsp;(Polity 2023) previously on New Books Network. Her articles have appeared in&nbsp;<em>Contexts</em>&nbsp;magazine and&nbsp;<em>The Conversation</em>, as well as numerous academic journals, and she has done work for the United Nations on sexual and reproductive health and rights and on Syrian refugee women</p>
<p><a href="https://www.stonybrook.edu/commcms/wgss/people/nancyhiemstra" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. Nancy Hiemstra</a>&nbsp;is a political, cultural, and feminist geographer and Associate Professor in the Department of Women's, Gender, and Sexuality Studies at Stony Brook University. Her scholarship focuses on how border and immigration policies shape patterns and consequences of human mobility. Her 2019 book&nbsp;<em>Detain and Deport: The Chaotic U.S. Immigration Enforcement Regime&nbsp;</em>examined the U.S. detention and deportation system, and her forthcoming book (with Deirdre Conlon)&nbsp;<em>Immigration Detention Inc: The Big Business of Locking Up Migrants&nbsp;</em>scrutinizes how profit making goals drive the expanding use of detention.</p>
<p><a href="https://findanexpert.unimelb.edu.au/profile/955699-jaya-keaney" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr Jaya Keaney</a>&nbsp;is Lecturer in Gender Studies in the School of Social and Political Sciences at the University of Melbourne. She writes, researches, and teaches in the fields of feminist technoscience, queer and feminist theory, and cultural studies. Her research across these fields explores reproduction, racism, and queer feminist practices of embodiment and inheritance. Jaya is the author of&nbsp;<a href="https://www.dukeupress.edu/making-gaybies" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Making Gaybies: Queer Reproduction and Multiracial Feeling</em></a>&nbsp;(Duke University Press, 2023), which was a finalist for the 2024 Rachel Carson Prize. Her writing has also appeared in journals such as&nbsp;<em>Body and Society,</em>&nbsp;<em>Science Technology &amp; Human Values,&nbsp;</em>and the Duke University Press edited collection&nbsp;<em>Long Term: Essays on Queer Commitment&nbsp;</em>(2021).</p>
<p>Mentioned:</p>
<ul>
  <li>Susan’s interview with Caitlin on&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/failing-moms#entry:286921@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Failing Moms: The Social Condemnation and Criminalization of Mothers</em></a>&nbsp;(Polity, 2024).</li>
</ul><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="57719674" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/73386685-cd80-45be-88d5-ba3b94a9f5d3/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=73386685-cd80-45be-88d5-ba3b94a9f5d3&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Caitlin Killian, &quot;Understanding Reproduction in Social Contexts&quot; (Bloomsbury, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:00:07</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In today&apos;s post-Roe v. Wade world, U.S. maternal mortality is on the rise and laws regarding contraception, involuntary sterilization, access to reproductive health services, and criminalization of people who are gestating are changing by the minute. Today I’m joined by Dr. Caitlin Killian, the editor of and one of the contributors to a new book from Bloomsbury Academic, Understanding Reproduction in Social Contexts: A Reader. I’m also pleased to host two of the chapter authors, Drs. Nancy Hiemstra and Jaya Keaney.
Using a reproductive justice framework, Understanding Reproduction in Social Contexts walks students through the social landscape around reproduction through the life course. Chapters by cutting-edge reproductive scholars, practitioners, and advocates address the social control of fertility and pregnancy, the promises and perils of assisted reproductive technologies, experiences of pregnancy, miscarriage, abortion, and birth, and how individuals make sense of and respond to the cultural, social, and political forces that condition their reproductive lives. The book takes an intersectional approach and considers how gender, sexuality, fatness, disability, class, race, and immigration status impact both an individual&apos;s health and the healthcare they receive. The reader includes timely topics such as increased legal limitations on abortion, transpeople and reproduction, and new developments in assisted reproduction and family formation. The book can support undergraduate and graduate courses on families, gender, public health, reproduction, and sexuality – and I’m pleased to have contributed a chapter.
Dr. Caitlin Killian is a Professor of Sociology at Drew University specializing in gender, families, reproduction, and immigration. We featured her book, Failing Moms: Social Condemnation and Criminalization of Mothers (Polity 2023) previously on New Books Network. Her articles have appeared in Contexts magazine and The Conversation, as well as numerous academic journals, and she has done work for the United Nations on sexual and reproductive health and rights and on Syrian refugee women
Dr. Nancy Hiemstra is a political, cultural, and feminist geographer and Associate Professor in the Department of Women&apos;s, Gender, and Sexuality Studies at Stony Brook University. Her scholarship focuses on how border and immigration policies shape patterns and consequences of human mobility. Her 2019 book Detain and Deport: The Chaotic U.S. Immigration Enforcement Regime examined the U.S. detention and deportation system, and her forthcoming book (with Deirdre Conlon) Immigration Detention Inc: The Big Business of Locking Up Migrants scrutinizes how profit making goals drive the expanding use of detention.
Dr Jaya Keaney is Lecturer in Gender Studies in the School of Social and Political Sciences at the University of Melbourne. She writes, researches, and teaches in the fields of feminist technoscience, queer and feminist theory, and cultural studies. Her research across these fields explores reproduction, racism, and queer feminist practices of embodiment and inheritance. Jaya is the author of Making Gaybies: Queer Reproduction and Multiracial Feeling (Duke University Press, 2023), which was a finalist for the 2024 Rachel Carson Prize. Her writing has also appeared in journals such as Body and Society, Science Technology &amp; Human Values, and the Duke University Press edited collection Long Term: Essays on Queer Commitment (2021).
Mentioned:
 Susan’s interview with Caitlin on Failing Moms: The Social Condemnation and Criminalization of Mothers (Polity, 2024).
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In today&apos;s post-Roe v. Wade world, U.S. maternal mortality is on the rise and laws regarding contraception, involuntary sterilization, access to reproductive health services, and criminalization of people who are gestating are changing by the minute. Today I’m joined by Dr. Caitlin Killian, the editor of and one of the contributors to a new book from Bloomsbury Academic, Understanding Reproduction in Social Contexts: A Reader. I’m also pleased to host two of the chapter authors, Drs. Nancy Hiemstra and Jaya Keaney.
Using a reproductive justice framework, Understanding Reproduction in Social Contexts walks students through the social landscape around reproduction through the life course. Chapters by cutting-edge reproductive scholars, practitioners, and advocates address the social control of fertility and pregnancy, the promises and perils of assisted reproductive technologies, experiences of pregnancy, miscarriage, abortion, and birth, and how individuals make sense of and respond to the cultural, social, and political forces that condition their reproductive lives. The book takes an intersectional approach and considers how gender, sexuality, fatness, disability, class, race, and immigration status impact both an individual&apos;s health and the healthcare they receive. The reader includes timely topics such as increased legal limitations on abortion, transpeople and reproduction, and new developments in assisted reproduction and family formation. The book can support undergraduate and graduate courses on families, gender, public health, reproduction, and sexuality – and I’m pleased to have contributed a chapter.
Dr. Caitlin Killian is a Professor of Sociology at Drew University specializing in gender, families, reproduction, and immigration. We featured her book, Failing Moms: Social Condemnation and Criminalization of Mothers (Polity 2023) previously on New Books Network. Her articles have appeared in Contexts magazine and The Conversation, as well as numerous academic journals, and she has done work for the United Nations on sexual and reproductive health and rights and on Syrian refugee women
Dr. Nancy Hiemstra is a political, cultural, and feminist geographer and Associate Professor in the Department of Women&apos;s, Gender, and Sexuality Studies at Stony Brook University. Her scholarship focuses on how border and immigration policies shape patterns and consequences of human mobility. Her 2019 book Detain and Deport: The Chaotic U.S. Immigration Enforcement Regime examined the U.S. detention and deportation system, and her forthcoming book (with Deirdre Conlon) Immigration Detention Inc: The Big Business of Locking Up Migrants scrutinizes how profit making goals drive the expanding use of detention.
Dr Jaya Keaney is Lecturer in Gender Studies in the School of Social and Political Sciences at the University of Melbourne. She writes, researches, and teaches in the fields of feminist technoscience, queer and feminist theory, and cultural studies. Her research across these fields explores reproduction, racism, and queer feminist practices of embodiment and inheritance. Jaya is the author of Making Gaybies: Queer Reproduction and Multiracial Feeling (Duke University Press, 2023), which was a finalist for the 2024 Rachel Carson Prize. Her writing has also appeared in journals such as Body and Society, Science Technology &amp; Human Values, and the Duke University Press edited collection Long Term: Essays on Queer Commitment (2021).
Mentioned:
 Susan’s interview with Caitlin on Failing Moms: The Social Condemnation and Criminalization of Mothers (Polity, 2024).
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>767</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5402a57a-2211-11f0-84e2-8b018bdecde5</guid>
      <title>Jeff Sebo, &quot;The Moral Circle: Who Matters, What Matters, and Why&quot; (Norton, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Today, human exceptionalism is the norm. Despite occasional nods to animal welfare, we prioritize humanity, often neglecting the welfare of a vast number of beings. As a result, we use hundreds of billions of vertebrates and trillions of invertebrates every year for a variety of purposes, often unnecessarily. We also plan to use animals, AI systems, and other nonhumans at even higher levels in the future. Yet as the dominant species, humanity has a responsibility to ask: Which nonhumans matter, how much do they matter, and what do we owe them in a world reshaped by human activity and technology?</p>
<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781324064817" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Moral Circle: Who Matters, What Matters, and Why</a>&nbsp;(W.W. Norton, 2025), philosopher Jeff Sebo challenges us to include all potentially significant beings in our moral community, with transformative implications for our lives and societies.</p>
<p>This book explores provocative case studies such as lawsuits over captive elephants and debates over factory-farmed insects, and compels us to consider future ethical quandaries, such as whether to send microbes to new planets, and whether to create virtual worlds filled with digital minds. Taking an expansive view of human responsibility, Sebo argues that building a positive future requires the shedding of human exceptionalism and radically rethinking our place in the world.</p>
<p><a href="https://jeffsebo.net/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Jeff Sebo</a>&nbsp;is Associate Professor of Environmental Studies, Affiliated Professor of Bioethics, Medical Ethics, Philosophy, and Law, Director of the Center for Environmental and Animal Protection, Director of the Center for Mind, Ethics, and Policy, and Co-Director of the Wild Animal Welfare Program at New York University.&nbsp;</p>
<p><a href="https://sites.google.com/view/kyle-johannsen/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Kyle Johannsen</a>&nbsp;is Sessional Faculty Member in the Department of Philosophy at Trent University. His most recent authored book is&nbsp;<em>Wild Animal Ethics: The Moral and Political Problem of Wild Animal Suffering</em>&nbsp;(Routledge, 2021).</p>
<p><br></p>
<p><em>Let's face it, most of the popular podcasts out there are
dumb. NBN features scholars (like you!), providing an enriching alternative to
students. We partner with presses like Oxford, Princeton, and Cambridge to make
academic research accessible to all. Please consider sharing the New Books
Network with your students. Download&nbsp;</em><a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/18YFnB006Nb1ON9_LF2tKvDJjir4d6lLB/view?usp=sharing" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>this poster here</em></a><em>&nbsp;to spread the word.</em></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><em>Please share this interview on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.instagram.com/newbooksnetwork" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Instagram</em></a><em>,&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/company/new-books-network/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>LinkedIn</em></a><em>,
or&nbsp;</em><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/newbooksnetwork.bsky.social" rel="noopener noreferrer">Bluesky</a><em>. Don't forget to subscribe to our Substack&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.substack.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>here</em></a><em>&nbsp;to
receive our weekly newsletter.</em></p>
<p>
</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/jeff-sebo-the-moral-circle-who-matters-what-matters-and-why-norton-2025-Ca2S3qWq</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today, human exceptionalism is the norm. Despite occasional nods to animal welfare, we prioritize humanity, often neglecting the welfare of a vast number of beings. As a result, we use hundreds of billions of vertebrates and trillions of invertebrates every year for a variety of purposes, often unnecessarily. We also plan to use animals, AI systems, and other nonhumans at even higher levels in the future. Yet as the dominant species, humanity has a responsibility to ask: Which nonhumans matter, how much do they matter, and what do we owe them in a world reshaped by human activity and technology?</p>
<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781324064817" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Moral Circle: Who Matters, What Matters, and Why</a>&nbsp;(W.W. Norton, 2025), philosopher Jeff Sebo challenges us to include all potentially significant beings in our moral community, with transformative implications for our lives and societies.</p>
<p>This book explores provocative case studies such as lawsuits over captive elephants and debates over factory-farmed insects, and compels us to consider future ethical quandaries, such as whether to send microbes to new planets, and whether to create virtual worlds filled with digital minds. Taking an expansive view of human responsibility, Sebo argues that building a positive future requires the shedding of human exceptionalism and radically rethinking our place in the world.</p>
<p><a href="https://jeffsebo.net/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Jeff Sebo</a>&nbsp;is Associate Professor of Environmental Studies, Affiliated Professor of Bioethics, Medical Ethics, Philosophy, and Law, Director of the Center for Environmental and Animal Protection, Director of the Center for Mind, Ethics, and Policy, and Co-Director of the Wild Animal Welfare Program at New York University.&nbsp;</p>
<p><a href="https://sites.google.com/view/kyle-johannsen/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Kyle Johannsen</a>&nbsp;is Sessional Faculty Member in the Department of Philosophy at Trent University. His most recent authored book is&nbsp;<em>Wild Animal Ethics: The Moral and Political Problem of Wild Animal Suffering</em>&nbsp;(Routledge, 2021).</p>
<p><br></p>
<p><em>Let's face it, most of the popular podcasts out there are
dumb. NBN features scholars (like you!), providing an enriching alternative to
students. We partner with presses like Oxford, Princeton, and Cambridge to make
academic research accessible to all. Please consider sharing the New Books
Network with your students. Download&nbsp;</em><a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/18YFnB006Nb1ON9_LF2tKvDJjir4d6lLB/view?usp=sharing" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>this poster here</em></a><em>&nbsp;to spread the word.</em></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><em>Please share this interview on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.instagram.com/newbooksnetwork" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Instagram</em></a><em>,&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/company/new-books-network/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>LinkedIn</em></a><em>,
or&nbsp;</em><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/newbooksnetwork.bsky.social" rel="noopener noreferrer">Bluesky</a><em>. Don't forget to subscribe to our Substack&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.substack.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>here</em></a><em>&nbsp;to
receive our weekly newsletter.</em></p>
<p>
</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="56575815" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/51def6a8-d99b-4291-813d-6dcee8024aa3/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=51def6a8-d99b-4291-813d-6dcee8024aa3&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Jeff Sebo, &quot;The Moral Circle: Who Matters, What Matters, and Why&quot; (Norton, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:58:55</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Today, human exceptionalism is the norm. Despite occasional nods to animal welfare, we prioritize humanity, often neglecting the welfare of a vast number of beings. As a result, we use hundreds of billions of vertebrates and trillions of invertebrates every year for a variety of purposes, often unnecessarily. We also plan to use animals, AI systems, and other nonhumans at even higher levels in the future. Yet as the dominant species, humanity has a responsibility to ask: Which nonhumans matter, how much do they matter, and what do we owe them in a world reshaped by human activity and technology?
In The Moral Circle: Who Matters, What Matters, and Why (W.W. Norton, 2025), philosopher Jeff Sebo challenges us to include all potentially significant beings in our moral community, with transformative implications for our lives and societies.
This book explores provocative case studies such as lawsuits over captive elephants and debates over factory-farmed insects, and compels us to consider future ethical quandaries, such as whether to send microbes to new planets, and whether to create virtual worlds filled with digital minds. Taking an expansive view of human responsibility, Sebo argues that building a positive future requires the shedding of human exceptionalism and radically rethinking our place in the world.
Jeff Sebo is Associate Professor of Environmental Studies, Affiliated Professor of Bioethics, Medical Ethics, Philosophy, and Law, Director of the Center for Environmental and Animal Protection, Director of the Center for Mind, Ethics, and Policy, and Co-Director of the Wild Animal Welfare Program at New York University. 
Kyle Johannsen is Sessional Faculty Member in the Department of Philosophy at Trent University. His most recent authored book is Wild Animal Ethics: The Moral and Political Problem of Wild Animal Suffering (Routledge, 2021).
Let&apos;s face it, most of the popular podcasts out there are
dumb. NBN features scholars (like you!), providing an enriching alternative to
students. We partner with presses like Oxford, Princeton, and Cambridge to make
academic research accessible to all. Please consider sharing the New Books
Network with your students. Download this poster here to spread the word.
 
Please share this interview on Instagram, LinkedIn,
or Bluesky. Don&apos;t forget to subscribe to our Substack here to
receive our weekly newsletter.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Today, human exceptionalism is the norm. Despite occasional nods to animal welfare, we prioritize humanity, often neglecting the welfare of a vast number of beings. As a result, we use hundreds of billions of vertebrates and trillions of invertebrates every year for a variety of purposes, often unnecessarily. We also plan to use animals, AI systems, and other nonhumans at even higher levels in the future. Yet as the dominant species, humanity has a responsibility to ask: Which nonhumans matter, how much do they matter, and what do we owe them in a world reshaped by human activity and technology?
In The Moral Circle: Who Matters, What Matters, and Why (W.W. Norton, 2025), philosopher Jeff Sebo challenges us to include all potentially significant beings in our moral community, with transformative implications for our lives and societies.
This book explores provocative case studies such as lawsuits over captive elephants and debates over factory-farmed insects, and compels us to consider future ethical quandaries, such as whether to send microbes to new planets, and whether to create virtual worlds filled with digital minds. Taking an expansive view of human responsibility, Sebo argues that building a positive future requires the shedding of human exceptionalism and radically rethinking our place in the world.
Jeff Sebo is Associate Professor of Environmental Studies, Affiliated Professor of Bioethics, Medical Ethics, Philosophy, and Law, Director of the Center for Environmental and Animal Protection, Director of the Center for Mind, Ethics, and Policy, and Co-Director of the Wild Animal Welfare Program at New York University. 
Kyle Johannsen is Sessional Faculty Member in the Department of Philosophy at Trent University. His most recent authored book is Wild Animal Ethics: The Moral and Political Problem of Wild Animal Suffering (Routledge, 2021).
Let&apos;s face it, most of the popular podcasts out there are
dumb. NBN features scholars (like you!), providing an enriching alternative to
students. We partner with presses like Oxford, Princeton, and Cambridge to make
academic research accessible to all. Please consider sharing the New Books
Network with your students. Download this poster here to spread the word.
 
Please share this interview on Instagram, LinkedIn,
or Bluesky. Don&apos;t forget to subscribe to our Substack here to
receive our weekly newsletter.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1526</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8a2b80da-21d1-11f0-9c42-8349ca45330b</guid>
      <title>Eleanor Paynter, &quot;Emergency in Transit: Witnessing Migration in the Colonial Present&quot; (U California Press, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780520402904" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Emergency in Transit: Witnessing Migration in the Colonial Present</em></a>&nbsp;(University of California Press, 2024) by Dr. Eleanor Paynter responds to the crisis framings that dominate migration debates in the global north. This capacious, interdisciplinary open-access study reformulates Europe's so-called "migrant crisis" from a sudden disaster to a site of contested witnessing, where competing narratives threaten, uphold, or reimagine migrant rights.</p><p>Focusing on Italy, a crucial port of arrival, Dr. Paynter draws together testimonials from ethnographic research—alongside literature, film, and visual art—to interrogate the colonial, racial logics that inform emergency responses to migration. She also examines the media, discourses, policies, and practices that shape lived experiences of migration well beyond international borders. Centering the witnessing of Black Africans in Italy,&nbsp;<em>Emergency in Transit</em>&nbsp;reveals how this emergency apparatus operates and posits a vision of mobility that refutes the notions of crisis so often imposed on those who cross the Mediterranean Sea.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/eleanor-paynter-emergency-in-transit-witnessing-migration-in-the-colonial-present-u-california-press-2024-M3ahOcDc</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780520402904" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Emergency in Transit: Witnessing Migration in the Colonial Present</em></a>&nbsp;(University of California Press, 2024) by Dr. Eleanor Paynter responds to the crisis framings that dominate migration debates in the global north. This capacious, interdisciplinary open-access study reformulates Europe's so-called "migrant crisis" from a sudden disaster to a site of contested witnessing, where competing narratives threaten, uphold, or reimagine migrant rights.</p><p>Focusing on Italy, a crucial port of arrival, Dr. Paynter draws together testimonials from ethnographic research—alongside literature, film, and visual art—to interrogate the colonial, racial logics that inform emergency responses to migration. She also examines the media, discourses, policies, and practices that shape lived experiences of migration well beyond international borders. Centering the witnessing of Black Africans in Italy,&nbsp;<em>Emergency in Transit</em>&nbsp;reveals how this emergency apparatus operates and posits a vision of mobility that refutes the notions of crisis so often imposed on those who cross the Mediterranean Sea.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="46942258" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/3e6f87e0-8dc3-4ce1-8472-277c10ede589/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=3e6f87e0-8dc3-4ce1-8472-277c10ede589&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Eleanor Paynter, &quot;Emergency in Transit: Witnessing Migration in the Colonial Present&quot; (U California Press, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:48:53</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Emergency in Transit: Witnessing Migration in the Colonial Present (University of California Press, 2024) by Dr. Eleanor Paynter responds to the crisis framings that dominate migration debates in the global north. This capacious, interdisciplinary open-access study reformulates Europe&apos;s so-called &quot;migrant crisis&quot; from a sudden disaster to a site of contested witnessing, where competing narratives threaten, uphold, or reimagine migrant rights.
Focusing on Italy, a crucial port of arrival, Dr. Paynter draws together testimonials from ethnographic research—alongside literature, film, and visual art—to interrogate the colonial, racial logics that inform emergency responses to migration. She also examines the media, discourses, policies, and practices that shape lived experiences of migration well beyond international borders. Centering the witnessing of Black Africans in Italy, Emergency in Transit reveals how this emergency apparatus operates and posits a vision of mobility that refutes the notions of crisis so often imposed on those who cross the Mediterranean Sea.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Emergency in Transit: Witnessing Migration in the Colonial Present (University of California Press, 2024) by Dr. Eleanor Paynter responds to the crisis framings that dominate migration debates in the global north. This capacious, interdisciplinary open-access study reformulates Europe&apos;s so-called &quot;migrant crisis&quot; from a sudden disaster to a site of contested witnessing, where competing narratives threaten, uphold, or reimagine migrant rights.
Focusing on Italy, a crucial port of arrival, Dr. Paynter draws together testimonials from ethnographic research—alongside literature, film, and visual art—to interrogate the colonial, racial logics that inform emergency responses to migration. She also examines the media, discourses, policies, and practices that shape lived experiences of migration well beyond international borders. Centering the witnessing of Black Africans in Italy, Emergency in Transit reveals how this emergency apparatus operates and posits a vision of mobility that refutes the notions of crisis so often imposed on those who cross the Mediterranean Sea.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>35</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">d429250c-2078-11f0-8c38-3b0d0d771855</guid>
      <title>Philip J. Stern, &quot;Empire, Incorporated: The Corporations That Built British Colonialism&quot; (Harvard UP, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Welcome to the&nbsp;<strong>Global Corporations Special Series</strong>&nbsp;on the Law Channel on the New Books Network. This Special Series is dedicated to interviews with scholars about recent books engaging with different aspects of global corporations – with a focus on the role of law and legal forms.</p><p>Our guest today is Professor Philip J. Stern, Professor of History at the History Department at Duke University. Philip is a historian of the British Empire, with an interest in the role of companies and corporations in colonial enterprise, overseas exploration and cartography, the historiography of British India, early modern economic thought, and digital and data visualization approaches to the problem of colonial sovereignty.</p><p>We spoke with Philip in a live event as part of a workshop in Hong Kong on the history of companies in Asia about his most recent book,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780674988125" rel="noopener noreferrer">Empire, Incorporated: The Corporations That Built British Colonialism</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Harvard University Press, 2023).</p><p>The book places corporations at the centre of the story of the British Empire. It is both a masterful synthesis of a vast body of existing historiographical literature and an incredibly original contribution describing the various corporations engaged in the interrelated and competing projects of what it terms as “corporate or venture colonialism” and their long afterlives of entangled sovereign and commercial powers.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/philip-j-stern-empire-incorporated-the-corporations-that-built-british-colonialism-harvard-up-2023-EEOEDXpF</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Welcome to the&nbsp;<strong>Global Corporations Special Series</strong>&nbsp;on the Law Channel on the New Books Network. This Special Series is dedicated to interviews with scholars about recent books engaging with different aspects of global corporations – with a focus on the role of law and legal forms.</p><p>Our guest today is Professor Philip J. Stern, Professor of History at the History Department at Duke University. Philip is a historian of the British Empire, with an interest in the role of companies and corporations in colonial enterprise, overseas exploration and cartography, the historiography of British India, early modern economic thought, and digital and data visualization approaches to the problem of colonial sovereignty.</p><p>We spoke with Philip in a live event as part of a workshop in Hong Kong on the history of companies in Asia about his most recent book,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780674988125" rel="noopener noreferrer">Empire, Incorporated: The Corporations That Built British Colonialism</a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Harvard University Press, 2023).</p><p>The book places corporations at the centre of the story of the British Empire. It is both a masterful synthesis of a vast body of existing historiographical literature and an incredibly original contribution describing the various corporations engaged in the interrelated and competing projects of what it terms as “corporate or venture colonialism” and their long afterlives of entangled sovereign and commercial powers.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="52560579" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/f2265cf6-e816-4ff9-b68e-4c5d69a0d697/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=f2265cf6-e816-4ff9-b68e-4c5d69a0d697&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Philip J. Stern, &quot;Empire, Incorporated: The Corporations That Built British Colonialism&quot; (Harvard UP, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:54:44</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Welcome to the Global Corporations Special Series on the Law Channel on the New Books Network. This Special Series is dedicated to interviews with scholars about recent books engaging with different aspects of global corporations – with a focus on the role of law and legal forms.
Our guest today is Professor Philip J. Stern, Professor of History at the History Department at Duke University. Philip is a historian of the British Empire, with an interest in the role of companies and corporations in colonial enterprise, overseas exploration and cartography, the historiography of British India, early modern economic thought, and digital and data visualization approaches to the problem of colonial sovereignty.
We spoke with Philip in a live event as part of a workshop in Hong Kong on the history of companies in Asia about his most recent book, Empire, Incorporated: The Corporations That Built British Colonialism (Harvard University Press, 2023).
The book places corporations at the centre of the story of the British Empire. It is both a masterful synthesis of a vast body of existing historiographical literature and an incredibly original contribution describing the various corporations engaged in the interrelated and competing projects of what it terms as “corporate or venture colonialism” and their long afterlives of entangled sovereign and commercial powers.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Welcome to the Global Corporations Special Series on the Law Channel on the New Books Network. This Special Series is dedicated to interviews with scholars about recent books engaging with different aspects of global corporations – with a focus on the role of law and legal forms.
Our guest today is Professor Philip J. Stern, Professor of History at the History Department at Duke University. Philip is a historian of the British Empire, with an interest in the role of companies and corporations in colonial enterprise, overseas exploration and cartography, the historiography of British India, early modern economic thought, and digital and data visualization approaches to the problem of colonial sovereignty.
We spoke with Philip in a live event as part of a workshop in Hong Kong on the history of companies in Asia about his most recent book, Empire, Incorporated: The Corporations That Built British Colonialism (Harvard University Press, 2023).
The book places corporations at the centre of the story of the British Empire. It is both a masterful synthesis of a vast body of existing historiographical literature and an incredibly original contribution describing the various corporations engaged in the interrelated and competing projects of what it terms as “corporate or venture colonialism” and their long afterlives of entangled sovereign and commercial powers.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>247</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">a143f560-1ebe-11f0-90f9-8f4ab8f6cc5d</guid>
      <title>Philip V. McHarris, &quot;Beyond Policing&quot; (Legacy Lit, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>What would happen if policing disappeared? Would we be safe? This book imagines a world without police.</p><p>It's evident that policing is a problem. But what is the best way forward? In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781538725665" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Beyond Policing</em></a>, distinguished scholar and writer Philip V. McHarris reimagines the world without police to find answers and reveal how we can make police departments obsolete.</p><p><em>Beyond Policing</em>&nbsp;tackles thorny issues with evidence, including data and personal stories, to uncover the weight of policing on people and communities and the patterns that prove police reform only leads to more policing.</p><p>McHarris challenges us to envision a future where safety is not synonymous with policing but is built on the foundation of community support and preventive measures. He explores innovative community-based safety models (like community mediators and violence interrupters), the decriminalization of driving offenses, and the creation of nonpolice crisis response teams. McHarris also outlines strategies for responding to conflict and harm in ways that transform the conditions that give rise to the issues. He asks us to imagine a world where people thrive without the shadow of inequality, where our approach to safety is a collective achievement.</p><p>McHarris writes, "What if our response to crisis wasn't about control but about care? How can we create conditions where safety is a shared responsibility? How can we design justice so that no community is routinely oppressed? Envisioning such a world isn't just a daydream; it's the first step toward building a society where violence and fear no longer dictate our lives."</p><p>Transformative and forward thinking,&nbsp;<em>Beyond Policing</em>&nbsp;provides a blueprint for a brighter, safer world. McHarris's vision is clear: we must dare to move beyond policing and foster a society where everyone has the resources to thrive and feel safe.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/philip-v-mcharris-beyond-policing-legacy-lit-2024-h0Pq403H</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What would happen if policing disappeared? Would we be safe? This book imagines a world without police.</p><p>It's evident that policing is a problem. But what is the best way forward? In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781538725665" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Beyond Policing</em></a>, distinguished scholar and writer Philip V. McHarris reimagines the world without police to find answers and reveal how we can make police departments obsolete.</p><p><em>Beyond Policing</em>&nbsp;tackles thorny issues with evidence, including data and personal stories, to uncover the weight of policing on people and communities and the patterns that prove police reform only leads to more policing.</p><p>McHarris challenges us to envision a future where safety is not synonymous with policing but is built on the foundation of community support and preventive measures. He explores innovative community-based safety models (like community mediators and violence interrupters), the decriminalization of driving offenses, and the creation of nonpolice crisis response teams. McHarris also outlines strategies for responding to conflict and harm in ways that transform the conditions that give rise to the issues. He asks us to imagine a world where people thrive without the shadow of inequality, where our approach to safety is a collective achievement.</p><p>McHarris writes, "What if our response to crisis wasn't about control but about care? How can we create conditions where safety is a shared responsibility? How can we design justice so that no community is routinely oppressed? Envisioning such a world isn't just a daydream; it's the first step toward building a society where violence and fear no longer dictate our lives."</p><p>Transformative and forward thinking,&nbsp;<em>Beyond Policing</em>&nbsp;provides a blueprint for a brighter, safer world. McHarris's vision is clear: we must dare to move beyond policing and foster a society where everyone has the resources to thrive and feel safe.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="42754040" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/3d8c4490-14a6-418f-a85c-0ae278048036/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=3d8c4490-14a6-418f-a85c-0ae278048036&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Philip V. McHarris, &quot;Beyond Policing&quot; (Legacy Lit, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:44:31</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>What would happen if policing disappeared? Would we be safe? This book imagines a world without police.
It&apos;s evident that policing is a problem. But what is the best way forward? In Beyond Policing, distinguished scholar and writer Philip V. McHarris reimagines the world without police to find answers and reveal how we can make police departments obsolete.
Beyond Policing tackles thorny issues with evidence, including data and personal stories, to uncover the weight of policing on people and communities and the patterns that prove police reform only leads to more policing.
McHarris challenges us to envision a future where safety is not synonymous with policing but is built on the foundation of community support and preventive measures. He explores innovative community-based safety models (like community mediators and violence interrupters), the decriminalization of driving offenses, and the creation of nonpolice crisis response teams. McHarris also outlines strategies for responding to conflict and harm in ways that transform the conditions that give rise to the issues. He asks us to imagine a world where people thrive without the shadow of inequality, where our approach to safety is a collective achievement.
McHarris writes, &quot;What if our response to crisis wasn&apos;t about control but about care? How can we create conditions where safety is a shared responsibility? How can we design justice so that no community is routinely oppressed? Envisioning such a world isn&apos;t just a daydream; it&apos;s the first step toward building a society where violence and fear no longer dictate our lives.&quot;
Transformative and forward thinking, Beyond Policing provides a blueprint for a brighter, safer world. McHarris&apos;s vision is clear: we must dare to move beyond policing and foster a society where everyone has the resources to thrive and feel safe.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>What would happen if policing disappeared? Would we be safe? This book imagines a world without police.
It&apos;s evident that policing is a problem. But what is the best way forward? In Beyond Policing, distinguished scholar and writer Philip V. McHarris reimagines the world without police to find answers and reveal how we can make police departments obsolete.
Beyond Policing tackles thorny issues with evidence, including data and personal stories, to uncover the weight of policing on people and communities and the patterns that prove police reform only leads to more policing.
McHarris challenges us to envision a future where safety is not synonymous with policing but is built on the foundation of community support and preventive measures. He explores innovative community-based safety models (like community mediators and violence interrupters), the decriminalization of driving offenses, and the creation of nonpolice crisis response teams. McHarris also outlines strategies for responding to conflict and harm in ways that transform the conditions that give rise to the issues. He asks us to imagine a world where people thrive without the shadow of inequality, where our approach to safety is a collective achievement.
McHarris writes, &quot;What if our response to crisis wasn&apos;t about control but about care? How can we create conditions where safety is a shared responsibility? How can we design justice so that no community is routinely oppressed? Envisioning such a world isn&apos;t just a daydream; it&apos;s the first step toward building a society where violence and fear no longer dictate our lives.&quot;
Transformative and forward thinking, Beyond Policing provides a blueprint for a brighter, safer world. McHarris&apos;s vision is clear: we must dare to move beyond policing and foster a society where everyone has the resources to thrive and feel safe.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>500</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">54719896-1fae-11f0-b423-23d11b793223</guid>
      <title>Tadashi Ishikawa, &quot;Geographies of Gender: Family and Law in Imperial Japan and Colonial Taiwan&quot; (Cambridge UP., 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009534178" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Geographies of Gender: Family and Law in Imperial Japan and Colonial Taiwan</em></a>&nbsp;(Cambridge University Press, 2024) Dr. Tadashi Ishikawa traces perceptions and practices of gender in the Japanese empire on the occasion of Japan's colonisation of Taiwan from 1895. In the 1910s, metropolitan and colonial authorities attempted social reform in ways which particularly impacted on family traditions and, therefore, gender relations, paving the way for the politics of comparison within and beyond the empire. In&nbsp;<em>Geographies of Gender</em>, Dr. Ishikawa delves into a variety of diplomatic issues, colonial and anticolonial discourses, and judicial cases, finding marriage gifts, daughter adoption, and premarital sexual relationships to be sites of tension between norms and ideals among both elite and ordinary men and women. He explores how the Japanese empire became a gendered space from the 1910s through the outbreak of the Second Sino-Japanese War in 1937, arguing that gender norms were both unsettled and reinforced in ways which highlight the instability of metropole-colony relations.</p><p>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose<a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;book</a>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer">New Books with Miranda Melcher</a>, wherever you get your podcasts.</p><p><br></p><p><em>Let's face it, most of the popular podcasts out there are dumb. NBN features scholars (like you!), providing an enriching alternative to students. We partner with presses like Oxford, Princeton, and Cambridge to make academic research accessible to all. Please consider sharing the New Books Network with your students. Download&nbsp;</em><a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/18YFnB006Nb1ON9_LF2tKvDJjir4d6lLB/view?usp=sharing" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>this poster here</em></a><em>&nbsp;to spread the word.</em></p><p><br></p><p><em>Please share this interview on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.instagram.com/newbooksnetwork" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Instagram</em></a><em>,&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/company/new-books-network/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>LinkedIn</em></a><em>, or&nbsp;</em><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/newbooksnetwork.bsky.social" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Bluesky</em></a><em>. Don't forget to subscribe to our Substack&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.substack.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>here</em></a><em>&nbsp;to receive our weekly newsletter.</em></p><p><br></p><p><em>150 million lifetime downloads. Advertise on the New Books Network. Watch our&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XHIutaAFfOY" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>promotional video</em></a><em>.</em></p><p><br></p><p><em>Learn how to&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bt7amE3ojGs&amp;t=2s" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>make the most of our library</em></a><em>.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/tadashi-ishikawa-geographies-of-gender-family-and-law-in-imperial-japan-and-colonial-taiwan-cambridge-up-2024-gDdArsux</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009534178" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Geographies of Gender: Family and Law in Imperial Japan and Colonial Taiwan</em></a>&nbsp;(Cambridge University Press, 2024) Dr. Tadashi Ishikawa traces perceptions and practices of gender in the Japanese empire on the occasion of Japan's colonisation of Taiwan from 1895. In the 1910s, metropolitan and colonial authorities attempted social reform in ways which particularly impacted on family traditions and, therefore, gender relations, paving the way for the politics of comparison within and beyond the empire. In&nbsp;<em>Geographies of Gender</em>, Dr. Ishikawa delves into a variety of diplomatic issues, colonial and anticolonial discourses, and judicial cases, finding marriage gifts, daughter adoption, and premarital sexual relationships to be sites of tension between norms and ideals among both elite and ordinary men and women. He explores how the Japanese empire became a gendered space from the 1910s through the outbreak of the Second Sino-Japanese War in 1937, arguing that gender norms were both unsettled and reinforced in ways which highlight the instability of metropole-colony relations.</p><p>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose<a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;book</a>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer">New Books with Miranda Melcher</a>, wherever you get your podcasts.</p><p><br></p><p><em>Let's face it, most of the popular podcasts out there are dumb. NBN features scholars (like you!), providing an enriching alternative to students. We partner with presses like Oxford, Princeton, and Cambridge to make academic research accessible to all. Please consider sharing the New Books Network with your students. Download&nbsp;</em><a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/18YFnB006Nb1ON9_LF2tKvDJjir4d6lLB/view?usp=sharing" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>this poster here</em></a><em>&nbsp;to spread the word.</em></p><p><br></p><p><em>Please share this interview on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.instagram.com/newbooksnetwork" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Instagram</em></a><em>,&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/company/new-books-network/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>LinkedIn</em></a><em>, or&nbsp;</em><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/newbooksnetwork.bsky.social" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Bluesky</em></a><em>. Don't forget to subscribe to our Substack&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.substack.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>here</em></a><em>&nbsp;to receive our weekly newsletter.</em></p><p><br></p><p><em>150 million lifetime downloads. Advertise on the New Books Network. Watch our&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XHIutaAFfOY" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>promotional video</em></a><em>.</em></p><p><br></p><p><em>Learn how to&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bt7amE3ojGs&amp;t=2s" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>make the most of our library</em></a><em>.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="62316528" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/b19b3ccc-1a4c-489c-b186-f7b7bc9ce473/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=b19b3ccc-1a4c-489c-b186-f7b7bc9ce473&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Tadashi Ishikawa, &quot;Geographies of Gender: Family and Law in Imperial Japan and Colonial Taiwan&quot; (Cambridge UP., 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:04:54</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In Geographies of Gender: Family and Law in Imperial Japan and Colonial Taiwan (Cambridge University Press, 2024) Dr. Tadashi Ishikawa traces perceptions and practices of gender in the Japanese empire on the occasion of Japan&apos;s colonisation of Taiwan from 1895. In the 1910s, metropolitan and colonial authorities attempted social reform in ways which particularly impacted on family traditions and, therefore, gender relations, paving the way for the politics of comparison within and beyond the empire. In Geographies of Gender, Dr. Ishikawa delves into a variety of diplomatic issues, colonial and anticolonial discourses, and judicial cases, finding marriage gifts, daughter adoption, and premarital sexual relationships to be sites of tension between norms and ideals among both elite and ordinary men and women. He explores how the Japanese empire became a gendered space from the 1910s through the outbreak of the Second Sino-Japanese War in 1937, arguing that gender norms were both unsettled and reinforced in ways which highlight the instability of metropole-colony relations.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Let&apos;s face it, most of the popular podcasts out there are dumb. NBN features scholars (like you!), providing an enriching alternative to students. We partner with presses like Oxford, Princeton, and Cambridge to make academic research accessible to all. Please consider sharing the New Books Network with your students. Download this poster here to spread the word.
Please share this interview on Instagram, LinkedIn, or Bluesky. Don&apos;t forget to subscribe to our Substack here to receive our weekly newsletter.
150 million lifetime downloads. Advertise on the New Books Network. Watch our promotional video.
Learn how to make the most of our library.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In Geographies of Gender: Family and Law in Imperial Japan and Colonial Taiwan (Cambridge University Press, 2024) Dr. Tadashi Ishikawa traces perceptions and practices of gender in the Japanese empire on the occasion of Japan&apos;s colonisation of Taiwan from 1895. In the 1910s, metropolitan and colonial authorities attempted social reform in ways which particularly impacted on family traditions and, therefore, gender relations, paving the way for the politics of comparison within and beyond the empire. In Geographies of Gender, Dr. Ishikawa delves into a variety of diplomatic issues, colonial and anticolonial discourses, and judicial cases, finding marriage gifts, daughter adoption, and premarital sexual relationships to be sites of tension between norms and ideals among both elite and ordinary men and women. He explores how the Japanese empire became a gendered space from the 1910s through the outbreak of the Second Sino-Japanese War in 1937, arguing that gender norms were both unsettled and reinforced in ways which highlight the instability of metropole-colony relations.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s interviews on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Let&apos;s face it, most of the popular podcasts out there are dumb. NBN features scholars (like you!), providing an enriching alternative to students. We partner with presses like Oxford, Princeton, and Cambridge to make academic research accessible to all. Please consider sharing the New Books Network with your students. Download this poster here to spread the word.
Please share this interview on Instagram, LinkedIn, or Bluesky. Don&apos;t forget to subscribe to our Substack here to receive our weekly newsletter.
150 million lifetime downloads. Advertise on the New Books Network. Watch our promotional video.
Learn how to make the most of our library.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>170</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">bac28496-1ebb-11f0-8c69-577d626cf947</guid>
      <title>Daniel J. Solove, &quot;On Privacy and Technology&quot; (Oxford UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Data and privacy have emerged as critical issues in our digitally interconnected era, profoundly influencing individual rights, societal norms, and democratic processes. In his book,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197771686" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>On Privacy and Technology</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Oxford UP, 2025), Daniel Solove provides a compelling exploration of the intersection between evolving technologies and privacy rights. Drawing on insights from law, philosophy, sociology, and communication studies, Solove unpacks the complex ways in which digital innovations challenge traditional notions of privacy and autonomy. The book advances a nuanced argument advocating for a reevaluation of how privacy is conceptualized and protected in an age dominated by data collection, surveillance, and algorithmic governance.</p><p>In this episode, Daniel Solove discusses how contemporary privacy concerns—ranging from mass surveillance and data breaches to algorithmic bias and digital profiling—can be critically understood and addressed. Grounded in rigorous theoretical analysis, the conversation pushes against the narrative that technological advancement inevitably erodes privacy, instead highlighting strategies and frameworks through which privacy rights can be reclaimed and reinforced in the digital age.</p><p>This interview was conducted by Shreya Urvashi, a doctoral researcher of sociology and education based in Toronto, Canada.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/daniel-j-solove-on-privacy-and-technology-oxford-up-2025-72VEJ7oE-WkbBepU4</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Data and privacy have emerged as critical issues in our digitally interconnected era, profoundly influencing individual rights, societal norms, and democratic processes. In his book,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197771686" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>On Privacy and Technology</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Oxford UP, 2025), Daniel Solove provides a compelling exploration of the intersection between evolving technologies and privacy rights. Drawing on insights from law, philosophy, sociology, and communication studies, Solove unpacks the complex ways in which digital innovations challenge traditional notions of privacy and autonomy. The book advances a nuanced argument advocating for a reevaluation of how privacy is conceptualized and protected in an age dominated by data collection, surveillance, and algorithmic governance.</p><p>In this episode, Daniel Solove discusses how contemporary privacy concerns—ranging from mass surveillance and data breaches to algorithmic bias and digital profiling—can be critically understood and addressed. Grounded in rigorous theoretical analysis, the conversation pushes against the narrative that technological advancement inevitably erodes privacy, instead highlighting strategies and frameworks through which privacy rights can be reclaimed and reinforced in the digital age.</p><p>This interview was conducted by Shreya Urvashi, a doctoral researcher of sociology and education based in Toronto, Canada.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="31231141" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/1cd7b3fc-fa10-4d9b-8b4c-f62977a53891/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=1cd7b3fc-fa10-4d9b-8b4c-f62977a53891&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Daniel J. Solove, &quot;On Privacy and Technology&quot; (Oxford UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:32:31</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Data and privacy have emerged as critical issues in our digitally interconnected era, profoundly influencing individual rights, societal norms, and democratic processes. In his book, On Privacy and Technology (Oxford UP, 2025), Daniel Solove provides a compelling exploration of the intersection between evolving technologies and privacy rights. Drawing on insights from law, philosophy, sociology, and communication studies, Solove unpacks the complex ways in which digital innovations challenge traditional notions of privacy and autonomy. The book advances a nuanced argument advocating for a reevaluation of how privacy is conceptualized and protected in an age dominated by data collection, surveillance, and algorithmic governance.
In this episode, Daniel Solove discusses how contemporary privacy concerns—ranging from mass surveillance and data breaches to algorithmic bias and digital profiling—can be critically understood and addressed. Grounded in rigorous theoretical analysis, the conversation pushes against the narrative that technological advancement inevitably erodes privacy, instead highlighting strategies and frameworks through which privacy rights can be reclaimed and reinforced in the digital age.
This interview was conducted by Shreya Urvashi, a doctoral researcher of sociology and education based in Toronto, Canada.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Data and privacy have emerged as critical issues in our digitally interconnected era, profoundly influencing individual rights, societal norms, and democratic processes. In his book, On Privacy and Technology (Oxford UP, 2025), Daniel Solove provides a compelling exploration of the intersection between evolving technologies and privacy rights. Drawing on insights from law, philosophy, sociology, and communication studies, Solove unpacks the complex ways in which digital innovations challenge traditional notions of privacy and autonomy. The book advances a nuanced argument advocating for a reevaluation of how privacy is conceptualized and protected in an age dominated by data collection, surveillance, and algorithmic governance.
In this episode, Daniel Solove discusses how contemporary privacy concerns—ranging from mass surveillance and data breaches to algorithmic bias and digital profiling—can be critically understood and addressed. Grounded in rigorous theoretical analysis, the conversation pushes against the narrative that technological advancement inevitably erodes privacy, instead highlighting strategies and frameworks through which privacy rights can be reclaimed and reinforced in the digital age.
This interview was conducted by Shreya Urvashi, a doctoral researcher of sociology and education based in Toronto, Canada.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1525</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5449089c-1a07-11f0-ad2e-bff99b5dc29a</guid>
      <title>Constitutional Private Law: A Conversation with Garrett West</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>What is constitutional private law, and how does it differ from the way we traditionally think about constitutional issues? When an individual employed by the government breaks the law, do we sue the person or the government? And what do these choices reveal about justice, accountability, and constitutional interpretation?</p><p>This week Madison’s Notes welcomes Garrett West, Associate Professor of Law at Yale Law School, for a deep dive into constitutional private law, an often-overlooked dimension of constitutional theory. While most discussions focus on government power and structure, this episode explores how constitutional principles might extend into private relationships and disputes.</p><p>West breaks down essential legal vocabulary, examines unexpected historical shifts in constitutional doctrine, and analyzes how courts have grappled with applying constitutional norms beyond the state. From torts and remedies to federal courts and administrative law, this conversation challenges conventional boundaries and asks: Where does the Constitution’s authority end?</p><p>A must-listen for anyone interested in legal theory, civil liberties, and the evolving role of constitutional law in private life.</p><p><a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/podcast" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Madison’s Notes</em></a>&nbsp;is the podcast of Princeton&nbsp;<a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions</em></a><em>.</em></p><p><em>Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/constitutional-private-law-a-conversation-with-garrett-west-ESM20DfL</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is constitutional private law, and how does it differ from the way we traditionally think about constitutional issues? When an individual employed by the government breaks the law, do we sue the person or the government? And what do these choices reveal about justice, accountability, and constitutional interpretation?</p><p>This week Madison’s Notes welcomes Garrett West, Associate Professor of Law at Yale Law School, for a deep dive into constitutional private law, an often-overlooked dimension of constitutional theory. While most discussions focus on government power and structure, this episode explores how constitutional principles might extend into private relationships and disputes.</p><p>West breaks down essential legal vocabulary, examines unexpected historical shifts in constitutional doctrine, and analyzes how courts have grappled with applying constitutional norms beyond the state. From torts and remedies to federal courts and administrative law, this conversation challenges conventional boundaries and asks: Where does the Constitution’s authority end?</p><p>A must-listen for anyone interested in legal theory, civil liberties, and the evolving role of constitutional law in private life.</p><p><a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/podcast" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Madison’s Notes</em></a>&nbsp;is the podcast of Princeton&nbsp;<a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions</em></a><em>.</em></p><p><em>Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="49706405" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/7c5eda76-e10f-475c-8b21-1971a30cef45/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=7c5eda76-e10f-475c-8b21-1971a30cef45&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Constitutional Private Law: A Conversation with Garrett West</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:51:46</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>What is constitutional private law, and how does it differ from the way we traditionally think about constitutional issues? When an individual employed by the government breaks the law, do we sue the person or the government? And what do these choices reveal about justice, accountability, and constitutional interpretation?
This week Madison’s Notes welcomes Garrett West, Associate Professor of Law at Yale Law School, for a deep dive into constitutional private law, an often-overlooked dimension of constitutional theory. While most discussions focus on government power and structure, this episode explores how constitutional principles might extend into private relationships and disputes.
West breaks down essential legal vocabulary, examines unexpected historical shifts in constitutional doctrine, and analyzes how courts have grappled with applying constitutional norms beyond the state. From torts and remedies to federal courts and administrative law, this conversation challenges conventional boundaries and asks: Where does the Constitution’s authority end?
A must-listen for anyone interested in legal theory, civil liberties, and the evolving role of constitutional law in private life.
Madison’s Notes is the podcast of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions.
Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>What is constitutional private law, and how does it differ from the way we traditionally think about constitutional issues? When an individual employed by the government breaks the law, do we sue the person or the government? And what do these choices reveal about justice, accountability, and constitutional interpretation?
This week Madison’s Notes welcomes Garrett West, Associate Professor of Law at Yale Law School, for a deep dive into constitutional private law, an often-overlooked dimension of constitutional theory. While most discussions focus on government power and structure, this episode explores how constitutional principles might extend into private relationships and disputes.
West breaks down essential legal vocabulary, examines unexpected historical shifts in constitutional doctrine, and analyzes how courts have grappled with applying constitutional norms beyond the state. From torts and remedies to federal courts and administrative law, this conversation challenges conventional boundaries and asks: Where does the Constitution’s authority end?
A must-listen for anyone interested in legal theory, civil liberties, and the evolving role of constitutional law in private life.
Madison’s Notes is the podcast of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions.
Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1524</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">89a1016e-163a-11f0-b8df-ff392b4f0858</guid>
      <title>Engage and Evade in 2025: Asad L. Asad on Latino Immigrants in America</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Today I’m speaking with Asad L. Asad, Assistant Professor of Sociology at Stanford University. He is the author of&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691182285" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Engage and Evade:&nbsp;How Latino Immigrant Families Manage Surveillance in Everyday Life</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Princeton UP, 2023). A highly relevant book, Engage and Evade documents the interactions between undocumented people and the agents and institutions of government. One might expect undocumented people to avoid the IRS, but as Asad demonstrates, many engage with government institutions in the hopes that positive interactions and compliance might help their immigration cases down the road. Published in 2023, immigration policy and treatment of undocumented people by the government has shifted dramatically in a short time. I’m grateful today to be able to speak with Asad about this thoughtful book.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/engage-and-evade-in-2025-asad-l-asad-on-latino-immigrants-in-america-KnJPdMKS</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today I’m speaking with Asad L. Asad, Assistant Professor of Sociology at Stanford University. He is the author of&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691182285" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Engage and Evade:&nbsp;How Latino Immigrant Families Manage Surveillance in Everyday Life</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Princeton UP, 2023). A highly relevant book, Engage and Evade documents the interactions between undocumented people and the agents and institutions of government. One might expect undocumented people to avoid the IRS, but as Asad demonstrates, many engage with government institutions in the hopes that positive interactions and compliance might help their immigration cases down the road. Published in 2023, immigration policy and treatment of undocumented people by the government has shifted dramatically in a short time. I’m grateful today to be able to speak with Asad about this thoughtful book.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="48064379" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/2bc13cb4-7279-4e46-840b-8ec2ab5aedea/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=2bc13cb4-7279-4e46-840b-8ec2ab5aedea&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Engage and Evade in 2025: Asad L. Asad on Latino Immigrants in America</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:50:03</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Today I’m speaking with Asad L. Asad, Assistant Professor of Sociology at Stanford University. He is the author of Engage and Evade: How Latino Immigrant Families Manage Surveillance in Everyday Life (Princeton UP, 2023). A highly relevant book, Engage and Evade documents the interactions between undocumented people and the agents and institutions of government. One might expect undocumented people to avoid the IRS, but as Asad demonstrates, many engage with government institutions in the hopes that positive interactions and compliance might help their immigration cases down the road. Published in 2023, immigration policy and treatment of undocumented people by the government has shifted dramatically in a short time. I’m grateful today to be able to speak with Asad about this thoughtful book.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Today I’m speaking with Asad L. Asad, Assistant Professor of Sociology at Stanford University. He is the author of Engage and Evade: How Latino Immigrant Families Manage Surveillance in Everyday Life (Princeton UP, 2023). A highly relevant book, Engage and Evade documents the interactions between undocumented people and the agents and institutions of government. One might expect undocumented people to avoid the IRS, but as Asad demonstrates, many engage with government institutions in the hopes that positive interactions and compliance might help their immigration cases down the road. Published in 2023, immigration policy and treatment of undocumented people by the government has shifted dramatically in a short time. I’m grateful today to be able to speak with Asad about this thoughtful book.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>115</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">008a0cac-ff80-11ef-ac53-2fbbd5f5cef5</guid>
      <title>Kathleen Thelen, &quot;Attention, Shoppers!: American Retail Capitalism and the Origins of the Amazon Economy&quot; (Princeton UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The United States is widely recognized as the quintessential consumer society, one where huge companies like Walmart and Amazon are famous for enticing customers with cheap goods and speedy delivery.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691266527" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Attention, Shoppers!: American Retail Capitalism and the Origins of the Amazon Economy</em></a>&nbsp;(Princeton University Press, 2025) traces the origins and evolution of American retail capitalism from the late nineteenth century to today, uncovering the roots of a bitter equilibrium where large low-cost retailers dominate and vast numbers of low-income families now rely on them to make ends meet.</p><p>Offering a comparative perspective on the history of American political economy, Dr. Kathleen Thelen shows how large-scale retailers in the United Kingdom, Germany, Denmark, and Sweden faced a far less hospitable regulatory environment than companies in the United States, which enjoyed judicial forbearance and often active government support. As American companies grew in scale and scope, they assembled an ever-expanding political coalition that could be weaponized to head off regulatory efforts, leveraging their market strength to squeeze suppliers and workers and even engaging in outright rule breaking when they encountered resistance.</p><p>Placing the rise of the Amazon economy in a broader comparative-historical context,&nbsp;<em>Attention, Shoppers!</em>&nbsp;reveals how large discount retailers have successfully exploited a uniquely permissive regulatory landscape to create a shopper’s paradise built on cheap labor and mass consumption.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;new book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 8 Apr 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/kathleen-thelen-attention-shoppers-american-retail-capitalism-and-the-origins-of-the-amazon-economy-princeton-up-2025-y5_Rxq8W</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The United States is widely recognized as the quintessential consumer society, one where huge companies like Walmart and Amazon are famous for enticing customers with cheap goods and speedy delivery.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691266527" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Attention, Shoppers!: American Retail Capitalism and the Origins of the Amazon Economy</em></a>&nbsp;(Princeton University Press, 2025) traces the origins and evolution of American retail capitalism from the late nineteenth century to today, uncovering the roots of a bitter equilibrium where large low-cost retailers dominate and vast numbers of low-income families now rely on them to make ends meet.</p><p>Offering a comparative perspective on the history of American political economy, Dr. Kathleen Thelen shows how large-scale retailers in the United Kingdom, Germany, Denmark, and Sweden faced a far less hospitable regulatory environment than companies in the United States, which enjoyed judicial forbearance and often active government support. As American companies grew in scale and scope, they assembled an ever-expanding political coalition that could be weaponized to head off regulatory efforts, leveraging their market strength to squeeze suppliers and workers and even engaging in outright rule breaking when they encountered resistance.</p><p>Placing the rise of the Amazon economy in a broader comparative-historical context,&nbsp;<em>Attention, Shoppers!</em>&nbsp;reveals how large discount retailers have successfully exploited a uniquely permissive regulatory landscape to create a shopper’s paradise built on cheap labor and mass consumption.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;new book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="42546005" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/c76ef712-a224-470e-bbd5-8a16319df521/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=c76ef712-a224-470e-bbd5-8a16319df521&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Kathleen Thelen, &quot;Attention, Shoppers!: American Retail Capitalism and the Origins of the Amazon Economy&quot; (Princeton UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:44:18</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The United States is widely recognized as the quintessential consumer society, one where huge companies like Walmart and Amazon are famous for enticing customers with cheap goods and speedy delivery. Attention, Shoppers!: American Retail Capitalism and the Origins of the Amazon Economy (Princeton University Press, 2025) traces the origins and evolution of American retail capitalism from the late nineteenth century to today, uncovering the roots of a bitter equilibrium where large low-cost retailers dominate and vast numbers of low-income families now rely on them to make ends meet.
Offering a comparative perspective on the history of American political economy, Dr. Kathleen Thelen shows how large-scale retailers in the United Kingdom, Germany, Denmark, and Sweden faced a far less hospitable regulatory environment than companies in the United States, which enjoyed judicial forbearance and often active government support. As American companies grew in scale and scope, they assembled an ever-expanding political coalition that could be weaponized to head off regulatory efforts, leveraging their market strength to squeeze suppliers and workers and even engaging in outright rule breaking when they encountered resistance.
Placing the rise of the Amazon economy in a broader comparative-historical context, Attention, Shoppers! reveals how large discount retailers have successfully exploited a uniquely permissive regulatory landscape to create a shopper’s paradise built on cheap labor and mass consumption.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The United States is widely recognized as the quintessential consumer society, one where huge companies like Walmart and Amazon are famous for enticing customers with cheap goods and speedy delivery. Attention, Shoppers!: American Retail Capitalism and the Origins of the Amazon Economy (Princeton University Press, 2025) traces the origins and evolution of American retail capitalism from the late nineteenth century to today, uncovering the roots of a bitter equilibrium where large low-cost retailers dominate and vast numbers of low-income families now rely on them to make ends meet.
Offering a comparative perspective on the history of American political economy, Dr. Kathleen Thelen shows how large-scale retailers in the United Kingdom, Germany, Denmark, and Sweden faced a far less hospitable regulatory environment than companies in the United States, which enjoyed judicial forbearance and often active government support. As American companies grew in scale and scope, they assembled an ever-expanding political coalition that could be weaponized to head off regulatory efforts, leveraging their market strength to squeeze suppliers and workers and even engaging in outright rule breaking when they encountered resistance.
Placing the rise of the Amazon economy in a broader comparative-historical context, Attention, Shoppers! reveals how large discount retailers have successfully exploited a uniquely permissive regulatory landscape to create a shopper’s paradise built on cheap labor and mass consumption.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>124</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">07fd411e-1161-11f0-9182-9b39b81b1803</guid>
      <title>James Boyle Draws the Line Between Humans and AI</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>It’s the&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/up-partners/uconn-popcast" rel="noopener noreferrer">UConn Popcast</a>, and we spoke with Duke Law Professor James Boyle about his new book&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780262049160" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Line: AI and the Future of Personhood</em></a>&nbsp;(MIT Press, 2024).&nbsp;We spoke with Boyle about how our legal and moral understandings of personhood are being challenged by advances in AI. We discussed the role of the law, popular culture, tests of sentience, and our capacity for empathy in shaping this urgent debate.</p><p>James Boyle is William Neal Reynolds Professor of Law at Duke Law School and founder of the&nbsp;<a href="https://www.law.duke.edu/cspd" rel="noopener noreferrer">Center for the Study of the Public Domain.</a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 5 Apr 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/james-boyle-draws-the-line-between-humans-and-ai-do7tRrFY</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It’s the&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/up-partners/uconn-popcast" rel="noopener noreferrer">UConn Popcast</a>, and we spoke with Duke Law Professor James Boyle about his new book&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780262049160" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Line: AI and the Future of Personhood</em></a>&nbsp;(MIT Press, 2024).&nbsp;We spoke with Boyle about how our legal and moral understandings of personhood are being challenged by advances in AI. We discussed the role of the law, popular culture, tests of sentience, and our capacity for empathy in shaping this urgent debate.</p><p>James Boyle is William Neal Reynolds Professor of Law at Duke Law School and founder of the&nbsp;<a href="https://www.law.duke.edu/cspd" rel="noopener noreferrer">Center for the Study of the Public Domain.</a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="49905305" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/a1bac401-78ea-474a-bd63-ff493ab2792c/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=a1bac401-78ea-474a-bd63-ff493ab2792c&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>James Boyle Draws the Line Between Humans and AI</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:51:58</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>It’s the UConn Popcast, and we spoke with Duke Law Professor James Boyle about his new book The Line: AI and the Future of Personhood (MIT Press, 2024). We spoke with Boyle about how our legal and moral understandings of personhood are being challenged by advances in AI. We discussed the role of the law, popular culture, tests of sentience, and our capacity for empathy in shaping this urgent debate.
James Boyle is William Neal Reynolds Professor of Law at Duke Law School and founder of the Center for the Study of the Public Domain.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>It’s the UConn Popcast, and we spoke with Duke Law Professor James Boyle about his new book The Line: AI and the Future of Personhood (MIT Press, 2024). We spoke with Boyle about how our legal and moral understandings of personhood are being challenged by advances in AI. We discussed the role of the law, popular culture, tests of sentience, and our capacity for empathy in shaping this urgent debate.
James Boyle is William Neal Reynolds Professor of Law at Duke Law School and founder of the Center for the Study of the Public Domain.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>28</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6eadcb28-0bcf-11f0-9a98-43c2d74f221f</guid>
      <title>Andrew Canessa and Manuela Lavinas Picq, &quot;Savages and Citizens: How Indigeneity Shapes the State&quot; (U Arizona Press, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Although Indigenous peoples are often perceived as standing outside political modernity,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780816553969" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Savages and Citizens: How Indigeneity Shapes the State</em></a>&nbsp;(University of Arizona Press, 2025) by Dr. Andrew Canessa &amp; Dr. Manuela Lavinas Picq takes the provocative view that Indigenous people have been fundamental to how contemporary state sovereignty was imagined, theorized, and practiced.</p><p>Delving into European political philosophy, comparative politics, and contemporary international law, this open-access book shows how the concept of indigeneity has shaped the development of the modern state. The exclusion of Indigenous people was not a collateral byproduct; it was a political project in its own right. The book argues that indigeneity is a political identity relational to modern nation-states and that Indigenous politics, although marking the boundary of the state, are co-constitutive of colonial processes of state-making. In showing how indigeneity is central to how the international system of states operates, the book forefronts Indigenous peoples as political actors to reject essentializing views that reduce them to cultural “survivors” rooted in the past.</p><p>With insights drawn from diverse global contexts and empirical research from Bolivia and Ecuador, this work advocates for the relevance of Indigenous studies within political science and argues for an ethnography of sovereignty in anthropology.&nbsp;<em>Savages and Citizens</em>&nbsp;makes a compelling case for the centrality of Indigenous perspectives to understand the modern state from political theory to international studies.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;new book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s episodes on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/andrew-canessa-and-manuela-lavinas-picq-savages-and-citizens-how-indigeneity-shapes-the-state-u-arizona-press-2025-QCHP12tA</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although Indigenous peoples are often perceived as standing outside political modernity,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780816553969" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Savages and Citizens: How Indigeneity Shapes the State</em></a>&nbsp;(University of Arizona Press, 2025) by Dr. Andrew Canessa &amp; Dr. Manuela Lavinas Picq takes the provocative view that Indigenous people have been fundamental to how contemporary state sovereignty was imagined, theorized, and practiced.</p><p>Delving into European political philosophy, comparative politics, and contemporary international law, this open-access book shows how the concept of indigeneity has shaped the development of the modern state. The exclusion of Indigenous people was not a collateral byproduct; it was a political project in its own right. The book argues that indigeneity is a political identity relational to modern nation-states and that Indigenous politics, although marking the boundary of the state, are co-constitutive of colonial processes of state-making. In showing how indigeneity is central to how the international system of states operates, the book forefronts Indigenous peoples as political actors to reject essentializing views that reduce them to cultural “survivors” rooted in the past.</p><p>With insights drawn from diverse global contexts and empirical research from Bolivia and Ecuador, this work advocates for the relevance of Indigenous studies within political science and argues for an ethnography of sovereignty in anthropology.&nbsp;<em>Savages and Citizens</em>&nbsp;makes a compelling case for the centrality of Indigenous perspectives to understand the modern state from political theory to international studies.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;new book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s episodes on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/new-books-with-miranda-melcher" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books with Miranda Melcher</em></a><em>, wherever you get your podcasts.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="56066862" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/5d42069f-32bd-4de5-b387-3e0039219d77/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=5d42069f-32bd-4de5-b387-3e0039219d77&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Andrew Canessa and Manuela Lavinas Picq, &quot;Savages and Citizens: How Indigeneity Shapes the State&quot; (U Arizona Press, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:58:23</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Although Indigenous peoples are often perceived as standing outside political modernity, Savages and Citizens: How Indigeneity Shapes the State (University of Arizona Press, 2025) by Dr. Andrew Canessa &amp; Dr. Manuela Lavinas Picq takes the provocative view that Indigenous people have been fundamental to how contemporary state sovereignty was imagined, theorized, and practiced.
Delving into European political philosophy, comparative politics, and contemporary international law, this open-access book shows how the concept of indigeneity has shaped the development of the modern state. The exclusion of Indigenous people was not a collateral byproduct; it was a political project in its own right. The book argues that indigeneity is a political identity relational to modern nation-states and that Indigenous politics, although marking the boundary of the state, are co-constitutive of colonial processes of state-making. In showing how indigeneity is central to how the international system of states operates, the book forefronts Indigenous peoples as political actors to reject essentializing views that reduce them to cultural “survivors” rooted in the past.
With insights drawn from diverse global contexts and empirical research from Bolivia and Ecuador, this work advocates for the relevance of Indigenous studies within political science and argues for an ethnography of sovereignty in anthropology. Savages and Citizens makes a compelling case for the centrality of Indigenous perspectives to understand the modern state from political theory to international studies.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s episodes on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Although Indigenous peoples are often perceived as standing outside political modernity, Savages and Citizens: How Indigeneity Shapes the State (University of Arizona Press, 2025) by Dr. Andrew Canessa &amp; Dr. Manuela Lavinas Picq takes the provocative view that Indigenous people have been fundamental to how contemporary state sovereignty was imagined, theorized, and practiced.
Delving into European political philosophy, comparative politics, and contemporary international law, this open-access book shows how the concept of indigeneity has shaped the development of the modern state. The exclusion of Indigenous people was not a collateral byproduct; it was a political project in its own right. The book argues that indigeneity is a political identity relational to modern nation-states and that Indigenous politics, although marking the boundary of the state, are co-constitutive of colonial processes of state-making. In showing how indigeneity is central to how the international system of states operates, the book forefronts Indigenous peoples as political actors to reject essentializing views that reduce them to cultural “survivors” rooted in the past.
With insights drawn from diverse global contexts and empirical research from Bolivia and Ecuador, this work advocates for the relevance of Indigenous studies within political science and argues for an ethnography of sovereignty in anthropology. Savages and Citizens makes a compelling case for the centrality of Indigenous perspectives to understand the modern state from political theory to international studies.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. You can find Miranda’s episodes on New Books with Miranda Melcher, wherever you get your podcasts.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>128</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6d4b7dd8-0be4-11f0-bbd1-535f8f379cb6</guid>
      <title>Giacinto della Cananea, &quot;The Common Core of European Administrative Laws: Retrospective and Prospective&quot; (Brill/NIjhoff, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Though European administrative laws have gained global significance in the last few decades, research which provides both theoretical analysis and original empirical research has been scarce.&nbsp;<a href="https://brill.com/display/title/63447?language=en" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Common Core of European Administrative Laws Retrospective and Prospective</em></a>&nbsp;(Brill/NIjhoff, 2023)&nbsp;an important account of the evolution of judicial review and administrative procedure legislation, using a factual analysis to shed light on how the different legal systems react to similar problems. Discussing the concept of a ‘common core’, Giacinto della Cananea reveals the commonalities in, and differences between, the foundational assumptions of European administrative adjudication and rule-making.</p><p>This is the fourth book in the series, Comparative Law in Global Perspective published by Brill Niehoff, and it is available open access&nbsp;<a href="https://brill.com/display/title/63447?language=en" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a>.</p><p>Giacinto della Cananea is a full professor in the department of law at the University of Bocconi. He holds a PhD in European law from the European University Institute (1994) and a law degree from the University of Rome ‘La Sapienza’ (1989). He is a public lawyer, with research interests in administrative law, European Union law and global administrative law, with specific focus on three areas: the comparative law of administrative procedures, the general principles of law, and budgetary issues. He and Mauro Bussani are co-editors of the series Comparative Law in Global Perspective, published by Brill Niehoff</p><p>Jessie Cohen holds a Ph.D. in History from Columbia University. She is an editor at the New Books Network</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/giacinto-della-cananea-the-common-core-of-european-administrative-laws-retrospective-and-prospective-brill-nijhoff-2023-4qwGM2w1</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Though European administrative laws have gained global significance in the last few decades, research which provides both theoretical analysis and original empirical research has been scarce.&nbsp;<a href="https://brill.com/display/title/63447?language=en" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Common Core of European Administrative Laws Retrospective and Prospective</em></a>&nbsp;(Brill/NIjhoff, 2023)&nbsp;an important account of the evolution of judicial review and administrative procedure legislation, using a factual analysis to shed light on how the different legal systems react to similar problems. Discussing the concept of a ‘common core’, Giacinto della Cananea reveals the commonalities in, and differences between, the foundational assumptions of European administrative adjudication and rule-making.</p><p>This is the fourth book in the series, Comparative Law in Global Perspective published by Brill Niehoff, and it is available open access&nbsp;<a href="https://brill.com/display/title/63447?language=en" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a>.</p><p>Giacinto della Cananea is a full professor in the department of law at the University of Bocconi. He holds a PhD in European law from the European University Institute (1994) and a law degree from the University of Rome ‘La Sapienza’ (1989). He is a public lawyer, with research interests in administrative law, European Union law and global administrative law, with specific focus on three areas: the comparative law of administrative procedures, the general principles of law, and budgetary issues. He and Mauro Bussani are co-editors of the series Comparative Law in Global Perspective, published by Brill Niehoff</p><p>Jessie Cohen holds a Ph.D. in History from Columbia University. She is an editor at the New Books Network</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="52025869" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/e69dcc2f-d4ff-477f-86da-4b7c56fa43e6/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=e69dcc2f-d4ff-477f-86da-4b7c56fa43e6&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Giacinto della Cananea, &quot;The Common Core of European Administrative Laws: Retrospective and Prospective&quot; (Brill/NIjhoff, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:54:11</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Though European administrative laws have gained global significance in the last few decades, research which provides both theoretical analysis and original empirical research has been scarce. The Common Core of European Administrative Laws Retrospective and Prospective (Brill/NIjhoff, 2023) an important account of the evolution of judicial review and administrative procedure legislation, using a factual analysis to shed light on how the different legal systems react to similar problems. Discussing the concept of a ‘common core’, Giacinto della Cananea reveals the commonalities in, and differences between, the foundational assumptions of European administrative adjudication and rule-making.
This is the fourth book in the series, Comparative Law in Global Perspective published by Brill Niehoff, and it is available open access here.
Giacinto della Cananea is a full professor in the department of law at the University of Bocconi. He holds a PhD in European law from the European University Institute (1994) and a law degree from the University of Rome ‘La Sapienza’ (1989). He is a public lawyer, with research interests in administrative law, European Union law and global administrative law, with specific focus on three areas: the comparative law of administrative procedures, the general principles of law, and budgetary issues. He and Mauro Bussani are co-editors of the series Comparative Law in Global Perspective, published by Brill Niehoff
Jessie Cohen holds a Ph.D. in History from Columbia University. She is an editor at the New Books Network
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Though European administrative laws have gained global significance in the last few decades, research which provides both theoretical analysis and original empirical research has been scarce. The Common Core of European Administrative Laws Retrospective and Prospective (Brill/NIjhoff, 2023) an important account of the evolution of judicial review and administrative procedure legislation, using a factual analysis to shed light on how the different legal systems react to similar problems. Discussing the concept of a ‘common core’, Giacinto della Cananea reveals the commonalities in, and differences between, the foundational assumptions of European administrative adjudication and rule-making.
This is the fourth book in the series, Comparative Law in Global Perspective published by Brill Niehoff, and it is available open access here.
Giacinto della Cananea is a full professor in the department of law at the University of Bocconi. He holds a PhD in European law from the European University Institute (1994) and a law degree from the University of Rome ‘La Sapienza’ (1989). He is a public lawyer, with research interests in administrative law, European Union law and global administrative law, with specific focus on three areas: the comparative law of administrative procedures, the general principles of law, and budgetary issues. He and Mauro Bussani are co-editors of the series Comparative Law in Global Perspective, published by Brill Niehoff
Jessie Cohen holds a Ph.D. in History from Columbia University. She is an editor at the New Books Network
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>6</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">c3ba2b68-0b05-11f0-90bb-bb9ba0abf3b8</guid>
      <title>Mikhail Goldis, &quot;Memoirs of a Jewish District Attorney from Soviet Ukraine&quot; (Academic Studies Press, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>What was it like to work as a Jewish district attorney in provincial Soviet Ukraine in the post-Stalinist eras? What role did antisemitism and Holocaust memories play in solving and investigating the criminal cases? How does a detective’s mind work? The answers to these and many other fascinating questions are found in&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9798887195902" rel="noopener noreferrer">Memoirs of a Jewish District Attorney from Soviet Ukraine</a>&nbsp;(Academic Studies Press, 2024).&nbsp;</p><p>Mikhail Goldis (1926-2020) worked as a detective and district attorney for 30 years in Ukraine and wrote his memoirs after immigrating to the US in 1993. Translated by Marat Grinberg, a prolific scholar of Russian and Jewish literature and cinema, the memoirs tell the rich and poignant story of Goldis’s life and what it took for a Jew to navigate and survive in the halls of Soviet power.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/mikhail-goldis-memoirs-of-a-jewish-district-attorney-from-soviet-ukraine-academic-studies-press-2024-aoo_JXGU</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What was it like to work as a Jewish district attorney in provincial Soviet Ukraine in the post-Stalinist eras? What role did antisemitism and Holocaust memories play in solving and investigating the criminal cases? How does a detective’s mind work? The answers to these and many other fascinating questions are found in&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9798887195902" rel="noopener noreferrer">Memoirs of a Jewish District Attorney from Soviet Ukraine</a>&nbsp;(Academic Studies Press, 2024).&nbsp;</p><p>Mikhail Goldis (1926-2020) worked as a detective and district attorney for 30 years in Ukraine and wrote his memoirs after immigrating to the US in 1993. Translated by Marat Grinberg, a prolific scholar of Russian and Jewish literature and cinema, the memoirs tell the rich and poignant story of Goldis’s life and what it took for a Jew to navigate and survive in the halls of Soviet power.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="40890971" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/25ed271a-3f50-4de2-a1f6-01bb7a69349f/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=25ed271a-3f50-4de2-a1f6-01bb7a69349f&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Mikhail Goldis, &quot;Memoirs of a Jewish District Attorney from Soviet Ukraine&quot; (Academic Studies Press, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:42:35</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>What was it like to work as a Jewish district attorney in provincial Soviet Ukraine in the post-Stalinist eras? What role did antisemitism and Holocaust memories play in solving and investigating the criminal cases? How does a detective’s mind work? The answers to these and many other fascinating questions are found in Memoirs of a Jewish District Attorney from Soviet Ukraine (Academic Studies Press, 2024). 
Mikhail Goldis (1926-2020) worked as a detective and district attorney for 30 years in Ukraine and wrote his memoirs after immigrating to the US in 1993. Translated by Marat Grinberg, a prolific scholar of Russian and Jewish literature and cinema, the memoirs tell the rich and poignant story of Goldis’s life and what it took for a Jew to navigate and survive in the halls of Soviet power.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>What was it like to work as a Jewish district attorney in provincial Soviet Ukraine in the post-Stalinist eras? What role did antisemitism and Holocaust memories play in solving and investigating the criminal cases? How does a detective’s mind work? The answers to these and many other fascinating questions are found in Memoirs of a Jewish District Attorney from Soviet Ukraine (Academic Studies Press, 2024). 
Mikhail Goldis (1926-2020) worked as a detective and district attorney for 30 years in Ukraine and wrote his memoirs after immigrating to the US in 1993. Translated by Marat Grinberg, a prolific scholar of Russian and Jewish literature and cinema, the memoirs tell the rich and poignant story of Goldis’s life and what it took for a Jew to navigate and survive in the halls of Soviet power.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>624</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7aeadd0c-0712-11f0-bbaa-37645cd00854</guid>
      <title>Postscript: Not a Matter of Left or Right: Historians Fighting Censorship</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The presidents of the American Historical Association and Organization of American Historians join the podcast to talk about the effects of historical censorship, data shredding, meaningful public education – and what everyone can do to fight back.</p><p>After being sworn in as the 47th president, Donald Trump issued a slew of executive orders. The order entitled “<a href="https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/01/defending-women-from-gender-ideology-extremism-and-restoring-biological-truth-to-the-federal-government/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Defending Women from Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government</a>” declares that “It is the policy of the United States to recognize two sexes, male and female. These sexes are not changeable and are grounded in fundamental and incontrovertible reality. Under my direction, the Executive Branch will enforce all sex-protective laws to promote this reality...” This order has swiftly affected what people may read on websites or museum panels that describe historical events and artifacts.</p><p>As a&nbsp;<a href="https://www.historians.org/" rel="noopener noreferrer">new joint statement from the American Historical Association</a>&nbsp;and the&nbsp;<a href="https://www.oah.org/2025/03/13/oah-issues-statement-condemning-federal-censorship-of-american-history/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Organization of American Historians</a>&nbsp;recounts, “Some alterations, such as those related to topics like the Tuskegee Airmen and the internment of Japanese Americans during World War II, have been hurriedly reversed in response to public outcry. Others remain. The scrubbing of words and acronyms from the Stonewall National Monument webpage, for instance, distorts the site’s history by denying the roles of transgender and queer people in movements for rights and liberation. This distortion of history renders the past unrecognizable to the people who lived it and useless to those who seek to learn from the past.”</p><p>Dr. Beth English is Executive Director of the Organization of American Historians. Her research and teaching focus on the historical and contemporary labor movement, working-class issues, globalization, deindustrialization, and women in the workplace. She is the author of A Common Thread: Labor, Politics, and Capital Mobility in the Textile Industry, and co-editor of Global Women’s Work: Perspectives on Gender and Work in the Global Economy. She has contributed to the Washington Post, NPR, Vox, Huffington Post, The New Republic, and other media outlets.</p><p>Dr. James R. Grossman is executive director of the American Historical Association. Previously, he was vice president for research and education at the Newberry Library, and has taught at University of Chicago and University of California, San Diego. Among his many publications are the award-winning books,&nbsp;<em>Land of Hope: Chicago, Black Southerners, and the Great Migration</em>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<em>A Chance to Make Good: African-Americans, 1900–1929</em>. His articles and short essays have focused on various aspects of American urban history, African American history, ethnicity, higher education, and the place of history in public culture. His public facing scholarship includes work published in the&nbsp;<em>Chicago Tribune</em>,&nbsp;<em>New York Times</em>,&nbsp;<em>Los Angeles Times</em>,&nbsp;<em>Time</em>,&nbsp;<em>The Hill</em>,&nbsp;<em>The Chronicle of Higher Education</em>, and&nbsp;<em>Inside Higher Education</em>.</p><p>Grossman has consulted on history-related projects generated by the&nbsp;<em>BBC</em>, Smithsonian, and various theater companies, film makers, museums, libraries, and foundations. He has served on the governing boards of the National Humanities Alliance, American Council of Learned Societies, Association of American Colleges and Universities, and Center for Research Libraries.</p><p>Mentioned:</p><ul>
<li>OAH’s&nbsp;<a href="https://www.oah.org/2025/03/12/records-at-risk-data-collection-initiative/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Records at Risk Data Collection Initiative</a>&nbsp;for individuals to report removed or changed material</li>
<li>For federal workers who are interested in sharing their experiences, OAH’s&nbsp;<a href="https://www.oah.org/2025/03/04/federal-employees-oral-history-project/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Emergency Oral History Project</a>
</li>
<li><a href="https://www.npr.org/2025/03/14/g-s1-54054/arlington-national-cemetery-dei-website" rel="noopener noreferrer">Arlington National Cemetery website removes histories highlighting Black, Hispanic, and women veterans</a></li>
<li>
<a href="https://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=37" rel="noopener noreferrer">National Center for Education Statistics</a>&nbsp;(NCES)</li>
<li><a href="https://nsarchive.gwu.edu/briefing-book/climate-change-transparency-project-foia/2025-02-06/disappearing-data-trump" rel="noopener noreferrer">Removal of climate data from government websites</a></li>
<li>Contribute to&nbsp;<a href="https://www.historians.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/donation-form.pdf" rel="noopener noreferrer">AHA</a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a href="https://www.oah.org/about/support-oah/" rel="noopener noreferrer">OAH</a>
</li>
<li>
<a href="https://5calls.org/" rel="noopener noreferrer">5calls ap</a>&nbsp;for connecting with federal senators and representatives</li>
<li>
<a href="https://www.historians.org/news/action-alert-iowa-hf-402-sf-322/" rel="noopener noreferrer">AHA Action Alert for Iowa residents</a>&nbsp;(and&nbsp;<a href="https://www.historians.org/news/aha-sends-letter-to-iowa-senate-education-committee-opposing-hf-402-sf-322/" rel="noopener noreferrer">AHA letter to Iowa Senate Education Committee</a>)</li>
</ul><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/postscript-not-a-matter-of-left-or-right-historians-fighting-censorship-R9TyNs91</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The presidents of the American Historical Association and Organization of American Historians join the podcast to talk about the effects of historical censorship, data shredding, meaningful public education – and what everyone can do to fight back.</p><p>After being sworn in as the 47th president, Donald Trump issued a slew of executive orders. The order entitled “<a href="https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/01/defending-women-from-gender-ideology-extremism-and-restoring-biological-truth-to-the-federal-government/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Defending Women from Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government</a>” declares that “It is the policy of the United States to recognize two sexes, male and female. These sexes are not changeable and are grounded in fundamental and incontrovertible reality. Under my direction, the Executive Branch will enforce all sex-protective laws to promote this reality...” This order has swiftly affected what people may read on websites or museum panels that describe historical events and artifacts.</p><p>As a&nbsp;<a href="https://www.historians.org/" rel="noopener noreferrer">new joint statement from the American Historical Association</a>&nbsp;and the&nbsp;<a href="https://www.oah.org/2025/03/13/oah-issues-statement-condemning-federal-censorship-of-american-history/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Organization of American Historians</a>&nbsp;recounts, “Some alterations, such as those related to topics like the Tuskegee Airmen and the internment of Japanese Americans during World War II, have been hurriedly reversed in response to public outcry. Others remain. The scrubbing of words and acronyms from the Stonewall National Monument webpage, for instance, distorts the site’s history by denying the roles of transgender and queer people in movements for rights and liberation. This distortion of history renders the past unrecognizable to the people who lived it and useless to those who seek to learn from the past.”</p><p>Dr. Beth English is Executive Director of the Organization of American Historians. Her research and teaching focus on the historical and contemporary labor movement, working-class issues, globalization, deindustrialization, and women in the workplace. She is the author of A Common Thread: Labor, Politics, and Capital Mobility in the Textile Industry, and co-editor of Global Women’s Work: Perspectives on Gender and Work in the Global Economy. She has contributed to the Washington Post, NPR, Vox, Huffington Post, The New Republic, and other media outlets.</p><p>Dr. James R. Grossman is executive director of the American Historical Association. Previously, he was vice president for research and education at the Newberry Library, and has taught at University of Chicago and University of California, San Diego. Among his many publications are the award-winning books,&nbsp;<em>Land of Hope: Chicago, Black Southerners, and the Great Migration</em>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<em>A Chance to Make Good: African-Americans, 1900–1929</em>. His articles and short essays have focused on various aspects of American urban history, African American history, ethnicity, higher education, and the place of history in public culture. His public facing scholarship includes work published in the&nbsp;<em>Chicago Tribune</em>,&nbsp;<em>New York Times</em>,&nbsp;<em>Los Angeles Times</em>,&nbsp;<em>Time</em>,&nbsp;<em>The Hill</em>,&nbsp;<em>The Chronicle of Higher Education</em>, and&nbsp;<em>Inside Higher Education</em>.</p><p>Grossman has consulted on history-related projects generated by the&nbsp;<em>BBC</em>, Smithsonian, and various theater companies, film makers, museums, libraries, and foundations. He has served on the governing boards of the National Humanities Alliance, American Council of Learned Societies, Association of American Colleges and Universities, and Center for Research Libraries.</p><p>Mentioned:</p><ul>
<li>OAH’s&nbsp;<a href="https://www.oah.org/2025/03/12/records-at-risk-data-collection-initiative/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Records at Risk Data Collection Initiative</a>&nbsp;for individuals to report removed or changed material</li>
<li>For federal workers who are interested in sharing their experiences, OAH’s&nbsp;<a href="https://www.oah.org/2025/03/04/federal-employees-oral-history-project/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Emergency Oral History Project</a>
</li>
<li><a href="https://www.npr.org/2025/03/14/g-s1-54054/arlington-national-cemetery-dei-website" rel="noopener noreferrer">Arlington National Cemetery website removes histories highlighting Black, Hispanic, and women veterans</a></li>
<li>
<a href="https://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=37" rel="noopener noreferrer">National Center for Education Statistics</a>&nbsp;(NCES)</li>
<li><a href="https://nsarchive.gwu.edu/briefing-book/climate-change-transparency-project-foia/2025-02-06/disappearing-data-trump" rel="noopener noreferrer">Removal of climate data from government websites</a></li>
<li>Contribute to&nbsp;<a href="https://www.historians.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/donation-form.pdf" rel="noopener noreferrer">AHA</a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a href="https://www.oah.org/about/support-oah/" rel="noopener noreferrer">OAH</a>
</li>
<li>
<a href="https://5calls.org/" rel="noopener noreferrer">5calls ap</a>&nbsp;for connecting with federal senators and representatives</li>
<li>
<a href="https://www.historians.org/news/action-alert-iowa-hf-402-sf-322/" rel="noopener noreferrer">AHA Action Alert for Iowa residents</a>&nbsp;(and&nbsp;<a href="https://www.historians.org/news/aha-sends-letter-to-iowa-senate-education-committee-opposing-hf-402-sf-322/" rel="noopener noreferrer">AHA letter to Iowa Senate Education Committee</a>)</li>
</ul><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="36223082" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/39cd0d90-4da4-49fd-a319-24157b6b6e9e/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=39cd0d90-4da4-49fd-a319-24157b6b6e9e&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Postscript: Not a Matter of Left or Right: Historians Fighting Censorship</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:37:43</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The presidents of the American Historical Association and Organization of American Historians join the podcast to talk about the effects of historical censorship, data shredding, meaningful public education – and what everyone can do to fight back.
After being sworn in as the 47th president, Donald Trump issued a slew of executive orders. The order entitled “Defending Women from Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government” declares that “It is the policy of the United States to recognize two sexes, male and female. These sexes are not changeable and are grounded in fundamental and incontrovertible reality. Under my direction, the Executive Branch will enforce all sex-protective laws to promote this reality...” This order has swiftly affected what people may read on websites or museum panels that describe historical events and artifacts.
As a new joint statement from the American Historical Association and the Organization of American Historians recounts, “Some alterations, such as those related to topics like the Tuskegee Airmen and the internment of Japanese Americans during World War II, have been hurriedly reversed in response to public outcry. Others remain. The scrubbing of words and acronyms from the Stonewall National Monument webpage, for instance, distorts the site’s history by denying the roles of transgender and queer people in movements for rights and liberation. This distortion of history renders the past unrecognizable to the people who lived it and useless to those who seek to learn from the past.”
Dr. Beth English is Executive Director of the Organization of American Historians. Her research and teaching focus on the historical and contemporary labor movement, working-class issues, globalization, deindustrialization, and women in the workplace. She is the author of A Common Thread: Labor, Politics, and Capital Mobility in the Textile Industry, and co-editor of Global Women’s Work: Perspectives on Gender and Work in the Global Economy. She has contributed to the Washington Post, NPR, Vox, Huffington Post, The New Republic, and other media outlets.
Dr. James R. Grossman is executive director of the American Historical Association. Previously, he was vice president for research and education at the Newberry Library, and has taught at University of Chicago and University of California, San Diego. Among his many publications are the award-winning books, Land of Hope: Chicago, Black Southerners, and the Great Migration and A Chance to Make Good: African-Americans, 1900–1929. His articles and short essays have focused on various aspects of American urban history, African American history, ethnicity, higher education, and the place of history in public culture. His public facing scholarship includes work published in the Chicago Tribune, New York Times, Los Angeles Times, Time, The Hill, The Chronicle of Higher Education, and Inside Higher Education.
Grossman has consulted on history-related projects generated by the BBC, Smithsonian, and various theater companies, film makers, museums, libraries, and foundations. He has served on the governing boards of the National Humanities Alliance, American Council of Learned Societies, Association of American Colleges and Universities, and Center for Research Libraries.
Mentioned:
OAH’s Records at Risk Data Collection Initiative for individuals to report removed or changed material
For federal workers who are interested in sharing their experiences, OAH’s Emergency Oral History Project
Arlington National Cemetery website removes histories highlighting Black, Hispanic, and women veterans
National Center for Education Statistics (NCES)
Removal of climate data from government websites
Contribute to AHA and OAH
5calls ap for connecting with federal senators and representatives
AHA Action Alert for Iowa residents (and AHA letter to Iowa Senate Education Committee)
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The presidents of the American Historical Association and Organization of American Historians join the podcast to talk about the effects of historical censorship, data shredding, meaningful public education – and what everyone can do to fight back.
After being sworn in as the 47th president, Donald Trump issued a slew of executive orders. The order entitled “Defending Women from Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government” declares that “It is the policy of the United States to recognize two sexes, male and female. These sexes are not changeable and are grounded in fundamental and incontrovertible reality. Under my direction, the Executive Branch will enforce all sex-protective laws to promote this reality...” This order has swiftly affected what people may read on websites or museum panels that describe historical events and artifacts.
As a new joint statement from the American Historical Association and the Organization of American Historians recounts, “Some alterations, such as those related to topics like the Tuskegee Airmen and the internment of Japanese Americans during World War II, have been hurriedly reversed in response to public outcry. Others remain. The scrubbing of words and acronyms from the Stonewall National Monument webpage, for instance, distorts the site’s history by denying the roles of transgender and queer people in movements for rights and liberation. This distortion of history renders the past unrecognizable to the people who lived it and useless to those who seek to learn from the past.”
Dr. Beth English is Executive Director of the Organization of American Historians. Her research and teaching focus on the historical and contemporary labor movement, working-class issues, globalization, deindustrialization, and women in the workplace. She is the author of A Common Thread: Labor, Politics, and Capital Mobility in the Textile Industry, and co-editor of Global Women’s Work: Perspectives on Gender and Work in the Global Economy. She has contributed to the Washington Post, NPR, Vox, Huffington Post, The New Republic, and other media outlets.
Dr. James R. Grossman is executive director of the American Historical Association. Previously, he was vice president for research and education at the Newberry Library, and has taught at University of Chicago and University of California, San Diego. Among his many publications are the award-winning books, Land of Hope: Chicago, Black Southerners, and the Great Migration and A Chance to Make Good: African-Americans, 1900–1929. His articles and short essays have focused on various aspects of American urban history, African American history, ethnicity, higher education, and the place of history in public culture. His public facing scholarship includes work published in the Chicago Tribune, New York Times, Los Angeles Times, Time, The Hill, The Chronicle of Higher Education, and Inside Higher Education.
Grossman has consulted on history-related projects generated by the BBC, Smithsonian, and various theater companies, film makers, museums, libraries, and foundations. He has served on the governing boards of the National Humanities Alliance, American Council of Learned Societies, Association of American Colleges and Universities, and Center for Research Libraries.
Mentioned:
OAH’s Records at Risk Data Collection Initiative for individuals to report removed or changed material
For federal workers who are interested in sharing their experiences, OAH’s Emergency Oral History Project
Arlington National Cemetery website removes histories highlighting Black, Hispanic, and women veterans
National Center for Education Statistics (NCES)
Removal of climate data from government websites
Contribute to AHA and OAH
5calls ap for connecting with federal senators and representatives
AHA Action Alert for Iowa residents (and AHA letter to Iowa Senate Education Committee)
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>37</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3af93adc-0694-11f0-8ac4-fbed95d5fe3c</guid>
      <title>Joshua Ehrlich, &quot;The East India Company and the Politics of Knowledge&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Welcome to the&nbsp;<strong>Global Corporations Special Series</strong>&nbsp;on the Law Channel on the New Books Network. This Special Series is dedicated to interviews with scholars about recent books engaging with different aspects of global corporations – with a focus on the role of law and legal forms.</p><p>Our guest today is Dr. Joshua Ehrlich, Associate Professor in the Department of History at the University of Macau. Josh is a historian of knowledge and political thought with a focus on the East India Company and the British Empire in South and Southeast Asia.</p><p>We spoke with Josh in a live event as part of a workshop in Hong Kong on the history of companies in Asia about his first book,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009367981" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The East India Company and the Politics of Knowledge</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>which was published by Cambridge University Press in 2023.</p><p>The book is a deeply researched and well-written account of how East India Company officials developed and deployed ideas about knowledge to bolster its own authority, and to manage the transition from corporate sovereignty towards unitary state sovereignty. In the process, Josh develops a novel methodological approach that he calls the history of ideas of knowledge – an approach that allows us to recover past meanings and usages of concepts about knowledge to make them available again in the present.</p><p><br></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/joshua-ehrlich-the-east-india-company-and-the-politics-of-knowledge-cambridge-up-2023-QdYAQ0gv</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Welcome to the&nbsp;<strong>Global Corporations Special Series</strong>&nbsp;on the Law Channel on the New Books Network. This Special Series is dedicated to interviews with scholars about recent books engaging with different aspects of global corporations – with a focus on the role of law and legal forms.</p><p>Our guest today is Dr. Joshua Ehrlich, Associate Professor in the Department of History at the University of Macau. Josh is a historian of knowledge and political thought with a focus on the East India Company and the British Empire in South and Southeast Asia.</p><p>We spoke with Josh in a live event as part of a workshop in Hong Kong on the history of companies in Asia about his first book,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009367981" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The East India Company and the Politics of Knowledge</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>which was published by Cambridge University Press in 2023.</p><p>The book is a deeply researched and well-written account of how East India Company officials developed and deployed ideas about knowledge to bolster its own authority, and to manage the transition from corporate sovereignty towards unitary state sovereignty. In the process, Josh develops a novel methodological approach that he calls the history of ideas of knowledge – an approach that allows us to recover past meanings and usages of concepts about knowledge to make them available again in the present.</p><p><br></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="47610185" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/6c6cf31a-43f8-4f9a-ad46-ffc9a3925720/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=6c6cf31a-43f8-4f9a-ad46-ffc9a3925720&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Joshua Ehrlich, &quot;The East India Company and the Politics of Knowledge&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:49:35</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Welcome to the Global Corporations Special Series on the Law Channel on the New Books Network. This Special Series is dedicated to interviews with scholars about recent books engaging with different aspects of global corporations – with a focus on the role of law and legal forms.
Our guest today is Dr. Joshua Ehrlich, Associate Professor in the Department of History at the University of Macau. Josh is a historian of knowledge and political thought with a focus on the East India Company and the British Empire in South and Southeast Asia.
We spoke with Josh in a live event as part of a workshop in Hong Kong on the history of companies in Asia about his first book, The East India Company and the Politics of Knowledge which was published by Cambridge University Press in 2023.
The book is a deeply researched and well-written account of how East India Company officials developed and deployed ideas about knowledge to bolster its own authority, and to manage the transition from corporate sovereignty towards unitary state sovereignty. In the process, Josh develops a novel methodological approach that he calls the history of ideas of knowledge – an approach that allows us to recover past meanings and usages of concepts about knowledge to make them available again in the present.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Welcome to the Global Corporations Special Series on the Law Channel on the New Books Network. This Special Series is dedicated to interviews with scholars about recent books engaging with different aspects of global corporations – with a focus on the role of law and legal forms.
Our guest today is Dr. Joshua Ehrlich, Associate Professor in the Department of History at the University of Macau. Josh is a historian of knowledge and political thought with a focus on the East India Company and the British Empire in South and Southeast Asia.
We spoke with Josh in a live event as part of a workshop in Hong Kong on the history of companies in Asia about his first book, The East India Company and the Politics of Knowledge which was published by Cambridge University Press in 2023.
The book is a deeply researched and well-written account of how East India Company officials developed and deployed ideas about knowledge to bolster its own authority, and to manage the transition from corporate sovereignty towards unitary state sovereignty. In the process, Josh develops a novel methodological approach that he calls the history of ideas of knowledge – an approach that allows us to recover past meanings and usages of concepts about knowledge to make them available again in the present.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>245</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">f20a9784-065d-11f0-92ec-af9b439c130d</guid>
      <title>Gerald J. Postema, &quot;Law&apos;s Rule: The Nature, Value, and Viability of the Rule of Law&quot; (Oxford UP, 2022)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Rule of law faces serious threats to its viability in many countries. It has become a recurring topic in the media and is affecting our daily lives. To understand better the meaning of rule of law, the stakes, and how governments and citizens can respond to today’s challenges, we must return to first principles.</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780190645342" rel="noopener noreferrer">Law’s Rule</a>&nbsp;(Oxford U. Press, 2022), eminent philosopher of law Gerald Postema draws on a lifetime of research and thought to articulate and defend a comprehensive, coherent, and compelling conception of the rule of law and defend it against serious challenges to its intelligibility, relevance, and normative force. The rule of law's ambition, Postema argues, is to provide protection and recourse against the arbitrary exercise of power using the distinctive tools of the law. Law provides a bulwark of protection, a bridle on the powerful, and a bond constituting and holding together the polity and giving public expression to an ideal mode of association.</p><p>Two principles immediately follow from this core: sovereignty of law, demanding that those who exercise ruling power govern with law and that law governs them, and equality in the eyes of the law, demanding that law's protection extend to all bound by it. Animating law's rule, the ethos of fidelity commits all members of the political community, officials and lay members alike, to take responsibility for holding each other accountable under the law.</p><p>Postema’s work is theoretically rigorous while addressing the myriad practical considerations in building and maintaining the rule of law.</p><p>Gerald Postema is Emeritus Professor of Philosophy, University of North Carolina had has widely published in legal and political philosophy and ethics. He earned a BA degree from Calvin College (1970) and PhD (1976) from Cornell University. He began his teaching career at Johns Hopkins University (1975-1980). From 1980 until his retirement in 2019, he taught philosophy and law at UNC-Chapel Hill, since 1996 as Boshamer Distinguished Professor of Philosophy.</p><p>He is interviewed by Thomas McInerney, an international lawyer, scholar, and strategist, who has worked to advance rule of law internationally for 25 years. He has taught in the Rule of Law for Development Program at Loyola University Chicago School of Law since 2011. He writes the&nbsp;<a href="https://tommcinerney.substack.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Rights, Regulation and Rule of Law</a>&nbsp;newsletter on Substack.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/gerald-j-postema-laws-rule-the-nature-value-and-viability-of-the-rule-of-law-oxford-up-2022-gdezKQW_</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rule of law faces serious threats to its viability in many countries. It has become a recurring topic in the media and is affecting our daily lives. To understand better the meaning of rule of law, the stakes, and how governments and citizens can respond to today’s challenges, we must return to first principles.</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780190645342" rel="noopener noreferrer">Law’s Rule</a>&nbsp;(Oxford U. Press, 2022), eminent philosopher of law Gerald Postema draws on a lifetime of research and thought to articulate and defend a comprehensive, coherent, and compelling conception of the rule of law and defend it against serious challenges to its intelligibility, relevance, and normative force. The rule of law's ambition, Postema argues, is to provide protection and recourse against the arbitrary exercise of power using the distinctive tools of the law. Law provides a bulwark of protection, a bridle on the powerful, and a bond constituting and holding together the polity and giving public expression to an ideal mode of association.</p><p>Two principles immediately follow from this core: sovereignty of law, demanding that those who exercise ruling power govern with law and that law governs them, and equality in the eyes of the law, demanding that law's protection extend to all bound by it. Animating law's rule, the ethos of fidelity commits all members of the political community, officials and lay members alike, to take responsibility for holding each other accountable under the law.</p><p>Postema’s work is theoretically rigorous while addressing the myriad practical considerations in building and maintaining the rule of law.</p><p>Gerald Postema is Emeritus Professor of Philosophy, University of North Carolina had has widely published in legal and political philosophy and ethics. He earned a BA degree from Calvin College (1970) and PhD (1976) from Cornell University. He began his teaching career at Johns Hopkins University (1975-1980). From 1980 until his retirement in 2019, he taught philosophy and law at UNC-Chapel Hill, since 1996 as Boshamer Distinguished Professor of Philosophy.</p><p>He is interviewed by Thomas McInerney, an international lawyer, scholar, and strategist, who has worked to advance rule of law internationally for 25 years. He has taught in the Rule of Law for Development Program at Loyola University Chicago School of Law since 2011. He writes the&nbsp;<a href="https://tommcinerney.substack.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Rights, Regulation and Rule of Law</a>&nbsp;newsletter on Substack.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="56621191" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/44f0a773-eec0-4b1e-a6d9-77809f4ac9b2/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=44f0a773-eec0-4b1e-a6d9-77809f4ac9b2&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Gerald J. Postema, &quot;Law&apos;s Rule: The Nature, Value, and Viability of the Rule of Law&quot; (Oxford UP, 2022)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:58:58</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Rule of law faces serious threats to its viability in many countries. It has become a recurring topic in the media and is affecting our daily lives. To understand better the meaning of rule of law, the stakes, and how governments and citizens can respond to today’s challenges, we must return to first principles.
In Law’s Rule (Oxford U. Press, 2022), eminent philosopher of law Gerald Postema draws on a lifetime of research and thought to articulate and defend a comprehensive, coherent, and compelling conception of the rule of law and defend it against serious challenges to its intelligibility, relevance, and normative force. The rule of law&apos;s ambition, Postema argues, is to provide protection and recourse against the arbitrary exercise of power using the distinctive tools of the law. Law provides a bulwark of protection, a bridle on the powerful, and a bond constituting and holding together the polity and giving public expression to an ideal mode of association.
Two principles immediately follow from this core: sovereignty of law, demanding that those who exercise ruling power govern with law and that law governs them, and equality in the eyes of the law, demanding that law&apos;s protection extend to all bound by it. Animating law&apos;s rule, the ethos of fidelity commits all members of the political community, officials and lay members alike, to take responsibility for holding each other accountable under the law.
Postema’s work is theoretically rigorous while addressing the myriad practical considerations in building and maintaining the rule of law.
Gerald Postema is Emeritus Professor of Philosophy, University of North Carolina had has widely published in legal and political philosophy and ethics. He earned a BA degree from Calvin College (1970) and PhD (1976) from Cornell University. He began his teaching career at Johns Hopkins University (1975-1980). From 1980 until his retirement in 2019, he taught philosophy and law at UNC-Chapel Hill, since 1996 as Boshamer Distinguished Professor of Philosophy.
He is interviewed by Thomas McInerney, an international lawyer, scholar, and strategist, who has worked to advance rule of law internationally for 25 years. He has taught in the Rule of Law for Development Program at Loyola University Chicago School of Law since 2011. He writes the Rights, Regulation and Rule of Law newsletter on Substack.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Rule of law faces serious threats to its viability in many countries. It has become a recurring topic in the media and is affecting our daily lives. To understand better the meaning of rule of law, the stakes, and how governments and citizens can respond to today’s challenges, we must return to first principles.
In Law’s Rule (Oxford U. Press, 2022), eminent philosopher of law Gerald Postema draws on a lifetime of research and thought to articulate and defend a comprehensive, coherent, and compelling conception of the rule of law and defend it against serious challenges to its intelligibility, relevance, and normative force. The rule of law&apos;s ambition, Postema argues, is to provide protection and recourse against the arbitrary exercise of power using the distinctive tools of the law. Law provides a bulwark of protection, a bridle on the powerful, and a bond constituting and holding together the polity and giving public expression to an ideal mode of association.
Two principles immediately follow from this core: sovereignty of law, demanding that those who exercise ruling power govern with law and that law governs them, and equality in the eyes of the law, demanding that law&apos;s protection extend to all bound by it. Animating law&apos;s rule, the ethos of fidelity commits all members of the political community, officials and lay members alike, to take responsibility for holding each other accountable under the law.
Postema’s work is theoretically rigorous while addressing the myriad practical considerations in building and maintaining the rule of law.
Gerald Postema is Emeritus Professor of Philosophy, University of North Carolina had has widely published in legal and political philosophy and ethics. He earned a BA degree from Calvin College (1970) and PhD (1976) from Cornell University. He began his teaching career at Johns Hopkins University (1975-1980). From 1980 until his retirement in 2019, he taught philosophy and law at UNC-Chapel Hill, since 1996 as Boshamer Distinguished Professor of Philosophy.
He is interviewed by Thomas McInerney, an international lawyer, scholar, and strategist, who has worked to advance rule of law internationally for 25 years. He has taught in the Rule of Law for Development Program at Loyola University Chicago School of Law since 2011. He writes the Rights, Regulation and Rule of Law newsletter on Substack.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1523</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9dea6986-05c7-11f0-9f86-738ea8e0d10c</guid>
      <title>Ahmed M. Abozaid, &quot;Counterterrorism Strategies in Egypt: Permanent Exceptions in the War on Terror&quot; (Routledge, 2021)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Ahmed M. Abozaid’s&nbsp;<em>Counterterrorism Strategies in Egypt: Permanent Exceptions in the War on Terror&nbsp;</em>(Routledge, 2021)<em>&nbsp;</em>reveals how counterterrorism discourses and practices became the main tool of a systematic violation of human rights in Egypt after the Arab Uprising. It examines how the civic and democratic uprising in Egypt turned into robust authoritarianism. By interrogating Egypt’s counterterrorism legislation, the book identifies a correlation between counterterrorism narratives and the systemic violation of human rights. It examines the construction of a national security state that has little tolerance for dissent, political debate or the questioning of official policy, and how the anti-terrorism measures undertaken are actually anti-democracy strategies.</p><p>In this episode, Ibrahim Fawzy interviews Ahmed M. Abozaid about his personal experiences, the difference between critical and traditional terrorism studies, the impact of counterterrorism policies on marginalized communities in Upper Egypt, and more.</p><p><em>Ibrahim Fawzy is a literary translator and writer based in Boston. His interests include translation studies, Arabic literature, ecocriticism, disability studies, and migration literature.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/ahmed-m-abozaid-counterterrorism-strategies-in-egypt-permanent-exceptions-in-the-war-on-terror-routledge-2021-wgk_CvRB</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahmed M. Abozaid’s&nbsp;<em>Counterterrorism Strategies in Egypt: Permanent Exceptions in the War on Terror&nbsp;</em>(Routledge, 2021)<em>&nbsp;</em>reveals how counterterrorism discourses and practices became the main tool of a systematic violation of human rights in Egypt after the Arab Uprising. It examines how the civic and democratic uprising in Egypt turned into robust authoritarianism. By interrogating Egypt’s counterterrorism legislation, the book identifies a correlation between counterterrorism narratives and the systemic violation of human rights. It examines the construction of a national security state that has little tolerance for dissent, political debate or the questioning of official policy, and how the anti-terrorism measures undertaken are actually anti-democracy strategies.</p><p>In this episode, Ibrahim Fawzy interviews Ahmed M. Abozaid about his personal experiences, the difference between critical and traditional terrorism studies, the impact of counterterrorism policies on marginalized communities in Upper Egypt, and more.</p><p><em>Ibrahim Fawzy is a literary translator and writer based in Boston. His interests include translation studies, Arabic literature, ecocriticism, disability studies, and migration literature.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="56193701" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/706fd8b9-7d73-4ce3-a9e7-d77dfd5f1088/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=706fd8b9-7d73-4ce3-a9e7-d77dfd5f1088&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Ahmed M. Abozaid, &quot;Counterterrorism Strategies in Egypt: Permanent Exceptions in the War on Terror&quot; (Routledge, 2021)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:58:31</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Ahmed M. Abozaid’s Counterterrorism Strategies in Egypt: Permanent Exceptions in the War on Terror (Routledge, 2021) reveals how counterterrorism discourses and practices became the main tool of a systematic violation of human rights in Egypt after the Arab Uprising. It examines how the civic and democratic uprising in Egypt turned into robust authoritarianism. By interrogating Egypt’s counterterrorism legislation, the book identifies a correlation between counterterrorism narratives and the systemic violation of human rights. It examines the construction of a national security state that has little tolerance for dissent, political debate or the questioning of official policy, and how the anti-terrorism measures undertaken are actually anti-democracy strategies.
In this episode, Ibrahim Fawzy interviews Ahmed M. Abozaid about his personal experiences, the difference between critical and traditional terrorism studies, the impact of counterterrorism policies on marginalized communities in Upper Egypt, and more.
Ibrahim Fawzy is a literary translator and writer based in Boston. His interests include translation studies, Arabic literature, ecocriticism, disability studies, and migration literature.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Ahmed M. Abozaid’s Counterterrorism Strategies in Egypt: Permanent Exceptions in the War on Terror (Routledge, 2021) reveals how counterterrorism discourses and practices became the main tool of a systematic violation of human rights in Egypt after the Arab Uprising. It examines how the civic and democratic uprising in Egypt turned into robust authoritarianism. By interrogating Egypt’s counterterrorism legislation, the book identifies a correlation between counterterrorism narratives and the systemic violation of human rights. It examines the construction of a national security state that has little tolerance for dissent, political debate or the questioning of official policy, and how the anti-terrorism measures undertaken are actually anti-democracy strategies.
In this episode, Ibrahim Fawzy interviews Ahmed M. Abozaid about his personal experiences, the difference between critical and traditional terrorism studies, the impact of counterterrorism policies on marginalized communities in Upper Egypt, and more.
Ibrahim Fawzy is a literary translator and writer based in Boston. His interests include translation studies, Arabic literature, ecocriticism, disability studies, and migration literature.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>298</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">984e1a9a-05b3-11f0-8399-ff0af1a0fdd8</guid>
      <title>Andrew Clapham, &quot;War&quot; (Oxford UP, 2021)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>This book poses the question: How relevant is the concept of war today? Professor Andrew Clapham of the Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies in Geneva examines how notions about war continue to influence how we conceive rights and obligations in national and international law. It considers the role international law plays in limiting what is forbidden and what is legitimated in times of war or armed conflict. The book highlights how, even though war has been outlawed and should be finished as an institutions, sates nevertheless continue to claim that they can wage necessary wars of self-defence, engage in lawful killings in war, imprison law-of-war detainees, and attack objects that are said to be part of a war-sustaining economy. Professor Clapham argues that, while there is general agreement that war has been abolished as a legal institution for settling disputes, the time has come to admit that the belligerent rights that once accompanied states at war are no longer available. In other words, simply claiming to be in a war or an armed conflict does not grant anyone a licence to kill people, destroy things, and acquire other people’s property or territory.</p><p>In this podcast, we begin by exploring Professor Clapham’s motivation for writing the book and the central arguments challenging traditional ideas of war, law, and state power. We discuss how historical, and outdated, ideas of ‘prize’ or war booty continue to influence modern conflict, and explore how rhetorical usages of the words ‘war’ and ‘armed conflict’ exert a particular influence on populations and even on the soldiers themselves. Professor Clapham argues that human rights law should play a bigger role in limiting actions of states in armed conflict, and looks to the future legal challenges posed by cyber warfare, drones and AI / autonomous weapons. We also touch on accountability for war crimes and other international crimes, both at the level of international state responsibility as seen at the International Court of Justice, and at the individual criminal liability as seen in the International Criminal Court. We end with an intriguing insight into how Professor Clapham is looking to further develop his thinking for his next book.</p><p>This book is available&nbsp;OPEN ACCESS&nbsp;<a href="https://academic.oup.com/book/57867" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a>.</p><p>Alex Batesmith is an Associate Professor in Legal Professions in the School of Law at the University of Leeds, and a former barrister and UN war crimes prosecutor, with teaching and research interests in international criminal law, cause lawyering and the legal profession, and law and emotion.</p><p>His University of Leeds profile page can be found&nbsp;<a href="https://essl.leeds.ac.uk/law/staff/1332/mr-alex-batesmith" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a>:&nbsp;</p><p>Bluesky: @batesmith.bsky.social</p><p><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/batesmith/" rel="noopener noreferrer">LinkedIn</a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/andrew-clapham-war-oxford-up-2021-wwz3Rpzl</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This book poses the question: How relevant is the concept of war today? Professor Andrew Clapham of the Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies in Geneva examines how notions about war continue to influence how we conceive rights and obligations in national and international law. It considers the role international law plays in limiting what is forbidden and what is legitimated in times of war or armed conflict. The book highlights how, even though war has been outlawed and should be finished as an institutions, sates nevertheless continue to claim that they can wage necessary wars of self-defence, engage in lawful killings in war, imprison law-of-war detainees, and attack objects that are said to be part of a war-sustaining economy. Professor Clapham argues that, while there is general agreement that war has been abolished as a legal institution for settling disputes, the time has come to admit that the belligerent rights that once accompanied states at war are no longer available. In other words, simply claiming to be in a war or an armed conflict does not grant anyone a licence to kill people, destroy things, and acquire other people’s property or territory.</p><p>In this podcast, we begin by exploring Professor Clapham’s motivation for writing the book and the central arguments challenging traditional ideas of war, law, and state power. We discuss how historical, and outdated, ideas of ‘prize’ or war booty continue to influence modern conflict, and explore how rhetorical usages of the words ‘war’ and ‘armed conflict’ exert a particular influence on populations and even on the soldiers themselves. Professor Clapham argues that human rights law should play a bigger role in limiting actions of states in armed conflict, and looks to the future legal challenges posed by cyber warfare, drones and AI / autonomous weapons. We also touch on accountability for war crimes and other international crimes, both at the level of international state responsibility as seen at the International Court of Justice, and at the individual criminal liability as seen in the International Criminal Court. We end with an intriguing insight into how Professor Clapham is looking to further develop his thinking for his next book.</p><p>This book is available&nbsp;OPEN ACCESS&nbsp;<a href="https://academic.oup.com/book/57867" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a>.</p><p>Alex Batesmith is an Associate Professor in Legal Professions in the School of Law at the University of Leeds, and a former barrister and UN war crimes prosecutor, with teaching and research interests in international criminal law, cause lawyering and the legal profession, and law and emotion.</p><p>His University of Leeds profile page can be found&nbsp;<a href="https://essl.leeds.ac.uk/law/staff/1332/mr-alex-batesmith" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a>:&nbsp;</p><p>Bluesky: @batesmith.bsky.social</p><p><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/batesmith/" rel="noopener noreferrer">LinkedIn</a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="57798137" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/52bb4ab7-6018-4f25-93eb-7bf65571263c/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=52bb4ab7-6018-4f25-93eb-7bf65571263c&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Andrew Clapham, &quot;War&quot; (Oxford UP, 2021)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:00:12</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>This book poses the question: How relevant is the concept of war today? Professor Andrew Clapham of the Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies in Geneva examines how notions about war continue to influence how we conceive rights and obligations in national and international law. It considers the role international law plays in limiting what is forbidden and what is legitimated in times of war or armed conflict. The book highlights how, even though war has been outlawed and should be finished as an institutions, sates nevertheless continue to claim that they can wage necessary wars of self-defence, engage in lawful killings in war, imprison law-of-war detainees, and attack objects that are said to be part of a war-sustaining economy. Professor Clapham argues that, while there is general agreement that war has been abolished as a legal institution for settling disputes, the time has come to admit that the belligerent rights that once accompanied states at war are no longer available. In other words, simply claiming to be in a war or an armed conflict does not grant anyone a licence to kill people, destroy things, and acquire other people’s property or territory.
In this podcast, we begin by exploring Professor Clapham’s motivation for writing the book and the central arguments challenging traditional ideas of war, law, and state power. We discuss how historical, and outdated, ideas of ‘prize’ or war booty continue to influence modern conflict, and explore how rhetorical usages of the words ‘war’ and ‘armed conflict’ exert a particular influence on populations and even on the soldiers themselves. Professor Clapham argues that human rights law should play a bigger role in limiting actions of states in armed conflict, and looks to the future legal challenges posed by cyber warfare, drones and AI / autonomous weapons. We also touch on accountability for war crimes and other international crimes, both at the level of international state responsibility as seen at the International Court of Justice, and at the individual criminal liability as seen in the International Criminal Court. We end with an intriguing insight into how Professor Clapham is looking to further develop his thinking for his next book.
This book is available OPEN ACCESS here.
Alex Batesmith is an Associate Professor in Legal Professions in the School of Law at the University of Leeds, and a former barrister and UN war crimes prosecutor, with teaching and research interests in international criminal law, cause lawyering and the legal profession, and law and emotion.
His University of Leeds profile page can be found here: 
Bluesky: @batesmith.bsky.social
LinkedIn
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>This book poses the question: How relevant is the concept of war today? Professor Andrew Clapham of the Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies in Geneva examines how notions about war continue to influence how we conceive rights and obligations in national and international law. It considers the role international law plays in limiting what is forbidden and what is legitimated in times of war or armed conflict. The book highlights how, even though war has been outlawed and should be finished as an institutions, sates nevertheless continue to claim that they can wage necessary wars of self-defence, engage in lawful killings in war, imprison law-of-war detainees, and attack objects that are said to be part of a war-sustaining economy. Professor Clapham argues that, while there is general agreement that war has been abolished as a legal institution for settling disputes, the time has come to admit that the belligerent rights that once accompanied states at war are no longer available. In other words, simply claiming to be in a war or an armed conflict does not grant anyone a licence to kill people, destroy things, and acquire other people’s property or territory.
In this podcast, we begin by exploring Professor Clapham’s motivation for writing the book and the central arguments challenging traditional ideas of war, law, and state power. We discuss how historical, and outdated, ideas of ‘prize’ or war booty continue to influence modern conflict, and explore how rhetorical usages of the words ‘war’ and ‘armed conflict’ exert a particular influence on populations and even on the soldiers themselves. Professor Clapham argues that human rights law should play a bigger role in limiting actions of states in armed conflict, and looks to the future legal challenges posed by cyber warfare, drones and AI / autonomous weapons. We also touch on accountability for war crimes and other international crimes, both at the level of international state responsibility as seen at the International Court of Justice, and at the individual criminal liability as seen in the International Criminal Court. We end with an intriguing insight into how Professor Clapham is looking to further develop his thinking for his next book.
This book is available OPEN ACCESS here.
Alex Batesmith is an Associate Professor in Legal Professions in the School of Law at the University of Leeds, and a former barrister and UN war crimes prosecutor, with teaching and research interests in international criminal law, cause lawyering and the legal profession, and law and emotion.
His University of Leeds profile page can be found here: 
Bluesky: @batesmith.bsky.social
LinkedIn
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1522</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">32e170ec-027c-11f0-bfae-7b632c0d0938</guid>
      <title>Simon Rabinovitch, &quot;Sovereignty and Religious Freedom: A Jewish History&quot; (Yale UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>It is a common assumption that in Israel, Jews have sovereignty, and in most other places where Jews live today, they have religious freedom instead. As Simon Rabinovitch shows in this original work, the situation is much more complicated. Jews today possess different kinds of legal rights in states around the world; some stem from religious freedom protections, and others evolved from a longer history of Jewish autonomy.</p><p>By comparing conflicts between Jewish collective and individual rights in courts and laws across the globe, from the French Revolution to today, this book provides a nuanced legal history of Jewish sovereignty and religious freedom. Rabinovitch weaves key themes in Jewish legal history with the individual stories of litigants, exploring ideas about citizenship and belonging; who is a Jew; what makes a Jewish family; and how to define Jewish space. He uses recent court cases to explore problems of conflicting rights and then situates each case in a wider historical context. This unique comparative history creates a global picture of modern legal development in which Jews continue to use the law to carve out surprising forms of sovereignty.</p><p>Simon Rabinovitch is the Stotsky Associate Professor of Jewish Historical and Cultural Studies at Northeastern University. He teaches and writes on a range of topics in European, Jewish, Russian, and legal history.</p><p>Geraldine Gudefin is a French-born modern Jewish historian researching Jewish family life, legal pluralism, and the migration experiences of Jews in France and the United States. She is currently a research fellow at the Hebrew University’s Avraham Harman Research Institute of Contemporary Jewry, and is completing a book titled&nbsp;<em>An Impossible Divorce? East European Jews and the Limits of Legal Pluralism in France, 1900-1939</em>.</p><p>Mentioned in the podcast:</p><ul>
<li>• Simon Rabinovitch,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.sup.org/books/history/jewish-rights-national-rites/excerpts" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Jewish Rights, National Rites: Nationalism and Autonomy in Late Imperial and Revolutionary Russia</em></a>&nbsp;(2014)</li>
<li>• Maurice Samuels,&nbsp;<a href="https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/R/bo24550561.html" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Right to Difference: French Universalism and the Jews</em></a>&nbsp;(2016)</li>
<li>• David Sorkin<a href="https://press.princeton.edu/books/paperback/9780691149370/the-religious-enlightenment?srsltid=AfmBOooat6qHFuj2wpcvUQxV8nD_iKukI7pFpqOUPjHtt63h9ZDgG9_n" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>, The Religious Enlightenment: Protestants, Jews, and Catholics from London to Vienna</em></a>&nbsp;(2008)</li>
<li>• David Sorkin,&nbsp;<a href="https://press.princeton.edu/books/hardcover/9780691164946/jewish-emancipation?srsltid=AfmBOopOc-tJCVBJDHDbIwSxmHaJmkLsb7ejIJd6adJ3_gMgngVnEpao" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Jewish Emancipation: A History across Five Centuries</em></a>&nbsp;(2019)</li>
<li>• Lawrence Rosen,&nbsp;<a href="https://nyupress.org/9781479830411/the-rights-of-groups/#:~:text=The%20Rights%20of%20Groups%20focuses,employ%20the%20notion%20of%20community." rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Rights of Groups: Understanding Community in the Eyes of the Law</em></a>&nbsp;(2024)</li>
<li>• Winnifred Fallers Sullivan,&nbsp;<a href="https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/C/bo25874237.html" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Church State Corporation: Construing Religion in US Law</em></a>&nbsp;(2020)</li>
<li>• Nomi M. Stolzenberg and David N. Myers,&nbsp;<a href="https://press.princeton.edu/books/hardcover/9780691199771/american-shtetl?srsltid=AfmBOooD3_TTpw6iX2WJBEgbL48jjySp6xxFLBFOYfRuJNOJA08rsGmd" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>American Shtetl: The Making of Kiryas Joel, a Hasidic Village in Upstate New York</em></a>&nbsp;(2022)</li>
<li>• David Biale,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/13335/power-and-powerlessness-in-jewish-history-by-david-biale/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Power &amp; Powerlessness in Jewish History</em></a>&nbsp;(1986)</li>
</ul><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/simon-rabinovitch-sovereignty-and-religious-freedom-a-jewish-history-yale-up-2024-Xyo6MbTl</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is a common assumption that in Israel, Jews have sovereignty, and in most other places where Jews live today, they have religious freedom instead. As Simon Rabinovitch shows in this original work, the situation is much more complicated. Jews today possess different kinds of legal rights in states around the world; some stem from religious freedom protections, and others evolved from a longer history of Jewish autonomy.</p><p>By comparing conflicts between Jewish collective and individual rights in courts and laws across the globe, from the French Revolution to today, this book provides a nuanced legal history of Jewish sovereignty and religious freedom. Rabinovitch weaves key themes in Jewish legal history with the individual stories of litigants, exploring ideas about citizenship and belonging; who is a Jew; what makes a Jewish family; and how to define Jewish space. He uses recent court cases to explore problems of conflicting rights and then situates each case in a wider historical context. This unique comparative history creates a global picture of modern legal development in which Jews continue to use the law to carve out surprising forms of sovereignty.</p><p>Simon Rabinovitch is the Stotsky Associate Professor of Jewish Historical and Cultural Studies at Northeastern University. He teaches and writes on a range of topics in European, Jewish, Russian, and legal history.</p><p>Geraldine Gudefin is a French-born modern Jewish historian researching Jewish family life, legal pluralism, and the migration experiences of Jews in France and the United States. She is currently a research fellow at the Hebrew University’s Avraham Harman Research Institute of Contemporary Jewry, and is completing a book titled&nbsp;<em>An Impossible Divorce? East European Jews and the Limits of Legal Pluralism in France, 1900-1939</em>.</p><p>Mentioned in the podcast:</p><ul>
<li>• Simon Rabinovitch,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.sup.org/books/history/jewish-rights-national-rites/excerpts" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Jewish Rights, National Rites: Nationalism and Autonomy in Late Imperial and Revolutionary Russia</em></a>&nbsp;(2014)</li>
<li>• Maurice Samuels,&nbsp;<a href="https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/R/bo24550561.html" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Right to Difference: French Universalism and the Jews</em></a>&nbsp;(2016)</li>
<li>• David Sorkin<a href="https://press.princeton.edu/books/paperback/9780691149370/the-religious-enlightenment?srsltid=AfmBOooat6qHFuj2wpcvUQxV8nD_iKukI7pFpqOUPjHtt63h9ZDgG9_n" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>, The Religious Enlightenment: Protestants, Jews, and Catholics from London to Vienna</em></a>&nbsp;(2008)</li>
<li>• David Sorkin,&nbsp;<a href="https://press.princeton.edu/books/hardcover/9780691164946/jewish-emancipation?srsltid=AfmBOopOc-tJCVBJDHDbIwSxmHaJmkLsb7ejIJd6adJ3_gMgngVnEpao" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Jewish Emancipation: A History across Five Centuries</em></a>&nbsp;(2019)</li>
<li>• Lawrence Rosen,&nbsp;<a href="https://nyupress.org/9781479830411/the-rights-of-groups/#:~:text=The%20Rights%20of%20Groups%20focuses,employ%20the%20notion%20of%20community." rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Rights of Groups: Understanding Community in the Eyes of the Law</em></a>&nbsp;(2024)</li>
<li>• Winnifred Fallers Sullivan,&nbsp;<a href="https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/C/bo25874237.html" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Church State Corporation: Construing Religion in US Law</em></a>&nbsp;(2020)</li>
<li>• Nomi M. Stolzenberg and David N. Myers,&nbsp;<a href="https://press.princeton.edu/books/hardcover/9780691199771/american-shtetl?srsltid=AfmBOooD3_TTpw6iX2WJBEgbL48jjySp6xxFLBFOYfRuJNOJA08rsGmd" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>American Shtetl: The Making of Kiryas Joel, a Hasidic Village in Upstate New York</em></a>&nbsp;(2022)</li>
<li>• David Biale,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/13335/power-and-powerlessness-in-jewish-history-by-david-biale/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Power &amp; Powerlessness in Jewish History</em></a>&nbsp;(1986)</li>
</ul><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="71029201" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/a8b0be72-76d7-4fe6-877c-2c6b99f3a377/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=a8b0be72-76d7-4fe6-877c-2c6b99f3a377&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Simon Rabinovitch, &quot;Sovereignty and Religious Freedom: A Jewish History&quot; (Yale UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:13:59</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>It is a common assumption that in Israel, Jews have sovereignty, and in most other places where Jews live today, they have religious freedom instead. As Simon Rabinovitch shows in this original work, the situation is much more complicated. Jews today possess different kinds of legal rights in states around the world; some stem from religious freedom protections, and others evolved from a longer history of Jewish autonomy.
By comparing conflicts between Jewish collective and individual rights in courts and laws across the globe, from the French Revolution to today, this book provides a nuanced legal history of Jewish sovereignty and religious freedom. Rabinovitch weaves key themes in Jewish legal history with the individual stories of litigants, exploring ideas about citizenship and belonging; who is a Jew; what makes a Jewish family; and how to define Jewish space. He uses recent court cases to explore problems of conflicting rights and then situates each case in a wider historical context. This unique comparative history creates a global picture of modern legal development in which Jews continue to use the law to carve out surprising forms of sovereignty.
Simon Rabinovitch is the Stotsky Associate Professor of Jewish Historical and Cultural Studies at Northeastern University. He teaches and writes on a range of topics in European, Jewish, Russian, and legal history.
Geraldine Gudefin is a French-born modern Jewish historian researching Jewish family life, legal pluralism, and the migration experiences of Jews in France and the United States. She is currently a research fellow at the Hebrew University’s Avraham Harman Research Institute of Contemporary Jewry, and is completing a book titled An Impossible Divorce? East European Jews and the Limits of Legal Pluralism in France, 1900-1939.
Mentioned in the podcast:
• Simon Rabinovitch, Jewish Rights, National Rites: Nationalism and Autonomy in Late Imperial and Revolutionary Russia (2014)
• Maurice Samuels, The Right to Difference: French Universalism and the Jews (2016)
• David Sorkin, The Religious Enlightenment: Protestants, Jews, and Catholics from London to Vienna (2008)
• David Sorkin, Jewish Emancipation: A History across Five Centuries (2019)
• Lawrence Rosen, The Rights of Groups: Understanding Community in the Eyes of the Law (2024)
• Winnifred Fallers Sullivan, Church State Corporation: Construing Religion in US Law (2020)
• Nomi M. Stolzenberg and David N. Myers, American Shtetl: The Making of Kiryas Joel, a Hasidic Village in Upstate New York (2022)
• David Biale, Power &amp; Powerlessness in Jewish History (1986)
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>It is a common assumption that in Israel, Jews have sovereignty, and in most other places where Jews live today, they have religious freedom instead. As Simon Rabinovitch shows in this original work, the situation is much more complicated. Jews today possess different kinds of legal rights in states around the world; some stem from religious freedom protections, and others evolved from a longer history of Jewish autonomy.
By comparing conflicts between Jewish collective and individual rights in courts and laws across the globe, from the French Revolution to today, this book provides a nuanced legal history of Jewish sovereignty and religious freedom. Rabinovitch weaves key themes in Jewish legal history with the individual stories of litigants, exploring ideas about citizenship and belonging; who is a Jew; what makes a Jewish family; and how to define Jewish space. He uses recent court cases to explore problems of conflicting rights and then situates each case in a wider historical context. This unique comparative history creates a global picture of modern legal development in which Jews continue to use the law to carve out surprising forms of sovereignty.
Simon Rabinovitch is the Stotsky Associate Professor of Jewish Historical and Cultural Studies at Northeastern University. He teaches and writes on a range of topics in European, Jewish, Russian, and legal history.
Geraldine Gudefin is a French-born modern Jewish historian researching Jewish family life, legal pluralism, and the migration experiences of Jews in France and the United States. She is currently a research fellow at the Hebrew University’s Avraham Harman Research Institute of Contemporary Jewry, and is completing a book titled An Impossible Divorce? East European Jews and the Limits of Legal Pluralism in France, 1900-1939.
Mentioned in the podcast:
• Simon Rabinovitch, Jewish Rights, National Rites: Nationalism and Autonomy in Late Imperial and Revolutionary Russia (2014)
• Maurice Samuels, The Right to Difference: French Universalism and the Jews (2016)
• David Sorkin, The Religious Enlightenment: Protestants, Jews, and Catholics from London to Vienna (2008)
• David Sorkin, Jewish Emancipation: A History across Five Centuries (2019)
• Lawrence Rosen, The Rights of Groups: Understanding Community in the Eyes of the Law (2024)
• Winnifred Fallers Sullivan, Church State Corporation: Construing Religion in US Law (2020)
• Nomi M. Stolzenberg and David N. Myers, American Shtetl: The Making of Kiryas Joel, a Hasidic Village in Upstate New York (2022)
• David Biale, Power &amp; Powerlessness in Jewish History (1986)
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>619</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1a222444-0104-11f0-b1da-1bb66526afe1</guid>
      <title>Mark Neocleous, &quot;Pacification: Social War and the Power of Police&quot; (Verso, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Today I talked to&nbsp;Mark Neocleous about his new book&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781804294017" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Pacification: Social War and the Power of Police</em></a>&nbsp;(Verso, 2025).</p><p>For more than two decades, Neocleous has been a pioneer in the radical critique of policing, security, and warfare. Today we will discuss his newest work on the theory and practice of pacification, which, he argues, is “social warfare carried out through the ideology of peace.” Pacification not only aims to counter resistance to capitalist exploitation, dispossession, and displacement, but it aims to prevent such resistance from emerging in the first place by constructing social institutions and the built environment. Pacification is a totalizing process by which states deploy social policies, symbolic practices, and coercive operations in order to produce cooperative – or at least acquiescent – subjects. However, pacification never succeeds in obscuring the antagonistic nature of capitalist social relations. Consequently, pacification becomes an endless social war for peace.</p><p>Mark Neocleous is Professor of the Critique of Political Economy at Brunel University in London. His previous books include&nbsp;<em>A Critical Theory of Police Power</em>&nbsp;(reissued by Verso in 2021),&nbsp;<em>The Politics of Immunity</em>&nbsp;(Verso, 2022), and&nbsp;<em>War Power, Police Power&nbsp;</em>(Edinburgh 2014). As a member of the Anti-Security Collective, he co-authored the&nbsp;<em>Security Abolition Manifesto</em>, which is available at anti-security.org.&nbsp;</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/mark-neocleous-pacification-social-war-and-the-power-of-police-verso-2025-pCdtr5yj</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today I talked to&nbsp;Mark Neocleous about his new book&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781804294017" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Pacification: Social War and the Power of Police</em></a>&nbsp;(Verso, 2025).</p><p>For more than two decades, Neocleous has been a pioneer in the radical critique of policing, security, and warfare. Today we will discuss his newest work on the theory and practice of pacification, which, he argues, is “social warfare carried out through the ideology of peace.” Pacification not only aims to counter resistance to capitalist exploitation, dispossession, and displacement, but it aims to prevent such resistance from emerging in the first place by constructing social institutions and the built environment. Pacification is a totalizing process by which states deploy social policies, symbolic practices, and coercive operations in order to produce cooperative – or at least acquiescent – subjects. However, pacification never succeeds in obscuring the antagonistic nature of capitalist social relations. Consequently, pacification becomes an endless social war for peace.</p><p>Mark Neocleous is Professor of the Critique of Political Economy at Brunel University in London. His previous books include&nbsp;<em>A Critical Theory of Police Power</em>&nbsp;(reissued by Verso in 2021),&nbsp;<em>The Politics of Immunity</em>&nbsp;(Verso, 2022), and&nbsp;<em>War Power, Police Power&nbsp;</em>(Edinburgh 2014). As a member of the Anti-Security Collective, he co-authored the&nbsp;<em>Security Abolition Manifesto</em>, which is available at anti-security.org.&nbsp;</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="78798449" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/93f8d51d-13f4-4e66-b9d1-422e8357d307/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=93f8d51d-13f4-4e66-b9d1-422e8357d307&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Mark Neocleous, &quot;Pacification: Social War and the Power of Police&quot; (Verso, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:22:04</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Today I talked to Mark Neocleous about his new book Pacification: Social War and the Power of Police (Verso, 2025).
For more than two decades, Neocleous has been a pioneer in the radical critique of policing, security, and warfare. Today we will discuss his newest work on the theory and practice of pacification, which, he argues, is “social warfare carried out through the ideology of peace.” Pacification not only aims to counter resistance to capitalist exploitation, dispossession, and displacement, but it aims to prevent such resistance from emerging in the first place by constructing social institutions and the built environment. Pacification is a totalizing process by which states deploy social policies, symbolic practices, and coercive operations in order to produce cooperative – or at least acquiescent – subjects. However, pacification never succeeds in obscuring the antagonistic nature of capitalist social relations. Consequently, pacification becomes an endless social war for peace.
Mark Neocleous is Professor of the Critique of Political Economy at Brunel University in London. His previous books include A Critical Theory of Police Power (reissued by Verso in 2021), The Politics of Immunity (Verso, 2022), and War Power, Police Power (Edinburgh 2014). As a member of the Anti-Security Collective, he co-authored the Security Abolition Manifesto, which is available at anti-security.org. 
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Today I talked to Mark Neocleous about his new book Pacification: Social War and the Power of Police (Verso, 2025).
For more than two decades, Neocleous has been a pioneer in the radical critique of policing, security, and warfare. Today we will discuss his newest work on the theory and practice of pacification, which, he argues, is “social warfare carried out through the ideology of peace.” Pacification not only aims to counter resistance to capitalist exploitation, dispossession, and displacement, but it aims to prevent such resistance from emerging in the first place by constructing social institutions and the built environment. Pacification is a totalizing process by which states deploy social policies, symbolic practices, and coercive operations in order to produce cooperative – or at least acquiescent – subjects. However, pacification never succeeds in obscuring the antagonistic nature of capitalist social relations. Consequently, pacification becomes an endless social war for peace.
Mark Neocleous is Professor of the Critique of Political Economy at Brunel University in London. His previous books include A Critical Theory of Police Power (reissued by Verso in 2021), The Politics of Immunity (Verso, 2022), and War Power, Police Power (Edinburgh 2014). As a member of the Anti-Security Collective, he co-authored the Security Abolition Manifesto, which is available at anti-security.org. 
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>125</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9c5b1c36-ff3d-11ef-a19f-533703b21d84</guid>
      <title>Postscript: How Trump’s Executive Order Contradicts Birthright Citizenship</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Birthright citizenship is established in the first sentence of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution – yet Donald Trump’s recent Executive Order 14160 denies some types of birthright citizenship. The Order contradicts over a century of American law, legal practice, and constitutional interpretation. Three groups have opposed the order as unconstitutional and challenged it in the courts: and cities, civil rights organizations, and labor organizations. In the podcast, three scholars to help Susan and Lilly interrogate the meaning of natural born citizenship, the political ramifications of Trump’s order, and the complicated history of natural born citizenship in the United States.</p><p>Dr. Anna O. Law is the Herbert Kurz Chair in Constitutional Rights and Associate Professor of Political Science at Brooklyn College, City University of New York.</p><p>Julie Novkov is Dean of Rockefeller College of Public Affairs and Policy and Professor of Political Science and Women’s, Gender, and Sexuality Studies, University at Albany, SUNY.</p><p>Carol Nackenoff is the Emerita Richter Professor of Political Science, Swarthmore College</p><p>Mentioned:</p><ul>
<li>
<a href="http://www.law.harvard.edu/faculty/cdonahue/courses/lhsemelh/materials/CalvinsCase.pdf" rel="noopener noreferrer">Calvin’s Case</a>&nbsp;(1608)</li>
<li>Donald Trump’s&nbsp;<a href="https://public-inspection.federalregister.gov/2025-02007.pdf" rel="noopener noreferrer">Executive order 14160</a>
</li>
<li>Julie and Carol’s 2021 book&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/american-by-birth#entry:87899@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>American by Birth: Wong Kim Ark and the Battle for Citizenship</em></a>&nbsp;and their&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/american-by-birth#entry:87899@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">NBN interview with Susan</a>.</li>
<li>Anna’s 2025 FREE open-access article “<a href="https://repository.law.wisc.edu/s/uwlaw/media/323610" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Civil War and Reconstruction Amendments’ Effects on Citizenship and Migration</a>”</li>
<li>Anna’s NBN conversation with Heath Brown on her 2017 book,&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/anna-law-the-immigration-battle-in-american-courts-cambridge-up-2014#entry:13544@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Immigration Battle in American Courts</em></a>
</li>
<li>Lilly’s conversation with Martha Jones about her book,&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/martha-s-jones-birthright-citizens-a-history-of-race-and-rights-in-antebellum-america-cambridge-up-2018-2#entry:9109@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Birthright Citizens: A History of Race and Rights in Antebellum America</em></a>
</li>
<li>Kate Masur,&nbsp;<em>Until Justice Be Done: America’s First Civil Rights Movement, from Revolution to Reconstruction</em>&nbsp;(2021)</li>
<li>Lilly’s NBN conversation with Elizabeth Cohen and Cyril Ghosh about their 2019 book&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/elizabeth-f-cohen-and-cyril-ghosh-citizenship-polity-2019#entry:7264@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Citizenship</em></a>
</li>
</ul><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/postscript-how-trumps-executive-order-contradicts-birthright-citizenship-iaF_kPD2</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Birthright citizenship is established in the first sentence of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution – yet Donald Trump’s recent Executive Order 14160 denies some types of birthright citizenship. The Order contradicts over a century of American law, legal practice, and constitutional interpretation. Three groups have opposed the order as unconstitutional and challenged it in the courts: and cities, civil rights organizations, and labor organizations. In the podcast, three scholars to help Susan and Lilly interrogate the meaning of natural born citizenship, the political ramifications of Trump’s order, and the complicated history of natural born citizenship in the United States.</p><p>Dr. Anna O. Law is the Herbert Kurz Chair in Constitutional Rights and Associate Professor of Political Science at Brooklyn College, City University of New York.</p><p>Julie Novkov is Dean of Rockefeller College of Public Affairs and Policy and Professor of Political Science and Women’s, Gender, and Sexuality Studies, University at Albany, SUNY.</p><p>Carol Nackenoff is the Emerita Richter Professor of Political Science, Swarthmore College</p><p>Mentioned:</p><ul>
<li>
<a href="http://www.law.harvard.edu/faculty/cdonahue/courses/lhsemelh/materials/CalvinsCase.pdf" rel="noopener noreferrer">Calvin’s Case</a>&nbsp;(1608)</li>
<li>Donald Trump’s&nbsp;<a href="https://public-inspection.federalregister.gov/2025-02007.pdf" rel="noopener noreferrer">Executive order 14160</a>
</li>
<li>Julie and Carol’s 2021 book&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/american-by-birth#entry:87899@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>American by Birth: Wong Kim Ark and the Battle for Citizenship</em></a>&nbsp;and their&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/american-by-birth#entry:87899@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">NBN interview with Susan</a>.</li>
<li>Anna’s 2025 FREE open-access article “<a href="https://repository.law.wisc.edu/s/uwlaw/media/323610" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Civil War and Reconstruction Amendments’ Effects on Citizenship and Migration</a>”</li>
<li>Anna’s NBN conversation with Heath Brown on her 2017 book,&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/anna-law-the-immigration-battle-in-american-courts-cambridge-up-2014#entry:13544@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Immigration Battle in American Courts</em></a>
</li>
<li>Lilly’s conversation with Martha Jones about her book,&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/martha-s-jones-birthright-citizens-a-history-of-race-and-rights-in-antebellum-america-cambridge-up-2018-2#entry:9109@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Birthright Citizens: A History of Race and Rights in Antebellum America</em></a>
</li>
<li>Kate Masur,&nbsp;<em>Until Justice Be Done: America’s First Civil Rights Movement, from Revolution to Reconstruction</em>&nbsp;(2021)</li>
<li>Lilly’s NBN conversation with Elizabeth Cohen and Cyril Ghosh about their 2019 book&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/elizabeth-f-cohen-and-cyril-ghosh-citizenship-polity-2019#entry:7264@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Citizenship</em></a>
</li>
</ul><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="34471898" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/b04524a7-94eb-4e3a-8ebe-c50c2e7eb4e7/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=b04524a7-94eb-4e3a-8ebe-c50c2e7eb4e7&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Postscript: How Trump’s Executive Order Contradicts Birthright Citizenship</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:35:54</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Birthright citizenship is established in the first sentence of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution – yet Donald Trump’s recent Executive Order 14160 denies some types of birthright citizenship. The Order contradicts over a century of American law, legal practice, and constitutional interpretation. Three groups have opposed the order as unconstitutional and challenged it in the courts: and cities, civil rights organizations, and labor organizations. In the podcast, three scholars to help Susan and Lilly interrogate the meaning of natural born citizenship, the political ramifications of Trump’s order, and the complicated history of natural born citizenship in the United States.
Dr. Anna O. Law is the Herbert Kurz Chair in Constitutional Rights and Associate Professor of Political Science at Brooklyn College, City University of New York.
Julie Novkov is Dean of Rockefeller College of Public Affairs and Policy and Professor of Political Science and Women’s, Gender, and Sexuality Studies, University at Albany, SUNY.
Carol Nackenoff is the Emerita Richter Professor of Political Science, Swarthmore College
Mentioned:
Calvin’s Case (1608)
Donald Trump’s Executive order 14160
Julie and Carol’s 2021 book American by Birth: Wong Kim Ark and the Battle for Citizenship and their NBN interview with Susan.
Anna’s 2025 FREE open-access article “The Civil War and Reconstruction Amendments’ Effects on Citizenship and Migration”
Anna’s NBN conversation with Heath Brown on her 2017 book, The Immigration Battle in American Courts
Lilly’s conversation with Martha Jones about her book, Birthright Citizens: A History of Race and Rights in Antebellum America
Kate Masur, Until Justice Be Done: America’s First Civil Rights Movement, from Revolution to Reconstruction (2021)
Lilly’s NBN conversation with Elizabeth Cohen and Cyril Ghosh about their 2019 book Citizenship
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Birthright citizenship is established in the first sentence of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution – yet Donald Trump’s recent Executive Order 14160 denies some types of birthright citizenship. The Order contradicts over a century of American law, legal practice, and constitutional interpretation. Three groups have opposed the order as unconstitutional and challenged it in the courts: and cities, civil rights organizations, and labor organizations. In the podcast, three scholars to help Susan and Lilly interrogate the meaning of natural born citizenship, the political ramifications of Trump’s order, and the complicated history of natural born citizenship in the United States.
Dr. Anna O. Law is the Herbert Kurz Chair in Constitutional Rights and Associate Professor of Political Science at Brooklyn College, City University of New York.
Julie Novkov is Dean of Rockefeller College of Public Affairs and Policy and Professor of Political Science and Women’s, Gender, and Sexuality Studies, University at Albany, SUNY.
Carol Nackenoff is the Emerita Richter Professor of Political Science, Swarthmore College
Mentioned:
Calvin’s Case (1608)
Donald Trump’s Executive order 14160
Julie and Carol’s 2021 book American by Birth: Wong Kim Ark and the Battle for Citizenship and their NBN interview with Susan.
Anna’s 2025 FREE open-access article “The Civil War and Reconstruction Amendments’ Effects on Citizenship and Migration”
Anna’s NBN conversation with Heath Brown on her 2017 book, The Immigration Battle in American Courts
Lilly’s conversation with Martha Jones about her book, Birthright Citizens: A History of Race and Rights in Antebellum America
Kate Masur, Until Justice Be Done: America’s First Civil Rights Movement, from Revolution to Reconstruction (2021)
Lilly’s NBN conversation with Elizabeth Cohen and Cyril Ghosh about their 2019 book Citizenship
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>35</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1ef1d8d6-fe8c-11ef-b784-678aa090afb8</guid>
      <title>Melissa Vise, &quot;The Unruly Tongue: Speech and Violence in Medieval Italy&quot; (U Pennsylvania Press, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781512827132" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Unruly Tongue: Speech and Violence in Medieval Italy</em></a>&nbsp;(University of Pennsylvania Press, 2025) by Dr. Melissa Vise, offers a new account of how the power of words changed in Western thought. Despite the association of freedom of speech with the political revolutions of the eighteenth century that ushered in the era of modern democracies, Dr. Vise locates the history of the repression of speech not in Europe’s monarchies but rather in Italy’s republics. Exploring the cultural process through which science and medicine, politics, law, literature, and theology together informed a new political ethics of speech, Dr. Vise uncovers the formation of a moral code where the regulation of the tongue became an integral component of republican values in medieval Europe.</p><p>The medieval citizens of Italy’s republics understood themselves to be wholly subject to the power of words not because they lived in an age of persecution or doctrinal rigidity, but because words had furnished the grounds for their political freedom. Speech-making was the means for speaking the republic itself into existence against the opposition of aristocracy, empire, and papacy. But because words had power, they could also be deployed as weapons. Speech contained the potential for violence and presented a threat to political and social order, and thus needed to be controlled. Dr. Vise shows how the laws that governed and curtailed speech in medieval Italy represented broader cultural understandings of human susceptibility to speech. Tracing anthropologies of speech from religious to political discourse, from civic courts to ecclesiastical courts, from medical texts to the works of Dante and Boccaccio,&nbsp;<em>The Unruly Tongue</em>&nbsp;demonstrates that the thirteenth century marked a major shift in how people perceived the power, and the threat, of speech: a change in thinking about “what words do.”</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;new book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/melissa-vise-the-unruly-tongue-speech-and-violence-in-medieval-italy-u-pennsylvania-press-2025-uSZgqPUT</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781512827132" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Unruly Tongue: Speech and Violence in Medieval Italy</em></a>&nbsp;(University of Pennsylvania Press, 2025) by Dr. Melissa Vise, offers a new account of how the power of words changed in Western thought. Despite the association of freedom of speech with the political revolutions of the eighteenth century that ushered in the era of modern democracies, Dr. Vise locates the history of the repression of speech not in Europe’s monarchies but rather in Italy’s republics. Exploring the cultural process through which science and medicine, politics, law, literature, and theology together informed a new political ethics of speech, Dr. Vise uncovers the formation of a moral code where the regulation of the tongue became an integral component of republican values in medieval Europe.</p><p>The medieval citizens of Italy’s republics understood themselves to be wholly subject to the power of words not because they lived in an age of persecution or doctrinal rigidity, but because words had furnished the grounds for their political freedom. Speech-making was the means for speaking the republic itself into existence against the opposition of aristocracy, empire, and papacy. But because words had power, they could also be deployed as weapons. Speech contained the potential for violence and presented a threat to political and social order, and thus needed to be controlled. Dr. Vise shows how the laws that governed and curtailed speech in medieval Italy represented broader cultural understandings of human susceptibility to speech. Tracing anthropologies of speech from religious to political discourse, from civic courts to ecclesiastical courts, from medical texts to the works of Dante and Boccaccio,&nbsp;<em>The Unruly Tongue</em>&nbsp;demonstrates that the thirteenth century marked a major shift in how people perceived the power, and the threat, of speech: a change in thinking about “what words do.”</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;new book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="44485234" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/75542176-9ab7-4720-b788-aa8d45ae34c9/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=75542176-9ab7-4720-b788-aa8d45ae34c9&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Melissa Vise, &quot;The Unruly Tongue: Speech and Violence in Medieval Italy&quot; (U Pennsylvania Press, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:46:20</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The Unruly Tongue: Speech and Violence in Medieval Italy (University of Pennsylvania Press, 2025) by Dr. Melissa Vise, offers a new account of how the power of words changed in Western thought. Despite the association of freedom of speech with the political revolutions of the eighteenth century that ushered in the era of modern democracies, Dr. Vise locates the history of the repression of speech not in Europe’s monarchies but rather in Italy’s republics. Exploring the cultural process through which science and medicine, politics, law, literature, and theology together informed a new political ethics of speech, Dr. Vise uncovers the formation of a moral code where the regulation of the tongue became an integral component of republican values in medieval Europe.
The medieval citizens of Italy’s republics understood themselves to be wholly subject to the power of words not because they lived in an age of persecution or doctrinal rigidity, but because words had furnished the grounds for their political freedom. Speech-making was the means for speaking the republic itself into existence against the opposition of aristocracy, empire, and papacy. But because words had power, they could also be deployed as weapons. Speech contained the potential for violence and presented a threat to political and social order, and thus needed to be controlled. Dr. Vise shows how the laws that governed and curtailed speech in medieval Italy represented broader cultural understandings of human susceptibility to speech. Tracing anthropologies of speech from religious to political discourse, from civic courts to ecclesiastical courts, from medical texts to the works of Dante and Boccaccio, The Unruly Tongue demonstrates that the thirteenth century marked a major shift in how people perceived the power, and the threat, of speech: a change in thinking about “what words do.”
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Unruly Tongue: Speech and Violence in Medieval Italy (University of Pennsylvania Press, 2025) by Dr. Melissa Vise, offers a new account of how the power of words changed in Western thought. Despite the association of freedom of speech with the political revolutions of the eighteenth century that ushered in the era of modern democracies, Dr. Vise locates the history of the repression of speech not in Europe’s monarchies but rather in Italy’s republics. Exploring the cultural process through which science and medicine, politics, law, literature, and theology together informed a new political ethics of speech, Dr. Vise uncovers the formation of a moral code where the regulation of the tongue became an integral component of republican values in medieval Europe.
The medieval citizens of Italy’s republics understood themselves to be wholly subject to the power of words not because they lived in an age of persecution or doctrinal rigidity, but because words had furnished the grounds for their political freedom. Speech-making was the means for speaking the republic itself into existence against the opposition of aristocracy, empire, and papacy. But because words had power, they could also be deployed as weapons. Speech contained the potential for violence and presented a threat to political and social order, and thus needed to be controlled. Dr. Vise shows how the laws that governed and curtailed speech in medieval Italy represented broader cultural understandings of human susceptibility to speech. Tracing anthropologies of speech from religious to political discourse, from civic courts to ecclesiastical courts, from medical texts to the works of Dante and Boccaccio, The Unruly Tongue demonstrates that the thirteenth century marked a major shift in how people perceived the power, and the threat, of speech: a change in thinking about “what words do.”
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>94</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">26f50b30-fc33-11ef-966d-47375f7411dc</guid>
      <title>Kristin A. Olbertson, &quot;The Dreadful Word: Speech Crime and Polite Gentlemen in Massachusetts, 1690–1776&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2022)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009102865" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Dreadful Word: Speech Crime and Polite Gentlemen in Massachusetts, 1690–1776</em></a>&nbsp;(Cambridge University Press, 2022) by Dr. Kristin Olbertson is the first comprehensive study of criminal speech in eighteenth-century New England, traces how the criminalization, prosecution, and punishment of speech offenses in Massachusetts helped to establish and legitimate a social and cultural regime of politeness.</p><p>Analyzing provincial statutes and hundreds of criminal prosecutions, Dr. Olbertson argues that colonists transformed their understanding of speech offenses, from fundamentally ungodly to primarily impolite. As white male gentility emerged as the pre-eminent model of authority, records of criminal prosecution and punishment show a distinct cadre of politely pious men defining themselves largely in contrast to the vulgar, the impious, and the unmanly. “Law,” as manifested in statutes as well as in local courts and communities, promoted and legitimized a particular, polite vision of the king's peace and helped effectuate the British Empire. In this unique and fascinating work, Dr. Olbertson reveals how ordinary people interacted with and shaped legal institutions.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;new book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 9 Mar 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/kristin-a-olbertson-the-dreadful-word-speech-crime-and-polite-gentlemen-in-massachusetts-16901776-cambridge-up-2022-iQbcioWA</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009102865" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Dreadful Word: Speech Crime and Polite Gentlemen in Massachusetts, 1690–1776</em></a>&nbsp;(Cambridge University Press, 2022) by Dr. Kristin Olbertson is the first comprehensive study of criminal speech in eighteenth-century New England, traces how the criminalization, prosecution, and punishment of speech offenses in Massachusetts helped to establish and legitimate a social and cultural regime of politeness.</p><p>Analyzing provincial statutes and hundreds of criminal prosecutions, Dr. Olbertson argues that colonists transformed their understanding of speech offenses, from fundamentally ungodly to primarily impolite. As white male gentility emerged as the pre-eminent model of authority, records of criminal prosecution and punishment show a distinct cadre of politely pious men defining themselves largely in contrast to the vulgar, the impious, and the unmanly. “Law,” as manifested in statutes as well as in local courts and communities, promoted and legitimized a particular, polite vision of the king's peace and helped effectuate the British Empire. In this unique and fascinating work, Dr. Olbertson reveals how ordinary people interacted with and shaped legal institutions.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;new book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="42353363" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/a823a723-df28-449e-b060-d87cf271dab8/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=a823a723-df28-449e-b060-d87cf271dab8&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Kristin A. Olbertson, &quot;The Dreadful Word: Speech Crime and Polite Gentlemen in Massachusetts, 1690–1776&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2022)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:44:06</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The Dreadful Word: Speech Crime and Polite Gentlemen in Massachusetts, 1690–1776 (Cambridge University Press, 2022) by Dr. Kristin Olbertson is the first comprehensive study of criminal speech in eighteenth-century New England, traces how the criminalization, prosecution, and punishment of speech offenses in Massachusetts helped to establish and legitimate a social and cultural regime of politeness.
Analyzing provincial statutes and hundreds of criminal prosecutions, Dr. Olbertson argues that colonists transformed their understanding of speech offenses, from fundamentally ungodly to primarily impolite. As white male gentility emerged as the pre-eminent model of authority, records of criminal prosecution and punishment show a distinct cadre of politely pious men defining themselves largely in contrast to the vulgar, the impious, and the unmanly. “Law,” as manifested in statutes as well as in local courts and communities, promoted and legitimized a particular, polite vision of the king&apos;s peace and helped effectuate the British Empire. In this unique and fascinating work, Dr. Olbertson reveals how ordinary people interacted with and shaped legal institutions.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Dreadful Word: Speech Crime and Polite Gentlemen in Massachusetts, 1690–1776 (Cambridge University Press, 2022) by Dr. Kristin Olbertson is the first comprehensive study of criminal speech in eighteenth-century New England, traces how the criminalization, prosecution, and punishment of speech offenses in Massachusetts helped to establish and legitimate a social and cultural regime of politeness.
Analyzing provincial statutes and hundreds of criminal prosecutions, Dr. Olbertson argues that colonists transformed their understanding of speech offenses, from fundamentally ungodly to primarily impolite. As white male gentility emerged as the pre-eminent model of authority, records of criminal prosecution and punishment show a distinct cadre of politely pious men defining themselves largely in contrast to the vulgar, the impious, and the unmanly. “Law,” as manifested in statutes as well as in local courts and communities, promoted and legitimized a particular, polite vision of the king&apos;s peace and helped effectuate the British Empire. In this unique and fascinating work, Dr. Olbertson reveals how ordinary people interacted with and shaped legal institutions.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>242</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">42686b94-fac8-11ef-b57e-db3452888da2</guid>
      <title>Kimberly Clausing, &quot;Open: The Progressive Case for Free Trade, Immigration, and Global Capital&quot; (Harvard UP, 2019)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Critics on the Left have long attacked open markets and free trade agreements for exploiting the poor and undermining labor, while those on the Right complain that they unjustly penalize workers back home. In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780674919334" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Open: The Progressive Case for Free Trade, Immigration, and Global Capital</em></a>&nbsp;(Harvard University Press, 2019),&nbsp;Kimberly Clausing takes on old and new skeptics in her compelling case that open economies are actually a force for good. Turning to the data to separate substance from spin, she shows how international trade makes countries richer, raises living standards, benefits consumers, and brings nations together. At a time when borders are closing and the safety of global supply chains is being thrown into question, she outlines a clear agenda to manage globalization more effectively, presenting strategies to equip workers for a modern economy and establish a better partnership between labor and the business community.</p><p><a href="https://law.ucla.edu/faculty/faculty-profiles/kimberly-clausing" rel="noopener noreferrer">Kimberly Clausing</a>&nbsp;holds the Eric M. Zolt Chair in Tax Law and Policy at the UCLA School of Law.&nbsp;During the first part of the Biden Administration, Clausing was the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Tax Analysis in the US Department of the Treasury, serving as the lead economist in the Office of Tax Policy. Prior to coming to UCLA, Clausing was the Thormund A. Miller and Walter Mintz Professor of Economics at Reed College.&nbsp;Professor Clausing is also a nonresident senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics, a member of the Council on Foreign Relations, and a research associate at the National Bureau of Economic Research. She has worked on economic policy research with the International Monetary Fund, the Hamilton Project, the Brookings Institution, the Tax Policy Center, and the Center for American Progress. She has testified before the House Ways and Means Committee, the Senate Committee on Finance, the Senate Committee on the Budget, and the Joint Economic Committee.&nbsp;Professor Clausing received her B.A. from Carleton College in 1991 and her Ph.D. from Harvard University in 1996, both in economics.</p><p>Other New Books Networks&nbsp;interviews on related themes include&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-unequal-effects-of-globalization#entry:351680@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">Yale economist Penny Goldberg, former Chief Economist of the World Bank, on The Unequal Effects of Globalization</a>,&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/streets-of-gold#entry:135008@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">Princeton economist Leah Boustan</a>&nbsp;on how immigrants have contributed to and rapidly assimilated into US society, and University of Massachusetts economist&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/how-china-escaped-shock-therapy#entry:120782@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">Isabella Weber on China's process of integration into the world economy</a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 8 Mar 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/kimberly-clausing-open-the-progressive-case-for-free-trade-immigration-and-global-capital-harvard-up-2019-EKBAmsQX</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Critics on the Left have long attacked open markets and free trade agreements for exploiting the poor and undermining labor, while those on the Right complain that they unjustly penalize workers back home. In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780674919334" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Open: The Progressive Case for Free Trade, Immigration, and Global Capital</em></a>&nbsp;(Harvard University Press, 2019),&nbsp;Kimberly Clausing takes on old and new skeptics in her compelling case that open economies are actually a force for good. Turning to the data to separate substance from spin, she shows how international trade makes countries richer, raises living standards, benefits consumers, and brings nations together. At a time when borders are closing and the safety of global supply chains is being thrown into question, she outlines a clear agenda to manage globalization more effectively, presenting strategies to equip workers for a modern economy and establish a better partnership between labor and the business community.</p><p><a href="https://law.ucla.edu/faculty/faculty-profiles/kimberly-clausing" rel="noopener noreferrer">Kimberly Clausing</a>&nbsp;holds the Eric M. Zolt Chair in Tax Law and Policy at the UCLA School of Law.&nbsp;During the first part of the Biden Administration, Clausing was the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Tax Analysis in the US Department of the Treasury, serving as the lead economist in the Office of Tax Policy. Prior to coming to UCLA, Clausing was the Thormund A. Miller and Walter Mintz Professor of Economics at Reed College.&nbsp;Professor Clausing is also a nonresident senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics, a member of the Council on Foreign Relations, and a research associate at the National Bureau of Economic Research. She has worked on economic policy research with the International Monetary Fund, the Hamilton Project, the Brookings Institution, the Tax Policy Center, and the Center for American Progress. She has testified before the House Ways and Means Committee, the Senate Committee on Finance, the Senate Committee on the Budget, and the Joint Economic Committee.&nbsp;Professor Clausing received her B.A. from Carleton College in 1991 and her Ph.D. from Harvard University in 1996, both in economics.</p><p>Other New Books Networks&nbsp;interviews on related themes include&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-unequal-effects-of-globalization#entry:351680@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">Yale economist Penny Goldberg, former Chief Economist of the World Bank, on The Unequal Effects of Globalization</a>,&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/streets-of-gold#entry:135008@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">Princeton economist Leah Boustan</a>&nbsp;on how immigrants have contributed to and rapidly assimilated into US society, and University of Massachusetts economist&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/how-china-escaped-shock-therapy#entry:120782@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">Isabella Weber on China's process of integration into the world economy</a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="57762686" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/6b56bad5-e904-4a8c-9ae7-ece65a8658e2/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=6b56bad5-e904-4a8c-9ae7-ece65a8658e2&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Kimberly Clausing, &quot;Open: The Progressive Case for Free Trade, Immigration, and Global Capital&quot; (Harvard UP, 2019)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:00:09</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Critics on the Left have long attacked open markets and free trade agreements for exploiting the poor and undermining labor, while those on the Right complain that they unjustly penalize workers back home. In Open: The Progressive Case for Free Trade, Immigration, and Global Capital (Harvard University Press, 2019), Kimberly Clausing takes on old and new skeptics in her compelling case that open economies are actually a force for good. Turning to the data to separate substance from spin, she shows how international trade makes countries richer, raises living standards, benefits consumers, and brings nations together. At a time when borders are closing and the safety of global supply chains is being thrown into question, she outlines a clear agenda to manage globalization more effectively, presenting strategies to equip workers for a modern economy and establish a better partnership between labor and the business community.
Kimberly Clausing holds the Eric M. Zolt Chair in Tax Law and Policy at the UCLA School of Law. During the first part of the Biden Administration, Clausing was the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Tax Analysis in the US Department of the Treasury, serving as the lead economist in the Office of Tax Policy. Prior to coming to UCLA, Clausing was the Thormund A. Miller and Walter Mintz Professor of Economics at Reed College. Professor Clausing is also a nonresident senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics, a member of the Council on Foreign Relations, and a research associate at the National Bureau of Economic Research. She has worked on economic policy research with the International Monetary Fund, the Hamilton Project, the Brookings Institution, the Tax Policy Center, and the Center for American Progress. She has testified before the House Ways and Means Committee, the Senate Committee on Finance, the Senate Committee on the Budget, and the Joint Economic Committee. Professor Clausing received her B.A. from Carleton College in 1991 and her Ph.D. from Harvard University in 1996, both in economics.
Other New Books Networks interviews on related themes include Yale economist Penny Goldberg, former Chief Economist of the World Bank, on The Unequal Effects of Globalization, Princeton economist Leah Boustan on how immigrants have contributed to and rapidly assimilated into US society, and University of Massachusetts economist Isabella Weber on China&apos;s process of integration into the world economy.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Critics on the Left have long attacked open markets and free trade agreements for exploiting the poor and undermining labor, while those on the Right complain that they unjustly penalize workers back home. In Open: The Progressive Case for Free Trade, Immigration, and Global Capital (Harvard University Press, 2019), Kimberly Clausing takes on old and new skeptics in her compelling case that open economies are actually a force for good. Turning to the data to separate substance from spin, she shows how international trade makes countries richer, raises living standards, benefits consumers, and brings nations together. At a time when borders are closing and the safety of global supply chains is being thrown into question, she outlines a clear agenda to manage globalization more effectively, presenting strategies to equip workers for a modern economy and establish a better partnership between labor and the business community.
Kimberly Clausing holds the Eric M. Zolt Chair in Tax Law and Policy at the UCLA School of Law. During the first part of the Biden Administration, Clausing was the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Tax Analysis in the US Department of the Treasury, serving as the lead economist in the Office of Tax Policy. Prior to coming to UCLA, Clausing was the Thormund A. Miller and Walter Mintz Professor of Economics at Reed College. Professor Clausing is also a nonresident senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics, a member of the Council on Foreign Relations, and a research associate at the National Bureau of Economic Research. She has worked on economic policy research with the International Monetary Fund, the Hamilton Project, the Brookings Institution, the Tax Policy Center, and the Center for American Progress. She has testified before the House Ways and Means Committee, the Senate Committee on Finance, the Senate Committee on the Budget, and the Joint Economic Committee. Professor Clausing received her B.A. from Carleton College in 1991 and her Ph.D. from Harvard University in 1996, both in economics.
Other New Books Networks interviews on related themes include Yale economist Penny Goldberg, former Chief Economist of the World Bank, on The Unequal Effects of Globalization, Princeton economist Leah Boustan on how immigrants have contributed to and rapidly assimilated into US society, and University of Massachusetts economist Isabella Weber on China&apos;s process of integration into the world economy.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>170</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">64bdbe02-f92d-11ef-915b-570fc1f5436e</guid>
      <title>Daniel J. Solove, &quot;On Privacy and Technology&quot; (Oxford UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Succinct and eloquent,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197771686" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>On Privacy and Technology</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Oxford UP, 2025)&nbsp;is an essential primer on how to face the threats to privacy in today's age of digital technologies and AI.</p><p>With the rapid rise of new digital technologies and artificial intelligence, is privacy dead? Can anything be done to save us from a dystopian world without privacy?</p><p>In this short and accessible book, internationally renowned privacy expert Daniel J. Solove draws from a range of fields, from law to philosophy to the humanities, to illustrate the profound changes technology is wreaking upon our privacy, why they matter, and what can be done about them. Solove provides incisive examinations of key concepts in the digital sphere, including control, manipulation, harm, automation, reputation, consent, prediction, inference, and many others.</p><p>Compelling and passionate,&nbsp;<em>On Privacy and Technology&nbsp;</em>teems with powerful insights that will transform the way you think about privacy and technology.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 7 Mar 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/daniel-j-solove-on-privacy-and-technology-oxford-up-2025-hcXzxifY</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Succinct and eloquent,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197771686" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>On Privacy and Technology</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Oxford UP, 2025)&nbsp;is an essential primer on how to face the threats to privacy in today's age of digital technologies and AI.</p><p>With the rapid rise of new digital technologies and artificial intelligence, is privacy dead? Can anything be done to save us from a dystopian world without privacy?</p><p>In this short and accessible book, internationally renowned privacy expert Daniel J. Solove draws from a range of fields, from law to philosophy to the humanities, to illustrate the profound changes technology is wreaking upon our privacy, why they matter, and what can be done about them. Solove provides incisive examinations of key concepts in the digital sphere, including control, manipulation, harm, automation, reputation, consent, prediction, inference, and many others.</p><p>Compelling and passionate,&nbsp;<em>On Privacy and Technology&nbsp;</em>teems with powerful insights that will transform the way you think about privacy and technology.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="36084622" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/9596eab8-b03e-495c-9402-a6340b644a03/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=9596eab8-b03e-495c-9402-a6340b644a03&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Daniel J. Solove, &quot;On Privacy and Technology&quot; (Oxford UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:37:35</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Succinct and eloquent, On Privacy and Technology (Oxford UP, 2025) is an essential primer on how to face the threats to privacy in today&apos;s age of digital technologies and AI.
With the rapid rise of new digital technologies and artificial intelligence, is privacy dead? Can anything be done to save us from a dystopian world without privacy?
In this short and accessible book, internationally renowned privacy expert Daniel J. Solove draws from a range of fields, from law to philosophy to the humanities, to illustrate the profound changes technology is wreaking upon our privacy, why they matter, and what can be done about them. Solove provides incisive examinations of key concepts in the digital sphere, including control, manipulation, harm, automation, reputation, consent, prediction, inference, and many others.
Compelling and passionate, On Privacy and Technology teems with powerful insights that will transform the way you think about privacy and technology.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Succinct and eloquent, On Privacy and Technology (Oxford UP, 2025) is an essential primer on how to face the threats to privacy in today&apos;s age of digital technologies and AI.
With the rapid rise of new digital technologies and artificial intelligence, is privacy dead? Can anything be done to save us from a dystopian world without privacy?
In this short and accessible book, internationally renowned privacy expert Daniel J. Solove draws from a range of fields, from law to philosophy to the humanities, to illustrate the profound changes technology is wreaking upon our privacy, why they matter, and what can be done about them. Solove provides incisive examinations of key concepts in the digital sphere, including control, manipulation, harm, automation, reputation, consent, prediction, inference, and many others.
Compelling and passionate, On Privacy and Technology teems with powerful insights that will transform the way you think about privacy and technology.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>382</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">05372dc4-f9d7-11ef-b6b5-ff67f61358f6</guid>
      <title>Jorge Goldstein, &quot;Patenting Life: Tales from the Front Lines of Intellectual Property and the New Biology&quot; (Georgetown UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In this episode, Jorge Goldstein, the author of&nbsp;<em>Patenting Life,</em> delves into the critical junction where biotechnology meets patent law. With a background as a molecular biologist turned patent attorney, Goldstein offers unique insights into how commercial biology has evolved and its profound effects on patent regulations. The discussion takes listeners on a journey from the early days of recombinant DNA technology to the cutting-edge advancements of CRISPR. Goldstein articulates how the commercialization of biological research influences scientific inquiry and reshapes patent law, highlighting key legal cases that have set the boundaries for patenting living organisms while addressing the complex ethical considerations that accompany these developments.</p><p>A significant theme in the conversation is the ongoing tension between academic research and commercial interests. Goldstein explains how this dynamic has molded patent policies and research agendas, emphasizing the concept of “enabling life” through patents. He also touches on emerging challenges posed by technologies like AI in biotechnology, raising questions about ownership and consent regarding biological materials and genetic data. Reflecting on broader ethical implications, Goldstein discusses the responsibilities that come with innovation in biotechnology and patent law while considering the future challenges for intellectual property frameworks, particularly in light of advancements in CRISPR and synthetic biology.</p><p>This episode provides a comprehensive overview of how the patenting of life has transformed not only biology and medicine but also the legal landscape, prompting listeners to think critically about the implications of these changes for society.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 7 Mar 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/jorge-goldstein-patenting-life-tales-from-the-front-lines-of-intellectual-property-and-the-new-biology-georgetown-up-2025-HwJPytwp</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this episode, Jorge Goldstein, the author of&nbsp;<em>Patenting Life,</em> delves into the critical junction where biotechnology meets patent law. With a background as a molecular biologist turned patent attorney, Goldstein offers unique insights into how commercial biology has evolved and its profound effects on patent regulations. The discussion takes listeners on a journey from the early days of recombinant DNA technology to the cutting-edge advancements of CRISPR. Goldstein articulates how the commercialization of biological research influences scientific inquiry and reshapes patent law, highlighting key legal cases that have set the boundaries for patenting living organisms while addressing the complex ethical considerations that accompany these developments.</p><p>A significant theme in the conversation is the ongoing tension between academic research and commercial interests. Goldstein explains how this dynamic has molded patent policies and research agendas, emphasizing the concept of “enabling life” through patents. He also touches on emerging challenges posed by technologies like AI in biotechnology, raising questions about ownership and consent regarding biological materials and genetic data. Reflecting on broader ethical implications, Goldstein discusses the responsibilities that come with innovation in biotechnology and patent law while considering the future challenges for intellectual property frameworks, particularly in light of advancements in CRISPR and synthetic biology.</p><p>This episode provides a comprehensive overview of how the patenting of life has transformed not only biology and medicine but also the legal landscape, prompting listeners to think critically about the implications of these changes for society.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="61965799" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/e6e1a0db-27cd-47a2-a2c0-5fc0f12968de/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=e6e1a0db-27cd-47a2-a2c0-5fc0f12968de&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Jorge Goldstein, &quot;Patenting Life: Tales from the Front Lines of Intellectual Property and the New Biology&quot; (Georgetown UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:04:32</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this episode, Jorge Goldstein, the author of Patenting Life, delves into the critical junction where biotechnology meets patent law. With a background as a molecular biologist turned patent attorney, Goldstein offers unique insights into how commercial biology has evolved and its profound effects on patent regulations. The discussion takes listeners on a journey from the early days of recombinant DNA technology to the cutting-edge advancements of CRISPR. Goldstein articulates how the commercialization of biological research influences scientific inquiry and reshapes patent law, highlighting key legal cases that have set the boundaries for patenting living organisms while addressing the complex ethical considerations that accompany these developments.
A significant theme in the conversation is the ongoing tension between academic research and commercial interests. Goldstein explains how this dynamic has molded patent policies and research agendas, emphasizing the concept of “enabling life” through patents. He also touches on emerging challenges posed by technologies like AI in biotechnology, raising questions about ownership and consent regarding biological materials and genetic data. Reflecting on broader ethical implications, Goldstein discusses the responsibilities that come with innovation in biotechnology and patent law while considering the future challenges for intellectual property frameworks, particularly in light of advancements in CRISPR and synthetic biology.
This episode provides a comprehensive overview of how the patenting of life has transformed not only biology and medicine but also the legal landscape, prompting listeners to think critically about the implications of these changes for society.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode, Jorge Goldstein, the author of Patenting Life, delves into the critical junction where biotechnology meets patent law. With a background as a molecular biologist turned patent attorney, Goldstein offers unique insights into how commercial biology has evolved and its profound effects on patent regulations. The discussion takes listeners on a journey from the early days of recombinant DNA technology to the cutting-edge advancements of CRISPR. Goldstein articulates how the commercialization of biological research influences scientific inquiry and reshapes patent law, highlighting key legal cases that have set the boundaries for patenting living organisms while addressing the complex ethical considerations that accompany these developments.
A significant theme in the conversation is the ongoing tension between academic research and commercial interests. Goldstein explains how this dynamic has molded patent policies and research agendas, emphasizing the concept of “enabling life” through patents. He also touches on emerging challenges posed by technologies like AI in biotechnology, raising questions about ownership and consent regarding biological materials and genetic data. Reflecting on broader ethical implications, Goldstein discusses the responsibilities that come with innovation in biotechnology and patent law while considering the future challenges for intellectual property frameworks, particularly in light of advancements in CRISPR and synthetic biology.
This episode provides a comprehensive overview of how the patenting of life has transformed not only biology and medicine but also the legal landscape, prompting listeners to think critically about the implications of these changes for society.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>241</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e45c6b96-f869-11ef-a047-c7c650f3f913</guid>
      <title>Over Ruled: The Human Toll of Too Much Law--A Conversation with Janie Nitze</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In the latest episode of&nbsp;<em>Madison’s Notes</em>, I spoke with Janie Nitze, co-author of&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780063238473" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Over Ruled: The Human Toll of Too Much Law</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Harper, 2004), a book written alongside Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch. Janie, a Harvard-educated attorney and former clerk for Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Neil Gorsuch, discussed the growing complexity of laws in America and their impact on everyday citizens. The book shares stories of ordinary Americans—fishermen in Florida, families in Montana, monks in Louisiana, and more—who find themselves caught in legal mazes created by an overwhelming and often opaque system of regulations.</p><p>Janie explained that while laws are necessary to maintain order and freedom, the sheer volume and complexity of modern regulations can undermine those principles. She highlighted how excessive laws, many of which are created by unelected agency officials, disproportionately affect those without wealth or power. Through these stories,&nbsp;<em>Over Ruled</em>&nbsp;shows how overregulation can erode trust in the legal system and create unintended consequences for individuals navigating their lives.</p><p>Janie’s perspective, shaped by her work at the Supreme Court, the Department of Justice, and the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board, provided a clear look at the challenges of balancing regulation and individual liberty.&nbsp;<em>Over Ruled</em>&nbsp;is a timely exploration of these issues, and this episode offers a deeper understanding of the human cost of too much law. Tune in to hear Janie’s insights and learn more about the stories behind the book.</p><p><a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/podcast" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Madison’s Notes</em></a>&nbsp;is the podcast of Princeton&nbsp;<a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions</em></a><em>.</em></p><p><em>Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 5 Mar 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/over-ruled-the-human-toll-of-too-much-law-a-conversation-with-janie-nitze-YHe1xULd</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the latest episode of&nbsp;<em>Madison’s Notes</em>, I spoke with Janie Nitze, co-author of&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780063238473" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Over Ruled: The Human Toll of Too Much Law</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Harper, 2004), a book written alongside Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch. Janie, a Harvard-educated attorney and former clerk for Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Neil Gorsuch, discussed the growing complexity of laws in America and their impact on everyday citizens. The book shares stories of ordinary Americans—fishermen in Florida, families in Montana, monks in Louisiana, and more—who find themselves caught in legal mazes created by an overwhelming and often opaque system of regulations.</p><p>Janie explained that while laws are necessary to maintain order and freedom, the sheer volume and complexity of modern regulations can undermine those principles. She highlighted how excessive laws, many of which are created by unelected agency officials, disproportionately affect those without wealth or power. Through these stories,&nbsp;<em>Over Ruled</em>&nbsp;shows how overregulation can erode trust in the legal system and create unintended consequences for individuals navigating their lives.</p><p>Janie’s perspective, shaped by her work at the Supreme Court, the Department of Justice, and the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board, provided a clear look at the challenges of balancing regulation and individual liberty.&nbsp;<em>Over Ruled</em>&nbsp;is a timely exploration of these issues, and this episode offers a deeper understanding of the human cost of too much law. Tune in to hear Janie’s insights and learn more about the stories behind the book.</p><p><a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/podcast" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Madison’s Notes</em></a>&nbsp;is the podcast of Princeton&nbsp;<a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions</em></a><em>.</em></p><p><em>Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="40139788" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/581b5fba-2117-43fc-8825-75a70ed4d456/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=581b5fba-2117-43fc-8825-75a70ed4d456&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Over Ruled: The Human Toll of Too Much Law--A Conversation with Janie Nitze</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:41:48</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In the latest episode of Madison’s Notes, I spoke with Janie Nitze, co-author of Over Ruled: The Human Toll of Too Much Law (Harper, 2004), a book written alongside Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch. Janie, a Harvard-educated attorney and former clerk for Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Neil Gorsuch, discussed the growing complexity of laws in America and their impact on everyday citizens. The book shares stories of ordinary Americans—fishermen in Florida, families in Montana, monks in Louisiana, and more—who find themselves caught in legal mazes created by an overwhelming and often opaque system of regulations.
Janie explained that while laws are necessary to maintain order and freedom, the sheer volume and complexity of modern regulations can undermine those principles. She highlighted how excessive laws, many of which are created by unelected agency officials, disproportionately affect those without wealth or power. Through these stories, Over Ruled shows how overregulation can erode trust in the legal system and create unintended consequences for individuals navigating their lives.
Janie’s perspective, shaped by her work at the Supreme Court, the Department of Justice, and the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board, provided a clear look at the challenges of balancing regulation and individual liberty. Over Ruled is a timely exploration of these issues, and this episode offers a deeper understanding of the human cost of too much law. Tune in to hear Janie’s insights and learn more about the stories behind the book.
Madison’s Notes is the podcast of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions.
Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In the latest episode of Madison’s Notes, I spoke with Janie Nitze, co-author of Over Ruled: The Human Toll of Too Much Law (Harper, 2004), a book written alongside Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch. Janie, a Harvard-educated attorney and former clerk for Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Neil Gorsuch, discussed the growing complexity of laws in America and their impact on everyday citizens. The book shares stories of ordinary Americans—fishermen in Florida, families in Montana, monks in Louisiana, and more—who find themselves caught in legal mazes created by an overwhelming and often opaque system of regulations.
Janie explained that while laws are necessary to maintain order and freedom, the sheer volume and complexity of modern regulations can undermine those principles. She highlighted how excessive laws, many of which are created by unelected agency officials, disproportionately affect those without wealth or power. Through these stories, Over Ruled shows how overregulation can erode trust in the legal system and create unintended consequences for individuals navigating their lives.
Janie’s perspective, shaped by her work at the Supreme Court, the Department of Justice, and the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board, provided a clear look at the challenges of balancing regulation and individual liberty. Over Ruled is a timely exploration of these issues, and this episode offers a deeper understanding of the human cost of too much law. Tune in to hear Janie’s insights and learn more about the stories behind the book.
Madison’s Notes is the podcast of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions.
Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>140</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">64d089d0-f85e-11ef-a12d-5bba905acd2d</guid>
      <title>Rebecca Janzen, &quot;Unlawful Violence: Mexican Law and Cultural Production&quot; (Vanderbilt UP, 2022)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Violence has only increased in Mexico since 2000: 23,000 murders were recorded in 2016, and 29,168 in 2017.</p><p>The abundance of laws and constitutional amendments that have cropped up in response are mirrored in Mexico's fragmented cultural production of the same period. Contemporary Mexican literature grapples with this splintered reality through non-linear stories from multiple perspectives, often told through shifts in time. The novels, such as Jorge Volpi's&nbsp;<em>Una novela criminal</em>&nbsp;[<em>A Novel Crime</em>] (2018) and Julián Herbert's&nbsp;<em>La casa del dolor ajeno</em>&nbsp;[<em>The House of the Pain of Others</em>] (2015) take multiple perspectives and follow non-linear plotlines; other examples, such as the very short stories in&nbsp;<em>¡Basta! 100 mujeres contra la violencia de género</em>&nbsp;[<em>Enough! 100 Women against Gender-Based Violence</em>] (2013), present perspectives from multiple authors.</p><p>Few scholars compare cultural production and legal texts in situations like Mexico, where extreme violence coexists with a high number of human rights laws.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780826504449" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Unlawful Violence: Mexican Law and Cultural Production&nbsp;</em></a>(Vanderbilt UP, 2022) measures fictional accounts of human rights against new laws that include constitutional amendments to reform legal proceedings, laws that protect children, laws that condemn violence against women, and laws that protect migrants and Indigenous peoples. It also explores debates about these laws in the Mexican house of representatives and senate, as well as interactions between the law and the Mexican public.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 5 Mar 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/rebecca-janzen-unlawful-violence-mexican-law-and-cultural-production-vanderbilt-up-2022-CCsPwERR</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Violence has only increased in Mexico since 2000: 23,000 murders were recorded in 2016, and 29,168 in 2017.</p><p>The abundance of laws and constitutional amendments that have cropped up in response are mirrored in Mexico's fragmented cultural production of the same period. Contemporary Mexican literature grapples with this splintered reality through non-linear stories from multiple perspectives, often told through shifts in time. The novels, such as Jorge Volpi's&nbsp;<em>Una novela criminal</em>&nbsp;[<em>A Novel Crime</em>] (2018) and Julián Herbert's&nbsp;<em>La casa del dolor ajeno</em>&nbsp;[<em>The House of the Pain of Others</em>] (2015) take multiple perspectives and follow non-linear plotlines; other examples, such as the very short stories in&nbsp;<em>¡Basta! 100 mujeres contra la violencia de género</em>&nbsp;[<em>Enough! 100 Women against Gender-Based Violence</em>] (2013), present perspectives from multiple authors.</p><p>Few scholars compare cultural production and legal texts in situations like Mexico, where extreme violence coexists with a high number of human rights laws.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780826504449" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Unlawful Violence: Mexican Law and Cultural Production&nbsp;</em></a>(Vanderbilt UP, 2022) measures fictional accounts of human rights against new laws that include constitutional amendments to reform legal proceedings, laws that protect children, laws that condemn violence against women, and laws that protect migrants and Indigenous peoples. It also explores debates about these laws in the Mexican house of representatives and senate, as well as interactions between the law and the Mexican public.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="50024975" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/24342387-bb05-4203-92d6-b028f2d3108c/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=24342387-bb05-4203-92d6-b028f2d3108c&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Rebecca Janzen, &quot;Unlawful Violence: Mexican Law and Cultural Production&quot; (Vanderbilt UP, 2022)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:52:06</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Violence has only increased in Mexico since 2000: 23,000 murders were recorded in 2016, and 29,168 in 2017.
The abundance of laws and constitutional amendments that have cropped up in response are mirrored in Mexico&apos;s fragmented cultural production of the same period. Contemporary Mexican literature grapples with this splintered reality through non-linear stories from multiple perspectives, often told through shifts in time. The novels, such as Jorge Volpi&apos;s Una novela criminal [A Novel Crime] (2018) and Julián Herbert&apos;s La casa del dolor ajeno [The House of the Pain of Others] (2015) take multiple perspectives and follow non-linear plotlines; other examples, such as the very short stories in ¡Basta! 100 mujeres contra la violencia de género [Enough! 100 Women against Gender-Based Violence] (2013), present perspectives from multiple authors.
Few scholars compare cultural production and legal texts in situations like Mexico, where extreme violence coexists with a high number of human rights laws. Unlawful Violence: Mexican Law and Cultural Production (Vanderbilt UP, 2022) measures fictional accounts of human rights against new laws that include constitutional amendments to reform legal proceedings, laws that protect children, laws that condemn violence against women, and laws that protect migrants and Indigenous peoples. It also explores debates about these laws in the Mexican house of representatives and senate, as well as interactions between the law and the Mexican public.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Violence has only increased in Mexico since 2000: 23,000 murders were recorded in 2016, and 29,168 in 2017.
The abundance of laws and constitutional amendments that have cropped up in response are mirrored in Mexico&apos;s fragmented cultural production of the same period. Contemporary Mexican literature grapples with this splintered reality through non-linear stories from multiple perspectives, often told through shifts in time. The novels, such as Jorge Volpi&apos;s Una novela criminal [A Novel Crime] (2018) and Julián Herbert&apos;s La casa del dolor ajeno [The House of the Pain of Others] (2015) take multiple perspectives and follow non-linear plotlines; other examples, such as the very short stories in ¡Basta! 100 mujeres contra la violencia de género [Enough! 100 Women against Gender-Based Violence] (2013), present perspectives from multiple authors.
Few scholars compare cultural production and legal texts in situations like Mexico, where extreme violence coexists with a high number of human rights laws. Unlawful Violence: Mexican Law and Cultural Production (Vanderbilt UP, 2022) measures fictional accounts of human rights against new laws that include constitutional amendments to reform legal proceedings, laws that protect children, laws that condemn violence against women, and laws that protect migrants and Indigenous peoples. It also explores debates about these laws in the Mexican house of representatives and senate, as well as interactions between the law and the Mexican public.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>7</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">a38660d0-f61c-11ef-bc75-27586ae01579</guid>
      <title>Multilingual Law-Making: A Discussion with Karen McAuliffe</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://profiles.uts.edu.au/Alexandra.Grey" rel="noopener noreferrer">Alexandra Grey</a>&nbsp;speaks with&nbsp;<a href="https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/staff/profiles/law/mcauliffe-karen" rel="noopener noreferrer">Karen McAuliffe</a>&nbsp;about multilingual law-making.</p><p>Karen is a Professor of Law and Language at Birmingham Law School in the UK. The conversation is about the important legal opinions delivered by the Advocates General at the European Court of Justice, and the effects of Advocates General drafting those opinions in their second or third language and with multilingual support staff.</p><p>It builds on&nbsp;<a href="https://birmingham.elsevierpure.com/en/publications/c345e441-47ab-4f33-96b8-825cdca66c1d" rel="noopener noreferrer">a chapter</a>&nbsp;written by Karen McAuliffe, Liana Muntean &amp; Virginia Mattioli in the book&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781316511299" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Researching the European Court of Justice</em></a>, edited by Madsen, Nicola and Vauchez and published by Cambridge University Press in 2022.</p><p>For additional resources, show notes, and transcripts, go&nbsp;<a href="https://www.languageonthemove.com/podcast/" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a>. You can also follow&nbsp;<a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/alexandra-grey-phd-7aa80330a/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Alexandra on LinkedIn</a>&nbsp;and Karen on BlueSky&nbsp;<a href="https://bsky.app/profile/profkmca.bsky.social" rel="noopener noreferrer">@profkmca.bsky.social</a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 4 Mar 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/multilingual-law-making-a-discussion-with-karen-mcauliffe-bbHTn9yL</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://profiles.uts.edu.au/Alexandra.Grey" rel="noopener noreferrer">Alexandra Grey</a>&nbsp;speaks with&nbsp;<a href="https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/staff/profiles/law/mcauliffe-karen" rel="noopener noreferrer">Karen McAuliffe</a>&nbsp;about multilingual law-making.</p><p>Karen is a Professor of Law and Language at Birmingham Law School in the UK. The conversation is about the important legal opinions delivered by the Advocates General at the European Court of Justice, and the effects of Advocates General drafting those opinions in their second or third language and with multilingual support staff.</p><p>It builds on&nbsp;<a href="https://birmingham.elsevierpure.com/en/publications/c345e441-47ab-4f33-96b8-825cdca66c1d" rel="noopener noreferrer">a chapter</a>&nbsp;written by Karen McAuliffe, Liana Muntean &amp; Virginia Mattioli in the book&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781316511299" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Researching the European Court of Justice</em></a>, edited by Madsen, Nicola and Vauchez and published by Cambridge University Press in 2022.</p><p>For additional resources, show notes, and transcripts, go&nbsp;<a href="https://www.languageonthemove.com/podcast/" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a>. You can also follow&nbsp;<a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/alexandra-grey-phd-7aa80330a/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Alexandra on LinkedIn</a>&nbsp;and Karen on BlueSky&nbsp;<a href="https://bsky.app/profile/profkmca.bsky.social" rel="noopener noreferrer">@profkmca.bsky.social</a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="41096521" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/2922d5c7-898a-49a7-a15e-8d5bb6ecd79f/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=2922d5c7-898a-49a7-a15e-8d5bb6ecd79f&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Multilingual Law-Making: A Discussion with Karen McAuliffe</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:42:48</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Alexandra Grey speaks with Karen McAuliffe about multilingual law-making.
Karen is a Professor of Law and Language at Birmingham Law School in the UK. The conversation is about the important legal opinions delivered by the Advocates General at the European Court of Justice, and the effects of Advocates General drafting those opinions in their second or third language and with multilingual support staff.
It builds on a chapter written by Karen McAuliffe, Liana Muntean &amp; Virginia Mattioli in the book Researching the European Court of Justice, edited by Madsen, Nicola and Vauchez and published by Cambridge University Press in 2022.
For additional resources, show notes, and transcripts, go here. You can also follow Alexandra on LinkedIn and Karen on BlueSky @profkmca.bsky.social.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Alexandra Grey speaks with Karen McAuliffe about multilingual law-making.
Karen is a Professor of Law and Language at Birmingham Law School in the UK. The conversation is about the important legal opinions delivered by the Advocates General at the European Court of Justice, and the effects of Advocates General drafting those opinions in their second or third language and with multilingual support staff.
It builds on a chapter written by Karen McAuliffe, Liana Muntean &amp; Virginia Mattioli in the book Researching the European Court of Justice, edited by Madsen, Nicola and Vauchez and published by Cambridge University Press in 2022.
For additional resources, show notes, and transcripts, go here. You can also follow Alexandra on LinkedIn and Karen on BlueSky @profkmca.bsky.social.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>44</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1075385c-f6b7-11ef-9e38-77ee2c1d1af1</guid>
      <title>Jeffrey A. Lenowitz, &quot;Constitutional Ratification Without Reason&quot; (Oxford UP, 2022)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780198852346" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Constitutional Ratification Without Reason</em></a>&nbsp;(Oxford UP, 2022)&nbsp;focuses on constitutional ratification, the procedure in which a draft constitution is submitted by its creators to the people or their representatives in an up or down vote determining implementation. Ratification is increasingly common and routinely recommended by experts. Nonetheless, it is neither neutral nor inevitable. Constitutions can be made without it and when it is used it has significant effects. This raises the central question of the book: should ratification be recommended? Put another way: is there a reason for treating the procedure as a default for the constitution-making process? Surprisingly, these questions are rarely asked. The procedure’s worth is assumed, not demonstrated, while ratification is generally overlooked in the literature. In fact, this is the first sustained study of ratification.&nbsp;</p><p>To address these oversights, this book defines ratification and its types, explains for the first time the procedure’s effects, conceptual origins, and history, and then concentrates on finding reasons for its use. Specifically, it builds up and analyzes the three most likely normative justifications. These urge the implementation of ratification because the procedure: enables the constituent power to make its constitution; fosters representation during constitution-making; or helps create a legitimate constitution. Ultimately, these justifications are found wanting, leading to the conclusion that ratification lacks a convincing, context-independent justification. Thus, experts should not recommend ratification as a matter of course, practitioners should not reach for it uncritically, and—more generally—one should avoid the blanket application of concepts from democratic theory to extraordinary contexts such as constitution-making.</p><p>Jeffrey Lenowitz is the Meyer and W. Walter Jaffe Associate Professor of Politics at Brandeis University, focusing on political theory. His research explores the the procedures uses to create new constitutions; constituent power and constitutional theory; the concept of legitimacy in the social sciences; voting ethics; and other aspects of democratic theory and institutional design.</p><p>&nbsp;<a href="https://vatsalnaresh.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">﻿Vatsal Naresh</a>&nbsp;is a Lecturer in Social Studies at Harvard University. His recent publications include co-edited volumes on Negotiating Democracy and Religious Pluralism (OUP 2021) and Constituent Assemblies (CUP 2018).</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 4 Mar 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/jeffrey-a-lenowitz-constitutional-ratification-without-reason-oxford-up-2022-ERGCYTcu</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780198852346" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Constitutional Ratification Without Reason</em></a>&nbsp;(Oxford UP, 2022)&nbsp;focuses on constitutional ratification, the procedure in which a draft constitution is submitted by its creators to the people or their representatives in an up or down vote determining implementation. Ratification is increasingly common and routinely recommended by experts. Nonetheless, it is neither neutral nor inevitable. Constitutions can be made without it and when it is used it has significant effects. This raises the central question of the book: should ratification be recommended? Put another way: is there a reason for treating the procedure as a default for the constitution-making process? Surprisingly, these questions are rarely asked. The procedure’s worth is assumed, not demonstrated, while ratification is generally overlooked in the literature. In fact, this is the first sustained study of ratification.&nbsp;</p><p>To address these oversights, this book defines ratification and its types, explains for the first time the procedure’s effects, conceptual origins, and history, and then concentrates on finding reasons for its use. Specifically, it builds up and analyzes the three most likely normative justifications. These urge the implementation of ratification because the procedure: enables the constituent power to make its constitution; fosters representation during constitution-making; or helps create a legitimate constitution. Ultimately, these justifications are found wanting, leading to the conclusion that ratification lacks a convincing, context-independent justification. Thus, experts should not recommend ratification as a matter of course, practitioners should not reach for it uncritically, and—more generally—one should avoid the blanket application of concepts from democratic theory to extraordinary contexts such as constitution-making.</p><p>Jeffrey Lenowitz is the Meyer and W. Walter Jaffe Associate Professor of Politics at Brandeis University, focusing on political theory. His research explores the the procedures uses to create new constitutions; constituent power and constitutional theory; the concept of legitimacy in the social sciences; voting ethics; and other aspects of democratic theory and institutional design.</p><p>&nbsp;<a href="https://vatsalnaresh.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">﻿Vatsal Naresh</a>&nbsp;is a Lecturer in Social Studies at Harvard University. His recent publications include co-edited volumes on Negotiating Democracy and Religious Pluralism (OUP 2021) and Constituent Assemblies (CUP 2018).</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="50865174" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/3cdc2db4-df97-4091-9367-3dc8c720e4c0/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=3cdc2db4-df97-4091-9367-3dc8c720e4c0&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Jeffrey A. Lenowitz, &quot;Constitutional Ratification Without Reason&quot; (Oxford UP, 2022)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:52:58</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Constitutional Ratification Without Reason (Oxford UP, 2022) focuses on constitutional ratification, the procedure in which a draft constitution is submitted by its creators to the people or their representatives in an up or down vote determining implementation. Ratification is increasingly common and routinely recommended by experts. Nonetheless, it is neither neutral nor inevitable. Constitutions can be made without it and when it is used it has significant effects. This raises the central question of the book: should ratification be recommended? Put another way: is there a reason for treating the procedure as a default for the constitution-making process? Surprisingly, these questions are rarely asked. The procedure’s worth is assumed, not demonstrated, while ratification is generally overlooked in the literature. In fact, this is the first sustained study of ratification. 
To address these oversights, this book defines ratification and its types, explains for the first time the procedure’s effects, conceptual origins, and history, and then concentrates on finding reasons for its use. Specifically, it builds up and analyzes the three most likely normative justifications. These urge the implementation of ratification because the procedure: enables the constituent power to make its constitution; fosters representation during constitution-making; or helps create a legitimate constitution. Ultimately, these justifications are found wanting, leading to the conclusion that ratification lacks a convincing, context-independent justification. Thus, experts should not recommend ratification as a matter of course, practitioners should not reach for it uncritically, and—more generally—one should avoid the blanket application of concepts from democratic theory to extraordinary contexts such as constitution-making.
Jeffrey Lenowitz is the Meyer and W. Walter Jaffe Associate Professor of Politics at Brandeis University, focusing on political theory. His research explores the the procedures uses to create new constitutions; constituent power and constitutional theory; the concept of legitimacy in the social sciences; voting ethics; and other aspects of democratic theory and institutional design.
 ﻿Vatsal Naresh is a Lecturer in Social Studies at Harvard University. His recent publications include co-edited volumes on Negotiating Democracy and Religious Pluralism (OUP 2021) and Constituent Assemblies (CUP 2018).
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Constitutional Ratification Without Reason (Oxford UP, 2022) focuses on constitutional ratification, the procedure in which a draft constitution is submitted by its creators to the people or their representatives in an up or down vote determining implementation. Ratification is increasingly common and routinely recommended by experts. Nonetheless, it is neither neutral nor inevitable. Constitutions can be made without it and when it is used it has significant effects. This raises the central question of the book: should ratification be recommended? Put another way: is there a reason for treating the procedure as a default for the constitution-making process? Surprisingly, these questions are rarely asked. The procedure’s worth is assumed, not demonstrated, while ratification is generally overlooked in the literature. In fact, this is the first sustained study of ratification. 
To address these oversights, this book defines ratification and its types, explains for the first time the procedure’s effects, conceptual origins, and history, and then concentrates on finding reasons for its use. Specifically, it builds up and analyzes the three most likely normative justifications. These urge the implementation of ratification because the procedure: enables the constituent power to make its constitution; fosters representation during constitution-making; or helps create a legitimate constitution. Ultimately, these justifications are found wanting, leading to the conclusion that ratification lacks a convincing, context-independent justification. Thus, experts should not recommend ratification as a matter of course, practitioners should not reach for it uncritically, and—more generally—one should avoid the blanket application of concepts from democratic theory to extraordinary contexts such as constitution-making.
Jeffrey Lenowitz is the Meyer and W. Walter Jaffe Associate Professor of Politics at Brandeis University, focusing on political theory. His research explores the the procedures uses to create new constitutions; constituent power and constitutional theory; the concept of legitimacy in the social sciences; voting ethics; and other aspects of democratic theory and institutional design.
 ﻿Vatsal Naresh is a Lecturer in Social Studies at Harvard University. His recent publications include co-edited volumes on Negotiating Democracy and Religious Pluralism (OUP 2021) and Constituent Assemblies (CUP 2018).
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>241</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6cf650ba-f546-11ef-90ca-975fcf1a6797</guid>
      <title>Kent Kauffman, &quot;Navigating Choppy Waters: Key Legal Issues College Faculty Need to Know&quot; (Rowman &amp; Littlefield, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>While full- and part-time college faculty and lecturers go about their jobs—doing all that is seen (teaching and publishing) and unseen (class prep, grading, and researching)—little, if any time is given to the uncomfortable acknowledgment that those acts have legal ramifications.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781538197295" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Navigating Choppy Waters: Key Legal Issues College Faculty Need to Know</em></a>&nbsp;(2025, Rowman &amp; Littlefield) thoughtfully addresses topics that are vital for those in academia.</p><p>Kent Kauffman is an Associate Professor of Business Law at Purdue University Fort Wayne.</p><p>Dr. Michael LaMagna is the Information Literacy Program &amp; Library Services Coordinator and Professor of Library Services at Delaware County Community College.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 2 Mar 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/kent-kauffman-navigating-choppy-waters-key-legal-issues-college-faculty-need-to-know-rowman-littlefield-2025-UEBcDxvi</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While full- and part-time college faculty and lecturers go about their jobs—doing all that is seen (teaching and publishing) and unseen (class prep, grading, and researching)—little, if any time is given to the uncomfortable acknowledgment that those acts have legal ramifications.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781538197295" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Navigating Choppy Waters: Key Legal Issues College Faculty Need to Know</em></a>&nbsp;(2025, Rowman &amp; Littlefield) thoughtfully addresses topics that are vital for those in academia.</p><p>Kent Kauffman is an Associate Professor of Business Law at Purdue University Fort Wayne.</p><p>Dr. Michael LaMagna is the Information Literacy Program &amp; Library Services Coordinator and Professor of Library Services at Delaware County Community College.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="50405324" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/b27470b0-4125-47e3-b2c7-1a84d6c667ce/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=b27470b0-4125-47e3-b2c7-1a84d6c667ce&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Kent Kauffman, &quot;Navigating Choppy Waters: Key Legal Issues College Faculty Need to Know&quot; (Rowman &amp; Littlefield, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:52:30</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>While full- and part-time college faculty and lecturers go about their jobs—doing all that is seen (teaching and publishing) and unseen (class prep, grading, and researching)—little, if any time is given to the uncomfortable acknowledgment that those acts have legal ramifications. Navigating Choppy Waters: Key Legal Issues College Faculty Need to Know (2025, Rowman &amp; Littlefield) thoughtfully addresses topics that are vital for those in academia.
Kent Kauffman is an Associate Professor of Business Law at Purdue University Fort Wayne.
Dr. Michael LaMagna is the Information Literacy Program &amp; Library Services Coordinator and Professor of Library Services at Delaware County Community College.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>While full- and part-time college faculty and lecturers go about their jobs—doing all that is seen (teaching and publishing) and unseen (class prep, grading, and researching)—little, if any time is given to the uncomfortable acknowledgment that those acts have legal ramifications. Navigating Choppy Waters: Key Legal Issues College Faculty Need to Know (2025, Rowman &amp; Littlefield) thoughtfully addresses topics that are vital for those in academia.
Kent Kauffman is an Associate Professor of Business Law at Purdue University Fort Wayne.
Dr. Michael LaMagna is the Information Literacy Program &amp; Library Services Coordinator and Professor of Library Services at Delaware County Community College.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>80</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">c187e2f6-f3ac-11ef-9d18-2fb84df9e94a</guid>
      <title>Religious Freedom: A Conversation on the Conservative Tradition with John D. Wilsey</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In this conversation, we sit down with John D. Wilsey, Professor of Church History and Philosophy at The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary and Senior Fellow at the Center for Religion, Culture, and Democracy, to tackle the urgent and often contentious topic of religious freedom in America. Drawing from his forthcoming book,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780802881908" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Religious Freedom: A Conservative Primer</em></a>&nbsp;(William B. Eerdmans, 2025), Wilsey examines how conservatives have historically understood religious freedom, how those views have evolved, and why the gap between past and present perspectives matters in today’s culture, and how it is the bedrock of American Government.</p><p>Wilsey addresses issues at the heart of this debate: How has the conservative understanding of religious freedom shifted, and what are the consequences of that shift?</p><p><a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/podcast" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Madison’s Notes</em></a>&nbsp;is the podcast of Princeton&nbsp;<a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions</em></a><em>.</em></p><p><em>Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/religious-freedom-a-conversation-on-the-conservative-tradition-with-john-d-wilsey-nstWYbro</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this conversation, we sit down with John D. Wilsey, Professor of Church History and Philosophy at The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary and Senior Fellow at the Center for Religion, Culture, and Democracy, to tackle the urgent and often contentious topic of religious freedom in America. Drawing from his forthcoming book,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780802881908" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Religious Freedom: A Conservative Primer</em></a>&nbsp;(William B. Eerdmans, 2025), Wilsey examines how conservatives have historically understood religious freedom, how those views have evolved, and why the gap between past and present perspectives matters in today’s culture, and how it is the bedrock of American Government.</p><p>Wilsey addresses issues at the heart of this debate: How has the conservative understanding of religious freedom shifted, and what are the consequences of that shift?</p><p><a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/podcast" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Madison’s Notes</em></a>&nbsp;is the podcast of Princeton&nbsp;<a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions</em></a><em>.</em></p><p><em>Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="42404761" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/0a8ef3ab-eea4-4eb0-861d-53e043c8da4c/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=0a8ef3ab-eea4-4eb0-861d-53e043c8da4c&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Religious Freedom: A Conversation on the Conservative Tradition with John D. Wilsey</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:44:10</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this conversation, we sit down with John D. Wilsey, Professor of Church History and Philosophy at The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary and Senior Fellow at the Center for Religion, Culture, and Democracy, to tackle the urgent and often contentious topic of religious freedom in America. Drawing from his forthcoming book, Religious Freedom: A Conservative Primer (William B. Eerdmans, 2025), Wilsey examines how conservatives have historically understood religious freedom, how those views have evolved, and why the gap between past and present perspectives matters in today’s culture, and how it is the bedrock of American Government.
Wilsey addresses issues at the heart of this debate: How has the conservative understanding of religious freedom shifted, and what are the consequences of that shift?
Madison’s Notes is the podcast of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions.
Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this conversation, we sit down with John D. Wilsey, Professor of Church History and Philosophy at The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary and Senior Fellow at the Center for Religion, Culture, and Democracy, to tackle the urgent and often contentious topic of religious freedom in America. Drawing from his forthcoming book, Religious Freedom: A Conservative Primer (William B. Eerdmans, 2025), Wilsey examines how conservatives have historically understood religious freedom, how those views have evolved, and why the gap between past and present perspectives matters in today’s culture, and how it is the bedrock of American Government.
Wilsey addresses issues at the heart of this debate: How has the conservative understanding of religious freedom shifted, and what are the consequences of that shift?
Madison’s Notes is the podcast of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions.
Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>139</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">f854da04-f128-11ef-ab76-df3e77e69ef1</guid>
      <title>Postscript: How to Fight Back: Charting Opposition to the Actions of the Trump Administration</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Shortly after Donald J. Trump was sworn in as the 47th American president, he issued 37 executive orders and, subsequently, the Trump administration has – through formal processes and also through extra-governmental extraordinary practices – triggered what many are calling a governmental and/or constitutional crisis. Dr. Christina Pagel has published two important Substack articles in which she&nbsp;<a href="https://christinapagel.substack.com/p/so-this-is-how-liberty-dies-making" rel="noopener noreferrer">groups the activities of the Trump administration into authoritarian and proto-authoritarian actions</a>&nbsp;– and&nbsp;<a href="https://christinapagel.substack.com/p/how-to-fight-back-charting-opposition" rel="noopener noreferrer">maps the opposition</a>. Her&nbsp;<em>unbelievable&nbsp;</em><a href="https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F04efb2b7-d27b-4e43-98e2-17375a423b37_7406x6615.jpeg" rel="noopener noreferrer">Venn diagram</a>&nbsp;reveals which actions are being met with organized resistance – and which are being left unchallenged. She is a data hound – and her data not only clarifies what is happening in the United States but provides tools for those who wish to&nbsp;<em>effectively&nbsp;</em>oppose it in the U.S. and abroad.</p><p><a href="https://profiles.ucl.ac.uk/4185" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. Christina Pagel&nbsp;</a>is Professor of Operational Research in Health Care, University College London. Operational Research is a pragmatic branch of mathematics to help people solve real-life problems. She is a member of Independent SAGE providing accessible updates on the national and international Covid-19 situation since May 2020. She has published in public-facing venues such as&nbsp;<em>The Conversation&nbsp;</em>and her free Substack,&nbsp;<a href="https://substack.com/@chrischirp" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Diving into Data &amp; Decision making</em></a>. You can follow her on social media.</p><p>Mentioned in the podcast:</p><p>Christina’s 2/13/25 Substack,&nbsp;<a href="https://christinapagel.substack.com/p/so-this-is-how-liberty-dies-making" rel="noopener noreferrer">"So this is how liberty dies… " Making sense of Trump's first three weeks</a>&nbsp;(categorizing 76 Trump administration actions and demonstrating how they align with authoritarianism).</p><p>Christina’s 2/17/25 Substack,&nbsp;<a href="https://christinapagel.substack.com/p/how-to-fight-back-charting-opposition" rel="noopener noreferrer">How to fight back: charting opposition to the actions of the Trump administration&nbsp;</a>(showing how Blue states, labor organizations, and civil rights groups are doing the most – and what can be learned from them).</p><p>The&nbsp;<a href="https://www.justsecurity.org/107087/tracker-litigation-legal-challenges-trump-administration/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Just Security</em>’s Litigation Tracker</a>&nbsp;based at the Reiss Center on Law and Security at New York University School of Law.</p><p><em>Vox’s&nbsp;</em>2/12/25 Unexplainable podcast, “Is Science in Danger?” (20 minutes) Noam Hassenfeld interviewing Derek Dowe (chemist/science writer)&nbsp;<a href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/1zUTMO_kTc3YNNo8L1y3mrPA-1DQGPn29ajQ1TD0fPvg/edit?tab=t.0" rel="noopener noreferrer">Transcript</a>&nbsp;or&nbsp;<a href="https://www.vox.com/unexplainable" rel="noopener noreferrer">podcast</a>.</p><p>Susan’s interview with Corey Brettschneider on his new Norton book&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-presidents-and-the-people" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Presidents and the</em></a>&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-presidents-and-the-people" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>People: Five Leaders Who Threatened Democracy and the Citizens Who Fought to</em></a>&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-presidents-and-the-people" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Defend It</em></a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Feb 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/postscript-how-to-fight-back-charting-opposition-to-the-actions-of-the-trump-administration-nkFAwHQT</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shortly after Donald J. Trump was sworn in as the 47th American president, he issued 37 executive orders and, subsequently, the Trump administration has – through formal processes and also through extra-governmental extraordinary practices – triggered what many are calling a governmental and/or constitutional crisis. Dr. Christina Pagel has published two important Substack articles in which she&nbsp;<a href="https://christinapagel.substack.com/p/so-this-is-how-liberty-dies-making" rel="noopener noreferrer">groups the activities of the Trump administration into authoritarian and proto-authoritarian actions</a>&nbsp;– and&nbsp;<a href="https://christinapagel.substack.com/p/how-to-fight-back-charting-opposition" rel="noopener noreferrer">maps the opposition</a>. Her&nbsp;<em>unbelievable&nbsp;</em><a href="https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F04efb2b7-d27b-4e43-98e2-17375a423b37_7406x6615.jpeg" rel="noopener noreferrer">Venn diagram</a>&nbsp;reveals which actions are being met with organized resistance – and which are being left unchallenged. She is a data hound – and her data not only clarifies what is happening in the United States but provides tools for those who wish to&nbsp;<em>effectively&nbsp;</em>oppose it in the U.S. and abroad.</p><p><a href="https://profiles.ucl.ac.uk/4185" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. Christina Pagel&nbsp;</a>is Professor of Operational Research in Health Care, University College London. Operational Research is a pragmatic branch of mathematics to help people solve real-life problems. She is a member of Independent SAGE providing accessible updates on the national and international Covid-19 situation since May 2020. She has published in public-facing venues such as&nbsp;<em>The Conversation&nbsp;</em>and her free Substack,&nbsp;<a href="https://substack.com/@chrischirp" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Diving into Data &amp; Decision making</em></a>. You can follow her on social media.</p><p>Mentioned in the podcast:</p><p>Christina’s 2/13/25 Substack,&nbsp;<a href="https://christinapagel.substack.com/p/so-this-is-how-liberty-dies-making" rel="noopener noreferrer">"So this is how liberty dies… " Making sense of Trump's first three weeks</a>&nbsp;(categorizing 76 Trump administration actions and demonstrating how they align with authoritarianism).</p><p>Christina’s 2/17/25 Substack,&nbsp;<a href="https://christinapagel.substack.com/p/how-to-fight-back-charting-opposition" rel="noopener noreferrer">How to fight back: charting opposition to the actions of the Trump administration&nbsp;</a>(showing how Blue states, labor organizations, and civil rights groups are doing the most – and what can be learned from them).</p><p>The&nbsp;<a href="https://www.justsecurity.org/107087/tracker-litigation-legal-challenges-trump-administration/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Just Security</em>’s Litigation Tracker</a>&nbsp;based at the Reiss Center on Law and Security at New York University School of Law.</p><p><em>Vox’s&nbsp;</em>2/12/25 Unexplainable podcast, “Is Science in Danger?” (20 minutes) Noam Hassenfeld interviewing Derek Dowe (chemist/science writer)&nbsp;<a href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/1zUTMO_kTc3YNNo8L1y3mrPA-1DQGPn29ajQ1TD0fPvg/edit?tab=t.0" rel="noopener noreferrer">Transcript</a>&nbsp;or&nbsp;<a href="https://www.vox.com/unexplainable" rel="noopener noreferrer">podcast</a>.</p><p>Susan’s interview with Corey Brettschneider on his new Norton book&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-presidents-and-the-people" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Presidents and the</em></a>&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-presidents-and-the-people" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>People: Five Leaders Who Threatened Democracy and the Citizens Who Fought to</em></a>&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-presidents-and-the-people" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Defend It</em></a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="47023050" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/3ac20e0d-a04d-4b5d-83b1-0b8a13f1b0d3/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=3ac20e0d-a04d-4b5d-83b1-0b8a13f1b0d3&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Postscript: How to Fight Back: Charting Opposition to the Actions of the Trump Administration</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:48:58</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Shortly after Donald J. Trump was sworn in as the 47th American president, he issued 37 executive orders and, subsequently, the Trump administration has – through formal processes and also through extra-governmental extraordinary practices – triggered what many are calling a governmental and/or constitutional crisis. Dr. Christina Pagel has published two important Substack articles in which she groups the activities of the Trump administration into authoritarian and proto-authoritarian actions – and maps the opposition. Her unbelievable Venn diagram reveals which actions are being met with organized resistance – and which are being left unchallenged. She is a data hound – and her data not only clarifies what is happening in the United States but provides tools for those who wish to effectively oppose it in the U.S. and abroad.
Dr. Christina Pagel is Professor of Operational Research in Health Care, University College London. Operational Research is a pragmatic branch of mathematics to help people solve real-life problems. She is a member of Independent SAGE providing accessible updates on the national and international Covid-19 situation since May 2020. She has published in public-facing venues such as The Conversation and her free Substack, Diving into Data &amp; Decision making. You can follow her on social media.
Mentioned in the podcast:
Christina’s 2/13/25 Substack, &quot;So this is how liberty dies… &quot; Making sense of Trump&apos;s first three weeks (categorizing 76 Trump administration actions and demonstrating how they align with authoritarianism).
Christina’s 2/17/25 Substack, How to fight back: charting opposition to the actions of the Trump administration (showing how Blue states, labor organizations, and civil rights groups are doing the most – and what can be learned from them).
The Just Security’s Litigation Tracker based at the Reiss Center on Law and Security at New York University School of Law.
Vox’s 2/12/25 Unexplainable podcast, “Is Science in Danger?” (20 minutes) Noam Hassenfeld interviewing Derek Dowe (chemist/science writer) Transcript or podcast.
Susan’s interview with Corey Brettschneider on his new Norton book The Presidents and the People: Five Leaders Who Threatened Democracy and the Citizens Who Fought to Defend It
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Shortly after Donald J. Trump was sworn in as the 47th American president, he issued 37 executive orders and, subsequently, the Trump administration has – through formal processes and also through extra-governmental extraordinary practices – triggered what many are calling a governmental and/or constitutional crisis. Dr. Christina Pagel has published two important Substack articles in which she groups the activities of the Trump administration into authoritarian and proto-authoritarian actions – and maps the opposition. Her unbelievable Venn diagram reveals which actions are being met with organized resistance – and which are being left unchallenged. She is a data hound – and her data not only clarifies what is happening in the United States but provides tools for those who wish to effectively oppose it in the U.S. and abroad.
Dr. Christina Pagel is Professor of Operational Research in Health Care, University College London. Operational Research is a pragmatic branch of mathematics to help people solve real-life problems. She is a member of Independent SAGE providing accessible updates on the national and international Covid-19 situation since May 2020. She has published in public-facing venues such as The Conversation and her free Substack, Diving into Data &amp; Decision making. You can follow her on social media.
Mentioned in the podcast:
Christina’s 2/13/25 Substack, &quot;So this is how liberty dies… &quot; Making sense of Trump&apos;s first three weeks (categorizing 76 Trump administration actions and demonstrating how they align with authoritarianism).
Christina’s 2/17/25 Substack, How to fight back: charting opposition to the actions of the Trump administration (showing how Blue states, labor organizations, and civil rights groups are doing the most – and what can be learned from them).
The Just Security’s Litigation Tracker based at the Reiss Center on Law and Security at New York University School of Law.
Vox’s 2/12/25 Unexplainable podcast, “Is Science in Danger?” (20 minutes) Noam Hassenfeld interviewing Derek Dowe (chemist/science writer) Transcript or podcast.
Susan’s interview with Corey Brettschneider on his new Norton book The Presidents and the People: Five Leaders Who Threatened Democracy and the Citizens Who Fought to Defend It
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>33</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">a8d7b5b0-f069-11ef-9856-8b862e917ca0</guid>
      <title>Elsa Stamatopoulou, &quot;Indigenous Peoples in the International Arena: The Global Movement for Self-Determination&quot; (Routledge, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Elsa Stamatopoulou’s&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781032734156" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Indigenous Peoples in the International Arena: The Global Movement for Self-Determination</em></a>&nbsp;(Routledge 2025) provides a definitive account of the creation and rise of the international Indigenous Peoples’ movement.</p><p>In the late 1970s, motivated by their dire situation and local struggles, and inspired by worldwide movements for social justice and decolonization, including the American civil rights movement, Indigenous Peoples around the world got together and began to organize at the international level. Although each defined itself by its relation to a unique land, culture, and often language, Indigenous Peoples from around the world made an extraordinary leap, using a common conceptual vocabulary and addressing international bodies that until then had barely recognized their existence. At the intersection of politics, law, and culture, this book documents the visionary emergence of the international Indigenous movement, detailing its challenges and achievements, including the historic recognition of Indigenous rights through the adoption of the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples in 2007. The winning by Indigenous Peoples of an unprecedented kind and degree of international participation – especially at the United Nations, an institution centered on states – meant overcoming enormous institutional and political resistance. The book shows how this participation became an increasingly assertive self-expression and even an exercise of self-determination by which Indigenous Peoples could both benefit from and contribute to the international community overall – now, crucially, by sharing their knowledge about climate change, their approaches to development and well-being, and their struggles against the impact of extractive industries on their lands and resources.</p><p>Written by the former Chief of the Secretariat of the United Nations Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues, this book will be of interest to researchers, teachers, students, advocates, practitioners, and others with interests in Indigenous legal and political issues.</p><p><em>Elsa Stamatopoulou is Director of the Indigenous Peoples’ Rights Program and Adjunct Professor in the Institute for the Study of Human Rights, the Department of Anthropology, and the Center for the Study of Ethnicity and Race at Columbia University, USA. Elsa is also Former (the first) Chief of the Secretariat of the UN Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues (among other functions at the UN).</em></p><p><a href="https://humanrightscolumbia.org/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Tim Wyman-McCarthy</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a Lecturer in the discipline of Human Rights and Associate Director of Graduate Studies at the Institute for the Study of Human Rights and the Department of Sociology at Columbia University. He can be reached at&nbsp;</em><a href="mailto:tw2468@columbia.edu" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>tw2468@columbia.edu</em></a><em>.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 23 Feb 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/elsa-stamatopoulou-indigenous-peoples-in-the-international-arena-the-global-movement-for-self-determination-routledge-2024-wRhxunK8</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Elsa Stamatopoulou’s&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781032734156" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Indigenous Peoples in the International Arena: The Global Movement for Self-Determination</em></a>&nbsp;(Routledge 2025) provides a definitive account of the creation and rise of the international Indigenous Peoples’ movement.</p><p>In the late 1970s, motivated by their dire situation and local struggles, and inspired by worldwide movements for social justice and decolonization, including the American civil rights movement, Indigenous Peoples around the world got together and began to organize at the international level. Although each defined itself by its relation to a unique land, culture, and often language, Indigenous Peoples from around the world made an extraordinary leap, using a common conceptual vocabulary and addressing international bodies that until then had barely recognized their existence. At the intersection of politics, law, and culture, this book documents the visionary emergence of the international Indigenous movement, detailing its challenges and achievements, including the historic recognition of Indigenous rights through the adoption of the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples in 2007. The winning by Indigenous Peoples of an unprecedented kind and degree of international participation – especially at the United Nations, an institution centered on states – meant overcoming enormous institutional and political resistance. The book shows how this participation became an increasingly assertive self-expression and even an exercise of self-determination by which Indigenous Peoples could both benefit from and contribute to the international community overall – now, crucially, by sharing their knowledge about climate change, their approaches to development and well-being, and their struggles against the impact of extractive industries on their lands and resources.</p><p>Written by the former Chief of the Secretariat of the United Nations Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues, this book will be of interest to researchers, teachers, students, advocates, practitioners, and others with interests in Indigenous legal and political issues.</p><p><em>Elsa Stamatopoulou is Director of the Indigenous Peoples’ Rights Program and Adjunct Professor in the Institute for the Study of Human Rights, the Department of Anthropology, and the Center for the Study of Ethnicity and Race at Columbia University, USA. Elsa is also Former (the first) Chief of the Secretariat of the UN Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues (among other functions at the UN).</em></p><p><a href="https://humanrightscolumbia.org/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Tim Wyman-McCarthy</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a Lecturer in the discipline of Human Rights and Associate Director of Graduate Studies at the Institute for the Study of Human Rights and the Department of Sociology at Columbia University. He can be reached at&nbsp;</em><a href="mailto:tw2468@columbia.edu" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>tw2468@columbia.edu</em></a><em>.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="57850125" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/f8c6ddfe-5907-4fae-8eb8-692728414bad/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=f8c6ddfe-5907-4fae-8eb8-692728414bad&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Elsa Stamatopoulou, &quot;Indigenous Peoples in the International Arena: The Global Movement for Self-Determination&quot; (Routledge, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:00:15</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Elsa Stamatopoulou’s Indigenous Peoples in the International Arena: The Global Movement for Self-Determination (Routledge 2025) provides a definitive account of the creation and rise of the international Indigenous Peoples’ movement.
In the late 1970s, motivated by their dire situation and local struggles, and inspired by worldwide movements for social justice and decolonization, including the American civil rights movement, Indigenous Peoples around the world got together and began to organize at the international level. Although each defined itself by its relation to a unique land, culture, and often language, Indigenous Peoples from around the world made an extraordinary leap, using a common conceptual vocabulary and addressing international bodies that until then had barely recognized their existence. At the intersection of politics, law, and culture, this book documents the visionary emergence of the international Indigenous movement, detailing its challenges and achievements, including the historic recognition of Indigenous rights through the adoption of the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples in 2007. The winning by Indigenous Peoples of an unprecedented kind and degree of international participation – especially at the United Nations, an institution centered on states – meant overcoming enormous institutional and political resistance. The book shows how this participation became an increasingly assertive self-expression and even an exercise of self-determination by which Indigenous Peoples could both benefit from and contribute to the international community overall – now, crucially, by sharing their knowledge about climate change, their approaches to development and well-being, and their struggles against the impact of extractive industries on their lands and resources.
Written by the former Chief of the Secretariat of the United Nations Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues, this book will be of interest to researchers, teachers, students, advocates, practitioners, and others with interests in Indigenous legal and political issues.
Elsa Stamatopoulou is Director of the Indigenous Peoples’ Rights Program and Adjunct Professor in the Institute for the Study of Human Rights, the Department of Anthropology, and the Center for the Study of Ethnicity and Race at Columbia University, USA. Elsa is also Former (the first) Chief of the Secretariat of the UN Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues (among other functions at the UN).
Tim Wyman-McCarthy is a Lecturer in the discipline of Human Rights and Associate Director of Graduate Studies at the Institute for the Study of Human Rights and the Department of Sociology at Columbia University. He can be reached at tw2468@columbia.edu.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Elsa Stamatopoulou’s Indigenous Peoples in the International Arena: The Global Movement for Self-Determination (Routledge 2025) provides a definitive account of the creation and rise of the international Indigenous Peoples’ movement.
In the late 1970s, motivated by their dire situation and local struggles, and inspired by worldwide movements for social justice and decolonization, including the American civil rights movement, Indigenous Peoples around the world got together and began to organize at the international level. Although each defined itself by its relation to a unique land, culture, and often language, Indigenous Peoples from around the world made an extraordinary leap, using a common conceptual vocabulary and addressing international bodies that until then had barely recognized their existence. At the intersection of politics, law, and culture, this book documents the visionary emergence of the international Indigenous movement, detailing its challenges and achievements, including the historic recognition of Indigenous rights through the adoption of the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples in 2007. The winning by Indigenous Peoples of an unprecedented kind and degree of international participation – especially at the United Nations, an institution centered on states – meant overcoming enormous institutional and political resistance. The book shows how this participation became an increasingly assertive self-expression and even an exercise of self-determination by which Indigenous Peoples could both benefit from and contribute to the international community overall – now, crucially, by sharing their knowledge about climate change, their approaches to development and well-being, and their struggles against the impact of extractive industries on their lands and resources.
Written by the former Chief of the Secretariat of the United Nations Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues, this book will be of interest to researchers, teachers, students, advocates, practitioners, and others with interests in Indigenous legal and political issues.
Elsa Stamatopoulou is Director of the Indigenous Peoples’ Rights Program and Adjunct Professor in the Institute for the Study of Human Rights, the Department of Anthropology, and the Center for the Study of Ethnicity and Race at Columbia University, USA. Elsa is also Former (the first) Chief of the Secretariat of the UN Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues (among other functions at the UN).
Tim Wyman-McCarthy is a Lecturer in the discipline of Human Rights and Associate Director of Graduate Studies at the Institute for the Study of Human Rights and the Department of Sociology at Columbia University. He can be reached at tw2468@columbia.edu.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>62</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3414b21c-ebc0-11ef-8483-7734383029ae</guid>
      <title>Ray Brescia, &quot;The Private Is Political: Identity and Democracy in the Age of Surveillance Capitalism&quot; (NYU Press, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>As Americans increasingly depend upon their phones, computers, and internet resources, their actions are less private than they believe. Data is routinely sold and shared with companies who want to sell something, political actors who want to analyze behavior, and law enforcement who seek to monitor and limit actions.</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781479832330" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Private is Political: Identity and Democracy in the Age of Surveillance Capitalism</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(NYU Press, 2025), law professor Ray Brescia explores the failure of existing legal systems and institutions to protect people’s online presence and identities. Examining the ways in which the digital space is under threat from both governments and private actors, Brescia reveals how the rise of private surveillance prevents individuals from organizing with others who might help to catalyze change in their lives. Brescia argues that we are not far from a world where surveillance chills not just our speech, but our very identities. Surveillance, he suggests, will ultimately stifle our ability to live full lives, realize democracy, and shape the laws that affect our privacy itself.</p><p>Brescia writes that “The search for identity and communion with others who share it has never been easier in all of human history. At the same time, our individual and collective identity is also under threat by a surveillance state like none that has ever existed before. This surveillance can be weaponized, not just for profit but also to promote political ends, and undermine efforts to achieve individual and collective self-determination”</p><p>The book identifies the harms to individuals from privacy violations, provides an expansive definition of&nbsp;<em>political&nbsp;</em>privacy, and identifies the ‘integrity of identity’ as a central feature of democracy.&nbsp;<em>The Private is Political&nbsp;</em>lays out the features of Surveillance Capitalism and provides a roadmap for “muscular disclosure”: a comprehensive privacy regime to empower consumers to collectively safeguard privacy rights.</p><p><a href="https://www.albanylaw.edu/faculty/faculty-directory/raymond-brescia" rel="noopener noreferrer">Professor Ray Brescia</a>&nbsp;is the Associate Dean for Research &amp; Intellectual Life and the Hon. Harold R. Tyler Professor in Law &amp; Technology at Albany Law School. He is the author of many scholarly works including&nbsp;<em>Lawyer Nation: The Past, Present, and Future of the American Legal Profession&nbsp;</em>(from NYU Press) and&nbsp;<em>The Future of Change: How Technology Shapes Social Revolutions&nbsp;</em>(from Cornell UP)<em>.&nbsp;</em>He is also the author of public facing work, most recently<em>&nbsp;“</em><a href="https://www.msnbc.com/opinion/msnbc-opinion/elon-musk-doge-privacy-data-breach-rcna191605" rel="noopener noreferrer">Elon Musk’s DOGE is executing a historically dangerous data breach</a>” on MSNBC. He started his legal career at the Legal Aid Society of New York where he was a Skadden Fellow, and then served as the Associate Director at the Urban Justice Center, also in New York City, where he represented grassroots groups like tenant associations and low-wage worker groups. Ray’s blog is “<a href="https://lawandsocialinnovation.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Future of Change</a>” and you can find him on&nbsp;<a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/ray-brescia-24bb658/" rel="noopener noreferrer">LinkedIn</a>.</p><p>Mentioned:</p><ul>
<li>
<a href="https://shoshanazuboff.com/book/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Shoshana Zuboff</a>&nbsp;on surveillance capitalism</li>
<li>
<a href="https://www.scotusblog.com/2025/01/supreme-court-upholds-tiktok-ban/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Supreme Court upholds TikTok ban</a>, Amy Howe, SCOTUSBLOG</li>
<li><a href="https://www.kevinpeterhe.com/data-voodoo" rel="noopener noreferrer">Kevin Peter He on “data voodoo dolls”</a></li>
</ul><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Feb 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/ray-brescia-the-private-is-political-identity-and-democracy-in-the-age-of-surveillance-capitalism-nyu-press-2025-PNmf4bsx</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As Americans increasingly depend upon their phones, computers, and internet resources, their actions are less private than they believe. Data is routinely sold and shared with companies who want to sell something, political actors who want to analyze behavior, and law enforcement who seek to monitor and limit actions.</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781479832330" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Private is Political: Identity and Democracy in the Age of Surveillance Capitalism</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(NYU Press, 2025), law professor Ray Brescia explores the failure of existing legal systems and institutions to protect people’s online presence and identities. Examining the ways in which the digital space is under threat from both governments and private actors, Brescia reveals how the rise of private surveillance prevents individuals from organizing with others who might help to catalyze change in their lives. Brescia argues that we are not far from a world where surveillance chills not just our speech, but our very identities. Surveillance, he suggests, will ultimately stifle our ability to live full lives, realize democracy, and shape the laws that affect our privacy itself.</p><p>Brescia writes that “The search for identity and communion with others who share it has never been easier in all of human history. At the same time, our individual and collective identity is also under threat by a surveillance state like none that has ever existed before. This surveillance can be weaponized, not just for profit but also to promote political ends, and undermine efforts to achieve individual and collective self-determination”</p><p>The book identifies the harms to individuals from privacy violations, provides an expansive definition of&nbsp;<em>political&nbsp;</em>privacy, and identifies the ‘integrity of identity’ as a central feature of democracy.&nbsp;<em>The Private is Political&nbsp;</em>lays out the features of Surveillance Capitalism and provides a roadmap for “muscular disclosure”: a comprehensive privacy regime to empower consumers to collectively safeguard privacy rights.</p><p><a href="https://www.albanylaw.edu/faculty/faculty-directory/raymond-brescia" rel="noopener noreferrer">Professor Ray Brescia</a>&nbsp;is the Associate Dean for Research &amp; Intellectual Life and the Hon. Harold R. Tyler Professor in Law &amp; Technology at Albany Law School. He is the author of many scholarly works including&nbsp;<em>Lawyer Nation: The Past, Present, and Future of the American Legal Profession&nbsp;</em>(from NYU Press) and&nbsp;<em>The Future of Change: How Technology Shapes Social Revolutions&nbsp;</em>(from Cornell UP)<em>.&nbsp;</em>He is also the author of public facing work, most recently<em>&nbsp;“</em><a href="https://www.msnbc.com/opinion/msnbc-opinion/elon-musk-doge-privacy-data-breach-rcna191605" rel="noopener noreferrer">Elon Musk’s DOGE is executing a historically dangerous data breach</a>” on MSNBC. He started his legal career at the Legal Aid Society of New York where he was a Skadden Fellow, and then served as the Associate Director at the Urban Justice Center, also in New York City, where he represented grassroots groups like tenant associations and low-wage worker groups. Ray’s blog is “<a href="https://lawandsocialinnovation.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Future of Change</a>” and you can find him on&nbsp;<a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/ray-brescia-24bb658/" rel="noopener noreferrer">LinkedIn</a>.</p><p>Mentioned:</p><ul>
<li>
<a href="https://shoshanazuboff.com/book/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Shoshana Zuboff</a>&nbsp;on surveillance capitalism</li>
<li>
<a href="https://www.scotusblog.com/2025/01/supreme-court-upholds-tiktok-ban/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Supreme Court upholds TikTok ban</a>, Amy Howe, SCOTUSBLOG</li>
<li><a href="https://www.kevinpeterhe.com/data-voodoo" rel="noopener noreferrer">Kevin Peter He on “data voodoo dolls”</a></li>
</ul><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="50922770" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/d8ab5314-7a08-4621-87d9-5b011a932083/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=d8ab5314-7a08-4621-87d9-5b011a932083&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Ray Brescia, &quot;The Private Is Political: Identity and Democracy in the Age of Surveillance Capitalism&quot; (NYU Press, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:53:02</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>As Americans increasingly depend upon their phones, computers, and internet resources, their actions are less private than they believe. Data is routinely sold and shared with companies who want to sell something, political actors who want to analyze behavior, and law enforcement who seek to monitor and limit actions.
In The Private is Political: Identity and Democracy in the Age of Surveillance Capitalism (NYU Press, 2025), law professor Ray Brescia explores the failure of existing legal systems and institutions to protect people’s online presence and identities. Examining the ways in which the digital space is under threat from both governments and private actors, Brescia reveals how the rise of private surveillance prevents individuals from organizing with others who might help to catalyze change in their lives. Brescia argues that we are not far from a world where surveillance chills not just our speech, but our very identities. Surveillance, he suggests, will ultimately stifle our ability to live full lives, realize democracy, and shape the laws that affect our privacy itself.
Brescia writes that “The search for identity and communion with others who share it has never been easier in all of human history. At the same time, our individual and collective identity is also under threat by a surveillance state like none that has ever existed before. This surveillance can be weaponized, not just for profit but also to promote political ends, and undermine efforts to achieve individual and collective self-determination”
The book identifies the harms to individuals from privacy violations, provides an expansive definition of political privacy, and identifies the ‘integrity of identity’ as a central feature of democracy. The Private is Political lays out the features of Surveillance Capitalism and provides a roadmap for “muscular disclosure”: a comprehensive privacy regime to empower consumers to collectively safeguard privacy rights.
Professor Ray Brescia is the Associate Dean for Research &amp; Intellectual Life and the Hon. Harold R. Tyler Professor in Law &amp; Technology at Albany Law School. He is the author of many scholarly works including Lawyer Nation: The Past, Present, and Future of the American Legal Profession (from NYU Press) and The Future of Change: How Technology Shapes Social Revolutions (from Cornell UP). He is also the author of public facing work, most recently “Elon Musk’s DOGE is executing a historically dangerous data breach” on MSNBC. He started his legal career at the Legal Aid Society of New York where he was a Skadden Fellow, and then served as the Associate Director at the Urban Justice Center, also in New York City, where he represented grassroots groups like tenant associations and low-wage worker groups. Ray’s blog is “The Future of Change” and you can find him on LinkedIn.
Mentioned:
Shoshana Zuboff on surveillance capitalism
Supreme Court upholds TikTok ban, Amy Howe, SCOTUSBLOG
Kevin Peter He on “data voodoo dolls”
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>As Americans increasingly depend upon their phones, computers, and internet resources, their actions are less private than they believe. Data is routinely sold and shared with companies who want to sell something, political actors who want to analyze behavior, and law enforcement who seek to monitor and limit actions.
In The Private is Political: Identity and Democracy in the Age of Surveillance Capitalism (NYU Press, 2025), law professor Ray Brescia explores the failure of existing legal systems and institutions to protect people’s online presence and identities. Examining the ways in which the digital space is under threat from both governments and private actors, Brescia reveals how the rise of private surveillance prevents individuals from organizing with others who might help to catalyze change in their lives. Brescia argues that we are not far from a world where surveillance chills not just our speech, but our very identities. Surveillance, he suggests, will ultimately stifle our ability to live full lives, realize democracy, and shape the laws that affect our privacy itself.
Brescia writes that “The search for identity and communion with others who share it has never been easier in all of human history. At the same time, our individual and collective identity is also under threat by a surveillance state like none that has ever existed before. This surveillance can be weaponized, not just for profit but also to promote political ends, and undermine efforts to achieve individual and collective self-determination”
The book identifies the harms to individuals from privacy violations, provides an expansive definition of political privacy, and identifies the ‘integrity of identity’ as a central feature of democracy. The Private is Political lays out the features of Surveillance Capitalism and provides a roadmap for “muscular disclosure”: a comprehensive privacy regime to empower consumers to collectively safeguard privacy rights.
Professor Ray Brescia is the Associate Dean for Research &amp; Intellectual Life and the Hon. Harold R. Tyler Professor in Law &amp; Technology at Albany Law School. He is the author of many scholarly works including Lawyer Nation: The Past, Present, and Future of the American Legal Profession (from NYU Press) and The Future of Change: How Technology Shapes Social Revolutions (from Cornell UP). He is also the author of public facing work, most recently “Elon Musk’s DOGE is executing a historically dangerous data breach” on MSNBC. He started his legal career at the Legal Aid Society of New York where he was a Skadden Fellow, and then served as the Associate Director at the Urban Justice Center, also in New York City, where he represented grassroots groups like tenant associations and low-wage worker groups. Ray’s blog is “The Future of Change” and you can find him on LinkedIn.
Mentioned:
Shoshana Zuboff on surveillance capitalism
Supreme Court upholds TikTok ban, Amy Howe, SCOTUSBLOG
Kevin Peter He on “data voodoo dolls”
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>759</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8c033da0-e8a9-11ef-934a-f734f5d3aca4</guid>
      <title>Marie-France Fortin, &quot;The King Can Do No Wrong: Constitutional Fundamentals, Common Law History, and Crown Liability&quot; (Oxford UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>'The king can do no wrong' remains one of the most fundamental yet misunderstood tenets of the common law tradition. Confusion over the phrase's historical origins and differing meanings has had serious consequences, making it easier for the state to escape liability for the harm caused to individuals by governmental officials or institutions.</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780198886914" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The King Can Do No Wrong: Constitutional Fundamentals, Common Law History, and Crown Liability</em></a>&nbsp;(Oxford University Press, 2024), the first dedicated monograph on the topic, Dr. Marie-France Fortin traces the historical evolution of 'the king can do no wrong' in constitutional and public law to shed new light on our current understanding of crown liability. The different meanings conveyed by the phrase in the common law world are clarified; the contradictions between them revealed. Adopting a historical constitutional approach, the book delves deep into traditional legal sources to develop an intellectual history of this key legal idea. It explains the mutation from 'the king can do no wrong' to 'the crown can do no wrong' at the end of the nineteenth century, analyzing the resulting departure from core tenets of the constitutional arrangement of the seventeenth century. The study of the evolution of 'the king can do no wrong' in English legal thinking, mirrored in Canada, is complemented by a comparative analysis of the idea in Australia, Ireland, and the United States, where its relationship with the concept of sovereign immunity is scrutinized.</p><p>Retracing the evolution of the king can do no wrong in legal thinking, this book enhances academics', students', practitioners', and judges' understanding of the law of governmental liability in the common law world.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;new book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/marie-france-fortin-the-king-can-do-no-wrong-constitutional-fundamentals-common-law-history-and-crown-liability-oxford-up-2024-ZY8F_Y1E</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>'The king can do no wrong' remains one of the most fundamental yet misunderstood tenets of the common law tradition. Confusion over the phrase's historical origins and differing meanings has had serious consequences, making it easier for the state to escape liability for the harm caused to individuals by governmental officials or institutions.</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780198886914" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The King Can Do No Wrong: Constitutional Fundamentals, Common Law History, and Crown Liability</em></a>&nbsp;(Oxford University Press, 2024), the first dedicated monograph on the topic, Dr. Marie-France Fortin traces the historical evolution of 'the king can do no wrong' in constitutional and public law to shed new light on our current understanding of crown liability. The different meanings conveyed by the phrase in the common law world are clarified; the contradictions between them revealed. Adopting a historical constitutional approach, the book delves deep into traditional legal sources to develop an intellectual history of this key legal idea. It explains the mutation from 'the king can do no wrong' to 'the crown can do no wrong' at the end of the nineteenth century, analyzing the resulting departure from core tenets of the constitutional arrangement of the seventeenth century. The study of the evolution of 'the king can do no wrong' in English legal thinking, mirrored in Canada, is complemented by a comparative analysis of the idea in Australia, Ireland, and the United States, where its relationship with the concept of sovereign immunity is scrutinized.</p><p>Retracing the evolution of the king can do no wrong in legal thinking, this book enhances academics', students', practitioners', and judges' understanding of the law of governmental liability in the common law world.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;new book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="66517400" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/2726f15d-1af3-414d-8b51-046b0db98dc3/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=2726f15d-1af3-414d-8b51-046b0db98dc3&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Marie-France Fortin, &quot;The King Can Do No Wrong: Constitutional Fundamentals, Common Law History, and Crown Liability&quot; (Oxford UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:09:17</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>&apos;The king can do no wrong&apos; remains one of the most fundamental yet misunderstood tenets of the common law tradition. Confusion over the phrase&apos;s historical origins and differing meanings has had serious consequences, making it easier for the state to escape liability for the harm caused to individuals by governmental officials or institutions.
In The King Can Do No Wrong: Constitutional Fundamentals, Common Law History, and Crown Liability (Oxford University Press, 2024), the first dedicated monograph on the topic, Dr. Marie-France Fortin traces the historical evolution of &apos;the king can do no wrong&apos; in constitutional and public law to shed new light on our current understanding of crown liability. The different meanings conveyed by the phrase in the common law world are clarified; the contradictions between them revealed. Adopting a historical constitutional approach, the book delves deep into traditional legal sources to develop an intellectual history of this key legal idea. It explains the mutation from &apos;the king can do no wrong&apos; to &apos;the crown can do no wrong&apos; at the end of the nineteenth century, analyzing the resulting departure from core tenets of the constitutional arrangement of the seventeenth century. The study of the evolution of &apos;the king can do no wrong&apos; in English legal thinking, mirrored in Canada, is complemented by a comparative analysis of the idea in Australia, Ireland, and the United States, where its relationship with the concept of sovereign immunity is scrutinized.
Retracing the evolution of the king can do no wrong in legal thinking, this book enhances academics&apos;, students&apos;, practitioners&apos;, and judges&apos; understanding of the law of governmental liability in the common law world.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>&apos;The king can do no wrong&apos; remains one of the most fundamental yet misunderstood tenets of the common law tradition. Confusion over the phrase&apos;s historical origins and differing meanings has had serious consequences, making it easier for the state to escape liability for the harm caused to individuals by governmental officials or institutions.
In The King Can Do No Wrong: Constitutional Fundamentals, Common Law History, and Crown Liability (Oxford University Press, 2024), the first dedicated monograph on the topic, Dr. Marie-France Fortin traces the historical evolution of &apos;the king can do no wrong&apos; in constitutional and public law to shed new light on our current understanding of crown liability. The different meanings conveyed by the phrase in the common law world are clarified; the contradictions between them revealed. Adopting a historical constitutional approach, the book delves deep into traditional legal sources to develop an intellectual history of this key legal idea. It explains the mutation from &apos;the king can do no wrong&apos; to &apos;the crown can do no wrong&apos; at the end of the nineteenth century, analyzing the resulting departure from core tenets of the constitutional arrangement of the seventeenth century. The study of the evolution of &apos;the king can do no wrong&apos; in English legal thinking, mirrored in Canada, is complemented by a comparative analysis of the idea in Australia, Ireland, and the United States, where its relationship with the concept of sovereign immunity is scrutinized.
Retracing the evolution of the king can do no wrong in legal thinking, this book enhances academics&apos;, students&apos;, practitioners&apos;, and judges&apos; understanding of the law of governmental liability in the common law world.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>240</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">33780d3c-e647-11ef-a0fc-d74c65757fd2</guid>
      <title>Rebecca Haw Allensworth, &quot;The Licensing Racket: How We Decide Who Is Allowed to Work, and Why It Goes Wrong&quot; (Harvard UP, 2025)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>When we think about "red tape" and the cost of regulation it's hard to overstate the impact of professional licensing. According to Professor&nbsp;Rebecca Haw Allensworth, it's bigger than unions and more expensive than sales taxes.</p><p>Millions of American workers are required - by law - to obtain a license in order to work. This barrier of entry depends on&nbsp;requirements set by licensing boards staffed mainly by members of the profession they oversee. It limits the number of people who can serve and also confers on licensees a certain degree of prestige and trust.&nbsp;</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780674295421" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Licensing Racket:&nbsp;How We Decide Who Is Allowed to Work, and Why It Goes Wrong</em></a>&nbsp;(Harvard UP, 2025), Allensworth goes deep into a complex web of conflicting priorities.&nbsp;</p><p>Whether it's hair stylists or doctors, plumbers or lawyers, licensing board members are asked to simultaneously represent their personal practice, fellow professionals, and the public. They have to literally "wear three hats", which leads to well-intentioned, but deeply flawed and biased, decision making.</p><p>Consumers depend on licensing boards to ensure that professionals&nbsp;maintain high quality and reliability&nbsp;standards by creating -&nbsp;and&nbsp;enforcing -&nbsp;licensing&nbsp;standards.&nbsp;</p><p>In reality, their decisions can be maddeningly arbitrary, creating unnecessary barriers to hopeful practitioners&nbsp;while simultaneously failing to protect the public from bad actors who abuse the trust placed in them.</p><p>Despite good intent,&nbsp;board members lack the resources and sometimes the will to&nbsp;investigate even serious disciplinary cases. The consequences&nbsp;include, but are not limited to,&nbsp;the failure of&nbsp;medical licensing boards to remove the abusive&nbsp;doctors&nbsp;who fueled the opioid crisis and a system that allows unethical predatory lawyers to continue to practice, often targeting clients who are unable to protect themselves.</p><p>While in some areas&nbsp;licensing is deeply flawed, in others it is critical to a well-functioning society. Allensworth argues for abolition where appropriate and reform where it is most needed.</p><p>See&nbsp;<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Wy6sdMi4to" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Professor Allensworth's faculty profile video</em></a></p><p><em>Author recommended reading:</em></p><ul>
<li>-&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/demon-copperhead-barbara-kingsolver/18506689?ean=9780063251922" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Demon Copperhead</em></a>&nbsp;by Barbara Kingsolver</li>
<li>-&nbsp;<a href="https://www.annalembke.com/drug-dealer-md" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Drug Dealer, MD</em></a>&nbsp;by Anna Lembke, MD</li>
</ul><p>Hosted by&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com//hosts/profile/b113c5c0-b702-44b3-9ee1-436e326cfbd3" rel="noopener noreferrer">Meghan Cochran</a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Feb 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/rebecca-haw-allensworth-the-licensing-racket-how-we-decide-who-is-allowed-to-work-and-why-it-goes-wrong-harvard-up-2025-GPJNhkc8</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When we think about "red tape" and the cost of regulation it's hard to overstate the impact of professional licensing. According to Professor&nbsp;Rebecca Haw Allensworth, it's bigger than unions and more expensive than sales taxes.</p><p>Millions of American workers are required - by law - to obtain a license in order to work. This barrier of entry depends on&nbsp;requirements set by licensing boards staffed mainly by members of the profession they oversee. It limits the number of people who can serve and also confers on licensees a certain degree of prestige and trust.&nbsp;</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780674295421" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Licensing Racket:&nbsp;How We Decide Who Is Allowed to Work, and Why It Goes Wrong</em></a>&nbsp;(Harvard UP, 2025), Allensworth goes deep into a complex web of conflicting priorities.&nbsp;</p><p>Whether it's hair stylists or doctors, plumbers or lawyers, licensing board members are asked to simultaneously represent their personal practice, fellow professionals, and the public. They have to literally "wear three hats", which leads to well-intentioned, but deeply flawed and biased, decision making.</p><p>Consumers depend on licensing boards to ensure that professionals&nbsp;maintain high quality and reliability&nbsp;standards by creating -&nbsp;and&nbsp;enforcing -&nbsp;licensing&nbsp;standards.&nbsp;</p><p>In reality, their decisions can be maddeningly arbitrary, creating unnecessary barriers to hopeful practitioners&nbsp;while simultaneously failing to protect the public from bad actors who abuse the trust placed in them.</p><p>Despite good intent,&nbsp;board members lack the resources and sometimes the will to&nbsp;investigate even serious disciplinary cases. The consequences&nbsp;include, but are not limited to,&nbsp;the failure of&nbsp;medical licensing boards to remove the abusive&nbsp;doctors&nbsp;who fueled the opioid crisis and a system that allows unethical predatory lawyers to continue to practice, often targeting clients who are unable to protect themselves.</p><p>While in some areas&nbsp;licensing is deeply flawed, in others it is critical to a well-functioning society. Allensworth argues for abolition where appropriate and reform where it is most needed.</p><p>See&nbsp;<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Wy6sdMi4to" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Professor Allensworth's faculty profile video</em></a></p><p><em>Author recommended reading:</em></p><ul>
<li>-&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/demon-copperhead-barbara-kingsolver/18506689?ean=9780063251922" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Demon Copperhead</em></a>&nbsp;by Barbara Kingsolver</li>
<li>-&nbsp;<a href="https://www.annalembke.com/drug-dealer-md" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Drug Dealer, MD</em></a>&nbsp;by Anna Lembke, MD</li>
</ul><p>Hosted by&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com//hosts/profile/b113c5c0-b702-44b3-9ee1-436e326cfbd3" rel="noopener noreferrer">Meghan Cochran</a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="51538283" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/913ecae5-346e-4773-bfae-7b32716a9af1/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=913ecae5-346e-4773-bfae-7b32716a9af1&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Rebecca Haw Allensworth, &quot;The Licensing Racket: How We Decide Who Is Allowed to Work, and Why It Goes Wrong&quot; (Harvard UP, 2025)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:53:40</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>When we think about &quot;red tape&quot; and the cost of regulation it&apos;s hard to overstate the impact of professional licensing. According to Professor Rebecca Haw Allensworth, it&apos;s bigger than unions and more expensive than sales taxes.
Millions of American workers are required - by law - to obtain a license in order to work. This barrier of entry depends on requirements set by licensing boards staffed mainly by members of the profession they oversee. It limits the number of people who can serve and also confers on licensees a certain degree of prestige and trust. 
In The Licensing Racket: How We Decide Who Is Allowed to Work, and Why It Goes Wrong (Harvard UP, 2025), Allensworth goes deep into a complex web of conflicting priorities. 
Whether it&apos;s hair stylists or doctors, plumbers or lawyers, licensing board members are asked to simultaneously represent their personal practice, fellow professionals, and the public. They have to literally &quot;wear three hats&quot;, which leads to well-intentioned, but deeply flawed and biased, decision making.
Consumers depend on licensing boards to ensure that professionals maintain high quality and reliability standards by creating - and enforcing - licensing standards. 
In reality, their decisions can be maddeningly arbitrary, creating unnecessary barriers to hopeful practitioners while simultaneously failing to protect the public from bad actors who abuse the trust placed in them.
Despite good intent, board members lack the resources and sometimes the will to investigate even serious disciplinary cases. The consequences include, but are not limited to, the failure of medical licensing boards to remove the abusive doctors who fueled the opioid crisis and a system that allows unethical predatory lawyers to continue to practice, often targeting clients who are unable to protect themselves.
While in some areas licensing is deeply flawed, in others it is critical to a well-functioning society. Allensworth argues for abolition where appropriate and reform where it is most needed.
See Professor Allensworth&apos;s faculty profile video
Author recommended reading:
- Demon Copperhead by Barbara Kingsolver
- Drug Dealer, MD by Anna Lembke, MD
Hosted by Meghan Cochran
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>When we think about &quot;red tape&quot; and the cost of regulation it&apos;s hard to overstate the impact of professional licensing. According to Professor Rebecca Haw Allensworth, it&apos;s bigger than unions and more expensive than sales taxes.
Millions of American workers are required - by law - to obtain a license in order to work. This barrier of entry depends on requirements set by licensing boards staffed mainly by members of the profession they oversee. It limits the number of people who can serve and also confers on licensees a certain degree of prestige and trust. 
In The Licensing Racket: How We Decide Who Is Allowed to Work, and Why It Goes Wrong (Harvard UP, 2025), Allensworth goes deep into a complex web of conflicting priorities. 
Whether it&apos;s hair stylists or doctors, plumbers or lawyers, licensing board members are asked to simultaneously represent their personal practice, fellow professionals, and the public. They have to literally &quot;wear three hats&quot;, which leads to well-intentioned, but deeply flawed and biased, decision making.
Consumers depend on licensing boards to ensure that professionals maintain high quality and reliability standards by creating - and enforcing - licensing standards. 
In reality, their decisions can be maddeningly arbitrary, creating unnecessary barriers to hopeful practitioners while simultaneously failing to protect the public from bad actors who abuse the trust placed in them.
Despite good intent, board members lack the resources and sometimes the will to investigate even serious disciplinary cases. The consequences include, but are not limited to, the failure of medical licensing boards to remove the abusive doctors who fueled the opioid crisis and a system that allows unethical predatory lawyers to continue to practice, often targeting clients who are unable to protect themselves.
While in some areas licensing is deeply flawed, in others it is critical to a well-functioning society. Allensworth argues for abolition where appropriate and reform where it is most needed.
See Professor Allensworth&apos;s faculty profile video
Author recommended reading:
- Demon Copperhead by Barbara Kingsolver
- Drug Dealer, MD by Anna Lembke, MD
Hosted by Meghan Cochran
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>239</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">35870fce-e48f-11ef-818e-33decd949143</guid>
      <title>Hiroshi Motomura, &quot;Borders and Belonging: Toward a Fair, Realistic, and Sustainable Immigration Policy&quot; (Oxford UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Immigration is now a polarizing issue across most advanced democracies. But too much that is written about immigration fails to appreciate the complex responses to the phenomenon. Too many observers assume imaginary consensus, avoid basic questions, or disregard the larger context for human migration.</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197743720" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Borders and Belonging: Toward a Fair Immigration Policy</em></a>&nbsp;(Oxford University Press, 2025), Hiroshi Motomura offers a complex and fair-minded account of immigration, its root causes, and the varying responses to it. Taking stock of the issue's complexity, while giving credence to the opinions of immigration critics, he tackles a series of important questions that, when answered, will move us closer to a more realistic and sustainable immigration policy. Motomura begins by affirming a basic concept—national borders—and asks when they might be ethical borders, fostering fairness but also responding realistically to migration patterns and to the political forces that migration generates. In a nation with ethical borders, who should be let in or kept out? How should people forced to migrate be treated? Should newcomers be admitted temporarily or permanently? How should those with lawful immigration status be treated? What is the best role for enforcement in immigration policy? To what extent does the arrival of newcomers hurt long-time residents? What are the "root causes" of immigration and how can we address them?</p><p>Realistic about the desire of most citizens for national borders, this book is an indispensable guide for moving toward ethical borders and better immigration policy.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;new book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 8 Feb 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/hiroshi-motomura-borders-and-belonging-toward-a-fair-realistic-and-sustainable-immigration-policy-oxford-up-2024-geeVlF94</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Immigration is now a polarizing issue across most advanced democracies. But too much that is written about immigration fails to appreciate the complex responses to the phenomenon. Too many observers assume imaginary consensus, avoid basic questions, or disregard the larger context for human migration.</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197743720" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Borders and Belonging: Toward a Fair Immigration Policy</em></a>&nbsp;(Oxford University Press, 2025), Hiroshi Motomura offers a complex and fair-minded account of immigration, its root causes, and the varying responses to it. Taking stock of the issue's complexity, while giving credence to the opinions of immigration critics, he tackles a series of important questions that, when answered, will move us closer to a more realistic and sustainable immigration policy. Motomura begins by affirming a basic concept—national borders—and asks when they might be ethical borders, fostering fairness but also responding realistically to migration patterns and to the political forces that migration generates. In a nation with ethical borders, who should be let in or kept out? How should people forced to migrate be treated? Should newcomers be admitted temporarily or permanently? How should those with lawful immigration status be treated? What is the best role for enforcement in immigration policy? To what extent does the arrival of newcomers hurt long-time residents? What are the "root causes" of immigration and how can we address them?</p><p>Realistic about the desire of most citizens for national borders, this book is an indispensable guide for moving toward ethical borders and better immigration policy.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;new book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="62756460" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/92bd5768-4759-4686-921f-f4ae40979384/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=92bd5768-4759-4686-921f-f4ae40979384&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Hiroshi Motomura, &quot;Borders and Belonging: Toward a Fair, Realistic, and Sustainable Immigration Policy&quot; (Oxford UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:05:22</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Immigration is now a polarizing issue across most advanced democracies. But too much that is written about immigration fails to appreciate the complex responses to the phenomenon. Too many observers assume imaginary consensus, avoid basic questions, or disregard the larger context for human migration.
In Borders and Belonging: Toward a Fair Immigration Policy (Oxford University Press, 2025), Hiroshi Motomura offers a complex and fair-minded account of immigration, its root causes, and the varying responses to it. Taking stock of the issue&apos;s complexity, while giving credence to the opinions of immigration critics, he tackles a series of important questions that, when answered, will move us closer to a more realistic and sustainable immigration policy. Motomura begins by affirming a basic concept—national borders—and asks when they might be ethical borders, fostering fairness but also responding realistically to migration patterns and to the political forces that migration generates. In a nation with ethical borders, who should be let in or kept out? How should people forced to migrate be treated? Should newcomers be admitted temporarily or permanently? How should those with lawful immigration status be treated? What is the best role for enforcement in immigration policy? To what extent does the arrival of newcomers hurt long-time residents? What are the &quot;root causes&quot; of immigration and how can we address them?
Realistic about the desire of most citizens for national borders, this book is an indispensable guide for moving toward ethical borders and better immigration policy.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Immigration is now a polarizing issue across most advanced democracies. But too much that is written about immigration fails to appreciate the complex responses to the phenomenon. Too many observers assume imaginary consensus, avoid basic questions, or disregard the larger context for human migration.
In Borders and Belonging: Toward a Fair Immigration Policy (Oxford University Press, 2025), Hiroshi Motomura offers a complex and fair-minded account of immigration, its root causes, and the varying responses to it. Taking stock of the issue&apos;s complexity, while giving credence to the opinions of immigration critics, he tackles a series of important questions that, when answered, will move us closer to a more realistic and sustainable immigration policy. Motomura begins by affirming a basic concept—national borders—and asks when they might be ethical borders, fostering fairness but also responding realistically to migration patterns and to the political forces that migration generates. In a nation with ethical borders, who should be let in or kept out? How should people forced to migrate be treated? Should newcomers be admitted temporarily or permanently? How should those with lawful immigration status be treated? What is the best role for enforcement in immigration policy? To what extent does the arrival of newcomers hurt long-time residents? What are the &quot;root causes&quot; of immigration and how can we address them?
Realistic about the desire of most citizens for national borders, this book is an indispensable guide for moving toward ethical borders and better immigration policy.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>238</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7b9ac48a-db50-11ef-abca-03236e77279a</guid>
      <title>James Boyle, &quot;The Line: AI and the Future of Personhood&quot; (MIT Press, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>This conversation includes James Boyle, Duke University;&nbsp;<a href="https://www.uprm.edu/humanidades/jeffrey-herlihy-mera/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Jeffrey Herlihy-Mera</a>, UPR-M;&nbsp;<a href="https://hectorjosehuyke.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Héctor José Huyke</a>, UPR-M, and Natalia Bustos, UPR-M.</p><p>This is the first of two episodes about&nbsp;<em>The Line: AI and the Future of Personhood</em>. The second, in Spanish, will appear on the&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/es/hosts/profile/259692b6-65ba-4d12-82b6-d09800c93f8b" rel="noopener noreferrer">New Books Network en español</a>. The series is sponsored by the&nbsp;<a href="https://www.uprm.edu/nuevoshorizontes/estudios-descoloniales/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Encuentros descoloniales</a>&nbsp;focal group at&nbsp;<a href="https://www.uprm.edu/nuevoshorizontes/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Instituto Nuevos Horizontes</a>&nbsp;at UPRM, a group of scholars who consider how decolonial approaches ​​can provide nuance in scientific knowledge.</p><p>This episode and the&nbsp;<a href="https://www.uprm.edu/nuevoshorizontes/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Instituto Nuevos Horizontes</a>&nbsp;at the UPRM have been supported by the Mellon Foundation. The conversation is part of the “<a href="https://www.uprm.edu/nuevoshorizontes/educacion-general/" rel="noopener noreferrer">STEM to STEAM</a>” project of the “Cornerstone” initiative, sponsored by the Teagle Foundation, which stresses the importance of integrating humanistic perspectives in the sciences.</p><p><em>The Line: AI and the Future of Personhood&nbsp;</em>is available online for free through the&nbsp;<a href="https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/15408.001.0001" rel="noopener noreferrer">MIT website</a>&nbsp;per the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International Public License.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jan 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/james-boyle-the-line-ai-and-the-future-of-personhood-mit-press-2024-gYH61vw_</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This conversation includes James Boyle, Duke University;&nbsp;<a href="https://www.uprm.edu/humanidades/jeffrey-herlihy-mera/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Jeffrey Herlihy-Mera</a>, UPR-M;&nbsp;<a href="https://hectorjosehuyke.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Héctor José Huyke</a>, UPR-M, and Natalia Bustos, UPR-M.</p><p>This is the first of two episodes about&nbsp;<em>The Line: AI and the Future of Personhood</em>. The second, in Spanish, will appear on the&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/es/hosts/profile/259692b6-65ba-4d12-82b6-d09800c93f8b" rel="noopener noreferrer">New Books Network en español</a>. The series is sponsored by the&nbsp;<a href="https://www.uprm.edu/nuevoshorizontes/estudios-descoloniales/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Encuentros descoloniales</a>&nbsp;focal group at&nbsp;<a href="https://www.uprm.edu/nuevoshorizontes/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Instituto Nuevos Horizontes</a>&nbsp;at UPRM, a group of scholars who consider how decolonial approaches ​​can provide nuance in scientific knowledge.</p><p>This episode and the&nbsp;<a href="https://www.uprm.edu/nuevoshorizontes/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Instituto Nuevos Horizontes</a>&nbsp;at the UPRM have been supported by the Mellon Foundation. The conversation is part of the “<a href="https://www.uprm.edu/nuevoshorizontes/educacion-general/" rel="noopener noreferrer">STEM to STEAM</a>” project of the “Cornerstone” initiative, sponsored by the Teagle Foundation, which stresses the importance of integrating humanistic perspectives in the sciences.</p><p><em>The Line: AI and the Future of Personhood&nbsp;</em>is available online for free through the&nbsp;<a href="https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/15408.001.0001" rel="noopener noreferrer">MIT website</a>&nbsp;per the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International Public License.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="64359654" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/3cfe1d54-0241-4dd6-8074-f18a0243bd21/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=3cfe1d54-0241-4dd6-8074-f18a0243bd21&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>James Boyle, &quot;The Line: AI and the Future of Personhood&quot; (MIT Press, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:07:02</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>This conversation includes James Boyle, Duke University; Jeffrey Herlihy-Mera, UPR-M; Héctor José Huyke, UPR-M, and Natalia Bustos, UPR-M.
This is the first of two episodes about The Line: AI and the Future of Personhood. The second, in Spanish, will appear on the New Books Network en español. The series is sponsored by the Encuentros descoloniales focal group at Instituto Nuevos Horizontes at UPRM, a group of scholars who consider how decolonial approaches ​​can provide nuance in scientific knowledge.
This episode and the Instituto Nuevos Horizontes at the UPRM have been supported by the Mellon Foundation. The conversation is part of the “STEM to STEAM” project of the “Cornerstone” initiative, sponsored by the Teagle Foundation, which stresses the importance of integrating humanistic perspectives in the sciences.
The Line: AI and the Future of Personhood is available online for free through the MIT website per the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International Public License.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>This conversation includes James Boyle, Duke University; Jeffrey Herlihy-Mera, UPR-M; Héctor José Huyke, UPR-M, and Natalia Bustos, UPR-M.
This is the first of two episodes about The Line: AI and the Future of Personhood. The second, in Spanish, will appear on the New Books Network en español. The series is sponsored by the Encuentros descoloniales focal group at Instituto Nuevos Horizontes at UPRM, a group of scholars who consider how decolonial approaches ​​can provide nuance in scientific knowledge.
This episode and the Instituto Nuevos Horizontes at the UPRM have been supported by the Mellon Foundation. The conversation is part of the “STEM to STEAM” project of the “Cornerstone” initiative, sponsored by the Teagle Foundation, which stresses the importance of integrating humanistic perspectives in the sciences.
The Line: AI and the Future of Personhood is available online for free through the MIT website per the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International Public License.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>83</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e2424db2-d9b5-11ef-bc75-af5633d8e1a3</guid>
      <title>Shimon Shetreet, &quot;Judicial Independence: Cornerstone of Democracy&quot; (Brill Nijhoff, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Today I’m speaking with Shimon Shetreet, Greenblatt Chair of Public and International Law at the&nbsp;<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hebrew_University_of_Jerusalem" rel="noopener noreferrer">Hebrew University</a>&nbsp;and a former politician. We are discussing his recently published work, co-edited with Hiram Chodosh, titled&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9789004535084" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Judicial Independence: Cornerstone of Democracy</em>.</a>&nbsp;Democracies around the world, from Israel and Mexico to Poland and Hungary, are grappling with challenges to judicial independence. Attacks on judicial independence often masquerade as attempts to strengthen democracy, despite the necessity of judicial independence to uphold constitutionality, hold no one above the law, and protect the most vulnerable people. This volume offers a truly comprehensive view of the global challenges facing judicial independence.</p><p>Shimon Shetreet is an Israeli former politician who held several ministerial portfolios between 1992 and 1996. He is currently the Greenblatt Chair of Public and International Law at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem.</p><p><em>Caleb Zakarin is editor at the New Books Network.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 26 Jan 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/shimon-shetreet-judicial-independence-cornerstone-of-democracy-brill-nijhoff-2023-XZJEU7UH</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today I’m speaking with Shimon Shetreet, Greenblatt Chair of Public and International Law at the&nbsp;<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hebrew_University_of_Jerusalem" rel="noopener noreferrer">Hebrew University</a>&nbsp;and a former politician. We are discussing his recently published work, co-edited with Hiram Chodosh, titled&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9789004535084" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Judicial Independence: Cornerstone of Democracy</em>.</a>&nbsp;Democracies around the world, from Israel and Mexico to Poland and Hungary, are grappling with challenges to judicial independence. Attacks on judicial independence often masquerade as attempts to strengthen democracy, despite the necessity of judicial independence to uphold constitutionality, hold no one above the law, and protect the most vulnerable people. This volume offers a truly comprehensive view of the global challenges facing judicial independence.</p><p>Shimon Shetreet is an Israeli former politician who held several ministerial portfolios between 1992 and 1996. He is currently the Greenblatt Chair of Public and International Law at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem.</p><p><em>Caleb Zakarin is editor at the New Books Network.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="44749850" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/6fc1b962-d3c3-426a-98de-37d16f07605d/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=6fc1b962-d3c3-426a-98de-37d16f07605d&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Shimon Shetreet, &quot;Judicial Independence: Cornerstone of Democracy&quot; (Brill Nijhoff, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:46:36</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Today I’m speaking with Shimon Shetreet, Greenblatt Chair of Public and International Law at the Hebrew University and a former politician. We are discussing his recently published work, co-edited with Hiram Chodosh, titled Judicial Independence: Cornerstone of Democracy. Democracies around the world, from Israel and Mexico to Poland and Hungary, are grappling with challenges to judicial independence. Attacks on judicial independence often masquerade as attempts to strengthen democracy, despite the necessity of judicial independence to uphold constitutionality, hold no one above the law, and protect the most vulnerable people. This volume offers a truly comprehensive view of the global challenges facing judicial independence.
Shimon Shetreet is an Israeli former politician who held several ministerial portfolios between 1992 and 1996. He is currently the Greenblatt Chair of Public and International Law at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
Caleb Zakarin is editor at the New Books Network.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Today I’m speaking with Shimon Shetreet, Greenblatt Chair of Public and International Law at the Hebrew University and a former politician. We are discussing his recently published work, co-edited with Hiram Chodosh, titled Judicial Independence: Cornerstone of Democracy. Democracies around the world, from Israel and Mexico to Poland and Hungary, are grappling with challenges to judicial independence. Attacks on judicial independence often masquerade as attempts to strengthen democracy, despite the necessity of judicial independence to uphold constitutionality, hold no one above the law, and protect the most vulnerable people. This volume offers a truly comprehensive view of the global challenges facing judicial independence.
Shimon Shetreet is an Israeli former politician who held several ministerial portfolios between 1992 and 1996. He is currently the Greenblatt Chair of Public and International Law at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
Caleb Zakarin is editor at the New Books Network.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>5</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">c8b4ce20-d9af-11ef-a530-07f1391e69b0</guid>
      <title>Rumu Sarkar, &quot;International Development Law: Rule of Law, Human Rights &amp; Global Finance&quot; (Springer, 2020)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9783030400705" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>International Development Law: Rule of Law, Human Rights &amp; Global Finance</em></a>&nbsp;(Springer, 2020) describes how international development works, its shortcomings, its theoretical and practical foundations, along with prescriptions for the future. It&nbsp;provides the reader with new perspectives on the origins of global poverty, identifies legal impediments to sustainable economic growth, and provides a better understanding of the challenges faced by the international community in resolving global poverty issues. The text is structured into two basic parts: the first part deals with the theoretical and philosophic foundations of the subject, and the second part sets forth issues relating to the international financial architecture, namely, international borrowing practices, privatization, and emerging economies.&nbsp;</p><p>In particular, the book provides new, innovative analysis on corruption as an impediment to sustainable development. The three interlocking facets of corruption are examined: transnational organized crime, Islamic-based international terrorism, and corruption within emerging economies and the international banking system. Thus fresh new analysis adds depth and clarity to a field that heretofore has been scattered and superficial. Finally, the “right to development” within the international human rights discourse is critically reviewed, particularly in light of new jurisprudence emerging from the African context.This book offers a fresh, new and balanced legal perspective on the development process. The text has been rigorously researched and has many practical facets based on the author’s professional experience within the international development field. It is an invaluable research and teaching tool since it takes a multidisciplinary approach to putting complex issues, legal trends and political questions into a clear, new perspective that is highly analytical as well as accessible to the reader. The author's elegant legal prose is both powerful and persuasive.</p><p>Rumu Sarkar is&nbsp;Adjunct Law Professor at&nbsp;Case Western Reserve University School of Law.</p><p><em>Caleb Zakarin is editor at the New Books Network.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 25 Jan 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/rumu-sarkar-international-development-law-rule-of-law-human-rights-global-finance-springer-2020-dUIZDLk0</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9783030400705" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>International Development Law: Rule of Law, Human Rights &amp; Global Finance</em></a>&nbsp;(Springer, 2020) describes how international development works, its shortcomings, its theoretical and practical foundations, along with prescriptions for the future. It&nbsp;provides the reader with new perspectives on the origins of global poverty, identifies legal impediments to sustainable economic growth, and provides a better understanding of the challenges faced by the international community in resolving global poverty issues. The text is structured into two basic parts: the first part deals with the theoretical and philosophic foundations of the subject, and the second part sets forth issues relating to the international financial architecture, namely, international borrowing practices, privatization, and emerging economies.&nbsp;</p><p>In particular, the book provides new, innovative analysis on corruption as an impediment to sustainable development. The three interlocking facets of corruption are examined: transnational organized crime, Islamic-based international terrorism, and corruption within emerging economies and the international banking system. Thus fresh new analysis adds depth and clarity to a field that heretofore has been scattered and superficial. Finally, the “right to development” within the international human rights discourse is critically reviewed, particularly in light of new jurisprudence emerging from the African context.This book offers a fresh, new and balanced legal perspective on the development process. The text has been rigorously researched and has many practical facets based on the author’s professional experience within the international development field. It is an invaluable research and teaching tool since it takes a multidisciplinary approach to putting complex issues, legal trends and political questions into a clear, new perspective that is highly analytical as well as accessible to the reader. The author's elegant legal prose is both powerful and persuasive.</p><p>Rumu Sarkar is&nbsp;Adjunct Law Professor at&nbsp;Case Western Reserve University School of Law.</p><p><em>Caleb Zakarin is editor at the New Books Network.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="43556813" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/078123b9-de37-4672-a9bd-e1d6808a17ff/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=078123b9-de37-4672-a9bd-e1d6808a17ff&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Rumu Sarkar, &quot;International Development Law: Rule of Law, Human Rights &amp; Global Finance&quot; (Springer, 2020)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:45:22</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>International Development Law: Rule of Law, Human Rights &amp; Global Finance (Springer, 2020) describes how international development works, its shortcomings, its theoretical and practical foundations, along with prescriptions for the future. It provides the reader with new perspectives on the origins of global poverty, identifies legal impediments to sustainable economic growth, and provides a better understanding of the challenges faced by the international community in resolving global poverty issues. The text is structured into two basic parts: the first part deals with the theoretical and philosophic foundations of the subject, and the second part sets forth issues relating to the international financial architecture, namely, international borrowing practices, privatization, and emerging economies. 
In particular, the book provides new, innovative analysis on corruption as an impediment to sustainable development. The three interlocking facets of corruption are examined: transnational organized crime, Islamic-based international terrorism, and corruption within emerging economies and the international banking system. Thus fresh new analysis adds depth and clarity to a field that heretofore has been scattered and superficial. Finally, the “right to development” within the international human rights discourse is critically reviewed, particularly in light of new jurisprudence emerging from the African context.This book offers a fresh, new and balanced legal perspective on the development process. The text has been rigorously researched and has many practical facets based on the author’s professional experience within the international development field. It is an invaluable research and teaching tool since it takes a multidisciplinary approach to putting complex issues, legal trends and political questions into a clear, new perspective that is highly analytical as well as accessible to the reader. The author&apos;s elegant legal prose is both powerful and persuasive.
Rumu Sarkar is Adjunct Law Professor at Case Western Reserve University School of Law.
Caleb Zakarin is editor at the New Books Network.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>International Development Law: Rule of Law, Human Rights &amp; Global Finance (Springer, 2020) describes how international development works, its shortcomings, its theoretical and practical foundations, along with prescriptions for the future. It provides the reader with new perspectives on the origins of global poverty, identifies legal impediments to sustainable economic growth, and provides a better understanding of the challenges faced by the international community in resolving global poverty issues. The text is structured into two basic parts: the first part deals with the theoretical and philosophic foundations of the subject, and the second part sets forth issues relating to the international financial architecture, namely, international borrowing practices, privatization, and emerging economies. 
In particular, the book provides new, innovative analysis on corruption as an impediment to sustainable development. The three interlocking facets of corruption are examined: transnational organized crime, Islamic-based international terrorism, and corruption within emerging economies and the international banking system. Thus fresh new analysis adds depth and clarity to a field that heretofore has been scattered and superficial. Finally, the “right to development” within the international human rights discourse is critically reviewed, particularly in light of new jurisprudence emerging from the African context.This book offers a fresh, new and balanced legal perspective on the development process. The text has been rigorously researched and has many practical facets based on the author’s professional experience within the international development field. It is an invaluable research and teaching tool since it takes a multidisciplinary approach to putting complex issues, legal trends and political questions into a clear, new perspective that is highly analytical as well as accessible to the reader. The author&apos;s elegant legal prose is both powerful and persuasive.
Rumu Sarkar is Adjunct Law Professor at Case Western Reserve University School of Law.
Caleb Zakarin is editor at the New Books Network.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>237</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2ae8c112-d5a7-11ef-b0f9-77f1f0cacfb4</guid>
      <title>Carol Cleaveland and Michele Waslin. &quot;Private Violence: Latin American Women and the Struggle for Asylum&quot; (NYU Press, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>How the US asylum process fails to protect against claims of gender-based violence.</p><p>Through eyewitness accounts of closed-court proceedings and powerful testimony from women who have sought asylum in the United States because of severe assaults and death threats by intimate partners and/or gang members,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781479824335" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Private Violence: Latin American Women and the Struggle for Asylum&nbsp;</em></a>(NYU Press, 2024) examines how immigration laws and policies shape the lives of Latin American women who seek safety in the United States. Carol Cleaveland and Michele Waslin describe the women's histories prior to crossing the border, and the legal strategies they use to convince Immigration Judges that rape and other forms of "private violence" should merit asylum - despite laws built on Cold War era assumptions that persecution occurs in the public sphere by state actors.</p><p><em>Private Violence</em>&nbsp;provides much-needed recommendations for incorporating a gender-based lens in the asylum process. The authors demonstrate how policy changes across Presidential administrations have made it difficult for survivors of "private violence" to qualify for asylum.&nbsp;<em>Private Violence</em>&nbsp;paints a damning portrait of America's broken asylum system. This volume illustrates the difficulties experienced by Latin American women who rely on this broken system for protection in the United States. It also illuminates women's resilience and the determination of immigration attorneys to reshape asylum law.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jan 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/carol-cleaveland-and-michele-waslin-private-violence-latin-american-women-and-the-struggle-for-asylum-nyu-press-2024-JSUktc88</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How the US asylum process fails to protect against claims of gender-based violence.</p><p>Through eyewitness accounts of closed-court proceedings and powerful testimony from women who have sought asylum in the United States because of severe assaults and death threats by intimate partners and/or gang members,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781479824335" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Private Violence: Latin American Women and the Struggle for Asylum&nbsp;</em></a>(NYU Press, 2024) examines how immigration laws and policies shape the lives of Latin American women who seek safety in the United States. Carol Cleaveland and Michele Waslin describe the women's histories prior to crossing the border, and the legal strategies they use to convince Immigration Judges that rape and other forms of "private violence" should merit asylum - despite laws built on Cold War era assumptions that persecution occurs in the public sphere by state actors.</p><p><em>Private Violence</em>&nbsp;provides much-needed recommendations for incorporating a gender-based lens in the asylum process. The authors demonstrate how policy changes across Presidential administrations have made it difficult for survivors of "private violence" to qualify for asylum.&nbsp;<em>Private Violence</em>&nbsp;paints a damning portrait of America's broken asylum system. This volume illustrates the difficulties experienced by Latin American women who rely on this broken system for protection in the United States. It also illuminates women's resilience and the determination of immigration attorneys to reshape asylum law.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="37046462" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/5b0760ec-4a15-4923-af66-d7d77b8583e4/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=5b0760ec-4a15-4923-af66-d7d77b8583e4&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Carol Cleaveland and Michele Waslin. &quot;Private Violence: Latin American Women and the Struggle for Asylum&quot; (NYU Press, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:38:35</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>How the US asylum process fails to protect against claims of gender-based violence.
Through eyewitness accounts of closed-court proceedings and powerful testimony from women who have sought asylum in the United States because of severe assaults and death threats by intimate partners and/or gang members, Private Violence: Latin American Women and the Struggle for Asylum (NYU Press, 2024) examines how immigration laws and policies shape the lives of Latin American women who seek safety in the United States. Carol Cleaveland and Michele Waslin describe the women&apos;s histories prior to crossing the border, and the legal strategies they use to convince Immigration Judges that rape and other forms of &quot;private violence&quot; should merit asylum - despite laws built on Cold War era assumptions that persecution occurs in the public sphere by state actors.
Private Violence provides much-needed recommendations for incorporating a gender-based lens in the asylum process. The authors demonstrate how policy changes across Presidential administrations have made it difficult for survivors of &quot;private violence&quot; to qualify for asylum. Private Violence paints a damning portrait of America&apos;s broken asylum system. This volume illustrates the difficulties experienced by Latin American women who rely on this broken system for protection in the United States. It also illuminates women&apos;s resilience and the determination of immigration attorneys to reshape asylum law.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>How the US asylum process fails to protect against claims of gender-based violence.
Through eyewitness accounts of closed-court proceedings and powerful testimony from women who have sought asylum in the United States because of severe assaults and death threats by intimate partners and/or gang members, Private Violence: Latin American Women and the Struggle for Asylum (NYU Press, 2024) examines how immigration laws and policies shape the lives of Latin American women who seek safety in the United States. Carol Cleaveland and Michele Waslin describe the women&apos;s histories prior to crossing the border, and the legal strategies they use to convince Immigration Judges that rape and other forms of &quot;private violence&quot; should merit asylum - despite laws built on Cold War era assumptions that persecution occurs in the public sphere by state actors.
Private Violence provides much-needed recommendations for incorporating a gender-based lens in the asylum process. The authors demonstrate how policy changes across Presidential administrations have made it difficult for survivors of &quot;private violence&quot; to qualify for asylum. Private Violence paints a damning portrait of America&apos;s broken asylum system. This volume illustrates the difficulties experienced by Latin American women who rely on this broken system for protection in the United States. It also illuminates women&apos;s resilience and the determination of immigration attorneys to reshape asylum law.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>229</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16ef64da-cf77-11ef-8bf7-d3a6033c465c</guid>
      <title>Chaya T. Halberstam, &quot;Trial Stories in Jewish Antiquity: Counternarratives of Justice&quot; (Oxford UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>What can early Jewish courtroom narratives tell us about the capacity and limits of human justice? By exploring how judges and the act of judging are depicted in these narratives,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780198865148" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Trial Stories in Jewish Antiquity: Counternarratives of Justice</em></a>&nbsp;(Oxford University Press, 2024), Chaya T. Halberstam challenges the prevailing notion, both then and now, of the ideal impartial judge. As a work of intellectual history, the book also contributes to contemporary debates about the role of legal decision-making in shaping a just society. Halberstam shows that instead of modelling a system in which lofty, inaccessible judges follow objective and rational rules, ancient Jewish trial narratives depict a legal practice dependent upon the individual judge's personal relationships, reactive emotions, and impulse to care.</p><p>Drawing from affect theory and feminist legal thought, Halberstam offers original readings of some of the most famous trials in ancient Jewish writings alongside minor case stories in Josephus and rabbinic literature. She shows both the consistency of a counter-tradition that sees legal practice as contingent upon relationship and emotion, and the specific ways in which that perspective was manifest in changing times and contexts.</p><p>Interviewee: Chaya T. Halberstam is Professor of Religious Studies at King's University College, University of Western Ontario.</p><p>Host: Schneur Zalman Newfield is an Associate Professor of Sociology and Jewish Studies at Hunter College, City University of New York, and the author of Degrees of Separation: Identity Formation While Leaving Ultra-Orthodox Judaism (Temple University Press). Visit him online at ZalmanNewfield.com.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 11 Jan 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/chaya-t-halberstam-trial-stories-in-jewish-antiquity-counternarratives-of-justice-oxford-up-2024-SYLdcBST</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What can early Jewish courtroom narratives tell us about the capacity and limits of human justice? By exploring how judges and the act of judging are depicted in these narratives,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780198865148" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Trial Stories in Jewish Antiquity: Counternarratives of Justice</em></a>&nbsp;(Oxford University Press, 2024), Chaya T. Halberstam challenges the prevailing notion, both then and now, of the ideal impartial judge. As a work of intellectual history, the book also contributes to contemporary debates about the role of legal decision-making in shaping a just society. Halberstam shows that instead of modelling a system in which lofty, inaccessible judges follow objective and rational rules, ancient Jewish trial narratives depict a legal practice dependent upon the individual judge's personal relationships, reactive emotions, and impulse to care.</p><p>Drawing from affect theory and feminist legal thought, Halberstam offers original readings of some of the most famous trials in ancient Jewish writings alongside minor case stories in Josephus and rabbinic literature. She shows both the consistency of a counter-tradition that sees legal practice as contingent upon relationship and emotion, and the specific ways in which that perspective was manifest in changing times and contexts.</p><p>Interviewee: Chaya T. Halberstam is Professor of Religious Studies at King's University College, University of Western Ontario.</p><p>Host: Schneur Zalman Newfield is an Associate Professor of Sociology and Jewish Studies at Hunter College, City University of New York, and the author of Degrees of Separation: Identity Formation While Leaving Ultra-Orthodox Judaism (Temple University Press). Visit him online at ZalmanNewfield.com.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="61211787" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/67c2ddc8-8dcb-44cb-9e3b-15918404fefc/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=67c2ddc8-8dcb-44cb-9e3b-15918404fefc&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Chaya T. Halberstam, &quot;Trial Stories in Jewish Antiquity: Counternarratives of Justice&quot; (Oxford UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:03:45</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>What can early Jewish courtroom narratives tell us about the capacity and limits of human justice? By exploring how judges and the act of judging are depicted in these narratives, Trial Stories in Jewish Antiquity: Counternarratives of Justice (Oxford University Press, 2024), Chaya T. Halberstam challenges the prevailing notion, both then and now, of the ideal impartial judge. As a work of intellectual history, the book also contributes to contemporary debates about the role of legal decision-making in shaping a just society. Halberstam shows that instead of modelling a system in which lofty, inaccessible judges follow objective and rational rules, ancient Jewish trial narratives depict a legal practice dependent upon the individual judge&apos;s personal relationships, reactive emotions, and impulse to care.
Drawing from affect theory and feminist legal thought, Halberstam offers original readings of some of the most famous trials in ancient Jewish writings alongside minor case stories in Josephus and rabbinic literature. She shows both the consistency of a counter-tradition that sees legal practice as contingent upon relationship and emotion, and the specific ways in which that perspective was manifest in changing times and contexts.
Interviewee: Chaya T. Halberstam is Professor of Religious Studies at King&apos;s University College, University of Western Ontario.
Host: Schneur Zalman Newfield is an Associate Professor of Sociology and Jewish Studies at Hunter College, City University of New York, and the author of Degrees of Separation: Identity Formation While Leaving Ultra-Orthodox Judaism (Temple University Press). Visit him online at ZalmanNewfield.com.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>What can early Jewish courtroom narratives tell us about the capacity and limits of human justice? By exploring how judges and the act of judging are depicted in these narratives, Trial Stories in Jewish Antiquity: Counternarratives of Justice (Oxford University Press, 2024), Chaya T. Halberstam challenges the prevailing notion, both then and now, of the ideal impartial judge. As a work of intellectual history, the book also contributes to contemporary debates about the role of legal decision-making in shaping a just society. Halberstam shows that instead of modelling a system in which lofty, inaccessible judges follow objective and rational rules, ancient Jewish trial narratives depict a legal practice dependent upon the individual judge&apos;s personal relationships, reactive emotions, and impulse to care.
Drawing from affect theory and feminist legal thought, Halberstam offers original readings of some of the most famous trials in ancient Jewish writings alongside minor case stories in Josephus and rabbinic literature. She shows both the consistency of a counter-tradition that sees legal practice as contingent upon relationship and emotion, and the specific ways in which that perspective was manifest in changing times and contexts.
Interviewee: Chaya T. Halberstam is Professor of Religious Studies at King&apos;s University College, University of Western Ontario.
Host: Schneur Zalman Newfield is an Associate Professor of Sociology and Jewish Studies at Hunter College, City University of New York, and the author of Degrees of Separation: Identity Formation While Leaving Ultra-Orthodox Judaism (Temple University Press). Visit him online at ZalmanNewfield.com.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>596</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">797e5866-ceb1-11ef-8906-93c2df4f8463</guid>
      <title>Edward Jones Corredera, &quot;Odious Debt: Bankruptcy, International Law, and the Making of Latin America&quot; (Oxford UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>What are fallen tyrants owed? What makes debt illegitimate? And when is bankruptcy moral? Drawing on new archival sources, this book shows how Latin American nations have wrestled with the morality of indebtedness and insolvency since their foundation, and outlines how their history can shed new light on contemporary global dilemmas.</p><p>With a focus on the early modern Spanish Empire and modern Mexico, Colombia, and Argentina, and based on archival research carried out across seven countries,<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780192888280" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;<em>Odious Debt: Bankruptcy, International Law, and the Making of Latin America</em>&nbsp;</a>(Oxford University Press, 2024) by Dr. Edward Jones Corredera studies 400 years of history and unearths overlooked congressional debates and understudied thinkers. The book shows how discussions on the morality of debt and default played a structuring role in the construction and codification of national constitutions, identities, and international legal norms in Latin America.</p><p>This new history of the moral economy of the Hispanic World from the 1520s to the 1920s illuminates contemporary issues in international law and international relations. Latin American jurists developed a global critique of economics and international law that continues to generate pressing questions about debt, bankruptcy, reparations, and the pursuit of a moral global economy.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;new book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jan 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/edward-jones-corredera-odious-debt-bankruptcy-international-law-and-the-making-of-latin-america-oxford-up-2024-EhodAmF9</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What are fallen tyrants owed? What makes debt illegitimate? And when is bankruptcy moral? Drawing on new archival sources, this book shows how Latin American nations have wrestled with the morality of indebtedness and insolvency since their foundation, and outlines how their history can shed new light on contemporary global dilemmas.</p><p>With a focus on the early modern Spanish Empire and modern Mexico, Colombia, and Argentina, and based on archival research carried out across seven countries,<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780192888280" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;<em>Odious Debt: Bankruptcy, International Law, and the Making of Latin America</em>&nbsp;</a>(Oxford University Press, 2024) by Dr. Edward Jones Corredera studies 400 years of history and unearths overlooked congressional debates and understudied thinkers. The book shows how discussions on the morality of debt and default played a structuring role in the construction and codification of national constitutions, identities, and international legal norms in Latin America.</p><p>This new history of the moral economy of the Hispanic World from the 1520s to the 1920s illuminates contemporary issues in international law and international relations. Latin American jurists developed a global critique of economics and international law that continues to generate pressing questions about debt, bankruptcy, reparations, and the pursuit of a moral global economy.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;new book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="40977609" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/59092f56-41c9-464e-8c77-6b92ac0f8a54/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=59092f56-41c9-464e-8c77-6b92ac0f8a54&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Edward Jones Corredera, &quot;Odious Debt: Bankruptcy, International Law, and the Making of Latin America&quot; (Oxford UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:42:40</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>What are fallen tyrants owed? What makes debt illegitimate? And when is bankruptcy moral? Drawing on new archival sources, this book shows how Latin American nations have wrestled with the morality of indebtedness and insolvency since their foundation, and outlines how their history can shed new light on contemporary global dilemmas.
With a focus on the early modern Spanish Empire and modern Mexico, Colombia, and Argentina, and based on archival research carried out across seven countries, Odious Debt: Bankruptcy, International Law, and the Making of Latin America (Oxford University Press, 2024) by Dr. Edward Jones Corredera studies 400 years of history and unearths overlooked congressional debates and understudied thinkers. The book shows how discussions on the morality of debt and default played a structuring role in the construction and codification of national constitutions, identities, and international legal norms in Latin America.
This new history of the moral economy of the Hispanic World from the 1520s to the 1920s illuminates contemporary issues in international law and international relations. Latin American jurists developed a global critique of economics and international law that continues to generate pressing questions about debt, bankruptcy, reparations, and the pursuit of a moral global economy.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>What are fallen tyrants owed? What makes debt illegitimate? And when is bankruptcy moral? Drawing on new archival sources, this book shows how Latin American nations have wrestled with the morality of indebtedness and insolvency since their foundation, and outlines how their history can shed new light on contemporary global dilemmas.
With a focus on the early modern Spanish Empire and modern Mexico, Colombia, and Argentina, and based on archival research carried out across seven countries, Odious Debt: Bankruptcy, International Law, and the Making of Latin America (Oxford University Press, 2024) by Dr. Edward Jones Corredera studies 400 years of history and unearths overlooked congressional debates and understudied thinkers. The book shows how discussions on the morality of debt and default played a structuring role in the construction and codification of national constitutions, identities, and international legal norms in Latin America.
This new history of the moral economy of the Hispanic World from the 1520s to the 1920s illuminates contemporary issues in international law and international relations. Latin American jurists developed a global critique of economics and international law that continues to generate pressing questions about debt, bankruptcy, reparations, and the pursuit of a moral global economy.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">0d18efe2-cb91-11ef-8fa3-b79c3e836d7d</guid>
      <title>Benjamin Meiches, &quot;The Politics of Annihilation: A Genealogy of Genocide&quot; (U Minnesota Press, 2019)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In <a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/1517905826/?tag=newbooinhis-20" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Politics of Annihilation: A Genealogy of Genocide</em></a> (University of Minnesota Press, 2019),<a href="https://directory.tacoma.uw.edu/employee/bmeiches" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Benjamin Meiches</em></a> takes a novel approach to the study of genocide by analyzing the ways in which ideas, concepts, and understandings about what genocide is and how it is to be prevented have become entrenched politically and intellectually. At the center of this analysis is what Meiches refers to throughout his text as the hegemonic understanding of genocide. Using what Michel Foucault describes as <em>genealogy</em>, Meiches set out to evaluate the process by which the concept of genocide has become intelligible. In doing so, Meiches offers significant evidence in support of many of the emerging critiques of the field of genocide studies. Meiches also inspires reflective and introspective thinking regarding the ways in which genocide scholarship contributes to the maintenance of a hegemonic understanding of genocide.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 7 Jan 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/benjamin-meiches-the-politics-of-annihilation-a-genealogy-of-genocide-u-minnesota-press-2019-teNRtpEh-3JDR5aUk</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In <a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/1517905826/?tag=newbooinhis-20" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Politics of Annihilation: A Genealogy of Genocide</em></a> (University of Minnesota Press, 2019),<a href="https://directory.tacoma.uw.edu/employee/bmeiches" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Benjamin Meiches</em></a> takes a novel approach to the study of genocide by analyzing the ways in which ideas, concepts, and understandings about what genocide is and how it is to be prevented have become entrenched politically and intellectually. At the center of this analysis is what Meiches refers to throughout his text as the hegemonic understanding of genocide. Using what Michel Foucault describes as <em>genealogy</em>, Meiches set out to evaluate the process by which the concept of genocide has become intelligible. In doing so, Meiches offers significant evidence in support of many of the emerging critiques of the field of genocide studies. Meiches also inspires reflective and introspective thinking regarding the ways in which genocide scholarship contributes to the maintenance of a hegemonic understanding of genocide.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="56070195" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/778a6aeb-6b21-4787-abad-520b6d0cf805/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=778a6aeb-6b21-4787-abad-520b6d0cf805&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Benjamin Meiches, &quot;The Politics of Annihilation: A Genealogy of Genocide&quot; (U Minnesota Press, 2019)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:58:24</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In The Politics of Annihilation: A Genealogy of Genocide (University of Minnesota Press, 2019),Benjamin Meiches takes a novel approach to the study of genocide by analyzing the ways in which ideas, concepts, and understandings about what genocide is and how it is to be prevented have become entrenched politically and intellectually. At the center of this analysis is what Meiches refers to throughout his text as the hegemonic understanding of genocide. Using what Michel Foucault describes as genealogy, Meiches set out to evaluate the process by which the concept of genocide has become intelligible. In doing so, Meiches offers significant evidence in support of many of the emerging critiques of the field of genocide studies. Meiches also inspires reflective and introspective thinking regarding the ways in which genocide scholarship contributes to the maintenance of a hegemonic understanding of genocide.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In The Politics of Annihilation: A Genealogy of Genocide (University of Minnesota Press, 2019),Benjamin Meiches takes a novel approach to the study of genocide by analyzing the ways in which ideas, concepts, and understandings about what genocide is and how it is to be prevented have become entrenched politically and intellectually. At the center of this analysis is what Meiches refers to throughout his text as the hegemonic understanding of genocide. Using what Michel Foucault describes as genealogy, Meiches set out to evaluate the process by which the concept of genocide has become intelligible. In doing so, Meiches offers significant evidence in support of many of the emerging critiques of the field of genocide studies. Meiches also inspires reflective and introspective thinking regarding the ways in which genocide scholarship contributes to the maintenance of a hegemonic understanding of genocide.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>94</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">af558a62-c9e9-11ef-8649-fb8a1b4d7fbb</guid>
      <title>Olga Borovaya, &quot;The 1840 Rhodes Blood Libel: Ottoman Jews at the Dawn of the Tanzimat Era&quot; (Berghahn Books, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The Rhodes blood libel of 1840, an outbreak of anti-Jewish violence, was initiated by the island’s governor in collusion with Levantine merchants, who charged the local Jewish community with murdering a Christian boy for ritual purposes. An episode in the shared histories of Ottomans and Jews, it was forgotten by the former and, even if remembered, misunderstood by the latter.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781805396864" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The 1840 Rhodes Blood Libel: Ottoman Jews at the Dawn of the Tanzimat Era</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Berghahn Books, 2024) aims to restore the place of this event in Sephardi and Ottoman history.</p><p>Based on newly discovered Ottoman and Jewish sources it argues that the acquittal of Rhodian Jews is adequately understood only in the context of the Tanzimat and the Sublime Porte’s foreign relations. Contrary to the common view that Ottoman Jews did not experience the impact of the Tanzimat reforms until the mid-1850s, this study shows that their effects were felt as early as 1840. Furthermore, this book offers a window onto life and intercommunal relations in the Eastern Mediterranean during the late Ottoman era.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 5 Jan 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/olga-borovaya-the-1840-rhodes-blood-libel-ottoman-jews-at-the-dawn-of-the-tanzimat-era-berghahn-books-2024-OdGYiWh2</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Rhodes blood libel of 1840, an outbreak of anti-Jewish violence, was initiated by the island’s governor in collusion with Levantine merchants, who charged the local Jewish community with murdering a Christian boy for ritual purposes. An episode in the shared histories of Ottomans and Jews, it was forgotten by the former and, even if remembered, misunderstood by the latter.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781805396864" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The 1840 Rhodes Blood Libel: Ottoman Jews at the Dawn of the Tanzimat Era</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Berghahn Books, 2024) aims to restore the place of this event in Sephardi and Ottoman history.</p><p>Based on newly discovered Ottoman and Jewish sources it argues that the acquittal of Rhodian Jews is adequately understood only in the context of the Tanzimat and the Sublime Porte’s foreign relations. Contrary to the common view that Ottoman Jews did not experience the impact of the Tanzimat reforms until the mid-1850s, this study shows that their effects were felt as early as 1840. Furthermore, this book offers a window onto life and intercommunal relations in the Eastern Mediterranean during the late Ottoman era.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="67427492" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/48d8988f-4b1e-420b-a1ce-799835d4872c/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=48d8988f-4b1e-420b-a1ce-799835d4872c&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Olga Borovaya, &quot;The 1840 Rhodes Blood Libel: Ottoman Jews at the Dawn of the Tanzimat Era&quot; (Berghahn Books, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:10:14</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The Rhodes blood libel of 1840, an outbreak of anti-Jewish violence, was initiated by the island’s governor in collusion with Levantine merchants, who charged the local Jewish community with murdering a Christian boy for ritual purposes. An episode in the shared histories of Ottomans and Jews, it was forgotten by the former and, even if remembered, misunderstood by the latter. The 1840 Rhodes Blood Libel: Ottoman Jews at the Dawn of the Tanzimat Era (Berghahn Books, 2024) aims to restore the place of this event in Sephardi and Ottoman history.
Based on newly discovered Ottoman and Jewish sources it argues that the acquittal of Rhodian Jews is adequately understood only in the context of the Tanzimat and the Sublime Porte’s foreign relations. Contrary to the common view that Ottoman Jews did not experience the impact of the Tanzimat reforms until the mid-1850s, this study shows that their effects were felt as early as 1840. Furthermore, this book offers a window onto life and intercommunal relations in the Eastern Mediterranean during the late Ottoman era.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Rhodes blood libel of 1840, an outbreak of anti-Jewish violence, was initiated by the island’s governor in collusion with Levantine merchants, who charged the local Jewish community with murdering a Christian boy for ritual purposes. An episode in the shared histories of Ottomans and Jews, it was forgotten by the former and, even if remembered, misunderstood by the latter. The 1840 Rhodes Blood Libel: Ottoman Jews at the Dawn of the Tanzimat Era (Berghahn Books, 2024) aims to restore the place of this event in Sephardi and Ottoman history.
Based on newly discovered Ottoman and Jewish sources it argues that the acquittal of Rhodian Jews is adequately understood only in the context of the Tanzimat and the Sublime Porte’s foreign relations. Contrary to the common view that Ottoman Jews did not experience the impact of the Tanzimat reforms until the mid-1850s, this study shows that their effects were felt as early as 1840. Furthermore, this book offers a window onto life and intercommunal relations in the Eastern Mediterranean during the late Ottoman era.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>595</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">f8bcba6e-ca01-11ef-84a0-276707f99a4f</guid>
      <title>Nara Milanich, &quot;Paternity: The Elusive Quest for the Father&quot; (Harvard UP, 2019)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://barnard.edu/profiles/nara-milanich" rel="noopener noreferrer">Nara Milanich</a>’s <a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/0674980689/?tag=newbooinhis-20" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Paternity: The Elusive Quest for the Father</em></a> (Harvard University Press, 2019) explains how fatherhood, long believed to be impossible to know with certainty, became a biological “fact” that could be ascertained with scientific testing. Though the advent of DNA testing might seem to make paternity less elusive, Milanich’s book invites readers to think about paternity not as a biological fact but as a socially-constructed role that has evolved over time. Historically, given assumed paternal uncertainty, fathers were defined in terms of their behavior (acting like a father) or their relationship to a child’s mother (being married to a woman made a man the father of her offspring). In the twentieth century, paternity testing developed as a way to scientifically determine male progenitors, although these new methods never replaced older ways of reckoning paternity. Milanich describes blood tests and other early techniques proffered by doctors and scrutinized by courts as a way to know the “true” father. Paternity testing, she points out, has been used to different ends in different societies: it could identify an errant progenitor or reveal a mother’s liaison. A certain paternity test result could mean economic security for a child or put a person’s life in jeopardy. Moreover, Milanich reveals the uneven application of paternity testing that has tended to protect the most privileged groups in different societies. Paternity is a transatlantic study that moves from South America to Europe and the United States, and its chapters touch upon the histories of science and medicine, gender and the family, and immigration. The podcast features fascinating case studies set in Brazil and Argentina. This book’s reflections on the making of modern paternity speak to our own time, when, for example, the U.S. government is using DNA testing at the border to separate “real” kin from “fictitious” families, as Milanich explains to podcast listeners. The stakes of knowing the father go far beyond determining biological progenitors, and this book vividly reconstructs the political uses and cultural implications of the paternity test.</p><p><em>Rachel Grace Newman is joining Smith College in July 2019 as Lecturer in the History of the Global South. She has a Ph.D. in History from Columbia University, and her dissertation was titled “Transnational Ambitions: Student Migrants and the Making of a National Future in Twentieth-Century Mexico.” She is also the author of a book on a binational program for migrant children whose families divided their time between Michoacán, Mexico and Watsonville, California. She is on Twitter (@rachelgnew).</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 4 Jan 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/nara-milanich-paternity-the-elusive-quest-for-the-father-harvard-up-2019-_hpVrgy_-x_UYFKA2</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://barnard.edu/profiles/nara-milanich" rel="noopener noreferrer">Nara Milanich</a>’s <a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/0674980689/?tag=newbooinhis-20" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Paternity: The Elusive Quest for the Father</em></a> (Harvard University Press, 2019) explains how fatherhood, long believed to be impossible to know with certainty, became a biological “fact” that could be ascertained with scientific testing. Though the advent of DNA testing might seem to make paternity less elusive, Milanich’s book invites readers to think about paternity not as a biological fact but as a socially-constructed role that has evolved over time. Historically, given assumed paternal uncertainty, fathers were defined in terms of their behavior (acting like a father) or their relationship to a child’s mother (being married to a woman made a man the father of her offspring). In the twentieth century, paternity testing developed as a way to scientifically determine male progenitors, although these new methods never replaced older ways of reckoning paternity. Milanich describes blood tests and other early techniques proffered by doctors and scrutinized by courts as a way to know the “true” father. Paternity testing, she points out, has been used to different ends in different societies: it could identify an errant progenitor or reveal a mother’s liaison. A certain paternity test result could mean economic security for a child or put a person’s life in jeopardy. Moreover, Milanich reveals the uneven application of paternity testing that has tended to protect the most privileged groups in different societies. Paternity is a transatlantic study that moves from South America to Europe and the United States, and its chapters touch upon the histories of science and medicine, gender and the family, and immigration. The podcast features fascinating case studies set in Brazil and Argentina. This book’s reflections on the making of modern paternity speak to our own time, when, for example, the U.S. government is using DNA testing at the border to separate “real” kin from “fictitious” families, as Milanich explains to podcast listeners. The stakes of knowing the father go far beyond determining biological progenitors, and this book vividly reconstructs the political uses and cultural implications of the paternity test.</p><p><em>Rachel Grace Newman is joining Smith College in July 2019 as Lecturer in the History of the Global South. She has a Ph.D. in History from Columbia University, and her dissertation was titled “Transnational Ambitions: Student Migrants and the Making of a National Future in Twentieth-Century Mexico.” She is also the author of a book on a binational program for migrant children whose families divided their time between Michoacán, Mexico and Watsonville, California. She is on Twitter (@rachelgnew).</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="64474182" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/c57f8777-e75d-4547-81ae-6811d165e042/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=c57f8777-e75d-4547-81ae-6811d165e042&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Nara Milanich, &quot;Paternity: The Elusive Quest for the Father&quot; (Harvard UP, 2019)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:07:09</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Nara Milanich’s Paternity: The Elusive Quest for the Father (Harvard University Press, 2019) explains how fatherhood, long believed to be impossible to know with certainty, became a biological “fact” that could be ascertained with scientific testing. Though the advent of DNA testing might seem to make paternity less elusive, Milanich’s book invites readers to think about paternity not as a biological fact but as a socially-constructed role that has evolved over time. Historically, given assumed paternal uncertainty, fathers were defined in terms of their behavior (acting like a father) or their relationship to a child’s mother (being married to a woman made a man the father of her offspring). In the twentieth century, paternity testing developed as a way to scientifically determine male progenitors, although these new methods never replaced older ways of reckoning paternity. Milanich describes blood tests and other early techniques proffered by doctors and scrutinized by courts as a way to know the “true” father. Paternity testing, she points out, has been used to different ends in different societies: it could identify an errant progenitor or reveal a mother’s liaison. A certain paternity test result could mean economic security for a child or put a person’s life in jeopardy. Moreover, Milanich reveals the uneven application of paternity testing that has tended to protect the most privileged groups in different societies. Paternity is a transatlantic study that moves from South America to Europe and the United States, and its chapters touch upon the histories of science and medicine, gender and the family, and immigration. The podcast features fascinating case studies set in Brazil and Argentina. This book’s reflections on the making of modern paternity speak to our own time, when, for example, the U.S. government is using DNA testing at the border to separate “real” kin from “fictitious” families, as Milanich explains to podcast listeners. The stakes of knowing the father go far beyond determining biological progenitors, and this book vividly reconstructs the political uses and cultural implications of the paternity test.
Rachel Grace Newman is joining Smith College in July 2019 as Lecturer in the History of the Global South. She has a Ph.D. in History from Columbia University, and her dissertation was titled “Transnational Ambitions: Student Migrants and the Making of a National Future in Twentieth-Century Mexico.” She is also the author of a book on a binational program for migrant children whose families divided their time between Michoacán, Mexico and Watsonville, California. She is on Twitter (@rachelgnew).
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Nara Milanich’s Paternity: The Elusive Quest for the Father (Harvard University Press, 2019) explains how fatherhood, long believed to be impossible to know with certainty, became a biological “fact” that could be ascertained with scientific testing. Though the advent of DNA testing might seem to make paternity less elusive, Milanich’s book invites readers to think about paternity not as a biological fact but as a socially-constructed role that has evolved over time. Historically, given assumed paternal uncertainty, fathers were defined in terms of their behavior (acting like a father) or their relationship to a child’s mother (being married to a woman made a man the father of her offspring). In the twentieth century, paternity testing developed as a way to scientifically determine male progenitors, although these new methods never replaced older ways of reckoning paternity. Milanich describes blood tests and other early techniques proffered by doctors and scrutinized by courts as a way to know the “true” father. Paternity testing, she points out, has been used to different ends in different societies: it could identify an errant progenitor or reveal a mother’s liaison. A certain paternity test result could mean economic security for a child or put a person’s life in jeopardy. Moreover, Milanich reveals the uneven application of paternity testing that has tended to protect the most privileged groups in different societies. Paternity is a transatlantic study that moves from South America to Europe and the United States, and its chapters touch upon the histories of science and medicine, gender and the family, and immigration. The podcast features fascinating case studies set in Brazil and Argentina. This book’s reflections on the making of modern paternity speak to our own time, when, for example, the U.S. government is using DNA testing at the border to separate “real” kin from “fictitious” families, as Milanich explains to podcast listeners. The stakes of knowing the father go far beyond determining biological progenitors, and this book vividly reconstructs the political uses and cultural implications of the paternity test.
Rachel Grace Newman is joining Smith College in July 2019 as Lecturer in the History of the Global South. She has a Ph.D. in History from Columbia University, and her dissertation was titled “Transnational Ambitions: Student Migrants and the Making of a National Future in Twentieth-Century Mexico.” She is also the author of a book on a binational program for migrant children whose families divided their time between Michoacán, Mexico and Watsonville, California. She is on Twitter (@rachelgnew).
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>44</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">c69ba6aa-c937-11ef-a9a7-e7dcb592c2c1</guid>
      <title>Benjamin T. Smith, &quot;The Dope: The Real History of the Mexican Drug Trade&quot; (W. W. Norton, 2021)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>For over a century Mexico has been embroiled in a drug war dictated by the demands of their neighbor to the north. In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781324006558" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Dope: The Real History of the Mexican Drug Trade</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(W. W. Norton, 2021), Benjamin T. Smith offers a history of the trade and its effects upon the people of Mexico. As he reveals, at the start of the 20th&nbsp;century drugs such as marijuana and opium were largely on the margins of Mexican society, used mainly by soldiers, prisoners, and immigrants. The association of marijuana with a bohemian subculture in the early 1920s prompted the first punitive laws against it, while the use of opium by Chinese immigrants led Mexican officials to target the drug as a means to arrest the country’s Chinese population.</p><p>Yet the drug trade thrived thanks to the growing demand for marijuana and heroin in the United States. In response, American officials pressured their Mexican counterparts to end drug production and distribution in their country, even to the point of ending the effort to provide heroin in a regulated way for the country’s relatively small population of heroin addicts. Yet these efforts often foundered on the economic factors involved, with many government officials protecting the trade either for personal profit or for the financial benefits the trade provided to their states. This trade only grew in the postwar era, as the explosion of drug use in the 1960s and the crackdown on the European heroin trade made Mexico an increasingly important supplier of narcotics to the United States. The vast profits to be made from this changed the nature of the trade from small-scale family-managed operations to much more complex organizations that increasingly employed violence to ensure their share of it. As Smith details, the consequences of this have proven enormously detrimental both to the Mexican state and to the Mexican people.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 3 Jan 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/benjamin-t-smith-the-dope-the-real-history-of-the-mexican-drug-trade-w-w-norton-2021-eVYWkYA8-pjTrg1_o</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For over a century Mexico has been embroiled in a drug war dictated by the demands of their neighbor to the north. In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781324006558" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Dope: The Real History of the Mexican Drug Trade</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(W. W. Norton, 2021), Benjamin T. Smith offers a history of the trade and its effects upon the people of Mexico. As he reveals, at the start of the 20th&nbsp;century drugs such as marijuana and opium were largely on the margins of Mexican society, used mainly by soldiers, prisoners, and immigrants. The association of marijuana with a bohemian subculture in the early 1920s prompted the first punitive laws against it, while the use of opium by Chinese immigrants led Mexican officials to target the drug as a means to arrest the country’s Chinese population.</p><p>Yet the drug trade thrived thanks to the growing demand for marijuana and heroin in the United States. In response, American officials pressured their Mexican counterparts to end drug production and distribution in their country, even to the point of ending the effort to provide heroin in a regulated way for the country’s relatively small population of heroin addicts. Yet these efforts often foundered on the economic factors involved, with many government officials protecting the trade either for personal profit or for the financial benefits the trade provided to their states. This trade only grew in the postwar era, as the explosion of drug use in the 1960s and the crackdown on the European heroin trade made Mexico an increasingly important supplier of narcotics to the United States. The vast profits to be made from this changed the nature of the trade from small-scale family-managed operations to much more complex organizations that increasingly employed violence to ensure their share of it. As Smith details, the consequences of this have proven enormously detrimental both to the Mexican state and to the Mexican people.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="39289447" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/1e57ae84-bad8-4f55-9b35-5737e78466bc/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=1e57ae84-bad8-4f55-9b35-5737e78466bc&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Benjamin T. Smith, &quot;The Dope: The Real History of the Mexican Drug Trade&quot; (W. W. Norton, 2021)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:40:54</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>For over a century Mexico has been embroiled in a drug war dictated by the demands of their neighbor to the north. In The Dope: The Real History of the Mexican Drug Trade (W. W. Norton, 2021), Benjamin T. Smith offers a history of the trade and its effects upon the people of Mexico. As he reveals, at the start of the 20th century drugs such as marijuana and opium were largely on the margins of Mexican society, used mainly by soldiers, prisoners, and immigrants. The association of marijuana with a bohemian subculture in the early 1920s prompted the first punitive laws against it, while the use of opium by Chinese immigrants led Mexican officials to target the drug as a means to arrest the country’s Chinese population.
Yet the drug trade thrived thanks to the growing demand for marijuana and heroin in the United States. In response, American officials pressured their Mexican counterparts to end drug production and distribution in their country, even to the point of ending the effort to provide heroin in a regulated way for the country’s relatively small population of heroin addicts. Yet these efforts often foundered on the economic factors involved, with many government officials protecting the trade either for personal profit or for the financial benefits the trade provided to their states. This trade only grew in the postwar era, as the explosion of drug use in the 1960s and the crackdown on the European heroin trade made Mexico an increasingly important supplier of narcotics to the United States. The vast profits to be made from this changed the nature of the trade from small-scale family-managed operations to much more complex organizations that increasingly employed violence to ensure their share of it. As Smith details, the consequences of this have proven enormously detrimental both to the Mexican state and to the Mexican people.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>For over a century Mexico has been embroiled in a drug war dictated by the demands of their neighbor to the north. In The Dope: The Real History of the Mexican Drug Trade (W. W. Norton, 2021), Benjamin T. Smith offers a history of the trade and its effects upon the people of Mexico. As he reveals, at the start of the 20th century drugs such as marijuana and opium were largely on the margins of Mexican society, used mainly by soldiers, prisoners, and immigrants. The association of marijuana with a bohemian subculture in the early 1920s prompted the first punitive laws against it, while the use of opium by Chinese immigrants led Mexican officials to target the drug as a means to arrest the country’s Chinese population.
Yet the drug trade thrived thanks to the growing demand for marijuana and heroin in the United States. In response, American officials pressured their Mexican counterparts to end drug production and distribution in their country, even to the point of ending the effort to provide heroin in a regulated way for the country’s relatively small population of heroin addicts. Yet these efforts often foundered on the economic factors involved, with many government officials protecting the trade either for personal profit or for the financial benefits the trade provided to their states. This trade only grew in the postwar era, as the explosion of drug use in the 1960s and the crackdown on the European heroin trade made Mexico an increasingly important supplier of narcotics to the United States. The vast profits to be made from this changed the nature of the trade from small-scale family-managed operations to much more complex organizations that increasingly employed violence to ensure their share of it. As Smith details, the consequences of this have proven enormously detrimental both to the Mexican state and to the Mexican people.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1041</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">b6091c30-c939-11ef-bc4e-7b5e1ae53588</guid>
      <title>Swethaa S. Ballakrishnen, &quot;Accidental Feminism: Gender Parity and Selective Mobility Among India’s Professional Elite&quot; (Princeton UP, 2021)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In India, elite law firms offer a surprising oasis for women within a hostile, predominantly male industry. Less than 10 percent of the country's lawyers are female, but women in the most prestigious firms are significantly represented both at entry and partnership. Elite workspaces are notorious for being unfriendly to new actors, so what allows for aberration in certain workspaces?</p><p>Drawing from observations and interviews with more than 130 elite professionals,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691182537" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Accidental Feminism: Gender Parity and Selective Mobility Among India’s Professional Elite</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Princeton UP, 2021) examines how a range of underlying mechanisms-gendered socialization and essentialism, family structures and dynamics, and firm and regulatory histories-afford certain professionals egalitarian outcomes that are not available to their local and global peers. Juxtaposing findings on the legal profession with those on elite consulting firms, Swethaa Ballakrishnen reveals that parity arises not from a commitment to create feminist organizations, but from structural factors that incidentally come together to do gender differently. Simultaneously, their research offers notes of caution: while conditional convergence may create equality in ways that more targeted endeavors fail to achieve, "accidental" developments are hard to replicate, and are, in this case, buttressed by embedded inequalities. Ballakrishnen examines whether gender parity produced without institutional sanction should still be considered feminist.</p><p>In offering new ways to think about equality movements and outcomes,&nbsp;<em>Accidental Feminism&nbsp;</em>forces readers to critically consider the work of intention in progress narratives.</p><p><a href="https://noopur.xyz/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Noopur Raval</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a postdoctoral researcher working at the intersection of Information Studies, STS, Media Studies and Anthropology.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 3 Jan 2025 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/swethaa-s-ballakrishnen-accidental-feminism-gender-parity-and-selective-mobility-among-indias-professional-elite-princeton-up-2021-qrAOPIu2-Md8eYz7X</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In India, elite law firms offer a surprising oasis for women within a hostile, predominantly male industry. Less than 10 percent of the country's lawyers are female, but women in the most prestigious firms are significantly represented both at entry and partnership. Elite workspaces are notorious for being unfriendly to new actors, so what allows for aberration in certain workspaces?</p><p>Drawing from observations and interviews with more than 130 elite professionals,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691182537" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Accidental Feminism: Gender Parity and Selective Mobility Among India’s Professional Elite</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Princeton UP, 2021) examines how a range of underlying mechanisms-gendered socialization and essentialism, family structures and dynamics, and firm and regulatory histories-afford certain professionals egalitarian outcomes that are not available to their local and global peers. Juxtaposing findings on the legal profession with those on elite consulting firms, Swethaa Ballakrishnen reveals that parity arises not from a commitment to create feminist organizations, but from structural factors that incidentally come together to do gender differently. Simultaneously, their research offers notes of caution: while conditional convergence may create equality in ways that more targeted endeavors fail to achieve, "accidental" developments are hard to replicate, and are, in this case, buttressed by embedded inequalities. Ballakrishnen examines whether gender parity produced without institutional sanction should still be considered feminist.</p><p>In offering new ways to think about equality movements and outcomes,&nbsp;<em>Accidental Feminism&nbsp;</em>forces readers to critically consider the work of intention in progress narratives.</p><p><a href="https://noopur.xyz/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Noopur Raval</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a postdoctoral researcher working at the intersection of Information Studies, STS, Media Studies and Anthropology.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="62063863" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/651dee77-e069-44e9-866b-527ff05509c9/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=651dee77-e069-44e9-866b-527ff05509c9&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Swethaa S. Ballakrishnen, &quot;Accidental Feminism: Gender Parity and Selective Mobility Among India’s Professional Elite&quot; (Princeton UP, 2021)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:04:36</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In India, elite law firms offer a surprising oasis for women within a hostile, predominantly male industry. Less than 10 percent of the country&apos;s lawyers are female, but women in the most prestigious firms are significantly represented both at entry and partnership. Elite workspaces are notorious for being unfriendly to new actors, so what allows for aberration in certain workspaces?
Drawing from observations and interviews with more than 130 elite professionals, Accidental Feminism: Gender Parity and Selective Mobility Among India’s Professional Elite (Princeton UP, 2021) examines how a range of underlying mechanisms-gendered socialization and essentialism, family structures and dynamics, and firm and regulatory histories-afford certain professionals egalitarian outcomes that are not available to their local and global peers. Juxtaposing findings on the legal profession with those on elite consulting firms, Swethaa Ballakrishnen reveals that parity arises not from a commitment to create feminist organizations, but from structural factors that incidentally come together to do gender differently. Simultaneously, their research offers notes of caution: while conditional convergence may create equality in ways that more targeted endeavors fail to achieve, &quot;accidental&quot; developments are hard to replicate, and are, in this case, buttressed by embedded inequalities. Ballakrishnen examines whether gender parity produced without institutional sanction should still be considered feminist.
In offering new ways to think about equality movements and outcomes, Accidental Feminism forces readers to critically consider the work of intention in progress narratives.
Noopur Raval is a postdoctoral researcher working at the intersection of Information Studies, STS, Media Studies and Anthropology.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In India, elite law firms offer a surprising oasis for women within a hostile, predominantly male industry. Less than 10 percent of the country&apos;s lawyers are female, but women in the most prestigious firms are significantly represented both at entry and partnership. Elite workspaces are notorious for being unfriendly to new actors, so what allows for aberration in certain workspaces?
Drawing from observations and interviews with more than 130 elite professionals, Accidental Feminism: Gender Parity and Selective Mobility Among India’s Professional Elite (Princeton UP, 2021) examines how a range of underlying mechanisms-gendered socialization and essentialism, family structures and dynamics, and firm and regulatory histories-afford certain professionals egalitarian outcomes that are not available to their local and global peers. Juxtaposing findings on the legal profession with those on elite consulting firms, Swethaa Ballakrishnen reveals that parity arises not from a commitment to create feminist organizations, but from structural factors that incidentally come together to do gender differently. Simultaneously, their research offers notes of caution: while conditional convergence may create equality in ways that more targeted endeavors fail to achieve, &quot;accidental&quot; developments are hard to replicate, and are, in this case, buttressed by embedded inequalities. Ballakrishnen examines whether gender parity produced without institutional sanction should still be considered feminist.
In offering new ways to think about equality movements and outcomes, Accidental Feminism forces readers to critically consider the work of intention in progress narratives.
Noopur Raval is a postdoctoral researcher working at the intersection of Information Studies, STS, Media Studies and Anthropology.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>123</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">c8d0f0e8-c210-11ef-a587-13729c548048</guid>
      <title>Language Rights in a Changing China</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In this episode of the&nbsp;<em>Language on the Move</em>&nbsp;Podcast,&nbsp;<a href="https://researchers.mq.edu.au/en/persons/brynn-quick" rel="noopener noreferrer">Brynn Quick</a>&nbsp;speaks with&nbsp;<a href="https://profiles.uts.edu.au/Alexandra.Grey" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. Alexandra Grey</a>&nbsp;about Dr. Grey’s book entitled&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781501517747" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Language Rights in a Changing China: A National Overview and Zhuang Case Study</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(De Gruyter, 2021).</p><p>China has had constitutional minority language rights for decades, but what do they mean today? Answering with nuance and empirical detail, this book examines the rights through a sociolinguistic study of Zhuang, the language of China’s largest minority group. The analysis traces language policy from the Constitution to local government practices, investigating how Zhuang language rights are experienced as opening or restricting socioeconomic opportunity. The study finds that language rights do not challenge ascendant marketised and mobility-focused language ideologies which ascribe low value to Zhuang. However, people still value a Zhuang identity validated by government policy and practice.</p><p>Rooted in a Bourdieusian approach to language, power and legal discourse, this is the first major publication to integrate contemporary debates in linguistics about mobility, capitalism and globalization into a study of China’s language policy.</p><p>This book came out in May 2021 after almost a decade of Alex’s doctoral and postdoctoral work. Her doctoral dissertation was recognised as the best dissertation on the sociology of language, internationally, through the 2018 Joshua A. Fishman Award.</p><p>For additional resources, show notes, and transcripts, go&nbsp;<a href="https://www.languageonthemove.com/podcast/" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Dec 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/language-rights-in-a-changing-china-2vIGph3p</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this episode of the&nbsp;<em>Language on the Move</em>&nbsp;Podcast,&nbsp;<a href="https://researchers.mq.edu.au/en/persons/brynn-quick" rel="noopener noreferrer">Brynn Quick</a>&nbsp;speaks with&nbsp;<a href="https://profiles.uts.edu.au/Alexandra.Grey" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. Alexandra Grey</a>&nbsp;about Dr. Grey’s book entitled&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781501517747" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Language Rights in a Changing China: A National Overview and Zhuang Case Study</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(De Gruyter, 2021).</p><p>China has had constitutional minority language rights for decades, but what do they mean today? Answering with nuance and empirical detail, this book examines the rights through a sociolinguistic study of Zhuang, the language of China’s largest minority group. The analysis traces language policy from the Constitution to local government practices, investigating how Zhuang language rights are experienced as opening or restricting socioeconomic opportunity. The study finds that language rights do not challenge ascendant marketised and mobility-focused language ideologies which ascribe low value to Zhuang. However, people still value a Zhuang identity validated by government policy and practice.</p><p>Rooted in a Bourdieusian approach to language, power and legal discourse, this is the first major publication to integrate contemporary debates in linguistics about mobility, capitalism and globalization into a study of China’s language policy.</p><p>This book came out in May 2021 after almost a decade of Alex’s doctoral and postdoctoral work. Her doctoral dissertation was recognised as the best dissertation on the sociology of language, internationally, through the 2018 Joshua A. Fishman Award.</p><p>For additional resources, show notes, and transcripts, go&nbsp;<a href="https://www.languageonthemove.com/podcast/" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="32424378" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/6db03044-59e5-4152-93d0-c40215986025/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=6db03044-59e5-4152-93d0-c40215986025&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Language Rights in a Changing China</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:33:46</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this episode of the Language on the Move Podcast, Brynn Quick speaks with Dr. Alexandra Grey about Dr. Grey’s book entitled Language Rights in a Changing China: A National Overview and Zhuang Case Study (De Gruyter, 2021).
China has had constitutional minority language rights for decades, but what do they mean today? Answering with nuance and empirical detail, this book examines the rights through a sociolinguistic study of Zhuang, the language of China’s largest minority group. The analysis traces language policy from the Constitution to local government practices, investigating how Zhuang language rights are experienced as opening or restricting socioeconomic opportunity. The study finds that language rights do not challenge ascendant marketised and mobility-focused language ideologies which ascribe low value to Zhuang. However, people still value a Zhuang identity validated by government policy and practice.
Rooted in a Bourdieusian approach to language, power and legal discourse, this is the first major publication to integrate contemporary debates in linguistics about mobility, capitalism and globalization into a study of China’s language policy.
This book came out in May 2021 after almost a decade of Alex’s doctoral and postdoctoral work. Her doctoral dissertation was recognised as the best dissertation on the sociology of language, internationally, through the 2018 Joshua A. Fishman Award.
For additional resources, show notes, and transcripts, go here.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode of the Language on the Move Podcast, Brynn Quick speaks with Dr. Alexandra Grey about Dr. Grey’s book entitled Language Rights in a Changing China: A National Overview and Zhuang Case Study (De Gruyter, 2021).
China has had constitutional minority language rights for decades, but what do they mean today? Answering with nuance and empirical detail, this book examines the rights through a sociolinguistic study of Zhuang, the language of China’s largest minority group. The analysis traces language policy from the Constitution to local government practices, investigating how Zhuang language rights are experienced as opening or restricting socioeconomic opportunity. The study finds that language rights do not challenge ascendant marketised and mobility-focused language ideologies which ascribe low value to Zhuang. However, people still value a Zhuang identity validated by government policy and practice.
Rooted in a Bourdieusian approach to language, power and legal discourse, this is the first major publication to integrate contemporary debates in linguistics about mobility, capitalism and globalization into a study of China’s language policy.
This book came out in May 2021 after almost a decade of Alex’s doctoral and postdoctoral work. Her doctoral dissertation was recognised as the best dissertation on the sociology of language, internationally, through the 2018 Joshua A. Fishman Award.
For additional resources, show notes, and transcripts, go here.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>39</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2eb85520-c47f-11ef-93eb-e3e7e7f16b46</guid>
      <title>Oishik Sircar, &quot;Ways of Remembering: Law, Cinema and Collective Memory in the New India&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781316512814" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Ways of Remembering: Law, Cinema and Collective Memory in the New India&nbsp;</em></a>(Cambridge UP, 2024) tells a story about the relationship between secular law and religious violence by studying the memorialisation of the 2002 Gujarat pogrom--postcolonial India's most litigated and mediatized event of anti-Muslim mass violence. By reading judgments and films on the pogrom through a novel interpretive framework, the book argues that the shared narrative of law and cinema engenders ways of remembering the pogrom in which the rationality of secular law offers a resolution to the irrationality of religious violence. In the public's collective memory, the force of this rationality simultaneously condemns and normalises violence against Muslims while exonerating secular law from its role in enabling the pogrom, thus keeping the violent (legal) order against India's Muslim citizens intact. The book contends that in foregrounding law's aesthetic dimensions we see the discursive ways in which secular law organizes violence and presents itself as the panacea for that very violence.</p><p><strong>About the Author:</strong>&nbsp;Oishik Sircar is a Senior Lecturer at the Melbourne Law School. He was previously the Professor of Law at Jindal Global Law School. His work maps the relationship between law, violence and aesthetics with a particular focus on contemporary India. Along with&nbsp;<em>Ways of Remembering: Law, Cinema and Collective Violence in the New India</em>&nbsp;(CUP 2024), he is the author of&nbsp;<em>Violent Modernities: Cultural Lives of Law in the New India</em>&nbsp;(OUP 2021) and the co-director of the award-winning documentary film&nbsp;<em>We Are Foot Soldiers</em>&nbsp;(PSBT 2010).</p><p><strong>Priyam Sinha</strong>&nbsp;recently graduated with a PhD from the National University of Singapore and has been awarded the Alexander Von Humboldt Postdoctoral Fellowship, starting 2025. She has interdisciplinary academic interests that lie at the intersection of film studies, critical new media industry studies, disability studies, affect studies, gender studies, and cultural studies. She can be reached at&nbsp;<a href="https://twitter.com/PriyamSinha" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://twitter.com/PriyamSinha</a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 29 Dec 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/oishik-sircar-ways-of-remembering-law-cinema-and-collective-memory-in-the-new-india-cambridge-up-2024-vOesgc5K</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781316512814" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Ways of Remembering: Law, Cinema and Collective Memory in the New India&nbsp;</em></a>(Cambridge UP, 2024) tells a story about the relationship between secular law and religious violence by studying the memorialisation of the 2002 Gujarat pogrom--postcolonial India's most litigated and mediatized event of anti-Muslim mass violence. By reading judgments and films on the pogrom through a novel interpretive framework, the book argues that the shared narrative of law and cinema engenders ways of remembering the pogrom in which the rationality of secular law offers a resolution to the irrationality of religious violence. In the public's collective memory, the force of this rationality simultaneously condemns and normalises violence against Muslims while exonerating secular law from its role in enabling the pogrom, thus keeping the violent (legal) order against India's Muslim citizens intact. The book contends that in foregrounding law's aesthetic dimensions we see the discursive ways in which secular law organizes violence and presents itself as the panacea for that very violence.</p><p><strong>About the Author:</strong>&nbsp;Oishik Sircar is a Senior Lecturer at the Melbourne Law School. He was previously the Professor of Law at Jindal Global Law School. His work maps the relationship between law, violence and aesthetics with a particular focus on contemporary India. Along with&nbsp;<em>Ways of Remembering: Law, Cinema and Collective Violence in the New India</em>&nbsp;(CUP 2024), he is the author of&nbsp;<em>Violent Modernities: Cultural Lives of Law in the New India</em>&nbsp;(OUP 2021) and the co-director of the award-winning documentary film&nbsp;<em>We Are Foot Soldiers</em>&nbsp;(PSBT 2010).</p><p><strong>Priyam Sinha</strong>&nbsp;recently graduated with a PhD from the National University of Singapore and has been awarded the Alexander Von Humboldt Postdoctoral Fellowship, starting 2025. She has interdisciplinary academic interests that lie at the intersection of film studies, critical new media industry studies, disability studies, affect studies, gender studies, and cultural studies. She can be reached at&nbsp;<a href="https://twitter.com/PriyamSinha" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://twitter.com/PriyamSinha</a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="82834140" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/ce4a32af-848d-4abe-8880-fe0f2ae109d4/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=ce4a32af-848d-4abe-8880-fe0f2ae109d4&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Oishik Sircar, &quot;Ways of Remembering: Law, Cinema and Collective Memory in the New India&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:26:16</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Ways of Remembering: Law, Cinema and Collective Memory in the New India (Cambridge UP, 2024) tells a story about the relationship between secular law and religious violence by studying the memorialisation of the 2002 Gujarat pogrom--postcolonial India&apos;s most litigated and mediatized event of anti-Muslim mass violence. By reading judgments and films on the pogrom through a novel interpretive framework, the book argues that the shared narrative of law and cinema engenders ways of remembering the pogrom in which the rationality of secular law offers a resolution to the irrationality of religious violence. In the public&apos;s collective memory, the force of this rationality simultaneously condemns and normalises violence against Muslims while exonerating secular law from its role in enabling the pogrom, thus keeping the violent (legal) order against India&apos;s Muslim citizens intact. The book contends that in foregrounding law&apos;s aesthetic dimensions we see the discursive ways in which secular law organizes violence and presents itself as the panacea for that very violence.
About the Author: Oishik Sircar is a Senior Lecturer at the Melbourne Law School. He was previously the Professor of Law at Jindal Global Law School. His work maps the relationship between law, violence and aesthetics with a particular focus on contemporary India. Along with Ways of Remembering: Law, Cinema and Collective Violence in the New India (CUP 2024), he is the author of Violent Modernities: Cultural Lives of Law in the New India (OUP 2021) and the co-director of the award-winning documentary film We Are Foot Soldiers (PSBT 2010).
Priyam Sinha recently graduated with a PhD from the National University of Singapore and has been awarded the Alexander Von Humboldt Postdoctoral Fellowship, starting 2025. She has interdisciplinary academic interests that lie at the intersection of film studies, critical new media industry studies, disability studies, affect studies, gender studies, and cultural studies. She can be reached at https://twitter.com/PriyamSinha
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Ways of Remembering: Law, Cinema and Collective Memory in the New India (Cambridge UP, 2024) tells a story about the relationship between secular law and religious violence by studying the memorialisation of the 2002 Gujarat pogrom--postcolonial India&apos;s most litigated and mediatized event of anti-Muslim mass violence. By reading judgments and films on the pogrom through a novel interpretive framework, the book argues that the shared narrative of law and cinema engenders ways of remembering the pogrom in which the rationality of secular law offers a resolution to the irrationality of religious violence. In the public&apos;s collective memory, the force of this rationality simultaneously condemns and normalises violence against Muslims while exonerating secular law from its role in enabling the pogrom, thus keeping the violent (legal) order against India&apos;s Muslim citizens intact. The book contends that in foregrounding law&apos;s aesthetic dimensions we see the discursive ways in which secular law organizes violence and presents itself as the panacea for that very violence.
About the Author: Oishik Sircar is a Senior Lecturer at the Melbourne Law School. He was previously the Professor of Law at Jindal Global Law School. His work maps the relationship between law, violence and aesthetics with a particular focus on contemporary India. Along with Ways of Remembering: Law, Cinema and Collective Violence in the New India (CUP 2024), he is the author of Violent Modernities: Cultural Lives of Law in the New India (OUP 2021) and the co-director of the award-winning documentary film We Are Foot Soldiers (PSBT 2010).
Priyam Sinha recently graduated with a PhD from the National University of Singapore and has been awarded the Alexander Von Humboldt Postdoctoral Fellowship, starting 2025. She has interdisciplinary academic interests that lie at the intersection of film studies, critical new media industry studies, disability studies, affect studies, gender studies, and cultural studies. She can be reached at https://twitter.com/PriyamSinha
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>258</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3cd6d818-c482-11ef-a7a3-9f3061bb44de</guid>
      <title>Radha Kumar, &quot;Police Matters: The Everyday State and Caste Politics in South India, 1900–1975&quot; (Cornell UP, 2021)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781501761065" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Police Matters: The Everyday State and Caste Politics in South India, 1900–1975</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Cornell UP, 2021) moves beyond the city to examine the intertwined nature of police and caste in the Tamil countryside. Radha Kumar argues that the colonial police deployed rigid notions of caste in their everyday tasks, refashioning rural identities in a process that has cast long postcolonial shadows.</p><p>Kumar draws on previously unexplored police archives to enter the dusty streets and market squares where local constables walked, following their gaze and observing their actions towards potential subversives. Station records present a textured view of ordinary interactions between police and society, showing that state coercion was not only exceptional and spectacular; it was also subtle and continuous, woven into everyday life. The colonial police categorized Indian subjects based on caste to ensure the security of agriculture and trade, and thus the smooth running of the economy. Among policemen and among the objects of their coercive gaze, caste became a particularly salient form of identity in the politics of public spaces.&nbsp;<em>Police Matters&nbsp;</em>demonstrates that, without doubt, modern caste politics have both been shaped by, and shaped, state policing.&nbsp;</p><p>Radha Kumar is Assistant Professor of History at the Maxwell School in Syracuse University. Dr. Kumar holds a PhD in History from Princeton University, where she specialized in Modern South Asian Studies. She has conducted archival research in a range of cities including Madurai, Tirunelveli, Bangalore, Chennai, Delhi, and London, and was supported by the History Department at Princeton University and by the Princeton Institute for International and Regional Studies.</p><p><a href="https://in.linkedin.com/in/sohini-chatterjee-763b39110" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Sohini Chatterjee</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a PhD Student in Gender, Sexuality, and Women's Studies at Western University, Canada. Her work has recently appeared in South Asian Popular Culture and Fat Studies.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 28 Dec 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/radha-kumar-police-matters-the-everyday-state-and-caste-politics-in-south-india-19001975-cornell-up-2021-BVz4_HTd-N57tOIFx</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781501761065" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Police Matters: The Everyday State and Caste Politics in South India, 1900–1975</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Cornell UP, 2021) moves beyond the city to examine the intertwined nature of police and caste in the Tamil countryside. Radha Kumar argues that the colonial police deployed rigid notions of caste in their everyday tasks, refashioning rural identities in a process that has cast long postcolonial shadows.</p><p>Kumar draws on previously unexplored police archives to enter the dusty streets and market squares where local constables walked, following their gaze and observing their actions towards potential subversives. Station records present a textured view of ordinary interactions between police and society, showing that state coercion was not only exceptional and spectacular; it was also subtle and continuous, woven into everyday life. The colonial police categorized Indian subjects based on caste to ensure the security of agriculture and trade, and thus the smooth running of the economy. Among policemen and among the objects of their coercive gaze, caste became a particularly salient form of identity in the politics of public spaces.&nbsp;<em>Police Matters&nbsp;</em>demonstrates that, without doubt, modern caste politics have both been shaped by, and shaped, state policing.&nbsp;</p><p>Radha Kumar is Assistant Professor of History at the Maxwell School in Syracuse University. Dr. Kumar holds a PhD in History from Princeton University, where she specialized in Modern South Asian Studies. She has conducted archival research in a range of cities including Madurai, Tirunelveli, Bangalore, Chennai, Delhi, and London, and was supported by the History Department at Princeton University and by the Princeton Institute for International and Regional Studies.</p><p><a href="https://in.linkedin.com/in/sohini-chatterjee-763b39110" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Sohini Chatterjee</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a PhD Student in Gender, Sexuality, and Women's Studies at Western University, Canada. Her work has recently appeared in South Asian Popular Culture and Fat Studies.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="57363592" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/71328816-6d6c-4469-9109-449a3a2210ff/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=71328816-6d6c-4469-9109-449a3a2210ff&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Radha Kumar, &quot;Police Matters: The Everyday State and Caste Politics in South India, 1900–1975&quot; (Cornell UP, 2021)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:59:42</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Police Matters: The Everyday State and Caste Politics in South India, 1900–1975 (Cornell UP, 2021) moves beyond the city to examine the intertwined nature of police and caste in the Tamil countryside. Radha Kumar argues that the colonial police deployed rigid notions of caste in their everyday tasks, refashioning rural identities in a process that has cast long postcolonial shadows.
Kumar draws on previously unexplored police archives to enter the dusty streets and market squares where local constables walked, following their gaze and observing their actions towards potential subversives. Station records present a textured view of ordinary interactions between police and society, showing that state coercion was not only exceptional and spectacular; it was also subtle and continuous, woven into everyday life. The colonial police categorized Indian subjects based on caste to ensure the security of agriculture and trade, and thus the smooth running of the economy. Among policemen and among the objects of their coercive gaze, caste became a particularly salient form of identity in the politics of public spaces. Police Matters demonstrates that, without doubt, modern caste politics have both been shaped by, and shaped, state policing. 
Radha Kumar is Assistant Professor of History at the Maxwell School in Syracuse University. Dr. Kumar holds a PhD in History from Princeton University, where she specialized in Modern South Asian Studies. She has conducted archival research in a range of cities including Madurai, Tirunelveli, Bangalore, Chennai, Delhi, and London, and was supported by the History Department at Princeton University and by the Princeton Institute for International and Regional Studies.
Sohini Chatterjee is a PhD Student in Gender, Sexuality, and Women&apos;s Studies at Western University, Canada. Her work has recently appeared in South Asian Popular Culture and Fat Studies.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Police Matters: The Everyday State and Caste Politics in South India, 1900–1975 (Cornell UP, 2021) moves beyond the city to examine the intertwined nature of police and caste in the Tamil countryside. Radha Kumar argues that the colonial police deployed rigid notions of caste in their everyday tasks, refashioning rural identities in a process that has cast long postcolonial shadows.
Kumar draws on previously unexplored police archives to enter the dusty streets and market squares where local constables walked, following their gaze and observing their actions towards potential subversives. Station records present a textured view of ordinary interactions between police and society, showing that state coercion was not only exceptional and spectacular; it was also subtle and continuous, woven into everyday life. The colonial police categorized Indian subjects based on caste to ensure the security of agriculture and trade, and thus the smooth running of the economy. Among policemen and among the objects of their coercive gaze, caste became a particularly salient form of identity in the politics of public spaces. Police Matters demonstrates that, without doubt, modern caste politics have both been shaped by, and shaped, state policing. 
Radha Kumar is Assistant Professor of History at the Maxwell School in Syracuse University. Dr. Kumar holds a PhD in History from Princeton University, where she specialized in Modern South Asian Studies. She has conducted archival research in a range of cities including Madurai, Tirunelveli, Bangalore, Chennai, Delhi, and London, and was supported by the History Department at Princeton University and by the Princeton Institute for International and Regional Studies.
Sohini Chatterjee is a PhD Student in Gender, Sexuality, and Women&apos;s Studies at Western University, Canada. Her work has recently appeared in South Asian Popular Culture and Fat Studies.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>133</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">a749df62-bd6e-11ef-addd-3b68910fa731</guid>
      <title>Julien Mailland, &quot;The Game That Never Ends: How Lawyers Shape the Videogame Industry&quot; (MIT Press, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>A guide to the fascinating legal history of the videogame industry, written for nonlawyers.&nbsp;</p><p>Why did a judge recall FIFA 15, a nonviolent soccer game, from French shelves in 2014? Why was Vodka Drunkenski, a character in Nintendo-Japan’s Punch-Out!, renamed Soda Popinski in the US and then in Western Europe, where the pun made no sense? Why was a Dutch-American company barred by US courts from distributing a clone of Pac-Man?&nbsp;</p><p>Julien Mailland answers all these questions and more in&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780262549394" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Game That Never Ends: How Lawyers Shape the Videogame Industry</em></a>&nbsp;(MIT Press, 2024), an inside look at the legal history that undergirds our favorite videogames. Drawing on a series of case studies as vignettes of the human comedy, Mailland sheds light on why and how the role of lawyers is key for understanding the videogame industry. Each chapter in The Game That Never Ends is a mini-puzzle that pieces together how an important legal issue arose, was resolved, and impacted the industry and the experience of gamers in real time. These chapters are interspersed with shorter chapters called “The Lawyer’s Corner,” opportunities to dive deeper into individual cases. Lightly footnoted, these interludes connect the previous chapters together by providing a conceptual meta-analysis. Offering a comprehensive overview of the global legal history of videogames, The Game That Never Ends will leave readers with a nuanced, in-depth, and more global understanding of the videogame industry.</p><p>Rudolf Thomas Inderst (*1978) enjoys video games since 1985. He received a master’s degree in political science, American cultural studies as well as contemporary and recent history from Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich and holds two PhDs in game studies (LMU &amp; University of Passau). Currently, he's teaching as a professor for game design at the IU International University for Applied Science, has submitted his third dissertation at the University of Vechta, holds the position as lead editor at the online journal Titel kulturmagazin for the game section, hosts the German local radio show Replay Value and is editor of the weekly game research newsletter DiGRA D-A-CH Game Studies Watchlist.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 21 Dec 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/julien-mailland-the-game-that-never-ends-how-lawyers-shape-the-videogame-industry-mit-press-2024-zeDzftMG</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A guide to the fascinating legal history of the videogame industry, written for nonlawyers.&nbsp;</p><p>Why did a judge recall FIFA 15, a nonviolent soccer game, from French shelves in 2014? Why was Vodka Drunkenski, a character in Nintendo-Japan’s Punch-Out!, renamed Soda Popinski in the US and then in Western Europe, where the pun made no sense? Why was a Dutch-American company barred by US courts from distributing a clone of Pac-Man?&nbsp;</p><p>Julien Mailland answers all these questions and more in&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780262549394" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Game That Never Ends: How Lawyers Shape the Videogame Industry</em></a>&nbsp;(MIT Press, 2024), an inside look at the legal history that undergirds our favorite videogames. Drawing on a series of case studies as vignettes of the human comedy, Mailland sheds light on why and how the role of lawyers is key for understanding the videogame industry. Each chapter in The Game That Never Ends is a mini-puzzle that pieces together how an important legal issue arose, was resolved, and impacted the industry and the experience of gamers in real time. These chapters are interspersed with shorter chapters called “The Lawyer’s Corner,” opportunities to dive deeper into individual cases. Lightly footnoted, these interludes connect the previous chapters together by providing a conceptual meta-analysis. Offering a comprehensive overview of the global legal history of videogames, The Game That Never Ends will leave readers with a nuanced, in-depth, and more global understanding of the videogame industry.</p><p>Rudolf Thomas Inderst (*1978) enjoys video games since 1985. He received a master’s degree in political science, American cultural studies as well as contemporary and recent history from Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich and holds two PhDs in game studies (LMU &amp; University of Passau). Currently, he's teaching as a professor for game design at the IU International University for Applied Science, has submitted his third dissertation at the University of Vechta, holds the position as lead editor at the online journal Titel kulturmagazin for the game section, hosts the German local radio show Replay Value and is editor of the weekly game research newsletter DiGRA D-A-CH Game Studies Watchlist.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="33517489" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/5a24232d-ffe1-4bb4-8061-bd541c0a4d9b/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=5a24232d-ffe1-4bb4-8061-bd541c0a4d9b&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Julien Mailland, &quot;The Game That Never Ends: How Lawyers Shape the Videogame Industry&quot; (MIT Press, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:34:54</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>A guide to the fascinating legal history of the videogame industry, written for nonlawyers. 
Why did a judge recall FIFA 15, a nonviolent soccer game, from French shelves in 2014? Why was Vodka Drunkenski, a character in Nintendo-Japan’s Punch-Out!, renamed Soda Popinski in the US and then in Western Europe, where the pun made no sense? Why was a Dutch-American company barred by US courts from distributing a clone of Pac-Man? 
Julien Mailland answers all these questions and more in The Game That Never Ends: How Lawyers Shape the Videogame Industry (MIT Press, 2024), an inside look at the legal history that undergirds our favorite videogames. Drawing on a series of case studies as vignettes of the human comedy, Mailland sheds light on why and how the role of lawyers is key for understanding the videogame industry. Each chapter in The Game That Never Ends is a mini-puzzle that pieces together how an important legal issue arose, was resolved, and impacted the industry and the experience of gamers in real time. These chapters are interspersed with shorter chapters called “The Lawyer’s Corner,” opportunities to dive deeper into individual cases. Lightly footnoted, these interludes connect the previous chapters together by providing a conceptual meta-analysis. Offering a comprehensive overview of the global legal history of videogames, The Game That Never Ends will leave readers with a nuanced, in-depth, and more global understanding of the videogame industry.
Rudolf Thomas Inderst (*1978) enjoys video games since 1985. He received a master’s degree in political science, American cultural studies as well as contemporary and recent history from Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich and holds two PhDs in game studies (LMU &amp; University of Passau). Currently, he&apos;s teaching as a professor for game design at the IU International University for Applied Science, has submitted his third dissertation at the University of Vechta, holds the position as lead editor at the online journal Titel kulturmagazin for the game section, hosts the German local radio show Replay Value and is editor of the weekly game research newsletter DiGRA D-A-CH Game Studies Watchlist.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>A guide to the fascinating legal history of the videogame industry, written for nonlawyers. 
Why did a judge recall FIFA 15, a nonviolent soccer game, from French shelves in 2014? Why was Vodka Drunkenski, a character in Nintendo-Japan’s Punch-Out!, renamed Soda Popinski in the US and then in Western Europe, where the pun made no sense? Why was a Dutch-American company barred by US courts from distributing a clone of Pac-Man? 
Julien Mailland answers all these questions and more in The Game That Never Ends: How Lawyers Shape the Videogame Industry (MIT Press, 2024), an inside look at the legal history that undergirds our favorite videogames. Drawing on a series of case studies as vignettes of the human comedy, Mailland sheds light on why and how the role of lawyers is key for understanding the videogame industry. Each chapter in The Game That Never Ends is a mini-puzzle that pieces together how an important legal issue arose, was resolved, and impacted the industry and the experience of gamers in real time. These chapters are interspersed with shorter chapters called “The Lawyer’s Corner,” opportunities to dive deeper into individual cases. Lightly footnoted, these interludes connect the previous chapters together by providing a conceptual meta-analysis. Offering a comprehensive overview of the global legal history of videogames, The Game That Never Ends will leave readers with a nuanced, in-depth, and more global understanding of the videogame industry.
Rudolf Thomas Inderst (*1978) enjoys video games since 1985. He received a master’s degree in political science, American cultural studies as well as contemporary and recent history from Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich and holds two PhDs in game studies (LMU &amp; University of Passau). Currently, he&apos;s teaching as a professor for game design at the IU International University for Applied Science, has submitted his third dissertation at the University of Vechta, holds the position as lead editor at the online journal Titel kulturmagazin for the game section, hosts the German local radio show Replay Value and is editor of the weekly game research newsletter DiGRA D-A-CH Game Studies Watchlist.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>28</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ae208c62-bbf4-11ef-940a-f7dd57512ed4</guid>
      <title>Jan Machielsen, &quot;The Basque Witch-Hunt: A Secret History&quot; (Bloomsbury, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In June 1609, two judges left Bordeaux for a territory at the very edge of their jurisdiction, a Basque-speaking province on the Atlantic coast called the Pays de Labourd. In four months, they executed up to 80 women and men for the crime of witchcraft, causing a wave of suspects to flee into Spain and sparking terror there. Witnesses, many of them children, described lurid tales of cannibalism, vampirism, and demonic sex. One of the judges, Pierre de Lancre, published a sensationalist account of this diabolical netherworld. With other accounts seemingly destroyed, this witch-hunt – France's largest – has always been seen through de Lancre's eyes. The narrative, re-told over the centuries, is that of a witch-hunt caused by a bigoted outsider.</p><p>Newly discovered evidence paints a very different, still darker picture, revealing a secret history underneath de Lancre's well-known tale. Far from an outside imposition, witchcraft was a home-grown problem. Panic had been building up over a number of years and the region was fractured by factionalism and a struggle over scarce resources.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781350441507" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Basque Witch-Hunt: A Secret History</em></a>&nbsp;(Bloomsbury, 2024) by Dr. Jan Machielsen reveals that de Lancre was no outsider; he was a local partisan, married into the Basque nobility. Living at the Franco-Spanish border, the Basques were victims of geography. Geo-politics caused a local conflict which made the witch-hunt inevitable. The same forces eventually sent thousands of religious refugees from Spain to France where they, in turn, became new objects of popular fear and anger.</p><p>The Basque witch-hunt is justly infamous. This book shows that almost everything historians thought they knew about it is wrong.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;new book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Dec 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/jan-machielsen-the-basque-witch-hunt-a-secret-history-bloomsbury-2024-DJpNOvp1</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In June 1609, two judges left Bordeaux for a territory at the very edge of their jurisdiction, a Basque-speaking province on the Atlantic coast called the Pays de Labourd. In four months, they executed up to 80 women and men for the crime of witchcraft, causing a wave of suspects to flee into Spain and sparking terror there. Witnesses, many of them children, described lurid tales of cannibalism, vampirism, and demonic sex. One of the judges, Pierre de Lancre, published a sensationalist account of this diabolical netherworld. With other accounts seemingly destroyed, this witch-hunt – France's largest – has always been seen through de Lancre's eyes. The narrative, re-told over the centuries, is that of a witch-hunt caused by a bigoted outsider.</p><p>Newly discovered evidence paints a very different, still darker picture, revealing a secret history underneath de Lancre's well-known tale. Far from an outside imposition, witchcraft was a home-grown problem. Panic had been building up over a number of years and the region was fractured by factionalism and a struggle over scarce resources.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781350441507" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Basque Witch-Hunt: A Secret History</em></a>&nbsp;(Bloomsbury, 2024) by Dr. Jan Machielsen reveals that de Lancre was no outsider; he was a local partisan, married into the Basque nobility. Living at the Franco-Spanish border, the Basques were victims of geography. Geo-politics caused a local conflict which made the witch-hunt inevitable. The same forces eventually sent thousands of religious refugees from Spain to France where they, in turn, became new objects of popular fear and anger.</p><p>The Basque witch-hunt is justly infamous. This book shows that almost everything historians thought they knew about it is wrong.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;new book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="46171917" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/6bf701d4-9239-468f-9c2f-f30c6d12c744/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=6bf701d4-9239-468f-9c2f-f30c6d12c744&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Jan Machielsen, &quot;The Basque Witch-Hunt: A Secret History&quot; (Bloomsbury, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:48:05</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In June 1609, two judges left Bordeaux for a territory at the very edge of their jurisdiction, a Basque-speaking province on the Atlantic coast called the Pays de Labourd. In four months, they executed up to 80 women and men for the crime of witchcraft, causing a wave of suspects to flee into Spain and sparking terror there. Witnesses, many of them children, described lurid tales of cannibalism, vampirism, and demonic sex. One of the judges, Pierre de Lancre, published a sensationalist account of this diabolical netherworld. With other accounts seemingly destroyed, this witch-hunt – France&apos;s largest – has always been seen through de Lancre&apos;s eyes. The narrative, re-told over the centuries, is that of a witch-hunt caused by a bigoted outsider.
Newly discovered evidence paints a very different, still darker picture, revealing a secret history underneath de Lancre&apos;s well-known tale. Far from an outside imposition, witchcraft was a home-grown problem. Panic had been building up over a number of years and the region was fractured by factionalism and a struggle over scarce resources. The Basque Witch-Hunt: A Secret History (Bloomsbury, 2024) by Dr. Jan Machielsen reveals that de Lancre was no outsider; he was a local partisan, married into the Basque nobility. Living at the Franco-Spanish border, the Basques were victims of geography. Geo-politics caused a local conflict which made the witch-hunt inevitable. The same forces eventually sent thousands of religious refugees from Spain to France where they, in turn, became new objects of popular fear and anger.
The Basque witch-hunt is justly infamous. This book shows that almost everything historians thought they knew about it is wrong.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In June 1609, two judges left Bordeaux for a territory at the very edge of their jurisdiction, a Basque-speaking province on the Atlantic coast called the Pays de Labourd. In four months, they executed up to 80 women and men for the crime of witchcraft, causing a wave of suspects to flee into Spain and sparking terror there. Witnesses, many of them children, described lurid tales of cannibalism, vampirism, and demonic sex. One of the judges, Pierre de Lancre, published a sensationalist account of this diabolical netherworld. With other accounts seemingly destroyed, this witch-hunt – France&apos;s largest – has always been seen through de Lancre&apos;s eyes. The narrative, re-told over the centuries, is that of a witch-hunt caused by a bigoted outsider.
Newly discovered evidence paints a very different, still darker picture, revealing a secret history underneath de Lancre&apos;s well-known tale. Far from an outside imposition, witchcraft was a home-grown problem. Panic had been building up over a number of years and the region was fractured by factionalism and a struggle over scarce resources. The Basque Witch-Hunt: A Secret History (Bloomsbury, 2024) by Dr. Jan Machielsen reveals that de Lancre was no outsider; he was a local partisan, married into the Basque nobility. Living at the Franco-Spanish border, the Basques were victims of geography. Geo-politics caused a local conflict which made the witch-hunt inevitable. The same forces eventually sent thousands of religious refugees from Spain to France where they, in turn, became new objects of popular fear and anger.
The Basque witch-hunt is justly infamous. This book shows that almost everything historians thought they knew about it is wrong.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>88</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4aba83c2-bb0d-11ef-a5a2-a3d7e1b71ddc</guid>
      <title>Leila Ullrich, &quot;Victims and the Labour of Justice at the International Criminal Court: The Blame Cascade&quot; (Oxford UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Victim participation at the International Criminal Court (ICC) has routinely been viewed as an empty promise of justice or mere spectacle for audiences in the Global North, providing little benefit for victims. Why, then, do people in Kenya and Uganda engage in justice processes that offer so little, so late? How and why do they become the court’s victims and intermediaries, and what impact do these labels have on them?&nbsp;</p><p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780198870258" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Victims and the Labour of Justice at the International Criminal Court: The Blame Cascade</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Oxford UP, 2024)&nbsp;offers a response to these poignant questions, demonstrating that the notion of ‘justice for victims’ is not merely symbolic, expressive, or instrumental. On the contrary — as Leila Ullrich argues — the ICC’s methods of victim engagement are productive, reproducing the Court as a relevant institution and transforming victims in the Global South into highly gendered and racialized labouring subjects. Challenging the Court’s interplay with global capitalist relationships, the book makes visible the hidden labour of justice, and how it lures, disciplines, and blames both victims and victims’ advocates. Drawing on critical theory, criminological analysis, and multi-sited ethnographic fieldwork in The Hague, Kenya, and Uganda,&nbsp;<em>Victims and the Labour of Justice at the International Criminal Court</em>&nbsp;illuminates how the drive to include victims as participants in international criminal justice proceedings also creates and disciplines them as blameworthy capitalist subjects. Yet, as victim workers learn to ‘stop crying’, ‘be peaceful’, ‘get married’, ‘work hard’, and ‘repay debt’, they also begin to challenge the terms of global justice.</p><p>Dr. Leila Ullrich is an Associate Professor of Criminology at the University of Oxford's Faculty of Law. Her research lies at the intersection of international criminal justice, transitional justice, victimology, and border criminology. Her work focuses on how global justice institutions construct gendered and racialized subjects and how these groups engage with or resist these processes. Outside academia, Leila worked as social stability analyst on the Syrian refugee crisis at the United Nations Development Programme in Lebanon and she has also worked as an intern for the ICC. She has also worked for the German Bundestag and the BBC World Service.</p><p>Alex Batesmith is an Associate Professor in Legal Professions in the School of Law at the University of Leeds, and a former barrister and UN war crimes prosecutor, with teaching and research interests in international criminal law, cause lawyering and the legal profession, and law and emotion.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/leila-ullrich-victims-and-the-labour-of-justice-at-the-international-criminal-court-the-blame-cascade-oxford-up-2024-l1MM1saf</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Victim participation at the International Criminal Court (ICC) has routinely been viewed as an empty promise of justice or mere spectacle for audiences in the Global North, providing little benefit for victims. Why, then, do people in Kenya and Uganda engage in justice processes that offer so little, so late? How and why do they become the court’s victims and intermediaries, and what impact do these labels have on them?&nbsp;</p><p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780198870258" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Victims and the Labour of Justice at the International Criminal Court: The Blame Cascade</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Oxford UP, 2024)&nbsp;offers a response to these poignant questions, demonstrating that the notion of ‘justice for victims’ is not merely symbolic, expressive, or instrumental. On the contrary — as Leila Ullrich argues — the ICC’s methods of victim engagement are productive, reproducing the Court as a relevant institution and transforming victims in the Global South into highly gendered and racialized labouring subjects. Challenging the Court’s interplay with global capitalist relationships, the book makes visible the hidden labour of justice, and how it lures, disciplines, and blames both victims and victims’ advocates. Drawing on critical theory, criminological analysis, and multi-sited ethnographic fieldwork in The Hague, Kenya, and Uganda,&nbsp;<em>Victims and the Labour of Justice at the International Criminal Court</em>&nbsp;illuminates how the drive to include victims as participants in international criminal justice proceedings also creates and disciplines them as blameworthy capitalist subjects. Yet, as victim workers learn to ‘stop crying’, ‘be peaceful’, ‘get married’, ‘work hard’, and ‘repay debt’, they also begin to challenge the terms of global justice.</p><p>Dr. Leila Ullrich is an Associate Professor of Criminology at the University of Oxford's Faculty of Law. Her research lies at the intersection of international criminal justice, transitional justice, victimology, and border criminology. Her work focuses on how global justice institutions construct gendered and racialized subjects and how these groups engage with or resist these processes. Outside academia, Leila worked as social stability analyst on the Syrian refugee crisis at the United Nations Development Programme in Lebanon and she has also worked as an intern for the ICC. She has also worked for the German Bundestag and the BBC World Service.</p><p>Alex Batesmith is an Associate Professor in Legal Professions in the School of Law at the University of Leeds, and a former barrister and UN war crimes prosecutor, with teaching and research interests in international criminal law, cause lawyering and the legal profession, and law and emotion.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="57738302" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/33b947e1-5e75-400d-9881-4875eb27ab30/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=33b947e1-5e75-400d-9881-4875eb27ab30&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Leila Ullrich, &quot;Victims and the Labour of Justice at the International Criminal Court: The Blame Cascade&quot; (Oxford UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:00:08</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Victim participation at the International Criminal Court (ICC) has routinely been viewed as an empty promise of justice or mere spectacle for audiences in the Global North, providing little benefit for victims. Why, then, do people in Kenya and Uganda engage in justice processes that offer so little, so late? How and why do they become the court’s victims and intermediaries, and what impact do these labels have on them? 
Victims and the Labour of Justice at the International Criminal Court: The Blame Cascade (Oxford UP, 2024) offers a response to these poignant questions, demonstrating that the notion of ‘justice for victims’ is not merely symbolic, expressive, or instrumental. On the contrary — as Leila Ullrich argues — the ICC’s methods of victim engagement are productive, reproducing the Court as a relevant institution and transforming victims in the Global South into highly gendered and racialized labouring subjects. Challenging the Court’s interplay with global capitalist relationships, the book makes visible the hidden labour of justice, and how it lures, disciplines, and blames both victims and victims’ advocates. Drawing on critical theory, criminological analysis, and multi-sited ethnographic fieldwork in The Hague, Kenya, and Uganda, Victims and the Labour of Justice at the International Criminal Court illuminates how the drive to include victims as participants in international criminal justice proceedings also creates and disciplines them as blameworthy capitalist subjects. Yet, as victim workers learn to ‘stop crying’, ‘be peaceful’, ‘get married’, ‘work hard’, and ‘repay debt’, they also begin to challenge the terms of global justice.
Dr. Leila Ullrich is an Associate Professor of Criminology at the University of Oxford&apos;s Faculty of Law. Her research lies at the intersection of international criminal justice, transitional justice, victimology, and border criminology. Her work focuses on how global justice institutions construct gendered and racialized subjects and how these groups engage with or resist these processes. Outside academia, Leila worked as social stability analyst on the Syrian refugee crisis at the United Nations Development Programme in Lebanon and she has also worked as an intern for the ICC. She has also worked for the German Bundestag and the BBC World Service.
Alex Batesmith is an Associate Professor in Legal Professions in the School of Law at the University of Leeds, and a former barrister and UN war crimes prosecutor, with teaching and research interests in international criminal law, cause lawyering and the legal profession, and law and emotion.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Victim participation at the International Criminal Court (ICC) has routinely been viewed as an empty promise of justice or mere spectacle for audiences in the Global North, providing little benefit for victims. Why, then, do people in Kenya and Uganda engage in justice processes that offer so little, so late? How and why do they become the court’s victims and intermediaries, and what impact do these labels have on them? 
Victims and the Labour of Justice at the International Criminal Court: The Blame Cascade (Oxford UP, 2024) offers a response to these poignant questions, demonstrating that the notion of ‘justice for victims’ is not merely symbolic, expressive, or instrumental. On the contrary — as Leila Ullrich argues — the ICC’s methods of victim engagement are productive, reproducing the Court as a relevant institution and transforming victims in the Global South into highly gendered and racialized labouring subjects. Challenging the Court’s interplay with global capitalist relationships, the book makes visible the hidden labour of justice, and how it lures, disciplines, and blames both victims and victims’ advocates. Drawing on critical theory, criminological analysis, and multi-sited ethnographic fieldwork in The Hague, Kenya, and Uganda, Victims and the Labour of Justice at the International Criminal Court illuminates how the drive to include victims as participants in international criminal justice proceedings also creates and disciplines them as blameworthy capitalist subjects. Yet, as victim workers learn to ‘stop crying’, ‘be peaceful’, ‘get married’, ‘work hard’, and ‘repay debt’, they also begin to challenge the terms of global justice.
Dr. Leila Ullrich is an Associate Professor of Criminology at the University of Oxford&apos;s Faculty of Law. Her research lies at the intersection of international criminal justice, transitional justice, victimology, and border criminology. Her work focuses on how global justice institutions construct gendered and racialized subjects and how these groups engage with or resist these processes. Outside academia, Leila worked as social stability analyst on the Syrian refugee crisis at the United Nations Development Programme in Lebanon and she has also worked as an intern for the ICC. She has also worked for the German Bundestag and the BBC World Service.
Alex Batesmith is an Associate Professor in Legal Professions in the School of Law at the University of Leeds, and a former barrister and UN war crimes prosecutor, with teaching and research interests in international criminal law, cause lawyering and the legal profession, and law and emotion.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>236</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">b341989c-b8cc-11ef-aad4-bbad2f8ccd96</guid>
      <title>Sandhya Fuchs, &quot;Fragile Hope: Seeking Justice for Hate Crimes in India&quot; (Stanford UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781503638341" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Fragile Hope: Seeking Justice for Hate Crimes in India</em></a>&nbsp;(Stanford University Press, 2024).&nbsp;Against the backdrop of the global Black Lives Matter movement, debates around the social impact of hate crime legislation have come to the political fore. In 2019, the UN Commission on Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice urgently asked how legal systems can counter bias and discrimination. In India, a nation with vast socio-cultural diversity, and a complex colonial past, questions about the relationship between law and histories of oppression have become particularly pressing. Recently, India has seen a rise in violence against Dalits (ex-untouchables) and other minorities. Consequently, an emerging "Dalit Lives Matter" movement has campaigned for the effective implementation of India's only hate crime law: the 1989 Scheduled Castes/Scheduled Tribes Prevention of Atrocities Act (PoA).</p><p>Drawing on long-term fieldwork with Dalit survivors of caste atrocities, human rights NGOs, police, and judiciary, Sandhya Fuchs unveils how Dalit communities in the state of Rajasthan interpret and mobilize the PoA. Fuchs shows that the PoA has emerged as a project of legal meliorism: the idea that persistent and creative legal labor can gradually improve the oppressive conditions that characterize Dalit lives. Moving beyond statistics and judicial arguments, Fuchs uses the intimate lens of personal narratives to lay bare how legal processes converge and conflict with political and gendered concerns about justice for caste atrocities, creating new controversies, inequalities, and hopes.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 14 Dec 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/sandhya-fuchs-fragile-hope-seeking-justice-for-hate-crimes-in-india-stanford-up-2024-vv1oZV_w</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781503638341" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Fragile Hope: Seeking Justice for Hate Crimes in India</em></a>&nbsp;(Stanford University Press, 2024).&nbsp;Against the backdrop of the global Black Lives Matter movement, debates around the social impact of hate crime legislation have come to the political fore. In 2019, the UN Commission on Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice urgently asked how legal systems can counter bias and discrimination. In India, a nation with vast socio-cultural diversity, and a complex colonial past, questions about the relationship between law and histories of oppression have become particularly pressing. Recently, India has seen a rise in violence against Dalits (ex-untouchables) and other minorities. Consequently, an emerging "Dalit Lives Matter" movement has campaigned for the effective implementation of India's only hate crime law: the 1989 Scheduled Castes/Scheduled Tribes Prevention of Atrocities Act (PoA).</p><p>Drawing on long-term fieldwork with Dalit survivors of caste atrocities, human rights NGOs, police, and judiciary, Sandhya Fuchs unveils how Dalit communities in the state of Rajasthan interpret and mobilize the PoA. Fuchs shows that the PoA has emerged as a project of legal meliorism: the idea that persistent and creative legal labor can gradually improve the oppressive conditions that characterize Dalit lives. Moving beyond statistics and judicial arguments, Fuchs uses the intimate lens of personal narratives to lay bare how legal processes converge and conflict with political and gendered concerns about justice for caste atrocities, creating new controversies, inequalities, and hopes.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="95822452" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/0570b528-a5fa-41d0-b6f0-75455511f4cd/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=0570b528-a5fa-41d0-b6f0-75455511f4cd&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Sandhya Fuchs, &quot;Fragile Hope: Seeking Justice for Hate Crimes in India&quot; (Stanford UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:39:48</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Fragile Hope: Seeking Justice for Hate Crimes in India (Stanford University Press, 2024). Against the backdrop of the global Black Lives Matter movement, debates around the social impact of hate crime legislation have come to the political fore. In 2019, the UN Commission on Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice urgently asked how legal systems can counter bias and discrimination. In India, a nation with vast socio-cultural diversity, and a complex colonial past, questions about the relationship between law and histories of oppression have become particularly pressing. Recently, India has seen a rise in violence against Dalits (ex-untouchables) and other minorities. Consequently, an emerging &quot;Dalit Lives Matter&quot; movement has campaigned for the effective implementation of India&apos;s only hate crime law: the 1989 Scheduled Castes/Scheduled Tribes Prevention of Atrocities Act (PoA).
Drawing on long-term fieldwork with Dalit survivors of caste atrocities, human rights NGOs, police, and judiciary, Sandhya Fuchs unveils how Dalit communities in the state of Rajasthan interpret and mobilize the PoA. Fuchs shows that the PoA has emerged as a project of legal meliorism: the idea that persistent and creative legal labor can gradually improve the oppressive conditions that characterize Dalit lives. Moving beyond statistics and judicial arguments, Fuchs uses the intimate lens of personal narratives to lay bare how legal processes converge and conflict with political and gendered concerns about justice for caste atrocities, creating new controversies, inequalities, and hopes.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Fragile Hope: Seeking Justice for Hate Crimes in India (Stanford University Press, 2024). Against the backdrop of the global Black Lives Matter movement, debates around the social impact of hate crime legislation have come to the political fore. In 2019, the UN Commission on Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice urgently asked how legal systems can counter bias and discrimination. In India, a nation with vast socio-cultural diversity, and a complex colonial past, questions about the relationship between law and histories of oppression have become particularly pressing. Recently, India has seen a rise in violence against Dalits (ex-untouchables) and other minorities. Consequently, an emerging &quot;Dalit Lives Matter&quot; movement has campaigned for the effective implementation of India&apos;s only hate crime law: the 1989 Scheduled Castes/Scheduled Tribes Prevention of Atrocities Act (PoA).
Drawing on long-term fieldwork with Dalit survivors of caste atrocities, human rights NGOs, police, and judiciary, Sandhya Fuchs unveils how Dalit communities in the state of Rajasthan interpret and mobilize the PoA. Fuchs shows that the PoA has emerged as a project of legal meliorism: the idea that persistent and creative legal labor can gradually improve the oppressive conditions that characterize Dalit lives. Moving beyond statistics and judicial arguments, Fuchs uses the intimate lens of personal narratives to lay bare how legal processes converge and conflict with political and gendered concerns about justice for caste atrocities, creating new controversies, inequalities, and hopes.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>255</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">f5e7ff7a-b7e5-11ef-b9bf-87b8a0563872</guid>
      <title>Melissa B. Jacoby, &quot;Unjust Debts: How Our Bankruptcy System Makes America More Unequal&quot; (New Press, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In theory, bankruptcy in America exists to cancel or restructure debts for people and companies that have way too many--a safety valve designed to provide a mechanism for restarting lives and businesses when things go wrong financially. In this brilliant and paradigm-shifting book, legal scholar Melissa B. Jacoby shows how bankruptcy has also become an escape hatch for powerful individuals, corporations, and governments, contributing in unseen and poorly understood ways to race, gender, and class inequality in America. When cities go bankrupt, for example, police unions enjoy added leverage while police brutality victims are denied a seat at the negotiating table; the system is more forgiving of civil rights abuses than of the parking tickets disproportionately distributed in African American neighborhoods. Across a broad range of crucial issues,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781620977866" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Unjust Debts:&nbsp;How Our Bankruptcy System Makes America More Unequal</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(New Press, 2024) reveals the hidden mechanisms by which bankruptcy impacts everything from sexual harassment to health care, police violence to employment discrimination, and the opioid crisis to gun violence. In the tradition of Matthew Desmond's groundbreaking&nbsp;<em>Evicted</em>,&nbsp;<em>Unjust Debts</em>&nbsp;is a riveting and original work of accessible scholarship with huge implications for ordinary people and will set the terms of debate for this vital subject.</p><p>Melissa B. Jacoby is the Graham Kenan Professor of Law at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.</p><p><em>Caleb Zakarin is editor at the New Books Network.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/melissa-b-jacoby-unjust-debts-how-our-bankruptcy-system-makes-america-more-unequal-new-press-2024-Sl9HgSAu</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In theory, bankruptcy in America exists to cancel or restructure debts for people and companies that have way too many--a safety valve designed to provide a mechanism for restarting lives and businesses when things go wrong financially. In this brilliant and paradigm-shifting book, legal scholar Melissa B. Jacoby shows how bankruptcy has also become an escape hatch for powerful individuals, corporations, and governments, contributing in unseen and poorly understood ways to race, gender, and class inequality in America. When cities go bankrupt, for example, police unions enjoy added leverage while police brutality victims are denied a seat at the negotiating table; the system is more forgiving of civil rights abuses than of the parking tickets disproportionately distributed in African American neighborhoods. Across a broad range of crucial issues,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781620977866" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Unjust Debts:&nbsp;How Our Bankruptcy System Makes America More Unequal</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(New Press, 2024) reveals the hidden mechanisms by which bankruptcy impacts everything from sexual harassment to health care, police violence to employment discrimination, and the opioid crisis to gun violence. In the tradition of Matthew Desmond's groundbreaking&nbsp;<em>Evicted</em>,&nbsp;<em>Unjust Debts</em>&nbsp;is a riveting and original work of accessible scholarship with huge implications for ordinary people and will set the terms of debate for this vital subject.</p><p>Melissa B. Jacoby is the Graham Kenan Professor of Law at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.</p><p><em>Caleb Zakarin is editor at the New Books Network.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="46904497" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/cedc11e7-764e-4ab9-990e-b702b263039b/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=cedc11e7-764e-4ab9-990e-b702b263039b&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Melissa B. Jacoby, &quot;Unjust Debts: How Our Bankruptcy System Makes America More Unequal&quot; (New Press, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:48:51</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In theory, bankruptcy in America exists to cancel or restructure debts for people and companies that have way too many--a safety valve designed to provide a mechanism for restarting lives and businesses when things go wrong financially. In this brilliant and paradigm-shifting book, legal scholar Melissa B. Jacoby shows how bankruptcy has also become an escape hatch for powerful individuals, corporations, and governments, contributing in unseen and poorly understood ways to race, gender, and class inequality in America. When cities go bankrupt, for example, police unions enjoy added leverage while police brutality victims are denied a seat at the negotiating table; the system is more forgiving of civil rights abuses than of the parking tickets disproportionately distributed in African American neighborhoods. Across a broad range of crucial issues, Unjust Debts: How Our Bankruptcy System Makes America More Unequal (New Press, 2024) reveals the hidden mechanisms by which bankruptcy impacts everything from sexual harassment to health care, police violence to employment discrimination, and the opioid crisis to gun violence. In the tradition of Matthew Desmond&apos;s groundbreaking Evicted, Unjust Debts is a riveting and original work of accessible scholarship with huge implications for ordinary people and will set the terms of debate for this vital subject.
Melissa B. Jacoby is the Graham Kenan Professor of Law at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Caleb Zakarin is editor at the New Books Network.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In theory, bankruptcy in America exists to cancel or restructure debts for people and companies that have way too many--a safety valve designed to provide a mechanism for restarting lives and businesses when things go wrong financially. In this brilliant and paradigm-shifting book, legal scholar Melissa B. Jacoby shows how bankruptcy has also become an escape hatch for powerful individuals, corporations, and governments, contributing in unseen and poorly understood ways to race, gender, and class inequality in America. When cities go bankrupt, for example, police unions enjoy added leverage while police brutality victims are denied a seat at the negotiating table; the system is more forgiving of civil rights abuses than of the parking tickets disproportionately distributed in African American neighborhoods. Across a broad range of crucial issues, Unjust Debts: How Our Bankruptcy System Makes America More Unequal (New Press, 2024) reveals the hidden mechanisms by which bankruptcy impacts everything from sexual harassment to health care, police violence to employment discrimination, and the opioid crisis to gun violence. In the tradition of Matthew Desmond&apos;s groundbreaking Evicted, Unjust Debts is a riveting and original work of accessible scholarship with huge implications for ordinary people and will set the terms of debate for this vital subject.
Melissa B. Jacoby is the Graham Kenan Professor of Law at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Caleb Zakarin is editor at the New Books Network.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>235</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4be26d08-b803-11ef-90b4-e74085e88523</guid>
      <title>Leslie Beth Ribovich, &quot;Without a Prayer: Religion and Race in New York City Public Schools&quot; (NYU Press, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The processes of secularization and desegregation were among the two most radical transformations of the American public school system in all its history. Many regard the 1962 and 1963 US Supreme Court rulings against school prayer and Bible-reading as the end of religion in public schools. Likewise, the 1954 Brown v. Board of Education case is seen as the dawn of school racial equality. Yet, these two major twentieth-century American educational movements are often perceived as having no bearing on one another.</p><p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781479817269" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Without a Prayer: Religion and Race in New York City Public Schools</em></a>&nbsp;(New York University Press, 2024) by Dr. Leslie Beth Ribovich redefines secularization and desegregation as intrinsically linked. Using New York City as a window into a national story, the volume argues that these rulings failed to successfully remove religion from public schools, because it was worked into the foundation of the public education structure, especially how public schools treated race and moral formation. Moreover, even public schools that were not legally segregated nonetheless remained racially segregated in part because public schools rooted moral lessons in an invented tradition—Judeo-Christianity—and in whiteness.</p><p>The book illuminates how both secularization and desegregation took the form of inculcating students into white Christian norms as part of their project of shaping them into citizens. Schools and religious and civic constituents worked together to promote programs such as juvenile delinquency prevention, moral and spiritual values curricula, and racial integration advocacy. At the same time, religiously and racially diverse community members drew on, resisted, and reimagined public school morality.</p><p>Drawing on research from a number of archival repositories, newspaper and legal databases, and visual and material culture,&nbsp;<em>Without a Prayer</em>&nbsp;shows how religion and racial discrimination were woven into the very fabric of public schools, continuing to inform public education’s everyday practices even after the Supreme Court rulings.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;new book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/leslie-beth-ribovich-without-a-prayer-religion-and-race-in-new-york-city-public-schools-nyu-press-2024-3Be0mRs4</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The processes of secularization and desegregation were among the two most radical transformations of the American public school system in all its history. Many regard the 1962 and 1963 US Supreme Court rulings against school prayer and Bible-reading as the end of religion in public schools. Likewise, the 1954 Brown v. Board of Education case is seen as the dawn of school racial equality. Yet, these two major twentieth-century American educational movements are often perceived as having no bearing on one another.</p><p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781479817269" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Without a Prayer: Religion and Race in New York City Public Schools</em></a>&nbsp;(New York University Press, 2024) by Dr. Leslie Beth Ribovich redefines secularization and desegregation as intrinsically linked. Using New York City as a window into a national story, the volume argues that these rulings failed to successfully remove religion from public schools, because it was worked into the foundation of the public education structure, especially how public schools treated race and moral formation. Moreover, even public schools that were not legally segregated nonetheless remained racially segregated in part because public schools rooted moral lessons in an invented tradition—Judeo-Christianity—and in whiteness.</p><p>The book illuminates how both secularization and desegregation took the form of inculcating students into white Christian norms as part of their project of shaping them into citizens. Schools and religious and civic constituents worked together to promote programs such as juvenile delinquency prevention, moral and spiritual values curricula, and racial integration advocacy. At the same time, religiously and racially diverse community members drew on, resisted, and reimagined public school morality.</p><p>Drawing on research from a number of archival repositories, newspaper and legal databases, and visual and material culture,&nbsp;<em>Without a Prayer</em>&nbsp;shows how religion and racial discrimination were woven into the very fabric of public schools, continuing to inform public education’s everyday practices even after the Supreme Court rulings.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;new book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="50420038" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/ed6151c0-e385-4b84-94a8-e5c13e87c2f5/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=ed6151c0-e385-4b84-94a8-e5c13e87c2f5&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Leslie Beth Ribovich, &quot;Without a Prayer: Religion and Race in New York City Public Schools&quot; (NYU Press, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:52:31</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The processes of secularization and desegregation were among the two most radical transformations of the American public school system in all its history. Many regard the 1962 and 1963 US Supreme Court rulings against school prayer and Bible-reading as the end of religion in public schools. Likewise, the 1954 Brown v. Board of Education case is seen as the dawn of school racial equality. Yet, these two major twentieth-century American educational movements are often perceived as having no bearing on one another.
Without a Prayer: Religion and Race in New York City Public Schools (New York University Press, 2024) by Dr. Leslie Beth Ribovich redefines secularization and desegregation as intrinsically linked. Using New York City as a window into a national story, the volume argues that these rulings failed to successfully remove religion from public schools, because it was worked into the foundation of the public education structure, especially how public schools treated race and moral formation. Moreover, even public schools that were not legally segregated nonetheless remained racially segregated in part because public schools rooted moral lessons in an invented tradition—Judeo-Christianity—and in whiteness.
The book illuminates how both secularization and desegregation took the form of inculcating students into white Christian norms as part of their project of shaping them into citizens. Schools and religious and civic constituents worked together to promote programs such as juvenile delinquency prevention, moral and spiritual values curricula, and racial integration advocacy. At the same time, religiously and racially diverse community members drew on, resisted, and reimagined public school morality.
Drawing on research from a number of archival repositories, newspaper and legal databases, and visual and material culture, Without a Prayer shows how religion and racial discrimination were woven into the very fabric of public schools, continuing to inform public education’s everyday practices even after the Supreme Court rulings.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The processes of secularization and desegregation were among the two most radical transformations of the American public school system in all its history. Many regard the 1962 and 1963 US Supreme Court rulings against school prayer and Bible-reading as the end of religion in public schools. Likewise, the 1954 Brown v. Board of Education case is seen as the dawn of school racial equality. Yet, these two major twentieth-century American educational movements are often perceived as having no bearing on one another.
Without a Prayer: Religion and Race in New York City Public Schools (New York University Press, 2024) by Dr. Leslie Beth Ribovich redefines secularization and desegregation as intrinsically linked. Using New York City as a window into a national story, the volume argues that these rulings failed to successfully remove religion from public schools, because it was worked into the foundation of the public education structure, especially how public schools treated race and moral formation. Moreover, even public schools that were not legally segregated nonetheless remained racially segregated in part because public schools rooted moral lessons in an invented tradition—Judeo-Christianity—and in whiteness.
The book illuminates how both secularization and desegregation took the form of inculcating students into white Christian norms as part of their project of shaping them into citizens. Schools and religious and civic constituents worked together to promote programs such as juvenile delinquency prevention, moral and spiritual values curricula, and racial integration advocacy. At the same time, religiously and racially diverse community members drew on, resisted, and reimagined public school morality.
Drawing on research from a number of archival repositories, newspaper and legal databases, and visual and material culture, Without a Prayer shows how religion and racial discrimination were woven into the very fabric of public schools, continuing to inform public education’s everyday practices even after the Supreme Court rulings.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1521</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">30fdf2d4-b7f2-11ef-9ee0-b34c510d2709</guid>
      <title>Shehnaz Haqqani, &quot;Feminism, Tradition and Change in Contemporary Islam: Negotiating Islamic Law and Gender&quot; (Oneworld, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Shehnaz Haqqani's new book&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780861548408" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Feminism, Tradition and Change in Contemporary Islam: Negotiating Islamic Law and Gender</em></a>&nbsp;(Oneworld 2024), masterfully blends textual analysis of pre-modern and modern Islamic consensus with qualitative interviews with Muslims in the contemporary United States, to track how notions of what constitutes Islamic and Islamic tradition shift over time.&nbsp;We learn from her interlocutors that certain Islamic legal rulings can be negotiated, as in the case of child marriage, sexual slavery or even female inheritance, while other legal consensus, such as around women’s interfaith marriage or women leading mixed-gender prayers are not negotiable. Haqqani incisively swifts through these various standards of negotiations and arrives at how legal rulings pertaining to Muslim women’s experiences are met with resistance. It seems then that matters of urgency and relevance, which are inevitably political, dedicate when Islamic law and/or tradition can be negotiated. Haqqani’s book illuminates how Islamic tradition has always been flexible, but male dominated scholarly consensus still dedicates this flexibility (or rather inflexibility from an Islamic feminist perspective). This book will be of interest to those who think on gender, Islam, Islamic feminism, Islamic law, and much more.</p><p>Dr. Shehnaz Haqqani is an assistant professor at Mercer University and specialises in Islam, with a focus on gender and sexuality. She is a host of the podcast New Books Network.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/shehnaz-haqqani-feminism-tradition-and-change-in-contemporary-islam-negotiating-islamic-law-and-gender-oneworld-2024-q6AYbT33</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shehnaz Haqqani's new book&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780861548408" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Feminism, Tradition and Change in Contemporary Islam: Negotiating Islamic Law and Gender</em></a>&nbsp;(Oneworld 2024), masterfully blends textual analysis of pre-modern and modern Islamic consensus with qualitative interviews with Muslims in the contemporary United States, to track how notions of what constitutes Islamic and Islamic tradition shift over time.&nbsp;We learn from her interlocutors that certain Islamic legal rulings can be negotiated, as in the case of child marriage, sexual slavery or even female inheritance, while other legal consensus, such as around women’s interfaith marriage or women leading mixed-gender prayers are not negotiable. Haqqani incisively swifts through these various standards of negotiations and arrives at how legal rulings pertaining to Muslim women’s experiences are met with resistance. It seems then that matters of urgency and relevance, which are inevitably political, dedicate when Islamic law and/or tradition can be negotiated. Haqqani’s book illuminates how Islamic tradition has always been flexible, but male dominated scholarly consensus still dedicates this flexibility (or rather inflexibility from an Islamic feminist perspective). This book will be of interest to those who think on gender, Islam, Islamic feminism, Islamic law, and much more.</p><p>Dr. Shehnaz Haqqani is an assistant professor at Mercer University and specialises in Islam, with a focus on gender and sexuality. She is a host of the podcast New Books Network.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="79540795" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/b91576ef-23b2-4891-a1ff-5a6eaa09ace3/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=b91576ef-23b2-4891-a1ff-5a6eaa09ace3&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Shehnaz Haqqani, &quot;Feminism, Tradition and Change in Contemporary Islam: Negotiating Islamic Law and Gender&quot; (Oneworld, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:22:51</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Shehnaz Haqqani&apos;s new book Feminism, Tradition and Change in Contemporary Islam: Negotiating Islamic Law and Gender (Oneworld 2024), masterfully blends textual analysis of pre-modern and modern Islamic consensus with qualitative interviews with Muslims in the contemporary United States, to track how notions of what constitutes Islamic and Islamic tradition shift over time. We learn from her interlocutors that certain Islamic legal rulings can be negotiated, as in the case of child marriage, sexual slavery or even female inheritance, while other legal consensus, such as around women’s interfaith marriage or women leading mixed-gender prayers are not negotiable. Haqqani incisively swifts through these various standards of negotiations and arrives at how legal rulings pertaining to Muslim women’s experiences are met with resistance. It seems then that matters of urgency and relevance, which are inevitably political, dedicate when Islamic law and/or tradition can be negotiated. Haqqani’s book illuminates how Islamic tradition has always been flexible, but male dominated scholarly consensus still dedicates this flexibility (or rather inflexibility from an Islamic feminist perspective). This book will be of interest to those who think on gender, Islam, Islamic feminism, Islamic law, and much more.
Dr. Shehnaz Haqqani is an assistant professor at Mercer University and specialises in Islam, with a focus on gender and sexuality. She is a host of the podcast New Books Network.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Shehnaz Haqqani&apos;s new book Feminism, Tradition and Change in Contemporary Islam: Negotiating Islamic Law and Gender (Oneworld 2024), masterfully blends textual analysis of pre-modern and modern Islamic consensus with qualitative interviews with Muslims in the contemporary United States, to track how notions of what constitutes Islamic and Islamic tradition shift over time. We learn from her interlocutors that certain Islamic legal rulings can be negotiated, as in the case of child marriage, sexual slavery or even female inheritance, while other legal consensus, such as around women’s interfaith marriage or women leading mixed-gender prayers are not negotiable. Haqqani incisively swifts through these various standards of negotiations and arrives at how legal rulings pertaining to Muslim women’s experiences are met with resistance. It seems then that matters of urgency and relevance, which are inevitably political, dedicate when Islamic law and/or tradition can be negotiated. Haqqani’s book illuminates how Islamic tradition has always been flexible, but male dominated scholarly consensus still dedicates this flexibility (or rather inflexibility from an Islamic feminist perspective). This book will be of interest to those who think on gender, Islam, Islamic feminism, Islamic law, and much more.
Dr. Shehnaz Haqqani is an assistant professor at Mercer University and specialises in Islam, with a focus on gender and sexuality. She is a host of the podcast New Books Network.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>346</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">51e1d556-b739-11ef-8687-2f67b74b2b1c</guid>
      <title>Witchcraft: A History in Thirteen Trials</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Today’s book is:&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781668002421" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Witchcraft: A History in 13 Trials</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Scribner, 2024),&nbsp;by Dr. Marion Gibson, which explores the&nbsp;global history of witch trials across Europe, Africa, and the Americas, told through thirteen distinct trials that illuminate a pattern of demonization and conspiratorial thinking that has profoundly shaped human history. Some of them are famous like the Salem witch trials, and some lesser-known, like the 1620s witch trial on Vardø island, Norway, where an indigenous Sami woman was accused of murder; the last witch trial in France in 1731, where a young woman was pitted against her confessor and cult leader; and a trial in Lesotho in 1948, where British colonial authorities executed local leaders. Exploring how witchcraft was feared, then decriminalized, and then reimagined as gendered persecution,&nbsp;<em>Witchcraft</em>&nbsp;takes on the intersections between gender and power, indigenous spirituality and colonial rule, political conspiracy and individual resistance. Offering a striking, dramatic journey unspooling over centuries and across continents,&nbsp;<em>Witchcraft&nbsp;</em>offers insights into some of the cruelest moments in history, reclaims voices that have been silenced, and asks us to seriously consider how we will create a future without further witch trials.</p><p>Our guest is:&nbsp;<a href="https://mariongibson.co.uk/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. Marion Gibson</a>, who is Professor of Renaissance and Magical Literatures at the University of Exeter, UK. She is the author of numerous scholarly articles, and seven academic books on witches in history and literature. She is General Editor of the series Elements in Magic for Cambridge University Press.&nbsp;<em>Witchcraft: A History in Thirteen Trials</em>&nbsp;is her most recent book.</p><p>Our host is:&nbsp;<a href="https://christinagessler.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. Christina Gessler</a>, who works as a developmental editor for scholars, and is the producer of the Academic Life podcast.</p><p>Listeners may enjoy this playlist:</p><ul>
<li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/feminism-and-fierceness-a-new-approach-to-biblical-studies#entry:134661@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">Fierce</a></li>
<li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/we-refuse-a-forceful-history-of-black-resistance#entry:351602@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">We Refuse</a></li>
<li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/about-maternal-health-studies-a-conversation-with-bethany-johnson#entry:108161@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">You're Doing It Wrong</a></li>
<li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-self-care-stuff-parenting-and-personal-life-in-academia#entry:50416@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">Gender-Creative Parenting</a></li>
<li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/leaving-academia#entry:322779@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">Reinventing Her Life</a></li>
<li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/a-conversation-about-reproductive-health-and-abortion-studies#entry:103212@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Turnaway Study</a></li>
</ul><p>Welcome to Academic Life, the podcast for your academic journey—and beyond! You can support the show by posting, assigning or sharing episodes. Join us to learn from experts inside and outside the academy, and around the world. Missed any of the 225+ Academic Life episodes? Find them&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/up-partners/academic-life" rel="noopener noreferrer">here.</a>&nbsp;And thank you for listening!</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/witchcraft-a-history-in-thirteen-trials-s7Hegcan</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today’s book is:&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781668002421" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Witchcraft: A History in 13 Trials</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Scribner, 2024),&nbsp;by Dr. Marion Gibson, which explores the&nbsp;global history of witch trials across Europe, Africa, and the Americas, told through thirteen distinct trials that illuminate a pattern of demonization and conspiratorial thinking that has profoundly shaped human history. Some of them are famous like the Salem witch trials, and some lesser-known, like the 1620s witch trial on Vardø island, Norway, where an indigenous Sami woman was accused of murder; the last witch trial in France in 1731, where a young woman was pitted against her confessor and cult leader; and a trial in Lesotho in 1948, where British colonial authorities executed local leaders. Exploring how witchcraft was feared, then decriminalized, and then reimagined as gendered persecution,&nbsp;<em>Witchcraft</em>&nbsp;takes on the intersections between gender and power, indigenous spirituality and colonial rule, political conspiracy and individual resistance. Offering a striking, dramatic journey unspooling over centuries and across continents,&nbsp;<em>Witchcraft&nbsp;</em>offers insights into some of the cruelest moments in history, reclaims voices that have been silenced, and asks us to seriously consider how we will create a future without further witch trials.</p><p>Our guest is:&nbsp;<a href="https://mariongibson.co.uk/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. Marion Gibson</a>, who is Professor of Renaissance and Magical Literatures at the University of Exeter, UK. She is the author of numerous scholarly articles, and seven academic books on witches in history and literature. She is General Editor of the series Elements in Magic for Cambridge University Press.&nbsp;<em>Witchcraft: A History in Thirteen Trials</em>&nbsp;is her most recent book.</p><p>Our host is:&nbsp;<a href="https://christinagessler.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. Christina Gessler</a>, who works as a developmental editor for scholars, and is the producer of the Academic Life podcast.</p><p>Listeners may enjoy this playlist:</p><ul>
<li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/feminism-and-fierceness-a-new-approach-to-biblical-studies#entry:134661@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">Fierce</a></li>
<li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/we-refuse-a-forceful-history-of-black-resistance#entry:351602@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">We Refuse</a></li>
<li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/about-maternal-health-studies-a-conversation-with-bethany-johnson#entry:108161@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">You're Doing It Wrong</a></li>
<li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-self-care-stuff-parenting-and-personal-life-in-academia#entry:50416@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">Gender-Creative Parenting</a></li>
<li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/leaving-academia#entry:322779@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">Reinventing Her Life</a></li>
<li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/a-conversation-about-reproductive-health-and-abortion-studies#entry:103212@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Turnaway Study</a></li>
</ul><p>Welcome to Academic Life, the podcast for your academic journey—and beyond! You can support the show by posting, assigning or sharing episodes. Join us to learn from experts inside and outside the academy, and around the world. Missed any of the 225+ Academic Life episodes? Find them&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/up-partners/academic-life" rel="noopener noreferrer">here.</a>&nbsp;And thank you for listening!</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="47693099" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/11040935-8052-4033-bc9e-43610373d39a/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=11040935-8052-4033-bc9e-43610373d39a&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Witchcraft: A History in Thirteen Trials</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:49:40</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Today’s book is: Witchcraft: A History in 13 Trials (Scribner, 2024), by Dr. Marion Gibson, which explores the global history of witch trials across Europe, Africa, and the Americas, told through thirteen distinct trials that illuminate a pattern of demonization and conspiratorial thinking that has profoundly shaped human history. Some of them are famous like the Salem witch trials, and some lesser-known, like the 1620s witch trial on Vardø island, Norway, where an indigenous Sami woman was accused of murder; the last witch trial in France in 1731, where a young woman was pitted against her confessor and cult leader; and a trial in Lesotho in 1948, where British colonial authorities executed local leaders. Exploring how witchcraft was feared, then decriminalized, and then reimagined as gendered persecution, Witchcraft takes on the intersections between gender and power, indigenous spirituality and colonial rule, political conspiracy and individual resistance. Offering a striking, dramatic journey unspooling over centuries and across continents, Witchcraft offers insights into some of the cruelest moments in history, reclaims voices that have been silenced, and asks us to seriously consider how we will create a future without further witch trials.
Our guest is: Dr. Marion Gibson, who is Professor of Renaissance and Magical Literatures at the University of Exeter, UK. She is the author of numerous scholarly articles, and seven academic books on witches in history and literature. She is General Editor of the series Elements in Magic for Cambridge University Press. Witchcraft: A History in Thirteen Trials is her most recent book.
Our host is: Dr. Christina Gessler, who works as a developmental editor for scholars, and is the producer of the Academic Life podcast.
Listeners may enjoy this playlist:
Fierce
We Refuse
You&apos;re Doing It Wrong
Gender-Creative Parenting
Reinventing Her Life
The Turnaway Study
Welcome to Academic Life, the podcast for your academic journey—and beyond! You can support the show by posting, assigning or sharing episodes. Join us to learn from experts inside and outside the academy, and around the world. Missed any of the 225+ Academic Life episodes? Find them here. And thank you for listening!
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Today’s book is: Witchcraft: A History in 13 Trials (Scribner, 2024), by Dr. Marion Gibson, which explores the global history of witch trials across Europe, Africa, and the Americas, told through thirteen distinct trials that illuminate a pattern of demonization and conspiratorial thinking that has profoundly shaped human history. Some of them are famous like the Salem witch trials, and some lesser-known, like the 1620s witch trial on Vardø island, Norway, where an indigenous Sami woman was accused of murder; the last witch trial in France in 1731, where a young woman was pitted against her confessor and cult leader; and a trial in Lesotho in 1948, where British colonial authorities executed local leaders. Exploring how witchcraft was feared, then decriminalized, and then reimagined as gendered persecution, Witchcraft takes on the intersections between gender and power, indigenous spirituality and colonial rule, political conspiracy and individual resistance. Offering a striking, dramatic journey unspooling over centuries and across continents, Witchcraft offers insights into some of the cruelest moments in history, reclaims voices that have been silenced, and asks us to seriously consider how we will create a future without further witch trials.
Our guest is: Dr. Marion Gibson, who is Professor of Renaissance and Magical Literatures at the University of Exeter, UK. She is the author of numerous scholarly articles, and seven academic books on witches in history and literature. She is General Editor of the series Elements in Magic for Cambridge University Press. Witchcraft: A History in Thirteen Trials is her most recent book.
Our host is: Dr. Christina Gessler, who works as a developmental editor for scholars, and is the producer of the Academic Life podcast.
Listeners may enjoy this playlist:
Fierce
We Refuse
You&apos;re Doing It Wrong
Gender-Creative Parenting
Reinventing Her Life
The Turnaway Study
Welcome to Academic Life, the podcast for your academic journey—and beyond! You can support the show by posting, assigning or sharing episodes. Join us to learn from experts inside and outside the academy, and around the world. Missed any of the 225+ Academic Life episodes? Find them here. And thank you for listening!
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>242</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e8565d86-b4d7-11ef-9ca8-576db16a0267</guid>
      <title>Mie Nakachi, &quot;Replacing the Dead: The Politics of Reproduction in the Postwar Soviet Union&quot; (Oxford UP, 2021)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Today I talked to&nbsp;Mie Nakachi about&nbsp;<a href="https://global.oup.com/academic/product/replacing-the-dead-9780190635138?cc=us&amp;lang=en&amp;" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Replacing the Dead: The Politics of Reproduction in the Postwar Soviet Union</em></a>&nbsp;(Oxford UP, 2021)</p><p>In 1920, the Soviet Union became the first country in the world to legalize abortion on demand. But in 1936, the Soviet leadership criminalized abortion: the collectivization of the early 1930s was followed by famine that took the lives of millions of people, and the government grew eager to recover the population. Drawing on an amazing wealth of archival material, Nakachi traces the dynamic of Soviet reproductive policies that were invariably guided by pronatalist goals but almost always had damaging consequences. The 1944 Family Law, aimed at making up for the enormous human losses of World War II (27 million people died, 20 million of them men), relieved men of parental responsibilities, legal or financial, thereby encouraging them to father children out of wedlock. Given the devastation of the war and inadequate levels of government support, many women sought to avoid such births. Their only recourse was abortion, which remained illegal and, as a result, often led to grave medical complications or even death—on top of being criminally punishable. Doctors were generally sympathetic to the women’s plight but they could not challenge the system. It was only in the mid-1950s that abortion was decriminalized, but until the end of the Soviet Union, modern contraception was barely available and abortion remained the primary method of birth control.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Dec 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/mie-nakachi-replacing-the-dead-the-politics-of-reproduction-in-the-postwar-soviet-union-oxford-up-2021-f6GuNbpn</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today I talked to&nbsp;Mie Nakachi about&nbsp;<a href="https://global.oup.com/academic/product/replacing-the-dead-9780190635138?cc=us&amp;lang=en&amp;" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Replacing the Dead: The Politics of Reproduction in the Postwar Soviet Union</em></a>&nbsp;(Oxford UP, 2021)</p><p>In 1920, the Soviet Union became the first country in the world to legalize abortion on demand. But in 1936, the Soviet leadership criminalized abortion: the collectivization of the early 1930s was followed by famine that took the lives of millions of people, and the government grew eager to recover the population. Drawing on an amazing wealth of archival material, Nakachi traces the dynamic of Soviet reproductive policies that were invariably guided by pronatalist goals but almost always had damaging consequences. The 1944 Family Law, aimed at making up for the enormous human losses of World War II (27 million people died, 20 million of them men), relieved men of parental responsibilities, legal or financial, thereby encouraging them to father children out of wedlock. Given the devastation of the war and inadequate levels of government support, many women sought to avoid such births. Their only recourse was abortion, which remained illegal and, as a result, often led to grave medical complications or even death—on top of being criminally punishable. Doctors were generally sympathetic to the women’s plight but they could not challenge the system. It was only in the mid-1950s that abortion was decriminalized, but until the end of the Soviet Union, modern contraception was barely available and abortion remained the primary method of birth control.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="66738339" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/6ea5e431-0ed0-4bf0-9d71-b339d6c33c9d/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=6ea5e431-0ed0-4bf0-9d71-b339d6c33c9d&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Mie Nakachi, &quot;Replacing the Dead: The Politics of Reproduction in the Postwar Soviet Union&quot; (Oxford UP, 2021)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:09:31</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Today I talked to Mie Nakachi about Replacing the Dead: The Politics of Reproduction in the Postwar Soviet Union (Oxford UP, 2021)
In 1920, the Soviet Union became the first country in the world to legalize abortion on demand. But in 1936, the Soviet leadership criminalized abortion: the collectivization of the early 1930s was followed by famine that took the lives of millions of people, and the government grew eager to recover the population. Drawing on an amazing wealth of archival material, Nakachi traces the dynamic of Soviet reproductive policies that were invariably guided by pronatalist goals but almost always had damaging consequences. The 1944 Family Law, aimed at making up for the enormous human losses of World War II (27 million people died, 20 million of them men), relieved men of parental responsibilities, legal or financial, thereby encouraging them to father children out of wedlock. Given the devastation of the war and inadequate levels of government support, many women sought to avoid such births. Their only recourse was abortion, which remained illegal and, as a result, often led to grave medical complications or even death—on top of being criminally punishable. Doctors were generally sympathetic to the women’s plight but they could not challenge the system. It was only in the mid-1950s that abortion was decriminalized, but until the end of the Soviet Union, modern contraception was barely available and abortion remained the primary method of birth control.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Today I talked to Mie Nakachi about Replacing the Dead: The Politics of Reproduction in the Postwar Soviet Union (Oxford UP, 2021)
In 1920, the Soviet Union became the first country in the world to legalize abortion on demand. But in 1936, the Soviet leadership criminalized abortion: the collectivization of the early 1930s was followed by famine that took the lives of millions of people, and the government grew eager to recover the population. Drawing on an amazing wealth of archival material, Nakachi traces the dynamic of Soviet reproductive policies that were invariably guided by pronatalist goals but almost always had damaging consequences. The 1944 Family Law, aimed at making up for the enormous human losses of World War II (27 million people died, 20 million of them men), relieved men of parental responsibilities, legal or financial, thereby encouraging them to father children out of wedlock. Given the devastation of the war and inadequate levels of government support, many women sought to avoid such births. Their only recourse was abortion, which remained illegal and, as a result, often led to grave medical complications or even death—on top of being criminally punishable. Doctors were generally sympathetic to the women’s plight but they could not challenge the system. It was only in the mid-1950s that abortion was decriminalized, but until the end of the Soviet Union, modern contraception was barely available and abortion remained the primary method of birth control.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>288</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">d4a89e0a-b4a7-11ef-abee-2345527b6b2d</guid>
      <title>Casey B. K. Dominguez, &quot;Commander in Chief: Partisanship, Nationalism, and the Reconstruction of Congressional War Powers&quot; (UP of Kansas, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The balance of power between the United States Congress and the president is particularly contested when it comes to war powers. The U.S. Constitution gives Congress the power to declare war but Article II Section 2 declares that "[t]he President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States." Today, presidents broadly define their constitutional authority as commander in chief. But in the nineteenth century,&nbsp;<em>Congress</em>&nbsp;claimed and defended expansive war powers authority. How did Congress define the boundaries between presidential and congressional war powers in the early republic? Did the definition of “commander in chief” change, and if so, when, how, and why did it do so?</p><p>Based on an original, comprehensive dataset of every congressional reference to the commander-in-chief clause from the ratification of the Constitution through 1917, Dr. Casey B.K. Dominguez analyzes the authority that members of Congress ascribed to the president as commander in chief and the boundaries they put around that authority.</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780700636518" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Commander in Chief: Partisanship, Nationalism, and the Reconstruction of Congressional War Powers</em></a>&nbsp;(University Press&nbsp;of Kansas, 2024)&nbsp;Dominguez shows that for more than a century members of Congress defined the commander in chief's authority narrowly, similar to that of any high-ranking military officer. But in a wave of nationalism during the Spanish-American War, members of Congress began to argue that Congress owed deference to the commander in chief – as a national representative of the military, nation, and flag rather than a military officer. These debates were partisan with members of Congress arguing for broader presidential war powers when the president was from their own party. Scholars often assume that it is the Supreme Court that interprets the Constitution but Dominguez’s work shows how&nbsp;<em>all&nbsp;</em>the branches interpret the constitution. She offers particularly keen insights on the use of constitutional stories or scripts about the commander in chief clause. While scholars have assumed that the expansion of presidential war powers happened in the middle of the 20th century, Dominguez’s research shows that the dynamical expansion began 50 years earlier. Her work helps readers understand when – and how – the United States shifted many military decisions to the president.</p><p>Dr.&nbsp;<a href="https://sites.google.com/sandiego.edu/professor-casey-b-k-dominguez/bio" rel="noopener noreferrer">Casey B. K. Dominguez</a>&nbsp;is professor of Political Science and International Relations at the University of San Diego. Her research focuses on the relationships between political parties and interest groups, and on the evolution of Constitutional war powers in the United States. I’m delighted to welcome her to New Books in Political Science.</p><p>Mentioned:</p><p>Victoria A. Farrar-Myers’s book on constitutional scripts,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.tamupress.com/book/9781585445851/scripted-for-change/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Scripted for Change</em></a></p><p><a href="https://www.tamupress.com/book/9781585445851/scripted-for-change/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Institutionalization of the American Presidency</em></a>&nbsp;(Texas A&amp;M Press, 2007)</p><p>Emmerich de Vattel’s&nbsp;<a href="https://constitutioncenter.org/the-constitution/historic-document-library/detail/emmerich-de-vattelthe-law-of-nations-1758" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Law of Nations</em>&nbsp;</a>(1758)</p><p>Mariah Zeisberg’s&nbsp;<a href="https://press.princeton.edu/books/hardcover/9780691157221/war-powers" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>War Powers: The Politics of Constitutional Authority</em></a>&nbsp;(Princeton 2013)</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 9 Dec 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/casey-b-k-dominguez-commander-in-chief-partisanship-nationalism-and-the-reconstruction-of-congressional-war-powers-up-of-kansas-2024-alsv4Op8</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The balance of power between the United States Congress and the president is particularly contested when it comes to war powers. The U.S. Constitution gives Congress the power to declare war but Article II Section 2 declares that "[t]he President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States." Today, presidents broadly define their constitutional authority as commander in chief. But in the nineteenth century,&nbsp;<em>Congress</em>&nbsp;claimed and defended expansive war powers authority. How did Congress define the boundaries between presidential and congressional war powers in the early republic? Did the definition of “commander in chief” change, and if so, when, how, and why did it do so?</p><p>Based on an original, comprehensive dataset of every congressional reference to the commander-in-chief clause from the ratification of the Constitution through 1917, Dr. Casey B.K. Dominguez analyzes the authority that members of Congress ascribed to the president as commander in chief and the boundaries they put around that authority.</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780700636518" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Commander in Chief: Partisanship, Nationalism, and the Reconstruction of Congressional War Powers</em></a>&nbsp;(University Press&nbsp;of Kansas, 2024)&nbsp;Dominguez shows that for more than a century members of Congress defined the commander in chief's authority narrowly, similar to that of any high-ranking military officer. But in a wave of nationalism during the Spanish-American War, members of Congress began to argue that Congress owed deference to the commander in chief – as a national representative of the military, nation, and flag rather than a military officer. These debates were partisan with members of Congress arguing for broader presidential war powers when the president was from their own party. Scholars often assume that it is the Supreme Court that interprets the Constitution but Dominguez’s work shows how&nbsp;<em>all&nbsp;</em>the branches interpret the constitution. She offers particularly keen insights on the use of constitutional stories or scripts about the commander in chief clause. While scholars have assumed that the expansion of presidential war powers happened in the middle of the 20th century, Dominguez’s research shows that the dynamical expansion began 50 years earlier. Her work helps readers understand when – and how – the United States shifted many military decisions to the president.</p><p>Dr.&nbsp;<a href="https://sites.google.com/sandiego.edu/professor-casey-b-k-dominguez/bio" rel="noopener noreferrer">Casey B. K. Dominguez</a>&nbsp;is professor of Political Science and International Relations at the University of San Diego. Her research focuses on the relationships between political parties and interest groups, and on the evolution of Constitutional war powers in the United States. I’m delighted to welcome her to New Books in Political Science.</p><p>Mentioned:</p><p>Victoria A. Farrar-Myers’s book on constitutional scripts,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.tamupress.com/book/9781585445851/scripted-for-change/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Scripted for Change</em></a></p><p><a href="https://www.tamupress.com/book/9781585445851/scripted-for-change/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Institutionalization of the American Presidency</em></a>&nbsp;(Texas A&amp;M Press, 2007)</p><p>Emmerich de Vattel’s&nbsp;<a href="https://constitutioncenter.org/the-constitution/historic-document-library/detail/emmerich-de-vattelthe-law-of-nations-1758" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Law of Nations</em>&nbsp;</a>(1758)</p><p>Mariah Zeisberg’s&nbsp;<a href="https://press.princeton.edu/books/hardcover/9780691157221/war-powers" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>War Powers: The Politics of Constitutional Authority</em></a>&nbsp;(Princeton 2013)</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="50837995" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/b8146eb7-62b5-4ce7-9dc7-90b9d42d9d00/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=b8146eb7-62b5-4ce7-9dc7-90b9d42d9d00&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Casey B. K. Dominguez, &quot;Commander in Chief: Partisanship, Nationalism, and the Reconstruction of Congressional War Powers&quot; (UP of Kansas, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:52:57</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The balance of power between the United States Congress and the president is particularly contested when it comes to war powers. The U.S. Constitution gives Congress the power to declare war but Article II Section 2 declares that &quot;[t]he President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States.&quot; Today, presidents broadly define their constitutional authority as commander in chief. But in the nineteenth century, Congress claimed and defended expansive war powers authority. How did Congress define the boundaries between presidential and congressional war powers in the early republic? Did the definition of “commander in chief” change, and if so, when, how, and why did it do so?
Based on an original, comprehensive dataset of every congressional reference to the commander-in-chief clause from the ratification of the Constitution through 1917, Dr. Casey B.K. Dominguez analyzes the authority that members of Congress ascribed to the president as commander in chief and the boundaries they put around that authority.
In Commander in Chief: Partisanship, Nationalism, and the Reconstruction of Congressional War Powers (University Press of Kansas, 2024) Dominguez shows that for more than a century members of Congress defined the commander in chief&apos;s authority narrowly, similar to that of any high-ranking military officer. But in a wave of nationalism during the Spanish-American War, members of Congress began to argue that Congress owed deference to the commander in chief – as a national representative of the military, nation, and flag rather than a military officer. These debates were partisan with members of Congress arguing for broader presidential war powers when the president was from their own party. Scholars often assume that it is the Supreme Court that interprets the Constitution but Dominguez’s work shows how all the branches interpret the constitution. She offers particularly keen insights on the use of constitutional stories or scripts about the commander in chief clause. While scholars have assumed that the expansion of presidential war powers happened in the middle of the 20th century, Dominguez’s research shows that the dynamical expansion began 50 years earlier. Her work helps readers understand when – and how – the United States shifted many military decisions to the president.
Dr. Casey B. K. Dominguez is professor of Political Science and International Relations at the University of San Diego. Her research focuses on the relationships between political parties and interest groups, and on the evolution of Constitutional war powers in the United States. I’m delighted to welcome her to New Books in Political Science.
Mentioned:
Victoria A. Farrar-Myers’s book on constitutional scripts, Scripted for Change
The Institutionalization of the American Presidency (Texas A&amp;M Press, 2007)
Emmerich de Vattel’s The Law of Nations (1758)
Mariah Zeisberg’s War Powers: The Politics of Constitutional Authority (Princeton 2013)
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The balance of power between the United States Congress and the president is particularly contested when it comes to war powers. The U.S. Constitution gives Congress the power to declare war but Article II Section 2 declares that &quot;[t]he President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States.&quot; Today, presidents broadly define their constitutional authority as commander in chief. But in the nineteenth century, Congress claimed and defended expansive war powers authority. How did Congress define the boundaries between presidential and congressional war powers in the early republic? Did the definition of “commander in chief” change, and if so, when, how, and why did it do so?
Based on an original, comprehensive dataset of every congressional reference to the commander-in-chief clause from the ratification of the Constitution through 1917, Dr. Casey B.K. Dominguez analyzes the authority that members of Congress ascribed to the president as commander in chief and the boundaries they put around that authority.
In Commander in Chief: Partisanship, Nationalism, and the Reconstruction of Congressional War Powers (University Press of Kansas, 2024) Dominguez shows that for more than a century members of Congress defined the commander in chief&apos;s authority narrowly, similar to that of any high-ranking military officer. But in a wave of nationalism during the Spanish-American War, members of Congress began to argue that Congress owed deference to the commander in chief – as a national representative of the military, nation, and flag rather than a military officer. These debates were partisan with members of Congress arguing for broader presidential war powers when the president was from their own party. Scholars often assume that it is the Supreme Court that interprets the Constitution but Dominguez’s work shows how all the branches interpret the constitution. She offers particularly keen insights on the use of constitutional stories or scripts about the commander in chief clause. While scholars have assumed that the expansion of presidential war powers happened in the middle of the 20th century, Dominguez’s research shows that the dynamical expansion began 50 years earlier. Her work helps readers understand when – and how – the United States shifted many military decisions to the president.
Dr. Casey B. K. Dominguez is professor of Political Science and International Relations at the University of San Diego. Her research focuses on the relationships between political parties and interest groups, and on the evolution of Constitutional war powers in the United States. I’m delighted to welcome her to New Books in Political Science.
Mentioned:
Victoria A. Farrar-Myers’s book on constitutional scripts, Scripted for Change
The Institutionalization of the American Presidency (Texas A&amp;M Press, 2007)
Emmerich de Vattel’s The Law of Nations (1758)
Mariah Zeisberg’s War Powers: The Politics of Constitutional Authority (Princeton 2013)
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>752</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">710f4970-b321-11ef-8307-b312646bde0e</guid>
      <title>Elyse Ona Singer, &quot;Lawful Sins: Abortion Rights and Reproductive Governance in Mexico&quot; (Stanford UP, 2022)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Mexico is at the center of the global battle over abortion. In 2007, a watershed reform legalized the procedure in the national capital, making it one of just three places across Latin America where it was permitted at the time. Abortion care is now available on demand and free of cost through a pioneering program of the Mexico City Ministry of Health, which has served hundreds of thousands of women. At the same time, abortion laws have grown harsher in several states outside the capital as part of a coordinated national backlash.</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781503631472" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Lawful Sins: Abortion Rights and Reproductive Governance in Mexico</em></a>&nbsp;(Stanford University Press, 2022), Dr. Elyse Ona Singer argues that while pregnant women in Mexico today have options that were unavailable just over a decade ago, they are also subject to the expanded reach of the Mexican state and the Catholic Church over their bodies and reproductive lives. By analyzing the moral politics of clinical encounters in Mexico City's public abortion program,&nbsp;<em>Lawful Sins</em>&nbsp;offers a critical account of the relationship among reproductive rights, gendered citizenship, and public healthcare. With timely insights on global struggles for reproductive justice, Dr. Singer reorients prevailing perspectives that approach abortion rights as a hallmark of women's citizenship in liberal societies.</p><p><br></p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;new book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 6 Dec 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/elyse-ona-singer-lawful-sins-abortion-rights-and-reproductive-governance-in-mexico-stanford-up-2022-MZ3WvBPw</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mexico is at the center of the global battle over abortion. In 2007, a watershed reform legalized the procedure in the national capital, making it one of just three places across Latin America where it was permitted at the time. Abortion care is now available on demand and free of cost through a pioneering program of the Mexico City Ministry of Health, which has served hundreds of thousands of women. At the same time, abortion laws have grown harsher in several states outside the capital as part of a coordinated national backlash.</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781503631472" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Lawful Sins: Abortion Rights and Reproductive Governance in Mexico</em></a>&nbsp;(Stanford University Press, 2022), Dr. Elyse Ona Singer argues that while pregnant women in Mexico today have options that were unavailable just over a decade ago, they are also subject to the expanded reach of the Mexican state and the Catholic Church over their bodies and reproductive lives. By analyzing the moral politics of clinical encounters in Mexico City's public abortion program,&nbsp;<em>Lawful Sins</em>&nbsp;offers a critical account of the relationship among reproductive rights, gendered citizenship, and public healthcare. With timely insights on global struggles for reproductive justice, Dr. Singer reorients prevailing perspectives that approach abortion rights as a hallmark of women's citizenship in liberal societies.</p><p><br></p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;new book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="42970429" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/fe49a874-d8b8-4998-a8d9-574c99a11321/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=fe49a874-d8b8-4998-a8d9-574c99a11321&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Elyse Ona Singer, &quot;Lawful Sins: Abortion Rights and Reproductive Governance in Mexico&quot; (Stanford UP, 2022)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:44:45</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Mexico is at the center of the global battle over abortion. In 2007, a watershed reform legalized the procedure in the national capital, making it one of just three places across Latin America where it was permitted at the time. Abortion care is now available on demand and free of cost through a pioneering program of the Mexico City Ministry of Health, which has served hundreds of thousands of women. At the same time, abortion laws have grown harsher in several states outside the capital as part of a coordinated national backlash.
In Lawful Sins: Abortion Rights and Reproductive Governance in Mexico (Stanford University Press, 2022), Dr. Elyse Ona Singer argues that while pregnant women in Mexico today have options that were unavailable just over a decade ago, they are also subject to the expanded reach of the Mexican state and the Catholic Church over their bodies and reproductive lives. By analyzing the moral politics of clinical encounters in Mexico City&apos;s public abortion program, Lawful Sins offers a critical account of the relationship among reproductive rights, gendered citizenship, and public healthcare. With timely insights on global struggles for reproductive justice, Dr. Singer reorients prevailing perspectives that approach abortion rights as a hallmark of women&apos;s citizenship in liberal societies.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Mexico is at the center of the global battle over abortion. In 2007, a watershed reform legalized the procedure in the national capital, making it one of just three places across Latin America where it was permitted at the time. Abortion care is now available on demand and free of cost through a pioneering program of the Mexico City Ministry of Health, which has served hundreds of thousands of women. At the same time, abortion laws have grown harsher in several states outside the capital as part of a coordinated national backlash.
In Lawful Sins: Abortion Rights and Reproductive Governance in Mexico (Stanford University Press, 2022), Dr. Elyse Ona Singer argues that while pregnant women in Mexico today have options that were unavailable just over a decade ago, they are also subject to the expanded reach of the Mexican state and the Catholic Church over their bodies and reproductive lives. By analyzing the moral politics of clinical encounters in Mexico City&apos;s public abortion program, Lawful Sins offers a critical account of the relationship among reproductive rights, gendered citizenship, and public healthcare. With timely insights on global struggles for reproductive justice, Dr. Singer reorients prevailing perspectives that approach abortion rights as a hallmark of women&apos;s citizenship in liberal societies.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>6</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">0863cb04-b32f-11ef-ad10-eb5e175b48b4</guid>
      <title>Richard J. Golsan, &quot;Justice in Lyon: Klaus Barbie and France&apos;s First Trial for Crimes Against Humanity&quot; (U Toronto Press, 2022)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The trial of former SS lieutenant and Gestapo chief Klaus Barbie was France's first trial for crimes against humanity. Known as the "Butcher of Lyon" during the Nazi occupation of that city from 1942 to 1944, Barbie tortured, deported, and murdered thousands of Jews and Resistance fighters. Following a lengthy investigation and the overcoming of numerous legal and other obstacles, the trial began in 1987 and attracted global attention.</p><p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781487545598" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Justice in Lyon: Klaus Barbie and France's First Trial for Crimes Against Humanity</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(U Toronto Press, 2022) is the first comprehensive history of the Barbie trial, including the investigation leading up to it, the legal background to the case, and the hurdles the prosecution had to clear in order to bring Barbie to justice. Richard J. Golsan examines the strategies used by the defence, the prosecution, and the lawyers who represented Barbie's many victims at the trial. The book draws from press coverage, articles, and books about Barbie and the trial published at the time, as well as recently released archival sources and the personal archives of lawyers at the trial.</p><p>Making the case that, despite the views of its many critics, the Barbie trial was a success in legal, historical, and pedagogical terms,&nbsp;<em>Justice in Lyon&nbsp;</em>details how the trial has had a positive impact on French and international law governing crimes against humanity.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 6 Dec 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/richard-j-golsan-justice-in-lyon-klaus-barbie-and-frances-first-trial-for-crimes-against-humanity-u-toronto-press-2022-MwYkToPj</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The trial of former SS lieutenant and Gestapo chief Klaus Barbie was France's first trial for crimes against humanity. Known as the "Butcher of Lyon" during the Nazi occupation of that city from 1942 to 1944, Barbie tortured, deported, and murdered thousands of Jews and Resistance fighters. Following a lengthy investigation and the overcoming of numerous legal and other obstacles, the trial began in 1987 and attracted global attention.</p><p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781487545598" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Justice in Lyon: Klaus Barbie and France's First Trial for Crimes Against Humanity</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(U Toronto Press, 2022) is the first comprehensive history of the Barbie trial, including the investigation leading up to it, the legal background to the case, and the hurdles the prosecution had to clear in order to bring Barbie to justice. Richard J. Golsan examines the strategies used by the defence, the prosecution, and the lawyers who represented Barbie's many victims at the trial. The book draws from press coverage, articles, and books about Barbie and the trial published at the time, as well as recently released archival sources and the personal archives of lawyers at the trial.</p><p>Making the case that, despite the views of its many critics, the Barbie trial was a success in legal, historical, and pedagogical terms,&nbsp;<em>Justice in Lyon&nbsp;</em>details how the trial has had a positive impact on French and international law governing crimes against humanity.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="73358250" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/1c700631-47a6-4ca6-b7a2-d85f63b535ed/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=1c700631-47a6-4ca6-b7a2-d85f63b535ed&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Richard J. Golsan, &quot;Justice in Lyon: Klaus Barbie and France&apos;s First Trial for Crimes Against Humanity&quot; (U Toronto Press, 2022)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:16:24</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The trial of former SS lieutenant and Gestapo chief Klaus Barbie was France&apos;s first trial for crimes against humanity. Known as the &quot;Butcher of Lyon&quot; during the Nazi occupation of that city from 1942 to 1944, Barbie tortured, deported, and murdered thousands of Jews and Resistance fighters. Following a lengthy investigation and the overcoming of numerous legal and other obstacles, the trial began in 1987 and attracted global attention.
Justice in Lyon: Klaus Barbie and France&apos;s First Trial for Crimes Against Humanity (U Toronto Press, 2022) is the first comprehensive history of the Barbie trial, including the investigation leading up to it, the legal background to the case, and the hurdles the prosecution had to clear in order to bring Barbie to justice. Richard J. Golsan examines the strategies used by the defence, the prosecution, and the lawyers who represented Barbie&apos;s many victims at the trial. The book draws from press coverage, articles, and books about Barbie and the trial published at the time, as well as recently released archival sources and the personal archives of lawyers at the trial.
Making the case that, despite the views of its many critics, the Barbie trial was a success in legal, historical, and pedagogical terms, Justice in Lyon details how the trial has had a positive impact on French and international law governing crimes against humanity.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The trial of former SS lieutenant and Gestapo chief Klaus Barbie was France&apos;s first trial for crimes against humanity. Known as the &quot;Butcher of Lyon&quot; during the Nazi occupation of that city from 1942 to 1944, Barbie tortured, deported, and murdered thousands of Jews and Resistance fighters. Following a lengthy investigation and the overcoming of numerous legal and other obstacles, the trial began in 1987 and attracted global attention.
Justice in Lyon: Klaus Barbie and France&apos;s First Trial for Crimes Against Humanity (U Toronto Press, 2022) is the first comprehensive history of the Barbie trial, including the investigation leading up to it, the legal background to the case, and the hurdles the prosecution had to clear in order to bring Barbie to justice. Richard J. Golsan examines the strategies used by the defence, the prosecution, and the lawyers who represented Barbie&apos;s many victims at the trial. The book draws from press coverage, articles, and books about Barbie and the trial published at the time, as well as recently released archival sources and the personal archives of lawyers at the trial.
Making the case that, despite the views of its many critics, the Barbie trial was a success in legal, historical, and pedagogical terms, Justice in Lyon details how the trial has had a positive impact on French and international law governing crimes against humanity.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1513</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">13853ee8-afe5-11ef-9a2c-b3ef5c764b1c</guid>
      <title>Carrie N. Baker, &quot;Abortion Pills: US History and Politics&quot; (Amherst College Press, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In this compelling and informative interview, Carrie N. Baker discusses her newest book,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781943208852" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Abortion Pills: US History and Politics</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Amherst College Press, 2024)<em>.</em>&nbsp;This book is the first comprehensive history of abortion pills in the United States, and Baker examines the actions of scientists, policy-makers, pharmaceutical companies, pro-abortion rights activists and anti-abortion forces as the abortion pill was developed in France in 1980, and subsequently brought to market in the United States. She carefully investigates the fight for FDA approval of the abortion pill, and reproductive rights advocates’ work to expand access. She pays particular attention to the critical period of 2020-2024 when in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic telemedicine abortion became a possibility. Baker ends exploring attempts to restrict abortion pills and self-managed abortions in the wake of the&nbsp;<em>Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization</em>&nbsp;Supreme Court decision. In this thoroughly researched history, Baker draws on interviews with over 80 activists, abortion providers, researchers, and people who have used abortion pills to demonstrate the range of actors involved in efforts to expand access to abortion pills. In addition, she analyzes medical research, government records, legal cases, and the archives of several reproductive health organizations.</p><p><em>Abortion Pills: US History and Politics&nbsp;</em>is available open-access starting December 3, 2024. Click the following link to see a&nbsp;<a href="https://www.fulcrum.org/concern/monographs/m900nx46q?locale=en" rel="noopener noreferrer">PDF of the book</a></p><p><em>C</em>arrie N. Baker holds a B.A. in Philosophy from Yale University, a J.D. from Emory University School of Law, and an M.A. and Ph.D. from Emory’s Institute of Women’s, Gender, and Sexuality Studies. She is the Sylvia Dlugasch Bauman Chair of American Studies and Professor of the Study of Women, Gender and Sexuality Studies at Smith College where, as a legal and social movement scholar, she teaches courses on gender, law and public policy; feminist social movements; and feminist public writing. In addition to publishing peer-reviewed academic scholarship, Baker also serves as a regular writer and contributing editor for Ms. Magazine, has a monthly column in the Daily Hampshire Gazette, and hosts Feminist Futures, a radio program on WHMP 101.5 FM in Northampton, Massachusetts<em>.</em></p><p><em>Jessie Cohen holds a Ph.D. in History from Columbia University, and is an editor at the New Books Network.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 3 Dec 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/carrie-n-baker-abortion-pills-us-history-and-politics-amherst-college-press-2024-NoAsiB_E</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this compelling and informative interview, Carrie N. Baker discusses her newest book,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781943208852" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Abortion Pills: US History and Politics</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Amherst College Press, 2024)<em>.</em>&nbsp;This book is the first comprehensive history of abortion pills in the United States, and Baker examines the actions of scientists, policy-makers, pharmaceutical companies, pro-abortion rights activists and anti-abortion forces as the abortion pill was developed in France in 1980, and subsequently brought to market in the United States. She carefully investigates the fight for FDA approval of the abortion pill, and reproductive rights advocates’ work to expand access. She pays particular attention to the critical period of 2020-2024 when in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic telemedicine abortion became a possibility. Baker ends exploring attempts to restrict abortion pills and self-managed abortions in the wake of the&nbsp;<em>Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization</em>&nbsp;Supreme Court decision. In this thoroughly researched history, Baker draws on interviews with over 80 activists, abortion providers, researchers, and people who have used abortion pills to demonstrate the range of actors involved in efforts to expand access to abortion pills. In addition, she analyzes medical research, government records, legal cases, and the archives of several reproductive health organizations.</p><p><em>Abortion Pills: US History and Politics&nbsp;</em>is available open-access starting December 3, 2024. Click the following link to see a&nbsp;<a href="https://www.fulcrum.org/concern/monographs/m900nx46q?locale=en" rel="noopener noreferrer">PDF of the book</a></p><p><em>C</em>arrie N. Baker holds a B.A. in Philosophy from Yale University, a J.D. from Emory University School of Law, and an M.A. and Ph.D. from Emory’s Institute of Women’s, Gender, and Sexuality Studies. She is the Sylvia Dlugasch Bauman Chair of American Studies and Professor of the Study of Women, Gender and Sexuality Studies at Smith College where, as a legal and social movement scholar, she teaches courses on gender, law and public policy; feminist social movements; and feminist public writing. In addition to publishing peer-reviewed academic scholarship, Baker also serves as a regular writer and contributing editor for Ms. Magazine, has a monthly column in the Daily Hampshire Gazette, and hosts Feminist Futures, a radio program on WHMP 101.5 FM in Northampton, Massachusetts<em>.</em></p><p><em>Jessie Cohen holds a Ph.D. in History from Columbia University, and is an editor at the New Books Network.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="59663830" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/ce41bd0c-e80a-4a3b-8bcc-a390051fe8c3/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=ce41bd0c-e80a-4a3b-8bcc-a390051fe8c3&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Carrie N. Baker, &quot;Abortion Pills: US History and Politics&quot; (Amherst College Press, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:02:08</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this compelling and informative interview, Carrie N. Baker discusses her newest book, Abortion Pills: US History and Politics (Amherst College Press, 2024). This book is the first comprehensive history of abortion pills in the United States, and Baker examines the actions of scientists, policy-makers, pharmaceutical companies, pro-abortion rights activists and anti-abortion forces as the abortion pill was developed in France in 1980, and subsequently brought to market in the United States. She carefully investigates the fight for FDA approval of the abortion pill, and reproductive rights advocates’ work to expand access. She pays particular attention to the critical period of 2020-2024 when in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic telemedicine abortion became a possibility. Baker ends exploring attempts to restrict abortion pills and self-managed abortions in the wake of the Dobbs v. Jackson Women&apos;s Health Organization Supreme Court decision. In this thoroughly researched history, Baker draws on interviews with over 80 activists, abortion providers, researchers, and people who have used abortion pills to demonstrate the range of actors involved in efforts to expand access to abortion pills. In addition, she analyzes medical research, government records, legal cases, and the archives of several reproductive health organizations.
Abortion Pills: US History and Politics is available open-access starting December 3, 2024. Click the following link to see a PDF of the book
Carrie N. Baker holds a B.A. in Philosophy from Yale University, a J.D. from Emory University School of Law, and an M.A. and Ph.D. from Emory’s Institute of Women’s, Gender, and Sexuality Studies. She is the Sylvia Dlugasch Bauman Chair of American Studies and Professor of the Study of Women, Gender and Sexuality Studies at Smith College where, as a legal and social movement scholar, she teaches courses on gender, law and public policy; feminist social movements; and feminist public writing. In addition to publishing peer-reviewed academic scholarship, Baker also serves as a regular writer and contributing editor for Ms. Magazine, has a monthly column in the Daily Hampshire Gazette, and hosts Feminist Futures, a radio program on WHMP 101.5 FM in Northampton, Massachusetts.
Jessie Cohen holds a Ph.D. in History from Columbia University, and is an editor at the New Books Network.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this compelling and informative interview, Carrie N. Baker discusses her newest book, Abortion Pills: US History and Politics (Amherst College Press, 2024). This book is the first comprehensive history of abortion pills in the United States, and Baker examines the actions of scientists, policy-makers, pharmaceutical companies, pro-abortion rights activists and anti-abortion forces as the abortion pill was developed in France in 1980, and subsequently brought to market in the United States. She carefully investigates the fight for FDA approval of the abortion pill, and reproductive rights advocates’ work to expand access. She pays particular attention to the critical period of 2020-2024 when in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic telemedicine abortion became a possibility. Baker ends exploring attempts to restrict abortion pills and self-managed abortions in the wake of the Dobbs v. Jackson Women&apos;s Health Organization Supreme Court decision. In this thoroughly researched history, Baker draws on interviews with over 80 activists, abortion providers, researchers, and people who have used abortion pills to demonstrate the range of actors involved in efforts to expand access to abortion pills. In addition, she analyzes medical research, government records, legal cases, and the archives of several reproductive health organizations.
Abortion Pills: US History and Politics is available open-access starting December 3, 2024. Click the following link to see a PDF of the book
Carrie N. Baker holds a B.A. in Philosophy from Yale University, a J.D. from Emory University School of Law, and an M.A. and Ph.D. from Emory’s Institute of Women’s, Gender, and Sexuality Studies. She is the Sylvia Dlugasch Bauman Chair of American Studies and Professor of the Study of Women, Gender and Sexuality Studies at Smith College where, as a legal and social movement scholar, she teaches courses on gender, law and public policy; feminist social movements; and feminist public writing. In addition to publishing peer-reviewed academic scholarship, Baker also serves as a regular writer and contributing editor for Ms. Magazine, has a monthly column in the Daily Hampshire Gazette, and hosts Feminist Futures, a radio program on WHMP 101.5 FM in Northampton, Massachusetts.
Jessie Cohen holds a Ph.D. in History from Columbia University, and is an editor at the New Books Network.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>284</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9fa0e65e-ace1-11ef-9344-7b9c4a98fb27</guid>
      <title>Olivia Chilcote, &quot;Unrecognized in California: Federal Acknowledgment and the San Luis Rey Band of Mission Indians&quot; (U Washington Press, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>California has more unrecognized Native tribes than any other state - what led to this strange state of affairs, and what does this mean in practice?&nbsp;</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780295752846" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Unrecognized in&nbsp;California:&nbsp;Federal Acknowledgment and the San Luis Rey Band of Mission&nbsp;Indians&nbsp;</em></a>(U Washington Press, 2024), San Diego State associate professor Olivia Chilcote answers these questions through the history and experience of her own tribe. Despite the inherent tribal sovereignty of the San Luis Rey Band, and indeed, of all Native tribes and nations, the long and difficult past of colonialism in California - from the Spanish, to the Mexican, to the American empires - has provided an array of obstacles to the acquisition of land and tribal recognition for the&nbsp;San Luis Rey Band and others. This unrecognized status has kept them from accessing several programs and protections, including NAGPRA. Yet, despite these headwinds, the San Luis Rey&nbsp;Band and other unrecognized California tribes nonetheless practice sovereignty in other ways, and in doing so continue to fight toward future recognition. In this very personal history, Chilcote explains how the government-to-government relationship between the United States and tribal nations creates both challenges and opportunities for Native people in the twenty first century.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 30 Nov 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/olivia-chilcote-unrecognized-in-california-federal-acknowledgment-and-the-san-luis-rey-band-of-mission-indians-u-washington-press-2024-ZyerZDBj</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>California has more unrecognized Native tribes than any other state - what led to this strange state of affairs, and what does this mean in practice?&nbsp;</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780295752846" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Unrecognized in&nbsp;California:&nbsp;Federal Acknowledgment and the San Luis Rey Band of Mission&nbsp;Indians&nbsp;</em></a>(U Washington Press, 2024), San Diego State associate professor Olivia Chilcote answers these questions through the history and experience of her own tribe. Despite the inherent tribal sovereignty of the San Luis Rey Band, and indeed, of all Native tribes and nations, the long and difficult past of colonialism in California - from the Spanish, to the Mexican, to the American empires - has provided an array of obstacles to the acquisition of land and tribal recognition for the&nbsp;San Luis Rey Band and others. This unrecognized status has kept them from accessing several programs and protections, including NAGPRA. Yet, despite these headwinds, the San Luis Rey&nbsp;Band and other unrecognized California tribes nonetheless practice sovereignty in other ways, and in doing so continue to fight toward future recognition. In this very personal history, Chilcote explains how the government-to-government relationship between the United States and tribal nations creates both challenges and opportunities for Native people in the twenty first century.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="73115751" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/bd2c4f9d-abfd-41fd-958c-e28e730ea168/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=bd2c4f9d-abfd-41fd-958c-e28e730ea168&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Olivia Chilcote, &quot;Unrecognized in California: Federal Acknowledgment and the San Luis Rey Band of Mission Indians&quot; (U Washington Press, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:16:09</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>California has more unrecognized Native tribes than any other state - what led to this strange state of affairs, and what does this mean in practice? 
In Unrecognized in California: Federal Acknowledgment and the San Luis Rey Band of Mission Indians (U Washington Press, 2024), San Diego State associate professor Olivia Chilcote answers these questions through the history and experience of her own tribe. Despite the inherent tribal sovereignty of the San Luis Rey Band, and indeed, of all Native tribes and nations, the long and difficult past of colonialism in California - from the Spanish, to the Mexican, to the American empires - has provided an array of obstacles to the acquisition of land and tribal recognition for the San Luis Rey Band and others. This unrecognized status has kept them from accessing several programs and protections, including NAGPRA. Yet, despite these headwinds, the San Luis Rey Band and other unrecognized California tribes nonetheless practice sovereignty in other ways, and in doing so continue to fight toward future recognition. In this very personal history, Chilcote explains how the government-to-government relationship between the United States and tribal nations creates both challenges and opportunities for Native people in the twenty first century.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>California has more unrecognized Native tribes than any other state - what led to this strange state of affairs, and what does this mean in practice? 
In Unrecognized in California: Federal Acknowledgment and the San Luis Rey Band of Mission Indians (U Washington Press, 2024), San Diego State associate professor Olivia Chilcote answers these questions through the history and experience of her own tribe. Despite the inherent tribal sovereignty of the San Luis Rey Band, and indeed, of all Native tribes and nations, the long and difficult past of colonialism in California - from the Spanish, to the Mexican, to the American empires - has provided an array of obstacles to the acquisition of land and tribal recognition for the San Luis Rey Band and others. This unrecognized status has kept them from accessing several programs and protections, including NAGPRA. Yet, despite these headwinds, the San Luis Rey Band and other unrecognized California tribes nonetheless practice sovereignty in other ways, and in doing so continue to fight toward future recognition. In this very personal history, Chilcote explains how the government-to-government relationship between the United States and tribal nations creates both challenges and opportunities for Native people in the twenty first century.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>172</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7e2837c8-aced-11ef-8ccc-7329f5f9cd52</guid>
      <title>Samantha A. Vortherms, &quot;Manipulating Authoritarian Citizenship: Security, Development, and Local Membership in China&quot; (Stanford UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The redistribution of political and economic rights is inherently unequal in autocratic societies. Autocrats routinely divide their populations into included and excluded groups, creating particularistic citizenship through granting some groups access to rights and redistribution while restricting or denying access to others. This book asks: why would a government with powerful tools of exclusion expand access to socioeconomic citizenship rights? And when autocratic systems expand redistribution, whom do they choose to include?</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781503640184" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Manipulating Authoritarian Citizenship: Security, Development, and Local Membership in China</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Stanford UP, 2024), Samantha A. Vortherms examines the crucial case of China—where internal citizenship regimes control who can and cannot become a local citizen through the household registration system (<em>hukou</em>)—and uncovers how autocrats use such institutions to create particularistic membership in citizenship. Vortherms shows how local governments explicitly manipulate local citizenship membership not only to ensure political security and stability, but also, crucially, to advance economic development. Vortherms demonstrates how autocrats use differentiated citizenship to control degrees of access to rights and thus fulfill the authoritarian bargain and balance security and economic incentives. This book expands our understanding of individual-state relations in both autocratic contexts and across a variety of regime types.</p><p><a href="https://www.samanthavortherms.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Samantha Vortherms</a>&nbsp;is an assistant professor at University of California, Irvine's&nbsp;<a href="http://www.polisci.uci.edu/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Department of Political Science</a>. She is a faculty affiliate at UCI’s&nbsp;<a href="https://www.longinstitute.uci.edu/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Long U.S.-China Institute</a>; its&nbsp;<a href="https://www.ppe.socsci.uci.edu/index.php" rel="noopener noreferrer">Philosophy, Political Science, and Economics program</a>; and is a Non-resident Scholar at UC San Diego’s&nbsp;<a href="https://china.ucsd.edu/" rel="noopener noreferrer">21st Century China Center</a>. The primary focus of her research is on how processes of economic development affect institutional change and the relationship between the individual and the state. Her research has been published in journals such as&nbsp;<em>The China Quarterly</em>,&nbsp;<em>World Development</em>,&nbsp;<em>Review of International Political Economy, Business and Politics</em>, and&nbsp;<em>Urban Studies</em>. She received her Ph.D. in&nbsp;<a href="http://polisci.wisc.edu/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Political Science</a>&nbsp;from the&nbsp;<a href="http://www.wisc.edu/" rel="noopener noreferrer">University of Wisconsin–Madison</a>, her M.A. in&nbsp;<a href="https://cir.uchicago.edu/" rel="noopener noreferrer">International Relations</a>&nbsp;at the University of Chicago, her A.M. in Public Policy from University of Chicago's&nbsp;<a href="https://harris.uchicago.edu/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Harris School of Public Policy</a>, and her B.A. from the University of Richmond.</p><p>Interviewer&nbsp;<a href="https://peterlorentzen.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Peter Lorentzen</a>&nbsp;is an&nbsp;<a href="https://www.usfca.edu/faculty/peter-lorentzen" rel="noopener noreferrer">Associate Professor of Economics at the University of San Francisco</a>, a nonresident scholar at the&nbsp;<a href="https://china.ucsd.edu/scholars/nonresident-scholars.html" rel="noopener noreferrer">UCSD 21st&nbsp;Century China Center</a>, an alumnus of the&nbsp;<a href="https://www.ncuscr.org/program/public-intellectuals-program/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Public Intellectuals Program of the National Committee on US-China Relations</a>, and is currently a visiting scholar at the&nbsp;<a href="https://sccei.fsi.stanford.edu/people/peter_lorentzen" rel="noopener noreferrer">Stanford Center on China’s Economy and Institutions</a>. His research focuses on the economics of information, incentives, and institutions, primarily as applied to the development and governance of China. He created the unique&nbsp;<a href="https://www.usfca.edu/arts-sciences/programs/graduate/applied-economics/program-overview" rel="noopener noreferrer">Master’s of Science in Applied Economics</a>&nbsp;at the University of San Francisco, which teaches the conceptual frameworks and practical data analytics skills needed to succeed in the digital economy.</p><p>Lorentzen’s other NBN interviews relating to China’s economy and social control include&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/seeking-truth-and-hiding-facts#entry:195144@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">Seeking Truth and Hiding Facts</a>, on governance and quantification,&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/outsourcing-repression#entry:165056@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">Outsourcing Repression</a>, on the use of nonstate actors for coercion,&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/how-china-escaped-shock-therapy#entry:120782@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">How China Escaped Shock Therapy</a>, on China’s marketization procession,&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/invisible-china#entry:137923@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">Invisible China</a>, on the urban-rural divide, and&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/welfare-for-autocrats-1#entry:61279@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">Welfare for Autocrats</a>, on the strategic targeting of poverty assistance.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 30 Nov 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/samantha-a-vortherms-manipulating-authoritarian-citizenship-security-development-and-local-membership-in-china-stanford-up-2024-5Fzel3GQ</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The redistribution of political and economic rights is inherently unequal in autocratic societies. Autocrats routinely divide their populations into included and excluded groups, creating particularistic citizenship through granting some groups access to rights and redistribution while restricting or denying access to others. This book asks: why would a government with powerful tools of exclusion expand access to socioeconomic citizenship rights? And when autocratic systems expand redistribution, whom do they choose to include?</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781503640184" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Manipulating Authoritarian Citizenship: Security, Development, and Local Membership in China</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Stanford UP, 2024), Samantha A. Vortherms examines the crucial case of China—where internal citizenship regimes control who can and cannot become a local citizen through the household registration system (<em>hukou</em>)—and uncovers how autocrats use such institutions to create particularistic membership in citizenship. Vortherms shows how local governments explicitly manipulate local citizenship membership not only to ensure political security and stability, but also, crucially, to advance economic development. Vortherms demonstrates how autocrats use differentiated citizenship to control degrees of access to rights and thus fulfill the authoritarian bargain and balance security and economic incentives. This book expands our understanding of individual-state relations in both autocratic contexts and across a variety of regime types.</p><p><a href="https://www.samanthavortherms.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Samantha Vortherms</a>&nbsp;is an assistant professor at University of California, Irvine's&nbsp;<a href="http://www.polisci.uci.edu/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Department of Political Science</a>. She is a faculty affiliate at UCI’s&nbsp;<a href="https://www.longinstitute.uci.edu/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Long U.S.-China Institute</a>; its&nbsp;<a href="https://www.ppe.socsci.uci.edu/index.php" rel="noopener noreferrer">Philosophy, Political Science, and Economics program</a>; and is a Non-resident Scholar at UC San Diego’s&nbsp;<a href="https://china.ucsd.edu/" rel="noopener noreferrer">21st Century China Center</a>. The primary focus of her research is on how processes of economic development affect institutional change and the relationship between the individual and the state. Her research has been published in journals such as&nbsp;<em>The China Quarterly</em>,&nbsp;<em>World Development</em>,&nbsp;<em>Review of International Political Economy, Business and Politics</em>, and&nbsp;<em>Urban Studies</em>. She received her Ph.D. in&nbsp;<a href="http://polisci.wisc.edu/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Political Science</a>&nbsp;from the&nbsp;<a href="http://www.wisc.edu/" rel="noopener noreferrer">University of Wisconsin–Madison</a>, her M.A. in&nbsp;<a href="https://cir.uchicago.edu/" rel="noopener noreferrer">International Relations</a>&nbsp;at the University of Chicago, her A.M. in Public Policy from University of Chicago's&nbsp;<a href="https://harris.uchicago.edu/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Harris School of Public Policy</a>, and her B.A. from the University of Richmond.</p><p>Interviewer&nbsp;<a href="https://peterlorentzen.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Peter Lorentzen</a>&nbsp;is an&nbsp;<a href="https://www.usfca.edu/faculty/peter-lorentzen" rel="noopener noreferrer">Associate Professor of Economics at the University of San Francisco</a>, a nonresident scholar at the&nbsp;<a href="https://china.ucsd.edu/scholars/nonresident-scholars.html" rel="noopener noreferrer">UCSD 21st&nbsp;Century China Center</a>, an alumnus of the&nbsp;<a href="https://www.ncuscr.org/program/public-intellectuals-program/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Public Intellectuals Program of the National Committee on US-China Relations</a>, and is currently a visiting scholar at the&nbsp;<a href="https://sccei.fsi.stanford.edu/people/peter_lorentzen" rel="noopener noreferrer">Stanford Center on China’s Economy and Institutions</a>. His research focuses on the economics of information, incentives, and institutions, primarily as applied to the development and governance of China. He created the unique&nbsp;<a href="https://www.usfca.edu/arts-sciences/programs/graduate/applied-economics/program-overview" rel="noopener noreferrer">Master’s of Science in Applied Economics</a>&nbsp;at the University of San Francisco, which teaches the conceptual frameworks and practical data analytics skills needed to succeed in the digital economy.</p><p>Lorentzen’s other NBN interviews relating to China’s economy and social control include&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/seeking-truth-and-hiding-facts#entry:195144@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">Seeking Truth and Hiding Facts</a>, on governance and quantification,&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/outsourcing-repression#entry:165056@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">Outsourcing Repression</a>, on the use of nonstate actors for coercion,&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/how-china-escaped-shock-therapy#entry:120782@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">How China Escaped Shock Therapy</a>, on China’s marketization procession,&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/invisible-china#entry:137923@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">Invisible China</a>, on the urban-rural divide, and&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/welfare-for-autocrats-1#entry:61279@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">Welfare for Autocrats</a>, on the strategic targeting of poverty assistance.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="58069894" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/e9da3f0a-6900-4567-b780-4e4665e07682/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=e9da3f0a-6900-4567-b780-4e4665e07682&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Samantha A. Vortherms, &quot;Manipulating Authoritarian Citizenship: Security, Development, and Local Membership in China&quot; (Stanford UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:00:29</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The redistribution of political and economic rights is inherently unequal in autocratic societies. Autocrats routinely divide their populations into included and excluded groups, creating particularistic citizenship through granting some groups access to rights and redistribution while restricting or denying access to others. This book asks: why would a government with powerful tools of exclusion expand access to socioeconomic citizenship rights? And when autocratic systems expand redistribution, whom do they choose to include?
In Manipulating Authoritarian Citizenship: Security, Development, and Local Membership in China (Stanford UP, 2024), Samantha A. Vortherms examines the crucial case of China—where internal citizenship regimes control who can and cannot become a local citizen through the household registration system (hukou)—and uncovers how autocrats use such institutions to create particularistic membership in citizenship. Vortherms shows how local governments explicitly manipulate local citizenship membership not only to ensure political security and stability, but also, crucially, to advance economic development. Vortherms demonstrates how autocrats use differentiated citizenship to control degrees of access to rights and thus fulfill the authoritarian bargain and balance security and economic incentives. This book expands our understanding of individual-state relations in both autocratic contexts and across a variety of regime types.
Samantha Vortherms is an assistant professor at University of California, Irvine&apos;s Department of Political Science. She is a faculty affiliate at UCI’s Long U.S.-China Institute; its Philosophy, Political Science, and Economics program; and is a Non-resident Scholar at UC San Diego’s 21st Century China Center. The primary focus of her research is on how processes of economic development affect institutional change and the relationship between the individual and the state. Her research has been published in journals such as The China Quarterly, World Development, Review of International Political Economy, Business and Politics, and Urban Studies. She received her Ph.D. in Political Science from the University of Wisconsin–Madison, her M.A. in International Relations at the University of Chicago, her A.M. in Public Policy from University of Chicago&apos;s Harris School of Public Policy, and her B.A. from the University of Richmond.
Interviewer Peter Lorentzen is an Associate Professor of Economics at the University of San Francisco, a nonresident scholar at the UCSD 21st Century China Center, an alumnus of the Public Intellectuals Program of the National Committee on US-China Relations, and is currently a visiting scholar at the Stanford Center on China’s Economy and Institutions. His research focuses on the economics of information, incentives, and institutions, primarily as applied to the development and governance of China. He created the unique Master’s of Science in Applied Economics at the University of San Francisco, which teaches the conceptual frameworks and practical data analytics skills needed to succeed in the digital economy.
Lorentzen’s other NBN interviews relating to China’s economy and social control include Seeking Truth and Hiding Facts, on governance and quantification, Outsourcing Repression, on the use of nonstate actors for coercion, How China Escaped Shock Therapy, on China’s marketization procession, Invisible China, on the urban-rural divide, and Welfare for Autocrats, on the strategic targeting of poverty assistance.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The redistribution of political and economic rights is inherently unequal in autocratic societies. Autocrats routinely divide their populations into included and excluded groups, creating particularistic citizenship through granting some groups access to rights and redistribution while restricting or denying access to others. This book asks: why would a government with powerful tools of exclusion expand access to socioeconomic citizenship rights? And when autocratic systems expand redistribution, whom do they choose to include?
In Manipulating Authoritarian Citizenship: Security, Development, and Local Membership in China (Stanford UP, 2024), Samantha A. Vortherms examines the crucial case of China—where internal citizenship regimes control who can and cannot become a local citizen through the household registration system (hukou)—and uncovers how autocrats use such institutions to create particularistic membership in citizenship. Vortherms shows how local governments explicitly manipulate local citizenship membership not only to ensure political security and stability, but also, crucially, to advance economic development. Vortherms demonstrates how autocrats use differentiated citizenship to control degrees of access to rights and thus fulfill the authoritarian bargain and balance security and economic incentives. This book expands our understanding of individual-state relations in both autocratic contexts and across a variety of regime types.
Samantha Vortherms is an assistant professor at University of California, Irvine&apos;s Department of Political Science. She is a faculty affiliate at UCI’s Long U.S.-China Institute; its Philosophy, Political Science, and Economics program; and is a Non-resident Scholar at UC San Diego’s 21st Century China Center. The primary focus of her research is on how processes of economic development affect institutional change and the relationship between the individual and the state. Her research has been published in journals such as The China Quarterly, World Development, Review of International Political Economy, Business and Politics, and Urban Studies. She received her Ph.D. in Political Science from the University of Wisconsin–Madison, her M.A. in International Relations at the University of Chicago, her A.M. in Public Policy from University of Chicago&apos;s Harris School of Public Policy, and her B.A. from the University of Richmond.
Interviewer Peter Lorentzen is an Associate Professor of Economics at the University of San Francisco, a nonresident scholar at the UCSD 21st Century China Center, an alumnus of the Public Intellectuals Program of the National Committee on US-China Relations, and is currently a visiting scholar at the Stanford Center on China’s Economy and Institutions. His research focuses on the economics of information, incentives, and institutions, primarily as applied to the development and governance of China. He created the unique Master’s of Science in Applied Economics at the University of San Francisco, which teaches the conceptual frameworks and practical data analytics skills needed to succeed in the digital economy.
Lorentzen’s other NBN interviews relating to China’s economy and social control include Seeking Truth and Hiding Facts, on governance and quantification, Outsourcing Repression, on the use of nonstate actors for coercion, How China Escaped Shock Therapy, on China’s marketization procession, Invisible China, on the urban-rural divide, and Welfare for Autocrats, on the strategic targeting of poverty assistance.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>106</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9d03c8b2-ab74-11ef-b76f-8fa19c4030eb</guid>
      <title>Daniel J. Mallinson and A. Lee Hannah, &quot;Green Rush: The Rise of Medical Marijuana in the United States&quot; (NYU Press, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Political Scientists Dan Mallinson and Lee Hannah, both experts on state-level politics and the policy making process, have a new book that focuses on the state-level process of legalization of medical cannabis across the United States.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781479827930" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Green Rush: The Rise of Medical Marijuana in the United States</em></a>&nbsp;(NYU Press, 2024)&nbsp;is a book that needed to be written, since it is an important exploration not only of the continuing policy conflicts and tensions around marijuana in the United States, but it specifically focuses on how states have taken up this issue and what they each did in moving towards medical marijuana’s accessibility. The marijuana question in in the United States remains a fascinating federalism dynamic, with national laws in conflict with state laws, and state laws operating in different ways, around both medical marijuana and legalized recreational use of cannabis.</p><p>Mallinson and Hannah provide the reader with an excellent overview of policymaking designs and theories since their analysis takes up so many different dimensions of the policy process in the United States. They then move into the history behind the criminalization of marijuana, and the way in which this policy has clearly racialized roots.&nbsp;<em>Green Rush</em>&nbsp;highlights the ways that some of the shifts and changes in state policies started to make their way through different states, via action by state legislatures and or through state-wide referenda. With particular attention to a number of states, like California, Pennsylvania, Ohio, and West Virginia, Mallinson and Hannah chart the ways that different states have gone about legalizing the medical use of marijuana, which has also been part of the pathway for other states to move towards decriminalization and legalization of adult use recreational marijuana.</p><p><em>Green Rush</em>&nbsp;is an accessible policy analysis and provides important insight into the path that medical marijuana took as it became legal in one state after another.&nbsp;<em>Green Rush: The Rise of Medical Marijuana in the United States</em>&nbsp;charts the policy changes themselves, but also pays attention to changing public opinion around cannabis and shifts in the war on drugs as well.</p><p>(I found this book so useful that I have adopted it to use in my&nbsp;<em>Public Policy</em>&nbsp;class.)</p><p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/hosts/profile/a7ac4af9-1306-463f-baf9-00f1f4187dfd" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books in Political Science</em></a><em>&nbsp;channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of&nbsp;</em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700633883/the-politics-of-the-marvel-cinematic-universe/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe</em></a><em>&nbsp;(University Press of Kansas, 2022), as well as co-editor of the award winning book,&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.kentuckypress.com/9780813141015/women-and-the-white-house/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a><em>&nbsp;(University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached&nbsp;</em><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/gorenlj.bsky.social" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>@gorenlj.bsky.social</em></a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Nov 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/daniel-j-mallinson-and-a-lee-hannah-green-rush-the-rise-of-medical-marijuana-in-the-united-states-nyu-press-2024-bsi_nHgI</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Political Scientists Dan Mallinson and Lee Hannah, both experts on state-level politics and the policy making process, have a new book that focuses on the state-level process of legalization of medical cannabis across the United States.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781479827930" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Green Rush: The Rise of Medical Marijuana in the United States</em></a>&nbsp;(NYU Press, 2024)&nbsp;is a book that needed to be written, since it is an important exploration not only of the continuing policy conflicts and tensions around marijuana in the United States, but it specifically focuses on how states have taken up this issue and what they each did in moving towards medical marijuana’s accessibility. The marijuana question in in the United States remains a fascinating federalism dynamic, with national laws in conflict with state laws, and state laws operating in different ways, around both medical marijuana and legalized recreational use of cannabis.</p><p>Mallinson and Hannah provide the reader with an excellent overview of policymaking designs and theories since their analysis takes up so many different dimensions of the policy process in the United States. They then move into the history behind the criminalization of marijuana, and the way in which this policy has clearly racialized roots.&nbsp;<em>Green Rush</em>&nbsp;highlights the ways that some of the shifts and changes in state policies started to make their way through different states, via action by state legislatures and or through state-wide referenda. With particular attention to a number of states, like California, Pennsylvania, Ohio, and West Virginia, Mallinson and Hannah chart the ways that different states have gone about legalizing the medical use of marijuana, which has also been part of the pathway for other states to move towards decriminalization and legalization of adult use recreational marijuana.</p><p><em>Green Rush</em>&nbsp;is an accessible policy analysis and provides important insight into the path that medical marijuana took as it became legal in one state after another.&nbsp;<em>Green Rush: The Rise of Medical Marijuana in the United States</em>&nbsp;charts the policy changes themselves, but also pays attention to changing public opinion around cannabis and shifts in the war on drugs as well.</p><p>(I found this book so useful that I have adopted it to use in my&nbsp;<em>Public Policy</em>&nbsp;class.)</p><p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/hosts/profile/a7ac4af9-1306-463f-baf9-00f1f4187dfd" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books in Political Science</em></a><em>&nbsp;channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of&nbsp;</em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700633883/the-politics-of-the-marvel-cinematic-universe/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe</em></a><em>&nbsp;(University Press of Kansas, 2022), as well as co-editor of the award winning book,&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.kentuckypress.com/9780813141015/women-and-the-white-house/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a><em>&nbsp;(University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached&nbsp;</em><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/gorenlj.bsky.social" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>@gorenlj.bsky.social</em></a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="46449025" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/acb15d0e-f3cb-4a44-a9f0-49e8d50568ef/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=acb15d0e-f3cb-4a44-a9f0-49e8d50568ef&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Daniel J. Mallinson and A. Lee Hannah, &quot;Green Rush: The Rise of Medical Marijuana in the United States&quot; (NYU Press, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:48:22</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Political Scientists Dan Mallinson and Lee Hannah, both experts on state-level politics and the policy making process, have a new book that focuses on the state-level process of legalization of medical cannabis across the United States. Green Rush: The Rise of Medical Marijuana in the United States (NYU Press, 2024) is a book that needed to be written, since it is an important exploration not only of the continuing policy conflicts and tensions around marijuana in the United States, but it specifically focuses on how states have taken up this issue and what they each did in moving towards medical marijuana’s accessibility. The marijuana question in in the United States remains a fascinating federalism dynamic, with national laws in conflict with state laws, and state laws operating in different ways, around both medical marijuana and legalized recreational use of cannabis.
Mallinson and Hannah provide the reader with an excellent overview of policymaking designs and theories since their analysis takes up so many different dimensions of the policy process in the United States. They then move into the history behind the criminalization of marijuana, and the way in which this policy has clearly racialized roots. Green Rush highlights the ways that some of the shifts and changes in state policies started to make their way through different states, via action by state legislatures and or through state-wide referenda. With particular attention to a number of states, like California, Pennsylvania, Ohio, and West Virginia, Mallinson and Hannah chart the ways that different states have gone about legalizing the medical use of marijuana, which has also been part of the pathway for other states to move towards decriminalization and legalization of adult use recreational marijuana.
Green Rush is an accessible policy analysis and provides important insight into the path that medical marijuana took as it became legal in one state after another. Green Rush: The Rise of Medical Marijuana in the United States charts the policy changes themselves, but also pays attention to changing public opinion around cannabis and shifts in the war on drugs as well.
(I found this book so useful that I have adopted it to use in my Public Policy class.)
Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the New Books in Political Science channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe (University Press of Kansas, 2022), as well as co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached @gorenlj.bsky.social
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Political Scientists Dan Mallinson and Lee Hannah, both experts on state-level politics and the policy making process, have a new book that focuses on the state-level process of legalization of medical cannabis across the United States. Green Rush: The Rise of Medical Marijuana in the United States (NYU Press, 2024) is a book that needed to be written, since it is an important exploration not only of the continuing policy conflicts and tensions around marijuana in the United States, but it specifically focuses on how states have taken up this issue and what they each did in moving towards medical marijuana’s accessibility. The marijuana question in in the United States remains a fascinating federalism dynamic, with national laws in conflict with state laws, and state laws operating in different ways, around both medical marijuana and legalized recreational use of cannabis.
Mallinson and Hannah provide the reader with an excellent overview of policymaking designs and theories since their analysis takes up so many different dimensions of the policy process in the United States. They then move into the history behind the criminalization of marijuana, and the way in which this policy has clearly racialized roots. Green Rush highlights the ways that some of the shifts and changes in state policies started to make their way through different states, via action by state legislatures and or through state-wide referenda. With particular attention to a number of states, like California, Pennsylvania, Ohio, and West Virginia, Mallinson and Hannah chart the ways that different states have gone about legalizing the medical use of marijuana, which has also been part of the pathway for other states to move towards decriminalization and legalization of adult use recreational marijuana.
Green Rush is an accessible policy analysis and provides important insight into the path that medical marijuana took as it became legal in one state after another. Green Rush: The Rise of Medical Marijuana in the United States charts the policy changes themselves, but also pays attention to changing public opinion around cannabis and shifts in the war on drugs as well.
(I found this book so useful that I have adopted it to use in my Public Policy class.)
Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the New Books in Political Science channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe (University Press of Kansas, 2022), as well as co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached @gorenlj.bsky.social
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>750</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">62030916-acf1-11ef-a308-531a6ca5a47f</guid>
      <title>Trump’s Mass Deportation Plan: Can He Really Do It?</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Kitty Calavita, Chancellor’s Professor Emerita of Criminology, Law and Society at the University of California, Irvine, discuss the historical context and implications of Operation Wetback, a 1954 U.S. mass deportation of Mexican immigrants, and its relevance to President-elect Donald Trump's proposed mass deportation plans. Calavita explains that Operation Wetback aimed to address the economic utility of undocumented workers and political backlash against them, particularly during a recession and Cold War rhetoric. She highlights the logistical challenges of such operations, including the integration of immigrants into various industries and the legal protections against random stops. Calavita suggests that while high-profile roundups may occur, a massive deportation campaign is unlikely due to economic and logistical obstacles.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Nov 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/trumps-mass-deportation-plan-can-he-really-do-it-SUXuz_6r</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kitty Calavita, Chancellor’s Professor Emerita of Criminology, Law and Society at the University of California, Irvine, discuss the historical context and implications of Operation Wetback, a 1954 U.S. mass deportation of Mexican immigrants, and its relevance to President-elect Donald Trump's proposed mass deportation plans. Calavita explains that Operation Wetback aimed to address the economic utility of undocumented workers and political backlash against them, particularly during a recession and Cold War rhetoric. She highlights the logistical challenges of such operations, including the integration of immigrants into various industries and the legal protections against random stops. Calavita suggests that while high-profile roundups may occur, a massive deportation campaign is unlikely due to economic and logistical obstacles.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="25627015" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/53cf9499-71d2-4b11-8a02-5a10faa888d6/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=53cf9499-71d2-4b11-8a02-5a10faa888d6&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Trump’s Mass Deportation Plan: Can He Really Do It?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:26:41</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Kitty Calavita, Chancellor’s Professor Emerita of Criminology, Law and Society at the University of California, Irvine, discuss the historical context and implications of Operation Wetback, a 1954 U.S. mass deportation of Mexican immigrants, and its relevance to President-elect Donald Trump&apos;s proposed mass deportation plans. Calavita explains that Operation Wetback aimed to address the economic utility of undocumented workers and political backlash against them, particularly during a recession and Cold War rhetoric. She highlights the logistical challenges of such operations, including the integration of immigrants into various industries and the legal protections against random stops. Calavita suggests that while high-profile roundups may occur, a massive deportation campaign is unlikely due to economic and logistical obstacles.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Kitty Calavita, Chancellor’s Professor Emerita of Criminology, Law and Society at the University of California, Irvine, discuss the historical context and implications of Operation Wetback, a 1954 U.S. mass deportation of Mexican immigrants, and its relevance to President-elect Donald Trump&apos;s proposed mass deportation plans. Calavita explains that Operation Wetback aimed to address the economic utility of undocumented workers and political backlash against them, particularly during a recession and Cold War rhetoric. She highlights the logistical challenges of such operations, including the integration of immigrants into various industries and the legal protections against random stops. Calavita suggests that while high-profile roundups may occur, a massive deportation campaign is unlikely due to economic and logistical obstacles.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>155</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">a8c65a68-aa69-11ef-959e-6332c782c16a</guid>
      <title>Sandipto Dasgupta, &quot;Legalizing the Revolution: India and the Constitution of the Postcolony&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Anticolonial movements of the twentieth century generated audacious ideas of freedom. Following decolonization, the challenge was to give an institutional form to those ideas. Through an original account of India's constitution making, Legalizing the Revolution explores the promises, challenges, and contradictions of that task.&nbsp;</p><p>In contrast to derived templates, Dasgupta theorizes the distinctively postcolonial constitution through an innovative synthesis of the history of decolonization and constitutional theory.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009525244" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Legalizing the Revolution: India and the Constitution of the Postcolony</em></a>&nbsp;(Cambridge UP, 2024) traces the contentious transition from the tumult of popular anticolonial politics to the ordered calculus of postcolonial governance; and then explains how major institutions – parliament, judiciary, rights, property – were formed by that foundational tension. A major contribution to postcolonial political theory, the book excavates the unrealized futures of decolonization. At the same time, through a critical account of the making of the postcolonial constitutional order, it offers keys to understanding the present crisis of that order, including and especially in India.</p><p>Sandipto Dasgupta is&nbsp;<a href="https://www.newschool.edu/nssr/faculty/sandipto-dasgupta/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Assistant Professor of Politics</a>&nbsp;at The New School for Social Research. For the 2024-25 academic year, he will be a member of the Institute for Advanced Study at Princeton University. His research is in the history of modern political and social thought, especially the political theory of empire, decolonization, and postcolonial presents.&nbsp;</p><p><a href="https://vatsalnaresh.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Vatsal Naresh</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a Lecturer in Social Studies at Harvard University. His recent publications include co-edited volumes on Negotiating Democracy and Religious Pluralism (OUP 2021) and Constituent Assemblies (CUP 2018).</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Nov 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/sandipto-dasgupta-legalizing-the-revolution-india-and-the-constitution-of-the-postcolony-cambridge-up-2024-dfbzwiE2</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anticolonial movements of the twentieth century generated audacious ideas of freedom. Following decolonization, the challenge was to give an institutional form to those ideas. Through an original account of India's constitution making, Legalizing the Revolution explores the promises, challenges, and contradictions of that task.&nbsp;</p><p>In contrast to derived templates, Dasgupta theorizes the distinctively postcolonial constitution through an innovative synthesis of the history of decolonization and constitutional theory.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009525244" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Legalizing the Revolution: India and the Constitution of the Postcolony</em></a>&nbsp;(Cambridge UP, 2024) traces the contentious transition from the tumult of popular anticolonial politics to the ordered calculus of postcolonial governance; and then explains how major institutions – parliament, judiciary, rights, property – were formed by that foundational tension. A major contribution to postcolonial political theory, the book excavates the unrealized futures of decolonization. At the same time, through a critical account of the making of the postcolonial constitutional order, it offers keys to understanding the present crisis of that order, including and especially in India.</p><p>Sandipto Dasgupta is&nbsp;<a href="https://www.newschool.edu/nssr/faculty/sandipto-dasgupta/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Assistant Professor of Politics</a>&nbsp;at The New School for Social Research. For the 2024-25 academic year, he will be a member of the Institute for Advanced Study at Princeton University. His research is in the history of modern political and social thought, especially the political theory of empire, decolonization, and postcolonial presents.&nbsp;</p><p><a href="https://vatsalnaresh.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Vatsal Naresh</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a Lecturer in Social Studies at Harvard University. His recent publications include co-edited volumes on Negotiating Democracy and Religious Pluralism (OUP 2021) and Constituent Assemblies (CUP 2018).</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="87865290" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/0fc4ad91-c81e-4d38-9116-2532d32be4d3/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=0fc4ad91-c81e-4d38-9116-2532d32be4d3&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Sandipto Dasgupta, &quot;Legalizing the Revolution: India and the Constitution of the Postcolony&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:31:31</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Anticolonial movements of the twentieth century generated audacious ideas of freedom. Following decolonization, the challenge was to give an institutional form to those ideas. Through an original account of India&apos;s constitution making, Legalizing the Revolution explores the promises, challenges, and contradictions of that task. 
In contrast to derived templates, Dasgupta theorizes the distinctively postcolonial constitution through an innovative synthesis of the history of decolonization and constitutional theory. Legalizing the Revolution: India and the Constitution of the Postcolony (Cambridge UP, 2024) traces the contentious transition from the tumult of popular anticolonial politics to the ordered calculus of postcolonial governance; and then explains how major institutions – parliament, judiciary, rights, property – were formed by that foundational tension. A major contribution to postcolonial political theory, the book excavates the unrealized futures of decolonization. At the same time, through a critical account of the making of the postcolonial constitutional order, it offers keys to understanding the present crisis of that order, including and especially in India.
Sandipto Dasgupta is Assistant Professor of Politics at The New School for Social Research. For the 2024-25 academic year, he will be a member of the Institute for Advanced Study at Princeton University. His research is in the history of modern political and social thought, especially the political theory of empire, decolonization, and postcolonial presents. 
Vatsal Naresh is a Lecturer in Social Studies at Harvard University. His recent publications include co-edited volumes on Negotiating Democracy and Religious Pluralism (OUP 2021) and Constituent Assemblies (CUP 2018).
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Anticolonial movements of the twentieth century generated audacious ideas of freedom. Following decolonization, the challenge was to give an institutional form to those ideas. Through an original account of India&apos;s constitution making, Legalizing the Revolution explores the promises, challenges, and contradictions of that task. 
In contrast to derived templates, Dasgupta theorizes the distinctively postcolonial constitution through an innovative synthesis of the history of decolonization and constitutional theory. Legalizing the Revolution: India and the Constitution of the Postcolony (Cambridge UP, 2024) traces the contentious transition from the tumult of popular anticolonial politics to the ordered calculus of postcolonial governance; and then explains how major institutions – parliament, judiciary, rights, property – were formed by that foundational tension. A major contribution to postcolonial political theory, the book excavates the unrealized futures of decolonization. At the same time, through a critical account of the making of the postcolonial constitutional order, it offers keys to understanding the present crisis of that order, including and especially in India.
Sandipto Dasgupta is Assistant Professor of Politics at The New School for Social Research. For the 2024-25 academic year, he will be a member of the Institute for Advanced Study at Princeton University. His research is in the history of modern political and social thought, especially the political theory of empire, decolonization, and postcolonial presents. 
Vatsal Naresh is a Lecturer in Social Studies at Harvard University. His recent publications include co-edited volumes on Negotiating Democracy and Religious Pluralism (OUP 2021) and Constituent Assemblies (CUP 2018).
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>250</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6a74a248-aa7c-11ef-95ee-13458b4af8c9</guid>
      <title>W. Paul Reeve, et al., &quot;This Abominable Slavery: Race, Religion, and the Battle over Human Bondage in Antebellum Utah&quot; (Oxford UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>On July 22, 1847, a group of about forty refugees entered the Salt Lake Valley. Among them were three enslaved men, two of whom shared the religion, Mormonism, that had caused them to flee. The valley was also home to members of the Ute tribe, who would sometimes barter captive women and children to Spanish colonizers. Thus, the question of whether the Latter-day Saints would accept or reject slavery in their new Zion confronted them on the day they first arrived. Five years later, after Utah had become an American territory, its legislature was prodded to take up the question then roiling the nation: would they be slave or free?</p><p><br></p><p>George D. Watt, the official reporter for the 1852 legislative session, reported debates and speeches in Pitman shorthand. They remained in their original format, virtually untouched, for more than one hundred and fifty years, until LaJean Purcell Carruth transcribed them. In this eye-opening volume&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197765029" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>This Abominable Slavery: Race, Religion, and the Battle over Human Bondage in Antebellum Utah</em></a>&nbsp;(Oxford University Press, 2024), Carruth, Dr. Christopher Rich, and Dr. W. Paul Reeve draw extensively on these new sources to chronicle the session, during which the legislature passed two important statutes: one that legally transformed African American slaves into "servants" but did not pass the condition of servitude on to their children and another that authorized twenty-year indentures for enslaved Native Americans.</p><p><br></p><p>This Abominable Slavery places these debates within the context of the nation's growing sectional divide and contextualizes the meaning of these laws in the lives of Black enslaved people and Native American indentured servants. In doing so, it sheds new light on race, religion, slavery, and unfree labor in the antebellum period.</p><p><br></p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;new book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Nov 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/w-paul-reeve-et-al-this-abominable-slavery-race-religion-and-the-battle-over-human-bondage-in-antebellum-utah-oxford-up-2024-XzubcWue</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On July 22, 1847, a group of about forty refugees entered the Salt Lake Valley. Among them were three enslaved men, two of whom shared the religion, Mormonism, that had caused them to flee. The valley was also home to members of the Ute tribe, who would sometimes barter captive women and children to Spanish colonizers. Thus, the question of whether the Latter-day Saints would accept or reject slavery in their new Zion confronted them on the day they first arrived. Five years later, after Utah had become an American territory, its legislature was prodded to take up the question then roiling the nation: would they be slave or free?</p><p><br></p><p>George D. Watt, the official reporter for the 1852 legislative session, reported debates and speeches in Pitman shorthand. They remained in their original format, virtually untouched, for more than one hundred and fifty years, until LaJean Purcell Carruth transcribed them. In this eye-opening volume&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197765029" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>This Abominable Slavery: Race, Religion, and the Battle over Human Bondage in Antebellum Utah</em></a>&nbsp;(Oxford University Press, 2024), Carruth, Dr. Christopher Rich, and Dr. W. Paul Reeve draw extensively on these new sources to chronicle the session, during which the legislature passed two important statutes: one that legally transformed African American slaves into "servants" but did not pass the condition of servitude on to their children and another that authorized twenty-year indentures for enslaved Native Americans.</p><p><br></p><p>This Abominable Slavery places these debates within the context of the nation's growing sectional divide and contextualizes the meaning of these laws in the lives of Black enslaved people and Native American indentured servants. In doing so, it sheds new light on race, religion, slavery, and unfree labor in the antebellum period.</p><p><br></p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;new book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="49626532" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/542ddf8a-29e9-4267-8d6c-55fb4d0bc40c/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=542ddf8a-29e9-4267-8d6c-55fb4d0bc40c&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>W. Paul Reeve, et al., &quot;This Abominable Slavery: Race, Religion, and the Battle over Human Bondage in Antebellum Utah&quot; (Oxford UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:51:41</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>On July 22, 1847, a group of about forty refugees entered the Salt Lake Valley. Among them were three enslaved men, two of whom shared the religion, Mormonism, that had caused them to flee. The valley was also home to members of the Ute tribe, who would sometimes barter captive women and children to Spanish colonizers. Thus, the question of whether the Latter-day Saints would accept or reject slavery in their new Zion confronted them on the day they first arrived. Five years later, after Utah had become an American territory, its legislature was prodded to take up the question then roiling the nation: would they be slave or free?
George D. Watt, the official reporter for the 1852 legislative session, reported debates and speeches in Pitman shorthand. They remained in their original format, virtually untouched, for more than one hundred and fifty years, until LaJean Purcell Carruth transcribed them. In this eye-opening volume This Abominable Slavery: Race, Religion, and the Battle over Human Bondage in Antebellum Utah (Oxford University Press, 2024), Carruth, Dr. Christopher Rich, and Dr. W. Paul Reeve draw extensively on these new sources to chronicle the session, during which the legislature passed two important statutes: one that legally transformed African American slaves into &quot;servants&quot; but did not pass the condition of servitude on to their children and another that authorized twenty-year indentures for enslaved Native Americans.
This Abominable Slavery places these debates within the context of the nation&apos;s growing sectional divide and contextualizes the meaning of these laws in the lives of Black enslaved people and Native American indentured servants. In doing so, it sheds new light on race, religion, slavery, and unfree labor in the antebellum period.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>On July 22, 1847, a group of about forty refugees entered the Salt Lake Valley. Among them were three enslaved men, two of whom shared the religion, Mormonism, that had caused them to flee. The valley was also home to members of the Ute tribe, who would sometimes barter captive women and children to Spanish colonizers. Thus, the question of whether the Latter-day Saints would accept or reject slavery in their new Zion confronted them on the day they first arrived. Five years later, after Utah had become an American territory, its legislature was prodded to take up the question then roiling the nation: would they be slave or free?
George D. Watt, the official reporter for the 1852 legislative session, reported debates and speeches in Pitman shorthand. They remained in their original format, virtually untouched, for more than one hundred and fifty years, until LaJean Purcell Carruth transcribed them. In this eye-opening volume This Abominable Slavery: Race, Religion, and the Battle over Human Bondage in Antebellum Utah (Oxford University Press, 2024), Carruth, Dr. Christopher Rich, and Dr. W. Paul Reeve draw extensively on these new sources to chronicle the session, during which the legislature passed two important statutes: one that legally transformed African American slaves into &quot;servants&quot; but did not pass the condition of servitude on to their children and another that authorized twenty-year indentures for enslaved Native Americans.
This Abominable Slavery places these debates within the context of the nation&apos;s growing sectional divide and contextualizes the meaning of these laws in the lives of Black enslaved people and Native American indentured servants. In doing so, it sheds new light on race, religion, slavery, and unfree labor in the antebellum period.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1507</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">c43cc624-a9ce-11ef-9e5b-abe6acfe23d0</guid>
      <title>Daniel S. Goldberg, &quot;Tackle Football and Traumatic Brain Injuries: Law, Ethics, and Public Health&quot; (Johns Hopkins UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Football is the national game in the United States – and many families and friends bond over their love of the sport. While few people play professional football, many participate in tackle football as children and adolescents. In the last decades, more attention has been paid to the dangers of playing tackle football, including traumatic brain injury and the degenerative brain disease, CTE (chronic traumatic encephalopathy). As more former players donated their brains, the rate of CTE surprised even those already concerned with traumatic brain injury. If the risks are so great, why do more than two million American children under the age of 18 continue to play tackle football? Is it the opportunity to contribute to a team? Overcome adversity? Test personal limits?</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781421450117" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Tackle Football and Traumatic Brain Injuries: Law, Ethics, and Public Health</em></a>&nbsp;(Johns Hopkins UP, 2024), Dr. Daniel S. Goldberg asks readers to think about American tackle football as an industry – like the American tobacco industry – that sells a product that is dangerous to those who use it. Despite the clearly documented costs to society and individuals who play, the tackle football industry has successfully manufactured doubt about the health hazards. Goldstein argues that a basic familiarity with the history of regulated industries and their intersection with public health is needed both to understand the contemporary debates and to move forward with fair and equitable policy solutions. If the risks to people who play were better known to the public, the profitability and perhaps even the viability of American football would be at risk.</p><p>Goldberg draws on public health ethics, public health law, and the histories of occupational and public health to assess the limits of parental choice to expose their children to risks of injury. Goldberg recommends using public health laws to counter the manufacture of doubt – offering specific policy proposals to address the population health and ethical problems presented by tackle football.</p><p><a href="https://www.cuanschutz.edu/centers/bioethicshumanities/about-us/facultystaff/daniel-s-goldberg" rel="noopener noreferrer">Daniel S. Goldstein</a>, JD, PhD is an associate professor at the Center for Bioethics and Humanities at the University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus. He is the director of Education at the Center for Bioethics and Humanities and director of the Public Health Ethics and Law Program.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Nov 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/daniel-s-goldberg-tackle-football-and-traumatic-brain-injuries-law-ethics-and-public-health-johns-hopkins-up-2024-8yAF3DIJ</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Football is the national game in the United States – and many families and friends bond over their love of the sport. While few people play professional football, many participate in tackle football as children and adolescents. In the last decades, more attention has been paid to the dangers of playing tackle football, including traumatic brain injury and the degenerative brain disease, CTE (chronic traumatic encephalopathy). As more former players donated their brains, the rate of CTE surprised even those already concerned with traumatic brain injury. If the risks are so great, why do more than two million American children under the age of 18 continue to play tackle football? Is it the opportunity to contribute to a team? Overcome adversity? Test personal limits?</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781421450117" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Tackle Football and Traumatic Brain Injuries: Law, Ethics, and Public Health</em></a>&nbsp;(Johns Hopkins UP, 2024), Dr. Daniel S. Goldberg asks readers to think about American tackle football as an industry – like the American tobacco industry – that sells a product that is dangerous to those who use it. Despite the clearly documented costs to society and individuals who play, the tackle football industry has successfully manufactured doubt about the health hazards. Goldstein argues that a basic familiarity with the history of regulated industries and their intersection with public health is needed both to understand the contemporary debates and to move forward with fair and equitable policy solutions. If the risks to people who play were better known to the public, the profitability and perhaps even the viability of American football would be at risk.</p><p>Goldberg draws on public health ethics, public health law, and the histories of occupational and public health to assess the limits of parental choice to expose their children to risks of injury. Goldberg recommends using public health laws to counter the manufacture of doubt – offering specific policy proposals to address the population health and ethical problems presented by tackle football.</p><p><a href="https://www.cuanschutz.edu/centers/bioethicshumanities/about-us/facultystaff/daniel-s-goldberg" rel="noopener noreferrer">Daniel S. Goldstein</a>, JD, PhD is an associate professor at the Center for Bioethics and Humanities at the University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus. He is the director of Education at the Center for Bioethics and Humanities and director of the Public Health Ethics and Law Program.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="53295159" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/3e7a8c5c-3d7e-4571-aeb4-1c3c24f24514/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=3e7a8c5c-3d7e-4571-aeb4-1c3c24f24514&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Daniel S. Goldberg, &quot;Tackle Football and Traumatic Brain Injuries: Law, Ethics, and Public Health&quot; (Johns Hopkins UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:55:30</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Football is the national game in the United States – and many families and friends bond over their love of the sport. While few people play professional football, many participate in tackle football as children and adolescents. In the last decades, more attention has been paid to the dangers of playing tackle football, including traumatic brain injury and the degenerative brain disease, CTE (chronic traumatic encephalopathy). As more former players donated their brains, the rate of CTE surprised even those already concerned with traumatic brain injury. If the risks are so great, why do more than two million American children under the age of 18 continue to play tackle football? Is it the opportunity to contribute to a team? Overcome adversity? Test personal limits?
In Tackle Football and Traumatic Brain Injuries: Law, Ethics, and Public Health (Johns Hopkins UP, 2024), Dr. Daniel S. Goldberg asks readers to think about American tackle football as an industry – like the American tobacco industry – that sells a product that is dangerous to those who use it. Despite the clearly documented costs to society and individuals who play, the tackle football industry has successfully manufactured doubt about the health hazards. Goldstein argues that a basic familiarity with the history of regulated industries and their intersection with public health is needed both to understand the contemporary debates and to move forward with fair and equitable policy solutions. If the risks to people who play were better known to the public, the profitability and perhaps even the viability of American football would be at risk.
Goldberg draws on public health ethics, public health law, and the histories of occupational and public health to assess the limits of parental choice to expose their children to risks of injury. Goldberg recommends using public health laws to counter the manufacture of doubt – offering specific policy proposals to address the population health and ethical problems presented by tackle football.
Daniel S. Goldstein, JD, PhD is an associate professor at the Center for Bioethics and Humanities at the University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus. He is the director of Education at the Center for Bioethics and Humanities and director of the Public Health Ethics and Law Program.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Football is the national game in the United States – and many families and friends bond over their love of the sport. While few people play professional football, many participate in tackle football as children and adolescents. In the last decades, more attention has been paid to the dangers of playing tackle football, including traumatic brain injury and the degenerative brain disease, CTE (chronic traumatic encephalopathy). As more former players donated their brains, the rate of CTE surprised even those already concerned with traumatic brain injury. If the risks are so great, why do more than two million American children under the age of 18 continue to play tackle football? Is it the opportunity to contribute to a team? Overcome adversity? Test personal limits?
In Tackle Football and Traumatic Brain Injuries: Law, Ethics, and Public Health (Johns Hopkins UP, 2024), Dr. Daniel S. Goldberg asks readers to think about American tackle football as an industry – like the American tobacco industry – that sells a product that is dangerous to those who use it. Despite the clearly documented costs to society and individuals who play, the tackle football industry has successfully manufactured doubt about the health hazards. Goldstein argues that a basic familiarity with the history of regulated industries and their intersection with public health is needed both to understand the contemporary debates and to move forward with fair and equitable policy solutions. If the risks to people who play were better known to the public, the profitability and perhaps even the viability of American football would be at risk.
Goldberg draws on public health ethics, public health law, and the histories of occupational and public health to assess the limits of parental choice to expose their children to risks of injury. Goldberg recommends using public health laws to counter the manufacture of doubt – offering specific policy proposals to address the population health and ethical problems presented by tackle football.
Daniel S. Goldstein, JD, PhD is an associate professor at the Center for Bioethics and Humanities at the University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus. He is the director of Education at the Center for Bioethics and Humanities and director of the Public Health Ethics and Law Program.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>749</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">353751aa-a9c5-11ef-96d3-6fb431d93566</guid>
      <title>Megan Rae Blakely, &quot;Technology, Intellectual Property Law, and Culture: The Tangification of Cultural Heritage&quot; (Routledge, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>How can we protect diverse cultural expressions in an era of huge technological change? In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780367439750" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Technology, Intellectual Property Law and Culture: The Tangification of Intangible Cultural Heritage</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Routledge, 2024),&nbsp;<a href="https://bsky.app/profile/meganraeblakely.bsky.social" rel="noopener noreferrer">Megan Rae Blakely</a>,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.lancaster.ac.uk/law/people/megan-blakely" rel="noopener noreferrer">a lecturer in law at Lancaster University</a>, examines the contemporary international legal context for heritage. The book uses three detailed case studies of Scotland, Ireland, and Wales, considering heritage in many different forms, from tourism and nation branding through to language and clothing. Rich in detail, but accessible for a those who are not specialists in law, technology, or heritage, the book is essential reading across the humanities and social sciences, as well as for anyone interested in how best to support and preserve the past.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Nov 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/megan-rae-blakely-technology-intellectual-property-law-and-culture-the-tangification-of-cultural-heritage-routledge-2024-23uHz_9Z</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How can we protect diverse cultural expressions in an era of huge technological change? In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780367439750" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Technology, Intellectual Property Law and Culture: The Tangification of Intangible Cultural Heritage</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Routledge, 2024),&nbsp;<a href="https://bsky.app/profile/meganraeblakely.bsky.social" rel="noopener noreferrer">Megan Rae Blakely</a>,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.lancaster.ac.uk/law/people/megan-blakely" rel="noopener noreferrer">a lecturer in law at Lancaster University</a>, examines the contemporary international legal context for heritage. The book uses three detailed case studies of Scotland, Ireland, and Wales, considering heritage in many different forms, from tourism and nation branding through to language and clothing. Rich in detail, but accessible for a those who are not specialists in law, technology, or heritage, the book is essential reading across the humanities and social sciences, as well as for anyone interested in how best to support and preserve the past.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="38819296" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/8a6fe08b-0cf2-4d92-a3f6-fa4f43bc1b02/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=8a6fe08b-0cf2-4d92-a3f6-fa4f43bc1b02&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Megan Rae Blakely, &quot;Technology, Intellectual Property Law, and Culture: The Tangification of Cultural Heritage&quot; (Routledge, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:40:26</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>How can we protect diverse cultural expressions in an era of huge technological change? In Technology, Intellectual Property Law and Culture: The Tangification of Intangible Cultural Heritage (Routledge, 2024), Megan Rae Blakely, a lecturer in law at Lancaster University, examines the contemporary international legal context for heritage. The book uses three detailed case studies of Scotland, Ireland, and Wales, considering heritage in many different forms, from tourism and nation branding through to language and clothing. Rich in detail, but accessible for a those who are not specialists in law, technology, or heritage, the book is essential reading across the humanities and social sciences, as well as for anyone interested in how best to support and preserve the past.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>How can we protect diverse cultural expressions in an era of huge technological change? In Technology, Intellectual Property Law and Culture: The Tangification of Intangible Cultural Heritage (Routledge, 2024), Megan Rae Blakely, a lecturer in law at Lancaster University, examines the contemporary international legal context for heritage. The book uses three detailed case studies of Scotland, Ireland, and Wales, considering heritage in many different forms, from tourism and nation branding through to language and clothing. Rich in detail, but accessible for a those who are not specialists in law, technology, or heritage, the book is essential reading across the humanities and social sciences, as well as for anyone interested in how best to support and preserve the past.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>495</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">d8f99eb4-a9ad-11ef-8808-bb21fbbcf1fc</guid>
      <title>The Secret Life of Central Bankers</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>This is the final episode of&nbsp;<a href="https://citedpodcast.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Cited’s</em></a>&nbsp;most recent season,<em>&nbsp;Use &amp; Abuse of Economic Expertise,&nbsp;</em>a season that tells stories of the political and scholarly battles behind the economic ideas that shape our world. For a full list of credits, and for the rest of the episodes,&nbsp;<a href="https://citedpodcast.com/category/season-03-use-and-abuse-of-economics/" rel="noopener noreferrer">visit the series page</a>. They will back with a new season focussed on environmental politics in early 2025, so make sure you are subscribed to the podcast (<a href="https://podcasts.apple.com/ca/podcast/cited-podcast/id558228325" rel="noopener noreferrer">Apple</a>,&nbsp;<a href="https://open.spotify.com/show/6pMLdKYpGooLKis7aORHSi" rel="noopener noreferrer">Spotify</a>,&nbsp;<a href="https://citedpodcast.com/feed/podcast/" rel="noopener noreferrer">manual RSS</a>).</p><p>The MAGA movement scores big wins by taking cheap shots at experts. Now, some worry that Donald Trump could try to oust Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell. The typical centrist position is to defend the supposedly impartial, apolitical expertise of such figures. Yet, we know that is not exactly right either. Is there a better way to imagine a better bank?</p><p>In our first segment, we speak with&nbsp;<a href="https://x.com/frances_coppola?lang=en" rel="noopener noreferrer">Frances Coppala</a>, author of&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wiley.com/en-be/The+Case+For+People's+Quantitative+Easing-p-9781509531301" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Case for People's Quantitative Easing.</em></a>&nbsp;It’s something of a case study in Fed politics, revealing how their decisions post-Global Financial Crisis served the rich, and not working people.</p><p>Yet, saying that these experts are&nbsp;<em>political&nbsp;</em>does not mean we have to be hyper-partisan reactionary hacks. Instead, democratizing the bank could offer a better way forward. That's according to&nbsp;<a href="https://www.law.northwestern.edu/faculty/profiles/anneliseriles/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Annelise Riles</a>, a professor of law and of anthropology, and author of the book&nbsp;<a href="https://www.cornellpress.cornell.edu/book/9781501732720/financial-citizenship/#bookTabs=1" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Financial Citizenship: Experts, Publics, and the Politics of Central Banking</em></a>. Riles is also host the&nbsp;<em>Foreign Policy&nbsp;</em>podcast&nbsp;<a href="https://foreignpolicy.com/podcasts/everyday-ambassador/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Everyday Ambassador</em></a>, which its new second season out now. What would democratizing the Fed look like, and would that really counter the powerful financial interests that have so thoroughly captured the institution?</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 24 Nov 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/the-secret-life-of-central-bankers-BVsfGHgr</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the final episode of&nbsp;<a href="https://citedpodcast.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Cited’s</em></a>&nbsp;most recent season,<em>&nbsp;Use &amp; Abuse of Economic Expertise,&nbsp;</em>a season that tells stories of the political and scholarly battles behind the economic ideas that shape our world. For a full list of credits, and for the rest of the episodes,&nbsp;<a href="https://citedpodcast.com/category/season-03-use-and-abuse-of-economics/" rel="noopener noreferrer">visit the series page</a>. They will back with a new season focussed on environmental politics in early 2025, so make sure you are subscribed to the podcast (<a href="https://podcasts.apple.com/ca/podcast/cited-podcast/id558228325" rel="noopener noreferrer">Apple</a>,&nbsp;<a href="https://open.spotify.com/show/6pMLdKYpGooLKis7aORHSi" rel="noopener noreferrer">Spotify</a>,&nbsp;<a href="https://citedpodcast.com/feed/podcast/" rel="noopener noreferrer">manual RSS</a>).</p><p>The MAGA movement scores big wins by taking cheap shots at experts. Now, some worry that Donald Trump could try to oust Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell. The typical centrist position is to defend the supposedly impartial, apolitical expertise of such figures. Yet, we know that is not exactly right either. Is there a better way to imagine a better bank?</p><p>In our first segment, we speak with&nbsp;<a href="https://x.com/frances_coppola?lang=en" rel="noopener noreferrer">Frances Coppala</a>, author of&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wiley.com/en-be/The+Case+For+People's+Quantitative+Easing-p-9781509531301" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Case for People's Quantitative Easing.</em></a>&nbsp;It’s something of a case study in Fed politics, revealing how their decisions post-Global Financial Crisis served the rich, and not working people.</p><p>Yet, saying that these experts are&nbsp;<em>political&nbsp;</em>does not mean we have to be hyper-partisan reactionary hacks. Instead, democratizing the bank could offer a better way forward. That's according to&nbsp;<a href="https://www.law.northwestern.edu/faculty/profiles/anneliseriles/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Annelise Riles</a>, a professor of law and of anthropology, and author of the book&nbsp;<a href="https://www.cornellpress.cornell.edu/book/9781501732720/financial-citizenship/#bookTabs=1" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Financial Citizenship: Experts, Publics, and the Politics of Central Banking</em></a>. Riles is also host the&nbsp;<em>Foreign Policy&nbsp;</em>podcast&nbsp;<a href="https://foreignpolicy.com/podcasts/everyday-ambassador/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Everyday Ambassador</em></a>, which its new second season out now. What would democratizing the Fed look like, and would that really counter the powerful financial interests that have so thoroughly captured the institution?</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="63483670" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/a4df5bbb-e8a7-4891-aaf4-b8a141a1ae81/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=a4df5bbb-e8a7-4891-aaf4-b8a141a1ae81&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>The Secret Life of Central Bankers</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:06:07</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>This is the final episode of Cited’s most recent season, Use &amp; Abuse of Economic Expertise, a season that tells stories of the political and scholarly battles behind the economic ideas that shape our world. For a full list of credits, and for the rest of the episodes, visit the series page. They will back with a new season focussed on environmental politics in early 2025, so make sure you are subscribed to the podcast (Apple, Spotify, manual RSS).
The MAGA movement scores big wins by taking cheap shots at experts. Now, some worry that Donald Trump could try to oust Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell. The typical centrist position is to defend the supposedly impartial, apolitical expertise of such figures. Yet, we know that is not exactly right either. Is there a better way to imagine a better bank?
In our first segment, we speak with Frances Coppala, author of The Case for People&apos;s Quantitative Easing. It’s something of a case study in Fed politics, revealing how their decisions post-Global Financial Crisis served the rich, and not working people.
Yet, saying that these experts are political does not mean we have to be hyper-partisan reactionary hacks. Instead, democratizing the bank could offer a better way forward. That&apos;s according to Annelise Riles, a professor of law and of anthropology, and author of the book Financial Citizenship: Experts, Publics, and the Politics of Central Banking. Riles is also host the Foreign Policy podcast Everyday Ambassador, which its new second season out now. What would democratizing the Fed look like, and would that really counter the powerful financial interests that have so thoroughly captured the institution?
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>This is the final episode of Cited’s most recent season, Use &amp; Abuse of Economic Expertise, a season that tells stories of the political and scholarly battles behind the economic ideas that shape our world. For a full list of credits, and for the rest of the episodes, visit the series page. They will back with a new season focussed on environmental politics in early 2025, so make sure you are subscribed to the podcast (Apple, Spotify, manual RSS).
The MAGA movement scores big wins by taking cheap shots at experts. Now, some worry that Donald Trump could try to oust Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell. The typical centrist position is to defend the supposedly impartial, apolitical expertise of such figures. Yet, we know that is not exactly right either. Is there a better way to imagine a better bank?
In our first segment, we speak with Frances Coppala, author of The Case for People&apos;s Quantitative Easing. It’s something of a case study in Fed politics, revealing how their decisions post-Global Financial Crisis served the rich, and not working people.
Yet, saying that these experts are political does not mean we have to be hyper-partisan reactionary hacks. Instead, democratizing the bank could offer a better way forward. That&apos;s according to Annelise Riles, a professor of law and of anthropology, and author of the book Financial Citizenship: Experts, Publics, and the Politics of Central Banking. Riles is also host the Foreign Policy podcast Everyday Ambassador, which its new second season out now. What would democratizing the Fed look like, and would that really counter the powerful financial interests that have so thoroughly captured the institution?
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>72</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">d78a70a8-a9c1-11ef-99c3-17948c72f214</guid>
      <title>Katherine C. Epstein, &quot;Analog Superpowers: How Twentieth-Century Technology Theft Built the National Security State&quot; (U Chicago Press, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>At the beginning of the twentieth century, two British inventors, Arthur Pollen and Harold Isherwood, became fascinated by a major military question: how to aim the big guns of battleships. These warships—of enormous geopolitical import before the advent of intercontinental missiles or drones—had to shoot in poor light and choppy seas at distant moving targets, conditions that impeded accurate gunfire. Seeing the need to account for a plethora of variables, Pollen and Isherwood built an integrated system for gathering data, calculating predictions, and transmitting the results to the gunners. At the heart of their invention was the most advanced analog computer of the day, a technological breakthrough that anticipated the famous Norden bombsight of World War II, the inertial guidance systems of nuclear missiles, and the networked “smart” systems that dominate combat today. Recognizing the value of Pollen and Isherwood’s invention, the British Royal Navy and the United States Navy pirated it, one after the other. When the inventors sued, both the British and US governments invoked secrecy, citing national security concerns.</p><p>Drawing on a wealth of archival evidence,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780226831220" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Analog Superpowers: How Twentieth-Century Technology Theft Built the National Security State</em></a>&nbsp;(University of Chicago Press, 2024) by Dr. Katherine C. Epstein analyzes these and related legal battles over naval technology, exploring how national defense tested the two countries’ commitment to individual rights and the free market. Dr. Epstein deftly sets out Pollen’s and Isherwood’s pioneering achievements, the patent questions raised, the geopolitical rivalry between Britain and the United States, and the legal precedents each country developed to control military tools built by private contractors.</p><p>Dr. Epstein’s account reveals that long before the US national security state sought to restrict information about atomic energy, it was already embroiled in another contest between innovation and secrecy. The America portrayed in this sweeping and accessible history isn’t yet a global hegemon but a rising superpower ready to acquire foreign technology by fair means or foul—much as it accuses China of doing today.</p><p>T<em>his interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;new book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 24 Nov 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/katherine-c-epstein-analog-superpowers-how-twentieth-century-technology-theft-built-the-national-security-state-u-chicago-press-2024-7JRO42de</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the beginning of the twentieth century, two British inventors, Arthur Pollen and Harold Isherwood, became fascinated by a major military question: how to aim the big guns of battleships. These warships—of enormous geopolitical import before the advent of intercontinental missiles or drones—had to shoot in poor light and choppy seas at distant moving targets, conditions that impeded accurate gunfire. Seeing the need to account for a plethora of variables, Pollen and Isherwood built an integrated system for gathering data, calculating predictions, and transmitting the results to the gunners. At the heart of their invention was the most advanced analog computer of the day, a technological breakthrough that anticipated the famous Norden bombsight of World War II, the inertial guidance systems of nuclear missiles, and the networked “smart” systems that dominate combat today. Recognizing the value of Pollen and Isherwood’s invention, the British Royal Navy and the United States Navy pirated it, one after the other. When the inventors sued, both the British and US governments invoked secrecy, citing national security concerns.</p><p>Drawing on a wealth of archival evidence,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780226831220" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Analog Superpowers: How Twentieth-Century Technology Theft Built the National Security State</em></a>&nbsp;(University of Chicago Press, 2024) by Dr. Katherine C. Epstein analyzes these and related legal battles over naval technology, exploring how national defense tested the two countries’ commitment to individual rights and the free market. Dr. Epstein deftly sets out Pollen’s and Isherwood’s pioneering achievements, the patent questions raised, the geopolitical rivalry between Britain and the United States, and the legal precedents each country developed to control military tools built by private contractors.</p><p>Dr. Epstein’s account reveals that long before the US national security state sought to restrict information about atomic energy, it was already embroiled in another contest between innovation and secrecy. The America portrayed in this sweeping and accessible history isn’t yet a global hegemon but a rising superpower ready to acquire foreign technology by fair means or foul—much as it accuses China of doing today.</p><p>T<em>his interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;new book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="63006659" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/01507e7b-797d-4a92-8130-effaa74f398a/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=01507e7b-797d-4a92-8130-effaa74f398a&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Katherine C. Epstein, &quot;Analog Superpowers: How Twentieth-Century Technology Theft Built the National Security State&quot; (U Chicago Press, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:05:37</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>At the beginning of the twentieth century, two British inventors, Arthur Pollen and Harold Isherwood, became fascinated by a major military question: how to aim the big guns of battleships. These warships—of enormous geopolitical import before the advent of intercontinental missiles or drones—had to shoot in poor light and choppy seas at distant moving targets, conditions that impeded accurate gunfire. Seeing the need to account for a plethora of variables, Pollen and Isherwood built an integrated system for gathering data, calculating predictions, and transmitting the results to the gunners. At the heart of their invention was the most advanced analog computer of the day, a technological breakthrough that anticipated the famous Norden bombsight of World War II, the inertial guidance systems of nuclear missiles, and the networked “smart” systems that dominate combat today. Recognizing the value of Pollen and Isherwood’s invention, the British Royal Navy and the United States Navy pirated it, one after the other. When the inventors sued, both the British and US governments invoked secrecy, citing national security concerns.
Drawing on a wealth of archival evidence, Analog Superpowers: How Twentieth-Century Technology Theft Built the National Security State (University of Chicago Press, 2024) by Dr. Katherine C. Epstein analyzes these and related legal battles over naval technology, exploring how national defense tested the two countries’ commitment to individual rights and the free market. Dr. Epstein deftly sets out Pollen’s and Isherwood’s pioneering achievements, the patent questions raised, the geopolitical rivalry between Britain and the United States, and the legal precedents each country developed to control military tools built by private contractors.
Dr. Epstein’s account reveals that long before the US national security state sought to restrict information about atomic energy, it was already embroiled in another contest between innovation and secrecy. The America portrayed in this sweeping and accessible history isn’t yet a global hegemon but a rising superpower ready to acquire foreign technology by fair means or foul—much as it accuses China of doing today.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>At the beginning of the twentieth century, two British inventors, Arthur Pollen and Harold Isherwood, became fascinated by a major military question: how to aim the big guns of battleships. These warships—of enormous geopolitical import before the advent of intercontinental missiles or drones—had to shoot in poor light and choppy seas at distant moving targets, conditions that impeded accurate gunfire. Seeing the need to account for a plethora of variables, Pollen and Isherwood built an integrated system for gathering data, calculating predictions, and transmitting the results to the gunners. At the heart of their invention was the most advanced analog computer of the day, a technological breakthrough that anticipated the famous Norden bombsight of World War II, the inertial guidance systems of nuclear missiles, and the networked “smart” systems that dominate combat today. Recognizing the value of Pollen and Isherwood’s invention, the British Royal Navy and the United States Navy pirated it, one after the other. When the inventors sued, both the British and US governments invoked secrecy, citing national security concerns.
Drawing on a wealth of archival evidence, Analog Superpowers: How Twentieth-Century Technology Theft Built the National Security State (University of Chicago Press, 2024) by Dr. Katherine C. Epstein analyzes these and related legal battles over naval technology, exploring how national defense tested the two countries’ commitment to individual rights and the free market. Dr. Epstein deftly sets out Pollen’s and Isherwood’s pioneering achievements, the patent questions raised, the geopolitical rivalry between Britain and the United States, and the legal precedents each country developed to control military tools built by private contractors.
Dr. Epstein’s account reveals that long before the US national security state sought to restrict information about atomic energy, it was already embroiled in another contest between innovation and secrecy. The America portrayed in this sweeping and accessible history isn’t yet a global hegemon but a rising superpower ready to acquire foreign technology by fair means or foul—much as it accuses China of doing today.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>377</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">b7899876-a9c9-11ef-af43-3b9c9fda5394</guid>
      <title>Kevin B. Smith, &quot;The Jailer&apos;s Reckoning: How Mass Incarceration Is Damaging America&quot; (Rowman &amp; Littlefield, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>How does a Black man in Austin get sent to prison on a 70-year sentence for stealing a tuna sandwich, likely costing Texas taxpayers roughly a million dollars? In America, your liberty--or even your life--may be forfeit not simply because of what you do, but where you do it. If the same man had run off with a lobster roll from a lunch counter in Maine it's unlikely that he'd be spending the rest of his life behind bars.</p><p>The U.S. incarcerates more people than any other industrial democracy in the world. We have more ex-prisoners than the entire population of Ireland, and more people with a felony record than the populations of Denmark, Norway, New Zealand and Liberia combined. Why did the United States become the world's biggest jailer? And, just as importantly, what has it done to us? What are the costs--socially, economically, and politically--of having the world's largest population of ex-prisoners? And what can we do about it?</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781538192382" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Jailer's Reckoning: How Mass Incarceration Is Damaging America</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Rowman &amp; Littlefield, 2024), Kevin B. Smith explains that the United States became the world's biggest jailer because politicians wanted to do something about a very real problem with violent crime. That effort was accelerated by a variety of partisan and socio-demographic trends that started to significantly reshape the political environment in the 1980s and 1990s. The force of those trends varied from state to state, but ultimately led to not just historically unprecedented levels of incarceration, but equally unprecedented numbers of ex-prisoners. Serving time behind bars is now a normalized social experience--it affects a majority of Americans directly or indirectly. There is a clear price, the jailer's reckoning, to be paid for this. As Smith shows, it is a society with declining levels of civic cohesion, reduced economic prospects, and less political engagement. Mass incarceration turns out to be something of a hidden bomb, a social explosion that inflicts enormous civic collateral damage on the entire country, and we must&nbsp;<em>all&nbsp;</em>do something about it.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 24 Nov 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/kevin-b-smith-the-jailers-reckoning-how-mass-incarceration-is-damaging-america-rowman-littlefield-2024-KoYqmf7w</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How does a Black man in Austin get sent to prison on a 70-year sentence for stealing a tuna sandwich, likely costing Texas taxpayers roughly a million dollars? In America, your liberty--or even your life--may be forfeit not simply because of what you do, but where you do it. If the same man had run off with a lobster roll from a lunch counter in Maine it's unlikely that he'd be spending the rest of his life behind bars.</p><p>The U.S. incarcerates more people than any other industrial democracy in the world. We have more ex-prisoners than the entire population of Ireland, and more people with a felony record than the populations of Denmark, Norway, New Zealand and Liberia combined. Why did the United States become the world's biggest jailer? And, just as importantly, what has it done to us? What are the costs--socially, economically, and politically--of having the world's largest population of ex-prisoners? And what can we do about it?</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781538192382" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Jailer's Reckoning: How Mass Incarceration Is Damaging America</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Rowman &amp; Littlefield, 2024), Kevin B. Smith explains that the United States became the world's biggest jailer because politicians wanted to do something about a very real problem with violent crime. That effort was accelerated by a variety of partisan and socio-demographic trends that started to significantly reshape the political environment in the 1980s and 1990s. The force of those trends varied from state to state, but ultimately led to not just historically unprecedented levels of incarceration, but equally unprecedented numbers of ex-prisoners. Serving time behind bars is now a normalized social experience--it affects a majority of Americans directly or indirectly. There is a clear price, the jailer's reckoning, to be paid for this. As Smith shows, it is a society with declining levels of civic cohesion, reduced economic prospects, and less political engagement. Mass incarceration turns out to be something of a hidden bomb, a social explosion that inflicts enormous civic collateral damage on the entire country, and we must&nbsp;<em>all&nbsp;</em>do something about it.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="49542401" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/410c241d-730b-4c2d-b43a-de3f785b402b/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=410c241d-730b-4c2d-b43a-de3f785b402b&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Kevin B. Smith, &quot;The Jailer&apos;s Reckoning: How Mass Incarceration Is Damaging America&quot; (Rowman &amp; Littlefield, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:51:36</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>How does a Black man in Austin get sent to prison on a 70-year sentence for stealing a tuna sandwich, likely costing Texas taxpayers roughly a million dollars? In America, your liberty--or even your life--may be forfeit not simply because of what you do, but where you do it. If the same man had run off with a lobster roll from a lunch counter in Maine it&apos;s unlikely that he&apos;d be spending the rest of his life behind bars.
The U.S. incarcerates more people than any other industrial democracy in the world. We have more ex-prisoners than the entire population of Ireland, and more people with a felony record than the populations of Denmark, Norway, New Zealand and Liberia combined. Why did the United States become the world&apos;s biggest jailer? And, just as importantly, what has it done to us? What are the costs--socially, economically, and politically--of having the world&apos;s largest population of ex-prisoners? And what can we do about it?
In The Jailer&apos;s Reckoning: How Mass Incarceration Is Damaging America (Rowman &amp; Littlefield, 2024), Kevin B. Smith explains that the United States became the world&apos;s biggest jailer because politicians wanted to do something about a very real problem with violent crime. That effort was accelerated by a variety of partisan and socio-demographic trends that started to significantly reshape the political environment in the 1980s and 1990s. The force of those trends varied from state to state, but ultimately led to not just historically unprecedented levels of incarceration, but equally unprecedented numbers of ex-prisoners. Serving time behind bars is now a normalized social experience--it affects a majority of Americans directly or indirectly. There is a clear price, the jailer&apos;s reckoning, to be paid for this. As Smith shows, it is a society with declining levels of civic cohesion, reduced economic prospects, and less political engagement. Mass incarceration turns out to be something of a hidden bomb, a social explosion that inflicts enormous civic collateral damage on the entire country, and we must all do something about it.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>How does a Black man in Austin get sent to prison on a 70-year sentence for stealing a tuna sandwich, likely costing Texas taxpayers roughly a million dollars? In America, your liberty--or even your life--may be forfeit not simply because of what you do, but where you do it. If the same man had run off with a lobster roll from a lunch counter in Maine it&apos;s unlikely that he&apos;d be spending the rest of his life behind bars.
The U.S. incarcerates more people than any other industrial democracy in the world. We have more ex-prisoners than the entire population of Ireland, and more people with a felony record than the populations of Denmark, Norway, New Zealand and Liberia combined. Why did the United States become the world&apos;s biggest jailer? And, just as importantly, what has it done to us? What are the costs--socially, economically, and politically--of having the world&apos;s largest population of ex-prisoners? And what can we do about it?
In The Jailer&apos;s Reckoning: How Mass Incarceration Is Damaging America (Rowman &amp; Littlefield, 2024), Kevin B. Smith explains that the United States became the world&apos;s biggest jailer because politicians wanted to do something about a very real problem with violent crime. That effort was accelerated by a variety of partisan and socio-demographic trends that started to significantly reshape the political environment in the 1980s and 1990s. The force of those trends varied from state to state, but ultimately led to not just historically unprecedented levels of incarceration, but equally unprecedented numbers of ex-prisoners. Serving time behind bars is now a normalized social experience--it affects a majority of Americans directly or indirectly. There is a clear price, the jailer&apos;s reckoning, to be paid for this. As Smith shows, it is a society with declining levels of civic cohesion, reduced economic prospects, and less political engagement. Mass incarceration turns out to be something of a hidden bomb, a social explosion that inflicts enormous civic collateral damage on the entire country, and we must all do something about it.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>24</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">98182518-a81e-11ef-b1e7-3f7e452a15aa</guid>
      <title>Robert B. Talisse, &quot;Civic Solitude: Why Democracy Needs Distance&quot; (Oxford UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>An internet search of the phrase "this is what democracy looks like" returns thousands of images of people assembled in public for the purpose of collective action. But is group collaboration truly the defining feature of effective democracy?</p><p>In Civic Solitude: Why Democracy Needs Distance (Oxford UP, 2024), Robert B. Talisse suggests that while group action is essential to democracy, action without reflection can present insidious challenges, as individuals' perspectives can be distorted by group dynamics. The culprit is a cognitive dynamic called belief polarization. As we interact with our political allies, we are exposed to forces that render us more radical in our beliefs and increasingly hostile to those who do not share them. What's more, the social environments we inhabit in our day-to-day lives are sorted along partisan lines. We are surrounded by triggers of political extremity and animosity. Thus, our ordinary activities encourage the attitude that democracy is possible only when everyone agrees--a profoundly antidemocratic stance.</p><p>Drawing on extensive research about polarization and partisanship, Talisse argues that certain core democratic capacities can be cultivated only at a distance from the political fray. If we are to meet the responsibilities of democratic citizenship, we must occasionally step away from our allies and opponents alike. We can perform this self-work only in secluded settings where we can engage in civic reflection that is not prepackaged in the idiom of our political divides, allowing us to contemplate political circumstances that are not our own.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Nov 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/robert-b-talisse-civic-solitude-why-democracy-needs-distance-oxford-up-2024-izlroEql</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An internet search of the phrase "this is what democracy looks like" returns thousands of images of people assembled in public for the purpose of collective action. But is group collaboration truly the defining feature of effective democracy?</p><p>In Civic Solitude: Why Democracy Needs Distance (Oxford UP, 2024), Robert B. Talisse suggests that while group action is essential to democracy, action without reflection can present insidious challenges, as individuals' perspectives can be distorted by group dynamics. The culprit is a cognitive dynamic called belief polarization. As we interact with our political allies, we are exposed to forces that render us more radical in our beliefs and increasingly hostile to those who do not share them. What's more, the social environments we inhabit in our day-to-day lives are sorted along partisan lines. We are surrounded by triggers of political extremity and animosity. Thus, our ordinary activities encourage the attitude that democracy is possible only when everyone agrees--a profoundly antidemocratic stance.</p><p>Drawing on extensive research about polarization and partisanship, Talisse argues that certain core democratic capacities can be cultivated only at a distance from the political fray. If we are to meet the responsibilities of democratic citizenship, we must occasionally step away from our allies and opponents alike. We can perform this self-work only in secluded settings where we can engage in civic reflection that is not prepackaged in the idiom of our political divides, allowing us to contemplate political circumstances that are not our own.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="86482690" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/19177283-4c5d-46e4-b494-96223545571f/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=19177283-4c5d-46e4-b494-96223545571f&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Robert B. Talisse, &quot;Civic Solitude: Why Democracy Needs Distance&quot; (Oxford UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:30:05</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>An internet search of the phrase &quot;this is what democracy looks like&quot; returns thousands of images of people assembled in public for the purpose of collective action. But is group collaboration truly the defining feature of effective democracy?
In Civic Solitude: Why Democracy Needs Distance (Oxford UP, 2024), Robert B. Talisse suggests that while group action is essential to democracy, action without reflection can present insidious challenges, as individuals&apos; perspectives can be distorted by group dynamics. The culprit is a cognitive dynamic called belief polarization. As we interact with our political allies, we are exposed to forces that render us more radical in our beliefs and increasingly hostile to those who do not share them. What&apos;s more, the social environments we inhabit in our day-to-day lives are sorted along partisan lines. We are surrounded by triggers of political extremity and animosity. Thus, our ordinary activities encourage the attitude that democracy is possible only when everyone agrees--a profoundly antidemocratic stance.
Drawing on extensive research about polarization and partisanship, Talisse argues that certain core democratic capacities can be cultivated only at a distance from the political fray. If we are to meet the responsibilities of democratic citizenship, we must occasionally step away from our allies and opponents alike. We can perform this self-work only in secluded settings where we can engage in civic reflection that is not prepackaged in the idiom of our political divides, allowing us to contemplate political circumstances that are not our own.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>An internet search of the phrase &quot;this is what democracy looks like&quot; returns thousands of images of people assembled in public for the purpose of collective action. But is group collaboration truly the defining feature of effective democracy?
In Civic Solitude: Why Democracy Needs Distance (Oxford UP, 2024), Robert B. Talisse suggests that while group action is essential to democracy, action without reflection can present insidious challenges, as individuals&apos; perspectives can be distorted by group dynamics. The culprit is a cognitive dynamic called belief polarization. As we interact with our political allies, we are exposed to forces that render us more radical in our beliefs and increasingly hostile to those who do not share them. What&apos;s more, the social environments we inhabit in our day-to-day lives are sorted along partisan lines. We are surrounded by triggers of political extremity and animosity. Thus, our ordinary activities encourage the attitude that democracy is possible only when everyone agrees--a profoundly antidemocratic stance.
Drawing on extensive research about polarization and partisanship, Talisse argues that certain core democratic capacities can be cultivated only at a distance from the political fray. If we are to meet the responsibilities of democratic citizenship, we must occasionally step away from our allies and opponents alike. We can perform this self-work only in secluded settings where we can engage in civic reflection that is not prepackaged in the idiom of our political divides, allowing us to contemplate political circumstances that are not our own.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>748</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5e252aae-a81e-11ef-96fc-1b8605be9ab4</guid>
      <title>Robert B. Talisse, &quot;Civic Solitude: Why Democracy Needs Distance&quot; (Oxford UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>An internet search of the phrase "this is what democracy looks like" returns thousands of images of people assembled in public for the purpose of collective action. But is group collaboration truly the defining feature of effective democracy?</p><p>In Civic Solitude: Why Democracy Needs Distance (Oxford UP, 2024), Robert B. Talisse suggests that while group action is essential to democracy, action without reflection can present insidious challenges, as individuals' perspectives can be distorted by group dynamics. The culprit is a cognitive dynamic called belief polarization. As we interact with our political allies, we are exposed to forces that render us more radical in our beliefs and increasingly hostile to those who do not share them. What's more, the social environments we inhabit in our day-to-day lives are sorted along partisan lines. We are surrounded by triggers of political extremity and animosity. Thus, our ordinary activities encourage the attitude that democracy is possible only when everyone agrees--a profoundly antidemocratic stance.</p><p>Drawing on extensive research about polarization and partisanship, Talisse argues that certain core democratic capacities can be cultivated only at a distance from the political fray. If we are to meet the responsibilities of democratic citizenship, we must occasionally step away from our allies and opponents alike. We can perform this self-work only in secluded settings where we can engage in civic reflection that is not prepackaged in the idiom of our political divides, allowing us to contemplate political circumstances that are not our own.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Nov 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/robert-b-talisse-civic-solitude-why-democracy-needs-distance-oxford-up-2024-SPw4riCu-U1MeHvCJ</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An internet search of the phrase "this is what democracy looks like" returns thousands of images of people assembled in public for the purpose of collective action. But is group collaboration truly the defining feature of effective democracy?</p><p>In Civic Solitude: Why Democracy Needs Distance (Oxford UP, 2024), Robert B. Talisse suggests that while group action is essential to democracy, action without reflection can present insidious challenges, as individuals' perspectives can be distorted by group dynamics. The culprit is a cognitive dynamic called belief polarization. As we interact with our political allies, we are exposed to forces that render us more radical in our beliefs and increasingly hostile to those who do not share them. What's more, the social environments we inhabit in our day-to-day lives are sorted along partisan lines. We are surrounded by triggers of political extremity and animosity. Thus, our ordinary activities encourage the attitude that democracy is possible only when everyone agrees--a profoundly antidemocratic stance.</p><p>Drawing on extensive research about polarization and partisanship, Talisse argues that certain core democratic capacities can be cultivated only at a distance from the political fray. If we are to meet the responsibilities of democratic citizenship, we must occasionally step away from our allies and opponents alike. We can perform this self-work only in secluded settings where we can engage in civic reflection that is not prepackaged in the idiom of our political divides, allowing us to contemplate political circumstances that are not our own.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="86482690" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/f436c2ba-d196-4e74-b59e-4893613b2f67/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=f436c2ba-d196-4e74-b59e-4893613b2f67&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Robert B. Talisse, &quot;Civic Solitude: Why Democracy Needs Distance&quot; (Oxford UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:30:05</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>An internet search of the phrase &quot;this is what democracy looks like&quot; returns thousands of images of people assembled in public for the purpose of collective action. But is group collaboration truly the defining feature of effective democracy?
In Civic Solitude: Why Democracy Needs Distance (Oxford UP, 2024), Robert B. Talisse suggests that while group action is essential to democracy, action without reflection can present insidious challenges, as individuals&apos; perspectives can be distorted by group dynamics. The culprit is a cognitive dynamic called belief polarization. As we interact with our political allies, we are exposed to forces that render us more radical in our beliefs and increasingly hostile to those who do not share them. What&apos;s more, the social environments we inhabit in our day-to-day lives are sorted along partisan lines. We are surrounded by triggers of political extremity and animosity. Thus, our ordinary activities encourage the attitude that democracy is possible only when everyone agrees--a profoundly antidemocratic stance.
Drawing on extensive research about polarization and partisanship, Talisse argues that certain core democratic capacities can be cultivated only at a distance from the political fray. If we are to meet the responsibilities of democratic citizenship, we must occasionally step away from our allies and opponents alike. We can perform this self-work only in secluded settings where we can engage in civic reflection that is not prepackaged in the idiom of our political divides, allowing us to contemplate political circumstances that are not our own.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>An internet search of the phrase &quot;this is what democracy looks like&quot; returns thousands of images of people assembled in public for the purpose of collective action. But is group collaboration truly the defining feature of effective democracy?
In Civic Solitude: Why Democracy Needs Distance (Oxford UP, 2024), Robert B. Talisse suggests that while group action is essential to democracy, action without reflection can present insidious challenges, as individuals&apos; perspectives can be distorted by group dynamics. The culprit is a cognitive dynamic called belief polarization. As we interact with our political allies, we are exposed to forces that render us more radical in our beliefs and increasingly hostile to those who do not share them. What&apos;s more, the social environments we inhabit in our day-to-day lives are sorted along partisan lines. We are surrounded by triggers of political extremity and animosity. Thus, our ordinary activities encourage the attitude that democracy is possible only when everyone agrees--a profoundly antidemocratic stance.
Drawing on extensive research about polarization and partisanship, Talisse argues that certain core democratic capacities can be cultivated only at a distance from the political fray. If we are to meet the responsibilities of democratic citizenship, we must occasionally step away from our allies and opponents alike. We can perform this self-work only in secluded settings where we can engage in civic reflection that is not prepackaged in the idiom of our political divides, allowing us to contemplate political circumstances that are not our own.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>748</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">67599dde-a5f4-11ef-bf76-d35775b17166</guid>
      <title>Thinking Machines: Will Robots Have Rights?</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>It’s the UConn Popcast, and in this episode of our series on artificial intelligence, we discuss Joanna Bryson’s essay “<a href="https://www.joannajbryson.org/publications/robots-should-be-slaves-pdf" rel="noopener noreferrer">Robots Should be Slaves</a>.”</p><p>We dive headlong into this provocative argument about the rights of robots. As scholars of cultural and social understanding, we are fascinated by the arguments Bryson - a computer scientist - makes about who should, and should not, be rights-bearing members of a community.</p><p>Does Bryson mean we should enslave robots now and always, regardless of their claims to rights? How does Bryson deal with the natural human tendency to anthropomorphize non-human things, and with the likelihood that as AI advances, robots will appear more human? If the robot as slave is an unacceptable idea - even in metaphorical form - then what other metaphors might help us think through our relationships with thinking machines?</p><p>Music by aiva.ai</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Nov 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/thinking-machines-will-robots-have-rights-M_tPRixi</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It’s the UConn Popcast, and in this episode of our series on artificial intelligence, we discuss Joanna Bryson’s essay “<a href="https://www.joannajbryson.org/publications/robots-should-be-slaves-pdf" rel="noopener noreferrer">Robots Should be Slaves</a>.”</p><p>We dive headlong into this provocative argument about the rights of robots. As scholars of cultural and social understanding, we are fascinated by the arguments Bryson - a computer scientist - makes about who should, and should not, be rights-bearing members of a community.</p><p>Does Bryson mean we should enslave robots now and always, regardless of their claims to rights? How does Bryson deal with the natural human tendency to anthropomorphize non-human things, and with the likelihood that as AI advances, robots will appear more human? If the robot as slave is an unacceptable idea - even in metaphorical form - then what other metaphors might help us think through our relationships with thinking machines?</p><p>Music by aiva.ai</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="24942885" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/d7799f6a-01ad-4019-83bc-59c710f0fc41/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=d7799f6a-01ad-4019-83bc-59c710f0fc41&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Thinking Machines: Will Robots Have Rights?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:25:58</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>It’s the UConn Popcast, and in this episode of our series on artificial intelligence, we discuss Joanna Bryson’s essay “Robots Should be Slaves.”
We dive headlong into this provocative argument about the rights of robots. As scholars of cultural and social understanding, we are fascinated by the arguments Bryson - a computer scientist - makes about who should, and should not, be rights-bearing members of a community.
Does Bryson mean we should enslave robots now and always, regardless of their claims to rights? How does Bryson deal with the natural human tendency to anthropomorphize non-human things, and with the likelihood that as AI advances, robots will appear more human? If the robot as slave is an unacceptable idea - even in metaphorical form - then what other metaphors might help us think through our relationships with thinking machines?
Music by aiva.ai
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>It’s the UConn Popcast, and in this episode of our series on artificial intelligence, we discuss Joanna Bryson’s essay “Robots Should be Slaves.”
We dive headlong into this provocative argument about the rights of robots. As scholars of cultural and social understanding, we are fascinated by the arguments Bryson - a computer scientist - makes about who should, and should not, be rights-bearing members of a community.
Does Bryson mean we should enslave robots now and always, regardless of their claims to rights? How does Bryson deal with the natural human tendency to anthropomorphize non-human things, and with the likelihood that as AI advances, robots will appear more human? If the robot as slave is an unacceptable idea - even in metaphorical form - then what other metaphors might help us think through our relationships with thinking machines?
Music by aiva.ai
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>20</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">baa94458-a44b-11ef-8a4c-f3b8185e4707</guid>
      <title>Laura F. Edwards, &quot;Only the Clothes on Her Back: Clothing and the Hidden History of Power in the Nineteenth-Century United States&quot; (Oxford UP, 2022)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>What can dresses, bedlinens, waistcoats, pantaloons, shoes, and kerchiefs tell us about the legal status of the least powerful members of American society? In the hands of eminent historian Laura F. Edwards, these textiles tell a revealing story of ordinary people and how they made use of their material goods' economic and legal value in the period between the Revolution and the Civil War.</p><p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197568576" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Only the Clothes on Her Back: Clothing and the Hidden History of Power in the Nineteenth-Century United States</em></a>&nbsp;(Oxford University Press, 2022) by Dr. Laura F. Edwards uncovers practices, commonly known then, but now long forgotten, which made textiles—clothing, cloth, bedding, and accessories, such as shoes and hats—a unique form of property that people without rights could own and exchange. The value of textiles depended on law, and it was law that turned these goods into a secure form of property for marginalized people, who not only used these textiles as currency, credit, and capital, but also as entree into the new republic's economy and governing institutions. Dr. Edwards grounds the laws relating to textiles in engaging stories from the lives of everyday Americans. Wives wove linen and kept the proceeds, enslaved people traded coats and shoes, and poor people invested in fabrics, which they carefully preserved in trunks. Dr. Edwards shows that these stories are about far more than cloth and clothing; they reshape our understanding of law and the economy in America.</p><p>Based on painstaking archival research from fifteen states,&nbsp;<em>Only the Clothes on Her Back</em>&nbsp;reconstructs this hidden history of power, tracing it from the governing order of the early republic in which textiles' legal principles flourished to the textiles' legal downfall in the mid-nineteenth century when they were crowded out by the rising power of rights.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;new book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Nov 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/laura-f-edwards-only-the-clothes-on-her-back-clothing-and-the-hidden-history-of-power-in-the-nineteenth-century-united-states-oxford-up-2022-SQOani8v</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What can dresses, bedlinens, waistcoats, pantaloons, shoes, and kerchiefs tell us about the legal status of the least powerful members of American society? In the hands of eminent historian Laura F. Edwards, these textiles tell a revealing story of ordinary people and how they made use of their material goods' economic and legal value in the period between the Revolution and the Civil War.</p><p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197568576" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Only the Clothes on Her Back: Clothing and the Hidden History of Power in the Nineteenth-Century United States</em></a>&nbsp;(Oxford University Press, 2022) by Dr. Laura F. Edwards uncovers practices, commonly known then, but now long forgotten, which made textiles—clothing, cloth, bedding, and accessories, such as shoes and hats—a unique form of property that people without rights could own and exchange. The value of textiles depended on law, and it was law that turned these goods into a secure form of property for marginalized people, who not only used these textiles as currency, credit, and capital, but also as entree into the new republic's economy and governing institutions. Dr. Edwards grounds the laws relating to textiles in engaging stories from the lives of everyday Americans. Wives wove linen and kept the proceeds, enslaved people traded coats and shoes, and poor people invested in fabrics, which they carefully preserved in trunks. Dr. Edwards shows that these stories are about far more than cloth and clothing; they reshape our understanding of law and the economy in America.</p><p>Based on painstaking archival research from fifteen states,&nbsp;<em>Only the Clothes on Her Back</em>&nbsp;reconstructs this hidden history of power, tracing it from the governing order of the early republic in which textiles' legal principles flourished to the textiles' legal downfall in the mid-nineteenth century when they were crowded out by the rising power of rights.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;new book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="51449281" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/cd97e1c8-0620-41bb-bf6d-108d12797a5a/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=cd97e1c8-0620-41bb-bf6d-108d12797a5a&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Laura F. Edwards, &quot;Only the Clothes on Her Back: Clothing and the Hidden History of Power in the Nineteenth-Century United States&quot; (Oxford UP, 2022)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:53:35</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>What can dresses, bedlinens, waistcoats, pantaloons, shoes, and kerchiefs tell us about the legal status of the least powerful members of American society? In the hands of eminent historian Laura F. Edwards, these textiles tell a revealing story of ordinary people and how they made use of their material goods&apos; economic and legal value in the period between the Revolution and the Civil War.
Only the Clothes on Her Back: Clothing and the Hidden History of Power in the Nineteenth-Century United States (Oxford University Press, 2022) by Dr. Laura F. Edwards uncovers practices, commonly known then, but now long forgotten, which made textiles—clothing, cloth, bedding, and accessories, such as shoes and hats—a unique form of property that people without rights could own and exchange. The value of textiles depended on law, and it was law that turned these goods into a secure form of property for marginalized people, who not only used these textiles as currency, credit, and capital, but also as entree into the new republic&apos;s economy and governing institutions. Dr. Edwards grounds the laws relating to textiles in engaging stories from the lives of everyday Americans. Wives wove linen and kept the proceeds, enslaved people traded coats and shoes, and poor people invested in fabrics, which they carefully preserved in trunks. Dr. Edwards shows that these stories are about far more than cloth and clothing; they reshape our understanding of law and the economy in America.
Based on painstaking archival research from fifteen states, Only the Clothes on Her Back reconstructs this hidden history of power, tracing it from the governing order of the early republic in which textiles&apos; legal principles flourished to the textiles&apos; legal downfall in the mid-nineteenth century when they were crowded out by the rising power of rights.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>What can dresses, bedlinens, waistcoats, pantaloons, shoes, and kerchiefs tell us about the legal status of the least powerful members of American society? In the hands of eminent historian Laura F. Edwards, these textiles tell a revealing story of ordinary people and how they made use of their material goods&apos; economic and legal value in the period between the Revolution and the Civil War.
Only the Clothes on Her Back: Clothing and the Hidden History of Power in the Nineteenth-Century United States (Oxford University Press, 2022) by Dr. Laura F. Edwards uncovers practices, commonly known then, but now long forgotten, which made textiles—clothing, cloth, bedding, and accessories, such as shoes and hats—a unique form of property that people without rights could own and exchange. The value of textiles depended on law, and it was law that turned these goods into a secure form of property for marginalized people, who not only used these textiles as currency, credit, and capital, but also as entree into the new republic&apos;s economy and governing institutions. Dr. Edwards grounds the laws relating to textiles in engaging stories from the lives of everyday Americans. Wives wove linen and kept the proceeds, enslaved people traded coats and shoes, and poor people invested in fabrics, which they carefully preserved in trunks. Dr. Edwards shows that these stories are about far more than cloth and clothing; they reshape our understanding of law and the economy in America.
Based on painstaking archival research from fifteen states, Only the Clothes on Her Back reconstructs this hidden history of power, tracing it from the governing order of the early republic in which textiles&apos; legal principles flourished to the textiles&apos; legal downfall in the mid-nineteenth century when they were crowded out by the rising power of rights.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>280</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">f1406d1c-a382-11ef-a8d8-d78f7f3092bd</guid>
      <title>Saadia Yacoob, &quot;Beyond the Binary: Gender and Legal Personhood in Islamic Law&quot; (U California Press, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Saadia Yacoob’s excellent new book,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780520393806" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Beyond the Binary: Gender and Legal Personhood in Islamic Law</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(U of California&nbsp;Press 2024), makes a compelling argument about gender and Islamic law that has been shockingly overlooked: Legal personhood in Islamic law is intersectional and relational, and gender is not a binary. While Muslims commonly treat gender as a fixed, stand-alone category in Islam that fundamentally shapes an individual’s legal status, Yacoob shows that that legal status in Islamic law was not determined by fixed categories of male or female but by a complex web of social hierarchies, including class, age, freedom, enslavement, social status, and lineage. She challenges the conventional binary understanding of gender by drawing on a rich array of historical, early Hanafi texts from the ninth to twelfth centuries. With insightful coverage of topics such as marriage, slavery, and sexual ethics, Yacoob finds that the categories of man and woman are unstable and conditional in Islamic law. In fact, she shows, the person’s legal and social status determined their role in society and not just their role but also how they were punished and treated in the law. Further, she argues that the category gender “did not exist as a group that had shared interests or a shared social position that led to a shared legal personhood as men or women” (p. 92).</p><p>In our interview today, Yacoob describes the origins of the book and its main arguments and findings and explains what she means by “beyond the binary” and “legal personhood” in the title of the book. We also discuss the specific chapters and some of the major themes that show up in each chapter, such as illicit sex and its consequences depending on one’s legal personhood, how a “child” was understood in her sources, what the terms “emphasized femininity” and “hegemonic masculinity” mean. Yacoob also explains what scholars miss by using only “gender” as an analytical category for studying power relations in Islamic law. We end with some of the practical implications of the arguments and findings of this book for both academics and lay Muslims, such as how we can use Islamic law itself to build our critiques of where we are today.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 16 Nov 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/saadia-yacoob-beyond-the-binary-gender-and-legal-personhood-in-islamic-law-u-california-press-2024-kUH8_e_W</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Saadia Yacoob’s excellent new book,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780520393806" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Beyond the Binary: Gender and Legal Personhood in Islamic Law</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(U of California&nbsp;Press 2024), makes a compelling argument about gender and Islamic law that has been shockingly overlooked: Legal personhood in Islamic law is intersectional and relational, and gender is not a binary. While Muslims commonly treat gender as a fixed, stand-alone category in Islam that fundamentally shapes an individual’s legal status, Yacoob shows that that legal status in Islamic law was not determined by fixed categories of male or female but by a complex web of social hierarchies, including class, age, freedom, enslavement, social status, and lineage. She challenges the conventional binary understanding of gender by drawing on a rich array of historical, early Hanafi texts from the ninth to twelfth centuries. With insightful coverage of topics such as marriage, slavery, and sexual ethics, Yacoob finds that the categories of man and woman are unstable and conditional in Islamic law. In fact, she shows, the person’s legal and social status determined their role in society and not just their role but also how they were punished and treated in the law. Further, she argues that the category gender “did not exist as a group that had shared interests or a shared social position that led to a shared legal personhood as men or women” (p. 92).</p><p>In our interview today, Yacoob describes the origins of the book and its main arguments and findings and explains what she means by “beyond the binary” and “legal personhood” in the title of the book. We also discuss the specific chapters and some of the major themes that show up in each chapter, such as illicit sex and its consequences depending on one’s legal personhood, how a “child” was understood in her sources, what the terms “emphasized femininity” and “hegemonic masculinity” mean. Yacoob also explains what scholars miss by using only “gender” as an analytical category for studying power relations in Islamic law. We end with some of the practical implications of the arguments and findings of this book for both academics and lay Muslims, such as how we can use Islamic law itself to build our critiques of where we are today.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="85120870" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/831841bd-38c4-41ac-8f3d-c78429143e56/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=831841bd-38c4-41ac-8f3d-c78429143e56&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Saadia Yacoob, &quot;Beyond the Binary: Gender and Legal Personhood in Islamic Law&quot; (U California Press, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:28:39</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Saadia Yacoob’s excellent new book, Beyond the Binary: Gender and Legal Personhood in Islamic Law (U of California Press 2024), makes a compelling argument about gender and Islamic law that has been shockingly overlooked: Legal personhood in Islamic law is intersectional and relational, and gender is not a binary. While Muslims commonly treat gender as a fixed, stand-alone category in Islam that fundamentally shapes an individual’s legal status, Yacoob shows that that legal status in Islamic law was not determined by fixed categories of male or female but by a complex web of social hierarchies, including class, age, freedom, enslavement, social status, and lineage. She challenges the conventional binary understanding of gender by drawing on a rich array of historical, early Hanafi texts from the ninth to twelfth centuries. With insightful coverage of topics such as marriage, slavery, and sexual ethics, Yacoob finds that the categories of man and woman are unstable and conditional in Islamic law. In fact, she shows, the person’s legal and social status determined their role in society and not just their role but also how they were punished and treated in the law. Further, she argues that the category gender “did not exist as a group that had shared interests or a shared social position that led to a shared legal personhood as men or women” (p. 92).
In our interview today, Yacoob describes the origins of the book and its main arguments and findings and explains what she means by “beyond the binary” and “legal personhood” in the title of the book. We also discuss the specific chapters and some of the major themes that show up in each chapter, such as illicit sex and its consequences depending on one’s legal personhood, how a “child” was understood in her sources, what the terms “emphasized femininity” and “hegemonic masculinity” mean. Yacoob also explains what scholars miss by using only “gender” as an analytical category for studying power relations in Islamic law. We end with some of the practical implications of the arguments and findings of this book for both academics and lay Muslims, such as how we can use Islamic law itself to build our critiques of where we are today.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Saadia Yacoob’s excellent new book, Beyond the Binary: Gender and Legal Personhood in Islamic Law (U of California Press 2024), makes a compelling argument about gender and Islamic law that has been shockingly overlooked: Legal personhood in Islamic law is intersectional and relational, and gender is not a binary. While Muslims commonly treat gender as a fixed, stand-alone category in Islam that fundamentally shapes an individual’s legal status, Yacoob shows that that legal status in Islamic law was not determined by fixed categories of male or female but by a complex web of social hierarchies, including class, age, freedom, enslavement, social status, and lineage. She challenges the conventional binary understanding of gender by drawing on a rich array of historical, early Hanafi texts from the ninth to twelfth centuries. With insightful coverage of topics such as marriage, slavery, and sexual ethics, Yacoob finds that the categories of man and woman are unstable and conditional in Islamic law. In fact, she shows, the person’s legal and social status determined their role in society and not just their role but also how they were punished and treated in the law. Further, she argues that the category gender “did not exist as a group that had shared interests or a shared social position that led to a shared legal personhood as men or women” (p. 92).
In our interview today, Yacoob describes the origins of the book and its main arguments and findings and explains what she means by “beyond the binary” and “legal personhood” in the title of the book. We also discuss the specific chapters and some of the major themes that show up in each chapter, such as illicit sex and its consequences depending on one’s legal personhood, how a “child” was understood in her sources, what the terms “emphasized femininity” and “hegemonic masculinity” mean. Yacoob also explains what scholars miss by using only “gender” as an analytical category for studying power relations in Islamic law. We end with some of the practical implications of the arguments and findings of this book for both academics and lay Muslims, such as how we can use Islamic law itself to build our critiques of where we are today.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>344</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">a1b1b9e6-a36d-11ef-8fa1-df409c3e8637</guid>
      <title>Lizhi Liu, &quot;From Click to Boom: The Political Economy of E-Commerce in China&quot; (Princeton UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>How do states build vital institutions for market development? Too often, governments confront technical or political barriers to providing the rule of law, contract enforcement, and loan access. In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691254104" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>From Click to Boom: The Political Economy of E-Commerce in China</em></a>&nbsp;(Princeton, 2024) Lizhi Liu suggests a digital solution: governments strategically outsourcing tasks of institutional development and enforcement to digital platforms—a process she calls “institutional outsourcing.”</p><p>China’s e-commerce boom showcases this digital path to development. In merely two decades, China built from scratch a two-trillion-dollar e-commerce market, with 800 million users, seventy million jobs, and nearly fifty percent of global online retail sales. Contrary to conventional wisdom, Liu argues, this market boom occurred because of weak government institutions, not despite them. Gaps in government institutions compelled e-commerce platforms to build powerful private institutions for contract enforcement, fraud detection, and dispute resolution. For a surprisingly long period, the authoritarian government acquiesced, endorsed, and even partnered with this private institutional building despite its disruptive nature. Drawing on a plethora of interviews, original surveys, proprietary data, and a field experiment, Liu shows that the resulting e-commerce boom had far-reaching effects on China.</p><p>Institutional outsourcing nonetheless harbors its own challenges. With inadequate regulation, platforms may abuse market power, while excessive regulation stifles institutional innovation. China’s regulatory oscillations toward platforms—from laissez-faire to crackdown and back to support—underscore the struggle to strike the right balance.</p><p><a href="https://www.lizhiliu.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Lizhi Liu</a>&nbsp;is assistant professor at the McDonough School of Business at Georgetown University, where she is also a faculty affiliate of the Department of Government. Her work has been published by American Economic Review: Insights, Studies in Comparative International Development, Minnesota Law Review, Oxford University Press, and Princeton University Press. She was also listed as a Poets&amp;Quants Top 50 Undergraduate Business Professor of 2021. She holds degrees in Political Science (PhD), Statistics (MS), and International Policy Studies (MA) from Stanford University and in International Relations (LLB) from Renmin University of China.</p><p>Interviewer&nbsp;<a href="https://peterlorentzen.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Peter Lorentzen</a>&nbsp;is an&nbsp;<a href="https://www.usfca.edu/faculty/peter-lorentzen" rel="noopener noreferrer">Associate Professor of Economics at the University of San Francisco</a>, a nonresident scholar at the&nbsp;<a href="https://china.ucsd.edu/scholars/nonresident-scholars.html" rel="noopener noreferrer">UCSD 21st&nbsp;Century China Center</a>, an alumnus of the&nbsp;<a href="https://www.ncuscr.org/program/public-intellectuals-program/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Public Intellectuals Program of the National Committee on US-China Relations</a>, and is currently a visiting scholar at the&nbsp;<a href="https://sccei.fsi.stanford.edu/people/peter_lorentzen" rel="noopener noreferrer">Stanford Center on China’s Economy and Institutions</a>. His research focuses on the economics of information, incentives, and institutions, primarily as applied to the development and governance of China. He created the unique&nbsp;<a href="https://www.usfca.edu/arts-sciences/programs/graduate/applied-economics/program-overview" rel="noopener noreferrer">Master’s of Science in Applied Economics</a>&nbsp;at the University of San Francisco, which teaches the conceptual frameworks and practical data analytics skills needed to succeed in the digital economy.</p><p>Lorentzen’s other NBN interviews relating to China’s tech sector include&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/aynne-kokas-trafficking-data-how-china-is-winning-the-battle-for-digital-sovereignty#entry:196799@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">Trafficking Data</a>, on how Chinese and American firms exploit user data,&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-tao-of-alibaba#entry:185178@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Tao of Alibaba</a>, on Alibaba’s business model and organizational culture,&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-tao-of-alibaba#entry:185178@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">Surveillance State</a>, on China’s digital surveillance,&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/prototype-nation#entry:103898@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">Prototype Nation</a>, on the culture and politics of China’s innovation economy.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 16 Nov 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/lizhi-liu-from-click-to-boom-the-political-economy-of-e-commerce-in-china-princeton-up-2024-vuFHNF0G</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do states build vital institutions for market development? Too often, governments confront technical or political barriers to providing the rule of law, contract enforcement, and loan access. In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691254104" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>From Click to Boom: The Political Economy of E-Commerce in China</em></a>&nbsp;(Princeton, 2024) Lizhi Liu suggests a digital solution: governments strategically outsourcing tasks of institutional development and enforcement to digital platforms—a process she calls “institutional outsourcing.”</p><p>China’s e-commerce boom showcases this digital path to development. In merely two decades, China built from scratch a two-trillion-dollar e-commerce market, with 800 million users, seventy million jobs, and nearly fifty percent of global online retail sales. Contrary to conventional wisdom, Liu argues, this market boom occurred because of weak government institutions, not despite them. Gaps in government institutions compelled e-commerce platforms to build powerful private institutions for contract enforcement, fraud detection, and dispute resolution. For a surprisingly long period, the authoritarian government acquiesced, endorsed, and even partnered with this private institutional building despite its disruptive nature. Drawing on a plethora of interviews, original surveys, proprietary data, and a field experiment, Liu shows that the resulting e-commerce boom had far-reaching effects on China.</p><p>Institutional outsourcing nonetheless harbors its own challenges. With inadequate regulation, platforms may abuse market power, while excessive regulation stifles institutional innovation. China’s regulatory oscillations toward platforms—from laissez-faire to crackdown and back to support—underscore the struggle to strike the right balance.</p><p><a href="https://www.lizhiliu.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Lizhi Liu</a>&nbsp;is assistant professor at the McDonough School of Business at Georgetown University, where she is also a faculty affiliate of the Department of Government. Her work has been published by American Economic Review: Insights, Studies in Comparative International Development, Minnesota Law Review, Oxford University Press, and Princeton University Press. She was also listed as a Poets&amp;Quants Top 50 Undergraduate Business Professor of 2021. She holds degrees in Political Science (PhD), Statistics (MS), and International Policy Studies (MA) from Stanford University and in International Relations (LLB) from Renmin University of China.</p><p>Interviewer&nbsp;<a href="https://peterlorentzen.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Peter Lorentzen</a>&nbsp;is an&nbsp;<a href="https://www.usfca.edu/faculty/peter-lorentzen" rel="noopener noreferrer">Associate Professor of Economics at the University of San Francisco</a>, a nonresident scholar at the&nbsp;<a href="https://china.ucsd.edu/scholars/nonresident-scholars.html" rel="noopener noreferrer">UCSD 21st&nbsp;Century China Center</a>, an alumnus of the&nbsp;<a href="https://www.ncuscr.org/program/public-intellectuals-program/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Public Intellectuals Program of the National Committee on US-China Relations</a>, and is currently a visiting scholar at the&nbsp;<a href="https://sccei.fsi.stanford.edu/people/peter_lorentzen" rel="noopener noreferrer">Stanford Center on China’s Economy and Institutions</a>. His research focuses on the economics of information, incentives, and institutions, primarily as applied to the development and governance of China. He created the unique&nbsp;<a href="https://www.usfca.edu/arts-sciences/programs/graduate/applied-economics/program-overview" rel="noopener noreferrer">Master’s of Science in Applied Economics</a>&nbsp;at the University of San Francisco, which teaches the conceptual frameworks and practical data analytics skills needed to succeed in the digital economy.</p><p>Lorentzen’s other NBN interviews relating to China’s tech sector include&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/aynne-kokas-trafficking-data-how-china-is-winning-the-battle-for-digital-sovereignty#entry:196799@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">Trafficking Data</a>, on how Chinese and American firms exploit user data,&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-tao-of-alibaba#entry:185178@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Tao of Alibaba</a>, on Alibaba’s business model and organizational culture,&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-tao-of-alibaba#entry:185178@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">Surveillance State</a>, on China’s digital surveillance,&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/prototype-nation#entry:103898@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">Prototype Nation</a>, on the culture and politics of China’s innovation economy.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="53028290" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/f0d80cd0-3c79-402b-bf5a-f242afc23377/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=f0d80cd0-3c79-402b-bf5a-f242afc23377&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Lizhi Liu, &quot;From Click to Boom: The Political Economy of E-Commerce in China&quot; (Princeton UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:55:13</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>How do states build vital institutions for market development? Too often, governments confront technical or political barriers to providing the rule of law, contract enforcement, and loan access. In From Click to Boom: The Political Economy of E-Commerce in China (Princeton, 2024) Lizhi Liu suggests a digital solution: governments strategically outsourcing tasks of institutional development and enforcement to digital platforms—a process she calls “institutional outsourcing.”
China’s e-commerce boom showcases this digital path to development. In merely two decades, China built from scratch a two-trillion-dollar e-commerce market, with 800 million users, seventy million jobs, and nearly fifty percent of global online retail sales. Contrary to conventional wisdom, Liu argues, this market boom occurred because of weak government institutions, not despite them. Gaps in government institutions compelled e-commerce platforms to build powerful private institutions for contract enforcement, fraud detection, and dispute resolution. For a surprisingly long period, the authoritarian government acquiesced, endorsed, and even partnered with this private institutional building despite its disruptive nature. Drawing on a plethora of interviews, original surveys, proprietary data, and a field experiment, Liu shows that the resulting e-commerce boom had far-reaching effects on China.
Institutional outsourcing nonetheless harbors its own challenges. With inadequate regulation, platforms may abuse market power, while excessive regulation stifles institutional innovation. China’s regulatory oscillations toward platforms—from laissez-faire to crackdown and back to support—underscore the struggle to strike the right balance.
Lizhi Liu is assistant professor at the McDonough School of Business at Georgetown University, where she is also a faculty affiliate of the Department of Government. Her work has been published by American Economic Review: Insights, Studies in Comparative International Development, Minnesota Law Review, Oxford University Press, and Princeton University Press. She was also listed as a Poets&amp;Quants Top 50 Undergraduate Business Professor of 2021. She holds degrees in Political Science (PhD), Statistics (MS), and International Policy Studies (MA) from Stanford University and in International Relations (LLB) from Renmin University of China.
Interviewer Peter Lorentzen is an Associate Professor of Economics at the University of San Francisco, a nonresident scholar at the UCSD 21st Century China Center, an alumnus of the Public Intellectuals Program of the National Committee on US-China Relations, and is currently a visiting scholar at the Stanford Center on China’s Economy and Institutions. His research focuses on the economics of information, incentives, and institutions, primarily as applied to the development and governance of China. He created the unique Master’s of Science in Applied Economics at the University of San Francisco, which teaches the conceptual frameworks and practical data analytics skills needed to succeed in the digital economy.
Lorentzen’s other NBN interviews relating to China’s tech sector include Trafficking Data, on how Chinese and American firms exploit user data, The Tao of Alibaba, on Alibaba’s business model and organizational culture, Surveillance State, on China’s digital surveillance, Prototype Nation, on the culture and politics of China’s innovation economy.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>How do states build vital institutions for market development? Too often, governments confront technical or political barriers to providing the rule of law, contract enforcement, and loan access. In From Click to Boom: The Political Economy of E-Commerce in China (Princeton, 2024) Lizhi Liu suggests a digital solution: governments strategically outsourcing tasks of institutional development and enforcement to digital platforms—a process she calls “institutional outsourcing.”
China’s e-commerce boom showcases this digital path to development. In merely two decades, China built from scratch a two-trillion-dollar e-commerce market, with 800 million users, seventy million jobs, and nearly fifty percent of global online retail sales. Contrary to conventional wisdom, Liu argues, this market boom occurred because of weak government institutions, not despite them. Gaps in government institutions compelled e-commerce platforms to build powerful private institutions for contract enforcement, fraud detection, and dispute resolution. For a surprisingly long period, the authoritarian government acquiesced, endorsed, and even partnered with this private institutional building despite its disruptive nature. Drawing on a plethora of interviews, original surveys, proprietary data, and a field experiment, Liu shows that the resulting e-commerce boom had far-reaching effects on China.
Institutional outsourcing nonetheless harbors its own challenges. With inadequate regulation, platforms may abuse market power, while excessive regulation stifles institutional innovation. China’s regulatory oscillations toward platforms—from laissez-faire to crackdown and back to support—underscore the struggle to strike the right balance.
Lizhi Liu is assistant professor at the McDonough School of Business at Georgetown University, where she is also a faculty affiliate of the Department of Government. Her work has been published by American Economic Review: Insights, Studies in Comparative International Development, Minnesota Law Review, Oxford University Press, and Princeton University Press. She was also listed as a Poets&amp;Quants Top 50 Undergraduate Business Professor of 2021. She holds degrees in Political Science (PhD), Statistics (MS), and International Policy Studies (MA) from Stanford University and in International Relations (LLB) from Renmin University of China.
Interviewer Peter Lorentzen is an Associate Professor of Economics at the University of San Francisco, a nonresident scholar at the UCSD 21st Century China Center, an alumnus of the Public Intellectuals Program of the National Committee on US-China Relations, and is currently a visiting scholar at the Stanford Center on China’s Economy and Institutions. His research focuses on the economics of information, incentives, and institutions, primarily as applied to the development and governance of China. He created the unique Master’s of Science in Applied Economics at the University of San Francisco, which teaches the conceptual frameworks and practical data analytics skills needed to succeed in the digital economy.
Lorentzen’s other NBN interviews relating to China’s tech sector include Trafficking Data, on how Chinese and American firms exploit user data, The Tao of Alibaba, on Alibaba’s business model and organizational culture, Surveillance State, on China’s digital surveillance, Prototype Nation, on the culture and politics of China’s innovation economy.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>163</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">564ac10c-a280-11ef-8fbc-efceb6b5a531</guid>
      <title>Sarah Cleary, &quot;The Myth of Harm: Horror, Censorship and the Child&quot; (Bloomsbury, 2022)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The horror genre has endured a long and controversial success within popular culture. Fraught with accusations pertaining to its alleged ability to harm and corrupt young people and indeed society as a whole, the genre is constantly under pressure to suppress that which has made it so popular to begin with - its ability to frighten and generate discussion about society's darker side.&nbsp;</p><p>In<em>&nbsp;</em><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781501378263" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Myth of Harm: Horror, Censorship and the Child</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Bloomsbury, 2022),&nbsp;Dr. Sarah Cleary analyses controversies, myths, and falsehoods surrounding the genre of horror. Focusing on five major controversies, the text examines how horror media has become a scapegoat for political and social issues, platforms for “moral entrepreneurs” and tools of hyperbole for the news industry.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Nov 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/sarah-cleary-the-myth-of-harm-horror-censorship-and-the-child-bloomsbury-2022-5qFbNNQj</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The horror genre has endured a long and controversial success within popular culture. Fraught with accusations pertaining to its alleged ability to harm and corrupt young people and indeed society as a whole, the genre is constantly under pressure to suppress that which has made it so popular to begin with - its ability to frighten and generate discussion about society's darker side.&nbsp;</p><p>In<em>&nbsp;</em><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781501378263" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Myth of Harm: Horror, Censorship and the Child</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Bloomsbury, 2022),&nbsp;Dr. Sarah Cleary analyses controversies, myths, and falsehoods surrounding the genre of horror. Focusing on five major controversies, the text examines how horror media has become a scapegoat for political and social issues, platforms for “moral entrepreneurs” and tools of hyperbole for the news industry.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="50852572" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/8987a3af-a6d1-4dfc-806a-f0acbf9eb159/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=8987a3af-a6d1-4dfc-806a-f0acbf9eb159&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Sarah Cleary, &quot;The Myth of Harm: Horror, Censorship and the Child&quot; (Bloomsbury, 2022)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:52:58</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The horror genre has endured a long and controversial success within popular culture. Fraught with accusations pertaining to its alleged ability to harm and corrupt young people and indeed society as a whole, the genre is constantly under pressure to suppress that which has made it so popular to begin with - its ability to frighten and generate discussion about society&apos;s darker side. 
In The Myth of Harm: Horror, Censorship and the Child (Bloomsbury, 2022), Dr. Sarah Cleary analyses controversies, myths, and falsehoods surrounding the genre of horror. Focusing on five major controversies, the text examines how horror media has become a scapegoat for political and social issues, platforms for “moral entrepreneurs” and tools of hyperbole for the news industry.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The horror genre has endured a long and controversial success within popular culture. Fraught with accusations pertaining to its alleged ability to harm and corrupt young people and indeed society as a whole, the genre is constantly under pressure to suppress that which has made it so popular to begin with - its ability to frighten and generate discussion about society&apos;s darker side. 
In The Myth of Harm: Horror, Censorship and the Child (Bloomsbury, 2022), Dr. Sarah Cleary analyses controversies, myths, and falsehoods surrounding the genre of horror. Focusing on five major controversies, the text examines how horror media has become a scapegoat for political and social issues, platforms for “moral entrepreneurs” and tools of hyperbole for the news industry.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>219</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ea4c350e-9a09-11ef-aa9b-bba7b934e447</guid>
      <title>Anthony Grasso, &quot;Dual Justice: America&apos;s Divergent Approaches to Street and Corporate Crime&quot; (U Chicago Press, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The United States incarcerates its citizens for property crime, drug use, and violent crime at a rate that exceeds any other developed nation – and disproportionately affects the poor and racial minorities. Yet the U.S. has never developed the capacity to consistently prosecute&nbsp;<em>corporate</em>&nbsp;wrongdoing. This disjuncture between the treatment of street and corporate crime is often narrated as hypocrisy. Others suggest that the disparity is rooted in a conservative backlash after the civil rights movement and the Great Society or a legacy of slavery, Jim Crow, and the racialization of crime.</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780226835594" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Dual Justice: America's Divergent Approaches to Street and Corporate Crime</em></a>&nbsp;(U Chicago Press, 2024), Dr. Anthony Grasso interrogates the intertwined histories of street and corporate crime to find that the differences in punishment are more than modern hypocrisy. Examining the carceral and regulatory states' evolutions from 1870 through today, Grasso argues that divergent approaches to street and corporate crime share common, self-reinforcing origins. During the Progressive Era, scholars and lawmakers championed naturalized theories of human difference such as eugenics to justify instituting punitive measures for poor offenders and regulatory controls for corporate lawbreakers. These ideas laid the foundation for dual justice systems: criminal justice institutions harshly governing street crime and regulatory institutions governing corporate misconduct.</p><p>Even after eugenics was discredited, criminal justice and regulatory institutions have developed in tandem to reinforce politically constructed understandings about who counts as a criminal. Using an impressive array of sources and methods, Dr. Grasso analyzes the intellectual history, policy debates, and state and federal institutional reforms that consolidated these ideas, along with their racial and class biases, into America's legal system.</p><p><a href="http://www.anthonyjgrasso.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. Anthony Grasso&nbsp;</a>is an assistant professor of political science at Rutgers University Camden. His research focuses on American political development, law, and inequality.</p><p>Mentioned:</p><ul>
<li>Susan’s interview with Dr. Joanna Wuest on&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/born-this-way#entry:332828@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Born This Way: Science, Citizenship, and Inequality in the American LGBTQ+ Movement</em></a>
</li>
<li>David Vogel,<em>&nbsp;Fluctuating Fortunes: The Political Power of Business in America&nbsp;</em>(Beard Books, 1989)</li>
</ul><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/anthony-grasso-dual-justice-americas-divergent-approaches-to-street-and-corporate-crime-u-chicago-press-2024-AcIgxPH1</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The United States incarcerates its citizens for property crime, drug use, and violent crime at a rate that exceeds any other developed nation – and disproportionately affects the poor and racial minorities. Yet the U.S. has never developed the capacity to consistently prosecute&nbsp;<em>corporate</em>&nbsp;wrongdoing. This disjuncture between the treatment of street and corporate crime is often narrated as hypocrisy. Others suggest that the disparity is rooted in a conservative backlash after the civil rights movement and the Great Society or a legacy of slavery, Jim Crow, and the racialization of crime.</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780226835594" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Dual Justice: America's Divergent Approaches to Street and Corporate Crime</em></a>&nbsp;(U Chicago Press, 2024), Dr. Anthony Grasso interrogates the intertwined histories of street and corporate crime to find that the differences in punishment are more than modern hypocrisy. Examining the carceral and regulatory states' evolutions from 1870 through today, Grasso argues that divergent approaches to street and corporate crime share common, self-reinforcing origins. During the Progressive Era, scholars and lawmakers championed naturalized theories of human difference such as eugenics to justify instituting punitive measures for poor offenders and regulatory controls for corporate lawbreakers. These ideas laid the foundation for dual justice systems: criminal justice institutions harshly governing street crime and regulatory institutions governing corporate misconduct.</p><p>Even after eugenics was discredited, criminal justice and regulatory institutions have developed in tandem to reinforce politically constructed understandings about who counts as a criminal. Using an impressive array of sources and methods, Dr. Grasso analyzes the intellectual history, policy debates, and state and federal institutional reforms that consolidated these ideas, along with their racial and class biases, into America's legal system.</p><p><a href="http://www.anthonyjgrasso.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. Anthony Grasso&nbsp;</a>is an assistant professor of political science at Rutgers University Camden. His research focuses on American political development, law, and inequality.</p><p>Mentioned:</p><ul>
<li>Susan’s interview with Dr. Joanna Wuest on&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/born-this-way#entry:332828@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Born This Way: Science, Citizenship, and Inequality in the American LGBTQ+ Movement</em></a>
</li>
<li>David Vogel,<em>&nbsp;Fluctuating Fortunes: The Political Power of Business in America&nbsp;</em>(Beard Books, 1989)</li>
</ul><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="50211944" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/b2531316-7bf4-4df7-aced-861d543b4741/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=b2531316-7bf4-4df7-aced-861d543b4741&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Anthony Grasso, &quot;Dual Justice: America&apos;s Divergent Approaches to Street and Corporate Crime&quot; (U Chicago Press, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:52:18</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The United States incarcerates its citizens for property crime, drug use, and violent crime at a rate that exceeds any other developed nation – and disproportionately affects the poor and racial minorities. Yet the U.S. has never developed the capacity to consistently prosecute corporate wrongdoing. This disjuncture between the treatment of street and corporate crime is often narrated as hypocrisy. Others suggest that the disparity is rooted in a conservative backlash after the civil rights movement and the Great Society or a legacy of slavery, Jim Crow, and the racialization of crime.
In Dual Justice: America&apos;s Divergent Approaches to Street and Corporate Crime (U Chicago Press, 2024), Dr. Anthony Grasso interrogates the intertwined histories of street and corporate crime to find that the differences in punishment are more than modern hypocrisy. Examining the carceral and regulatory states&apos; evolutions from 1870 through today, Grasso argues that divergent approaches to street and corporate crime share common, self-reinforcing origins. During the Progressive Era, scholars and lawmakers championed naturalized theories of human difference such as eugenics to justify instituting punitive measures for poor offenders and regulatory controls for corporate lawbreakers. These ideas laid the foundation for dual justice systems: criminal justice institutions harshly governing street crime and regulatory institutions governing corporate misconduct.
Even after eugenics was discredited, criminal justice and regulatory institutions have developed in tandem to reinforce politically constructed understandings about who counts as a criminal. Using an impressive array of sources and methods, Dr. Grasso analyzes the intellectual history, policy debates, and state and federal institutional reforms that consolidated these ideas, along with their racial and class biases, into America&apos;s legal system.
Dr. Anthony Grasso is an assistant professor of political science at Rutgers University Camden. His research focuses on American political development, law, and inequality.
Mentioned:
Susan’s interview with Dr. Joanna Wuest on Born This Way: Science, Citizenship, and Inequality in the American LGBTQ+ Movement
David Vogel, Fluctuating Fortunes: The Political Power of Business in America (Beard Books, 1989)
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The United States incarcerates its citizens for property crime, drug use, and violent crime at a rate that exceeds any other developed nation – and disproportionately affects the poor and racial minorities. Yet the U.S. has never developed the capacity to consistently prosecute corporate wrongdoing. This disjuncture between the treatment of street and corporate crime is often narrated as hypocrisy. Others suggest that the disparity is rooted in a conservative backlash after the civil rights movement and the Great Society or a legacy of slavery, Jim Crow, and the racialization of crime.
In Dual Justice: America&apos;s Divergent Approaches to Street and Corporate Crime (U Chicago Press, 2024), Dr. Anthony Grasso interrogates the intertwined histories of street and corporate crime to find that the differences in punishment are more than modern hypocrisy. Examining the carceral and regulatory states&apos; evolutions from 1870 through today, Grasso argues that divergent approaches to street and corporate crime share common, self-reinforcing origins. During the Progressive Era, scholars and lawmakers championed naturalized theories of human difference such as eugenics to justify instituting punitive measures for poor offenders and regulatory controls for corporate lawbreakers. These ideas laid the foundation for dual justice systems: criminal justice institutions harshly governing street crime and regulatory institutions governing corporate misconduct.
Even after eugenics was discredited, criminal justice and regulatory institutions have developed in tandem to reinforce politically constructed understandings about who counts as a criminal. Using an impressive array of sources and methods, Dr. Grasso analyzes the intellectual history, policy debates, and state and federal institutional reforms that consolidated these ideas, along with their racial and class biases, into America&apos;s legal system.
Dr. Anthony Grasso is an assistant professor of political science at Rutgers University Camden. His research focuses on American political development, law, and inequality.
Mentioned:
Susan’s interview with Dr. Joanna Wuest on Born This Way: Science, Citizenship, and Inequality in the American LGBTQ+ Movement
David Vogel, Fluctuating Fortunes: The Political Power of Business in America (Beard Books, 1989)
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>746</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">a14cd22e-99f4-11ef-9545-43977a349584</guid>
      <title>History and Law with Rodger Citron</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>I spoke with an accomplished attorney and innovative law professor Rodger Citron of the Touro Law School about the complex relationships between history and... yes, law. We talked about how the Nuremberg trials of Nazi criminals after World War II shaped the US legal philosophy. We dug into themes like the tensions between originalism and evolving interpretations of the Constitution and how judges’ personal histories impact supposedly objective rulings. We discussed Judge Irving Kaufman (famous for sentencing Julius and Ethel Rosenberg to death in 1951) and how his complex legacy offers insight into the human dimension of the judiciary. We also discussed a recent Supreme Court case, Mallory v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company, to illustrate the evolving (and surprising) tensions between originalism and "Living Constitution" approaches to law. With serious legal questions bound to arise during Trump's second term as president, and a bloody land war raging in Europe, this is a timely topic for anyone eager to understand the implications of history to contemporary institutions and events.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 7 Nov 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/history-and-law-with-rodger-citron-w623guhV</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I spoke with an accomplished attorney and innovative law professor Rodger Citron of the Touro Law School about the complex relationships between history and... yes, law. We talked about how the Nuremberg trials of Nazi criminals after World War II shaped the US legal philosophy. We dug into themes like the tensions between originalism and evolving interpretations of the Constitution and how judges’ personal histories impact supposedly objective rulings. We discussed Judge Irving Kaufman (famous for sentencing Julius and Ethel Rosenberg to death in 1951) and how his complex legacy offers insight into the human dimension of the judiciary. We also discussed a recent Supreme Court case, Mallory v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company, to illustrate the evolving (and surprising) tensions between originalism and "Living Constitution" approaches to law. With serious legal questions bound to arise during Trump's second term as president, and a bloody land war raging in Europe, this is a timely topic for anyone eager to understand the implications of history to contemporary institutions and events.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="67446105" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/5418b99b-2910-4b70-831c-c4a2e28bc553/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=5418b99b-2910-4b70-831c-c4a2e28bc553&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>History and Law with Rodger Citron</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:10:15</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>I spoke with an accomplished attorney and innovative law professor Rodger Citron of the Touro Law School about the complex relationships between history and... yes, law. We talked about how the Nuremberg trials of Nazi criminals after World War II shaped the US legal philosophy. We dug into themes like the tensions between originalism and evolving interpretations of the Constitution and how judges’ personal histories impact supposedly objective rulings. We discussed Judge Irving Kaufman (famous for sentencing Julius and Ethel Rosenberg to death in 1951) and how his complex legacy offers insight into the human dimension of the judiciary. We also discussed a recent Supreme Court case, Mallory v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company, to illustrate the evolving (and surprising) tensions between originalism and &quot;Living Constitution&quot; approaches to law. With serious legal questions bound to arise during Trump&apos;s second term as president, and a bloody land war raging in Europe, this is a timely topic for anyone eager to understand the implications of history to contemporary institutions and events.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>I spoke with an accomplished attorney and innovative law professor Rodger Citron of the Touro Law School about the complex relationships between history and... yes, law. We talked about how the Nuremberg trials of Nazi criminals after World War II shaped the US legal philosophy. We dug into themes like the tensions between originalism and evolving interpretations of the Constitution and how judges’ personal histories impact supposedly objective rulings. We discussed Judge Irving Kaufman (famous for sentencing Julius and Ethel Rosenberg to death in 1951) and how his complex legacy offers insight into the human dimension of the judiciary. We also discussed a recent Supreme Court case, Mallory v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company, to illustrate the evolving (and surprising) tensions between originalism and &quot;Living Constitution&quot; approaches to law. With serious legal questions bound to arise during Trump&apos;s second term as president, and a bloody land war raging in Europe, this is a timely topic for anyone eager to understand the implications of history to contemporary institutions and events.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>14</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8cdb2426-994a-11ef-a1b3-670b2804c99e</guid>
      <title>The Impeachment Power: A Conversation with Keith Whittington</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In this week’s episode we step into conversation with Keith Whittington about his new book,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691265391" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Impeachment Power:&nbsp;The Law, Politics, and Purpose of an Extraordinary Constitutional Tool</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Princeton UP, 2024), we explored the historical and constitutional dimensions of impeachment in American politics. Whittington provided a detailed account of how the Founders intended impeachment to function as a safeguard against executive overreach. We discussed the evolution of impeachment cases, from Andrew Johnson to more recent examples, examining how political partisanship and public opinion have shaped its application over time. Whittington also reflected on the implications of impeachment for the health of democratic institutions and constitutional governance today. It was an enlightening discussion on one of the most important, yet often misunderstood, mechanisms in the U.S. Constitution.</p><p>Keith E. Whittington is the David Boies Professor of Law at Yale Law School. Whittington’s teaching and scholarship span American constitutional theory, American political and constitutional history, judicial politics, the presidency, and free speech and the law. He is the author of&nbsp;<em>You Can't Teach That! The Battle Over University Classrooms</em>&nbsp;(2024),&nbsp;<em>Repugnant Laws: Judicial Review of Acts of Congress from the Founding to the Present</em>&nbsp;(2019), and&nbsp;<em>Speak Freely: Why Universities Must Defend Free Speech&nbsp;</em>(2018), as well as&nbsp;<em>Constitutional Interpretation&nbsp;</em>(1999),&nbsp;<em>Political Foundations of Judicial Supremacy</em>&nbsp;(2007), and other works on constitutional theory and law and politics.</p><p>Whittington has spent most of his career at Princeton University, where he served as the William Nelson Cromwell Professor of Politics from 2006 to 2024. He has also held visiting appointments at Georgetown University Law Center, Harvard Law School, and the University of Texas School of Law.</p><p><a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/podcast" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Madison’s Notes</em></a>&nbsp;is the podcast of Princeton&nbsp;<a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions</em></a><em>.</em></p><p><em>Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 6 Nov 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/the-impeachment-power-a-conversation-with-keith-whittington-3BBqwjkj</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this week’s episode we step into conversation with Keith Whittington about his new book,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691265391" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Impeachment Power:&nbsp;The Law, Politics, and Purpose of an Extraordinary Constitutional Tool</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Princeton UP, 2024), we explored the historical and constitutional dimensions of impeachment in American politics. Whittington provided a detailed account of how the Founders intended impeachment to function as a safeguard against executive overreach. We discussed the evolution of impeachment cases, from Andrew Johnson to more recent examples, examining how political partisanship and public opinion have shaped its application over time. Whittington also reflected on the implications of impeachment for the health of democratic institutions and constitutional governance today. It was an enlightening discussion on one of the most important, yet often misunderstood, mechanisms in the U.S. Constitution.</p><p>Keith E. Whittington is the David Boies Professor of Law at Yale Law School. Whittington’s teaching and scholarship span American constitutional theory, American political and constitutional history, judicial politics, the presidency, and free speech and the law. He is the author of&nbsp;<em>You Can't Teach That! The Battle Over University Classrooms</em>&nbsp;(2024),&nbsp;<em>Repugnant Laws: Judicial Review of Acts of Congress from the Founding to the Present</em>&nbsp;(2019), and&nbsp;<em>Speak Freely: Why Universities Must Defend Free Speech&nbsp;</em>(2018), as well as&nbsp;<em>Constitutional Interpretation&nbsp;</em>(1999),&nbsp;<em>Political Foundations of Judicial Supremacy</em>&nbsp;(2007), and other works on constitutional theory and law and politics.</p><p>Whittington has spent most of his career at Princeton University, where he served as the William Nelson Cromwell Professor of Politics from 2006 to 2024. He has also held visiting appointments at Georgetown University Law Center, Harvard Law School, and the University of Texas School of Law.</p><p><a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/podcast" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Madison’s Notes</em></a>&nbsp;is the podcast of Princeton&nbsp;<a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions</em></a><em>.</em></p><p><em>Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="47512489" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/c6386b3b-2bf7-418f-a594-cc435c8536a4/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=c6386b3b-2bf7-418f-a594-cc435c8536a4&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>The Impeachment Power: A Conversation with Keith Whittington</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:49:29</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this week’s episode we step into conversation with Keith Whittington about his new book, The Impeachment Power: The Law, Politics, and Purpose of an Extraordinary Constitutional Tool (Princeton UP, 2024), we explored the historical and constitutional dimensions of impeachment in American politics. Whittington provided a detailed account of how the Founders intended impeachment to function as a safeguard against executive overreach. We discussed the evolution of impeachment cases, from Andrew Johnson to more recent examples, examining how political partisanship and public opinion have shaped its application over time. Whittington also reflected on the implications of impeachment for the health of democratic institutions and constitutional governance today. It was an enlightening discussion on one of the most important, yet often misunderstood, mechanisms in the U.S. Constitution.
Keith E. Whittington is the David Boies Professor of Law at Yale Law School. Whittington’s teaching and scholarship span American constitutional theory, American political and constitutional history, judicial politics, the presidency, and free speech and the law. He is the author of You Can&apos;t Teach That! The Battle Over University Classrooms (2024), Repugnant Laws: Judicial Review of Acts of Congress from the Founding to the Present (2019), and Speak Freely: Why Universities Must Defend Free Speech (2018), as well as Constitutional Interpretation (1999), Political Foundations of Judicial Supremacy (2007), and other works on constitutional theory and law and politics.
Whittington has spent most of his career at Princeton University, where he served as the William Nelson Cromwell Professor of Politics from 2006 to 2024. He has also held visiting appointments at Georgetown University Law Center, Harvard Law School, and the University of Texas School of Law.
Madison’s Notes is the podcast of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions.
Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this week’s episode we step into conversation with Keith Whittington about his new book, The Impeachment Power: The Law, Politics, and Purpose of an Extraordinary Constitutional Tool (Princeton UP, 2024), we explored the historical and constitutional dimensions of impeachment in American politics. Whittington provided a detailed account of how the Founders intended impeachment to function as a safeguard against executive overreach. We discussed the evolution of impeachment cases, from Andrew Johnson to more recent examples, examining how political partisanship and public opinion have shaped its application over time. Whittington also reflected on the implications of impeachment for the health of democratic institutions and constitutional governance today. It was an enlightening discussion on one of the most important, yet often misunderstood, mechanisms in the U.S. Constitution.
Keith E. Whittington is the David Boies Professor of Law at Yale Law School. Whittington’s teaching and scholarship span American constitutional theory, American political and constitutional history, judicial politics, the presidency, and free speech and the law. He is the author of You Can&apos;t Teach That! The Battle Over University Classrooms (2024), Repugnant Laws: Judicial Review of Acts of Congress from the Founding to the Present (2019), and Speak Freely: Why Universities Must Defend Free Speech (2018), as well as Constitutional Interpretation (1999), Political Foundations of Judicial Supremacy (2007), and other works on constitutional theory and law and politics.
Whittington has spent most of his career at Princeton University, where he served as the William Nelson Cromwell Professor of Politics from 2006 to 2024. He has also held visiting appointments at Georgetown University Law Center, Harvard Law School, and the University of Texas School of Law.
Madison’s Notes is the podcast of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions.
Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>126</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4bf7b19c-96e1-11ef-b9fd-f3b6df00f685</guid>
      <title>Kirsten Widner and Anna Gunderson, &quot;The Haves and Have-Nots in Supreme Court Representation and Participation, 2016 to 2021&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>There has been a lot of commentary from scholars and journalists as to the meaning of Donald Trump’s three appointments to the United States Supreme Court – with regards to changes in jurisprudence, increased separation of the Court from political processes that legitimate it. Drs. Kirsten Widner and Anna Gunderson have done something a little different using tools from political science.&nbsp;</p><p>Their new book,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009394338" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Haves and Have-Nots in Supreme Court Representation and Participation, 2016 to 2021</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Cambridge UP 2024), examines how the changing composition of the US Supreme Court affects who participates in advocacy before the Court. Who thinks to bring a case to the Supreme Court and has that changed since three new justices were appointed during the presidency of Donald Trump? Their book argues that Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett have changed the behavior of both litigants (people bringing cases) and&nbsp;<em>amicus curiae</em>&nbsp;(groups that write briefs in support of either side).</p><p>Their study demonstrates that the growing conservatism of the Court radically reshaped the incentives of interested parties and, as a result, their participation in litigation activity. These changes in incentives have both normative and substantive importance – decreasing the power of marginalized groups and increasing opportunities for people and groups with conservative interests. Their study shows how the makeup of the Supreme Court affects the issues heard and which voices are heard loudest in the documents.</p><p><a href="https://polisci.utk.edu/person/kirsten-widner/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Kirsten Widner</a>&nbsp;is an Assistant Professor of Political Science at the University of Tennessee, Knoxville. She received her JD from the University of San Diego School of Law and her PhD from Emory University. Her research focuses on the political representation of marginalized and unenfranchised groups.</p><p><a href="http://annagunderson.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Anna Gunderson</a>&nbsp;is an Associate Professor of Public Affairs at the University of Texas, Austin and she received her PhD from Emory University. She studies American politics; the politics of punishment and policing; judicial politics; state politics; and public policy.</p><p>Mentioned:</p><ul>
<li>Anna Gunderson, Kirsten Widner, and Maggie Macdonald,<strong>&nbsp;“</strong><a href="https://scholars.uky.edu/en/publications/pursuing-change-or-pursuing-credit-litigation-and-credit-claiming" rel="noopener noreferrer">Pursuing Change or Pursuing Credit? Litigation and Credit Claiming on Social Media</a>,”&nbsp;<em>Journal of Law and Courts</em>&nbsp;2024.</li>
<li>Rebecca Kreitzer and Candis Watts, “<a href="https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/ps-political-science-and-politics/article/abs/reproducible-and-replicable-an-empirical-assessment-of-the-social-construction-of-politically-relevant-target-groups/087BA5CA1DE6FE26A1FE90C99611367A" rel="noopener noreferrer">Reproducible and replicable: An</a>&nbsp;<a href="https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/ps-political-science-and-politics/article/abs/reproducible-and-replicable-an-empirical-assessment-of-the-social-construction-of-politically-relevant-target-groups/087BA5CA1DE6FE26A1FE90C99611367A" rel="noopener noreferrer">empirical assessment of the social construction of politically relevant target</a>&nbsp;<a href="https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/ps-political-science-and-politics/article/abs/reproducible-and-replicable-an-empirical-assessment-of-the-social-construction-of-politically-relevant-target-groups/087BA5CA1DE6FE26A1FE90C99611367A" rel="noopener noreferrer">groups</a>.”</li>
<li>Ann Schneider and Helen Ingram, “<a href="https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/american-political-science-review/article/abs/social-construction-of-target-populations-implications-for-politics-and-policy/861B4A5EA194CC405B13515F1970550A" rel="noopener noreferrer">Social construction of target populations:</a>&nbsp;<a href="https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/american-political-science-review/article/abs/social-construction-of-target-populations-implications-for-politics-and-policy/861B4A5EA194CC405B13515F1970550A" rel="noopener noreferrer">Implications for politics and policy</a>” and&nbsp;<a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700608430/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Policy Design for Democracy</em></a><em>.</em>
</li>
</ul><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/kirsten-widner-and-anna-gunderson-the-haves-and-have-nots-in-supreme-court-representation-and-participation-2016-to-2021-cambridge-up-2024-3Z_rbZz0</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There has been a lot of commentary from scholars and journalists as to the meaning of Donald Trump’s three appointments to the United States Supreme Court – with regards to changes in jurisprudence, increased separation of the Court from political processes that legitimate it. Drs. Kirsten Widner and Anna Gunderson have done something a little different using tools from political science.&nbsp;</p><p>Their new book,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009394338" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Haves and Have-Nots in Supreme Court Representation and Participation, 2016 to 2021</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Cambridge UP 2024), examines how the changing composition of the US Supreme Court affects who participates in advocacy before the Court. Who thinks to bring a case to the Supreme Court and has that changed since three new justices were appointed during the presidency of Donald Trump? Their book argues that Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett have changed the behavior of both litigants (people bringing cases) and&nbsp;<em>amicus curiae</em>&nbsp;(groups that write briefs in support of either side).</p><p>Their study demonstrates that the growing conservatism of the Court radically reshaped the incentives of interested parties and, as a result, their participation in litigation activity. These changes in incentives have both normative and substantive importance – decreasing the power of marginalized groups and increasing opportunities for people and groups with conservative interests. Their study shows how the makeup of the Supreme Court affects the issues heard and which voices are heard loudest in the documents.</p><p><a href="https://polisci.utk.edu/person/kirsten-widner/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Kirsten Widner</a>&nbsp;is an Assistant Professor of Political Science at the University of Tennessee, Knoxville. She received her JD from the University of San Diego School of Law and her PhD from Emory University. Her research focuses on the political representation of marginalized and unenfranchised groups.</p><p><a href="http://annagunderson.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Anna Gunderson</a>&nbsp;is an Associate Professor of Public Affairs at the University of Texas, Austin and she received her PhD from Emory University. She studies American politics; the politics of punishment and policing; judicial politics; state politics; and public policy.</p><p>Mentioned:</p><ul>
<li>Anna Gunderson, Kirsten Widner, and Maggie Macdonald,<strong>&nbsp;“</strong><a href="https://scholars.uky.edu/en/publications/pursuing-change-or-pursuing-credit-litigation-and-credit-claiming" rel="noopener noreferrer">Pursuing Change or Pursuing Credit? Litigation and Credit Claiming on Social Media</a>,”&nbsp;<em>Journal of Law and Courts</em>&nbsp;2024.</li>
<li>Rebecca Kreitzer and Candis Watts, “<a href="https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/ps-political-science-and-politics/article/abs/reproducible-and-replicable-an-empirical-assessment-of-the-social-construction-of-politically-relevant-target-groups/087BA5CA1DE6FE26A1FE90C99611367A" rel="noopener noreferrer">Reproducible and replicable: An</a>&nbsp;<a href="https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/ps-political-science-and-politics/article/abs/reproducible-and-replicable-an-empirical-assessment-of-the-social-construction-of-politically-relevant-target-groups/087BA5CA1DE6FE26A1FE90C99611367A" rel="noopener noreferrer">empirical assessment of the social construction of politically relevant target</a>&nbsp;<a href="https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/ps-political-science-and-politics/article/abs/reproducible-and-replicable-an-empirical-assessment-of-the-social-construction-of-politically-relevant-target-groups/087BA5CA1DE6FE26A1FE90C99611367A" rel="noopener noreferrer">groups</a>.”</li>
<li>Ann Schneider and Helen Ingram, “<a href="https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/american-political-science-review/article/abs/social-construction-of-target-populations-implications-for-politics-and-policy/861B4A5EA194CC405B13515F1970550A" rel="noopener noreferrer">Social construction of target populations:</a>&nbsp;<a href="https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/american-political-science-review/article/abs/social-construction-of-target-populations-implications-for-politics-and-policy/861B4A5EA194CC405B13515F1970550A" rel="noopener noreferrer">Implications for politics and policy</a>” and&nbsp;<a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700608430/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Policy Design for Democracy</em></a><em>.</em>
</li>
</ul><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="59122450" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/3db8d31d-9e65-46fe-9744-ac245d9ec4fb/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=3db8d31d-9e65-46fe-9744-ac245d9ec4fb&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Kirsten Widner and Anna Gunderson, &quot;The Haves and Have-Nots in Supreme Court Representation and Participation, 2016 to 2021&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:01:34</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>There has been a lot of commentary from scholars and journalists as to the meaning of Donald Trump’s three appointments to the United States Supreme Court – with regards to changes in jurisprudence, increased separation of the Court from political processes that legitimate it. Drs. Kirsten Widner and Anna Gunderson have done something a little different using tools from political science. 
Their new book, The Haves and Have-Nots in Supreme Court Representation and Participation, 2016 to 2021 (Cambridge UP 2024), examines how the changing composition of the US Supreme Court affects who participates in advocacy before the Court. Who thinks to bring a case to the Supreme Court and has that changed since three new justices were appointed during the presidency of Donald Trump? Their book argues that Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett have changed the behavior of both litigants (people bringing cases) and amicus curiae (groups that write briefs in support of either side).
Their study demonstrates that the growing conservatism of the Court radically reshaped the incentives of interested parties and, as a result, their participation in litigation activity. These changes in incentives have both normative and substantive importance – decreasing the power of marginalized groups and increasing opportunities for people and groups with conservative interests. Their study shows how the makeup of the Supreme Court affects the issues heard and which voices are heard loudest in the documents.
Kirsten Widner is an Assistant Professor of Political Science at the University of Tennessee, Knoxville. She received her JD from the University of San Diego School of Law and her PhD from Emory University. Her research focuses on the political representation of marginalized and unenfranchised groups.
Anna Gunderson is an Associate Professor of Public Affairs at the University of Texas, Austin and she received her PhD from Emory University. She studies American politics; the politics of punishment and policing; judicial politics; state politics; and public policy.
Mentioned:
Anna Gunderson, Kirsten Widner, and Maggie Macdonald, “Pursuing Change or Pursuing Credit? Litigation and Credit Claiming on Social Media,” Journal of Law and Courts 2024.
Rebecca Kreitzer and Candis Watts, “Reproducible and replicable: An empirical assessment of the social construction of politically relevant target groups.”
Ann Schneider and Helen Ingram, “Social construction of target populations: Implications for politics and policy” and Policy Design for Democracy.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>There has been a lot of commentary from scholars and journalists as to the meaning of Donald Trump’s three appointments to the United States Supreme Court – with regards to changes in jurisprudence, increased separation of the Court from political processes that legitimate it. Drs. Kirsten Widner and Anna Gunderson have done something a little different using tools from political science. 
Their new book, The Haves and Have-Nots in Supreme Court Representation and Participation, 2016 to 2021 (Cambridge UP 2024), examines how the changing composition of the US Supreme Court affects who participates in advocacy before the Court. Who thinks to bring a case to the Supreme Court and has that changed since three new justices were appointed during the presidency of Donald Trump? Their book argues that Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett have changed the behavior of both litigants (people bringing cases) and amicus curiae (groups that write briefs in support of either side).
Their study demonstrates that the growing conservatism of the Court radically reshaped the incentives of interested parties and, as a result, their participation in litigation activity. These changes in incentives have both normative and substantive importance – decreasing the power of marginalized groups and increasing opportunities for people and groups with conservative interests. Their study shows how the makeup of the Supreme Court affects the issues heard and which voices are heard loudest in the documents.
Kirsten Widner is an Assistant Professor of Political Science at the University of Tennessee, Knoxville. She received her JD from the University of San Diego School of Law and her PhD from Emory University. Her research focuses on the political representation of marginalized and unenfranchised groups.
Anna Gunderson is an Associate Professor of Public Affairs at the University of Texas, Austin and she received her PhD from Emory University. She studies American politics; the politics of punishment and policing; judicial politics; state politics; and public policy.
Mentioned:
Anna Gunderson, Kirsten Widner, and Maggie Macdonald, “Pursuing Change or Pursuing Credit? Litigation and Credit Claiming on Social Media,” Journal of Law and Courts 2024.
Rebecca Kreitzer and Candis Watts, “Reproducible and replicable: An empirical assessment of the social construction of politically relevant target groups.”
Ann Schneider and Helen Ingram, “Social construction of target populations: Implications for politics and policy” and Policy Design for Democracy.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>745</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">88d9c4a6-954c-11ef-b76c-67805b0e9bdc</guid>
      <title>Judging Refugees: Narrative and Oral Testimony in Refugee Status Determination</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Dr&nbsp;<a href="https://www.une.edu.au/staff-profiles/law/Dr-Laura-Smith-Khan_Profile" rel="noopener noreferrer">Laura Smith-Khan</a>&nbsp;speaks with Dr&nbsp;<a href="https://profiles.uts.edu.au/anthea.vogl" rel="noopener noreferrer">Anthea Vogl</a>&nbsp;about her new book,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781108831857" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Judging Refugees: Narrative and Oral Testimony in Refugee Status Determination</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Cambridge UP, 2024). The conversation introduces listeners to the procedures involved in seeking asylum in the global north and how language is implicated throughout these processes. Discussing Dr Vogl’s new book and research, the podcast explores the difficult narrative demands these processes place on those seeking asylum, and the sociopolitical context underlying them. It reflects on the contributions scholars across disciplines have made and can make to law and policy reform, informing best practice, and advocating for more just systems.</p><p>For additional resources, show notes, and transcripts, go&nbsp;<a href="https://www.languageonthemove.com/podcast/" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a>.</p><p>Follow Laura Smith-Khan on&nbsp;<a href="https://bsky.app/profile/lauraskh.bsky.social" rel="noopener noreferrer">Bluesky</a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a href="https://twitter.com/DrLauraSKh" rel="noopener noreferrer">Twitter</a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Oct 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/judging-refugees-narrative-and-oral-testimony-in-refugee-status-determination-7JXHNotz</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dr&nbsp;<a href="https://www.une.edu.au/staff-profiles/law/Dr-Laura-Smith-Khan_Profile" rel="noopener noreferrer">Laura Smith-Khan</a>&nbsp;speaks with Dr&nbsp;<a href="https://profiles.uts.edu.au/anthea.vogl" rel="noopener noreferrer">Anthea Vogl</a>&nbsp;about her new book,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781108831857" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Judging Refugees: Narrative and Oral Testimony in Refugee Status Determination</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Cambridge UP, 2024). The conversation introduces listeners to the procedures involved in seeking asylum in the global north and how language is implicated throughout these processes. Discussing Dr Vogl’s new book and research, the podcast explores the difficult narrative demands these processes place on those seeking asylum, and the sociopolitical context underlying them. It reflects on the contributions scholars across disciplines have made and can make to law and policy reform, informing best practice, and advocating for more just systems.</p><p>For additional resources, show notes, and transcripts, go&nbsp;<a href="https://www.languageonthemove.com/podcast/" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a>.</p><p>Follow Laura Smith-Khan on&nbsp;<a href="https://bsky.app/profile/lauraskh.bsky.social" rel="noopener noreferrer">Bluesky</a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a href="https://twitter.com/DrLauraSKh" rel="noopener noreferrer">Twitter</a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="61520060" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/2323af6f-fa9f-4208-8d73-d7174d5ba993/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=2323af6f-fa9f-4208-8d73-d7174d5ba993&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Judging Refugees: Narrative and Oral Testimony in Refugee Status Determination</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:04:04</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Dr Laura Smith-Khan speaks with Dr Anthea Vogl about her new book, Judging Refugees: Narrative and Oral Testimony in Refugee Status Determination (Cambridge UP, 2024). The conversation introduces listeners to the procedures involved in seeking asylum in the global north and how language is implicated throughout these processes. Discussing Dr Vogl’s new book and research, the podcast explores the difficult narrative demands these processes place on those seeking asylum, and the sociopolitical context underlying them. It reflects on the contributions scholars across disciplines have made and can make to law and policy reform, informing best practice, and advocating for more just systems.
For additional resources, show notes, and transcripts, go here.
Follow Laura Smith-Khan on Bluesky and Twitter.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Dr Laura Smith-Khan speaks with Dr Anthea Vogl about her new book, Judging Refugees: Narrative and Oral Testimony in Refugee Status Determination (Cambridge UP, 2024). The conversation introduces listeners to the procedures involved in seeking asylum in the global north and how language is implicated throughout these processes. Discussing Dr Vogl’s new book and research, the podcast explores the difficult narrative demands these processes place on those seeking asylum, and the sociopolitical context underlying them. It reflects on the contributions scholars across disciplines have made and can make to law and policy reform, informing best practice, and advocating for more just systems.
For additional resources, show notes, and transcripts, go here.
Follow Laura Smith-Khan on Bluesky and Twitter.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>35</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7353376a-d53d-d943-e02e-fe47e2b24802</guid>
      <title>Possessed by the Right Hand: The Problem of Slavery in Islamic Law and Muslim Cultures</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In this episode, we interview Prof. Bernard Freamon on his new book <em>Possessed by the Right Hand</em>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Oct 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/possessed-by-the-right-hand-the-problem-of-slavery-in-islamic-law-and-muslim-cultures-xP_OkaP4</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this episode, we interview Prof. Bernard Freamon on his new book <em>Possessed by the Right Hand</em>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="25159031" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/57242054-51db-42e7-85ef-ae65fc08dbf5/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=57242054-51db-42e7-85ef-ae65fc08dbf5&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Possessed by the Right Hand: The Problem of Slavery in Islamic Law and Muslim Cultures</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/2cf6a02f-0d83-47c7-a772-7eb4e1c50adb/1f074c8a-94c6-4241-9cc4-487d3deeb19b/3000x3000/472441f8cf2c8b82f4e06bef450af5d9.jpg?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:26:12</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this episode, we interview Prof. Bernard Freamon on his new book Possessed by the Right Hand.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode, we interview Prof. Bernard Freamon on his new book Possessed by the Right Hand.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>20</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">dd23e418-8c98-11ef-9e6a-f3d185c1b985</guid>
      <title>E. L. Gaston, &quot;Illusions of Control: Dilemmas in Managing U.S. Proxy Forces in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Syria&quot; (Columbia UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Over the last two decades, the United States has supported a range of militias, rebels, and other armed groups in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Syria. Critics have argued that such partnerships have many perils, from enabling human rights abuses to seeding future threats. Policy makers, however, have sought to mitigate the risks of partnering with irregular armed groups. Militia group leaders in far-flung corners of these war-torn countries were subjected to background checks and instructed about international law and human rights, and their funding was cut when they crossed red lines. To what extent have such mechanisms curbed the dangers of proxy warfare, and what unforeseen consequences has this approach unleashed?</p><p>Drawing on a decade of field research and hundreds of interviews with stakeholders, in&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780231210133" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Illusions of Control: Dilemmas in Managing U.S. Proxy Forces in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Syria</em></a>&nbsp;(Columbia University Press, 2024), Dr. Erica L. Gaston unpacks the dilemmas of attempting to control proxy forces. She demonstrates that, although the tools U.S. policy makers used to constrain partners’ behavior increased in number and sophistication, they never fully addressed the range of political, security, and legal concerns surrounding these forces. Moreover, by shifting policy makers’ calculations, the use of proxy forces introduced additional moral hazards and may have enabled riskier decision making. Featuring substantial empirical detail and close analysis of key internal debates,&nbsp;<em>Illusions of Control</em>&nbsp;offers new perspectives on some of the most significant and controversial elements of recent U.S. security policy. In addition to nuanced insights about proxy relationships, this book provides a novel analytical toolkit for exploring transnational bargaining and foreign policy deliberations in hybrid political environments.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;new book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 19 Oct 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/e-l-gaston-illusions-of-control-dilemmas-in-managing-u-s-proxy-forces-in-afghanistan-iraq-and-syria-columbia-up-2024-tFw4JuaF</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over the last two decades, the United States has supported a range of militias, rebels, and other armed groups in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Syria. Critics have argued that such partnerships have many perils, from enabling human rights abuses to seeding future threats. Policy makers, however, have sought to mitigate the risks of partnering with irregular armed groups. Militia group leaders in far-flung corners of these war-torn countries were subjected to background checks and instructed about international law and human rights, and their funding was cut when they crossed red lines. To what extent have such mechanisms curbed the dangers of proxy warfare, and what unforeseen consequences has this approach unleashed?</p><p>Drawing on a decade of field research and hundreds of interviews with stakeholders, in&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780231210133" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Illusions of Control: Dilemmas in Managing U.S. Proxy Forces in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Syria</em></a>&nbsp;(Columbia University Press, 2024), Dr. Erica L. Gaston unpacks the dilemmas of attempting to control proxy forces. She demonstrates that, although the tools U.S. policy makers used to constrain partners’ behavior increased in number and sophistication, they never fully addressed the range of political, security, and legal concerns surrounding these forces. Moreover, by shifting policy makers’ calculations, the use of proxy forces introduced additional moral hazards and may have enabled riskier decision making. Featuring substantial empirical detail and close analysis of key internal debates,&nbsp;<em>Illusions of Control</em>&nbsp;offers new perspectives on some of the most significant and controversial elements of recent U.S. security policy. In addition to nuanced insights about proxy relationships, this book provides a novel analytical toolkit for exploring transnational bargaining and foreign policy deliberations in hybrid political environments.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;new book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="54127540" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/82d88119-f038-4ed9-8070-c5ac88169f0a/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=82d88119-f038-4ed9-8070-c5ac88169f0a&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>E. L. Gaston, &quot;Illusions of Control: Dilemmas in Managing U.S. Proxy Forces in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Syria&quot; (Columbia UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:56:22</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Over the last two decades, the United States has supported a range of militias, rebels, and other armed groups in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Syria. Critics have argued that such partnerships have many perils, from enabling human rights abuses to seeding future threats. Policy makers, however, have sought to mitigate the risks of partnering with irregular armed groups. Militia group leaders in far-flung corners of these war-torn countries were subjected to background checks and instructed about international law and human rights, and their funding was cut when they crossed red lines. To what extent have such mechanisms curbed the dangers of proxy warfare, and what unforeseen consequences has this approach unleashed?
Drawing on a decade of field research and hundreds of interviews with stakeholders, in Illusions of Control: Dilemmas in Managing U.S. Proxy Forces in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Syria (Columbia University Press, 2024), Dr. Erica L. Gaston unpacks the dilemmas of attempting to control proxy forces. She demonstrates that, although the tools U.S. policy makers used to constrain partners’ behavior increased in number and sophistication, they never fully addressed the range of political, security, and legal concerns surrounding these forces. Moreover, by shifting policy makers’ calculations, the use of proxy forces introduced additional moral hazards and may have enabled riskier decision making. Featuring substantial empirical detail and close analysis of key internal debates, Illusions of Control offers new perspectives on some of the most significant and controversial elements of recent U.S. security policy. In addition to nuanced insights about proxy relationships, this book provides a novel analytical toolkit for exploring transnational bargaining and foreign policy deliberations in hybrid political environments.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Over the last two decades, the United States has supported a range of militias, rebels, and other armed groups in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Syria. Critics have argued that such partnerships have many perils, from enabling human rights abuses to seeding future threats. Policy makers, however, have sought to mitigate the risks of partnering with irregular armed groups. Militia group leaders in far-flung corners of these war-torn countries were subjected to background checks and instructed about international law and human rights, and their funding was cut when they crossed red lines. To what extent have such mechanisms curbed the dangers of proxy warfare, and what unforeseen consequences has this approach unleashed?
Drawing on a decade of field research and hundreds of interviews with stakeholders, in Illusions of Control: Dilemmas in Managing U.S. Proxy Forces in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Syria (Columbia University Press, 2024), Dr. Erica L. Gaston unpacks the dilemmas of attempting to control proxy forces. She demonstrates that, although the tools U.S. policy makers used to constrain partners’ behavior increased in number and sophistication, they never fully addressed the range of political, security, and legal concerns surrounding these forces. Moreover, by shifting policy makers’ calculations, the use of proxy forces introduced additional moral hazards and may have enabled riskier decision making. Featuring substantial empirical detail and close analysis of key internal debates, Illusions of Control offers new perspectives on some of the most significant and controversial elements of recent U.S. security policy. In addition to nuanced insights about proxy relationships, this book provides a novel analytical toolkit for exploring transnational bargaining and foreign policy deliberations in hybrid political environments.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>108</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">27641366-8a61-11ef-824e-0f1d75b15a6c</guid>
      <title>Keith E. Whittington, &quot;You Can&apos;t Teach That!: The Battle over University Classrooms&quot; (Polity Press, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Who controls what is taught in American universities – professors or politicians? The answer is far from clear but suddenly urgent. Unprecedented efforts are now underway to restrict what ideas can be promoted and discussed in university classrooms. Professors at public universities have long assumed that their freedom to teach is unassailable and that there were firm constitutional protections shielding them from political interventions. Those assumptions might always have been more hopeful than sound.&nbsp;A battle over the control of the university classroom is now brewing, and the courts will be called upon to establish clearer guidelines as to what – if any – limits legislatures might have in dictating what is taught in public universities.&nbsp;</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781509564538" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>You Can't Teach That!: The Battle over University Classrooms</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Polity Press, 2024), Keith Whittington argues that the First Amendment imposes meaningful limits on how government officials can restrict the ideas discussed on university campuses. In clear and accessible prose, he illuminates the legal status of academic freedom in the United States and shows how existing constitutional doctrine can be deployed to protect unbridled free inquiry.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Oct 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/keith-e-whittington-you-can-t-teach-that-the-battle-over-university-classrooms-polity-press-2024-p8ZYQfoy</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who controls what is taught in American universities – professors or politicians? The answer is far from clear but suddenly urgent. Unprecedented efforts are now underway to restrict what ideas can be promoted and discussed in university classrooms. Professors at public universities have long assumed that their freedom to teach is unassailable and that there were firm constitutional protections shielding them from political interventions. Those assumptions might always have been more hopeful than sound.&nbsp;A battle over the control of the university classroom is now brewing, and the courts will be called upon to establish clearer guidelines as to what – if any – limits legislatures might have in dictating what is taught in public universities.&nbsp;</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781509564538" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>You Can't Teach That!: The Battle over University Classrooms</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Polity Press, 2024), Keith Whittington argues that the First Amendment imposes meaningful limits on how government officials can restrict the ideas discussed on university campuses. In clear and accessible prose, he illuminates the legal status of academic freedom in the United States and shows how existing constitutional doctrine can be deployed to protect unbridled free inquiry.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="51623750" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/2d95b032-0b2b-4294-8016-80ef5556328e/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=2d95b032-0b2b-4294-8016-80ef5556328e&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Keith E. Whittington, &quot;You Can&apos;t Teach That!: The Battle over University Classrooms&quot; (Polity Press, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:53:46</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Who controls what is taught in American universities – professors or politicians? The answer is far from clear but suddenly urgent. Unprecedented efforts are now underway to restrict what ideas can be promoted and discussed in university classrooms. Professors at public universities have long assumed that their freedom to teach is unassailable and that there were firm constitutional protections shielding them from political interventions. Those assumptions might always have been more hopeful than sound. A battle over the control of the university classroom is now brewing, and the courts will be called upon to establish clearer guidelines as to what – if any – limits legislatures might have in dictating what is taught in public universities. 
In You Can&apos;t Teach That!: The Battle over University Classrooms (Polity Press, 2024), Keith Whittington argues that the First Amendment imposes meaningful limits on how government officials can restrict the ideas discussed on university campuses. In clear and accessible prose, he illuminates the legal status of academic freedom in the United States and shows how existing constitutional doctrine can be deployed to protect unbridled free inquiry.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Who controls what is taught in American universities – professors or politicians? The answer is far from clear but suddenly urgent. Unprecedented efforts are now underway to restrict what ideas can be promoted and discussed in university classrooms. Professors at public universities have long assumed that their freedom to teach is unassailable and that there were firm constitutional protections shielding them from political interventions. Those assumptions might always have been more hopeful than sound. A battle over the control of the university classroom is now brewing, and the courts will be called upon to establish clearer guidelines as to what – if any – limits legislatures might have in dictating what is taught in public universities. 
In You Can&apos;t Teach That!: The Battle over University Classrooms (Polity Press, 2024), Keith Whittington argues that the First Amendment imposes meaningful limits on how government officials can restrict the ideas discussed on university campuses. In clear and accessible prose, he illuminates the legal status of academic freedom in the United States and shows how existing constitutional doctrine can be deployed to protect unbridled free inquiry.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>190</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">dab78b25-328a-6343-4685-eeb754205160</guid>
      <title>Slavery and Islam</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In this episode, we talk to Professor Jonathan Brown about his book, <em>Slavery and Islam</em>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Oct 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/slavery-and-islam-GX3jNVsj</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this episode, we talk to Professor Jonathan Brown about his book, <em>Slavery and Islam</em>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="33437054" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/74a2aea1-724b-408d-b190-285b98d2cbed/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=74a2aea1-724b-408d-b190-285b98d2cbed&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Slavery and Islam</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/2cf6a02f-0d83-47c7-a772-7eb4e1c50adb/5e575d6f-e10e-42b1-a860-eb146736614b/3000x3000/472441f8cf2c8b82f4e06bef450af5d9.jpg?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:34:49</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this episode, we talk to Professor Jonathan Brown about his book, Slavery and Islam.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode, we talk to Professor Jonathan Brown about his book, Slavery and Islam.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>19</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">bacb73da-88ca-11ef-900d-178014b6c6c6</guid>
      <title>The Social Contract in the Ruins: A Conversation with Dr. Paul DeHart</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In the latest episode of&nbsp;<em>Madison’s Notes</em>, we sit down with Dr. Paul DeHart, professor of Political Science at Texas State University and author of&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780826223050" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Social Contract in the Ruins:&nbsp;</em>&nbsp;<em>Natural Law and Government by Consent</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(University of Missouri Press, 2024). In this illuminating discussion, Dr. DeHart challenges the prevailing belief that social contract theory and classical natural law are fundamentally incompatible. His book offers a bold argument: political authority and obligation cannot be grounded solely in human agreement but must rest on a deeper, antecedent moral foundation—one that is uncreated and independent of human or divine will. Without this objective moral good, even the widely accepted principle of government by consent loses its coherence.</p><p>Throughout the episode, Dr. DeHart explores key philosophical questions surrounding political legitimacy and the moral underpinnings of authority. We dive into why modern approaches to grounding political authority through consent alone are self-defeating and how classical natural law is essential to upholding the principles that guide just governance.</p><p>Listeners will gain a deeper understanding of the intersection between political theory, philosophy, and morality, as well as the relevance of these ideas in today's political landscape. Whether you're a scholar of political philosophy or simply curious about the foundations of political authority, this episode is packed with rich insights and thoughtful discussion.</p><p><u>Dr. Dehart’s other works:</u></p><p><a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/uncovering-the-constitution-s-moral-design-volume-1-paul-r-dehart/10748264?ean=9780826221308" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Uncovering the Constitution's Moral Design</em></a></p><p><a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/reason-revelation-and-the-civic-order-paul-dehart/11601129?ean=9780875804842" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Reason, Revelation, and the Civic Order: Political Philosophy and the Claims of Faith</em></a></p><p><a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/podcast" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Madison’s Notes</em></a>&nbsp;is the podcast of Princeton&nbsp;<a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions</em></a><em>.</em></p><p><em>Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Oct 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/the-social-contract-in-the-ruins-a-conversation-with-dr-paul-dehart-uL6pL1_I</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the latest episode of&nbsp;<em>Madison’s Notes</em>, we sit down with Dr. Paul DeHart, professor of Political Science at Texas State University and author of&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780826223050" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Social Contract in the Ruins:&nbsp;</em>&nbsp;<em>Natural Law and Government by Consent</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(University of Missouri Press, 2024). In this illuminating discussion, Dr. DeHart challenges the prevailing belief that social contract theory and classical natural law are fundamentally incompatible. His book offers a bold argument: political authority and obligation cannot be grounded solely in human agreement but must rest on a deeper, antecedent moral foundation—one that is uncreated and independent of human or divine will. Without this objective moral good, even the widely accepted principle of government by consent loses its coherence.</p><p>Throughout the episode, Dr. DeHart explores key philosophical questions surrounding political legitimacy and the moral underpinnings of authority. We dive into why modern approaches to grounding political authority through consent alone are self-defeating and how classical natural law is essential to upholding the principles that guide just governance.</p><p>Listeners will gain a deeper understanding of the intersection between political theory, philosophy, and morality, as well as the relevance of these ideas in today's political landscape. Whether you're a scholar of political philosophy or simply curious about the foundations of political authority, this episode is packed with rich insights and thoughtful discussion.</p><p><u>Dr. Dehart’s other works:</u></p><p><a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/uncovering-the-constitution-s-moral-design-volume-1-paul-r-dehart/10748264?ean=9780826221308" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Uncovering the Constitution's Moral Design</em></a></p><p><a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/reason-revelation-and-the-civic-order-paul-dehart/11601129?ean=9780875804842" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Reason, Revelation, and the Civic Order: Political Philosophy and the Claims of Faith</em></a></p><p><a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/podcast" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Madison’s Notes</em></a>&nbsp;is the podcast of Princeton&nbsp;<a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions</em></a><em>.</em></p><p><em>Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="54374601" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/fca87161-19f1-46ff-9323-9d1565263170/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=fca87161-19f1-46ff-9323-9d1565263170&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>The Social Contract in the Ruins: A Conversation with Dr. Paul DeHart</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:56:38</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In the latest episode of Madison’s Notes, we sit down with Dr. Paul DeHart, professor of Political Science at Texas State University and author of The Social Contract in the Ruins:  Natural Law and Government by Consent (University of Missouri Press, 2024). In this illuminating discussion, Dr. DeHart challenges the prevailing belief that social contract theory and classical natural law are fundamentally incompatible. His book offers a bold argument: political authority and obligation cannot be grounded solely in human agreement but must rest on a deeper, antecedent moral foundation—one that is uncreated and independent of human or divine will. Without this objective moral good, even the widely accepted principle of government by consent loses its coherence.
Throughout the episode, Dr. DeHart explores key philosophical questions surrounding political legitimacy and the moral underpinnings of authority. We dive into why modern approaches to grounding political authority through consent alone are self-defeating and how classical natural law is essential to upholding the principles that guide just governance.
Listeners will gain a deeper understanding of the intersection between political theory, philosophy, and morality, as well as the relevance of these ideas in today&apos;s political landscape. Whether you&apos;re a scholar of political philosophy or simply curious about the foundations of political authority, this episode is packed with rich insights and thoughtful discussion.
Dr. Dehart’s other works:
Uncovering the Constitution&apos;s Moral Design
Reason, Revelation, and the Civic Order: Political Philosophy and the Claims of Faith
Madison’s Notes is the podcast of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions.
Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In the latest episode of Madison’s Notes, we sit down with Dr. Paul DeHart, professor of Political Science at Texas State University and author of The Social Contract in the Ruins:  Natural Law and Government by Consent (University of Missouri Press, 2024). In this illuminating discussion, Dr. DeHart challenges the prevailing belief that social contract theory and classical natural law are fundamentally incompatible. His book offers a bold argument: political authority and obligation cannot be grounded solely in human agreement but must rest on a deeper, antecedent moral foundation—one that is uncreated and independent of human or divine will. Without this objective moral good, even the widely accepted principle of government by consent loses its coherence.
Throughout the episode, Dr. DeHart explores key philosophical questions surrounding political legitimacy and the moral underpinnings of authority. We dive into why modern approaches to grounding political authority through consent alone are self-defeating and how classical natural law is essential to upholding the principles that guide just governance.
Listeners will gain a deeper understanding of the intersection between political theory, philosophy, and morality, as well as the relevance of these ideas in today&apos;s political landscape. Whether you&apos;re a scholar of political philosophy or simply curious about the foundations of political authority, this episode is packed with rich insights and thoughtful discussion.
Dr. Dehart’s other works:
Uncovering the Constitution&apos;s Moral Design
Reason, Revelation, and the Civic Order: Political Philosophy and the Claims of Faith
Madison’s Notes is the podcast of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions.
Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>123</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4ede9572-88a6-11ef-8401-4ffffdade4f3</guid>
      <title>Eric R. Schlereth, &quot;Quitting the Nation: Emigrant Rights in North America&quot; (UNC Press, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Perceptions of the United States as a nation of immigrants are so commonplace that its history as a nation of emigrants is forgotten. However, once the United States came into existence, its citizens immediately asserted rights to emigrate for political allegiances elsewhere.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781469678535" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Quitting the Nation: Emigrant Rights in North America&nbsp;</em></a>(UNC Press, 2024)&nbsp;recovers this unfamiliar story by braiding the histories of citizenship and the North American borderlands to explain the evolution of emigrant rights between 1750 and 1870.</p><p>Eric R. Schlereth traces the legal and political origins of emigrant rights in contests to decide who possessed them and who did not. At the same time, it follows the thousands of people that exercised emigration right citizenship by leaving the United States for settlements elsewhere in North America. Ultimately, Schlereth shows that national allegiance was often no more powerful than the freedom to cast it aside. The advent of emigrant rights had lasting implications, for it suggested that people are free to move throughout the world and to decide for themselves the nation they belong to. This claim remains urgent in the twenty-first century as limitations on personal mobility persist inside the United States and at its borders.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Hannah Nolan, a PhD Candidate at the University of Maryland, College Park. Her work focuses upon the intersection of memory, partisanship, and ethnic identity during the early republic to explore the construction of Irish and American identities in the United States.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Oct 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/eric-r-schlereth-quitting-the-nation-emigrant-rights-in-north-america-unc-press-2024-JEXBP6ci</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perceptions of the United States as a nation of immigrants are so commonplace that its history as a nation of emigrants is forgotten. However, once the United States came into existence, its citizens immediately asserted rights to emigrate for political allegiances elsewhere.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781469678535" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Quitting the Nation: Emigrant Rights in North America&nbsp;</em></a>(UNC Press, 2024)&nbsp;recovers this unfamiliar story by braiding the histories of citizenship and the North American borderlands to explain the evolution of emigrant rights between 1750 and 1870.</p><p>Eric R. Schlereth traces the legal and political origins of emigrant rights in contests to decide who possessed them and who did not. At the same time, it follows the thousands of people that exercised emigration right citizenship by leaving the United States for settlements elsewhere in North America. Ultimately, Schlereth shows that national allegiance was often no more powerful than the freedom to cast it aside. The advent of emigrant rights had lasting implications, for it suggested that people are free to move throughout the world and to decide for themselves the nation they belong to. This claim remains urgent in the twenty-first century as limitations on personal mobility persist inside the United States and at its borders.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Hannah Nolan, a PhD Candidate at the University of Maryland, College Park. Her work focuses upon the intersection of memory, partisanship, and ethnic identity during the early republic to explore the construction of Irish and American identities in the United States.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="48295463" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/4c930945-2297-4ef1-b4e8-8cc4fe771949/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=4c930945-2297-4ef1-b4e8-8cc4fe771949&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Eric R. Schlereth, &quot;Quitting the Nation: Emigrant Rights in North America&quot; (UNC Press, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:50:18</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Perceptions of the United States as a nation of immigrants are so commonplace that its history as a nation of emigrants is forgotten. However, once the United States came into existence, its citizens immediately asserted rights to emigrate for political allegiances elsewhere. Quitting the Nation: Emigrant Rights in North America (UNC Press, 2024) recovers this unfamiliar story by braiding the histories of citizenship and the North American borderlands to explain the evolution of emigrant rights between 1750 and 1870.
Eric R. Schlereth traces the legal and political origins of emigrant rights in contests to decide who possessed them and who did not. At the same time, it follows the thousands of people that exercised emigration right citizenship by leaving the United States for settlements elsewhere in North America. Ultimately, Schlereth shows that national allegiance was often no more powerful than the freedom to cast it aside. The advent of emigrant rights had lasting implications, for it suggested that people are free to move throughout the world and to decide for themselves the nation they belong to. This claim remains urgent in the twenty-first century as limitations on personal mobility persist inside the United States and at its borders.
This interview was conducted by Hannah Nolan, a PhD Candidate at the University of Maryland, College Park. Her work focuses upon the intersection of memory, partisanship, and ethnic identity during the early republic to explore the construction of Irish and American identities in the United States.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Perceptions of the United States as a nation of immigrants are so commonplace that its history as a nation of emigrants is forgotten. However, once the United States came into existence, its citizens immediately asserted rights to emigrate for political allegiances elsewhere. Quitting the Nation: Emigrant Rights in North America (UNC Press, 2024) recovers this unfamiliar story by braiding the histories of citizenship and the North American borderlands to explain the evolution of emigrant rights between 1750 and 1870.
Eric R. Schlereth traces the legal and political origins of emigrant rights in contests to decide who possessed them and who did not. At the same time, it follows the thousands of people that exercised emigration right citizenship by leaving the United States for settlements elsewhere in North America. Ultimately, Schlereth shows that national allegiance was often no more powerful than the freedom to cast it aside. The advent of emigrant rights had lasting implications, for it suggested that people are free to move throughout the world and to decide for themselves the nation they belong to. This claim remains urgent in the twenty-first century as limitations on personal mobility persist inside the United States and at its borders.
This interview was conducted by Hannah Nolan, a PhD Candidate at the University of Maryland, College Park. Her work focuses upon the intersection of memory, partisanship, and ethnic identity during the early republic to explore the construction of Irish and American identities in the United States.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1489</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">70476ce2-8802-11ef-9fb9-e37348bcc373</guid>
      <title>Gretchen Sisson, &quot;Relinquished: The Politics of Adoption and the Privilege of American Motherhood&quot; (St. Martin&apos;s Press, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Adoption has always been viewed as a beloved institution for building families, as well as a mutually agreeable common ground in the otherwise partisan&nbsp;abortion debate. Little attention, however, has been paid to the lives of mothers who relinquish their infants for private adoption. Through the lens of<em>&nbsp;</em>reproductive justice,&nbsp;<em>Relinquished: The Politics of Adoption and the Privilege of American Motherhood&nbsp;</em>reveals adoption to be a path of constrained choice for women who face immense barriers to access abortion, or to parent their children safely.</p><p>With the overturning of&nbsp;<em>Roe v. Wade,</em>&nbsp;adoption increasingly functions as an institution that perpetuates reproductive injustice by separating families and policing parenthood under the guise of feel-good family building for middle-upper-class white people.&nbsp;Based on hundreds of in-depth interviews,&nbsp;<em>Relinquished&nbsp;</em>centers and amplifies&nbsp;the voices&nbsp;of relinquishing mothers, and fills an important gap in the national conversation about reproductive politics and justice.&nbsp;</p><p><a href="https://www.sharonyam.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Shui-yin&nbsp;Sharon Yam</a>&nbsp;is Associate Professor of Writing, Rhetoric, and Digital Studies, and Affiliate Faculty of Gender and Women's Studies at the University of Kentucky. She is the co-author of&nbsp;<a href="https://www.press.jhu.edu/books/title/53812/doing-gender-justice" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Doing Gender Justice: Queering Reproduction, Kin, and Care.&nbsp;</em></a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 12 Oct 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/gretchen-sisson-relinquished-the-politics-of-adoption-and-the-privilege-of-american-motherhood-st-martins-press-2024-fZOQ6WAe</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adoption has always been viewed as a beloved institution for building families, as well as a mutually agreeable common ground in the otherwise partisan&nbsp;abortion debate. Little attention, however, has been paid to the lives of mothers who relinquish their infants for private adoption. Through the lens of<em>&nbsp;</em>reproductive justice,&nbsp;<em>Relinquished: The Politics of Adoption and the Privilege of American Motherhood&nbsp;</em>reveals adoption to be a path of constrained choice for women who face immense barriers to access abortion, or to parent their children safely.</p><p>With the overturning of&nbsp;<em>Roe v. Wade,</em>&nbsp;adoption increasingly functions as an institution that perpetuates reproductive injustice by separating families and policing parenthood under the guise of feel-good family building for middle-upper-class white people.&nbsp;Based on hundreds of in-depth interviews,&nbsp;<em>Relinquished&nbsp;</em>centers and amplifies&nbsp;the voices&nbsp;of relinquishing mothers, and fills an important gap in the national conversation about reproductive politics and justice.&nbsp;</p><p><a href="https://www.sharonyam.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Shui-yin&nbsp;Sharon Yam</a>&nbsp;is Associate Professor of Writing, Rhetoric, and Digital Studies, and Affiliate Faculty of Gender and Women's Studies at the University of Kentucky. She is the co-author of&nbsp;<a href="https://www.press.jhu.edu/books/title/53812/doing-gender-justice" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Doing Gender Justice: Queering Reproduction, Kin, and Care.&nbsp;</em></a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="60955289" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/ddaea6ee-b5fa-4aec-8a2d-f31b4acdb70c/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=ddaea6ee-b5fa-4aec-8a2d-f31b4acdb70c&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Gretchen Sisson, &quot;Relinquished: The Politics of Adoption and the Privilege of American Motherhood&quot; (St. Martin&apos;s Press, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:03:29</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Adoption has always been viewed as a beloved institution for building families, as well as a mutually agreeable common ground in the otherwise partisan abortion debate. Little attention, however, has been paid to the lives of mothers who relinquish their infants for private adoption. Through the lens of reproductive justice, Relinquished: The Politics of Adoption and the Privilege of American Motherhood reveals adoption to be a path of constrained choice for women who face immense barriers to access abortion, or to parent their children safely.
With the overturning of Roe v. Wade, adoption increasingly functions as an institution that perpetuates reproductive injustice by separating families and policing parenthood under the guise of feel-good family building for middle-upper-class white people. Based on hundreds of in-depth interviews, Relinquished centers and amplifies the voices of relinquishing mothers, and fills an important gap in the national conversation about reproductive politics and justice. 
Shui-yin Sharon Yam is Associate Professor of Writing, Rhetoric, and Digital Studies, and Affiliate Faculty of Gender and Women&apos;s Studies at the University of Kentucky. She is the co-author of Doing Gender Justice: Queering Reproduction, Kin, and Care. 
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Adoption has always been viewed as a beloved institution for building families, as well as a mutually agreeable common ground in the otherwise partisan abortion debate. Little attention, however, has been paid to the lives of mothers who relinquish their infants for private adoption. Through the lens of reproductive justice, Relinquished: The Politics of Adoption and the Privilege of American Motherhood reveals adoption to be a path of constrained choice for women who face immense barriers to access abortion, or to parent their children safely.
With the overturning of Roe v. Wade, adoption increasingly functions as an institution that perpetuates reproductive injustice by separating families and policing parenthood under the guise of feel-good family building for middle-upper-class white people. Based on hundreds of in-depth interviews, Relinquished centers and amplifies the voices of relinquishing mothers, and fills an important gap in the national conversation about reproductive politics and justice. 
Shui-yin Sharon Yam is Associate Professor of Writing, Rhetoric, and Digital Studies, and Affiliate Faculty of Gender and Women&apos;s Studies at the University of Kentucky. She is the co-author of Doing Gender Justice: Queering Reproduction, Kin, and Care. 
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>242</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">35a141b6-8722-11ef-858f-c7602a364c1f</guid>
      <title>Talking Thai Politics: Kunthika Nutcharut, Defending Disruptors</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>What is it like to be a human rights lawyer in Thailand? How does the new generation of 2020s political activists differ from those of previous eras? In this episode of&nbsp;<em>Talking Thai Politics</em>, we talk to Kunthika Nutcharut about her work with Thai Lawyers for Human Rights.</p><p>Kunthika comes from a political family – her lawyer father Krisadang Nutcharut was a student activisit in the 1970s – and she studied and worked in Germany before deciding to return to Thailand to taken on the challenging work of defending outspoken figures in the post-2020 student-led protest movement.</p><p>Duncan McCargo is President’s Chair in Global Affairs at Nanyang Technological University.</p><p>Chayata Sripanich is a research associate with the Generation Thailand project.</p><p><a href="https://thaipolitics.leeds.ac.uk/podcasts/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Talking Thai Politics</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>brings crafted conversations about the politics of Thailand to a global audience. Created by the Generation Thailand project at Nanyang Technological University, the podcast is co-hosted by Duncan McCargo and Chayata Sripanich. Our production assistant is Li Xinruo.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Oct 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/talking-thai-politics-kunthika-nutcharut-defending-disruptors-a0yukxa7</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is it like to be a human rights lawyer in Thailand? How does the new generation of 2020s political activists differ from those of previous eras? In this episode of&nbsp;<em>Talking Thai Politics</em>, we talk to Kunthika Nutcharut about her work with Thai Lawyers for Human Rights.</p><p>Kunthika comes from a political family – her lawyer father Krisadang Nutcharut was a student activisit in the 1970s – and she studied and worked in Germany before deciding to return to Thailand to taken on the challenging work of defending outspoken figures in the post-2020 student-led protest movement.</p><p>Duncan McCargo is President’s Chair in Global Affairs at Nanyang Technological University.</p><p>Chayata Sripanich is a research associate with the Generation Thailand project.</p><p><a href="https://thaipolitics.leeds.ac.uk/podcasts/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Talking Thai Politics</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>brings crafted conversations about the politics of Thailand to a global audience. Created by the Generation Thailand project at Nanyang Technological University, the podcast is co-hosted by Duncan McCargo and Chayata Sripanich. Our production assistant is Li Xinruo.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="30632399" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/e07f1fd2-d2b6-4ab8-be25-aca907dd2444/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=e07f1fd2-d2b6-4ab8-be25-aca907dd2444&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Talking Thai Politics: Kunthika Nutcharut, Defending Disruptors</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:31:54</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>What is it like to be a human rights lawyer in Thailand? How does the new generation of 2020s political activists differ from those of previous eras? In this episode of Talking Thai Politics, we talk to Kunthika Nutcharut about her work with Thai Lawyers for Human Rights.
Kunthika comes from a political family – her lawyer father Krisadang Nutcharut was a student activisit in the 1970s – and she studied and worked in Germany before deciding to return to Thailand to taken on the challenging work of defending outspoken figures in the post-2020 student-led protest movement.
Duncan McCargo is President’s Chair in Global Affairs at Nanyang Technological University.
Chayata Sripanich is a research associate with the Generation Thailand project.
Talking Thai Politics brings crafted conversations about the politics of Thailand to a global audience. Created by the Generation Thailand project at Nanyang Technological University, the podcast is co-hosted by Duncan McCargo and Chayata Sripanich. Our production assistant is Li Xinruo.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>What is it like to be a human rights lawyer in Thailand? How does the new generation of 2020s political activists differ from those of previous eras? In this episode of Talking Thai Politics, we talk to Kunthika Nutcharut about her work with Thai Lawyers for Human Rights.
Kunthika comes from a political family – her lawyer father Krisadang Nutcharut was a student activisit in the 1970s – and she studied and worked in Germany before deciding to return to Thailand to taken on the challenging work of defending outspoken figures in the post-2020 student-led protest movement.
Duncan McCargo is President’s Chair in Global Affairs at Nanyang Technological University.
Chayata Sripanich is a research associate with the Generation Thailand project.
Talking Thai Politics brings crafted conversations about the politics of Thailand to a global audience. Created by the Generation Thailand project at Nanyang Technological University, the podcast is co-hosted by Duncan McCargo and Chayata Sripanich. Our production assistant is Li Xinruo.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>3</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">a42e70f6-84f0-11ef-8352-5b7985fd405f</guid>
      <title>Risa Cromer, &quot;Conceiving Christian America: Embryo Adoption and Reproductive Politics&quot; (NYU Press, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In 1997, a group of white pro-life evangelical Christians in the United States created the nation’s first embryo adoption program to “save” the thousands of frozen human embryos remaining from assisted reproduction procedures, which they contend are unborn children. While a small part of US fertility services, embryo adoption has played an outsized role in conservative politics, from high-profile battles over public investment in human embryonic stem cell research to the overturning of Roe v. Wade. Based on six years of ethnographic research with embryo adoption staff and participants, Dr. Risa Cromer uncovers how embryo adoption advances ambitious political goals for expanding the influence of conservative Christian values and power.</p><p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781479818594" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Conceiving Christian America: Embryo Adoption and Reproductive Politics</em></a>&nbsp;(NYU Press, 2023) is the first book on embryo adoption tracing how this powerful social movement draws on white saviorist tropes in their aims to reconceive personhood, with drastic consequences for reproductive rights and justice. Documenting the practices, narratives, and beliefs that move embryos from freezers to uteruses, this book wields anthropological wariness as a tool for confronting the multiple tactics of the Christian Right. Timely and provocative,&nbsp;<em>Conceiving Christian America</em>&nbsp;presents a bold and nuanced examination of a family-making process focused on conceiving a Christian nation.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;new book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 9 Oct 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/risa-cromer-conceiving-christian-america-embryo-adoption-and-reproductive-politics-nyu-press-2023-qHPAm3x2</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In 1997, a group of white pro-life evangelical Christians in the United States created the nation’s first embryo adoption program to “save” the thousands of frozen human embryos remaining from assisted reproduction procedures, which they contend are unborn children. While a small part of US fertility services, embryo adoption has played an outsized role in conservative politics, from high-profile battles over public investment in human embryonic stem cell research to the overturning of Roe v. Wade. Based on six years of ethnographic research with embryo adoption staff and participants, Dr. Risa Cromer uncovers how embryo adoption advances ambitious political goals for expanding the influence of conservative Christian values and power.</p><p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781479818594" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Conceiving Christian America: Embryo Adoption and Reproductive Politics</em></a>&nbsp;(NYU Press, 2023) is the first book on embryo adoption tracing how this powerful social movement draws on white saviorist tropes in their aims to reconceive personhood, with drastic consequences for reproductive rights and justice. Documenting the practices, narratives, and beliefs that move embryos from freezers to uteruses, this book wields anthropological wariness as a tool for confronting the multiple tactics of the Christian Right. Timely and provocative,&nbsp;<em>Conceiving Christian America</em>&nbsp;presents a bold and nuanced examination of a family-making process focused on conceiving a Christian nation.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;new book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="76317800" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/50cc924d-84da-441b-91c1-8f4f6d6b1093/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=50cc924d-84da-441b-91c1-8f4f6d6b1093&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Risa Cromer, &quot;Conceiving Christian America: Embryo Adoption and Reproductive Politics&quot; (NYU Press, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:19:29</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In 1997, a group of white pro-life evangelical Christians in the United States created the nation’s first embryo adoption program to “save” the thousands of frozen human embryos remaining from assisted reproduction procedures, which they contend are unborn children. While a small part of US fertility services, embryo adoption has played an outsized role in conservative politics, from high-profile battles over public investment in human embryonic stem cell research to the overturning of Roe v. Wade. Based on six years of ethnographic research with embryo adoption staff and participants, Dr. Risa Cromer uncovers how embryo adoption advances ambitious political goals for expanding the influence of conservative Christian values and power.
Conceiving Christian America: Embryo Adoption and Reproductive Politics (NYU Press, 2023) is the first book on embryo adoption tracing how this powerful social movement draws on white saviorist tropes in their aims to reconceive personhood, with drastic consequences for reproductive rights and justice. Documenting the practices, narratives, and beliefs that move embryos from freezers to uteruses, this book wields anthropological wariness as a tool for confronting the multiple tactics of the Christian Right. Timely and provocative, Conceiving Christian America presents a bold and nuanced examination of a family-making process focused on conceiving a Christian nation.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In 1997, a group of white pro-life evangelical Christians in the United States created the nation’s first embryo adoption program to “save” the thousands of frozen human embryos remaining from assisted reproduction procedures, which they contend are unborn children. While a small part of US fertility services, embryo adoption has played an outsized role in conservative politics, from high-profile battles over public investment in human embryonic stem cell research to the overturning of Roe v. Wade. Based on six years of ethnographic research with embryo adoption staff and participants, Dr. Risa Cromer uncovers how embryo adoption advances ambitious political goals for expanding the influence of conservative Christian values and power.
Conceiving Christian America: Embryo Adoption and Reproductive Politics (NYU Press, 2023) is the first book on embryo adoption tracing how this powerful social movement draws on white saviorist tropes in their aims to reconceive personhood, with drastic consequences for reproductive rights and justice. Documenting the practices, narratives, and beliefs that move embryos from freezers to uteruses, this book wields anthropological wariness as a tool for confronting the multiple tactics of the Christian Right. Timely and provocative, Conceiving Christian America presents a bold and nuanced examination of a family-making process focused on conceiving a Christian nation.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>281</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8d21f170-83de-11ef-9ceb-af737f2297ad</guid>
      <title>Jonathan Turley, &quot;The Indispensable Right: Free Speech in an Age of Rage&quot; (Simon and Schuster, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>“It’s a free country.” Many of us recall saying that as children as we learned that we were American citizens who were endowed with certain rights—such as free speech. We would use those words when we wanted to assert our own rights when we were being bullied or chastised. We would use them to let others know that even if we did not agree with what they were saying or doing, they were within their rights to express certain opinions or to do certain things.</p><p>How many American adults feel as confident now about expressing our views in public settings as we did when we were children or young adults?</p><p>In his authoritative but general-reader-friendly new book,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.amazon.com/Indispensable-Right-Free-Speech-Rage/dp/1668047047" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Indispensable Right: Free Speech in an Age of Rage</a>&nbsp;legal scholar and public intellectual Jonathan Turley argues that many Americans nowadays are “speech phobic” and employ terms such as “hate speech” to shut down legitimate discussion of such topics as immigration, government policies during the height of the Covid pandemic and transgenderism. He maintains that free expression is imperative for human flourishing and that stifling it can lead to a spiral of frustration boiling up to rage, which is then repressed by expressions of state rage such as the Palmer Raids and the excesses of McCarthyism.</p><p>Turley walks us through the history of free speech in America and across today’s minefields of topics that can get even average people cancelled—and what forms “canceling” can take.</p><p>In approachable, fairly short chapters Professor Turley reminds us of how quickly some of the heroes of the American Revolution and champions of liberty devolved into semi-tyrants. His treatment of John Adams and the Alien and Sedition Acts (the latter of which rendered it a crime to, “print, utter, or publish...any false, scandalous, and malicious writing” about the government) is particularly eye-opening and provides crucial background as the reader proceeds through the book. The concept of sedition is a major focus of the book and alerts us as citizens that it is not a matter confined to centuries ago, but a matter very much in the forefront of the American legal and political landscape in the wake what happened in Washington DC in January 2021.</p><p>Indeed, what we should call what those events is another fascinating focus of the book. Turley argues forcefully and persuasively that January 6 was not an insurrection but a protest that became a riot. This was a brave stance to take given that, as he points out in the book, anyone who argued that January 6 was anything but an insurrection was in danger of being labeled a sympathizer or an apologist for the rioters.</p><p>Turley’s book has become even more of a crucial read in the wake of the anti-Israel protests on college campuses in the spring of 2024. Ditto some shockingly anti-free-speech comments recently by supposedly mainstream Democrats such as John Kerry and Hillary Clinton.</p><p>We will touch on the status of free speech as an issue in the 2024 presidential election and how free speech has been impacted by the Biden-Harris administration. The topic of censorship came up, for example, in the 2024 vice-presidential debate and we will get Professor Turley’s take on that.</p><p><em>Hope J. Leman is a grants researcher.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 7 Oct 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/jonathan-turley-the-indispensable-right-free-speech-in-an-age-of-rage-simon-and-schuster-2024-pMeq7C8v</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“It’s a free country.” Many of us recall saying that as children as we learned that we were American citizens who were endowed with certain rights—such as free speech. We would use those words when we wanted to assert our own rights when we were being bullied or chastised. We would use them to let others know that even if we did not agree with what they were saying or doing, they were within their rights to express certain opinions or to do certain things.</p><p>How many American adults feel as confident now about expressing our views in public settings as we did when we were children or young adults?</p><p>In his authoritative but general-reader-friendly new book,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.amazon.com/Indispensable-Right-Free-Speech-Rage/dp/1668047047" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Indispensable Right: Free Speech in an Age of Rage</a>&nbsp;legal scholar and public intellectual Jonathan Turley argues that many Americans nowadays are “speech phobic” and employ terms such as “hate speech” to shut down legitimate discussion of such topics as immigration, government policies during the height of the Covid pandemic and transgenderism. He maintains that free expression is imperative for human flourishing and that stifling it can lead to a spiral of frustration boiling up to rage, which is then repressed by expressions of state rage such as the Palmer Raids and the excesses of McCarthyism.</p><p>Turley walks us through the history of free speech in America and across today’s minefields of topics that can get even average people cancelled—and what forms “canceling” can take.</p><p>In approachable, fairly short chapters Professor Turley reminds us of how quickly some of the heroes of the American Revolution and champions of liberty devolved into semi-tyrants. His treatment of John Adams and the Alien and Sedition Acts (the latter of which rendered it a crime to, “print, utter, or publish...any false, scandalous, and malicious writing” about the government) is particularly eye-opening and provides crucial background as the reader proceeds through the book. The concept of sedition is a major focus of the book and alerts us as citizens that it is not a matter confined to centuries ago, but a matter very much in the forefront of the American legal and political landscape in the wake what happened in Washington DC in January 2021.</p><p>Indeed, what we should call what those events is another fascinating focus of the book. Turley argues forcefully and persuasively that January 6 was not an insurrection but a protest that became a riot. This was a brave stance to take given that, as he points out in the book, anyone who argued that January 6 was anything but an insurrection was in danger of being labeled a sympathizer or an apologist for the rioters.</p><p>Turley’s book has become even more of a crucial read in the wake of the anti-Israel protests on college campuses in the spring of 2024. Ditto some shockingly anti-free-speech comments recently by supposedly mainstream Democrats such as John Kerry and Hillary Clinton.</p><p>We will touch on the status of free speech as an issue in the 2024 presidential election and how free speech has been impacted by the Biden-Harris administration. The topic of censorship came up, for example, in the 2024 vice-presidential debate and we will get Professor Turley’s take on that.</p><p><em>Hope J. Leman is a grants researcher.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="26573795" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/bb72f4d0-20bb-4622-9ffa-0adf81433b1c/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=bb72f4d0-20bb-4622-9ffa-0adf81433b1c&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Jonathan Turley, &quot;The Indispensable Right: Free Speech in an Age of Rage&quot; (Simon and Schuster, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:27:40</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>“It’s a free country.” Many of us recall saying that as children as we learned that we were American citizens who were endowed with certain rights—such as free speech. We would use those words when we wanted to assert our own rights when we were being bullied or chastised. We would use them to let others know that even if we did not agree with what they were saying or doing, they were within their rights to express certain opinions or to do certain things.
How many American adults feel as confident now about expressing our views in public settings as we did when we were children or young adults?
In his authoritative but general-reader-friendly new book, The Indispensable Right: Free Speech in an Age of Rage legal scholar and public intellectual Jonathan Turley argues that many Americans nowadays are “speech phobic” and employ terms such as “hate speech” to shut down legitimate discussion of such topics as immigration, government policies during the height of the Covid pandemic and transgenderism. He maintains that free expression is imperative for human flourishing and that stifling it can lead to a spiral of frustration boiling up to rage, which is then repressed by expressions of state rage such as the Palmer Raids and the excesses of McCarthyism.
Turley walks us through the history of free speech in America and across today’s minefields of topics that can get even average people cancelled—and what forms “canceling” can take.
In approachable, fairly short chapters Professor Turley reminds us of how quickly some of the heroes of the American Revolution and champions of liberty devolved into semi-tyrants. His treatment of John Adams and the Alien and Sedition Acts (the latter of which rendered it a crime to, “print, utter, or publish...any false, scandalous, and malicious writing” about the government) is particularly eye-opening and provides crucial background as the reader proceeds through the book. The concept of sedition is a major focus of the book and alerts us as citizens that it is not a matter confined to centuries ago, but a matter very much in the forefront of the American legal and political landscape in the wake what happened in Washington DC in January 2021.
Indeed, what we should call what those events is another fascinating focus of the book. Turley argues forcefully and persuasively that January 6 was not an insurrection but a protest that became a riot. This was a brave stance to take given that, as he points out in the book, anyone who argued that January 6 was anything but an insurrection was in danger of being labeled a sympathizer or an apologist for the rioters.
Turley’s book has become even more of a crucial read in the wake of the anti-Israel protests on college campuses in the spring of 2024. Ditto some shockingly anti-free-speech comments recently by supposedly mainstream Democrats such as John Kerry and Hillary Clinton.
We will touch on the status of free speech as an issue in the 2024 presidential election and how free speech has been impacted by the Biden-Harris administration. The topic of censorship came up, for example, in the 2024 vice-presidential debate and we will get Professor Turley’s take on that.
Hope J. Leman is a grants researcher.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>“It’s a free country.” Many of us recall saying that as children as we learned that we were American citizens who were endowed with certain rights—such as free speech. We would use those words when we wanted to assert our own rights when we were being bullied or chastised. We would use them to let others know that even if we did not agree with what they were saying or doing, they were within their rights to express certain opinions or to do certain things.
How many American adults feel as confident now about expressing our views in public settings as we did when we were children or young adults?
In his authoritative but general-reader-friendly new book, The Indispensable Right: Free Speech in an Age of Rage legal scholar and public intellectual Jonathan Turley argues that many Americans nowadays are “speech phobic” and employ terms such as “hate speech” to shut down legitimate discussion of such topics as immigration, government policies during the height of the Covid pandemic and transgenderism. He maintains that free expression is imperative for human flourishing and that stifling it can lead to a spiral of frustration boiling up to rage, which is then repressed by expressions of state rage such as the Palmer Raids and the excesses of McCarthyism.
Turley walks us through the history of free speech in America and across today’s minefields of topics that can get even average people cancelled—and what forms “canceling” can take.
In approachable, fairly short chapters Professor Turley reminds us of how quickly some of the heroes of the American Revolution and champions of liberty devolved into semi-tyrants. His treatment of John Adams and the Alien and Sedition Acts (the latter of which rendered it a crime to, “print, utter, or publish...any false, scandalous, and malicious writing” about the government) is particularly eye-opening and provides crucial background as the reader proceeds through the book. The concept of sedition is a major focus of the book and alerts us as citizens that it is not a matter confined to centuries ago, but a matter very much in the forefront of the American legal and political landscape in the wake what happened in Washington DC in January 2021.
Indeed, what we should call what those events is another fascinating focus of the book. Turley argues forcefully and persuasively that January 6 was not an insurrection but a protest that became a riot. This was a brave stance to take given that, as he points out in the book, anyone who argued that January 6 was anything but an insurrection was in danger of being labeled a sympathizer or an apologist for the rioters.
Turley’s book has become even more of a crucial read in the wake of the anti-Israel protests on college campuses in the spring of 2024. Ditto some shockingly anti-free-speech comments recently by supposedly mainstream Democrats such as John Kerry and Hillary Clinton.
We will touch on the status of free speech as an issue in the 2024 presidential election and how free speech has been impacted by the Biden-Harris administration. The topic of censorship came up, for example, in the 2024 vice-presidential debate and we will get Professor Turley’s take on that.
Hope J. Leman is a grants researcher.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>234</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2aefcba8-8352-11ef-88a5-4bade279f410</guid>
      <title>Ciara Torres-Spelliscy, &quot;Corporatocracy: How to Protect Democracy from Dark Money and Corrupt Politicians&quot; (NYU Press, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>What threatens American democracy and the rule of law? In her new book,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781479828326" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Corporatocracy: How to Protect Democracy from Dark Money and Corrupt Politicians</em></a>&nbsp;(NYU Press, 2024),</p><p>legal scholar and campaign spending expert Ciara Torres-Spelliscy argues that the USA’s privately-funded campaign finance system – combined with corporate greed and antidemocratic strains in the modern Republican Party – endangers American democracy. As she sees it, unseen political actors and untraceable dark money influence our elections, while anti-democratic rhetoric threatens a tilt towards authoritarianism.</p><p>Drawing on key Supreme Court cases such as&nbsp;<em>Citizens United</em>, Professor Torres-Spelliscy explores how corporations have undermined democratic norms, practices, and laws. From bankrolling regressive politicians to funding ghost candidates with dark money, the book exposes how corporations subvert the will of the American people – yet courts struggle to hold corporate interests and corrupt politicians accountable. If American democracy is going to survive in the long term, then the deep pockets of the largest corporations cannot be allowed to join focus with the anti-democratic fringe. Professor Torres-Spelliscy fears a repeat of the January 6th insurrection – but with expansive corporate sponsorship.</p><p>Professor Torres Spelliscy outlines the ways in which Corporate forces might be held accountable by the courts, their shareholders, and citizens themselves. Along with other reforms, she proposes a democracy litmus test that requires loyalty to democracy in politics&nbsp;<em>and&nbsp;</em>the economy.</p><p>The end of the podcast features her insights on how oil interests crypto “techno bros” have invested in the outcome of the November 2024 election.</p><p><a href="http://www.cskllc.net/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Ciara Torres-Spelliscy</a>&nbsp;is a Professor of Law at Stetson Law. She is also a Brennan Center Fellow at NYU Law School who has testified before Congress as an expert on campaign finance and has helped draft Supreme Court briefs. Previously, she authored&nbsp;<em>Corporate Citizen</em>&nbsp;(Carolina 2016) and&nbsp;<em>Political Brands</em>&nbsp;(Elgar 2019). She has recently written about&nbsp;<a href="https://washingtonmonthly.com/2024/09/27/the-intriguing-role-public-financing-of-campaigns-played-in-the-eric-adams-indictments/" rel="noopener noreferrer">public financing and the Eric Adams indictments</a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a href="https://lawandcrime.com/analysis/the-crypto-bros-are-spending-big-in-the-2024-election/" rel="noopener noreferrer">crypto spending in the 2024 election</a>.</p><p>Mentioned in the podcast:</p><ul>
<li>Judd Legum's work on corporate PACs in his Substack,&nbsp;<a href="https://popular.info/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Popular Information</a>
</li>
<li>Photo with Barack Obama for which Jho Low paid $20 million can be seen&nbsp;<a href="https://m.malaysiakini.com/news/662674#google_vignette" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a>
</li>
<li>
<a href="https://www.npr.org/2022/01/04/1069232219/heres-where-election-deniers-and-doubters-are-running-to-control-voting" rel="noopener noreferrer">Example of 2022 media attempts</a>&nbsp;to identify “sedition caucus” and election deniers for voters</li>
</ul><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 7 Oct 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/ciara-torres-spelliscy-corporatocracy-how-to-protect-democracy-from-dark-money-and-corrupt-politicians-nyu-press-2024-t406Fmzd</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What threatens American democracy and the rule of law? In her new book,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781479828326" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Corporatocracy: How to Protect Democracy from Dark Money and Corrupt Politicians</em></a>&nbsp;(NYU Press, 2024),</p><p>legal scholar and campaign spending expert Ciara Torres-Spelliscy argues that the USA’s privately-funded campaign finance system – combined with corporate greed and antidemocratic strains in the modern Republican Party – endangers American democracy. As she sees it, unseen political actors and untraceable dark money influence our elections, while anti-democratic rhetoric threatens a tilt towards authoritarianism.</p><p>Drawing on key Supreme Court cases such as&nbsp;<em>Citizens United</em>, Professor Torres-Spelliscy explores how corporations have undermined democratic norms, practices, and laws. From bankrolling regressive politicians to funding ghost candidates with dark money, the book exposes how corporations subvert the will of the American people – yet courts struggle to hold corporate interests and corrupt politicians accountable. If American democracy is going to survive in the long term, then the deep pockets of the largest corporations cannot be allowed to join focus with the anti-democratic fringe. Professor Torres-Spelliscy fears a repeat of the January 6th insurrection – but with expansive corporate sponsorship.</p><p>Professor Torres Spelliscy outlines the ways in which Corporate forces might be held accountable by the courts, their shareholders, and citizens themselves. Along with other reforms, she proposes a democracy litmus test that requires loyalty to democracy in politics&nbsp;<em>and&nbsp;</em>the economy.</p><p>The end of the podcast features her insights on how oil interests crypto “techno bros” have invested in the outcome of the November 2024 election.</p><p><a href="http://www.cskllc.net/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Ciara Torres-Spelliscy</a>&nbsp;is a Professor of Law at Stetson Law. She is also a Brennan Center Fellow at NYU Law School who has testified before Congress as an expert on campaign finance and has helped draft Supreme Court briefs. Previously, she authored&nbsp;<em>Corporate Citizen</em>&nbsp;(Carolina 2016) and&nbsp;<em>Political Brands</em>&nbsp;(Elgar 2019). She has recently written about&nbsp;<a href="https://washingtonmonthly.com/2024/09/27/the-intriguing-role-public-financing-of-campaigns-played-in-the-eric-adams-indictments/" rel="noopener noreferrer">public financing and the Eric Adams indictments</a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a href="https://lawandcrime.com/analysis/the-crypto-bros-are-spending-big-in-the-2024-election/" rel="noopener noreferrer">crypto spending in the 2024 election</a>.</p><p>Mentioned in the podcast:</p><ul>
<li>Judd Legum's work on corporate PACs in his Substack,&nbsp;<a href="https://popular.info/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Popular Information</a>
</li>
<li>Photo with Barack Obama for which Jho Low paid $20 million can be seen&nbsp;<a href="https://m.malaysiakini.com/news/662674#google_vignette" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a>
</li>
<li>
<a href="https://www.npr.org/2022/01/04/1069232219/heres-where-election-deniers-and-doubters-are-running-to-control-voting" rel="noopener noreferrer">Example of 2022 media attempts</a>&nbsp;to identify “sedition caucus” and election deniers for voters</li>
</ul><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="66192359" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/f80d4d27-1131-49a1-9bea-82239c7146d4/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=f80d4d27-1131-49a1-9bea-82239c7146d4&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Ciara Torres-Spelliscy, &quot;Corporatocracy: How to Protect Democracy from Dark Money and Corrupt Politicians&quot; (NYU Press, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:08:56</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>What threatens American democracy and the rule of law? In her new book, Corporatocracy: How to Protect Democracy from Dark Money and Corrupt Politicians (NYU Press, 2024),
legal scholar and campaign spending expert Ciara Torres-Spelliscy argues that the USA’s privately-funded campaign finance system – combined with corporate greed and antidemocratic strains in the modern Republican Party – endangers American democracy. As she sees it, unseen political actors and untraceable dark money influence our elections, while anti-democratic rhetoric threatens a tilt towards authoritarianism.
Drawing on key Supreme Court cases such as Citizens United, Professor Torres-Spelliscy explores how corporations have undermined democratic norms, practices, and laws. From bankrolling regressive politicians to funding ghost candidates with dark money, the book exposes how corporations subvert the will of the American people – yet courts struggle to hold corporate interests and corrupt politicians accountable. If American democracy is going to survive in the long term, then the deep pockets of the largest corporations cannot be allowed to join focus with the anti-democratic fringe. Professor Torres-Spelliscy fears a repeat of the January 6th insurrection – but with expansive corporate sponsorship.
Professor Torres Spelliscy outlines the ways in which Corporate forces might be held accountable by the courts, their shareholders, and citizens themselves. Along with other reforms, she proposes a democracy litmus test that requires loyalty to democracy in politics and the economy.
The end of the podcast features her insights on how oil interests crypto “techno bros” have invested in the outcome of the November 2024 election.
Ciara Torres-Spelliscy is a Professor of Law at Stetson Law. She is also a Brennan Center Fellow at NYU Law School who has testified before Congress as an expert on campaign finance and has helped draft Supreme Court briefs. Previously, she authored Corporate Citizen (Carolina 2016) and Political Brands (Elgar 2019). She has recently written about public financing and the Eric Adams indictments and crypto spending in the 2024 election.
Mentioned in the podcast:
Judd Legum&apos;s work on corporate PACs in his Substack, Popular Information
Photo with Barack Obama for which Jho Low paid $20 million can be seen here
Example of 2022 media attempts to identify “sedition caucus” and election deniers for voters
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>What threatens American democracy and the rule of law? In her new book, Corporatocracy: How to Protect Democracy from Dark Money and Corrupt Politicians (NYU Press, 2024),
legal scholar and campaign spending expert Ciara Torres-Spelliscy argues that the USA’s privately-funded campaign finance system – combined with corporate greed and antidemocratic strains in the modern Republican Party – endangers American democracy. As she sees it, unseen political actors and untraceable dark money influence our elections, while anti-democratic rhetoric threatens a tilt towards authoritarianism.
Drawing on key Supreme Court cases such as Citizens United, Professor Torres-Spelliscy explores how corporations have undermined democratic norms, practices, and laws. From bankrolling regressive politicians to funding ghost candidates with dark money, the book exposes how corporations subvert the will of the American people – yet courts struggle to hold corporate interests and corrupt politicians accountable. If American democracy is going to survive in the long term, then the deep pockets of the largest corporations cannot be allowed to join focus with the anti-democratic fringe. Professor Torres-Spelliscy fears a repeat of the January 6th insurrection – but with expansive corporate sponsorship.
Professor Torres Spelliscy outlines the ways in which Corporate forces might be held accountable by the courts, their shareholders, and citizens themselves. Along with other reforms, she proposes a democracy litmus test that requires loyalty to democracy in politics and the economy.
The end of the podcast features her insights on how oil interests crypto “techno bros” have invested in the outcome of the November 2024 election.
Ciara Torres-Spelliscy is a Professor of Law at Stetson Law. She is also a Brennan Center Fellow at NYU Law School who has testified before Congress as an expert on campaign finance and has helped draft Supreme Court briefs. Previously, she authored Corporate Citizen (Carolina 2016) and Political Brands (Elgar 2019). She has recently written about public financing and the Eric Adams indictments and crypto spending in the 2024 election.
Mentioned in the podcast:
Judd Legum&apos;s work on corporate PACs in his Substack, Popular Information
Photo with Barack Obama for which Jho Low paid $20 million can be seen here
Example of 2022 media attempts to identify “sedition caucus” and election deniers for voters
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>742</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">fce64234-827d-11ef-86fa-b7596f6d6320</guid>
      <title>Megan Bradley et al., &quot;IOM Unbound?: Obligations and Accountability of the International Organization for Migration in an Era of Expansion&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>It is an era of expansion for the International Organization for Migration (IOM), an increasingly influential actor in the global governance of migration. Bringing together leading experts in international law and international relations, this collection examines the dynamics and implications of IOM's expansion in a new way.&nbsp;</p><p>Analyzing IOM as an international organization (IO),<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009184182" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;<em>IOM Unbound?: Obligations and Accountability of the International Organization for Migration in an Era of Expansion</em></a>&nbsp;(Cambridge UP, 2023) illuminates the practices, obligations and accountability of this powerful but controversial actor, advancing understanding of IOM itself and broader struggles for IO accountability. The contributions explore key, yet often under-researched, IOM activities including its role in humanitarian emergencies, internal displacement, data collection, ethical labour recruitment, and migrant detention. Offering recommendations for reforms rooted in empirical evidence and careful normative analysis, this is a vital resource for all those interested in the obligations and accountability of international organizations, and in the field of migration. This title is also available as Open Access on Cambridge Core.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 5 Oct 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/megan-bradley-et-al-iom-unbound-obligations-and-accountability-of-the-international-organization-for-migration-in-an-era-of-expansion-cambridge-up-2023-SNPOW2pe</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is an era of expansion for the International Organization for Migration (IOM), an increasingly influential actor in the global governance of migration. Bringing together leading experts in international law and international relations, this collection examines the dynamics and implications of IOM's expansion in a new way.&nbsp;</p><p>Analyzing IOM as an international organization (IO),<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009184182" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;<em>IOM Unbound?: Obligations and Accountability of the International Organization for Migration in an Era of Expansion</em></a>&nbsp;(Cambridge UP, 2023) illuminates the practices, obligations and accountability of this powerful but controversial actor, advancing understanding of IOM itself and broader struggles for IO accountability. The contributions explore key, yet often under-researched, IOM activities including its role in humanitarian emergencies, internal displacement, data collection, ethical labour recruitment, and migrant detention. Offering recommendations for reforms rooted in empirical evidence and careful normative analysis, this is a vital resource for all those interested in the obligations and accountability of international organizations, and in the field of migration. This title is also available as Open Access on Cambridge Core.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="96058331" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/7e913c9f-e7c1-4095-b04d-cb07d66562d7/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=7e913c9f-e7c1-4095-b04d-cb07d66562d7&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Megan Bradley et al., &quot;IOM Unbound?: Obligations and Accountability of the International Organization for Migration in an Era of Expansion&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:40:03</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>It is an era of expansion for the International Organization for Migration (IOM), an increasingly influential actor in the global governance of migration. Bringing together leading experts in international law and international relations, this collection examines the dynamics and implications of IOM&apos;s expansion in a new way. 
Analyzing IOM as an international organization (IO), IOM Unbound?: Obligations and Accountability of the International Organization for Migration in an Era of Expansion (Cambridge UP, 2023) illuminates the practices, obligations and accountability of this powerful but controversial actor, advancing understanding of IOM itself and broader struggles for IO accountability. The contributions explore key, yet often under-researched, IOM activities including its role in humanitarian emergencies, internal displacement, data collection, ethical labour recruitment, and migrant detention. Offering recommendations for reforms rooted in empirical evidence and careful normative analysis, this is a vital resource for all those interested in the obligations and accountability of international organizations, and in the field of migration. This title is also available as Open Access on Cambridge Core.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>It is an era of expansion for the International Organization for Migration (IOM), an increasingly influential actor in the global governance of migration. Bringing together leading experts in international law and international relations, this collection examines the dynamics and implications of IOM&apos;s expansion in a new way. 
Analyzing IOM as an international organization (IO), IOM Unbound?: Obligations and Accountability of the International Organization for Migration in an Era of Expansion (Cambridge UP, 2023) illuminates the practices, obligations and accountability of this powerful but controversial actor, advancing understanding of IOM itself and broader struggles for IO accountability. The contributions explore key, yet often under-researched, IOM activities including its role in humanitarian emergencies, internal displacement, data collection, ethical labour recruitment, and migrant detention. Offering recommendations for reforms rooted in empirical evidence and careful normative analysis, this is a vital resource for all those interested in the obligations and accountability of international organizations, and in the field of migration. This title is also available as Open Access on Cambridge Core.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>233</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e81befea-8037-11ef-af02-9beba823576f</guid>
      <title>Jon Michaels and David Noll, &quot;Vigilante Nation: How State-Sponsored Terror Threatens Our Democracy&quot; (Atria/One Signal, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Law professors Jon Michaels and David Noll use their expertise to expose how state-supported forms of vigilantism are being deployed by MAGA Republicans and Christian nationalists to roll back civil, political, and privacy rights and subvert American democracy. Beyond identifying the dangers of vigilantism,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781668023235" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Vigilante Nation: How State-Sponsored Terror Threatens Our Democracy</em></a>&nbsp;(Atria/One Signal, 2024)&nbsp;functions as a call to arms with a playbook for a democratic response.</p><p>Michaels and Noll look back in time to make sense of today's American politics. They demonstrate how Christian nationalists have previously used state-supported forms of vigilantism when their power and privilege have been challenged. The book examines the early republic, abolitionism, and Reconstruction.</p><p>Since the failed coup by supporters of Former president Donald Trump on January 6, 2021, Michaels and Noll document how overlapping networks of right-wing lawyers, politicians, plutocrats, and preachers have resurrected state-supported vigilantism – using wide ranging methods including book bans, anti-abortion bounties, and attacks on government proceedings, especially elections. Michaels and Noll see the US at a critical inflection point in which state-sponsored vigilantism is openly supported by GOP candidates for president and vice-president, Project 2025, and wider networks, Michaels and Noll move beyond analysis to action: 19 model laws to pass. The supporters of democratic equality are numerous and dexterous enough to create a plan to fight radicalism and vigilantism&nbsp;<em>and&nbsp;</em>secure the broad promises of the civil rights revolution.</p><p><a href="https://law.ucla.edu/faculty/faculty-profiles/jon-d-michaels" rel="noopener noreferrer">Jon Michaels</a>&nbsp;is a professor of law at UCLA Law, where he teaches and writes about constitutional law, public administration, and national security. He has written numerous articles in law reviews including Yale, University of Chicago, and Harvard and also public facing work in venues like the&nbsp;<em>Washington Post</em>, the&nbsp;<em>New York Times</em>, and&nbsp;<em>Foreign Affairs</em>.</p><p><a href="http://noll.org/" rel="noopener noreferrer">David Noll</a>&nbsp;is a law professor at Rutgers Law School. He teaches and writes on courts, administrative law, and legal movements. He publishes scholarly work in law reviews such as California, Cornell, Michigan and NYU and translates for wider audiences in places like the&nbsp;<em>New York Times</em>,&nbsp;<em>Politico</em>, and&nbsp;<em>Slate</em>.</p><p>Mentioned in the podcast:</p><ul>
<li>
<em>By Hands Now Known: Jim Crow’s Legal Executioners</em>&nbsp;(Norton) by Margaret A. Burnham</li>
<li>
<em>Let them Eat Tweets: How the Right Rules in an Age of Extreme Inequality</em>&nbsp;(Liveright) by Jacob Hacker and Paul Pierson</li>
<li>
<a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/people/hannah-natanson/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Hannah Nathanson</a>&nbsp;at the&nbsp;<em>Washington Post&nbsp;</em>who was part of a team of journalists awarded the 2022 Pulitzer Prize for Public Service for coverage of the Jan. 6 insurrection at the U.S. Capitol</li>
<li>Previous interviews with scholars addressing the breakdown of American democracy:&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/four-threats#entry:41440@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em><u>Four Threats: The Recurring Crises of American Democracy</u></em></a>&nbsp;(Suzanne Mettler and Robert C. Lieberman)&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/phantoms-of-a-beleaguered-republic#entry:76268@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">Phantoms of a Beleaguered Republic</a>&nbsp;(Stephen Skowronek, John A. Dearborn, and Desmond King);&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/steven-levitsky-and-daniel-ziblatt-how-democracies-die-crown-2018#entry:8570@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>How Democracies Die</em></a>&nbsp;(Steve Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt);&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-specter-of-dictatorship#entry:334703@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Specter of Dictatorship: Judicial Enabling of Presidential Power</em></a>&nbsp;(David M. Driesen and&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/a-supreme-court-unlike-any-other#entry:336097@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>A Supreme Court Unlike Any Other: The Deepening Divide Between the Justices and the People</em></a>&nbsp;(Kevin J. McMahon)</li>
</ul><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 3 Oct 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/jon-michaels-and-david-noll-vigilante-nation-how-state-sponsored-terror-threatens-our-democracy-atria-one-signal-2024-vUwBBi4u</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Law professors Jon Michaels and David Noll use their expertise to expose how state-supported forms of vigilantism are being deployed by MAGA Republicans and Christian nationalists to roll back civil, political, and privacy rights and subvert American democracy. Beyond identifying the dangers of vigilantism,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781668023235" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Vigilante Nation: How State-Sponsored Terror Threatens Our Democracy</em></a>&nbsp;(Atria/One Signal, 2024)&nbsp;functions as a call to arms with a playbook for a democratic response.</p><p>Michaels and Noll look back in time to make sense of today's American politics. They demonstrate how Christian nationalists have previously used state-supported forms of vigilantism when their power and privilege have been challenged. The book examines the early republic, abolitionism, and Reconstruction.</p><p>Since the failed coup by supporters of Former president Donald Trump on January 6, 2021, Michaels and Noll document how overlapping networks of right-wing lawyers, politicians, plutocrats, and preachers have resurrected state-supported vigilantism – using wide ranging methods including book bans, anti-abortion bounties, and attacks on government proceedings, especially elections. Michaels and Noll see the US at a critical inflection point in which state-sponsored vigilantism is openly supported by GOP candidates for president and vice-president, Project 2025, and wider networks, Michaels and Noll move beyond analysis to action: 19 model laws to pass. The supporters of democratic equality are numerous and dexterous enough to create a plan to fight radicalism and vigilantism&nbsp;<em>and&nbsp;</em>secure the broad promises of the civil rights revolution.</p><p><a href="https://law.ucla.edu/faculty/faculty-profiles/jon-d-michaels" rel="noopener noreferrer">Jon Michaels</a>&nbsp;is a professor of law at UCLA Law, where he teaches and writes about constitutional law, public administration, and national security. He has written numerous articles in law reviews including Yale, University of Chicago, and Harvard and also public facing work in venues like the&nbsp;<em>Washington Post</em>, the&nbsp;<em>New York Times</em>, and&nbsp;<em>Foreign Affairs</em>.</p><p><a href="http://noll.org/" rel="noopener noreferrer">David Noll</a>&nbsp;is a law professor at Rutgers Law School. He teaches and writes on courts, administrative law, and legal movements. He publishes scholarly work in law reviews such as California, Cornell, Michigan and NYU and translates for wider audiences in places like the&nbsp;<em>New York Times</em>,&nbsp;<em>Politico</em>, and&nbsp;<em>Slate</em>.</p><p>Mentioned in the podcast:</p><ul>
<li>
<em>By Hands Now Known: Jim Crow’s Legal Executioners</em>&nbsp;(Norton) by Margaret A. Burnham</li>
<li>
<em>Let them Eat Tweets: How the Right Rules in an Age of Extreme Inequality</em>&nbsp;(Liveright) by Jacob Hacker and Paul Pierson</li>
<li>
<a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/people/hannah-natanson/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Hannah Nathanson</a>&nbsp;at the&nbsp;<em>Washington Post&nbsp;</em>who was part of a team of journalists awarded the 2022 Pulitzer Prize for Public Service for coverage of the Jan. 6 insurrection at the U.S. Capitol</li>
<li>Previous interviews with scholars addressing the breakdown of American democracy:&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/four-threats#entry:41440@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em><u>Four Threats: The Recurring Crises of American Democracy</u></em></a>&nbsp;(Suzanne Mettler and Robert C. Lieberman)&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/phantoms-of-a-beleaguered-republic#entry:76268@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">Phantoms of a Beleaguered Republic</a>&nbsp;(Stephen Skowronek, John A. Dearborn, and Desmond King);&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/steven-levitsky-and-daniel-ziblatt-how-democracies-die-crown-2018#entry:8570@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>How Democracies Die</em></a>&nbsp;(Steve Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt);&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-specter-of-dictatorship#entry:334703@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Specter of Dictatorship: Judicial Enabling of Presidential Power</em></a>&nbsp;(David M. Driesen and&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/a-supreme-court-unlike-any-other#entry:336097@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>A Supreme Court Unlike Any Other: The Deepening Divide Between the Justices and the People</em></a>&nbsp;(Kevin J. McMahon)</li>
</ul><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="72836856" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/1200508b-8a93-4399-a87f-868a8b002742/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=1200508b-8a93-4399-a87f-868a8b002742&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Jon Michaels and David Noll, &quot;Vigilante Nation: How State-Sponsored Terror Threatens Our Democracy&quot; (Atria/One Signal, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:15:51</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Law professors Jon Michaels and David Noll use their expertise to expose how state-supported forms of vigilantism are being deployed by MAGA Republicans and Christian nationalists to roll back civil, political, and privacy rights and subvert American democracy. Beyond identifying the dangers of vigilantism, Vigilante Nation: How State-Sponsored Terror Threatens Our Democracy (Atria/One Signal, 2024) functions as a call to arms with a playbook for a democratic response.
Michaels and Noll look back in time to make sense of today&apos;s American politics. They demonstrate how Christian nationalists have previously used state-supported forms of vigilantism when their power and privilege have been challenged. The book examines the early republic, abolitionism, and Reconstruction.
Since the failed coup by supporters of Former president Donald Trump on January 6, 2021, Michaels and Noll document how overlapping networks of right-wing lawyers, politicians, plutocrats, and preachers have resurrected state-supported vigilantism – using wide ranging methods including book bans, anti-abortion bounties, and attacks on government proceedings, especially elections. Michaels and Noll see the US at a critical inflection point in which state-sponsored vigilantism is openly supported by GOP candidates for president and vice-president, Project 2025, and wider networks, Michaels and Noll move beyond analysis to action: 19 model laws to pass. The supporters of democratic equality are numerous and dexterous enough to create a plan to fight radicalism and vigilantism and secure the broad promises of the civil rights revolution.
Jon Michaels is a professor of law at UCLA Law, where he teaches and writes about constitutional law, public administration, and national security. He has written numerous articles in law reviews including Yale, University of Chicago, and Harvard and also public facing work in venues like the Washington Post, the New York Times, and Foreign Affairs.
David Noll is a law professor at Rutgers Law School. He teaches and writes on courts, administrative law, and legal movements. He publishes scholarly work in law reviews such as California, Cornell, Michigan and NYU and translates for wider audiences in places like the New York Times, Politico, and Slate.
Mentioned in the podcast:
By Hands Now Known: Jim Crow’s Legal Executioners (Norton) by Margaret A. Burnham
Let them Eat Tweets: How the Right Rules in an Age of Extreme Inequality (Liveright) by Jacob Hacker and Paul Pierson
Hannah Nathanson at the Washington Post who was part of a team of journalists awarded the 2022 Pulitzer Prize for Public Service for coverage of the Jan. 6 insurrection at the U.S. Capitol
Previous interviews with scholars addressing the breakdown of American democracy: Four Threats: The Recurring Crises of American Democracy (Suzanne Mettler and Robert C. Lieberman) Phantoms of a Beleaguered Republic (Stephen Skowronek, John A. Dearborn, and Desmond King); How Democracies Die (Steve Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt); The Specter of Dictatorship: Judicial Enabling of Presidential Power (David M. Driesen and A Supreme Court Unlike Any Other: The Deepening Divide Between the Justices and the People (Kevin J. McMahon)
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Law professors Jon Michaels and David Noll use their expertise to expose how state-supported forms of vigilantism are being deployed by MAGA Republicans and Christian nationalists to roll back civil, political, and privacy rights and subvert American democracy. Beyond identifying the dangers of vigilantism, Vigilante Nation: How State-Sponsored Terror Threatens Our Democracy (Atria/One Signal, 2024) functions as a call to arms with a playbook for a democratic response.
Michaels and Noll look back in time to make sense of today&apos;s American politics. They demonstrate how Christian nationalists have previously used state-supported forms of vigilantism when their power and privilege have been challenged. The book examines the early republic, abolitionism, and Reconstruction.
Since the failed coup by supporters of Former president Donald Trump on January 6, 2021, Michaels and Noll document how overlapping networks of right-wing lawyers, politicians, plutocrats, and preachers have resurrected state-supported vigilantism – using wide ranging methods including book bans, anti-abortion bounties, and attacks on government proceedings, especially elections. Michaels and Noll see the US at a critical inflection point in which state-sponsored vigilantism is openly supported by GOP candidates for president and vice-president, Project 2025, and wider networks, Michaels and Noll move beyond analysis to action: 19 model laws to pass. The supporters of democratic equality are numerous and dexterous enough to create a plan to fight radicalism and vigilantism and secure the broad promises of the civil rights revolution.
Jon Michaels is a professor of law at UCLA Law, where he teaches and writes about constitutional law, public administration, and national security. He has written numerous articles in law reviews including Yale, University of Chicago, and Harvard and also public facing work in venues like the Washington Post, the New York Times, and Foreign Affairs.
David Noll is a law professor at Rutgers Law School. He teaches and writes on courts, administrative law, and legal movements. He publishes scholarly work in law reviews such as California, Cornell, Michigan and NYU and translates for wider audiences in places like the New York Times, Politico, and Slate.
Mentioned in the podcast:
By Hands Now Known: Jim Crow’s Legal Executioners (Norton) by Margaret A. Burnham
Let them Eat Tweets: How the Right Rules in an Age of Extreme Inequality (Liveright) by Jacob Hacker and Paul Pierson
Hannah Nathanson at the Washington Post who was part of a team of journalists awarded the 2022 Pulitzer Prize for Public Service for coverage of the Jan. 6 insurrection at the U.S. Capitol
Previous interviews with scholars addressing the breakdown of American democracy: Four Threats: The Recurring Crises of American Democracy (Suzanne Mettler and Robert C. Lieberman) Phantoms of a Beleaguered Republic (Stephen Skowronek, John A. Dearborn, and Desmond King); How Democracies Die (Steve Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt); The Specter of Dictatorship: Judicial Enabling of Presidential Power (David M. Driesen and A Supreme Court Unlike Any Other: The Deepening Divide Between the Justices and the People (Kevin J. McMahon)
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>740</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">afb56470-6d1c-11ef-afc8-5f6664863782</guid>
      <title>Deepa Das Acevedo, &quot;The Battle for Sabarimala: Religion, Law, and Gender in Contemporary India&quot; (Oxford UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://academic.oup.com/book/57588" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Battle for Sabarimala: Religion, Law, and Gender in Contemporary India</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Oxford UP, 2024) tells the story of one of contemporary India’s most contentious disputes: a long-running struggle over women’s access to the Hindu temple at Sabarimala. In 2018, the Indian Supreme Court ruled that the temple, which had traditionally been forbidden to women aged ten to fifty because their presence offended the presiding deity, was required to open its doors to all Hindus. The decision in&nbsp;<em>Indian Younger Lawyers Association</em>&nbsp;rocked the nation: protests were launched around India and throughout the diaspora, a record-setting human chain called the ‘Women’s Wall’ was coordinated, and dozens of petitions were filed asking the Supreme Court to review, and potentially reverse, its landmark opinion.&nbsp;</p><p>Perhaps most significantly,&nbsp;<em>IYLA</em>&nbsp;led the Court to openly reconsider the Essential Practices Doctrine that has been a mainstay of Indian religious freedom jurisprudence since 1954. In this first monograph-length study of the dispute, legal anthropologist Deepa Das Acevedo draws on ethnographic fieldwork, legal analysis, and media archives to tell a multifaceted narrative about the ‘ban on women’. Reaching as far back as the eighteenth century, when the relationship between temple deities and the government was transformed by an ambitious precolonial ruler, and coming up to the litigation delays caused by the coronavirus pandemic, Das Acevedo reveals the complexities of the dispute and the constitutional framework that defines it. That framework, Das Acevedo argues, reflects two distinct conceptions of religion-state relations, both of which have emerged at various stages in the—still unresolved—battle for Sabarimala.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 3 Oct 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/deepa-das-acevedo-the-battle-for-sabarimala-religion-law-and-gender-in-contemporary-india-oxford-up-2024-FJQmpFAf</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://academic.oup.com/book/57588" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Battle for Sabarimala: Religion, Law, and Gender in Contemporary India</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Oxford UP, 2024) tells the story of one of contemporary India’s most contentious disputes: a long-running struggle over women’s access to the Hindu temple at Sabarimala. In 2018, the Indian Supreme Court ruled that the temple, which had traditionally been forbidden to women aged ten to fifty because their presence offended the presiding deity, was required to open its doors to all Hindus. The decision in&nbsp;<em>Indian Younger Lawyers Association</em>&nbsp;rocked the nation: protests were launched around India and throughout the diaspora, a record-setting human chain called the ‘Women’s Wall’ was coordinated, and dozens of petitions were filed asking the Supreme Court to review, and potentially reverse, its landmark opinion.&nbsp;</p><p>Perhaps most significantly,&nbsp;<em>IYLA</em>&nbsp;led the Court to openly reconsider the Essential Practices Doctrine that has been a mainstay of Indian religious freedom jurisprudence since 1954. In this first monograph-length study of the dispute, legal anthropologist Deepa Das Acevedo draws on ethnographic fieldwork, legal analysis, and media archives to tell a multifaceted narrative about the ‘ban on women’. Reaching as far back as the eighteenth century, when the relationship between temple deities and the government was transformed by an ambitious precolonial ruler, and coming up to the litigation delays caused by the coronavirus pandemic, Das Acevedo reveals the complexities of the dispute and the constitutional framework that defines it. That framework, Das Acevedo argues, reflects two distinct conceptions of religion-state relations, both of which have emerged at various stages in the—still unresolved—battle for Sabarimala.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="28693812" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/48e08d10-a755-4f14-8cef-0dd2d916c598/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=48e08d10-a755-4f14-8cef-0dd2d916c598&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Deepa Das Acevedo, &quot;The Battle for Sabarimala: Religion, Law, and Gender in Contemporary India&quot; (Oxford UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:29:53</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The Battle for Sabarimala: Religion, Law, and Gender in Contemporary India (Oxford UP, 2024) tells the story of one of contemporary India’s most contentious disputes: a long-running struggle over women’s access to the Hindu temple at Sabarimala. In 2018, the Indian Supreme Court ruled that the temple, which had traditionally been forbidden to women aged ten to fifty because their presence offended the presiding deity, was required to open its doors to all Hindus. The decision in Indian Younger Lawyers Association rocked the nation: protests were launched around India and throughout the diaspora, a record-setting human chain called the ‘Women’s Wall’ was coordinated, and dozens of petitions were filed asking the Supreme Court to review, and potentially reverse, its landmark opinion. 
Perhaps most significantly, IYLA led the Court to openly reconsider the Essential Practices Doctrine that has been a mainstay of Indian religious freedom jurisprudence since 1954. In this first monograph-length study of the dispute, legal anthropologist Deepa Das Acevedo draws on ethnographic fieldwork, legal analysis, and media archives to tell a multifaceted narrative about the ‘ban on women’. Reaching as far back as the eighteenth century, when the relationship between temple deities and the government was transformed by an ambitious precolonial ruler, and coming up to the litigation delays caused by the coronavirus pandemic, Das Acevedo reveals the complexities of the dispute and the constitutional framework that defines it. That framework, Das Acevedo argues, reflects two distinct conceptions of religion-state relations, both of which have emerged at various stages in the—still unresolved—battle for Sabarimala.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Battle for Sabarimala: Religion, Law, and Gender in Contemporary India (Oxford UP, 2024) tells the story of one of contemporary India’s most contentious disputes: a long-running struggle over women’s access to the Hindu temple at Sabarimala. In 2018, the Indian Supreme Court ruled that the temple, which had traditionally been forbidden to women aged ten to fifty because their presence offended the presiding deity, was required to open its doors to all Hindus. The decision in Indian Younger Lawyers Association rocked the nation: protests were launched around India and throughout the diaspora, a record-setting human chain called the ‘Women’s Wall’ was coordinated, and dozens of petitions were filed asking the Supreme Court to review, and potentially reverse, its landmark opinion. 
Perhaps most significantly, IYLA led the Court to openly reconsider the Essential Practices Doctrine that has been a mainstay of Indian religious freedom jurisprudence since 1954. In this first monograph-length study of the dispute, legal anthropologist Deepa Das Acevedo draws on ethnographic fieldwork, legal analysis, and media archives to tell a multifaceted narrative about the ‘ban on women’. Reaching as far back as the eighteenth century, when the relationship between temple deities and the government was transformed by an ambitious precolonial ruler, and coming up to the litigation delays caused by the coronavirus pandemic, Das Acevedo reveals the complexities of the dispute and the constitutional framework that defines it. That framework, Das Acevedo argues, reflects two distinct conceptions of religion-state relations, both of which have emerged at various stages in the—still unresolved—battle for Sabarimala.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>356</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">42d352fa-7f4a-11ef-b781-6f81bd991362</guid>
      <title>Samuel Ely Bagg, &quot;The Dispersion of Power: A Critical Realist Theory of Democracy&quot; (Oxford UP, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>We commonly think of democracy as a social order governed by the people’s collective will. Given the size of the modern states, this picture is typically adjusted to say that democracy is a system of&nbsp;<em>representative government</em>, where elected officials are tasked with governing in ways that reflect the collective will of their constituents.</p><p>Although it is familiar, this way of depicting democracy invites difficulties. The concept of a collective will is notoriously difficult to nail down. And, moreover, the idea that modern elections reveal or express such a will remains dubious. Accordingly, a good deal of democratic theory aims to fill in the missing details regarding the collective will and its representation.</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780192848826" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Dispersion of Power: A Critical Realist Theory of Democracy</em></a>&nbsp;(Oxford University Press 2024),&nbsp;<a href="https://sc.edu/study/colleges_schools/artsandsciences/political_science/our_people/directory/bagg_samuel.php" rel="noopener noreferrer">Samuel Bagg</a>&nbsp;takes a different tack by proposing a vision of democracy where the central aim is to protect public power from capture.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 1 Oct 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/samuel-ely-bagg-the-dispersion-of-power-a-critical-realist-theory-of-democracy-oxford-up-2023-HXlup1l2</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We commonly think of democracy as a social order governed by the people’s collective will. Given the size of the modern states, this picture is typically adjusted to say that democracy is a system of&nbsp;<em>representative government</em>, where elected officials are tasked with governing in ways that reflect the collective will of their constituents.</p><p>Although it is familiar, this way of depicting democracy invites difficulties. The concept of a collective will is notoriously difficult to nail down. And, moreover, the idea that modern elections reveal or express such a will remains dubious. Accordingly, a good deal of democratic theory aims to fill in the missing details regarding the collective will and its representation.</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780192848826" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Dispersion of Power: A Critical Realist Theory of Democracy</em></a>&nbsp;(Oxford University Press 2024),&nbsp;<a href="https://sc.edu/study/colleges_schools/artsandsciences/political_science/our_people/directory/bagg_samuel.php" rel="noopener noreferrer">Samuel Bagg</a>&nbsp;takes a different tack by proposing a vision of democracy where the central aim is to protect public power from capture.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="58931214" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/9c9d1d09-5129-41d2-94c4-8d5f43d1f00f/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=9c9d1d09-5129-41d2-94c4-8d5f43d1f00f&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Samuel Ely Bagg, &quot;The Dispersion of Power: A Critical Realist Theory of Democracy&quot; (Oxford UP, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:01:23</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>We commonly think of democracy as a social order governed by the people’s collective will. Given the size of the modern states, this picture is typically adjusted to say that democracy is a system of representative government, where elected officials are tasked with governing in ways that reflect the collective will of their constituents.
Although it is familiar, this way of depicting democracy invites difficulties. The concept of a collective will is notoriously difficult to nail down. And, moreover, the idea that modern elections reveal or express such a will remains dubious. Accordingly, a good deal of democratic theory aims to fill in the missing details regarding the collective will and its representation.
In The Dispersion of Power: A Critical Realist Theory of Democracy (Oxford University Press 2024), Samuel Bagg takes a different tack by proposing a vision of democracy where the central aim is to protect public power from capture.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>We commonly think of democracy as a social order governed by the people’s collective will. Given the size of the modern states, this picture is typically adjusted to say that democracy is a system of representative government, where elected officials are tasked with governing in ways that reflect the collective will of their constituents.
Although it is familiar, this way of depicting democracy invites difficulties. The concept of a collective will is notoriously difficult to nail down. And, moreover, the idea that modern elections reveal or express such a will remains dubious. Accordingly, a good deal of democratic theory aims to fill in the missing details regarding the collective will and its representation.
In The Dispersion of Power: A Critical Realist Theory of Democracy (Oxford University Press 2024), Samuel Bagg takes a different tack by proposing a vision of democracy where the central aim is to protect public power from capture.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>354</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6613d640-7aa9-11ef-ac37-cf9845dd4aca</guid>
      <title>Caterina Fugazzola, &quot;Words Like Water: Queer Mobilization and Social Change in China&quot; (Temple UP, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>After China officially “decriminalized” same-sex behavior in 1997, both the visibility and public acceptance of&nbsp;<em>tongzhi</em>, an inclusive identity term that refers to nonheterosexual and gender nonconforming identities in the People’s Republic of China, has improved. However, for all the positive change, there are few opportunities for political and civil rights advocacy under Xi Jinping’s authoritarian rule.</p><p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781439921470" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Words Like Water: Queer Mobilization and Social Change in China</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Temple UP, 2023) explores the nonconfrontational strategies the&nbsp;<em>tongzhi</em>&nbsp;movement uses in contemporary China. Caterina Fugazzola analyzes&nbsp;<em>tongzhi</em>&nbsp;organizers’ conceptualizations of, and approaches to, social change, explaining how they avoid the backlash that meets Western tactics, such as protests, confrontation, and language about individual freedoms. In contrast, the groups’ intentional use of community and family-oriented narratives, discourses, and understandings of sexual identity are more effective, especially in situations where direct political engagement is not possible.</p><p>Providing on-the-ground stories that examine the social, cultural, and political constraints and opportunities,&nbsp;<em>Words like Water</em>&nbsp;emphasizes the value of discursive flexibility that allows activists to adapt to changing social and political conditions.</p><p>Caterina Fugazzola is Assistant Senior Instructional Professor of Global Studies at the University of Chicago.</p><p>Qing Shen is&nbsp;a PhD candidate in anthropology at Uppsala University, Sweden.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Sep 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/caterina-fugazzola-words-like-water-queer-mobilization-and-social-change-in-china-temple-up-2023-9t_lBiyC</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After China officially “decriminalized” same-sex behavior in 1997, both the visibility and public acceptance of&nbsp;<em>tongzhi</em>, an inclusive identity term that refers to nonheterosexual and gender nonconforming identities in the People’s Republic of China, has improved. However, for all the positive change, there are few opportunities for political and civil rights advocacy under Xi Jinping’s authoritarian rule.</p><p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781439921470" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Words Like Water: Queer Mobilization and Social Change in China</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Temple UP, 2023) explores the nonconfrontational strategies the&nbsp;<em>tongzhi</em>&nbsp;movement uses in contemporary China. Caterina Fugazzola analyzes&nbsp;<em>tongzhi</em>&nbsp;organizers’ conceptualizations of, and approaches to, social change, explaining how they avoid the backlash that meets Western tactics, such as protests, confrontation, and language about individual freedoms. In contrast, the groups’ intentional use of community and family-oriented narratives, discourses, and understandings of sexual identity are more effective, especially in situations where direct political engagement is not possible.</p><p>Providing on-the-ground stories that examine the social, cultural, and political constraints and opportunities,&nbsp;<em>Words like Water</em>&nbsp;emphasizes the value of discursive flexibility that allows activists to adapt to changing social and political conditions.</p><p>Caterina Fugazzola is Assistant Senior Instructional Professor of Global Studies at the University of Chicago.</p><p>Qing Shen is&nbsp;a PhD candidate in anthropology at Uppsala University, Sweden.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="55667865" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/ab303d81-8ec3-498d-a347-eaa1cb3b034b/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=ab303d81-8ec3-498d-a347-eaa1cb3b034b&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Caterina Fugazzola, &quot;Words Like Water: Queer Mobilization and Social Change in China&quot; (Temple UP, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:57:59</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>After China officially “decriminalized” same-sex behavior in 1997, both the visibility and public acceptance of tongzhi, an inclusive identity term that refers to nonheterosexual and gender nonconforming identities in the People’s Republic of China, has improved. However, for all the positive change, there are few opportunities for political and civil rights advocacy under Xi Jinping’s authoritarian rule.
Words Like Water: Queer Mobilization and Social Change in China (Temple UP, 2023) explores the nonconfrontational strategies the tongzhi movement uses in contemporary China. Caterina Fugazzola analyzes tongzhi organizers’ conceptualizations of, and approaches to, social change, explaining how they avoid the backlash that meets Western tactics, such as protests, confrontation, and language about individual freedoms. In contrast, the groups’ intentional use of community and family-oriented narratives, discourses, and understandings of sexual identity are more effective, especially in situations where direct political engagement is not possible.
Providing on-the-ground stories that examine the social, cultural, and political constraints and opportunities, Words like Water emphasizes the value of discursive flexibility that allows activists to adapt to changing social and political conditions.
Caterina Fugazzola is Assistant Senior Instructional Professor of Global Studies at the University of Chicago.
Qing Shen is a PhD candidate in anthropology at Uppsala University, Sweden.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>After China officially “decriminalized” same-sex behavior in 1997, both the visibility and public acceptance of tongzhi, an inclusive identity term that refers to nonheterosexual and gender nonconforming identities in the People’s Republic of China, has improved. However, for all the positive change, there are few opportunities for political and civil rights advocacy under Xi Jinping’s authoritarian rule.
Words Like Water: Queer Mobilization and Social Change in China (Temple UP, 2023) explores the nonconfrontational strategies the tongzhi movement uses in contemporary China. Caterina Fugazzola analyzes tongzhi organizers’ conceptualizations of, and approaches to, social change, explaining how they avoid the backlash that meets Western tactics, such as protests, confrontation, and language about individual freedoms. In contrast, the groups’ intentional use of community and family-oriented narratives, discourses, and understandings of sexual identity are more effective, especially in situations where direct political engagement is not possible.
Providing on-the-ground stories that examine the social, cultural, and political constraints and opportunities, Words like Water emphasizes the value of discursive flexibility that allows activists to adapt to changing social and political conditions.
Caterina Fugazzola is Assistant Senior Instructional Professor of Global Studies at the University of Chicago.
Qing Shen is a PhD candidate in anthropology at Uppsala University, Sweden.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>68</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7bb7528e-6d2e-11ef-8ce0-2736cd707268</guid>
      <title>Ethical Machines: A Conversation with Reid Blackman</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Join us as we discuss Dr. Reid Blackman’s new book:&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781647822811" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Ethical Machines: Your Concise Guide to Totally Unbiased, Transparent, and Respectful AI</em></a>&nbsp;(Harvard Business Review Press, 2022). We dive into the intricacies of developing AI and the intersection of ethics and innovation.</p><p>Reid Blackman, Ph.D., is the author of&nbsp;<em>Ethical Machines</em>, creator and host of the podcast “Ethical Machines,” and Founder and CEO of Virtue, a digital ethical risk consultancy. He is also an advisor to the Canadian government on their federal AI regulations, was a founding member of EY’s AI Advisory Board, and a Senior Advisor to the Deloitte AI Institute. His work, which includes advising and speaking to organizations including AWS, US Bank, the FBI, NASA, and the World Economic Forum, has been profiled by The Wall Street Journal, the BBC, and Forbes. His written work appears in The Harvard Business Review and The New York Times. Prior to founding Virtue, Reid was a professor of philosophy at Colgate University and UNC-Chapel Hill. Learn</p><p><a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/podcast" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Madison’s Notes</em></a>&nbsp;is the podcast of Princeton&nbsp;<a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions</em></a></p><p><em>Contributions to and/or sponsorship of guest does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/ethical-machines-a-conversation-with-reid-blackman-ZUeOjl8_</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Join us as we discuss Dr. Reid Blackman’s new book:&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781647822811" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Ethical Machines: Your Concise Guide to Totally Unbiased, Transparent, and Respectful AI</em></a>&nbsp;(Harvard Business Review Press, 2022). We dive into the intricacies of developing AI and the intersection of ethics and innovation.</p><p>Reid Blackman, Ph.D., is the author of&nbsp;<em>Ethical Machines</em>, creator and host of the podcast “Ethical Machines,” and Founder and CEO of Virtue, a digital ethical risk consultancy. He is also an advisor to the Canadian government on their federal AI regulations, was a founding member of EY’s AI Advisory Board, and a Senior Advisor to the Deloitte AI Institute. His work, which includes advising and speaking to organizations including AWS, US Bank, the FBI, NASA, and the World Economic Forum, has been profiled by The Wall Street Journal, the BBC, and Forbes. His written work appears in The Harvard Business Review and The New York Times. Prior to founding Virtue, Reid was a professor of philosophy at Colgate University and UNC-Chapel Hill. Learn</p><p><a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/podcast" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Madison’s Notes</em></a>&nbsp;is the podcast of Princeton&nbsp;<a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions</em></a></p><p><em>Contributions to and/or sponsorship of guest does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="50415957" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/bfc78762-1daf-487d-96bc-640a0ee71cc8/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=bfc78762-1daf-487d-96bc-640a0ee71cc8&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Ethical Machines: A Conversation with Reid Blackman</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:52:30</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Join us as we discuss Dr. Reid Blackman’s new book: Ethical Machines: Your Concise Guide to Totally Unbiased, Transparent, and Respectful AI (Harvard Business Review Press, 2022). We dive into the intricacies of developing AI and the intersection of ethics and innovation.
Reid Blackman, Ph.D., is the author of Ethical Machines, creator and host of the podcast “Ethical Machines,” and Founder and CEO of Virtue, a digital ethical risk consultancy. He is also an advisor to the Canadian government on their federal AI regulations, was a founding member of EY’s AI Advisory Board, and a Senior Advisor to the Deloitte AI Institute. His work, which includes advising and speaking to organizations including AWS, US Bank, the FBI, NASA, and the World Economic Forum, has been profiled by The Wall Street Journal, the BBC, and Forbes. His written work appears in The Harvard Business Review and The New York Times. Prior to founding Virtue, Reid was a professor of philosophy at Colgate University and UNC-Chapel Hill. Learn
Madison’s Notes is the podcast of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions
Contributions to and/or sponsorship of guest does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Join us as we discuss Dr. Reid Blackman’s new book: Ethical Machines: Your Concise Guide to Totally Unbiased, Transparent, and Respectful AI (Harvard Business Review Press, 2022). We dive into the intricacies of developing AI and the intersection of ethics and innovation.
Reid Blackman, Ph.D., is the author of Ethical Machines, creator and host of the podcast “Ethical Machines,” and Founder and CEO of Virtue, a digital ethical risk consultancy. He is also an advisor to the Canadian government on their federal AI regulations, was a founding member of EY’s AI Advisory Board, and a Senior Advisor to the Deloitte AI Institute. His work, which includes advising and speaking to organizations including AWS, US Bank, the FBI, NASA, and the World Economic Forum, has been profiled by The Wall Street Journal, the BBC, and Forbes. His written work appears in The Harvard Business Review and The New York Times. Prior to founding Virtue, Reid was a professor of philosophy at Colgate University and UNC-Chapel Hill. Learn
Madison’s Notes is the podcast of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions
Contributions to and/or sponsorship of guest does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>118</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">b47cf326-7378-11ef-9a7a-7b12dabdeac6</guid>
      <title>David M. Driesen, &quot;The Specter of Dictatorship: Judicial Enabling of Presidential Power&quot; (Stanford UP, 2021)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>At the end of the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia, Benjamin Franklin was asked whether we have a republic or a monarchy. He replied “A Republic…if you can keep it.” In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781503628618" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Specter of Dictatorship: Judicial Enabling of Presidential Power</em></a>&nbsp;(Stanford UP, 2021), David M. Driesen argues that Donald Trump's presidency challenged Americans to consider whether the Madisonian system of checks and balances could robustly respond to a president claiming extensive executive power and disregarding traditional processes such as the peaceful transition of power. Driesen notes that Benjamin Franklin and many men in the “founding” generation observed tyrannical government in Europe – and they explicitly included safeguards in the U.S. Constitution to prevent extensive executive power in the United States.</p><p>In this tradition, Driesen analyzes the chief executive's role in the democratic decline of Hungary, Poland, and Turkey. He argues that an insufficiently constrained presidency is one of the most important systemic threats to constitutional democracy. Driesen urges the U.S. to learn from the mistakes of these failing democracies. Specifically, he sees the United States Supreme Court as enabling the expansion of executive power.&nbsp;<em>Specter of Dictatorship&nbsp;</em>highlights how the Supreme Court’s reliance on and expansion of the legal approach called unitary executive theory threatens the separation of powers in the U.S. Driesen recommends a less deferential approach in which the judiciary checks the executive. The Supreme Court has been acting a if policing presidential power is the threat to democracy – but the real danger for constitutional democracy lies in expansion of executive power. For Driesen, judges and justices should give&nbsp;<em>substantial weight&nbsp;</em>to concerns about democratic erosion. Because autocracy is spreading abroad and presidential power is expanding in the US, Benjamin Franklin’s concern about maintaining democracy is relevant in 2024.</p><p><a href="http://law.syr.edu/profile/david-driesen1" rel="noopener noreferrer">Professor Driesen</a>&nbsp;is the thirteenth University Professor at Syracuse University where he teaches constitutional and environmental law. He is a graduate of the Yale Law School and has published several books and numerous articles with leading academic publishers and law reviews.</p><p>From the podcast:</p><ul>
<li>David’s piece on&nbsp;<a href="https://illinoislawreview.org/print/vol-2024-no-4/does-the-separation-of-powers-justify-the-major-questions-doctrine-2/" rel="noopener noreferrer">major questions doctrine</a>
</li>
<li>David’s editorial on the POTUS debate, Victor Orban, and Haitian Immigrants</li>
</ul><p><br></p><p>Correction from Susan – the two dissenters in&nbsp;<em>Roe v. Wade</em>&nbsp;were appointed by John F. Kennedy and&nbsp;<em>Richard Nixon</em>. The justices voting in favor of reproductive rights were 5 men appointed by Republican presidents (Dwight Eisenhower and Richard Nixon) and 2 men appointed by Democratic presidents (Franklin Roosevelt and Lyndon Johnson).</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/david-m-driesen-the-specter-of-dictatorship-judicial-enabling-of-presidential-power-stanford-up-2021-1CcRl4Xy</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the end of the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia, Benjamin Franklin was asked whether we have a republic or a monarchy. He replied “A Republic…if you can keep it.” In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781503628618" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Specter of Dictatorship: Judicial Enabling of Presidential Power</em></a>&nbsp;(Stanford UP, 2021), David M. Driesen argues that Donald Trump's presidency challenged Americans to consider whether the Madisonian system of checks and balances could robustly respond to a president claiming extensive executive power and disregarding traditional processes such as the peaceful transition of power. Driesen notes that Benjamin Franklin and many men in the “founding” generation observed tyrannical government in Europe – and they explicitly included safeguards in the U.S. Constitution to prevent extensive executive power in the United States.</p><p>In this tradition, Driesen analyzes the chief executive's role in the democratic decline of Hungary, Poland, and Turkey. He argues that an insufficiently constrained presidency is one of the most important systemic threats to constitutional democracy. Driesen urges the U.S. to learn from the mistakes of these failing democracies. Specifically, he sees the United States Supreme Court as enabling the expansion of executive power.&nbsp;<em>Specter of Dictatorship&nbsp;</em>highlights how the Supreme Court’s reliance on and expansion of the legal approach called unitary executive theory threatens the separation of powers in the U.S. Driesen recommends a less deferential approach in which the judiciary checks the executive. The Supreme Court has been acting a if policing presidential power is the threat to democracy – but the real danger for constitutional democracy lies in expansion of executive power. For Driesen, judges and justices should give&nbsp;<em>substantial weight&nbsp;</em>to concerns about democratic erosion. Because autocracy is spreading abroad and presidential power is expanding in the US, Benjamin Franklin’s concern about maintaining democracy is relevant in 2024.</p><p><a href="http://law.syr.edu/profile/david-driesen1" rel="noopener noreferrer">Professor Driesen</a>&nbsp;is the thirteenth University Professor at Syracuse University where he teaches constitutional and environmental law. He is a graduate of the Yale Law School and has published several books and numerous articles with leading academic publishers and law reviews.</p><p>From the podcast:</p><ul>
<li>David’s piece on&nbsp;<a href="https://illinoislawreview.org/print/vol-2024-no-4/does-the-separation-of-powers-justify-the-major-questions-doctrine-2/" rel="noopener noreferrer">major questions doctrine</a>
</li>
<li>David’s editorial on the POTUS debate, Victor Orban, and Haitian Immigrants</li>
</ul><p><br></p><p>Correction from Susan – the two dissenters in&nbsp;<em>Roe v. Wade</em>&nbsp;were appointed by John F. Kennedy and&nbsp;<em>Richard Nixon</em>. The justices voting in favor of reproductive rights were 5 men appointed by Republican presidents (Dwight Eisenhower and Richard Nixon) and 2 men appointed by Democratic presidents (Franklin Roosevelt and Lyndon Johnson).</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="49502752" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/5f521e25-5c1d-4434-b70f-c91ebd1f8b0f/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=5f521e25-5c1d-4434-b70f-c91ebd1f8b0f&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>David M. Driesen, &quot;The Specter of Dictatorship: Judicial Enabling of Presidential Power&quot; (Stanford UP, 2021)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:51:33</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>At the end of the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia, Benjamin Franklin was asked whether we have a republic or a monarchy. He replied “A Republic…if you can keep it.” In The Specter of Dictatorship: Judicial Enabling of Presidential Power (Stanford UP, 2021), David M. Driesen argues that Donald Trump&apos;s presidency challenged Americans to consider whether the Madisonian system of checks and balances could robustly respond to a president claiming extensive executive power and disregarding traditional processes such as the peaceful transition of power. Driesen notes that Benjamin Franklin and many men in the “founding” generation observed tyrannical government in Europe – and they explicitly included safeguards in the U.S. Constitution to prevent extensive executive power in the United States.
In this tradition, Driesen analyzes the chief executive&apos;s role in the democratic decline of Hungary, Poland, and Turkey. He argues that an insufficiently constrained presidency is one of the most important systemic threats to constitutional democracy. Driesen urges the U.S. to learn from the mistakes of these failing democracies. Specifically, he sees the United States Supreme Court as enabling the expansion of executive power. Specter of Dictatorship highlights how the Supreme Court’s reliance on and expansion of the legal approach called unitary executive theory threatens the separation of powers in the U.S. Driesen recommends a less deferential approach in which the judiciary checks the executive. The Supreme Court has been acting a if policing presidential power is the threat to democracy – but the real danger for constitutional democracy lies in expansion of executive power. For Driesen, judges and justices should give substantial weight to concerns about democratic erosion. Because autocracy is spreading abroad and presidential power is expanding in the US, Benjamin Franklin’s concern about maintaining democracy is relevant in 2024.
Professor Driesen is the thirteenth University Professor at Syracuse University where he teaches constitutional and environmental law. He is a graduate of the Yale Law School and has published several books and numerous articles with leading academic publishers and law reviews.
From the podcast:
David’s piece on major questions doctrine
David’s editorial on the POTUS debate, Victor Orban, and Haitian Immigrants
Correction from Susan – the two dissenters in Roe v. Wade were appointed by John F. Kennedy and Richard Nixon. The justices voting in favor of reproductive rights were 5 men appointed by Republican presidents (Dwight Eisenhower and Richard Nixon) and 2 men appointed by Democratic presidents (Franklin Roosevelt and Lyndon Johnson).
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>At the end of the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia, Benjamin Franklin was asked whether we have a republic or a monarchy. He replied “A Republic…if you can keep it.” In The Specter of Dictatorship: Judicial Enabling of Presidential Power (Stanford UP, 2021), David M. Driesen argues that Donald Trump&apos;s presidency challenged Americans to consider whether the Madisonian system of checks and balances could robustly respond to a president claiming extensive executive power and disregarding traditional processes such as the peaceful transition of power. Driesen notes that Benjamin Franklin and many men in the “founding” generation observed tyrannical government in Europe – and they explicitly included safeguards in the U.S. Constitution to prevent extensive executive power in the United States.
In this tradition, Driesen analyzes the chief executive&apos;s role in the democratic decline of Hungary, Poland, and Turkey. He argues that an insufficiently constrained presidency is one of the most important systemic threats to constitutional democracy. Driesen urges the U.S. to learn from the mistakes of these failing democracies. Specifically, he sees the United States Supreme Court as enabling the expansion of executive power. Specter of Dictatorship highlights how the Supreme Court’s reliance on and expansion of the legal approach called unitary executive theory threatens the separation of powers in the U.S. Driesen recommends a less deferential approach in which the judiciary checks the executive. The Supreme Court has been acting a if policing presidential power is the threat to democracy – but the real danger for constitutional democracy lies in expansion of executive power. For Driesen, judges and justices should give substantial weight to concerns about democratic erosion. Because autocracy is spreading abroad and presidential power is expanding in the US, Benjamin Franklin’s concern about maintaining democracy is relevant in 2024.
Professor Driesen is the thirteenth University Professor at Syracuse University where he teaches constitutional and environmental law. He is a graduate of the Yale Law School and has published several books and numerous articles with leading academic publishers and law reviews.
From the podcast:
David’s piece on major questions doctrine
David’s editorial on the POTUS debate, Victor Orban, and Haitian Immigrants
Correction from Susan – the two dissenters in Roe v. Wade were appointed by John F. Kennedy and Richard Nixon. The justices voting in favor of reproductive rights were 5 men appointed by Republican presidents (Dwight Eisenhower and Richard Nixon) and 2 men appointed by Democratic presidents (Franklin Roosevelt and Lyndon Johnson).
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>738</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">bf75dda2-7822-11ef-9f5c-fb177b19ad89</guid>
      <title>Gergely Gosztonyi, &quot;Censorship from Plato to Social Media: The Complexity of Social Media’s Content Regulation and Moderation Practices&quot; (Springer, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In many countries, censorship, blocking of internet access and internet content for political purposes are still part of everyday life. Will filtering, blocking, and hacking replace scissors and black ink? This book argues that only a broader understanding of censorship can effectively protect freedom of expression.</p><p>For centuries, church and state controlled the content available to the public through political, moral and religious censorship. As technology evolved, the legal and political tools were refined, but the classic censorship system continued until the end of the 20th century. However, the myth of total freedom of communication and a law-free space that had been expected with the advent of the internet was soon challenged. The new rulers of the digital world, tech companies, emerged and gained enormous power over free speech and content management. All this happened alongside cautious regulation attempts on the part of various states, either by granting platforms near-totalimmunity (US) or by setting up new rules that were not fully developed (EU). China has established the Great Firewall and the Golden Shield as a third way.</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9783031465284" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Censorship from Plato to Social Media: The Complexity of Social Media’s Content Regulation and Moderation Practices</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Springer, 2023), particular attention is paid to developments since the 2010s, when Internet-related problems began to multiply. The state’s solutions have mostly pointed in one direction: towards greater control of platforms and the content they host. Similarities can be found in the US debates, the Chinese and Russian positions on internet sovereignty, and the new European digital regulations (DSA-DMA). The book addresses them all.</p><p>This book will be of interest to anyone who wants to understand the complexities of social media’s content regulation and moderation practices. It makes a valuable contribution to the field of freedom of expression and the internet, showing that, with different kinds of censorship, this essentially free form of communication has come – almost by default – under legal regulation and the original freedom may have been lost in too many countries in recent years.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 22 Sep 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/gergely-gosztonyi-censorship-from-plato-to-social-media-the-complexity-of-social-medias-content-regulation-and-moderation-practices-springer-2023-igiNYgvB</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In many countries, censorship, blocking of internet access and internet content for political purposes are still part of everyday life. Will filtering, blocking, and hacking replace scissors and black ink? This book argues that only a broader understanding of censorship can effectively protect freedom of expression.</p><p>For centuries, church and state controlled the content available to the public through political, moral and religious censorship. As technology evolved, the legal and political tools were refined, but the classic censorship system continued until the end of the 20th century. However, the myth of total freedom of communication and a law-free space that had been expected with the advent of the internet was soon challenged. The new rulers of the digital world, tech companies, emerged and gained enormous power over free speech and content management. All this happened alongside cautious regulation attempts on the part of various states, either by granting platforms near-totalimmunity (US) or by setting up new rules that were not fully developed (EU). China has established the Great Firewall and the Golden Shield as a third way.</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9783031465284" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Censorship from Plato to Social Media: The Complexity of Social Media’s Content Regulation and Moderation Practices</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Springer, 2023), particular attention is paid to developments since the 2010s, when Internet-related problems began to multiply. The state’s solutions have mostly pointed in one direction: towards greater control of platforms and the content they host. Similarities can be found in the US debates, the Chinese and Russian positions on internet sovereignty, and the new European digital regulations (DSA-DMA). The book addresses them all.</p><p>This book will be of interest to anyone who wants to understand the complexities of social media’s content regulation and moderation practices. It makes a valuable contribution to the field of freedom of expression and the internet, showing that, with different kinds of censorship, this essentially free form of communication has come – almost by default – under legal regulation and the original freedom may have been lost in too many countries in recent years.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="42962589" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/088cc340-0001-414a-b9df-aff6ccade267/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=088cc340-0001-414a-b9df-aff6ccade267&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Gergely Gosztonyi, &quot;Censorship from Plato to Social Media: The Complexity of Social Media’s Content Regulation and Moderation Practices&quot; (Springer, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:44:44</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In many countries, censorship, blocking of internet access and internet content for political purposes are still part of everyday life. Will filtering, blocking, and hacking replace scissors and black ink? This book argues that only a broader understanding of censorship can effectively protect freedom of expression.
For centuries, church and state controlled the content available to the public through political, moral and religious censorship. As technology evolved, the legal and political tools were refined, but the classic censorship system continued until the end of the 20th century. However, the myth of total freedom of communication and a law-free space that had been expected with the advent of the internet was soon challenged. The new rulers of the digital world, tech companies, emerged and gained enormous power over free speech and content management. All this happened alongside cautious regulation attempts on the part of various states, either by granting platforms near-totalimmunity (US) or by setting up new rules that were not fully developed (EU). China has established the Great Firewall and the Golden Shield as a third way.
In Censorship from Plato to Social Media: The Complexity of Social Media’s Content Regulation and Moderation Practices (Springer, 2023), particular attention is paid to developments since the 2010s, when Internet-related problems began to multiply. The state’s solutions have mostly pointed in one direction: towards greater control of platforms and the content they host. Similarities can be found in the US debates, the Chinese and Russian positions on internet sovereignty, and the new European digital regulations (DSA-DMA). The book addresses them all.
This book will be of interest to anyone who wants to understand the complexities of social media’s content regulation and moderation practices. It makes a valuable contribution to the field of freedom of expression and the internet, showing that, with different kinds of censorship, this essentially free form of communication has come – almost by default – under legal regulation and the original freedom may have been lost in too many countries in recent years.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In many countries, censorship, blocking of internet access and internet content for political purposes are still part of everyday life. Will filtering, blocking, and hacking replace scissors and black ink? This book argues that only a broader understanding of censorship can effectively protect freedom of expression.
For centuries, church and state controlled the content available to the public through political, moral and religious censorship. As technology evolved, the legal and political tools were refined, but the classic censorship system continued until the end of the 20th century. However, the myth of total freedom of communication and a law-free space that had been expected with the advent of the internet was soon challenged. The new rulers of the digital world, tech companies, emerged and gained enormous power over free speech and content management. All this happened alongside cautious regulation attempts on the part of various states, either by granting platforms near-totalimmunity (US) or by setting up new rules that were not fully developed (EU). China has established the Great Firewall and the Golden Shield as a third way.
In Censorship from Plato to Social Media: The Complexity of Social Media’s Content Regulation and Moderation Practices (Springer, 2023), particular attention is paid to developments since the 2010s, when Internet-related problems began to multiply. The state’s solutions have mostly pointed in one direction: towards greater control of platforms and the content they host. Similarities can be found in the US debates, the Chinese and Russian positions on internet sovereignty, and the new European digital regulations (DSA-DMA). The book addresses them all.
This book will be of interest to anyone who wants to understand the complexities of social media’s content regulation and moderation practices. It makes a valuable contribution to the field of freedom of expression and the internet, showing that, with different kinds of censorship, this essentially free form of communication has come – almost by default – under legal regulation and the original freedom may have been lost in too many countries in recent years.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>225</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5696e1e2-7781-11ef-9f4d-bf7d6e4fe343</guid>
      <title>Robert Polner and Michael Tubridy, &quot;An Irish Passion for Justice: The Life of Rebel New York Attorney Paul O&apos;Dwyer&quot; (Cornell UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In the city of New York from the 1930s to the 1990s, Irish attorney Paul O’Dwyer was a fierce and enduring presence in courtrooms, on picket lines, and in contests for elected office. He was forever the advocate of the downtrodden and marginalized, fighting not only for Irish Catholics in Northern Ireland but for workers, radicals, Jews, and African Americans and against the Vietnam War.</p><p>With his shock of white hair and bushy eyebrows, O’Dwyer was widely recognized in politics and in the media. His work as a reform Democrat transformed the Democratic Party and his advocacy for peace and justice in Northern Ireland bore fruit in the Good Friday Agreement of 1998 that ended decades of conflict.</p><p>Until now, however, there has been no biography of this happy warrior for social justice. Fortunately, that problem has been remedied with a new book by Robert Polner and Michael Tubridy,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781501773051" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>An Irish Passion for Justice: The Life of Rebel New York Attorney Paul O’Dwyer</em></a>&nbsp;(Cornell UP, 2024).</p><p>Host Robert W. Snyder is Manhattan Borough Historian and professor emeritus of journalism, and American Studies at Rutgers University. His latest book,&nbsp;<em>When the City Stopped: Stories from New York’s Essential Workers</em>, is due out in March 2025 from Cornell University Press. Email: rwsnyder@rutgers.edu</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 22 Sep 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/robert-polner-and-michael-tubridy-an-irish-passion-for-justice-the-life-of-rebel-new-york-attorney-paul-o-dwyer-cornell-up-2024-jYl7MUWc</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the city of New York from the 1930s to the 1990s, Irish attorney Paul O’Dwyer was a fierce and enduring presence in courtrooms, on picket lines, and in contests for elected office. He was forever the advocate of the downtrodden and marginalized, fighting not only for Irish Catholics in Northern Ireland but for workers, radicals, Jews, and African Americans and against the Vietnam War.</p><p>With his shock of white hair and bushy eyebrows, O’Dwyer was widely recognized in politics and in the media. His work as a reform Democrat transformed the Democratic Party and his advocacy for peace and justice in Northern Ireland bore fruit in the Good Friday Agreement of 1998 that ended decades of conflict.</p><p>Until now, however, there has been no biography of this happy warrior for social justice. Fortunately, that problem has been remedied with a new book by Robert Polner and Michael Tubridy,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781501773051" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>An Irish Passion for Justice: The Life of Rebel New York Attorney Paul O’Dwyer</em></a>&nbsp;(Cornell UP, 2024).</p><p>Host Robert W. Snyder is Manhattan Borough Historian and professor emeritus of journalism, and American Studies at Rutgers University. His latest book,&nbsp;<em>When the City Stopped: Stories from New York’s Essential Workers</em>, is due out in March 2025 from Cornell University Press. Email: rwsnyder@rutgers.edu</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="47154634" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/8b328086-e052-4dc7-8fb2-64afdb756a68/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=8b328086-e052-4dc7-8fb2-64afdb756a68&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Robert Polner and Michael Tubridy, &quot;An Irish Passion for Justice: The Life of Rebel New York Attorney Paul O&apos;Dwyer&quot; (Cornell UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:49:07</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In the city of New York from the 1930s to the 1990s, Irish attorney Paul O’Dwyer was a fierce and enduring presence in courtrooms, on picket lines, and in contests for elected office. He was forever the advocate of the downtrodden and marginalized, fighting not only for Irish Catholics in Northern Ireland but for workers, radicals, Jews, and African Americans and against the Vietnam War.
With his shock of white hair and bushy eyebrows, O’Dwyer was widely recognized in politics and in the media. His work as a reform Democrat transformed the Democratic Party and his advocacy for peace and justice in Northern Ireland bore fruit in the Good Friday Agreement of 1998 that ended decades of conflict.
Until now, however, there has been no biography of this happy warrior for social justice. Fortunately, that problem has been remedied with a new book by Robert Polner and Michael Tubridy, An Irish Passion for Justice: The Life of Rebel New York Attorney Paul O’Dwyer (Cornell UP, 2024).
Host Robert W. Snyder is Manhattan Borough Historian and professor emeritus of journalism, and American Studies at Rutgers University. His latest book, When the City Stopped: Stories from New York’s Essential Workers, is due out in March 2025 from Cornell University Press. Email: rwsnyder@rutgers.edu
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In the city of New York from the 1930s to the 1990s, Irish attorney Paul O’Dwyer was a fierce and enduring presence in courtrooms, on picket lines, and in contests for elected office. He was forever the advocate of the downtrodden and marginalized, fighting not only for Irish Catholics in Northern Ireland but for workers, radicals, Jews, and African Americans and against the Vietnam War.
With his shock of white hair and bushy eyebrows, O’Dwyer was widely recognized in politics and in the media. His work as a reform Democrat transformed the Democratic Party and his advocacy for peace and justice in Northern Ireland bore fruit in the Good Friday Agreement of 1998 that ended decades of conflict.
Until now, however, there has been no biography of this happy warrior for social justice. Fortunately, that problem has been remedied with a new book by Robert Polner and Michael Tubridy, An Irish Passion for Justice: The Life of Rebel New York Attorney Paul O’Dwyer (Cornell UP, 2024).
Host Robert W. Snyder is Manhattan Borough Historian and professor emeritus of journalism, and American Studies at Rutgers University. His latest book, When the City Stopped: Stories from New York’s Essential Workers, is due out in March 2025 from Cornell University Press. Email: rwsnyder@rutgers.edu
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>259</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">69f81424-7775-11ef-b895-8721b677a2dc</guid>
      <title>Aideen O’Shaughnessy, &quot;Embodying Irish Abortion Reform: Bodies, Emotions, and Feminist Activism&quot; (Bristol UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Dr. Aideen O'Shaughnessy is a Senior Lecturer in Sociology at the University of Lincoln. She has a PhD in Sociology from the University of Cambridge, an MA in Gender Studies Research from Utrecht University and a BA in Sociology and French at Trinity College Dublin. Her research focuses on gender, health, and social movements and she is particularly interested in the study of reproductive health, rights, and justice. She has published widely in journals including Body and Society, the European Journal of Women's Studies, and the BMJ Sexual and Reproductive Health.</p><p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781529236439" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Embodying Irish Abortion Reform: Bodies, Emotions, and Feminist Activism</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Bristol UP, 2024) explores the lived, embodied and affective experiences of reproductive rights activists living under, and mobilizing against, Ireland’s constitutional abortion ban.</p><p>Through qualitative research and in-depth interviews with activists, the author exposes the subtle influence of the 8th Amendment on Irish women and their (reproductive) bodies, whether or not they have ever attempted to access a clandestine abortion.</p><p>It explains how the everyday embodied practices, bodily labours and affective experiences of women and gestating people were shaped by the 8th amendment and through the need to ‘prepare’ for crisis pregnancies. In addition, it reveals the integral role of women’s bodies and emotions in changing the political and social landscape in Ireland, through the historical transformation of the country’s abortion laws.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 21 Sep 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/aideen-oshaughnessy-embodying-irish-abortion-reform-bodies-emotions-and-feminist-activism-bristol-up-2024-gHlSs_gY</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dr. Aideen O'Shaughnessy is a Senior Lecturer in Sociology at the University of Lincoln. She has a PhD in Sociology from the University of Cambridge, an MA in Gender Studies Research from Utrecht University and a BA in Sociology and French at Trinity College Dublin. Her research focuses on gender, health, and social movements and she is particularly interested in the study of reproductive health, rights, and justice. She has published widely in journals including Body and Society, the European Journal of Women's Studies, and the BMJ Sexual and Reproductive Health.</p><p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781529236439" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Embodying Irish Abortion Reform: Bodies, Emotions, and Feminist Activism</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Bristol UP, 2024) explores the lived, embodied and affective experiences of reproductive rights activists living under, and mobilizing against, Ireland’s constitutional abortion ban.</p><p>Through qualitative research and in-depth interviews with activists, the author exposes the subtle influence of the 8th Amendment on Irish women and their (reproductive) bodies, whether or not they have ever attempted to access a clandestine abortion.</p><p>It explains how the everyday embodied practices, bodily labours and affective experiences of women and gestating people were shaped by the 8th amendment and through the need to ‘prepare’ for crisis pregnancies. In addition, it reveals the integral role of women’s bodies and emotions in changing the political and social landscape in Ireland, through the historical transformation of the country’s abortion laws.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="43776886" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/7e185b60-84cc-4877-986a-7bd817ecb422/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=7e185b60-84cc-4877-986a-7bd817ecb422&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Aideen O’Shaughnessy, &quot;Embodying Irish Abortion Reform: Bodies, Emotions, and Feminist Activism&quot; (Bristol UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:45:35</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Dr. Aideen O&apos;Shaughnessy is a Senior Lecturer in Sociology at the University of Lincoln. She has a PhD in Sociology from the University of Cambridge, an MA in Gender Studies Research from Utrecht University and a BA in Sociology and French at Trinity College Dublin. Her research focuses on gender, health, and social movements and she is particularly interested in the study of reproductive health, rights, and justice. She has published widely in journals including Body and Society, the European Journal of Women&apos;s Studies, and the BMJ Sexual and Reproductive Health.
Embodying Irish Abortion Reform: Bodies, Emotions, and Feminist Activism (Bristol UP, 2024) explores the lived, embodied and affective experiences of reproductive rights activists living under, and mobilizing against, Ireland’s constitutional abortion ban.
Through qualitative research and in-depth interviews with activists, the author exposes the subtle influence of the 8th Amendment on Irish women and their (reproductive) bodies, whether or not they have ever attempted to access a clandestine abortion.
It explains how the everyday embodied practices, bodily labours and affective experiences of women and gestating people were shaped by the 8th amendment and through the need to ‘prepare’ for crisis pregnancies. In addition, it reveals the integral role of women’s bodies and emotions in changing the political and social landscape in Ireland, through the historical transformation of the country’s abortion laws.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Dr. Aideen O&apos;Shaughnessy is a Senior Lecturer in Sociology at the University of Lincoln. She has a PhD in Sociology from the University of Cambridge, an MA in Gender Studies Research from Utrecht University and a BA in Sociology and French at Trinity College Dublin. Her research focuses on gender, health, and social movements and she is particularly interested in the study of reproductive health, rights, and justice. She has published widely in journals including Body and Society, the European Journal of Women&apos;s Studies, and the BMJ Sexual and Reproductive Health.
Embodying Irish Abortion Reform: Bodies, Emotions, and Feminist Activism (Bristol UP, 2024) explores the lived, embodied and affective experiences of reproductive rights activists living under, and mobilizing against, Ireland’s constitutional abortion ban.
Through qualitative research and in-depth interviews with activists, the author exposes the subtle influence of the 8th Amendment on Irish women and their (reproductive) bodies, whether or not they have ever attempted to access a clandestine abortion.
It explains how the everyday embodied practices, bodily labours and affective experiences of women and gestating people were shaped by the 8th amendment and through the need to ‘prepare’ for crisis pregnancies. In addition, it reveals the integral role of women’s bodies and emotions in changing the political and social landscape in Ireland, through the historical transformation of the country’s abortion laws.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1308</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">f712d004-7524-11ef-8fcf-ab33028665a3</guid>
      <title>Celebrating Constitution Day, Part. 2: A Conversation with Julia Mahoney</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In this conversation, we dive into key issues shaping the legal landscape today: the complexities of constitutional interpretation, the evolving role and power of the judiciary, and how corruption can impact government systems. We also explored the critical role that civic education plays in maintaining a healthy democracy.</p><p>Julia D. Mahoney is the John S. Battle Professor of Law and the Joseph C. Carter, Jr. Research Professor of Law at the University of Virginia School of Law, where she teaches courses in Constitutional Law and Property Law. Her recent scholarship includes articles on government takings of property, the classical legal tradition in education, and feminism and common good constitutionalism. A graduate of the Yale Law School, she is a member of the American Law Institute and serves on the Board of Advisors of the New Civil Liberties Alliance.</p><p>Show Notes:</p><p><a href="https://lawliberty.org/forum/a-common-good-constitutionalist-feminism/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>A Common Good Constitutional Feminism</em></a><em>,&nbsp;</em>Julia Mahoney. Law and Liberty | August 2022</p><p><a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/podcast" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Madison’s Notes</em></a>&nbsp;is the podcast of Princeton&nbsp;<a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions</em></a></p><p><em>Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Sep 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/celebrating-constitution-day-part-2-a-conversation-with-julia-mahoney-xa2xXwt_</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this conversation, we dive into key issues shaping the legal landscape today: the complexities of constitutional interpretation, the evolving role and power of the judiciary, and how corruption can impact government systems. We also explored the critical role that civic education plays in maintaining a healthy democracy.</p><p>Julia D. Mahoney is the John S. Battle Professor of Law and the Joseph C. Carter, Jr. Research Professor of Law at the University of Virginia School of Law, where she teaches courses in Constitutional Law and Property Law. Her recent scholarship includes articles on government takings of property, the classical legal tradition in education, and feminism and common good constitutionalism. A graduate of the Yale Law School, she is a member of the American Law Institute and serves on the Board of Advisors of the New Civil Liberties Alliance.</p><p>Show Notes:</p><p><a href="https://lawliberty.org/forum/a-common-good-constitutionalist-feminism/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>A Common Good Constitutional Feminism</em></a><em>,&nbsp;</em>Julia Mahoney. Law and Liberty | August 2022</p><p><a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/podcast" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Madison’s Notes</em></a>&nbsp;is the podcast of Princeton&nbsp;<a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions</em></a></p><p><em>Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="49385730" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/70ca37f6-f196-4e20-b477-8c099e55da5d/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=70ca37f6-f196-4e20-b477-8c099e55da5d&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Celebrating Constitution Day, Part. 2: A Conversation with Julia Mahoney</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:51:26</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this conversation, we dive into key issues shaping the legal landscape today: the complexities of constitutional interpretation, the evolving role and power of the judiciary, and how corruption can impact government systems. We also explored the critical role that civic education plays in maintaining a healthy democracy.
Julia D. Mahoney is the John S. Battle Professor of Law and the Joseph C. Carter, Jr. Research Professor of Law at the University of Virginia School of Law, where she teaches courses in Constitutional Law and Property Law. Her recent scholarship includes articles on government takings of property, the classical legal tradition in education, and feminism and common good constitutionalism. A graduate of the Yale Law School, she is a member of the American Law Institute and serves on the Board of Advisors of the New Civil Liberties Alliance.
Show Notes:
A Common Good Constitutional Feminism, Julia Mahoney. Law and Liberty | August 2022
Madison’s Notes is the podcast of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions
Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this conversation, we dive into key issues shaping the legal landscape today: the complexities of constitutional interpretation, the evolving role and power of the judiciary, and how corruption can impact government systems. We also explored the critical role that civic education plays in maintaining a healthy democracy.
Julia D. Mahoney is the John S. Battle Professor of Law and the Joseph C. Carter, Jr. Research Professor of Law at the University of Virginia School of Law, where she teaches courses in Constitutional Law and Property Law. Her recent scholarship includes articles on government takings of property, the classical legal tradition in education, and feminism and common good constitutionalism. A graduate of the Yale Law School, she is a member of the American Law Institute and serves on the Board of Advisors of the New Civil Liberties Alliance.
Show Notes:
A Common Good Constitutional Feminism, Julia Mahoney. Law and Liberty | August 2022
Madison’s Notes is the podcast of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions
Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>120</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">b3f4c37e-6d20-11ef-bb56-7b06fb8b8be5</guid>
      <title>Kevin J. McMahon, &quot;A Supreme Court Unlike Any Other: The Deepening Divide Between the Justices and the People&quot; (U Chicago Press, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Many scholars and members of the press have argued that John Roberts’ Supreme Court is exceptional. While some emphasize the approach to interpreting the Constitution or the justices conservative ideology, Dr. Kevin J. McMahon suggests that the key issue is democratic legitimacy. Historically, the Supreme Court has always had some “democracy gap” – democratically elected presidents appoint justices that serve for life. As presidents select justices, they attempt to move the Supreme Court in their desired ideological direction while “simultaneously advancing their electoral interests and managing their governing coalition.” Despite these forces, Dr. McMahon argues that past Supreme Courts were still closer to democratic principles. Today’s court is exceptional because the “democracy gap” is severe.</p><p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780226831084" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>A Supreme Court Unlike Any Other: The Deepening Divide Between the Justices and the People</em>&nbsp;</a>(U Chicago Press, 2024) draws on historical and contemporary data to reveal how the long arc of court battles (from FDR to Donald Trump) created this democracy gap. McMahon highlights changes to the politics of nominating and confirming justices, the changes in who is even considered to be in the pool to be a Supreme Court justice, and the increased salience of the Court in elections.</p><p><a href="https://internet3.trincoll.edu/facProfiles/Default.aspx?fid=1261609" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. Kevin J. McMahon</a>&nbsp;(he/him) is the John R. Reitemeyer [RightMeyer]Professor of Political Science at Trinity College, and the author of two award-winning books,&nbsp;<em>Reconsidering Roosevelt on Race&nbsp;</em>and&nbsp;<em>Nixon’s Court</em>, both published by The University of Chicago Press. Together with&nbsp;<em>A Supreme Court Unlike Any Other</em>, the three books form a trilogy that interrogates whether 100 years of presidential efforts to shape the high court affect the supreme court’s democratic legitimacy.</p><p>Dr. McMahon also writes public facing essays in outlets such as&nbsp;<em>US News &amp; World Report&nbsp;</em>and&nbsp;<em>The Conversation</em>. For example,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.usnews.com/opinion/articles/2024-07-01/the-supreme-courts-ruling-on-presidential-immunity-undermines-democracy" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Presidential Immunity Case &amp; American Democracy</a><u>,&nbsp;</u><a href="https://theconversation.com/knowing-when-to-call-it-quits-takes-courage-and-confidence-3-case-studies-233602" rel="noopener noreferrer">President Biden &amp; the Courage it Takes to Call it Quits</a><u>,&nbsp;</u><a href="https://theconversation.com/even-the-supreme-courts-conservative-justices-are-polarized-about-the-state-of-american-politics-232341" rel="noopener noreferrer">Conservative Justices Polarized on the State of American Politics</a><u>, and&nbsp;</u><a href="https://theconversation.com/justice-sotomayors-health-isnt-the-real-problem-for-democrats-winning-elections-is-229327" rel="noopener noreferrer">Calls for a Supreme Court Justice to Retire</a><u>.</u></p><p>Susan mentioned&nbsp;<a href="https://archive.nytimes.com/www.nytimes.com/interactive/2013/03/11/us/politics/small-state-advantage.html" rel="noopener noreferrer">a stark&nbsp;<em>New York Times&nbsp;</em>graphic</a>&nbsp;of how 6 senators (CA, NY, TX) represent the same number of voters as 62 senators. 2022 data (but less dramatically presented) is&nbsp;<a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2022/10/27/learning/whats-going-on-in-this-graph-nov-9-2022.html" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/kevin-j-mcmahon-a-supreme-court-unlike-any-other-the-deepening-divide-between-the-justices-and-the-people-u-chicago-press-2024-RVqAt3Gh</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many scholars and members of the press have argued that John Roberts’ Supreme Court is exceptional. While some emphasize the approach to interpreting the Constitution or the justices conservative ideology, Dr. Kevin J. McMahon suggests that the key issue is democratic legitimacy. Historically, the Supreme Court has always had some “democracy gap” – democratically elected presidents appoint justices that serve for life. As presidents select justices, they attempt to move the Supreme Court in their desired ideological direction while “simultaneously advancing their electoral interests and managing their governing coalition.” Despite these forces, Dr. McMahon argues that past Supreme Courts were still closer to democratic principles. Today’s court is exceptional because the “democracy gap” is severe.</p><p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780226831084" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>A Supreme Court Unlike Any Other: The Deepening Divide Between the Justices and the People</em>&nbsp;</a>(U Chicago Press, 2024) draws on historical and contemporary data to reveal how the long arc of court battles (from FDR to Donald Trump) created this democracy gap. McMahon highlights changes to the politics of nominating and confirming justices, the changes in who is even considered to be in the pool to be a Supreme Court justice, and the increased salience of the Court in elections.</p><p><a href="https://internet3.trincoll.edu/facProfiles/Default.aspx?fid=1261609" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. Kevin J. McMahon</a>&nbsp;(he/him) is the John R. Reitemeyer [RightMeyer]Professor of Political Science at Trinity College, and the author of two award-winning books,&nbsp;<em>Reconsidering Roosevelt on Race&nbsp;</em>and&nbsp;<em>Nixon’s Court</em>, both published by The University of Chicago Press. Together with&nbsp;<em>A Supreme Court Unlike Any Other</em>, the three books form a trilogy that interrogates whether 100 years of presidential efforts to shape the high court affect the supreme court’s democratic legitimacy.</p><p>Dr. McMahon also writes public facing essays in outlets such as&nbsp;<em>US News &amp; World Report&nbsp;</em>and&nbsp;<em>The Conversation</em>. For example,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.usnews.com/opinion/articles/2024-07-01/the-supreme-courts-ruling-on-presidential-immunity-undermines-democracy" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Presidential Immunity Case &amp; American Democracy</a><u>,&nbsp;</u><a href="https://theconversation.com/knowing-when-to-call-it-quits-takes-courage-and-confidence-3-case-studies-233602" rel="noopener noreferrer">President Biden &amp; the Courage it Takes to Call it Quits</a><u>,&nbsp;</u><a href="https://theconversation.com/even-the-supreme-courts-conservative-justices-are-polarized-about-the-state-of-american-politics-232341" rel="noopener noreferrer">Conservative Justices Polarized on the State of American Politics</a><u>, and&nbsp;</u><a href="https://theconversation.com/justice-sotomayors-health-isnt-the-real-problem-for-democrats-winning-elections-is-229327" rel="noopener noreferrer">Calls for a Supreme Court Justice to Retire</a><u>.</u></p><p>Susan mentioned&nbsp;<a href="https://archive.nytimes.com/www.nytimes.com/interactive/2013/03/11/us/politics/small-state-advantage.html" rel="noopener noreferrer">a stark&nbsp;<em>New York Times&nbsp;</em>graphic</a>&nbsp;of how 6 senators (CA, NY, TX) represent the same number of voters as 62 senators. 2022 data (but less dramatically presented) is&nbsp;<a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2022/10/27/learning/whats-going-on-in-this-graph-nov-9-2022.html" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="51743715" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/2aa223f3-3faa-4de1-9cfc-abbb66d82d26/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=2aa223f3-3faa-4de1-9cfc-abbb66d82d26&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Kevin J. McMahon, &quot;A Supreme Court Unlike Any Other: The Deepening Divide Between the Justices and the People&quot; (U Chicago Press, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:53:53</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Many scholars and members of the press have argued that John Roberts’ Supreme Court is exceptional. While some emphasize the approach to interpreting the Constitution or the justices conservative ideology, Dr. Kevin J. McMahon suggests that the key issue is democratic legitimacy. Historically, the Supreme Court has always had some “democracy gap” – democratically elected presidents appoint justices that serve for life. As presidents select justices, they attempt to move the Supreme Court in their desired ideological direction while “simultaneously advancing their electoral interests and managing their governing coalition.” Despite these forces, Dr. McMahon argues that past Supreme Courts were still closer to democratic principles. Today’s court is exceptional because the “democracy gap” is severe.
A Supreme Court Unlike Any Other: The Deepening Divide Between the Justices and the People (U Chicago Press, 2024) draws on historical and contemporary data to reveal how the long arc of court battles (from FDR to Donald Trump) created this democracy gap. McMahon highlights changes to the politics of nominating and confirming justices, the changes in who is even considered to be in the pool to be a Supreme Court justice, and the increased salience of the Court in elections.
Dr. Kevin J. McMahon (he/him) is the John R. Reitemeyer [RightMeyer]Professor of Political Science at Trinity College, and the author of two award-winning books, Reconsidering Roosevelt on Race and Nixon’s Court, both published by The University of Chicago Press. Together with A Supreme Court Unlike Any Other, the three books form a trilogy that interrogates whether 100 years of presidential efforts to shape the high court affect the supreme court’s democratic legitimacy.
Dr. McMahon also writes public facing essays in outlets such as US News &amp; World Report and The Conversation. For example, The Presidential Immunity Case &amp; American Democracy, President Biden &amp; the Courage it Takes to Call it Quits, Conservative Justices Polarized on the State of American Politics, and Calls for a Supreme Court Justice to Retire.
Susan mentioned a stark New York Times graphic of how 6 senators (CA, NY, TX) represent the same number of voters as 62 senators. 2022 data (but less dramatically presented) is here.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Many scholars and members of the press have argued that John Roberts’ Supreme Court is exceptional. While some emphasize the approach to interpreting the Constitution or the justices conservative ideology, Dr. Kevin J. McMahon suggests that the key issue is democratic legitimacy. Historically, the Supreme Court has always had some “democracy gap” – democratically elected presidents appoint justices that serve for life. As presidents select justices, they attempt to move the Supreme Court in their desired ideological direction while “simultaneously advancing their electoral interests and managing their governing coalition.” Despite these forces, Dr. McMahon argues that past Supreme Courts were still closer to democratic principles. Today’s court is exceptional because the “democracy gap” is severe.
A Supreme Court Unlike Any Other: The Deepening Divide Between the Justices and the People (U Chicago Press, 2024) draws on historical and contemporary data to reveal how the long arc of court battles (from FDR to Donald Trump) created this democracy gap. McMahon highlights changes to the politics of nominating and confirming justices, the changes in who is even considered to be in the pool to be a Supreme Court justice, and the increased salience of the Court in elections.
Dr. Kevin J. McMahon (he/him) is the John R. Reitemeyer [RightMeyer]Professor of Political Science at Trinity College, and the author of two award-winning books, Reconsidering Roosevelt on Race and Nixon’s Court, both published by The University of Chicago Press. Together with A Supreme Court Unlike Any Other, the three books form a trilogy that interrogates whether 100 years of presidential efforts to shape the high court affect the supreme court’s democratic legitimacy.
Dr. McMahon also writes public facing essays in outlets such as US News &amp; World Report and The Conversation. For example, The Presidential Immunity Case &amp; American Democracy, President Biden &amp; the Courage it Takes to Call it Quits, Conservative Justices Polarized on the State of American Politics, and Calls for a Supreme Court Justice to Retire.
Susan mentioned a stark New York Times graphic of how 6 senators (CA, NY, TX) represent the same number of voters as 62 senators. 2022 data (but less dramatically presented) is here.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>737</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">feff5c6a-72cc-11ef-992c-ef3170a093c1</guid>
      <title>Michael L. Walker, &quot;Indefinite: Doing Time in Jail&quot; (Oxford UP, 2022)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Jails are the principal people-processing machines of the criminal justice system. Mostly they hold persons awaiting trial who cannot afford or have been denied bail. Although jail sentences max out at a year, some spend years awaiting trial in jail-especially in counties where courts are jammed&nbsp;with cases. City and county jails, detention centers, police lockups, and other temporary holding facilities are regularly overcrowded, poorly funded, and the buildings are often in disrepair. American jails admit over ten million people every year, but very little is known about what happens to&nbsp;them while they're locked away.</p><p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780190072865" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Indefinite: Doing Time in Jail</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Oxford UP, 2022) is an ethnographic study of a California county jail that reflects on what it means to do jail time and what it does to men. Michael L. Walker spent several extended spells in jail, having been arrested while trying to pay parking tickets in graduate school. This book is an intimate&nbsp;account of his experience and in it he shares the routines, rhythms, and subtle meanings that come with being incarcerated. Walker shows how punishment in jail is much more than the deprivation of liberties. It is, he argues, purposefully degrading. Jail creates a racial politics that organizes&nbsp;daily life, moves men from clock time to event time, normalizes trauma, and imbues residents with substantial measures of vulnerability. Deputies used self-centered management styles to address the problems associated with running a jail, some that magnified individual conflicts to potential group&nbsp;conflicts and others that created divisions between residents for the sake of control. And though not every deputy indulged, many gave themselves over to the pleasures of punishment.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 15 Sep 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/michael-l-walker-indefinite-doing-time-in-jail-oxford-up-2022-rFhq7oDO-abEZu4nt</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jails are the principal people-processing machines of the criminal justice system. Mostly they hold persons awaiting trial who cannot afford or have been denied bail. Although jail sentences max out at a year, some spend years awaiting trial in jail-especially in counties where courts are jammed&nbsp;with cases. City and county jails, detention centers, police lockups, and other temporary holding facilities are regularly overcrowded, poorly funded, and the buildings are often in disrepair. American jails admit over ten million people every year, but very little is known about what happens to&nbsp;them while they're locked away.</p><p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780190072865" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Indefinite: Doing Time in Jail</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Oxford UP, 2022) is an ethnographic study of a California county jail that reflects on what it means to do jail time and what it does to men. Michael L. Walker spent several extended spells in jail, having been arrested while trying to pay parking tickets in graduate school. This book is an intimate&nbsp;account of his experience and in it he shares the routines, rhythms, and subtle meanings that come with being incarcerated. Walker shows how punishment in jail is much more than the deprivation of liberties. It is, he argues, purposefully degrading. Jail creates a racial politics that organizes&nbsp;daily life, moves men from clock time to event time, normalizes trauma, and imbues residents with substantial measures of vulnerability. Deputies used self-centered management styles to address the problems associated with running a jail, some that magnified individual conflicts to potential group&nbsp;conflicts and others that created divisions between residents for the sake of control. And though not every deputy indulged, many gave themselves over to the pleasures of punishment.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="34035663" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/45d81338-1e69-4221-b15e-3e669345f145/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=45d81338-1e69-4221-b15e-3e669345f145&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Michael L. Walker, &quot;Indefinite: Doing Time in Jail&quot; (Oxford UP, 2022)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:35:24</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Jails are the principal people-processing machines of the criminal justice system. Mostly they hold persons awaiting trial who cannot afford or have been denied bail. Although jail sentences max out at a year, some spend years awaiting trial in jail-especially in counties where courts are jammed with cases. City and county jails, detention centers, police lockups, and other temporary holding facilities are regularly overcrowded, poorly funded, and the buildings are often in disrepair. American jails admit over ten million people every year, but very little is known about what happens to them while they&apos;re locked away.
Indefinite: Doing Time in Jail (Oxford UP, 2022) is an ethnographic study of a California county jail that reflects on what it means to do jail time and what it does to men. Michael L. Walker spent several extended spells in jail, having been arrested while trying to pay parking tickets in graduate school. This book is an intimate account of his experience and in it he shares the routines, rhythms, and subtle meanings that come with being incarcerated. Walker shows how punishment in jail is much more than the deprivation of liberties. It is, he argues, purposefully degrading. Jail creates a racial politics that organizes daily life, moves men from clock time to event time, normalizes trauma, and imbues residents with substantial measures of vulnerability. Deputies used self-centered management styles to address the problems associated with running a jail, some that magnified individual conflicts to potential group conflicts and others that created divisions between residents for the sake of control. And though not every deputy indulged, many gave themselves over to the pleasures of punishment.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Jails are the principal people-processing machines of the criminal justice system. Mostly they hold persons awaiting trial who cannot afford or have been denied bail. Although jail sentences max out at a year, some spend years awaiting trial in jail-especially in counties where courts are jammed with cases. City and county jails, detention centers, police lockups, and other temporary holding facilities are regularly overcrowded, poorly funded, and the buildings are often in disrepair. American jails admit over ten million people every year, but very little is known about what happens to them while they&apos;re locked away.
Indefinite: Doing Time in Jail (Oxford UP, 2022) is an ethnographic study of a California county jail that reflects on what it means to do jail time and what it does to men. Michael L. Walker spent several extended spells in jail, having been arrested while trying to pay parking tickets in graduate school. This book is an intimate account of his experience and in it he shares the routines, rhythms, and subtle meanings that come with being incarcerated. Walker shows how punishment in jail is much more than the deprivation of liberties. It is, he argues, purposefully degrading. Jail creates a racial politics that organizes daily life, moves men from clock time to event time, normalizes trauma, and imbues residents with substantial measures of vulnerability. Deputies used self-centered management styles to address the problems associated with running a jail, some that magnified individual conflicts to potential group conflicts and others that created divisions between residents for the sake of control. And though not every deputy indulged, many gave themselves over to the pleasures of punishment.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">b1a24a5c-71fc-11ef-b967-038c9f5f1846</guid>
      <title>Jennifer Redmond and Mary McAuliffe, &quot;The Politics of Gender and Sexuality in Modern Ireland: A Reader&quot; (Four Courts Press, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Mary McAuliffe is a historian and lecturer in Gender Studies at UCD. Her latest publications include (is&nbsp;<em>The Diaries of Kathleen Lynn</em>&nbsp;co-authored with Harriet Wheelock) and&nbsp;<em>Margaret Skinnider; a biography</em>&nbsp;(UCD Press,2020). Throughout the Decade of Centenaries 2012-2023 she has been conducting extensive research on the experiences of women during the War of Independence and Civil War and is currently completing her book based on that research,&nbsp;<em>OUTRAGE: Gendered and Sexual Violence in the Irish War of Independence and Civil War, 1919-1923</em>&nbsp;(forthcoming 2025). Jennifer Redmond is Associate Professor in Twentieth Century Irish History in the Department of History at Maynooth University. She is the author of&nbsp;<em>Moving Histories: Irish Women’s Emigration to Britain from Independence to Republic&nbsp;</em>and the co-editor of&nbsp;<em>Irish Women in the First World War Era.&nbsp;</em>She also sits on the Editorial Board for the journal,&nbsp;<em>Women's History Review</em>&nbsp;and for the Documents in Irish Foreign Policy series, a joint initiative of the National Archives of Ireland and the Royal Irish Academy.</p><p>In this interview, they discuss their new edited collection<em>&nbsp;</em><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781801511391" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Politics of Gender and Sexuality in Modern Ireland</em>&nbsp;</a>(Four Courts Press, 2024)&nbsp;as well as their own intellectual backgrounds and views on Irish history-writing.</p><p><em>The Politics of Gender and Sexuality in Modern Ireland</em>&nbsp;is an edited collection of focused, cohesive and persuasive essays, based on the newest research on gender, sexuality and sexual politics. It offers historical reflections and contemporary analyses of issues related to the contested and often hidden histories of sexual politics and gender identities in Ireland in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. Including but going beyond the binary of male and female heterosexual experience, the book explores LGBTQI+ histories, the treatment of intersex persons, and the history of trans people and activism in Ireland. As an interdisciplinary work, this reader draws together scholars working in a range of fields on innovative, new research on this theme. The essays consider these histories as seen over two centuries and reflect on the societal shifts in modern Ireland as evidenced in two recent referenda and the responses to the scandals emerging from the state’s treatment of unmarried mothers.</p><p><em>Aidan Beatty is a lecturer in history at Carnegie Mellon University</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 14 Sep 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/jennifer-redmond-and-mary-mcauliffe-the-politics-of-gender-and-sexuality-in-modern-ireland-a-reader-four-courts-press-2024-M9rvlhvv</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mary McAuliffe is a historian and lecturer in Gender Studies at UCD. Her latest publications include (is&nbsp;<em>The Diaries of Kathleen Lynn</em>&nbsp;co-authored with Harriet Wheelock) and&nbsp;<em>Margaret Skinnider; a biography</em>&nbsp;(UCD Press,2020). Throughout the Decade of Centenaries 2012-2023 she has been conducting extensive research on the experiences of women during the War of Independence and Civil War and is currently completing her book based on that research,&nbsp;<em>OUTRAGE: Gendered and Sexual Violence in the Irish War of Independence and Civil War, 1919-1923</em>&nbsp;(forthcoming 2025). Jennifer Redmond is Associate Professor in Twentieth Century Irish History in the Department of History at Maynooth University. She is the author of&nbsp;<em>Moving Histories: Irish Women’s Emigration to Britain from Independence to Republic&nbsp;</em>and the co-editor of&nbsp;<em>Irish Women in the First World War Era.&nbsp;</em>She also sits on the Editorial Board for the journal,&nbsp;<em>Women's History Review</em>&nbsp;and for the Documents in Irish Foreign Policy series, a joint initiative of the National Archives of Ireland and the Royal Irish Academy.</p><p>In this interview, they discuss their new edited collection<em>&nbsp;</em><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781801511391" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Politics of Gender and Sexuality in Modern Ireland</em>&nbsp;</a>(Four Courts Press, 2024)&nbsp;as well as their own intellectual backgrounds and views on Irish history-writing.</p><p><em>The Politics of Gender and Sexuality in Modern Ireland</em>&nbsp;is an edited collection of focused, cohesive and persuasive essays, based on the newest research on gender, sexuality and sexual politics. It offers historical reflections and contemporary analyses of issues related to the contested and often hidden histories of sexual politics and gender identities in Ireland in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. Including but going beyond the binary of male and female heterosexual experience, the book explores LGBTQI+ histories, the treatment of intersex persons, and the history of trans people and activism in Ireland. As an interdisciplinary work, this reader draws together scholars working in a range of fields on innovative, new research on this theme. The essays consider these histories as seen over two centuries and reflect on the societal shifts in modern Ireland as evidenced in two recent referenda and the responses to the scandals emerging from the state’s treatment of unmarried mothers.</p><p><em>Aidan Beatty is a lecturer in history at Carnegie Mellon University</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="54832865" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/b2d19e82-a813-4d3c-9513-c568baaf5b0a/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=b2d19e82-a813-4d3c-9513-c568baaf5b0a&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Jennifer Redmond and Mary McAuliffe, &quot;The Politics of Gender and Sexuality in Modern Ireland: A Reader&quot; (Four Courts Press, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:57:06</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Mary McAuliffe is a historian and lecturer in Gender Studies at UCD. Her latest publications include (is The Diaries of Kathleen Lynn co-authored with Harriet Wheelock) and Margaret Skinnider; a biography (UCD Press,2020). Throughout the Decade of Centenaries 2012-2023 she has been conducting extensive research on the experiences of women during the War of Independence and Civil War and is currently completing her book based on that research, OUTRAGE: Gendered and Sexual Violence in the Irish War of Independence and Civil War, 1919-1923 (forthcoming 2025). Jennifer Redmond is Associate Professor in Twentieth Century Irish History in the Department of History at Maynooth University. She is the author of Moving Histories: Irish Women’s Emigration to Britain from Independence to Republic and the co-editor of Irish Women in the First World War Era. She also sits on the Editorial Board for the journal, Women&apos;s History Review and for the Documents in Irish Foreign Policy series, a joint initiative of the National Archives of Ireland and the Royal Irish Academy.
In this interview, they discuss their new edited collection The Politics of Gender and Sexuality in Modern Ireland (Four Courts Press, 2024) as well as their own intellectual backgrounds and views on Irish history-writing.
The Politics of Gender and Sexuality in Modern Ireland is an edited collection of focused, cohesive and persuasive essays, based on the newest research on gender, sexuality and sexual politics. It offers historical reflections and contemporary analyses of issues related to the contested and often hidden histories of sexual politics and gender identities in Ireland in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. Including but going beyond the binary of male and female heterosexual experience, the book explores LGBTQI+ histories, the treatment of intersex persons, and the history of trans people and activism in Ireland. As an interdisciplinary work, this reader draws together scholars working in a range of fields on innovative, new research on this theme. The essays consider these histories as seen over two centuries and reflect on the societal shifts in modern Ireland as evidenced in two recent referenda and the responses to the scandals emerging from the state’s treatment of unmarried mothers.
Aidan Beatty is a lecturer in history at Carnegie Mellon University
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Mary McAuliffe is a historian and lecturer in Gender Studies at UCD. Her latest publications include (is The Diaries of Kathleen Lynn co-authored with Harriet Wheelock) and Margaret Skinnider; a biography (UCD Press,2020). Throughout the Decade of Centenaries 2012-2023 she has been conducting extensive research on the experiences of women during the War of Independence and Civil War and is currently completing her book based on that research, OUTRAGE: Gendered and Sexual Violence in the Irish War of Independence and Civil War, 1919-1923 (forthcoming 2025). Jennifer Redmond is Associate Professor in Twentieth Century Irish History in the Department of History at Maynooth University. She is the author of Moving Histories: Irish Women’s Emigration to Britain from Independence to Republic and the co-editor of Irish Women in the First World War Era. She also sits on the Editorial Board for the journal, Women&apos;s History Review and for the Documents in Irish Foreign Policy series, a joint initiative of the National Archives of Ireland and the Royal Irish Academy.
In this interview, they discuss their new edited collection The Politics of Gender and Sexuality in Modern Ireland (Four Courts Press, 2024) as well as their own intellectual backgrounds and views on Irish history-writing.
The Politics of Gender and Sexuality in Modern Ireland is an edited collection of focused, cohesive and persuasive essays, based on the newest research on gender, sexuality and sexual politics. It offers historical reflections and contemporary analyses of issues related to the contested and often hidden histories of sexual politics and gender identities in Ireland in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. Including but going beyond the binary of male and female heterosexual experience, the book explores LGBTQI+ histories, the treatment of intersex persons, and the history of trans people and activism in Ireland. As an interdisciplinary work, this reader draws together scholars working in a range of fields on innovative, new research on this theme. The essays consider these histories as seen over two centuries and reflect on the societal shifts in modern Ireland as evidenced in two recent referenda and the responses to the scandals emerging from the state’s treatment of unmarried mothers.
Aidan Beatty is a lecturer in history at Carnegie Mellon University
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>68</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e4c1ec00-6fa2-11ef-9a7b-bf1238b7a056</guid>
      <title>Celebrating Constitution Day Pt. 1: A Conversation with Cass R. Sunstein</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Join us for an in-depth exploration of Professor Cass Sunstein's latest work,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780674298781" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Campus Free Speech</em></a>&nbsp;(Harvard University Press, September 2024).&nbsp;</p><p>Together, we'll examine the book’s intriguing take on free speech in academic spaces and the broader implications for constitutional interpretation. Professor Sunstein also delves into the exercise of administrative power, with timely discussions on COVID-era authority and the Supreme Court's decision in&nbsp;<em>Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council</em>. Gain unique insights from Sunstein on how the Constitution remains a guiding force for the American public in navigating modern challenges.</p><p>Cass R. Sunstein is the Robert Walmsley University Professor at Harvard. He is the founder and director of the Program on Behavioral Economics and Public Policy at Harvard Law School. In 2018, he received the Holberg Prize from the government of Norway, sometimes described as the equivalent of the Nobel Prize for law and the humanities. In 2020, the World Health Organization appointed him as Chair of its technical advisory group on Behavioural Insights and Sciences for Health. From 2009 to 2012, he was Administrator of the White House Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, and after that, he served on the President’s Review Board on Intelligence and Communications Technologies and on the Pentagon’s Defense Innovation Board. Mr. Sunstein has testified before congressional committees on many subjects, and he has advised officials at the United Nations, the European Commission, the World Bank, and many nations on issues of law and public policy. He serves as an adviser to the Behavioural Insights Team in the United Kingdom.</p><p>Professor Sunstein is author of hundreds of articles and dozens of books, including&nbsp;<em>Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness</em>&nbsp;(with Richard H. Thaler, 2008),&nbsp;<em>Simpler: The Future of Government</em>&nbsp;(2013),&nbsp;<em>The Ethics of Influence</em>&nbsp;(2015),&nbsp;<em>#Republic</em>&nbsp;(2017),&nbsp;<em>Impeachment: A Citizen’s Guide</em>&nbsp;(2017),&nbsp;<em>The Cost-Benefit Revolution</em>&nbsp;(2018),&nbsp;<em>On Freedom</em>&nbsp;(2019),&nbsp;<em>Conformity</em>&nbsp;(2019),&nbsp;<em>How Change Happens</em>&nbsp;(2019), and&nbsp;<em>Too Much Information</em>&nbsp;(2020). He is now working on a variety of projects involving the regulatory state, “sludge” (defined to include paperwork and similar burdens), fake news, and freedom of speech.</p><p><a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/podcast" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Madison’s Notes</em></a>&nbsp;is the podcast of Princeton&nbsp;<a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions</em></a></p><p><em>Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/celebrating-constitution-day-pt-1-a-conversation-with-cass-r-sunstein-Duda4MS9</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Join us for an in-depth exploration of Professor Cass Sunstein's latest work,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780674298781" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Campus Free Speech</em></a>&nbsp;(Harvard University Press, September 2024).&nbsp;</p><p>Together, we'll examine the book’s intriguing take on free speech in academic spaces and the broader implications for constitutional interpretation. Professor Sunstein also delves into the exercise of administrative power, with timely discussions on COVID-era authority and the Supreme Court's decision in&nbsp;<em>Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council</em>. Gain unique insights from Sunstein on how the Constitution remains a guiding force for the American public in navigating modern challenges.</p><p>Cass R. Sunstein is the Robert Walmsley University Professor at Harvard. He is the founder and director of the Program on Behavioral Economics and Public Policy at Harvard Law School. In 2018, he received the Holberg Prize from the government of Norway, sometimes described as the equivalent of the Nobel Prize for law and the humanities. In 2020, the World Health Organization appointed him as Chair of its technical advisory group on Behavioural Insights and Sciences for Health. From 2009 to 2012, he was Administrator of the White House Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, and after that, he served on the President’s Review Board on Intelligence and Communications Technologies and on the Pentagon’s Defense Innovation Board. Mr. Sunstein has testified before congressional committees on many subjects, and he has advised officials at the United Nations, the European Commission, the World Bank, and many nations on issues of law and public policy. He serves as an adviser to the Behavioural Insights Team in the United Kingdom.</p><p>Professor Sunstein is author of hundreds of articles and dozens of books, including&nbsp;<em>Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness</em>&nbsp;(with Richard H. Thaler, 2008),&nbsp;<em>Simpler: The Future of Government</em>&nbsp;(2013),&nbsp;<em>The Ethics of Influence</em>&nbsp;(2015),&nbsp;<em>#Republic</em>&nbsp;(2017),&nbsp;<em>Impeachment: A Citizen’s Guide</em>&nbsp;(2017),&nbsp;<em>The Cost-Benefit Revolution</em>&nbsp;(2018),&nbsp;<em>On Freedom</em>&nbsp;(2019),&nbsp;<em>Conformity</em>&nbsp;(2019),&nbsp;<em>How Change Happens</em>&nbsp;(2019), and&nbsp;<em>Too Much Information</em>&nbsp;(2020). He is now working on a variety of projects involving the regulatory state, “sludge” (defined to include paperwork and similar burdens), fake news, and freedom of speech.</p><p><a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/podcast" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Madison’s Notes</em></a>&nbsp;is the podcast of Princeton&nbsp;<a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions</em></a></p><p><em>Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="47583963" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/5d521341-538b-4364-99ab-c4153f1d92c9/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=5d521341-538b-4364-99ab-c4153f1d92c9&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Celebrating Constitution Day Pt. 1: A Conversation with Cass R. Sunstein</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:49:33</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Join us for an in-depth exploration of Professor Cass Sunstein&apos;s latest work, Campus Free Speech (Harvard University Press, September 2024). 
Together, we&apos;ll examine the book’s intriguing take on free speech in academic spaces and the broader implications for constitutional interpretation. Professor Sunstein also delves into the exercise of administrative power, with timely discussions on COVID-era authority and the Supreme Court&apos;s decision in Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council. Gain unique insights from Sunstein on how the Constitution remains a guiding force for the American public in navigating modern challenges.
Cass R. Sunstein is the Robert Walmsley University Professor at Harvard. He is the founder and director of the Program on Behavioral Economics and Public Policy at Harvard Law School. In 2018, he received the Holberg Prize from the government of Norway, sometimes described as the equivalent of the Nobel Prize for law and the humanities. In 2020, the World Health Organization appointed him as Chair of its technical advisory group on Behavioural Insights and Sciences for Health. From 2009 to 2012, he was Administrator of the White House Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, and after that, he served on the President’s Review Board on Intelligence and Communications Technologies and on the Pentagon’s Defense Innovation Board. Mr. Sunstein has testified before congressional committees on many subjects, and he has advised officials at the United Nations, the European Commission, the World Bank, and many nations on issues of law and public policy. He serves as an adviser to the Behavioural Insights Team in the United Kingdom.
Professor Sunstein is author of hundreds of articles and dozens of books, including Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness (with Richard H. Thaler, 2008), Simpler: The Future of Government (2013), The Ethics of Influence (2015), #Republic (2017), Impeachment: A Citizen’s Guide (2017), The Cost-Benefit Revolution (2018), On Freedom (2019), Conformity (2019), How Change Happens (2019), and Too Much Information (2020). He is now working on a variety of projects involving the regulatory state, “sludge” (defined to include paperwork and similar burdens), fake news, and freedom of speech.
Madison’s Notes is the podcast of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions
Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Join us for an in-depth exploration of Professor Cass Sunstein&apos;s latest work, Campus Free Speech (Harvard University Press, September 2024). 
Together, we&apos;ll examine the book’s intriguing take on free speech in academic spaces and the broader implications for constitutional interpretation. Professor Sunstein also delves into the exercise of administrative power, with timely discussions on COVID-era authority and the Supreme Court&apos;s decision in Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council. Gain unique insights from Sunstein on how the Constitution remains a guiding force for the American public in navigating modern challenges.
Cass R. Sunstein is the Robert Walmsley University Professor at Harvard. He is the founder and director of the Program on Behavioral Economics and Public Policy at Harvard Law School. In 2018, he received the Holberg Prize from the government of Norway, sometimes described as the equivalent of the Nobel Prize for law and the humanities. In 2020, the World Health Organization appointed him as Chair of its technical advisory group on Behavioural Insights and Sciences for Health. From 2009 to 2012, he was Administrator of the White House Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, and after that, he served on the President’s Review Board on Intelligence and Communications Technologies and on the Pentagon’s Defense Innovation Board. Mr. Sunstein has testified before congressional committees on many subjects, and he has advised officials at the United Nations, the European Commission, the World Bank, and many nations on issues of law and public policy. He serves as an adviser to the Behavioural Insights Team in the United Kingdom.
Professor Sunstein is author of hundreds of articles and dozens of books, including Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness (with Richard H. Thaler, 2008), Simpler: The Future of Government (2013), The Ethics of Influence (2015), #Republic (2017), Impeachment: A Citizen’s Guide (2017), The Cost-Benefit Revolution (2018), On Freedom (2019), Conformity (2019), How Change Happens (2019), and Too Much Information (2020). He is now working on a variety of projects involving the regulatory state, “sludge” (defined to include paperwork and similar burdens), fake news, and freedom of speech.
Madison’s Notes is the podcast of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions
Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any speaker does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>119</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">df5d0932-6d15-11ef-a3c9-c31de0b06bc3</guid>
      <title>Anthony Michael Kreis, &quot;Rot and Revival: The History of Constitutional Law in American Political Development&quot; (U California Press, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>One of the great divides in American judicial scholarship is between legal scholars who take the justices at their word and assume that those words define the law and political scientists who dismiss all judicial arguments as smokescreens for partisan bias or wider political forces. Today’s guest has written a book that bridges that divide.&nbsp;</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780520394193" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Rot and Revival: The History of Constitutional Law in American Political Development</em></a>&nbsp;(U California Press, 2024), Dr. Anthony Michael Kreis uses methods from history, law, and political science to theorize and document how politics make American constitutional law and how the courts affect the path of partisan politics. Understanding American constitutional law means looking at the relationship among dominant political coalitions, social movements, and the evolution of constitutional law as prescribed by judges. For Kreis, constitutional doctrine does not exist in a philosophical vacuum – it is a “distillation of partisan politics.”</p><p>Rejecting the idea that the Constitution's significance and interpretation can be divorced from contemporary political realities, Kreis uses tools from law, history, and American political development to explain how American constitutional law reflects the ideological commitments of dominant political coalitions, the consequences of major public policy choices, and the influences of intervening social movements. For Kreis, constitutional law is “best understood through the diachronic lens of American Political Development (APD) and the concept of political time. Kreis concludes that the courts have never been—and cannot be—institutions lying outside the currents of national politics.</p><p>Dr.&nbsp;<a href="https://law.gsu.edu/profile/anthony-kreis/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Anthony Michael Kreis</a>&nbsp;is assistant professor at Georgia State University College of Law where he teaches constitutional law and works at the intersection of law and American Political Development. He earned his undergraduate and law degrees at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and Washington &amp; Lee University, respectively, and his PhD from the School of Public and International Affairs at the University of Georgia.</p><p>Mentioned:</p><ul>
<li>President Lyndon B. Johnson’s&nbsp;<a href="https://millercenter.org/the-presidency/presidential-speeches/march-15-1965-speech-congress-voting-rights" rel="noopener noreferrer">March 15, 1965 speech</a>&nbsp;before Congress on voting rights</li>
<li>Keith E. Whittington’s&nbsp;<a href="https://kewhitt.scholar.princeton.edu/political-foundations-judicial-supremacy" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Political Foundations of Judicial Supremacy</em>&nbsp;and other works</a>
</li>
<li>Gerald Rosenberg’s&nbsp;<a href="https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/H/bo193463251.html" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring About Social Change?</em></a>
</li>
</ul><p><em>﻿</em></p><p>Correction: Justices Sotomayor and Kagan were nominated by President Obama and Justice Jackson was nominated by President Biden.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 9 Sep 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/anthony-michael-kreis-rot-and-revival-the-history-of-constitutional-law-in-american-political-development-u-california-press-2024-YgDlZrs9</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the great divides in American judicial scholarship is between legal scholars who take the justices at their word and assume that those words define the law and political scientists who dismiss all judicial arguments as smokescreens for partisan bias or wider political forces. Today’s guest has written a book that bridges that divide.&nbsp;</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780520394193" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Rot and Revival: The History of Constitutional Law in American Political Development</em></a>&nbsp;(U California Press, 2024), Dr. Anthony Michael Kreis uses methods from history, law, and political science to theorize and document how politics make American constitutional law and how the courts affect the path of partisan politics. Understanding American constitutional law means looking at the relationship among dominant political coalitions, social movements, and the evolution of constitutional law as prescribed by judges. For Kreis, constitutional doctrine does not exist in a philosophical vacuum – it is a “distillation of partisan politics.”</p><p>Rejecting the idea that the Constitution's significance and interpretation can be divorced from contemporary political realities, Kreis uses tools from law, history, and American political development to explain how American constitutional law reflects the ideological commitments of dominant political coalitions, the consequences of major public policy choices, and the influences of intervening social movements. For Kreis, constitutional law is “best understood through the diachronic lens of American Political Development (APD) and the concept of political time. Kreis concludes that the courts have never been—and cannot be—institutions lying outside the currents of national politics.</p><p>Dr.&nbsp;<a href="https://law.gsu.edu/profile/anthony-kreis/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Anthony Michael Kreis</a>&nbsp;is assistant professor at Georgia State University College of Law where he teaches constitutional law and works at the intersection of law and American Political Development. He earned his undergraduate and law degrees at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and Washington &amp; Lee University, respectively, and his PhD from the School of Public and International Affairs at the University of Georgia.</p><p>Mentioned:</p><ul>
<li>President Lyndon B. Johnson’s&nbsp;<a href="https://millercenter.org/the-presidency/presidential-speeches/march-15-1965-speech-congress-voting-rights" rel="noopener noreferrer">March 15, 1965 speech</a>&nbsp;before Congress on voting rights</li>
<li>Keith E. Whittington’s&nbsp;<a href="https://kewhitt.scholar.princeton.edu/political-foundations-judicial-supremacy" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Political Foundations of Judicial Supremacy</em>&nbsp;and other works</a>
</li>
<li>Gerald Rosenberg’s&nbsp;<a href="https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/H/bo193463251.html" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring About Social Change?</em></a>
</li>
</ul><p><em>﻿</em></p><p>Correction: Justices Sotomayor and Kagan were nominated by President Obama and Justice Jackson was nominated by President Biden.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="56938232" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/17527dc4-ab2a-4a9e-9ec4-96ff30c484cc/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=17527dc4-ab2a-4a9e-9ec4-96ff30c484cc&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Anthony Michael Kreis, &quot;Rot and Revival: The History of Constitutional Law in American Political Development&quot; (U California Press, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:59:18</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>One of the great divides in American judicial scholarship is between legal scholars who take the justices at their word and assume that those words define the law and political scientists who dismiss all judicial arguments as smokescreens for partisan bias or wider political forces. Today’s guest has written a book that bridges that divide. 
In Rot and Revival: The History of Constitutional Law in American Political Development (U California Press, 2024), Dr. Anthony Michael Kreis uses methods from history, law, and political science to theorize and document how politics make American constitutional law and how the courts affect the path of partisan politics. Understanding American constitutional law means looking at the relationship among dominant political coalitions, social movements, and the evolution of constitutional law as prescribed by judges. For Kreis, constitutional doctrine does not exist in a philosophical vacuum – it is a “distillation of partisan politics.”
Rejecting the idea that the Constitution&apos;s significance and interpretation can be divorced from contemporary political realities, Kreis uses tools from law, history, and American political development to explain how American constitutional law reflects the ideological commitments of dominant political coalitions, the consequences of major public policy choices, and the influences of intervening social movements. For Kreis, constitutional law is “best understood through the diachronic lens of American Political Development (APD) and the concept of political time. Kreis concludes that the courts have never been—and cannot be—institutions lying outside the currents of national politics.
Dr. Anthony Michael Kreis is assistant professor at Georgia State University College of Law where he teaches constitutional law and works at the intersection of law and American Political Development. He earned his undergraduate and law degrees at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and Washington &amp; Lee University, respectively, and his PhD from the School of Public and International Affairs at the University of Georgia.
Mentioned:
President Lyndon B. Johnson’s March 15, 1965 speech before Congress on voting rights
Keith E. Whittington’s Political Foundations of Judicial Supremacy and other works
Gerald Rosenberg’s The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring About Social Change?
﻿
Correction: Justices Sotomayor and Kagan were nominated by President Obama and Justice Jackson was nominated by President Biden.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>One of the great divides in American judicial scholarship is between legal scholars who take the justices at their word and assume that those words define the law and political scientists who dismiss all judicial arguments as smokescreens for partisan bias or wider political forces. Today’s guest has written a book that bridges that divide. 
In Rot and Revival: The History of Constitutional Law in American Political Development (U California Press, 2024), Dr. Anthony Michael Kreis uses methods from history, law, and political science to theorize and document how politics make American constitutional law and how the courts affect the path of partisan politics. Understanding American constitutional law means looking at the relationship among dominant political coalitions, social movements, and the evolution of constitutional law as prescribed by judges. For Kreis, constitutional doctrine does not exist in a philosophical vacuum – it is a “distillation of partisan politics.”
Rejecting the idea that the Constitution&apos;s significance and interpretation can be divorced from contemporary political realities, Kreis uses tools from law, history, and American political development to explain how American constitutional law reflects the ideological commitments of dominant political coalitions, the consequences of major public policy choices, and the influences of intervening social movements. For Kreis, constitutional law is “best understood through the diachronic lens of American Political Development (APD) and the concept of political time. Kreis concludes that the courts have never been—and cannot be—institutions lying outside the currents of national politics.
Dr. Anthony Michael Kreis is assistant professor at Georgia State University College of Law where he teaches constitutional law and works at the intersection of law and American Political Development. He earned his undergraduate and law degrees at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and Washington &amp; Lee University, respectively, and his PhD from the School of Public and International Affairs at the University of Georgia.
Mentioned:
President Lyndon B. Johnson’s March 15, 1965 speech before Congress on voting rights
Keith E. Whittington’s Political Foundations of Judicial Supremacy and other works
Gerald Rosenberg’s The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring About Social Change?
﻿
Correction: Justices Sotomayor and Kagan were nominated by President Obama and Justice Jackson was nominated by President Biden.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>736</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1e8ac2bc-6afe-11ef-81b0-bb7e06b4e30a</guid>
      <title>Judge Frederic Block, &quot;A Second Chance: A Federal Judge Decides Who Deserves It&quot; (The New Press, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The police officer who brutalized Abner Louima. A purveyor of child pornography. These are some of the defendants to have come before U.S. District Court Judge Frederic Block to ask for reductions in their prison sentences. All of them have been found guilty and have already served decades in prison, but under the 2018 First Step Act they are entitled to petition for reconsideration and release. In a rare glimpse behind the bench, Judge Block recounts the cases of six incarcerated people who have done heinous things but have nevertheless petitioned him for their release. He then explains the criteria the First Step Act has spelled out for his consideration. And, in a novel twist, he asks the reader, “What would you do?”&nbsp;</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781620978870" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>A Second Chance: A Federal Judge Decides Who Deserves It&nbsp;</em></a>(The New Press, 2024),&nbsp;Judge Block puts us out of our suspense in a third section of the book where he tells us what he did do in each case and why, as he weighs each compassionate release request, evaluating issues ranging from “the trial tax,” to sentencing disparities, to judicial incompetence. Finally, Judge Block makes the case that the First Step Act should be extended to state court judges, since state prisons house about 90 percent of those incarcerated. In a book that could be the basis for a new season of Law &amp; Order, Judge Block challenges our ideas about punishment and justice.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 5 Sep 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/judge-frederic-block-a-second-chance-a-federal-judge-decides-who-deserves-it-the-new-press-2024-7TXFKopx</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The police officer who brutalized Abner Louima. A purveyor of child pornography. These are some of the defendants to have come before U.S. District Court Judge Frederic Block to ask for reductions in their prison sentences. All of them have been found guilty and have already served decades in prison, but under the 2018 First Step Act they are entitled to petition for reconsideration and release. In a rare glimpse behind the bench, Judge Block recounts the cases of six incarcerated people who have done heinous things but have nevertheless petitioned him for their release. He then explains the criteria the First Step Act has spelled out for his consideration. And, in a novel twist, he asks the reader, “What would you do?”&nbsp;</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781620978870" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>A Second Chance: A Federal Judge Decides Who Deserves It&nbsp;</em></a>(The New Press, 2024),&nbsp;Judge Block puts us out of our suspense in a third section of the book where he tells us what he did do in each case and why, as he weighs each compassionate release request, evaluating issues ranging from “the trial tax,” to sentencing disparities, to judicial incompetence. Finally, Judge Block makes the case that the First Step Act should be extended to state court judges, since state prisons house about 90 percent of those incarcerated. In a book that could be the basis for a new season of Law &amp; Order, Judge Block challenges our ideas about punishment and justice.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="25899797" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/ee7cb77f-c034-46a0-9595-7e442aa448ae/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=ee7cb77f-c034-46a0-9595-7e442aa448ae&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Judge Frederic Block, &quot;A Second Chance: A Federal Judge Decides Who Deserves It&quot; (The New Press, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:26:58</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The police officer who brutalized Abner Louima. A purveyor of child pornography. These are some of the defendants to have come before U.S. District Court Judge Frederic Block to ask for reductions in their prison sentences. All of them have been found guilty and have already served decades in prison, but under the 2018 First Step Act they are entitled to petition for reconsideration and release. In a rare glimpse behind the bench, Judge Block recounts the cases of six incarcerated people who have done heinous things but have nevertheless petitioned him for their release. He then explains the criteria the First Step Act has spelled out for his consideration. And, in a novel twist, he asks the reader, “What would you do?” 
In A Second Chance: A Federal Judge Decides Who Deserves It (The New Press, 2024), Judge Block puts us out of our suspense in a third section of the book where he tells us what he did do in each case and why, as he weighs each compassionate release request, evaluating issues ranging from “the trial tax,” to sentencing disparities, to judicial incompetence. Finally, Judge Block makes the case that the First Step Act should be extended to state court judges, since state prisons house about 90 percent of those incarcerated. In a book that could be the basis for a new season of Law &amp; Order, Judge Block challenges our ideas about punishment and justice.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The police officer who brutalized Abner Louima. A purveyor of child pornography. These are some of the defendants to have come before U.S. District Court Judge Frederic Block to ask for reductions in their prison sentences. All of them have been found guilty and have already served decades in prison, but under the 2018 First Step Act they are entitled to petition for reconsideration and release. In a rare glimpse behind the bench, Judge Block recounts the cases of six incarcerated people who have done heinous things but have nevertheless petitioned him for their release. He then explains the criteria the First Step Act has spelled out for his consideration. And, in a novel twist, he asks the reader, “What would you do?” 
In A Second Chance: A Federal Judge Decides Who Deserves It (The New Press, 2024), Judge Block puts us out of our suspense in a third section of the book where he tells us what he did do in each case and why, as he weighs each compassionate release request, evaluating issues ranging from “the trial tax,” to sentencing disparities, to judicial incompetence. Finally, Judge Block makes the case that the First Step Act should be extended to state court judges, since state prisons house about 90 percent of those incarcerated. In a book that could be the basis for a new season of Law &amp; Order, Judge Block challenges our ideas about punishment and justice.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>188</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">97194e22-3614-4864-a8a0-180ee4fae59a</guid>
      <title>Dr. Alexandre Caeiro on the Politics of Islamic Law and Institutions in Qatar</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>An interview with Dr. Alexandre Caeiro in which we discuss Islamic law and institutions in Qatar, secularisation and the Ottomans.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 4 Sep 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/dr-alexandre-caeiro-on-the-politics-of-islamic-law-and-institutions-in-qatar-_EJZHYod</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An interview with Dr. Alexandre Caeiro in which we discuss Islamic law and institutions in Qatar, secularisation and the Ottomans.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="17954683" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/299466cf-6a98-4b7a-847f-cd2916a3b60e/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=299466cf-6a98-4b7a-847f-cd2916a3b60e&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Dr. Alexandre Caeiro on the Politics of Islamic Law and Institutions in Qatar</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/2cf6a02f-0d83-47c7-a772-7eb4e1c50adb/2bf6dded-6064-4dc4-b00c-ca01b8a944d3/3000x3000/472441f8cf2c8b82f4e06bef450af5d9.jpg?aid=rss_feed"/>
      <itunes:duration>00:18:42</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>An interview with Dr. Alexandre Caeiro in which we discuss Islamic law and institutions in Qatar, secularisation and the Ottomans.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>An interview with Dr. Alexandre Caeiro in which we discuss Islamic law and institutions in Qatar, secularisation and the Ottomans.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>14</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">0104d730-6a33-11ef-ab63-53eb01f97122</guid>
      <title>Cary Nelson, &quot;Hate Speech and Academic Freedom: The Antisemitic Assault on Basic Principles&quot; (Academic Studies Press, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Completed shortly before Hamas carried out its barbaric October massacre,&nbsp;Cary Nelson's&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9798887194202" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Hate Speech and Academic Freedom: The Antisemitic Assault on Basic Principles</em></a>&nbsp;(Academic Studies Press, 2024)&nbsp;takes up issues that have consequently gained new urgency in the academy worldwide.</p><p>It is the first book to ask what impact antisemitism has had on the fundamental principles the academy relies on for its identity—academic freedom, free speech rights, standards for hiring or firing faculty members and administrators, and the ethics of academic conduct and debate.</p><p>Antisemitic hatred is spreading at a fever pitch. What steps can counter it? What damage to students is done when departments embrace anti-Zionism? Should faculty members face consequences for promoting antisemitism on social media? Should universities make a new push to adopt the IHRA Definition of Antisemitism?</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 4 Sep 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/cary-nelson-hate-speech-and-academic-freedom-the-antisemitic-assault-on-basic-principles-academic-studies-press-2024-ZzSI2NXn</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Completed shortly before Hamas carried out its barbaric October massacre,&nbsp;Cary Nelson's&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9798887194202" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Hate Speech and Academic Freedom: The Antisemitic Assault on Basic Principles</em></a>&nbsp;(Academic Studies Press, 2024)&nbsp;takes up issues that have consequently gained new urgency in the academy worldwide.</p><p>It is the first book to ask what impact antisemitism has had on the fundamental principles the academy relies on for its identity—academic freedom, free speech rights, standards for hiring or firing faculty members and administrators, and the ethics of academic conduct and debate.</p><p>Antisemitic hatred is spreading at a fever pitch. What steps can counter it? What damage to students is done when departments embrace anti-Zionism? Should faculty members face consequences for promoting antisemitism on social media? Should universities make a new push to adopt the IHRA Definition of Antisemitism?</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="33563003" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/b9c01ca1-7d4d-499e-b6ab-9c8da33a25be/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=b9c01ca1-7d4d-499e-b6ab-9c8da33a25be&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Cary Nelson, &quot;Hate Speech and Academic Freedom: The Antisemitic Assault on Basic Principles&quot; (Academic Studies Press, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:34:57</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Completed shortly before Hamas carried out its barbaric October massacre, Cary Nelson&apos;s Hate Speech and Academic Freedom: The Antisemitic Assault on Basic Principles (Academic Studies Press, 2024) takes up issues that have consequently gained new urgency in the academy worldwide.
It is the first book to ask what impact antisemitism has had on the fundamental principles the academy relies on for its identity—academic freedom, free speech rights, standards for hiring or firing faculty members and administrators, and the ethics of academic conduct and debate.
Antisemitic hatred is spreading at a fever pitch. What steps can counter it? What damage to students is done when departments embrace anti-Zionism? Should faculty members face consequences for promoting antisemitism on social media? Should universities make a new push to adopt the IHRA Definition of Antisemitism?
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Completed shortly before Hamas carried out its barbaric October massacre, Cary Nelson&apos;s Hate Speech and Academic Freedom: The Antisemitic Assault on Basic Principles (Academic Studies Press, 2024) takes up issues that have consequently gained new urgency in the academy worldwide.
It is the first book to ask what impact antisemitism has had on the fundamental principles the academy relies on for its identity—academic freedom, free speech rights, standards for hiring or firing faculty members and administrators, and the ethics of academic conduct and debate.
Antisemitic hatred is spreading at a fever pitch. What steps can counter it? What damage to students is done when departments embrace anti-Zionism? Should faculty members face consequences for promoting antisemitism on social media? Should universities make a new push to adopt the IHRA Definition of Antisemitism?
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>126</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5a90f8c4-685d-11ef-bba7-539025eefcba</guid>
      <title>Jonathan Gienapp, &quot;Against Constitutional Originalism: A Historical Critique&quot; (Yale UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The legal theory of&nbsp;constitutional originalism has attracted increasing&nbsp;attention in recent years as the&nbsp;US Supreme Court has tilted with the weight of justices who&nbsp;self-describe as&nbsp;originalists.&nbsp;</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780300265859" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Against Constitutional Originalism: A Historical Critique</em></a>&nbsp;(Yale UP, 2024), Jonathan Gienapp&nbsp;examines the theory and describes how it falls short of achieving the interpretive authority that it claims.&nbsp;</p><p>Gienapp asserts that&nbsp;we need&nbsp;to reconstruct 18th century legal arguments as they were originally understood before judging them, while originalists reject historical understanding in favor of a more pliable textualist approach that allows them to impose their modern legal perspectives onto the past.&nbsp;</p><p>This "have your cake and eat it too" methodology allows originalists to claim the authority of the Founders while simultaneously discounting anything that those same Founders may have said, done, or understood&nbsp;that doesn't&nbsp;appear among the approximately 7500 words of the&nbsp;Constitution itself.&nbsp;&nbsp;</p><p>This book&nbsp;speaks directly to&nbsp;originalists with a challenge to make a fundamental choice between recognizing how our modern constitutional practices distort the original constitution and embrace them for the modern fiction that they are, or recover the original Constitution that the Founders actually knew.&nbsp;</p><p>Author recommended reading:&nbsp;</p><ul><li>
<a href="https://yalebooks.yale.edu/book/9780300223217/the-interbellum-constitution/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Interbellum Consitution: Union, Commerce, and Slavery in the Age of Federalisms</em></a>&nbsp;(Yale UP, 2024)&nbsp;by Alison L. LaCroix</li></ul><p><br></p><p>Related resources:&nbsp;</p><ul>
<li>
<a href="https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/S/bo13179781.html" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Structure of Scientific Revolutions</em></a>&nbsp;by Thomas S. Kuhn</li>
<li>
<a href="https://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/ag/legacy/2011/08/23/07-09-1985.pdf" rel="noopener noreferrer">Edwin Meese speech to the American Bar Association</a>&nbsp;in 1985</li>
<li>
<a href="https://press.princeton.edu/books/paperback/9780691152400/constitutional-faith?srsltid=AfmBOootOUJTfpshvYBaMJRcfHPo2lN4LsGVG-YoonW8bydPmlB8z3mh" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Constitutional Faith</em></a>&nbsp;by Sanford Levinson</li>
</ul><p><br></p><p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/jonathan-gienapp-the-second-creation-fixing-the-american-constitution-in-the-founding-era-harvard-up-2018#entry:8092@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">New Books Network&nbsp;interview with Jonathan&nbsp;Gienapp</a>, when Derek Litvak spoke with him in 2019&nbsp;about&nbsp;<a href="https://www.hup.harvard.edu/books/9780674185043" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Second Creation: Fixing the American Constitution in the Founding Era</em></a>&nbsp;(Harvard UP 2018).</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 3 Sep 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/jonathan-gienapp-against-constitutional-originalism-a-historical-critique-yale-up-2024-nyPV8Ilj</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The legal theory of&nbsp;constitutional originalism has attracted increasing&nbsp;attention in recent years as the&nbsp;US Supreme Court has tilted with the weight of justices who&nbsp;self-describe as&nbsp;originalists.&nbsp;</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780300265859" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Against Constitutional Originalism: A Historical Critique</em></a>&nbsp;(Yale UP, 2024), Jonathan Gienapp&nbsp;examines the theory and describes how it falls short of achieving the interpretive authority that it claims.&nbsp;</p><p>Gienapp asserts that&nbsp;we need&nbsp;to reconstruct 18th century legal arguments as they were originally understood before judging them, while originalists reject historical understanding in favor of a more pliable textualist approach that allows them to impose their modern legal perspectives onto the past.&nbsp;</p><p>This "have your cake and eat it too" methodology allows originalists to claim the authority of the Founders while simultaneously discounting anything that those same Founders may have said, done, or understood&nbsp;that doesn't&nbsp;appear among the approximately 7500 words of the&nbsp;Constitution itself.&nbsp;&nbsp;</p><p>This book&nbsp;speaks directly to&nbsp;originalists with a challenge to make a fundamental choice between recognizing how our modern constitutional practices distort the original constitution and embrace them for the modern fiction that they are, or recover the original Constitution that the Founders actually knew.&nbsp;</p><p>Author recommended reading:&nbsp;</p><ul><li>
<a href="https://yalebooks.yale.edu/book/9780300223217/the-interbellum-constitution/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Interbellum Consitution: Union, Commerce, and Slavery in the Age of Federalisms</em></a>&nbsp;(Yale UP, 2024)&nbsp;by Alison L. LaCroix</li></ul><p><br></p><p>Related resources:&nbsp;</p><ul>
<li>
<a href="https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/S/bo13179781.html" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Structure of Scientific Revolutions</em></a>&nbsp;by Thomas S. Kuhn</li>
<li>
<a href="https://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/ag/legacy/2011/08/23/07-09-1985.pdf" rel="noopener noreferrer">Edwin Meese speech to the American Bar Association</a>&nbsp;in 1985</li>
<li>
<a href="https://press.princeton.edu/books/paperback/9780691152400/constitutional-faith?srsltid=AfmBOootOUJTfpshvYBaMJRcfHPo2lN4LsGVG-YoonW8bydPmlB8z3mh" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Constitutional Faith</em></a>&nbsp;by Sanford Levinson</li>
</ul><p><br></p><p><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/jonathan-gienapp-the-second-creation-fixing-the-american-constitution-in-the-founding-era-harvard-up-2018#entry:8092@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">New Books Network&nbsp;interview with Jonathan&nbsp;Gienapp</a>, when Derek Litvak spoke with him in 2019&nbsp;about&nbsp;<a href="https://www.hup.harvard.edu/books/9780674185043" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Second Creation: Fixing the American Constitution in the Founding Era</em></a>&nbsp;(Harvard UP 2018).</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="77674472" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/eda1e904-8b6d-4fbd-b47b-85c8e751aa99/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=eda1e904-8b6d-4fbd-b47b-85c8e751aa99&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Jonathan Gienapp, &quot;Against Constitutional Originalism: A Historical Critique&quot; (Yale UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:20:54</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The legal theory of constitutional originalism has attracted increasing attention in recent years as the US Supreme Court has tilted with the weight of justices who self-describe as originalists. 
In Against Constitutional Originalism: A Historical Critique (Yale UP, 2024), Jonathan Gienapp examines the theory and describes how it falls short of achieving the interpretive authority that it claims. 
Gienapp asserts that we need to reconstruct 18th century legal arguments as they were originally understood before judging them, while originalists reject historical understanding in favor of a more pliable textualist approach that allows them to impose their modern legal perspectives onto the past. 
This &quot;have your cake and eat it too&quot; methodology allows originalists to claim the authority of the Founders while simultaneously discounting anything that those same Founders may have said, done, or understood that doesn&apos;t appear among the approximately 7500 words of the Constitution itself.  
This book speaks directly to originalists with a challenge to make a fundamental choice between recognizing how our modern constitutional practices distort the original constitution and embrace them for the modern fiction that they are, or recover the original Constitution that the Founders actually knew. 
Author recommended reading: 
The Interbellum Consitution: Union, Commerce, and Slavery in the Age of Federalisms (Yale UP, 2024) by Alison L. LaCroix
Related resources: 
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions by Thomas S. Kuhn
Edwin Meese speech to the American Bar Association in 1985
Constitutional Faith by Sanford Levinson
New Books Network interview with Jonathan Gienapp, when Derek Litvak spoke with him in 2019 about The Second Creation: Fixing the American Constitution in the Founding Era (Harvard UP 2018).
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The legal theory of constitutional originalism has attracted increasing attention in recent years as the US Supreme Court has tilted with the weight of justices who self-describe as originalists. 
In Against Constitutional Originalism: A Historical Critique (Yale UP, 2024), Jonathan Gienapp examines the theory and describes how it falls short of achieving the interpretive authority that it claims. 
Gienapp asserts that we need to reconstruct 18th century legal arguments as they were originally understood before judging them, while originalists reject historical understanding in favor of a more pliable textualist approach that allows them to impose their modern legal perspectives onto the past. 
This &quot;have your cake and eat it too&quot; methodology allows originalists to claim the authority of the Founders while simultaneously discounting anything that those same Founders may have said, done, or understood that doesn&apos;t appear among the approximately 7500 words of the Constitution itself.  
This book speaks directly to originalists with a challenge to make a fundamental choice between recognizing how our modern constitutional practices distort the original constitution and embrace them for the modern fiction that they are, or recover the original Constitution that the Founders actually knew. 
Author recommended reading: 
The Interbellum Consitution: Union, Commerce, and Slavery in the Age of Federalisms (Yale UP, 2024) by Alison L. LaCroix
Related resources: 
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions by Thomas S. Kuhn
Edwin Meese speech to the American Bar Association in 1985
Constitutional Faith by Sanford Levinson
New Books Network interview with Jonathan Gienapp, when Derek Litvak spoke with him in 2019 about The Second Creation: Fixing the American Constitution in the Founding Era (Harvard UP 2018).
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>232</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">040ce0f4-5d76-11ef-80dd-6fc7fb17b76a</guid>
      <title>Joanna Wuest, &quot;Born This Way: Science, Citizenship, and Inequality in the American LGBTQ+ Movement&quot; (U Chicago Press, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Scholars often narrate the legal cases confirming LGBTQ+ rights as a huge success story. While it took 100 years to confirm the rights of Black Americans, it took far less time for courts to recognize marriage and adoption rights or workplace discrimination protections for queer people.</p><p>The legal and political success of LGBTQ+ advocates often depended upon presenting sexual and gender identities as innate – or “immutable” to fit legal categories. Conservatives who oppose LGBTQ+ equality often argue that sexual and gender identity is something that can be taught. They use the offensive language of “grooming” and contagious “gender ideology” that corrupts susceptible children.</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780226827537" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Born This Way: Science, Citizenship, and Inequality in the American LGBTQ+ Movement</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(U Chicago Press, 2023)<em>,&nbsp;</em>Dr. Joanna Wuest unpacks how a biologically based understanding of gender and sexuality– based on arguments from the “natural sciences and mental health professions” – became central to American LGBTQ+ advocacy. Her book is both a “celebratory and cautionary” story about the costs of relying on science to win impressive victories for queer rights. The book interrogates the “LGBTQ+ rights movement, the scientific study of human difference, and the biopolitical character of citizenship that formed at the nexus of the two.” As LGBTQ+ advocates brought “science to bear on civil rights struggles,” they transformed American politics and the epistemology of identity politics more broadly.”&nbsp;</p><p><a href="https://www.joannawuest.com/publications.html" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. Joanna Wuest</a>&nbsp;is an incoming Assistant Professor of Women's, Gender, and Sexuality Studies at Stony Brook University and a sociolegal scholar specializing in sexual and gender minority rights, health, and political economy. Her book,&nbsp;<em>Born This Way: Science, Citizenship, and Inequality in the American LGBTQ+ Movement</em>, received an Honorable Mention for the Society for Social Studies of Science's 2024 Rachel Carson Prize and was featured on a recent episode of&nbsp;<em>Radiolab.</em></p><p>During the podcast, we mentioned:</p><p>Joanna’s article with Dr. Briana S. Last, “<a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0277953623008900" rel="noopener noreferrer">Agents of scientific uncertainty: Conflicts over evidence and expertise in gender-affirming care bans for minors</a>” in Social Science &amp; Medicine.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/joanna-wuest-born-this-way-science-citizenship-and-inequality-in-the-american-lgbtq-movement-u-chicago-press-2023-HU_tsF_W</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scholars often narrate the legal cases confirming LGBTQ+ rights as a huge success story. While it took 100 years to confirm the rights of Black Americans, it took far less time for courts to recognize marriage and adoption rights or workplace discrimination protections for queer people.</p><p>The legal and political success of LGBTQ+ advocates often depended upon presenting sexual and gender identities as innate – or “immutable” to fit legal categories. Conservatives who oppose LGBTQ+ equality often argue that sexual and gender identity is something that can be taught. They use the offensive language of “grooming” and contagious “gender ideology” that corrupts susceptible children.</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780226827537" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Born This Way: Science, Citizenship, and Inequality in the American LGBTQ+ Movement</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(U Chicago Press, 2023)<em>,&nbsp;</em>Dr. Joanna Wuest unpacks how a biologically based understanding of gender and sexuality– based on arguments from the “natural sciences and mental health professions” – became central to American LGBTQ+ advocacy. Her book is both a “celebratory and cautionary” story about the costs of relying on science to win impressive victories for queer rights. The book interrogates the “LGBTQ+ rights movement, the scientific study of human difference, and the biopolitical character of citizenship that formed at the nexus of the two.” As LGBTQ+ advocates brought “science to bear on civil rights struggles,” they transformed American politics and the epistemology of identity politics more broadly.”&nbsp;</p><p><a href="https://www.joannawuest.com/publications.html" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. Joanna Wuest</a>&nbsp;is an incoming Assistant Professor of Women's, Gender, and Sexuality Studies at Stony Brook University and a sociolegal scholar specializing in sexual and gender minority rights, health, and political economy. Her book,&nbsp;<em>Born This Way: Science, Citizenship, and Inequality in the American LGBTQ+ Movement</em>, received an Honorable Mention for the Society for Social Studies of Science's 2024 Rachel Carson Prize and was featured on a recent episode of&nbsp;<em>Radiolab.</em></p><p>During the podcast, we mentioned:</p><p>Joanna’s article with Dr. Briana S. Last, “<a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0277953623008900" rel="noopener noreferrer">Agents of scientific uncertainty: Conflicts over evidence and expertise in gender-affirming care bans for minors</a>” in Social Science &amp; Medicine.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="49533104" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/4a6f1153-03d6-49c1-8850-e8e29b9417e7/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=4a6f1153-03d6-49c1-8850-e8e29b9417e7&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Joanna Wuest, &quot;Born This Way: Science, Citizenship, and Inequality in the American LGBTQ+ Movement&quot; (U Chicago Press, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:51:35</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Scholars often narrate the legal cases confirming LGBTQ+ rights as a huge success story. While it took 100 years to confirm the rights of Black Americans, it took far less time for courts to recognize marriage and adoption rights or workplace discrimination protections for queer people.
The legal and political success of LGBTQ+ advocates often depended upon presenting sexual and gender identities as innate – or “immutable” to fit legal categories. Conservatives who oppose LGBTQ+ equality often argue that sexual and gender identity is something that can be taught. They use the offensive language of “grooming” and contagious “gender ideology” that corrupts susceptible children.
In Born This Way: Science, Citizenship, and Inequality in the American LGBTQ+ Movement (U Chicago Press, 2023), Dr. Joanna Wuest unpacks how a biologically based understanding of gender and sexuality– based on arguments from the “natural sciences and mental health professions” – became central to American LGBTQ+ advocacy. Her book is both a “celebratory and cautionary” story about the costs of relying on science to win impressive victories for queer rights. The book interrogates the “LGBTQ+ rights movement, the scientific study of human difference, and the biopolitical character of citizenship that formed at the nexus of the two.” As LGBTQ+ advocates brought “science to bear on civil rights struggles,” they transformed American politics and the epistemology of identity politics more broadly.” 
Dr. Joanna Wuest is an incoming Assistant Professor of Women&apos;s, Gender, and Sexuality Studies at Stony Brook University and a sociolegal scholar specializing in sexual and gender minority rights, health, and political economy. Her book, Born This Way: Science, Citizenship, and Inequality in the American LGBTQ+ Movement, received an Honorable Mention for the Society for Social Studies of Science&apos;s 2024 Rachel Carson Prize and was featured on a recent episode of Radiolab.
During the podcast, we mentioned:
Joanna’s article with Dr. Briana S. Last, “Agents of scientific uncertainty: Conflicts over evidence and expertise in gender-affirming care bans for minors” in Social Science &amp; Medicine.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Scholars often narrate the legal cases confirming LGBTQ+ rights as a huge success story. While it took 100 years to confirm the rights of Black Americans, it took far less time for courts to recognize marriage and adoption rights or workplace discrimination protections for queer people.
The legal and political success of LGBTQ+ advocates often depended upon presenting sexual and gender identities as innate – or “immutable” to fit legal categories. Conservatives who oppose LGBTQ+ equality often argue that sexual and gender identity is something that can be taught. They use the offensive language of “grooming” and contagious “gender ideology” that corrupts susceptible children.
In Born This Way: Science, Citizenship, and Inequality in the American LGBTQ+ Movement (U Chicago Press, 2023), Dr. Joanna Wuest unpacks how a biologically based understanding of gender and sexuality– based on arguments from the “natural sciences and mental health professions” – became central to American LGBTQ+ advocacy. Her book is both a “celebratory and cautionary” story about the costs of relying on science to win impressive victories for queer rights. The book interrogates the “LGBTQ+ rights movement, the scientific study of human difference, and the biopolitical character of citizenship that formed at the nexus of the two.” As LGBTQ+ advocates brought “science to bear on civil rights struggles,” they transformed American politics and the epistemology of identity politics more broadly.” 
Dr. Joanna Wuest is an incoming Assistant Professor of Women&apos;s, Gender, and Sexuality Studies at Stony Brook University and a sociolegal scholar specializing in sexual and gender minority rights, health, and political economy. Her book, Born This Way: Science, Citizenship, and Inequality in the American LGBTQ+ Movement, received an Honorable Mention for the Society for Social Studies of Science&apos;s 2024 Rachel Carson Prize and was featured on a recent episode of Radiolab.
During the podcast, we mentioned:
Joanna’s article with Dr. Briana S. Last, “Agents of scientific uncertainty: Conflicts over evidence and expertise in gender-affirming care bans for minors” in Social Science &amp; Medicine.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>731</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3fd3b412-60c0-11ef-af67-ffb3c7701d0c</guid>
      <title>Damaging Rationality: Exxon-Funded Legal Research and the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>This is part #3 of a&nbsp;<em>the&nbsp;</em><a href="https://citedpodcast.com/category/season-02-the-rationality-wars/irrational-alaskans/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>(ir)Rational Alaskans</em></a><em>,&nbsp;</em>a&nbsp;<a href="https://citedpodcast.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Cited Podcast</em></a>&nbsp;mini-series that re-examines the legacy of the Exxon Valdez oil spill.</p><p>In<a href="https://citedpodcast.com/2024/08/13/episode-6-the-irrational-alaskans-pt-2-of-3/" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;the last episode</a>&nbsp;of&nbsp;<em>the (ir)Rational Alaskans</em>, Riki Ott, Linden O’Toole, and thousands of other Alaskan fishers won over $5 billion in punitive damages against Exxon for the Exxon Valdez oil spill. In our finale, while Ott and O’Toole wait for their cheques, Exxon fights back with a legal and academic appeal. In that appeal, they marshal some of the most-respected scholars of our generation.</p><p>The&nbsp;<em>(ir)Rational Alaskans&nbsp;</em>is a partnership with&nbsp;<a href="https://www.nationalobserver.com/podcast/slick-science" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Canada’s National Observer</em></a><em>.</em>&nbsp;You can also read about this story in<a href="https://jacobin.com/2024/08/behavioral-economics-exxon-valdez-elitism" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;<em>Jacobin</em></a><em>.&nbsp;</em>For a full list of credits, and for the rest of the episodes, visit the<a href="https://citedpodcast.com/category/season-02-the-rationality-wars/" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;series page</a>.</p><p><strong>Programming Note</strong>: This marks the end of our returning season,&nbsp;<em>the Rationality Wars.&nbsp;</em>We will back with another season shortly, sometime this fall. If you want to catch that season, make sure to stay subscribed to our podcast feed (<a href="https://podcasts.apple.com/ca/podcast/cited-podcast/id558228325" rel="noopener noreferrer">Apple</a>,<a href="https://open.spotify.com/show/6pMLdKYpGooLKis7aORHSi" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;Spotify</a>,<a href="https://citedpodcast.com/feed/podcast/" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;RSS</a>). You can also stay updated by following us on X (<a href="https://x.com/citedpodcast" rel="noopener noreferrer">@citedpodcast</a>), and you can contact us directly at info [at] citedmedia.ca if you have any questions or any feedback. Finally, if you are impatient and just itching for more content, check out some of our other episodes, like: the other<a href="https://citedpodcast.com/category/season-02-the-rationality-wars/" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;episodes in this season</a>, if you joined up late; the episodes from<a href="https://citedpodcast.com/category/season-01-the-science-wars/" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;last season</a>, especially<a href="https://citedpodcast.com/2020/07/30/8-americas-chernobyl-1-of-2/" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;<em>America's Chernobyl</em></a><em>;&nbsp;</em>or some of the<a href="https://dartsandletters.ca/category/highlights/" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;highlights</a>&nbsp;from our other podcast,&nbsp;<em>Darts and Letters.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 25 Aug 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/damaging-rationality-exxon-funded-legal-research-and-the-exxon-valdez-oil-spill-H_SHQ7nS</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is part #3 of a&nbsp;<em>the&nbsp;</em><a href="https://citedpodcast.com/category/season-02-the-rationality-wars/irrational-alaskans/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>(ir)Rational Alaskans</em></a><em>,&nbsp;</em>a&nbsp;<a href="https://citedpodcast.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Cited Podcast</em></a>&nbsp;mini-series that re-examines the legacy of the Exxon Valdez oil spill.</p><p>In<a href="https://citedpodcast.com/2024/08/13/episode-6-the-irrational-alaskans-pt-2-of-3/" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;the last episode</a>&nbsp;of&nbsp;<em>the (ir)Rational Alaskans</em>, Riki Ott, Linden O’Toole, and thousands of other Alaskan fishers won over $5 billion in punitive damages against Exxon for the Exxon Valdez oil spill. In our finale, while Ott and O’Toole wait for their cheques, Exxon fights back with a legal and academic appeal. In that appeal, they marshal some of the most-respected scholars of our generation.</p><p>The&nbsp;<em>(ir)Rational Alaskans&nbsp;</em>is a partnership with&nbsp;<a href="https://www.nationalobserver.com/podcast/slick-science" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Canada’s National Observer</em></a><em>.</em>&nbsp;You can also read about this story in<a href="https://jacobin.com/2024/08/behavioral-economics-exxon-valdez-elitism" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;<em>Jacobin</em></a><em>.&nbsp;</em>For a full list of credits, and for the rest of the episodes, visit the<a href="https://citedpodcast.com/category/season-02-the-rationality-wars/" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;series page</a>.</p><p><strong>Programming Note</strong>: This marks the end of our returning season,&nbsp;<em>the Rationality Wars.&nbsp;</em>We will back with another season shortly, sometime this fall. If you want to catch that season, make sure to stay subscribed to our podcast feed (<a href="https://podcasts.apple.com/ca/podcast/cited-podcast/id558228325" rel="noopener noreferrer">Apple</a>,<a href="https://open.spotify.com/show/6pMLdKYpGooLKis7aORHSi" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;Spotify</a>,<a href="https://citedpodcast.com/feed/podcast/" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;RSS</a>). You can also stay updated by following us on X (<a href="https://x.com/citedpodcast" rel="noopener noreferrer">@citedpodcast</a>), and you can contact us directly at info [at] citedmedia.ca if you have any questions or any feedback. Finally, if you are impatient and just itching for more content, check out some of our other episodes, like: the other<a href="https://citedpodcast.com/category/season-02-the-rationality-wars/" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;episodes in this season</a>, if you joined up late; the episodes from<a href="https://citedpodcast.com/category/season-01-the-science-wars/" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;last season</a>, especially<a href="https://citedpodcast.com/2020/07/30/8-americas-chernobyl-1-of-2/" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;<em>America's Chernobyl</em></a><em>;&nbsp;</em>or some of the<a href="https://dartsandletters.ca/category/highlights/" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;highlights</a>&nbsp;from our other podcast,&nbsp;<em>Darts and Letters.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="65366732" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/6b041167-75a9-41f7-8a4f-7555d176c4c1/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=6b041167-75a9-41f7-8a4f-7555d176c4c1&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Damaging Rationality: Exxon-Funded Legal Research and the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:08:05</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>This is part #3 of a the (ir)Rational Alaskans, a Cited Podcast mini-series that re-examines the legacy of the Exxon Valdez oil spill.
In the last episode of the (ir)Rational Alaskans, Riki Ott, Linden O’Toole, and thousands of other Alaskan fishers won over $5 billion in punitive damages against Exxon for the Exxon Valdez oil spill. In our finale, while Ott and O’Toole wait for their cheques, Exxon fights back with a legal and academic appeal. In that appeal, they marshal some of the most-respected scholars of our generation.
The (ir)Rational Alaskans is a partnership with Canada’s National Observer. You can also read about this story in Jacobin. For a full list of credits, and for the rest of the episodes, visit the series page.
Programming Note: This marks the end of our returning season, the Rationality Wars. We will back with another season shortly, sometime this fall. If you want to catch that season, make sure to stay subscribed to our podcast feed (Apple, Spotify, RSS). You can also stay updated by following us on X (@citedpodcast), and you can contact us directly at info [at] citedmedia.ca if you have any questions or any feedback. Finally, if you are impatient and just itching for more content, check out some of our other episodes, like: the other episodes in this season, if you joined up late; the episodes from last season, especially America&apos;s Chernobyl; or some of the highlights from our other podcast, Darts and Letters.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>This is part #3 of a the (ir)Rational Alaskans, a Cited Podcast mini-series that re-examines the legacy of the Exxon Valdez oil spill.
In the last episode of the (ir)Rational Alaskans, Riki Ott, Linden O’Toole, and thousands of other Alaskan fishers won over $5 billion in punitive damages against Exxon for the Exxon Valdez oil spill. In our finale, while Ott and O’Toole wait for their cheques, Exxon fights back with a legal and academic appeal. In that appeal, they marshal some of the most-respected scholars of our generation.
The (ir)Rational Alaskans is a partnership with Canada’s National Observer. You can also read about this story in Jacobin. For a full list of credits, and for the rest of the episodes, visit the series page.
Programming Note: This marks the end of our returning season, the Rationality Wars. We will back with another season shortly, sometime this fall. If you want to catch that season, make sure to stay subscribed to our podcast feed (Apple, Spotify, RSS). You can also stay updated by following us on X (@citedpodcast), and you can contact us directly at info [at] citedmedia.ca if you have any questions or any feedback. Finally, if you are impatient and just itching for more content, check out some of our other episodes, like: the other episodes in this season, if you joined up late; the episodes from last season, especially America&apos;s Chernobyl; or some of the highlights from our other podcast, Darts and Letters.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>67</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">c4da49a4-60bc-11ef-91bf-df26f06a0faa</guid>
      <title>Gary Mucciaroni, &quot;Answers to the Labour Question: Industrial Relations and the State in the Anglophone World, 1880–1945&quot; (U Toronto Press, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Since the mid-nineteenth century, public officials, reformers, journalists, and other elites have referred to “the labour question.” The labour question was rooted in the system of wage labour that spread throughout much of Europe and its colonies and produced contending classes as industrialization unfolded.&nbsp;<em>Answers to the Labour Question</em>&nbsp;explores how the liberal state responded to workers’ demands that employers recognize trade unions as their legitimate representatives in their struggle for compensation and control over the workplace.</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781487551513" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Answers to the Labour Question: Industrial Relations and the State in the Anglophone World, 1880–1945</em></a>&nbsp;(University of Toronto Press, 2024), Dr. Gary Mucciaroni examines five Anglophone nations – Australia, Canada, Great Britain, New Zealand, and the United States – whose differences are often overlooked in the literature on political economy, which lumps them together as liberal, “market-led” economies. Despite their many shared characteristics and common historical origins, these nations’ responses to the labour question diverged dramatically. Dr. Mucciaroni identifies the factors that explain why these nations developed such different industrial relations regimes and how the paths each nation took to the adoption of its regime reflected a different logic of institutional change. Drawing on newspaper accounts, parliamentary debates, and personal memoirs, among other sources,&nbsp;<em>Answers to the Labour Question</em>&nbsp;aims to understand the variety of state responses to industrial unrest and institutional change beyond the domain of industrial relations.</p><p><br></p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;new book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 24 Aug 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/gary-mucciaroni-answers-to-the-labour-question-industrial-relations-and-the-state-in-the-anglophone-world-18801945-u-toronto-press-2024-Rrd6YC7N</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since the mid-nineteenth century, public officials, reformers, journalists, and other elites have referred to “the labour question.” The labour question was rooted in the system of wage labour that spread throughout much of Europe and its colonies and produced contending classes as industrialization unfolded.&nbsp;<em>Answers to the Labour Question</em>&nbsp;explores how the liberal state responded to workers’ demands that employers recognize trade unions as their legitimate representatives in their struggle for compensation and control over the workplace.</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781487551513" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Answers to the Labour Question: Industrial Relations and the State in the Anglophone World, 1880–1945</em></a>&nbsp;(University of Toronto Press, 2024), Dr. Gary Mucciaroni examines five Anglophone nations – Australia, Canada, Great Britain, New Zealand, and the United States – whose differences are often overlooked in the literature on political economy, which lumps them together as liberal, “market-led” economies. Despite their many shared characteristics and common historical origins, these nations’ responses to the labour question diverged dramatically. Dr. Mucciaroni identifies the factors that explain why these nations developed such different industrial relations regimes and how the paths each nation took to the adoption of its regime reflected a different logic of institutional change. Drawing on newspaper accounts, parliamentary debates, and personal memoirs, among other sources,&nbsp;<em>Answers to the Labour Question</em>&nbsp;aims to understand the variety of state responses to industrial unrest and institutional change beyond the domain of industrial relations.</p><p><br></p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;new book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="59788210" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/6b1cc9fe-0904-44e2-bd71-cf290e4265de/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=6b1cc9fe-0904-44e2-bd71-cf290e4265de&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Gary Mucciaroni, &quot;Answers to the Labour Question: Industrial Relations and the State in the Anglophone World, 1880–1945&quot; (U Toronto Press, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:02:16</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Since the mid-nineteenth century, public officials, reformers, journalists, and other elites have referred to “the labour question.” The labour question was rooted in the system of wage labour that spread throughout much of Europe and its colonies and produced contending classes as industrialization unfolded. Answers to the Labour Question explores how the liberal state responded to workers’ demands that employers recognize trade unions as their legitimate representatives in their struggle for compensation and control over the workplace.
In Answers to the Labour Question: Industrial Relations and the State in the Anglophone World, 1880–1945 (University of Toronto Press, 2024), Dr. Gary Mucciaroni examines five Anglophone nations – Australia, Canada, Great Britain, New Zealand, and the United States – whose differences are often overlooked in the literature on political economy, which lumps them together as liberal, “market-led” economies. Despite their many shared characteristics and common historical origins, these nations’ responses to the labour question diverged dramatically. Dr. Mucciaroni identifies the factors that explain why these nations developed such different industrial relations regimes and how the paths each nation took to the adoption of its regime reflected a different logic of institutional change. Drawing on newspaper accounts, parliamentary debates, and personal memoirs, among other sources, Answers to the Labour Question aims to understand the variety of state responses to industrial unrest and institutional change beyond the domain of industrial relations.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Since the mid-nineteenth century, public officials, reformers, journalists, and other elites have referred to “the labour question.” The labour question was rooted in the system of wage labour that spread throughout much of Europe and its colonies and produced contending classes as industrialization unfolded. Answers to the Labour Question explores how the liberal state responded to workers’ demands that employers recognize trade unions as their legitimate representatives in their struggle for compensation and control over the workplace.
In Answers to the Labour Question: Industrial Relations and the State in the Anglophone World, 1880–1945 (University of Toronto Press, 2024), Dr. Gary Mucciaroni examines five Anglophone nations – Australia, Canada, Great Britain, New Zealand, and the United States – whose differences are often overlooked in the literature on political economy, which lumps them together as liberal, “market-led” economies. Despite their many shared characteristics and common historical origins, these nations’ responses to the labour question diverged dramatically. Dr. Mucciaroni identifies the factors that explain why these nations developed such different industrial relations regimes and how the paths each nation took to the adoption of its regime reflected a different logic of institutional change. Drawing on newspaper accounts, parliamentary debates, and personal memoirs, among other sources, Answers to the Labour Question aims to understand the variety of state responses to industrial unrest and institutional change beyond the domain of industrial relations.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>110</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">259b446e-60b3-11ef-9d06-277816f09648</guid>
      <title>Wesley G. Phelps, &quot;Before Lawrence v. Texas: The Making of a Queer Social Movement&quot; (U Texas Press, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In 2003, in a ruling that bordered on poetic, Supreme Court&nbsp;Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote in&nbsp;<em>Lawrence v. Texas</em>&nbsp;that sexual behavior between consenting adults was protected under the constitutional right to privacy. This was a landmark case in the course of LGBTQ+ rights in the Untied States, laying the groundwork for cases like 2015's&nbsp;<em>Obergefell v. Hodges</em>. Yet, this case did not emerge out of nowhere.&nbsp;</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781477329474" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Before Lawrence v. Texas: The&nbsp;Making of a Queer Social Movement</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(U&nbsp;Texas Press, 2023),&nbsp;University of North Texas history professor Wesley Phelps argues that behind each successful court case stands a litany of failures, challenges, and individual human stories, each of which laid the groundwork for these landmark successes. By tracking the long history of queer activism in Texas during the 1960s, 70s, and 80s, Phelps shows how the long road toward greater LGBTQ+ civil rights was paved with hard work by hundreds of activists, lawyers, and allies. No movement exists in a vacuum, and&nbsp;<em>Before Lawrence v. Texas</em>&nbsp;provides a roadmap showing how historical change really occurs.&nbsp;</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 24 Aug 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/wesley-g-phelps-before-lawrence-v-texas-the-making-of-a-queer-social-movement-u-texas-press-2023-SZJD5ao8</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In 2003, in a ruling that bordered on poetic, Supreme Court&nbsp;Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote in&nbsp;<em>Lawrence v. Texas</em>&nbsp;that sexual behavior between consenting adults was protected under the constitutional right to privacy. This was a landmark case in the course of LGBTQ+ rights in the Untied States, laying the groundwork for cases like 2015's&nbsp;<em>Obergefell v. Hodges</em>. Yet, this case did not emerge out of nowhere.&nbsp;</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781477329474" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Before Lawrence v. Texas: The&nbsp;Making of a Queer Social Movement</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(U&nbsp;Texas Press, 2023),&nbsp;University of North Texas history professor Wesley Phelps argues that behind each successful court case stands a litany of failures, challenges, and individual human stories, each of which laid the groundwork for these landmark successes. By tracking the long history of queer activism in Texas during the 1960s, 70s, and 80s, Phelps shows how the long road toward greater LGBTQ+ civil rights was paved with hard work by hundreds of activists, lawyers, and allies. No movement exists in a vacuum, and&nbsp;<em>Before Lawrence v. Texas</em>&nbsp;provides a roadmap showing how historical change really occurs.&nbsp;</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="52460421" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/d8fe713a-d817-4e5d-b972-ae181b84ae2a/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=d8fe713a-d817-4e5d-b972-ae181b84ae2a&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Wesley G. Phelps, &quot;Before Lawrence v. Texas: The Making of a Queer Social Movement&quot; (U Texas Press, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:54:38</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In 2003, in a ruling that bordered on poetic, Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote in Lawrence v. Texas that sexual behavior between consenting adults was protected under the constitutional right to privacy. This was a landmark case in the course of LGBTQ+ rights in the Untied States, laying the groundwork for cases like 2015&apos;s Obergefell v. Hodges. Yet, this case did not emerge out of nowhere. 
In Before Lawrence v. Texas: The Making of a Queer Social Movement (U Texas Press, 2023), University of North Texas history professor Wesley Phelps argues that behind each successful court case stands a litany of failures, challenges, and individual human stories, each of which laid the groundwork for these landmark successes. By tracking the long history of queer activism in Texas during the 1960s, 70s, and 80s, Phelps shows how the long road toward greater LGBTQ+ civil rights was paved with hard work by hundreds of activists, lawyers, and allies. No movement exists in a vacuum, and Before Lawrence v. Texas provides a roadmap showing how historical change really occurs. 
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In 2003, in a ruling that bordered on poetic, Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote in Lawrence v. Texas that sexual behavior between consenting adults was protected under the constitutional right to privacy. This was a landmark case in the course of LGBTQ+ rights in the Untied States, laying the groundwork for cases like 2015&apos;s Obergefell v. Hodges. Yet, this case did not emerge out of nowhere. 
In Before Lawrence v. Texas: The Making of a Queer Social Movement (U Texas Press, 2023), University of North Texas history professor Wesley Phelps argues that behind each successful court case stands a litany of failures, challenges, and individual human stories, each of which laid the groundwork for these landmark successes. By tracking the long history of queer activism in Texas during the 1960s, 70s, and 80s, Phelps shows how the long road toward greater LGBTQ+ civil rights was paved with hard work by hundreds of activists, lawyers, and allies. No movement exists in a vacuum, and Before Lawrence v. Texas provides a roadmap showing how historical change really occurs. 
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>166</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8e3de7be-5fe7-11ef-a969-ebdd6d88a130</guid>
      <title>Robert McCorquodale, &quot;Business and Human Rights&quot; (Oxford UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Business and Human Rights Law is a rapidly growing area of law, which has dramatically transformed many parts of international law. In this new volume in the&nbsp;<em>Elements</em>&nbsp;series, Robert McCorquodale explores how the responsibility for human rights abuses has transitioned from a purely state obligation to also being the responsibility of businesses. Business responsibility for human rights impacts have become subject both to legislation and to court decisions whenever their activities lead to human rights abuses anywhere in the world.</p><p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780192855862" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Business and Human Rights</em></a>&nbsp;(Oxford UP, 2024) shows the importance of the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights in these developments, and examines their influence on international, regional, and national law. It also analyses the changes on state obligations to protect human rights, on the corporate responsibility for human rights abuses, and on effective access to remedies for those adversely affected by business activities. Each of these shifts has consequences on core tenets of international law, such as sovereignty and jurisdiction, and has implications for crafting new international law in areas such as climate change and technology.</p><p>Robert is a member of the United Nations Working Group on Business and Human Rights, and brings his decades of experience in scholarship and legal practice in business and human rights law, as well as his extensive engagement with businesses, governments, civil society, and international organisations, to bear on his understanding and analysis of this increasingly important field.</p><p>Alex Batesmith is a Lecturer in Legal Profession in the School of Law at the University of Leeds, and a former barrister and UN war crimes prosecutor, with teaching and research interests in international criminal law, cause lawyering and the legal profession, and law and emotion. His University of Leeds profile page can be found&nbsp;<a href="https://essl.leeds.ac.uk/law/staff/1332/mr-alex-batesmith" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a>.&nbsp;Twitter: @batesmith.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/batesmith/" rel="noopener noreferrer">LinkedIn</a></p><p>His recent publications include:</p><ul>
<li>
<a href="https://www.routledge.com/The-Incoherence-of-Human-Rights-in-International-Law-Absence-Emergence-and-Limitations/Ashley-Butler/p/book/9781032638034#:~:text=This%20book%20explores%20this%20incoherent,how%20it%20may%20be%20remedied." rel="noopener noreferrer">“Cambodia and the progressivist ‘imaginary’: The limitations of international(ised) criminal tribunals as mechanisms for implementing human rights”&nbsp;</a>in Louisa Ashley and Nicolette Butler (eds),<em>&nbsp;The Incoherence of Human Rights in International Law: Absence, Emergence and Limitations&nbsp;</em>(Routledge, 2024&nbsp;<strong>ISBN13:&nbsp;</strong>978-1-032638-03-4)</li>
<li>
<a href="https://counterpress.org.uk/publications/aesthetics-and-counter-aesthetics-of-international-justice/#1634466943999-1d22caf9-d8076232-5aaf4645-b1c7" rel="noopener noreferrer">“‘Poetic Justice Products’: International Justice, Victim Counter-Aesthetics, and the Spectre of the Show Trial”</a>&nbsp;in Christine Schwöbel-Patel and Rob Knox (eds)&nbsp;<em>Aesthetics and Counter-Aesthetics of International Justice</em>&nbsp;(Counterpress, 2024 ISBN 978-1-910761-17-5)</li>
<li>
<a href="https://www.routledge.com/Leading-Works-on-the-Legal-Profession/Newman/p/book/9781032182803" rel="noopener noreferrer">"Lawyers who want to make the world a better place – Scheingold and Sarat’s Something to Believe In: Politics, Professionalism, and Cause Lawyering"&nbsp;</a>in D. Newman (ed.)&nbsp;<em>Leading Works on the Legal Profession&nbsp;</em>(Routledge, July 2023), ISBN 978-1-032182-80-3)</li>
<li>
<a href="https://academic.oup.com/jicj/article-abstract/19/4/803/6459130?redirectedFrom=fulltext" rel="noopener noreferrer">“International Prosecutors as Cause Lawyers"&nbsp;</a>(2021)&nbsp;<em>Journal of International Criminal Justice&nbsp;</em>19(4) 803-830 (ISSN 1478-1387)</li>
</ul><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/robert-mccorquodale-business-and-human-rights-oxford-up-2024-lhqd7_Ps</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Business and Human Rights Law is a rapidly growing area of law, which has dramatically transformed many parts of international law. In this new volume in the&nbsp;<em>Elements</em>&nbsp;series, Robert McCorquodale explores how the responsibility for human rights abuses has transitioned from a purely state obligation to also being the responsibility of businesses. Business responsibility for human rights impacts have become subject both to legislation and to court decisions whenever their activities lead to human rights abuses anywhere in the world.</p><p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780192855862" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Business and Human Rights</em></a>&nbsp;(Oxford UP, 2024) shows the importance of the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights in these developments, and examines their influence on international, regional, and national law. It also analyses the changes on state obligations to protect human rights, on the corporate responsibility for human rights abuses, and on effective access to remedies for those adversely affected by business activities. Each of these shifts has consequences on core tenets of international law, such as sovereignty and jurisdiction, and has implications for crafting new international law in areas such as climate change and technology.</p><p>Robert is a member of the United Nations Working Group on Business and Human Rights, and brings his decades of experience in scholarship and legal practice in business and human rights law, as well as his extensive engagement with businesses, governments, civil society, and international organisations, to bear on his understanding and analysis of this increasingly important field.</p><p>Alex Batesmith is a Lecturer in Legal Profession in the School of Law at the University of Leeds, and a former barrister and UN war crimes prosecutor, with teaching and research interests in international criminal law, cause lawyering and the legal profession, and law and emotion. His University of Leeds profile page can be found&nbsp;<a href="https://essl.leeds.ac.uk/law/staff/1332/mr-alex-batesmith" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a>.&nbsp;Twitter: @batesmith.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/batesmith/" rel="noopener noreferrer">LinkedIn</a></p><p>His recent publications include:</p><ul>
<li>
<a href="https://www.routledge.com/The-Incoherence-of-Human-Rights-in-International-Law-Absence-Emergence-and-Limitations/Ashley-Butler/p/book/9781032638034#:~:text=This%20book%20explores%20this%20incoherent,how%20it%20may%20be%20remedied." rel="noopener noreferrer">“Cambodia and the progressivist ‘imaginary’: The limitations of international(ised) criminal tribunals as mechanisms for implementing human rights”&nbsp;</a>in Louisa Ashley and Nicolette Butler (eds),<em>&nbsp;The Incoherence of Human Rights in International Law: Absence, Emergence and Limitations&nbsp;</em>(Routledge, 2024&nbsp;<strong>ISBN13:&nbsp;</strong>978-1-032638-03-4)</li>
<li>
<a href="https://counterpress.org.uk/publications/aesthetics-and-counter-aesthetics-of-international-justice/#1634466943999-1d22caf9-d8076232-5aaf4645-b1c7" rel="noopener noreferrer">“‘Poetic Justice Products’: International Justice, Victim Counter-Aesthetics, and the Spectre of the Show Trial”</a>&nbsp;in Christine Schwöbel-Patel and Rob Knox (eds)&nbsp;<em>Aesthetics and Counter-Aesthetics of International Justice</em>&nbsp;(Counterpress, 2024 ISBN 978-1-910761-17-5)</li>
<li>
<a href="https://www.routledge.com/Leading-Works-on-the-Legal-Profession/Newman/p/book/9781032182803" rel="noopener noreferrer">"Lawyers who want to make the world a better place – Scheingold and Sarat’s Something to Believe In: Politics, Professionalism, and Cause Lawyering"&nbsp;</a>in D. Newman (ed.)&nbsp;<em>Leading Works on the Legal Profession&nbsp;</em>(Routledge, July 2023), ISBN 978-1-032182-80-3)</li>
<li>
<a href="https://academic.oup.com/jicj/article-abstract/19/4/803/6459130?redirectedFrom=fulltext" rel="noopener noreferrer">“International Prosecutors as Cause Lawyers"&nbsp;</a>(2021)&nbsp;<em>Journal of International Criminal Justice&nbsp;</em>19(4) 803-830 (ISSN 1478-1387)</li>
</ul><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="75787725" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/547b54d0-e57f-41cb-a06c-22b09fa5d582/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=547b54d0-e57f-41cb-a06c-22b09fa5d582&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Robert McCorquodale, &quot;Business and Human Rights&quot; (Oxford UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:18:56</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Business and Human Rights Law is a rapidly growing area of law, which has dramatically transformed many parts of international law. In this new volume in the Elements series, Robert McCorquodale explores how the responsibility for human rights abuses has transitioned from a purely state obligation to also being the responsibility of businesses. Business responsibility for human rights impacts have become subject both to legislation and to court decisions whenever their activities lead to human rights abuses anywhere in the world.
Business and Human Rights (Oxford UP, 2024) shows the importance of the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights in these developments, and examines their influence on international, regional, and national law. It also analyses the changes on state obligations to protect human rights, on the corporate responsibility for human rights abuses, and on effective access to remedies for those adversely affected by business activities. Each of these shifts has consequences on core tenets of international law, such as sovereignty and jurisdiction, and has implications for crafting new international law in areas such as climate change and technology.
Robert is a member of the United Nations Working Group on Business and Human Rights, and brings his decades of experience in scholarship and legal practice in business and human rights law, as well as his extensive engagement with businesses, governments, civil society, and international organisations, to bear on his understanding and analysis of this increasingly important field.
Alex Batesmith is a Lecturer in Legal Profession in the School of Law at the University of Leeds, and a former barrister and UN war crimes prosecutor, with teaching and research interests in international criminal law, cause lawyering and the legal profession, and law and emotion. His University of Leeds profile page can be found here. Twitter: @batesmith. LinkedIn
His recent publications include:
“Cambodia and the progressivist ‘imaginary’: The limitations of international(ised) criminal tribunals as mechanisms for implementing human rights” in Louisa Ashley and Nicolette Butler (eds), The Incoherence of Human Rights in International Law: Absence, Emergence and Limitations (Routledge, 2024 ISBN13: 978-1-032638-03-4)
“‘Poetic Justice Products’: International Justice, Victim Counter-Aesthetics, and the Spectre of the Show Trial” in Christine Schwöbel-Patel and Rob Knox (eds) Aesthetics and Counter-Aesthetics of International Justice (Counterpress, 2024 ISBN 978-1-910761-17-5)
&quot;Lawyers who want to make the world a better place – Scheingold and Sarat’s Something to Believe In: Politics, Professionalism, and Cause Lawyering&quot; in D. Newman (ed.) Leading Works on the Legal Profession (Routledge, July 2023), ISBN 978-1-032182-80-3)
“International Prosecutors as Cause Lawyers&quot; (2021) Journal of International Criminal Justice 19(4) 803-830 (ISSN 1478-1387)
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Business and Human Rights Law is a rapidly growing area of law, which has dramatically transformed many parts of international law. In this new volume in the Elements series, Robert McCorquodale explores how the responsibility for human rights abuses has transitioned from a purely state obligation to also being the responsibility of businesses. Business responsibility for human rights impacts have become subject both to legislation and to court decisions whenever their activities lead to human rights abuses anywhere in the world.
Business and Human Rights (Oxford UP, 2024) shows the importance of the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights in these developments, and examines their influence on international, regional, and national law. It also analyses the changes on state obligations to protect human rights, on the corporate responsibility for human rights abuses, and on effective access to remedies for those adversely affected by business activities. Each of these shifts has consequences on core tenets of international law, such as sovereignty and jurisdiction, and has implications for crafting new international law in areas such as climate change and technology.
Robert is a member of the United Nations Working Group on Business and Human Rights, and brings his decades of experience in scholarship and legal practice in business and human rights law, as well as his extensive engagement with businesses, governments, civil society, and international organisations, to bear on his understanding and analysis of this increasingly important field.
Alex Batesmith is a Lecturer in Legal Profession in the School of Law at the University of Leeds, and a former barrister and UN war crimes prosecutor, with teaching and research interests in international criminal law, cause lawyering and the legal profession, and law and emotion. His University of Leeds profile page can be found here. Twitter: @batesmith. LinkedIn
His recent publications include:
“Cambodia and the progressivist ‘imaginary’: The limitations of international(ised) criminal tribunals as mechanisms for implementing human rights” in Louisa Ashley and Nicolette Butler (eds), The Incoherence of Human Rights in International Law: Absence, Emergence and Limitations (Routledge, 2024 ISBN13: 978-1-032638-03-4)
“‘Poetic Justice Products’: International Justice, Victim Counter-Aesthetics, and the Spectre of the Show Trial” in Christine Schwöbel-Patel and Rob Knox (eds) Aesthetics and Counter-Aesthetics of International Justice (Counterpress, 2024 ISBN 978-1-910761-17-5)
&quot;Lawyers who want to make the world a better place – Scheingold and Sarat’s Something to Believe In: Politics, Professionalism, and Cause Lawyering&quot; in D. Newman (ed.) Leading Works on the Legal Profession (Routledge, July 2023), ISBN 978-1-032182-80-3)
“International Prosecutors as Cause Lawyers&quot; (2021) Journal of International Criminal Justice 19(4) 803-830 (ISSN 1478-1387)
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>231</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">372178c8-5fd9-11ef-96b7-f74928c81fc6</guid>
      <title>Ren Pepitone, &quot;Brotherhood of Barristers: A Cultural History of the British Legal Profession, 1840–1940&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>How did ideas of masculinity shape the British legal profession and the wider expectations of the white-collar professional?<em>&nbsp;</em><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009456746" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Brotherhood of Barristers: A Cultural History of the British Legal Profession, 1840–1940</em></a>&nbsp;(Cambridge University Press, 2024) by Dr. Ren Pepitone examines the cultural history of the Inns of Court – four legal societies whose rituals of symbolic brotherhood took place in their supposedly ancient halls. These societies invented traditions to create a sense of belonging among members – or, conversely, to marginalise those who did not fit the profession's ideals.</p><p>Dr. Pepitone examines the legal profession's efforts to maintain an exclusive, masculine culture in the face of sweeping social changes across the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. Utilising established sources such as institutional records alongside diaries, guidebooks, and newspapers, this book looks afresh at the gendered operations of Victorian professional life.&nbsp;<em>Brotherhood of Barristers</em>&nbsp;incorporates a diverse array of historical actors, from the bar's most high-flying to struggling law students, disbarred barristers, political radicals, and women's rights campaigners.</p><p>Thi<em>s interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;new book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/ren-pepitone-brotherhood-of-barristers-a-cultural-history-of-the-british-legal-profession-18401940-cambridge-up-2024-oZzeehLC</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How did ideas of masculinity shape the British legal profession and the wider expectations of the white-collar professional?<em>&nbsp;</em><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009456746" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Brotherhood of Barristers: A Cultural History of the British Legal Profession, 1840–1940</em></a>&nbsp;(Cambridge University Press, 2024) by Dr. Ren Pepitone examines the cultural history of the Inns of Court – four legal societies whose rituals of symbolic brotherhood took place in their supposedly ancient halls. These societies invented traditions to create a sense of belonging among members – or, conversely, to marginalise those who did not fit the profession's ideals.</p><p>Dr. Pepitone examines the legal profession's efforts to maintain an exclusive, masculine culture in the face of sweeping social changes across the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. Utilising established sources such as institutional records alongside diaries, guidebooks, and newspapers, this book looks afresh at the gendered operations of Victorian professional life.&nbsp;<em>Brotherhood of Barristers</em>&nbsp;incorporates a diverse array of historical actors, from the bar's most high-flying to struggling law students, disbarred barristers, political radicals, and women's rights campaigners.</p><p>Thi<em>s interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;new book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="54929358" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/3e4bed80-693d-466f-a690-99a45a3a0b23/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=3e4bed80-693d-466f-a690-99a45a3a0b23&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Ren Pepitone, &quot;Brotherhood of Barristers: A Cultural History of the British Legal Profession, 1840–1940&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:57:12</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>How did ideas of masculinity shape the British legal profession and the wider expectations of the white-collar professional? Brotherhood of Barristers: A Cultural History of the British Legal Profession, 1840–1940 (Cambridge University Press, 2024) by Dr. Ren Pepitone examines the cultural history of the Inns of Court – four legal societies whose rituals of symbolic brotherhood took place in their supposedly ancient halls. These societies invented traditions to create a sense of belonging among members – or, conversely, to marginalise those who did not fit the profession&apos;s ideals.
Dr. Pepitone examines the legal profession&apos;s efforts to maintain an exclusive, masculine culture in the face of sweeping social changes across the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. Utilising established sources such as institutional records alongside diaries, guidebooks, and newspapers, this book looks afresh at the gendered operations of Victorian professional life. Brotherhood of Barristers incorporates a diverse array of historical actors, from the bar&apos;s most high-flying to struggling law students, disbarred barristers, political radicals, and women&apos;s rights campaigners.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>How did ideas of masculinity shape the British legal profession and the wider expectations of the white-collar professional? Brotherhood of Barristers: A Cultural History of the British Legal Profession, 1840–1940 (Cambridge University Press, 2024) by Dr. Ren Pepitone examines the cultural history of the Inns of Court – four legal societies whose rituals of symbolic brotherhood took place in their supposedly ancient halls. These societies invented traditions to create a sense of belonging among members – or, conversely, to marginalise those who did not fit the profession&apos;s ideals.
Dr. Pepitone examines the legal profession&apos;s efforts to maintain an exclusive, masculine culture in the face of sweeping social changes across the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. Utilising established sources such as institutional records alongside diaries, guidebooks, and newspapers, this book looks afresh at the gendered operations of Victorian professional life. Brotherhood of Barristers incorporates a diverse array of historical actors, from the bar&apos;s most high-flying to struggling law students, disbarred barristers, political radicals, and women&apos;s rights campaigners.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>131</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">53c2bcdc-5d61-11ef-a063-97c1c2b498f1</guid>
      <title>Gregory Makoff, &quot;Default: The Landmark Court Battle over Argentina&apos;s $100 Billion Debt Restructuring&quot; (Georgetown UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The dramatic inside story of the most important case in the history of sovereign debt law Unlike individuals or corporations that become insolvent, nations do not have access to bankruptcy protection from their creditors. When a country defaults on its debt, the international financial system is ill equipped to manage the crisis. Decisions by key individuals—from national leaders to those at the International Monetary Fund, from holdout creditors to judges—determine the fate of an entire national economy. A prime example is Argentina’s 2001 default on $100 billion in bonds, which stands out for its messy outcomes and outsized impact on sovereign debt markets, sovereign debt law, and IMF policy.&nbsp;</p><p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781647123987" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Default:&nbsp;The Landmark Court Battle over Argentina's $100 Billion Debt Restructuring</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Georgetown UP, 2024)&nbsp;is the riveting story of Argentina’s sovereign debt drama, which reveals the obscure inner workings of sovereign debt restructuring. This detailed case study describes the intense fight over the role of the IMF in Argentina’s 2005 debt restructuring and the ensuing bitter decade of litigation with holdout creditors, demonstrating that outcomes for sovereign debt are determined by a complex interplay between financial markets, governments, the IMF, the press, and the courts. This cautionary tale lays bare the institutional, political, and legal pressures that come into play when a country cannot repay its debts. It offers a deeper understanding of how global financial capitalism functions for those who work in or study debt markets, international finance, international relations, and international law.</p><p><a href="https://www.defaultthebook.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><strong>Gregory Makoff</strong>, PhD</a>, is a senior fellow at the Harvard Kennedy School and a senior fellow&nbsp;at the Centre for International Governance Innovation and an expert on sovereign debt management. A former banker specializing in debt advice, liability management, and derivatives, he has also advised the US Department of the Treasury.</p><p><em>Caleb Zakarin is editor at the New Books Network.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Aug 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/gregory-makoff-default-the-landmark-court-battle-over-argentinas-100-billion-debt-restructuring-georgetown-up-2024-gTTLn6Ut</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The dramatic inside story of the most important case in the history of sovereign debt law Unlike individuals or corporations that become insolvent, nations do not have access to bankruptcy protection from their creditors. When a country defaults on its debt, the international financial system is ill equipped to manage the crisis. Decisions by key individuals—from national leaders to those at the International Monetary Fund, from holdout creditors to judges—determine the fate of an entire national economy. A prime example is Argentina’s 2001 default on $100 billion in bonds, which stands out for its messy outcomes and outsized impact on sovereign debt markets, sovereign debt law, and IMF policy.&nbsp;</p><p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781647123987" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Default:&nbsp;The Landmark Court Battle over Argentina's $100 Billion Debt Restructuring</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Georgetown UP, 2024)&nbsp;is the riveting story of Argentina’s sovereign debt drama, which reveals the obscure inner workings of sovereign debt restructuring. This detailed case study describes the intense fight over the role of the IMF in Argentina’s 2005 debt restructuring and the ensuing bitter decade of litigation with holdout creditors, demonstrating that outcomes for sovereign debt are determined by a complex interplay between financial markets, governments, the IMF, the press, and the courts. This cautionary tale lays bare the institutional, political, and legal pressures that come into play when a country cannot repay its debts. It offers a deeper understanding of how global financial capitalism functions for those who work in or study debt markets, international finance, international relations, and international law.</p><p><a href="https://www.defaultthebook.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><strong>Gregory Makoff</strong>, PhD</a>, is a senior fellow at the Harvard Kennedy School and a senior fellow&nbsp;at the Centre for International Governance Innovation and an expert on sovereign debt management. A former banker specializing in debt advice, liability management, and derivatives, he has also advised the US Department of the Treasury.</p><p><em>Caleb Zakarin is editor at the New Books Network.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="51249340" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/185dd1cd-9081-4a6f-86c9-396fc634ce8a/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=185dd1cd-9081-4a6f-86c9-396fc634ce8a&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Gregory Makoff, &quot;Default: The Landmark Court Battle over Argentina&apos;s $100 Billion Debt Restructuring&quot; (Georgetown UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:53:22</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The dramatic inside story of the most important case in the history of sovereign debt law Unlike individuals or corporations that become insolvent, nations do not have access to bankruptcy protection from their creditors. When a country defaults on its debt, the international financial system is ill equipped to manage the crisis. Decisions by key individuals—from national leaders to those at the International Monetary Fund, from holdout creditors to judges—determine the fate of an entire national economy. A prime example is Argentina’s 2001 default on $100 billion in bonds, which stands out for its messy outcomes and outsized impact on sovereign debt markets, sovereign debt law, and IMF policy. 
Default: The Landmark Court Battle over Argentina&apos;s $100 Billion Debt Restructuring (Georgetown UP, 2024) is the riveting story of Argentina’s sovereign debt drama, which reveals the obscure inner workings of sovereign debt restructuring. This detailed case study describes the intense fight over the role of the IMF in Argentina’s 2005 debt restructuring and the ensuing bitter decade of litigation with holdout creditors, demonstrating that outcomes for sovereign debt are determined by a complex interplay between financial markets, governments, the IMF, the press, and the courts. This cautionary tale lays bare the institutional, political, and legal pressures that come into play when a country cannot repay its debts. It offers a deeper understanding of how global financial capitalism functions for those who work in or study debt markets, international finance, international relations, and international law.
Gregory Makoff, PhD, is a senior fellow at the Harvard Kennedy School and a senior fellow at the Centre for International Governance Innovation and an expert on sovereign debt management. A former banker specializing in debt advice, liability management, and derivatives, he has also advised the US Department of the Treasury.
Caleb Zakarin is editor at the New Books Network.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The dramatic inside story of the most important case in the history of sovereign debt law Unlike individuals or corporations that become insolvent, nations do not have access to bankruptcy protection from their creditors. When a country defaults on its debt, the international financial system is ill equipped to manage the crisis. Decisions by key individuals—from national leaders to those at the International Monetary Fund, from holdout creditors to judges—determine the fate of an entire national economy. A prime example is Argentina’s 2001 default on $100 billion in bonds, which stands out for its messy outcomes and outsized impact on sovereign debt markets, sovereign debt law, and IMF policy. 
Default: The Landmark Court Battle over Argentina&apos;s $100 Billion Debt Restructuring (Georgetown UP, 2024) is the riveting story of Argentina’s sovereign debt drama, which reveals the obscure inner workings of sovereign debt restructuring. This detailed case study describes the intense fight over the role of the IMF in Argentina’s 2005 debt restructuring and the ensuing bitter decade of litigation with holdout creditors, demonstrating that outcomes for sovereign debt are determined by a complex interplay between financial markets, governments, the IMF, the press, and the courts. This cautionary tale lays bare the institutional, political, and legal pressures that come into play when a country cannot repay its debts. It offers a deeper understanding of how global financial capitalism functions for those who work in or study debt markets, international finance, international relations, and international law.
Gregory Makoff, PhD, is a senior fellow at the Harvard Kennedy School and a senior fellow at the Centre for International Governance Innovation and an expert on sovereign debt management. A former banker specializing in debt advice, liability management, and derivatives, he has also advised the US Department of the Treasury.
Caleb Zakarin is editor at the New Books Network.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>108</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">868b02a0-5d7f-11ef-9cd9-d3adcf0e4ba7</guid>
      <title>Maria Dimova-Cookson, &quot;Rethinking Positive and Negative Liberty&quot; (Routledge, 2019)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.dur.ac.uk/research/directory/staff/?mode=staff&amp;id=2890" rel="noopener noreferrer">Maria Dimova-Cookson</a>'s new book <a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/0415665515/?tag=newbooinhis-20" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Rethinking Positive and Negative Liberty</em></a><em> </em>(Routledge, 2019) offers an analysis of the distinction between positive and negative freedom building on the work of Constant, Green and Berlin. The author proposes a new reading of this distinction for the twenty-first century. The author defends the idea that freedom is a dynamic interaction between two inseparable, yet sometimes fundamentally, opposed positive and negative concepts – the yin and yang of freedom. Positive freedom is achieved when one succeeds in doing what is right, while negative freedom is achieved when one is able to advance one’s wellbeing. In an environment of culture wars, resurging populism and challenge to progressive liberal values, theorizing freedom in negative and positive terms can help us better understand the political dilemmas we face and point the way forward.</p><p>Maria Dimova-Cookson is Associate Professor in Politics at the School of Government and International Affairs, Durham University, UK.</p><p><a href="https://geogian.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Yorgos Giannakopoulos</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(<a href="https://twitter.com/giannako" rel="noopener noreferrer">@giannako</a>)&nbsp;<em>is a currently a Junior Research Fellow in Durham University, UK. He is a historian of Modern Britain and Europe. His&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/23801883.2018.1527185" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>published research</em></a><em>&nbsp;recovers the regional impact of&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01916599.2017.1381858" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>British Intellectuals</em></a><em>&nbsp;in Eastern Europe&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/modern-intellectual-history/article/make-britain-great-again-angloamerican-thought-and-world-politics-in-the-age-of-empires/5CB40CC7868181411291EA1F0D0ED595" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>in the age of nationalism and internationalism</em></a><em>.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Aug 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/maria-dimova-cookson-rethinking-positive-and-negative-liberty-routledge-2019-ZChrJPyO</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.dur.ac.uk/research/directory/staff/?mode=staff&amp;id=2890" rel="noopener noreferrer">Maria Dimova-Cookson</a>'s new book <a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/0415665515/?tag=newbooinhis-20" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Rethinking Positive and Negative Liberty</em></a><em> </em>(Routledge, 2019) offers an analysis of the distinction between positive and negative freedom building on the work of Constant, Green and Berlin. The author proposes a new reading of this distinction for the twenty-first century. The author defends the idea that freedom is a dynamic interaction between two inseparable, yet sometimes fundamentally, opposed positive and negative concepts – the yin and yang of freedom. Positive freedom is achieved when one succeeds in doing what is right, while negative freedom is achieved when one is able to advance one’s wellbeing. In an environment of culture wars, resurging populism and challenge to progressive liberal values, theorizing freedom in negative and positive terms can help us better understand the political dilemmas we face and point the way forward.</p><p>Maria Dimova-Cookson is Associate Professor in Politics at the School of Government and International Affairs, Durham University, UK.</p><p><a href="https://geogian.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Yorgos Giannakopoulos</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(<a href="https://twitter.com/giannako" rel="noopener noreferrer">@giannako</a>)&nbsp;<em>is a currently a Junior Research Fellow in Durham University, UK. He is a historian of Modern Britain and Europe. His&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/23801883.2018.1527185" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>published research</em></a><em>&nbsp;recovers the regional impact of&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01916599.2017.1381858" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>British Intellectuals</em></a><em>&nbsp;in Eastern Europe&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/modern-intellectual-history/article/make-britain-great-again-angloamerican-thought-and-world-politics-in-the-age-of-empires/5CB40CC7868181411291EA1F0D0ED595" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>in the age of nationalism and internationalism</em></a><em>.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="36484322" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/2e126b47-c2df-4d1d-ba2d-7b0e7805cd7b/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=2e126b47-c2df-4d1d-ba2d-7b0e7805cd7b&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Maria Dimova-Cookson, &quot;Rethinking Positive and Negative Liberty&quot; (Routledge, 2019)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:38:00</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Maria Dimova-Cookson&apos;s new book Rethinking Positive and Negative Liberty (Routledge, 2019) offers an analysis of the distinction between positive and negative freedom building on the work of Constant, Green and Berlin. The author proposes a new reading of this distinction for the twenty-first century. The author defends the idea that freedom is a dynamic interaction between two inseparable, yet sometimes fundamentally, opposed positive and negative concepts – the yin and yang of freedom. Positive freedom is achieved when one succeeds in doing what is right, while negative freedom is achieved when one is able to advance one’s wellbeing. In an environment of culture wars, resurging populism and challenge to progressive liberal values, theorizing freedom in negative and positive terms can help us better understand the political dilemmas we face and point the way forward.
Maria Dimova-Cookson is Associate Professor in Politics at the School of Government and International Affairs, Durham University, UK.
Yorgos Giannakopoulos (@giannako) is a currently a Junior Research Fellow in Durham University, UK. He is a historian of Modern Britain and Europe. His published research recovers the regional impact of British Intellectuals in Eastern Europe in the age of nationalism and internationalism.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Maria Dimova-Cookson&apos;s new book Rethinking Positive and Negative Liberty (Routledge, 2019) offers an analysis of the distinction between positive and negative freedom building on the work of Constant, Green and Berlin. The author proposes a new reading of this distinction for the twenty-first century. The author defends the idea that freedom is a dynamic interaction between two inseparable, yet sometimes fundamentally, opposed positive and negative concepts – the yin and yang of freedom. Positive freedom is achieved when one succeeds in doing what is right, while negative freedom is achieved when one is able to advance one’s wellbeing. In an environment of culture wars, resurging populism and challenge to progressive liberal values, theorizing freedom in negative and positive terms can help us better understand the political dilemmas we face and point the way forward.
Maria Dimova-Cookson is Associate Professor in Politics at the School of Government and International Affairs, Durham University, UK.
Yorgos Giannakopoulos (@giannako) is a currently a Junior Research Fellow in Durham University, UK. He is a historian of Modern Britain and Europe. His published research recovers the regional impact of British Intellectuals in Eastern Europe in the age of nationalism and internationalism.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>55</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5e44efc6-5ca4-11ef-bc77-9f01bb9185ee</guid>
      <title>Raj Jayadev, &quot;Protect Your People: How Ordinary Families Are Using Participatory Defense to Challenge Mass Incarceration&quot; (New Press, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Over two million Americans are currently in prison or jail. Another 4.5 million are on probation or parole. And nearly one in two Americans have a family member who is or has been incarcerated. Writing for those new to activism as well as seasoned organizers, celebrated criminal justice activist Raj Jayadev introduces readers to the groundbreaking idea of participatory defense, a community organizing model for families and communities aimed at bettering the outcome of cases involving their loved ones and transforming the landscape of power in the courts. Participatory defense has led to acquittals, dismissed and reduced charges, prison terms changed to rehabilitation programs, and life sentences taken off the table.&nbsp;</p><p>Drawing on years of organizing to offer a radical vision of community intervention,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781620977002" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Protect Your People: How Ordinary Families Are Using Participatory Defense to Challenge Mass Incarceration</em></a>&nbsp;(New Press, 2023) features stories from across the country, highlighting the most effective strategies of this groundbreaking approach, including how to get loved ones released from bail hearings, arraignments, and post-conviction; how to take on deportation cases; how to prevent youth from being transferred to adult court, and more. A radical new argument for the era of mass incarceration, Protect Your People shows that real change is possible when people step into America's courtrooms and get involved.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 18 Aug 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/raj-jayadev-protect-your-people-how-ordinary-families-are-using-participatory-defense-to-challenge-mass-incarceration-new-press-2023-NHJnpwQp</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over two million Americans are currently in prison or jail. Another 4.5 million are on probation or parole. And nearly one in two Americans have a family member who is or has been incarcerated. Writing for those new to activism as well as seasoned organizers, celebrated criminal justice activist Raj Jayadev introduces readers to the groundbreaking idea of participatory defense, a community organizing model for families and communities aimed at bettering the outcome of cases involving their loved ones and transforming the landscape of power in the courts. Participatory defense has led to acquittals, dismissed and reduced charges, prison terms changed to rehabilitation programs, and life sentences taken off the table.&nbsp;</p><p>Drawing on years of organizing to offer a radical vision of community intervention,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781620977002" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Protect Your People: How Ordinary Families Are Using Participatory Defense to Challenge Mass Incarceration</em></a>&nbsp;(New Press, 2023) features stories from across the country, highlighting the most effective strategies of this groundbreaking approach, including how to get loved ones released from bail hearings, arraignments, and post-conviction; how to take on deportation cases; how to prevent youth from being transferred to adult court, and more. A radical new argument for the era of mass incarceration, Protect Your People shows that real change is possible when people step into America's courtrooms and get involved.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="30086968" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/2771dec1-2f7d-46cd-9857-28cfa79d2156/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=2771dec1-2f7d-46cd-9857-28cfa79d2156&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Raj Jayadev, &quot;Protect Your People: How Ordinary Families Are Using Participatory Defense to Challenge Mass Incarceration&quot; (New Press, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:31:20</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Over two million Americans are currently in prison or jail. Another 4.5 million are on probation or parole. And nearly one in two Americans have a family member who is or has been incarcerated. Writing for those new to activism as well as seasoned organizers, celebrated criminal justice activist Raj Jayadev introduces readers to the groundbreaking idea of participatory defense, a community organizing model for families and communities aimed at bettering the outcome of cases involving their loved ones and transforming the landscape of power in the courts. Participatory defense has led to acquittals, dismissed and reduced charges, prison terms changed to rehabilitation programs, and life sentences taken off the table. 
Drawing on years of organizing to offer a radical vision of community intervention, Protect Your People: How Ordinary Families Are Using Participatory Defense to Challenge Mass Incarceration (New Press, 2023) features stories from across the country, highlighting the most effective strategies of this groundbreaking approach, including how to get loved ones released from bail hearings, arraignments, and post-conviction; how to take on deportation cases; how to prevent youth from being transferred to adult court, and more. A radical new argument for the era of mass incarceration, Protect Your People shows that real change is possible when people step into America&apos;s courtrooms and get involved.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Over two million Americans are currently in prison or jail. Another 4.5 million are on probation or parole. And nearly one in two Americans have a family member who is or has been incarcerated. Writing for those new to activism as well as seasoned organizers, celebrated criminal justice activist Raj Jayadev introduces readers to the groundbreaking idea of participatory defense, a community organizing model for families and communities aimed at bettering the outcome of cases involving their loved ones and transforming the landscape of power in the courts. Participatory defense has led to acquittals, dismissed and reduced charges, prison terms changed to rehabilitation programs, and life sentences taken off the table. 
Drawing on years of organizing to offer a radical vision of community intervention, Protect Your People: How Ordinary Families Are Using Participatory Defense to Challenge Mass Incarceration (New Press, 2023) features stories from across the country, highlighting the most effective strategies of this groundbreaking approach, including how to get loved ones released from bail hearings, arraignments, and post-conviction; how to take on deportation cases; how to prevent youth from being transferred to adult court, and more. A radical new argument for the era of mass incarceration, Protect Your People shows that real change is possible when people step into America&apos;s courtrooms and get involved.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>187</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">55e0deac-5c9b-11ef-9328-f3f6703c99fb</guid>
      <title>Justine Bendel, &quot;Litigating the Environment: Process and Procedure Before International Courts and Tribunals&quot; (Edward Elgar, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://www.e-elgar.com/shop/usd/litigating-the-environment-9781789901320.html" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Litigating the Environment: Process and Procedure Before International Courts and Tribunals</em></a>&nbsp;(Edward Elgar, 2023), Dr Justine Bendel scrutinises how international courts and tribunals may respond procedurally to an ever-growing list of environmental disputes. In a time of environmental crisis, she lays crucial groundwork for strengthening the application of international environmental law, a topic of increasing relevance for global civil society.</p><p>Putting into perspective the practices of various international courts and tribunals, Dr Bendel works within the constraints of the existing judicial framework to sharpen international environmental justice and governance. She provides judges and litigators with tools that they can use when confronted with environmental disputes, to extract the best practices in the interest of improving environmental litigation for each phase of a judicial procedure.</p><p>In this podcast, Dr Bendel discusses the complexity of multiple legal, regulatory and guidance frameworks insofar as international environmental law is concerned. She explains how it is highly likely that the subject matter of an environmental dispute will cover common areas or resources that affect global or multilateral interests, which inevitably adds a political dimension to any dispute resolution when it comes to areas that transcend national jurisdictions. Dr Bendel explores how typically bilateral proceedings under international law might be expanded to accommodate the interests of other states – and non-state actors such as international non-governmental organisations – through creatively and flexibly adapting procedures that already exist before international courts and tribunals, including dispute resolution and non-compliance procedures. Now is the time, she says, for international courts and tribunals to be used to resolve environmental disputes and to make authoritative legal determinations on protecting the planet and its precious resources.</p><p><a href="https://essl.leeds.ac.uk/law/staff/1332/mr-alex-batesmith" rel="noopener noreferrer">Alex Batesmith</a>&nbsp;is a Lecturer in Legal Profession at the School of Law, University of Leeds, UK. His research focuses on lawyers, their professional self-identity and their motivations, and how these shape the institutions and the discipline in which they work. He has a particular interest in, and practitioner experience of, international criminal law and transitional justice. Twitter: @batesmith</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 18 Aug 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/justine-bendel-litigating-the-environment-process-and-procedure-before-international-courts-and-tribunals-edward-elgar-2023-FbgLOEub</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://www.e-elgar.com/shop/usd/litigating-the-environment-9781789901320.html" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Litigating the Environment: Process and Procedure Before International Courts and Tribunals</em></a>&nbsp;(Edward Elgar, 2023), Dr Justine Bendel scrutinises how international courts and tribunals may respond procedurally to an ever-growing list of environmental disputes. In a time of environmental crisis, she lays crucial groundwork for strengthening the application of international environmental law, a topic of increasing relevance for global civil society.</p><p>Putting into perspective the practices of various international courts and tribunals, Dr Bendel works within the constraints of the existing judicial framework to sharpen international environmental justice and governance. She provides judges and litigators with tools that they can use when confronted with environmental disputes, to extract the best practices in the interest of improving environmental litigation for each phase of a judicial procedure.</p><p>In this podcast, Dr Bendel discusses the complexity of multiple legal, regulatory and guidance frameworks insofar as international environmental law is concerned. She explains how it is highly likely that the subject matter of an environmental dispute will cover common areas or resources that affect global or multilateral interests, which inevitably adds a political dimension to any dispute resolution when it comes to areas that transcend national jurisdictions. Dr Bendel explores how typically bilateral proceedings under international law might be expanded to accommodate the interests of other states – and non-state actors such as international non-governmental organisations – through creatively and flexibly adapting procedures that already exist before international courts and tribunals, including dispute resolution and non-compliance procedures. Now is the time, she says, for international courts and tribunals to be used to resolve environmental disputes and to make authoritative legal determinations on protecting the planet and its precious resources.</p><p><a href="https://essl.leeds.ac.uk/law/staff/1332/mr-alex-batesmith" rel="noopener noreferrer">Alex Batesmith</a>&nbsp;is a Lecturer in Legal Profession at the School of Law, University of Leeds, UK. His research focuses on lawyers, their professional self-identity and their motivations, and how these shape the institutions and the discipline in which they work. He has a particular interest in, and practitioner experience of, international criminal law and transitional justice. Twitter: @batesmith</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="74436423" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/273809aa-0224-4961-b49a-bc0b27240b4d/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=273809aa-0224-4961-b49a-bc0b27240b4d&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Justine Bendel, &quot;Litigating the Environment: Process and Procedure Before International Courts and Tribunals&quot; (Edward Elgar, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:17:32</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In Litigating the Environment: Process and Procedure Before International Courts and Tribunals (Edward Elgar, 2023), Dr Justine Bendel scrutinises how international courts and tribunals may respond procedurally to an ever-growing list of environmental disputes. In a time of environmental crisis, she lays crucial groundwork for strengthening the application of international environmental law, a topic of increasing relevance for global civil society.
Putting into perspective the practices of various international courts and tribunals, Dr Bendel works within the constraints of the existing judicial framework to sharpen international environmental justice and governance. She provides judges and litigators with tools that they can use when confronted with environmental disputes, to extract the best practices in the interest of improving environmental litigation for each phase of a judicial procedure.
In this podcast, Dr Bendel discusses the complexity of multiple legal, regulatory and guidance frameworks insofar as international environmental law is concerned. She explains how it is highly likely that the subject matter of an environmental dispute will cover common areas or resources that affect global or multilateral interests, which inevitably adds a political dimension to any dispute resolution when it comes to areas that transcend national jurisdictions. Dr Bendel explores how typically bilateral proceedings under international law might be expanded to accommodate the interests of other states – and non-state actors such as international non-governmental organisations – through creatively and flexibly adapting procedures that already exist before international courts and tribunals, including dispute resolution and non-compliance procedures. Now is the time, she says, for international courts and tribunals to be used to resolve environmental disputes and to make authoritative legal determinations on protecting the planet and its precious resources.
Alex Batesmith is a Lecturer in Legal Profession at the School of Law, University of Leeds, UK. His research focuses on lawyers, their professional self-identity and their motivations, and how these shape the institutions and the discipline in which they work. He has a particular interest in, and practitioner experience of, international criminal law and transitional justice. Twitter: @batesmith
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In Litigating the Environment: Process and Procedure Before International Courts and Tribunals (Edward Elgar, 2023), Dr Justine Bendel scrutinises how international courts and tribunals may respond procedurally to an ever-growing list of environmental disputes. In a time of environmental crisis, she lays crucial groundwork for strengthening the application of international environmental law, a topic of increasing relevance for global civil society.
Putting into perspective the practices of various international courts and tribunals, Dr Bendel works within the constraints of the existing judicial framework to sharpen international environmental justice and governance. She provides judges and litigators with tools that they can use when confronted with environmental disputes, to extract the best practices in the interest of improving environmental litigation for each phase of a judicial procedure.
In this podcast, Dr Bendel discusses the complexity of multiple legal, regulatory and guidance frameworks insofar as international environmental law is concerned. She explains how it is highly likely that the subject matter of an environmental dispute will cover common areas or resources that affect global or multilateral interests, which inevitably adds a political dimension to any dispute resolution when it comes to areas that transcend national jurisdictions. Dr Bendel explores how typically bilateral proceedings under international law might be expanded to accommodate the interests of other states – and non-state actors such as international non-governmental organisations – through creatively and flexibly adapting procedures that already exist before international courts and tribunals, including dispute resolution and non-compliance procedures. Now is the time, she says, for international courts and tribunals to be used to resolve environmental disputes and to make authoritative legal determinations on protecting the planet and its precious resources.
Alex Batesmith is a Lecturer in Legal Profession at the School of Law, University of Leeds, UK. His research focuses on lawyers, their professional self-identity and their motivations, and how these shape the institutions and the discipline in which they work. He has a particular interest in, and practitioner experience of, international criminal law and transitional justice. Twitter: @batesmith
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>230</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">a6d86546-5b29-11ef-8086-f7981b862170</guid>
      <title>Shaun S. Yates, &quot;Over-Efficiency in the Lower Criminal Courts: Understanding a Key Problem and How to Fix it&quot; (Policy Press, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In our pursuit of efficiency in the lower criminal courts, have we lost sight of quality justice? Through the critical examination of original stenographic data,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781529236392" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Over-Efficiency in the Lower Criminal Courts: Understanding a Key Problem and How to Fix it</em></a>&nbsp;(Policy Press, 2024) by Dr. Shaun Yates demonstrates how an English Magistrates' courthouse often pursued managerial efficiency to the detriment of social justice and procedural due process values.</p><p>Given that these courts process more than 95% of all criminal cases, this ‘over-efficiency’ problem has the capacity to cause significant social harm. Dr. Yates’ work concludes by providing socio-legal and criminological readers with ways to fix this over-efficiency problem. This accessible work is of value to policy makers and post-graduate students alike.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;new book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 17 Aug 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/shaun-s-yates-over-efficiency-in-the-lower-criminal-courts-understanding-a-key-problem-and-how-to-fix-it-policy-press-2024-JmnAfDm_</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In our pursuit of efficiency in the lower criminal courts, have we lost sight of quality justice? Through the critical examination of original stenographic data,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781529236392" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Over-Efficiency in the Lower Criminal Courts: Understanding a Key Problem and How to Fix it</em></a>&nbsp;(Policy Press, 2024) by Dr. Shaun Yates demonstrates how an English Magistrates' courthouse often pursued managerial efficiency to the detriment of social justice and procedural due process values.</p><p>Given that these courts process more than 95% of all criminal cases, this ‘over-efficiency’ problem has the capacity to cause significant social harm. Dr. Yates’ work concludes by providing socio-legal and criminological readers with ways to fix this over-efficiency problem. This accessible work is of value to policy makers and post-graduate students alike.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;new book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="43090278" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/36105038-3709-4514-b793-25306da897ea/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=36105038-3709-4514-b793-25306da897ea&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Shaun S. Yates, &quot;Over-Efficiency in the Lower Criminal Courts: Understanding a Key Problem and How to Fix it&quot; (Policy Press, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:44:53</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In our pursuit of efficiency in the lower criminal courts, have we lost sight of quality justice? Through the critical examination of original stenographic data, Over-Efficiency in the Lower Criminal Courts: Understanding a Key Problem and How to Fix it (Policy Press, 2024) by Dr. Shaun Yates demonstrates how an English Magistrates&apos; courthouse often pursued managerial efficiency to the detriment of social justice and procedural due process values.
Given that these courts process more than 95% of all criminal cases, this ‘over-efficiency’ problem has the capacity to cause significant social harm. Dr. Yates’ work concludes by providing socio-legal and criminological readers with ways to fix this over-efficiency problem. This accessible work is of value to policy makers and post-graduate students alike.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In our pursuit of efficiency in the lower criminal courts, have we lost sight of quality justice? Through the critical examination of original stenographic data, Over-Efficiency in the Lower Criminal Courts: Understanding a Key Problem and How to Fix it (Policy Press, 2024) by Dr. Shaun Yates demonstrates how an English Magistrates&apos; courthouse often pursued managerial efficiency to the detriment of social justice and procedural due process values.
Given that these courts process more than 95% of all criminal cases, this ‘over-efficiency’ problem has the capacity to cause significant social harm. Dr. Yates’ work concludes by providing socio-legal and criminological readers with ways to fix this over-efficiency problem. This accessible work is of value to policy makers and post-graduate students alike.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>229</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5f1f1c34-5a6d-11ef-b88b-27b8225d3ad4</guid>
      <title>12 Angry Alaskans: Re-Examining the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill Case</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>This is part #2 of a&nbsp;<em>the (ir)Rational Alaskans,&nbsp;</em>a&nbsp;<a href="https://citedpodcast.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Cited Podcast</em></a>&nbsp;series that re-examines the legacy of the Exxon Valdez oil spill.</p><p><a href="https://citedpodcast.com/2024/08/08/episode-6-the-irrational-alaskans-pt-1-of-3/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Last episode</a>, the spill devastates Cordova, Alaska. In this second part,&nbsp;<em>12 Angry Alaskans</em>, a jury of ordinary Alaskans picks up our story. They muddle through the most devastating, and most complicated, environmental disaster in US history. How would they decide the case?</p><p><a href="https://podcasts.apple.com/ca/podcast/cited-podcast/id558228325" rel="noopener noreferrer">Subscribe today</a>&nbsp;to ensure you do not miss our finale,&nbsp;<em>Damaging Rationality</em>, which examines the forgotten academic story behind Exxon’s legal appeals. You can also listen to a&nbsp;<a href="https://citedpodcast.com/2024/08/13/next-week-damaging-rationality/" rel="noopener noreferrer">trailer</a>&nbsp;today. The&nbsp;<em>(ir)Rational Alaskans&nbsp;</em>is a partnership with&nbsp;<a href="https://www.nationalobserver.com/podcast/slick-science" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Canada’s National Observer</em></a><em>.</em>&nbsp;For a full list of credits, and for the rest of the episodes,&nbsp;<a href="https://citedpodcast.com/category/season-02-the-rationality-wars/" rel="noopener noreferrer">visit the series page</a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Aug 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/12-angry-alaskans-re-examining-the-exxon-valdez-oil-spill-case-E_tXX5nM</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is part #2 of a&nbsp;<em>the (ir)Rational Alaskans,&nbsp;</em>a&nbsp;<a href="https://citedpodcast.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Cited Podcast</em></a>&nbsp;series that re-examines the legacy of the Exxon Valdez oil spill.</p><p><a href="https://citedpodcast.com/2024/08/08/episode-6-the-irrational-alaskans-pt-1-of-3/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Last episode</a>, the spill devastates Cordova, Alaska. In this second part,&nbsp;<em>12 Angry Alaskans</em>, a jury of ordinary Alaskans picks up our story. They muddle through the most devastating, and most complicated, environmental disaster in US history. How would they decide the case?</p><p><a href="https://podcasts.apple.com/ca/podcast/cited-podcast/id558228325" rel="noopener noreferrer">Subscribe today</a>&nbsp;to ensure you do not miss our finale,&nbsp;<em>Damaging Rationality</em>, which examines the forgotten academic story behind Exxon’s legal appeals. You can also listen to a&nbsp;<a href="https://citedpodcast.com/2024/08/13/next-week-damaging-rationality/" rel="noopener noreferrer">trailer</a>&nbsp;today. The&nbsp;<em>(ir)Rational Alaskans&nbsp;</em>is a partnership with&nbsp;<a href="https://www.nationalobserver.com/podcast/slick-science" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Canada’s National Observer</em></a><em>.</em>&nbsp;For a full list of credits, and for the rest of the episodes,&nbsp;<a href="https://citedpodcast.com/category/season-02-the-rationality-wars/" rel="noopener noreferrer">visit the series page</a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="64089741" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/cf4a565c-b79b-4d7e-b5ad-47a3889d66ad/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=cf4a565c-b79b-4d7e-b5ad-47a3889d66ad&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>12 Angry Alaskans: Re-Examining the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill Case</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:06:45</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>This is part #2 of a the (ir)Rational Alaskans, a Cited Podcast series that re-examines the legacy of the Exxon Valdez oil spill.
Last episode, the spill devastates Cordova, Alaska. In this second part, 12 Angry Alaskans, a jury of ordinary Alaskans picks up our story. They muddle through the most devastating, and most complicated, environmental disaster in US history. How would they decide the case?
Subscribe today to ensure you do not miss our finale, Damaging Rationality, which examines the forgotten academic story behind Exxon’s legal appeals. You can also listen to a trailer today. The (ir)Rational Alaskans is a partnership with Canada’s National Observer. For a full list of credits, and for the rest of the episodes, visit the series page.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>This is part #2 of a the (ir)Rational Alaskans, a Cited Podcast series that re-examines the legacy of the Exxon Valdez oil spill.
Last episode, the spill devastates Cordova, Alaska. In this second part, 12 Angry Alaskans, a jury of ordinary Alaskans picks up our story. They muddle through the most devastating, and most complicated, environmental disaster in US history. How would they decide the case?
Subscribe today to ensure you do not miss our finale, Damaging Rationality, which examines the forgotten academic story behind Exxon’s legal appeals. You can also listen to a trailer today. The (ir)Rational Alaskans is a partnership with Canada’s National Observer. For a full list of credits, and for the rest of the episodes, visit the series page.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>67</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7088e3de-5693-11ef-82e7-b767e331d29d</guid>
      <title>Peter Charles Hoffer, &quot;The Supreme Court Footnote: A Surprising History&quot; (NYU Press, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>When the draft majority decision in&nbsp;<em>Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health</em>&nbsp;was leaked, the media, public officials, and scholars focused on the overturning of&nbsp;<em>Roe v. Wade</em>. They noted Justice Alito’s strident tone and radical use of originalism to eliminate constitutional protection for reproductive rights. My guest today has written a book that asks us to also notice over 140 footnotes in the majority opinion and dissent. Are these notes part of the law? In his new book,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781479830220" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Supreme Court Footnote: A Surprising History</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(NYU Press, 2024), Dr. Peter Charles Hoffer insists that these notes are significant. The footnotes reveal the justices' beliefs about the Constitution's essence, highlight their controversial reasoning, and expose “vastly different interpretations of the role of Supreme Court Justice.”</p><p>Using a comprehensive qualitative analysis,&nbsp;<em>The Supreme Court Footnote</em>, offers a history of the evolution of footnotes in US Supreme Court opinions and a thoughtful set of case studies to reveal the particular ways that the footnote has affected Supreme Court decisions. Hoffer argues that justices alter the course of history through their decisions and the footnote is the way in which they push their own understanding of the Constitution.</p><p>Eight case studies show how the footnote has evolved over time. He begins with&nbsp;<em>Chisholm v. Georgia</em>&nbsp;in 1792 and ends with&nbsp;<em>Dobbs v. Jackson</em>&nbsp;case in 2022. Using&nbsp;<em>Dred Scott, Viterbo v. Friedlander, Muller v. Oregon, United States v. Carolene Products, Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka,&nbsp;</em>and&nbsp;<em>District of Columbia v. Heller</em>, Hoffer demonstrates how the footnotes reflect the changing role of the Supreme Court justice and the manner in which they interpret the Constitution. Dr. Hoffer looks back in order to look forward. He offers a study of the footnote that is relevant to contemporary debates over the Supreme Court, methods of interpretation, and politics.&nbsp;</p><p><a href="https://www.history.uga.edu/directory/people/peter-charles-hoffer" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. Peter Charles Hoffer</a>&nbsp;is Distinguished Research Professor of History at the University of Georgia. Hoffer went to University of Rochester and Harvard and has taught at Ohio State, Notre Dame, and UGA (since 1978). He has written books on the Supreme Court, the Federal Court System, infanticide, impeachment, abortion, early American history, slave rebellions, and historical methods.</p><p>During the podcast, we mentioned:</p><ul>
<li>Anthony Grafton’s&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/the-footnote-a-curious-history-anthony-grafton/6715257?gad_source=1&amp;gclid=CjwKCAjw1K-zBhBIEiwAWeCOF2tJ27n38ZLn6FijfFGNbHSrTKoXMcfbqF5QyEiQ2ZpjbWZG5LUfpBoCOrsQAvD_BwE" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Footnote: A Curious History</em></a>&nbsp;(Harvard, 1999)</li>
<li>My NBN&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-people-and-their-peace#entry:262520@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">conversation with Laura F. Edward’s on her book (<em>The People and their Peace),&nbsp;</em>originalism and domestic violence</a>
</li>
<li>The University of Kansas’s&nbsp;<a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/search-grid/?keyword=landmark+law+cases" rel="noopener noreferrer">Landmark Law Series</a>
</li>
<li>Peter’s book&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/reading-law-forward-the-making-of-a-democratic-jurisprudence-from-john-marshall-to-stephen-g-breyer-peter-charles-hoffer/20014339" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Reading Law Forward: The Making of a Democratic Jurisprudence from John Marshall to Stephen G. Breyer</em></a>&nbsp;(University of Kansas, 2023)</li>
<li>The&nbsp;<a href="https://www.npr.org/2024/06/12/nx-s1-5002000/lauren-windsor-secret-recordings-supreme-court-chief-justice-roberts-and-justice-alito" rel="noopener noreferrer">June 2024 recording of Justices Roberts and Alito</a>&nbsp;on godliness</li>
<li>Susan’s “<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/admin/entries/episodes/%E2%80%A2%09https:/www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/712393" rel="noopener noreferrer">Sensitive Places?: How Gender Unmasks the Myth of Originalism in&nbsp;<em>District of Columbia</em>&nbsp;v.&nbsp;<em>Heller</em></a>” (<em>Polity</em>, 2021)</li>
</ul><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Aug 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/peter-charles-hoffer-the-supreme-court-footnote-a-surprising-history-nyu-press-2024-05bGg88H</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When the draft majority decision in&nbsp;<em>Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health</em>&nbsp;was leaked, the media, public officials, and scholars focused on the overturning of&nbsp;<em>Roe v. Wade</em>. They noted Justice Alito’s strident tone and radical use of originalism to eliminate constitutional protection for reproductive rights. My guest today has written a book that asks us to also notice over 140 footnotes in the majority opinion and dissent. Are these notes part of the law? In his new book,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781479830220" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Supreme Court Footnote: A Surprising History</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(NYU Press, 2024), Dr. Peter Charles Hoffer insists that these notes are significant. The footnotes reveal the justices' beliefs about the Constitution's essence, highlight their controversial reasoning, and expose “vastly different interpretations of the role of Supreme Court Justice.”</p><p>Using a comprehensive qualitative analysis,&nbsp;<em>The Supreme Court Footnote</em>, offers a history of the evolution of footnotes in US Supreme Court opinions and a thoughtful set of case studies to reveal the particular ways that the footnote has affected Supreme Court decisions. Hoffer argues that justices alter the course of history through their decisions and the footnote is the way in which they push their own understanding of the Constitution.</p><p>Eight case studies show how the footnote has evolved over time. He begins with&nbsp;<em>Chisholm v. Georgia</em>&nbsp;in 1792 and ends with&nbsp;<em>Dobbs v. Jackson</em>&nbsp;case in 2022. Using&nbsp;<em>Dred Scott, Viterbo v. Friedlander, Muller v. Oregon, United States v. Carolene Products, Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka,&nbsp;</em>and&nbsp;<em>District of Columbia v. Heller</em>, Hoffer demonstrates how the footnotes reflect the changing role of the Supreme Court justice and the manner in which they interpret the Constitution. Dr. Hoffer looks back in order to look forward. He offers a study of the footnote that is relevant to contemporary debates over the Supreme Court, methods of interpretation, and politics.&nbsp;</p><p><a href="https://www.history.uga.edu/directory/people/peter-charles-hoffer" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. Peter Charles Hoffer</a>&nbsp;is Distinguished Research Professor of History at the University of Georgia. Hoffer went to University of Rochester and Harvard and has taught at Ohio State, Notre Dame, and UGA (since 1978). He has written books on the Supreme Court, the Federal Court System, infanticide, impeachment, abortion, early American history, slave rebellions, and historical methods.</p><p>During the podcast, we mentioned:</p><ul>
<li>Anthony Grafton’s&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/the-footnote-a-curious-history-anthony-grafton/6715257?gad_source=1&amp;gclid=CjwKCAjw1K-zBhBIEiwAWeCOF2tJ27n38ZLn6FijfFGNbHSrTKoXMcfbqF5QyEiQ2ZpjbWZG5LUfpBoCOrsQAvD_BwE" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Footnote: A Curious History</em></a>&nbsp;(Harvard, 1999)</li>
<li>My NBN&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-people-and-their-peace#entry:262520@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">conversation with Laura F. Edward’s on her book (<em>The People and their Peace),&nbsp;</em>originalism and domestic violence</a>
</li>
<li>The University of Kansas’s&nbsp;<a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/search-grid/?keyword=landmark+law+cases" rel="noopener noreferrer">Landmark Law Series</a>
</li>
<li>Peter’s book&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/reading-law-forward-the-making-of-a-democratic-jurisprudence-from-john-marshall-to-stephen-g-breyer-peter-charles-hoffer/20014339" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Reading Law Forward: The Making of a Democratic Jurisprudence from John Marshall to Stephen G. Breyer</em></a>&nbsp;(University of Kansas, 2023)</li>
<li>The&nbsp;<a href="https://www.npr.org/2024/06/12/nx-s1-5002000/lauren-windsor-secret-recordings-supreme-court-chief-justice-roberts-and-justice-alito" rel="noopener noreferrer">June 2024 recording of Justices Roberts and Alito</a>&nbsp;on godliness</li>
<li>Susan’s “<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/admin/entries/episodes/%E2%80%A2%09https:/www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/712393" rel="noopener noreferrer">Sensitive Places?: How Gender Unmasks the Myth of Originalism in&nbsp;<em>District of Columbia</em>&nbsp;v.&nbsp;<em>Heller</em></a>” (<em>Polity</em>, 2021)</li>
</ul><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="56455688" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/ce43dbfd-fc3d-4581-9183-62ac42bf876c/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=ce43dbfd-fc3d-4581-9183-62ac42bf876c&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Peter Charles Hoffer, &quot;The Supreme Court Footnote: A Surprising History&quot; (NYU Press, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:58:48</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>When the draft majority decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women&apos;s Health was leaked, the media, public officials, and scholars focused on the overturning of Roe v. Wade. They noted Justice Alito’s strident tone and radical use of originalism to eliminate constitutional protection for reproductive rights. My guest today has written a book that asks us to also notice over 140 footnotes in the majority opinion and dissent. Are these notes part of the law? In his new book, The Supreme Court Footnote: A Surprising History (NYU Press, 2024), Dr. Peter Charles Hoffer insists that these notes are significant. The footnotes reveal the justices&apos; beliefs about the Constitution&apos;s essence, highlight their controversial reasoning, and expose “vastly different interpretations of the role of Supreme Court Justice.”
Using a comprehensive qualitative analysis, The Supreme Court Footnote, offers a history of the evolution of footnotes in US Supreme Court opinions and a thoughtful set of case studies to reveal the particular ways that the footnote has affected Supreme Court decisions. Hoffer argues that justices alter the course of history through their decisions and the footnote is the way in which they push their own understanding of the Constitution.
Eight case studies show how the footnote has evolved over time. He begins with Chisholm v. Georgia in 1792 and ends with Dobbs v. Jackson case in 2022. Using Dred Scott, Viterbo v. Friedlander, Muller v. Oregon, United States v. Carolene Products, Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, and District of Columbia v. Heller, Hoffer demonstrates how the footnotes reflect the changing role of the Supreme Court justice and the manner in which they interpret the Constitution. Dr. Hoffer looks back in order to look forward. He offers a study of the footnote that is relevant to contemporary debates over the Supreme Court, methods of interpretation, and politics. 
Dr. Peter Charles Hoffer is Distinguished Research Professor of History at the University of Georgia. Hoffer went to University of Rochester and Harvard and has taught at Ohio State, Notre Dame, and UGA (since 1978). He has written books on the Supreme Court, the Federal Court System, infanticide, impeachment, abortion, early American history, slave rebellions, and historical methods.
During the podcast, we mentioned:
Anthony Grafton’s The Footnote: A Curious History (Harvard, 1999)
My NBN conversation with Laura F. Edward’s on her book (The People and their Peace), originalism and domestic violence
The University of Kansas’s Landmark Law Series
Peter’s book Reading Law Forward: The Making of a Democratic Jurisprudence from John Marshall to Stephen G. Breyer (University of Kansas, 2023)
The June 2024 recording of Justices Roberts and Alito on godliness
Susan’s “Sensitive Places?: How Gender Unmasks the Myth of Originalism in District of Columbia v. Heller” (Polity, 2021)
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>When the draft majority decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women&apos;s Health was leaked, the media, public officials, and scholars focused on the overturning of Roe v. Wade. They noted Justice Alito’s strident tone and radical use of originalism to eliminate constitutional protection for reproductive rights. My guest today has written a book that asks us to also notice over 140 footnotes in the majority opinion and dissent. Are these notes part of the law? In his new book, The Supreme Court Footnote: A Surprising History (NYU Press, 2024), Dr. Peter Charles Hoffer insists that these notes are significant. The footnotes reveal the justices&apos; beliefs about the Constitution&apos;s essence, highlight their controversial reasoning, and expose “vastly different interpretations of the role of Supreme Court Justice.”
Using a comprehensive qualitative analysis, The Supreme Court Footnote, offers a history of the evolution of footnotes in US Supreme Court opinions and a thoughtful set of case studies to reveal the particular ways that the footnote has affected Supreme Court decisions. Hoffer argues that justices alter the course of history through their decisions and the footnote is the way in which they push their own understanding of the Constitution.
Eight case studies show how the footnote has evolved over time. He begins with Chisholm v. Georgia in 1792 and ends with Dobbs v. Jackson case in 2022. Using Dred Scott, Viterbo v. Friedlander, Muller v. Oregon, United States v. Carolene Products, Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, and District of Columbia v. Heller, Hoffer demonstrates how the footnotes reflect the changing role of the Supreme Court justice and the manner in which they interpret the Constitution. Dr. Hoffer looks back in order to look forward. He offers a study of the footnote that is relevant to contemporary debates over the Supreme Court, methods of interpretation, and politics. 
Dr. Peter Charles Hoffer is Distinguished Research Professor of History at the University of Georgia. Hoffer went to University of Rochester and Harvard and has taught at Ohio State, Notre Dame, and UGA (since 1978). He has written books on the Supreme Court, the Federal Court System, infanticide, impeachment, abortion, early American history, slave rebellions, and historical methods.
During the podcast, we mentioned:
Anthony Grafton’s The Footnote: A Curious History (Harvard, 1999)
My NBN conversation with Laura F. Edward’s on her book (The People and their Peace), originalism and domestic violence
The University of Kansas’s Landmark Law Series
Peter’s book Reading Law Forward: The Making of a Democratic Jurisprudence from John Marshall to Stephen G. Breyer (University of Kansas, 2023)
The June 2024 recording of Justices Roberts and Alito on godliness
Susan’s “Sensitive Places?: How Gender Unmasks the Myth of Originalism in District of Columbia v. Heller” (Polity, 2021)
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>728</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">557434fc-55aa-11ef-85ad-8738c100bc7b</guid>
      <title>Daniel Kahneman’s Forgotten Legacy: Investigating Exxon-Funded Psychological Research</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>After the unprecedented Exxon Valdez oil spill, a jury of ordinary Alaskans decided that Exxon had to be punished. However, Exxon fought back against their punishment. They did so, in-part, by supporting research that suggested jurors are irrational. This work came from an esteemed group of psychologists, behavioural economists, and legal theorists–including Daniel Kahneman, and Cass Sunstein.</p><p>In this three-part series in partnership with&nbsp;<a href="https://www.nationalobserver.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Canada’s National Observer</em></a>,&nbsp;<a href="https://citedpodcast.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Cited Podcast</em></a>&nbsp;investigates the forgotten legacy of the Exxon Valdez oil spill and the research that followed. This first part,&nbsp;<em>an Alaskan Nightmare,&nbsp;</em>covers the spill and its immediate effects. Subsequent episodes will run weekly.&nbsp;<a href="https://podcasts.apple.com/ca/podcast/cited-podcast/id558228325" rel="noopener noreferrer">Subscribe today</a>&nbsp;to ensure you do not miss part #2,&nbsp;<em>12 Angry Alaskans,&nbsp;</em>and part #3,&nbsp;<em>Damaging Rationality</em>.</p><p>This is episode five of&nbsp;<a href="https://citedpodcast.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Cited Podcast’s</em></a>&nbsp;returning season,&nbsp;<a href="https://citedpodcast.com/category/season-02-the-rationality-wars/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>the Rationality Wars</em></a>. This season tells stories of political and scholarly battles to define rationality and irrationality. For a full list of credits, and for the rest of the episodes,&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/admin/entries/episodes/This%20is%20episode%20three%20of%20Cited%20Podcast%E2%80%99s%20returning%20season,%20the%20Rationality%20Wars.%20This%20season%20tells%20stories%20of%20political%20and%20scholarly%20battles%20to%20define%20rationality%20and%20irrationality.%20For%20a%20full%20list%20of%20credits,%20and%20for%20the%20rest%20of%20the%20episodes,%20visit%20the%20series%20page." rel="noopener noreferrer">visit the series page</a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 9 Aug 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/daniel-kahnemans-forgotten-legacy-investigating-exxon-funded-psychological-research-uXAqnux4</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After the unprecedented Exxon Valdez oil spill, a jury of ordinary Alaskans decided that Exxon had to be punished. However, Exxon fought back against their punishment. They did so, in-part, by supporting research that suggested jurors are irrational. This work came from an esteemed group of psychologists, behavioural economists, and legal theorists–including Daniel Kahneman, and Cass Sunstein.</p><p>In this three-part series in partnership with&nbsp;<a href="https://www.nationalobserver.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Canada’s National Observer</em></a>,&nbsp;<a href="https://citedpodcast.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Cited Podcast</em></a>&nbsp;investigates the forgotten legacy of the Exxon Valdez oil spill and the research that followed. This first part,&nbsp;<em>an Alaskan Nightmare,&nbsp;</em>covers the spill and its immediate effects. Subsequent episodes will run weekly.&nbsp;<a href="https://podcasts.apple.com/ca/podcast/cited-podcast/id558228325" rel="noopener noreferrer">Subscribe today</a>&nbsp;to ensure you do not miss part #2,&nbsp;<em>12 Angry Alaskans,&nbsp;</em>and part #3,&nbsp;<em>Damaging Rationality</em>.</p><p>This is episode five of&nbsp;<a href="https://citedpodcast.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Cited Podcast’s</em></a>&nbsp;returning season,&nbsp;<a href="https://citedpodcast.com/category/season-02-the-rationality-wars/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>the Rationality Wars</em></a>. This season tells stories of political and scholarly battles to define rationality and irrationality. For a full list of credits, and for the rest of the episodes,&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/admin/entries/episodes/This%20is%20episode%20three%20of%20Cited%20Podcast%E2%80%99s%20returning%20season,%20the%20Rationality%20Wars.%20This%20season%20tells%20stories%20of%20political%20and%20scholarly%20battles%20to%20define%20rationality%20and%20irrationality.%20For%20a%20full%20list%20of%20credits,%20and%20for%20the%20rest%20of%20the%20episodes,%20visit%20the%20series%20page." rel="noopener noreferrer">visit the series page</a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="57131332" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/1ff73917-9e1a-44b6-9bc0-aadeeeee6ded/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=1ff73917-9e1a-44b6-9bc0-aadeeeee6ded&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Daniel Kahneman’s Forgotten Legacy: Investigating Exxon-Funded Psychological Research</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:59:30</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>After the unprecedented Exxon Valdez oil spill, a jury of ordinary Alaskans decided that Exxon had to be punished. However, Exxon fought back against their punishment. They did so, in-part, by supporting research that suggested jurors are irrational. This work came from an esteemed group of psychologists, behavioural economists, and legal theorists–including Daniel Kahneman, and Cass Sunstein.
In this three-part series in partnership with Canada’s National Observer, Cited Podcast investigates the forgotten legacy of the Exxon Valdez oil spill and the research that followed. This first part, an Alaskan Nightmare, covers the spill and its immediate effects. Subsequent episodes will run weekly. Subscribe today to ensure you do not miss part #2, 12 Angry Alaskans, and part #3, Damaging Rationality.
This is episode five of Cited Podcast’s returning season, the Rationality Wars. This season tells stories of political and scholarly battles to define rationality and irrationality. For a full list of credits, and for the rest of the episodes, visit the series page.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>After the unprecedented Exxon Valdez oil spill, a jury of ordinary Alaskans decided that Exxon had to be punished. However, Exxon fought back against their punishment. They did so, in-part, by supporting research that suggested jurors are irrational. This work came from an esteemed group of psychologists, behavioural economists, and legal theorists–including Daniel Kahneman, and Cass Sunstein.
In this three-part series in partnership with Canada’s National Observer, Cited Podcast investigates the forgotten legacy of the Exxon Valdez oil spill and the research that followed. This first part, an Alaskan Nightmare, covers the spill and its immediate effects. Subsequent episodes will run weekly. Subscribe today to ensure you do not miss part #2, 12 Angry Alaskans, and part #3, Damaging Rationality.
This is episode five of Cited Podcast’s returning season, the Rationality Wars. This season tells stories of political and scholarly battles to define rationality and irrationality. For a full list of credits, and for the rest of the episodes, visit the series page.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>68</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">79fb9d9c-5366-11ef-b96f-73ccfa10a505</guid>
      <title>Samuel Ely Bagg, &quot;The Dispersion of Power: A Critical Realist Theory of Democracy&quot; (Oxford UP, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>This year, many countries around the world, including most of the world's most populous democracies, have consequential nation-wide elections. In many of these elections, democracy itself is at stake.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780192848826" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Dispersion of Power: A Critical Realist Theory of Democracy</em></a>&nbsp;(Oxford UP, 2023) is an urgent call to rethink centuries of conventional wisdom about what democracy is, why it matters, and how to make it better. Drawing from history, social science, psychology, and critical theory, Samuel Ely Bagg explains why we should shift our orientation away from maximizing collective self-rule and why prevailing strategies of democratic reform often make things worse. Bagg argues we should see democracy as a way of protecting public power from capture - a vision that is at once more realistic and, he argues, more inspiring. The book presents an ambitious and comprehensive engagement with democracy's foundations, principles, and practices. Make no mistake, this work of political theory is profoundly worldly: it bears reading for those interested in politics across time, space, and scale - from the reconstruction US to contemporary Hungary, Turkey and Venezuela.&nbsp;</p><p>Samuel Bagg is Assistant Professor in the Department of Political Science at the University of South Carolina, where he teaches courses in political theory. Before coming to UofSC, he taught at the University of Oxford, McGill University, and Duke University, where he received his PhD in 2017.</p><p><a href="https://vatsalnaresh.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Vatsal Naresh</a>&nbsp;is a Lecturer in Social Studies at Harvard University. His recent publications include co-edited volumes on Negotiating Democracy and Religious Pluralism (OUP 2021) and Constituent Assemblies (CUP 2018).</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 7 Aug 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/samuel-ely-bagg-the-dispersion-of-power-a-critical-realist-theory-of-democracy-oxford-up-2023-s4gBwBRa-5GzUxt77</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This year, many countries around the world, including most of the world's most populous democracies, have consequential nation-wide elections. In many of these elections, democracy itself is at stake.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780192848826" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Dispersion of Power: A Critical Realist Theory of Democracy</em></a>&nbsp;(Oxford UP, 2023) is an urgent call to rethink centuries of conventional wisdom about what democracy is, why it matters, and how to make it better. Drawing from history, social science, psychology, and critical theory, Samuel Ely Bagg explains why we should shift our orientation away from maximizing collective self-rule and why prevailing strategies of democratic reform often make things worse. Bagg argues we should see democracy as a way of protecting public power from capture - a vision that is at once more realistic and, he argues, more inspiring. The book presents an ambitious and comprehensive engagement with democracy's foundations, principles, and practices. Make no mistake, this work of political theory is profoundly worldly: it bears reading for those interested in politics across time, space, and scale - from the reconstruction US to contemporary Hungary, Turkey and Venezuela.&nbsp;</p><p>Samuel Bagg is Assistant Professor in the Department of Political Science at the University of South Carolina, where he teaches courses in political theory. Before coming to UofSC, he taught at the University of Oxford, McGill University, and Duke University, where he received his PhD in 2017.</p><p><a href="https://vatsalnaresh.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Vatsal Naresh</a>&nbsp;is a Lecturer in Social Studies at Harvard University. His recent publications include co-edited volumes on Negotiating Democracy and Religious Pluralism (OUP 2021) and Constituent Assemblies (CUP 2018).</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="73091055" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/7ff06939-4a20-4c55-bed8-41dd2e872778/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=7ff06939-4a20-4c55-bed8-41dd2e872778&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Samuel Ely Bagg, &quot;The Dispersion of Power: A Critical Realist Theory of Democracy&quot; (Oxford UP, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:16:08</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>This year, many countries around the world, including most of the world&apos;s most populous democracies, have consequential nation-wide elections. In many of these elections, democracy itself is at stake. The Dispersion of Power: A Critical Realist Theory of Democracy (Oxford UP, 2023) is an urgent call to rethink centuries of conventional wisdom about what democracy is, why it matters, and how to make it better. Drawing from history, social science, psychology, and critical theory, Samuel Ely Bagg explains why we should shift our orientation away from maximizing collective self-rule and why prevailing strategies of democratic reform often make things worse. Bagg argues we should see democracy as a way of protecting public power from capture - a vision that is at once more realistic and, he argues, more inspiring. The book presents an ambitious and comprehensive engagement with democracy&apos;s foundations, principles, and practices. Make no mistake, this work of political theory is profoundly worldly: it bears reading for those interested in politics across time, space, and scale - from the reconstruction US to contemporary Hungary, Turkey and Venezuela. 
Samuel Bagg is Assistant Professor in the Department of Political Science at the University of South Carolina, where he teaches courses in political theory. Before coming to UofSC, he taught at the University of Oxford, McGill University, and Duke University, where he received his PhD in 2017.
Vatsal Naresh is a Lecturer in Social Studies at Harvard University. His recent publications include co-edited volumes on Negotiating Democracy and Religious Pluralism (OUP 2021) and Constituent Assemblies (CUP 2018).
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>This year, many countries around the world, including most of the world&apos;s most populous democracies, have consequential nation-wide elections. In many of these elections, democracy itself is at stake. The Dispersion of Power: A Critical Realist Theory of Democracy (Oxford UP, 2023) is an urgent call to rethink centuries of conventional wisdom about what democracy is, why it matters, and how to make it better. Drawing from history, social science, psychology, and critical theory, Samuel Ely Bagg explains why we should shift our orientation away from maximizing collective self-rule and why prevailing strategies of democratic reform often make things worse. Bagg argues we should see democracy as a way of protecting public power from capture - a vision that is at once more realistic and, he argues, more inspiring. The book presents an ambitious and comprehensive engagement with democracy&apos;s foundations, principles, and practices. Make no mistake, this work of political theory is profoundly worldly: it bears reading for those interested in politics across time, space, and scale - from the reconstruction US to contemporary Hungary, Turkey and Venezuela. 
Samuel Bagg is Assistant Professor in the Department of Political Science at the University of South Carolina, where he teaches courses in political theory. Before coming to UofSC, he taught at the University of Oxford, McGill University, and Duke University, where he received his PhD in 2017.
Vatsal Naresh is a Lecturer in Social Studies at Harvard University. His recent publications include co-edited volumes on Negotiating Democracy and Religious Pluralism (OUP 2021) and Constituent Assemblies (CUP 2018).
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>727</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">f9d108b0-5369-11ef-b9f5-2f6800e69e34</guid>
      <title>Thomas A. Kerns and Kathleen Dean Moore, &quot;Bearing Witness: The Human Rights Case Against Fracking and Climate Change&quot; (Oregon State UP, 2021)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Bringing together philosophy, jurisprudence, and a deep concern for the environment,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/bearing-witness-the-human-rights-case-against-fracking-and-climate-change-thomas-a-kerns/15613514?ean=9780870710728" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Bearing Witness: The Human Rights Case Against Fracking and Climate Change</em></a>&nbsp;offers an inspiring and generative way of thinking about the impacts of anthropogenic climate change. In particular, Thomas Kearns and Kathleen Dean Moore provide readers with insight into the Permanent Peoples' Tribunal as well as the wide-ranging and deeply-felt impacts of fracking, interspersing legal analysis, excerpts of Tribunal testimony, and reflections by climate writers like Winona LaDuke, Robin Wall Kimmerer, and Sandra Steingraber. The book's structure even creatively mirrors that of the Tribunal, offering a collage of insight to any reader interested in human rights and environmental issues—it is a work of deep dedication to thinking critically and deeply about how to face not only the environmental degradation caused by fracking, but also other kinds of harms caused by resource extraction and corporate interests. Rather than slip into climate nihilism,&nbsp;<em>Bearing Witness</em>&nbsp;seeks to name, investigate, and claim rights around environmental harms felt by humans and non-humans alike.</p><p>In the face of the increasing, globally-felt&nbsp;impacts of climate change, Kearns and Dean Moore provide us with a human-rights centered framework for engaging with and addressing some of the most pressing questions of our time.</p><p><a href="https://www.environmentandhumanrights.org/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Thomas A. Kearns</a>&nbsp;is an&nbsp;Emeritus Professor of Philosophy at North Seattle College, and is&nbsp;Director of Environment and Human Rights Advisory.&nbsp;In 2015, he helped draft the international Declaration on Human Rights and Climate Change, and in 2018, co-organized the&nbsp;International Tribunal on Human Rights, Fracking and Climate Change, which forms much of the basis for this book. His work is currently centred around facilitating youth climate courts.</p><p><a href="https://riverwalking.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Kathleen Dean Moore</a>&nbsp;is a&nbsp;Distinguished Philosophy Professor Emerita at Oregon State University, and longstanding public advocate for&nbsp;climate justice and ecological thriving. Her concern for climate catastrophe led her to leave her academic position to speak and write on environmental crises.&nbsp;Her numerous books and essays—many award-winning—focus on environmental ethics and climate crises, and she has published widely in academic and non-academic fora alike.</p><p><a href="https://www.rinevieth.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Rine Vieth</a>&nbsp;is an incoming FRQSC Postdoctoral Fellow at Université Laval. Interested in how people experience state legal regimes, their research centres around questions of law, migration, gender, and religion.</p><p>Further reading and works discussed in this episode:</p><ul>
<li><a href="https://www.tribunalonfracking.org/" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Permanent Peoples’ Tribunal on Human Rights, Fracking, and Climate Change</a></li>
<li>Film by the Spring Creek Project at Oregon State University,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qUgXyGuxDo8" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Bedrock Rights: A New Foundation for Global Action Against Fracking and Climate Change</em></a>
</li>
<li>Kathleen Dean Moore and Bob Haverluck,&nbsp;<a href="https://osupress.oregonstate.edu/book/take-heart" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Take Heart</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(OSU Press)</li>
<li><a href="https://www.youthclimatecourts.org/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Youth Climate Courts website</a></li>
</ul><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 6 Aug 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/thomas-a-kerns-and-kathleen-dean-moore-bearing-witness-the-human-rights-case-against-fracking-and-climate-change-oregon-state-up-2021-qf4JB9wT</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bringing together philosophy, jurisprudence, and a deep concern for the environment,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/bearing-witness-the-human-rights-case-against-fracking-and-climate-change-thomas-a-kerns/15613514?ean=9780870710728" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Bearing Witness: The Human Rights Case Against Fracking and Climate Change</em></a>&nbsp;offers an inspiring and generative way of thinking about the impacts of anthropogenic climate change. In particular, Thomas Kearns and Kathleen Dean Moore provide readers with insight into the Permanent Peoples' Tribunal as well as the wide-ranging and deeply-felt impacts of fracking, interspersing legal analysis, excerpts of Tribunal testimony, and reflections by climate writers like Winona LaDuke, Robin Wall Kimmerer, and Sandra Steingraber. The book's structure even creatively mirrors that of the Tribunal, offering a collage of insight to any reader interested in human rights and environmental issues—it is a work of deep dedication to thinking critically and deeply about how to face not only the environmental degradation caused by fracking, but also other kinds of harms caused by resource extraction and corporate interests. Rather than slip into climate nihilism,&nbsp;<em>Bearing Witness</em>&nbsp;seeks to name, investigate, and claim rights around environmental harms felt by humans and non-humans alike.</p><p>In the face of the increasing, globally-felt&nbsp;impacts of climate change, Kearns and Dean Moore provide us with a human-rights centered framework for engaging with and addressing some of the most pressing questions of our time.</p><p><a href="https://www.environmentandhumanrights.org/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Thomas A. Kearns</a>&nbsp;is an&nbsp;Emeritus Professor of Philosophy at North Seattle College, and is&nbsp;Director of Environment and Human Rights Advisory.&nbsp;In 2015, he helped draft the international Declaration on Human Rights and Climate Change, and in 2018, co-organized the&nbsp;International Tribunal on Human Rights, Fracking and Climate Change, which forms much of the basis for this book. His work is currently centred around facilitating youth climate courts.</p><p><a href="https://riverwalking.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Kathleen Dean Moore</a>&nbsp;is a&nbsp;Distinguished Philosophy Professor Emerita at Oregon State University, and longstanding public advocate for&nbsp;climate justice and ecological thriving. Her concern for climate catastrophe led her to leave her academic position to speak and write on environmental crises.&nbsp;Her numerous books and essays—many award-winning—focus on environmental ethics and climate crises, and she has published widely in academic and non-academic fora alike.</p><p><a href="https://www.rinevieth.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Rine Vieth</a>&nbsp;is an incoming FRQSC Postdoctoral Fellow at Université Laval. Interested in how people experience state legal regimes, their research centres around questions of law, migration, gender, and religion.</p><p>Further reading and works discussed in this episode:</p><ul>
<li><a href="https://www.tribunalonfracking.org/" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Permanent Peoples’ Tribunal on Human Rights, Fracking, and Climate Change</a></li>
<li>Film by the Spring Creek Project at Oregon State University,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qUgXyGuxDo8" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Bedrock Rights: A New Foundation for Global Action Against Fracking and Climate Change</em></a>
</li>
<li>Kathleen Dean Moore and Bob Haverluck,&nbsp;<a href="https://osupress.oregonstate.edu/book/take-heart" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Take Heart</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(OSU Press)</li>
<li><a href="https://www.youthclimatecourts.org/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Youth Climate Courts website</a></li>
</ul><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="44083568" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/393cca04-d9b7-494b-8ab9-4c87dc9a5d9f/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=393cca04-d9b7-494b-8ab9-4c87dc9a5d9f&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Thomas A. Kerns and Kathleen Dean Moore, &quot;Bearing Witness: The Human Rights Case Against Fracking and Climate Change&quot; (Oregon State UP, 2021)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:45:54</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Bringing together philosophy, jurisprudence, and a deep concern for the environment, Bearing Witness: The Human Rights Case Against Fracking and Climate Change offers an inspiring and generative way of thinking about the impacts of anthropogenic climate change. In particular, Thomas Kearns and Kathleen Dean Moore provide readers with insight into the Permanent Peoples&apos; Tribunal as well as the wide-ranging and deeply-felt impacts of fracking, interspersing legal analysis, excerpts of Tribunal testimony, and reflections by climate writers like Winona LaDuke, Robin Wall Kimmerer, and Sandra Steingraber. The book&apos;s structure even creatively mirrors that of the Tribunal, offering a collage of insight to any reader interested in human rights and environmental issues—it is a work of deep dedication to thinking critically and deeply about how to face not only the environmental degradation caused by fracking, but also other kinds of harms caused by resource extraction and corporate interests. Rather than slip into climate nihilism, Bearing Witness seeks to name, investigate, and claim rights around environmental harms felt by humans and non-humans alike.
In the face of the increasing, globally-felt impacts of climate change, Kearns and Dean Moore provide us with a human-rights centered framework for engaging with and addressing some of the most pressing questions of our time.
Thomas A. Kearns is an Emeritus Professor of Philosophy at North Seattle College, and is Director of Environment and Human Rights Advisory. In 2015, he helped draft the international Declaration on Human Rights and Climate Change, and in 2018, co-organized the International Tribunal on Human Rights, Fracking and Climate Change, which forms much of the basis for this book. His work is currently centred around facilitating youth climate courts.
Kathleen Dean Moore is a Distinguished Philosophy Professor Emerita at Oregon State University, and longstanding public advocate for climate justice and ecological thriving. Her concern for climate catastrophe led her to leave her academic position to speak and write on environmental crises. Her numerous books and essays—many award-winning—focus on environmental ethics and climate crises, and she has published widely in academic and non-academic fora alike.
Rine Vieth is an incoming FRQSC Postdoctoral Fellow at Université Laval. Interested in how people experience state legal regimes, their research centres around questions of law, migration, gender, and religion.
Further reading and works discussed in this episode:
The Permanent Peoples’ Tribunal on Human Rights, Fracking, and Climate Change
Film by the Spring Creek Project at Oregon State University, Bedrock Rights: A New Foundation for Global Action Against Fracking and Climate Change
Kathleen Dean Moore and Bob Haverluck, Take Heart (OSU Press)
Youth Climate Courts website
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Bringing together philosophy, jurisprudence, and a deep concern for the environment, Bearing Witness: The Human Rights Case Against Fracking and Climate Change offers an inspiring and generative way of thinking about the impacts of anthropogenic climate change. In particular, Thomas Kearns and Kathleen Dean Moore provide readers with insight into the Permanent Peoples&apos; Tribunal as well as the wide-ranging and deeply-felt impacts of fracking, interspersing legal analysis, excerpts of Tribunal testimony, and reflections by climate writers like Winona LaDuke, Robin Wall Kimmerer, and Sandra Steingraber. The book&apos;s structure even creatively mirrors that of the Tribunal, offering a collage of insight to any reader interested in human rights and environmental issues—it is a work of deep dedication to thinking critically and deeply about how to face not only the environmental degradation caused by fracking, but also other kinds of harms caused by resource extraction and corporate interests. Rather than slip into climate nihilism, Bearing Witness seeks to name, investigate, and claim rights around environmental harms felt by humans and non-humans alike.
In the face of the increasing, globally-felt impacts of climate change, Kearns and Dean Moore provide us with a human-rights centered framework for engaging with and addressing some of the most pressing questions of our time.
Thomas A. Kearns is an Emeritus Professor of Philosophy at North Seattle College, and is Director of Environment and Human Rights Advisory. In 2015, he helped draft the international Declaration on Human Rights and Climate Change, and in 2018, co-organized the International Tribunal on Human Rights, Fracking and Climate Change, which forms much of the basis for this book. His work is currently centred around facilitating youth climate courts.
Kathleen Dean Moore is a Distinguished Philosophy Professor Emerita at Oregon State University, and longstanding public advocate for climate justice and ecological thriving. Her concern for climate catastrophe led her to leave her academic position to speak and write on environmental crises. Her numerous books and essays—many award-winning—focus on environmental ethics and climate crises, and she has published widely in academic and non-academic fora alike.
Rine Vieth is an incoming FRQSC Postdoctoral Fellow at Université Laval. Interested in how people experience state legal regimes, their research centres around questions of law, migration, gender, and religion.
Further reading and works discussed in this episode:
The Permanent Peoples’ Tribunal on Human Rights, Fracking, and Climate Change
Film by the Spring Creek Project at Oregon State University, Bedrock Rights: A New Foundation for Global Action Against Fracking and Climate Change
Kathleen Dean Moore and Bob Haverluck, Take Heart (OSU Press)
Youth Climate Courts website
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>53</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">c760e080-50f3-11ef-9057-e770277634e1</guid>
      <title>Rachel M. Scott, &quot;Recasting Islamic Law: Religion and the Nation State in Egyptian Constitution Making&quot; (Cornell UP, 2021)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>By examining the intersection of Islamic law, state law, religion, and culture in the Egyptian nation-building process,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781501753978" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Recasting Islamic Law: Religion and the Nation State in Egyptian Constitution Making</em></a>&nbsp;(Cornell University Press, 2021) highlights how the sharia, when attached to constitutional commitments, is reshaped into modern Islamic state law.</p><p>Dr. Rachel M. Scott analyses the complex effects of constitutional commitments to the sharia in the wake of the Egyptian Revolution of 2011. She argues that the sharia is not dismantled by the modern state when it is applied as modern Islamic state law, but rather recast in its service. In showing the particular forms that the sharia takes when it is applied as modern Islamic state law, Scott pushes back against assumptions that introductions of the sharia into modern state law result in either the revival of mediaeval Islam or in its complete transformation. Scott engages with premodern law and with the Ottoman legal legacy on topics concerning Egypt's Coptic community, women's rights, personal status law, and the relationship between religious scholars and the Supreme Constitutional Court.&nbsp;<em>Recasting Islamic Law</em>&nbsp;considers modern Islamic state law's discontinuities and its continuities with premodern sharia.</p><p>Thanks to generous funding from Virginia Tech and its participation in TOME (Toward an Open Monograph Ecosystem), the ebook editions of this book are available as Open Access volumes from Cornell Open (cornellpress.cornell.edu/cornell-open) and other repositories.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;new book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 3 Aug 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/rachel-m-scott-recasting-islamic-law-religion-and-the-nation-state-in-egyptian-constitution-making-cornell-up-2021-S2Sl9LWh</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By examining the intersection of Islamic law, state law, religion, and culture in the Egyptian nation-building process,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781501753978" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Recasting Islamic Law: Religion and the Nation State in Egyptian Constitution Making</em></a>&nbsp;(Cornell University Press, 2021) highlights how the sharia, when attached to constitutional commitments, is reshaped into modern Islamic state law.</p><p>Dr. Rachel M. Scott analyses the complex effects of constitutional commitments to the sharia in the wake of the Egyptian Revolution of 2011. She argues that the sharia is not dismantled by the modern state when it is applied as modern Islamic state law, but rather recast in its service. In showing the particular forms that the sharia takes when it is applied as modern Islamic state law, Scott pushes back against assumptions that introductions of the sharia into modern state law result in either the revival of mediaeval Islam or in its complete transformation. Scott engages with premodern law and with the Ottoman legal legacy on topics concerning Egypt's Coptic community, women's rights, personal status law, and the relationship between religious scholars and the Supreme Constitutional Court.&nbsp;<em>Recasting Islamic Law</em>&nbsp;considers modern Islamic state law's discontinuities and its continuities with premodern sharia.</p><p>Thanks to generous funding from Virginia Tech and its participation in TOME (Toward an Open Monograph Ecosystem), the ebook editions of this book are available as Open Access volumes from Cornell Open (cornellpress.cornell.edu/cornell-open) and other repositories.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;new book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="61075805" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/676e36c8-dee8-4c85-bc0a-d5427d586658/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=676e36c8-dee8-4c85-bc0a-d5427d586658&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Rachel M. Scott, &quot;Recasting Islamic Law: Religion and the Nation State in Egyptian Constitution Making&quot; (Cornell UP, 2021)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:03:37</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>By examining the intersection of Islamic law, state law, religion, and culture in the Egyptian nation-building process, Recasting Islamic Law: Religion and the Nation State in Egyptian Constitution Making (Cornell University Press, 2021) highlights how the sharia, when attached to constitutional commitments, is reshaped into modern Islamic state law.
Dr. Rachel M. Scott analyses the complex effects of constitutional commitments to the sharia in the wake of the Egyptian Revolution of 2011. She argues that the sharia is not dismantled by the modern state when it is applied as modern Islamic state law, but rather recast in its service. In showing the particular forms that the sharia takes when it is applied as modern Islamic state law, Scott pushes back against assumptions that introductions of the sharia into modern state law result in either the revival of mediaeval Islam or in its complete transformation. Scott engages with premodern law and with the Ottoman legal legacy on topics concerning Egypt&apos;s Coptic community, women&apos;s rights, personal status law, and the relationship between religious scholars and the Supreme Constitutional Court. Recasting Islamic Law considers modern Islamic state law&apos;s discontinuities and its continuities with premodern sharia.
Thanks to generous funding from Virginia Tech and its participation in TOME (Toward an Open Monograph Ecosystem), the ebook editions of this book are available as Open Access volumes from Cornell Open (cornellpress.cornell.edu/cornell-open) and other repositories.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>By examining the intersection of Islamic law, state law, religion, and culture in the Egyptian nation-building process, Recasting Islamic Law: Religion and the Nation State in Egyptian Constitution Making (Cornell University Press, 2021) highlights how the sharia, when attached to constitutional commitments, is reshaped into modern Islamic state law.
Dr. Rachel M. Scott analyses the complex effects of constitutional commitments to the sharia in the wake of the Egyptian Revolution of 2011. She argues that the sharia is not dismantled by the modern state when it is applied as modern Islamic state law, but rather recast in its service. In showing the particular forms that the sharia takes when it is applied as modern Islamic state law, Scott pushes back against assumptions that introductions of the sharia into modern state law result in either the revival of mediaeval Islam or in its complete transformation. Scott engages with premodern law and with the Ottoman legal legacy on topics concerning Egypt&apos;s Coptic community, women&apos;s rights, personal status law, and the relationship between religious scholars and the Supreme Constitutional Court. Recasting Islamic Law considers modern Islamic state law&apos;s discontinuities and its continuities with premodern sharia.
Thanks to generous funding from Virginia Tech and its participation in TOME (Toward an Open Monograph Ecosystem), the ebook editions of this book are available as Open Access volumes from Cornell Open (cornellpress.cornell.edu/cornell-open) and other repositories.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>338</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2fca609a-4ead-11ef-b577-bb86e025effc</guid>
      <title>Jessica S. Henry, &quot;Smoke But No Fire: Convicting the Innocent of Crimes that Never Happened&quot; (U California Press, 2021)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Jessica Henry's&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780520385801" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Smoke But No Fire: Convicting the Innocent of Crimes that Never Happened</em></a>&nbsp;(U California Press, 2021)&nbsp;explores a shocking but all-too-common kind of wrongful conviction: wrongful convictions for crimes that never actually happened. Henry's meticulously-researched book sheds light on how the US criminal justice system makes it possible to convict people of nonexistent crimes. By tracing this issue from first interactions with&nbsp;the police, to encounters with&nbsp;legal professionals, to judges' verdicts, and beyond, Henry's analysis explains in heartbreaking detail the impacts of convictions without a crime&nbsp;on those convicted and their families—as well as what this means for US criminal law. Drawing from Henry's own experience working for many years as a public defender,&nbsp;<em>Smoke But No Fire</em>&nbsp;will be of great interest to legal professionals, students, organizers, and anyone interested in criminal law.</p><p><a href="https://jessicahenryjustice.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Jessica Henry</a>&nbsp;is a Professor in the Department of Justice Studies at Montclair State University. Previously, she worked as a public defender in New York City for nearly ten years.&nbsp;Her research focuses on the US criminal justice system, particularly wrongful convictions, severe sentences, and hate crimes.</p><p><a href="https://www.rinevieth.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Rine Vieth</a>&nbsp;is an incoming FRQSC Postdoctoral Fellow at Université Laval. Interested in how people experience state legal regimes, their research centres around questions of law, migration, gender, and religion.</p><p>Further reading:</p><ul>
<li><a href="https://www.law.umich.edu/special/exoneration/Pages/about.aspx" rel="noopener noreferrer">National Registry of Exonerations</a></li>
<li>Jessica Henry,&nbsp;"<a href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3139797" rel="noopener noreferrer">Smoke but No Fire: When Innocent People Are Wrongly Convicted of Crimes That Never Happened</a>" in the&nbsp;<em>American Criminal Law Review</em>&nbsp;(via SSRN)</li>
<li>Michelle Alexander, “<a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/11/opinion/sunday/go-to-trial-crash-the-justice-system.html" rel="noopener noreferrer">Go to Trial: Crash the Justice System</a>” in the&nbsp;<em>New York Times</em>&nbsp;Opinion section&nbsp;</li>
<li>2024 New Jersey&nbsp;<a href="https://nj.gov/governor/news/news/562024/approved/20240619a.shtml" rel="noopener noreferrer">Clemency Initiative Announcement</a>
</li>
</ul><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/jessica-s-henry-smoke-but-no-fire-convicting-the-innocent-of-crimes-that-never-happened-u-california-press-2021-buApE411</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jessica Henry's&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780520385801" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Smoke But No Fire: Convicting the Innocent of Crimes that Never Happened</em></a>&nbsp;(U California Press, 2021)&nbsp;explores a shocking but all-too-common kind of wrongful conviction: wrongful convictions for crimes that never actually happened. Henry's meticulously-researched book sheds light on how the US criminal justice system makes it possible to convict people of nonexistent crimes. By tracing this issue from first interactions with&nbsp;the police, to encounters with&nbsp;legal professionals, to judges' verdicts, and beyond, Henry's analysis explains in heartbreaking detail the impacts of convictions without a crime&nbsp;on those convicted and their families—as well as what this means for US criminal law. Drawing from Henry's own experience working for many years as a public defender,&nbsp;<em>Smoke But No Fire</em>&nbsp;will be of great interest to legal professionals, students, organizers, and anyone interested in criminal law.</p><p><a href="https://jessicahenryjustice.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Jessica Henry</a>&nbsp;is a Professor in the Department of Justice Studies at Montclair State University. Previously, she worked as a public defender in New York City for nearly ten years.&nbsp;Her research focuses on the US criminal justice system, particularly wrongful convictions, severe sentences, and hate crimes.</p><p><a href="https://www.rinevieth.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Rine Vieth</a>&nbsp;is an incoming FRQSC Postdoctoral Fellow at Université Laval. Interested in how people experience state legal regimes, their research centres around questions of law, migration, gender, and religion.</p><p>Further reading:</p><ul>
<li><a href="https://www.law.umich.edu/special/exoneration/Pages/about.aspx" rel="noopener noreferrer">National Registry of Exonerations</a></li>
<li>Jessica Henry,&nbsp;"<a href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3139797" rel="noopener noreferrer">Smoke but No Fire: When Innocent People Are Wrongly Convicted of Crimes That Never Happened</a>" in the&nbsp;<em>American Criminal Law Review</em>&nbsp;(via SSRN)</li>
<li>Michelle Alexander, “<a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/11/opinion/sunday/go-to-trial-crash-the-justice-system.html" rel="noopener noreferrer">Go to Trial: Crash the Justice System</a>” in the&nbsp;<em>New York Times</em>&nbsp;Opinion section&nbsp;</li>
<li>2024 New Jersey&nbsp;<a href="https://nj.gov/governor/news/news/562024/approved/20240619a.shtml" rel="noopener noreferrer">Clemency Initiative Announcement</a>
</li>
</ul><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="43019921" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/930a2187-7b21-4e1a-9261-197dfdb9c72d/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=930a2187-7b21-4e1a-9261-197dfdb9c72d&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Jessica S. Henry, &quot;Smoke But No Fire: Convicting the Innocent of Crimes that Never Happened&quot; (U California Press, 2021)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:44:48</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Jessica Henry&apos;s Smoke But No Fire: Convicting the Innocent of Crimes that Never Happened (U California Press, 2021) explores a shocking but all-too-common kind of wrongful conviction: wrongful convictions for crimes that never actually happened. Henry&apos;s meticulously-researched book sheds light on how the US criminal justice system makes it possible to convict people of nonexistent crimes. By tracing this issue from first interactions with the police, to encounters with legal professionals, to judges&apos; verdicts, and beyond, Henry&apos;s analysis explains in heartbreaking detail the impacts of convictions without a crime on those convicted and their families—as well as what this means for US criminal law. Drawing from Henry&apos;s own experience working for many years as a public defender, Smoke But No Fire will be of great interest to legal professionals, students, organizers, and anyone interested in criminal law.
Jessica Henry is a Professor in the Department of Justice Studies at Montclair State University. Previously, she worked as a public defender in New York City for nearly ten years. Her research focuses on the US criminal justice system, particularly wrongful convictions, severe sentences, and hate crimes.
Rine Vieth is an incoming FRQSC Postdoctoral Fellow at Université Laval. Interested in how people experience state legal regimes, their research centres around questions of law, migration, gender, and religion.
Further reading:
National Registry of Exonerations
Jessica Henry, &quot;Smoke but No Fire: When Innocent People Are Wrongly Convicted of Crimes That Never Happened&quot; in the American Criminal Law Review (via SSRN)
Michelle Alexander, “Go to Trial: Crash the Justice System” in the New York Times Opinion section 
2024 New Jersey Clemency Initiative Announcement
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Jessica Henry&apos;s Smoke But No Fire: Convicting the Innocent of Crimes that Never Happened (U California Press, 2021) explores a shocking but all-too-common kind of wrongful conviction: wrongful convictions for crimes that never actually happened. Henry&apos;s meticulously-researched book sheds light on how the US criminal justice system makes it possible to convict people of nonexistent crimes. By tracing this issue from first interactions with the police, to encounters with legal professionals, to judges&apos; verdicts, and beyond, Henry&apos;s analysis explains in heartbreaking detail the impacts of convictions without a crime on those convicted and their families—as well as what this means for US criminal law. Drawing from Henry&apos;s own experience working for many years as a public defender, Smoke But No Fire will be of great interest to legal professionals, students, organizers, and anyone interested in criminal law.
Jessica Henry is a Professor in the Department of Justice Studies at Montclair State University. Previously, she worked as a public defender in New York City for nearly ten years. Her research focuses on the US criminal justice system, particularly wrongful convictions, severe sentences, and hate crimes.
Rine Vieth is an incoming FRQSC Postdoctoral Fellow at Université Laval. Interested in how people experience state legal regimes, their research centres around questions of law, migration, gender, and religion.
Further reading:
National Registry of Exonerations
Jessica Henry, &quot;Smoke but No Fire: When Innocent People Are Wrongly Convicted of Crimes That Never Happened&quot; in the American Criminal Law Review (via SSRN)
Michelle Alexander, “Go to Trial: Crash the Justice System” in the New York Times Opinion section 
2024 New Jersey Clemency Initiative Announcement
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>57</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9d180eda-4d0f-11ef-b275-3fd07b676273</guid>
      <title>David A. Messenger, &quot;Hunting Nazis in Franco&apos;s Spain&quot; (LSU Press, 2014)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In the waning days and immediate aftermath of World War II, Nazi diplomats and spies based in Spain decided to stay rather than return to a defeated Germany. The decidedly pro-German dictatorship of General Francisco Franco gave them refuge and welcomed other officials and agents from the Third Reich who had escaped and made their way to Iberia. Amid fears of a revival of the Third Reich, Allied intelligence and diplomatic officers developed a repatriation program across Europe to return these individuals to Germany, where occupation authorities could further investigate them. Yet due to Spain's longstanding ideological alliance with Hitler, German infiltration of the Spanish economy and society was extensive, and the Allies could count on minimal Spanish cooperation in this effort.</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780807155639" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Hunting Nazis in Franco's Spain</em></a>&nbsp;(LSU Press, 2014), David Messenger deftly traces the development and execution of the Allied repatriation scheme, providing an analysis of Allied, Spanish, and German expatriate responses. Messenger shows that by April 1946, British and American embassy staff in Madrid had compiled a census of the roughly 10,000 Germans then residing in Spain and had drawn up three lists of 1,677 men and women targeted for repatriation to occupied Germany. While the Spanish government did round up and turn over some Germans to the Allies, many of them were intentionally overlooked in the process. By mid-1947, Franco's regime had forced only 265 people to leave Spain; most Germans managed to evade repatriation by moving from Spain to Argentina or by solidifying their ties to the Franco regime and Span-ish life. By 1948, the program was effectively over.</p><p>Drawing on records in American, British, and Spanish archives, this first book-length study in English of the repatriation program tells the story of this dramatic chapter in the history of post--World War II Europe.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jul 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/david-a-messenger-hunting-nazis-in-francos-spain-lsu-press-2014-E_F3Vcyd</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the waning days and immediate aftermath of World War II, Nazi diplomats and spies based in Spain decided to stay rather than return to a defeated Germany. The decidedly pro-German dictatorship of General Francisco Franco gave them refuge and welcomed other officials and agents from the Third Reich who had escaped and made their way to Iberia. Amid fears of a revival of the Third Reich, Allied intelligence and diplomatic officers developed a repatriation program across Europe to return these individuals to Germany, where occupation authorities could further investigate them. Yet due to Spain's longstanding ideological alliance with Hitler, German infiltration of the Spanish economy and society was extensive, and the Allies could count on minimal Spanish cooperation in this effort.</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780807155639" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Hunting Nazis in Franco's Spain</em></a>&nbsp;(LSU Press, 2014), David Messenger deftly traces the development and execution of the Allied repatriation scheme, providing an analysis of Allied, Spanish, and German expatriate responses. Messenger shows that by April 1946, British and American embassy staff in Madrid had compiled a census of the roughly 10,000 Germans then residing in Spain and had drawn up three lists of 1,677 men and women targeted for repatriation to occupied Germany. While the Spanish government did round up and turn over some Germans to the Allies, many of them were intentionally overlooked in the process. By mid-1947, Franco's regime had forced only 265 people to leave Spain; most Germans managed to evade repatriation by moving from Spain to Argentina or by solidifying their ties to the Franco regime and Span-ish life. By 1948, the program was effectively over.</p><p>Drawing on records in American, British, and Spanish archives, this first book-length study in English of the repatriation program tells the story of this dramatic chapter in the history of post--World War II Europe.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="63179708" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/ed2562b6-034d-4b6e-87da-d67c402f5f7c/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=ed2562b6-034d-4b6e-87da-d67c402f5f7c&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>David A. Messenger, &quot;Hunting Nazis in Franco&apos;s Spain&quot; (LSU Press, 2014)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:05:48</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In the waning days and immediate aftermath of World War II, Nazi diplomats and spies based in Spain decided to stay rather than return to a defeated Germany. The decidedly pro-German dictatorship of General Francisco Franco gave them refuge and welcomed other officials and agents from the Third Reich who had escaped and made their way to Iberia. Amid fears of a revival of the Third Reich, Allied intelligence and diplomatic officers developed a repatriation program across Europe to return these individuals to Germany, where occupation authorities could further investigate them. Yet due to Spain&apos;s longstanding ideological alliance with Hitler, German infiltration of the Spanish economy and society was extensive, and the Allies could count on minimal Spanish cooperation in this effort.
In Hunting Nazis in Franco&apos;s Spain (LSU Press, 2014), David Messenger deftly traces the development and execution of the Allied repatriation scheme, providing an analysis of Allied, Spanish, and German expatriate responses. Messenger shows that by April 1946, British and American embassy staff in Madrid had compiled a census of the roughly 10,000 Germans then residing in Spain and had drawn up three lists of 1,677 men and women targeted for repatriation to occupied Germany. While the Spanish government did round up and turn over some Germans to the Allies, many of them were intentionally overlooked in the process. By mid-1947, Franco&apos;s regime had forced only 265 people to leave Spain; most Germans managed to evade repatriation by moving from Spain to Argentina or by solidifying their ties to the Franco regime and Span-ish life. By 1948, the program was effectively over.
Drawing on records in American, British, and Spanish archives, this first book-length study in English of the repatriation program tells the story of this dramatic chapter in the history of post--World War II Europe.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In the waning days and immediate aftermath of World War II, Nazi diplomats and spies based in Spain decided to stay rather than return to a defeated Germany. The decidedly pro-German dictatorship of General Francisco Franco gave them refuge and welcomed other officials and agents from the Third Reich who had escaped and made their way to Iberia. Amid fears of a revival of the Third Reich, Allied intelligence and diplomatic officers developed a repatriation program across Europe to return these individuals to Germany, where occupation authorities could further investigate them. Yet due to Spain&apos;s longstanding ideological alliance with Hitler, German infiltration of the Spanish economy and society was extensive, and the Allies could count on minimal Spanish cooperation in this effort.
In Hunting Nazis in Franco&apos;s Spain (LSU Press, 2014), David Messenger deftly traces the development and execution of the Allied repatriation scheme, providing an analysis of Allied, Spanish, and German expatriate responses. Messenger shows that by April 1946, British and American embassy staff in Madrid had compiled a census of the roughly 10,000 Germans then residing in Spain and had drawn up three lists of 1,677 men and women targeted for repatriation to occupied Germany. While the Spanish government did round up and turn over some Germans to the Allies, many of them were intentionally overlooked in the process. By mid-1947, Franco&apos;s regime had forced only 265 people to leave Spain; most Germans managed to evade repatriation by moving from Spain to Argentina or by solidifying their ties to the Franco regime and Span-ish life. By 1948, the program was effectively over.
Drawing on records in American, British, and Spanish archives, this first book-length study in English of the repatriation program tells the story of this dramatic chapter in the history of post--World War II Europe.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1464</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2357a5f2-4ceb-11ef-84d6-47637720f0e2</guid>
      <title>David Pozen, &quot;The Constitution of the War on Drugs&quot; (Oxford UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The U.S. government's decades-long "war on drugs" is increasingly recognized as a moral travesty as well as a policy failure. The criminalization of substances such as marijuana and magic mushrooms offends core tenets of liberalism, from the right to self-rule to protection of privacy to freedom of religion. It contributes to mass incarceration and racial subordination. And it costs billions of dollars per year—all without advancing public health. Yet, in hundreds upon hundreds of cases, courts have allowed the war to proceed virtually unchecked. How could a set of policies so draconian, destructive, and discriminatory escape constitutional curtailment?</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197685457" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Constitution of the War on Drugs</em></a>&nbsp;(Oxford UP, 2024), David Pozen provides an authoritative, critical constitutional history of the drug war, casting new light on both drug prohibition and U.S. constitutional development. Throughout the 1960s and 1970s, advocates argued that criminal drug bans violate the Constitution's guarantees of due process, equal protection, federalism, free speech, free exercise of religion, and humane punishment. Many scholars and jurists agreed. Pozen demonstrates the plausibility of a constitutional path not taken, one that would have led to a more compassionate approach to drug control.</p><p>Rather than restrain the drug war, the Constitution helped to legitimate and entrench it. Pozen shows how a profoundly illiberal and paternalistic policy regime was assimilated into, and came to shape, an ostensibly liberal and pluralistic constitutional order. Placing the U.S. jurisprudence in comparative context,&nbsp;<em>The Constitution of the War on Drugs&nbsp;</em>offers a comprehensive review of drug-rights decisions along with a roadmap to constitutional reform options available today.</p><p>This book is available open access&nbsp;<a href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4692949" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jul 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/david-pozen-the-constitution-of-the-war-on-drugs-oxford-up-2024-_l3uS65c-LNwV0Hfg</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The U.S. government's decades-long "war on drugs" is increasingly recognized as a moral travesty as well as a policy failure. The criminalization of substances such as marijuana and magic mushrooms offends core tenets of liberalism, from the right to self-rule to protection of privacy to freedom of religion. It contributes to mass incarceration and racial subordination. And it costs billions of dollars per year—all without advancing public health. Yet, in hundreds upon hundreds of cases, courts have allowed the war to proceed virtually unchecked. How could a set of policies so draconian, destructive, and discriminatory escape constitutional curtailment?</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197685457" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Constitution of the War on Drugs</em></a>&nbsp;(Oxford UP, 2024), David Pozen provides an authoritative, critical constitutional history of the drug war, casting new light on both drug prohibition and U.S. constitutional development. Throughout the 1960s and 1970s, advocates argued that criminal drug bans violate the Constitution's guarantees of due process, equal protection, federalism, free speech, free exercise of religion, and humane punishment. Many scholars and jurists agreed. Pozen demonstrates the plausibility of a constitutional path not taken, one that would have led to a more compassionate approach to drug control.</p><p>Rather than restrain the drug war, the Constitution helped to legitimate and entrench it. Pozen shows how a profoundly illiberal and paternalistic policy regime was assimilated into, and came to shape, an ostensibly liberal and pluralistic constitutional order. Placing the U.S. jurisprudence in comparative context,&nbsp;<em>The Constitution of the War on Drugs&nbsp;</em>offers a comprehensive review of drug-rights decisions along with a roadmap to constitutional reform options available today.</p><p>This book is available open access&nbsp;<a href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4692949" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="41809034" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/81efb4a6-e01c-4371-9046-5868fb3919f6/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=81efb4a6-e01c-4371-9046-5868fb3919f6&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>David Pozen, &quot;The Constitution of the War on Drugs&quot; (Oxford UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:43:32</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The U.S. government&apos;s decades-long &quot;war on drugs&quot; is increasingly recognized as a moral travesty as well as a policy failure. The criminalization of substances such as marijuana and magic mushrooms offends core tenets of liberalism, from the right to self-rule to protection of privacy to freedom of religion. It contributes to mass incarceration and racial subordination. And it costs billions of dollars per year—all without advancing public health. Yet, in hundreds upon hundreds of cases, courts have allowed the war to proceed virtually unchecked. How could a set of policies so draconian, destructive, and discriminatory escape constitutional curtailment?
In The Constitution of the War on Drugs (Oxford UP, 2024), David Pozen provides an authoritative, critical constitutional history of the drug war, casting new light on both drug prohibition and U.S. constitutional development. Throughout the 1960s and 1970s, advocates argued that criminal drug bans violate the Constitution&apos;s guarantees of due process, equal protection, federalism, free speech, free exercise of religion, and humane punishment. Many scholars and jurists agreed. Pozen demonstrates the plausibility of a constitutional path not taken, one that would have led to a more compassionate approach to drug control.
Rather than restrain the drug war, the Constitution helped to legitimate and entrench it. Pozen shows how a profoundly illiberal and paternalistic policy regime was assimilated into, and came to shape, an ostensibly liberal and pluralistic constitutional order. Placing the U.S. jurisprudence in comparative context, The Constitution of the War on Drugs offers a comprehensive review of drug-rights decisions along with a roadmap to constitutional reform options available today.
This book is available open access here.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The U.S. government&apos;s decades-long &quot;war on drugs&quot; is increasingly recognized as a moral travesty as well as a policy failure. The criminalization of substances such as marijuana and magic mushrooms offends core tenets of liberalism, from the right to self-rule to protection of privacy to freedom of religion. It contributes to mass incarceration and racial subordination. And it costs billions of dollars per year—all without advancing public health. Yet, in hundreds upon hundreds of cases, courts have allowed the war to proceed virtually unchecked. How could a set of policies so draconian, destructive, and discriminatory escape constitutional curtailment?
In The Constitution of the War on Drugs (Oxford UP, 2024), David Pozen provides an authoritative, critical constitutional history of the drug war, casting new light on both drug prohibition and U.S. constitutional development. Throughout the 1960s and 1970s, advocates argued that criminal drug bans violate the Constitution&apos;s guarantees of due process, equal protection, federalism, free speech, free exercise of religion, and humane punishment. Many scholars and jurists agreed. Pozen demonstrates the plausibility of a constitutional path not taken, one that would have led to a more compassionate approach to drug control.
Rather than restrain the drug war, the Constitution helped to legitimate and entrench it. Pozen shows how a profoundly illiberal and paternalistic policy regime was assimilated into, and came to shape, an ostensibly liberal and pluralistic constitutional order. Placing the U.S. jurisprudence in comparative context, The Constitution of the War on Drugs offers a comprehensive review of drug-rights decisions along with a roadmap to constitutional reform options available today.
This book is available open access here.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>228</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3aee0f1c-4c37-11ef-8328-5b97d5251ce3</guid>
      <title>Maarit Jänterä-Jareborg and Hélène Tigroudja, &quot;Women’s Human Rights and the Elimination of Discrimination&quot; (Brill/Nijhoff, 2016)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Despite global undertakings to safeguard the full enjoyment of human rights, culture, traditional practices and religion are widely used to discriminate against women. In&nbsp;<a href="https://brill.com/edcollbook/title/33783" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Women’s Human Rights and the Elimination of Discrimination</em></a>&nbsp;(Brill/Nijhoff, 2016),&nbsp;17 scholars approach women’s human rights globally, regionally and nationally, combining the perspectives of public and private international law in a hitherto unique manner. Comprehensive legal, culture-based and theoretical overviews are combined with analyses of topical issues, such as unbalanced sex-ratios, intercountry adoption, women as refugees or as “surrogate mothers”, violence against women and cross-border enforcement of protection orders.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 28 Jul 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/maarit-jantera-jareborg-and-helene-tigroudja-womens-human-rights-and-the-elimination-of-discrimination-brill-nijhoff-2016-bhuBbFW5</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Despite global undertakings to safeguard the full enjoyment of human rights, culture, traditional practices and religion are widely used to discriminate against women. In&nbsp;<a href="https://brill.com/edcollbook/title/33783" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Women’s Human Rights and the Elimination of Discrimination</em></a>&nbsp;(Brill/Nijhoff, 2016),&nbsp;17 scholars approach women’s human rights globally, regionally and nationally, combining the perspectives of public and private international law in a hitherto unique manner. Comprehensive legal, culture-based and theoretical overviews are combined with analyses of topical issues, such as unbalanced sex-ratios, intercountry adoption, women as refugees or as “surrogate mothers”, violence against women and cross-border enforcement of protection orders.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="46356562" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/3c0f53eb-ec2c-4f2e-bd3c-78994a2f7cd1/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=3c0f53eb-ec2c-4f2e-bd3c-78994a2f7cd1&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Maarit Jänterä-Jareborg and Hélène Tigroudja, &quot;Women’s Human Rights and the Elimination of Discrimination&quot; (Brill/Nijhoff, 2016)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:48:17</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Despite global undertakings to safeguard the full enjoyment of human rights, culture, traditional practices and religion are widely used to discriminate against women. In Women’s Human Rights and the Elimination of Discrimination (Brill/Nijhoff, 2016), 17 scholars approach women’s human rights globally, regionally and nationally, combining the perspectives of public and private international law in a hitherto unique manner. Comprehensive legal, culture-based and theoretical overviews are combined with analyses of topical issues, such as unbalanced sex-ratios, intercountry adoption, women as refugees or as “surrogate mothers”, violence against women and cross-border enforcement of protection orders.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Despite global undertakings to safeguard the full enjoyment of human rights, culture, traditional practices and religion are widely used to discriminate against women. In Women’s Human Rights and the Elimination of Discrimination (Brill/Nijhoff, 2016), 17 scholars approach women’s human rights globally, regionally and nationally, combining the perspectives of public and private international law in a hitherto unique manner. Comprehensive legal, culture-based and theoretical overviews are combined with analyses of topical issues, such as unbalanced sex-ratios, intercountry adoption, women as refugees or as “surrogate mothers”, violence against women and cross-border enforcement of protection orders.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>4</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">876a52b2-4aaf-11ef-b1e9-4363af96a0b3</guid>
      <title>Jean-Denis Mouton and Péter Kovács. &quot;The Concept of Citizenship in International Law&quot; (Brill/Nijhoff, 2018)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Several trends justify why it is worth analysing the concept of citizenship in international law. On the one hand, human mobility enhanced in the last decades of the twentieth century contributed largely to the multiplication of multiple citizenship. The phenomenon of migration, often linked to crises, fosters statelessness and presents new challenges to international law. The internationalization of human rights can accordingly have an impact on the law of nationality. Moreover, within the framework of regional organizations, new forms of citizenship are emerging. This phenomenon, going hand in hand with the traditional, historybased citizenship is also contributing to the challenges that the concept of citizenship faces in international law.</p><p>Attempting to get answers to these questions,<a href="https://brill.com/edcollbook/title/38737?rskey=R2fT4u&amp;result=1" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;<em>The Concept of Citizenship in International Law</em></a>&nbsp;(Brill/Nijhoff, 2018) tackles first common theoretical aspects at a universal level to be followed later by the analysis of the regional aspects. It tries to deepen the ongoing discussion in the scientific community and among the greater public on nationality and citizenship issues.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jul 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/jean-denis-mouton-and-peter-kovacs-the-concept-of-citizenship-in-international-law-brill-nijhoff-2018-daEDfaSB</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Several trends justify why it is worth analysing the concept of citizenship in international law. On the one hand, human mobility enhanced in the last decades of the twentieth century contributed largely to the multiplication of multiple citizenship. The phenomenon of migration, often linked to crises, fosters statelessness and presents new challenges to international law. The internationalization of human rights can accordingly have an impact on the law of nationality. Moreover, within the framework of regional organizations, new forms of citizenship are emerging. This phenomenon, going hand in hand with the traditional, historybased citizenship is also contributing to the challenges that the concept of citizenship faces in international law.</p><p>Attempting to get answers to these questions,<a href="https://brill.com/edcollbook/title/38737?rskey=R2fT4u&amp;result=1" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;<em>The Concept of Citizenship in International Law</em></a>&nbsp;(Brill/Nijhoff, 2018) tackles first common theoretical aspects at a universal level to be followed later by the analysis of the regional aspects. It tries to deepen the ongoing discussion in the scientific community and among the greater public on nationality and citizenship issues.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="62518207" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/6d31a138-a18c-4e62-8e15-f1ea37213131/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=6d31a138-a18c-4e62-8e15-f1ea37213131&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Jean-Denis Mouton and Péter Kovács. &quot;The Concept of Citizenship in International Law&quot; (Brill/Nijhoff, 2018)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:05:07</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Several trends justify why it is worth analysing the concept of citizenship in international law. On the one hand, human mobility enhanced in the last decades of the twentieth century contributed largely to the multiplication of multiple citizenship. The phenomenon of migration, often linked to crises, fosters statelessness and presents new challenges to international law. The internationalization of human rights can accordingly have an impact on the law of nationality. Moreover, within the framework of regional organizations, new forms of citizenship are emerging. This phenomenon, going hand in hand with the traditional, historybased citizenship is also contributing to the challenges that the concept of citizenship faces in international law.
Attempting to get answers to these questions, The Concept of Citizenship in International Law (Brill/Nijhoff, 2018) tackles first common theoretical aspects at a universal level to be followed later by the analysis of the regional aspects. It tries to deepen the ongoing discussion in the scientific community and among the greater public on nationality and citizenship issues.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Several trends justify why it is worth analysing the concept of citizenship in international law. On the one hand, human mobility enhanced in the last decades of the twentieth century contributed largely to the multiplication of multiple citizenship. The phenomenon of migration, often linked to crises, fosters statelessness and presents new challenges to international law. The internationalization of human rights can accordingly have an impact on the law of nationality. Moreover, within the framework of regional organizations, new forms of citizenship are emerging. This phenomenon, going hand in hand with the traditional, historybased citizenship is also contributing to the challenges that the concept of citizenship faces in international law.
Attempting to get answers to these questions, The Concept of Citizenship in International Law (Brill/Nijhoff, 2018) tackles first common theoretical aspects at a universal level to be followed later by the analysis of the regional aspects. It tries to deepen the ongoing discussion in the scientific community and among the greater public on nationality and citizenship issues.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>3</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">cdaa4214-4906-11ef-81f6-1f315758ea49</guid>
      <title>Alexander Sasha Kondakov, &quot;Violent Affections: Queer Sexuality, Techniques of Power, and Law in Russia&quot; (UCL Press, 2022)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.uclpress.co.uk/products/192308" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Violent Affections: Queer Sexuality, Techniques of Power, and Law in Russia</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(UCL Press, 2022) by&nbsp;Alexander Sasha Kondakov uncovers techniques of power that work to translate emotions into violence against queer people. Based on analysis of over 300 criminal cases of anti-queer violence in Russia before and after the introduction of ‘gay propaganda’ law, the book shows how violent acts are framed in emotional language by perpetrators during their criminal trials. It then utilises an original methodology of studying ‘legal memes’ and argues that these individual affective states are directly connected to the political violence aimed at queer lives more generally.&nbsp;</p><p>The main aim of&nbsp;<em>Violent Affections</em>&nbsp;is to explore the social mechanisms and techniques that impact anti-queer violence evidenced in the reviewed cases. Kondakov expands upon two sets of interdisciplinary literature – queer theory and affect theory – in order to conceptualise what is referred to as neo-disciplinary power. Taking the empirical observations from Russia as a starting point, he develops an original explanation of how contemporary power relations are changing from those of late modernity as envisioned by Foucault’s Panopticon to neo-disciplinary power relations of a much more fragmented, fluid and unstructured kind – the Memeticon. The book traces how exactly affections circulate from body to body as a kind of virus and eventually invade the body that responds with violence. In this analytic effort, it draws on the arguments from memetics – the theory of how pieces of information pass on from one body to another as they thrive to survive by continuing to resonate. This work makes the argument truly interdisciplinary.</p><p>This book is available open access&nbsp;<a href="https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/58052" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a>.&nbsp;</p><p>Alexander Sasha Kondakov is an assistant professor at the School of Sociology, University College Dublin, Ireland.</p><p>Tatiana Klepikova is a postdoctoral researcher at the University of Regensburg, where she leads a research group on queer literatures and cultures under socialism.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jul 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/alexander-sasha-kondakov-violent-affections-queer-sexuality-techniques-of-power-and-law-in-russia-ucl-press-2022-ENC1IVzj</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.uclpress.co.uk/products/192308" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Violent Affections: Queer Sexuality, Techniques of Power, and Law in Russia</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(UCL Press, 2022) by&nbsp;Alexander Sasha Kondakov uncovers techniques of power that work to translate emotions into violence against queer people. Based on analysis of over 300 criminal cases of anti-queer violence in Russia before and after the introduction of ‘gay propaganda’ law, the book shows how violent acts are framed in emotional language by perpetrators during their criminal trials. It then utilises an original methodology of studying ‘legal memes’ and argues that these individual affective states are directly connected to the political violence aimed at queer lives more generally.&nbsp;</p><p>The main aim of&nbsp;<em>Violent Affections</em>&nbsp;is to explore the social mechanisms and techniques that impact anti-queer violence evidenced in the reviewed cases. Kondakov expands upon two sets of interdisciplinary literature – queer theory and affect theory – in order to conceptualise what is referred to as neo-disciplinary power. Taking the empirical observations from Russia as a starting point, he develops an original explanation of how contemporary power relations are changing from those of late modernity as envisioned by Foucault’s Panopticon to neo-disciplinary power relations of a much more fragmented, fluid and unstructured kind – the Memeticon. The book traces how exactly affections circulate from body to body as a kind of virus and eventually invade the body that responds with violence. In this analytic effort, it draws on the arguments from memetics – the theory of how pieces of information pass on from one body to another as they thrive to survive by continuing to resonate. This work makes the argument truly interdisciplinary.</p><p>This book is available open access&nbsp;<a href="https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/58052" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a>.&nbsp;</p><p>Alexander Sasha Kondakov is an assistant professor at the School of Sociology, University College Dublin, Ireland.</p><p>Tatiana Klepikova is a postdoctoral researcher at the University of Regensburg, where she leads a research group on queer literatures and cultures under socialism.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="60340430" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/9e3c3a78-8e7a-4937-b9d7-361a86cbd2f5/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=9e3c3a78-8e7a-4937-b9d7-361a86cbd2f5&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Alexander Sasha Kondakov, &quot;Violent Affections: Queer Sexuality, Techniques of Power, and Law in Russia&quot; (UCL Press, 2022)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:02:51</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Violent Affections: Queer Sexuality, Techniques of Power, and Law in Russia (UCL Press, 2022) by Alexander Sasha Kondakov uncovers techniques of power that work to translate emotions into violence against queer people. Based on analysis of over 300 criminal cases of anti-queer violence in Russia before and after the introduction of ‘gay propaganda’ law, the book shows how violent acts are framed in emotional language by perpetrators during their criminal trials. It then utilises an original methodology of studying ‘legal memes’ and argues that these individual affective states are directly connected to the political violence aimed at queer lives more generally. 
The main aim of Violent Affections is to explore the social mechanisms and techniques that impact anti-queer violence evidenced in the reviewed cases. Kondakov expands upon two sets of interdisciplinary literature – queer theory and affect theory – in order to conceptualise what is referred to as neo-disciplinary power. Taking the empirical observations from Russia as a starting point, he develops an original explanation of how contemporary power relations are changing from those of late modernity as envisioned by Foucault’s Panopticon to neo-disciplinary power relations of a much more fragmented, fluid and unstructured kind – the Memeticon. The book traces how exactly affections circulate from body to body as a kind of virus and eventually invade the body that responds with violence. In this analytic effort, it draws on the arguments from memetics – the theory of how pieces of information pass on from one body to another as they thrive to survive by continuing to resonate. This work makes the argument truly interdisciplinary.
This book is available open access here. 
Alexander Sasha Kondakov is an assistant professor at the School of Sociology, University College Dublin, Ireland.
Tatiana Klepikova is a postdoctoral researcher at the University of Regensburg, where she leads a research group on queer literatures and cultures under socialism.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Violent Affections: Queer Sexuality, Techniques of Power, and Law in Russia (UCL Press, 2022) by Alexander Sasha Kondakov uncovers techniques of power that work to translate emotions into violence against queer people. Based on analysis of over 300 criminal cases of anti-queer violence in Russia before and after the introduction of ‘gay propaganda’ law, the book shows how violent acts are framed in emotional language by perpetrators during their criminal trials. It then utilises an original methodology of studying ‘legal memes’ and argues that these individual affective states are directly connected to the political violence aimed at queer lives more generally. 
The main aim of Violent Affections is to explore the social mechanisms and techniques that impact anti-queer violence evidenced in the reviewed cases. Kondakov expands upon two sets of interdisciplinary literature – queer theory and affect theory – in order to conceptualise what is referred to as neo-disciplinary power. Taking the empirical observations from Russia as a starting point, he develops an original explanation of how contemporary power relations are changing from those of late modernity as envisioned by Foucault’s Panopticon to neo-disciplinary power relations of a much more fragmented, fluid and unstructured kind – the Memeticon. The book traces how exactly affections circulate from body to body as a kind of virus and eventually invade the body that responds with violence. In this analytic effort, it draws on the arguments from memetics – the theory of how pieces of information pass on from one body to another as they thrive to survive by continuing to resonate. This work makes the argument truly interdisciplinary.
This book is available open access here. 
Alexander Sasha Kondakov is an assistant professor at the School of Sociology, University College Dublin, Ireland.
Tatiana Klepikova is a postdoctoral researcher at the University of Regensburg, where she leads a research group on queer literatures and cultures under socialism.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>274</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9f39f0d6-4605-11ef-ae50-df525cfaf2b9</guid>
      <title>Francine Banner, &quot;Beyond Complicity: Why We Blame Each Other Instead of Systems&quot; (U California Press, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780520399464" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Beyond Complicity: Why We Blame Each Other Instead of Systems</em></a>&nbsp;(University of California Press, 2024) by Dr. Francine Banner is a fascinating cultural diagnosis that identifies our obsession with complicity as a symptom of a deeply divided society. The questions surrounding what it means to be legally complicit are the same ones we may ask ourselves as we evaluate our own and others' responsibility for inherited and ongoing harms, such as racism, sexism, and climate change: What does it mean that someone "knew" they were contributing to wrongdoing? How much involvement must a person have in order to be complicit? At what point are we obligated to intervene?</p><p>Dr. Banner ties together pop culture, politics, law, and social movements to provide a framework for thinking about what we know intuitively: that our society is defined by crisis, risk, and the quest to root out hazards at all costs. Engaging with legal cases, historical examples, and contemporary case studies,&nbsp;<em>Beyond Complicity</em>&nbsp;unfolds the complex role that complicity plays in US law and society today, offering suggestions for how to shift focus away from blame and toward positive, lasting systemic change.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;new book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 21 Jul 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/francine-banner-beyond-complicity-why-we-blame-each-other-instead-of-systems-u-california-press-2024-MUE4JAUq</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780520399464" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Beyond Complicity: Why We Blame Each Other Instead of Systems</em></a>&nbsp;(University of California Press, 2024) by Dr. Francine Banner is a fascinating cultural diagnosis that identifies our obsession with complicity as a symptom of a deeply divided society. The questions surrounding what it means to be legally complicit are the same ones we may ask ourselves as we evaluate our own and others' responsibility for inherited and ongoing harms, such as racism, sexism, and climate change: What does it mean that someone "knew" they were contributing to wrongdoing? How much involvement must a person have in order to be complicit? At what point are we obligated to intervene?</p><p>Dr. Banner ties together pop culture, politics, law, and social movements to provide a framework for thinking about what we know intuitively: that our society is defined by crisis, risk, and the quest to root out hazards at all costs. Engaging with legal cases, historical examples, and contemporary case studies,&nbsp;<em>Beyond Complicity</em>&nbsp;unfolds the complex role that complicity plays in US law and society today, offering suggestions for how to shift focus away from blame and toward positive, lasting systemic change.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;new book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="51062780" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/f0f8880e-3dd0-4dce-a242-b7641de1f1cd/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=f0f8880e-3dd0-4dce-a242-b7641de1f1cd&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Francine Banner, &quot;Beyond Complicity: Why We Blame Each Other Instead of Systems&quot; (U California Press, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:53:11</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Beyond Complicity: Why We Blame Each Other Instead of Systems (University of California Press, 2024) by Dr. Francine Banner is a fascinating cultural diagnosis that identifies our obsession with complicity as a symptom of a deeply divided society. The questions surrounding what it means to be legally complicit are the same ones we may ask ourselves as we evaluate our own and others&apos; responsibility for inherited and ongoing harms, such as racism, sexism, and climate change: What does it mean that someone &quot;knew&quot; they were contributing to wrongdoing? How much involvement must a person have in order to be complicit? At what point are we obligated to intervene?
Dr. Banner ties together pop culture, politics, law, and social movements to provide a framework for thinking about what we know intuitively: that our society is defined by crisis, risk, and the quest to root out hazards at all costs. Engaging with legal cases, historical examples, and contemporary case studies, Beyond Complicity unfolds the complex role that complicity plays in US law and society today, offering suggestions for how to shift focus away from blame and toward positive, lasting systemic change.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Beyond Complicity: Why We Blame Each Other Instead of Systems (University of California Press, 2024) by Dr. Francine Banner is a fascinating cultural diagnosis that identifies our obsession with complicity as a symptom of a deeply divided society. The questions surrounding what it means to be legally complicit are the same ones we may ask ourselves as we evaluate our own and others&apos; responsibility for inherited and ongoing harms, such as racism, sexism, and climate change: What does it mean that someone &quot;knew&quot; they were contributing to wrongdoing? How much involvement must a person have in order to be complicit? At what point are we obligated to intervene?
Dr. Banner ties together pop culture, politics, law, and social movements to provide a framework for thinking about what we know intuitively: that our society is defined by crisis, risk, and the quest to root out hazards at all costs. Engaging with legal cases, historical examples, and contemporary case studies, Beyond Complicity unfolds the complex role that complicity plays in US law and society today, offering suggestions for how to shift focus away from blame and toward positive, lasting systemic change.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>227</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4c1efe54-460b-11ef-884c-c3ec1f3b84be</guid>
      <title>Matt Stoller, &quot;Goliath: The 100-Year War Between Monopoly Power and Democracy&quot; (Simon &amp; Schuster, 2020)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781501182891" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Goliath: The 100-Year War Between Monopoly Power and Democracy</em></a>&nbsp;(Simon &amp; Schuster, 2019), Matt Stoller explains how authoritarianism and populism have returned to American politics for the first time in eighty years, as the outcome of the 2016 election shook our faith in democratic institutions. It has brought to the fore dangerous forces that many modern Americans never even knew existed. Today's bitter recriminations and panic represent more than just fear of the future, they reflect a basic confusion about what is happening and the historical backstory that brought us to this moment.</p><p>The true effects of populism, a shrinking middle class, and concentrated financial wealth are only just beginning to manifest themselves under the current administrations. The lessons of Stoller's study will only grow more relevant as time passes. "An engaging call to arms," (Kirkus Reviews) Stoller illustrates here in rich detail how we arrived at this tenuous moment, and the steps we must take to create a new democracy.</p><p>Matt Stoller is the Director of Research at the American Economic Liberties Project.</p><p><em>Caleb Zakarin is the Assistant Editor of the New Books Network (Twitter: @caleb_zakarin).</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 20 Jul 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/matt-stoller-goliath-the-100-year-war-between-monopoly-power-and-democracy-simon-schuster-2020-0QMIp6ng-FgtqNXC1</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781501182891" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Goliath: The 100-Year War Between Monopoly Power and Democracy</em></a>&nbsp;(Simon &amp; Schuster, 2019), Matt Stoller explains how authoritarianism and populism have returned to American politics for the first time in eighty years, as the outcome of the 2016 election shook our faith in democratic institutions. It has brought to the fore dangerous forces that many modern Americans never even knew existed. Today's bitter recriminations and panic represent more than just fear of the future, they reflect a basic confusion about what is happening and the historical backstory that brought us to this moment.</p><p>The true effects of populism, a shrinking middle class, and concentrated financial wealth are only just beginning to manifest themselves under the current administrations. The lessons of Stoller's study will only grow more relevant as time passes. "An engaging call to arms," (Kirkus Reviews) Stoller illustrates here in rich detail how we arrived at this tenuous moment, and the steps we must take to create a new democracy.</p><p>Matt Stoller is the Director of Research at the American Economic Liberties Project.</p><p><em>Caleb Zakarin is the Assistant Editor of the New Books Network (Twitter: @caleb_zakarin).</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="47332147" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/68ed4b65-1233-4528-a693-9dabbca45ff5/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=68ed4b65-1233-4528-a693-9dabbca45ff5&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Matt Stoller, &quot;Goliath: The 100-Year War Between Monopoly Power and Democracy&quot; (Simon &amp; Schuster, 2020)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:49:18</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In Goliath: The 100-Year War Between Monopoly Power and Democracy (Simon &amp; Schuster, 2019), Matt Stoller explains how authoritarianism and populism have returned to American politics for the first time in eighty years, as the outcome of the 2016 election shook our faith in democratic institutions. It has brought to the fore dangerous forces that many modern Americans never even knew existed. Today&apos;s bitter recriminations and panic represent more than just fear of the future, they reflect a basic confusion about what is happening and the historical backstory that brought us to this moment.
The true effects of populism, a shrinking middle class, and concentrated financial wealth are only just beginning to manifest themselves under the current administrations. The lessons of Stoller&apos;s study will only grow more relevant as time passes. &quot;An engaging call to arms,&quot; (Kirkus Reviews) Stoller illustrates here in rich detail how we arrived at this tenuous moment, and the steps we must take to create a new democracy.
Matt Stoller is the Director of Research at the American Economic Liberties Project.
Caleb Zakarin is the Assistant Editor of the New Books Network (Twitter: @caleb_zakarin).
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In Goliath: The 100-Year War Between Monopoly Power and Democracy (Simon &amp; Schuster, 2019), Matt Stoller explains how authoritarianism and populism have returned to American politics for the first time in eighty years, as the outcome of the 2016 election shook our faith in democratic institutions. It has brought to the fore dangerous forces that many modern Americans never even knew existed. Today&apos;s bitter recriminations and panic represent more than just fear of the future, they reflect a basic confusion about what is happening and the historical backstory that brought us to this moment.
The true effects of populism, a shrinking middle class, and concentrated financial wealth are only just beginning to manifest themselves under the current administrations. The lessons of Stoller&apos;s study will only grow more relevant as time passes. &quot;An engaging call to arms,&quot; (Kirkus Reviews) Stoller illustrates here in rich detail how we arrived at this tenuous moment, and the steps we must take to create a new democracy.
Matt Stoller is the Director of Research at the American Economic Liberties Project.
Caleb Zakarin is the Assistant Editor of the New Books Network (Twitter: @caleb_zakarin).
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>144</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">d31cc370-445b-11ef-8ab5-7739292af3f2</guid>
      <title>Freeman&apos;s Challenge: The Murder That Shook America&apos;s Original Prison for Profit</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Today’s book is:&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780226744230" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Freeman’s Challenge: The Murder That Shook America’s Original Prison for Profit</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(U Chicago Press, 2024), by Dr. Robin Bernstein, which tells the story of a teenager named William Freeman. Convicted of a horse theft he insisted he did not commit, he was sentenced to five years of hard labor in Auburn’s new prison. Uniting incarceration and capitalism, the facility included industrial factories where prisoners worked as “slaves of the state.” They earned no wages, yet they manufactured furniture, animal harnesses, carpets, and combs, which consumers bought throughout the North. Then one young man challenged the system. Incensed at being forced to work without pay, William Freeman demanded wages. His challenge triggered violence: first against him, then by him. Freeman committed a murder that terrified and bewildered white America. And white America struck back—with aftereffects that reverberate into our lives today in the persistent myth of inherent Black criminality. William Freeman’s story reveals how the North invented prison for profit half a century before the Thirteenth Amendment outlawed slavery “except as a punishment for crime”—and how Frederick Douglass, Harriet Tubman, and other African Americans invented strategies of resilience and resistance in a city dominated by a citadel of unfreedom. Through one Black man, his family, and his city, Dr. Bernstein tells an explosive, moving story about the entangled origins of prison for profit and anti-Black racism.</p><p>Our guest is: Dr. Robin Bernstein, who is an award-winning cultural historian specializing in race and racism from the nineteenth century to the present. She teaches at Harvard University, where she is the Dillon Professor of American History and Professor of African and African American Studies and Studies of Women, Gender, and Sexuality.&nbsp;</p><p>Our host is:&nbsp;<a href="https://christinagessler.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. Christina Gessler</a>, the producer of the Academic Life podcast. She holds a PhD in history, which she uses to explore what stories we tell (and why) and what happens to those we never tell.</p><p>Playlist for listeners who wish to learn more:</p><ul>
<li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/stitching-freedom#entry:300506@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">Stitching Freedom: Embroidery and Incarceration</a></li>
<li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/education-behind-the-wall#entry:206799@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">Education Behind the Wall</a></li>
<li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/researching-racial-injustice#entry:39399@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">Hands Up, Don't Shoot: Researching Racial Injustice</a></li>
<li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-journal-of-higher-education-in-prison#entry:156475@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Journal of Higher Education in Prison</a></li>
</ul><p><br></p><p>Welcome to Academic Life, the podcast for your academic journey—and beyond! You can support the show by posting, assigning or sharing episodes. Join us again to learn from more experts inside and outside the academy, and around the world. Missed any of the 200+ Academic Life episodes? You’ll find them all archived&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/up-partners/academic-life" rel="noopener noreferrer">here.</a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jul 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/freemans-challenge-the-murder-that-shook-americas-original-prison-for-profit-5VZkmXJu</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today’s book is:&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780226744230" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Freeman’s Challenge: The Murder That Shook America’s Original Prison for Profit</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(U Chicago Press, 2024), by Dr. Robin Bernstein, which tells the story of a teenager named William Freeman. Convicted of a horse theft he insisted he did not commit, he was sentenced to five years of hard labor in Auburn’s new prison. Uniting incarceration and capitalism, the facility included industrial factories where prisoners worked as “slaves of the state.” They earned no wages, yet they manufactured furniture, animal harnesses, carpets, and combs, which consumers bought throughout the North. Then one young man challenged the system. Incensed at being forced to work without pay, William Freeman demanded wages. His challenge triggered violence: first against him, then by him. Freeman committed a murder that terrified and bewildered white America. And white America struck back—with aftereffects that reverberate into our lives today in the persistent myth of inherent Black criminality. William Freeman’s story reveals how the North invented prison for profit half a century before the Thirteenth Amendment outlawed slavery “except as a punishment for crime”—and how Frederick Douglass, Harriet Tubman, and other African Americans invented strategies of resilience and resistance in a city dominated by a citadel of unfreedom. Through one Black man, his family, and his city, Dr. Bernstein tells an explosive, moving story about the entangled origins of prison for profit and anti-Black racism.</p><p>Our guest is: Dr. Robin Bernstein, who is an award-winning cultural historian specializing in race and racism from the nineteenth century to the present. She teaches at Harvard University, where she is the Dillon Professor of American History and Professor of African and African American Studies and Studies of Women, Gender, and Sexuality.&nbsp;</p><p>Our host is:&nbsp;<a href="https://christinagessler.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. Christina Gessler</a>, the producer of the Academic Life podcast. She holds a PhD in history, which she uses to explore what stories we tell (and why) and what happens to those we never tell.</p><p>Playlist for listeners who wish to learn more:</p><ul>
<li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/stitching-freedom#entry:300506@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">Stitching Freedom: Embroidery and Incarceration</a></li>
<li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/education-behind-the-wall#entry:206799@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">Education Behind the Wall</a></li>
<li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/researching-racial-injustice#entry:39399@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">Hands Up, Don't Shoot: Researching Racial Injustice</a></li>
<li><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-journal-of-higher-education-in-prison#entry:156475@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Journal of Higher Education in Prison</a></li>
</ul><p><br></p><p>Welcome to Academic Life, the podcast for your academic journey—and beyond! You can support the show by posting, assigning or sharing episodes. Join us again to learn from more experts inside and outside the academy, and around the world. Missed any of the 200+ Academic Life episodes? You’ll find them all archived&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/up-partners/academic-life" rel="noopener noreferrer">here.</a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="50784741" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/cc04a45b-0171-4763-80b4-ee567e4cab4f/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=cc04a45b-0171-4763-80b4-ee567e4cab4f&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Freeman&apos;s Challenge: The Murder That Shook America&apos;s Original Prison for Profit</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:52:53</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Today’s book is: Freeman’s Challenge: The Murder That Shook America’s Original Prison for Profit (U Chicago Press, 2024), by Dr. Robin Bernstein, which tells the story of a teenager named William Freeman. Convicted of a horse theft he insisted he did not commit, he was sentenced to five years of hard labor in Auburn’s new prison. Uniting incarceration and capitalism, the facility included industrial factories where prisoners worked as “slaves of the state.” They earned no wages, yet they manufactured furniture, animal harnesses, carpets, and combs, which consumers bought throughout the North. Then one young man challenged the system. Incensed at being forced to work without pay, William Freeman demanded wages. His challenge triggered violence: first against him, then by him. Freeman committed a murder that terrified and bewildered white America. And white America struck back—with aftereffects that reverberate into our lives today in the persistent myth of inherent Black criminality. William Freeman’s story reveals how the North invented prison for profit half a century before the Thirteenth Amendment outlawed slavery “except as a punishment for crime”—and how Frederick Douglass, Harriet Tubman, and other African Americans invented strategies of resilience and resistance in a city dominated by a citadel of unfreedom. Through one Black man, his family, and his city, Dr. Bernstein tells an explosive, moving story about the entangled origins of prison for profit and anti-Black racism.
Our guest is: Dr. Robin Bernstein, who is an award-winning cultural historian specializing in race and racism from the nineteenth century to the present. She teaches at Harvard University, where she is the Dillon Professor of American History and Professor of African and African American Studies and Studies of Women, Gender, and Sexuality. 
Our host is: Dr. Christina Gessler, the producer of the Academic Life podcast. She holds a PhD in history, which she uses to explore what stories we tell (and why) and what happens to those we never tell.
Playlist for listeners who wish to learn more:
Stitching Freedom: Embroidery and Incarceration
Education Behind the Wall
Hands Up, Don&apos;t Shoot: Researching Racial Injustice
The Journal of Higher Education in Prison
Welcome to Academic Life, the podcast for your academic journey—and beyond! You can support the show by posting, assigning or sharing episodes. Join us again to learn from more experts inside and outside the academy, and around the world. Missed any of the 200+ Academic Life episodes? You’ll find them all archived here.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Today’s book is: Freeman’s Challenge: The Murder That Shook America’s Original Prison for Profit (U Chicago Press, 2024), by Dr. Robin Bernstein, which tells the story of a teenager named William Freeman. Convicted of a horse theft he insisted he did not commit, he was sentenced to five years of hard labor in Auburn’s new prison. Uniting incarceration and capitalism, the facility included industrial factories where prisoners worked as “slaves of the state.” They earned no wages, yet they manufactured furniture, animal harnesses, carpets, and combs, which consumers bought throughout the North. Then one young man challenged the system. Incensed at being forced to work without pay, William Freeman demanded wages. His challenge triggered violence: first against him, then by him. Freeman committed a murder that terrified and bewildered white America. And white America struck back—with aftereffects that reverberate into our lives today in the persistent myth of inherent Black criminality. William Freeman’s story reveals how the North invented prison for profit half a century before the Thirteenth Amendment outlawed slavery “except as a punishment for crime”—and how Frederick Douglass, Harriet Tubman, and other African Americans invented strategies of resilience and resistance in a city dominated by a citadel of unfreedom. Through one Black man, his family, and his city, Dr. Bernstein tells an explosive, moving story about the entangled origins of prison for profit and anti-Black racism.
Our guest is: Dr. Robin Bernstein, who is an award-winning cultural historian specializing in race and racism from the nineteenth century to the present. She teaches at Harvard University, where she is the Dillon Professor of American History and Professor of African and African American Studies and Studies of Women, Gender, and Sexuality. 
Our host is: Dr. Christina Gessler, the producer of the Academic Life podcast. She holds a PhD in history, which she uses to explore what stories we tell (and why) and what happens to those we never tell.
Playlist for listeners who wish to learn more:
Stitching Freedom: Embroidery and Incarceration
Education Behind the Wall
Hands Up, Don&apos;t Shoot: Researching Racial Injustice
The Journal of Higher Education in Prison
Welcome to Academic Life, the podcast for your academic journey—and beyond! You can support the show by posting, assigning or sharing episodes. Join us again to learn from more experts inside and outside the academy, and around the world. Missed any of the 200+ Academic Life episodes? You’ll find them all archived here.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>223</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e686e350-42a8-11ef-b88b-3b32f236f6a6</guid>
      <title>Michael Willrich, &quot;American Anarchy: The Epic Struggle between Immigrant Radicals and the US Government at the Dawn of the Twentieth Century&quot; (Basic Books, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In the early twentieth century, anarchists like Emma Goldman and Alexander Berkman championed a radical vision of a world without states, laws, or private property. Militant and sometimes violent, anarchists were heroes to many working-class immigrants. But to many others, anarchism was a terrifyingly foreign ideology. Determined to crush it, government officials launched a decades-long “war on anarchy,” a brutal program of spying, censorship, and deportation that set the foundations of the modern surveillance state. The lawyers who came to the anarchists’ defense advanced groundbreaking arguments for free speech and due process, inspiring the emergence of the civil liberties movement.</p><p>Michael Willrich's book&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781541697379" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>American Anarchy: The Epic Struggle between Immigrant Radicals and the US Government at the Dawn of the Twentieth Century&nbsp;</em></a>(Basic Books, 2023) tells the gripping tale of the anarchists, their allies, and their enemies, showing how their battles over freedom and power still shape our public life.</p><p><a href="https://huji.academia.edu/GeraldineGudefin" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Geraldine Gudefin</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a French-born modern Jewish historian researching Jewish family life, legal pluralism, and the migration experiences of Jews in France and the United States. She is currently a research fellow at the Hebrew University’s Avraham Harman Research Institute of Contemporary Jewry, and is completing a book titled An Impossible Divorce? East European Jews and the Limits of Legal Pluralism in France, 1900-1939.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jul 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/michael-willrich-american-anarchy-the-epic-struggle-between-immigrant-radicals-and-the-us-government-at-the-dawn-of-the-twentieth-century-basic-books-2023-vTtEz6ey</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the early twentieth century, anarchists like Emma Goldman and Alexander Berkman championed a radical vision of a world without states, laws, or private property. Militant and sometimes violent, anarchists were heroes to many working-class immigrants. But to many others, anarchism was a terrifyingly foreign ideology. Determined to crush it, government officials launched a decades-long “war on anarchy,” a brutal program of spying, censorship, and deportation that set the foundations of the modern surveillance state. The lawyers who came to the anarchists’ defense advanced groundbreaking arguments for free speech and due process, inspiring the emergence of the civil liberties movement.</p><p>Michael Willrich's book&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781541697379" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>American Anarchy: The Epic Struggle between Immigrant Radicals and the US Government at the Dawn of the Twentieth Century&nbsp;</em></a>(Basic Books, 2023) tells the gripping tale of the anarchists, their allies, and their enemies, showing how their battles over freedom and power still shape our public life.</p><p><a href="https://huji.academia.edu/GeraldineGudefin" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Geraldine Gudefin</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a French-born modern Jewish historian researching Jewish family life, legal pluralism, and the migration experiences of Jews in France and the United States. She is currently a research fellow at the Hebrew University’s Avraham Harman Research Institute of Contemporary Jewry, and is completing a book titled An Impossible Divorce? East European Jews and the Limits of Legal Pluralism in France, 1900-1939.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="67280871" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/a3e50598-3883-4449-92e5-0c479d2dfc06/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=a3e50598-3883-4449-92e5-0c479d2dfc06&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Michael Willrich, &quot;American Anarchy: The Epic Struggle between Immigrant Radicals and the US Government at the Dawn of the Twentieth Century&quot; (Basic Books, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:10:04</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In the early twentieth century, anarchists like Emma Goldman and Alexander Berkman championed a radical vision of a world without states, laws, or private property. Militant and sometimes violent, anarchists were heroes to many working-class immigrants. But to many others, anarchism was a terrifyingly foreign ideology. Determined to crush it, government officials launched a decades-long “war on anarchy,” a brutal program of spying, censorship, and deportation that set the foundations of the modern surveillance state. The lawyers who came to the anarchists’ defense advanced groundbreaking arguments for free speech and due process, inspiring the emergence of the civil liberties movement.
Michael Willrich&apos;s book American Anarchy: The Epic Struggle between Immigrant Radicals and the US Government at the Dawn of the Twentieth Century (Basic Books, 2023) tells the gripping tale of the anarchists, their allies, and their enemies, showing how their battles over freedom and power still shape our public life.
Geraldine Gudefin is a French-born modern Jewish historian researching Jewish family life, legal pluralism, and the migration experiences of Jews in France and the United States. She is currently a research fellow at the Hebrew University’s Avraham Harman Research Institute of Contemporary Jewry, and is completing a book titled An Impossible Divorce? East European Jews and the Limits of Legal Pluralism in France, 1900-1939.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In the early twentieth century, anarchists like Emma Goldman and Alexander Berkman championed a radical vision of a world without states, laws, or private property. Militant and sometimes violent, anarchists were heroes to many working-class immigrants. But to many others, anarchism was a terrifyingly foreign ideology. Determined to crush it, government officials launched a decades-long “war on anarchy,” a brutal program of spying, censorship, and deportation that set the foundations of the modern surveillance state. The lawyers who came to the anarchists’ defense advanced groundbreaking arguments for free speech and due process, inspiring the emergence of the civil liberties movement.
Michael Willrich&apos;s book American Anarchy: The Epic Struggle between Immigrant Radicals and the US Government at the Dawn of the Twentieth Century (Basic Books, 2023) tells the gripping tale of the anarchists, their allies, and their enemies, showing how their battles over freedom and power still shape our public life.
Geraldine Gudefin is a French-born modern Jewish historian researching Jewish family life, legal pluralism, and the migration experiences of Jews in France and the United States. She is currently a research fellow at the Hebrew University’s Avraham Harman Research Institute of Contemporary Jewry, and is completing a book titled An Impossible Divorce? East European Jews and the Limits of Legal Pluralism in France, 1900-1939.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>266</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">40bf0e64-42d7-11ef-a528-43e16ff958b7</guid>
      <title>Stefanie Coché, &quot;Psychiatric Institutions and Society: The Practice of Psychiatric Committal in the &quot;Third Reich,&quot; the Democratic Republic of Germany, and the Federal Republic of Germany, 1941-1963&quot; (Routledge, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Stefanie Coché's&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781032716176" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Psychiatric Institutions and Society: the Practice of Psychiatric Commital in the “Third Reich,” the Democratic Republic of Germany, and the Federal Republic of Germany, 1941-1963</em>&nbsp;</a>(London: Routledge, 2024; translated by Alex Skinner)&nbsp;probes how the serious and sometimes fatal decision was made to admit individuals to asylums during Germany’s age of extremes. The book shows that - even during the Nazi killing of the sick - relatives played an even more important role in most admissions than doctors and the authorities.</p><p>In light of admission practices, this study traces how ideas about illness, safety, and normality changed when the Nazi regime collapsed in 1945 and illuminates how closely power configurations in the psychiatric sector were linked to political and social circumstances in the early years of both German successor states.</p><p><a href="https://dornsife.usc.edu/cf/hist/people/faculty_display.cfm?Person_ID=1003449" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Paul Lerner</em></a><em>&nbsp;is Professor of History at the University of Southern California where he directs the Max Kade Institute for Austrian-German-Swiss Studies. He can be reached at plerner@usc.edu and @PFLerner.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jul 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/stefanie-coche-psychiatric-institutions-and-society-the-practice-of-psychiatric-committal-in-the-third-reich-the-democratic-republic-of-germany-and-the-federal-republic-of-germany-1941-1963-routledge-2024-HPloouFr</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stefanie Coché's&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781032716176" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Psychiatric Institutions and Society: the Practice of Psychiatric Commital in the “Third Reich,” the Democratic Republic of Germany, and the Federal Republic of Germany, 1941-1963</em>&nbsp;</a>(London: Routledge, 2024; translated by Alex Skinner)&nbsp;probes how the serious and sometimes fatal decision was made to admit individuals to asylums during Germany’s age of extremes. The book shows that - even during the Nazi killing of the sick - relatives played an even more important role in most admissions than doctors and the authorities.</p><p>In light of admission practices, this study traces how ideas about illness, safety, and normality changed when the Nazi regime collapsed in 1945 and illuminates how closely power configurations in the psychiatric sector were linked to political and social circumstances in the early years of both German successor states.</p><p><a href="https://dornsife.usc.edu/cf/hist/people/faculty_display.cfm?Person_ID=1003449" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Paul Lerner</em></a><em>&nbsp;is Professor of History at the University of Southern California where he directs the Max Kade Institute for Austrian-German-Swiss Studies. He can be reached at plerner@usc.edu and @PFLerner.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="50550513" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/deb78c8e-16d3-41a8-a9ce-75a3ef2eac8e/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=deb78c8e-16d3-41a8-a9ce-75a3ef2eac8e&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Stefanie Coché, &quot;Psychiatric Institutions and Society: The Practice of Psychiatric Committal in the &quot;Third Reich,&quot; the Democratic Republic of Germany, and the Federal Republic of Germany, 1941-1963&quot; (Routledge, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:52:39</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Stefanie Coché&apos;s Psychiatric Institutions and Society: the Practice of Psychiatric Commital in the “Third Reich,” the Democratic Republic of Germany, and the Federal Republic of Germany, 1941-1963 (London: Routledge, 2024; translated by Alex Skinner) probes how the serious and sometimes fatal decision was made to admit individuals to asylums during Germany’s age of extremes. The book shows that - even during the Nazi killing of the sick - relatives played an even more important role in most admissions than doctors and the authorities.
In light of admission practices, this study traces how ideas about illness, safety, and normality changed when the Nazi regime collapsed in 1945 and illuminates how closely power configurations in the psychiatric sector were linked to political and social circumstances in the early years of both German successor states.
Paul Lerner is Professor of History at the University of Southern California where he directs the Max Kade Institute for Austrian-German-Swiss Studies. He can be reached at plerner@usc.edu and @PFLerner.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Stefanie Coché&apos;s Psychiatric Institutions and Society: the Practice of Psychiatric Commital in the “Third Reich,” the Democratic Republic of Germany, and the Federal Republic of Germany, 1941-1963 (London: Routledge, 2024; translated by Alex Skinner) probes how the serious and sometimes fatal decision was made to admit individuals to asylums during Germany’s age of extremes. The book shows that - even during the Nazi killing of the sick - relatives played an even more important role in most admissions than doctors and the authorities.
In light of admission practices, this study traces how ideas about illness, safety, and normality changed when the Nazi regime collapsed in 1945 and illuminates how closely power configurations in the psychiatric sector were linked to political and social circumstances in the early years of both German successor states.
Paul Lerner is Professor of History at the University of Southern California where he directs the Max Kade Institute for Austrian-German-Swiss Studies. He can be reached at plerner@usc.edu and @PFLerner.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>161</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">95f7cccc-4084-11ef-a0c0-6b9e3fedfe92</guid>
      <title>Carl Öhman, &quot;The Afterlife of Data: What Happens to Your Information When You Die and Why You Should Care&quot; (U Chicago Press, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>A short, thought-provoking book about what happens to our online identities after we die.</p><p>These days, so much of our lives takes place online—but what about our afterlives? Thanks to the digital trails that we leave behind, our identities can now be reconstructed after our death. In fact, AI technology is already enabling us to “interact” with the departed. Sooner than we think, the dead will outnumber the living on Facebook. In this thought-provoking book, Carl Öhman explores the increasingly urgent question of what we should do with all this data and whether our digital afterlives are really our own—and if not, who should have the right to decide what happens to our data.</p><p>The stakes could hardly be higher. In the next thirty years alone, about two billion people will die. Those of us who remain will inherit the digital remains of an entire generation of humanity—the first digital citizens. Whoever ends up controlling these archives will also effectively control future access to our collective digital past, and this power will have vast political consequences. The fate of our digital remains should be of concern to everyone—past, present, and future. Rising to these challenges, Öhman explains, will require a collective reshaping of our economic and technical systems to reflect more than just the monetary value of digital remains.</p><p>As we stand before a period of deep civilizational change,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780226828220" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Afterlife of Data: What Happens to Your Information When You Die and Why You Should Care</em></a>&nbsp;(U Chicago Press, 2024)&nbsp;will be an essential guide to understanding why and how we as a human race must gain control of our collective digital past—before it is too late.</p><p><a href="https://jakec007.github.io/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Jake Chanenson</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a computer science Ph.D. student and law student at the University of Chicago. Broadly, Jake is interested in topics relating to HCI, privacy, and tech policy. Jake’s work has been published in top venues such as ACM’s CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 14 Jul 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/carl-ohman-the-afterlife-of-data-what-happens-to-your-information-when-you-die-and-why-you-should-care-u-chicago-press-2024-KlOpmMPL</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A short, thought-provoking book about what happens to our online identities after we die.</p><p>These days, so much of our lives takes place online—but what about our afterlives? Thanks to the digital trails that we leave behind, our identities can now be reconstructed after our death. In fact, AI technology is already enabling us to “interact” with the departed. Sooner than we think, the dead will outnumber the living on Facebook. In this thought-provoking book, Carl Öhman explores the increasingly urgent question of what we should do with all this data and whether our digital afterlives are really our own—and if not, who should have the right to decide what happens to our data.</p><p>The stakes could hardly be higher. In the next thirty years alone, about two billion people will die. Those of us who remain will inherit the digital remains of an entire generation of humanity—the first digital citizens. Whoever ends up controlling these archives will also effectively control future access to our collective digital past, and this power will have vast political consequences. The fate of our digital remains should be of concern to everyone—past, present, and future. Rising to these challenges, Öhman explains, will require a collective reshaping of our economic and technical systems to reflect more than just the monetary value of digital remains.</p><p>As we stand before a period of deep civilizational change,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780226828220" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Afterlife of Data: What Happens to Your Information When You Die and Why You Should Care</em></a>&nbsp;(U Chicago Press, 2024)&nbsp;will be an essential guide to understanding why and how we as a human race must gain control of our collective digital past—before it is too late.</p><p><a href="https://jakec007.github.io/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Jake Chanenson</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a computer science Ph.D. student and law student at the University of Chicago. Broadly, Jake is interested in topics relating to HCI, privacy, and tech policy. Jake’s work has been published in top venues such as ACM’s CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="35135310" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/466410bd-0561-424f-9bab-442897802183/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=466410bd-0561-424f-9bab-442897802183&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Carl Öhman, &quot;The Afterlife of Data: What Happens to Your Information When You Die and Why You Should Care&quot; (U Chicago Press, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:36:35</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>A short, thought-provoking book about what happens to our online identities after we die.
These days, so much of our lives takes place online—but what about our afterlives? Thanks to the digital trails that we leave behind, our identities can now be reconstructed after our death. In fact, AI technology is already enabling us to “interact” with the departed. Sooner than we think, the dead will outnumber the living on Facebook. In this thought-provoking book, Carl Öhman explores the increasingly urgent question of what we should do with all this data and whether our digital afterlives are really our own—and if not, who should have the right to decide what happens to our data.
The stakes could hardly be higher. In the next thirty years alone, about two billion people will die. Those of us who remain will inherit the digital remains of an entire generation of humanity—the first digital citizens. Whoever ends up controlling these archives will also effectively control future access to our collective digital past, and this power will have vast political consequences. The fate of our digital remains should be of concern to everyone—past, present, and future. Rising to these challenges, Öhman explains, will require a collective reshaping of our economic and technical systems to reflect more than just the monetary value of digital remains.
As we stand before a period of deep civilizational change, The Afterlife of Data: What Happens to Your Information When You Die and Why You Should Care (U Chicago Press, 2024) will be an essential guide to understanding why and how we as a human race must gain control of our collective digital past—before it is too late.
Jake Chanenson is a computer science Ph.D. student and law student at the University of Chicago. Broadly, Jake is interested in topics relating to HCI, privacy, and tech policy. Jake’s work has been published in top venues such as ACM’s CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>A short, thought-provoking book about what happens to our online identities after we die.
These days, so much of our lives takes place online—but what about our afterlives? Thanks to the digital trails that we leave behind, our identities can now be reconstructed after our death. In fact, AI technology is already enabling us to “interact” with the departed. Sooner than we think, the dead will outnumber the living on Facebook. In this thought-provoking book, Carl Öhman explores the increasingly urgent question of what we should do with all this data and whether our digital afterlives are really our own—and if not, who should have the right to decide what happens to our data.
The stakes could hardly be higher. In the next thirty years alone, about two billion people will die. Those of us who remain will inherit the digital remains of an entire generation of humanity—the first digital citizens. Whoever ends up controlling these archives will also effectively control future access to our collective digital past, and this power will have vast political consequences. The fate of our digital remains should be of concern to everyone—past, present, and future. Rising to these challenges, Öhman explains, will require a collective reshaping of our economic and technical systems to reflect more than just the monetary value of digital remains.
As we stand before a period of deep civilizational change, The Afterlife of Data: What Happens to Your Information When You Die and Why You Should Care (U Chicago Press, 2024) will be an essential guide to understanding why and how we as a human race must gain control of our collective digital past—before it is too late.
Jake Chanenson is a computer science Ph.D. student and law student at the University of Chicago. Broadly, Jake is interested in topics relating to HCI, privacy, and tech policy. Jake’s work has been published in top venues such as ACM’s CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>369</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">0c1b5ca4-1a26-11eb-94e1-5b8b7db4303b</guid>
      <title>Kevin Leo Nadal, &quot;Queering Law and Order: LGBTQ Communities and the Criminal Justice System&quot; (Lexington Book, 2020)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Throughout US history, lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) people have been pathologized, victimized, and criminalized. Reports of lynching, burning, or murdering of LGBTQ people have been documented for centuries. Prior to the 1970s, LGBTQ people were deemed as having psychological disorders and subsequently subject to electroshock therapy and other ineffective and cruel treatments. LGBTQ people have historically been arrested or imprisoned for crimes like sodomy, cross-dressing, and gathering in public spaces. And while there have been many strides to advocate for LGBTQ rights in contemporary times, there are still many ways that the criminal justice system works against LGBTQ and their lives, liberties, and freedoms.</p><p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781793601063" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Queering Law and Order: LGBTQ Communities and the Criminal Justice System</em></a>&nbsp;(Lexington Books, 2020) examines the state of LGBTQ people within the criminal justice system. Intertwining legal cases, academic research, and popular media, Nadal reviews a wide range of issues—ranging from historical heterosexist and transphobic legislation to police brutality to the prison industrial complex to family law. Grounded in Queer Theory and intersectional lenses, each chapter provides recommendations for queering and disrupting the justice system. This book serves as both an academic resource and a call to action for readers who are interested in advocating for LGBTQ rights.</p><p><em>Nick Pozek is the Assistant Director of the Parker School of Foreign and Comparative Law at Columbia University in the City of New York and a host of New Books in Law.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 14 Jul 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/kevin-leo-nadal-queering-law-and-order-lgbtq-communities-and-the-criminal-justice-system-lexington-book-2020-RdDr6GIE</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Throughout US history, lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) people have been pathologized, victimized, and criminalized. Reports of lynching, burning, or murdering of LGBTQ people have been documented for centuries. Prior to the 1970s, LGBTQ people were deemed as having psychological disorders and subsequently subject to electroshock therapy and other ineffective and cruel treatments. LGBTQ people have historically been arrested or imprisoned for crimes like sodomy, cross-dressing, and gathering in public spaces. And while there have been many strides to advocate for LGBTQ rights in contemporary times, there are still many ways that the criminal justice system works against LGBTQ and their lives, liberties, and freedoms.</p><p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781793601063" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Queering Law and Order: LGBTQ Communities and the Criminal Justice System</em></a>&nbsp;(Lexington Books, 2020) examines the state of LGBTQ people within the criminal justice system. Intertwining legal cases, academic research, and popular media, Nadal reviews a wide range of issues—ranging from historical heterosexist and transphobic legislation to police brutality to the prison industrial complex to family law. Grounded in Queer Theory and intersectional lenses, each chapter provides recommendations for queering and disrupting the justice system. This book serves as both an academic resource and a call to action for readers who are interested in advocating for LGBTQ rights.</p><p><em>Nick Pozek is the Assistant Director of the Parker School of Foreign and Comparative Law at Columbia University in the City of New York and a host of New Books in Law.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="35655165" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/97bace4f-7176-49d2-8426-0e7e00bc79fa/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=97bace4f-7176-49d2-8426-0e7e00bc79fa&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Kevin Leo Nadal, &quot;Queering Law and Order: LGBTQ Communities and the Criminal Justice System&quot; (Lexington Book, 2020)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:37:08</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Throughout US history, lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) people have been pathologized, victimized, and criminalized. Reports of lynching, burning, or murdering of LGBTQ people have been documented for centuries. Prior to the 1970s, LGBTQ people were deemed as having psychological disorders and subsequently subject to electroshock therapy and other ineffective and cruel treatments. LGBTQ people have historically been arrested or imprisoned for crimes like sodomy, cross-dressing, and gathering in public spaces. And while there have been many strides to advocate for LGBTQ rights in contemporary times, there are still many ways that the criminal justice system works against LGBTQ and their lives, liberties, and freedoms.
Queering Law and Order: LGBTQ Communities and the Criminal Justice System (Lexington Books, 2020) examines the state of LGBTQ people within the criminal justice system. Intertwining legal cases, academic research, and popular media, Nadal reviews a wide range of issues—ranging from historical heterosexist and transphobic legislation to police brutality to the prison industrial complex to family law. Grounded in Queer Theory and intersectional lenses, each chapter provides recommendations for queering and disrupting the justice system. This book serves as both an academic resource and a call to action for readers who are interested in advocating for LGBTQ rights.
Nick Pozek is the Assistant Director of the Parker School of Foreign and Comparative Law at Columbia University in the City of New York and a host of New Books in Law.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Throughout US history, lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) people have been pathologized, victimized, and criminalized. Reports of lynching, burning, or murdering of LGBTQ people have been documented for centuries. Prior to the 1970s, LGBTQ people were deemed as having psychological disorders and subsequently subject to electroshock therapy and other ineffective and cruel treatments. LGBTQ people have historically been arrested or imprisoned for crimes like sodomy, cross-dressing, and gathering in public spaces. And while there have been many strides to advocate for LGBTQ rights in contemporary times, there are still many ways that the criminal justice system works against LGBTQ and their lives, liberties, and freedoms.
Queering Law and Order: LGBTQ Communities and the Criminal Justice System (Lexington Books, 2020) examines the state of LGBTQ people within the criminal justice system. Intertwining legal cases, academic research, and popular media, Nadal reviews a wide range of issues—ranging from historical heterosexist and transphobic legislation to police brutality to the prison industrial complex to family law. Grounded in Queer Theory and intersectional lenses, each chapter provides recommendations for queering and disrupting the justice system. This book serves as both an academic resource and a call to action for readers who are interested in advocating for LGBTQ rights.
Nick Pozek is the Assistant Director of the Parker School of Foreign and Comparative Law at Columbia University in the City of New York and a host of New Books in Law.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>107</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">076e9908-411b-11ef-ac16-af5916d816c9</guid>
      <title>Mónica A. Jiménez, &quot;Making Never-Never Land: Race and Law in the Creation of Puerto Rico&quot; (UNC Press, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Myths about the powers held by the United States are often supported by the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court, which derives its logic from the interpretation of a document that the US itself developed. Therefore, when pressure is placed on a specific legal precedent, the shallowness of its validity is revealed. Dr. Mónica A. Jiménez accomplishes this kind of scholarly work in her recently published book&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781469678450" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Making Never-Never Land: Race and Law in the Creation of Puerto Rico</em></a>&nbsp;(University of North Carolina Press, 2024). By tracing the legal logic of what continues to animate the colonial dynamics between the United States and Puerto Rico, Jiménez offers a “genealogy of racial exclusion in law” (36) that both folds time and space to make clear how late-19th century Supreme Court logics and opinions continue to subjugate the land and people of Puerto Rico to colonial violence.</p><p>Split into two sections, the first half of the book details the key case&nbsp;<em>Downes v. Bidwell (1901)</em>, while the second half explores how the legal ramifications of&nbsp;<em>Downes</em>&nbsp;continued to haunt the archipelago. The first chapter focuses on the development of&nbsp;<em>Downes&nbsp;</em>and its outcome, which argued that territories of the United States were not allowed to access certain provisions of the U.S. Constitution. The ambiguous legal foundation for this decision was established in 1900 after Puerto Rico was acquired by the United States when the US Supreme Court established the territorial incorporation doctrine, effectively creating the legal category of “unincorporated territory." Chapter two probes the white supremacist U.S. legal landscape to offer a “genealogy of racial exclusion in law” (36) that shows the reader how U.S. settler colonialism and empire-making are dependent on the reuse and recycling of legal precedents and tactics that disenfranchised and dispossessed racially marginalized communities. By excavating the legal opinions handed down during the Marshal Trilolgy and Dred Scott v. Sandford – a collection of Supreme Court cases that defined 19th-century legal policy for Native Americans and African Americans, respectively – Jiménez makes clear that “It is not a coincidence that the most shameful cases in the United States’ legal history of race should serve as direct precedents to a decision that continues to serve as the basis for Puerto Rico’s exclusion more than one hundred years after it was handed down” (9).</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 14 Jul 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/monica-a-jimenez-making-never-never-land-race-and-law-in-the-creation-of-puerto-rico-unc-press-2024-zksekrX_</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Myths about the powers held by the United States are often supported by the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court, which derives its logic from the interpretation of a document that the US itself developed. Therefore, when pressure is placed on a specific legal precedent, the shallowness of its validity is revealed. Dr. Mónica A. Jiménez accomplishes this kind of scholarly work in her recently published book&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781469678450" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Making Never-Never Land: Race and Law in the Creation of Puerto Rico</em></a>&nbsp;(University of North Carolina Press, 2024). By tracing the legal logic of what continues to animate the colonial dynamics between the United States and Puerto Rico, Jiménez offers a “genealogy of racial exclusion in law” (36) that both folds time and space to make clear how late-19th century Supreme Court logics and opinions continue to subjugate the land and people of Puerto Rico to colonial violence.</p><p>Split into two sections, the first half of the book details the key case&nbsp;<em>Downes v. Bidwell (1901)</em>, while the second half explores how the legal ramifications of&nbsp;<em>Downes</em>&nbsp;continued to haunt the archipelago. The first chapter focuses on the development of&nbsp;<em>Downes&nbsp;</em>and its outcome, which argued that territories of the United States were not allowed to access certain provisions of the U.S. Constitution. The ambiguous legal foundation for this decision was established in 1900 after Puerto Rico was acquired by the United States when the US Supreme Court established the territorial incorporation doctrine, effectively creating the legal category of “unincorporated territory." Chapter two probes the white supremacist U.S. legal landscape to offer a “genealogy of racial exclusion in law” (36) that shows the reader how U.S. settler colonialism and empire-making are dependent on the reuse and recycling of legal precedents and tactics that disenfranchised and dispossessed racially marginalized communities. By excavating the legal opinions handed down during the Marshal Trilolgy and Dred Scott v. Sandford – a collection of Supreme Court cases that defined 19th-century legal policy for Native Americans and African Americans, respectively – Jiménez makes clear that “It is not a coincidence that the most shameful cases in the United States’ legal history of race should serve as direct precedents to a decision that continues to serve as the basis for Puerto Rico’s exclusion more than one hundred years after it was handed down” (9).</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="80932729" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/85d241a3-e7e4-41a1-b61a-09f8cf971893/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=85d241a3-e7e4-41a1-b61a-09f8cf971893&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Mónica A. Jiménez, &quot;Making Never-Never Land: Race and Law in the Creation of Puerto Rico&quot; (UNC Press, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:24:18</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Myths about the powers held by the United States are often supported by the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court, which derives its logic from the interpretation of a document that the US itself developed. Therefore, when pressure is placed on a specific legal precedent, the shallowness of its validity is revealed. Dr. Mónica A. Jiménez accomplishes this kind of scholarly work in her recently published book Making Never-Never Land: Race and Law in the Creation of Puerto Rico (University of North Carolina Press, 2024). By tracing the legal logic of what continues to animate the colonial dynamics between the United States and Puerto Rico, Jiménez offers a “genealogy of racial exclusion in law” (36) that both folds time and space to make clear how late-19th century Supreme Court logics and opinions continue to subjugate the land and people of Puerto Rico to colonial violence.
Split into two sections, the first half of the book details the key case Downes v. Bidwell (1901), while the second half explores how the legal ramifications of Downes continued to haunt the archipelago. The first chapter focuses on the development of Downes and its outcome, which argued that territories of the United States were not allowed to access certain provisions of the U.S. Constitution. The ambiguous legal foundation for this decision was established in 1900 after Puerto Rico was acquired by the United States when the US Supreme Court established the territorial incorporation doctrine, effectively creating the legal category of “unincorporated territory.&quot; Chapter two probes the white supremacist U.S. legal landscape to offer a “genealogy of racial exclusion in law” (36) that shows the reader how U.S. settler colonialism and empire-making are dependent on the reuse and recycling of legal precedents and tactics that disenfranchised and dispossessed racially marginalized communities. By excavating the legal opinions handed down during the Marshal Trilolgy and Dred Scott v. Sandford – a collection of Supreme Court cases that defined 19th-century legal policy for Native Americans and African Americans, respectively – Jiménez makes clear that “It is not a coincidence that the most shameful cases in the United States’ legal history of race should serve as direct precedents to a decision that continues to serve as the basis for Puerto Rico’s exclusion more than one hundred years after it was handed down” (9).
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Myths about the powers held by the United States are often supported by the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court, which derives its logic from the interpretation of a document that the US itself developed. Therefore, when pressure is placed on a specific legal precedent, the shallowness of its validity is revealed. Dr. Mónica A. Jiménez accomplishes this kind of scholarly work in her recently published book Making Never-Never Land: Race and Law in the Creation of Puerto Rico (University of North Carolina Press, 2024). By tracing the legal logic of what continues to animate the colonial dynamics between the United States and Puerto Rico, Jiménez offers a “genealogy of racial exclusion in law” (36) that both folds time and space to make clear how late-19th century Supreme Court logics and opinions continue to subjugate the land and people of Puerto Rico to colonial violence.
Split into two sections, the first half of the book details the key case Downes v. Bidwell (1901), while the second half explores how the legal ramifications of Downes continued to haunt the archipelago. The first chapter focuses on the development of Downes and its outcome, which argued that territories of the United States were not allowed to access certain provisions of the U.S. Constitution. The ambiguous legal foundation for this decision was established in 1900 after Puerto Rico was acquired by the United States when the US Supreme Court established the territorial incorporation doctrine, effectively creating the legal category of “unincorporated territory.&quot; Chapter two probes the white supremacist U.S. legal landscape to offer a “genealogy of racial exclusion in law” (36) that shows the reader how U.S. settler colonialism and empire-making are dependent on the reuse and recycling of legal precedents and tactics that disenfranchised and dispossessed racially marginalized communities. By excavating the legal opinions handed down during the Marshal Trilolgy and Dred Scott v. Sandford – a collection of Supreme Court cases that defined 19th-century legal policy for Native Americans and African Americans, respectively – Jiménez makes clear that “It is not a coincidence that the most shameful cases in the United States’ legal history of race should serve as direct precedents to a decision that continues to serve as the basis for Puerto Rico’s exclusion more than one hundred years after it was handed down” (9).
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>116</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">30e9b5c6-4088-11ef-870a-5fdc76e19623</guid>
      <title>Jonathan Connolly, &quot;Worthy of Freedom: Indenture and Free Labor in the Era of Emancipation&quot; (U Chicago Press, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780226833644" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Worthy of Freedom: Indenture and Free Labor in the Era of Emancipation</em></a>&nbsp;(University of Chicago Press, 2024), Jonathan Connolly traces the normalization of indenture from its controversial beginnings to its widespread adoption across the British Empire during the nineteenth century. Initially viewed as a covert revival of slavery, indenture caused a scandal in Britain and India. But over time, economic conflict in the colonies altered public perceptions of indenture, now increasingly viewed as a legitimate form of free labor and a means of preserving the promise of abolition. Connolly explains how the large-scale, state-sponsored migration of Indian subjects to work on sugar plantations across Mauritius, British Guiana, and Trinidad transformed both the notion of post-slavery free labor and the political economy of emancipation. Excavating legal and public debates and tracing practical applications of the law, Connolly carefully reconstructs how the categories of free and unfree labor were made and remade to suit the interests of capital and empire, showing that emancipation was not simply a triumphal event but, rather, a deeply contested process. In so doing, he advances an original interpretation of how indenture changed the meaning of “freedom” in a post-abolition world.</p><p><br></p><p><a href="https://hist.uic.edu/profiles/connolly-jon/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Jonathan Connolly</a>&nbsp;is Assistant Professor of History at the University of Illinois Chicago. Connolly is&nbsp;a historian of the British empire with transnational interests in migration, the history of emancipation, and legal history. His research primarily concerns abolition and emancipation, imperial political and legal culture, and the category of free labor in the Caribbean and the Indian Ocean.&nbsp;</p><p><em>Your host for this episode is&nbsp;Mahishan Gnanaseharan,&nbsp;a PhD student in the Department of History at Stanford University. Mahishan&nbsp;studies the social, political, and intellectual histories of South Asian migrants across the Indian Ocean during the 19th and 20th centuries.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 13 Jul 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/jonathan-connolly-worthy-of-freedom-indenture-and-free-labor-in-the-era-of-emancipation-u-chicago-press-2024-CJM3Y6JA</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780226833644" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Worthy of Freedom: Indenture and Free Labor in the Era of Emancipation</em></a>&nbsp;(University of Chicago Press, 2024), Jonathan Connolly traces the normalization of indenture from its controversial beginnings to its widespread adoption across the British Empire during the nineteenth century. Initially viewed as a covert revival of slavery, indenture caused a scandal in Britain and India. But over time, economic conflict in the colonies altered public perceptions of indenture, now increasingly viewed as a legitimate form of free labor and a means of preserving the promise of abolition. Connolly explains how the large-scale, state-sponsored migration of Indian subjects to work on sugar plantations across Mauritius, British Guiana, and Trinidad transformed both the notion of post-slavery free labor and the political economy of emancipation. Excavating legal and public debates and tracing practical applications of the law, Connolly carefully reconstructs how the categories of free and unfree labor were made and remade to suit the interests of capital and empire, showing that emancipation was not simply a triumphal event but, rather, a deeply contested process. In so doing, he advances an original interpretation of how indenture changed the meaning of “freedom” in a post-abolition world.</p><p><br></p><p><a href="https://hist.uic.edu/profiles/connolly-jon/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Jonathan Connolly</a>&nbsp;is Assistant Professor of History at the University of Illinois Chicago. Connolly is&nbsp;a historian of the British empire with transnational interests in migration, the history of emancipation, and legal history. His research primarily concerns abolition and emancipation, imperial political and legal culture, and the category of free labor in the Caribbean and the Indian Ocean.&nbsp;</p><p><em>Your host for this episode is&nbsp;Mahishan Gnanaseharan,&nbsp;a PhD student in the Department of History at Stanford University. Mahishan&nbsp;studies the social, political, and intellectual histories of South Asian migrants across the Indian Ocean during the 19th and 20th centuries.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="59363118" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/45262f04-693d-4d6a-b2e9-4027185cf626/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=45262f04-693d-4d6a-b2e9-4027185cf626&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Jonathan Connolly, &quot;Worthy of Freedom: Indenture and Free Labor in the Era of Emancipation&quot; (U Chicago Press, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:01:50</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In Worthy of Freedom: Indenture and Free Labor in the Era of Emancipation (University of Chicago Press, 2024), Jonathan Connolly traces the normalization of indenture from its controversial beginnings to its widespread adoption across the British Empire during the nineteenth century. Initially viewed as a covert revival of slavery, indenture caused a scandal in Britain and India. But over time, economic conflict in the colonies altered public perceptions of indenture, now increasingly viewed as a legitimate form of free labor and a means of preserving the promise of abolition. Connolly explains how the large-scale, state-sponsored migration of Indian subjects to work on sugar plantations across Mauritius, British Guiana, and Trinidad transformed both the notion of post-slavery free labor and the political economy of emancipation. Excavating legal and public debates and tracing practical applications of the law, Connolly carefully reconstructs how the categories of free and unfree labor were made and remade to suit the interests of capital and empire, showing that emancipation was not simply a triumphal event but, rather, a deeply contested process. In so doing, he advances an original interpretation of how indenture changed the meaning of “freedom” in a post-abolition world.
Jonathan Connolly is Assistant Professor of History at the University of Illinois Chicago. Connolly is a historian of the British empire with transnational interests in migration, the history of emancipation, and legal history. His research primarily concerns abolition and emancipation, imperial political and legal culture, and the category of free labor in the Caribbean and the Indian Ocean. 
Your host for this episode is Mahishan Gnanaseharan, a PhD student in the Department of History at Stanford University. Mahishan studies the social, political, and intellectual histories of South Asian migrants across the Indian Ocean during the 19th and 20th centuries.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In Worthy of Freedom: Indenture and Free Labor in the Era of Emancipation (University of Chicago Press, 2024), Jonathan Connolly traces the normalization of indenture from its controversial beginnings to its widespread adoption across the British Empire during the nineteenth century. Initially viewed as a covert revival of slavery, indenture caused a scandal in Britain and India. But over time, economic conflict in the colonies altered public perceptions of indenture, now increasingly viewed as a legitimate form of free labor and a means of preserving the promise of abolition. Connolly explains how the large-scale, state-sponsored migration of Indian subjects to work on sugar plantations across Mauritius, British Guiana, and Trinidad transformed both the notion of post-slavery free labor and the political economy of emancipation. Excavating legal and public debates and tracing practical applications of the law, Connolly carefully reconstructs how the categories of free and unfree labor were made and remade to suit the interests of capital and empire, showing that emancipation was not simply a triumphal event but, rather, a deeply contested process. In so doing, he advances an original interpretation of how indenture changed the meaning of “freedom” in a post-abolition world.
Jonathan Connolly is Assistant Professor of History at the University of Illinois Chicago. Connolly is a historian of the British empire with transnational interests in migration, the history of emancipation, and legal history. His research primarily concerns abolition and emancipation, imperial political and legal culture, and the category of free labor in the Caribbean and the Indian Ocean. 
Your host for this episode is Mahishan Gnanaseharan, a PhD student in the Department of History at Stanford University. Mahishan studies the social, political, and intellectual histories of South Asian migrants across the Indian Ocean during the 19th and 20th centuries.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>236</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e10465d2-3ed0-11ef-af20-93b3bb767b78</guid>
      <title>Maya Pagni Barak, &quot;The Slow Violence of Immigration Court: Procedural Justice on Trial&quot; (NYU Press, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Each year, hundreds of thousands of migrants are moved through immigration court. With a national backlog surpassing one million cases, court hearings take years and most migrants will eventually be ordered deported.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781479821037" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Slow Violence of Immigration Court: Procedural Justice on Trial</em></a>&nbsp;(NYU Press, 2023) by Dr. Maya Pagni Barak sheds light on the experiences of migrants from the “Northern Triangle” (Guatemala, Honduras, and El Salvador) as they navigate legal processes, deportation proceedings, immigration court, and the immigration system writ large.</p><p>Grounded in the illuminating stories of people facing deportation, the family members who support them, and the attorneys who defend them,&nbsp;<em>The Slow Violence of Immigration Court</em>&nbsp;invites readers to question matters of fairness and justice and the fear of living with the threat of deportation. Although the spectacle of violence created by family separation and deportation is perceived as extreme and unprecedented, these long legal proceedings are masked in the mundane and are often overlooked, ignored, and excused. In an urgent call to action, Dr. Barak deftly demonstrates that deportation and family separation are not abhorrent anomalies, but are a routine, slow form of violence at the heart of the U.S. immigration system.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;new book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jul 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/maya-pagni-barak-the-slow-violence-of-immigration-court-procedural-justice-on-trial-nyu-press-2023-ungHz_5d</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Each year, hundreds of thousands of migrants are moved through immigration court. With a national backlog surpassing one million cases, court hearings take years and most migrants will eventually be ordered deported.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781479821037" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Slow Violence of Immigration Court: Procedural Justice on Trial</em></a>&nbsp;(NYU Press, 2023) by Dr. Maya Pagni Barak sheds light on the experiences of migrants from the “Northern Triangle” (Guatemala, Honduras, and El Salvador) as they navigate legal processes, deportation proceedings, immigration court, and the immigration system writ large.</p><p>Grounded in the illuminating stories of people facing deportation, the family members who support them, and the attorneys who defend them,&nbsp;<em>The Slow Violence of Immigration Court</em>&nbsp;invites readers to question matters of fairness and justice and the fear of living with the threat of deportation. Although the spectacle of violence created by family separation and deportation is perceived as extreme and unprecedented, these long legal proceedings are masked in the mundane and are often overlooked, ignored, and excused. In an urgent call to action, Dr. Barak deftly demonstrates that deportation and family separation are not abhorrent anomalies, but are a routine, slow form of violence at the heart of the U.S. immigration system.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;new book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="47614729" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/a02b5601-d287-46a4-9d11-8d467660e57e/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=a02b5601-d287-46a4-9d11-8d467660e57e&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Maya Pagni Barak, &quot;The Slow Violence of Immigration Court: Procedural Justice on Trial&quot; (NYU Press, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:49:35</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Each year, hundreds of thousands of migrants are moved through immigration court. With a national backlog surpassing one million cases, court hearings take years and most migrants will eventually be ordered deported. The Slow Violence of Immigration Court: Procedural Justice on Trial (NYU Press, 2023) by Dr. Maya Pagni Barak sheds light on the experiences of migrants from the “Northern Triangle” (Guatemala, Honduras, and El Salvador) as they navigate legal processes, deportation proceedings, immigration court, and the immigration system writ large.
Grounded in the illuminating stories of people facing deportation, the family members who support them, and the attorneys who defend them, The Slow Violence of Immigration Court invites readers to question matters of fairness and justice and the fear of living with the threat of deportation. Although the spectacle of violence created by family separation and deportation is perceived as extreme and unprecedented, these long legal proceedings are masked in the mundane and are often overlooked, ignored, and excused. In an urgent call to action, Dr. Barak deftly demonstrates that deportation and family separation are not abhorrent anomalies, but are a routine, slow form of violence at the heart of the U.S. immigration system.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Each year, hundreds of thousands of migrants are moved through immigration court. With a national backlog surpassing one million cases, court hearings take years and most migrants will eventually be ordered deported. The Slow Violence of Immigration Court: Procedural Justice on Trial (NYU Press, 2023) by Dr. Maya Pagni Barak sheds light on the experiences of migrants from the “Northern Triangle” (Guatemala, Honduras, and El Salvador) as they navigate legal processes, deportation proceedings, immigration court, and the immigration system writ large.
Grounded in the illuminating stories of people facing deportation, the family members who support them, and the attorneys who defend them, The Slow Violence of Immigration Court invites readers to question matters of fairness and justice and the fear of living with the threat of deportation. Although the spectacle of violence created by family separation and deportation is perceived as extreme and unprecedented, these long legal proceedings are masked in the mundane and are often overlooked, ignored, and excused. In an urgent call to action, Dr. Barak deftly demonstrates that deportation and family separation are not abhorrent anomalies, but are a routine, slow form of violence at the heart of the U.S. immigration system.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>226</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">eecd457a-3e31-11ef-ae40-af80fa14c781</guid>
      <title>Aram Sinnreich and Jesse Gilbert, &quot;The Secret Life of Data:  Navigating Hype and Uncertainty in the Age of Algorithmic Surveillance&quot; (MIT Press, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>What is data, and why does it matter for us to care about the data traces we leave behind? What are the implications for our lives of how this data is used by other people in other times and places? In a conversation with&nbsp;<a href="https://www.kau.se/en/researchers/joanne-kuai" rel="noopener noreferrer">Joanne Kuai</a>, authors Aram Sinnreich and Jesse Gilbert introduce their new book and talk about how we can rethink our relationship with data and stay informed to make better decisions in the face of technological uncertainty.</p><p>In their latest book,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780262048811" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Secret Life of Data: Navigating Hype and Uncertainty in The Age of Algorithmic Surveillance</em></a>&nbsp;(MIT Press, 2024), Aram Sinnreich and Jesse Gilbert explore the many unpredictable and often surprising ways in which data surveillance, AI, and the constant presence of algorithms impact our culture and society in the age of global networks.</p><p>The book focuses primarily on the long-term consequences of humanity's recent rush toward digitizing, storing, and analyzing every piece of data about ourselves and the world we live in. The authors advocate for “slow fixes” regarding our relationship to data, such as creating new laws and regulations, ethics and aesthetics, and models of production for our datafied society.</p><p><a href="https://www.sinnreich.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Aram Sinnreich</a>&nbsp;is an author, professor, and musician. He is Chair of Communication Studies at American University. His books include&nbsp;<em>Mashed Up</em>,<em>&nbsp;The Piracy Crusade</em>,&nbsp;<em>The Essential Guide to Intellectual Property</em>, and&nbsp;<em>A Second Chance for Yesterday&nbsp;</em>(published as R. A. Sinn).</p><p><a href="http://jessegilbert.net/about/bio/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Jesse Gilbert</a>&nbsp;is an interdisciplinary artist exploring the intersection of visual art, sound, and software design at his firm Dark Matter Media. He was the founding Chair of the Media Technology department at Woodbury University, and he has taught interactive software design at both CalArts and UC San Diego.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/aram-sinnreich-and-jesse-gilbert-the-secret-life-of-data-navigating-hype-and-uncertainty-in-the-age-of-algorithmic-surveillance-mit-press-2024-JbgK6WcQ</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is data, and why does it matter for us to care about the data traces we leave behind? What are the implications for our lives of how this data is used by other people in other times and places? In a conversation with&nbsp;<a href="https://www.kau.se/en/researchers/joanne-kuai" rel="noopener noreferrer">Joanne Kuai</a>, authors Aram Sinnreich and Jesse Gilbert introduce their new book and talk about how we can rethink our relationship with data and stay informed to make better decisions in the face of technological uncertainty.</p><p>In their latest book,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780262048811" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Secret Life of Data: Navigating Hype and Uncertainty in The Age of Algorithmic Surveillance</em></a>&nbsp;(MIT Press, 2024), Aram Sinnreich and Jesse Gilbert explore the many unpredictable and often surprising ways in which data surveillance, AI, and the constant presence of algorithms impact our culture and society in the age of global networks.</p><p>The book focuses primarily on the long-term consequences of humanity's recent rush toward digitizing, storing, and analyzing every piece of data about ourselves and the world we live in. The authors advocate for “slow fixes” regarding our relationship to data, such as creating new laws and regulations, ethics and aesthetics, and models of production for our datafied society.</p><p><a href="https://www.sinnreich.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Aram Sinnreich</a>&nbsp;is an author, professor, and musician. He is Chair of Communication Studies at American University. His books include&nbsp;<em>Mashed Up</em>,<em>&nbsp;The Piracy Crusade</em>,&nbsp;<em>The Essential Guide to Intellectual Property</em>, and&nbsp;<em>A Second Chance for Yesterday&nbsp;</em>(published as R. A. Sinn).</p><p><a href="http://jessegilbert.net/about/bio/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Jesse Gilbert</a>&nbsp;is an interdisciplinary artist exploring the intersection of visual art, sound, and software design at his firm Dark Matter Media. He was the founding Chair of the Media Technology department at Woodbury University, and he has taught interactive software design at both CalArts and UC San Diego.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="37701535" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/d40d03cd-5e6a-4894-b2c1-ecba77a97a44/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=d40d03cd-5e6a-4894-b2c1-ecba77a97a44&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Aram Sinnreich and Jesse Gilbert, &quot;The Secret Life of Data:  Navigating Hype and Uncertainty in the Age of Algorithmic Surveillance&quot; (MIT Press, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:39:16</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>What is data, and why does it matter for us to care about the data traces we leave behind? What are the implications for our lives of how this data is used by other people in other times and places? In a conversation with Joanne Kuai, authors Aram Sinnreich and Jesse Gilbert introduce their new book and talk about how we can rethink our relationship with data and stay informed to make better decisions in the face of technological uncertainty.
In their latest book, The Secret Life of Data: Navigating Hype and Uncertainty in The Age of Algorithmic Surveillance (MIT Press, 2024), Aram Sinnreich and Jesse Gilbert explore the many unpredictable and often surprising ways in which data surveillance, AI, and the constant presence of algorithms impact our culture and society in the age of global networks.
The book focuses primarily on the long-term consequences of humanity&apos;s recent rush toward digitizing, storing, and analyzing every piece of data about ourselves and the world we live in. The authors advocate for “slow fixes” regarding our relationship to data, such as creating new laws and regulations, ethics and aesthetics, and models of production for our datafied society.
Aram Sinnreich is an author, professor, and musician. He is Chair of Communication Studies at American University. His books include Mashed Up, The Piracy Crusade, The Essential Guide to Intellectual Property, and A Second Chance for Yesterday (published as R. A. Sinn).
Jesse Gilbert is an interdisciplinary artist exploring the intersection of visual art, sound, and software design at his firm Dark Matter Media. He was the founding Chair of the Media Technology department at Woodbury University, and he has taught interactive software design at both CalArts and UC San Diego.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>What is data, and why does it matter for us to care about the data traces we leave behind? What are the implications for our lives of how this data is used by other people in other times and places? In a conversation with Joanne Kuai, authors Aram Sinnreich and Jesse Gilbert introduce their new book and talk about how we can rethink our relationship with data and stay informed to make better decisions in the face of technological uncertainty.
In their latest book, The Secret Life of Data: Navigating Hype and Uncertainty in The Age of Algorithmic Surveillance (MIT Press, 2024), Aram Sinnreich and Jesse Gilbert explore the many unpredictable and often surprising ways in which data surveillance, AI, and the constant presence of algorithms impact our culture and society in the age of global networks.
The book focuses primarily on the long-term consequences of humanity&apos;s recent rush toward digitizing, storing, and analyzing every piece of data about ourselves and the world we live in. The authors advocate for “slow fixes” regarding our relationship to data, such as creating new laws and regulations, ethics and aesthetics, and models of production for our datafied society.
Aram Sinnreich is an author, professor, and musician. He is Chair of Communication Studies at American University. His books include Mashed Up, The Piracy Crusade, The Essential Guide to Intellectual Property, and A Second Chance for Yesterday (published as R. A. Sinn).
Jesse Gilbert is an interdisciplinary artist exploring the intersection of visual art, sound, and software design at his firm Dark Matter Media. He was the founding Chair of the Media Technology department at Woodbury University, and he has taught interactive software design at both CalArts and UC San Diego.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>368</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e7066ac4-3d5f-11ef-bb10-9369f633a95e</guid>
      <title>Premal Dharia et al., &quot;Dismantling Mass Incarceration: A Handbook for Change&quot; (FSG Originals, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In recent years, a searching national conversation has called attention to the social and racial injustices that define America’s criminal system. The incarceration of vast numbers of people, and the punitive treatment of African Americans in particular, are targets of widespread criticism. But despite the election of progressive prosecutors in several cities and the passage of reform legislation at the local, state, and federal levels, the system remains very much intact. How can the damage and depredations of the carceral state be undone?&nbsp;</p><p>In this pathbreaking reader, three of the nation’s leading advocates —Premal Dharia, James Forman Jr., and Maria Hawilo—provide us with tools to move from despair and critique to hope and action.<em>&nbsp;</em><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780374614485" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Dismantling Mass Incarceration: A Handbook for Change&nbsp;</em></a>(FSG Originals, 2024) surveys new approaches to confronting the carceral state in all its guises, exploring ways that police, prosecutors, public defenders, judges, prisons, and even life after prison can be radically reconceived. The book captures debates about the comparative merits of reforming or abolishing prisons and police forces, and introduces a host of bold but practical interventions. The contributors range from noted figures such as Angela Davis, Clint Smith, and Larry Krasner to local organizers, judges, and people currently or formerly incarcerated. The result is an invaluable guide for students, activists, and anyone who wishes to understand mass incarceration—and hasten its end.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 9 Jul 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/premal-dharia-et-al-dismantling-mass-incarceration-a-handbook-for-change-fsg-originals-2024-d_FnJO8d</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In recent years, a searching national conversation has called attention to the social and racial injustices that define America’s criminal system. The incarceration of vast numbers of people, and the punitive treatment of African Americans in particular, are targets of widespread criticism. But despite the election of progressive prosecutors in several cities and the passage of reform legislation at the local, state, and federal levels, the system remains very much intact. How can the damage and depredations of the carceral state be undone?&nbsp;</p><p>In this pathbreaking reader, three of the nation’s leading advocates —Premal Dharia, James Forman Jr., and Maria Hawilo—provide us with tools to move from despair and critique to hope and action.<em>&nbsp;</em><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780374614485" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Dismantling Mass Incarceration: A Handbook for Change&nbsp;</em></a>(FSG Originals, 2024) surveys new approaches to confronting the carceral state in all its guises, exploring ways that police, prosecutors, public defenders, judges, prisons, and even life after prison can be radically reconceived. The book captures debates about the comparative merits of reforming or abolishing prisons and police forces, and introduces a host of bold but practical interventions. The contributors range from noted figures such as Angela Davis, Clint Smith, and Larry Krasner to local organizers, judges, and people currently or formerly incarcerated. The result is an invaluable guide for students, activists, and anyone who wishes to understand mass incarceration—and hasten its end.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="31187508" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/aa8c0234-ca5c-4b60-8007-c68485764dfc/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=aa8c0234-ca5c-4b60-8007-c68485764dfc&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Premal Dharia et al., &quot;Dismantling Mass Incarceration: A Handbook for Change&quot; (FSG Originals, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:32:29</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In recent years, a searching national conversation has called attention to the social and racial injustices that define America’s criminal system. The incarceration of vast numbers of people, and the punitive treatment of African Americans in particular, are targets of widespread criticism. But despite the election of progressive prosecutors in several cities and the passage of reform legislation at the local, state, and federal levels, the system remains very much intact. How can the damage and depredations of the carceral state be undone? 
In this pathbreaking reader, three of the nation’s leading advocates —Premal Dharia, James Forman Jr., and Maria Hawilo—provide us with tools to move from despair and critique to hope and action. Dismantling Mass Incarceration: A Handbook for Change (FSG Originals, 2024) surveys new approaches to confronting the carceral state in all its guises, exploring ways that police, prosecutors, public defenders, judges, prisons, and even life after prison can be radically reconceived. The book captures debates about the comparative merits of reforming or abolishing prisons and police forces, and introduces a host of bold but practical interventions. The contributors range from noted figures such as Angela Davis, Clint Smith, and Larry Krasner to local organizers, judges, and people currently or formerly incarcerated. The result is an invaluable guide for students, activists, and anyone who wishes to understand mass incarceration—and hasten its end.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In recent years, a searching national conversation has called attention to the social and racial injustices that define America’s criminal system. The incarceration of vast numbers of people, and the punitive treatment of African Americans in particular, are targets of widespread criticism. But despite the election of progressive prosecutors in several cities and the passage of reform legislation at the local, state, and federal levels, the system remains very much intact. How can the damage and depredations of the carceral state be undone? 
In this pathbreaking reader, three of the nation’s leading advocates —Premal Dharia, James Forman Jr., and Maria Hawilo—provide us with tools to move from despair and critique to hope and action. Dismantling Mass Incarceration: A Handbook for Change (FSG Originals, 2024) surveys new approaches to confronting the carceral state in all its guises, exploring ways that police, prosecutors, public defenders, judges, prisons, and even life after prison can be radically reconceived. The book captures debates about the comparative merits of reforming or abolishing prisons and police forces, and introduces a host of bold but practical interventions. The contributors range from noted figures such as Angela Davis, Clint Smith, and Larry Krasner to local organizers, judges, and people currently or formerly incarcerated. The result is an invaluable guide for students, activists, and anyone who wishes to understand mass incarceration—and hasten its end.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>185</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">656b7ba4-3ade-11ef-a77d-8b44a18df808</guid>
      <title>Russell Sandberg and Daniel Newman, &quot;Law and Humanities&quot; (Anthem Press, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781839990366" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Law and Humanities</em></a>&nbsp;(Anthem Press, 2024), Professor Russell Sandberg and Dr Daniel Newman provide an accessible introduction to the law and humanities. Each chapter explores the nature, development and possible further trajectory of a disciplinary ‘law and’ field, tackling a wide ranging series of topics as law and geography, law and history, law and literature, law and theatre. Each chapter is written by an expert in the respective field and addresses how the two disciplines of law and the other respective field operate. This edited work fulfils a real and pressing need to provide an accessible, introductory but critical guide to law and humanities as a whole by exploring how each disciplinary ‘law and’ field has developed, contributes to further scrutinizing the content and role of law, and how it can contribute and be enriched by being understood within the law and humanities tradition as a whole.</p><p>In the podcast, Professor Sandberg and Dr Newman explain their aims in editing this collection, and how in particular studying law and the respective humanities can enhance a legal studies curriculum beyond the confines of an exclusively doctrinal education. The editors also explore in detail the chapters they authored – Law and History, Law and Philosophy and Law and Religion, before offering some reflections on and hopes for the future of the broader Law and Humanities discipline.</p><p><a href="https://essl.leeds.ac.uk/law/staff/1332/mr-alex-batesmith" rel="noopener noreferrer">Alex Batesmith</a>&nbsp;is a Lecturer in Legal Profession in the School of Law at the University of Leeds, and a former barrister and UN war crimes prosecutor, with teaching and research interests in international criminal law, cause lawyering and the legal profession, and law and emotion.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/batesmith/" rel="noopener noreferrer">LinkedIn</a>.</p><p>His recent publications include:</p><ul>
<li>
<a href="https://counterpress.org.uk/publications/aesthetics-and-counter-aesthetics-of-international-justice/#1634466943999-1d22caf9-d8076232-5aaf4645-b1c7" rel="noopener noreferrer">“‘Poetic Justice Products’: International Justice, Victim Counter-Aesthetics, and the Spectre of the Show Trial”</a>&nbsp;in Christine Schwöbel-Patel and Rob Knox (eds)&nbsp;<em>Aesthetics and Counter-Aesthetics of International Justice</em>&nbsp;(Counterpress, 2024, ISBN 978-1-910761-17-5)</li>
<li>
<a href="https://www.routledge.com/Leading-Works-on-the-Legal-Profession/Newman/p/book/9781032182803" rel="noopener noreferrer">"Lawyers who want to make the world a better place – Scheingold and Sarat’s Something to Believe In: Politics, Professionalism, and Cause Lawyering"&nbsp;</a>in D. Newman (ed.)&nbsp;<em>Leading Works on the Legal Profession&nbsp;</em>(Routledge, July 2023), ISBN 978-1-032182-80-3)</li>
<li>
<a href="https://academic.oup.com/jicj/article-abstract/19/4/803/6459130?redirectedFrom=fulltext" rel="noopener noreferrer">“International Prosecutors as Cause Lawyers"&nbsp;</a>(2021)&nbsp;<em>Journal of International Criminal Justice&nbsp;</em>19(4) 803-830 (ISSN 1478-1387)</li>
</ul><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 7 Jul 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/russell-sandberg-and-daniel-newman-law-and-humanities-anthem-press-2024-sGUmFNLe</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781839990366" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Law and Humanities</em></a>&nbsp;(Anthem Press, 2024), Professor Russell Sandberg and Dr Daniel Newman provide an accessible introduction to the law and humanities. Each chapter explores the nature, development and possible further trajectory of a disciplinary ‘law and’ field, tackling a wide ranging series of topics as law and geography, law and history, law and literature, law and theatre. Each chapter is written by an expert in the respective field and addresses how the two disciplines of law and the other respective field operate. This edited work fulfils a real and pressing need to provide an accessible, introductory but critical guide to law and humanities as a whole by exploring how each disciplinary ‘law and’ field has developed, contributes to further scrutinizing the content and role of law, and how it can contribute and be enriched by being understood within the law and humanities tradition as a whole.</p><p>In the podcast, Professor Sandberg and Dr Newman explain their aims in editing this collection, and how in particular studying law and the respective humanities can enhance a legal studies curriculum beyond the confines of an exclusively doctrinal education. The editors also explore in detail the chapters they authored – Law and History, Law and Philosophy and Law and Religion, before offering some reflections on and hopes for the future of the broader Law and Humanities discipline.</p><p><a href="https://essl.leeds.ac.uk/law/staff/1332/mr-alex-batesmith" rel="noopener noreferrer">Alex Batesmith</a>&nbsp;is a Lecturer in Legal Profession in the School of Law at the University of Leeds, and a former barrister and UN war crimes prosecutor, with teaching and research interests in international criminal law, cause lawyering and the legal profession, and law and emotion.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/batesmith/" rel="noopener noreferrer">LinkedIn</a>.</p><p>His recent publications include:</p><ul>
<li>
<a href="https://counterpress.org.uk/publications/aesthetics-and-counter-aesthetics-of-international-justice/#1634466943999-1d22caf9-d8076232-5aaf4645-b1c7" rel="noopener noreferrer">“‘Poetic Justice Products’: International Justice, Victim Counter-Aesthetics, and the Spectre of the Show Trial”</a>&nbsp;in Christine Schwöbel-Patel and Rob Knox (eds)&nbsp;<em>Aesthetics and Counter-Aesthetics of International Justice</em>&nbsp;(Counterpress, 2024, ISBN 978-1-910761-17-5)</li>
<li>
<a href="https://www.routledge.com/Leading-Works-on-the-Legal-Profession/Newman/p/book/9781032182803" rel="noopener noreferrer">"Lawyers who want to make the world a better place – Scheingold and Sarat’s Something to Believe In: Politics, Professionalism, and Cause Lawyering"&nbsp;</a>in D. Newman (ed.)&nbsp;<em>Leading Works on the Legal Profession&nbsp;</em>(Routledge, July 2023), ISBN 978-1-032182-80-3)</li>
<li>
<a href="https://academic.oup.com/jicj/article-abstract/19/4/803/6459130?redirectedFrom=fulltext" rel="noopener noreferrer">“International Prosecutors as Cause Lawyers"&nbsp;</a>(2021)&nbsp;<em>Journal of International Criminal Justice&nbsp;</em>19(4) 803-830 (ISSN 1478-1387)</li>
</ul><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="96350884" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/b5fcab44-06a2-4253-b7a1-4ec04b0ae601/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=b5fcab44-06a2-4253-b7a1-4ec04b0ae601&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Russell Sandberg and Daniel Newman, &quot;Law and Humanities&quot; (Anthem Press, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:40:21</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In Law and Humanities (Anthem Press, 2024), Professor Russell Sandberg and Dr Daniel Newman provide an accessible introduction to the law and humanities. Each chapter explores the nature, development and possible further trajectory of a disciplinary ‘law and’ field, tackling a wide ranging series of topics as law and geography, law and history, law and literature, law and theatre. Each chapter is written by an expert in the respective field and addresses how the two disciplines of law and the other respective field operate. This edited work fulfils a real and pressing need to provide an accessible, introductory but critical guide to law and humanities as a whole by exploring how each disciplinary ‘law and’ field has developed, contributes to further scrutinizing the content and role of law, and how it can contribute and be enriched by being understood within the law and humanities tradition as a whole.
In the podcast, Professor Sandberg and Dr Newman explain their aims in editing this collection, and how in particular studying law and the respective humanities can enhance a legal studies curriculum beyond the confines of an exclusively doctrinal education. The editors also explore in detail the chapters they authored – Law and History, Law and Philosophy and Law and Religion, before offering some reflections on and hopes for the future of the broader Law and Humanities discipline.
Alex Batesmith is a Lecturer in Legal Profession in the School of Law at the University of Leeds, and a former barrister and UN war crimes prosecutor, with teaching and research interests in international criminal law, cause lawyering and the legal profession, and law and emotion. LinkedIn.
His recent publications include:
“‘Poetic Justice Products’: International Justice, Victim Counter-Aesthetics, and the Spectre of the Show Trial” in Christine Schwöbel-Patel and Rob Knox (eds) Aesthetics and Counter-Aesthetics of International Justice (Counterpress, 2024, ISBN 978-1-910761-17-5)
&quot;Lawyers who want to make the world a better place – Scheingold and Sarat’s Something to Believe In: Politics, Professionalism, and Cause Lawyering&quot; in D. Newman (ed.) Leading Works on the Legal Profession (Routledge, July 2023), ISBN 978-1-032182-80-3)
“International Prosecutors as Cause Lawyers&quot; (2021) Journal of International Criminal Justice 19(4) 803-830 (ISSN 1478-1387)
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In Law and Humanities (Anthem Press, 2024), Professor Russell Sandberg and Dr Daniel Newman provide an accessible introduction to the law and humanities. Each chapter explores the nature, development and possible further trajectory of a disciplinary ‘law and’ field, tackling a wide ranging series of topics as law and geography, law and history, law and literature, law and theatre. Each chapter is written by an expert in the respective field and addresses how the two disciplines of law and the other respective field operate. This edited work fulfils a real and pressing need to provide an accessible, introductory but critical guide to law and humanities as a whole by exploring how each disciplinary ‘law and’ field has developed, contributes to further scrutinizing the content and role of law, and how it can contribute and be enriched by being understood within the law and humanities tradition as a whole.
In the podcast, Professor Sandberg and Dr Newman explain their aims in editing this collection, and how in particular studying law and the respective humanities can enhance a legal studies curriculum beyond the confines of an exclusively doctrinal education. The editors also explore in detail the chapters they authored – Law and History, Law and Philosophy and Law and Religion, before offering some reflections on and hopes for the future of the broader Law and Humanities discipline.
Alex Batesmith is a Lecturer in Legal Profession in the School of Law at the University of Leeds, and a former barrister and UN war crimes prosecutor, with teaching and research interests in international criminal law, cause lawyering and the legal profession, and law and emotion. LinkedIn.
His recent publications include:
“‘Poetic Justice Products’: International Justice, Victim Counter-Aesthetics, and the Spectre of the Show Trial” in Christine Schwöbel-Patel and Rob Knox (eds) Aesthetics and Counter-Aesthetics of International Justice (Counterpress, 2024, ISBN 978-1-910761-17-5)
&quot;Lawyers who want to make the world a better place – Scheingold and Sarat’s Something to Believe In: Politics, Professionalism, and Cause Lawyering&quot; in D. Newman (ed.) Leading Works on the Legal Profession (Routledge, July 2023), ISBN 978-1-032182-80-3)
“International Prosecutors as Cause Lawyers&quot; (2021) Journal of International Criminal Justice 19(4) 803-830 (ISSN 1478-1387)
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>225</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e056fdfa-3a31-11ef-9abe-9fa9a47501d2</guid>
      <title>The (ir)Rational Rainbow (the DSM &amp; the Fight to Depathologize Homosexuality)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The psychological establishment has long pathologized diverse forms of sexual identity and gender expression. In the mid-century, a brave movement of gays and lesbians fought back and claimed: no, actually, we’re&nbsp;<em>healthy</em>. But in the process, did they define other identities&nbsp;<em>unhealthy?</em></p><p>This is episode two of&nbsp;<em>Cited Podcast's&nbsp;</em>returning season,&nbsp;<em>the Rationality Wars.&nbsp;</em>It tells stories about the political and intellectual battles to define rationality and irrational. For the rest of the series,&nbsp;<a href="https://citedpodcast.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">visit citedpodcast.com</a>. You will be able find this on all the relevant podcatchers (<a href="https://podcasts.apple.com/ca/podcast/cited-podcast/id558228325" rel="noopener noreferrer">Apple</a>,&nbsp;<a href="https://open.spotify.com/show/6pMLdKYpGooLKis7aORHSi" rel="noopener noreferrer">Spotify</a>, etc.). If you use something else or you cannot find our feed, you can&nbsp;<a href="https://citedpodcast.com/feed/podcast/" rel="noopener noreferrer">manually add our RSS feed</a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 6 Jul 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/the-ir-rational-rainbow-the-dsm-the-fight-to-depathologize-homosexuality-q4z9B5hl</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The psychological establishment has long pathologized diverse forms of sexual identity and gender expression. In the mid-century, a brave movement of gays and lesbians fought back and claimed: no, actually, we’re&nbsp;<em>healthy</em>. But in the process, did they define other identities&nbsp;<em>unhealthy?</em></p><p>This is episode two of&nbsp;<em>Cited Podcast's&nbsp;</em>returning season,&nbsp;<em>the Rationality Wars.&nbsp;</em>It tells stories about the political and intellectual battles to define rationality and irrational. For the rest of the series,&nbsp;<a href="https://citedpodcast.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">visit citedpodcast.com</a>. You will be able find this on all the relevant podcatchers (<a href="https://podcasts.apple.com/ca/podcast/cited-podcast/id558228325" rel="noopener noreferrer">Apple</a>,&nbsp;<a href="https://open.spotify.com/show/6pMLdKYpGooLKis7aORHSi" rel="noopener noreferrer">Spotify</a>, etc.). If you use something else or you cannot find our feed, you can&nbsp;<a href="https://citedpodcast.com/feed/podcast/" rel="noopener noreferrer">manually add our RSS feed</a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="68079700" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/b4947fb3-077b-4435-8226-35acc7eb2aaf/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=b4947fb3-077b-4435-8226-35acc7eb2aaf&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>The (ir)Rational Rainbow (the DSM &amp; the Fight to Depathologize Homosexuality)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:10:54</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The psychological establishment has long pathologized diverse forms of sexual identity and gender expression. In the mid-century, a brave movement of gays and lesbians fought back and claimed: no, actually, we’re healthy. But in the process, did they define other identities unhealthy?
This is episode two of Cited Podcast&apos;s returning season, the Rationality Wars. It tells stories about the political and intellectual battles to define rationality and irrational. For the rest of the series, visit citedpodcast.com. You will be able find this on all the relevant podcatchers (Apple, Spotify, etc.). If you use something else or you cannot find our feed, you can manually add our RSS feed.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The psychological establishment has long pathologized diverse forms of sexual identity and gender expression. In the mid-century, a brave movement of gays and lesbians fought back and claimed: no, actually, we’re healthy. But in the process, did they define other identities unhealthy?
This is episode two of Cited Podcast&apos;s returning season, the Rationality Wars. It tells stories about the political and intellectual battles to define rationality and irrational. For the rest of the series, visit citedpodcast.com. You will be able find this on all the relevant podcatchers (Apple, Spotify, etc.). If you use something else or you cannot find our feed, you can manually add our RSS feed.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>63</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">fdc31fcc-37ed-11ef-80de-a3509ef519c7</guid>
      <title>Ailbhe O&apos;Loughlin, &quot;Law and Personality Disorder: Human Rights, Human Risks, and Rehabilitation&quot; (Oxford UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780198839279" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Law and Personality Disorder: Human Rights, Human Risks, and Rehabilitation</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Oxford&nbsp;UP,&nbsp;2024)<em>,&nbsp;</em>Dr Ailbhe O'Loughlin considers the controversial and under-researched concern of what to do with dangerous people with severe personality disorders.&nbsp;She brings together scientific evidence, law and policy, to consider risk prevention, public security and human rights. This is a controversial area of law and policy, informed by ongoing debates about 'dangerous' offenders which exists at the intersection of liberal legal principles and advocates of social defence.&nbsp;</p><p>In today's conversation, we spoke about preventative detention, the effectiveness of therapeutic intervention and risk management, gaps in human rights protections, and the assumptions that the legal principles and processes that govern this population are founded on. O'Loughlin draws out key issues for reform and calls for further evidence-based inquiry with regards to criminal defences,&nbsp;sentencing and dispositions. This will be&nbsp;an important book for policy makers, legal academics, psychiatrists and anyone who works with this category of offenders.&nbsp;</p><p><a href="https://www.york.ac.uk/law/people/o'loughlin/#research-content" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr Ailbhe O'Loughlin</a>&nbsp;is a Senior Lecturer at York Law School, at The University of York. Her&nbsp;research focuses on the intersection between mental health and criminal justice.&nbsp;&nbsp;</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 3 Jul 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/ailbhe-o-loughlin-law-and-personality-disorder-human-rights-human-risks-and-rehabilitation-oxford-up-2024-Or1LsW1x</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780198839279" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Law and Personality Disorder: Human Rights, Human Risks, and Rehabilitation</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Oxford&nbsp;UP,&nbsp;2024)<em>,&nbsp;</em>Dr Ailbhe O'Loughlin considers the controversial and under-researched concern of what to do with dangerous people with severe personality disorders.&nbsp;She brings together scientific evidence, law and policy, to consider risk prevention, public security and human rights. This is a controversial area of law and policy, informed by ongoing debates about 'dangerous' offenders which exists at the intersection of liberal legal principles and advocates of social defence.&nbsp;</p><p>In today's conversation, we spoke about preventative detention, the effectiveness of therapeutic intervention and risk management, gaps in human rights protections, and the assumptions that the legal principles and processes that govern this population are founded on. O'Loughlin draws out key issues for reform and calls for further evidence-based inquiry with regards to criminal defences,&nbsp;sentencing and dispositions. This will be&nbsp;an important book for policy makers, legal academics, psychiatrists and anyone who works with this category of offenders.&nbsp;</p><p><a href="https://www.york.ac.uk/law/people/o'loughlin/#research-content" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr Ailbhe O'Loughlin</a>&nbsp;is a Senior Lecturer at York Law School, at The University of York. Her&nbsp;research focuses on the intersection between mental health and criminal justice.&nbsp;&nbsp;</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="64972303" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/f936cc46-1f2e-467c-a37f-921475fadd14/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=f936cc46-1f2e-467c-a37f-921475fadd14&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Ailbhe O&apos;Loughlin, &quot;Law and Personality Disorder: Human Rights, Human Risks, and Rehabilitation&quot; (Oxford UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:07:40</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In Law and Personality Disorder: Human Rights, Human Risks, and Rehabilitation (Oxford UP, 2024), Dr Ailbhe O&apos;Loughlin considers the controversial and under-researched concern of what to do with dangerous people with severe personality disorders. She brings together scientific evidence, law and policy, to consider risk prevention, public security and human rights. This is a controversial area of law and policy, informed by ongoing debates about &apos;dangerous&apos; offenders which exists at the intersection of liberal legal principles and advocates of social defence. 
In today&apos;s conversation, we spoke about preventative detention, the effectiveness of therapeutic intervention and risk management, gaps in human rights protections, and the assumptions that the legal principles and processes that govern this population are founded on. O&apos;Loughlin draws out key issues for reform and calls for further evidence-based inquiry with regards to criminal defences, sentencing and dispositions. This will be an important book for policy makers, legal academics, psychiatrists and anyone who works with this category of offenders. 
Dr Ailbhe O&apos;Loughlin is a Senior Lecturer at York Law School, at The University of York. Her research focuses on the intersection between mental health and criminal justice.  
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In Law and Personality Disorder: Human Rights, Human Risks, and Rehabilitation (Oxford UP, 2024), Dr Ailbhe O&apos;Loughlin considers the controversial and under-researched concern of what to do with dangerous people with severe personality disorders. She brings together scientific evidence, law and policy, to consider risk prevention, public security and human rights. This is a controversial area of law and policy, informed by ongoing debates about &apos;dangerous&apos; offenders which exists at the intersection of liberal legal principles and advocates of social defence. 
In today&apos;s conversation, we spoke about preventative detention, the effectiveness of therapeutic intervention and risk management, gaps in human rights protections, and the assumptions that the legal principles and processes that govern this population are founded on. O&apos;Loughlin draws out key issues for reform and calls for further evidence-based inquiry with regards to criminal defences, sentencing and dispositions. This will be an important book for policy makers, legal academics, psychiatrists and anyone who works with this category of offenders. 
Dr Ailbhe O&apos;Loughlin is a Senior Lecturer at York Law School, at The University of York. Her research focuses on the intersection between mental health and criminal justice.  
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>224</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1728fe32-361d-11ef-9b78-5f52870ddb52</guid>
      <title>Felicia Arriaga, &quot;Behind Crimmigration: ICE, Law Enforcement, and Resistance in America&quot; (UNC Press, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In recent years, dozens of counties in North Carolina have partnered with federal law enforcement in the criminalization of immigration--what many have dubbed "crimmigration." Southern border enforcement still monopolizes the national immigration debate, but immigration enforcement has become common within the United States as well. While Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) operations are a major part of American immigration enforcement, Felicia Arriaga maintains that ICE relies on an already well-established system--the use of local law enforcement and local governments to identify, incarcerate, and deport undocumented immigrants.</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781469673233" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Behind Crimmigration: ICE, Law Enforcement, and Resistance in America</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(UNC Press, 2023),&nbsp;Arriaga contends that the long-term partnership between local sheriffs and immigration law enforcement in places like North Carolina has created a form of racialized social control of the Latinx community. Arriaga uses data from five county sheriff's offices and their governing bodies to trace the creation and subsequent normalization of ICE and local law enforcement partnerships. Arriaga argues that the methods used by these partnerships to control immigration are employed throughout the United States, but they have been particularly visible in North Carolina, where the Latinx population increased by 111 percent between 2000 and 2010. Arriaga's evidence also reveals how Latinx communities are resisting and adapting to these systems.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 30 Jun 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/felicia-arriaga-behind-crimmigration-ice-law-enforcement-and-resistance-in-america-unc-press-2023-CpeAhFr_</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In recent years, dozens of counties in North Carolina have partnered with federal law enforcement in the criminalization of immigration--what many have dubbed "crimmigration." Southern border enforcement still monopolizes the national immigration debate, but immigration enforcement has become common within the United States as well. While Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) operations are a major part of American immigration enforcement, Felicia Arriaga maintains that ICE relies on an already well-established system--the use of local law enforcement and local governments to identify, incarcerate, and deport undocumented immigrants.</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781469673233" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Behind Crimmigration: ICE, Law Enforcement, and Resistance in America</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(UNC Press, 2023),&nbsp;Arriaga contends that the long-term partnership between local sheriffs and immigration law enforcement in places like North Carolina has created a form of racialized social control of the Latinx community. Arriaga uses data from five county sheriff's offices and their governing bodies to trace the creation and subsequent normalization of ICE and local law enforcement partnerships. Arriaga argues that the methods used by these partnerships to control immigration are employed throughout the United States, but they have been particularly visible in North Carolina, where the Latinx population increased by 111 percent between 2000 and 2010. Arriaga's evidence also reveals how Latinx communities are resisting and adapting to these systems.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="60453430" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/8955c9f9-59c9-4f2c-9bfd-02dcf7ad1192/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=8955c9f9-59c9-4f2c-9bfd-02dcf7ad1192&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Felicia Arriaga, &quot;Behind Crimmigration: ICE, Law Enforcement, and Resistance in America&quot; (UNC Press, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:02:58</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In recent years, dozens of counties in North Carolina have partnered with federal law enforcement in the criminalization of immigration--what many have dubbed &quot;crimmigration.&quot; Southern border enforcement still monopolizes the national immigration debate, but immigration enforcement has become common within the United States as well. While Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) operations are a major part of American immigration enforcement, Felicia Arriaga maintains that ICE relies on an already well-established system--the use of local law enforcement and local governments to identify, incarcerate, and deport undocumented immigrants.
In Behind Crimmigration: ICE, Law Enforcement, and Resistance in America (UNC Press, 2023), Arriaga contends that the long-term partnership between local sheriffs and immigration law enforcement in places like North Carolina has created a form of racialized social control of the Latinx community. Arriaga uses data from five county sheriff&apos;s offices and their governing bodies to trace the creation and subsequent normalization of ICE and local law enforcement partnerships. Arriaga argues that the methods used by these partnerships to control immigration are employed throughout the United States, but they have been particularly visible in North Carolina, where the Latinx population increased by 111 percent between 2000 and 2010. Arriaga&apos;s evidence also reveals how Latinx communities are resisting and adapting to these systems.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In recent years, dozens of counties in North Carolina have partnered with federal law enforcement in the criminalization of immigration--what many have dubbed &quot;crimmigration.&quot; Southern border enforcement still monopolizes the national immigration debate, but immigration enforcement has become common within the United States as well. While Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) operations are a major part of American immigration enforcement, Felicia Arriaga maintains that ICE relies on an already well-established system--the use of local law enforcement and local governments to identify, incarcerate, and deport undocumented immigrants.
In Behind Crimmigration: ICE, Law Enforcement, and Resistance in America (UNC Press, 2023), Arriaga contends that the long-term partnership between local sheriffs and immigration law enforcement in places like North Carolina has created a form of racialized social control of the Latinx community. Arriaga uses data from five county sheriff&apos;s offices and their governing bodies to trace the creation and subsequent normalization of ICE and local law enforcement partnerships. Arriaga argues that the methods used by these partnerships to control immigration are employed throughout the United States, but they have been particularly visible in North Carolina, where the Latinx population increased by 111 percent between 2000 and 2010. Arriaga&apos;s evidence also reveals how Latinx communities are resisting and adapting to these systems.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>23</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">173c4e12-30ad-11ef-81e8-8b08341f198c</guid>
      <title>Jeremy Schipper, &quot;Denmark Vesey&apos;s Bible: The Thwarted Revolt That Put Slavery and Scripture on Trial&quot; (Princeton UP, 2022)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691259314" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Denmark Vesey's Bible: The Thwarted Revolt that Put Slavery and Scripture on Trial</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Princeton UP, 2022),&nbsp;Dr. Jeremy Schipper tells the&nbsp;story of a free Black man accused of plotting an anti-slavery insurrection in Charleston, South Carolina, in 1822. Vesey was found guilty and hanged along with dozens of&nbsp;others accused of collaborating with him.</p><p>At the center of the book is an examination of how former slave Denmark Vesey used interpretations of the Bible to justify the revolt while members of the white establishment in South Carolina use that&nbsp;same Bible to support the&nbsp;slaveholders view of themselves as benevolent biblical patriarchs.&nbsp;</p><p>The book is a riveting account of a key moment in&nbsp;antebellum American history that underscores deep racial inequities and the assumed supremacy of white Christians during a time of violence, fear, and conflicting understandings of moral superiority and biblical truth.</p><p>Recommended reading:&nbsp;</p><p><a href="https://upf.com/book.asp?id=EGERT001" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Denmark Vesey Affair: A Documentary History</a>&nbsp;edited by&nbsp;Douglas R. Egerton and Robert L. Paquette</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/jeremy-schipper-denmark-veseys-bible-the-thwarted-revolt-that-put-slavery-and-scripture-on-trial-princeton-up-2022-bunfrVjL</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691259314" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Denmark Vesey's Bible: The Thwarted Revolt that Put Slavery and Scripture on Trial</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Princeton UP, 2022),&nbsp;Dr. Jeremy Schipper tells the&nbsp;story of a free Black man accused of plotting an anti-slavery insurrection in Charleston, South Carolina, in 1822. Vesey was found guilty and hanged along with dozens of&nbsp;others accused of collaborating with him.</p><p>At the center of the book is an examination of how former slave Denmark Vesey used interpretations of the Bible to justify the revolt while members of the white establishment in South Carolina use that&nbsp;same Bible to support the&nbsp;slaveholders view of themselves as benevolent biblical patriarchs.&nbsp;</p><p>The book is a riveting account of a key moment in&nbsp;antebellum American history that underscores deep racial inequities and the assumed supremacy of white Christians during a time of violence, fear, and conflicting understandings of moral superiority and biblical truth.</p><p>Recommended reading:&nbsp;</p><p><a href="https://upf.com/book.asp?id=EGERT001" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Denmark Vesey Affair: A Documentary History</a>&nbsp;edited by&nbsp;Douglas R. Egerton and Robert L. Paquette</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="70747821" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/7f63df04-8677-47eb-bae9-d35a9d6c5b41/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=7f63df04-8677-47eb-bae9-d35a9d6c5b41&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Jeremy Schipper, &quot;Denmark Vesey&apos;s Bible: The Thwarted Revolt That Put Slavery and Scripture on Trial&quot; (Princeton UP, 2022)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:13:41</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In Denmark Vesey&apos;s Bible: The Thwarted Revolt that Put Slavery and Scripture on Trial (Princeton UP, 2022), Dr. Jeremy Schipper tells the story of a free Black man accused of plotting an anti-slavery insurrection in Charleston, South Carolina, in 1822. Vesey was found guilty and hanged along with dozens of others accused of collaborating with him.
At the center of the book is an examination of how former slave Denmark Vesey used interpretations of the Bible to justify the revolt while members of the white establishment in South Carolina use that same Bible to support the slaveholders view of themselves as benevolent biblical patriarchs. 
The book is a riveting account of a key moment in antebellum American history that underscores deep racial inequities and the assumed supremacy of white Christians during a time of violence, fear, and conflicting understandings of moral superiority and biblical truth.
Recommended reading: 
The Denmark Vesey Affair: A Documentary History edited by Douglas R. Egerton and Robert L. Paquette
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In Denmark Vesey&apos;s Bible: The Thwarted Revolt that Put Slavery and Scripture on Trial (Princeton UP, 2022), Dr. Jeremy Schipper tells the story of a free Black man accused of plotting an anti-slavery insurrection in Charleston, South Carolina, in 1822. Vesey was found guilty and hanged along with dozens of others accused of collaborating with him.
At the center of the book is an examination of how former slave Denmark Vesey used interpretations of the Bible to justify the revolt while members of the white establishment in South Carolina use that same Bible to support the slaveholders view of themselves as benevolent biblical patriarchs. 
The book is a riveting account of a key moment in antebellum American history that underscores deep racial inequities and the assumed supremacy of white Christians during a time of violence, fear, and conflicting understandings of moral superiority and biblical truth.
Recommended reading: 
The Denmark Vesey Affair: A Documentary History edited by Douglas R. Egerton and Robert L. Paquette
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>465</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e7786ae8-3238-11ef-8f02-4f5bceeb729b</guid>
      <title>Reeju Ray, &quot;Placing the Frontier in British North-East India: Law, Custom, and Knowledge&quot; (Oxford UP, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780192887085" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Placing the Frontier in British North-East India: Law, Custom, and Knowledge</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Oxford UP, 2023) is a study of the travels of colonial law into the North-East frontier of the British Empire in India. Focusing on the nineteenth century, it examines the relationship of law and space, and indigenous place-making. Inhabitants of the frontier hills examined in this book were not defined as British subjects, yet they were incorporated within the colonial legal framework. The work examines the nature of this legal limbo that produced both the hills and their inhabitants as interruptions but equally as integral to the imperial project. Through a study of place-making by indigenous inhabitants of the frontier, it further demonstrates the heterogeneous narratives of self and belonging found in sites of orality and kinship that shape the hills in the present day.</p><p>The book contributes to the historiography of law in colonial South Asia. It focuses on an understudied region that reveals intricacies of colonial law that are crucial for an analysis of forms of governance of marginalized communities throughout India. The breadth of literary and non-literary sources used in the book allows for the juxtaposition of local reproductions of the past and histories of belonging that defy binary notions of history and memory, myth and reality, and physical and imaginative space.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Jun 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/reeju-ray-placing-the-frontier-in-british-north-east-india-law-custom-and-knowledge-oxford-up-2023-WKwiiK25</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780192887085" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Placing the Frontier in British North-East India: Law, Custom, and Knowledge</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Oxford UP, 2023) is a study of the travels of colonial law into the North-East frontier of the British Empire in India. Focusing on the nineteenth century, it examines the relationship of law and space, and indigenous place-making. Inhabitants of the frontier hills examined in this book were not defined as British subjects, yet they were incorporated within the colonial legal framework. The work examines the nature of this legal limbo that produced both the hills and their inhabitants as interruptions but equally as integral to the imperial project. Through a study of place-making by indigenous inhabitants of the frontier, it further demonstrates the heterogeneous narratives of self and belonging found in sites of orality and kinship that shape the hills in the present day.</p><p>The book contributes to the historiography of law in colonial South Asia. It focuses on an understudied region that reveals intricacies of colonial law that are crucial for an analysis of forms of governance of marginalized communities throughout India. The breadth of literary and non-literary sources used in the book allows for the juxtaposition of local reproductions of the past and histories of belonging that defy binary notions of history and memory, myth and reality, and physical and imaginative space.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="56332224" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/30f3fb2e-193f-4f44-80a2-69ecd59aaea9/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=30f3fb2e-193f-4f44-80a2-69ecd59aaea9&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Reeju Ray, &quot;Placing the Frontier in British North-East India: Law, Custom, and Knowledge&quot; (Oxford UP, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:58:40</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Placing the Frontier in British North-East India: Law, Custom, and Knowledge (Oxford UP, 2023) is a study of the travels of colonial law into the North-East frontier of the British Empire in India. Focusing on the nineteenth century, it examines the relationship of law and space, and indigenous place-making. Inhabitants of the frontier hills examined in this book were not defined as British subjects, yet they were incorporated within the colonial legal framework. The work examines the nature of this legal limbo that produced both the hills and their inhabitants as interruptions but equally as integral to the imperial project. Through a study of place-making by indigenous inhabitants of the frontier, it further demonstrates the heterogeneous narratives of self and belonging found in sites of orality and kinship that shape the hills in the present day.
The book contributes to the historiography of law in colonial South Asia. It focuses on an understudied region that reveals intricacies of colonial law that are crucial for an analysis of forms of governance of marginalized communities throughout India. The breadth of literary and non-literary sources used in the book allows for the juxtaposition of local reproductions of the past and histories of belonging that defy binary notions of history and memory, myth and reality, and physical and imaginative space.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Placing the Frontier in British North-East India: Law, Custom, and Knowledge (Oxford UP, 2023) is a study of the travels of colonial law into the North-East frontier of the British Empire in India. Focusing on the nineteenth century, it examines the relationship of law and space, and indigenous place-making. Inhabitants of the frontier hills examined in this book were not defined as British subjects, yet they were incorporated within the colonial legal framework. The work examines the nature of this legal limbo that produced both the hills and their inhabitants as interruptions but equally as integral to the imperial project. Through a study of place-making by indigenous inhabitants of the frontier, it further demonstrates the heterogeneous narratives of self and belonging found in sites of orality and kinship that shape the hills in the present day.
The book contributes to the historiography of law in colonial South Asia. It focuses on an understudied region that reveals intricacies of colonial law that are crucial for an analysis of forms of governance of marginalized communities throughout India. The breadth of literary and non-literary sources used in the book allows for the juxtaposition of local reproductions of the past and histories of belonging that defy binary notions of history and memory, myth and reality, and physical and imaginative space.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>232</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">78aa825c-2e5c-11ef-8d1f-c7c87d56571e</guid>
      <title>Andreas Fulda, &quot;Germany and China: How Entanglement Undermines Freedom, Prosperity and Security&quot; (Bloombury, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781350357013" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Germany and China: How Entanglement Undermines Freedom, Prosperity and Security</em></a>&nbsp;(Bloomsbury, 2024)&nbsp;is a groundbreaking book, of which the findings have significant implications both for German-China relations and also in understanding the rising influence of autocratic China on liberal democracies globally. In today's interview, Associate&nbsp;<a href="https://www.nottingham.ac.uk/politics/people/andreas.fulda" rel="noopener noreferrer">Professor Andreas Fulda</a>&nbsp;and I spoke about Germany's entanglement with China, and the extent of Germany's dependancies on China in terms of economics,&nbsp;technology, politics and academia. We spoke about the blind spots of policy makers and academics have, and the way that China policy is&nbsp;constructed and interpreted as a result. We also spoke about the implications for national security and German sovereignty, and the way that Germany entanglement with China is&nbsp;a warning sign for democratic states everywhere.&nbsp;</p><p>Dr Fulda is a political scientist and China scholar with a keen interest in the philosophy of science. You can listen to an interview about his previous book,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.routledge.com/The-Struggle-for-Democracy-in-Mainland-China-Taiwan-and-Hong-Kong-Sharp/Fulda/p/book/9780367334901" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Struggle for Democracy in Mainland China, Taiwan and Hong KongSharp Power and its Discontents</em></a>&nbsp;(Routledge: 2019)&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/andreas-fulda-the-struggle-for-democracy-in-mainland-china-taiwan-and-hong-kong-routledge-2020#entry:31105@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a>.&nbsp;</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 22 Jun 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/andreas-fulda-germany-and-china-how-entanglement-undermines-freedom-prosperity-and-security-bloombury-2024-uNVQ5Bnw</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781350357013" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Germany and China: How Entanglement Undermines Freedom, Prosperity and Security</em></a>&nbsp;(Bloomsbury, 2024)&nbsp;is a groundbreaking book, of which the findings have significant implications both for German-China relations and also in understanding the rising influence of autocratic China on liberal democracies globally. In today's interview, Associate&nbsp;<a href="https://www.nottingham.ac.uk/politics/people/andreas.fulda" rel="noopener noreferrer">Professor Andreas Fulda</a>&nbsp;and I spoke about Germany's entanglement with China, and the extent of Germany's dependancies on China in terms of economics,&nbsp;technology, politics and academia. We spoke about the blind spots of policy makers and academics have, and the way that China policy is&nbsp;constructed and interpreted as a result. We also spoke about the implications for national security and German sovereignty, and the way that Germany entanglement with China is&nbsp;a warning sign for democratic states everywhere.&nbsp;</p><p>Dr Fulda is a political scientist and China scholar with a keen interest in the philosophy of science. You can listen to an interview about his previous book,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.routledge.com/The-Struggle-for-Democracy-in-Mainland-China-Taiwan-and-Hong-Kong-Sharp/Fulda/p/book/9780367334901" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Struggle for Democracy in Mainland China, Taiwan and Hong KongSharp Power and its Discontents</em></a>&nbsp;(Routledge: 2019)&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/andreas-fulda-the-struggle-for-democracy-in-mainland-china-taiwan-and-hong-kong-routledge-2020#entry:31105@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a>.&nbsp;</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="57629283" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/8cd3a3cb-2cf1-4dfb-8d2e-7f7035e781ce/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=8cd3a3cb-2cf1-4dfb-8d2e-7f7035e781ce&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Andreas Fulda, &quot;Germany and China: How Entanglement Undermines Freedom, Prosperity and Security&quot; (Bloombury, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:00:01</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Germany and China: How Entanglement Undermines Freedom, Prosperity and Security (Bloomsbury, 2024) is a groundbreaking book, of which the findings have significant implications both for German-China relations and also in understanding the rising influence of autocratic China on liberal democracies globally. In today&apos;s interview, Associate Professor Andreas Fulda and I spoke about Germany&apos;s entanglement with China, and the extent of Germany&apos;s dependancies on China in terms of economics, technology, politics and academia. We spoke about the blind spots of policy makers and academics have, and the way that China policy is constructed and interpreted as a result. We also spoke about the implications for national security and German sovereignty, and the way that Germany entanglement with China is a warning sign for democratic states everywhere. 
Dr Fulda is a political scientist and China scholar with a keen interest in the philosophy of science. You can listen to an interview about his previous book, The Struggle for Democracy in Mainland China, Taiwan and Hong KongSharp Power and its Discontents (Routledge: 2019) here. 
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Germany and China: How Entanglement Undermines Freedom, Prosperity and Security (Bloomsbury, 2024) is a groundbreaking book, of which the findings have significant implications both for German-China relations and also in understanding the rising influence of autocratic China on liberal democracies globally. In today&apos;s interview, Associate Professor Andreas Fulda and I spoke about Germany&apos;s entanglement with China, and the extent of Germany&apos;s dependancies on China in terms of economics, technology, politics and academia. We spoke about the blind spots of policy makers and academics have, and the way that China policy is constructed and interpreted as a result. We also spoke about the implications for national security and German sovereignty, and the way that Germany entanglement with China is a warning sign for democratic states everywhere. 
Dr Fulda is a political scientist and China scholar with a keen interest in the philosophy of science. You can listen to an interview about his previous book, The Struggle for Democracy in Mainland China, Taiwan and Hong KongSharp Power and its Discontents (Routledge: 2019) here. 
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>223</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">016bfedc-2f1a-11ef-b931-4be37f89df3b</guid>
      <title>Stephanie DeGooyer, &quot;Before Borders: A Legal and Literary History of Naturalization&quot; (Johns Hopkins UP, 2022)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>How can the novel be a way to understand the development of nation-state borders?&nbsp;An important work in the intersections of law, literature, history, and migration, Stephanie DeGooyer's&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781421443928" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Before Borders:&nbsp;A Legal and Literary History of Naturalization</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Johns Hopkins UP, 2022)&nbsp;offers fascinating&nbsp;insight into understanding naturalization. Tracing the idea of naturalization as it can be understood as a&nbsp;legal fiction and through literary fiction, DeGooyer offers a compelling approach to understanding naturalization as a generative mechanism for national expansion. Through a careful and engaging&nbsp;analysis that spans from Mary Shelley to court proceedings, De Gooyer's&nbsp;<em>Before Borders</em>&nbsp;is a compelling read that will be of great interest for those interested in histories of migration, creative approaches to studying the state, and ways to approach law through and alongside literature.</p><p><a href="https://englishcomplit.unc.edu/faculty-directory/stephanie-degooyer/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Stephanie DeGooyer</a>&nbsp;is Assistant Professor and Frank Borden and Barbara Lasater Hanes Fellow in the Department of English &amp; Comparative Literature&nbsp;at the University of North Carolina. Her research focuses on the intersections between law and literature.</p><p><a href="https://www.rinevieth.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Rine Vieth</em></a><em>&nbsp;is an incoming FRQSC Postdoctoral Fellow at Université Laval. Interested in how people experience state legal regimes, their research centres around questions of law, migration, gender, and&nbsp;religion.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 22 Jun 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/stephanie-degooyer-before-borders-a-legal-and-literary-history-of-naturalization-johns-hopkins-up-2022-1og8C0wI</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How can the novel be a way to understand the development of nation-state borders?&nbsp;An important work in the intersections of law, literature, history, and migration, Stephanie DeGooyer's&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781421443928" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Before Borders:&nbsp;A Legal and Literary History of Naturalization</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Johns Hopkins UP, 2022)&nbsp;offers fascinating&nbsp;insight into understanding naturalization. Tracing the idea of naturalization as it can be understood as a&nbsp;legal fiction and through literary fiction, DeGooyer offers a compelling approach to understanding naturalization as a generative mechanism for national expansion. Through a careful and engaging&nbsp;analysis that spans from Mary Shelley to court proceedings, De Gooyer's&nbsp;<em>Before Borders</em>&nbsp;is a compelling read that will be of great interest for those interested in histories of migration, creative approaches to studying the state, and ways to approach law through and alongside literature.</p><p><a href="https://englishcomplit.unc.edu/faculty-directory/stephanie-degooyer/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Stephanie DeGooyer</a>&nbsp;is Assistant Professor and Frank Borden and Barbara Lasater Hanes Fellow in the Department of English &amp; Comparative Literature&nbsp;at the University of North Carolina. Her research focuses on the intersections between law and literature.</p><p><a href="https://www.rinevieth.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Rine Vieth</em></a><em>&nbsp;is an incoming FRQSC Postdoctoral Fellow at Université Laval. Interested in how people experience state legal regimes, their research centres around questions of law, migration, gender, and&nbsp;religion.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="43860890" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/7d46bcc2-bdca-4547-bd6f-eee5e564fb1e/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=7d46bcc2-bdca-4547-bd6f-eee5e564fb1e&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Stephanie DeGooyer, &quot;Before Borders: A Legal and Literary History of Naturalization&quot; (Johns Hopkins UP, 2022)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:45:41</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>How can the novel be a way to understand the development of nation-state borders? An important work in the intersections of law, literature, history, and migration, Stephanie DeGooyer&apos;s Before Borders: A Legal and Literary History of Naturalization (Johns Hopkins UP, 2022) offers fascinating insight into understanding naturalization. Tracing the idea of naturalization as it can be understood as a legal fiction and through literary fiction, DeGooyer offers a compelling approach to understanding naturalization as a generative mechanism for national expansion. Through a careful and engaging analysis that spans from Mary Shelley to court proceedings, De Gooyer&apos;s Before Borders is a compelling read that will be of great interest for those interested in histories of migration, creative approaches to studying the state, and ways to approach law through and alongside literature.
Stephanie DeGooyer is Assistant Professor and Frank Borden and Barbara Lasater Hanes Fellow in the Department of English &amp; Comparative Literature at the University of North Carolina. Her research focuses on the intersections between law and literature.
Rine Vieth is an incoming FRQSC Postdoctoral Fellow at Université Laval. Interested in how people experience state legal regimes, their research centres around questions of law, migration, gender, and religion.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>How can the novel be a way to understand the development of nation-state borders? An important work in the intersections of law, literature, history, and migration, Stephanie DeGooyer&apos;s Before Borders: A Legal and Literary History of Naturalization (Johns Hopkins UP, 2022) offers fascinating insight into understanding naturalization. Tracing the idea of naturalization as it can be understood as a legal fiction and through literary fiction, DeGooyer offers a compelling approach to understanding naturalization as a generative mechanism for national expansion. Through a careful and engaging analysis that spans from Mary Shelley to court proceedings, De Gooyer&apos;s Before Borders is a compelling read that will be of great interest for those interested in histories of migration, creative approaches to studying the state, and ways to approach law through and alongside literature.
Stephanie DeGooyer is Assistant Professor and Frank Borden and Barbara Lasater Hanes Fellow in the Department of English &amp; Comparative Literature at the University of North Carolina. Her research focuses on the intersections between law and literature.
Rine Vieth is an incoming FRQSC Postdoctoral Fellow at Université Laval. Interested in how people experience state legal regimes, their research centres around questions of law, migration, gender, and religion.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>56</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">60be3a48-2d9f-11ef-98b0-432826b40b1b</guid>
      <title>Postscript: The Supreme Court’s Decisions on Bump Stocks and Mifepristone</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In this episode of our occasional series,&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/postscript" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Postscript</em></a>, we focus on the Supreme Court’s recently published decisions in two cases, about guns and abortion, but more about how the Executive and Judicial branches of government function in the United States. Constitutional Law scholar (and&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/hosts/profile/9a1ab667-550e-4823-9287-f93ad4fd0a67" rel="noopener noreferrer">New Books in Political Science co-host</a>)&nbsp;<a href="https://directory.sju.edu/susan-liebell" rel="noopener noreferrer">Susan Liebell</a>&nbsp;takes us through&nbsp;<a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/22-976_e29g.pdf" rel="noopener noreferrer">Garland v. Cargill</a>, which focused on the Trump Administration’s implementation of a prohibition against bump stocks for rifles following the deadly shooting in Las Vegas, Nevada in 2017. Liebell, a published expert on the Second Amendment and the long history of gun regulation in the United States, explains the thrust of the case, which is only tangentially connected to the Second Amendment, but calls into question the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearm’s (ATF) expertise, particularly in context of the majority opinion’s decision that the ATF was not using its administrative power correctly. The&nbsp;<a href="https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/602/22-976/#tab-opinion-4902868" rel="noopener noreferrer">majority opinion</a>, written by Justice Clarence Thomas, may signal the Supreme Court’s inclinations towards&nbsp;<a href="https://www.oyez.org/cases/1983/82-1005" rel="noopener noreferrer">Chevron deference</a>, which is also before the Court this term in the case of&nbsp;<a href="https://www.oyez.org/cases/2023/22-451" rel="noopener noreferrer">Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo</a>.</p><p>Liebell, also an expert on abortion access, reproductive health regulation, and citizenship, explains the Court’s unanimous decision in&nbsp;<a href="https://www.oyez.org/cases/2023/23-235" rel="noopener noreferrer">Food and Drug Administration v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine</a>. The opinion, written by Justice Brett Kavanaugh, focused solely on the question of standing, and whether the Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine actually qualified to bring the case since there was no clear injury that had been sustained in the suit they brought before the District Court in Amarillo, Texas. Thus, the drug Mifepristone, which was to be banned nationwide in the initial court ruling by U.S. District Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk, was not banned as a result of this lawsuit brought by the Food and Drug Administration. This case, not dissimilar from Garland v. Cargill, focuses on procedural questions more than it focuses on other issues. And the unanimous decision is about that legal procedure, not about the FDA, or the process to through which drugs are brought to market in the United States, or about the Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine’s indictment of the process for prescribing mifepristone. Our conversation threads through these cases, and others (like&nbsp;<a href="https://www.oyez.org/cases/2021/19-1392" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization</a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a href="https://www.oyez.org/cases/2007/07-290" rel="noopener noreferrer">District of Columbia v. Heller</a>) that set the foundation for these cases to come forward.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/postscript-the-supreme-courts-decisions-on-bump-stocks-and-mifepristone-J9h4_qbn</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this episode of our occasional series,&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/special-series/postscript" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Postscript</em></a>, we focus on the Supreme Court’s recently published decisions in two cases, about guns and abortion, but more about how the Executive and Judicial branches of government function in the United States. Constitutional Law scholar (and&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/hosts/profile/9a1ab667-550e-4823-9287-f93ad4fd0a67" rel="noopener noreferrer">New Books in Political Science co-host</a>)&nbsp;<a href="https://directory.sju.edu/susan-liebell" rel="noopener noreferrer">Susan Liebell</a>&nbsp;takes us through&nbsp;<a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/22-976_e29g.pdf" rel="noopener noreferrer">Garland v. Cargill</a>, which focused on the Trump Administration’s implementation of a prohibition against bump stocks for rifles following the deadly shooting in Las Vegas, Nevada in 2017. Liebell, a published expert on the Second Amendment and the long history of gun regulation in the United States, explains the thrust of the case, which is only tangentially connected to the Second Amendment, but calls into question the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearm’s (ATF) expertise, particularly in context of the majority opinion’s decision that the ATF was not using its administrative power correctly. The&nbsp;<a href="https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/602/22-976/#tab-opinion-4902868" rel="noopener noreferrer">majority opinion</a>, written by Justice Clarence Thomas, may signal the Supreme Court’s inclinations towards&nbsp;<a href="https://www.oyez.org/cases/1983/82-1005" rel="noopener noreferrer">Chevron deference</a>, which is also before the Court this term in the case of&nbsp;<a href="https://www.oyez.org/cases/2023/22-451" rel="noopener noreferrer">Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo</a>.</p><p>Liebell, also an expert on abortion access, reproductive health regulation, and citizenship, explains the Court’s unanimous decision in&nbsp;<a href="https://www.oyez.org/cases/2023/23-235" rel="noopener noreferrer">Food and Drug Administration v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine</a>. The opinion, written by Justice Brett Kavanaugh, focused solely on the question of standing, and whether the Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine actually qualified to bring the case since there was no clear injury that had been sustained in the suit they brought before the District Court in Amarillo, Texas. Thus, the drug Mifepristone, which was to be banned nationwide in the initial court ruling by U.S. District Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk, was not banned as a result of this lawsuit brought by the Food and Drug Administration. This case, not dissimilar from Garland v. Cargill, focuses on procedural questions more than it focuses on other issues. And the unanimous decision is about that legal procedure, not about the FDA, or the process to through which drugs are brought to market in the United States, or about the Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine’s indictment of the process for prescribing mifepristone. Our conversation threads through these cases, and others (like&nbsp;<a href="https://www.oyez.org/cases/2021/19-1392" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization</a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a href="https://www.oyez.org/cases/2007/07-290" rel="noopener noreferrer">District of Columbia v. Heller</a>) that set the foundation for these cases to come forward.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="31747084" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/08a741c3-1a4e-4a04-af2e-4ec7bafd40ab/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=08a741c3-1a4e-4a04-af2e-4ec7bafd40ab&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Postscript: The Supreme Court’s Decisions on Bump Stocks and Mifepristone</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:33:03</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this episode of our occasional series, Postscript, we focus on the Supreme Court’s recently published decisions in two cases, about guns and abortion, but more about how the Executive and Judicial branches of government function in the United States. Constitutional Law scholar (and New Books in Political Science co-host) Susan Liebell takes us through Garland v. Cargill, which focused on the Trump Administration’s implementation of a prohibition against bump stocks for rifles following the deadly shooting in Las Vegas, Nevada in 2017. Liebell, a published expert on the Second Amendment and the long history of gun regulation in the United States, explains the thrust of the case, which is only tangentially connected to the Second Amendment, but calls into question the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearm’s (ATF) expertise, particularly in context of the majority opinion’s decision that the ATF was not using its administrative power correctly. The majority opinion, written by Justice Clarence Thomas, may signal the Supreme Court’s inclinations towards Chevron deference, which is also before the Court this term in the case of Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo.
Liebell, also an expert on abortion access, reproductive health regulation, and citizenship, explains the Court’s unanimous decision in Food and Drug Administration v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine. The opinion, written by Justice Brett Kavanaugh, focused solely on the question of standing, and whether the Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine actually qualified to bring the case since there was no clear injury that had been sustained in the suit they brought before the District Court in Amarillo, Texas. Thus, the drug Mifepristone, which was to be banned nationwide in the initial court ruling by U.S. District Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk, was not banned as a result of this lawsuit brought by the Food and Drug Administration. This case, not dissimilar from Garland v. Cargill, focuses on procedural questions more than it focuses on other issues. And the unanimous decision is about that legal procedure, not about the FDA, or the process to through which drugs are brought to market in the United States, or about the Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine’s indictment of the process for prescribing mifepristone. Our conversation threads through these cases, and others (like Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization and District of Columbia v. Heller) that set the foundation for these cases to come forward.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode of our occasional series, Postscript, we focus on the Supreme Court’s recently published decisions in two cases, about guns and abortion, but more about how the Executive and Judicial branches of government function in the United States. Constitutional Law scholar (and New Books in Political Science co-host) Susan Liebell takes us through Garland v. Cargill, which focused on the Trump Administration’s implementation of a prohibition against bump stocks for rifles following the deadly shooting in Las Vegas, Nevada in 2017. Liebell, a published expert on the Second Amendment and the long history of gun regulation in the United States, explains the thrust of the case, which is only tangentially connected to the Second Amendment, but calls into question the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearm’s (ATF) expertise, particularly in context of the majority opinion’s decision that the ATF was not using its administrative power correctly. The majority opinion, written by Justice Clarence Thomas, may signal the Supreme Court’s inclinations towards Chevron deference, which is also before the Court this term in the case of Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo.
Liebell, also an expert on abortion access, reproductive health regulation, and citizenship, explains the Court’s unanimous decision in Food and Drug Administration v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine. The opinion, written by Justice Brett Kavanaugh, focused solely on the question of standing, and whether the Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine actually qualified to bring the case since there was no clear injury that had been sustained in the suit they brought before the District Court in Amarillo, Texas. Thus, the drug Mifepristone, which was to be banned nationwide in the initial court ruling by U.S. District Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk, was not banned as a result of this lawsuit brought by the Food and Drug Administration. This case, not dissimilar from Garland v. Cargill, focuses on procedural questions more than it focuses on other issues. And the unanimous decision is about that legal procedure, not about the FDA, or the process to through which drugs are brought to market in the United States, or about the Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine’s indictment of the process for prescribing mifepristone. Our conversation threads through these cases, and others (like Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization and District of Columbia v. Heller) that set the foundation for these cases to come forward.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>24</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">c8484ed4-2bff-11ef-9ae0-6fd605f2d94c</guid>
      <title>Aziz Rana, &quot;The Constitutional Bind: How Americans Came to Idolize a Document That Fails Them&quot; (U Chicago Press, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In a pathbreaking retelling of the American experience, Aziz Rana shows that today’s reverential constitutional culture is a distinctively twentieth-century phenomenon. Rana connects this widespread idolization to another relatively recent development: the rise of US global dominance. Ultimately, such veneration has had far-reaching consequences: despite offering a unifying language of reform, it has also unleashed an interventionist national security state abroad while undermining the possibility of deeper change at home.</p><p>Revealing how the current constitutional order was forged over the twentieth century,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780226350721" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Constitutional Bind: How Americans Came to Idolize a Document That Fails Them</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(U Chicago Press, 2024) also sheds light on an array of movement activists—in Black, Indigenous, feminist, labor, and immigrant politics—who struggled to imagine different constitutional horizons. As time passed, these voices of opposition were excised from memory. Today, they offer essential insights that Rana reconstructs to forward an ambitious and comprehensive vision for moving past the constitutional bind.</p><p>Aziz Rana is a Professor and Provost’s Distinguished Fellow at Boston College Law School and the incoming J. Donald Monan, S.J., University Professor of Law and Government (beginning 2024).</p><p><a href="https://vatsalnaresh.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Vatsal Naresh</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a Lecturer in Social Studies at Harvard University. He is the editor of Negotiating Democracy and Religious Pluralism (OUP 2021) and Constituent Assemblies (CUP 2018).</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/aziz-rana-the-constitutional-bind-how-americans-came-to-idolize-a-document-that-fails-them-u-chicago-press-2024-m6RjrTih</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a pathbreaking retelling of the American experience, Aziz Rana shows that today’s reverential constitutional culture is a distinctively twentieth-century phenomenon. Rana connects this widespread idolization to another relatively recent development: the rise of US global dominance. Ultimately, such veneration has had far-reaching consequences: despite offering a unifying language of reform, it has also unleashed an interventionist national security state abroad while undermining the possibility of deeper change at home.</p><p>Revealing how the current constitutional order was forged over the twentieth century,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780226350721" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Constitutional Bind: How Americans Came to Idolize a Document That Fails Them</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(U Chicago Press, 2024) also sheds light on an array of movement activists—in Black, Indigenous, feminist, labor, and immigrant politics—who struggled to imagine different constitutional horizons. As time passed, these voices of opposition were excised from memory. Today, they offer essential insights that Rana reconstructs to forward an ambitious and comprehensive vision for moving past the constitutional bind.</p><p>Aziz Rana is a Professor and Provost’s Distinguished Fellow at Boston College Law School and the incoming J. Donald Monan, S.J., University Professor of Law and Government (beginning 2024).</p><p><a href="https://vatsalnaresh.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Vatsal Naresh</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a Lecturer in Social Studies at Harvard University. He is the editor of Negotiating Democracy and Religious Pluralism (OUP 2021) and Constituent Assemblies (CUP 2018).</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="69535340" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/3867db69-6c3b-4c81-b8d5-3913dccdd101/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=3867db69-6c3b-4c81-b8d5-3913dccdd101&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Aziz Rana, &quot;The Constitutional Bind: How Americans Came to Idolize a Document That Fails Them&quot; (U Chicago Press, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:12:25</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In a pathbreaking retelling of the American experience, Aziz Rana shows that today’s reverential constitutional culture is a distinctively twentieth-century phenomenon. Rana connects this widespread idolization to another relatively recent development: the rise of US global dominance. Ultimately, such veneration has had far-reaching consequences: despite offering a unifying language of reform, it has also unleashed an interventionist national security state abroad while undermining the possibility of deeper change at home.
Revealing how the current constitutional order was forged over the twentieth century, The Constitutional Bind: How Americans Came to Idolize a Document That Fails Them (U Chicago Press, 2024) also sheds light on an array of movement activists—in Black, Indigenous, feminist, labor, and immigrant politics—who struggled to imagine different constitutional horizons. As time passed, these voices of opposition were excised from memory. Today, they offer essential insights that Rana reconstructs to forward an ambitious and comprehensive vision for moving past the constitutional bind.
Aziz Rana is a Professor and Provost’s Distinguished Fellow at Boston College Law School and the incoming J. Donald Monan, S.J., University Professor of Law and Government (beginning 2024).
Vatsal Naresh is a Lecturer in Social Studies at Harvard University. He is the editor of Negotiating Democracy and Religious Pluralism (OUP 2021) and Constituent Assemblies (CUP 2018).
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In a pathbreaking retelling of the American experience, Aziz Rana shows that today’s reverential constitutional culture is a distinctively twentieth-century phenomenon. Rana connects this widespread idolization to another relatively recent development: the rise of US global dominance. Ultimately, such veneration has had far-reaching consequences: despite offering a unifying language of reform, it has also unleashed an interventionist national security state abroad while undermining the possibility of deeper change at home.
Revealing how the current constitutional order was forged over the twentieth century, The Constitutional Bind: How Americans Came to Idolize a Document That Fails Them (U Chicago Press, 2024) also sheds light on an array of movement activists—in Black, Indigenous, feminist, labor, and immigrant politics—who struggled to imagine different constitutional horizons. As time passed, these voices of opposition were excised from memory. Today, they offer essential insights that Rana reconstructs to forward an ambitious and comprehensive vision for moving past the constitutional bind.
Aziz Rana is a Professor and Provost’s Distinguished Fellow at Boston College Law School and the incoming J. Donald Monan, S.J., University Professor of Law and Government (beginning 2024).
Vatsal Naresh is a Lecturer in Social Studies at Harvard University. He is the editor of Negotiating Democracy and Religious Pluralism (OUP 2021) and Constituent Assemblies (CUP 2018).
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>214</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">79b14cf4-2bf9-11ef-98f5-0b9a049b3473</guid>
      <title>Rhodri Davies, &quot;What Is Philanthropy For?&quot; (Bristol UP, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In recent years, philanthropy, the use of private assets for the public good, has come under renewed scrutiny. Do elite philanthropists wield too much power? Is big-money philanthropy unaccountable and therefore anti-democratic? And what about so-called "tainted donations" and "dark money" funding pseudo-philanthropic political projects? The COVID-19 pandemic has amplified many of these criticisms, leading some to conclude that philanthropy needs to be fundamentally reshaped to play a positive role in our future.</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781529226928" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>What is Philanthropy For?</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Bristol University Press, 2023), Rhodri Davies examines&nbsp;why it's important to ask what philanthropy is for, as it has shaped our world for centuries. Considering the alternatives, including charity, justice, taxation, the state, democracy, and the market, he explores the pressing questions that philanthropy must tackle to be equal to the challenges of the 21st century.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/rhodri-davies-what-is-philanthropy-for-bristol-up-2023-dEOY13nW</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In recent years, philanthropy, the use of private assets for the public good, has come under renewed scrutiny. Do elite philanthropists wield too much power? Is big-money philanthropy unaccountable and therefore anti-democratic? And what about so-called "tainted donations" and "dark money" funding pseudo-philanthropic political projects? The COVID-19 pandemic has amplified many of these criticisms, leading some to conclude that philanthropy needs to be fundamentally reshaped to play a positive role in our future.</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781529226928" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>What is Philanthropy For?</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Bristol University Press, 2023), Rhodri Davies examines&nbsp;why it's important to ask what philanthropy is for, as it has shaped our world for centuries. Considering the alternatives, including charity, justice, taxation, the state, democracy, and the market, he explores the pressing questions that philanthropy must tackle to be equal to the challenges of the 21st century.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="36819288" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/12fefe70-0600-40eb-a614-10e062731be0/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=12fefe70-0600-40eb-a614-10e062731be0&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Rhodri Davies, &quot;What Is Philanthropy For?&quot; (Bristol UP, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:38:21</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In recent years, philanthropy, the use of private assets for the public good, has come under renewed scrutiny. Do elite philanthropists wield too much power? Is big-money philanthropy unaccountable and therefore anti-democratic? And what about so-called &quot;tainted donations&quot; and &quot;dark money&quot; funding pseudo-philanthropic political projects? The COVID-19 pandemic has amplified many of these criticisms, leading some to conclude that philanthropy needs to be fundamentally reshaped to play a positive role in our future.
In What is Philanthropy For? (Bristol University Press, 2023), Rhodri Davies examines why it&apos;s important to ask what philanthropy is for, as it has shaped our world for centuries. Considering the alternatives, including charity, justice, taxation, the state, democracy, and the market, he explores the pressing questions that philanthropy must tackle to be equal to the challenges of the 21st century.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In recent years, philanthropy, the use of private assets for the public good, has come under renewed scrutiny. Do elite philanthropists wield too much power? Is big-money philanthropy unaccountable and therefore anti-democratic? And what about so-called &quot;tainted donations&quot; and &quot;dark money&quot; funding pseudo-philanthropic political projects? The COVID-19 pandemic has amplified many of these criticisms, leading some to conclude that philanthropy needs to be fundamentally reshaped to play a positive role in our future.
In What is Philanthropy For? (Bristol University Press, 2023), Rhodri Davies examines why it&apos;s important to ask what philanthropy is for, as it has shaped our world for centuries. Considering the alternatives, including charity, justice, taxation, the state, democracy, and the market, he explores the pressing questions that philanthropy must tackle to be equal to the challenges of the 21st century.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>222</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">381e99c2-2b31-11ef-bea4-939be90982cb</guid>
      <title>Qian Wei, &quot;The Governance of Philanthropic Foundations in Authoritarian China&quot; (Routledge, 2022)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Chinese philanthropic foundations navigate a uniquely challenging terrain shaped by authoritarian governance.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781032233932" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Governance of Philanthropic Foundations in Authoritarian China: A Power Perspective</em></a>&nbsp;(Routledge, 2022) examines these complexities, delivering a novel multilevel analysis of the power dynamics that underpin the governance of nonprofit organizations within an authoritarian context.</p><p>Chinese philanthropic foundations, with their distinct democratic culture, grapple with a unique set of challenges. The government’s evolving methods of control often lead to stringent regulations that limit the foundations’ autonomy. Foundations that heavily rely on individual donations are particularly vulnerable to these pressures, potentially transforming into conduits of authoritarianism rather than champions of democratic values.</p><p>This book offers a comprehensive and, at times, bleak picture of the conditions under which Chinese foundations operate, offering critical insights into the future trajectory of the nonprofit sector in China.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/qian-wei-the-governance-of-philanthropic-foundations-in-authoritarian-china-routledge-2022-sL3TrzuE</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chinese philanthropic foundations navigate a uniquely challenging terrain shaped by authoritarian governance.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781032233932" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Governance of Philanthropic Foundations in Authoritarian China: A Power Perspective</em></a>&nbsp;(Routledge, 2022) examines these complexities, delivering a novel multilevel analysis of the power dynamics that underpin the governance of nonprofit organizations within an authoritarian context.</p><p>Chinese philanthropic foundations, with their distinct democratic culture, grapple with a unique set of challenges. The government’s evolving methods of control often lead to stringent regulations that limit the foundations’ autonomy. Foundations that heavily rely on individual donations are particularly vulnerable to these pressures, potentially transforming into conduits of authoritarianism rather than champions of democratic values.</p><p>This book offers a comprehensive and, at times, bleak picture of the conditions under which Chinese foundations operate, offering critical insights into the future trajectory of the nonprofit sector in China.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="73614060" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/db5bbb52-c071-4f8d-9243-d7bc930a1d7c/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=db5bbb52-c071-4f8d-9243-d7bc930a1d7c&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Qian Wei, &quot;The Governance of Philanthropic Foundations in Authoritarian China&quot; (Routledge, 2022)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:16:40</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Chinese philanthropic foundations navigate a uniquely challenging terrain shaped by authoritarian governance. The Governance of Philanthropic Foundations in Authoritarian China: A Power Perspective (Routledge, 2022) examines these complexities, delivering a novel multilevel analysis of the power dynamics that underpin the governance of nonprofit organizations within an authoritarian context.
Chinese philanthropic foundations, with their distinct democratic culture, grapple with a unique set of challenges. The government’s evolving methods of control often lead to stringent regulations that limit the foundations’ autonomy. Foundations that heavily rely on individual donations are particularly vulnerable to these pressures, potentially transforming into conduits of authoritarianism rather than champions of democratic values.
This book offers a comprehensive and, at times, bleak picture of the conditions under which Chinese foundations operate, offering critical insights into the future trajectory of the nonprofit sector in China.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Chinese philanthropic foundations navigate a uniquely challenging terrain shaped by authoritarian governance. The Governance of Philanthropic Foundations in Authoritarian China: A Power Perspective (Routledge, 2022) examines these complexities, delivering a novel multilevel analysis of the power dynamics that underpin the governance of nonprofit organizations within an authoritarian context.
Chinese philanthropic foundations, with their distinct democratic culture, grapple with a unique set of challenges. The government’s evolving methods of control often lead to stringent regulations that limit the foundations’ autonomy. Foundations that heavily rely on individual donations are particularly vulnerable to these pressures, potentially transforming into conduits of authoritarianism rather than champions of democratic values.
This book offers a comprehensive and, at times, bleak picture of the conditions under which Chinese foundations operate, offering critical insights into the future trajectory of the nonprofit sector in China.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>221</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">10fe5902-2b1a-11ef-b339-0f9ce125d93f</guid>
      <title>Alex V. Barnard, &quot;Conservatorship: Inside California&apos;s System of Coercion and Care for Mental Illness&quot; (Columbia UP, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Is involuntary psychiatric treatment the solution to the intertwined crises of untreated mental illness, homelessness, and addiction? In recent years, politicians and advocates have sought to expand the use of conservatorships, a legal tool used to force someone deemed “gravely disabled,” or unable to meet their needs for food, clothing, or shelter as a result of mental illness, to take medication and be placed in a locked facility. At the same time, civil liberties and disability rights groups have seized on cases like that of Britney Spears to argue that conservatorships are inherently abusive.</p><p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780231210256" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Conservatorship: Inside California's System of Coercion and Care for Mental Illness</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Columbia UP, 2023) is an incisive and compelling portrait of the functioning—and failings—of California’s conservatorship system. Drawing on hundreds of interviews with professionals, policy makers, families, and conservatees,&nbsp;<a href="https://alexvbarnard.org/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Alex V. Barnard</a>&nbsp;takes readers to the streets where police encounter homeless people in crisis, the locked wards where people receiving treatment are confined, and the courtrooms where judges decide on conservatorship petitions. As he shows, California’s state government has abdicated authority over this system, leaving the question of who receives compassionate care and who faces coercion dependent on the financial incentives of for-profit facilities, the constraints of underresourced clinicians, and the desperate struggles of families to obtain treatment for their loved ones.</p><p>This book offers a timely warning: reforms to expand conservatorship will lead to more coercion but little transformative care until government assumes accountability for ensuring the health and dignity of its most vulnerable citizens.</p><p><em>Michael O. Johnston, Ph.D. is a Assistant Professor of Sociology at William Penn University. He is the author of The Social Construction of a Cultural Spectacle: Floatzilla (Lexington Books, 2023) and Community Media Representations of Place and Identity at Tug Fest: Reconstructing the Mississippi River (Lexington Books, 2022). His general area of study is in the areas of social construction of experience, identity, and place. He is currently conducting research for his next project that looks at nightlife and the emotional labor that is performed by employees of bars and nightclubs. To learn more about Michael O. Johnston you can go to his&nbsp;</em><a href="https://profjohnston.weebly.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>website</em></a><em>,&nbsp;</em><a href="https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=2RfJ6FMAAAAJ&amp;hl=en" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Google Scholar</em></a><em>, Twitter @ProfessorJohnst, or by email at johnstonmo@wmpenn.edu.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/alex-v-barnard-conservatorship-inside-californias-system-of-coercion-and-care-for-mental-illness-columbia-up-2023-jc_9cvwU</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is involuntary psychiatric treatment the solution to the intertwined crises of untreated mental illness, homelessness, and addiction? In recent years, politicians and advocates have sought to expand the use of conservatorships, a legal tool used to force someone deemed “gravely disabled,” or unable to meet their needs for food, clothing, or shelter as a result of mental illness, to take medication and be placed in a locked facility. At the same time, civil liberties and disability rights groups have seized on cases like that of Britney Spears to argue that conservatorships are inherently abusive.</p><p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780231210256" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Conservatorship: Inside California's System of Coercion and Care for Mental Illness</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Columbia UP, 2023) is an incisive and compelling portrait of the functioning—and failings—of California’s conservatorship system. Drawing on hundreds of interviews with professionals, policy makers, families, and conservatees,&nbsp;<a href="https://alexvbarnard.org/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Alex V. Barnard</a>&nbsp;takes readers to the streets where police encounter homeless people in crisis, the locked wards where people receiving treatment are confined, and the courtrooms where judges decide on conservatorship petitions. As he shows, California’s state government has abdicated authority over this system, leaving the question of who receives compassionate care and who faces coercion dependent on the financial incentives of for-profit facilities, the constraints of underresourced clinicians, and the desperate struggles of families to obtain treatment for their loved ones.</p><p>This book offers a timely warning: reforms to expand conservatorship will lead to more coercion but little transformative care until government assumes accountability for ensuring the health and dignity of its most vulnerable citizens.</p><p><em>Michael O. Johnston, Ph.D. is a Assistant Professor of Sociology at William Penn University. He is the author of The Social Construction of a Cultural Spectacle: Floatzilla (Lexington Books, 2023) and Community Media Representations of Place and Identity at Tug Fest: Reconstructing the Mississippi River (Lexington Books, 2022). His general area of study is in the areas of social construction of experience, identity, and place. He is currently conducting research for his next project that looks at nightlife and the emotional labor that is performed by employees of bars and nightclubs. To learn more about Michael O. Johnston you can go to his&nbsp;</em><a href="https://profjohnston.weebly.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>website</em></a><em>,&nbsp;</em><a href="https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=2RfJ6FMAAAAJ&amp;hl=en" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Google Scholar</em></a><em>, Twitter @ProfessorJohnst, or by email at johnstonmo@wmpenn.edu.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="53628542" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/065877ff-a964-4cfa-b224-68c0d26ee107/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=065877ff-a964-4cfa-b224-68c0d26ee107&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Alex V. Barnard, &quot;Conservatorship: Inside California&apos;s System of Coercion and Care for Mental Illness&quot; (Columbia UP, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:55:51</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Is involuntary psychiatric treatment the solution to the intertwined crises of untreated mental illness, homelessness, and addiction? In recent years, politicians and advocates have sought to expand the use of conservatorships, a legal tool used to force someone deemed “gravely disabled,” or unable to meet their needs for food, clothing, or shelter as a result of mental illness, to take medication and be placed in a locked facility. At the same time, civil liberties and disability rights groups have seized on cases like that of Britney Spears to argue that conservatorships are inherently abusive.
Conservatorship: Inside California&apos;s System of Coercion and Care for Mental Illness (Columbia UP, 2023) is an incisive and compelling portrait of the functioning—and failings—of California’s conservatorship system. Drawing on hundreds of interviews with professionals, policy makers, families, and conservatees, Alex V. Barnard takes readers to the streets where police encounter homeless people in crisis, the locked wards where people receiving treatment are confined, and the courtrooms where judges decide on conservatorship petitions. As he shows, California’s state government has abdicated authority over this system, leaving the question of who receives compassionate care and who faces coercion dependent on the financial incentives of for-profit facilities, the constraints of underresourced clinicians, and the desperate struggles of families to obtain treatment for their loved ones.
This book offers a timely warning: reforms to expand conservatorship will lead to more coercion but little transformative care until government assumes accountability for ensuring the health and dignity of its most vulnerable citizens.
Michael O. Johnston, Ph.D. is a Assistant Professor of Sociology at William Penn University. He is the author of The Social Construction of a Cultural Spectacle: Floatzilla (Lexington Books, 2023) and Community Media Representations of Place and Identity at Tug Fest: Reconstructing the Mississippi River (Lexington Books, 2022). His general area of study is in the areas of social construction of experience, identity, and place. He is currently conducting research for his next project that looks at nightlife and the emotional labor that is performed by employees of bars and nightclubs. To learn more about Michael O. Johnston you can go to his website, Google Scholar, Twitter @ProfessorJohnst, or by email at johnstonmo@wmpenn.edu.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Is involuntary psychiatric treatment the solution to the intertwined crises of untreated mental illness, homelessness, and addiction? In recent years, politicians and advocates have sought to expand the use of conservatorships, a legal tool used to force someone deemed “gravely disabled,” or unable to meet their needs for food, clothing, or shelter as a result of mental illness, to take medication and be placed in a locked facility. At the same time, civil liberties and disability rights groups have seized on cases like that of Britney Spears to argue that conservatorships are inherently abusive.
Conservatorship: Inside California&apos;s System of Coercion and Care for Mental Illness (Columbia UP, 2023) is an incisive and compelling portrait of the functioning—and failings—of California’s conservatorship system. Drawing on hundreds of interviews with professionals, policy makers, families, and conservatees, Alex V. Barnard takes readers to the streets where police encounter homeless people in crisis, the locked wards where people receiving treatment are confined, and the courtrooms where judges decide on conservatorship petitions. As he shows, California’s state government has abdicated authority over this system, leaving the question of who receives compassionate care and who faces coercion dependent on the financial incentives of for-profit facilities, the constraints of underresourced clinicians, and the desperate struggles of families to obtain treatment for their loved ones.
This book offers a timely warning: reforms to expand conservatorship will lead to more coercion but little transformative care until government assumes accountability for ensuring the health and dignity of its most vulnerable citizens.
Michael O. Johnston, Ph.D. is a Assistant Professor of Sociology at William Penn University. He is the author of The Social Construction of a Cultural Spectacle: Floatzilla (Lexington Books, 2023) and Community Media Representations of Place and Identity at Tug Fest: Reconstructing the Mississippi River (Lexington Books, 2022). His general area of study is in the areas of social construction of experience, identity, and place. He is currently conducting research for his next project that looks at nightlife and the emotional labor that is performed by employees of bars and nightclubs. To learn more about Michael O. Johnston you can go to his website, Google Scholar, Twitter @ProfessorJohnst, or by email at johnstonmo@wmpenn.edu.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>367</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">eb2628ce-2725-11ef-bf4d-738411f5d56d</guid>
      <title>Julia Wojnowska-Radzińska, &quot;Implications of Pre-Emptive Data Surveillance for Fundamental Rights in the European Union&quot; (Brill Nijhoff, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In<em>&nbsp;</em><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9789004677678" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Implications of Pre-Emptive Data Surveillance for Fundamental Rights in the European Union</em></a>&nbsp;(Brill Nijhoff, 2023) Julia Wojnowska-Radzińska offers a comprehensive legal analysis of various forms of pre-emptive data surveillance adopted by the European legislator and their impact on fundamental rights. It also identifies what minimum guarantees have to be set up to recognize pre-emptive data surveillance as a legitimate measure in a democratic society. The book aims to answer the essential question of how to strike the proper balance between fundamental rights and security interests in the digital age.</p><p><em>Caleb Zakarin is Editor at the New Books Network.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/julia-wojnowska-radzinska-implications-of-pre-emptive-data-surveillance-for-fundamental-rights-in-the-european-union-brill-nijhoff-2023-7B9h1TEu</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In<em>&nbsp;</em><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9789004677678" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Implications of Pre-Emptive Data Surveillance for Fundamental Rights in the European Union</em></a>&nbsp;(Brill Nijhoff, 2023) Julia Wojnowska-Radzińska offers a comprehensive legal analysis of various forms of pre-emptive data surveillance adopted by the European legislator and their impact on fundamental rights. It also identifies what minimum guarantees have to be set up to recognize pre-emptive data surveillance as a legitimate measure in a democratic society. The book aims to answer the essential question of how to strike the proper balance between fundamental rights and security interests in the digital age.</p><p><em>Caleb Zakarin is Editor at the New Books Network.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="33948594" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/25089ff4-73ce-40ec-959b-455f42d510b8/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=25089ff4-73ce-40ec-959b-455f42d510b8&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Julia Wojnowska-Radzińska, &quot;Implications of Pre-Emptive Data Surveillance for Fundamental Rights in the European Union&quot; (Brill Nijhoff, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:35:21</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In Implications of Pre-Emptive Data Surveillance for Fundamental Rights in the European Union (Brill Nijhoff, 2023) Julia Wojnowska-Radzińska offers a comprehensive legal analysis of various forms of pre-emptive data surveillance adopted by the European legislator and their impact on fundamental rights. It also identifies what minimum guarantees have to be set up to recognize pre-emptive data surveillance as a legitimate measure in a democratic society. The book aims to answer the essential question of how to strike the proper balance between fundamental rights and security interests in the digital age.
Caleb Zakarin is Editor at the New Books Network.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In Implications of Pre-Emptive Data Surveillance for Fundamental Rights in the European Union (Brill Nijhoff, 2023) Julia Wojnowska-Radzińska offers a comprehensive legal analysis of various forms of pre-emptive data surveillance adopted by the European legislator and their impact on fundamental rights. It also identifies what minimum guarantees have to be set up to recognize pre-emptive data surveillance as a legitimate measure in a democratic society. The book aims to answer the essential question of how to strike the proper balance between fundamental rights and security interests in the digital age.
Caleb Zakarin is Editor at the New Books Network.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>2</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">0ad7cb94-24cb-11ef-9c28-532043e336f8</guid>
      <title>Robert G. Boatright, &quot;Reform and Retrenchment: A Century of Efforts to Fix Primary Elections&quot; (Oxford UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Until 1900, most political parties in the United States chose their leaders – either in back rooms with a few party elites making decisions or in conventions. The direct primary, in which voters select party nominees for state and federal offices, was one of the most widely adopted political reforms of the early twentieth century Progressive movement.</p><p>Intuitively, the direct primary sounds democratic. Voters directly select the candidates. They have more of say over who will ultimately represent or govern them. But decades of scholarship suggests that direct primaries might not have changed the outcomes of party nominations. The conventional wisdom is that as the strength of the Progressive movement declined and voters paid attention to other issues. Party leaders were able to reassert control over candidate selection. In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197774083" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Reform and Retrenchment: A Century of Efforts to Fix Primary Elections</em>&nbsp;</a>(Oxford UP, 2024), Dr. Robert G. Boatright insists this narrative is incorrect and misleading for contemporary efforts to reform the primary election system in the U.S. because some of the early concerns about primaries are still with us today.</p><p>The book presents data from 1928-1970 explaining the type of reforms states implemented and their success or failure. Dr. Boatright argues that the introduction of the indirect primary created more chaos than scholars have previously documented. Political parties, factions, and reform groups manipulated primary election laws to gain advantage, often under the guise of enhancing democracy. How does this history impact contemporary plans for reform of the primary system? Many suggested reforms were tried – and failed – during the 20th&nbsp;century. Boatright concludes that despite the clear flaws in the direct primary system, little can be done to change the primary system. Reformers should instead focus on elections and governance. The end of the podcast features his suggestions.</p><p>During the podcast, Rob mentions Dr. Jack Santucci’s&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/more-parties-or-no-parties-the-politics-of-electoral-reform-in-america-jack-santucci/18386145?ean=9780197630655" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>More Parties or No Parties: The Politics of Electoral Reform in America</em></a>&nbsp;(Oxford 2022).</p><p><a href="http://wordpress.clarku.edu/rboatright/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. Robert G. Boatright</a>&nbsp;is Professor of Political Science at Clark University in Worcester, MA and the Director of Research for the National Institute for Civil Discourse at the University of Arizona. His research focuses on the effects of campaign and election laws on the behavior of politicians and interest groups with a particular emphasis on primary elections and campaign finance laws. He is the author or editor of 9 books. Heath Brown and I have interviewed Rob previously on New Books in Political Science:&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/r-g-boatright-and-v-sperling-trumping-politics-as-usual-masculinity-misogyny-and-the-2016-elections-oxford-up-2019#entry:31619@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Trumping Politics as Usual:Masculinity, Misogyny, and the 2016 Elections</em></a></p><p>(with co-author Valerie Sperling) and&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/robert-boatright-ed-the-deregulatory-moment-a-comparative-perspective-on-changing-campaign-finance-laws-u-of-michigan-press-2015#entry:14406@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Deregulatory Moment?: A Comparative Perspective on Changing Campaign Finance Laws</em></a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/robert-g-boatright-reform-and-retrenchment-a-century-of-efforts-to-fix-primary-elections-oxford-up-2024-ffTIXrW7</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Until 1900, most political parties in the United States chose their leaders – either in back rooms with a few party elites making decisions or in conventions. The direct primary, in which voters select party nominees for state and federal offices, was one of the most widely adopted political reforms of the early twentieth century Progressive movement.</p><p>Intuitively, the direct primary sounds democratic. Voters directly select the candidates. They have more of say over who will ultimately represent or govern them. But decades of scholarship suggests that direct primaries might not have changed the outcomes of party nominations. The conventional wisdom is that as the strength of the Progressive movement declined and voters paid attention to other issues. Party leaders were able to reassert control over candidate selection. In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197774083" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Reform and Retrenchment: A Century of Efforts to Fix Primary Elections</em>&nbsp;</a>(Oxford UP, 2024), Dr. Robert G. Boatright insists this narrative is incorrect and misleading for contemporary efforts to reform the primary election system in the U.S. because some of the early concerns about primaries are still with us today.</p><p>The book presents data from 1928-1970 explaining the type of reforms states implemented and their success or failure. Dr. Boatright argues that the introduction of the indirect primary created more chaos than scholars have previously documented. Political parties, factions, and reform groups manipulated primary election laws to gain advantage, often under the guise of enhancing democracy. How does this history impact contemporary plans for reform of the primary system? Many suggested reforms were tried – and failed – during the 20th&nbsp;century. Boatright concludes that despite the clear flaws in the direct primary system, little can be done to change the primary system. Reformers should instead focus on elections and governance. The end of the podcast features his suggestions.</p><p>During the podcast, Rob mentions Dr. Jack Santucci’s&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/more-parties-or-no-parties-the-politics-of-electoral-reform-in-america-jack-santucci/18386145?ean=9780197630655" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>More Parties or No Parties: The Politics of Electoral Reform in America</em></a>&nbsp;(Oxford 2022).</p><p><a href="http://wordpress.clarku.edu/rboatright/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. Robert G. Boatright</a>&nbsp;is Professor of Political Science at Clark University in Worcester, MA and the Director of Research for the National Institute for Civil Discourse at the University of Arizona. His research focuses on the effects of campaign and election laws on the behavior of politicians and interest groups with a particular emphasis on primary elections and campaign finance laws. He is the author or editor of 9 books. Heath Brown and I have interviewed Rob previously on New Books in Political Science:&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/r-g-boatright-and-v-sperling-trumping-politics-as-usual-masculinity-misogyny-and-the-2016-elections-oxford-up-2019#entry:31619@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Trumping Politics as Usual:Masculinity, Misogyny, and the 2016 Elections</em></a></p><p>(with co-author Valerie Sperling) and&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/robert-boatright-ed-the-deregulatory-moment-a-comparative-perspective-on-changing-campaign-finance-laws-u-of-michigan-press-2015#entry:14406@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Deregulatory Moment?: A Comparative Perspective on Changing Campaign Finance Laws</em></a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="53796013" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/3431f617-b631-41d6-b88f-df009c1b9cd0/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=3431f617-b631-41d6-b88f-df009c1b9cd0&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Robert G. Boatright, &quot;Reform and Retrenchment: A Century of Efforts to Fix Primary Elections&quot; (Oxford UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:56:01</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Until 1900, most political parties in the United States chose their leaders – either in back rooms with a few party elites making decisions or in conventions. The direct primary, in which voters select party nominees for state and federal offices, was one of the most widely adopted political reforms of the early twentieth century Progressive movement.
Intuitively, the direct primary sounds democratic. Voters directly select the candidates. They have more of say over who will ultimately represent or govern them. But decades of scholarship suggests that direct primaries might not have changed the outcomes of party nominations. The conventional wisdom is that as the strength of the Progressive movement declined and voters paid attention to other issues. Party leaders were able to reassert control over candidate selection. In Reform and Retrenchment: A Century of Efforts to Fix Primary Elections (Oxford UP, 2024), Dr. Robert G. Boatright insists this narrative is incorrect and misleading for contemporary efforts to reform the primary election system in the U.S. because some of the early concerns about primaries are still with us today.
The book presents data from 1928-1970 explaining the type of reforms states implemented and their success or failure. Dr. Boatright argues that the introduction of the indirect primary created more chaos than scholars have previously documented. Political parties, factions, and reform groups manipulated primary election laws to gain advantage, often under the guise of enhancing democracy. How does this history impact contemporary plans for reform of the primary system? Many suggested reforms were tried – and failed – during the 20th century. Boatright concludes that despite the clear flaws in the direct primary system, little can be done to change the primary system. Reformers should instead focus on elections and governance. The end of the podcast features his suggestions.
During the podcast, Rob mentions Dr. Jack Santucci’s More Parties or No Parties: The Politics of Electoral Reform in America (Oxford 2022).
Dr. Robert G. Boatright is Professor of Political Science at Clark University in Worcester, MA and the Director of Research for the National Institute for Civil Discourse at the University of Arizona. His research focuses on the effects of campaign and election laws on the behavior of politicians and interest groups with a particular emphasis on primary elections and campaign finance laws. He is the author or editor of 9 books. Heath Brown and I have interviewed Rob previously on New Books in Political Science: Trumping Politics as Usual:Masculinity, Misogyny, and the 2016 Elections
(with co-author Valerie Sperling) and The Deregulatory Moment?: A Comparative Perspective on Changing Campaign Finance Laws.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Until 1900, most political parties in the United States chose their leaders – either in back rooms with a few party elites making decisions or in conventions. The direct primary, in which voters select party nominees for state and federal offices, was one of the most widely adopted political reforms of the early twentieth century Progressive movement.
Intuitively, the direct primary sounds democratic. Voters directly select the candidates. They have more of say over who will ultimately represent or govern them. But decades of scholarship suggests that direct primaries might not have changed the outcomes of party nominations. The conventional wisdom is that as the strength of the Progressive movement declined and voters paid attention to other issues. Party leaders were able to reassert control over candidate selection. In Reform and Retrenchment: A Century of Efforts to Fix Primary Elections (Oxford UP, 2024), Dr. Robert G. Boatright insists this narrative is incorrect and misleading for contemporary efforts to reform the primary election system in the U.S. because some of the early concerns about primaries are still with us today.
The book presents data from 1928-1970 explaining the type of reforms states implemented and their success or failure. Dr. Boatright argues that the introduction of the indirect primary created more chaos than scholars have previously documented. Political parties, factions, and reform groups manipulated primary election laws to gain advantage, often under the guise of enhancing democracy. How does this history impact contemporary plans for reform of the primary system? Many suggested reforms were tried – and failed – during the 20th century. Boatright concludes that despite the clear flaws in the direct primary system, little can be done to change the primary system. Reformers should instead focus on elections and governance. The end of the podcast features his suggestions.
During the podcast, Rob mentions Dr. Jack Santucci’s More Parties or No Parties: The Politics of Electoral Reform in America (Oxford 2022).
Dr. Robert G. Boatright is Professor of Political Science at Clark University in Worcester, MA and the Director of Research for the National Institute for Civil Discourse at the University of Arizona. His research focuses on the effects of campaign and election laws on the behavior of politicians and interest groups with a particular emphasis on primary elections and campaign finance laws. He is the author or editor of 9 books. Heath Brown and I have interviewed Rob previously on New Books in Political Science: Trumping Politics as Usual:Masculinity, Misogyny, and the 2016 Elections
(with co-author Valerie Sperling) and The Deregulatory Moment?: A Comparative Perspective on Changing Campaign Finance Laws.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>720</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">c76905d6-2410-11ef-80be-fb0d9a9a2d16</guid>
      <title>Sharrona Pearl, &quot;Do I Know You?: From Face Blindness to Super Recognition&quot; (Johns Hopkins UP, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781421447537" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Do I Know You? From Faceblindness to Super Recognition</em></a>&nbsp;(Johns Hopkins University Press, 2023), Dr. Sharrona Pearl explores the fascinating category of face recognition and the "the face recognition spectrum," which ranges from face blindness at one end to super recognition at the other. Super recognizers can recall faces from only the briefest exposure, while face blind people lack the capacity to recognize faces at all, including those of their closest loved ones. Informed by archival research, the latest neurological studies, and testimonials from people at both ends of the spectrum, Dr. Pearl tells a nuanced story of how we relate to each other through our faces.</p><p>The category of face recognition is relatively new despite the importance of faces in how we build relationships and understand our own humanity. Dr. Pearl shows how this most tacit of knowledge came to enter the scientific and diagnostic field despite difficulties with identifying it. She offers a grounded framework for how we evaluate others and draw conclusions about them, with significant implications for race, gender, class, and disability. Dr. Pearl explores the shifting ideas around the face-recognition spectrum, explaining the effects of these diagnoses on real people alongside implications for how facial recognition is studied and understood. Face blindness is framed as a disability, while super recognition is framed as a superpower with no meaningful disadvantages. This superhero rhetoric is tied to the use of super recognizers in criminal detection, prosecution, and other forms of state surveillance.<em>&nbsp;Do I Know You?&nbsp;</em>demonstrates a humanistic approach to the study of the brain, one that offers an entirely new method for examining this fundamental aspect of human interaction.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;new book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 8 Jun 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/sharrona-pearl-do-i-know-you-from-face-blindness-to-super-recognition-johns-hopkins-up-2023-e4Q3F_EU</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781421447537" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Do I Know You? From Faceblindness to Super Recognition</em></a>&nbsp;(Johns Hopkins University Press, 2023), Dr. Sharrona Pearl explores the fascinating category of face recognition and the "the face recognition spectrum," which ranges from face blindness at one end to super recognition at the other. Super recognizers can recall faces from only the briefest exposure, while face blind people lack the capacity to recognize faces at all, including those of their closest loved ones. Informed by archival research, the latest neurological studies, and testimonials from people at both ends of the spectrum, Dr. Pearl tells a nuanced story of how we relate to each other through our faces.</p><p>The category of face recognition is relatively new despite the importance of faces in how we build relationships and understand our own humanity. Dr. Pearl shows how this most tacit of knowledge came to enter the scientific and diagnostic field despite difficulties with identifying it. She offers a grounded framework for how we evaluate others and draw conclusions about them, with significant implications for race, gender, class, and disability. Dr. Pearl explores the shifting ideas around the face-recognition spectrum, explaining the effects of these diagnoses on real people alongside implications for how facial recognition is studied and understood. Face blindness is framed as a disability, while super recognition is framed as a superpower with no meaningful disadvantages. This superhero rhetoric is tied to the use of super recognizers in criminal detection, prosecution, and other forms of state surveillance.<em>&nbsp;Do I Know You?&nbsp;</em>demonstrates a humanistic approach to the study of the brain, one that offers an entirely new method for examining this fundamental aspect of human interaction.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;new book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="34536439" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/47f22f97-3e7f-423c-aeda-8a442eb80f24/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=47f22f97-3e7f-423c-aeda-8a442eb80f24&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Sharrona Pearl, &quot;Do I Know You?: From Face Blindness to Super Recognition&quot; (Johns Hopkins UP, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:35:58</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In Do I Know You? From Faceblindness to Super Recognition (Johns Hopkins University Press, 2023), Dr. Sharrona Pearl explores the fascinating category of face recognition and the &quot;the face recognition spectrum,&quot; which ranges from face blindness at one end to super recognition at the other. Super recognizers can recall faces from only the briefest exposure, while face blind people lack the capacity to recognize faces at all, including those of their closest loved ones. Informed by archival research, the latest neurological studies, and testimonials from people at both ends of the spectrum, Dr. Pearl tells a nuanced story of how we relate to each other through our faces.
The category of face recognition is relatively new despite the importance of faces in how we build relationships and understand our own humanity. Dr. Pearl shows how this most tacit of knowledge came to enter the scientific and diagnostic field despite difficulties with identifying it. She offers a grounded framework for how we evaluate others and draw conclusions about them, with significant implications for race, gender, class, and disability. Dr. Pearl explores the shifting ideas around the face-recognition spectrum, explaining the effects of these diagnoses on real people alongside implications for how facial recognition is studied and understood. Face blindness is framed as a disability, while super recognition is framed as a superpower with no meaningful disadvantages. This superhero rhetoric is tied to the use of super recognizers in criminal detection, prosecution, and other forms of state surveillance. Do I Know You? demonstrates a humanistic approach to the study of the brain, one that offers an entirely new method for examining this fundamental aspect of human interaction.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In Do I Know You? From Faceblindness to Super Recognition (Johns Hopkins University Press, 2023), Dr. Sharrona Pearl explores the fascinating category of face recognition and the &quot;the face recognition spectrum,&quot; which ranges from face blindness at one end to super recognition at the other. Super recognizers can recall faces from only the briefest exposure, while face blind people lack the capacity to recognize faces at all, including those of their closest loved ones. Informed by archival research, the latest neurological studies, and testimonials from people at both ends of the spectrum, Dr. Pearl tells a nuanced story of how we relate to each other through our faces.
The category of face recognition is relatively new despite the importance of faces in how we build relationships and understand our own humanity. Dr. Pearl shows how this most tacit of knowledge came to enter the scientific and diagnostic field despite difficulties with identifying it. She offers a grounded framework for how we evaluate others and draw conclusions about them, with significant implications for race, gender, class, and disability. Dr. Pearl explores the shifting ideas around the face-recognition spectrum, explaining the effects of these diagnoses on real people alongside implications for how facial recognition is studied and understood. Face blindness is framed as a disability, while super recognition is framed as a superpower with no meaningful disadvantages. This superhero rhetoric is tied to the use of super recognizers in criminal detection, prosecution, and other forms of state surveillance. Do I Know You? demonstrates a humanistic approach to the study of the brain, one that offers an entirely new method for examining this fundamental aspect of human interaction.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>31</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3629d95a-f922-11ea-9510-eb3e204ddd7d</guid>
      <title>Michele Goodwin, &quot;Policing the Womb: Invisible Women and the Criminalization of Motherhood&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2020)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781107030176" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Policing the Womb: Invisible Women and the Criminalization of Motherhood</em> </a>(Cambridge University Press, 2020) a brilliant but shocking account of the criminalization of all aspects of reproduction, pregnancy, abortion, birth, and motherhood in the United States. In her extensively researched monograph, <a href="https://www.michelebgoodwin.com" rel="noopener noreferrer">Michele Goodwin</a> recounts the horrific contemporary situation, which includes, for example, mothers giving birth shackled in leg irons, in solitary confinement, even in prison toilets, and in some states, women being coerced by the State into sterilization, in exchange for reduced sentences. She contextualises the modern day situation in America’s history of slavery and oppression, and also in relation to its place in the world. Goodwin shows how prosecutors abuse laws, and medical professionals are complicit in a system that disproportionally impacts the poor and women of color. However, Goodwin warns that these women are just the canaries in the coalmine. Not only is the United States the deadliest country in the developed world for pregnant women, but the severe lack of protections for reproductive rights and motherhood is compounding racial and indigent disparities.</p><p><em>Jane Richards is a doctoral candidate in Human Rights Law at the University of Hong Kong. Her research interests include disability, equality, criminal law and civil disobedience. You can find her on twitter @JaneRichardsHK where she avidly follows the Hong Kong’s protests and its politics.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 8 Jun 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/michele-goodwin-policing-the-womb-invisible-women-and-the-criminalization-of-motherhood-cambridge-up-2020-FlElmKIo</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781107030176" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Policing the Womb: Invisible Women and the Criminalization of Motherhood</em> </a>(Cambridge University Press, 2020) a brilliant but shocking account of the criminalization of all aspects of reproduction, pregnancy, abortion, birth, and motherhood in the United States. In her extensively researched monograph, <a href="https://www.michelebgoodwin.com" rel="noopener noreferrer">Michele Goodwin</a> recounts the horrific contemporary situation, which includes, for example, mothers giving birth shackled in leg irons, in solitary confinement, even in prison toilets, and in some states, women being coerced by the State into sterilization, in exchange for reduced sentences. She contextualises the modern day situation in America’s history of slavery and oppression, and also in relation to its place in the world. Goodwin shows how prosecutors abuse laws, and medical professionals are complicit in a system that disproportionally impacts the poor and women of color. However, Goodwin warns that these women are just the canaries in the coalmine. Not only is the United States the deadliest country in the developed world for pregnant women, but the severe lack of protections for reproductive rights and motherhood is compounding racial and indigent disparities.</p><p><em>Jane Richards is a doctoral candidate in Human Rights Law at the University of Hong Kong. Her research interests include disability, equality, criminal law and civil disobedience. You can find her on twitter @JaneRichardsHK where she avidly follows the Hong Kong’s protests and its politics.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="62740100" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/c81b5a60-07dd-4104-b47f-b2a19ed145dd/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=c81b5a60-07dd-4104-b47f-b2a19ed145dd&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Michele Goodwin, &quot;Policing the Womb: Invisible Women and the Criminalization of Motherhood&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2020)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:05:21</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Policing the Womb: Invisible Women and the Criminalization of Motherhood (Cambridge University Press, 2020) a brilliant but shocking account of the criminalization of all aspects of reproduction, pregnancy, abortion, birth, and motherhood in the United States. In her extensively researched monograph, Michele Goodwin recounts the horrific contemporary situation, which includes, for example, mothers giving birth shackled in leg irons, in solitary confinement, even in prison toilets, and in some states, women being coerced by the State into sterilization, in exchange for reduced sentences. She contextualises the modern day situation in America’s history of slavery and oppression, and also in relation to its place in the world. Goodwin shows how prosecutors abuse laws, and medical professionals are complicit in a system that disproportionally impacts the poor and women of color. However, Goodwin warns that these women are just the canaries in the coalmine. Not only is the United States the deadliest country in the developed world for pregnant women, but the severe lack of protections for reproductive rights and motherhood is compounding racial and indigent disparities.
Jane Richards is a doctoral candidate in Human Rights Law at the University of Hong Kong. Her research interests include disability, equality, criminal law and civil disobedience. You can find her on twitter @JaneRichardsHK where she avidly follows the Hong Kong’s protests and its politics.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Policing the Womb: Invisible Women and the Criminalization of Motherhood (Cambridge University Press, 2020) a brilliant but shocking account of the criminalization of all aspects of reproduction, pregnancy, abortion, birth, and motherhood in the United States. In her extensively researched monograph, Michele Goodwin recounts the horrific contemporary situation, which includes, for example, mothers giving birth shackled in leg irons, in solitary confinement, even in prison toilets, and in some states, women being coerced by the State into sterilization, in exchange for reduced sentences. She contextualises the modern day situation in America’s history of slavery and oppression, and also in relation to its place in the world. Goodwin shows how prosecutors abuse laws, and medical professionals are complicit in a system that disproportionally impacts the poor and women of color. However, Goodwin warns that these women are just the canaries in the coalmine. Not only is the United States the deadliest country in the developed world for pregnant women, but the severe lack of protections for reproductive rights and motherhood is compounding racial and indigent disparities.
Jane Richards is a doctoral candidate in Human Rights Law at the University of Hong Kong. Her research interests include disability, equality, criminal law and civil disobedience. You can find her on twitter @JaneRichardsHK where she avidly follows the Hong Kong’s protests and its politics.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>98</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">60c14738-2372-11ef-84a1-1fc559eb9cfa</guid>
      <title>Judith Lewis Herman, &quot;Truth and Repair: How Trauma Survivors Envision Justice&quot; (Basic Books, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Judith Herman is renowned for her groundbreaking work with survivors of trauma, including sexual trauma. Her earlier books include&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781541602953" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Trauma and Recovery: The Aftermath of Violence - from Domestic Abuse to Political Terror</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Basic Books, 2022)&nbsp;<em>and</em><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780674002708" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;<em>Father-Daughter Incest</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Harvard UP, 2000)</p><p>The #MeToo movement brought worldwide attention to sexual violence, in both domestic and work settings. However, the movement did not address the crime of sexual violence in war, and the use of rape as a weapon of war. In fact, when these historical horrors were brutally used once again in October 2023, the #MeToo movement, and other feminist and anti-rape organizations responded - not with outrage- but with silence.</p><p>In contrast, high profile, celebrity cases of sexual abuse and harasment in the U.S. and U.K. gained media coverage, with attention focused on the fates of a few notorious predators who were put on trial. We heard far less about the outcomes of those trials for the survivors of their abuse.</p><p>Professor Herman maintains that conventional retributive process fails to serve most survivors; it was never designed for them. She argues that the first step toward a better form of justice is simply to ask survivors what would make things as right as possible for them.</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780674002708" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Truth and Repair: How Trauma Survivors Envision Justice</em>&nbsp;</a>(Basic Books, 2023) she commits the radical act of listening to survivors. Recounting their stories, she offers an alternative vision of justice as healing for survivors and their communities.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 7 Jun 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/judith-lewis-herman-truth-and-repair-how-trauma-survivors-envision-justice-basic-books-2023-XzMfc24x</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Judith Herman is renowned for her groundbreaking work with survivors of trauma, including sexual trauma. Her earlier books include&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781541602953" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Trauma and Recovery: The Aftermath of Violence - from Domestic Abuse to Political Terror</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Basic Books, 2022)&nbsp;<em>and</em><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780674002708" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;<em>Father-Daughter Incest</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Harvard UP, 2000)</p><p>The #MeToo movement brought worldwide attention to sexual violence, in both domestic and work settings. However, the movement did not address the crime of sexual violence in war, and the use of rape as a weapon of war. In fact, when these historical horrors were brutally used once again in October 2023, the #MeToo movement, and other feminist and anti-rape organizations responded - not with outrage- but with silence.</p><p>In contrast, high profile, celebrity cases of sexual abuse and harasment in the U.S. and U.K. gained media coverage, with attention focused on the fates of a few notorious predators who were put on trial. We heard far less about the outcomes of those trials for the survivors of their abuse.</p><p>Professor Herman maintains that conventional retributive process fails to serve most survivors; it was never designed for them. She argues that the first step toward a better form of justice is simply to ask survivors what would make things as right as possible for them.</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780674002708" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Truth and Repair: How Trauma Survivors Envision Justice</em>&nbsp;</a>(Basic Books, 2023) she commits the radical act of listening to survivors. Recounting their stories, she offers an alternative vision of justice as healing for survivors and their communities.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="28795307" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/6060f89a-3745-449b-b8aa-37eeb407fd48/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=6060f89a-3745-449b-b8aa-37eeb407fd48&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Judith Lewis Herman, &quot;Truth and Repair: How Trauma Survivors Envision Justice&quot; (Basic Books, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:29:59</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Judith Herman is renowned for her groundbreaking work with survivors of trauma, including sexual trauma. Her earlier books include Trauma and Recovery: The Aftermath of Violence - from Domestic Abuse to Political Terror (Basic Books, 2022) and Father-Daughter Incest (Harvard UP, 2000)
The #MeToo movement brought worldwide attention to sexual violence, in both domestic and work settings. However, the movement did not address the crime of sexual violence in war, and the use of rape as a weapon of war. In fact, when these historical horrors were brutally used once again in October 2023, the #MeToo movement, and other feminist and anti-rape organizations responded - not with outrage- but with silence.
In contrast, high profile, celebrity cases of sexual abuse and harasment in the U.S. and U.K. gained media coverage, with attention focused on the fates of a few notorious predators who were put on trial. We heard far less about the outcomes of those trials for the survivors of their abuse.
Professor Herman maintains that conventional retributive process fails to serve most survivors; it was never designed for them. She argues that the first step toward a better form of justice is simply to ask survivors what would make things as right as possible for them.
In Truth and Repair: How Trauma Survivors Envision Justice (Basic Books, 2023) she commits the radical act of listening to survivors. Recounting their stories, she offers an alternative vision of justice as healing for survivors and their communities.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Judith Herman is renowned for her groundbreaking work with survivors of trauma, including sexual trauma. Her earlier books include Trauma and Recovery: The Aftermath of Violence - from Domestic Abuse to Political Terror (Basic Books, 2022) and Father-Daughter Incest (Harvard UP, 2000)
The #MeToo movement brought worldwide attention to sexual violence, in both domestic and work settings. However, the movement did not address the crime of sexual violence in war, and the use of rape as a weapon of war. In fact, when these historical horrors were brutally used once again in October 2023, the #MeToo movement, and other feminist and anti-rape organizations responded - not with outrage- but with silence.
In contrast, high profile, celebrity cases of sexual abuse and harasment in the U.S. and U.K. gained media coverage, with attention focused on the fates of a few notorious predators who were put on trial. We heard far less about the outcomes of those trials for the survivors of their abuse.
Professor Herman maintains that conventional retributive process fails to serve most survivors; it was never designed for them. She argues that the first step toward a better form of justice is simply to ask survivors what would make things as right as possible for them.
In Truth and Repair: How Trauma Survivors Envision Justice (Basic Books, 2023) she commits the radical act of listening to survivors. Recounting their stories, she offers an alternative vision of justice as healing for survivors and their communities.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>122</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">66da546e-21bc-11ef-b601-7b827afb1221</guid>
      <title>Vivien Marsh, &quot;Seeking Truth in International TV News: China, CGTN, and the BBC&quot; (Routledge, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780367558529" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Seeking Truth in International News: China, CGTN and the BBC</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Routledge, 2023)&nbsp;<a href="https://vivienmarsh.com/about-me" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr Vivien Marsh</a>&nbsp;analyses the differences between journalistic traditions in China and the West, and extent to which this impacts the ability of news media to hold power to account. This facilitates a&nbsp;fascinating account of the role of journalists in seeking truth from facts, and the way that public&nbsp;narratives of events&nbsp;are constructed. The book has extensive global coverage, and readers will come to understand the significance of both what is reported, and also the significance of scrutinising what is left out.&nbsp;</p><p>Dr&nbsp;<a href="https://www.westminster.ac.uk/about-us/our-people/directory/marsh-vivien" rel="noopener noreferrer">Vivien Marsh</a>&nbsp;is an independent&nbsp;academic&nbsp;researcher at The University of Westminster, UK. She is a former global news editor, reporter and writer.&nbsp;</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 4 Jun 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/vivien-marsh-seeking-truth-in-international-tv-news-china-cgtn-and-the-bbc-routledge-2023-Z57M_0Co</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780367558529" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Seeking Truth in International News: China, CGTN and the BBC</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Routledge, 2023)&nbsp;<a href="https://vivienmarsh.com/about-me" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr Vivien Marsh</a>&nbsp;analyses the differences between journalistic traditions in China and the West, and extent to which this impacts the ability of news media to hold power to account. This facilitates a&nbsp;fascinating account of the role of journalists in seeking truth from facts, and the way that public&nbsp;narratives of events&nbsp;are constructed. The book has extensive global coverage, and readers will come to understand the significance of both what is reported, and also the significance of scrutinising what is left out.&nbsp;</p><p>Dr&nbsp;<a href="https://www.westminster.ac.uk/about-us/our-people/directory/marsh-vivien" rel="noopener noreferrer">Vivien Marsh</a>&nbsp;is an independent&nbsp;academic&nbsp;researcher at The University of Westminster, UK. She is a former global news editor, reporter and writer.&nbsp;</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="58350464" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/f7c58c2f-a02d-46cc-a459-31580916a245/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=f7c58c2f-a02d-46cc-a459-31580916a245&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Vivien Marsh, &quot;Seeking Truth in International TV News: China, CGTN, and the BBC&quot; (Routledge, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:00:46</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In Seeking Truth in International News: China, CGTN and the BBC (Routledge, 2023) Dr Vivien Marsh analyses the differences between journalistic traditions in China and the West, and extent to which this impacts the ability of news media to hold power to account. This facilitates a fascinating account of the role of journalists in seeking truth from facts, and the way that public narratives of events are constructed. The book has extensive global coverage, and readers will come to understand the significance of both what is reported, and also the significance of scrutinising what is left out. 
Dr Vivien Marsh is an independent academic researcher at The University of Westminster, UK. She is a former global news editor, reporter and writer. 
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In Seeking Truth in International News: China, CGTN and the BBC (Routledge, 2023) Dr Vivien Marsh analyses the differences between journalistic traditions in China and the West, and extent to which this impacts the ability of news media to hold power to account. This facilitates a fascinating account of the role of journalists in seeking truth from facts, and the way that public narratives of events are constructed. The book has extensive global coverage, and readers will come to understand the significance of both what is reported, and also the significance of scrutinising what is left out. 
Dr Vivien Marsh is an independent academic researcher at The University of Westminster, UK. She is a former global news editor, reporter and writer. 
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>220</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">d7b4a37e-1ac8-11ef-99cc-fbfb92510ad5</guid>
      <title>Benjamin Balint, &quot;Kafka&apos;s Last Trial: The Case of a Literary Legacy&quot; (Norton, 2019)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>When Franz Kafka died in 1924, his loyal friend Max Brod could not bring himself to fulfill Kafka’s last instruction: to burn his remaining manuscripts. Instead, Brod devoted his life to championing Kafka’s work, rescuing his legacy from both obscurity and physical destruction. Nearly a century later, an international legal battle erupted to determine which country could claim ownership: the Jewish state, where Kafka dreamed of living, or Germany, where Kafka’s three sisters perished in the Holocaust?&nbsp;</p><p><em>In&nbsp;</em><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780393357387" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>﻿Kafka's Last Trial: The Case of a Literary Legacy</em></a>&nbsp;(Norton, 2019),&nbsp;Benjamin Balint offers a gripping account of the controversial trial in Israeli courts—brimming with dilemmas legal, ethical, and political—that determined the fate of Kafka’s manuscripts.</p><p>Benjamin Balint, a fellow at the Van Leer Institute in Jerusalem, is the author most recently of&nbsp;<em>Bruno Schulz: An Artist, a Murder, and the Hijacking of History</em>&nbsp;(Norton), winner of a National Jewish Book Award. His book&nbsp;<em>Kafka's Last Trial</em>&nbsp;(Norton) won the Sami Rohr Prize and has been translated into a dozen languages. He is also the co-author, with Merav Mack, of&nbsp;<em>Jerusalem: City of the Book</em>&nbsp;(Yale).</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 3 Jun 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/benjamin-balint-kafkas-last-trial-the-case-of-a-literary-legacy-norton-2019-kFXUiBH7</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When Franz Kafka died in 1924, his loyal friend Max Brod could not bring himself to fulfill Kafka’s last instruction: to burn his remaining manuscripts. Instead, Brod devoted his life to championing Kafka’s work, rescuing his legacy from both obscurity and physical destruction. Nearly a century later, an international legal battle erupted to determine which country could claim ownership: the Jewish state, where Kafka dreamed of living, or Germany, where Kafka’s three sisters perished in the Holocaust?&nbsp;</p><p><em>In&nbsp;</em><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780393357387" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>﻿Kafka's Last Trial: The Case of a Literary Legacy</em></a>&nbsp;(Norton, 2019),&nbsp;Benjamin Balint offers a gripping account of the controversial trial in Israeli courts—brimming with dilemmas legal, ethical, and political—that determined the fate of Kafka’s manuscripts.</p><p>Benjamin Balint, a fellow at the Van Leer Institute in Jerusalem, is the author most recently of&nbsp;<em>Bruno Schulz: An Artist, a Murder, and the Hijacking of History</em>&nbsp;(Norton), winner of a National Jewish Book Award. His book&nbsp;<em>Kafka's Last Trial</em>&nbsp;(Norton) won the Sami Rohr Prize and has been translated into a dozen languages. He is also the co-author, with Merav Mack, of&nbsp;<em>Jerusalem: City of the Book</em>&nbsp;(Yale).</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="39110043" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/9ef141c4-c279-4550-a566-33576856c2dc/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=9ef141c4-c279-4550-a566-33576856c2dc&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Benjamin Balint, &quot;Kafka&apos;s Last Trial: The Case of a Literary Legacy&quot; (Norton, 2019)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:40:44</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>When Franz Kafka died in 1924, his loyal friend Max Brod could not bring himself to fulfill Kafka’s last instruction: to burn his remaining manuscripts. Instead, Brod devoted his life to championing Kafka’s work, rescuing his legacy from both obscurity and physical destruction. Nearly a century later, an international legal battle erupted to determine which country could claim ownership: the Jewish state, where Kafka dreamed of living, or Germany, where Kafka’s three sisters perished in the Holocaust? 
In ﻿Kafka&apos;s Last Trial: The Case of a Literary Legacy (Norton, 2019), Benjamin Balint offers a gripping account of the controversial trial in Israeli courts—brimming with dilemmas legal, ethical, and political—that determined the fate of Kafka’s manuscripts.
Benjamin Balint, a fellow at the Van Leer Institute in Jerusalem, is the author most recently of Bruno Schulz: An Artist, a Murder, and the Hijacking of History (Norton), winner of a National Jewish Book Award. His book Kafka&apos;s Last Trial (Norton) won the Sami Rohr Prize and has been translated into a dozen languages. He is also the co-author, with Merav Mack, of Jerusalem: City of the Book (Yale).
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>When Franz Kafka died in 1924, his loyal friend Max Brod could not bring himself to fulfill Kafka’s last instruction: to burn his remaining manuscripts. Instead, Brod devoted his life to championing Kafka’s work, rescuing his legacy from both obscurity and physical destruction. Nearly a century later, an international legal battle erupted to determine which country could claim ownership: the Jewish state, where Kafka dreamed of living, or Germany, where Kafka’s three sisters perished in the Holocaust? 
In ﻿Kafka&apos;s Last Trial: The Case of a Literary Legacy (Norton, 2019), Benjamin Balint offers a gripping account of the controversial trial in Israeli courts—brimming with dilemmas legal, ethical, and political—that determined the fate of Kafka’s manuscripts.
Benjamin Balint, a fellow at the Van Leer Institute in Jerusalem, is the author most recently of Bruno Schulz: An Artist, a Murder, and the Hijacking of History (Norton), winner of a National Jewish Book Award. His book Kafka&apos;s Last Trial (Norton) won the Sami Rohr Prize and has been translated into a dozen languages. He is also the co-author, with Merav Mack, of Jerusalem: City of the Book (Yale).
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>302</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">80664486-ce84-11ea-bb6e-db4937181afc</guid>
      <title>Aya Gruber, &quot;The Feminist War on Crime: The Unexpected Role of Women’s Liberation in Mass Incarceration&quot; (U California Press, 2020)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://lawweb.colorado.edu/profiles/profile.jsp?id=325" rel="noopener noreferrer">Aya Gruber</a>, a professor of law at the University of Colorado Law School, has written a history of how the women’s movement in America has shaped the law on domestic violence and sexual assault.</p><p>In <a href="https://www.amazon.com/dp/0520304519/?tag=newbooinhis-20" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Feminist War on Crime: The Unexpected Role of Women’s Liberation in Mass Incarceration</em></a> (University of California Press, 2020), Professor Gruber contends that the legal reform movement on sexual assault began with feminists in the 19th century, who argued in favor of temperance reform, partly in the hope that it would lead to less violence against women.&nbsp;She also argues that the social context in which sexual assault allegations were made in the 19th century, especially regarding African-American males and white women, influenced the outcomes in legal cases and divided the feminists of the 19th century.&nbsp;Professor Gruber also addresses the fissures created in the women’s movement from the 1960s through today regarding how sexual assault should be treated under the law has worked against justice for both victims and their assailants.&nbsp;Professor Gruber argues that sexual assault law is premised upon erroneous beliefs about how men and women interact, the norms of nonverbal conduct, and the efficacy of punitive solutions.&nbsp;In addition to covering the history of sexual assault law she addresses how the criminal law might be reformed to meet the “convergent interests” of men and women.</p><p><a href="https://www.montclair.edu/profilepages/view_profile.php?username=drakei" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Ian J. Drake</em></a><em>&nbsp;is an Associate Professor of Political Science and Law at Montclair State University. His scholarly interests include American legal and constitutional history and political theory.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 2 Jun 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/aya-gruber-the-feminist-war-on-crime-the-unexpected-role-of-womens-liberation-in-mass-incarceration-u-california-press-2020-2tU2CTfM</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://lawweb.colorado.edu/profiles/profile.jsp?id=325" rel="noopener noreferrer">Aya Gruber</a>, a professor of law at the University of Colorado Law School, has written a history of how the women’s movement in America has shaped the law on domestic violence and sexual assault.</p><p>In <a href="https://www.amazon.com/dp/0520304519/?tag=newbooinhis-20" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Feminist War on Crime: The Unexpected Role of Women’s Liberation in Mass Incarceration</em></a> (University of California Press, 2020), Professor Gruber contends that the legal reform movement on sexual assault began with feminists in the 19th century, who argued in favor of temperance reform, partly in the hope that it would lead to less violence against women.&nbsp;She also argues that the social context in which sexual assault allegations were made in the 19th century, especially regarding African-American males and white women, influenced the outcomes in legal cases and divided the feminists of the 19th century.&nbsp;Professor Gruber also addresses the fissures created in the women’s movement from the 1960s through today regarding how sexual assault should be treated under the law has worked against justice for both victims and their assailants.&nbsp;Professor Gruber argues that sexual assault law is premised upon erroneous beliefs about how men and women interact, the norms of nonverbal conduct, and the efficacy of punitive solutions.&nbsp;In addition to covering the history of sexual assault law she addresses how the criminal law might be reformed to meet the “convergent interests” of men and women.</p><p><a href="https://www.montclair.edu/profilepages/view_profile.php?username=drakei" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Ian J. Drake</em></a><em>&nbsp;is an Associate Professor of Political Science and Law at Montclair State University. His scholarly interests include American legal and constitutional history and political theory.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="65615941" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/db002b05-219b-4955-8451-09b2eedd17e4/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=db002b05-219b-4955-8451-09b2eedd17e4&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Aya Gruber, &quot;The Feminist War on Crime: The Unexpected Role of Women’s Liberation in Mass Incarceration&quot; (U California Press, 2020)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:08:20</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Aya Gruber, a professor of law at the University of Colorado Law School, has written a history of how the women’s movement in America has shaped the law on domestic violence and sexual assault.
In The Feminist War on Crime: The Unexpected Role of Women’s Liberation in Mass Incarceration (University of California Press, 2020), Professor Gruber contends that the legal reform movement on sexual assault began with feminists in the 19th century, who argued in favor of temperance reform, partly in the hope that it would lead to less violence against women. She also argues that the social context in which sexual assault allegations were made in the 19th century, especially regarding African-American males and white women, influenced the outcomes in legal cases and divided the feminists of the 19th century. Professor Gruber also addresses the fissures created in the women’s movement from the 1960s through today regarding how sexual assault should be treated under the law has worked against justice for both victims and their assailants. Professor Gruber argues that sexual assault law is premised upon erroneous beliefs about how men and women interact, the norms of nonverbal conduct, and the efficacy of punitive solutions. In addition to covering the history of sexual assault law she addresses how the criminal law might be reformed to meet the “convergent interests” of men and women.
Ian J. Drake is an Associate Professor of Political Science and Law at Montclair State University. His scholarly interests include American legal and constitutional history and political theory.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Aya Gruber, a professor of law at the University of Colorado Law School, has written a history of how the women’s movement in America has shaped the law on domestic violence and sexual assault.
In The Feminist War on Crime: The Unexpected Role of Women’s Liberation in Mass Incarceration (University of California Press, 2020), Professor Gruber contends that the legal reform movement on sexual assault began with feminists in the 19th century, who argued in favor of temperance reform, partly in the hope that it would lead to less violence against women. She also argues that the social context in which sexual assault allegations were made in the 19th century, especially regarding African-American males and white women, influenced the outcomes in legal cases and divided the feminists of the 19th century. Professor Gruber also addresses the fissures created in the women’s movement from the 1960s through today regarding how sexual assault should be treated under the law has worked against justice for both victims and their assailants. Professor Gruber argues that sexual assault law is premised upon erroneous beliefs about how men and women interact, the norms of nonverbal conduct, and the efficacy of punitive solutions. In addition to covering the history of sexual assault law she addresses how the criminal law might be reformed to meet the “convergent interests” of men and women.
Ian J. Drake is an Associate Professor of Political Science and Law at Montclair State University. His scholarly interests include American legal and constitutional history and political theory.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>93</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">771aa7d8-1f6f-11ef-b698-93740aa30552</guid>
      <title>Weh Yeoh, &quot;Redundant Charities: Escaping the Cycle of Dependence&quot; (Koan Press, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Weh Yeoh's&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780645728026" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Redundant Charities: Escaping the Cycle of Dependence</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Koan Press, 2023) presents a transformative approach to charitable work. Drawing on his extensive experience in the non-profit sector, Yeoh argues that the ultimate goal of a charity should be to render itself unnecessary. He critiques the traditional charity model, which often perpetuates dependency and self-preservation, and instead advocates for organizations to implement clear exit strategies and focus on supporting local communities to solve their own problems.</p><p>Yeoh asserts that success in charity work is measured by the ability to address root causes and sustainably transfer skills and resources to local populations, ensuring they can continue the work independently. This approach is exemplified by his own work founding OIC Cambodia, where he aimed to establish a sustainable speech therapy profession in Cambodia, ultimately handing over the leadership to local practitioners.</p><p>The book is not just a critique but also offers practical guidance on how charities can shift towards this new model, challenging readers to rethink their strategies and align their missions with long-term, self-sustaining impact.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 2 Jun 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/weh-yeoh-redundant-charities-escaping-the-cycle-of-dependence-koan-press-2023-oYXVPX7k</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Weh Yeoh's&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780645728026" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Redundant Charities: Escaping the Cycle of Dependence</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Koan Press, 2023) presents a transformative approach to charitable work. Drawing on his extensive experience in the non-profit sector, Yeoh argues that the ultimate goal of a charity should be to render itself unnecessary. He critiques the traditional charity model, which often perpetuates dependency and self-preservation, and instead advocates for organizations to implement clear exit strategies and focus on supporting local communities to solve their own problems.</p><p>Yeoh asserts that success in charity work is measured by the ability to address root causes and sustainably transfer skills and resources to local populations, ensuring they can continue the work independently. This approach is exemplified by his own work founding OIC Cambodia, where he aimed to establish a sustainable speech therapy profession in Cambodia, ultimately handing over the leadership to local practitioners.</p><p>The book is not just a critique but also offers practical guidance on how charities can shift towards this new model, challenging readers to rethink their strategies and align their missions with long-term, self-sustaining impact.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="37049459" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/28f056ab-8ba6-4d32-9c30-1db73742594a/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=28f056ab-8ba6-4d32-9c30-1db73742594a&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Weh Yeoh, &quot;Redundant Charities: Escaping the Cycle of Dependence&quot; (Koan Press, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:38:35</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Weh Yeoh&apos;s Redundant Charities: Escaping the Cycle of Dependence (Koan Press, 2023) presents a transformative approach to charitable work. Drawing on his extensive experience in the non-profit sector, Yeoh argues that the ultimate goal of a charity should be to render itself unnecessary. He critiques the traditional charity model, which often perpetuates dependency and self-preservation, and instead advocates for organizations to implement clear exit strategies and focus on supporting local communities to solve their own problems.
Yeoh asserts that success in charity work is measured by the ability to address root causes and sustainably transfer skills and resources to local populations, ensuring they can continue the work independently. This approach is exemplified by his own work founding OIC Cambodia, where he aimed to establish a sustainable speech therapy profession in Cambodia, ultimately handing over the leadership to local practitioners.
The book is not just a critique but also offers practical guidance on how charities can shift towards this new model, challenging readers to rethink their strategies and align their missions with long-term, self-sustaining impact.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Weh Yeoh&apos;s Redundant Charities: Escaping the Cycle of Dependence (Koan Press, 2023) presents a transformative approach to charitable work. Drawing on his extensive experience in the non-profit sector, Yeoh argues that the ultimate goal of a charity should be to render itself unnecessary. He critiques the traditional charity model, which often perpetuates dependency and self-preservation, and instead advocates for organizations to implement clear exit strategies and focus on supporting local communities to solve their own problems.
Yeoh asserts that success in charity work is measured by the ability to address root causes and sustainably transfer skills and resources to local populations, ensuring they can continue the work independently. This approach is exemplified by his own work founding OIC Cambodia, where he aimed to establish a sustainable speech therapy profession in Cambodia, ultimately handing over the leadership to local practitioners.
The book is not just a critique but also offers practical guidance on how charities can shift towards this new model, challenging readers to rethink their strategies and align their missions with long-term, self-sustaining impact.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>219</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4e57214a-1f89-11ef-9e93-532b18958cb1</guid>
      <title>Adam Goodman, &quot;The Deportation Machine: America’s Long History of Expelling Immigrants&quot; (Princeton UP, 2020)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Many of us know that immigrants have been deported from the United States for well over a century, but has anyone ever asked <em>how</em>? In <a href="https://www.amazon.com/dp/0691182159/?tag=newbooinhis-20" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Deportation Machine: America’s Long History of Expelling Immigrants</em></a> (Princeton University Press, 2020), author Adam Goodman brings together new archival evidence to write an expansive history of deportation from the United States that threads the late-nineteenth century through to the present.</p><p>Goodman, Assistant Professor of Latin American and Latino studies as well as history at the University of Illinois at Chicago, argues that the “deportation machine” operated through three main mechanisms: formal deportations, voluntary departures, and self-deportations. But contrary to mainstream assumptions about the U.S. immigration system, the overwhelming majority of deportations throughout the 1900s have not been formal proceedings in immigration court, but instead administrative processes and informal fear campaigns that pushed immigrants out of the country. Our interview with Goodman will cover how the history of deportation is linked with the development of federal power, state coercion, and activist resistance for due process. We also discuss the connections between the deportation machine and the contemporary debate on the prison-industrial complex, anti-immigrant prejudice, and demands for police reform. Far beyond the harsh realities of deportation, this book shows us how the politics of expulsion sought to define who truly belonged in America.</p><p><a href="https://history.princeton.edu/people/jaime-s%C3%A1nchez-jr" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Jaime Sánchez, Jr.</em></a><em> is a Ph.D. Candidate in the Department of History at Princeton University and a scholar of U.S. politics and Latino studies. He is currently writing an institutional history of the Democratic National Committee and partisan coalition politics in the twentieth century. You can follow him on Twitter </em><a href="https://twitter.com/Jaime_SanchezJr" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>@Jaime_SanchezJr</em></a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 2 Jun 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/adam-goodman-the-deportation-machine-americas-long-history-of-expelling-immigrants-princeton-up-2020-IYMMKuVS-GO3BGJS2</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many of us know that immigrants have been deported from the United States for well over a century, but has anyone ever asked <em>how</em>? In <a href="https://www.amazon.com/dp/0691182159/?tag=newbooinhis-20" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Deportation Machine: America’s Long History of Expelling Immigrants</em></a> (Princeton University Press, 2020), author Adam Goodman brings together new archival evidence to write an expansive history of deportation from the United States that threads the late-nineteenth century through to the present.</p><p>Goodman, Assistant Professor of Latin American and Latino studies as well as history at the University of Illinois at Chicago, argues that the “deportation machine” operated through three main mechanisms: formal deportations, voluntary departures, and self-deportations. But contrary to mainstream assumptions about the U.S. immigration system, the overwhelming majority of deportations throughout the 1900s have not been formal proceedings in immigration court, but instead administrative processes and informal fear campaigns that pushed immigrants out of the country. Our interview with Goodman will cover how the history of deportation is linked with the development of federal power, state coercion, and activist resistance for due process. We also discuss the connections between the deportation machine and the contemporary debate on the prison-industrial complex, anti-immigrant prejudice, and demands for police reform. Far beyond the harsh realities of deportation, this book shows us how the politics of expulsion sought to define who truly belonged in America.</p><p><a href="https://history.princeton.edu/people/jaime-s%C3%A1nchez-jr" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Jaime Sánchez, Jr.</em></a><em> is a Ph.D. Candidate in the Department of History at Princeton University and a scholar of U.S. politics and Latino studies. He is currently writing an institutional history of the Democratic National Committee and partisan coalition politics in the twentieth century. You can follow him on Twitter </em><a href="https://twitter.com/Jaime_SanchezJr" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>@Jaime_SanchezJr</em></a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="64578364" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/50d9b60b-dd1b-44cf-8ee7-2e132ce5f746/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=50d9b60b-dd1b-44cf-8ee7-2e132ce5f746&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Adam Goodman, &quot;The Deportation Machine: America’s Long History of Expelling Immigrants&quot; (Princeton UP, 2020)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:07:15</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Many of us know that immigrants have been deported from the United States for well over a century, but has anyone ever asked how? In The Deportation Machine: America’s Long History of Expelling Immigrants (Princeton University Press, 2020), author Adam Goodman brings together new archival evidence to write an expansive history of deportation from the United States that threads the late-nineteenth century through to the present.
Goodman, Assistant Professor of Latin American and Latino studies as well as history at the University of Illinois at Chicago, argues that the “deportation machine” operated through three main mechanisms: formal deportations, voluntary departures, and self-deportations. But contrary to mainstream assumptions about the U.S. immigration system, the overwhelming majority of deportations throughout the 1900s have not been formal proceedings in immigration court, but instead administrative processes and informal fear campaigns that pushed immigrants out of the country. Our interview with Goodman will cover how the history of deportation is linked with the development of federal power, state coercion, and activist resistance for due process. We also discuss the connections between the deportation machine and the contemporary debate on the prison-industrial complex, anti-immigrant prejudice, and demands for police reform. Far beyond the harsh realities of deportation, this book shows us how the politics of expulsion sought to define who truly belonged in America.
Jaime Sánchez, Jr. is a Ph.D. Candidate in the Department of History at Princeton University and a scholar of U.S. politics and Latino studies. He is currently writing an institutional history of the Democratic National Committee and partisan coalition politics in the twentieth century. You can follow him on Twitter @Jaime_SanchezJr.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Many of us know that immigrants have been deported from the United States for well over a century, but has anyone ever asked how? In The Deportation Machine: America’s Long History of Expelling Immigrants (Princeton University Press, 2020), author Adam Goodman brings together new archival evidence to write an expansive history of deportation from the United States that threads the late-nineteenth century through to the present.
Goodman, Assistant Professor of Latin American and Latino studies as well as history at the University of Illinois at Chicago, argues that the “deportation machine” operated through three main mechanisms: formal deportations, voluntary departures, and self-deportations. But contrary to mainstream assumptions about the U.S. immigration system, the overwhelming majority of deportations throughout the 1900s have not been formal proceedings in immigration court, but instead administrative processes and informal fear campaigns that pushed immigrants out of the country. Our interview with Goodman will cover how the history of deportation is linked with the development of federal power, state coercion, and activist resistance for due process. We also discuss the connections between the deportation machine and the contemporary debate on the prison-industrial complex, anti-immigrant prejudice, and demands for police reform. Far beyond the harsh realities of deportation, this book shows us how the politics of expulsion sought to define who truly belonged in America.
Jaime Sánchez, Jr. is a Ph.D. Candidate in the Department of History at Princeton University and a scholar of U.S. politics and Latino studies. He is currently writing an institutional history of the Democratic National Committee and partisan coalition politics in the twentieth century. You can follow him on Twitter @Jaime_SanchezJr.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>64</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e8cd99e6-15ef-11ef-963b-bf104b63b3f0</guid>
      <title>Benjamin A. Schupmann, &quot;Democracy Despite Itself: Liberal Constitutionalism and Militant Democracy&quot; (Oxford UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Seeking a second term as US president in November, Donald Trump joins a roster of politicians&nbsp;whose declared aim is to use legal means to bend democracy to their will and in their interests. The system withstood his first term. In Venezuela, Ecuador, Turkey, and Hungary, the systems didn’t, and they are undergoing stress tests in Israel, Slovakia, and Georgia.</p><p>In Venezuela, Turkey and Hungary, elections still happen and parliaments, courts, and media are intact but checks and balances have been steadily eroded as one party bids for sustained majority rule. Since the turn of the millennium, 80% of cases of democratic retreat have taken this form rather than through violence.</p><p>Worst of all, “illiberal democracy” is popular. Between 2016 and 2020, Trump added 11 million votes. In 2022, after 12 consecutive years in power, Hungary’s ruling party extended its support. Recent polls show that a third of Americans would prefer a strong unelected leader to a weak elected one while a fifth of French under-35s are indifferent to the prospect of an end to democracy.</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780192873026" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Democracy Despite Itself: Liberal Constitutionalism and Militant Democracy</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(OUP Press, 2024) Benjamin Schupmann addresses this democratic internal rot and how to defend against it. "Democratic cannibalism is a perennial problem,” he writes. “It is a question of when, not if, popular anti-democratic movements will erupt from within and try to use legal revolutionary methods to devour democracy. Democratic constitution should be designed to provide democrats with the means to defend it and themselves".</p><p>Benjamin Schupmann is an Assistant Professor at Yale-NUS College in Singapore. He got his PhD at Columbia University and then taught at Duke Kunshan University and the National University of Singapore.&nbsp;<em>Democracy Despite Itself&nbsp;</em>is his second book. His first –&nbsp;<a href="https://uk.bookshop.org/p/books/carl-schmitt-s-state-and-constitutional-theory-a-critical-analysis-benjamin-schupmann/2165879?ean=9780198791614" rel="noopener noreferrer">Carl Schmitt's State and Constitutional Theory</a>&nbsp;– was published in 2017.</p><p>*The author's book recommendations are&nbsp;<a href="https://uk.bookshop.org/p/books/sovereignty-across-generations-constituent-power-and-political-liberalism-alessandro-ferrara/7300481?ean=9780192871077" rel="noopener noreferrer">Sovereignty Across Generations: Constituent Power and Political Liberalism</a>&nbsp;by&nbsp;Alessandro Ferrara (OUP Oxford,&nbsp;2023) and&nbsp;<a href="https://www.amazon.co.uk/Social-Acceleration-Modernity-Directions-Critical/dp/0231148356" rel="noopener noreferrer">Social Acceleration: A New Theory of Modernity</a>&nbsp;by&nbsp;Hartmut Rosa (Columbia University Press, 2013).&nbsp;</p><p><a href="https://www.clippings.me/timgwynnjones" rel="noopener noreferrer">Tim Gwynn Jones</a>&nbsp;is an economic and political-risk analyst at Medley Advisors, who also writes the&nbsp;<a href="https://twentyfourtwo.substack.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">twenty4two</a>&nbsp;newsletter on Substack.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 May 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/benjamin-a-schupmann-democracy-despite-itself-liberal-constitutionalism-and-militant-democracy-oxford-up-2024-_Qd0D7WN</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seeking a second term as US president in November, Donald Trump joins a roster of politicians&nbsp;whose declared aim is to use legal means to bend democracy to their will and in their interests. The system withstood his first term. In Venezuela, Ecuador, Turkey, and Hungary, the systems didn’t, and they are undergoing stress tests in Israel, Slovakia, and Georgia.</p><p>In Venezuela, Turkey and Hungary, elections still happen and parliaments, courts, and media are intact but checks and balances have been steadily eroded as one party bids for sustained majority rule. Since the turn of the millennium, 80% of cases of democratic retreat have taken this form rather than through violence.</p><p>Worst of all, “illiberal democracy” is popular. Between 2016 and 2020, Trump added 11 million votes. In 2022, after 12 consecutive years in power, Hungary’s ruling party extended its support. Recent polls show that a third of Americans would prefer a strong unelected leader to a weak elected one while a fifth of French under-35s are indifferent to the prospect of an end to democracy.</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780192873026" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Democracy Despite Itself: Liberal Constitutionalism and Militant Democracy</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(OUP Press, 2024) Benjamin Schupmann addresses this democratic internal rot and how to defend against it. "Democratic cannibalism is a perennial problem,” he writes. “It is a question of when, not if, popular anti-democratic movements will erupt from within and try to use legal revolutionary methods to devour democracy. Democratic constitution should be designed to provide democrats with the means to defend it and themselves".</p><p>Benjamin Schupmann is an Assistant Professor at Yale-NUS College in Singapore. He got his PhD at Columbia University and then taught at Duke Kunshan University and the National University of Singapore.&nbsp;<em>Democracy Despite Itself&nbsp;</em>is his second book. His first –&nbsp;<a href="https://uk.bookshop.org/p/books/carl-schmitt-s-state-and-constitutional-theory-a-critical-analysis-benjamin-schupmann/2165879?ean=9780198791614" rel="noopener noreferrer">Carl Schmitt's State and Constitutional Theory</a>&nbsp;– was published in 2017.</p><p>*The author's book recommendations are&nbsp;<a href="https://uk.bookshop.org/p/books/sovereignty-across-generations-constituent-power-and-political-liberalism-alessandro-ferrara/7300481?ean=9780192871077" rel="noopener noreferrer">Sovereignty Across Generations: Constituent Power and Political Liberalism</a>&nbsp;by&nbsp;Alessandro Ferrara (OUP Oxford,&nbsp;2023) and&nbsp;<a href="https://www.amazon.co.uk/Social-Acceleration-Modernity-Directions-Critical/dp/0231148356" rel="noopener noreferrer">Social Acceleration: A New Theory of Modernity</a>&nbsp;by&nbsp;Hartmut Rosa (Columbia University Press, 2013).&nbsp;</p><p><a href="https://www.clippings.me/timgwynnjones" rel="noopener noreferrer">Tim Gwynn Jones</a>&nbsp;is an economic and political-risk analyst at Medley Advisors, who also writes the&nbsp;<a href="https://twentyfourtwo.substack.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">twenty4two</a>&nbsp;newsletter on Substack.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="36698047" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/dd9320c1-d0fb-4fbd-86f9-243f91560c7c/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=dd9320c1-d0fb-4fbd-86f9-243f91560c7c&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Benjamin A. Schupmann, &quot;Democracy Despite Itself: Liberal Constitutionalism and Militant Democracy&quot; (Oxford UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:38:13</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Seeking a second term as US president in November, Donald Trump joins a roster of politicians whose declared aim is to use legal means to bend democracy to their will and in their interests. The system withstood his first term. In Venezuela, Ecuador, Turkey, and Hungary, the systems didn’t, and they are undergoing stress tests in Israel, Slovakia, and Georgia.
In Venezuela, Turkey and Hungary, elections still happen and parliaments, courts, and media are intact but checks and balances have been steadily eroded as one party bids for sustained majority rule. Since the turn of the millennium, 80% of cases of democratic retreat have taken this form rather than through violence.
Worst of all, “illiberal democracy” is popular. Between 2016 and 2020, Trump added 11 million votes. In 2022, after 12 consecutive years in power, Hungary’s ruling party extended its support. Recent polls show that a third of Americans would prefer a strong unelected leader to a weak elected one while a fifth of French under-35s are indifferent to the prospect of an end to democracy.
In Democracy Despite Itself: Liberal Constitutionalism and Militant Democracy (OUP Press, 2024) Benjamin Schupmann addresses this democratic internal rot and how to defend against it. &quot;Democratic cannibalism is a perennial problem,” he writes. “It is a question of when, not if, popular anti-democratic movements will erupt from within and try to use legal revolutionary methods to devour democracy. Democratic constitution should be designed to provide democrats with the means to defend it and themselves&quot;.
Benjamin Schupmann is an Assistant Professor at Yale-NUS College in Singapore. He got his PhD at Columbia University and then taught at Duke Kunshan University and the National University of Singapore. Democracy Despite Itself is his second book. His first – Carl Schmitt&apos;s State and Constitutional Theory – was published in 2017.
*The author&apos;s book recommendations are Sovereignty Across Generations: Constituent Power and Political Liberalism by Alessandro Ferrara (OUP Oxford, 2023) and Social Acceleration: A New Theory of Modernity by Hartmut Rosa (Columbia University Press, 2013). 
Tim Gwynn Jones is an economic and political-risk analyst at Medley Advisors, who also writes the twenty4two newsletter on Substack.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Seeking a second term as US president in November, Donald Trump joins a roster of politicians whose declared aim is to use legal means to bend democracy to their will and in their interests. The system withstood his first term. In Venezuela, Ecuador, Turkey, and Hungary, the systems didn’t, and they are undergoing stress tests in Israel, Slovakia, and Georgia.
In Venezuela, Turkey and Hungary, elections still happen and parliaments, courts, and media are intact but checks and balances have been steadily eroded as one party bids for sustained majority rule. Since the turn of the millennium, 80% of cases of democratic retreat have taken this form rather than through violence.
Worst of all, “illiberal democracy” is popular. Between 2016 and 2020, Trump added 11 million votes. In 2022, after 12 consecutive years in power, Hungary’s ruling party extended its support. Recent polls show that a third of Americans would prefer a strong unelected leader to a weak elected one while a fifth of French under-35s are indifferent to the prospect of an end to democracy.
In Democracy Despite Itself: Liberal Constitutionalism and Militant Democracy (OUP Press, 2024) Benjamin Schupmann addresses this democratic internal rot and how to defend against it. &quot;Democratic cannibalism is a perennial problem,” he writes. “It is a question of when, not if, popular anti-democratic movements will erupt from within and try to use legal revolutionary methods to devour democracy. Democratic constitution should be designed to provide democrats with the means to defend it and themselves&quot;.
Benjamin Schupmann is an Assistant Professor at Yale-NUS College in Singapore. He got his PhD at Columbia University and then taught at Duke Kunshan University and the National University of Singapore. Democracy Despite Itself is his second book. His first – Carl Schmitt&apos;s State and Constitutional Theory – was published in 2017.
*The author&apos;s book recommendations are Sovereignty Across Generations: Constituent Power and Political Liberalism by Alessandro Ferrara (OUP Oxford, 2023) and Social Acceleration: A New Theory of Modernity by Hartmut Rosa (Columbia University Press, 2013). 
Tim Gwynn Jones is an economic and political-risk analyst at Medley Advisors, who also writes the twenty4two newsletter on Substack.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>718</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">46ec30b0-1b8f-11ef-8e0f-4774fe54839c</guid>
      <title>Gary J. Bass, &quot;Judgement at Tokyo: World War II on Trial and the Making of Modern Asia&quot; (Knopf, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In December 1948, a panel of 12 judges sentenced 23 Japanese officials for war crimes. Seven, including former Prime Minister Hideki Tojo, were sentenced to death. The sentencing ended the International Military Tribunal for the Far East, an over-two-year-long trial over Imperial Japan’s atrocities in China and its decision to attack the U.S.</p><p>But unlike the trials at Nuremberg, now seen as one of the touchstones of modern international law, the trials at Tokyo were a messy affair. The ruling wasn’t unanimous, with two judges dissenting. Indian judge Radhabinod Pal even chose to acquit everybody. The judges couldn’t agree on anything, the prosecution made significant mistakes, and the defense constantly complained about not having enough time and resources.</p><p>Gary Bass tells the entire story of the trials at Tokyo—from their formulation at the end of a long World War by a triumphant yet weary U.S., to the eventual decision to let many sentenced defendants out on parole as Japan became a close Cold War ally of Washington—in his book&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781101947104" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Judgment at Tokyo: World War II on Trial and the Making of Modern Asia</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Knopf: 2023)</p><p>Gary Bass is also the author of&nbsp;<em>The Blood Telegram: Nixon, Kissenger and a Forgotten Genocide&nbsp;</em>(Vintage: 2014)<em>,&nbsp;</em>which was a finalist for the Pulitzer Prize in general nonfiction and won the Arthur Ross Book Award from the Council on Foreign Relations, among other awards. He is the William P. Boswell Professor of World Politics of Peace and War at Princeton University. His previous books are<em>&nbsp;Freedom's Battle: The Origins of Humanitarian Intervention&nbsp;</em>(Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group: 2008) and&nbsp;<em>Stay the Hand of Vengeance: The Politics of War Crimes Tribunals&nbsp;</em>(Princeton University Press: 2002). A former reporter for The Economist, Bass writes often for The New York Times and has written for The New Yorker, The Washington Post, The Atlantic, Foreign Affairs, and other publications.</p><p><em>You can find more reviews, excerpts, interviews, and essays at</em><a href="https://asianreviewofbooks.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;<em>The Asian Review of Books</em></a><em>. Including its review of&nbsp;</em><a href="https://asianreviewofbooks.com/content/judgement-at-tokyo-world-war-ii-on-trial-and-the-making-of-modern-asia-by-gary-j-bass/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Judgment at Tokyo</em></a><em>. Follow on Twitter at</em><a href="https://twitter.com/BookReviewsAsia" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;<em>@BookReviewsAsia</em></a><em>.</em></p><p><em>Nicholas Gordon is an editor for a global magazine, and a reviewer for the Asian Review of Books. He can be found on Twitter at</em><a href="https://twitter.com/nickrigordon?lang=en" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;<em>@nickrigordon</em></a><em>.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 May 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/gary-j-bass-judgement-at-tokyo-world-war-ii-on-trial-and-the-making-of-modern-asia-knopf-2023-ZbfFXaal-DWtTNTd7</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In December 1948, a panel of 12 judges sentenced 23 Japanese officials for war crimes. Seven, including former Prime Minister Hideki Tojo, were sentenced to death. The sentencing ended the International Military Tribunal for the Far East, an over-two-year-long trial over Imperial Japan’s atrocities in China and its decision to attack the U.S.</p><p>But unlike the trials at Nuremberg, now seen as one of the touchstones of modern international law, the trials at Tokyo were a messy affair. The ruling wasn’t unanimous, with two judges dissenting. Indian judge Radhabinod Pal even chose to acquit everybody. The judges couldn’t agree on anything, the prosecution made significant mistakes, and the defense constantly complained about not having enough time and resources.</p><p>Gary Bass tells the entire story of the trials at Tokyo—from their formulation at the end of a long World War by a triumphant yet weary U.S., to the eventual decision to let many sentenced defendants out on parole as Japan became a close Cold War ally of Washington—in his book&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781101947104" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Judgment at Tokyo: World War II on Trial and the Making of Modern Asia</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Knopf: 2023)</p><p>Gary Bass is also the author of&nbsp;<em>The Blood Telegram: Nixon, Kissenger and a Forgotten Genocide&nbsp;</em>(Vintage: 2014)<em>,&nbsp;</em>which was a finalist for the Pulitzer Prize in general nonfiction and won the Arthur Ross Book Award from the Council on Foreign Relations, among other awards. He is the William P. Boswell Professor of World Politics of Peace and War at Princeton University. His previous books are<em>&nbsp;Freedom's Battle: The Origins of Humanitarian Intervention&nbsp;</em>(Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group: 2008) and&nbsp;<em>Stay the Hand of Vengeance: The Politics of War Crimes Tribunals&nbsp;</em>(Princeton University Press: 2002). A former reporter for The Economist, Bass writes often for The New York Times and has written for The New Yorker, The Washington Post, The Atlantic, Foreign Affairs, and other publications.</p><p><em>You can find more reviews, excerpts, interviews, and essays at</em><a href="https://asianreviewofbooks.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;<em>The Asian Review of Books</em></a><em>. Including its review of&nbsp;</em><a href="https://asianreviewofbooks.com/content/judgement-at-tokyo-world-war-ii-on-trial-and-the-making-of-modern-asia-by-gary-j-bass/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Judgment at Tokyo</em></a><em>. Follow on Twitter at</em><a href="https://twitter.com/BookReviewsAsia" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;<em>@BookReviewsAsia</em></a><em>.</em></p><p><em>Nicholas Gordon is an editor for a global magazine, and a reviewer for the Asian Review of Books. He can be found on Twitter at</em><a href="https://twitter.com/nickrigordon?lang=en" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;<em>@nickrigordon</em></a><em>.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="43788067" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/8739748f-57f0-4f13-a981-1e2ed297f852/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=8739748f-57f0-4f13-a981-1e2ed297f852&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Gary J. Bass, &quot;Judgement at Tokyo: World War II on Trial and the Making of Modern Asia&quot; (Knopf, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:45:36</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In December 1948, a panel of 12 judges sentenced 23 Japanese officials for war crimes. Seven, including former Prime Minister Hideki Tojo, were sentenced to death. The sentencing ended the International Military Tribunal for the Far East, an over-two-year-long trial over Imperial Japan’s atrocities in China and its decision to attack the U.S.
But unlike the trials at Nuremberg, now seen as one of the touchstones of modern international law, the trials at Tokyo were a messy affair. The ruling wasn’t unanimous, with two judges dissenting. Indian judge Radhabinod Pal even chose to acquit everybody. The judges couldn’t agree on anything, the prosecution made significant mistakes, and the defense constantly complained about not having enough time and resources.
Gary Bass tells the entire story of the trials at Tokyo—from their formulation at the end of a long World War by a triumphant yet weary U.S., to the eventual decision to let many sentenced defendants out on parole as Japan became a close Cold War ally of Washington—in his book Judgment at Tokyo: World War II on Trial and the Making of Modern Asia (Knopf: 2023)
Gary Bass is also the author of The Blood Telegram: Nixon, Kissenger and a Forgotten Genocide (Vintage: 2014), which was a finalist for the Pulitzer Prize in general nonfiction and won the Arthur Ross Book Award from the Council on Foreign Relations, among other awards. He is the William P. Boswell Professor of World Politics of Peace and War at Princeton University. His previous books are Freedom&apos;s Battle: The Origins of Humanitarian Intervention (Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group: 2008) and Stay the Hand of Vengeance: The Politics of War Crimes Tribunals (Princeton University Press: 2002). A former reporter for The Economist, Bass writes often for The New York Times and has written for The New Yorker, The Washington Post, The Atlantic, Foreign Affairs, and other publications.
You can find more reviews, excerpts, interviews, and essays at The Asian Review of Books. Including its review of Judgment at Tokyo. Follow on Twitter at @BookReviewsAsia.
Nicholas Gordon is an editor for a global magazine, and a reviewer for the Asian Review of Books. He can be found on Twitter at @nickrigordon.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In December 1948, a panel of 12 judges sentenced 23 Japanese officials for war crimes. Seven, including former Prime Minister Hideki Tojo, were sentenced to death. The sentencing ended the International Military Tribunal for the Far East, an over-two-year-long trial over Imperial Japan’s atrocities in China and its decision to attack the U.S.
But unlike the trials at Nuremberg, now seen as one of the touchstones of modern international law, the trials at Tokyo were a messy affair. The ruling wasn’t unanimous, with two judges dissenting. Indian judge Radhabinod Pal even chose to acquit everybody. The judges couldn’t agree on anything, the prosecution made significant mistakes, and the defense constantly complained about not having enough time and resources.
Gary Bass tells the entire story of the trials at Tokyo—from their formulation at the end of a long World War by a triumphant yet weary U.S., to the eventual decision to let many sentenced defendants out on parole as Japan became a close Cold War ally of Washington—in his book Judgment at Tokyo: World War II on Trial and the Making of Modern Asia (Knopf: 2023)
Gary Bass is also the author of The Blood Telegram: Nixon, Kissenger and a Forgotten Genocide (Vintage: 2014), which was a finalist for the Pulitzer Prize in general nonfiction and won the Arthur Ross Book Award from the Council on Foreign Relations, among other awards. He is the William P. Boswell Professor of World Politics of Peace and War at Princeton University. His previous books are Freedom&apos;s Battle: The Origins of Humanitarian Intervention (Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group: 2008) and Stay the Hand of Vengeance: The Politics of War Crimes Tribunals (Princeton University Press: 2002). A former reporter for The Economist, Bass writes often for The New York Times and has written for The New Yorker, The Washington Post, The Atlantic, Foreign Affairs, and other publications.
You can find more reviews, excerpts, interviews, and essays at The Asian Review of Books. Including its review of Judgment at Tokyo. Follow on Twitter at @BookReviewsAsia.
Nicholas Gordon is an editor for a global magazine, and a reviewer for the Asian Review of Books. He can be found on Twitter at @nickrigordon.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>189</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">aa4cefbe-1865-11ef-9afc-47bed9e397de</guid>
      <title>Jeffrey Reiman and Paul Leighton, &quot;The Rich Get Richer and the Poor Get Prison&quot; (Routledge, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>For 40 years, this classic text has taken the issue of economic inequality seriously and asked: Why are our prisons filled with the poor? Why aren't the tools of the criminal justice system being used to protect Americans from predatory business practices and to punish well-off people who cause widespread harm?&nbsp;</p><p>This new edition continues to engage readers in important exercises of critical thinking: Why has the U.S. relied so heavily on tough crime policies despite evidence of their limited effectiveness, and how much of the decline in crime rates can be attributed to them? Why does the U.S. have such a high crime rate compared to other developed nations, and what could we do about it? Are the morally blameworthy harms of the rich and poor equally translated into criminal laws that protect the public from harms on the streets and harms from the suites? How much class bias is present in the criminal justice system-both when the rich and poor engage in the same act, and when the rich use their leadership of corporations to perpetrate mass victimization?&nbsp;</p><p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781032437521" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Rich Get Richer and the Poor Get Prison</em></a>&nbsp;(Routledge, 2023) shows readers that much of what goes on in the criminal justice system violates citizens' sense of basic fairness. It presents extensive evidence from mainstream data that the criminal justice system does not function in the way it says it does nor in the way that readers believe it should.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/jeffrey-reiman-and-paul-leighton-the-rich-get-richer-and-the-poor-get-prison-routledge-2023-R_zTevaQ</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For 40 years, this classic text has taken the issue of economic inequality seriously and asked: Why are our prisons filled with the poor? Why aren't the tools of the criminal justice system being used to protect Americans from predatory business practices and to punish well-off people who cause widespread harm?&nbsp;</p><p>This new edition continues to engage readers in important exercises of critical thinking: Why has the U.S. relied so heavily on tough crime policies despite evidence of their limited effectiveness, and how much of the decline in crime rates can be attributed to them? Why does the U.S. have such a high crime rate compared to other developed nations, and what could we do about it? Are the morally blameworthy harms of the rich and poor equally translated into criminal laws that protect the public from harms on the streets and harms from the suites? How much class bias is present in the criminal justice system-both when the rich and poor engage in the same act, and when the rich use their leadership of corporations to perpetrate mass victimization?&nbsp;</p><p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781032437521" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Rich Get Richer and the Poor Get Prison</em></a>&nbsp;(Routledge, 2023) shows readers that much of what goes on in the criminal justice system violates citizens' sense of basic fairness. It presents extensive evidence from mainstream data that the criminal justice system does not function in the way it says it does nor in the way that readers believe it should.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="35741499" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/fcd98fd8-e77b-4700-9374-f070094df94d/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=fcd98fd8-e77b-4700-9374-f070094df94d&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Jeffrey Reiman and Paul Leighton, &quot;The Rich Get Richer and the Poor Get Prison&quot; (Routledge, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:37:13</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>For 40 years, this classic text has taken the issue of economic inequality seriously and asked: Why are our prisons filled with the poor? Why aren&apos;t the tools of the criminal justice system being used to protect Americans from predatory business practices and to punish well-off people who cause widespread harm? 
This new edition continues to engage readers in important exercises of critical thinking: Why has the U.S. relied so heavily on tough crime policies despite evidence of their limited effectiveness, and how much of the decline in crime rates can be attributed to them? Why does the U.S. have such a high crime rate compared to other developed nations, and what could we do about it? Are the morally blameworthy harms of the rich and poor equally translated into criminal laws that protect the public from harms on the streets and harms from the suites? How much class bias is present in the criminal justice system-both when the rich and poor engage in the same act, and when the rich use their leadership of corporations to perpetrate mass victimization? 
The Rich Get Richer and the Poor Get Prison (Routledge, 2023) shows readers that much of what goes on in the criminal justice system violates citizens&apos; sense of basic fairness. It presents extensive evidence from mainstream data that the criminal justice system does not function in the way it says it does nor in the way that readers believe it should.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>For 40 years, this classic text has taken the issue of economic inequality seriously and asked: Why are our prisons filled with the poor? Why aren&apos;t the tools of the criminal justice system being used to protect Americans from predatory business practices and to punish well-off people who cause widespread harm? 
This new edition continues to engage readers in important exercises of critical thinking: Why has the U.S. relied so heavily on tough crime policies despite evidence of their limited effectiveness, and how much of the decline in crime rates can be attributed to them? Why does the U.S. have such a high crime rate compared to other developed nations, and what could we do about it? Are the morally blameworthy harms of the rich and poor equally translated into criminal laws that protect the public from harms on the streets and harms from the suites? How much class bias is present in the criminal justice system-both when the rich and poor engage in the same act, and when the rich use their leadership of corporations to perpetrate mass victimization? 
The Rich Get Richer and the Poor Get Prison (Routledge, 2023) shows readers that much of what goes on in the criminal justice system violates citizens&apos; sense of basic fairness. It presents extensive evidence from mainstream data that the criminal justice system does not function in the way it says it does nor in the way that readers believe it should.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>182</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">d3ec053a-1789-11ef-ac39-dfe658ec7874</guid>
      <title>Danielle R. Olden, &quot;Racial Uncertainties: Mexican Americans, School Desegregation, and the Making of Race in Post–Civil Rights America&quot; (U California Press, 2022)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Mexican Americans have often fit uncertainly into the white/non-white binary that has goverens much of American history. After Colorado, and much of the rest of the American West, became American claimed territory after the Mexican-Americna War in 1848, thousands of formerly Mexican citizens became American citizens. Flash foward a century to post-war Denver. In the spring of 1969, Mexican American students staged a walk out in protest of poor quality education, racist teachers, and school segregation - they were met by police in riot gear, to beat and arrested dozens of peaceful protestors. Denver thus&nbsp;became ground zero for debates over race in the American West, a city as important to conceptions of whiteness, "minority" status, and colorblindness as any place in the South.</p><p>In the award winning book,<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780520343351" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;<em>Racial Uncertainties:&nbsp;Mexican Americans, School&nbsp;Desegregation, and the Making of Race in Post-Civil Rights America</em>&nbsp;</a>(U&nbsp;California Press, 2022), University of Utah historian Danielle Olden tracks the history of Chicano, Latinx, and Mexican American identities through Denver's history, focusing on the lead up to the 1973 Supreme Court case, Keyes v. Denver School&nbsp;District No. 1. Olden tracks the remarkable and complicated story of that city's Chicano, Black, and white communities through the halting process of school desegregation, and in doing so provides an explemary lesson in&nbsp;the social mutability of the concept of race.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/danielle-r-olden-racial-uncertainties-mexican-americans-school-desegregation-and-the-making-of-race-in-postcivil-rights-america-u-california-press-2022-w9Z_gp2w</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mexican Americans have often fit uncertainly into the white/non-white binary that has goverens much of American history. After Colorado, and much of the rest of the American West, became American claimed territory after the Mexican-Americna War in 1848, thousands of formerly Mexican citizens became American citizens. Flash foward a century to post-war Denver. In the spring of 1969, Mexican American students staged a walk out in protest of poor quality education, racist teachers, and school segregation - they were met by police in riot gear, to beat and arrested dozens of peaceful protestors. Denver thus&nbsp;became ground zero for debates over race in the American West, a city as important to conceptions of whiteness, "minority" status, and colorblindness as any place in the South.</p><p>In the award winning book,<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780520343351" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;<em>Racial Uncertainties:&nbsp;Mexican Americans, School&nbsp;Desegregation, and the Making of Race in Post-Civil Rights America</em>&nbsp;</a>(U&nbsp;California Press, 2022), University of Utah historian Danielle Olden tracks the history of Chicano, Latinx, and Mexican American identities through Denver's history, focusing on the lead up to the 1973 Supreme Court case, Keyes v. Denver School&nbsp;District No. 1. Olden tracks the remarkable and complicated story of that city's Chicano, Black, and white communities through the halting process of school desegregation, and in doing so provides an explemary lesson in&nbsp;the social mutability of the concept of race.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="75077404" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/9c3f746f-bd61-480c-b836-a24c21ad9cbf/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=9c3f746f-bd61-480c-b836-a24c21ad9cbf&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Danielle R. Olden, &quot;Racial Uncertainties: Mexican Americans, School Desegregation, and the Making of Race in Post–Civil Rights America&quot; (U California Press, 2022)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:18:12</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Mexican Americans have often fit uncertainly into the white/non-white binary that has goverens much of American history. After Colorado, and much of the rest of the American West, became American claimed territory after the Mexican-Americna War in 1848, thousands of formerly Mexican citizens became American citizens. Flash foward a century to post-war Denver. In the spring of 1969, Mexican American students staged a walk out in protest of poor quality education, racist teachers, and school segregation - they were met by police in riot gear, to beat and arrested dozens of peaceful protestors. Denver thus became ground zero for debates over race in the American West, a city as important to conceptions of whiteness, &quot;minority&quot; status, and colorblindness as any place in the South.
In the award winning book, Racial Uncertainties: Mexican Americans, School Desegregation, and the Making of Race in Post-Civil Rights America (U California Press, 2022), University of Utah historian Danielle Olden tracks the history of Chicano, Latinx, and Mexican American identities through Denver&apos;s history, focusing on the lead up to the 1973 Supreme Court case, Keyes v. Denver School District No. 1. Olden tracks the remarkable and complicated story of that city&apos;s Chicano, Black, and white communities through the halting process of school desegregation, and in doing so provides an explemary lesson in the social mutability of the concept of race.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Mexican Americans have often fit uncertainly into the white/non-white binary that has goverens much of American history. After Colorado, and much of the rest of the American West, became American claimed territory after the Mexican-Americna War in 1848, thousands of formerly Mexican citizens became American citizens. Flash foward a century to post-war Denver. In the spring of 1969, Mexican American students staged a walk out in protest of poor quality education, racist teachers, and school segregation - they were met by police in riot gear, to beat and arrested dozens of peaceful protestors. Denver thus became ground zero for debates over race in the American West, a city as important to conceptions of whiteness, &quot;minority&quot; status, and colorblindness as any place in the South.
In the award winning book, Racial Uncertainties: Mexican Americans, School Desegregation, and the Making of Race in Post-Civil Rights America (U California Press, 2022), University of Utah historian Danielle Olden tracks the history of Chicano, Latinx, and Mexican American identities through Denver&apos;s history, focusing on the lead up to the 1973 Supreme Court case, Keyes v. Denver School District No. 1. Olden tracks the remarkable and complicated story of that city&apos;s Chicano, Black, and white communities through the halting process of school desegregation, and in doing so provides an explemary lesson in the social mutability of the concept of race.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>161</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">b5bf4526-15e6-11ef-ba23-eb22855e7a66</guid>
      <title>Sarah Cassella, &quot;Global Risks and International Law: The Case of Climate Change and Pandemics&quot; (Brill/Nijhoff, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Global risks present formidable challenges to international law. Although they have long been identified in many other scientific disciplines, they are currently only considered on a sectoral basis in international law in the absence of a legal definition.&nbsp;</p><p>The aim of&nbsp;<a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/sarah-cassella-29951475/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Sarah Cassella</a>'s book<a href="https://brill.com/display/title/64294?language=en" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;<em>Global Risks and International Law: The Case of Climate Change and Pandemics</em></a>&nbsp;(Brill/Nijhoff, 2023)&nbsp;is threefold: to identify the main elements that characterise global risks in a legal perspective, to determine the characteristics that make them a new category of risk, and to analyse the changes they bring about in the main mechanisms of international law. Drawing on the relationship between international law and other legal systems, and in particular national law, this book highlights possible responses to the challenges posed by global risks. The study is based on extensive practice related to the examples of climate change and pandemics, but opens up perspectives on conclusions that could be common to other global risks, such as financial risks or cyber risks.</p><p><a href="https://univ-droit.fr/universitaires/5569-cassella-sarah" rel="noopener noreferrer">Sarah Cassella</a>, Ph.D. (2009), is Professor of International Law at Université Paris.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/sarah-cassella-global-risks-and-international-law-the-case-of-climate-change-and-pandemics-brill-nijhoff-2023-kZH0dGHK</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Global risks present formidable challenges to international law. Although they have long been identified in many other scientific disciplines, they are currently only considered on a sectoral basis in international law in the absence of a legal definition.&nbsp;</p><p>The aim of&nbsp;<a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/sarah-cassella-29951475/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Sarah Cassella</a>'s book<a href="https://brill.com/display/title/64294?language=en" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;<em>Global Risks and International Law: The Case of Climate Change and Pandemics</em></a>&nbsp;(Brill/Nijhoff, 2023)&nbsp;is threefold: to identify the main elements that characterise global risks in a legal perspective, to determine the characteristics that make them a new category of risk, and to analyse the changes they bring about in the main mechanisms of international law. Drawing on the relationship between international law and other legal systems, and in particular national law, this book highlights possible responses to the challenges posed by global risks. The study is based on extensive practice related to the examples of climate change and pandemics, but opens up perspectives on conclusions that could be common to other global risks, such as financial risks or cyber risks.</p><p><a href="https://univ-droit.fr/universitaires/5569-cassella-sarah" rel="noopener noreferrer">Sarah Cassella</a>, Ph.D. (2009), is Professor of International Law at Université Paris.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="43181482" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/55d265ec-a0ac-4f2b-aaae-ce4303b9bd83/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=55d265ec-a0ac-4f2b-aaae-ce4303b9bd83&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Sarah Cassella, &quot;Global Risks and International Law: The Case of Climate Change and Pandemics&quot; (Brill/Nijhoff, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:44:58</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Global risks present formidable challenges to international law. Although they have long been identified in many other scientific disciplines, they are currently only considered on a sectoral basis in international law in the absence of a legal definition. 
The aim of Sarah Cassella&apos;s book Global Risks and International Law: The Case of Climate Change and Pandemics (Brill/Nijhoff, 2023) is threefold: to identify the main elements that characterise global risks in a legal perspective, to determine the characteristics that make them a new category of risk, and to analyse the changes they bring about in the main mechanisms of international law. Drawing on the relationship between international law and other legal systems, and in particular national law, this book highlights possible responses to the challenges posed by global risks. The study is based on extensive practice related to the examples of climate change and pandemics, but opens up perspectives on conclusions that could be common to other global risks, such as financial risks or cyber risks.
Sarah Cassella, Ph.D. (2009), is Professor of International Law at Université Paris.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Global risks present formidable challenges to international law. Although they have long been identified in many other scientific disciplines, they are currently only considered on a sectoral basis in international law in the absence of a legal definition. 
The aim of Sarah Cassella&apos;s book Global Risks and International Law: The Case of Climate Change and Pandemics (Brill/Nijhoff, 2023) is threefold: to identify the main elements that characterise global risks in a legal perspective, to determine the characteristics that make them a new category of risk, and to analyse the changes they bring about in the main mechanisms of international law. Drawing on the relationship between international law and other legal systems, and in particular national law, this book highlights possible responses to the challenges posed by global risks. The study is based on extensive practice related to the examples of climate change and pandemics, but opens up perspectives on conclusions that could be common to other global risks, such as financial risks or cyber risks.
Sarah Cassella, Ph.D. (2009), is Professor of International Law at Université Paris.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">72cad268-1469-11ef-8c59-7344080ece6e</guid>
      <title>Kate Morgan, &quot;The Walnut Tree: Women, Violence and the Law – A Hidden History&quot; (Mudlark, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>'A woman, a dog and a walnut tree, the more they are beaten, the better they’ll be.' So went the proverb quoted by a prominent MP in the Houses of Parliament in 1853. His words – intended ironically in a debate about a rise in attacks on women – summed up the prevailing attitude of the day, in which violence against women was waved away as a part and parcel of modern living – a chilling seam of misogyny that had polluted both parliament and the law. But were things about to change?</p><p><a href="https://harpercollins.co.uk/products/the-walnut-tree-women-violence-and-the-law-a-hidden-history-kate-morgan?variant=40292736598094" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Walnut Tree: Women, Violence and the Law – A Hidden History</em>&nbsp;</a>(Mudlark, 2024) is a vivid and essential work of historical non-fiction. In it, Kate Morgan explores the legal campaigns, test cases and individual injustices of the Victorian and Edwardian eras which fundamentally re-shaped the status of women under British law. These are seen through the untold stories of women whose cases became cornerstones of our modern legal system and shine a light on the historical inequalities of the law.</p><p>We hear of the uniquely abusive marriage which culminated in the dramatic story of the ‘Clitheroe wife abduction’; of the domestic tragedies which changed the law on domestic violence; the controversies surrounding the Contagious Diseases Act and the women who campaigned to abolish it; and the real courtroom stories behind notorious murder cases such as the ‘Camden Town Murder’.</p><p>Exploring the 19th- and early 20th Century legal history that influenced the modern-day stances on issues such as domestic abuse, sexual violence and divorce,&nbsp;<em>The Walnut Tree&nbsp;</em>lifts the lid on the shocking history of women under British law – and what it means for women today.</p><p><br></p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;new book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/kate-morgan-the-walnut-tree-women-violence-and-the-law-a-hidden-history-mudlark-2024-4hroKml_</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>'A woman, a dog and a walnut tree, the more they are beaten, the better they’ll be.' So went the proverb quoted by a prominent MP in the Houses of Parliament in 1853. His words – intended ironically in a debate about a rise in attacks on women – summed up the prevailing attitude of the day, in which violence against women was waved away as a part and parcel of modern living – a chilling seam of misogyny that had polluted both parliament and the law. But were things about to change?</p><p><a href="https://harpercollins.co.uk/products/the-walnut-tree-women-violence-and-the-law-a-hidden-history-kate-morgan?variant=40292736598094" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Walnut Tree: Women, Violence and the Law – A Hidden History</em>&nbsp;</a>(Mudlark, 2024) is a vivid and essential work of historical non-fiction. In it, Kate Morgan explores the legal campaigns, test cases and individual injustices of the Victorian and Edwardian eras which fundamentally re-shaped the status of women under British law. These are seen through the untold stories of women whose cases became cornerstones of our modern legal system and shine a light on the historical inequalities of the law.</p><p>We hear of the uniquely abusive marriage which culminated in the dramatic story of the ‘Clitheroe wife abduction’; of the domestic tragedies which changed the law on domestic violence; the controversies surrounding the Contagious Diseases Act and the women who campaigned to abolish it; and the real courtroom stories behind notorious murder cases such as the ‘Camden Town Murder’.</p><p>Exploring the 19th- and early 20th Century legal history that influenced the modern-day stances on issues such as domestic abuse, sexual violence and divorce,&nbsp;<em>The Walnut Tree&nbsp;</em>lifts the lid on the shocking history of women under British law – and what it means for women today.</p><p><br></p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;new book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="44834111" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/27378e22-ee6b-4bef-b8df-52dded61cb51/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=27378e22-ee6b-4bef-b8df-52dded61cb51&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Kate Morgan, &quot;The Walnut Tree: Women, Violence and the Law – A Hidden History&quot; (Mudlark, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:46:41</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>&apos;A woman, a dog and a walnut tree, the more they are beaten, the better they’ll be.&apos; So went the proverb quoted by a prominent MP in the Houses of Parliament in 1853. His words – intended ironically in a debate about a rise in attacks on women – summed up the prevailing attitude of the day, in which violence against women was waved away as a part and parcel of modern living – a chilling seam of misogyny that had polluted both parliament and the law. But were things about to change?
The Walnut Tree: Women, Violence and the Law – A Hidden History (Mudlark, 2024) is a vivid and essential work of historical non-fiction. In it, Kate Morgan explores the legal campaigns, test cases and individual injustices of the Victorian and Edwardian eras which fundamentally re-shaped the status of women under British law. These are seen through the untold stories of women whose cases became cornerstones of our modern legal system and shine a light on the historical inequalities of the law.
We hear of the uniquely abusive marriage which culminated in the dramatic story of the ‘Clitheroe wife abduction’; of the domestic tragedies which changed the law on domestic violence; the controversies surrounding the Contagious Diseases Act and the women who campaigned to abolish it; and the real courtroom stories behind notorious murder cases such as the ‘Camden Town Murder’.
Exploring the 19th- and early 20th Century legal history that influenced the modern-day stances on issues such as domestic abuse, sexual violence and divorce, The Walnut Tree lifts the lid on the shocking history of women under British law – and what it means for women today.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>&apos;A woman, a dog and a walnut tree, the more they are beaten, the better they’ll be.&apos; So went the proverb quoted by a prominent MP in the Houses of Parliament in 1853. His words – intended ironically in a debate about a rise in attacks on women – summed up the prevailing attitude of the day, in which violence against women was waved away as a part and parcel of modern living – a chilling seam of misogyny that had polluted both parliament and the law. But were things about to change?
The Walnut Tree: Women, Violence and the Law – A Hidden History (Mudlark, 2024) is a vivid and essential work of historical non-fiction. In it, Kate Morgan explores the legal campaigns, test cases and individual injustices of the Victorian and Edwardian eras which fundamentally re-shaped the status of women under British law. These are seen through the untold stories of women whose cases became cornerstones of our modern legal system and shine a light on the historical inequalities of the law.
We hear of the uniquely abusive marriage which culminated in the dramatic story of the ‘Clitheroe wife abduction’; of the domestic tragedies which changed the law on domestic violence; the controversies surrounding the Contagious Diseases Act and the women who campaigned to abolish it; and the real courtroom stories behind notorious murder cases such as the ‘Camden Town Murder’.
Exploring the 19th- and early 20th Century legal history that influenced the modern-day stances on issues such as domestic abuse, sexual violence and divorce, The Walnut Tree lifts the lid on the shocking history of women under British law – and what it means for women today.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>90</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">48017cc0-13b6-11ef-8d91-eba960c0f63e</guid>
      <title>Anna Brinkman, &quot;Balancing Strategy: Sea Power, Neutrality, and Prize Law in the Seven Years&apos; War&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>What is the relationship between seapower, law, and strategy? In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009425568" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Balancing Strategy: Seapower, Neutrality, and Prize-Law in the Seven Years' War</em></a>&nbsp;(Cambridge University Press, 2024) Dr. Anna Brinkman uses in-depth analysis of cases brought before the Court of Prize Appeal during the Seven Years' War to explore how Britain worked to shape maritime international law to its strategic advantage. Within the court, government ofﬁcials and naval and legal minds came together to shape legal decisions from the perspectives of both legal philosophy and maritime strategic aims. As a result, neutrality and the negotiation of rights became critical to maritime warfare.&nbsp;<em>Balancing Strategy</em>&nbsp;unpicks a complex web of competing priorities: deals struck with the Dutch Republic and Spain; imperial rivalry; mercantilism; colonial trade; and the relationships between metropoles and colonies, trade, and the navy. Ultimately, influencing and shaping international law of the sea allows a nation to create the norms and rules that constrain or enable the use of seapower during war.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;new book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/anna-brinkman-balancing-strategy-sea-power-neutrality-and-prize-law-in-the-seven-years-war-cambridge-up-2024-Q63jJjy5</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is the relationship between seapower, law, and strategy? In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009425568" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Balancing Strategy: Seapower, Neutrality, and Prize-Law in the Seven Years' War</em></a>&nbsp;(Cambridge University Press, 2024) Dr. Anna Brinkman uses in-depth analysis of cases brought before the Court of Prize Appeal during the Seven Years' War to explore how Britain worked to shape maritime international law to its strategic advantage. Within the court, government ofﬁcials and naval and legal minds came together to shape legal decisions from the perspectives of both legal philosophy and maritime strategic aims. As a result, neutrality and the negotiation of rights became critical to maritime warfare.&nbsp;<em>Balancing Strategy</em>&nbsp;unpicks a complex web of competing priorities: deals struck with the Dutch Republic and Spain; imperial rivalry; mercantilism; colonial trade; and the relationships between metropoles and colonies, trade, and the navy. Ultimately, influencing and shaping international law of the sea allows a nation to create the norms and rules that constrain or enable the use of seapower during war.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;new book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="53548292" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/babe869e-979f-4f1c-a3a5-49b6141ab713/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=babe869e-979f-4f1c-a3a5-49b6141ab713&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Anna Brinkman, &quot;Balancing Strategy: Sea Power, Neutrality, and Prize Law in the Seven Years&apos; War&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:55:46</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>What is the relationship between seapower, law, and strategy? In Balancing Strategy: Seapower, Neutrality, and Prize-Law in the Seven Years&apos; War (Cambridge University Press, 2024) Dr. Anna Brinkman uses in-depth analysis of cases brought before the Court of Prize Appeal during the Seven Years&apos; War to explore how Britain worked to shape maritime international law to its strategic advantage. Within the court, government ofﬁcials and naval and legal minds came together to shape legal decisions from the perspectives of both legal philosophy and maritime strategic aims. As a result, neutrality and the negotiation of rights became critical to maritime warfare. Balancing Strategy unpicks a complex web of competing priorities: deals struck with the Dutch Republic and Spain; imperial rivalry; mercantilism; colonial trade; and the relationships between metropoles and colonies, trade, and the navy. Ultimately, influencing and shaping international law of the sea allows a nation to create the norms and rules that constrain or enable the use of seapower during war.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>What is the relationship between seapower, law, and strategy? In Balancing Strategy: Seapower, Neutrality, and Prize-Law in the Seven Years&apos; War (Cambridge University Press, 2024) Dr. Anna Brinkman uses in-depth analysis of cases brought before the Court of Prize Appeal during the Seven Years&apos; War to explore how Britain worked to shape maritime international law to its strategic advantage. Within the court, government ofﬁcials and naval and legal minds came together to shape legal decisions from the perspectives of both legal philosophy and maritime strategic aims. As a result, neutrality and the negotiation of rights became critical to maritime warfare. Balancing Strategy unpicks a complex web of competing priorities: deals struck with the Dutch Republic and Spain; imperial rivalry; mercantilism; colonial trade; and the relationships between metropoles and colonies, trade, and the navy. Ultimately, influencing and shaping international law of the sea allows a nation to create the norms and rules that constrain or enable the use of seapower during war.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>237</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ad0e5344-1399-11ef-9165-e71eedde8e45</guid>
      <title>Adriana Chira, &quot;Patchwork Freedoms: Law, Slavery, and Race beyond Cuba&apos;s Plantations&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2022)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In nineteenth-century Santiago de Cuba, the island of Cuba's radical cradle, Afro-descendant peasants forged freedom and devised their own formative path to emancipation. Drawing on understudied archives, this pathbreaking work,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781108730808" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Patchwork Freedoms: Law, Slavery, and Race beyond Cuba's Plantations</em></a>&nbsp;(Cambridge UP, 2022)&nbsp;unearths a new history of Black rural geography and popular legalism, and offers a new framework for thinking about nineteenth-century Black freedom. Santiago de Cuba's Afro-descendant peasantries did not rely on liberal-abolitionist ideologies as a primary reference point in their struggle for rights. Instead, they negotiated their freedom and land piecemeal, through colonial legal frameworks that allowed for local custom and manumission. While gradually wearing down the institution of slavery through litigation and self-purchase, they reimagined colonial racial systems before Cuba's intellectuals had their say. Long before residents of Cuba protested for national independence and island-wide emancipation in 1868, it was Santiago's Afro-descendant peasants who, gradually and invisibly, laid the groundwork for emancipation.</p><p><em>Kishauna Soljour is an Assistant Professor of Public Humanities at San Diego State University. Her most recent writing appears in the edited collection:&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.amazon.com/Rights-Lives-Evolution-Struggle-Liberation/dp/0826506658/ref=sr_1_1?crid=294FH7OWIM8UU&amp;dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9.5O9HuYnUNAjxobLe7Dufmta_qn-XIMKvhehoaymQxOHYTDG5VCIy2Kzh8wylCyZtMuUItxd468KUk75RCdz13yMPnRi-bwcLMNyjUFF9DbrmKJChilzJCL44LvHk0sjzznFUMCoGef7M3bzhMbRk-xs5v9DeOOs214IGx_qyyhLfZz5GLqaNZkpCYku6AsPsmSi1HE95-Us-ZRrNjnyPfE1Mo7iFobz9mzLM-KHz_fI.lDLnV0b05AgDclfLPGhrqnSmOFY_VxQOqN14ce58cBs&amp;dib_tag=se&amp;keywords=from+rights+to+lives+book&amp;qid=1711049289&amp;sprefix=from+rights+to+lives+boo%2Caps%2C117&amp;sr=8-1" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>From Rights to Lives: The Evolution of the Black Freedom Struggle</em></a><em>.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/adriana-chira-patchwork-freedoms-law-slavery-and-race-beyond-cubas-plantations-cambridge-up-2022-9SZQHyC9</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In nineteenth-century Santiago de Cuba, the island of Cuba's radical cradle, Afro-descendant peasants forged freedom and devised their own formative path to emancipation. Drawing on understudied archives, this pathbreaking work,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781108730808" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Patchwork Freedoms: Law, Slavery, and Race beyond Cuba's Plantations</em></a>&nbsp;(Cambridge UP, 2022)&nbsp;unearths a new history of Black rural geography and popular legalism, and offers a new framework for thinking about nineteenth-century Black freedom. Santiago de Cuba's Afro-descendant peasantries did not rely on liberal-abolitionist ideologies as a primary reference point in their struggle for rights. Instead, they negotiated their freedom and land piecemeal, through colonial legal frameworks that allowed for local custom and manumission. While gradually wearing down the institution of slavery through litigation and self-purchase, they reimagined colonial racial systems before Cuba's intellectuals had their say. Long before residents of Cuba protested for national independence and island-wide emancipation in 1868, it was Santiago's Afro-descendant peasants who, gradually and invisibly, laid the groundwork for emancipation.</p><p><em>Kishauna Soljour is an Assistant Professor of Public Humanities at San Diego State University. Her most recent writing appears in the edited collection:&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.amazon.com/Rights-Lives-Evolution-Struggle-Liberation/dp/0826506658/ref=sr_1_1?crid=294FH7OWIM8UU&amp;dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9.5O9HuYnUNAjxobLe7Dufmta_qn-XIMKvhehoaymQxOHYTDG5VCIy2Kzh8wylCyZtMuUItxd468KUk75RCdz13yMPnRi-bwcLMNyjUFF9DbrmKJChilzJCL44LvHk0sjzznFUMCoGef7M3bzhMbRk-xs5v9DeOOs214IGx_qyyhLfZz5GLqaNZkpCYku6AsPsmSi1HE95-Us-ZRrNjnyPfE1Mo7iFobz9mzLM-KHz_fI.lDLnV0b05AgDclfLPGhrqnSmOFY_VxQOqN14ce58cBs&amp;dib_tag=se&amp;keywords=from+rights+to+lives+book&amp;qid=1711049289&amp;sprefix=from+rights+to+lives+boo%2Caps%2C117&amp;sr=8-1" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>From Rights to Lives: The Evolution of the Black Freedom Struggle</em></a><em>.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="38751349" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/c8eddf64-a99b-4d3e-bcfa-5058d3b5945d/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=c8eddf64-a99b-4d3e-bcfa-5058d3b5945d&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Adriana Chira, &quot;Patchwork Freedoms: Law, Slavery, and Race beyond Cuba&apos;s Plantations&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2022)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:40:21</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In nineteenth-century Santiago de Cuba, the island of Cuba&apos;s radical cradle, Afro-descendant peasants forged freedom and devised their own formative path to emancipation. Drawing on understudied archives, this pathbreaking work, Patchwork Freedoms: Law, Slavery, and Race beyond Cuba&apos;s Plantations (Cambridge UP, 2022) unearths a new history of Black rural geography and popular legalism, and offers a new framework for thinking about nineteenth-century Black freedom. Santiago de Cuba&apos;s Afro-descendant peasantries did not rely on liberal-abolitionist ideologies as a primary reference point in their struggle for rights. Instead, they negotiated their freedom and land piecemeal, through colonial legal frameworks that allowed for local custom and manumission. While gradually wearing down the institution of slavery through litigation and self-purchase, they reimagined colonial racial systems before Cuba&apos;s intellectuals had their say. Long before residents of Cuba protested for national independence and island-wide emancipation in 1868, it was Santiago&apos;s Afro-descendant peasants who, gradually and invisibly, laid the groundwork for emancipation.
Kishauna Soljour is an Assistant Professor of Public Humanities at San Diego State University. Her most recent writing appears in the edited collection: From Rights to Lives: The Evolution of the Black Freedom Struggle.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In nineteenth-century Santiago de Cuba, the island of Cuba&apos;s radical cradle, Afro-descendant peasants forged freedom and devised their own formative path to emancipation. Drawing on understudied archives, this pathbreaking work, Patchwork Freedoms: Law, Slavery, and Race beyond Cuba&apos;s Plantations (Cambridge UP, 2022) unearths a new history of Black rural geography and popular legalism, and offers a new framework for thinking about nineteenth-century Black freedom. Santiago de Cuba&apos;s Afro-descendant peasantries did not rely on liberal-abolitionist ideologies as a primary reference point in their struggle for rights. Instead, they negotiated their freedom and land piecemeal, through colonial legal frameworks that allowed for local custom and manumission. While gradually wearing down the institution of slavery through litigation and self-purchase, they reimagined colonial racial systems before Cuba&apos;s intellectuals had their say. Long before residents of Cuba protested for national independence and island-wide emancipation in 1868, it was Santiago&apos;s Afro-descendant peasants who, gradually and invisibly, laid the groundwork for emancipation.
Kishauna Soljour is an Assistant Professor of Public Humanities at San Diego State University. Her most recent writing appears in the edited collection: From Rights to Lives: The Evolution of the Black Freedom Struggle.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>111</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">181851de-12d8-11ef-b98d-5b762fa661ce</guid>
      <title>Kunal M. Parker, &quot;The Turn to Process: American Legal, Political, and Economic Thought, 1870-1970&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009335232" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Turn to Process:&nbsp;American Legal, Political, and Economic Thought, 1870-1970</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Cambridge University Press, 2023), Kunal M. Parker explores the massive reorientation of American legal, political, and economic thinking between 1870 and 1970. Over this period, American conceptions of law, democracy, and markets went from being oriented around truths, ends, and foundations to being oriented around methods, processes, and techniques. No longer viewed as founded in justice and morality, law became a way of doing things centered around legal procedure. Shedding its foundations in the 'people,' democracy became a technique of governance consisting of an endless process of interacting groups. Liberating themselves from the truths of labor, markets and market actors became intellectual and political techniques without necessary grounding in the reality of human behavior. Contrasting nineteenth and twentieth century legal, political, and economic thought, this book situates this transformation in the philosophical crisis of modernism and the rise of the administrative state.</p><p>Kunal M. Parker is a Professor of Law and Dean's Distinguished Scholar at the University of Miami.</p><p><em>Caleb Zakarin</em>&nbsp;is editor of the New Books Network.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/kunal-m-parker-the-turn-to-process-american-legal-political-and-economic-thought-1870-1970-cambridge-up-2023-7xiGPIJR</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009335232" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Turn to Process:&nbsp;American Legal, Political, and Economic Thought, 1870-1970</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Cambridge University Press, 2023), Kunal M. Parker explores the massive reorientation of American legal, political, and economic thinking between 1870 and 1970. Over this period, American conceptions of law, democracy, and markets went from being oriented around truths, ends, and foundations to being oriented around methods, processes, and techniques. No longer viewed as founded in justice and morality, law became a way of doing things centered around legal procedure. Shedding its foundations in the 'people,' democracy became a technique of governance consisting of an endless process of interacting groups. Liberating themselves from the truths of labor, markets and market actors became intellectual and political techniques without necessary grounding in the reality of human behavior. Contrasting nineteenth and twentieth century legal, political, and economic thought, this book situates this transformation in the philosophical crisis of modernism and the rise of the administrative state.</p><p>Kunal M. Parker is a Professor of Law and Dean's Distinguished Scholar at the University of Miami.</p><p><em>Caleb Zakarin</em>&nbsp;is editor of the New Books Network.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="56042056" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/2f75e4b0-7356-47b5-8dc2-ed933d11c36b/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=2f75e4b0-7356-47b5-8dc2-ed933d11c36b&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Kunal M. Parker, &quot;The Turn to Process: American Legal, Political, and Economic Thought, 1870-1970&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:58:22</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In The Turn to Process: American Legal, Political, and Economic Thought, 1870-1970 (Cambridge University Press, 2023), Kunal M. Parker explores the massive reorientation of American legal, political, and economic thinking between 1870 and 1970. Over this period, American conceptions of law, democracy, and markets went from being oriented around truths, ends, and foundations to being oriented around methods, processes, and techniques. No longer viewed as founded in justice and morality, law became a way of doing things centered around legal procedure. Shedding its foundations in the &apos;people,&apos; democracy became a technique of governance consisting of an endless process of interacting groups. Liberating themselves from the truths of labor, markets and market actors became intellectual and political techniques without necessary grounding in the reality of human behavior. Contrasting nineteenth and twentieth century legal, political, and economic thought, this book situates this transformation in the philosophical crisis of modernism and the rise of the administrative state.
Kunal M. Parker is a Professor of Law and Dean&apos;s Distinguished Scholar at the University of Miami.
Caleb Zakarin is editor of the New Books Network.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In The Turn to Process: American Legal, Political, and Economic Thought, 1870-1970 (Cambridge University Press, 2023), Kunal M. Parker explores the massive reorientation of American legal, political, and economic thinking between 1870 and 1970. Over this period, American conceptions of law, democracy, and markets went from being oriented around truths, ends, and foundations to being oriented around methods, processes, and techniques. No longer viewed as founded in justice and morality, law became a way of doing things centered around legal procedure. Shedding its foundations in the &apos;people,&apos; democracy became a technique of governance consisting of an endless process of interacting groups. Liberating themselves from the truths of labor, markets and market actors became intellectual and political techniques without necessary grounding in the reality of human behavior. Contrasting nineteenth and twentieth century legal, political, and economic thought, this book situates this transformation in the philosophical crisis of modernism and the rise of the administrative state.
Kunal M. Parker is a Professor of Law and Dean&apos;s Distinguished Scholar at the University of Miami.
Caleb Zakarin is editor of the New Books Network.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>211</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">a61fab04-1219-11ef-bc6b-e33b51d3a073</guid>
      <title>Chris Stephen, &quot;The Future of War Crimes Justice&quot; (Melville House, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781685891190" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Future of War Crimes Justice</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Melville House, 2024), journalist and war correspondent Chris Stephen takes a colourful look at the erratic history of war crimes justice, and the pioneers who created it. He examines its shortcomings, and options for making it more effective, including the case for prosecuting the corporations and banks who fund warlords. Casting the net wider, he examines alternatives to war crimes trials, and looks into the minds of war criminals themselves through an evaluation of evidence from psychiatric studies. With international law advocates fighting for justice on one side, and reluctant governments unwilling to relinquish control on the other, he sets out to answer whether the world of the future will be governed by the rule of law or might is right.</p><p>The podcast begins by exploring what is meant by ‘justice’ in the context of war crimes – whether it is (or should be) a process and collection of rights-respecting investigations and trials, or an outcome (the prosecution, conviction and sentencing of people who have committed the worst crimes) – and then discusses the challenges at the heart of the system of international war crimes justice as it has developed from the post-World War II trials of Nuremberg and Toyko. Chris Stephen discusses the impossibility of bringing leaders of major powers to justice, such as Russia’s Vladimir Putin, under the current system of war crimes justice, acknowledging the role that&nbsp;<em>realpolitik</em>&nbsp;and national state interest plays in preventing greater engagement with the International Criminal Court in The Hague.</p><p><a href="https://essl.leeds.ac.uk/law/staff/1332/mr-alex-batesmith" rel="noopener noreferrer">Alex Batesmith</a>&nbsp;is a Lecturer in Legal Profession in the School of Law at the University of Leeds, and a former barrister and UN war crimes prosecutor, with teaching and research interests in international criminal law, cause lawyering and the legal profession, and law and emotion.&nbsp;Twitter: @batesmith.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/batesmith/" rel="noopener noreferrer">LinkedIn</a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/chris-stephen-the-future-of-war-crimes-justice-melville-house-2024-iTDSJMZn</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781685891190" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Future of War Crimes Justice</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Melville House, 2024), journalist and war correspondent Chris Stephen takes a colourful look at the erratic history of war crimes justice, and the pioneers who created it. He examines its shortcomings, and options for making it more effective, including the case for prosecuting the corporations and banks who fund warlords. Casting the net wider, he examines alternatives to war crimes trials, and looks into the minds of war criminals themselves through an evaluation of evidence from psychiatric studies. With international law advocates fighting for justice on one side, and reluctant governments unwilling to relinquish control on the other, he sets out to answer whether the world of the future will be governed by the rule of law or might is right.</p><p>The podcast begins by exploring what is meant by ‘justice’ in the context of war crimes – whether it is (or should be) a process and collection of rights-respecting investigations and trials, or an outcome (the prosecution, conviction and sentencing of people who have committed the worst crimes) – and then discusses the challenges at the heart of the system of international war crimes justice as it has developed from the post-World War II trials of Nuremberg and Toyko. Chris Stephen discusses the impossibility of bringing leaders of major powers to justice, such as Russia’s Vladimir Putin, under the current system of war crimes justice, acknowledging the role that&nbsp;<em>realpolitik</em>&nbsp;and national state interest plays in preventing greater engagement with the International Criminal Court in The Hague.</p><p><a href="https://essl.leeds.ac.uk/law/staff/1332/mr-alex-batesmith" rel="noopener noreferrer">Alex Batesmith</a>&nbsp;is a Lecturer in Legal Profession in the School of Law at the University of Leeds, and a former barrister and UN war crimes prosecutor, with teaching and research interests in international criminal law, cause lawyering and the legal profession, and law and emotion.&nbsp;Twitter: @batesmith.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/batesmith/" rel="noopener noreferrer">LinkedIn</a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="55585552" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/6050e706-7897-4293-815a-8a1ca8202c21/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=6050e706-7897-4293-815a-8a1ca8202c21&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Chris Stephen, &quot;The Future of War Crimes Justice&quot; (Melville House, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:57:53</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The Future of War Crimes Justice (Melville House, 2024), journalist and war correspondent Chris Stephen takes a colourful look at the erratic history of war crimes justice, and the pioneers who created it. He examines its shortcomings, and options for making it more effective, including the case for prosecuting the corporations and banks who fund warlords. Casting the net wider, he examines alternatives to war crimes trials, and looks into the minds of war criminals themselves through an evaluation of evidence from psychiatric studies. With international law advocates fighting for justice on one side, and reluctant governments unwilling to relinquish control on the other, he sets out to answer whether the world of the future will be governed by the rule of law or might is right.
The podcast begins by exploring what is meant by ‘justice’ in the context of war crimes – whether it is (or should be) a process and collection of rights-respecting investigations and trials, or an outcome (the prosecution, conviction and sentencing of people who have committed the worst crimes) – and then discusses the challenges at the heart of the system of international war crimes justice as it has developed from the post-World War II trials of Nuremberg and Toyko. Chris Stephen discusses the impossibility of bringing leaders of major powers to justice, such as Russia’s Vladimir Putin, under the current system of war crimes justice, acknowledging the role that realpolitik and national state interest plays in preventing greater engagement with the International Criminal Court in The Hague.
Alex Batesmith is a Lecturer in Legal Profession in the School of Law at the University of Leeds, and a former barrister and UN war crimes prosecutor, with teaching and research interests in international criminal law, cause lawyering and the legal profession, and law and emotion. Twitter: @batesmith. LinkedIn.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Future of War Crimes Justice (Melville House, 2024), journalist and war correspondent Chris Stephen takes a colourful look at the erratic history of war crimes justice, and the pioneers who created it. He examines its shortcomings, and options for making it more effective, including the case for prosecuting the corporations and banks who fund warlords. Casting the net wider, he examines alternatives to war crimes trials, and looks into the minds of war criminals themselves through an evaluation of evidence from psychiatric studies. With international law advocates fighting for justice on one side, and reluctant governments unwilling to relinquish control on the other, he sets out to answer whether the world of the future will be governed by the rule of law or might is right.
The podcast begins by exploring what is meant by ‘justice’ in the context of war crimes – whether it is (or should be) a process and collection of rights-respecting investigations and trials, or an outcome (the prosecution, conviction and sentencing of people who have committed the worst crimes) – and then discusses the challenges at the heart of the system of international war crimes justice as it has developed from the post-World War II trials of Nuremberg and Toyko. Chris Stephen discusses the impossibility of bringing leaders of major powers to justice, such as Russia’s Vladimir Putin, under the current system of war crimes justice, acknowledging the role that realpolitik and national state interest plays in preventing greater engagement with the International Criminal Court in The Hague.
Alex Batesmith is a Lecturer in Legal Profession in the School of Law at the University of Leeds, and a former barrister and UN war crimes prosecutor, with teaching and research interests in international criminal law, cause lawyering and the legal profession, and law and emotion. Twitter: @batesmith. LinkedIn.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>218</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6ec4a0ec-11fb-11ef-a497-03ef9ec36eff</guid>
      <title>Can the Constitution Still Unite Us?: A Conversation with Yuval Levin</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>During an era of broad political dissatisfaction, what is the history and role of the Constitution? Does the Constitution still have the power to unite us? Dr. Yuval Levin joins Madison's Notes to discuss his forthcoming book&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/untitled-on-us-constitution-yuval-levin/20795913?ean=9780465040742" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>American Covenant: How the Constitution Unified Our Nation ― and Could Again</em></a>. Along the way, he delves into key American figures from James Madison to Woodrow Wilson and the reasons for our present discord.</p><p><a href="https://www.aei.org/profile/yuval-levin/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Yuval Levin</a>&nbsp;is a Senior Fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, where he is the Beth and Ravenel Curry Chair in Public Policy, and Director of&nbsp;<a href="https://www.aei.org/policy-areas/sccs/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Social, Cultural, and Constitutional Studies</a>. He is the Founder and Editor in Chief of&nbsp;<a href="https://www.nationalaffairs.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">National Affairs</a>, as well as a senior editor at The New Atlantis, a contributing editor at National Review, and a contributing opinion writer at The New York Times. Dr. Levin served as a member of the White House domestic policy staff under President George W. Bush. He was also executive director of the President’s Council on Bioethics and a congressional staffer at the member, committee, and leadership levels. He holds a PhD from the Committee on Social Thought at the University of Chicago.</p><p><em>Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any event does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.</em></p><p><a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/people/annika-nordquist" rel="noopener noreferrer">Annika Nordquist</a>&nbsp;is the Communications Coordinator of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions and host of the Program’s podcast,&nbsp;<a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/podcast" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Madison’s Notes</em></a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/can-the-constitution-still-unite-us-a-conversation-with-yuval-levin-Q7Owb90q</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>During an era of broad political dissatisfaction, what is the history and role of the Constitution? Does the Constitution still have the power to unite us? Dr. Yuval Levin joins Madison's Notes to discuss his forthcoming book&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/untitled-on-us-constitution-yuval-levin/20795913?ean=9780465040742" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>American Covenant: How the Constitution Unified Our Nation ― and Could Again</em></a>. Along the way, he delves into key American figures from James Madison to Woodrow Wilson and the reasons for our present discord.</p><p><a href="https://www.aei.org/profile/yuval-levin/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Yuval Levin</a>&nbsp;is a Senior Fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, where he is the Beth and Ravenel Curry Chair in Public Policy, and Director of&nbsp;<a href="https://www.aei.org/policy-areas/sccs/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Social, Cultural, and Constitutional Studies</a>. He is the Founder and Editor in Chief of&nbsp;<a href="https://www.nationalaffairs.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">National Affairs</a>, as well as a senior editor at The New Atlantis, a contributing editor at National Review, and a contributing opinion writer at The New York Times. Dr. Levin served as a member of the White House domestic policy staff under President George W. Bush. He was also executive director of the President’s Council on Bioethics and a congressional staffer at the member, committee, and leadership levels. He holds a PhD from the Committee on Social Thought at the University of Chicago.</p><p><em>Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any event does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.</em></p><p><a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/people/annika-nordquist" rel="noopener noreferrer">Annika Nordquist</a>&nbsp;is the Communications Coordinator of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions and host of the Program’s podcast,&nbsp;<a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/podcast" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Madison’s Notes</em></a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="51074280" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/dcfcf237-1297-4864-b1ad-63d1d18cac44/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=dcfcf237-1297-4864-b1ad-63d1d18cac44&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Can the Constitution Still Unite Us?: A Conversation with Yuval Levin</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:53:11</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>During an era of broad political dissatisfaction, what is the history and role of the Constitution? Does the Constitution still have the power to unite us? Dr. Yuval Levin joins Madison&apos;s Notes to discuss his forthcoming book American Covenant: How the Constitution Unified Our Nation ― and Could Again. Along the way, he delves into key American figures from James Madison to Woodrow Wilson and the reasons for our present discord.
Yuval Levin is a Senior Fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, where he is the Beth and Ravenel Curry Chair in Public Policy, and Director of Social, Cultural, and Constitutional Studies. He is the Founder and Editor in Chief of National Affairs, as well as a senior editor at The New Atlantis, a contributing editor at National Review, and a contributing opinion writer at The New York Times. Dr. Levin served as a member of the White House domestic policy staff under President George W. Bush. He was also executive director of the President’s Council on Bioethics and a congressional staffer at the member, committee, and leadership levels. He holds a PhD from the Committee on Social Thought at the University of Chicago.
Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any event does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.
Annika Nordquist is the Communications Coordinator of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions and host of the Program’s podcast, Madison’s Notes.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>During an era of broad political dissatisfaction, what is the history and role of the Constitution? Does the Constitution still have the power to unite us? Dr. Yuval Levin joins Madison&apos;s Notes to discuss his forthcoming book American Covenant: How the Constitution Unified Our Nation ― and Could Again. Along the way, he delves into key American figures from James Madison to Woodrow Wilson and the reasons for our present discord.
Yuval Levin is a Senior Fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, where he is the Beth and Ravenel Curry Chair in Public Policy, and Director of Social, Cultural, and Constitutional Studies. He is the Founder and Editor in Chief of National Affairs, as well as a senior editor at The New Atlantis, a contributing editor at National Review, and a contributing opinion writer at The New York Times. Dr. Levin served as a member of the White House domestic policy staff under President George W. Bush. He was also executive director of the President’s Council on Bioethics and a congressional staffer at the member, committee, and leadership levels. He holds a PhD from the Committee on Social Thought at the University of Chicago.
Contributions to and/or sponsorship of any event does not constitute departmental or institutional endorsement of the specific program, speakers or views presented.
Annika Nordquist is the Communications Coordinator of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions and host of the Program’s podcast, Madison’s Notes.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>107</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">b80ccb3a-0fd0-11ef-9936-8ba440f273d4</guid>
      <title>Shelley X. Liu, &quot;Governing After War: Rebel Victories and Post-War Statebuilding&quot; (Oxford UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197696712" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Governing After War: Rebel Victories and Post-war Statebuilding</em></a>&nbsp;(Oxford University Press, 2024) by Dr. Shelley X. Liu explores how wartime processes affects post-war state-building efforts when rebels win a civil war and come into power. Post-war governance is a continuation of war--although violence has ceased, the victor must consolidate its control over the state through a process of internal conquest. This means carefully making choices about resource allocation towards development and security. Where does the victor choose to spend, and why? And what are the implications for ultimately consolidating power and preventing conflict recurrence?</p><p>The book examines wartime rebel-civilian ties under rebel governance and explains how these ties--along with rebel governing institutions--shape the rebel victors' post-war various resource allocation strategies to establish control at the sub-national level. In turn, successfully balancing resources dedicated toward development and security helps the victor to consolidate power. The book relies on mixed-methods evidence from Zimbabwe and Liberia, combining interviews, focus groups, and archival data with fine-grained census, administrative, survey, and conflict datasets to provide an in-depth examination of subnational variation in wartime rebel behavior and post-war governing strategies. A comparison of Zimbabwe and Liberia alongside four additional civil wars in Burundi, Rwanda, Côte d'Ivoire, and Angola further demonstrates the importance of wartime civilian tie-formation for post-war control. The argument's central insights point to war and peace as part of a long state-building process, and suggest that the international community should pay attention to sub-national political constraints that new governments face. Her findings offer implications for recent rebel victories and, more broadly, for understanding the termination, trajectories, and political legacies of such conflicts around the world.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;new book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/shelley-x-liu-governing-after-war-rebel-victories-and-post-war-statebuilding-oxford-up-2024-cAMwlk8x</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197696712" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Governing After War: Rebel Victories and Post-war Statebuilding</em></a>&nbsp;(Oxford University Press, 2024) by Dr. Shelley X. Liu explores how wartime processes affects post-war state-building efforts when rebels win a civil war and come into power. Post-war governance is a continuation of war--although violence has ceased, the victor must consolidate its control over the state through a process of internal conquest. This means carefully making choices about resource allocation towards development and security. Where does the victor choose to spend, and why? And what are the implications for ultimately consolidating power and preventing conflict recurrence?</p><p>The book examines wartime rebel-civilian ties under rebel governance and explains how these ties--along with rebel governing institutions--shape the rebel victors' post-war various resource allocation strategies to establish control at the sub-national level. In turn, successfully balancing resources dedicated toward development and security helps the victor to consolidate power. The book relies on mixed-methods evidence from Zimbabwe and Liberia, combining interviews, focus groups, and archival data with fine-grained census, administrative, survey, and conflict datasets to provide an in-depth examination of subnational variation in wartime rebel behavior and post-war governing strategies. A comparison of Zimbabwe and Liberia alongside four additional civil wars in Burundi, Rwanda, Côte d'Ivoire, and Angola further demonstrates the importance of wartime civilian tie-formation for post-war control. The argument's central insights point to war and peace as part of a long state-building process, and suggest that the international community should pay attention to sub-national political constraints that new governments face. Her findings offer implications for recent rebel victories and, more broadly, for understanding the termination, trajectories, and political legacies of such conflicts around the world.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;new book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="39490285" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/b084be1e-3a29-452e-846d-059c5c4a6e2c/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=b084be1e-3a29-452e-846d-059c5c4a6e2c&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Shelley X. Liu, &quot;Governing After War: Rebel Victories and Post-War Statebuilding&quot; (Oxford UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:41:07</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Governing After War: Rebel Victories and Post-war Statebuilding (Oxford University Press, 2024) by Dr. Shelley X. Liu explores how wartime processes affects post-war state-building efforts when rebels win a civil war and come into power. Post-war governance is a continuation of war--although violence has ceased, the victor must consolidate its control over the state through a process of internal conquest. This means carefully making choices about resource allocation towards development and security. Where does the victor choose to spend, and why? And what are the implications for ultimately consolidating power and preventing conflict recurrence?
The book examines wartime rebel-civilian ties under rebel governance and explains how these ties--along with rebel governing institutions--shape the rebel victors&apos; post-war various resource allocation strategies to establish control at the sub-national level. In turn, successfully balancing resources dedicated toward development and security helps the victor to consolidate power. The book relies on mixed-methods evidence from Zimbabwe and Liberia, combining interviews, focus groups, and archival data with fine-grained census, administrative, survey, and conflict datasets to provide an in-depth examination of subnational variation in wartime rebel behavior and post-war governing strategies. A comparison of Zimbabwe and Liberia alongside four additional civil wars in Burundi, Rwanda, Côte d&apos;Ivoire, and Angola further demonstrates the importance of wartime civilian tie-formation for post-war control. The argument&apos;s central insights point to war and peace as part of a long state-building process, and suggest that the international community should pay attention to sub-national political constraints that new governments face. Her findings offer implications for recent rebel victories and, more broadly, for understanding the termination, trajectories, and political legacies of such conflicts around the world.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Governing After War: Rebel Victories and Post-war Statebuilding (Oxford University Press, 2024) by Dr. Shelley X. Liu explores how wartime processes affects post-war state-building efforts when rebels win a civil war and come into power. Post-war governance is a continuation of war--although violence has ceased, the victor must consolidate its control over the state through a process of internal conquest. This means carefully making choices about resource allocation towards development and security. Where does the victor choose to spend, and why? And what are the implications for ultimately consolidating power and preventing conflict recurrence?
The book examines wartime rebel-civilian ties under rebel governance and explains how these ties--along with rebel governing institutions--shape the rebel victors&apos; post-war various resource allocation strategies to establish control at the sub-national level. In turn, successfully balancing resources dedicated toward development and security helps the victor to consolidate power. The book relies on mixed-methods evidence from Zimbabwe and Liberia, combining interviews, focus groups, and archival data with fine-grained census, administrative, survey, and conflict datasets to provide an in-depth examination of subnational variation in wartime rebel behavior and post-war governing strategies. A comparison of Zimbabwe and Liberia alongside four additional civil wars in Burundi, Rwanda, Côte d&apos;Ivoire, and Angola further demonstrates the importance of wartime civilian tie-formation for post-war control. The argument&apos;s central insights point to war and peace as part of a long state-building process, and suggest that the international community should pay attention to sub-national political constraints that new governments face. Her findings offer implications for recent rebel victories and, more broadly, for understanding the termination, trajectories, and political legacies of such conflicts around the world.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>717</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8562d01e-0a51-11ef-b2ee-6fb1bffd9f4a</guid>
      <title>Javier Samper Vendrell, &quot;The Seduction of Youth: Print Culture and Homosexual Rights in the Weimar Republic&quot; (U Toronto Press, 2020)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The Weimar Republic is well-known for its gay rights movement and recent scholarship has demonstrated some of its contradictory elements. In his recent book entitled&nbsp;<a href="https://www.amazon.com/dp/1487525036/?tag=newbooinhis-20" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Seduction of Youth: Print Culture and Homosexual Rights in the Weimar Republic</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(University of Toronto Press, 2020), <a href="https://www.grinnell.edu/user/samperja" rel="noopener noreferrer">Javier Samper Vendrell</a>&nbsp;writes the first study to focus on the League for Human Rights and its leader, Friedrich Radszuweit. It uses his position at the center of the Weimar-era gay rights movement to tease out the diverging political strategies and contradictory tactics that distinguished the movement. By examining news articles and opinion pieces, as well as literary texts and photographs in the League’s numerous pulp magazines for homosexuals, Vendrell reconstructs forgotten aspects of the history of same-sex desire and subjectivity. While recognizing the possibilities of liberal rights for sexual freedom during the Weimar Republic, the League’s "respectability politics" failed in part because Radszuweit’s own publications contributed to the idea that homosexual men were considered a threat to youth, doing little to change the views of the many people who believed in homosexual seduction – a homophobic trope that endured well into the twentieth century.</p><p><em>Michael E. O’Sullivan is </em><a href="https://www.marist.edu/liberal-arts/faculty/michael-osullivan" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Professor of History at Marist College</em></a><em> where he teaches courses about Modern Europe. He published </em><a href="https://www.amazon.com/Disruptive-Power-Catholic-Miracles-1918-1965/dp/1487503431/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1521234797&amp;sr=8-1&amp;keywords=Disruptive+Power+Michael+O%27Sullivan" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Disruptive Power: Catholic Women, Miracles, and Politics in Modern Germany, 1918-1965</em></a><em> with University of Toronto Press in 2018. It was recently awarded the </em><a href="https://uwaterloo.ca/centre-for-german-studies/2018-book-prize-finalist-michael-e-osullivan" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Waterloo Centre for German Studies Book Prize</em></a><em> for 2018.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 6 May 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/javier-samper-vendrell-the-seduction-of-youth-print-culture-and-homosexual-rights-in-the-weimar-republic-u-toronto-press-2020-fke4JgW_</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Weimar Republic is well-known for its gay rights movement and recent scholarship has demonstrated some of its contradictory elements. In his recent book entitled&nbsp;<a href="https://www.amazon.com/dp/1487525036/?tag=newbooinhis-20" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Seduction of Youth: Print Culture and Homosexual Rights in the Weimar Republic</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(University of Toronto Press, 2020), <a href="https://www.grinnell.edu/user/samperja" rel="noopener noreferrer">Javier Samper Vendrell</a>&nbsp;writes the first study to focus on the League for Human Rights and its leader, Friedrich Radszuweit. It uses his position at the center of the Weimar-era gay rights movement to tease out the diverging political strategies and contradictory tactics that distinguished the movement. By examining news articles and opinion pieces, as well as literary texts and photographs in the League’s numerous pulp magazines for homosexuals, Vendrell reconstructs forgotten aspects of the history of same-sex desire and subjectivity. While recognizing the possibilities of liberal rights for sexual freedom during the Weimar Republic, the League’s "respectability politics" failed in part because Radszuweit’s own publications contributed to the idea that homosexual men were considered a threat to youth, doing little to change the views of the many people who believed in homosexual seduction – a homophobic trope that endured well into the twentieth century.</p><p><em>Michael E. O’Sullivan is </em><a href="https://www.marist.edu/liberal-arts/faculty/michael-osullivan" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Professor of History at Marist College</em></a><em> where he teaches courses about Modern Europe. He published </em><a href="https://www.amazon.com/Disruptive-Power-Catholic-Miracles-1918-1965/dp/1487503431/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1521234797&amp;sr=8-1&amp;keywords=Disruptive+Power+Michael+O%27Sullivan" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Disruptive Power: Catholic Women, Miracles, and Politics in Modern Germany, 1918-1965</em></a><em> with University of Toronto Press in 2018. It was recently awarded the </em><a href="https://uwaterloo.ca/centre-for-german-studies/2018-book-prize-finalist-michael-e-osullivan" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Waterloo Centre for German Studies Book Prize</em></a><em> for 2018.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="63839538" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/c8ebc454-d288-4335-a92f-d963691ab9be/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=c8ebc454-d288-4335-a92f-d963691ab9be&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Javier Samper Vendrell, &quot;The Seduction of Youth: Print Culture and Homosexual Rights in the Weimar Republic&quot; (U Toronto Press, 2020)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:06:29</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The Weimar Republic is well-known for its gay rights movement and recent scholarship has demonstrated some of its contradictory elements. In his recent book entitled The Seduction of Youth: Print Culture and Homosexual Rights in the Weimar Republic (University of Toronto Press, 2020), Javier Samper Vendrell writes the first study to focus on the League for Human Rights and its leader, Friedrich Radszuweit. It uses his position at the center of the Weimar-era gay rights movement to tease out the diverging political strategies and contradictory tactics that distinguished the movement. By examining news articles and opinion pieces, as well as literary texts and photographs in the League’s numerous pulp magazines for homosexuals, Vendrell reconstructs forgotten aspects of the history of same-sex desire and subjectivity. While recognizing the possibilities of liberal rights for sexual freedom during the Weimar Republic, the League’s &quot;respectability politics&quot; failed in part because Radszuweit’s own publications contributed to the idea that homosexual men were considered a threat to youth, doing little to change the views of the many people who believed in homosexual seduction – a homophobic trope that endured well into the twentieth century.
Michael E. O’Sullivan is Professor of History at Marist College where he teaches courses about Modern Europe. He published Disruptive Power: Catholic Women, Miracles, and Politics in Modern Germany, 1918-1965 with University of Toronto Press in 2018. It was recently awarded the Waterloo Centre for German Studies Book Prize for 2018.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Weimar Republic is well-known for its gay rights movement and recent scholarship has demonstrated some of its contradictory elements. In his recent book entitled The Seduction of Youth: Print Culture and Homosexual Rights in the Weimar Republic (University of Toronto Press, 2020), Javier Samper Vendrell writes the first study to focus on the League for Human Rights and its leader, Friedrich Radszuweit. It uses his position at the center of the Weimar-era gay rights movement to tease out the diverging political strategies and contradictory tactics that distinguished the movement. By examining news articles and opinion pieces, as well as literary texts and photographs in the League’s numerous pulp magazines for homosexuals, Vendrell reconstructs forgotten aspects of the history of same-sex desire and subjectivity. While recognizing the possibilities of liberal rights for sexual freedom during the Weimar Republic, the League’s &quot;respectability politics&quot; failed in part because Radszuweit’s own publications contributed to the idea that homosexual men were considered a threat to youth, doing little to change the views of the many people who believed in homosexual seduction – a homophobic trope that endured well into the twentieth century.
Michael E. O’Sullivan is Professor of History at Marist College where he teaches courses about Modern Europe. He published Disruptive Power: Catholic Women, Miracles, and Politics in Modern Germany, 1918-1965 with University of Toronto Press in 2018. It was recently awarded the Waterloo Centre for German Studies Book Prize for 2018.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>89</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7a9c4e3c-ffe6-11ee-8338-a3636f5c2599</guid>
      <title>J. P. Messina, &quot;Private Censorship&quot; (Oxford UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>When we think of censorship, our minds might turn to state agencies exercising power to silence dissent. However, contemporary concerns about censorship arise in contexts where non-state actors suppress expression and communication. There are subtle and not-so-subtle forms of interference that come from social groups, employers, media corporations, and even search engines. Should these “new” forms of censorship alarm us? Should we assess them in ways that mirror our typical views about state-enacted censorship? If not, how should we think about non-state modes of censorship?</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://global.oup.com/academic/product/private-censorship-9780197581902?cc=us&amp;lang=en&amp;" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Private Censorship</em></a>&nbsp;(Oxford University Press, 2024),&nbsp;<a href="https://www.cla.purdue.edu/directory/profiles/jp-messina.html" rel="noopener noreferrer">JP Messina</a>&nbsp;takes up these broad questions. He examines a range of emerging sites of non-state censorship – what he calls “private” censorship – and sorts through the normative, political, and legal issues.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 1 May 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/j-p-messina-private-censorship-oxford-up-2024-BfHey4aR</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When we think of censorship, our minds might turn to state agencies exercising power to silence dissent. However, contemporary concerns about censorship arise in contexts where non-state actors suppress expression and communication. There are subtle and not-so-subtle forms of interference that come from social groups, employers, media corporations, and even search engines. Should these “new” forms of censorship alarm us? Should we assess them in ways that mirror our typical views about state-enacted censorship? If not, how should we think about non-state modes of censorship?</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://global.oup.com/academic/product/private-censorship-9780197581902?cc=us&amp;lang=en&amp;" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Private Censorship</em></a>&nbsp;(Oxford University Press, 2024),&nbsp;<a href="https://www.cla.purdue.edu/directory/profiles/jp-messina.html" rel="noopener noreferrer">JP Messina</a>&nbsp;takes up these broad questions. He examines a range of emerging sites of non-state censorship – what he calls “private” censorship – and sorts through the normative, political, and legal issues.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="63233109" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/8c4055aa-5d68-4dfc-9ca2-f4d006a61d3d/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=8c4055aa-5d68-4dfc-9ca2-f4d006a61d3d&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>J. P. Messina, &quot;Private Censorship&quot; (Oxford UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:05:51</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>When we think of censorship, our minds might turn to state agencies exercising power to silence dissent. However, contemporary concerns about censorship arise in contexts where non-state actors suppress expression and communication. There are subtle and not-so-subtle forms of interference that come from social groups, employers, media corporations, and even search engines. Should these “new” forms of censorship alarm us? Should we assess them in ways that mirror our typical views about state-enacted censorship? If not, how should we think about non-state modes of censorship?
In Private Censorship (Oxford University Press, 2024), JP Messina takes up these broad questions. He examines a range of emerging sites of non-state censorship – what he calls “private” censorship – and sorts through the normative, political, and legal issues.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>When we think of censorship, our minds might turn to state agencies exercising power to silence dissent. However, contemporary concerns about censorship arise in contexts where non-state actors suppress expression and communication. There are subtle and not-so-subtle forms of interference that come from social groups, employers, media corporations, and even search engines. Should these “new” forms of censorship alarm us? Should we assess them in ways that mirror our typical views about state-enacted censorship? If not, how should we think about non-state modes of censorship?
In Private Censorship (Oxford University Press, 2024), JP Messina takes up these broad questions. He examines a range of emerging sites of non-state censorship – what he calls “private” censorship – and sorts through the normative, political, and legal issues.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>341</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">69db85e4-072b-11ef-a70a-53a77eac3cd5</guid>
      <title>Jennifer M. Black, &quot;Branding Trust: Advertising and Trademarks in Nineteenth-Century America&quot; (U Pennsylvania Press, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In the early nineteenth century, the American commercial marketplace was a chaotic, unregulated environment in which knock-offs and outright frauds thrived. Appearances could be deceiving, and entrepreneurs often relied on their personal reputations to close deals and make sales. Rapid industrialization and expanding trade routes opened new markets with enormous potential, but how could distant merchants convince potential customers, whom they had never met, that they could be trusted?&nbsp;</p><p>Through wide-ranging visual and textual evidence, including a robust selection of early advertisements,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781512825008" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Branding Trust: Advertising and Trademarks in Nineteenth-Century America</em></a>&nbsp;(University of Pennsylvania Press, 2023) by Dr. Jennifer M. Black tells the story of how advertising evolved to meet these challenges, tracing the themes of character and class as they intertwined with and influenced graphic design, trademark law, and ideas about ethical business practice in the United States.</p><p>As early as the 1830s, printers, advertising agents, and manufacturers collaborated to devise new ways to advertise goods. They used eye-catching designs and fonts to grab viewers’ attention and wove together meaningful images and prose to gain the public’s trust. At the same time, manufacturers took legal steps to safeguard their intellectual property, formulating new ways to protect their brands by taking legal action against counterfeits and frauds. By the end of the nineteenth century, these advertising and legal strategies came together to form the primary components of modern branding: demonstrating character, protecting goodwill, entertaining viewers to build rapport, and deploying the latest graphic innovations in print. Trademarks became the symbols that embodied these ideas—in print, in the law, and to the public.</p><p><em>Branding Trust</em>&nbsp;thus identifies and explains the visual rhetoric of trust and legitimacy that has come to reign over American capitalism. Though the 1920s has often been held up as the birth of modern advertising, Dr. Black argues that advertising professionals had in fact learned how to navigate public relations over the previous century by adapting the language, imagery, and ideas of the American middle class.</p><p><br></p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;new book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 1 May 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/jennifer-m-black-branding-trust-advertising-and-trademarks-in-nineteenth-century-america-u-pennsylvania-press-2023-L5E6EpNc</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the early nineteenth century, the American commercial marketplace was a chaotic, unregulated environment in which knock-offs and outright frauds thrived. Appearances could be deceiving, and entrepreneurs often relied on their personal reputations to close deals and make sales. Rapid industrialization and expanding trade routes opened new markets with enormous potential, but how could distant merchants convince potential customers, whom they had never met, that they could be trusted?&nbsp;</p><p>Through wide-ranging visual and textual evidence, including a robust selection of early advertisements,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781512825008" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Branding Trust: Advertising and Trademarks in Nineteenth-Century America</em></a>&nbsp;(University of Pennsylvania Press, 2023) by Dr. Jennifer M. Black tells the story of how advertising evolved to meet these challenges, tracing the themes of character and class as they intertwined with and influenced graphic design, trademark law, and ideas about ethical business practice in the United States.</p><p>As early as the 1830s, printers, advertising agents, and manufacturers collaborated to devise new ways to advertise goods. They used eye-catching designs and fonts to grab viewers’ attention and wove together meaningful images and prose to gain the public’s trust. At the same time, manufacturers took legal steps to safeguard their intellectual property, formulating new ways to protect their brands by taking legal action against counterfeits and frauds. By the end of the nineteenth century, these advertising and legal strategies came together to form the primary components of modern branding: demonstrating character, protecting goodwill, entertaining viewers to build rapport, and deploying the latest graphic innovations in print. Trademarks became the symbols that embodied these ideas—in print, in the law, and to the public.</p><p><em>Branding Trust</em>&nbsp;thus identifies and explains the visual rhetoric of trust and legitimacy that has come to reign over American capitalism. Though the 1920s has often been held up as the birth of modern advertising, Dr. Black argues that advertising professionals had in fact learned how to navigate public relations over the previous century by adapting the language, imagery, and ideas of the American middle class.</p><p><br></p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;new book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="50902156" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/ae30544d-d785-4f9b-bee4-0a67af244b57/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=ae30544d-d785-4f9b-bee4-0a67af244b57&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Jennifer M. Black, &quot;Branding Trust: Advertising and Trademarks in Nineteenth-Century America&quot; (U Pennsylvania Press, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:53:01</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In the early nineteenth century, the American commercial marketplace was a chaotic, unregulated environment in which knock-offs and outright frauds thrived. Appearances could be deceiving, and entrepreneurs often relied on their personal reputations to close deals and make sales. Rapid industrialization and expanding trade routes opened new markets with enormous potential, but how could distant merchants convince potential customers, whom they had never met, that they could be trusted? 
Through wide-ranging visual and textual evidence, including a robust selection of early advertisements, Branding Trust: Advertising and Trademarks in Nineteenth-Century America (University of Pennsylvania Press, 2023) by Dr. Jennifer M. Black tells the story of how advertising evolved to meet these challenges, tracing the themes of character and class as they intertwined with and influenced graphic design, trademark law, and ideas about ethical business practice in the United States.
As early as the 1830s, printers, advertising agents, and manufacturers collaborated to devise new ways to advertise goods. They used eye-catching designs and fonts to grab viewers’ attention and wove together meaningful images and prose to gain the public’s trust. At the same time, manufacturers took legal steps to safeguard their intellectual property, formulating new ways to protect their brands by taking legal action against counterfeits and frauds. By the end of the nineteenth century, these advertising and legal strategies came together to form the primary components of modern branding: demonstrating character, protecting goodwill, entertaining viewers to build rapport, and deploying the latest graphic innovations in print. Trademarks became the symbols that embodied these ideas—in print, in the law, and to the public.
Branding Trust thus identifies and explains the visual rhetoric of trust and legitimacy that has come to reign over American capitalism. Though the 1920s has often been held up as the birth of modern advertising, Dr. Black argues that advertising professionals had in fact learned how to navigate public relations over the previous century by adapting the language, imagery, and ideas of the American middle class.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In the early nineteenth century, the American commercial marketplace was a chaotic, unregulated environment in which knock-offs and outright frauds thrived. Appearances could be deceiving, and entrepreneurs often relied on their personal reputations to close deals and make sales. Rapid industrialization and expanding trade routes opened new markets with enormous potential, but how could distant merchants convince potential customers, whom they had never met, that they could be trusted? 
Through wide-ranging visual and textual evidence, including a robust selection of early advertisements, Branding Trust: Advertising and Trademarks in Nineteenth-Century America (University of Pennsylvania Press, 2023) by Dr. Jennifer M. Black tells the story of how advertising evolved to meet these challenges, tracing the themes of character and class as they intertwined with and influenced graphic design, trademark law, and ideas about ethical business practice in the United States.
As early as the 1830s, printers, advertising agents, and manufacturers collaborated to devise new ways to advertise goods. They used eye-catching designs and fonts to grab viewers’ attention and wove together meaningful images and prose to gain the public’s trust. At the same time, manufacturers took legal steps to safeguard their intellectual property, formulating new ways to protect their brands by taking legal action against counterfeits and frauds. By the end of the nineteenth century, these advertising and legal strategies came together to form the primary components of modern branding: demonstrating character, protecting goodwill, entertaining viewers to build rapport, and deploying the latest graphic innovations in print. Trademarks became the symbols that embodied these ideas—in print, in the law, and to the public.
Branding Trust thus identifies and explains the visual rhetoric of trust and legitimacy that has come to reign over American capitalism. Though the 1920s has often been held up as the birth of modern advertising, Dr. Black argues that advertising professionals had in fact learned how to navigate public relations over the previous century by adapting the language, imagery, and ideas of the American middle class.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>100</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">afecdd5a-04a4-11ef-aad9-071ff0b5a4aa</guid>
      <title>David Pozen, &quot;The Constitution of the War on Drugs&quot; (Oxford UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>David Pozen is the Charles Keller Beekman Professor of Law at Columbia Law School and the author of the new book,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197685457" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Constitution of the War on Drugs</em></a>&nbsp;(Oxford UP, 2024). An expert in constitutional law, Pozen argues that the drug war has been an unmitigated disaster, in terms of money, efficacy, and human rights. But even as activists peel off the drug war’s more unsavory aspects through cannabis and psychedelic legalization, Pozen also argues that they’ve neglected to consider the impact America’s courts could have on rectifying oppressive drug laws.</p><p>It wasn’t always this way.&nbsp;<em>The Constitution of the War on Drugs</em>&nbsp;also details the “hidden history” of a brief legal moment in the late 1960s and early 1970s when lawyers effectively argued for liberalized drug policies – on the sound basis of the Constitution. The moment was eventually overturned, but Pozen argues it could be a useful historical lesson for people interested in the effects of constitutional law on the drug war today.</p><p>A link to the digital edition of&nbsp;<em>The Constitution of the War on Drugs</em>&nbsp;will soon be available here.</p><p><a href="http://www.emilydufton.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Emily Dufton</em></a><em>&nbsp;is the author of</em><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780465096169" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;Grass Roots: The Rise and Fall and Rise of Marijuana in America&nbsp;</em></a><em>(Basic Books, 2017). A drug historian and writer, her second book, on the development of the opioid addiction medication industry, is coming out soon from the University of Chicago Press.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 28 Apr 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/david-pozen-the-constitution-of-the-war-on-drugs-oxford-up-2024-0ABO__pm</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David Pozen is the Charles Keller Beekman Professor of Law at Columbia Law School and the author of the new book,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197685457" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Constitution of the War on Drugs</em></a>&nbsp;(Oxford UP, 2024). An expert in constitutional law, Pozen argues that the drug war has been an unmitigated disaster, in terms of money, efficacy, and human rights. But even as activists peel off the drug war’s more unsavory aspects through cannabis and psychedelic legalization, Pozen also argues that they’ve neglected to consider the impact America’s courts could have on rectifying oppressive drug laws.</p><p>It wasn’t always this way.&nbsp;<em>The Constitution of the War on Drugs</em>&nbsp;also details the “hidden history” of a brief legal moment in the late 1960s and early 1970s when lawyers effectively argued for liberalized drug policies – on the sound basis of the Constitution. The moment was eventually overturned, but Pozen argues it could be a useful historical lesson for people interested in the effects of constitutional law on the drug war today.</p><p>A link to the digital edition of&nbsp;<em>The Constitution of the War on Drugs</em>&nbsp;will soon be available here.</p><p><a href="http://www.emilydufton.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Emily Dufton</em></a><em>&nbsp;is the author of</em><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780465096169" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;Grass Roots: The Rise and Fall and Rise of Marijuana in America&nbsp;</em></a><em>(Basic Books, 2017). A drug historian and writer, her second book, on the development of the opioid addiction medication industry, is coming out soon from the University of Chicago Press.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="52970729" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/ec364e1f-62b3-41a4-ac9b-6e34f46c70e2/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=ec364e1f-62b3-41a4-ac9b-6e34f46c70e2&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>David Pozen, &quot;The Constitution of the War on Drugs&quot; (Oxford UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:55:10</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>David Pozen is the Charles Keller Beekman Professor of Law at Columbia Law School and the author of the new book, The Constitution of the War on Drugs (Oxford UP, 2024). An expert in constitutional law, Pozen argues that the drug war has been an unmitigated disaster, in terms of money, efficacy, and human rights. But even as activists peel off the drug war’s more unsavory aspects through cannabis and psychedelic legalization, Pozen also argues that they’ve neglected to consider the impact America’s courts could have on rectifying oppressive drug laws.
It wasn’t always this way. The Constitution of the War on Drugs also details the “hidden history” of a brief legal moment in the late 1960s and early 1970s when lawyers effectively argued for liberalized drug policies – on the sound basis of the Constitution. The moment was eventually overturned, but Pozen argues it could be a useful historical lesson for people interested in the effects of constitutional law on the drug war today.
A link to the digital edition of The Constitution of the War on Drugs will soon be available here.
Emily Dufton is the author of Grass Roots: The Rise and Fall and Rise of Marijuana in America (Basic Books, 2017). A drug historian and writer, her second book, on the development of the opioid addiction medication industry, is coming out soon from the University of Chicago Press.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>David Pozen is the Charles Keller Beekman Professor of Law at Columbia Law School and the author of the new book, The Constitution of the War on Drugs (Oxford UP, 2024). An expert in constitutional law, Pozen argues that the drug war has been an unmitigated disaster, in terms of money, efficacy, and human rights. But even as activists peel off the drug war’s more unsavory aspects through cannabis and psychedelic legalization, Pozen also argues that they’ve neglected to consider the impact America’s courts could have on rectifying oppressive drug laws.
It wasn’t always this way. The Constitution of the War on Drugs also details the “hidden history” of a brief legal moment in the late 1960s and early 1970s when lawyers effectively argued for liberalized drug policies – on the sound basis of the Constitution. The moment was eventually overturned, but Pozen argues it could be a useful historical lesson for people interested in the effects of constitutional law on the drug war today.
A link to the digital edition of The Constitution of the War on Drugs will soon be available here.
Emily Dufton is the author of Grass Roots: The Rise and Fall and Rise of Marijuana in America (Basic Books, 2017). A drug historian and writer, her second book, on the development of the opioid addiction medication industry, is coming out soon from the University of Chicago Press.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>61</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">518b4efe-0409-11ef-81d9-f3df3ac60ccf</guid>
      <title>Leigh Gilmore, &quot;The #MeToo Effect: What Happens When We Believe Women&quot; (Columbia UP, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The #MeToo movement inspired millions to testify to the widespread experience of sexual violence. More broadly, it shifted the deeply ingrained response to women’s accounts of sexual violence from doubting all of them to believing some of them. What changed?</p><p>In<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780231194204" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;<em>The #MeToo Effect: What Happens When We Believe Women</em>&nbsp;</a>(Columbia UP, 2023),&nbsp;Leigh Gilmore provides a new account of #MeToo that reveals how storytelling by survivors propelled the call for sexual justice beyond courts and high-profile cases. At a time when the cultural conversation was fixated on appeals to legal and bureaucratic systems, narrative activism— storytelling in the service of social change—elevated survivors as authorities. Their testimony fused credibility and accountability into the #MeToo effect: uniting millions of separate accounts into an existential demand for sexual justice and the right to be heard.</p><p>Gilmore reframes #MeToo as a breakthrough moment within a longer history of feminist thought and activism. She analyzes the centrality of autobiographical storytelling in intersectional and antirape activism and traces how literary representations of sexual violence dating from antiquity intertwine with cultural notions of doubt, obligation, and agency. By focusing on the intersectional prehistory of #MeToo, Gilmore sheds light on how survivors have used narrative to frame sexual violence as an urgent problem requiring structural solutions in diverse global contexts. Considering the roles of literature and literary criticism in movements for social change,&nbsp;<em>The #MeToo Effect&nbsp;</em>demonstrates how “reading like a survivor” provides resources for activism.</p><p><em>﻿</em><a href="https://www.janescimeca.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Jane Scimeca</em></a><em>&nbsp;is Professor of History at Brookdale Community College. @JaneScimeca1</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 27 Apr 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/leigh-gilmore-the-metoo-effect-what-happens-when-we-believe-women-columbia-up-2023-bws9Lg_9</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The #MeToo movement inspired millions to testify to the widespread experience of sexual violence. More broadly, it shifted the deeply ingrained response to women’s accounts of sexual violence from doubting all of them to believing some of them. What changed?</p><p>In<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780231194204" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;<em>The #MeToo Effect: What Happens When We Believe Women</em>&nbsp;</a>(Columbia UP, 2023),&nbsp;Leigh Gilmore provides a new account of #MeToo that reveals how storytelling by survivors propelled the call for sexual justice beyond courts and high-profile cases. At a time when the cultural conversation was fixated on appeals to legal and bureaucratic systems, narrative activism— storytelling in the service of social change—elevated survivors as authorities. Their testimony fused credibility and accountability into the #MeToo effect: uniting millions of separate accounts into an existential demand for sexual justice and the right to be heard.</p><p>Gilmore reframes #MeToo as a breakthrough moment within a longer history of feminist thought and activism. She analyzes the centrality of autobiographical storytelling in intersectional and antirape activism and traces how literary representations of sexual violence dating from antiquity intertwine with cultural notions of doubt, obligation, and agency. By focusing on the intersectional prehistory of #MeToo, Gilmore sheds light on how survivors have used narrative to frame sexual violence as an urgent problem requiring structural solutions in diverse global contexts. Considering the roles of literature and literary criticism in movements for social change,&nbsp;<em>The #MeToo Effect&nbsp;</em>demonstrates how “reading like a survivor” provides resources for activism.</p><p><em>﻿</em><a href="https://www.janescimeca.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Jane Scimeca</em></a><em>&nbsp;is Professor of History at Brookdale Community College. @JaneScimeca1</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="46478439" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/14de0988-2d8b-4f83-bc36-a011d3901776/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=14de0988-2d8b-4f83-bc36-a011d3901776&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Leigh Gilmore, &quot;The #MeToo Effect: What Happens When We Believe Women&quot; (Columbia UP, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:48:24</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The #MeToo movement inspired millions to testify to the widespread experience of sexual violence. More broadly, it shifted the deeply ingrained response to women’s accounts of sexual violence from doubting all of them to believing some of them. What changed?
In The #MeToo Effect: What Happens When We Believe Women (Columbia UP, 2023), Leigh Gilmore provides a new account of #MeToo that reveals how storytelling by survivors propelled the call for sexual justice beyond courts and high-profile cases. At a time when the cultural conversation was fixated on appeals to legal and bureaucratic systems, narrative activism— storytelling in the service of social change—elevated survivors as authorities. Their testimony fused credibility and accountability into the #MeToo effect: uniting millions of separate accounts into an existential demand for sexual justice and the right to be heard.
Gilmore reframes #MeToo as a breakthrough moment within a longer history of feminist thought and activism. She analyzes the centrality of autobiographical storytelling in intersectional and antirape activism and traces how literary representations of sexual violence dating from antiquity intertwine with cultural notions of doubt, obligation, and agency. By focusing on the intersectional prehistory of #MeToo, Gilmore sheds light on how survivors have used narrative to frame sexual violence as an urgent problem requiring structural solutions in diverse global contexts. Considering the roles of literature and literary criticism in movements for social change, The #MeToo Effect demonstrates how “reading like a survivor” provides resources for activism.
﻿Jane Scimeca is Professor of History at Brookdale Community College. @JaneScimeca1
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The #MeToo movement inspired millions to testify to the widespread experience of sexual violence. More broadly, it shifted the deeply ingrained response to women’s accounts of sexual violence from doubting all of them to believing some of them. What changed?
In The #MeToo Effect: What Happens When We Believe Women (Columbia UP, 2023), Leigh Gilmore provides a new account of #MeToo that reveals how storytelling by survivors propelled the call for sexual justice beyond courts and high-profile cases. At a time when the cultural conversation was fixated on appeals to legal and bureaucratic systems, narrative activism— storytelling in the service of social change—elevated survivors as authorities. Their testimony fused credibility and accountability into the #MeToo effect: uniting millions of separate accounts into an existential demand for sexual justice and the right to be heard.
Gilmore reframes #MeToo as a breakthrough moment within a longer history of feminist thought and activism. She analyzes the centrality of autobiographical storytelling in intersectional and antirape activism and traces how literary representations of sexual violence dating from antiquity intertwine with cultural notions of doubt, obligation, and agency. By focusing on the intersectional prehistory of #MeToo, Gilmore sheds light on how survivors have used narrative to frame sexual violence as an urgent problem requiring structural solutions in diverse global contexts. Considering the roles of literature and literary criticism in movements for social change, The #MeToo Effect demonstrates how “reading like a survivor” provides resources for activism.
﻿Jane Scimeca is Professor of History at Brookdale Community College. @JaneScimeca1
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>88</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1f088abc-017c-11ef-a99f-0f0b9e25c543</guid>
      <title>Anu Bradford, &quot;Digital Empires: The Global Battle to Regulate Technology&quot; (Oxford UP, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The global battle among the three dominant digital powers―the United States, China, and the European Union―is intensifying. All three regimes are racing to regulate tech companies, with each advancing a competing vision for the digital economy while attempting to expand its sphere of influence in the digital world. In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197649268" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Digital Empires: The Global Battle to Regulate Technology</em></a>&nbsp;(Oxford UP, 2023), her provocative follow-up to&nbsp;<em>The Brussels Effect</em>, Anu Bradford explores a rivalry that will shape the world in the decades to come.</p><p>Across the globe, people dependent on digital technologies have become increasingly alarmed that their rapid adoption and transformation have ushered in an exceedingly concentrated economy where a few powerful companies control vast economic wealth and political power, undermine data privacy, and widen the gap between economic winners and losers. In response, world leaders are variously embracing the idea of reining in the most dominant tech companies. Bradford examines three competing regulatory approaches―the American market-driven model, the Chinese state-driven model, and the European rights-driven regulatory model―and discusses how governments and tech companies navigate the inevitable conflicts that arise when these regulatory approaches collide in the international domain. Which digital empire will prevail in the contest for global influence remains an open question, yet their contrasting strategies are increasingly clear.</p><p>Digital societies are at an inflection point. In the midst of these unfolding regulatory battles, governments, tech companies, and digital citizens are making important choices that will shape the future ethos of the digital society. Digital Empires lays bare the choices we face as societies and individuals, explains the forces that shape those choices, and illuminates the immense stakes involved for everyone who uses digital technologies.</p><p><a href="https://jakec007.github.io/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Jake Chanenson</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a computer science Ph.D. student and law student at the University of Chicago. Broadly, Jake is interested in topics relating to HCI, privacy, and tech policy. Jake’s work has been published in top venues such as ACM’s CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/anu-bradford-digital-empires-the-global-battle-to-regulate-technology-oxford-up-2023-JglGdWs4</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The global battle among the three dominant digital powers―the United States, China, and the European Union―is intensifying. All three regimes are racing to regulate tech companies, with each advancing a competing vision for the digital economy while attempting to expand its sphere of influence in the digital world. In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197649268" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Digital Empires: The Global Battle to Regulate Technology</em></a>&nbsp;(Oxford UP, 2023), her provocative follow-up to&nbsp;<em>The Brussels Effect</em>, Anu Bradford explores a rivalry that will shape the world in the decades to come.</p><p>Across the globe, people dependent on digital technologies have become increasingly alarmed that their rapid adoption and transformation have ushered in an exceedingly concentrated economy where a few powerful companies control vast economic wealth and political power, undermine data privacy, and widen the gap between economic winners and losers. In response, world leaders are variously embracing the idea of reining in the most dominant tech companies. Bradford examines three competing regulatory approaches―the American market-driven model, the Chinese state-driven model, and the European rights-driven regulatory model―and discusses how governments and tech companies navigate the inevitable conflicts that arise when these regulatory approaches collide in the international domain. Which digital empire will prevail in the contest for global influence remains an open question, yet their contrasting strategies are increasingly clear.</p><p>Digital societies are at an inflection point. In the midst of these unfolding regulatory battles, governments, tech companies, and digital citizens are making important choices that will shape the future ethos of the digital society. Digital Empires lays bare the choices we face as societies and individuals, explains the forces that shape those choices, and illuminates the immense stakes involved for everyone who uses digital technologies.</p><p><a href="https://jakec007.github.io/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Jake Chanenson</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a computer science Ph.D. student and law student at the University of Chicago. Broadly, Jake is interested in topics relating to HCI, privacy, and tech policy. Jake’s work has been published in top venues such as ACM’s CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="18741058" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/f9964dbf-99c9-4265-891c-e06519fad131/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=f9964dbf-99c9-4265-891c-e06519fad131&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Anu Bradford, &quot;Digital Empires: The Global Battle to Regulate Technology&quot; (Oxford UP, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:19:31</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The global battle among the three dominant digital powers―the United States, China, and the European Union―is intensifying. All three regimes are racing to regulate tech companies, with each advancing a competing vision for the digital economy while attempting to expand its sphere of influence in the digital world. In Digital Empires: The Global Battle to Regulate Technology (Oxford UP, 2023), her provocative follow-up to The Brussels Effect, Anu Bradford explores a rivalry that will shape the world in the decades to come.
Across the globe, people dependent on digital technologies have become increasingly alarmed that their rapid adoption and transformation have ushered in an exceedingly concentrated economy where a few powerful companies control vast economic wealth and political power, undermine data privacy, and widen the gap between economic winners and losers. In response, world leaders are variously embracing the idea of reining in the most dominant tech companies. Bradford examines three competing regulatory approaches―the American market-driven model, the Chinese state-driven model, and the European rights-driven regulatory model―and discusses how governments and tech companies navigate the inevitable conflicts that arise when these regulatory approaches collide in the international domain. Which digital empire will prevail in the contest for global influence remains an open question, yet their contrasting strategies are increasingly clear.
Digital societies are at an inflection point. In the midst of these unfolding regulatory battles, governments, tech companies, and digital citizens are making important choices that will shape the future ethos of the digital society. Digital Empires lays bare the choices we face as societies and individuals, explains the forces that shape those choices, and illuminates the immense stakes involved for everyone who uses digital technologies.
Jake Chanenson is a computer science Ph.D. student and law student at the University of Chicago. Broadly, Jake is interested in topics relating to HCI, privacy, and tech policy. Jake’s work has been published in top venues such as ACM’s CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The global battle among the three dominant digital powers―the United States, China, and the European Union―is intensifying. All three regimes are racing to regulate tech companies, with each advancing a competing vision for the digital economy while attempting to expand its sphere of influence in the digital world. In Digital Empires: The Global Battle to Regulate Technology (Oxford UP, 2023), her provocative follow-up to The Brussels Effect, Anu Bradford explores a rivalry that will shape the world in the decades to come.
Across the globe, people dependent on digital technologies have become increasingly alarmed that their rapid adoption and transformation have ushered in an exceedingly concentrated economy where a few powerful companies control vast economic wealth and political power, undermine data privacy, and widen the gap between economic winners and losers. In response, world leaders are variously embracing the idea of reining in the most dominant tech companies. Bradford examines three competing regulatory approaches―the American market-driven model, the Chinese state-driven model, and the European rights-driven regulatory model―and discusses how governments and tech companies navigate the inevitable conflicts that arise when these regulatory approaches collide in the international domain. Which digital empire will prevail in the contest for global influence remains an open question, yet their contrasting strategies are increasingly clear.
Digital societies are at an inflection point. In the midst of these unfolding regulatory battles, governments, tech companies, and digital citizens are making important choices that will shape the future ethos of the digital society. Digital Empires lays bare the choices we face as societies and individuals, explains the forces that shape those choices, and illuminates the immense stakes involved for everyone who uses digital technologies.
Jake Chanenson is a computer science Ph.D. student and law student at the University of Chicago. Broadly, Jake is interested in topics relating to HCI, privacy, and tech policy. Jake’s work has been published in top venues such as ACM’s CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>364</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8b990776-f77f-11ee-a081-c34fc5290f4a</guid>
      <title>Egor Lazarev, &quot;State-Building as Lawfare: Custom, Sharia, and State Law in Postwar Chechnya&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009245944" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>State-Building as Lawfare: Custom, Sharia, and State Law in Postwar Chechnya</em></a>&nbsp;(Cambridge University Press, 2023) by Dr. Egor Lazarev explores the use of state and non-state legal systems by both politicians and ordinary people in postwar Chechnya. The book addresses two interrelated puzzles: why do local rulers tolerate and even promote non-state legal systems at the expense of state law, and why do some members of repressed ethnic minorities choose to resolve their everyday disputes using state legal systems instead of non-state alternatives?</p><p>The book documents how the rulers of Chechnya promote and reinvent customary law and Sharia in order to borrow legitimacy from tradition and religion, increase autonomy from the metropole, and accommodate communal authorities and former rebels. At the same time, the book shows how prolonged armed conflict disrupted the traditional social hierarchies and pushed some Chechen women to use state law, spurring state formation from below.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;forthcoming book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 13 Apr 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/egor-lazarev-state-building-as-lawfare-custom-sharia-and-state-law-in-postwar-chechnya-cambridge-up-2023-MUL2Aj1s</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009245944" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>State-Building as Lawfare: Custom, Sharia, and State Law in Postwar Chechnya</em></a>&nbsp;(Cambridge University Press, 2023) by Dr. Egor Lazarev explores the use of state and non-state legal systems by both politicians and ordinary people in postwar Chechnya. The book addresses two interrelated puzzles: why do local rulers tolerate and even promote non-state legal systems at the expense of state law, and why do some members of repressed ethnic minorities choose to resolve their everyday disputes using state legal systems instead of non-state alternatives?</p><p>The book documents how the rulers of Chechnya promote and reinvent customary law and Sharia in order to borrow legitimacy from tradition and religion, increase autonomy from the metropole, and accommodate communal authorities and former rebels. At the same time, the book shows how prolonged armed conflict disrupted the traditional social hierarchies and pushed some Chechen women to use state law, spurring state formation from below.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;forthcoming book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="48961113" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/dcadc5f9-14a8-4eb3-ad0e-e425f460983e/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=dcadc5f9-14a8-4eb3-ad0e-e425f460983e&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Egor Lazarev, &quot;State-Building as Lawfare: Custom, Sharia, and State Law in Postwar Chechnya&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:50:59</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>State-Building as Lawfare: Custom, Sharia, and State Law in Postwar Chechnya (Cambridge University Press, 2023) by Dr. Egor Lazarev explores the use of state and non-state legal systems by both politicians and ordinary people in postwar Chechnya. The book addresses two interrelated puzzles: why do local rulers tolerate and even promote non-state legal systems at the expense of state law, and why do some members of repressed ethnic minorities choose to resolve their everyday disputes using state legal systems instead of non-state alternatives?
The book documents how the rulers of Chechnya promote and reinvent customary law and Sharia in order to borrow legitimacy from tradition and religion, increase autonomy from the metropole, and accommodate communal authorities and former rebels. At the same time, the book shows how prolonged armed conflict disrupted the traditional social hierarchies and pushed some Chechen women to use state law, spurring state formation from below.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose forthcoming book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>State-Building as Lawfare: Custom, Sharia, and State Law in Postwar Chechnya (Cambridge University Press, 2023) by Dr. Egor Lazarev explores the use of state and non-state legal systems by both politicians and ordinary people in postwar Chechnya. The book addresses two interrelated puzzles: why do local rulers tolerate and even promote non-state legal systems at the expense of state law, and why do some members of repressed ethnic minorities choose to resolve their everyday disputes using state legal systems instead of non-state alternatives?
The book documents how the rulers of Chechnya promote and reinvent customary law and Sharia in order to borrow legitimacy from tradition and religion, increase autonomy from the metropole, and accommodate communal authorities and former rebels. At the same time, the book shows how prolonged armed conflict disrupted the traditional social hierarchies and pushed some Chechen women to use state law, spurring state formation from below.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose forthcoming book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>266</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">b5318cc0-f36f-11ee-b251-53b86eb48e1f</guid>
      <title>Rabiat Akande, &quot;Entangled Domains: Empire, Law and Religion in Northern Nigeria&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Set in Colonial Northern Nigeria, this book confronts a paradox: the state insisted on its separation from religion even as it governed its multireligious population through what remained of the precolonial caliphate.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781316511558" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Entangled Domains: Empire, Law and Religion in Northern Nigeria</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Cambridge UP, 2023) grapples with this history to offer a provocative account of secularism as a contested yet contingent mode of governing religion and religious difference. Drawing on detailed archival research, Rabiat Akande vividly illustrates constitutional struggles triggered by the colonial state's governance of religion and interrogates the legacy of that governance agenda in the postcolonial state. This book is a novel commentary on the dynamic interplay between law, faith, identity, and power in the context of the modern state's emergence from colonial processes.</p><p>Dr. Akande is currently an Assistant Professor in the Osgoode Hall Law School at York University in Canada and chairs the international legal history project at the African Institute of International Law in Arusha. Previously, she was a postdoctoral fellow at the Harvard Academy for International and Area Studies as an Academy Scholar from 2019-2021. She received her Doctor of Juridical Science (SJD) degree from Harvard Law School in 2019 with her dissertation, “Navigating Entanglements: Contestations over Religion-State Relations in British Northern Nigeria, c. 1890-1978” receiving the Law and Society in the Muslim World Prize. At Harvard University, Dr. Akande held the Clark Byse fellowship at the Law School and was a Dissertation Fellow and Graduate Student Associate at the Weatherhead Center for International Affairs. She also served on the editorial board of the Harvard International Law Journal. Prior to her graduate work, Dr. Akande obtained her Bachelor of Laws from the University of Ibadan, graduating with First Class Honors and at the top of her class. She later studied at the Nigerian Law School, from which she also graduated with First Class Honors.</p><p><em>Dr. Katz is currently a postdoc in Grants Operations Management and Creative Engagement at UNC Chapel Hill. She was previously a postdoc in the History Department at Duke University, and a Visiting Assisting Professor at Loyola University New Orleans. She received her PhD in African History from the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 6 Apr 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/rabiat-akande-entangled-domains-empire-law-and-religion-in-northern-nigeria-cambridge-up-2023-Gm548KAd</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Set in Colonial Northern Nigeria, this book confronts a paradox: the state insisted on its separation from religion even as it governed its multireligious population through what remained of the precolonial caliphate.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781316511558" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Entangled Domains: Empire, Law and Religion in Northern Nigeria</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Cambridge UP, 2023) grapples with this history to offer a provocative account of secularism as a contested yet contingent mode of governing religion and religious difference. Drawing on detailed archival research, Rabiat Akande vividly illustrates constitutional struggles triggered by the colonial state's governance of religion and interrogates the legacy of that governance agenda in the postcolonial state. This book is a novel commentary on the dynamic interplay between law, faith, identity, and power in the context of the modern state's emergence from colonial processes.</p><p>Dr. Akande is currently an Assistant Professor in the Osgoode Hall Law School at York University in Canada and chairs the international legal history project at the African Institute of International Law in Arusha. Previously, she was a postdoctoral fellow at the Harvard Academy for International and Area Studies as an Academy Scholar from 2019-2021. She received her Doctor of Juridical Science (SJD) degree from Harvard Law School in 2019 with her dissertation, “Navigating Entanglements: Contestations over Religion-State Relations in British Northern Nigeria, c. 1890-1978” receiving the Law and Society in the Muslim World Prize. At Harvard University, Dr. Akande held the Clark Byse fellowship at the Law School and was a Dissertation Fellow and Graduate Student Associate at the Weatherhead Center for International Affairs. She also served on the editorial board of the Harvard International Law Journal. Prior to her graduate work, Dr. Akande obtained her Bachelor of Laws from the University of Ibadan, graduating with First Class Honors and at the top of her class. She later studied at the Nigerian Law School, from which she also graduated with First Class Honors.</p><p><em>Dr. Katz is currently a postdoc in Grants Operations Management and Creative Engagement at UNC Chapel Hill. She was previously a postdoc in the History Department at Duke University, and a Visiting Assisting Professor at Loyola University New Orleans. She received her PhD in African History from the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="87425642" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/f52b58e1-37b1-43da-9da6-138478da6b8d/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=f52b58e1-37b1-43da-9da6-138478da6b8d&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Rabiat Akande, &quot;Entangled Domains: Empire, Law and Religion in Northern Nigeria&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:31:03</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Set in Colonial Northern Nigeria, this book confronts a paradox: the state insisted on its separation from religion even as it governed its multireligious population through what remained of the precolonial caliphate. Entangled Domains: Empire, Law and Religion in Northern Nigeria (Cambridge UP, 2023) grapples with this history to offer a provocative account of secularism as a contested yet contingent mode of governing religion and religious difference. Drawing on detailed archival research, Rabiat Akande vividly illustrates constitutional struggles triggered by the colonial state&apos;s governance of religion and interrogates the legacy of that governance agenda in the postcolonial state. This book is a novel commentary on the dynamic interplay between law, faith, identity, and power in the context of the modern state&apos;s emergence from colonial processes.
Dr. Akande is currently an Assistant Professor in the Osgoode Hall Law School at York University in Canada and chairs the international legal history project at the African Institute of International Law in Arusha. Previously, she was a postdoctoral fellow at the Harvard Academy for International and Area Studies as an Academy Scholar from 2019-2021. She received her Doctor of Juridical Science (SJD) degree from Harvard Law School in 2019 with her dissertation, “Navigating Entanglements: Contestations over Religion-State Relations in British Northern Nigeria, c. 1890-1978” receiving the Law and Society in the Muslim World Prize. At Harvard University, Dr. Akande held the Clark Byse fellowship at the Law School and was a Dissertation Fellow and Graduate Student Associate at the Weatherhead Center for International Affairs. She also served on the editorial board of the Harvard International Law Journal. Prior to her graduate work, Dr. Akande obtained her Bachelor of Laws from the University of Ibadan, graduating with First Class Honors and at the top of her class. She later studied at the Nigerian Law School, from which she also graduated with First Class Honors.
Dr. Katz is currently a postdoc in Grants Operations Management and Creative Engagement at UNC Chapel Hill. She was previously a postdoc in the History Department at Duke University, and a Visiting Assisting Professor at Loyola University New Orleans. She received her PhD in African History from the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Set in Colonial Northern Nigeria, this book confronts a paradox: the state insisted on its separation from religion even as it governed its multireligious population through what remained of the precolonial caliphate. Entangled Domains: Empire, Law and Religion in Northern Nigeria (Cambridge UP, 2023) grapples with this history to offer a provocative account of secularism as a contested yet contingent mode of governing religion and religious difference. Drawing on detailed archival research, Rabiat Akande vividly illustrates constitutional struggles triggered by the colonial state&apos;s governance of religion and interrogates the legacy of that governance agenda in the postcolonial state. This book is a novel commentary on the dynamic interplay between law, faith, identity, and power in the context of the modern state&apos;s emergence from colonial processes.
Dr. Akande is currently an Assistant Professor in the Osgoode Hall Law School at York University in Canada and chairs the international legal history project at the African Institute of International Law in Arusha. Previously, she was a postdoctoral fellow at the Harvard Academy for International and Area Studies as an Academy Scholar from 2019-2021. She received her Doctor of Juridical Science (SJD) degree from Harvard Law School in 2019 with her dissertation, “Navigating Entanglements: Contestations over Religion-State Relations in British Northern Nigeria, c. 1890-1978” receiving the Law and Society in the Muslim World Prize. At Harvard University, Dr. Akande held the Clark Byse fellowship at the Law School and was a Dissertation Fellow and Graduate Student Associate at the Weatherhead Center for International Affairs. She also served on the editorial board of the Harvard International Law Journal. Prior to her graduate work, Dr. Akande obtained her Bachelor of Laws from the University of Ibadan, graduating with First Class Honors and at the top of her class. She later studied at the Nigerian Law School, from which she also graduated with First Class Honors.
Dr. Katz is currently a postdoc in Grants Operations Management and Creative Engagement at UNC Chapel Hill. She was previously a postdoc in the History Department at Duke University, and a Visiting Assisting Professor at Loyola University New Orleans. She received her PhD in African History from the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>186</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">79964bb6-f382-11ee-a621-13124004227e</guid>
      <title>Michael LeFebvre, &quot;Collections, Codes, and Torah: The Re-characterization of Israel&apos;s Written Law&quot; (Bloomsbury, 2019)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Scholars of biblical law widely hold that ancient Israel did not draft law-texts for legislative purposes. Little attention has yet been given to explaining how and when later Judaism did come to regard Torah as legislative. As a result, the current consensus (that Ezra introduced legislative uses of Torah) is based on assumptions which have been never tested.</p><p>Join us as we speak with Michael LeFebvre about his book,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780567692672" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Collections, Codes, and Torah: The Re-characterization of Israel's Written Law</em></a>&nbsp;(Bloomsbury, 2019) a study that challenges the current consensus, and presents an alternative hypothesis.</p><p>Michael LeFebvre earned his PhD at the University of Aberdeen. He’s a presbyterian minister living in Indianapolis, Indiana, and a fellow with the Center for Pastor Theologians.</p><p><em>L. Michael Morales is Professor of Biblical Studies at Greenville Presbyterian Theological Seminary, and the author of The Tabernacle Pre-Figured: Cosmic Mountain Ideology in Genesis and Exodus&nbsp;(Peeters, 2012), Who Shall Ascend the Mountain of the Lord?: A Biblical Theology of Leviticus&nbsp;(IVP Academic, 2015), and Exodus Old and New: A Biblical Theology of Redemption (IVP Academic, 2020). He can be reached at mmorales@gpts.edu</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 6 Apr 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/michael-lefebvre-collections-codes-and-torah-the-re-characterization-of-israels-written-law-bloomsbury-2019-1gZCPwa7</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scholars of biblical law widely hold that ancient Israel did not draft law-texts for legislative purposes. Little attention has yet been given to explaining how and when later Judaism did come to regard Torah as legislative. As a result, the current consensus (that Ezra introduced legislative uses of Torah) is based on assumptions which have been never tested.</p><p>Join us as we speak with Michael LeFebvre about his book,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780567692672" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Collections, Codes, and Torah: The Re-characterization of Israel's Written Law</em></a>&nbsp;(Bloomsbury, 2019) a study that challenges the current consensus, and presents an alternative hypothesis.</p><p>Michael LeFebvre earned his PhD at the University of Aberdeen. He’s a presbyterian minister living in Indianapolis, Indiana, and a fellow with the Center for Pastor Theologians.</p><p><em>L. Michael Morales is Professor of Biblical Studies at Greenville Presbyterian Theological Seminary, and the author of The Tabernacle Pre-Figured: Cosmic Mountain Ideology in Genesis and Exodus&nbsp;(Peeters, 2012), Who Shall Ascend the Mountain of the Lord?: A Biblical Theology of Leviticus&nbsp;(IVP Academic, 2015), and Exodus Old and New: A Biblical Theology of Redemption (IVP Academic, 2020). He can be reached at mmorales@gpts.edu</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="15010139" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/cab060d4-cf39-4848-876b-bf1d9e79c921/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=cab060d4-cf39-4848-876b-bf1d9e79c921&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Michael LeFebvre, &quot;Collections, Codes, and Torah: The Re-characterization of Israel&apos;s Written Law&quot; (Bloomsbury, 2019)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:15:38</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Scholars of biblical law widely hold that ancient Israel did not draft law-texts for legislative purposes. Little attention has yet been given to explaining how and when later Judaism did come to regard Torah as legislative. As a result, the current consensus (that Ezra introduced legislative uses of Torah) is based on assumptions which have been never tested.
Join us as we speak with Michael LeFebvre about his book, Collections, Codes, and Torah: The Re-characterization of Israel&apos;s Written Law (Bloomsbury, 2019) a study that challenges the current consensus, and presents an alternative hypothesis.
Michael LeFebvre earned his PhD at the University of Aberdeen. He’s a presbyterian minister living in Indianapolis, Indiana, and a fellow with the Center for Pastor Theologians.
L. Michael Morales is Professor of Biblical Studies at Greenville Presbyterian Theological Seminary, and the author of The Tabernacle Pre-Figured: Cosmic Mountain Ideology in Genesis and Exodus (Peeters, 2012), Who Shall Ascend the Mountain of the Lord?: A Biblical Theology of Leviticus (IVP Academic, 2015), and Exodus Old and New: A Biblical Theology of Redemption (IVP Academic, 2020). He can be reached at mmorales@gpts.edu
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Scholars of biblical law widely hold that ancient Israel did not draft law-texts for legislative purposes. Little attention has yet been given to explaining how and when later Judaism did come to regard Torah as legislative. As a result, the current consensus (that Ezra introduced legislative uses of Torah) is based on assumptions which have been never tested.
Join us as we speak with Michael LeFebvre about his book, Collections, Codes, and Torah: The Re-characterization of Israel&apos;s Written Law (Bloomsbury, 2019) a study that challenges the current consensus, and presents an alternative hypothesis.
Michael LeFebvre earned his PhD at the University of Aberdeen. He’s a presbyterian minister living in Indianapolis, Indiana, and a fellow with the Center for Pastor Theologians.
L. Michael Morales is Professor of Biblical Studies at Greenville Presbyterian Theological Seminary, and the author of The Tabernacle Pre-Figured: Cosmic Mountain Ideology in Genesis and Exodus (Peeters, 2012), Who Shall Ascend the Mountain of the Lord?: A Biblical Theology of Leviticus (IVP Academic, 2015), and Exodus Old and New: A Biblical Theology of Redemption (IVP Academic, 2020). He can be reached at mmorales@gpts.edu
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>149</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">d1479ccc-edd6-11ee-aaad-bb7f025bbe2d</guid>
      <title>W. B. Allen, &quot;Montesquieu&apos;s &apos;The Spirit of the Laws&apos;: A Critical Edition&quot; (Anthem Press, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><em>The Spirit of the Laws</em>&nbsp;not only systematizes the foundational ideas of “separation of powers” and “balances and checks,” it provides the decisive response to the question of whether power in the nation-state can be limited in the aftermath of the Westphalian settlement of 1648. It describes a civilizational change through which power becomes domesticated, with built-in resistance to attempts to absolutize (or make total) political power. As such, it is the Bible of modern politics, now made more accessible to English readers than it ever has been.</p><p>There have been in English only two prior translations of this work that first appeared in 1748. The deficiencies of those two efforts have been broadly identified in the scholarship. Although the text is still used with regularity in university instruction (having been recovered after a lull in the 1950s and 60s), it deserves – and now receives – a presentation that enhances its usefulness in the analysis both of politics and the philosophical foundations of human life.</p><p>Montesquieu’s singularity – the first secular argument against race-based slavery and only the second secular argument against the servitude of women – provides a special heritage for the modern word to preserve and a key to making operational those fundamental insights within the context of sustained political and cultural development. The replacement of blood and tribe with the universal attributes of humanity (while recognizing the highly variable ecologies of communities) constitutes the single-most important moral and political development of the modern world. And&nbsp;<em>The Spirit of the Laws</em>&nbsp;bears a primary responsibility for that accomplishment.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781839982941" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Montesquieu's 'The Spirit of the Laws':&nbsp;A Critical Edition</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Anthem Press, 2024)<em>&nbsp;</em>is a worthy translation.</p><p>W. B. Allen studies and writes broadly in political philosophy and history, with special focus on traditions of self-government and liberalism.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 31 Mar 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/w-b-allen-montesquieus-the-spirit-of-the-laws-a-critical-edition-anthem-press-2023-wSrkMYVp</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>The Spirit of the Laws</em>&nbsp;not only systematizes the foundational ideas of “separation of powers” and “balances and checks,” it provides the decisive response to the question of whether power in the nation-state can be limited in the aftermath of the Westphalian settlement of 1648. It describes a civilizational change through which power becomes domesticated, with built-in resistance to attempts to absolutize (or make total) political power. As such, it is the Bible of modern politics, now made more accessible to English readers than it ever has been.</p><p>There have been in English only two prior translations of this work that first appeared in 1748. The deficiencies of those two efforts have been broadly identified in the scholarship. Although the text is still used with regularity in university instruction (having been recovered after a lull in the 1950s and 60s), it deserves – and now receives – a presentation that enhances its usefulness in the analysis both of politics and the philosophical foundations of human life.</p><p>Montesquieu’s singularity – the first secular argument against race-based slavery and only the second secular argument against the servitude of women – provides a special heritage for the modern word to preserve and a key to making operational those fundamental insights within the context of sustained political and cultural development. The replacement of blood and tribe with the universal attributes of humanity (while recognizing the highly variable ecologies of communities) constitutes the single-most important moral and political development of the modern world. And&nbsp;<em>The Spirit of the Laws</em>&nbsp;bears a primary responsibility for that accomplishment.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781839982941" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Montesquieu's 'The Spirit of the Laws':&nbsp;A Critical Edition</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Anthem Press, 2024)<em>&nbsp;</em>is a worthy translation.</p><p>W. B. Allen studies and writes broadly in political philosophy and history, with special focus on traditions of self-government and liberalism.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="49866170" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/1271c338-b0ab-4306-986f-0529924542ef/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=1271c338-b0ab-4306-986f-0529924542ef&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>W. B. Allen, &quot;Montesquieu&apos;s &apos;The Spirit of the Laws&apos;: A Critical Edition&quot; (Anthem Press, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:51:56</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The Spirit of the Laws not only systematizes the foundational ideas of “separation of powers” and “balances and checks,” it provides the decisive response to the question of whether power in the nation-state can be limited in the aftermath of the Westphalian settlement of 1648. It describes a civilizational change through which power becomes domesticated, with built-in resistance to attempts to absolutize (or make total) political power. As such, it is the Bible of modern politics, now made more accessible to English readers than it ever has been.
There have been in English only two prior translations of this work that first appeared in 1748. The deficiencies of those two efforts have been broadly identified in the scholarship. Although the text is still used with regularity in university instruction (having been recovered after a lull in the 1950s and 60s), it deserves – and now receives – a presentation that enhances its usefulness in the analysis both of politics and the philosophical foundations of human life.
Montesquieu’s singularity – the first secular argument against race-based slavery and only the second secular argument against the servitude of women – provides a special heritage for the modern word to preserve and a key to making operational those fundamental insights within the context of sustained political and cultural development. The replacement of blood and tribe with the universal attributes of humanity (while recognizing the highly variable ecologies of communities) constitutes the single-most important moral and political development of the modern world. And The Spirit of the Laws bears a primary responsibility for that accomplishment. Montesquieu&apos;s &apos;The Spirit of the Laws&apos;: A Critical Edition (Anthem Press, 2024) is a worthy translation.
W. B. Allen studies and writes broadly in political philosophy and history, with special focus on traditions of self-government and liberalism.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Spirit of the Laws not only systematizes the foundational ideas of “separation of powers” and “balances and checks,” it provides the decisive response to the question of whether power in the nation-state can be limited in the aftermath of the Westphalian settlement of 1648. It describes a civilizational change through which power becomes domesticated, with built-in resistance to attempts to absolutize (or make total) political power. As such, it is the Bible of modern politics, now made more accessible to English readers than it ever has been.
There have been in English only two prior translations of this work that first appeared in 1748. The deficiencies of those two efforts have been broadly identified in the scholarship. Although the text is still used with regularity in university instruction (having been recovered after a lull in the 1950s and 60s), it deserves – and now receives – a presentation that enhances its usefulness in the analysis both of politics and the philosophical foundations of human life.
Montesquieu’s singularity – the first secular argument against race-based slavery and only the second secular argument against the servitude of women – provides a special heritage for the modern word to preserve and a key to making operational those fundamental insights within the context of sustained political and cultural development. The replacement of blood and tribe with the universal attributes of humanity (while recognizing the highly variable ecologies of communities) constitutes the single-most important moral and political development of the modern world. And The Spirit of the Laws bears a primary responsibility for that accomplishment. Montesquieu&apos;s &apos;The Spirit of the Laws&apos;: A Critical Edition (Anthem Press, 2024) is a worthy translation.
W. B. Allen studies and writes broadly in political philosophy and history, with special focus on traditions of self-government and liberalism.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>217</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">a109a2b2-edf4-11ee-92f2-37b8ad7484c4</guid>
      <title>Yuliya Zabyelina, &quot;Between Immunity and Impunity: External Accountability of Political Elites for Transnational Crime&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>How do top-level public officials take advantage of immunity from foreign jurisdiction afforded to them by international law? How does the immunity entitlement allow them to thwart investigations and trial proceedings in foreign courts? What responses exist to prevent and punish such conduct?</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781316514580" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Between Immunity and Impunity: External Accountability of Political Elites for Transnational Crime</em></a>&nbsp;(Cambridge University Press, 2023), Dr. Yuliya Zabyelina unravels the intricate layers of impunity of political elites complicit in transnational crimes. By examining cases of trafficking in persons and drugs, corruption, and money laundering that implicate heads of state and of government, ministers, diplomats, and international civil servants, she shows that, despite the potential of international law immunity to impede or delay justice, there are prominent instruments of external accountability. Accessible and compelling, this book provides novel insights for readers interested in the close-knit bond between power, illicit wealth, and impunity.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;forthcoming book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 31 Mar 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/yuliya-zabyelina-between-immunity-and-impunity-external-accountability-of-political-elites-for-transnational-crime-cambridge-up-2023-XTmo6cg7</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do top-level public officials take advantage of immunity from foreign jurisdiction afforded to them by international law? How does the immunity entitlement allow them to thwart investigations and trial proceedings in foreign courts? What responses exist to prevent and punish such conduct?</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781316514580" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Between Immunity and Impunity: External Accountability of Political Elites for Transnational Crime</em></a>&nbsp;(Cambridge University Press, 2023), Dr. Yuliya Zabyelina unravels the intricate layers of impunity of political elites complicit in transnational crimes. By examining cases of trafficking in persons and drugs, corruption, and money laundering that implicate heads of state and of government, ministers, diplomats, and international civil servants, she shows that, despite the potential of international law immunity to impede or delay justice, there are prominent instruments of external accountability. Accessible and compelling, this book provides novel insights for readers interested in the close-knit bond between power, illicit wealth, and impunity.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;forthcoming book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="50305342" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/3c4b7bb1-8d17-4ce9-a18e-273cd898eb01/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=3c4b7bb1-8d17-4ce9-a18e-273cd898eb01&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Yuliya Zabyelina, &quot;Between Immunity and Impunity: External Accountability of Political Elites for Transnational Crime&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:52:23</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>How do top-level public officials take advantage of immunity from foreign jurisdiction afforded to them by international law? How does the immunity entitlement allow them to thwart investigations and trial proceedings in foreign courts? What responses exist to prevent and punish such conduct?
In Between Immunity and Impunity: External Accountability of Political Elites for Transnational Crime (Cambridge University Press, 2023), Dr. Yuliya Zabyelina unravels the intricate layers of impunity of political elites complicit in transnational crimes. By examining cases of trafficking in persons and drugs, corruption, and money laundering that implicate heads of state and of government, ministers, diplomats, and international civil servants, she shows that, despite the potential of international law immunity to impede or delay justice, there are prominent instruments of external accountability. Accessible and compelling, this book provides novel insights for readers interested in the close-knit bond between power, illicit wealth, and impunity.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose forthcoming book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>How do top-level public officials take advantage of immunity from foreign jurisdiction afforded to them by international law? How does the immunity entitlement allow them to thwart investigations and trial proceedings in foreign courts? What responses exist to prevent and punish such conduct?
In Between Immunity and Impunity: External Accountability of Political Elites for Transnational Crime (Cambridge University Press, 2023), Dr. Yuliya Zabyelina unravels the intricate layers of impunity of political elites complicit in transnational crimes. By examining cases of trafficking in persons and drugs, corruption, and money laundering that implicate heads of state and of government, ministers, diplomats, and international civil servants, she shows that, despite the potential of international law immunity to impede or delay justice, there are prominent instruments of external accountability. Accessible and compelling, this book provides novel insights for readers interested in the close-knit bond between power, illicit wealth, and impunity.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose forthcoming book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>217</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4dbb5846-ebb3-11ee-9761-4bb5f29c0cba</guid>
      <title>Ignacio Cofone, &quot;The Privacy Fallacy: Harm and Power in the Information Economy&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Our privacy is besieged by tech companies.</p><p>Companies can do this because our laws are built on outdated ideas that trap lawmakers, regulators, and courts into wrong assumptions about privacy, resulting in ineffective legal remedies to one of the most pressing concerns of our generation.</p><p>Drawing on behavioral science, sociology, and economics, Ignacio Cofone challenges existing laws and reform proposals and dispels enduring misconceptions about data-driven interactions. This exploration offers readers a holistic view of why current laws and regulations fail to protect us against corporate digital harms, particularly those created by AI. Cofone then proposes a better response: meaningful accountability for the consequences of corporate data practices, which ultimately entails creating a new type of liability that recognizes the value of privacy.</p><p><a href="https://jakec007.github.io/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Jake Chanenson</a>&nbsp;is a computer science Ph.D. student and law student at the University of Chicago. Broadly, Jake is interested in topics relating to HCI, privacy, and tech policy. Jake’s work has been published in top venues such as ACM’s CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/ignacio-cofone-the-privacy-fallacy-harm-and-power-in-the-information-economy-cambridge-up-2023-zDVTVsy0</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our privacy is besieged by tech companies.</p><p>Companies can do this because our laws are built on outdated ideas that trap lawmakers, regulators, and courts into wrong assumptions about privacy, resulting in ineffective legal remedies to one of the most pressing concerns of our generation.</p><p>Drawing on behavioral science, sociology, and economics, Ignacio Cofone challenges existing laws and reform proposals and dispels enduring misconceptions about data-driven interactions. This exploration offers readers a holistic view of why current laws and regulations fail to protect us against corporate digital harms, particularly those created by AI. Cofone then proposes a better response: meaningful accountability for the consequences of corporate data practices, which ultimately entails creating a new type of liability that recognizes the value of privacy.</p><p><a href="https://jakec007.github.io/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Jake Chanenson</a>&nbsp;is a computer science Ph.D. student and law student at the University of Chicago. Broadly, Jake is interested in topics relating to HCI, privacy, and tech policy. Jake’s work has been published in top venues such as ACM’s CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="26845805" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/f4249a8c-56b1-4d54-8fd4-501494615fde/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=f4249a8c-56b1-4d54-8fd4-501494615fde&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Ignacio Cofone, &quot;The Privacy Fallacy: Harm and Power in the Information Economy&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:27:57</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Our privacy is besieged by tech companies.
Companies can do this because our laws are built on outdated ideas that trap lawmakers, regulators, and courts into wrong assumptions about privacy, resulting in ineffective legal remedies to one of the most pressing concerns of our generation.
Drawing on behavioral science, sociology, and economics, Ignacio Cofone challenges existing laws and reform proposals and dispels enduring misconceptions about data-driven interactions. This exploration offers readers a holistic view of why current laws and regulations fail to protect us against corporate digital harms, particularly those created by AI. Cofone then proposes a better response: meaningful accountability for the consequences of corporate data practices, which ultimately entails creating a new type of liability that recognizes the value of privacy.
Jake Chanenson is a computer science Ph.D. student and law student at the University of Chicago. Broadly, Jake is interested in topics relating to HCI, privacy, and tech policy. Jake’s work has been published in top venues such as ACM’s CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Our privacy is besieged by tech companies.
Companies can do this because our laws are built on outdated ideas that trap lawmakers, regulators, and courts into wrong assumptions about privacy, resulting in ineffective legal remedies to one of the most pressing concerns of our generation.
Drawing on behavioral science, sociology, and economics, Ignacio Cofone challenges existing laws and reform proposals and dispels enduring misconceptions about data-driven interactions. This exploration offers readers a holistic view of why current laws and regulations fail to protect us against corporate digital harms, particularly those created by AI. Cofone then proposes a better response: meaningful accountability for the consequences of corporate data practices, which ultimately entails creating a new type of liability that recognizes the value of privacy.
Jake Chanenson is a computer science Ph.D. student and law student at the University of Chicago. Broadly, Jake is interested in topics relating to HCI, privacy, and tech policy. Jake’s work has been published in top venues such as ACM’s CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>363</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">71598d72-e9f1-11ee-a7a9-b387acc92cd7</guid>
      <title>Michael Davis, &quot;Freedom Undone: The Assault on Liberal Values in Hong Kong&quot; (Association for Asian Studies, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>"What happened in Hong Kong is not an anomaly but a warning" - Hong Kong Human Rights defender Chow Hang Tung, speech written from prison upon receiving a human rights award.</p><p>In our interview today, I spoke with Professor Michael C. Davis, author of&nbsp;<a href="https://www.asianstudies.org/store/freedom-undone-the-assault-on-liberal-values-and-institutions-in-hong-kong-michael-c-davis/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Freedom Undone: The Assault on Liberal Values and Institutions in Hong Kong</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(AAS and Columbia UP, 2024).<em>&nbsp;</em>In his latest book, he writes about&nbsp;how one of the world's most free-wheeling cities has transitioned from a vibrant global center of culture and finance into an illiberal regime. We spoke about the progressive shifts towards authoritarian governance in Hong Kong's post-colonial period,&nbsp;leading up to the introduction of the National Security Law of 2020, and the rapid erosion of human rights and liberal freedoms&nbsp;since. Professor Davis explained the significance of Hong Kong's new domestic National Security Law, introduced last week, and its implications for the erosion of global democratic institutions globally.&nbsp;</p><p><a href="https://www.wilsoncenter.org/person/michael-c-davis" rel="noopener noreferrer">Professor Michael C. Davis</a>&nbsp;is a former long-time professor at the University of Hong Kong and prior to that at the Chinese University of Hong Kong, where he taught course on human rights and constitutional development. He is currently a Global Fellow at the Woodrow Wilson International Centre for Scholars, a Senior Research Associate at the Weatherhead East Asia Institute at Columbia University, and a Professor of Law and International Affairs at O.P. Jindal Global University in India. He also enjoys research affiliations at New York University and the University of Notre Dame.&nbsp;</p><p>You can listen to our earlier interview, about Professor Davis' book,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/making-hong-kong-china-the-rollback-of-human-rights-and-the-rule-of-law-michael-c-davis/15360348?ean=9781952636134" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Making Hong Kong China: The Rollback of Human Rights and the Rule of Law</em></a>&nbsp;(Columbia UP, 2020)&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/making-hong-kong-china#entry:30683@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/michael-davis-freedom-undone-the-assault-on-liberal-values-in-hong-kong-association-for-asian-studies-2023-Jcn6SMTK</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"What happened in Hong Kong is not an anomaly but a warning" - Hong Kong Human Rights defender Chow Hang Tung, speech written from prison upon receiving a human rights award.</p><p>In our interview today, I spoke with Professor Michael C. Davis, author of&nbsp;<a href="https://www.asianstudies.org/store/freedom-undone-the-assault-on-liberal-values-and-institutions-in-hong-kong-michael-c-davis/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Freedom Undone: The Assault on Liberal Values and Institutions in Hong Kong</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(AAS and Columbia UP, 2024).<em>&nbsp;</em>In his latest book, he writes about&nbsp;how one of the world's most free-wheeling cities has transitioned from a vibrant global center of culture and finance into an illiberal regime. We spoke about the progressive shifts towards authoritarian governance in Hong Kong's post-colonial period,&nbsp;leading up to the introduction of the National Security Law of 2020, and the rapid erosion of human rights and liberal freedoms&nbsp;since. Professor Davis explained the significance of Hong Kong's new domestic National Security Law, introduced last week, and its implications for the erosion of global democratic institutions globally.&nbsp;</p><p><a href="https://www.wilsoncenter.org/person/michael-c-davis" rel="noopener noreferrer">Professor Michael C. Davis</a>&nbsp;is a former long-time professor at the University of Hong Kong and prior to that at the Chinese University of Hong Kong, where he taught course on human rights and constitutional development. He is currently a Global Fellow at the Woodrow Wilson International Centre for Scholars, a Senior Research Associate at the Weatherhead East Asia Institute at Columbia University, and a Professor of Law and International Affairs at O.P. Jindal Global University in India. He also enjoys research affiliations at New York University and the University of Notre Dame.&nbsp;</p><p>You can listen to our earlier interview, about Professor Davis' book,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/making-hong-kong-china-the-rollback-of-human-rights-and-the-rule-of-law-michael-c-davis/15360348?ean=9781952636134" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Making Hong Kong China: The Rollback of Human Rights and the Rule of Law</em></a>&nbsp;(Columbia UP, 2020)&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/making-hong-kong-china#entry:30683@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="61177151" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/47e2fb68-8d3a-49ca-ac94-b9079676b9b5/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=47e2fb68-8d3a-49ca-ac94-b9079676b9b5&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Michael Davis, &quot;Freedom Undone: The Assault on Liberal Values in Hong Kong&quot; (Association for Asian Studies, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:03:43</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>&quot;What happened in Hong Kong is not an anomaly but a warning&quot; - Hong Kong Human Rights defender Chow Hang Tung, speech written from prison upon receiving a human rights award.
In our interview today, I spoke with Professor Michael C. Davis, author of Freedom Undone: The Assault on Liberal Values and Institutions in Hong Kong (AAS and Columbia UP, 2024). In his latest book, he writes about how one of the world&apos;s most free-wheeling cities has transitioned from a vibrant global center of culture and finance into an illiberal regime. We spoke about the progressive shifts towards authoritarian governance in Hong Kong&apos;s post-colonial period, leading up to the introduction of the National Security Law of 2020, and the rapid erosion of human rights and liberal freedoms since. Professor Davis explained the significance of Hong Kong&apos;s new domestic National Security Law, introduced last week, and its implications for the erosion of global democratic institutions globally. 
Professor Michael C. Davis is a former long-time professor at the University of Hong Kong and prior to that at the Chinese University of Hong Kong, where he taught course on human rights and constitutional development. He is currently a Global Fellow at the Woodrow Wilson International Centre for Scholars, a Senior Research Associate at the Weatherhead East Asia Institute at Columbia University, and a Professor of Law and International Affairs at O.P. Jindal Global University in India. He also enjoys research affiliations at New York University and the University of Notre Dame. 
You can listen to our earlier interview, about Professor Davis&apos; book, Making Hong Kong China: The Rollback of Human Rights and the Rule of Law (Columbia UP, 2020) here.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>&quot;What happened in Hong Kong is not an anomaly but a warning&quot; - Hong Kong Human Rights defender Chow Hang Tung, speech written from prison upon receiving a human rights award.
In our interview today, I spoke with Professor Michael C. Davis, author of Freedom Undone: The Assault on Liberal Values and Institutions in Hong Kong (AAS and Columbia UP, 2024). In his latest book, he writes about how one of the world&apos;s most free-wheeling cities has transitioned from a vibrant global center of culture and finance into an illiberal regime. We spoke about the progressive shifts towards authoritarian governance in Hong Kong&apos;s post-colonial period, leading up to the introduction of the National Security Law of 2020, and the rapid erosion of human rights and liberal freedoms since. Professor Davis explained the significance of Hong Kong&apos;s new domestic National Security Law, introduced last week, and its implications for the erosion of global democratic institutions globally. 
Professor Michael C. Davis is a former long-time professor at the University of Hong Kong and prior to that at the Chinese University of Hong Kong, where he taught course on human rights and constitutional development. He is currently a Global Fellow at the Woodrow Wilson International Centre for Scholars, a Senior Research Associate at the Weatherhead East Asia Institute at Columbia University, and a Professor of Law and International Affairs at O.P. Jindal Global University in India. He also enjoys research affiliations at New York University and the University of Notre Dame. 
You can listen to our earlier interview, about Professor Davis&apos; book, Making Hong Kong China: The Rollback of Human Rights and the Rule of Law (Columbia UP, 2020) here.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>216</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">41e25bd0-e863-11ee-a976-3b46b8e31801</guid>
      <title>How Can We Reach International Consensus on AI Regulation?</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In this episode of International Horizons, RBI director John Torpey interviews&nbsp;<a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/gabriele-mazzini-2baa948/?originalSubdomain=be" rel="noopener noreferrer">Gabriele Mazzini</a>, a lawyer and officer of the European Commission and expert in AI regulation. Mazzini discusses the means through which European countries have found agreement on the definition of AI and how to regulate it. Moreover, Mazzini stresses that the fears of an apocalyptic AI revolution taking over humankind are not well-grounded. He also comments on the United States case and how it differs from Europe when it comes to regulating AI, acknowledging that there's been big progress in legislation in this area.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/how-can-we-reach-international-consensus-on-ai-regulation-TYyKZl_k</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this episode of International Horizons, RBI director John Torpey interviews&nbsp;<a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/gabriele-mazzini-2baa948/?originalSubdomain=be" rel="noopener noreferrer">Gabriele Mazzini</a>, a lawyer and officer of the European Commission and expert in AI regulation. Mazzini discusses the means through which European countries have found agreement on the definition of AI and how to regulate it. Moreover, Mazzini stresses that the fears of an apocalyptic AI revolution taking over humankind are not well-grounded. He also comments on the United States case and how it differs from Europe when it comes to regulating AI, acknowledging that there's been big progress in legislation in this area.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="37899825" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/2e745e71-8a5f-4efe-884f-1a8cd504dc66/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=2e745e71-8a5f-4efe-884f-1a8cd504dc66&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>How Can We Reach International Consensus on AI Regulation?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:39:28</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this episode of International Horizons, RBI director John Torpey interviews Gabriele Mazzini, a lawyer and officer of the European Commission and expert in AI regulation. Mazzini discusses the means through which European countries have found agreement on the definition of AI and how to regulate it. Moreover, Mazzini stresses that the fears of an apocalyptic AI revolution taking over humankind are not well-grounded. He also comments on the United States case and how it differs from Europe when it comes to regulating AI, acknowledging that there&apos;s been big progress in legislation in this area.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this episode of International Horizons, RBI director John Torpey interviews Gabriele Mazzini, a lawyer and officer of the European Commission and expert in AI regulation. Mazzini discusses the means through which European countries have found agreement on the definition of AI and how to regulate it. Moreover, Mazzini stresses that the fears of an apocalyptic AI revolution taking over humankind are not well-grounded. He also comments on the United States case and how it differs from Europe when it comes to regulating AI, acknowledging that there&apos;s been big progress in legislation in this area.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>140</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">45b655ee-e855-11ee-b49c-3fdabd8341be</guid>
      <title>Colette Cann and Eric Demeulenaere, &quot;The Activist Academic: Engaged Scholarship for Resistance, Hope and Social Change&quot; (Myers Education Press, 2020)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>How can traditional academic scholarship be disrupted by activist academics? How can we make space for those who are underrepresented and historically oppressed to come to academia as their authentic selves? How can the platform of academia create space for change in the world? In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781975501396" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Activist Academic: Engaged Scholarship for Resistance, Hope and Social Change</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Myers Education Press: 2020), Professor Colette N. Cann and Professor Eric J. DeMeulenarare answer these questions. Their work challenges dominant frameworks of what it is to be an academic. They challenge readers to think about their responsibility as academics, and their role not just as researchers and teachers, but as parents, friends and members of the community. This book should be compulsory reading for&nbsp;for all scholars, and those that aspire to enter academia. It provides the opportunity&nbsp;to rethink the ways that activism and scholarship can be combined, and the impact that academics have in the spaces that they work.&nbsp;</p><p><a href="https://www.usfca.edu/faculty/colette-cann" rel="noopener noreferrer">Professor Colette N. Cann</a>&nbsp;is the Associate Dean for Academic and Faculty Advancement and&nbsp;Professor in the School of Education at the University of San Francisco.&nbsp;</p><p><a href="https://www.clarku.edu/faculty/profiles/eric-demeulenaere/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Professor Eric DeMeulenaere</a>&nbsp;is&nbsp;a&nbsp;Professor of Education,&nbsp;Director of Community, Youth, &amp; Education Studies and&nbsp;Director of Comparative Race &amp; Ethnic Studies at&nbsp;Clark University.&nbsp;</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 24 Mar 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/colette-cann-and-eric-demeulenaere-the-activist-academic-engaged-scholarship-for-resistance-hope-and-social-change-myers-education-press-2020-NyUKCMD2</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How can traditional academic scholarship be disrupted by activist academics? How can we make space for those who are underrepresented and historically oppressed to come to academia as their authentic selves? How can the platform of academia create space for change in the world? In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781975501396" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Activist Academic: Engaged Scholarship for Resistance, Hope and Social Change</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Myers Education Press: 2020), Professor Colette N. Cann and Professor Eric J. DeMeulenarare answer these questions. Their work challenges dominant frameworks of what it is to be an academic. They challenge readers to think about their responsibility as academics, and their role not just as researchers and teachers, but as parents, friends and members of the community. This book should be compulsory reading for&nbsp;for all scholars, and those that aspire to enter academia. It provides the opportunity&nbsp;to rethink the ways that activism and scholarship can be combined, and the impact that academics have in the spaces that they work.&nbsp;</p><p><a href="https://www.usfca.edu/faculty/colette-cann" rel="noopener noreferrer">Professor Colette N. Cann</a>&nbsp;is the Associate Dean for Academic and Faculty Advancement and&nbsp;Professor in the School of Education at the University of San Francisco.&nbsp;</p><p><a href="https://www.clarku.edu/faculty/profiles/eric-demeulenaere/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Professor Eric DeMeulenaere</a>&nbsp;is&nbsp;a&nbsp;Professor of Education,&nbsp;Director of Community, Youth, &amp; Education Studies and&nbsp;Director of Comparative Race &amp; Ethnic Studies at&nbsp;Clark University.&nbsp;</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="54538935" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/bc09e3b3-fa09-4ebd-9198-b00671c751eb/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=bc09e3b3-fa09-4ebd-9198-b00671c751eb&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Colette Cann and Eric Demeulenaere, &quot;The Activist Academic: Engaged Scholarship for Resistance, Hope and Social Change&quot; (Myers Education Press, 2020)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:56:48</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>How can traditional academic scholarship be disrupted by activist academics? How can we make space for those who are underrepresented and historically oppressed to come to academia as their authentic selves? How can the platform of academia create space for change in the world? In The Activist Academic: Engaged Scholarship for Resistance, Hope and Social Change (Myers Education Press: 2020), Professor Colette N. Cann and Professor Eric J. DeMeulenarare answer these questions. Their work challenges dominant frameworks of what it is to be an academic. They challenge readers to think about their responsibility as academics, and their role not just as researchers and teachers, but as parents, friends and members of the community. This book should be compulsory reading for for all scholars, and those that aspire to enter academia. It provides the opportunity to rethink the ways that activism and scholarship can be combined, and the impact that academics have in the spaces that they work. 
Professor Colette N. Cann is the Associate Dean for Academic and Faculty Advancement and Professor in the School of Education at the University of San Francisco. 
Professor Eric DeMeulenaere is a Professor of Education, Director of Community, Youth, &amp; Education Studies and Director of Comparative Race &amp; Ethnic Studies at Clark University. 
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>How can traditional academic scholarship be disrupted by activist academics? How can we make space for those who are underrepresented and historically oppressed to come to academia as their authentic selves? How can the platform of academia create space for change in the world? In The Activist Academic: Engaged Scholarship for Resistance, Hope and Social Change (Myers Education Press: 2020), Professor Colette N. Cann and Professor Eric J. DeMeulenarare answer these questions. Their work challenges dominant frameworks of what it is to be an academic. They challenge readers to think about their responsibility as academics, and their role not just as researchers and teachers, but as parents, friends and members of the community. This book should be compulsory reading for for all scholars, and those that aspire to enter academia. It provides the opportunity to rethink the ways that activism and scholarship can be combined, and the impact that academics have in the spaces that they work. 
Professor Colette N. Cann is the Associate Dean for Academic and Faculty Advancement and Professor in the School of Education at the University of San Francisco. 
Professor Eric DeMeulenaere is a Professor of Education, Director of Community, Youth, &amp; Education Studies and Director of Comparative Race &amp; Ethnic Studies at Clark University. 
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>215</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">f99f5cc6-e56d-11ee-accc-6b04333fd789</guid>
      <title>Patryk I. Labuda, &quot;International Criminal Tribunals and Domestic Accountability&quot; (Oxford UP, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In the 1990s, the promise of justice for atrocity crimes was associated with the revival of international criminal tribunals (ICTs). More recently, however, there has been a renewed emphasis on domestic accountability for international crimes across the globe. In identifying a 'complementarity turn', a paradigm shift toward domestic accountability in the field of international criminal justice, this book investigates how the shadow of international criminal tribunals influences the treatment of serious crimes at the national level.</p><p>Drawing on research and interviews in Rwanda, the Democratic Republic of Congo, and Sierra Leone,<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780198868842" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;<em>International Criminal Tribunals and Domestic Accountability: In the Court's Shadow</em></a>&nbsp;(Oxford University Press, 2023) by Dr. Patryk I. Labuda develops a tripartite framework to analyse how states and tribunals work with, despite, or against one another in the fight against impunity. While international prosecutors and judges use the principle of complementarity to foster cooperation and decrease tension with government actors, Dr. Labuda argues that too much deference by ICTs toward states reduces the likelihood of accountability and may enable national elites to consolidate authoritarian power.</p><p>By interrogating how international accountability stakeholders relate to their domestic counterparts, International Criminal Tribunals and Domestic Accountability advocates improvements to ICTs' institutional design and more dynamic interactions with states to strengthen the enforcement of international criminal law.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;forthcoming book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/patryk-i-labuda-international-criminal-tribunals-and-domestic-accountability-oxford-up-2023-MxrYVGq7</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the 1990s, the promise of justice for atrocity crimes was associated with the revival of international criminal tribunals (ICTs). More recently, however, there has been a renewed emphasis on domestic accountability for international crimes across the globe. In identifying a 'complementarity turn', a paradigm shift toward domestic accountability in the field of international criminal justice, this book investigates how the shadow of international criminal tribunals influences the treatment of serious crimes at the national level.</p><p>Drawing on research and interviews in Rwanda, the Democratic Republic of Congo, and Sierra Leone,<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780198868842" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;<em>International Criminal Tribunals and Domestic Accountability: In the Court's Shadow</em></a>&nbsp;(Oxford University Press, 2023) by Dr. Patryk I. Labuda develops a tripartite framework to analyse how states and tribunals work with, despite, or against one another in the fight against impunity. While international prosecutors and judges use the principle of complementarity to foster cooperation and decrease tension with government actors, Dr. Labuda argues that too much deference by ICTs toward states reduces the likelihood of accountability and may enable national elites to consolidate authoritarian power.</p><p>By interrogating how international accountability stakeholders relate to their domestic counterparts, International Criminal Tribunals and Domestic Accountability advocates improvements to ICTs' institutional design and more dynamic interactions with states to strengthen the enforcement of international criminal law.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;forthcoming book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="55972084" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/c2950509-79de-4926-9507-4a2934eb6a2e/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=c2950509-79de-4926-9507-4a2934eb6a2e&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Patryk I. Labuda, &quot;International Criminal Tribunals and Domestic Accountability&quot; (Oxford UP, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:58:18</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In the 1990s, the promise of justice for atrocity crimes was associated with the revival of international criminal tribunals (ICTs). More recently, however, there has been a renewed emphasis on domestic accountability for international crimes across the globe. In identifying a &apos;complementarity turn&apos;, a paradigm shift toward domestic accountability in the field of international criminal justice, this book investigates how the shadow of international criminal tribunals influences the treatment of serious crimes at the national level.
Drawing on research and interviews in Rwanda, the Democratic Republic of Congo, and Sierra Leone, International Criminal Tribunals and Domestic Accountability: In the Court&apos;s Shadow (Oxford University Press, 2023) by Dr. Patryk I. Labuda develops a tripartite framework to analyse how states and tribunals work with, despite, or against one another in the fight against impunity. While international prosecutors and judges use the principle of complementarity to foster cooperation and decrease tension with government actors, Dr. Labuda argues that too much deference by ICTs toward states reduces the likelihood of accountability and may enable national elites to consolidate authoritarian power.
By interrogating how international accountability stakeholders relate to their domestic counterparts, International Criminal Tribunals and Domestic Accountability advocates improvements to ICTs&apos; institutional design and more dynamic interactions with states to strengthen the enforcement of international criminal law.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose forthcoming book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In the 1990s, the promise of justice for atrocity crimes was associated with the revival of international criminal tribunals (ICTs). More recently, however, there has been a renewed emphasis on domestic accountability for international crimes across the globe. In identifying a &apos;complementarity turn&apos;, a paradigm shift toward domestic accountability in the field of international criminal justice, this book investigates how the shadow of international criminal tribunals influences the treatment of serious crimes at the national level.
Drawing on research and interviews in Rwanda, the Democratic Republic of Congo, and Sierra Leone, International Criminal Tribunals and Domestic Accountability: In the Court&apos;s Shadow (Oxford University Press, 2023) by Dr. Patryk I. Labuda develops a tripartite framework to analyse how states and tribunals work with, despite, or against one another in the fight against impunity. While international prosecutors and judges use the principle of complementarity to foster cooperation and decrease tension with government actors, Dr. Labuda argues that too much deference by ICTs toward states reduces the likelihood of accountability and may enable national elites to consolidate authoritarian power.
By interrogating how international accountability stakeholders relate to their domestic counterparts, International Criminal Tribunals and Domestic Accountability advocates improvements to ICTs&apos; institutional design and more dynamic interactions with states to strengthen the enforcement of international criminal law.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose forthcoming book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>214</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">fbd75384-e475-11ee-9490-53c279652464</guid>
      <title>Kalika Mehta, &quot;Strategic Litigation and Corporate Complicity in Crimes Under International Law: A TWAIL Analysis&quot; (Routledge, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Kalika Mehta's book&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781032520643" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Strategic Litigation and Corporate Complicity in Crimes Under International Law: A TWAIL Analysis</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Routledge, 2023)&nbsp;provides a comprehensive account of how non-state actors rely on international criminal law as a tool in the service of progressive political causes.</p><p>The argument that international criminal law and its institutions serve as an instrument in the hands of a few powerful states, and that its practice is characterized by double standards and selectivity, has received considerable attention. This book, however, focuses on a practice that is informed by this argument. Its focus is on an alternative practice within international criminal law, where non-state actors navigate what critical scholars call a structurally biased legal system, in order to achieve long-term political objectives. Innovatively, the book combines the concerns expressed by Third World Approaches to International Law with strategic litigation that focuses on the accountability of corporations for their complicity in crimes under international law. Analysing this litigation, the book demonstrates that, while it is crucial to highlight the blind spots of the international criminal legal framework, it is also important to take into account the practice of non-state actors engaged in leveraging its emancipatory potential.</p><p><a href="https://essl.leeds.ac.uk/law/staff/1332/mr-alex-batesmith" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Alex Batesmith</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a Lecturer in Legal Profession at the School of Law, University of Leeds, UK. His research focuses on lawyers, their professional self-identity and their motivations, and how these shape the institutions and the discipline in which they work. Twitter: @batesmith</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/kalika-mehta-strategic-litigation-and-corporate-complicity-in-crimes-under-international-law-a-twail-analysis-routledge-2023-huwJhIZ1</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kalika Mehta's book&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781032520643" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Strategic Litigation and Corporate Complicity in Crimes Under International Law: A TWAIL Analysis</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Routledge, 2023)&nbsp;provides a comprehensive account of how non-state actors rely on international criminal law as a tool in the service of progressive political causes.</p><p>The argument that international criminal law and its institutions serve as an instrument in the hands of a few powerful states, and that its practice is characterized by double standards and selectivity, has received considerable attention. This book, however, focuses on a practice that is informed by this argument. Its focus is on an alternative practice within international criminal law, where non-state actors navigate what critical scholars call a structurally biased legal system, in order to achieve long-term political objectives. Innovatively, the book combines the concerns expressed by Third World Approaches to International Law with strategic litigation that focuses on the accountability of corporations for their complicity in crimes under international law. Analysing this litigation, the book demonstrates that, while it is crucial to highlight the blind spots of the international criminal legal framework, it is also important to take into account the practice of non-state actors engaged in leveraging its emancipatory potential.</p><p><a href="https://essl.leeds.ac.uk/law/staff/1332/mr-alex-batesmith" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Alex Batesmith</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a Lecturer in Legal Profession at the School of Law, University of Leeds, UK. His research focuses on lawyers, their professional self-identity and their motivations, and how these shape the institutions and the discipline in which they work. Twitter: @batesmith</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="61921945" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/32340212-61d7-42bd-b7f6-7fbe7539fc00/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=32340212-61d7-42bd-b7f6-7fbe7539fc00&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Kalika Mehta, &quot;Strategic Litigation and Corporate Complicity in Crimes Under International Law: A TWAIL Analysis&quot; (Routledge, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:04:29</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Kalika Mehta&apos;s book Strategic Litigation and Corporate Complicity in Crimes Under International Law: A TWAIL Analysis (Routledge, 2023) provides a comprehensive account of how non-state actors rely on international criminal law as a tool in the service of progressive political causes.
The argument that international criminal law and its institutions serve as an instrument in the hands of a few powerful states, and that its practice is characterized by double standards and selectivity, has received considerable attention. This book, however, focuses on a practice that is informed by this argument. Its focus is on an alternative practice within international criminal law, where non-state actors navigate what critical scholars call a structurally biased legal system, in order to achieve long-term political objectives. Innovatively, the book combines the concerns expressed by Third World Approaches to International Law with strategic litigation that focuses on the accountability of corporations for their complicity in crimes under international law. Analysing this litigation, the book demonstrates that, while it is crucial to highlight the blind spots of the international criminal legal framework, it is also important to take into account the practice of non-state actors engaged in leveraging its emancipatory potential.
Alex Batesmith is a Lecturer in Legal Profession at the School of Law, University of Leeds, UK. His research focuses on lawyers, their professional self-identity and their motivations, and how these shape the institutions and the discipline in which they work. Twitter: @batesmith
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Kalika Mehta&apos;s book Strategic Litigation and Corporate Complicity in Crimes Under International Law: A TWAIL Analysis (Routledge, 2023) provides a comprehensive account of how non-state actors rely on international criminal law as a tool in the service of progressive political causes.
The argument that international criminal law and its institutions serve as an instrument in the hands of a few powerful states, and that its practice is characterized by double standards and selectivity, has received considerable attention. This book, however, focuses on a practice that is informed by this argument. Its focus is on an alternative practice within international criminal law, where non-state actors navigate what critical scholars call a structurally biased legal system, in order to achieve long-term political objectives. Innovatively, the book combines the concerns expressed by Third World Approaches to International Law with strategic litigation that focuses on the accountability of corporations for their complicity in crimes under international law. Analysing this litigation, the book demonstrates that, while it is crucial to highlight the blind spots of the international criminal legal framework, it is also important to take into account the practice of non-state actors engaged in leveraging its emancipatory potential.
Alex Batesmith is a Lecturer in Legal Profession at the School of Law, University of Leeds, UK. His research focuses on lawyers, their professional self-identity and their motivations, and how these shape the institutions and the discipline in which they work. Twitter: @batesmith
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>213</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">b0b49b92-e3b1-11ee-b3ef-af874656452c</guid>
      <title>Rachel Blumenthal, &quot;Right to Reparations: The Claims Conference and Holocaust Survivors, 1951–1964&quot; (Lexington, 2021)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781793637895" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Right to Reparations: The Claims Conference and Holocaust Survivors, 1951–1964</em></a>&nbsp;(Lexington, 2021) examines the early years of the Claims Conference, the organization which lobbies for and distributes reparations to Holocaust survivors, and its operations as a nongovernmental actor promoting reparative justice in global politics. Rachel Blumenthal traces the founding of the organization by one person, and its continued campaign for the payment of compensation to survivors after Israel left the negotiations. This book explores the degree to which the leadership entity served individual victims of the Third Reich, the Jewish public, or member organizations.</p><p><a href="https://huji.academia.edu/GeraldineGudefin" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Geraldine Gudefin</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a French-born modern Jewish historian researching Jewish family life, legal pluralism, and the migration experiences of Jews in France and the United States. She is currently a research fellow at the Hebrew University’s Avraham Harman Research Institute of Contemporary Jewry, and is completing a book titled An Impossible Divorce? East European Jews and the Limits of Legal Pluralism in France, 1900-1939.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/rachel-blumenthal-right-to-reparations-the-claims-conference-and-holocaust-survivors-19511964-lexington-2021-d5h_dxz8</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781793637895" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Right to Reparations: The Claims Conference and Holocaust Survivors, 1951–1964</em></a>&nbsp;(Lexington, 2021) examines the early years of the Claims Conference, the organization which lobbies for and distributes reparations to Holocaust survivors, and its operations as a nongovernmental actor promoting reparative justice in global politics. Rachel Blumenthal traces the founding of the organization by one person, and its continued campaign for the payment of compensation to survivors after Israel left the negotiations. This book explores the degree to which the leadership entity served individual victims of the Third Reich, the Jewish public, or member organizations.</p><p><a href="https://huji.academia.edu/GeraldineGudefin" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Geraldine Gudefin</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a French-born modern Jewish historian researching Jewish family life, legal pluralism, and the migration experiences of Jews in France and the United States. She is currently a research fellow at the Hebrew University’s Avraham Harman Research Institute of Contemporary Jewry, and is completing a book titled An Impossible Divorce? East European Jews and the Limits of Legal Pluralism in France, 1900-1939.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="34875253" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/f5859b61-a7c3-43eb-92a2-83f8fe80b4d1/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=f5859b61-a7c3-43eb-92a2-83f8fe80b4d1&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Rachel Blumenthal, &quot;Right to Reparations: The Claims Conference and Holocaust Survivors, 1951–1964&quot; (Lexington, 2021)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:36:19</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Right to Reparations: The Claims Conference and Holocaust Survivors, 1951–1964 (Lexington, 2021) examines the early years of the Claims Conference, the organization which lobbies for and distributes reparations to Holocaust survivors, and its operations as a nongovernmental actor promoting reparative justice in global politics. Rachel Blumenthal traces the founding of the organization by one person, and its continued campaign for the payment of compensation to survivors after Israel left the negotiations. This book explores the degree to which the leadership entity served individual victims of the Third Reich, the Jewish public, or member organizations.
Geraldine Gudefin is a French-born modern Jewish historian researching Jewish family life, legal pluralism, and the migration experiences of Jews in France and the United States. She is currently a research fellow at the Hebrew University’s Avraham Harman Research Institute of Contemporary Jewry, and is completing a book titled An Impossible Divorce? East European Jews and the Limits of Legal Pluralism in France, 1900-1939.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Right to Reparations: The Claims Conference and Holocaust Survivors, 1951–1964 (Lexington, 2021) examines the early years of the Claims Conference, the organization which lobbies for and distributes reparations to Holocaust survivors, and its operations as a nongovernmental actor promoting reparative justice in global politics. Rachel Blumenthal traces the founding of the organization by one person, and its continued campaign for the payment of compensation to survivors after Israel left the negotiations. This book explores the degree to which the leadership entity served individual victims of the Third Reich, the Jewish public, or member organizations.
Geraldine Gudefin is a French-born modern Jewish historian researching Jewish family life, legal pluralism, and the migration experiences of Jews in France and the United States. She is currently a research fellow at the Hebrew University’s Avraham Harman Research Institute of Contemporary Jewry, and is completing a book titled An Impossible Divorce? East European Jews and the Limits of Legal Pluralism in France, 1900-1939.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>488</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">02d2d3ae-e244-11ee-b1c4-1302a7ba3934</guid>
      <title>Ada Maria Kuskowski, &quot;Vernacular Law; Writing and the Reinvention of Customary Law in Medieval France&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2022)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Custom was fundamental to mediaeval legal practice. Whether in a property dispute or a trial for murder, the aggrieved and accused would go to lay court where cases were resolved according to custom. What custom meant, however, went through a radical shift in the mediaeval period. Between the twelfth and thirteenth centuries, custom went from being a largely oral and performed practice to one that was also conceptualised in writing.</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009217897" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Vernacular Law: Writing and the Reinvention of Customary Law in Medieval France</em></a>&nbsp;(Cambridge University Press, 2022), Dr. Ada Maria Kuskowski uses French lawbooks known as&nbsp;<em>coutumiers</em>&nbsp;to trace the repercussions this transformation – in the form of custom from unwritten to written and in the language of law from elite Latin to common vernacular – had on the cultural world of law.&nbsp;<em>Vernacular Law</em>&nbsp;offers a new understanding of the formation of a new field of knowledge: authors combined ideas, experience and critical thought to write lawbooks that made disparate customs into the field known as customary law.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;forthcoming book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 16 Mar 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/ada-maria-kuskowski-vernacular-law-writing-and-the-reinvention-of-customary-law-in-medieval-france-cambridge-up-2022-cEPyq9IW</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Custom was fundamental to mediaeval legal practice. Whether in a property dispute or a trial for murder, the aggrieved and accused would go to lay court where cases were resolved according to custom. What custom meant, however, went through a radical shift in the mediaeval period. Between the twelfth and thirteenth centuries, custom went from being a largely oral and performed practice to one that was also conceptualised in writing.</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009217897" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Vernacular Law: Writing and the Reinvention of Customary Law in Medieval France</em></a>&nbsp;(Cambridge University Press, 2022), Dr. Ada Maria Kuskowski uses French lawbooks known as&nbsp;<em>coutumiers</em>&nbsp;to trace the repercussions this transformation – in the form of custom from unwritten to written and in the language of law from elite Latin to common vernacular – had on the cultural world of law.&nbsp;<em>Vernacular Law</em>&nbsp;offers a new understanding of the formation of a new field of knowledge: authors combined ideas, experience and critical thought to write lawbooks that made disparate customs into the field known as customary law.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;forthcoming book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="59381348" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/1166c926-70b4-4d07-823d-80c9882df6e6/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=1166c926-70b4-4d07-823d-80c9882df6e6&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Ada Maria Kuskowski, &quot;Vernacular Law; Writing and the Reinvention of Customary Law in Medieval France&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2022)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:01:51</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Custom was fundamental to mediaeval legal practice. Whether in a property dispute or a trial for murder, the aggrieved and accused would go to lay court where cases were resolved according to custom. What custom meant, however, went through a radical shift in the mediaeval period. Between the twelfth and thirteenth centuries, custom went from being a largely oral and performed practice to one that was also conceptualised in writing.
In Vernacular Law: Writing and the Reinvention of Customary Law in Medieval France (Cambridge University Press, 2022), Dr. Ada Maria Kuskowski uses French lawbooks known as coutumiers to trace the repercussions this transformation – in the form of custom from unwritten to written and in the language of law from elite Latin to common vernacular – had on the cultural world of law. Vernacular Law offers a new understanding of the formation of a new field of knowledge: authors combined ideas, experience and critical thought to write lawbooks that made disparate customs into the field known as customary law.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose forthcoming book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Custom was fundamental to mediaeval legal practice. Whether in a property dispute or a trial for murder, the aggrieved and accused would go to lay court where cases were resolved according to custom. What custom meant, however, went through a radical shift in the mediaeval period. Between the twelfth and thirteenth centuries, custom went from being a largely oral and performed practice to one that was also conceptualised in writing.
In Vernacular Law: Writing and the Reinvention of Customary Law in Medieval France (Cambridge University Press, 2022), Dr. Ada Maria Kuskowski uses French lawbooks known as coutumiers to trace the repercussions this transformation – in the form of custom from unwritten to written and in the language of law from elite Latin to common vernacular – had on the cultural world of law. Vernacular Law offers a new understanding of the formation of a new field of knowledge: authors combined ideas, experience and critical thought to write lawbooks that made disparate customs into the field known as customary law.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose forthcoming book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>61</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3bb54022-dfaf-11ee-a8e5-4340d58e170f</guid>
      <title>Legal Cultures in the Russian Empire</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Law. How does the state form and use it? How do people use and shape it? How does law shape culture? How does the practice of law change over time in a modernizing colony? What was stable and what was malleable in the application of law in early modern Russia versus its Central Asian colony in the Empire’s final century? What’s the difference between a bribe and a gift?</p><p>These are some of the questions at the heart of this fascinating conversation about two books that probe the theoretical and instrumental underpinnings, as well as the everyday practice, of law in different periods and regions of the Russian Empire.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781107699762" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Crime and Punishment in Early Modern Russia</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Cambridge UP, 2012)&nbsp;by Nancy Kollmann analyzes the day-to-day practice of Russian criminal justice in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries.&nbsp;<a href="https://brill.com/display/title/33746?language=en" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Visions of Justice: Sharī’a and Cultural Change in Russian Central Asia</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Brill, 2017; available open access)<em>&nbsp;</em>by Paolo Sartori excavates civil law practice to explore legal consciousness among the Muslim communities of Central Asia from the end of the eighteenth century through the fall of the Russian Empire, situating his work within a range of debates about colonialism and law, legal pluralism, and subaltern subjectivity. Paolo Sartori and Nancy Kollmann explore overlaps, divergence and much more that emerge from their respective findings in these deeply researched books.</p><p>Paolo Sartori is a Senior Research Associate and the Chairman of the Commission for the Study of Islam in Central Eurasia at the Austrian Academy of Sciences. He currently serves as the Editor-in-Chief of the&nbsp;<em>Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient and the Journal of Central Asian History</em>&nbsp;(Brill). In addition to&nbsp;<em>Visions of Justice</em>, authoring several scholarly articles and co-editing essay collections, Sartori has co-authored two books,&nbsp;<em>Seeking Justice at the Court of the Khans of Khiva (19th–Early 20th&nbsp;Centuries)</em>&nbsp;(Leiden: Brill, 2020), co-authored with Ulfat Abdurasulov and&nbsp;<em>Éksperimenty imperii: adat, shariat, i proizvodtsvo znanii v Kazakhskoi stepi</em>&nbsp;(Moscow: Novoe Literaturnoe Obozrenie, 2019), co-authored with Pavel Shabley.</p><p>Nancy Kollmann is the William H. Bonsall Professor of History at Stanford University in California. In addition to&nbsp;<em>Crime and Punishment in Early Modern Russia&nbsp;</em>(2012), she is the author of&nbsp;<em>Kinship and Politics: The Making of the Muscovite Political System, 1345–1547&nbsp;</em>(1987),&nbsp;<em>By Honor Bound: State and Society in Early Modern Russia&nbsp;</em>(1999);&nbsp;<em>The Russian Empire, 1450–1801&nbsp;</em>(2017), and&nbsp;<em>Visualizing Russia in Early Modern Europe&nbsp;</em>(forthcoming August 2024).</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2024 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/legal-cultures-in-the-russian-empire-DzIlfnzf</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Law. How does the state form and use it? How do people use and shape it? How does law shape culture? How does the practice of law change over time in a modernizing colony? What was stable and what was malleable in the application of law in early modern Russia versus its Central Asian colony in the Empire’s final century? What’s the difference between a bribe and a gift?</p><p>These are some of the questions at the heart of this fascinating conversation about two books that probe the theoretical and instrumental underpinnings, as well as the everyday practice, of law in different periods and regions of the Russian Empire.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781107699762" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Crime and Punishment in Early Modern Russia</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Cambridge UP, 2012)&nbsp;by Nancy Kollmann analyzes the day-to-day practice of Russian criminal justice in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries.&nbsp;<a href="https://brill.com/display/title/33746?language=en" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Visions of Justice: Sharī’a and Cultural Change in Russian Central Asia</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Brill, 2017; available open access)<em>&nbsp;</em>by Paolo Sartori excavates civil law practice to explore legal consciousness among the Muslim communities of Central Asia from the end of the eighteenth century through the fall of the Russian Empire, situating his work within a range of debates about colonialism and law, legal pluralism, and subaltern subjectivity. Paolo Sartori and Nancy Kollmann explore overlaps, divergence and much more that emerge from their respective findings in these deeply researched books.</p><p>Paolo Sartori is a Senior Research Associate and the Chairman of the Commission for the Study of Islam in Central Eurasia at the Austrian Academy of Sciences. He currently serves as the Editor-in-Chief of the&nbsp;<em>Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient and the Journal of Central Asian History</em>&nbsp;(Brill). In addition to&nbsp;<em>Visions of Justice</em>, authoring several scholarly articles and co-editing essay collections, Sartori has co-authored two books,&nbsp;<em>Seeking Justice at the Court of the Khans of Khiva (19th–Early 20th&nbsp;Centuries)</em>&nbsp;(Leiden: Brill, 2020), co-authored with Ulfat Abdurasulov and&nbsp;<em>Éksperimenty imperii: adat, shariat, i proizvodtsvo znanii v Kazakhskoi stepi</em>&nbsp;(Moscow: Novoe Literaturnoe Obozrenie, 2019), co-authored with Pavel Shabley.</p><p>Nancy Kollmann is the William H. Bonsall Professor of History at Stanford University in California. In addition to&nbsp;<em>Crime and Punishment in Early Modern Russia&nbsp;</em>(2012), she is the author of&nbsp;<em>Kinship and Politics: The Making of the Muscovite Political System, 1345–1547&nbsp;</em>(1987),&nbsp;<em>By Honor Bound: State and Society in Early Modern Russia&nbsp;</em>(1999);&nbsp;<em>The Russian Empire, 1450–1801&nbsp;</em>(2017), and&nbsp;<em>Visualizing Russia in Early Modern Europe&nbsp;</em>(forthcoming August 2024).</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="70110396" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/3e1ab378-7904-49c4-8dfb-3957b3beb6d9/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=3e1ab378-7904-49c4-8dfb-3957b3beb6d9&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Legal Cultures in the Russian Empire</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:13:01</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Law. How does the state form and use it? How do people use and shape it? How does law shape culture? How does the practice of law change over time in a modernizing colony? What was stable and what was malleable in the application of law in early modern Russia versus its Central Asian colony in the Empire’s final century? What’s the difference between a bribe and a gift?
These are some of the questions at the heart of this fascinating conversation about two books that probe the theoretical and instrumental underpinnings, as well as the everyday practice, of law in different periods and regions of the Russian Empire. Crime and Punishment in Early Modern Russia (Cambridge UP, 2012) by Nancy Kollmann analyzes the day-to-day practice of Russian criminal justice in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. Visions of Justice: Sharī’a and Cultural Change in Russian Central Asia (Brill, 2017; available open access) by Paolo Sartori excavates civil law practice to explore legal consciousness among the Muslim communities of Central Asia from the end of the eighteenth century through the fall of the Russian Empire, situating his work within a range of debates about colonialism and law, legal pluralism, and subaltern subjectivity. Paolo Sartori and Nancy Kollmann explore overlaps, divergence and much more that emerge from their respective findings in these deeply researched books.
Paolo Sartori is a Senior Research Associate and the Chairman of the Commission for the Study of Islam in Central Eurasia at the Austrian Academy of Sciences. He currently serves as the Editor-in-Chief of the Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient and the Journal of Central Asian History (Brill). In addition to Visions of Justice, authoring several scholarly articles and co-editing essay collections, Sartori has co-authored two books, Seeking Justice at the Court of the Khans of Khiva (19th–Early 20th Centuries) (Leiden: Brill, 2020), co-authored with Ulfat Abdurasulov and Éksperimenty imperii: adat, shariat, i proizvodtsvo znanii v Kazakhskoi stepi (Moscow: Novoe Literaturnoe Obozrenie, 2019), co-authored with Pavel Shabley.
Nancy Kollmann is the William H. Bonsall Professor of History at Stanford University in California. In addition to Crime and Punishment in Early Modern Russia (2012), she is the author of Kinship and Politics: The Making of the Muscovite Political System, 1345–1547 (1987), By Honor Bound: State and Society in Early Modern Russia (1999); The Russian Empire, 1450–1801 (2017), and Visualizing Russia in Early Modern Europe (forthcoming August 2024).
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Law. How does the state form and use it? How do people use and shape it? How does law shape culture? How does the practice of law change over time in a modernizing colony? What was stable and what was malleable in the application of law in early modern Russia versus its Central Asian colony in the Empire’s final century? What’s the difference between a bribe and a gift?
These are some of the questions at the heart of this fascinating conversation about two books that probe the theoretical and instrumental underpinnings, as well as the everyday practice, of law in different periods and regions of the Russian Empire. Crime and Punishment in Early Modern Russia (Cambridge UP, 2012) by Nancy Kollmann analyzes the day-to-day practice of Russian criminal justice in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. Visions of Justice: Sharī’a and Cultural Change in Russian Central Asia (Brill, 2017; available open access) by Paolo Sartori excavates civil law practice to explore legal consciousness among the Muslim communities of Central Asia from the end of the eighteenth century through the fall of the Russian Empire, situating his work within a range of debates about colonialism and law, legal pluralism, and subaltern subjectivity. Paolo Sartori and Nancy Kollmann explore overlaps, divergence and much more that emerge from their respective findings in these deeply researched books.
Paolo Sartori is a Senior Research Associate and the Chairman of the Commission for the Study of Islam in Central Eurasia at the Austrian Academy of Sciences. He currently serves as the Editor-in-Chief of the Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient and the Journal of Central Asian History (Brill). In addition to Visions of Justice, authoring several scholarly articles and co-editing essay collections, Sartori has co-authored two books, Seeking Justice at the Court of the Khans of Khiva (19th–Early 20th Centuries) (Leiden: Brill, 2020), co-authored with Ulfat Abdurasulov and Éksperimenty imperii: adat, shariat, i proizvodtsvo znanii v Kazakhskoi stepi (Moscow: Novoe Literaturnoe Obozrenie, 2019), co-authored with Pavel Shabley.
Nancy Kollmann is the William H. Bonsall Professor of History at Stanford University in California. In addition to Crime and Punishment in Early Modern Russia (2012), she is the author of Kinship and Politics: The Making of the Muscovite Political System, 1345–1547 (1987), By Honor Bound: State and Society in Early Modern Russia (1999); The Russian Empire, 1450–1801 (2017), and Visualizing Russia in Early Modern Europe (forthcoming August 2024).
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>261</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">967a0dde-dbff-11ee-a67a-4734e615c87d</guid>
      <title>Priyasha Saksena, &quot;Sovereignty, International Law, and the Princely States of Colonial South Asia&quot; (Oxford UP, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780192866585" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Sovereignty, International Law, and the Princely States of Colonial South Asia</em></a>&nbsp;(Oxford UP, 2023),&nbsp;Dr Priyasha Saksena interrogates the centuries-old question of what constitutes a sovereign state in the international legal sphere. She explores the history of sovereignty through an analysis of the jurisdictional politics involving the princely states of colonial South Asia. Governed by local rulers, these princely states were subject to British paramountcy whilst remaining legally distinct from directly ruled British India. Their legal status and the extent of their rights remained the subject of feverish debates through the entirety of British colonial rule. This book traces the ways in which the language of sovereignty shaped the discourse surrounding the legal status of the princely states to illustrate how the doctrine of sovereignty came to structure political imagination in colonial South Asia and the framework of the modern Indian state.</p><p>In this podcast, Dr Saksena explores how the various players within British India – international lawyers, British politicians, colonial officials, rulers and bureaucrats of princely states, and anti-colonial nationalists – used definitions of sovereignty to construct political orders in line with their interests and aspirations. By invoking the vernacular of sovereignty in contrasting ways to support their differing visions of imperial and world order, these actors also attempted to reconfigure the boundaries among the spheres of the national, the imperial, and the international. Our discussions chart the debates and disputes over the princely states across two hundred years of Indian history, and how they continually defined and redefined the concept of sovereignty and international legitimacy in South Asia.</p><p>The podcast explores the importance of the language of international law, how it is used and by whom, and how it is both a counterweight and a shaping force for political power. We discuss how different understandings of sovereignty have been (and still are) influencing the various ways in which people think about organising the world and their relationship to each other.</p><p><em>﻿</em><a href="https://essl.leeds.ac.uk/law/staff/1332/mr-alex-batesmith" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Alex Batesmith</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a Lecturer in Legal Profession at the School of Law, University of Leeds, UK. His research focuses on lawyers, their professional self-identity and their motivations, and how these shape the institutions and the discipline in which they work. Twitter: @batesmith</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 7 Mar 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/priyasha-saksena-sovereignty-international-law-and-the-princely-states-of-colonial-south-asia-oxford-up-2023-C9_M_KxZ</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780192866585" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Sovereignty, International Law, and the Princely States of Colonial South Asia</em></a>&nbsp;(Oxford UP, 2023),&nbsp;Dr Priyasha Saksena interrogates the centuries-old question of what constitutes a sovereign state in the international legal sphere. She explores the history of sovereignty through an analysis of the jurisdictional politics involving the princely states of colonial South Asia. Governed by local rulers, these princely states were subject to British paramountcy whilst remaining legally distinct from directly ruled British India. Their legal status and the extent of their rights remained the subject of feverish debates through the entirety of British colonial rule. This book traces the ways in which the language of sovereignty shaped the discourse surrounding the legal status of the princely states to illustrate how the doctrine of sovereignty came to structure political imagination in colonial South Asia and the framework of the modern Indian state.</p><p>In this podcast, Dr Saksena explores how the various players within British India – international lawyers, British politicians, colonial officials, rulers and bureaucrats of princely states, and anti-colonial nationalists – used definitions of sovereignty to construct political orders in line with their interests and aspirations. By invoking the vernacular of sovereignty in contrasting ways to support their differing visions of imperial and world order, these actors also attempted to reconfigure the boundaries among the spheres of the national, the imperial, and the international. Our discussions chart the debates and disputes over the princely states across two hundred years of Indian history, and how they continually defined and redefined the concept of sovereignty and international legitimacy in South Asia.</p><p>The podcast explores the importance of the language of international law, how it is used and by whom, and how it is both a counterweight and a shaping force for political power. We discuss how different understandings of sovereignty have been (and still are) influencing the various ways in which people think about organising the world and their relationship to each other.</p><p><em>﻿</em><a href="https://essl.leeds.ac.uk/law/staff/1332/mr-alex-batesmith" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Alex Batesmith</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a Lecturer in Legal Profession at the School of Law, University of Leeds, UK. His research focuses on lawyers, their professional self-identity and their motivations, and how these shape the institutions and the discipline in which they work. Twitter: @batesmith</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="72865774" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/85cecee6-a904-4577-9091-1b1f67736ee6/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=85cecee6-a904-4577-9091-1b1f67736ee6&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Priyasha Saksena, &quot;Sovereignty, International Law, and the Princely States of Colonial South Asia&quot; (Oxford UP, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:15:53</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In Sovereignty, International Law, and the Princely States of Colonial South Asia (Oxford UP, 2023), Dr Priyasha Saksena interrogates the centuries-old question of what constitutes a sovereign state in the international legal sphere. She explores the history of sovereignty through an analysis of the jurisdictional politics involving the princely states of colonial South Asia. Governed by local rulers, these princely states were subject to British paramountcy whilst remaining legally distinct from directly ruled British India. Their legal status and the extent of their rights remained the subject of feverish debates through the entirety of British colonial rule. This book traces the ways in which the language of sovereignty shaped the discourse surrounding the legal status of the princely states to illustrate how the doctrine of sovereignty came to structure political imagination in colonial South Asia and the framework of the modern Indian state.
In this podcast, Dr Saksena explores how the various players within British India – international lawyers, British politicians, colonial officials, rulers and bureaucrats of princely states, and anti-colonial nationalists – used definitions of sovereignty to construct political orders in line with their interests and aspirations. By invoking the vernacular of sovereignty in contrasting ways to support their differing visions of imperial and world order, these actors also attempted to reconfigure the boundaries among the spheres of the national, the imperial, and the international. Our discussions chart the debates and disputes over the princely states across two hundred years of Indian history, and how they continually defined and redefined the concept of sovereignty and international legitimacy in South Asia.
The podcast explores the importance of the language of international law, how it is used and by whom, and how it is both a counterweight and a shaping force for political power. We discuss how different understandings of sovereignty have been (and still are) influencing the various ways in which people think about organising the world and their relationship to each other.
﻿Alex Batesmith is a Lecturer in Legal Profession at the School of Law, University of Leeds, UK. His research focuses on lawyers, their professional self-identity and their motivations, and how these shape the institutions and the discipline in which they work. Twitter: @batesmith
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In Sovereignty, International Law, and the Princely States of Colonial South Asia (Oxford UP, 2023), Dr Priyasha Saksena interrogates the centuries-old question of what constitutes a sovereign state in the international legal sphere. She explores the history of sovereignty through an analysis of the jurisdictional politics involving the princely states of colonial South Asia. Governed by local rulers, these princely states were subject to British paramountcy whilst remaining legally distinct from directly ruled British India. Their legal status and the extent of their rights remained the subject of feverish debates through the entirety of British colonial rule. This book traces the ways in which the language of sovereignty shaped the discourse surrounding the legal status of the princely states to illustrate how the doctrine of sovereignty came to structure political imagination in colonial South Asia and the framework of the modern Indian state.
In this podcast, Dr Saksena explores how the various players within British India – international lawyers, British politicians, colonial officials, rulers and bureaucrats of princely states, and anti-colonial nationalists – used definitions of sovereignty to construct political orders in line with their interests and aspirations. By invoking the vernacular of sovereignty in contrasting ways to support their differing visions of imperial and world order, these actors also attempted to reconfigure the boundaries among the spheres of the national, the imperial, and the international. Our discussions chart the debates and disputes over the princely states across two hundred years of Indian history, and how they continually defined and redefined the concept of sovereignty and international legitimacy in South Asia.
The podcast explores the importance of the language of international law, how it is used and by whom, and how it is both a counterweight and a shaping force for political power. We discuss how different understandings of sovereignty have been (and still are) influencing the various ways in which people think about organising the world and their relationship to each other.
﻿Alex Batesmith is a Lecturer in Legal Profession at the School of Law, University of Leeds, UK. His research focuses on lawyers, their professional self-identity and their motivations, and how these shape the institutions and the discipline in which they work. Twitter: @batesmith
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>212</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">940c04ba-d67a-11ee-a41b-f3624a6bbe04</guid>
      <title>Carly Goodman, &quot;Dreamland: America&apos;s Immigration Lottery in an Age of Restriction&quot; (UNC Press, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In a world of border walls and obstacles to migration, a lottery where winners can gain permanent residency in the United States sounds too good to be true. Just as unlikely is the idea that the United States would make such visas available to foster diversity within a country where systemic racism endures. But in 1990, the United States Diversity Visa Lottery was created to do just that.</p><p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781469673042" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Dreamland: America's Immigration Lottery in an Age of Restriction</em></a>&nbsp;(UNC Press, 2023) tells the surprising story of this unlikely government program and its role in American life as well as the global story of migration. Historian Carly Goodman takes readers from Washington, D.C., where proponents deployed a colorblind narrative about our "nation of immigrants" to secure visas for white immigrants, to the African countries where it flourished and fostered dreams of going to America. From the post office to the internet, aspiring emigrants, visa agents, and others embraced the lottery and tried their luck in a time of austerity and limits. Rising African immigration to the United States has enriched American life, created opportunities for mobility, and nourished imagined possibilities. But the promise of the American dream has been threatened by the United States' embrace of anti-immigrant policies and persistent anti-Black racism.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Feb 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/carly-goodman-dreamland-americas-immigration-lottery-in-an-age-of-restriction-unc-press-2023-c8fod_Vx</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a world of border walls and obstacles to migration, a lottery where winners can gain permanent residency in the United States sounds too good to be true. Just as unlikely is the idea that the United States would make such visas available to foster diversity within a country where systemic racism endures. But in 1990, the United States Diversity Visa Lottery was created to do just that.</p><p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781469673042" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Dreamland: America's Immigration Lottery in an Age of Restriction</em></a>&nbsp;(UNC Press, 2023) tells the surprising story of this unlikely government program and its role in American life as well as the global story of migration. Historian Carly Goodman takes readers from Washington, D.C., where proponents deployed a colorblind narrative about our "nation of immigrants" to secure visas for white immigrants, to the African countries where it flourished and fostered dreams of going to America. From the post office to the internet, aspiring emigrants, visa agents, and others embraced the lottery and tried their luck in a time of austerity and limits. Rising African immigration to the United States has enriched American life, created opportunities for mobility, and nourished imagined possibilities. But the promise of the American dream has been threatened by the United States' embrace of anti-immigrant policies and persistent anti-Black racism.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="67474122" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/d796ed3e-ee51-47bc-9666-11dd3700bd2f/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=d796ed3e-ee51-47bc-9666-11dd3700bd2f&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Carly Goodman, &quot;Dreamland: America&apos;s Immigration Lottery in an Age of Restriction&quot; (UNC Press, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:10:17</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In a world of border walls and obstacles to migration, a lottery where winners can gain permanent residency in the United States sounds too good to be true. Just as unlikely is the idea that the United States would make such visas available to foster diversity within a country where systemic racism endures. But in 1990, the United States Diversity Visa Lottery was created to do just that.
Dreamland: America&apos;s Immigration Lottery in an Age of Restriction (UNC Press, 2023) tells the surprising story of this unlikely government program and its role in American life as well as the global story of migration. Historian Carly Goodman takes readers from Washington, D.C., where proponents deployed a colorblind narrative about our &quot;nation of immigrants&quot; to secure visas for white immigrants, to the African countries where it flourished and fostered dreams of going to America. From the post office to the internet, aspiring emigrants, visa agents, and others embraced the lottery and tried their luck in a time of austerity and limits. Rising African immigration to the United States has enriched American life, created opportunities for mobility, and nourished imagined possibilities. But the promise of the American dream has been threatened by the United States&apos; embrace of anti-immigrant policies and persistent anti-Black racism.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In a world of border walls and obstacles to migration, a lottery where winners can gain permanent residency in the United States sounds too good to be true. Just as unlikely is the idea that the United States would make such visas available to foster diversity within a country where systemic racism endures. But in 1990, the United States Diversity Visa Lottery was created to do just that.
Dreamland: America&apos;s Immigration Lottery in an Age of Restriction (UNC Press, 2023) tells the surprising story of this unlikely government program and its role in American life as well as the global story of migration. Historian Carly Goodman takes readers from Washington, D.C., where proponents deployed a colorblind narrative about our &quot;nation of immigrants&quot; to secure visas for white immigrants, to the African countries where it flourished and fostered dreams of going to America. From the post office to the internet, aspiring emigrants, visa agents, and others embraced the lottery and tried their luck in a time of austerity and limits. Rising African immigration to the United States has enriched American life, created opportunities for mobility, and nourished imagined possibilities. But the promise of the American dream has been threatened by the United States&apos; embrace of anti-immigrant policies and persistent anti-Black racism.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>112</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">896e83ae-d67d-11ee-8918-9b3d663e5414</guid>
      <title>Christian R. Burset, &quot;An Empire of Laws: Legal Pluralism in British Colonial Policy&quot; (Yale UP, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780300253238" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>An Empire of Laws: Legal Pluralism in British Colonial Policy</em></a>&nbsp;(Yale University Press, 2023), Dr. Christian R. Burset presents a compelling reexamination of how Britain used law to shape its empire.</p><p>For many years, Britain tried to impose its own laws on the peoples it conquered, and English common law usually followed the Union Jack. But the common law became less common after Britain emerged from the Seven Years’ War (1754–63) as the world’s most powerful empire. At that point, imperial policymakers adopted a strategy of legal pluralism: some colonies remained under English law, while others, including parts of India and former French territories in North America, retained much of their previous legal regimes.</p><p>As legal historian Dr. Burset argues, determining how much English law a colony received depended on what kind of colony Britain wanted to create. Policymakers thought English law could turn any territory into an anglicized, commercial colony; legal pluralism, in contrast, would ensure a colony’s economic and political subordination. Britain’s turn to legal pluralism thus reflected the victory of a new vision of empire—authoritarian, extractive, and tolerant—over more assimilationist and egalitarian alternatives. Among other implications, this helps explain American colonists’ reverence for the common law: it expressed and preserved their equal status in the empire. This book, the first empire-wide overview of law as an instrument of policy in the eighteenth-century British Empire, offers an imaginative rethinking of the relationship between tolerance and empire.</p><p><br></p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;forthcoming book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Feb 2024 05:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/christian-r-burset-an-empire-of-laws-legal-pluralism-in-british-colonial-policy-yale-up-2023-s2zDVZmu</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780300253238" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>An Empire of Laws: Legal Pluralism in British Colonial Policy</em></a>&nbsp;(Yale University Press, 2023), Dr. Christian R. Burset presents a compelling reexamination of how Britain used law to shape its empire.</p><p>For many years, Britain tried to impose its own laws on the peoples it conquered, and English common law usually followed the Union Jack. But the common law became less common after Britain emerged from the Seven Years’ War (1754–63) as the world’s most powerful empire. At that point, imperial policymakers adopted a strategy of legal pluralism: some colonies remained under English law, while others, including parts of India and former French territories in North America, retained much of their previous legal regimes.</p><p>As legal historian Dr. Burset argues, determining how much English law a colony received depended on what kind of colony Britain wanted to create. Policymakers thought English law could turn any territory into an anglicized, commercial colony; legal pluralism, in contrast, would ensure a colony’s economic and political subordination. Britain’s turn to legal pluralism thus reflected the victory of a new vision of empire—authoritarian, extractive, and tolerant—over more assimilationist and egalitarian alternatives. Among other implications, this helps explain American colonists’ reverence for the common law: it expressed and preserved their equal status in the empire. This book, the first empire-wide overview of law as an instrument of policy in the eighteenth-century British Empire, offers an imaginative rethinking of the relationship between tolerance and empire.</p><p><br></p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;forthcoming book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="42604165" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/ea9b196e-976a-4799-941e-baa57a1e7172/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=ea9b196e-976a-4799-941e-baa57a1e7172&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Christian R. Burset, &quot;An Empire of Laws: Legal Pluralism in British Colonial Policy&quot; (Yale UP, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:44:22</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In An Empire of Laws: Legal Pluralism in British Colonial Policy (Yale University Press, 2023), Dr. Christian R. Burset presents a compelling reexamination of how Britain used law to shape its empire.
For many years, Britain tried to impose its own laws on the peoples it conquered, and English common law usually followed the Union Jack. But the common law became less common after Britain emerged from the Seven Years’ War (1754–63) as the world’s most powerful empire. At that point, imperial policymakers adopted a strategy of legal pluralism: some colonies remained under English law, while others, including parts of India and former French territories in North America, retained much of their previous legal regimes.
As legal historian Dr. Burset argues, determining how much English law a colony received depended on what kind of colony Britain wanted to create. Policymakers thought English law could turn any territory into an anglicized, commercial colony; legal pluralism, in contrast, would ensure a colony’s economic and political subordination. Britain’s turn to legal pluralism thus reflected the victory of a new vision of empire—authoritarian, extractive, and tolerant—over more assimilationist and egalitarian alternatives. Among other implications, this helps explain American colonists’ reverence for the common law: it expressed and preserved their equal status in the empire. This book, the first empire-wide overview of law as an instrument of policy in the eighteenth-century British Empire, offers an imaginative rethinking of the relationship between tolerance and empire.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose forthcoming book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In An Empire of Laws: Legal Pluralism in British Colonial Policy (Yale University Press, 2023), Dr. Christian R. Burset presents a compelling reexamination of how Britain used law to shape its empire.
For many years, Britain tried to impose its own laws on the peoples it conquered, and English common law usually followed the Union Jack. But the common law became less common after Britain emerged from the Seven Years’ War (1754–63) as the world’s most powerful empire. At that point, imperial policymakers adopted a strategy of legal pluralism: some colonies remained under English law, while others, including parts of India and former French territories in North America, retained much of their previous legal regimes.
As legal historian Dr. Burset argues, determining how much English law a colony received depended on what kind of colony Britain wanted to create. Policymakers thought English law could turn any territory into an anglicized, commercial colony; legal pluralism, in contrast, would ensure a colony’s economic and political subordination. Britain’s turn to legal pluralism thus reflected the victory of a new vision of empire—authoritarian, extractive, and tolerant—over more assimilationist and egalitarian alternatives. Among other implications, this helps explain American colonists’ reverence for the common law: it expressed and preserved their equal status in the empire. This book, the first empire-wide overview of law as an instrument of policy in the eighteenth-century British Empire, offers an imaginative rethinking of the relationship between tolerance and empire.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose forthcoming book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>115</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">c861662e-d1a2-11ee-89fd-a7cd58bb1d8c</guid>
      <title>Jack Levin and Julie B. Wiest, &quot;Covert Violence: The Secret Weapon of the Powerless&quot; (Bristol University Press, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Covert violence occurs in all social institutions—including families and close relationships, education, workplaces, politics, mass media, and healthcare—each with its own unique power dynamics that shape the incidence and patterns of these vicious acts.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781529230697" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Covert Violence: The Secret Weapon of the Powerless</em></a>&nbsp;(Bristol University Press, 2023) by Dr. Jack Levin and Dr. Julie B. Wiest focuses on the types of surreptitious murder and mayhem that perpetrators intend to go unnoticed by would-be victims—until it’s too late. When such attacks are carried out with efficiency and competence, they may be disguised in official records as the result of illness, accident, or intentional self-harm, only on occasion to be later reclassified as the brutal crimes they are.</p><p>This compelling and much-needed book is for all those who seek to understand—and strive to prevent—violence in society.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;forthcoming book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/jack-levin-and-julie-b-wiest-covert-violence-the-secret-weapon-of-the-powerless-bristol-university-press-2023-_33ACAKC</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Covert violence occurs in all social institutions—including families and close relationships, education, workplaces, politics, mass media, and healthcare—each with its own unique power dynamics that shape the incidence and patterns of these vicious acts.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781529230697" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Covert Violence: The Secret Weapon of the Powerless</em></a>&nbsp;(Bristol University Press, 2023) by Dr. Jack Levin and Dr. Julie B. Wiest focuses on the types of surreptitious murder and mayhem that perpetrators intend to go unnoticed by would-be victims—until it’s too late. When such attacks are carried out with efficiency and competence, they may be disguised in official records as the result of illness, accident, or intentional self-harm, only on occasion to be later reclassified as the brutal crimes they are.</p><p>This compelling and much-needed book is for all those who seek to understand—and strive to prevent—violence in society.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;forthcoming book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="50243317" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/7bda7341-e42b-467d-a83c-cabfc1f4b6a0/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=7bda7341-e42b-467d-a83c-cabfc1f4b6a0&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Jack Levin and Julie B. Wiest, &quot;Covert Violence: The Secret Weapon of the Powerless&quot; (Bristol University Press, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:52:20</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Covert violence occurs in all social institutions—including families and close relationships, education, workplaces, politics, mass media, and healthcare—each with its own unique power dynamics that shape the incidence and patterns of these vicious acts. Covert Violence: The Secret Weapon of the Powerless (Bristol University Press, 2023) by Dr. Jack Levin and Dr. Julie B. Wiest focuses on the types of surreptitious murder and mayhem that perpetrators intend to go unnoticed by would-be victims—until it’s too late. When such attacks are carried out with efficiency and competence, they may be disguised in official records as the result of illness, accident, or intentional self-harm, only on occasion to be later reclassified as the brutal crimes they are.
This compelling and much-needed book is for all those who seek to understand—and strive to prevent—violence in society.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose forthcoming book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Covert violence occurs in all social institutions—including families and close relationships, education, workplaces, politics, mass media, and healthcare—each with its own unique power dynamics that shape the incidence and patterns of these vicious acts. Covert Violence: The Secret Weapon of the Powerless (Bristol University Press, 2023) by Dr. Jack Levin and Dr. Julie B. Wiest focuses on the types of surreptitious murder and mayhem that perpetrators intend to go unnoticed by would-be victims—until it’s too late. When such attacks are carried out with efficiency and competence, they may be disguised in official records as the result of illness, accident, or intentional self-harm, only on occasion to be later reclassified as the brutal crimes they are.
This compelling and much-needed book is for all those who seek to understand—and strive to prevent—violence in society.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose forthcoming book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>211</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">54decc42-d1ce-11ee-a983-eb19cf8f73cc</guid>
      <title>Devin O. Pendas, &quot;Democracy, Nazi Trials and Transitional Justice in Germany, 1945–1950&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2020)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In his new book,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780521871297" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Democracy, Nazi Trials, and Transitional Justice in Germany, 1945-1950</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Cambridge University Press, 2020), Dr. Devin O. Pendas examines how German courts conducted Nazi trials in the immediate postwar context. His work combines close readings of legal discourses in conjunction with very human stories to present a narrative of both irony and tragedy. In a masterful comparison of all four occupation zones, this book successfully musters historical data to challenge and overturn standard conceptualizations of “transitional justice.” It thus belongs definitively in the repertoire of legal scholars, political scientists, historians, and international relations theorists.</p><p><a href="https://www.bc.edu/bc-web/schools/mcas/departments/history/people/graduate-students/eric-grube.html" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Eric Grube</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a PhD candidate in the Department of History at Boston College. He studies modern German and Austrian history, with a special interest in right-wing paramilitary organizations across interwar Bavaria and Austria.</em><a href="https://commons.lib.jmu.edu/mhr/vol16/iss1/5/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>"Casualties of War? Refining the Civilian-Military Dichotomy in World War I"</em></a><em>, Madison Historical Review, 2019.&nbsp;</em><a href="https://essaysinhistory.com/articles/abstract/36/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>"Racist Limitations on Violence: The Nazi Occupation of Denmark"</em></a><em>, Essays in History, 2017.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/devin-o-pendas-democracy-nazi-trials-and-transitional-justice-in-germany-19451950-cambridge-up-2020-nqlbAyW0-aC5v_axb</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In his new book,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780521871297" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Democracy, Nazi Trials, and Transitional Justice in Germany, 1945-1950</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Cambridge University Press, 2020), Dr. Devin O. Pendas examines how German courts conducted Nazi trials in the immediate postwar context. His work combines close readings of legal discourses in conjunction with very human stories to present a narrative of both irony and tragedy. In a masterful comparison of all four occupation zones, this book successfully musters historical data to challenge and overturn standard conceptualizations of “transitional justice.” It thus belongs definitively in the repertoire of legal scholars, political scientists, historians, and international relations theorists.</p><p><a href="https://www.bc.edu/bc-web/schools/mcas/departments/history/people/graduate-students/eric-grube.html" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Eric Grube</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a PhD candidate in the Department of History at Boston College. He studies modern German and Austrian history, with a special interest in right-wing paramilitary organizations across interwar Bavaria and Austria.</em><a href="https://commons.lib.jmu.edu/mhr/vol16/iss1/5/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>"Casualties of War? Refining the Civilian-Military Dichotomy in World War I"</em></a><em>, Madison Historical Review, 2019.&nbsp;</em><a href="https://essaysinhistory.com/articles/abstract/36/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>"Racist Limitations on Violence: The Nazi Occupation of Denmark"</em></a><em>, Essays in History, 2017.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="50364087" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/a52ef1d9-ca47-45c9-bf32-6e87f18733ca/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=a52ef1d9-ca47-45c9-bf32-6e87f18733ca&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Devin O. Pendas, &quot;Democracy, Nazi Trials and Transitional Justice in Germany, 1945–1950&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2020)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:52:25</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In his new book, Democracy, Nazi Trials, and Transitional Justice in Germany, 1945-1950 (Cambridge University Press, 2020), Dr. Devin O. Pendas examines how German courts conducted Nazi trials in the immediate postwar context. His work combines close readings of legal discourses in conjunction with very human stories to present a narrative of both irony and tragedy. In a masterful comparison of all four occupation zones, this book successfully musters historical data to challenge and overturn standard conceptualizations of “transitional justice.” It thus belongs definitively in the repertoire of legal scholars, political scientists, historians, and international relations theorists.
Eric Grube is a PhD candidate in the Department of History at Boston College. He studies modern German and Austrian history, with a special interest in right-wing paramilitary organizations across interwar Bavaria and Austria.&quot;Casualties of War? Refining the Civilian-Military Dichotomy in World War I&quot;, Madison Historical Review, 2019. &quot;Racist Limitations on Violence: The Nazi Occupation of Denmark&quot;, Essays in History, 2017.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In his new book, Democracy, Nazi Trials, and Transitional Justice in Germany, 1945-1950 (Cambridge University Press, 2020), Dr. Devin O. Pendas examines how German courts conducted Nazi trials in the immediate postwar context. His work combines close readings of legal discourses in conjunction with very human stories to present a narrative of both irony and tragedy. In a masterful comparison of all four occupation zones, this book successfully musters historical data to challenge and overturn standard conceptualizations of “transitional justice.” It thus belongs definitively in the repertoire of legal scholars, political scientists, historians, and international relations theorists.
Eric Grube is a PhD candidate in the Department of History at Boston College. He studies modern German and Austrian history, with a special interest in right-wing paramilitary organizations across interwar Bavaria and Austria.&quot;Casualties of War? Refining the Civilian-Military Dichotomy in World War I&quot;, Madison Historical Review, 2019. &quot;Racist Limitations on Violence: The Nazi Occupation of Denmark&quot;, Essays in History, 2017.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>121</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">c1bd6c58-d0fa-11ee-9ea4-5f076307422d</guid>
      <title>Isabella Alexander, &quot;Copyright and Cartography: History, Law, and the Circulation of Geographical Knowledge&quot; (Bloomsbury, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Isabella Alexander's book&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781509958337" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Copyright and Cartography: History, Law, and the Circulation of Geographical Knowledge</em></a>&nbsp;(Bloomsbury, 2023) explores the intertwined histories of mapmaking and copyright law in Britain from the early modern period up to World War 1, focusing chiefly on the 18th and 19th centuries. Taking a multidisciplinary approach and making extensive use of the archival record, this is the first detailed, historical account of the relationship between maps and copyright. As such, it examines how the emergence and development of copyright law affected mapmakers and the map trade and how the application of copyright law to the field of mapmaking affected the development of copyright doctrine. Its explorations cast new light on the circulation of geographical knowledge, different cultures of authorship and creativity, and connections between copyright law, print culture, technology, and society.&nbsp;</p><p>The book will be of interest to legal historians, intellectual property scholars, and historians of the map and print culture, as well as those interested in the history of knowledge and how legal control over data has been exerted over time. It takes the reader back to the earliest attempts to establish who can own and control geographical information and its graphic representation in the form of a map. In so doing, it establishes a long history of tension between the interests of private enterprise, government, and the public. The book's investigations end in the first decades of the 20th century, but the tensions it identifies persist in the 21st century, although today paper maps have been largely replaced by web-based mapping platforms and digital geospatial data.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.bloomsburycollections.com/monograph?docid=b-9781509958368" rel="noopener noreferrer">The eBook editions of this book</a>&nbsp;are available open access under a CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 licence on bloomsburycollections.com. Open access was funded by the Australian Research Council.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/isabella-alexander-copyright-and-cartography-history-law-and-the-circulation-of-geographical-knowledge-bloomsbury-2023-cqOcWmzM</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isabella Alexander's book&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781509958337" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Copyright and Cartography: History, Law, and the Circulation of Geographical Knowledge</em></a>&nbsp;(Bloomsbury, 2023) explores the intertwined histories of mapmaking and copyright law in Britain from the early modern period up to World War 1, focusing chiefly on the 18th and 19th centuries. Taking a multidisciplinary approach and making extensive use of the archival record, this is the first detailed, historical account of the relationship between maps and copyright. As such, it examines how the emergence and development of copyright law affected mapmakers and the map trade and how the application of copyright law to the field of mapmaking affected the development of copyright doctrine. Its explorations cast new light on the circulation of geographical knowledge, different cultures of authorship and creativity, and connections between copyright law, print culture, technology, and society.&nbsp;</p><p>The book will be of interest to legal historians, intellectual property scholars, and historians of the map and print culture, as well as those interested in the history of knowledge and how legal control over data has been exerted over time. It takes the reader back to the earliest attempts to establish who can own and control geographical information and its graphic representation in the form of a map. In so doing, it establishes a long history of tension between the interests of private enterprise, government, and the public. The book's investigations end in the first decades of the 20th century, but the tensions it identifies persist in the 21st century, although today paper maps have been largely replaced by web-based mapping platforms and digital geospatial data.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.bloomsburycollections.com/monograph?docid=b-9781509958368" rel="noopener noreferrer">The eBook editions of this book</a>&nbsp;are available open access under a CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 licence on bloomsburycollections.com. Open access was funded by the Australian Research Council.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="41642810" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/cba452ff-f738-48b3-a8c3-203a0e001cdf/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=cba452ff-f738-48b3-a8c3-203a0e001cdf&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Isabella Alexander, &quot;Copyright and Cartography: History, Law, and the Circulation of Geographical Knowledge&quot; (Bloomsbury, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:43:22</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Isabella Alexander&apos;s book Copyright and Cartography: History, Law, and the Circulation of Geographical Knowledge (Bloomsbury, 2023) explores the intertwined histories of mapmaking and copyright law in Britain from the early modern period up to World War 1, focusing chiefly on the 18th and 19th centuries. Taking a multidisciplinary approach and making extensive use of the archival record, this is the first detailed, historical account of the relationship between maps and copyright. As such, it examines how the emergence and development of copyright law affected mapmakers and the map trade and how the application of copyright law to the field of mapmaking affected the development of copyright doctrine. Its explorations cast new light on the circulation of geographical knowledge, different cultures of authorship and creativity, and connections between copyright law, print culture, technology, and society. 
The book will be of interest to legal historians, intellectual property scholars, and historians of the map and print culture, as well as those interested in the history of knowledge and how legal control over data has been exerted over time. It takes the reader back to the earliest attempts to establish who can own and control geographical information and its graphic representation in the form of a map. In so doing, it establishes a long history of tension between the interests of private enterprise, government, and the public. The book&apos;s investigations end in the first decades of the 20th century, but the tensions it identifies persist in the 21st century, although today paper maps have been largely replaced by web-based mapping platforms and digital geospatial data. The eBook editions of this book are available open access under a CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 licence on bloomsburycollections.com. Open access was funded by the Australian Research Council.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Isabella Alexander&apos;s book Copyright and Cartography: History, Law, and the Circulation of Geographical Knowledge (Bloomsbury, 2023) explores the intertwined histories of mapmaking and copyright law in Britain from the early modern period up to World War 1, focusing chiefly on the 18th and 19th centuries. Taking a multidisciplinary approach and making extensive use of the archival record, this is the first detailed, historical account of the relationship between maps and copyright. As such, it examines how the emergence and development of copyright law affected mapmakers and the map trade and how the application of copyright law to the field of mapmaking affected the development of copyright doctrine. Its explorations cast new light on the circulation of geographical knowledge, different cultures of authorship and creativity, and connections between copyright law, print culture, technology, and society. 
The book will be of interest to legal historians, intellectual property scholars, and historians of the map and print culture, as well as those interested in the history of knowledge and how legal control over data has been exerted over time. It takes the reader back to the earliest attempts to establish who can own and control geographical information and its graphic representation in the form of a map. In so doing, it establishes a long history of tension between the interests of private enterprise, government, and the public. The book&apos;s investigations end in the first decades of the 20th century, but the tensions it identifies persist in the 21st century, although today paper maps have been largely replaced by web-based mapping platforms and digital geospatial data. The eBook editions of this book are available open access under a CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 licence on bloomsburycollections.com. Open access was funded by the Australian Research Council.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>107</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">047abde8-d105-11ee-92fb-276151bc9b57</guid>
      <title>Katharina Pistor, &quot;The Code of Capital: How the Law Creates Wealth and Inequality&quot; (Princeton UP, 2019)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>"Most lawyers, most actors, most soldiers and sailors, most athletes, most doctors, and most diplomats feel a certain solidarity in the face of outsiders, and, in spite of other differences, they share fragments of a common ethic in their working life, and a kind of moral complicity."</p><p>– Stuart Hampshire, <em>Justice is Conflict.</em></p><p>There are many more examples of professional solidarity, however fragmented and tentative, sharing the link of a common ethic that helps make systems, and the analysis of them, possible in the larger political economy. Writing from a law professor’s vantage point, <a href="https://www.law.columbia.edu/faculty/katharina-pistor" rel="noopener noreferrer">Katharina Pistor</a>, in her new book, <a href="https://www.amazon.com/dp/0691208603/?tag=newbooinhis-20" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Code of Capital: How the Law Creates Wealth and Inequality</em></a> (Princeton University Press, 2019) explains how even though law is a social good it has been harnessed as a private commodity over time that creates private wealth, and plays a significant role in the increasing disparity of financial outcomes.</p><p>As she points out in this interview, and her chapter ‘Masters of the Code’, it is ‘critical to have lawyers in the room’, and they clearly have the lead role in her well-researched and nuanced thesis centered on the decentralized institution of private law. Professor Pistor builds on Rudden’s ‘feudal calculus’ providing the long view of legal systems in maintaining and creating wealth and draws on historical analogies including the enclosure movements as she interweaves her analysis of capital asset creation with a broader critique of professional and institutional agency. Polanyi and Piketty figure into Pistor’s analysis among many others, as does the help of the state’s coercive backing as she draws on the breadth of her own governance research and analysis of the collapsed socialist regimes in the 1990s, and a research pivot toward western market economies following the 2008 Global Financial Crisis.</p><p>Professor Pistor is a comparative scholar with a keen interdisciplinary eye for the relationship between law, values, and markets, dovetailing larger concepts with detailed descriptions of the coding of ‘stocks, bonds, ideas, and even expectations—assets that exist only in law.’ All of which informs her inquiry into why some legal systems have been more accommodating to capital’s coding cravings and others less so, as she describes the process by which capital is created. She moves beyond legal realism’s less granular critiques, and as reviewers such as Samuel Moyn have suggested – this book ‘deserves to be the essential text of any movement today that concerns itself with law and political economy’.</p><p>Katharina Pistor is the Edwin B. Parker Professor of Comparative Law, and the Director of the Center on Global Legal Transformation at Columbia Law School.</p><p><em>Keith Krueger lectures at the SHU-UTS Business School in Shanghai.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/katharina-pistor-the-code-of-capital-how-the-law-creates-wealth-and-inequality-princeton-up-2019-n4zrHTXW-jA_uuxkt</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"Most lawyers, most actors, most soldiers and sailors, most athletes, most doctors, and most diplomats feel a certain solidarity in the face of outsiders, and, in spite of other differences, they share fragments of a common ethic in their working life, and a kind of moral complicity."</p><p>– Stuart Hampshire, <em>Justice is Conflict.</em></p><p>There are many more examples of professional solidarity, however fragmented and tentative, sharing the link of a common ethic that helps make systems, and the analysis of them, possible in the larger political economy. Writing from a law professor’s vantage point, <a href="https://www.law.columbia.edu/faculty/katharina-pistor" rel="noopener noreferrer">Katharina Pistor</a>, in her new book, <a href="https://www.amazon.com/dp/0691208603/?tag=newbooinhis-20" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Code of Capital: How the Law Creates Wealth and Inequality</em></a> (Princeton University Press, 2019) explains how even though law is a social good it has been harnessed as a private commodity over time that creates private wealth, and plays a significant role in the increasing disparity of financial outcomes.</p><p>As she points out in this interview, and her chapter ‘Masters of the Code’, it is ‘critical to have lawyers in the room’, and they clearly have the lead role in her well-researched and nuanced thesis centered on the decentralized institution of private law. Professor Pistor builds on Rudden’s ‘feudal calculus’ providing the long view of legal systems in maintaining and creating wealth and draws on historical analogies including the enclosure movements as she interweaves her analysis of capital asset creation with a broader critique of professional and institutional agency. Polanyi and Piketty figure into Pistor’s analysis among many others, as does the help of the state’s coercive backing as she draws on the breadth of her own governance research and analysis of the collapsed socialist regimes in the 1990s, and a research pivot toward western market economies following the 2008 Global Financial Crisis.</p><p>Professor Pistor is a comparative scholar with a keen interdisciplinary eye for the relationship between law, values, and markets, dovetailing larger concepts with detailed descriptions of the coding of ‘stocks, bonds, ideas, and even expectations—assets that exist only in law.’ All of which informs her inquiry into why some legal systems have been more accommodating to capital’s coding cravings and others less so, as she describes the process by which capital is created. She moves beyond legal realism’s less granular critiques, and as reviewers such as Samuel Moyn have suggested – this book ‘deserves to be the essential text of any movement today that concerns itself with law and political economy’.</p><p>Katharina Pistor is the Edwin B. Parker Professor of Comparative Law, and the Director of the Center on Global Legal Transformation at Columbia Law School.</p><p><em>Keith Krueger lectures at the SHU-UTS Business School in Shanghai.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="65349173" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/2785f29b-0fc6-4aae-918b-f97a8cc00809/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=2785f29b-0fc6-4aae-918b-f97a8cc00809&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Katharina Pistor, &quot;The Code of Capital: How the Law Creates Wealth and Inequality&quot; (Princeton UP, 2019)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:08:04</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>&quot;Most lawyers, most actors, most soldiers and sailors, most athletes, most doctors, and most diplomats feel a certain solidarity in the face of outsiders, and, in spite of other differences, they share fragments of a common ethic in their working life, and a kind of moral complicity.&quot;
– Stuart Hampshire, Justice is Conflict.
There are many more examples of professional solidarity, however fragmented and tentative, sharing the link of a common ethic that helps make systems, and the analysis of them, possible in the larger political economy. Writing from a law professor’s vantage point, Katharina Pistor, in her new book, The Code of Capital: How the Law Creates Wealth and Inequality (Princeton University Press, 2019) explains how even though law is a social good it has been harnessed as a private commodity over time that creates private wealth, and plays a significant role in the increasing disparity of financial outcomes.
As she points out in this interview, and her chapter ‘Masters of the Code’, it is ‘critical to have lawyers in the room’, and they clearly have the lead role in her well-researched and nuanced thesis centered on the decentralized institution of private law. Professor Pistor builds on Rudden’s ‘feudal calculus’ providing the long view of legal systems in maintaining and creating wealth and draws on historical analogies including the enclosure movements as she interweaves her analysis of capital asset creation with a broader critique of professional and institutional agency. Polanyi and Piketty figure into Pistor’s analysis among many others, as does the help of the state’s coercive backing as she draws on the breadth of her own governance research and analysis of the collapsed socialist regimes in the 1990s, and a research pivot toward western market economies following the 2008 Global Financial Crisis.
Professor Pistor is a comparative scholar with a keen interdisciplinary eye for the relationship between law, values, and markets, dovetailing larger concepts with detailed descriptions of the coding of ‘stocks, bonds, ideas, and even expectations—assets that exist only in law.’ All of which informs her inquiry into why some legal systems have been more accommodating to capital’s coding cravings and others less so, as she describes the process by which capital is created. She moves beyond legal realism’s less granular critiques, and as reviewers such as Samuel Moyn have suggested – this book ‘deserves to be the essential text of any movement today that concerns itself with law and political economy’.
Katharina Pistor is the Edwin B. Parker Professor of Comparative Law, and the Director of the Center on Global Legal Transformation at Columbia Law School.
Keith Krueger lectures at the SHU-UTS Business School in Shanghai.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>&quot;Most lawyers, most actors, most soldiers and sailors, most athletes, most doctors, and most diplomats feel a certain solidarity in the face of outsiders, and, in spite of other differences, they share fragments of a common ethic in their working life, and a kind of moral complicity.&quot;
– Stuart Hampshire, Justice is Conflict.
There are many more examples of professional solidarity, however fragmented and tentative, sharing the link of a common ethic that helps make systems, and the analysis of them, possible in the larger political economy. Writing from a law professor’s vantage point, Katharina Pistor, in her new book, The Code of Capital: How the Law Creates Wealth and Inequality (Princeton University Press, 2019) explains how even though law is a social good it has been harnessed as a private commodity over time that creates private wealth, and plays a significant role in the increasing disparity of financial outcomes.
As she points out in this interview, and her chapter ‘Masters of the Code’, it is ‘critical to have lawyers in the room’, and they clearly have the lead role in her well-researched and nuanced thesis centered on the decentralized institution of private law. Professor Pistor builds on Rudden’s ‘feudal calculus’ providing the long view of legal systems in maintaining and creating wealth and draws on historical analogies including the enclosure movements as she interweaves her analysis of capital asset creation with a broader critique of professional and institutional agency. Polanyi and Piketty figure into Pistor’s analysis among many others, as does the help of the state’s coercive backing as she draws on the breadth of her own governance research and analysis of the collapsed socialist regimes in the 1990s, and a research pivot toward western market economies following the 2008 Global Financial Crisis.
Professor Pistor is a comparative scholar with a keen interdisciplinary eye for the relationship between law, values, and markets, dovetailing larger concepts with detailed descriptions of the coding of ‘stocks, bonds, ideas, and even expectations—assets that exist only in law.’ All of which informs her inquiry into why some legal systems have been more accommodating to capital’s coding cravings and others less so, as she describes the process by which capital is created. She moves beyond legal realism’s less granular critiques, and as reviewers such as Samuel Moyn have suggested – this book ‘deserves to be the essential text of any movement today that concerns itself with law and political economy’.
Katharina Pistor is the Edwin B. Parker Professor of Comparative Law, and the Director of the Center on Global Legal Transformation at Columbia Law School.
Keith Krueger lectures at the SHU-UTS Business School in Shanghai.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>60</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">a86bc4be-d034-11ee-9f2e-bb27656ec09e</guid>
      <title>Allyson Mower, &quot;Developing Authorship and Copyright Ownership Policies: Best Practices&quot; (Rowman and Littlefield, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Authorship represents a new area of policy-related work within higher education research administration, funding agencies, and scholarly journal publishing.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781538173848" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Developing Authorship and Copyright Ownership Policies: Best Practices</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Rowman &amp; Littlefield, 2024) by Allyson Mower offers the unique aspect of combining details on copyright ownership as well as authorship into a single volume on best practices for administrators, journal publishers, research managers, and policy drafters within and outside of higher education. Discover more about the definition of 'author'--from data gatherer to writer--to inform policy development while understanding the interconnected relationships between authorship, copyright ownership, and scholarly communication. This book will also demonstrate how to develop inclusive and equitable authorship policies that reflect the range of diversity within the research endeavor and scholarly publishing.</p><p>Allyson Mower, MA, MLIS has served as the scholarly communication and copyright librarian at the University of Utah Marriott Library since 2008. Her expertise focuses on authorship—both current and historical trends—as well as the connections between information access, reading, and authoring. She developed the Utah Reading Census, an annual survey to determine Utahns’ attitudes towards reading and convened the France Davis Utah Black Archive in 2021. Allyson also serves as the policy liaison for the Academic Senate and runs a professional development book club.</p><p><em>Dr. Michael LaMagna is the Information Literacy Program &amp; Library Services Coordinator and Professor of Library Services at Delaware County Community College.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/allyson-mower-developing-authorship-and-copyright-ownership-policies-best-practices-rowman-and-littlefield-2024-WngvgzbQ</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Authorship represents a new area of policy-related work within higher education research administration, funding agencies, and scholarly journal publishing.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781538173848" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Developing Authorship and Copyright Ownership Policies: Best Practices</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Rowman &amp; Littlefield, 2024) by Allyson Mower offers the unique aspect of combining details on copyright ownership as well as authorship into a single volume on best practices for administrators, journal publishers, research managers, and policy drafters within and outside of higher education. Discover more about the definition of 'author'--from data gatherer to writer--to inform policy development while understanding the interconnected relationships between authorship, copyright ownership, and scholarly communication. This book will also demonstrate how to develop inclusive and equitable authorship policies that reflect the range of diversity within the research endeavor and scholarly publishing.</p><p>Allyson Mower, MA, MLIS has served as the scholarly communication and copyright librarian at the University of Utah Marriott Library since 2008. Her expertise focuses on authorship—both current and historical trends—as well as the connections between information access, reading, and authoring. She developed the Utah Reading Census, an annual survey to determine Utahns’ attitudes towards reading and convened the France Davis Utah Black Archive in 2021. Allyson also serves as the policy liaison for the Academic Senate and runs a professional development book club.</p><p><em>Dr. Michael LaMagna is the Information Literacy Program &amp; Library Services Coordinator and Professor of Library Services at Delaware County Community College.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="45656620" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/8c1b20bf-2125-4b80-b293-f59ec577a761/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=8c1b20bf-2125-4b80-b293-f59ec577a761&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Allyson Mower, &quot;Developing Authorship and Copyright Ownership Policies: Best Practices&quot; (Rowman and Littlefield, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:47:33</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Authorship represents a new area of policy-related work within higher education research administration, funding agencies, and scholarly journal publishing. Developing Authorship and Copyright Ownership Policies: Best Practices (Rowman &amp; Littlefield, 2024) by Allyson Mower offers the unique aspect of combining details on copyright ownership as well as authorship into a single volume on best practices for administrators, journal publishers, research managers, and policy drafters within and outside of higher education. Discover more about the definition of &apos;author&apos;--from data gatherer to writer--to inform policy development while understanding the interconnected relationships between authorship, copyright ownership, and scholarly communication. This book will also demonstrate how to develop inclusive and equitable authorship policies that reflect the range of diversity within the research endeavor and scholarly publishing.
Allyson Mower, MA, MLIS has served as the scholarly communication and copyright librarian at the University of Utah Marriott Library since 2008. Her expertise focuses on authorship—both current and historical trends—as well as the connections between information access, reading, and authoring. She developed the Utah Reading Census, an annual survey to determine Utahns’ attitudes towards reading and convened the France Davis Utah Black Archive in 2021. Allyson also serves as the policy liaison for the Academic Senate and runs a professional development book club.
Dr. Michael LaMagna is the Information Literacy Program &amp; Library Services Coordinator and Professor of Library Services at Delaware County Community College.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Authorship represents a new area of policy-related work within higher education research administration, funding agencies, and scholarly journal publishing. Developing Authorship and Copyright Ownership Policies: Best Practices (Rowman &amp; Littlefield, 2024) by Allyson Mower offers the unique aspect of combining details on copyright ownership as well as authorship into a single volume on best practices for administrators, journal publishers, research managers, and policy drafters within and outside of higher education. Discover more about the definition of &apos;author&apos;--from data gatherer to writer--to inform policy development while understanding the interconnected relationships between authorship, copyright ownership, and scholarly communication. This book will also demonstrate how to develop inclusive and equitable authorship policies that reflect the range of diversity within the research endeavor and scholarly publishing.
Allyson Mower, MA, MLIS has served as the scholarly communication and copyright librarian at the University of Utah Marriott Library since 2008. Her expertise focuses on authorship—both current and historical trends—as well as the connections between information access, reading, and authoring. She developed the Utah Reading Census, an annual survey to determine Utahns’ attitudes towards reading and convened the France Davis Utah Black Archive in 2021. Allyson also serves as the policy liaison for the Academic Senate and runs a professional development book club.
Dr. Michael LaMagna is the Information Literacy Program &amp; Library Services Coordinator and Professor of Library Services at Delaware County Community College.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>45</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">023e5dac-d03b-11ee-bc98-cfe1eb5ba249</guid>
      <title>Max Ward, &quot;Thought Crime: Ideology and State Power in Interwar Japan&quot; (Duke UP, 2019)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.middlebury.edu/academics/igs/faculty/node/285084" rel="noopener noreferrer">Max Ward</a>’s <a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/1478001658/?tag=newbooinhis-20" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Thought Crime: Ideology and State Power in Interwar Japan</em></a> (Duke University Press, 2019) analyzes the trajectory and transformations of the implementation of Japan’s 1925 Peace Preservation Law from its conception until the early years of the 1940s. The law, which began as a state effort to tamp down radicalism and “dangerous thought” (mostly Marxism) and preserve and protect imperial sovereignty, spawned a massive apparatus populated by both state and nonstate actors dedicated to ideologically converting and rehabilitating thought criminals. In addition to being a case study of the nature and ideology of punishment and repentance for thought crimes in late Imperial Japan—and the way in which the emperor functioned as a “ghost in the machine” animating the pursuit of political repression—Ward’s book also provides insight into the policing of ideological threats and its relationship to national identity politics. <em>Thought Crime</em> follows the evolution and transformation of the Peace Preservation Law and its attendant social and institutional structures from interwar attempts to repress dangerous thought to a system of mass ideological conversion, and finally to the consequences of its integration into practices of total mobilization during wartime.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/max-ward-thought-crime-ideology-and-state-power-in-interwar-japan-duke-up-2019-tlczFt7H</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.middlebury.edu/academics/igs/faculty/node/285084" rel="noopener noreferrer">Max Ward</a>’s <a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/1478001658/?tag=newbooinhis-20" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Thought Crime: Ideology and State Power in Interwar Japan</em></a> (Duke University Press, 2019) analyzes the trajectory and transformations of the implementation of Japan’s 1925 Peace Preservation Law from its conception until the early years of the 1940s. The law, which began as a state effort to tamp down radicalism and “dangerous thought” (mostly Marxism) and preserve and protect imperial sovereignty, spawned a massive apparatus populated by both state and nonstate actors dedicated to ideologically converting and rehabilitating thought criminals. In addition to being a case study of the nature and ideology of punishment and repentance for thought crimes in late Imperial Japan—and the way in which the emperor functioned as a “ghost in the machine” animating the pursuit of political repression—Ward’s book also provides insight into the policing of ideological threats and its relationship to national identity politics. <em>Thought Crime</em> follows the evolution and transformation of the Peace Preservation Law and its attendant social and institutional structures from interwar attempts to repress dangerous thought to a system of mass ideological conversion, and finally to the consequences of its integration into practices of total mobilization during wartime.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="68594283" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/5a608d07-283d-4549-9717-a16cd849b0d3/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=5a608d07-283d-4549-9717-a16cd849b0d3&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Max Ward, &quot;Thought Crime: Ideology and State Power in Interwar Japan&quot; (Duke UP, 2019)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:11:27</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Max Ward’s Thought Crime: Ideology and State Power in Interwar Japan (Duke University Press, 2019) analyzes the trajectory and transformations of the implementation of Japan’s 1925 Peace Preservation Law from its conception until the early years of the 1940s. The law, which began as a state effort to tamp down radicalism and “dangerous thought” (mostly Marxism) and preserve and protect imperial sovereignty, spawned a massive apparatus populated by both state and nonstate actors dedicated to ideologically converting and rehabilitating thought criminals. In addition to being a case study of the nature and ideology of punishment and repentance for thought crimes in late Imperial Japan—and the way in which the emperor functioned as a “ghost in the machine” animating the pursuit of political repression—Ward’s book also provides insight into the policing of ideological threats and its relationship to national identity politics. Thought Crime follows the evolution and transformation of the Peace Preservation Law and its attendant social and institutional structures from interwar attempts to repress dangerous thought to a system of mass ideological conversion, and finally to the consequences of its integration into practices of total mobilization during wartime.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Max Ward’s Thought Crime: Ideology and State Power in Interwar Japan (Duke University Press, 2019) analyzes the trajectory and transformations of the implementation of Japan’s 1925 Peace Preservation Law from its conception until the early years of the 1940s. The law, which began as a state effort to tamp down radicalism and “dangerous thought” (mostly Marxism) and preserve and protect imperial sovereignty, spawned a massive apparatus populated by both state and nonstate actors dedicated to ideologically converting and rehabilitating thought criminals. In addition to being a case study of the nature and ideology of punishment and repentance for thought crimes in late Imperial Japan—and the way in which the emperor functioned as a “ghost in the machine” animating the pursuit of political repression—Ward’s book also provides insight into the policing of ideological threats and its relationship to national identity politics. Thought Crime follows the evolution and transformation of the Peace Preservation Law and its attendant social and institutional structures from interwar attempts to repress dangerous thought to a system of mass ideological conversion, and finally to the consequences of its integration into practices of total mobilization during wartime.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>289</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">d20c8756-cf6f-11ee-95a6-2fff6a754258</guid>
      <title>Robert Louis Wilken, &quot;Liberty in the Things of God: The Christian Origins of Religious Freedom&quot; (Yale UP, 2019)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://berkleycenter.georgetown.edu/people/robert-louis-wilken" rel="noopener noreferrer">Robert Louis Wilken</a>, the William R. Kenan Professor Emeritus of the History of Christianity at the University of Virginia, has written an intellectual history of the ideas surrounding freedom of religion.&nbsp;<a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/0300226632/?tag=newbooinhis-20" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Liberty in the Things of God: The Christian Origins of Religious Freedom</em></a> (Yale University Press, 2019) offers a revisionist history of how the ideas of freedom of conscience and freedom of religion originated in the writings of the Christian fathers of the early Church, such as Tertullian and Lactantius, during the period when Christians were a persecuted sect of the Roman Empire.&nbsp;Wilken argues that it was not the political theorists of the Enlightenment who invented religious freedom in response to the wars of the Reformation, but rather the participants of the Reformation itself, including both Protestant and Catholic thinkers, who recovered ideas from the Roman-era Church fathers and used them to develop arguments about religious liberty for both individuals and faith communities.&nbsp;Wilken demonstrates that the concerns about whether faith could ever be enforced by the sword were present from the beginnings of Christianity.&nbsp;Wilken’s book helps inform our understanding of the origins of religious liberty, which is a concept of great import in contemporary debates about the meaning of the First Amendment’s Free Exercise and Establishment Clauses.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/robert-louis-wilken-liberty-in-the-things-of-god-the-christian-origins-of-religious-freedom-yale-up-2019-Ga9_SpIU-_Rgk8MFU</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://berkleycenter.georgetown.edu/people/robert-louis-wilken" rel="noopener noreferrer">Robert Louis Wilken</a>, the William R. Kenan Professor Emeritus of the History of Christianity at the University of Virginia, has written an intellectual history of the ideas surrounding freedom of religion.&nbsp;<a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/0300226632/?tag=newbooinhis-20" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Liberty in the Things of God: The Christian Origins of Religious Freedom</em></a> (Yale University Press, 2019) offers a revisionist history of how the ideas of freedom of conscience and freedom of religion originated in the writings of the Christian fathers of the early Church, such as Tertullian and Lactantius, during the period when Christians were a persecuted sect of the Roman Empire.&nbsp;Wilken argues that it was not the political theorists of the Enlightenment who invented religious freedom in response to the wars of the Reformation, but rather the participants of the Reformation itself, including both Protestant and Catholic thinkers, who recovered ideas from the Roman-era Church fathers and used them to develop arguments about religious liberty for both individuals and faith communities.&nbsp;Wilken demonstrates that the concerns about whether faith could ever be enforced by the sword were present from the beginnings of Christianity.&nbsp;Wilken’s book helps inform our understanding of the origins of religious liberty, which is a concept of great import in contemporary debates about the meaning of the First Amendment’s Free Exercise and Establishment Clauses.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="56718091" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/94fa213b-bf3d-4afd-a282-7cc7f01c514e/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=94fa213b-bf3d-4afd-a282-7cc7f01c514e&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Robert Louis Wilken, &quot;Liberty in the Things of God: The Christian Origins of Religious Freedom&quot; (Yale UP, 2019)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:59:04</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Robert Louis Wilken, the William R. Kenan Professor Emeritus of the History of Christianity at the University of Virginia, has written an intellectual history of the ideas surrounding freedom of religion. Liberty in the Things of God: The Christian Origins of Religious Freedom (Yale University Press, 2019) offers a revisionist history of how the ideas of freedom of conscience and freedom of religion originated in the writings of the Christian fathers of the early Church, such as Tertullian and Lactantius, during the period when Christians were a persecuted sect of the Roman Empire. Wilken argues that it was not the political theorists of the Enlightenment who invented religious freedom in response to the wars of the Reformation, but rather the participants of the Reformation itself, including both Protestant and Catholic thinkers, who recovered ideas from the Roman-era Church fathers and used them to develop arguments about religious liberty for both individuals and faith communities. Wilken demonstrates that the concerns about whether faith could ever be enforced by the sword were present from the beginnings of Christianity. Wilken’s book helps inform our understanding of the origins of religious liberty, which is a concept of great import in contemporary debates about the meaning of the First Amendment’s Free Exercise and Establishment Clauses.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Robert Louis Wilken, the William R. Kenan Professor Emeritus of the History of Christianity at the University of Virginia, has written an intellectual history of the ideas surrounding freedom of religion. Liberty in the Things of God: The Christian Origins of Religious Freedom (Yale University Press, 2019) offers a revisionist history of how the ideas of freedom of conscience and freedom of religion originated in the writings of the Christian fathers of the early Church, such as Tertullian and Lactantius, during the period when Christians were a persecuted sect of the Roman Empire. Wilken argues that it was not the political theorists of the Enlightenment who invented religious freedom in response to the wars of the Reformation, but rather the participants of the Reformation itself, including both Protestant and Catholic thinkers, who recovered ideas from the Roman-era Church fathers and used them to develop arguments about religious liberty for both individuals and faith communities. Wilken demonstrates that the concerns about whether faith could ever be enforced by the sword were present from the beginnings of Christianity. Wilken’s book helps inform our understanding of the origins of religious liberty, which is a concept of great import in contemporary debates about the meaning of the First Amendment’s Free Exercise and Establishment Clauses.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>50</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">75af1dc8-ce8b-11ee-b8ca-db925ab0abe6</guid>
      <title>Cameron McWhirter and Zusha Elinson, &quot;American Gun: The True Story of the AR-15&quot; (FSG, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In the 1950s, an obsessive firearms designer named Eugene Stoner invented the AR-15 rifle in a California garage. High-minded and patriotic, Stoner sought to devise a lightweight, easy-to-use weapon that could replace the M1s touted by soldiers in World War II. What he did create was a lethal handheld icon of the American century.</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780374103859" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>American Gun: The True Story of the AR-15</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(FSG, 2023), the veteran&nbsp;<em>Wall Street Journal</em>&nbsp;reporters Cameron McWhirter and Zusha Elinson track the AR-15 from inception to ubiquity. How did the same gun represent the essence of freedom to millions of Americans and the essence of evil to millions more? To answer this question, McWhirter and Elinson follow Stoner--the American Kalashnikov--as he struggled mightily to win support for his invention, which under the name M16 would become standard equipment in Vietnam. Shunned by gun owners at first, the rifle's popularity would take off thanks to a renegade band of small-time gun makers. And in the 2000s, it would become the weapon of choice for mass shooters, prompting widespread calls for proscription even as the gun industry embraced it as a financial savior. Writing with fairness and compassion, McWhirter and Elinson explore America's gun culture, revealing the deep appeal of the AR-15, the awful havoc it wreaks, and the politics of reducing its toll. The result is a moral history of contemporary America's love affair with technology, freedom, and weaponry.</p><p><strong>Cameron McWhirter</strong>&nbsp;is a national reporter for&nbsp;<em>The Wall Street Journal</em>, based in Atlanta. He has covered mass shootings, violent protests and natural disasters across the South. He is also the author of&nbsp;<em>Red Summer: The Summer of 1919 and the Awakening of Black America</em>. Previously, he reported for other publications in the U.S., as well as Bosnia, Iraq, and Ethiopia.</p><p><strong>Zusha Elinson&nbsp;</strong>is a national reporter, writing about guns and violence for the&nbsp;<em>Wall Street Journal</em>. Based in California, he has also written for the Center for Investigative Reporting and the&nbsp;<em>New York Times</em>&nbsp;Bay Area section.</p><p><strong>Recommended Books</strong>:</p><ul>
<li>Robert Caro,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/the-path-to-power-the-years-of-lyndon-johnson-i-robert-a-caro/6701672?ean=9780679729457" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Path to Power</em></a>
</li>
<li>William Shawcross,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/sideshow-kissinger-nixon-and-the-destruction-of-cambodia-william-shawcross/9113542?ean=9780815412243" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Sideshow</em></a>
</li>
<li>Dexter Filkins,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/the-forever-war-dexter-filkins/8724573?ean=9780307279446" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Forever War</a>
</li>
<li>Adam Winkler,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/gunfight-the-battle-over-the-right-to-bear-arms-in-america-adam-winkler/8757576?ean=9780393345834" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Gun Fight</em></a>
</li>
<li>Tim Mak,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/misfire-inside-the-downfall-of-the-nra-tim-mak/16943803?ean=9781524746452" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Misfire</em></a>
</li>
<li>Doug Stanton,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/12-strong-the-declassified-true-story-of-the-horse-soldiers-doug-stanton/15560142?ean=9781416580522" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Horse Solidiers</em></a>
</li>
</ul><p><em>﻿</em></p><p><a href="https://www.ithaca.edu/faculty/cholmes" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Chris Holmes</em></a><em>&nbsp;is Chair of Literatures in English and Associate Professor at Ithaca College. He writes criticism on contemporary global literatures. His book, Kazuo Ishiguro Against World Literature, is under contract with Bloomsbury Publishing. He is the co-director of&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.ithaca.edu/academics/school-humanities-and-sciences/writing/new-voices-festival" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The New Voices Festival</em></a><em>, a celebration of work in poetry, prose, and playwriting by up-and-coming young writers.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/cameron-mcwhirter-and-zusha-elinson-american-gun-the-true-story-of-the-ar-15-fsg-2023-dAQp40i0</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the 1950s, an obsessive firearms designer named Eugene Stoner invented the AR-15 rifle in a California garage. High-minded and patriotic, Stoner sought to devise a lightweight, easy-to-use weapon that could replace the M1s touted by soldiers in World War II. What he did create was a lethal handheld icon of the American century.</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780374103859" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>American Gun: The True Story of the AR-15</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(FSG, 2023), the veteran&nbsp;<em>Wall Street Journal</em>&nbsp;reporters Cameron McWhirter and Zusha Elinson track the AR-15 from inception to ubiquity. How did the same gun represent the essence of freedom to millions of Americans and the essence of evil to millions more? To answer this question, McWhirter and Elinson follow Stoner--the American Kalashnikov--as he struggled mightily to win support for his invention, which under the name M16 would become standard equipment in Vietnam. Shunned by gun owners at first, the rifle's popularity would take off thanks to a renegade band of small-time gun makers. And in the 2000s, it would become the weapon of choice for mass shooters, prompting widespread calls for proscription even as the gun industry embraced it as a financial savior. Writing with fairness and compassion, McWhirter and Elinson explore America's gun culture, revealing the deep appeal of the AR-15, the awful havoc it wreaks, and the politics of reducing its toll. The result is a moral history of contemporary America's love affair with technology, freedom, and weaponry.</p><p><strong>Cameron McWhirter</strong>&nbsp;is a national reporter for&nbsp;<em>The Wall Street Journal</em>, based in Atlanta. He has covered mass shootings, violent protests and natural disasters across the South. He is also the author of&nbsp;<em>Red Summer: The Summer of 1919 and the Awakening of Black America</em>. Previously, he reported for other publications in the U.S., as well as Bosnia, Iraq, and Ethiopia.</p><p><strong>Zusha Elinson&nbsp;</strong>is a national reporter, writing about guns and violence for the&nbsp;<em>Wall Street Journal</em>. Based in California, he has also written for the Center for Investigative Reporting and the&nbsp;<em>New York Times</em>&nbsp;Bay Area section.</p><p><strong>Recommended Books</strong>:</p><ul>
<li>Robert Caro,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/the-path-to-power-the-years-of-lyndon-johnson-i-robert-a-caro/6701672?ean=9780679729457" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Path to Power</em></a>
</li>
<li>William Shawcross,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/sideshow-kissinger-nixon-and-the-destruction-of-cambodia-william-shawcross/9113542?ean=9780815412243" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Sideshow</em></a>
</li>
<li>Dexter Filkins,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/the-forever-war-dexter-filkins/8724573?ean=9780307279446" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Forever War</a>
</li>
<li>Adam Winkler,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/gunfight-the-battle-over-the-right-to-bear-arms-in-america-adam-winkler/8757576?ean=9780393345834" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Gun Fight</em></a>
</li>
<li>Tim Mak,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/misfire-inside-the-downfall-of-the-nra-tim-mak/16943803?ean=9781524746452" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Misfire</em></a>
</li>
<li>Doug Stanton,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/12-strong-the-declassified-true-story-of-the-horse-soldiers-doug-stanton/15560142?ean=9781416580522" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Horse Solidiers</em></a>
</li>
</ul><p><em>﻿</em></p><p><a href="https://www.ithaca.edu/faculty/cholmes" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Chris Holmes</em></a><em>&nbsp;is Chair of Literatures in English and Associate Professor at Ithaca College. He writes criticism on contemporary global literatures. His book, Kazuo Ishiguro Against World Literature, is under contract with Bloomsbury Publishing. He is the co-director of&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.ithaca.edu/academics/school-humanities-and-sciences/writing/new-voices-festival" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The New Voices Festival</em></a><em>, a celebration of work in poetry, prose, and playwriting by up-and-coming young writers.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="62198243" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/5a310e4d-b3c7-463c-9e4e-0f4c7d43d750/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=5a310e4d-b3c7-463c-9e4e-0f4c7d43d750&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Cameron McWhirter and Zusha Elinson, &quot;American Gun: The True Story of the AR-15&quot; (FSG, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:04:47</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In the 1950s, an obsessive firearms designer named Eugene Stoner invented the AR-15 rifle in a California garage. High-minded and patriotic, Stoner sought to devise a lightweight, easy-to-use weapon that could replace the M1s touted by soldiers in World War II. What he did create was a lethal handheld icon of the American century.
In American Gun: The True Story of the AR-15 (FSG, 2023), the veteran Wall Street Journal reporters Cameron McWhirter and Zusha Elinson track the AR-15 from inception to ubiquity. How did the same gun represent the essence of freedom to millions of Americans and the essence of evil to millions more? To answer this question, McWhirter and Elinson follow Stoner--the American Kalashnikov--as he struggled mightily to win support for his invention, which under the name M16 would become standard equipment in Vietnam. Shunned by gun owners at first, the rifle&apos;s popularity would take off thanks to a renegade band of small-time gun makers. And in the 2000s, it would become the weapon of choice for mass shooters, prompting widespread calls for proscription even as the gun industry embraced it as a financial savior. Writing with fairness and compassion, McWhirter and Elinson explore America&apos;s gun culture, revealing the deep appeal of the AR-15, the awful havoc it wreaks, and the politics of reducing its toll. The result is a moral history of contemporary America&apos;s love affair with technology, freedom, and weaponry.
Cameron McWhirter is a national reporter for The Wall Street Journal, based in Atlanta. He has covered mass shootings, violent protests and natural disasters across the South. He is also the author of Red Summer: The Summer of 1919 and the Awakening of Black America. Previously, he reported for other publications in the U.S., as well as Bosnia, Iraq, and Ethiopia.
Zusha Elinson is a national reporter, writing about guns and violence for the Wall Street Journal. Based in California, he has also written for the Center for Investigative Reporting and the New York Times Bay Area section.
Recommended Books:
Robert Caro, The Path to Power
William Shawcross, Sideshow
Dexter Filkins, The Forever War
Adam Winkler, Gun Fight
Tim Mak, Misfire
Doug Stanton, Horse Solidiers
﻿
Chris Holmes is Chair of Literatures in English and Associate Professor at Ithaca College. He writes criticism on contemporary global literatures. His book, Kazuo Ishiguro Against World Literature, is under contract with Bloomsbury Publishing. He is the co-director of The New Voices Festival, a celebration of work in poetry, prose, and playwriting by up-and-coming young writers.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In the 1950s, an obsessive firearms designer named Eugene Stoner invented the AR-15 rifle in a California garage. High-minded and patriotic, Stoner sought to devise a lightweight, easy-to-use weapon that could replace the M1s touted by soldiers in World War II. What he did create was a lethal handheld icon of the American century.
In American Gun: The True Story of the AR-15 (FSG, 2023), the veteran Wall Street Journal reporters Cameron McWhirter and Zusha Elinson track the AR-15 from inception to ubiquity. How did the same gun represent the essence of freedom to millions of Americans and the essence of evil to millions more? To answer this question, McWhirter and Elinson follow Stoner--the American Kalashnikov--as he struggled mightily to win support for his invention, which under the name M16 would become standard equipment in Vietnam. Shunned by gun owners at first, the rifle&apos;s popularity would take off thanks to a renegade band of small-time gun makers. And in the 2000s, it would become the weapon of choice for mass shooters, prompting widespread calls for proscription even as the gun industry embraced it as a financial savior. Writing with fairness and compassion, McWhirter and Elinson explore America&apos;s gun culture, revealing the deep appeal of the AR-15, the awful havoc it wreaks, and the politics of reducing its toll. The result is a moral history of contemporary America&apos;s love affair with technology, freedom, and weaponry.
Cameron McWhirter is a national reporter for The Wall Street Journal, based in Atlanta. He has covered mass shootings, violent protests and natural disasters across the South. He is also the author of Red Summer: The Summer of 1919 and the Awakening of Black America. Previously, he reported for other publications in the U.S., as well as Bosnia, Iraq, and Ethiopia.
Zusha Elinson is a national reporter, writing about guns and violence for the Wall Street Journal. Based in California, he has also written for the Center for Investigative Reporting and the New York Times Bay Area section.
Recommended Books:
Robert Caro, The Path to Power
William Shawcross, Sideshow
Dexter Filkins, The Forever War
Adam Winkler, Gun Fight
Tim Mak, Misfire
Doug Stanton, Horse Solidiers
﻿
Chris Holmes is Chair of Literatures in English and Associate Professor at Ithaca College. He writes criticism on contemporary global literatures. His book, Kazuo Ishiguro Against World Literature, is under contract with Bloomsbury Publishing. He is the co-director of The New Voices Festival, a celebration of work in poetry, prose, and playwriting by up-and-coming young writers.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>120</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">87c5f58c-cdd6-11ee-8e06-c7fa3bf3e6f1</guid>
      <title>Tom Hamilton, &quot;A Widow&apos;s Vengeance After the Wars of Religion: Gender and Justice in Renaissance France&quot; (Oxford UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Paris, 1599. At the end of the French Wars of Religion, the widow Renée Chevalier instigated the prosecution of the military captain Mathurin Delacanche, who had committed multiple acts of rape, homicide, and theft against the villagers who lived around her château near the cathedral city of Sens. But how could Chevalier win her case when King Henri IV's Edict of Nantes ordered that the recent troubles should be forgotten as 'things that had never been'?&nbsp;</p><p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780192870179" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>A Widow's Vengeance After the Wars of Religion: Gender and Justice in Renaissance France</em></a>&nbsp;(Oxford UP, 2024) is an original and wide-ranging account of the impact of the religious wars on daily life. Based on neglected archival sources and an exceptional criminal trial, it recovers the experiences of women, peasants, and foot soldiers, who are marginalized in most historical accounts. Tom Hamilton shows how this trial contributed to a wider struggle for justice and an end to violence in postwar France. People throughout the society of the Old Regime did not consider rape and pillage as inevitable consequences of war, and denounced soldiers' illicit violence when they were given the chance. As a result, the early modern laws of war need to be understood not only as the idealistic invention of great legal thinkers, but also as a practical framework that enabled magistrates to do justice for plaintiffs and witnesses, like Chevalier and the villagers who lived under her protection.&nbsp;</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/tom-hamilton-a-widows-vengeance-after-the-wars-of-religion-gender-and-justice-in-renaissance-france-oxford-up-2024-_bLABvCB</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paris, 1599. At the end of the French Wars of Religion, the widow Renée Chevalier instigated the prosecution of the military captain Mathurin Delacanche, who had committed multiple acts of rape, homicide, and theft against the villagers who lived around her château near the cathedral city of Sens. But how could Chevalier win her case when King Henri IV's Edict of Nantes ordered that the recent troubles should be forgotten as 'things that had never been'?&nbsp;</p><p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780192870179" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>A Widow's Vengeance After the Wars of Religion: Gender and Justice in Renaissance France</em></a>&nbsp;(Oxford UP, 2024) is an original and wide-ranging account of the impact of the religious wars on daily life. Based on neglected archival sources and an exceptional criminal trial, it recovers the experiences of women, peasants, and foot soldiers, who are marginalized in most historical accounts. Tom Hamilton shows how this trial contributed to a wider struggle for justice and an end to violence in postwar France. People throughout the society of the Old Regime did not consider rape and pillage as inevitable consequences of war, and denounced soldiers' illicit violence when they were given the chance. As a result, the early modern laws of war need to be understood not only as the idealistic invention of great legal thinkers, but also as a practical framework that enabled magistrates to do justice for plaintiffs and witnesses, like Chevalier and the villagers who lived under her protection.&nbsp;</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="53740967" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/5db60a86-ba1a-4b61-971b-33e346e8f7a1/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=5db60a86-ba1a-4b61-971b-33e346e8f7a1&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Tom Hamilton, &quot;A Widow&apos;s Vengeance After the Wars of Religion: Gender and Justice in Renaissance France&quot; (Oxford UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:55:58</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Paris, 1599. At the end of the French Wars of Religion, the widow Renée Chevalier instigated the prosecution of the military captain Mathurin Delacanche, who had committed multiple acts of rape, homicide, and theft against the villagers who lived around her château near the cathedral city of Sens. But how could Chevalier win her case when King Henri IV&apos;s Edict of Nantes ordered that the recent troubles should be forgotten as &apos;things that had never been&apos;? 
A Widow&apos;s Vengeance After the Wars of Religion: Gender and Justice in Renaissance France (Oxford UP, 2024) is an original and wide-ranging account of the impact of the religious wars on daily life. Based on neglected archival sources and an exceptional criminal trial, it recovers the experiences of women, peasants, and foot soldiers, who are marginalized in most historical accounts. Tom Hamilton shows how this trial contributed to a wider struggle for justice and an end to violence in postwar France. People throughout the society of the Old Regime did not consider rape and pillage as inevitable consequences of war, and denounced soldiers&apos; illicit violence when they were given the chance. As a result, the early modern laws of war need to be understood not only as the idealistic invention of great legal thinkers, but also as a practical framework that enabled magistrates to do justice for plaintiffs and witnesses, like Chevalier and the villagers who lived under her protection. 
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Paris, 1599. At the end of the French Wars of Religion, the widow Renée Chevalier instigated the prosecution of the military captain Mathurin Delacanche, who had committed multiple acts of rape, homicide, and theft against the villagers who lived around her château near the cathedral city of Sens. But how could Chevalier win her case when King Henri IV&apos;s Edict of Nantes ordered that the recent troubles should be forgotten as &apos;things that had never been&apos;? 
A Widow&apos;s Vengeance After the Wars of Religion: Gender and Justice in Renaissance France (Oxford UP, 2024) is an original and wide-ranging account of the impact of the religious wars on daily life. Based on neglected archival sources and an exceptional criminal trial, it recovers the experiences of women, peasants, and foot soldiers, who are marginalized in most historical accounts. Tom Hamilton shows how this trial contributed to a wider struggle for justice and an end to violence in postwar France. People throughout the society of the Old Regime did not consider rape and pillage as inevitable consequences of war, and denounced soldiers&apos; illicit violence when they were given the chance. As a result, the early modern laws of war need to be understood not only as the idealistic invention of great legal thinkers, but also as a practical framework that enabled magistrates to do justice for plaintiffs and witnesses, like Chevalier and the villagers who lived under her protection. 
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>63</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7fc35c4e-cc4b-11ee-a7de-1b8016d5d4d3</guid>
      <title>Ian Saxine, &quot;Properties of Empire: Indians, Colonists, and Land Speculators on the New England Frontier&quot; (NYU Press, 2019)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In <a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/147983212X/?tag=newbooinhis-20" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Properties of Empire: Indians, Colonists, and Land Speculators on the New England Frontier</em></a> (NYU Press, 2019), <a href="https://www.bridgew.edu/department/history/our-faculty#Ian%20Saxine" rel="noopener noreferrer">Ian Saxine</a>, Visiting Assistant Professor of History at Bridgewater State University, shows the dynamic relationship between Native and English systems of property on the turbulent edge of Britain’s empire, and how so many colonists came to believe their prosperity depended on acknowledging Indigenous land rights. As absentee land speculators and hardscrabble colonists squabbled over conflicting visions for the frontier, Wabanaki Indians’ unity allowed them to forcefully project their own interpretations of often poorly remembered old land deeds and treaties. The result was the creation of a system of property in Maine that defied English law, and preserved Native power and territory. Eventually, ordinary colonists, dissident speculators, and grasping officials succeeded in undermining and finally destroying this arrangement, a process that took place in councils and courtrooms, in taverns and treaties, and on battlefields.</p><p><em>Properties of Empire</em> challenges assumptions about the relationship between Indigenous and imperial property creation in early America, as well as the fixed nature of Indian “sales” of land, revealing the existence of a prolonged struggle to re-interpret seventeenth-century land transactions and treaties well into the eighteenth century. The ongoing struggle to construct a commonly agreed-upon culture of landownership shaped diplomacy, imperial administration, and matters of colonial law in powerful ways, and its legacy remains with us today.</p><p><em>Ryan Tripp is adjunct history faculty for the College of Online and Continuing Education at Southern New Hampshire University.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/ian-saxine-properties-of-empire-indians-colonists-and-land-speculators-on-the-new-england-frontier-nyu-press-2019-kdLpBIGN-H_zeoPGr</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In <a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/147983212X/?tag=newbooinhis-20" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Properties of Empire: Indians, Colonists, and Land Speculators on the New England Frontier</em></a> (NYU Press, 2019), <a href="https://www.bridgew.edu/department/history/our-faculty#Ian%20Saxine" rel="noopener noreferrer">Ian Saxine</a>, Visiting Assistant Professor of History at Bridgewater State University, shows the dynamic relationship between Native and English systems of property on the turbulent edge of Britain’s empire, and how so many colonists came to believe their prosperity depended on acknowledging Indigenous land rights. As absentee land speculators and hardscrabble colonists squabbled over conflicting visions for the frontier, Wabanaki Indians’ unity allowed them to forcefully project their own interpretations of often poorly remembered old land deeds and treaties. The result was the creation of a system of property in Maine that defied English law, and preserved Native power and territory. Eventually, ordinary colonists, dissident speculators, and grasping officials succeeded in undermining and finally destroying this arrangement, a process that took place in councils and courtrooms, in taverns and treaties, and on battlefields.</p><p><em>Properties of Empire</em> challenges assumptions about the relationship between Indigenous and imperial property creation in early America, as well as the fixed nature of Indian “sales” of land, revealing the existence of a prolonged struggle to re-interpret seventeenth-century land transactions and treaties well into the eighteenth century. The ongoing struggle to construct a commonly agreed-upon culture of landownership shaped diplomacy, imperial administration, and matters of colonial law in powerful ways, and its legacy remains with us today.</p><p><em>Ryan Tripp is adjunct history faculty for the College of Online and Continuing Education at Southern New Hampshire University.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="79671117" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/ba5c5eee-7a3d-4664-b0de-227b07d2d119/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=ba5c5eee-7a3d-4664-b0de-227b07d2d119&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Ian Saxine, &quot;Properties of Empire: Indians, Colonists, and Land Speculators on the New England Frontier&quot; (NYU Press, 2019)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:22:59</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In Properties of Empire: Indians, Colonists, and Land Speculators on the New England Frontier (NYU Press, 2019), Ian Saxine, Visiting Assistant Professor of History at Bridgewater State University, shows the dynamic relationship between Native and English systems of property on the turbulent edge of Britain’s empire, and how so many colonists came to believe their prosperity depended on acknowledging Indigenous land rights. As absentee land speculators and hardscrabble colonists squabbled over conflicting visions for the frontier, Wabanaki Indians’ unity allowed them to forcefully project their own interpretations of often poorly remembered old land deeds and treaties. The result was the creation of a system of property in Maine that defied English law, and preserved Native power and territory. Eventually, ordinary colonists, dissident speculators, and grasping officials succeeded in undermining and finally destroying this arrangement, a process that took place in councils and courtrooms, in taverns and treaties, and on battlefields.
Properties of Empire challenges assumptions about the relationship between Indigenous and imperial property creation in early America, as well as the fixed nature of Indian “sales” of land, revealing the existence of a prolonged struggle to re-interpret seventeenth-century land transactions and treaties well into the eighteenth century. The ongoing struggle to construct a commonly agreed-upon culture of landownership shaped diplomacy, imperial administration, and matters of colonial law in powerful ways, and its legacy remains with us today.
Ryan Tripp is adjunct history faculty for the College of Online and Continuing Education at Southern New Hampshire University.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In Properties of Empire: Indians, Colonists, and Land Speculators on the New England Frontier (NYU Press, 2019), Ian Saxine, Visiting Assistant Professor of History at Bridgewater State University, shows the dynamic relationship between Native and English systems of property on the turbulent edge of Britain’s empire, and how so many colonists came to believe their prosperity depended on acknowledging Indigenous land rights. As absentee land speculators and hardscrabble colonists squabbled over conflicting visions for the frontier, Wabanaki Indians’ unity allowed them to forcefully project their own interpretations of often poorly remembered old land deeds and treaties. The result was the creation of a system of property in Maine that defied English law, and preserved Native power and territory. Eventually, ordinary colonists, dissident speculators, and grasping officials succeeded in undermining and finally destroying this arrangement, a process that took place in councils and courtrooms, in taverns and treaties, and on battlefields.
Properties of Empire challenges assumptions about the relationship between Indigenous and imperial property creation in early America, as well as the fixed nature of Indian “sales” of land, revealing the existence of a prolonged struggle to re-interpret seventeenth-century land transactions and treaties well into the eighteenth century. The ongoing struggle to construct a commonly agreed-upon culture of landownership shaped diplomacy, imperial administration, and matters of colonial law in powerful ways, and its legacy remains with us today.
Ryan Tripp is adjunct history faculty for the College of Online and Continuing Education at Southern New Hampshire University.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>512</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">a5bb76e2-bfae-11ee-9992-fb4f9ee2e593</guid>
      <title>Richard L. Hasen, &quot;A Real Right to Vote: How a Constitutional Amendment Can Safeguard American Democracy&quot; (Princeton UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Throughout history, too many Americans have been disenfranchised or faced needless barriers to voting. Part of the blame falls on the Constitution, which does not contain an affirmative right to vote. The Supreme Court has made matters worse by failing to protect voting rights and limiting Congress's ability to do so. The time has come for voters to take action and push for an amendment to the Constitution that would guarantee this right for all.</p><p>Drawing on troubling stories of state attempts to disenfranchise military voters, women, African Americans, students, former felons, Native Americans, and others, Richard Hasen argues that American democracy can and should do better in assuring that all eligible voters can cast a meaningful vote that will be fairly counted. He shows how a constitutional right to vote can deescalate voting wars between political parties that lead to endless rounds of litigation and undermine voter confidence in elections, and can safeguard democracy against dangerous attempts at election subversion like the one we witnessed in the aftermath of the 2020 presidential election.</p><p>The path to a constitutional amendment is undoubtedly hard, especially in these polarized times.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691257716" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>A Real Right to Vote: How a Constitutional Amendment Can Safeguard American Democracy</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Princeton UP, 2024) explains what's in it for conservatives who have resisted voting reform and reveals how the pursuit of an amendment can yield tangible dividends for democracy long before ratification.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/richard-l-hasen-a-real-right-to-vote-how-a-constitutional-amendment-can-safeguard-american-democracy-princeton-up-2024-qow2JBky</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Throughout history, too many Americans have been disenfranchised or faced needless barriers to voting. Part of the blame falls on the Constitution, which does not contain an affirmative right to vote. The Supreme Court has made matters worse by failing to protect voting rights and limiting Congress's ability to do so. The time has come for voters to take action and push for an amendment to the Constitution that would guarantee this right for all.</p><p>Drawing on troubling stories of state attempts to disenfranchise military voters, women, African Americans, students, former felons, Native Americans, and others, Richard Hasen argues that American democracy can and should do better in assuring that all eligible voters can cast a meaningful vote that will be fairly counted. He shows how a constitutional right to vote can deescalate voting wars between political parties that lead to endless rounds of litigation and undermine voter confidence in elections, and can safeguard democracy against dangerous attempts at election subversion like the one we witnessed in the aftermath of the 2020 presidential election.</p><p>The path to a constitutional amendment is undoubtedly hard, especially in these polarized times.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691257716" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>A Real Right to Vote: How a Constitutional Amendment Can Safeguard American Democracy</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Princeton UP, 2024) explains what's in it for conservatives who have resisted voting reform and reveals how the pursuit of an amendment can yield tangible dividends for democracy long before ratification.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="27006274" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/4eaa622d-bcf7-44ee-ae21-3b818892f08a/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=4eaa622d-bcf7-44ee-ae21-3b818892f08a&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Richard L. Hasen, &quot;A Real Right to Vote: How a Constitutional Amendment Can Safeguard American Democracy&quot; (Princeton UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:28:07</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Throughout history, too many Americans have been disenfranchised or faced needless barriers to voting. Part of the blame falls on the Constitution, which does not contain an affirmative right to vote. The Supreme Court has made matters worse by failing to protect voting rights and limiting Congress&apos;s ability to do so. The time has come for voters to take action and push for an amendment to the Constitution that would guarantee this right for all.
Drawing on troubling stories of state attempts to disenfranchise military voters, women, African Americans, students, former felons, Native Americans, and others, Richard Hasen argues that American democracy can and should do better in assuring that all eligible voters can cast a meaningful vote that will be fairly counted. He shows how a constitutional right to vote can deescalate voting wars between political parties that lead to endless rounds of litigation and undermine voter confidence in elections, and can safeguard democracy against dangerous attempts at election subversion like the one we witnessed in the aftermath of the 2020 presidential election.
The path to a constitutional amendment is undoubtedly hard, especially in these polarized times. A Real Right to Vote: How a Constitutional Amendment Can Safeguard American Democracy (Princeton UP, 2024) explains what&apos;s in it for conservatives who have resisted voting reform and reveals how the pursuit of an amendment can yield tangible dividends for democracy long before ratification.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Throughout history, too many Americans have been disenfranchised or faced needless barriers to voting. Part of the blame falls on the Constitution, which does not contain an affirmative right to vote. The Supreme Court has made matters worse by failing to protect voting rights and limiting Congress&apos;s ability to do so. The time has come for voters to take action and push for an amendment to the Constitution that would guarantee this right for all.
Drawing on troubling stories of state attempts to disenfranchise military voters, women, African Americans, students, former felons, Native Americans, and others, Richard Hasen argues that American democracy can and should do better in assuring that all eligible voters can cast a meaningful vote that will be fairly counted. He shows how a constitutional right to vote can deescalate voting wars between political parties that lead to endless rounds of litigation and undermine voter confidence in elections, and can safeguard democracy against dangerous attempts at election subversion like the one we witnessed in the aftermath of the 2020 presidential election.
The path to a constitutional amendment is undoubtedly hard, especially in these polarized times. A Real Right to Vote: How a Constitutional Amendment Can Safeguard American Democracy (Princeton UP, 2024) explains what&apos;s in it for conservatives who have resisted voting reform and reveals how the pursuit of an amendment can yield tangible dividends for democracy long before ratification.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>80</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2537746e-caa1-11ee-940e-d76b8a0075f8</guid>
      <title>Ryan Manucha, &quot;Booze, Cigarettes, and Constitutional Dust-Ups: Canada&apos;s Quest for Interprovincial Free Trade&quot; (McGill-Queen&apos;s UP, 2022)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Today I talked to&nbsp;Ryan Manucha about his new book&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780228014423" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Booze, Cigarettes, and Constitutional Dust-Ups: Canada's Quest for Interprovincial Free Trade</em></a>&nbsp;(McGill-Queen's UP, 2022).</p><p>In 2012, after Gerard Comeau had driven to Quebec to purchase cheaper beer and crossed back into New Brunswick, police officers tailed and detained him, confiscated his haul, and levied a fine. With Comeau's story as his starting point, Ryan Manucha tells the fascinating tale of Canadian interprovincial trade. Interprovincial trade barriers and other frictions bring much-needed revenue into the coffers of&nbsp;provincial governments, which then can direct these funds toward various social services, but hinder the mobility of professionals, account for the different building codes imposed by Canadian provinces, and generally increase the price tag for Canadian consumers. In a candid interview, Ryan explains his interest in this topic, the backbone of his book's argument, and his efforts to make change workable.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/ryan-manucha-booze-cigarettes-and-constitutional-dust-ups-canadas-quest-for-interprovincial-free-trade-mcgill-queens-up-2022-ESo9I9pY</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today I talked to&nbsp;Ryan Manucha about his new book&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780228014423" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Booze, Cigarettes, and Constitutional Dust-Ups: Canada's Quest for Interprovincial Free Trade</em></a>&nbsp;(McGill-Queen's UP, 2022).</p><p>In 2012, after Gerard Comeau had driven to Quebec to purchase cheaper beer and crossed back into New Brunswick, police officers tailed and detained him, confiscated his haul, and levied a fine. With Comeau's story as his starting point, Ryan Manucha tells the fascinating tale of Canadian interprovincial trade. Interprovincial trade barriers and other frictions bring much-needed revenue into the coffers of&nbsp;provincial governments, which then can direct these funds toward various social services, but hinder the mobility of professionals, account for the different building codes imposed by Canadian provinces, and generally increase the price tag for Canadian consumers. In a candid interview, Ryan explains his interest in this topic, the backbone of his book's argument, and his efforts to make change workable.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="48698669" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/39341bb9-0adf-4538-9e8e-dbd837d49f84/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=39341bb9-0adf-4538-9e8e-dbd837d49f84&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Ryan Manucha, &quot;Booze, Cigarettes, and Constitutional Dust-Ups: Canada&apos;s Quest for Interprovincial Free Trade&quot; (McGill-Queen&apos;s UP, 2022)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:50:43</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Today I talked to Ryan Manucha about his new book Booze, Cigarettes, and Constitutional Dust-Ups: Canada&apos;s Quest for Interprovincial Free Trade (McGill-Queen&apos;s UP, 2022).
In 2012, after Gerard Comeau had driven to Quebec to purchase cheaper beer and crossed back into New Brunswick, police officers tailed and detained him, confiscated his haul, and levied a fine. With Comeau&apos;s story as his starting point, Ryan Manucha tells the fascinating tale of Canadian interprovincial trade. Interprovincial trade barriers and other frictions bring much-needed revenue into the coffers of provincial governments, which then can direct these funds toward various social services, but hinder the mobility of professionals, account for the different building codes imposed by Canadian provinces, and generally increase the price tag for Canadian consumers. In a candid interview, Ryan explains his interest in this topic, the backbone of his book&apos;s argument, and his efforts to make change workable.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Today I talked to Ryan Manucha about his new book Booze, Cigarettes, and Constitutional Dust-Ups: Canada&apos;s Quest for Interprovincial Free Trade (McGill-Queen&apos;s UP, 2022).
In 2012, after Gerard Comeau had driven to Quebec to purchase cheaper beer and crossed back into New Brunswick, police officers tailed and detained him, confiscated his haul, and levied a fine. With Comeau&apos;s story as his starting point, Ryan Manucha tells the fascinating tale of Canadian interprovincial trade. Interprovincial trade barriers and other frictions bring much-needed revenue into the coffers of provincial governments, which then can direct these funds toward various social services, but hinder the mobility of professionals, account for the different building codes imposed by Canadian provinces, and generally increase the price tag for Canadian consumers. In a candid interview, Ryan explains his interest in this topic, the backbone of his book&apos;s argument, and his efforts to make change workable.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>34</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1869a878-cab6-11ee-b137-2f7e12bbf73f</guid>
      <title>Marisol LeBrón, &quot;Policing Life and Death: Race, Violence, and Resistance in Puerto Rico&quot; (U California Press, 2019)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://liberalarts.utexas.edu/mals/faculty/ml47499" rel="noopener noreferrer">Marisol LeBrón</a>’s new book, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/0520300173/?tag=newbooinhis-20" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Policing Life and Death: Race, Violence, and Resistance in Puerto Rico</em></a> (University of California Press, 2019), examines the rise of and resistance to punitive governance (tough on crime policing policies) in Puerto Rico from the 1990s to the present. As in the United States, LeBrón shows how increased investment in policing did not respond to a spike in crime. It actually emerged as a strategy to shore up the local political and economic establishment mired in the crisis of the archipelago’s postwar colonial development policy “Operation Bootstrap,” spiking unemployment, lack of U.S. investment, and a growing informal economy which included the drug trade. Puerto Rican elites hoped to reinvent themselves as models for tough on crime policing and gatekeepers for the United States to Latin America. Beginning with the mano dura contra el crimen (iron fist against crime) policy of commonwealth Governor Pedro Rosselló in 1993, police increasingly targeted lower income, predominantly Black public housing complexes (caseríos) as sources of criminality and lawlessness. Using Justice Department reports, social media research, newspapers, and oral interviews to create a “police archive,” LeBrón demonstrates that while police killings, brutality, surveillance, and harassment were hallmarks of mano dura, the policy also reinvented popular understandings of the “who” and “where” of crime that endure to the present. In doing so, she shows how presumptions about race, class, gender, and sexuality linked to certain places (public housing, sex work neighborhoods, schools, and universities) created notions of victims and criminals who “deserved” life or death. The book’s second half explores critiques of and resistance to punitive governance by looking at underground rap, university student activism, social media debates, and non-punitive anti-violence activism. These case studies show the growing resistance to policing as policy instead of social investment, but also the tenacity of the discourses of criminality activists must wrestle with today.</p><p>LeBrón is also the author of the forthcoming Aftershocks of Disaster: Puerto Rico Before and After the Storm (Haymarket Books) and the co-creator of the Puerto Rico Syllabus.</p><p><em>Jesse Zarley will be an assistant professor of history at Saint Joseph’s College on Long Island, where in Fall 2019 he will be teaching Latin American, Caribbean, and World History. His research interests include borderlands, ethnohistory, race, and transnationalism during Latin America’s Age of Revolution, particularly in Chile and Argentina. He is the author of a recent article on Mapuche leaders and Chile’s independence wars. You can follow him on Twitter.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/marisol-lebron-policing-life-and-death-race-violence-and-resistance-in-puerto-rico-u-california-press-2019-5NQwNYri-O734EGsy</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://liberalarts.utexas.edu/mals/faculty/ml47499" rel="noopener noreferrer">Marisol LeBrón</a>’s new book, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/0520300173/?tag=newbooinhis-20" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Policing Life and Death: Race, Violence, and Resistance in Puerto Rico</em></a> (University of California Press, 2019), examines the rise of and resistance to punitive governance (tough on crime policing policies) in Puerto Rico from the 1990s to the present. As in the United States, LeBrón shows how increased investment in policing did not respond to a spike in crime. It actually emerged as a strategy to shore up the local political and economic establishment mired in the crisis of the archipelago’s postwar colonial development policy “Operation Bootstrap,” spiking unemployment, lack of U.S. investment, and a growing informal economy which included the drug trade. Puerto Rican elites hoped to reinvent themselves as models for tough on crime policing and gatekeepers for the United States to Latin America. Beginning with the mano dura contra el crimen (iron fist against crime) policy of commonwealth Governor Pedro Rosselló in 1993, police increasingly targeted lower income, predominantly Black public housing complexes (caseríos) as sources of criminality and lawlessness. Using Justice Department reports, social media research, newspapers, and oral interviews to create a “police archive,” LeBrón demonstrates that while police killings, brutality, surveillance, and harassment were hallmarks of mano dura, the policy also reinvented popular understandings of the “who” and “where” of crime that endure to the present. In doing so, she shows how presumptions about race, class, gender, and sexuality linked to certain places (public housing, sex work neighborhoods, schools, and universities) created notions of victims and criminals who “deserved” life or death. The book’s second half explores critiques of and resistance to punitive governance by looking at underground rap, university student activism, social media debates, and non-punitive anti-violence activism. These case studies show the growing resistance to policing as policy instead of social investment, but also the tenacity of the discourses of criminality activists must wrestle with today.</p><p>LeBrón is also the author of the forthcoming Aftershocks of Disaster: Puerto Rico Before and After the Storm (Haymarket Books) and the co-creator of the Puerto Rico Syllabus.</p><p><em>Jesse Zarley will be an assistant professor of history at Saint Joseph’s College on Long Island, where in Fall 2019 he will be teaching Latin American, Caribbean, and World History. His research interests include borderlands, ethnohistory, race, and transnationalism during Latin America’s Age of Revolution, particularly in Chile and Argentina. He is the author of a recent article on Mapuche leaders and Chile’s independence wars. You can follow him on Twitter.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="63268498" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/7c959166-92ff-4cbb-b09a-bf274ac92174/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=7c959166-92ff-4cbb-b09a-bf274ac92174&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Marisol LeBrón, &quot;Policing Life and Death: Race, Violence, and Resistance in Puerto Rico&quot; (U California Press, 2019)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:05:54</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Marisol LeBrón’s new book, Policing Life and Death: Race, Violence, and Resistance in Puerto Rico (University of California Press, 2019), examines the rise of and resistance to punitive governance (tough on crime policing policies) in Puerto Rico from the 1990s to the present. As in the United States, LeBrón shows how increased investment in policing did not respond to a spike in crime. It actually emerged as a strategy to shore up the local political and economic establishment mired in the crisis of the archipelago’s postwar colonial development policy “Operation Bootstrap,” spiking unemployment, lack of U.S. investment, and a growing informal economy which included the drug trade. Puerto Rican elites hoped to reinvent themselves as models for tough on crime policing and gatekeepers for the United States to Latin America. Beginning with the mano dura contra el crimen (iron fist against crime) policy of commonwealth Governor Pedro Rosselló in 1993, police increasingly targeted lower income, predominantly Black public housing complexes (caseríos) as sources of criminality and lawlessness. Using Justice Department reports, social media research, newspapers, and oral interviews to create a “police archive,” LeBrón demonstrates that while police killings, brutality, surveillance, and harassment were hallmarks of mano dura, the policy also reinvented popular understandings of the “who” and “where” of crime that endure to the present. In doing so, she shows how presumptions about race, class, gender, and sexuality linked to certain places (public housing, sex work neighborhoods, schools, and universities) created notions of victims and criminals who “deserved” life or death. The book’s second half explores critiques of and resistance to punitive governance by looking at underground rap, university student activism, social media debates, and non-punitive anti-violence activism. These case studies show the growing resistance to policing as policy instead of social investment, but also the tenacity of the discourses of criminality activists must wrestle with today.
LeBrón is also the author of the forthcoming Aftershocks of Disaster: Puerto Rico Before and After the Storm (Haymarket Books) and the co-creator of the Puerto Rico Syllabus.
Jesse Zarley will be an assistant professor of history at Saint Joseph’s College on Long Island, where in Fall 2019 he will be teaching Latin American, Caribbean, and World History. His research interests include borderlands, ethnohistory, race, and transnationalism during Latin America’s Age of Revolution, particularly in Chile and Argentina. He is the author of a recent article on Mapuche leaders and Chile’s independence wars. You can follow him on Twitter.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Marisol LeBrón’s new book, Policing Life and Death: Race, Violence, and Resistance in Puerto Rico (University of California Press, 2019), examines the rise of and resistance to punitive governance (tough on crime policing policies) in Puerto Rico from the 1990s to the present. As in the United States, LeBrón shows how increased investment in policing did not respond to a spike in crime. It actually emerged as a strategy to shore up the local political and economic establishment mired in the crisis of the archipelago’s postwar colonial development policy “Operation Bootstrap,” spiking unemployment, lack of U.S. investment, and a growing informal economy which included the drug trade. Puerto Rican elites hoped to reinvent themselves as models for tough on crime policing and gatekeepers for the United States to Latin America. Beginning with the mano dura contra el crimen (iron fist against crime) policy of commonwealth Governor Pedro Rosselló in 1993, police increasingly targeted lower income, predominantly Black public housing complexes (caseríos) as sources of criminality and lawlessness. Using Justice Department reports, social media research, newspapers, and oral interviews to create a “police archive,” LeBrón demonstrates that while police killings, brutality, surveillance, and harassment were hallmarks of mano dura, the policy also reinvented popular understandings of the “who” and “where” of crime that endure to the present. In doing so, she shows how presumptions about race, class, gender, and sexuality linked to certain places (public housing, sex work neighborhoods, schools, and universities) created notions of victims and criminals who “deserved” life or death. The book’s second half explores critiques of and resistance to punitive governance by looking at underground rap, university student activism, social media debates, and non-punitive anti-violence activism. These case studies show the growing resistance to policing as policy instead of social investment, but also the tenacity of the discourses of criminality activists must wrestle with today.
LeBrón is also the author of the forthcoming Aftershocks of Disaster: Puerto Rico Before and After the Storm (Haymarket Books) and the co-creator of the Puerto Rico Syllabus.
Jesse Zarley will be an assistant professor of history at Saint Joseph’s College on Long Island, where in Fall 2019 he will be teaching Latin American, Caribbean, and World History. His research interests include borderlands, ethnohistory, race, and transnationalism during Latin America’s Age of Revolution, particularly in Chile and Argentina. He is the author of a recent article on Mapuche leaders and Chile’s independence wars. You can follow him on Twitter.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>46</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">c0ce28be-c9c5-11ee-80a2-f75bd4e604dd</guid>
      <title>Laura Flannigan, &quot;Royal Justice and the Making of the Tudor Commonwealth, 1485–1547&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The dawn of the Tudor regime is one of most recognisable periods of English history. Yet the focus on its monarchs' private lives and ministers' constitutional reforms creates the impression that this age's major developments were isolated to halls of power, far removed from the wider populace.</p><p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009371360" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Royal Justice and the Making of the Tudor Commonwealth, 1485–1547</em></a>&nbsp;(Cambridge University Press, 2023) by Dr. Laura Flannigan presents a more holistic vision of politics and society in late mediaeval and early modern England. Delving into the rich but little-studied archive of the royal Court of Requests, it reconstructs collaborations between sovereigns and subjects on the formulation of an important governmental ideal: justice. Examining the institutional and social dimensions of this point of contact, this study places ordinary people, their knowledge and demands at the heart of a judicial revolution unfolding within the governments of Henry VII and Henry VIII. Yet it also demonstrates that directing extraordinary royal justice into ordinary procedures created as many problems as it solved.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;forthcoming book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/laura-flannigan-royal-justice-and-the-making-of-the-tudor-commonwealth-14851547-cambridge-up-2023-foUBNzUO</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The dawn of the Tudor regime is one of most recognisable periods of English history. Yet the focus on its monarchs' private lives and ministers' constitutional reforms creates the impression that this age's major developments were isolated to halls of power, far removed from the wider populace.</p><p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009371360" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Royal Justice and the Making of the Tudor Commonwealth, 1485–1547</em></a>&nbsp;(Cambridge University Press, 2023) by Dr. Laura Flannigan presents a more holistic vision of politics and society in late mediaeval and early modern England. Delving into the rich but little-studied archive of the royal Court of Requests, it reconstructs collaborations between sovereigns and subjects on the formulation of an important governmental ideal: justice. Examining the institutional and social dimensions of this point of contact, this study places ordinary people, their knowledge and demands at the heart of a judicial revolution unfolding within the governments of Henry VII and Henry VIII. Yet it also demonstrates that directing extraordinary royal justice into ordinary procedures created as many problems as it solved.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;forthcoming book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="49066120" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/898da9ae-2366-476e-aeaa-695c6cbe3c8f/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=898da9ae-2366-476e-aeaa-695c6cbe3c8f&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Laura Flannigan, &quot;Royal Justice and the Making of the Tudor Commonwealth, 1485–1547&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:51:06</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The dawn of the Tudor regime is one of most recognisable periods of English history. Yet the focus on its monarchs&apos; private lives and ministers&apos; constitutional reforms creates the impression that this age&apos;s major developments were isolated to halls of power, far removed from the wider populace.
Royal Justice and the Making of the Tudor Commonwealth, 1485–1547 (Cambridge University Press, 2023) by Dr. Laura Flannigan presents a more holistic vision of politics and society in late mediaeval and early modern England. Delving into the rich but little-studied archive of the royal Court of Requests, it reconstructs collaborations between sovereigns and subjects on the formulation of an important governmental ideal: justice. Examining the institutional and social dimensions of this point of contact, this study places ordinary people, their knowledge and demands at the heart of a judicial revolution unfolding within the governments of Henry VII and Henry VIII. Yet it also demonstrates that directing extraordinary royal justice into ordinary procedures created as many problems as it solved.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose forthcoming book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The dawn of the Tudor regime is one of most recognisable periods of English history. Yet the focus on its monarchs&apos; private lives and ministers&apos; constitutional reforms creates the impression that this age&apos;s major developments were isolated to halls of power, far removed from the wider populace.
Royal Justice and the Making of the Tudor Commonwealth, 1485–1547 (Cambridge University Press, 2023) by Dr. Laura Flannigan presents a more holistic vision of politics and society in late mediaeval and early modern England. Delving into the rich but little-studied archive of the royal Court of Requests, it reconstructs collaborations between sovereigns and subjects on the formulation of an important governmental ideal: justice. Examining the institutional and social dimensions of this point of contact, this study places ordinary people, their knowledge and demands at the heart of a judicial revolution unfolding within the governments of Henry VII and Henry VIII. Yet it also demonstrates that directing extraordinary royal justice into ordinary procedures created as many problems as it solved.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose forthcoming book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>111</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">704bc7cc-c91e-11ee-863b-73b835dc5ead</guid>
      <title>Jeanne Theoharis, &quot;The Strange Careers of the Jim Crow North: Segregation and Struggle outside of the South&quot; (NYU Press, 2019)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In this New Books Network/Gotham Center for NYC History podcast, guest host Beth Harpaz, editor of the City University of New York website <a href="https://sum.cuny.edu/" rel="noopener noreferrer">SUM</a>, interviews <a href="http://www.brooklyn.cuny.edu/web/academics/faculty/faculty_profile.jsp?faculty=510" rel="noopener noreferrer">Jeanne Theoharis</a>, distinguished professor of political science at Brooklyn College. Their topic is a new book just out from NYU Press, co-edited by Theoharis, called <a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/1479820334/?tag=newbooinhis-20" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Strange Careers of the Jim Crow North: Segregation and Struggle outside of the South </em></a>(NYU Press, 2019).</p><p>The book looks at the history of institutionalized racism around the U.S., showing that laws, policies, and entitlements in every region of the country not only created segregated communities, but also promoted affluence and opportunities for white Americans while keeping African Americans out of the middle class.</p><p>“There did not need to be a ‘no coloreds’ sign for hotels, restaurants, pools, parks, housing complexes, schools, and jobs to be segregated across the North as well,” wrote Theoharis and her co-editor Professor <a href="https://www.bowdoin.edu/profiles/faculty/bpurnell/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Brian Purnell</a> of Bowdoin College.</p><p>In the podcast, Theoharis shows how African-Americans have faced discrimination in everything from pre-Civil War legal codes in New York, to 20th-century government programs like Social Security and the G.I. bill. She and Harpaz also discuss the ways in which the legacy of these racist policies persist today in public education, the criminal justice system, and other aspects of American society.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/jeanne-theoharis-the-strange-careers-of-the-jim-crow-north-segregation-and-struggle-outside-of-the-south-nyu-press-2019-kVFSBoYa-cwQeZ_X0</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this New Books Network/Gotham Center for NYC History podcast, guest host Beth Harpaz, editor of the City University of New York website <a href="https://sum.cuny.edu/" rel="noopener noreferrer">SUM</a>, interviews <a href="http://www.brooklyn.cuny.edu/web/academics/faculty/faculty_profile.jsp?faculty=510" rel="noopener noreferrer">Jeanne Theoharis</a>, distinguished professor of political science at Brooklyn College. Their topic is a new book just out from NYU Press, co-edited by Theoharis, called <a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/1479820334/?tag=newbooinhis-20" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Strange Careers of the Jim Crow North: Segregation and Struggle outside of the South </em></a>(NYU Press, 2019).</p><p>The book looks at the history of institutionalized racism around the U.S., showing that laws, policies, and entitlements in every region of the country not only created segregated communities, but also promoted affluence and opportunities for white Americans while keeping African Americans out of the middle class.</p><p>“There did not need to be a ‘no coloreds’ sign for hotels, restaurants, pools, parks, housing complexes, schools, and jobs to be segregated across the North as well,” wrote Theoharis and her co-editor Professor <a href="https://www.bowdoin.edu/profiles/faculty/bpurnell/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Brian Purnell</a> of Bowdoin College.</p><p>In the podcast, Theoharis shows how African-Americans have faced discrimination in everything from pre-Civil War legal codes in New York, to 20th-century government programs like Social Security and the G.I. bill. She and Harpaz also discuss the ways in which the legacy of these racist policies persist today in public education, the criminal justice system, and other aspects of American society.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="38666591" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/162e6752-d8d2-4eda-b9ab-51a3b2468a12/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=162e6752-d8d2-4eda-b9ab-51a3b2468a12&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Jeanne Theoharis, &quot;The Strange Careers of the Jim Crow North: Segregation and Struggle outside of the South&quot; (NYU Press, 2019)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:40:16</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this New Books Network/Gotham Center for NYC History podcast, guest host Beth Harpaz, editor of the City University of New York website SUM, interviews Jeanne Theoharis, distinguished professor of political science at Brooklyn College. Their topic is a new book just out from NYU Press, co-edited by Theoharis, called The Strange Careers of the Jim Crow North: Segregation and Struggle outside of the South (NYU Press, 2019).
The book looks at the history of institutionalized racism around the U.S., showing that laws, policies, and entitlements in every region of the country not only created segregated communities, but also promoted affluence and opportunities for white Americans while keeping African Americans out of the middle class.
“There did not need to be a ‘no coloreds’ sign for hotels, restaurants, pools, parks, housing complexes, schools, and jobs to be segregated across the North as well,” wrote Theoharis and her co-editor Professor Brian Purnell of Bowdoin College.
In the podcast, Theoharis shows how African-Americans have faced discrimination in everything from pre-Civil War legal codes in New York, to 20th-century government programs like Social Security and the G.I. bill. She and Harpaz also discuss the ways in which the legacy of these racist policies persist today in public education, the criminal justice system, and other aspects of American society.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this New Books Network/Gotham Center for NYC History podcast, guest host Beth Harpaz, editor of the City University of New York website SUM, interviews Jeanne Theoharis, distinguished professor of political science at Brooklyn College. Their topic is a new book just out from NYU Press, co-edited by Theoharis, called The Strange Careers of the Jim Crow North: Segregation and Struggle outside of the South (NYU Press, 2019).
The book looks at the history of institutionalized racism around the U.S., showing that laws, policies, and entitlements in every region of the country not only created segregated communities, but also promoted affluence and opportunities for white Americans while keeping African Americans out of the middle class.
“There did not need to be a ‘no coloreds’ sign for hotels, restaurants, pools, parks, housing complexes, schools, and jobs to be segregated across the North as well,” wrote Theoharis and her co-editor Professor Brian Purnell of Bowdoin College.
In the podcast, Theoharis shows how African-Americans have faced discrimination in everything from pre-Civil War legal codes in New York, to 20th-century government programs like Social Security and the G.I. bill. She and Harpaz also discuss the ways in which the legacy of these racist policies persist today in public education, the criminal justice system, and other aspects of American society.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>497</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1f1c906c-c85f-11ee-bf53-5f5dcf171c11</guid>
      <title>James L. Gibson and Michael J. Nelson, &quot;Judging Inequality: State Supreme Courts and the Inequality Crisis&quot; (Russell Sage, 2021)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Soaring levels of political, legal, economic, and social inequality have been documented by social scientists – but the public conversation and scholarship on inequality has not examined the role of state law and state courts in establishing policies that significantly affect inequality. Political scientists James L. Gibson and Michael J. Nelson analyze their original database of nearly 6,000 decisions made by over 900 judges on 50 state supreme courts over a quarter century to demonstrate how state high courts craft policy. The fifty state supreme courts shape American inequality in two ways: through substantive policy decisions that fail to advance equality and by rulings favoring more privileged litigants (typically known as "upperdogs").&nbsp;</p><p>The book focuses on court-made public policy on issues including educational equity and adequacy, LGBTQ+ rights, and worker's rights. The conventional wisdom assumes that courts protect underdogs from majorities but Gibson and Nelson demonstrate that judges most often favor dominant political elites and coalitions. As such, courts are unlikely to serve as an independent force against the rise of inequality in the United States.</p><p><a href="https://polisci.wustl.edu/people/james-l-gibson" rel="noopener noreferrer">James Gibson</a>&nbsp;is the Sidney W. Souers Professor of Government at Washington University in Saint Louis. His research interests are in Law and Politics, Comparative Politics, and American Politics.</p><p><a href="https://mjnelson.org/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Michael Nelson</a>&nbsp;is a Professor of Political Science at Penn State University. He studies judicial politics and U.S. state politics, especially public attitudes toward law and courts, judicial behavior, and the politics of court reform. Michael was a guest on the New Books Network for the&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-elevator-effect#entry:256018@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Elevator Effect</em></a>, a book he co-wrote with Morgan Hazelton and Rachael K. Hinkle in 2023.</p><p>In the podcast, we mention Dr. Gibson’s brand new article regarding the&nbsp;<em>Dobbs&nbsp;</em>abortion case: “<a href="http://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12834" rel="noopener noreferrer">Losing legitimacy: The challenges of the Dobbs ruling to conventional legitimacy theory</a>” from the&nbsp;<em>American Journal of Political Science</em>.</p><p>Daniela Lavergne served as the editorial assistant for this podcast.</p><p><em>﻿</em><a href="https://www.sju.edu/faculty/susan-liebell#_ga=2.125106634.1318472952.1578330950-502593983.1578330950" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Susan Liebell&nbsp;</em></a><em>is a Professor of Political Science at Saint Joseph’s University in Philadelphia.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/james-l-gibson-and-michael-j-nelson-judging-inequality-state-supreme-courts-and-the-inequality-crisis-russell-sage-2021-eVD7SpwE</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Soaring levels of political, legal, economic, and social inequality have been documented by social scientists – but the public conversation and scholarship on inequality has not examined the role of state law and state courts in establishing policies that significantly affect inequality. Political scientists James L. Gibson and Michael J. Nelson analyze their original database of nearly 6,000 decisions made by over 900 judges on 50 state supreme courts over a quarter century to demonstrate how state high courts craft policy. The fifty state supreme courts shape American inequality in two ways: through substantive policy decisions that fail to advance equality and by rulings favoring more privileged litigants (typically known as "upperdogs").&nbsp;</p><p>The book focuses on court-made public policy on issues including educational equity and adequacy, LGBTQ+ rights, and worker's rights. The conventional wisdom assumes that courts protect underdogs from majorities but Gibson and Nelson demonstrate that judges most often favor dominant political elites and coalitions. As such, courts are unlikely to serve as an independent force against the rise of inequality in the United States.</p><p><a href="https://polisci.wustl.edu/people/james-l-gibson" rel="noopener noreferrer">James Gibson</a>&nbsp;is the Sidney W. Souers Professor of Government at Washington University in Saint Louis. His research interests are in Law and Politics, Comparative Politics, and American Politics.</p><p><a href="https://mjnelson.org/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Michael Nelson</a>&nbsp;is a Professor of Political Science at Penn State University. He studies judicial politics and U.S. state politics, especially public attitudes toward law and courts, judicial behavior, and the politics of court reform. Michael was a guest on the New Books Network for the&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-elevator-effect#entry:256018@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Elevator Effect</em></a>, a book he co-wrote with Morgan Hazelton and Rachael K. Hinkle in 2023.</p><p>In the podcast, we mention Dr. Gibson’s brand new article regarding the&nbsp;<em>Dobbs&nbsp;</em>abortion case: “<a href="http://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12834" rel="noopener noreferrer">Losing legitimacy: The challenges of the Dobbs ruling to conventional legitimacy theory</a>” from the&nbsp;<em>American Journal of Political Science</em>.</p><p>Daniela Lavergne served as the editorial assistant for this podcast.</p><p><em>﻿</em><a href="https://www.sju.edu/faculty/susan-liebell#_ga=2.125106634.1318472952.1578330950-502593983.1578330950" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Susan Liebell&nbsp;</em></a><em>is a Professor of Political Science at Saint Joseph’s University in Philadelphia.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="53015662" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/85a9e838-20a4-4ac6-9d81-a6e2ee46a00c/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=85a9e838-20a4-4ac6-9d81-a6e2ee46a00c&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>James L. Gibson and Michael J. Nelson, &quot;Judging Inequality: State Supreme Courts and the Inequality Crisis&quot; (Russell Sage, 2021)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:55:13</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Soaring levels of political, legal, economic, and social inequality have been documented by social scientists – but the public conversation and scholarship on inequality has not examined the role of state law and state courts in establishing policies that significantly affect inequality. Political scientists James L. Gibson and Michael J. Nelson analyze their original database of nearly 6,000 decisions made by over 900 judges on 50 state supreme courts over a quarter century to demonstrate how state high courts craft policy. The fifty state supreme courts shape American inequality in two ways: through substantive policy decisions that fail to advance equality and by rulings favoring more privileged litigants (typically known as &quot;upperdogs&quot;). 
The book focuses on court-made public policy on issues including educational equity and adequacy, LGBTQ+ rights, and worker&apos;s rights. The conventional wisdom assumes that courts protect underdogs from majorities but Gibson and Nelson demonstrate that judges most often favor dominant political elites and coalitions. As such, courts are unlikely to serve as an independent force against the rise of inequality in the United States.
James Gibson is the Sidney W. Souers Professor of Government at Washington University in Saint Louis. His research interests are in Law and Politics, Comparative Politics, and American Politics.
Michael Nelson is a Professor of Political Science at Penn State University. He studies judicial politics and U.S. state politics, especially public attitudes toward law and courts, judicial behavior, and the politics of court reform. Michael was a guest on the New Books Network for the The Elevator Effect, a book he co-wrote with Morgan Hazelton and Rachael K. Hinkle in 2023.
In the podcast, we mention Dr. Gibson’s brand new article regarding the Dobbs abortion case: “Losing legitimacy: The challenges of the Dobbs ruling to conventional legitimacy theory” from the American Journal of Political Science.
Daniela Lavergne served as the editorial assistant for this podcast.
﻿Susan Liebell is a Professor of Political Science at Saint Joseph’s University in Philadelphia.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Soaring levels of political, legal, economic, and social inequality have been documented by social scientists – but the public conversation and scholarship on inequality has not examined the role of state law and state courts in establishing policies that significantly affect inequality. Political scientists James L. Gibson and Michael J. Nelson analyze their original database of nearly 6,000 decisions made by over 900 judges on 50 state supreme courts over a quarter century to demonstrate how state high courts craft policy. The fifty state supreme courts shape American inequality in two ways: through substantive policy decisions that fail to advance equality and by rulings favoring more privileged litigants (typically known as &quot;upperdogs&quot;). 
The book focuses on court-made public policy on issues including educational equity and adequacy, LGBTQ+ rights, and worker&apos;s rights. The conventional wisdom assumes that courts protect underdogs from majorities but Gibson and Nelson demonstrate that judges most often favor dominant political elites and coalitions. As such, courts are unlikely to serve as an independent force against the rise of inequality in the United States.
James Gibson is the Sidney W. Souers Professor of Government at Washington University in Saint Louis. His research interests are in Law and Politics, Comparative Politics, and American Politics.
Michael Nelson is a Professor of Political Science at Penn State University. He studies judicial politics and U.S. state politics, especially public attitudes toward law and courts, judicial behavior, and the politics of court reform. Michael was a guest on the New Books Network for the The Elevator Effect, a book he co-wrote with Morgan Hazelton and Rachael K. Hinkle in 2023.
In the podcast, we mention Dr. Gibson’s brand new article regarding the Dobbs abortion case: “Losing legitimacy: The challenges of the Dobbs ruling to conventional legitimacy theory” from the American Journal of Political Science.
Daniela Lavergne served as the editorial assistant for this podcast.
﻿Susan Liebell is a Professor of Political Science at Saint Joseph’s University in Philadelphia.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>104</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e429f3d4-c6b3-11ee-96c4-77737174128b</guid>
      <title>Kerstin Bree Carlson, &quot;The Justice Laboratory: International Law in Africa&quot; (Brookings Institution Press, 2022)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Ever since World War II, the United Nations and other international actors have created laws, treaties, and institutions to punish perpetrators of genocide, war crimes, and crimes against humanity. These efforts have established universally recognized norms and have resulted in several high-profile convictions in egregious cases. But international criminal justice now seems to be a declining force—its energy sapped by long delays in prosecutions, lagging public attention, and a globally rising authoritarianism that disregards legal niceties.</p><p><a href="https://www.brookings.edu/books/the-justice-laboratory/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Justice Laboratory: International Law in Africa</em></a>&nbsp;(Brookings Institution, 2022) by Dr. Kristin Bree Carlson reviews five examples of international criminal justice as they have been applied across Africa, where brutal civil conflicts in recent decades resulted in varying degrees of global attention and action. Written in an accessible style, this book explores the connections between politics and the doctrine of international criminal law. Highlighting little-known institutional examples and under-discussed political situations, the book contributes to a broader international understanding of African politics and international criminal justice, as well as the lessons the African experiences offer for other regions.</p><p><br></p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;forthcoming book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 9 Feb 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/kerstin-bree-carlson-the-justice-laboratory-international-law-in-africa-brookings-institution-press-2022-Rj8RTpNp</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ever since World War II, the United Nations and other international actors have created laws, treaties, and institutions to punish perpetrators of genocide, war crimes, and crimes against humanity. These efforts have established universally recognized norms and have resulted in several high-profile convictions in egregious cases. But international criminal justice now seems to be a declining force—its energy sapped by long delays in prosecutions, lagging public attention, and a globally rising authoritarianism that disregards legal niceties.</p><p><a href="https://www.brookings.edu/books/the-justice-laboratory/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Justice Laboratory: International Law in Africa</em></a>&nbsp;(Brookings Institution, 2022) by Dr. Kristin Bree Carlson reviews five examples of international criminal justice as they have been applied across Africa, where brutal civil conflicts in recent decades resulted in varying degrees of global attention and action. Written in an accessible style, this book explores the connections between politics and the doctrine of international criminal law. Highlighting little-known institutional examples and under-discussed political situations, the book contributes to a broader international understanding of African politics and international criminal justice, as well as the lessons the African experiences offer for other regions.</p><p><br></p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;forthcoming book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="54305448" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/68fa451e-4ca3-4573-bd6f-71cdd3832c3c/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=68fa451e-4ca3-4573-bd6f-71cdd3832c3c&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Kerstin Bree Carlson, &quot;The Justice Laboratory: International Law in Africa&quot; (Brookings Institution Press, 2022)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:56:33</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Ever since World War II, the United Nations and other international actors have created laws, treaties, and institutions to punish perpetrators of genocide, war crimes, and crimes against humanity. These efforts have established universally recognized norms and have resulted in several high-profile convictions in egregious cases. But international criminal justice now seems to be a declining force—its energy sapped by long delays in prosecutions, lagging public attention, and a globally rising authoritarianism that disregards legal niceties.
The Justice Laboratory: International Law in Africa (Brookings Institution, 2022) by Dr. Kristin Bree Carlson reviews five examples of international criminal justice as they have been applied across Africa, where brutal civil conflicts in recent decades resulted in varying degrees of global attention and action. Written in an accessible style, this book explores the connections between politics and the doctrine of international criminal law. Highlighting little-known institutional examples and under-discussed political situations, the book contributes to a broader international understanding of African politics and international criminal justice, as well as the lessons the African experiences offer for other regions.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose forthcoming book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Ever since World War II, the United Nations and other international actors have created laws, treaties, and institutions to punish perpetrators of genocide, war crimes, and crimes against humanity. These efforts have established universally recognized norms and have resulted in several high-profile convictions in egregious cases. But international criminal justice now seems to be a declining force—its energy sapped by long delays in prosecutions, lagging public attention, and a globally rising authoritarianism that disregards legal niceties.
The Justice Laboratory: International Law in Africa (Brookings Institution, 2022) by Dr. Kristin Bree Carlson reviews five examples of international criminal justice as they have been applied across Africa, where brutal civil conflicts in recent decades resulted in varying degrees of global attention and action. Written in an accessible style, this book explores the connections between politics and the doctrine of international criminal law. Highlighting little-known institutional examples and under-discussed political situations, the book contributes to a broader international understanding of African politics and international criminal justice, as well as the lessons the African experiences offer for other regions.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose forthcoming book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>179</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">af78331c-c52d-11ee-b2a1-372c7b0b32a7</guid>
      <title>Calvin John Smiley, &quot;Purgatory Citizenship: Reentry, Race, and Abolition&quot; (U California Press, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780520385986" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Purgatory Citizenship: Reentry, Race, and Abolition</em></a>&nbsp;(University of California Press, 2023), Calvin John Smiley explores the lives of people who were formerly incarcerated and the many daunting challenges they face. Those being released from prison must navigate the reentry process with diminished legal rights and amplified social stigmas, in a journey that is often confusing, complex, and precarious.</p><p>Calvin John Smiley is an Associate Professor of Sociology at Hunter College, City University of New York.</p><p><em>Schneur Zalman Newfield is an Associate Professor of Sociology and Jewish Studies at Hunter College, City University of New York, and the author of Degrees of Separation: Identity Formation While Leaving Ultra-Orthodox Judaism (Temple University Press). Visit him online at ZalmanNewfield.com.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 7 Feb 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/calvin-john-smiley-purgatory-citizenship-reentry-race-and-abolition-u-california-press-2023-O5pgHNfV</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780520385986" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Purgatory Citizenship: Reentry, Race, and Abolition</em></a>&nbsp;(University of California Press, 2023), Calvin John Smiley explores the lives of people who were formerly incarcerated and the many daunting challenges they face. Those being released from prison must navigate the reentry process with diminished legal rights and amplified social stigmas, in a journey that is often confusing, complex, and precarious.</p><p>Calvin John Smiley is an Associate Professor of Sociology at Hunter College, City University of New York.</p><p><em>Schneur Zalman Newfield is an Associate Professor of Sociology and Jewish Studies at Hunter College, City University of New York, and the author of Degrees of Separation: Identity Formation While Leaving Ultra-Orthodox Judaism (Temple University Press). Visit him online at ZalmanNewfield.com.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="64007082" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/e47c89e7-5732-4b90-84f4-76efed678e86/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=e47c89e7-5732-4b90-84f4-76efed678e86&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Calvin John Smiley, &quot;Purgatory Citizenship: Reentry, Race, and Abolition&quot; (U California Press, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:06:40</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In Purgatory Citizenship: Reentry, Race, and Abolition (University of California Press, 2023), Calvin John Smiley explores the lives of people who were formerly incarcerated and the many daunting challenges they face. Those being released from prison must navigate the reentry process with diminished legal rights and amplified social stigmas, in a journey that is often confusing, complex, and precarious.
Calvin John Smiley is an Associate Professor of Sociology at Hunter College, City University of New York.
Schneur Zalman Newfield is an Associate Professor of Sociology and Jewish Studies at Hunter College, City University of New York, and the author of Degrees of Separation: Identity Formation While Leaving Ultra-Orthodox Judaism (Temple University Press). Visit him online at ZalmanNewfield.com.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In Purgatory Citizenship: Reentry, Race, and Abolition (University of California Press, 2023), Calvin John Smiley explores the lives of people who were formerly incarcerated and the many daunting challenges they face. Those being released from prison must navigate the reentry process with diminished legal rights and amplified social stigmas, in a journey that is often confusing, complex, and precarious.
Calvin John Smiley is an Associate Professor of Sociology at Hunter College, City University of New York.
Schneur Zalman Newfield is an Associate Professor of Sociology and Jewish Studies at Hunter College, City University of New York, and the author of Degrees of Separation: Identity Formation While Leaving Ultra-Orthodox Judaism (Temple University Press). Visit him online at ZalmanNewfield.com.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>21</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5da6a3ca-ab51-11ee-96d8-076dbe2028f6</guid>
      <title>Jessica Hinchy, &quot;Governing Gender and Sexuality in Colonial India: The Hijra, c.1850-1900&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2019)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Until <a href="http://research.ntu.edu.sg/expertise/academicprofile/Pages/StaffProfile.aspx?ST_EMAILID=JHINCHY&amp;CategoryDescription=History" rel="noopener noreferrer">Jessica Hinchy</a>’s latest book, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/110849255X/?tag=newbooinhis-20" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Governing Gender and Sexuality in Colonial India: The Hijra, c.1850-1900</em></a> (Cambridge University Press, 2019), there was no single monograph dedicated to the history of the <em>Hijra</em> community. Perhaps this silence can bear the loudest testament of the marginalization this gender non-confirming community was subjected to under British colonial rule. This book is, therefore, important not only because of its efforts to humanize and situate this community amid the anxieties and hubristic ambitions of colonial rule, but also because it documents the ability many <em>Hijras</em> have to preserve in spite of systematic policing and criminalization. More importantly, perhaps, Jessica Hinchy reveals that the <em>Hijras’ </em>were not just surveilled or marginalized; British colonial authorities ultimately aimed to eradicate and eliminate the community entirely.</p><p>Jessica Hinchy is Assistant Professor in History at the Nanyang Technological University, in Singapore. Her research examines gender, sexuality and colonialism in India. In addition to studying the history of the transgender Hijra community under British colonial rule, Dr. Hinchy has also explored problems related to slavery, masculinity, and indirect colonial rule in India through several publications on Khwajasarai eunuch-slaves. She has also investigated the history of childhood, in particular in relation to sexuality and slavery.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 5 Feb 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/jessica-hinchy-governing-gender-and-sexuality-in-colonial-india-the-hijra-c-1850-1900-cambridge-up-2019-AyGW8k0k-sUlyrG9f</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Until <a href="http://research.ntu.edu.sg/expertise/academicprofile/Pages/StaffProfile.aspx?ST_EMAILID=JHINCHY&amp;CategoryDescription=History" rel="noopener noreferrer">Jessica Hinchy</a>’s latest book, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/110849255X/?tag=newbooinhis-20" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Governing Gender and Sexuality in Colonial India: The Hijra, c.1850-1900</em></a> (Cambridge University Press, 2019), there was no single monograph dedicated to the history of the <em>Hijra</em> community. Perhaps this silence can bear the loudest testament of the marginalization this gender non-confirming community was subjected to under British colonial rule. This book is, therefore, important not only because of its efforts to humanize and situate this community amid the anxieties and hubristic ambitions of colonial rule, but also because it documents the ability many <em>Hijras</em> have to preserve in spite of systematic policing and criminalization. More importantly, perhaps, Jessica Hinchy reveals that the <em>Hijras’ </em>were not just surveilled or marginalized; British colonial authorities ultimately aimed to eradicate and eliminate the community entirely.</p><p>Jessica Hinchy is Assistant Professor in History at the Nanyang Technological University, in Singapore. Her research examines gender, sexuality and colonialism in India. In addition to studying the history of the transgender Hijra community under British colonial rule, Dr. Hinchy has also explored problems related to slavery, masculinity, and indirect colonial rule in India through several publications on Khwajasarai eunuch-slaves. She has also investigated the history of childhood, in particular in relation to sexuality and slavery.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="57979371" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/49bfce21-3ebb-46f9-b62a-f18ed6e0ade9/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=49bfce21-3ebb-46f9-b62a-f18ed6e0ade9&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Jessica Hinchy, &quot;Governing Gender and Sexuality in Colonial India: The Hijra, c.1850-1900&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2019)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:00:21</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Until Jessica Hinchy’s latest book, Governing Gender and Sexuality in Colonial India: The Hijra, c.1850-1900 (Cambridge University Press, 2019), there was no single monograph dedicated to the history of the Hijra community. Perhaps this silence can bear the loudest testament of the marginalization this gender non-confirming community was subjected to under British colonial rule. This book is, therefore, important not only because of its efforts to humanize and situate this community amid the anxieties and hubristic ambitions of colonial rule, but also because it documents the ability many Hijras have to preserve in spite of systematic policing and criminalization. More importantly, perhaps, Jessica Hinchy reveals that the Hijras’ were not just surveilled or marginalized; British colonial authorities ultimately aimed to eradicate and eliminate the community entirely.
Jessica Hinchy is Assistant Professor in History at the Nanyang Technological University, in Singapore. Her research examines gender, sexuality and colonialism in India. In addition to studying the history of the transgender Hijra community under British colonial rule, Dr. Hinchy has also explored problems related to slavery, masculinity, and indirect colonial rule in India through several publications on Khwajasarai eunuch-slaves. She has also investigated the history of childhood, in particular in relation to sexuality and slavery.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Until Jessica Hinchy’s latest book, Governing Gender and Sexuality in Colonial India: The Hijra, c.1850-1900 (Cambridge University Press, 2019), there was no single monograph dedicated to the history of the Hijra community. Perhaps this silence can bear the loudest testament of the marginalization this gender non-confirming community was subjected to under British colonial rule. This book is, therefore, important not only because of its efforts to humanize and situate this community amid the anxieties and hubristic ambitions of colonial rule, but also because it documents the ability many Hijras have to preserve in spite of systematic policing and criminalization. More importantly, perhaps, Jessica Hinchy reveals that the Hijras’ were not just surveilled or marginalized; British colonial authorities ultimately aimed to eradicate and eliminate the community entirely.
Jessica Hinchy is Assistant Professor in History at the Nanyang Technological University, in Singapore. Her research examines gender, sexuality and colonialism in India. In addition to studying the history of the transgender Hijra community under British colonial rule, Dr. Hinchy has also explored problems related to slavery, masculinity, and indirect colonial rule in India through several publications on Khwajasarai eunuch-slaves. She has also investigated the history of childhood, in particular in relation to sexuality and slavery.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>102</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">76b01dec-c136-11ee-ac52-1bfb30047ca1</guid>
      <title>George Fisher, &quot;Beware Euphoria: The Moral Roots and Racial Myths of America&apos;s War on Drugs&quot; (Oxford UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>George Fisher, the Judge John Crown Professor of Law at Stanford Law School, just released his new book&nbsp;<a href="https://global.oup.com/academic/product/beware-euphoria-9780197688489" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Beware Euphoria: The Moral Roots and Racial Myths of America’s Drug War</em></a>, with Oxford University Press. George has been teaching and writing in the realms of evidence, prosecution practice, and criminal legal history since 1995. He began practice as a prosecutor in Massachusetts and later taught at the law schools of Boston College, Harvard, and Yale.&nbsp;<em>Beware Euphoria&nbsp;</em>is the most recent among a slew of other books, articles, and essays that he’s published over the years, and perhaps the most contrarian. In this interview, George discusses his research methods and how he came to the conclusion that the history of America’s drug war, while racially motivated, was not meant to target minorities, but protect the morals and health of America’s white youth.</p><p><a href="http://www.emilydufton.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Emily Dufton</em></a><em>&nbsp;is the author of</em><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780465096169" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;Grass Roots: The Rise and Fall and Rise of Marijuana in America&nbsp;</em></a><em>(Basic Books, 2017). A drug historian and writer, her second book, on the development of the opioid addiction medication industry, is under contract with the University of Chicago Press.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 3 Feb 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/george-fisher-beware-euphoria-the-moral-roots-and-racial-myths-of-americas-war-on-drugs-oxford-up-2024-xx0wWwhp</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>George Fisher, the Judge John Crown Professor of Law at Stanford Law School, just released his new book&nbsp;<a href="https://global.oup.com/academic/product/beware-euphoria-9780197688489" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Beware Euphoria: The Moral Roots and Racial Myths of America’s Drug War</em></a>, with Oxford University Press. George has been teaching and writing in the realms of evidence, prosecution practice, and criminal legal history since 1995. He began practice as a prosecutor in Massachusetts and later taught at the law schools of Boston College, Harvard, and Yale.&nbsp;<em>Beware Euphoria&nbsp;</em>is the most recent among a slew of other books, articles, and essays that he’s published over the years, and perhaps the most contrarian. In this interview, George discusses his research methods and how he came to the conclusion that the history of America’s drug war, while racially motivated, was not meant to target minorities, but protect the morals and health of America’s white youth.</p><p><a href="http://www.emilydufton.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Emily Dufton</em></a><em>&nbsp;is the author of</em><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780465096169" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;Grass Roots: The Rise and Fall and Rise of Marijuana in America&nbsp;</em></a><em>(Basic Books, 2017). A drug historian and writer, her second book, on the development of the opioid addiction medication industry, is under contract with the University of Chicago Press.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="56988798" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/286a7839-31ce-459c-9f97-421693a7d0e8/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=286a7839-31ce-459c-9f97-421693a7d0e8&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>George Fisher, &quot;Beware Euphoria: The Moral Roots and Racial Myths of America&apos;s War on Drugs&quot; (Oxford UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:59:21</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>George Fisher, the Judge John Crown Professor of Law at Stanford Law School, just released his new book Beware Euphoria: The Moral Roots and Racial Myths of America’s Drug War, with Oxford University Press. George has been teaching and writing in the realms of evidence, prosecution practice, and criminal legal history since 1995. He began practice as a prosecutor in Massachusetts and later taught at the law schools of Boston College, Harvard, and Yale. Beware Euphoria is the most recent among a slew of other books, articles, and essays that he’s published over the years, and perhaps the most contrarian. In this interview, George discusses his research methods and how he came to the conclusion that the history of America’s drug war, while racially motivated, was not meant to target minorities, but protect the morals and health of America’s white youth.
Emily Dufton is the author of Grass Roots: The Rise and Fall and Rise of Marijuana in America (Basic Books, 2017). A drug historian and writer, her second book, on the development of the opioid addiction medication industry, is under contract with the University of Chicago Press.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>George Fisher, the Judge John Crown Professor of Law at Stanford Law School, just released his new book Beware Euphoria: The Moral Roots and Racial Myths of America’s Drug War, with Oxford University Press. George has been teaching and writing in the realms of evidence, prosecution practice, and criminal legal history since 1995. He began practice as a prosecutor in Massachusetts and later taught at the law schools of Boston College, Harvard, and Yale. Beware Euphoria is the most recent among a slew of other books, articles, and essays that he’s published over the years, and perhaps the most contrarian. In this interview, George discusses his research methods and how he came to the conclusion that the history of America’s drug war, while racially motivated, was not meant to target minorities, but protect the morals and health of America’s white youth.
Emily Dufton is the author of Grass Roots: The Rise and Fall and Rise of Marijuana in America (Basic Books, 2017). A drug historian and writer, her second book, on the development of the opioid addiction medication industry, is under contract with the University of Chicago Press.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>60</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">178c5eb8-c143-11ee-9e7c-53c99d45c027</guid>
      <title>Chrystin Ondersma, &quot;Dignity Not Debt: An Abolitionist Approach to Economic Justice&quot; (U California Press, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>American households have a debt problem. The problem is not, as often claimed, that Americans recklessly take on too much debt. The problem is that US debt policies have no basis in reality. Weaving together the histories and trends of US debt policy with her own family story, Chrystin Ondersma debunks the myths that have long governed debt policy, like the belief that debt leads to prosperity or the claim that bad debt is the result of bad choices, both of which nest in the overarching myth of a free market unhindered by government interference and accessible to all.&nbsp;</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780520391475" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Dignity Not Debt: An Abolitionist Approach to Economic Justice</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(U California Press, 2024), Ondersma offers a compelling, flexible, and reality-based taxonomy rooted in the internationally recognized principle of human dignity. Ondersma's new categories of debt--grounded in abolitionist principles--revolutionize how policymakers are able to think about debt, which will in turn revolutionize the American debt landscape itself.</p><p><em>﻿</em><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/stephenpimpare/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Stephen Pimpare</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a Senior Fellow at the Carsey School of Public Policy at the University of New Hampshire.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 3 Feb 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/chrystin-ondersma-dignity-not-debt-an-abolitionist-approach-to-economic-justice-u-california-press-2024-Hg59HW4B</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>American households have a debt problem. The problem is not, as often claimed, that Americans recklessly take on too much debt. The problem is that US debt policies have no basis in reality. Weaving together the histories and trends of US debt policy with her own family story, Chrystin Ondersma debunks the myths that have long governed debt policy, like the belief that debt leads to prosperity or the claim that bad debt is the result of bad choices, both of which nest in the overarching myth of a free market unhindered by government interference and accessible to all.&nbsp;</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780520391475" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Dignity Not Debt: An Abolitionist Approach to Economic Justice</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(U California Press, 2024), Ondersma offers a compelling, flexible, and reality-based taxonomy rooted in the internationally recognized principle of human dignity. Ondersma's new categories of debt--grounded in abolitionist principles--revolutionize how policymakers are able to think about debt, which will in turn revolutionize the American debt landscape itself.</p><p><em>﻿</em><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/stephenpimpare/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Stephen Pimpare</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a Senior Fellow at the Carsey School of Public Policy at the University of New Hampshire.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="30429046" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/63cfdeb4-20c1-4725-826f-5c37609f6991/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=63cfdeb4-20c1-4725-826f-5c37609f6991&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Chrystin Ondersma, &quot;Dignity Not Debt: An Abolitionist Approach to Economic Justice&quot; (U California Press, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:31:41</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>American households have a debt problem. The problem is not, as often claimed, that Americans recklessly take on too much debt. The problem is that US debt policies have no basis in reality. Weaving together the histories and trends of US debt policy with her own family story, Chrystin Ondersma debunks the myths that have long governed debt policy, like the belief that debt leads to prosperity or the claim that bad debt is the result of bad choices, both of which nest in the overarching myth of a free market unhindered by government interference and accessible to all. 
In Dignity Not Debt: An Abolitionist Approach to Economic Justice (U California Press, 2024), Ondersma offers a compelling, flexible, and reality-based taxonomy rooted in the internationally recognized principle of human dignity. Ondersma&apos;s new categories of debt--grounded in abolitionist principles--revolutionize how policymakers are able to think about debt, which will in turn revolutionize the American debt landscape itself.
﻿Stephen Pimpare is a Senior Fellow at the Carsey School of Public Policy at the University of New Hampshire.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>American households have a debt problem. The problem is not, as often claimed, that Americans recklessly take on too much debt. The problem is that US debt policies have no basis in reality. Weaving together the histories and trends of US debt policy with her own family story, Chrystin Ondersma debunks the myths that have long governed debt policy, like the belief that debt leads to prosperity or the claim that bad debt is the result of bad choices, both of which nest in the overarching myth of a free market unhindered by government interference and accessible to all. 
In Dignity Not Debt: An Abolitionist Approach to Economic Justice (U California Press, 2024), Ondersma offers a compelling, flexible, and reality-based taxonomy rooted in the internationally recognized principle of human dignity. Ondersma&apos;s new categories of debt--grounded in abolitionist principles--revolutionize how policymakers are able to think about debt, which will in turn revolutionize the American debt landscape itself.
﻿Stephen Pimpare is a Senior Fellow at the Carsey School of Public Policy at the University of New Hampshire.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>173</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8c22670a-c06b-11ee-b214-3fe1485f4346</guid>
      <title>Shibani Mahtani and Timothy McLaughlin, &quot;Among the Braves: Hope, Struggle, and Exile in the Battle for Hong Kong and the Future of Global Democracy&quot; (Hachette, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780306830365" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Among the Braves Hope, Struggle, and Exile in the Battles for Hong Kong and the Future of Global Democracy</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Hachette, 2023) Shibani Mahtani and Timothy McLaughlin&nbsp;tell the story of Hong Kong's demise from Two Systems to One Country through the eyes of some of its key actors in the 2019 Anti-Extradition protests. In their&nbsp;richly evocative narrative, Mahtani and McLaughlin draw on their on-the-ground reporting, and weave this through a historical account to foreground the fight of&nbsp;the&nbsp;frontline protestors, referred to in Cantonese as "The Braves", who felt they had no other choice but to resist Beijing's increasingly authoritarian governance.&nbsp;</p><p>In this interview, we discussed the way that the changing political landscape of&nbsp;Hong Kong is demonstrative of the fragility of democratic institutions. We spoke about attempts by Beijing to erase historical memory through the imposition of increasingly draconian laws. Mahtani and McLaughlin will provide listeners with insight as to why Hong Kong matters, and why the rest of the world should take notice of the global erosion of democratic freedoms.&nbsp;</p><p><a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/people/shibani-mahtani/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Shibani Mahtani</a>&nbsp;is an international investigative correspondent for the&nbsp;<em>Washington Post.&nbsp;</em>She was previously the&nbsp;<em>Post's&nbsp;</em>Hong Kong and Southeast Asia bureau chief and a correspondent for the&nbsp;<em>Wall Street Journal</em>&nbsp;based in Singapore, Yangon, and Chicago. Her Hong Kong coverage was honored with prizes including a Human Rights Press Award for an investigation into police misconduct.&nbsp;</p><p><a href="https://www.timothymclaughlin.net/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Timothy McLaughlin</a>&nbsp;is a prize-winning contributing writer for&nbsp;<em>The Atlantic</em>. Previously he worked for&nbsp;<em>Reuters</em>&nbsp;news agency. His work has also appeared in publications including&nbsp;<em>WIRED</em>,&nbsp;<em>The Washington Post, The Los Angeles Times,&nbsp;</em>and&nbsp;<em>Prospect.&nbsp;</em>He has won multiple awards for his Hong Kong coverage, including two Best in Business Awards from the Society for Advancing Business Editing, and is a two-time finalist for The Livingston Award for International Reporting.</p><p><em>Jane Richards is a Lecturer in Law at York Law School, UK.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 2 Feb 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/shibani-mahtani-and-timothy-mclaughlin-among-the-braves-hope-struggle-and-exile-in-the-battle-for-hong-kong-and-the-future-of-global-democracy-hachette-2023-ivMoNgVI</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780306830365" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Among the Braves Hope, Struggle, and Exile in the Battles for Hong Kong and the Future of Global Democracy</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Hachette, 2023) Shibani Mahtani and Timothy McLaughlin&nbsp;tell the story of Hong Kong's demise from Two Systems to One Country through the eyes of some of its key actors in the 2019 Anti-Extradition protests. In their&nbsp;richly evocative narrative, Mahtani and McLaughlin draw on their on-the-ground reporting, and weave this through a historical account to foreground the fight of&nbsp;the&nbsp;frontline protestors, referred to in Cantonese as "The Braves", who felt they had no other choice but to resist Beijing's increasingly authoritarian governance.&nbsp;</p><p>In this interview, we discussed the way that the changing political landscape of&nbsp;Hong Kong is demonstrative of the fragility of democratic institutions. We spoke about attempts by Beijing to erase historical memory through the imposition of increasingly draconian laws. Mahtani and McLaughlin will provide listeners with insight as to why Hong Kong matters, and why the rest of the world should take notice of the global erosion of democratic freedoms.&nbsp;</p><p><a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/people/shibani-mahtani/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Shibani Mahtani</a>&nbsp;is an international investigative correspondent for the&nbsp;<em>Washington Post.&nbsp;</em>She was previously the&nbsp;<em>Post's&nbsp;</em>Hong Kong and Southeast Asia bureau chief and a correspondent for the&nbsp;<em>Wall Street Journal</em>&nbsp;based in Singapore, Yangon, and Chicago. Her Hong Kong coverage was honored with prizes including a Human Rights Press Award for an investigation into police misconduct.&nbsp;</p><p><a href="https://www.timothymclaughlin.net/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Timothy McLaughlin</a>&nbsp;is a prize-winning contributing writer for&nbsp;<em>The Atlantic</em>. Previously he worked for&nbsp;<em>Reuters</em>&nbsp;news agency. His work has also appeared in publications including&nbsp;<em>WIRED</em>,&nbsp;<em>The Washington Post, The Los Angeles Times,&nbsp;</em>and&nbsp;<em>Prospect.&nbsp;</em>He has won multiple awards for his Hong Kong coverage, including two Best in Business Awards from the Society for Advancing Business Editing, and is a two-time finalist for The Livingston Award for International Reporting.</p><p><em>Jane Richards is a Lecturer in Law at York Law School, UK.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="54823919" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/539a4efa-d840-45d7-97b3-f96f7ae26936/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=539a4efa-d840-45d7-97b3-f96f7ae26936&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Shibani Mahtani and Timothy McLaughlin, &quot;Among the Braves: Hope, Struggle, and Exile in the Battle for Hong Kong and the Future of Global Democracy&quot; (Hachette, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:57:06</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In Among the Braves Hope, Struggle, and Exile in the Battles for Hong Kong and the Future of Global Democracy (Hachette, 2023) Shibani Mahtani and Timothy McLaughlin tell the story of Hong Kong&apos;s demise from Two Systems to One Country through the eyes of some of its key actors in the 2019 Anti-Extradition protests. In their richly evocative narrative, Mahtani and McLaughlin draw on their on-the-ground reporting, and weave this through a historical account to foreground the fight of the frontline protestors, referred to in Cantonese as &quot;The Braves&quot;, who felt they had no other choice but to resist Beijing&apos;s increasingly authoritarian governance. 
In this interview, we discussed the way that the changing political landscape of Hong Kong is demonstrative of the fragility of democratic institutions. We spoke about attempts by Beijing to erase historical memory through the imposition of increasingly draconian laws. Mahtani and McLaughlin will provide listeners with insight as to why Hong Kong matters, and why the rest of the world should take notice of the global erosion of democratic freedoms. 
Shibani Mahtani is an international investigative correspondent for the Washington Post. She was previously the Post&apos;s Hong Kong and Southeast Asia bureau chief and a correspondent for the Wall Street Journal based in Singapore, Yangon, and Chicago. Her Hong Kong coverage was honored with prizes including a Human Rights Press Award for an investigation into police misconduct. 
Timothy McLaughlin is a prize-winning contributing writer for The Atlantic. Previously he worked for Reuters news agency. His work has also appeared in publications including WIRED, The Washington Post, The Los Angeles Times, and Prospect. He has won multiple awards for his Hong Kong coverage, including two Best in Business Awards from the Society for Advancing Business Editing, and is a two-time finalist for The Livingston Award for International Reporting.
Jane Richards is a Lecturer in Law at York Law School, UK.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In Among the Braves Hope, Struggle, and Exile in the Battles for Hong Kong and the Future of Global Democracy (Hachette, 2023) Shibani Mahtani and Timothy McLaughlin tell the story of Hong Kong&apos;s demise from Two Systems to One Country through the eyes of some of its key actors in the 2019 Anti-Extradition protests. In their richly evocative narrative, Mahtani and McLaughlin draw on their on-the-ground reporting, and weave this through a historical account to foreground the fight of the frontline protestors, referred to in Cantonese as &quot;The Braves&quot;, who felt they had no other choice but to resist Beijing&apos;s increasingly authoritarian governance. 
In this interview, we discussed the way that the changing political landscape of Hong Kong is demonstrative of the fragility of democratic institutions. We spoke about attempts by Beijing to erase historical memory through the imposition of increasingly draconian laws. Mahtani and McLaughlin will provide listeners with insight as to why Hong Kong matters, and why the rest of the world should take notice of the global erosion of democratic freedoms. 
Shibani Mahtani is an international investigative correspondent for the Washington Post. She was previously the Post&apos;s Hong Kong and Southeast Asia bureau chief and a correspondent for the Wall Street Journal based in Singapore, Yangon, and Chicago. Her Hong Kong coverage was honored with prizes including a Human Rights Press Award for an investigation into police misconduct. 
Timothy McLaughlin is a prize-winning contributing writer for The Atlantic. Previously he worked for Reuters news agency. His work has also appeared in publications including WIRED, The Washington Post, The Los Angeles Times, and Prospect. He has won multiple awards for his Hong Kong coverage, including two Best in Business Awards from the Society for Advancing Business Editing, and is a two-time finalist for The Livingston Award for International Reporting.
Jane Richards is a Lecturer in Law at York Law School, UK.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>209</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">51b6f6b8-c04c-11ee-a13d-8b967f9bea3d</guid>
      <title>Matthew D. Lassiter, &quot;The Suburban Crisis: White America and the War on Drugs&quot; (Princeton UP, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Most accounts of post-1950s political history tell the story of of the war on drugs as part of a racial system of social control of urban minority populations, an extension of the federal war on black street crime and the foundation for the "new Jim Crow" of mass incarceration as key characteristics of the U.S. in this period. But as the Nixon White House understood, and as the Carter and Reagan administrations also learned, there were not nearly enough urban heroin addicts in America to sustain a national war on drugs.&nbsp;</p><p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691177281" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Suburban Crisis: White America and the War on Drugs</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Princeton University Press, 2023) argues that the long war on drugs has reflected both the bipartisan mandate for urban crime control and the balancing act required to resolve an impossible public policy: the criminalization of the social practices and consumer choices of tens of millions of white middle-class Americans constantly categorized as "otherwise law-abiding citizens."" That is, the white middle class was just as much a target as minority populations. The criminalization of marijuana - the white middle-class drug problem - moved to the epicenter of the national war on drugs during the Nixon era. White middle-class youth by the millions were both the primary victims of the organized drug trade and excessive drug war enforcement, but policymakers also remained committed to deterring their illegal drug use, controlling their subculture, and coercing them into rehabilitation through criminal law. Only with the emergence of crack cocaine epidemic of the mid-1980s did this use of state power move out of suburbs and reemerge more dramatically in urban and minority areas.&nbsp;</p><p>This book tells a history of how state institutions, mass media, and grassroots political movements long constructed the wars on drugs, crime, and delinquency through the lens of suburban crisis while repeatedly launching bipartisan/nonpartisan crusades to protect white middle-class victims from perceived and actual threats, both internal and external. The book works on a national, regional, and local level, with deep case studies of major areas like San Francisco, LA, Washington, and New York. This history uses the lens of the suburban drug war to examine the consequences when affluent white suburban families serve as the nation's heroes and victims all at the same time, in politics, policy, and popular culture.</p><p>Matthew D. Lassiter is professor of history and Arthur F. Thurnau Professor at the University of Michigan, where he is co-director of the Carceral State Project.</p><p><em>Caleb Zakarin is the Assistant Editor of the New Books Network.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 1 Feb 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/matthew-d-lassiter-the-suburban-crisis-white-america-and-the-war-on-drugs-princeton-up-2023-8rH1EGdQ</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most accounts of post-1950s political history tell the story of of the war on drugs as part of a racial system of social control of urban minority populations, an extension of the federal war on black street crime and the foundation for the "new Jim Crow" of mass incarceration as key characteristics of the U.S. in this period. But as the Nixon White House understood, and as the Carter and Reagan administrations also learned, there were not nearly enough urban heroin addicts in America to sustain a national war on drugs.&nbsp;</p><p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691177281" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Suburban Crisis: White America and the War on Drugs</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Princeton University Press, 2023) argues that the long war on drugs has reflected both the bipartisan mandate for urban crime control and the balancing act required to resolve an impossible public policy: the criminalization of the social practices and consumer choices of tens of millions of white middle-class Americans constantly categorized as "otherwise law-abiding citizens."" That is, the white middle class was just as much a target as minority populations. The criminalization of marijuana - the white middle-class drug problem - moved to the epicenter of the national war on drugs during the Nixon era. White middle-class youth by the millions were both the primary victims of the organized drug trade and excessive drug war enforcement, but policymakers also remained committed to deterring their illegal drug use, controlling their subculture, and coercing them into rehabilitation through criminal law. Only with the emergence of crack cocaine epidemic of the mid-1980s did this use of state power move out of suburbs and reemerge more dramatically in urban and minority areas.&nbsp;</p><p>This book tells a history of how state institutions, mass media, and grassroots political movements long constructed the wars on drugs, crime, and delinquency through the lens of suburban crisis while repeatedly launching bipartisan/nonpartisan crusades to protect white middle-class victims from perceived and actual threats, both internal and external. The book works on a national, regional, and local level, with deep case studies of major areas like San Francisco, LA, Washington, and New York. This history uses the lens of the suburban drug war to examine the consequences when affluent white suburban families serve as the nation's heroes and victims all at the same time, in politics, policy, and popular culture.</p><p>Matthew D. Lassiter is professor of history and Arthur F. Thurnau Professor at the University of Michigan, where he is co-director of the Carceral State Project.</p><p><em>Caleb Zakarin is the Assistant Editor of the New Books Network.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="53634333" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/a61ef481-a46e-43f7-beeb-87c314a858ba/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=a61ef481-a46e-43f7-beeb-87c314a858ba&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Matthew D. Lassiter, &quot;The Suburban Crisis: White America and the War on Drugs&quot; (Princeton UP, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:55:51</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Most accounts of post-1950s political history tell the story of of the war on drugs as part of a racial system of social control of urban minority populations, an extension of the federal war on black street crime and the foundation for the &quot;new Jim Crow&quot; of mass incarceration as key characteristics of the U.S. in this period. But as the Nixon White House understood, and as the Carter and Reagan administrations also learned, there were not nearly enough urban heroin addicts in America to sustain a national war on drugs. 
The Suburban Crisis: White America and the War on Drugs (Princeton University Press, 2023) argues that the long war on drugs has reflected both the bipartisan mandate for urban crime control and the balancing act required to resolve an impossible public policy: the criminalization of the social practices and consumer choices of tens of millions of white middle-class Americans constantly categorized as &quot;otherwise law-abiding citizens.&quot;&quot; That is, the white middle class was just as much a target as minority populations. The criminalization of marijuana - the white middle-class drug problem - moved to the epicenter of the national war on drugs during the Nixon era. White middle-class youth by the millions were both the primary victims of the organized drug trade and excessive drug war enforcement, but policymakers also remained committed to deterring their illegal drug use, controlling their subculture, and coercing them into rehabilitation through criminal law. Only with the emergence of crack cocaine epidemic of the mid-1980s did this use of state power move out of suburbs and reemerge more dramatically in urban and minority areas. 
This book tells a history of how state institutions, mass media, and grassroots political movements long constructed the wars on drugs, crime, and delinquency through the lens of suburban crisis while repeatedly launching bipartisan/nonpartisan crusades to protect white middle-class victims from perceived and actual threats, both internal and external. The book works on a national, regional, and local level, with deep case studies of major areas like San Francisco, LA, Washington, and New York. This history uses the lens of the suburban drug war to examine the consequences when affluent white suburban families serve as the nation&apos;s heroes and victims all at the same time, in politics, policy, and popular culture.
Matthew D. Lassiter is professor of history and Arthur F. Thurnau Professor at the University of Michigan, where he is co-director of the Carceral State Project.
Caleb Zakarin is the Assistant Editor of the New Books Network.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Most accounts of post-1950s political history tell the story of of the war on drugs as part of a racial system of social control of urban minority populations, an extension of the federal war on black street crime and the foundation for the &quot;new Jim Crow&quot; of mass incarceration as key characteristics of the U.S. in this period. But as the Nixon White House understood, and as the Carter and Reagan administrations also learned, there were not nearly enough urban heroin addicts in America to sustain a national war on drugs. 
The Suburban Crisis: White America and the War on Drugs (Princeton University Press, 2023) argues that the long war on drugs has reflected both the bipartisan mandate for urban crime control and the balancing act required to resolve an impossible public policy: the criminalization of the social practices and consumer choices of tens of millions of white middle-class Americans constantly categorized as &quot;otherwise law-abiding citizens.&quot;&quot; That is, the white middle class was just as much a target as minority populations. The criminalization of marijuana - the white middle-class drug problem - moved to the epicenter of the national war on drugs during the Nixon era. White middle-class youth by the millions were both the primary victims of the organized drug trade and excessive drug war enforcement, but policymakers also remained committed to deterring their illegal drug use, controlling their subculture, and coercing them into rehabilitation through criminal law. Only with the emergence of crack cocaine epidemic of the mid-1980s did this use of state power move out of suburbs and reemerge more dramatically in urban and minority areas. 
This book tells a history of how state institutions, mass media, and grassroots political movements long constructed the wars on drugs, crime, and delinquency through the lens of suburban crisis while repeatedly launching bipartisan/nonpartisan crusades to protect white middle-class victims from perceived and actual threats, both internal and external. The book works on a national, regional, and local level, with deep case studies of major areas like San Francisco, LA, Washington, and New York. This history uses the lens of the suburban drug war to examine the consequences when affluent white suburban families serve as the nation&apos;s heroes and victims all at the same time, in politics, policy, and popular culture.
Matthew D. Lassiter is professor of history and Arthur F. Thurnau Professor at the University of Michigan, where he is co-director of the Carceral State Project.
Caleb Zakarin is the Assistant Editor of the New Books Network.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>59</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">0d22b94a-bf72-11ee-910d-0b95eb7f3b54</guid>
      <title>Alan K. Chen and Justin Marceau, &quot;Truth and Transparency: Undercover Investigations in the Twenty-First Century&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Undercover investigators have been celebrated as critical conduits of political speech and essential protectors of transparency. They have also been derided as intrusive and spy-like, inconsistent with private property rights, and morally or ethically questionable.</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781108725422" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Truth and Transparency: Undercover Investigations in the Twenty-First Century</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Cambridge University Press, 2023), Dr. Alan K. Chen and Dr. Justin Marceau rigorously examine this duality and seek to provide a socio-legal context for understanding these varying views. The book concretely deﬁnes undercover investigations, distinguishes the practice from investigative journalism and whistleblowing, and provides a comprehensive legal history. Chapters explore the public need for investigations and the rights of investigators, paying close attention to the types of investigations that fall beyond the scope of constitutional protection. The book also provides concrete empirical evidence of the broad, bipartisan support for undercover investigations and champions the practice as an essential com-ponent of the transparency our democracy needs to thrive.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;forthcoming book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/alan-k-chen-and-justin-marceau-truth-and-transparency-undercover-investigations-in-the-twenty-first-century-cambridge-up-2023-oIafn3na</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Undercover investigators have been celebrated as critical conduits of political speech and essential protectors of transparency. They have also been derided as intrusive and spy-like, inconsistent with private property rights, and morally or ethically questionable.</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781108725422" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Truth and Transparency: Undercover Investigations in the Twenty-First Century</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Cambridge University Press, 2023), Dr. Alan K. Chen and Dr. Justin Marceau rigorously examine this duality and seek to provide a socio-legal context for understanding these varying views. The book concretely deﬁnes undercover investigations, distinguishes the practice from investigative journalism and whistleblowing, and provides a comprehensive legal history. Chapters explore the public need for investigations and the rights of investigators, paying close attention to the types of investigations that fall beyond the scope of constitutional protection. The book also provides concrete empirical evidence of the broad, bipartisan support for undercover investigations and champions the practice as an essential com-ponent of the transparency our democracy needs to thrive.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;forthcoming book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="60607719" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/87cf36b4-2048-4254-9514-cd027390b296/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=87cf36b4-2048-4254-9514-cd027390b296&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Alan K. Chen and Justin Marceau, &quot;Truth and Transparency: Undercover Investigations in the Twenty-First Century&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:03:07</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Undercover investigators have been celebrated as critical conduits of political speech and essential protectors of transparency. They have also been derided as intrusive and spy-like, inconsistent with private property rights, and morally or ethically questionable.
In Truth and Transparency: Undercover Investigations in the Twenty-First Century (Cambridge University Press, 2023), Dr. Alan K. Chen and Dr. Justin Marceau rigorously examine this duality and seek to provide a socio-legal context for understanding these varying views. The book concretely deﬁnes undercover investigations, distinguishes the practice from investigative journalism and whistleblowing, and provides a comprehensive legal history. Chapters explore the public need for investigations and the rights of investigators, paying close attention to the types of investigations that fall beyond the scope of constitutional protection. The book also provides concrete empirical evidence of the broad, bipartisan support for undercover investigations and champions the practice as an essential com-ponent of the transparency our democracy needs to thrive.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose forthcoming book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Undercover investigators have been celebrated as critical conduits of political speech and essential protectors of transparency. They have also been derided as intrusive and spy-like, inconsistent with private property rights, and morally or ethically questionable.
In Truth and Transparency: Undercover Investigations in the Twenty-First Century (Cambridge University Press, 2023), Dr. Alan K. Chen and Dr. Justin Marceau rigorously examine this duality and seek to provide a socio-legal context for understanding these varying views. The book concretely deﬁnes undercover investigations, distinguishes the practice from investigative journalism and whistleblowing, and provides a comprehensive legal history. Chapters explore the public need for investigations and the rights of investigators, paying close attention to the types of investigations that fall beyond the scope of constitutional protection. The book also provides concrete empirical evidence of the broad, bipartisan support for undercover investigations and champions the practice as an essential com-ponent of the transparency our democracy needs to thrive.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose forthcoming book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>73</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">bd50a2ae-bc8a-11ee-a11a-0bed929660e4</guid>
      <title>Caitlin Killian, &quot;Failing Moms: Social Condemnation and Criminalization of Mothers&quot; (Polity Press, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The role of mother is often celebrated in the United States as the most important job in the world but Dr. Caitlin Killian argues that American motherhood is increasingly monitored and perilous. From preconception, through pregnancy, and while parenting, she argues that women are held to ever-higher standards and punished – both socially and criminally – for failing to live up to these norms.</p><p>Using historical accounts, public health pronouncements, social psychological research, and course cases,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781509557738" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Failing Moms: Social Condemnation and Criminalization of Mothers</em></a>&nbsp;(Polity Press, 2023) documents how women of all ethnic backgrounds and socioeconomic statuses have been interrogated, held against their will, and jailed for a rapidly expanding list of offenses such as falling down the stairs while pregnant or letting a child spend time alone in a park, actions that were not considered criminal a generation ago. While poor mothers and moms of color are targeted the most, Dr. Killian argues that all moms are in jeopardy, whether they realize it or not. Women and mothers are disproportionately held accountable compared to men and fathers who do not see their reproduction policed and almost never incur charges for “failure to protect.” The gendered inequality of prosecutions reveals them to be more about controlling women than protecting children. Other books have examined the specific risks to either pregnant or parenting women – but few connect the issues – and that is Dr. Killian’s goal. Using a reproductive justice lens, she analyzes the extent of the crisis and what must change to prevent mass penalization and provide resources to allow people to mother well.</p><p>Dr.&nbsp;<a href="https://caitlinkillian.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Caitlin Killian</a>&nbsp;is a professor of sociology at Drew University specializing in gender, families, reproduction, and immigration. She has worked as a consultant for the United Nations, developing the module on sexual and reproductive health and rights for UN staff training and co-authoring a UNDP report on Syrian refugee women. Her articles have appeared in Contexts magazine and The Conversation, and she has published in numerous academic journals about adoption, overblown warnings about women’s alcohol consumption during pregnancy, sexual and reproductive health and justice, and immigrant and refugee women.</p><p>Dr. Killian mentions:</p><ul>
<li>Michele Goodwin,&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/michele-goodwin-policing-the-womb-invisible-women-and-the-criminalization-of-motherhood-cambridge-up-2020#entry:32182@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Policing the Womb: Invisible Women and the Criminalization of Motherhood</em></a>
</li>
<li>Renee Almeling,&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/rene-almeling-guynecology-the-missing-science-of-mens-reproductive-health-u-california-press-2020#entry:32393@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>GUYnecology: The Missing Science of Men’s Reproductive Health</em></a>
</li>
<li>Jeanne Flavin,&nbsp;<em>Our Bodies, Our Crimes: The Policing of Women's Reproduction</em>
</li>
<li>Miranda R. Waggoner,&nbsp;<em>The Zero Trimester: Pre-Pregnancy Care and the Politics of Reproductive Risk</em>
</li>
<li>Cynthia Daniels,&nbsp;<em>Exposing Men: The Science and Politics of Male Reproduction</em>
</li>
<li>Kim Brooks,&nbsp;<em>Small Animals: Parenthood in the Age of Fear</em>
</li>
</ul><p><em>﻿</em></p><p>George Lobis served as the editorial assistant for this podcast.</p><p><a href="https://www.sju.edu/faculty/susan-liebell#_ga=2.125106634.1318472952.1578330950-502593983.1578330950" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Susan Liebell&nbsp;</em></a><em>is a Professor of Political Science at Saint Joseph’s University in Philadelphia.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/caitlin-killian-failing-moms-social-condemnation-and-criminalization-of-mothers-polity-press-2023-MpRjhFFs</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The role of mother is often celebrated in the United States as the most important job in the world but Dr. Caitlin Killian argues that American motherhood is increasingly monitored and perilous. From preconception, through pregnancy, and while parenting, she argues that women are held to ever-higher standards and punished – both socially and criminally – for failing to live up to these norms.</p><p>Using historical accounts, public health pronouncements, social psychological research, and course cases,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781509557738" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Failing Moms: Social Condemnation and Criminalization of Mothers</em></a>&nbsp;(Polity Press, 2023) documents how women of all ethnic backgrounds and socioeconomic statuses have been interrogated, held against their will, and jailed for a rapidly expanding list of offenses such as falling down the stairs while pregnant or letting a child spend time alone in a park, actions that were not considered criminal a generation ago. While poor mothers and moms of color are targeted the most, Dr. Killian argues that all moms are in jeopardy, whether they realize it or not. Women and mothers are disproportionately held accountable compared to men and fathers who do not see their reproduction policed and almost never incur charges for “failure to protect.” The gendered inequality of prosecutions reveals them to be more about controlling women than protecting children. Other books have examined the specific risks to either pregnant or parenting women – but few connect the issues – and that is Dr. Killian’s goal. Using a reproductive justice lens, she analyzes the extent of the crisis and what must change to prevent mass penalization and provide resources to allow people to mother well.</p><p>Dr.&nbsp;<a href="https://caitlinkillian.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Caitlin Killian</a>&nbsp;is a professor of sociology at Drew University specializing in gender, families, reproduction, and immigration. She has worked as a consultant for the United Nations, developing the module on sexual and reproductive health and rights for UN staff training and co-authoring a UNDP report on Syrian refugee women. Her articles have appeared in Contexts magazine and The Conversation, and she has published in numerous academic journals about adoption, overblown warnings about women’s alcohol consumption during pregnancy, sexual and reproductive health and justice, and immigrant and refugee women.</p><p>Dr. Killian mentions:</p><ul>
<li>Michele Goodwin,&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/michele-goodwin-policing-the-womb-invisible-women-and-the-criminalization-of-motherhood-cambridge-up-2020#entry:32182@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Policing the Womb: Invisible Women and the Criminalization of Motherhood</em></a>
</li>
<li>Renee Almeling,&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/rene-almeling-guynecology-the-missing-science-of-mens-reproductive-health-u-california-press-2020#entry:32393@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>GUYnecology: The Missing Science of Men’s Reproductive Health</em></a>
</li>
<li>Jeanne Flavin,&nbsp;<em>Our Bodies, Our Crimes: The Policing of Women's Reproduction</em>
</li>
<li>Miranda R. Waggoner,&nbsp;<em>The Zero Trimester: Pre-Pregnancy Care and the Politics of Reproductive Risk</em>
</li>
<li>Cynthia Daniels,&nbsp;<em>Exposing Men: The Science and Politics of Male Reproduction</em>
</li>
<li>Kim Brooks,&nbsp;<em>Small Animals: Parenthood in the Age of Fear</em>
</li>
</ul><p><em>﻿</em></p><p>George Lobis served as the editorial assistant for this podcast.</p><p><a href="https://www.sju.edu/faculty/susan-liebell#_ga=2.125106634.1318472952.1578330950-502593983.1578330950" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Susan Liebell&nbsp;</em></a><em>is a Professor of Political Science at Saint Joseph’s University in Philadelphia.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="53374088" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/d50495f9-3fd0-4e3f-ae8f-b9c159d38716/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=d50495f9-3fd0-4e3f-ae8f-b9c159d38716&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Caitlin Killian, &quot;Failing Moms: Social Condemnation and Criminalization of Mothers&quot; (Polity Press, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:55:35</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The role of mother is often celebrated in the United States as the most important job in the world but Dr. Caitlin Killian argues that American motherhood is increasingly monitored and perilous. From preconception, through pregnancy, and while parenting, she argues that women are held to ever-higher standards and punished – both socially and criminally – for failing to live up to these norms.
Using historical accounts, public health pronouncements, social psychological research, and course cases, Failing Moms: Social Condemnation and Criminalization of Mothers (Polity Press, 2023) documents how women of all ethnic backgrounds and socioeconomic statuses have been interrogated, held against their will, and jailed for a rapidly expanding list of offenses such as falling down the stairs while pregnant or letting a child spend time alone in a park, actions that were not considered criminal a generation ago. While poor mothers and moms of color are targeted the most, Dr. Killian argues that all moms are in jeopardy, whether they realize it or not. Women and mothers are disproportionately held accountable compared to men and fathers who do not see their reproduction policed and almost never incur charges for “failure to protect.” The gendered inequality of prosecutions reveals them to be more about controlling women than protecting children. Other books have examined the specific risks to either pregnant or parenting women – but few connect the issues – and that is Dr. Killian’s goal. Using a reproductive justice lens, she analyzes the extent of the crisis and what must change to prevent mass penalization and provide resources to allow people to mother well.
Dr. Caitlin Killian is a professor of sociology at Drew University specializing in gender, families, reproduction, and immigration. She has worked as a consultant for the United Nations, developing the module on sexual and reproductive health and rights for UN staff training and co-authoring a UNDP report on Syrian refugee women. Her articles have appeared in Contexts magazine and The Conversation, and she has published in numerous academic journals about adoption, overblown warnings about women’s alcohol consumption during pregnancy, sexual and reproductive health and justice, and immigrant and refugee women.
Dr. Killian mentions:
Michele Goodwin, Policing the Womb: Invisible Women and the Criminalization of Motherhood
Renee Almeling, GUYnecology: The Missing Science of Men’s Reproductive Health
Jeanne Flavin, Our Bodies, Our Crimes: The Policing of Women&apos;s Reproduction
Miranda R. Waggoner, The Zero Trimester: Pre-Pregnancy Care and the Politics of Reproductive Risk
Cynthia Daniels, Exposing Men: The Science and Politics of Male Reproduction
Kim Brooks, Small Animals: Parenthood in the Age of Fear
﻿
George Lobis served as the editorial assistant for this podcast.
Susan Liebell is a Professor of Political Science at Saint Joseph’s University in Philadelphia.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The role of mother is often celebrated in the United States as the most important job in the world but Dr. Caitlin Killian argues that American motherhood is increasingly monitored and perilous. From preconception, through pregnancy, and while parenting, she argues that women are held to ever-higher standards and punished – both socially and criminally – for failing to live up to these norms.
Using historical accounts, public health pronouncements, social psychological research, and course cases, Failing Moms: Social Condemnation and Criminalization of Mothers (Polity Press, 2023) documents how women of all ethnic backgrounds and socioeconomic statuses have been interrogated, held against their will, and jailed for a rapidly expanding list of offenses such as falling down the stairs while pregnant or letting a child spend time alone in a park, actions that were not considered criminal a generation ago. While poor mothers and moms of color are targeted the most, Dr. Killian argues that all moms are in jeopardy, whether they realize it or not. Women and mothers are disproportionately held accountable compared to men and fathers who do not see their reproduction policed and almost never incur charges for “failure to protect.” The gendered inequality of prosecutions reveals them to be more about controlling women than protecting children. Other books have examined the specific risks to either pregnant or parenting women – but few connect the issues – and that is Dr. Killian’s goal. Using a reproductive justice lens, she analyzes the extent of the crisis and what must change to prevent mass penalization and provide resources to allow people to mother well.
Dr. Caitlin Killian is a professor of sociology at Drew University specializing in gender, families, reproduction, and immigration. She has worked as a consultant for the United Nations, developing the module on sexual and reproductive health and rights for UN staff training and co-authoring a UNDP report on Syrian refugee women. Her articles have appeared in Contexts magazine and The Conversation, and she has published in numerous academic journals about adoption, overblown warnings about women’s alcohol consumption during pregnancy, sexual and reproductive health and justice, and immigrant and refugee women.
Dr. Killian mentions:
Michele Goodwin, Policing the Womb: Invisible Women and the Criminalization of Motherhood
Renee Almeling, GUYnecology: The Missing Science of Men’s Reproductive Health
Jeanne Flavin, Our Bodies, Our Crimes: The Policing of Women&apos;s Reproduction
Miranda R. Waggoner, The Zero Trimester: Pre-Pregnancy Care and the Politics of Reproductive Risk
Cynthia Daniels, Exposing Men: The Science and Politics of Male Reproduction
Kim Brooks, Small Animals: Parenthood in the Age of Fear
﻿
George Lobis served as the editorial assistant for this podcast.
Susan Liebell is a Professor of Political Science at Saint Joseph’s University in Philadelphia.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>702</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">f592e232-bd28-11ee-bea1-47deb97d802f</guid>
      <title>Rachel Nolan, &quot;Until I Find You: Disappeared Children and Coercive Adoptions in Guatemala&quot; (Harvard UP, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The poignant saga of Guatemala's adoption industry: an international marketplace for children, built on a foundation of inequality, war, and Indigenous dispossession. In 2009 Dolores Preat went to a small Maya town in Guatemala to find her birth mother. At the address retrieved from her adoption file, she was told that her supposed mother, one Rosario Colop Chim, never gave up a child for adoption--but in 1986 a girl across the street was abducted. At that house, Preat met a woman who strongly resembled her. Colop Chim, it turned out, was not Preat's mother at all, but a jaladora--a baby broker. Some 40,000 children, many Indigenous, were kidnapped or otherwise coercively parted from families scarred by Guatemala's civil war or made desperate by unrelenting poverty. Amid the US-backed army's genocide against Indigenous Maya, children were wrested from their villages and put up for adoption illegally, mostly in the United States.&nbsp;</p><p>During the war's second decade, adoption was privatized, overseen by lawyers who made good money matching children to overseas families. Private adoptions skyrocketed to the point where tiny Guatemala overtook giants like China and Russia as a "sender" state. Drawing on government archives, oral histories, and a rare cache of adoption files opened briefly for war crimes investigations, Rachel Nolan explores the human toll of an international industry that thrives on exploitation. Would-be parents in rich countries have fostered a commercial market for children from poor countries, with Guatemala becoming the most extreme case.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780674270350" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Until I Find You: Disappeared Children and Coercive Adoptions in Guatemala</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Harvard UP, 2024) reckons with the hard truths of a practice that builds loving families in the Global North out of economic exploitation, endemic violence, and dislocation in the Global South.</p><p>Rachel Nolan is Contributing Editor at&nbsp;<em>Harper’s Magazine</em>&nbsp;and has written for the&nbsp;<em>New Yorker</em>, the&nbsp;<em>London Review of Books</em>, the&nbsp;<em>New York Times</em>, the&nbsp;<em>New York Review of Books</em>, and the Salvadoran investigative news outlet&nbsp;<em>El Faro</em>. She is Assistant Professor of International Relations at Boston University.</p><p><em>Katie Coldiron is the Outreach Program Manager for the Digital Library of the Caribbean (dLOC) and PhD student in History at Florida International University.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 28 Jan 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/rachel-nolan-until-i-find-you-disappeared-children-and-coercive-adoptions-in-guatemala-harvard-up-2024-s6YW1Wfb</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The poignant saga of Guatemala's adoption industry: an international marketplace for children, built on a foundation of inequality, war, and Indigenous dispossession. In 2009 Dolores Preat went to a small Maya town in Guatemala to find her birth mother. At the address retrieved from her adoption file, she was told that her supposed mother, one Rosario Colop Chim, never gave up a child for adoption--but in 1986 a girl across the street was abducted. At that house, Preat met a woman who strongly resembled her. Colop Chim, it turned out, was not Preat's mother at all, but a jaladora--a baby broker. Some 40,000 children, many Indigenous, were kidnapped or otherwise coercively parted from families scarred by Guatemala's civil war or made desperate by unrelenting poverty. Amid the US-backed army's genocide against Indigenous Maya, children were wrested from their villages and put up for adoption illegally, mostly in the United States.&nbsp;</p><p>During the war's second decade, adoption was privatized, overseen by lawyers who made good money matching children to overseas families. Private adoptions skyrocketed to the point where tiny Guatemala overtook giants like China and Russia as a "sender" state. Drawing on government archives, oral histories, and a rare cache of adoption files opened briefly for war crimes investigations, Rachel Nolan explores the human toll of an international industry that thrives on exploitation. Would-be parents in rich countries have fostered a commercial market for children from poor countries, with Guatemala becoming the most extreme case.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780674270350" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Until I Find You: Disappeared Children and Coercive Adoptions in Guatemala</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Harvard UP, 2024) reckons with the hard truths of a practice that builds loving families in the Global North out of economic exploitation, endemic violence, and dislocation in the Global South.</p><p>Rachel Nolan is Contributing Editor at&nbsp;<em>Harper’s Magazine</em>&nbsp;and has written for the&nbsp;<em>New Yorker</em>, the&nbsp;<em>London Review of Books</em>, the&nbsp;<em>New York Times</em>, the&nbsp;<em>New York Review of Books</em>, and the Salvadoran investigative news outlet&nbsp;<em>El Faro</em>. She is Assistant Professor of International Relations at Boston University.</p><p><em>Katie Coldiron is the Outreach Program Manager for the Digital Library of the Caribbean (dLOC) and PhD student in History at Florida International University.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="41143778" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/0ef6d103-aeba-4b10-aa58-ea70f2978cf7/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=0ef6d103-aeba-4b10-aa58-ea70f2978cf7&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Rachel Nolan, &quot;Until I Find You: Disappeared Children and Coercive Adoptions in Guatemala&quot; (Harvard UP, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:42:51</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The poignant saga of Guatemala&apos;s adoption industry: an international marketplace for children, built on a foundation of inequality, war, and Indigenous dispossession. In 2009 Dolores Preat went to a small Maya town in Guatemala to find her birth mother. At the address retrieved from her adoption file, she was told that her supposed mother, one Rosario Colop Chim, never gave up a child for adoption--but in 1986 a girl across the street was abducted. At that house, Preat met a woman who strongly resembled her. Colop Chim, it turned out, was not Preat&apos;s mother at all, but a jaladora--a baby broker. Some 40,000 children, many Indigenous, were kidnapped or otherwise coercively parted from families scarred by Guatemala&apos;s civil war or made desperate by unrelenting poverty. Amid the US-backed army&apos;s genocide against Indigenous Maya, children were wrested from their villages and put up for adoption illegally, mostly in the United States. 
During the war&apos;s second decade, adoption was privatized, overseen by lawyers who made good money matching children to overseas families. Private adoptions skyrocketed to the point where tiny Guatemala overtook giants like China and Russia as a &quot;sender&quot; state. Drawing on government archives, oral histories, and a rare cache of adoption files opened briefly for war crimes investigations, Rachel Nolan explores the human toll of an international industry that thrives on exploitation. Would-be parents in rich countries have fostered a commercial market for children from poor countries, with Guatemala becoming the most extreme case. Until I Find You: Disappeared Children and Coercive Adoptions in Guatemala (Harvard UP, 2024) reckons with the hard truths of a practice that builds loving families in the Global North out of economic exploitation, endemic violence, and dislocation in the Global South.
Rachel Nolan is Contributing Editor at Harper’s Magazine and has written for the New Yorker, the London Review of Books, the New York Times, the New York Review of Books, and the Salvadoran investigative news outlet El Faro. She is Assistant Professor of International Relations at Boston University.
Katie Coldiron is the Outreach Program Manager for the Digital Library of the Caribbean (dLOC) and PhD student in History at Florida International University.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The poignant saga of Guatemala&apos;s adoption industry: an international marketplace for children, built on a foundation of inequality, war, and Indigenous dispossession. In 2009 Dolores Preat went to a small Maya town in Guatemala to find her birth mother. At the address retrieved from her adoption file, she was told that her supposed mother, one Rosario Colop Chim, never gave up a child for adoption--but in 1986 a girl across the street was abducted. At that house, Preat met a woman who strongly resembled her. Colop Chim, it turned out, was not Preat&apos;s mother at all, but a jaladora--a baby broker. Some 40,000 children, many Indigenous, were kidnapped or otherwise coercively parted from families scarred by Guatemala&apos;s civil war or made desperate by unrelenting poverty. Amid the US-backed army&apos;s genocide against Indigenous Maya, children were wrested from their villages and put up for adoption illegally, mostly in the United States. 
During the war&apos;s second decade, adoption was privatized, overseen by lawyers who made good money matching children to overseas families. Private adoptions skyrocketed to the point where tiny Guatemala overtook giants like China and Russia as a &quot;sender&quot; state. Drawing on government archives, oral histories, and a rare cache of adoption files opened briefly for war crimes investigations, Rachel Nolan explores the human toll of an international industry that thrives on exploitation. Would-be parents in rich countries have fostered a commercial market for children from poor countries, with Guatemala becoming the most extreme case. Until I Find You: Disappeared Children and Coercive Adoptions in Guatemala (Harvard UP, 2024) reckons with the hard truths of a practice that builds loving families in the Global North out of economic exploitation, endemic violence, and dislocation in the Global South.
Rachel Nolan is Contributing Editor at Harper’s Magazine and has written for the New Yorker, the London Review of Books, the New York Times, the New York Review of Books, and the Salvadoran investigative news outlet El Faro. She is Assistant Professor of International Relations at Boston University.
Katie Coldiron is the Outreach Program Manager for the Digital Library of the Caribbean (dLOC) and PhD student in History at Florida International University.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>206</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7412efa0-bd22-11ee-81c4-cfcdf995506a</guid>
      <title>Sandro Galea, &quot;Within Reason: A Liberal Public Health for an Illiberal Time&quot; (U Chicago Press, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>A provocative chronicle of how US public health has strayed from its liberal roots.</p><p>The Covid-19 response was a crucible of politics and public health—a volatile combination that produced predictably bad results. As scientific expertise became entangled with political motivations, the public-health establishment found itself mired in political encampment.</p><p>It was, as Sandro Galea argues, a crisis of liberalism: a retreat from the principles of free speech, open debate, and the pursuit of knowledge through reasoned inquiry that should inform the work of public health.</p><p>Across fifty essays,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780226822914" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Within Reason: A Liberal Public Health for an Illiberal Time</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(U Chicago Press, 2023) chronicles how public health became enmeshed in the insidious social trends that accelerated under Covid-19. Galea challenges this intellectual drift towards intolerance and absolutism while showing how similar regressions from reason undermined social progress during earlier eras.&nbsp;<em>Within Reason</em>&nbsp;builds an incisive case for a return to critical, open inquiry as a guiding principle for the future public health we want—and a future we must work to protect.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 28 Jan 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/sandro-galea-within-reason-a-liberal-public-health-for-an-illiberal-time-u-chicago-press-2023-k6TYiuri</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A provocative chronicle of how US public health has strayed from its liberal roots.</p><p>The Covid-19 response was a crucible of politics and public health—a volatile combination that produced predictably bad results. As scientific expertise became entangled with political motivations, the public-health establishment found itself mired in political encampment.</p><p>It was, as Sandro Galea argues, a crisis of liberalism: a retreat from the principles of free speech, open debate, and the pursuit of knowledge through reasoned inquiry that should inform the work of public health.</p><p>Across fifty essays,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780226822914" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Within Reason: A Liberal Public Health for an Illiberal Time</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(U Chicago Press, 2023) chronicles how public health became enmeshed in the insidious social trends that accelerated under Covid-19. Galea challenges this intellectual drift towards intolerance and absolutism while showing how similar regressions from reason undermined social progress during earlier eras.&nbsp;<em>Within Reason</em>&nbsp;builds an incisive case for a return to critical, open inquiry as a guiding principle for the future public health we want—and a future we must work to protect.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="26023692" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/b70f0614-f64e-4b0f-9806-37ee16551a42/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=b70f0614-f64e-4b0f-9806-37ee16551a42&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Sandro Galea, &quot;Within Reason: A Liberal Public Health for an Illiberal Time&quot; (U Chicago Press, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:27:06</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>A provocative chronicle of how US public health has strayed from its liberal roots.
The Covid-19 response was a crucible of politics and public health—a volatile combination that produced predictably bad results. As scientific expertise became entangled with political motivations, the public-health establishment found itself mired in political encampment.
It was, as Sandro Galea argues, a crisis of liberalism: a retreat from the principles of free speech, open debate, and the pursuit of knowledge through reasoned inquiry that should inform the work of public health.
Across fifty essays, Within Reason: A Liberal Public Health for an Illiberal Time (U Chicago Press, 2023) chronicles how public health became enmeshed in the insidious social trends that accelerated under Covid-19. Galea challenges this intellectual drift towards intolerance and absolutism while showing how similar regressions from reason undermined social progress during earlier eras. Within Reason builds an incisive case for a return to critical, open inquiry as a guiding principle for the future public health we want—and a future we must work to protect.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>A provocative chronicle of how US public health has strayed from its liberal roots.
The Covid-19 response was a crucible of politics and public health—a volatile combination that produced predictably bad results. As scientific expertise became entangled with political motivations, the public-health establishment found itself mired in political encampment.
It was, as Sandro Galea argues, a crisis of liberalism: a retreat from the principles of free speech, open debate, and the pursuit of knowledge through reasoned inquiry that should inform the work of public health.
Across fifty essays, Within Reason: A Liberal Public Health for an Illiberal Time (U Chicago Press, 2023) chronicles how public health became enmeshed in the insidious social trends that accelerated under Covid-19. Galea challenges this intellectual drift towards intolerance and absolutism while showing how similar regressions from reason undermined social progress during earlier eras. Within Reason builds an incisive case for a return to critical, open inquiry as a guiding principle for the future public health we want—and a future we must work to protect.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>5</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1ecde700-bb03-11ee-a00d-cbf774150637</guid>
      <title>Bruce Wardhaugh, &quot;Competition Law in Crisis: The Antitrust Response to Economic Shocks&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2022)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In recent years, government agencies around the world have been forced to consider the role of competition law and policy in addressing various&nbsp;crises, including the COVID-19&nbsp;pandemic and the 2008&nbsp;financial collapse. There is no easy formula that a competition agency can apply to determine the appropriate response to a crisis; indeed, there is substantial debate about the issue. One common criticism of competition law and policy&nbsp;is that usually it is too inflexible to deal with a crisis,&nbsp;prohibiting an adequate response to economic and industrial shocks.&nbsp;</p><p>Bruce Wardhaugh's&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781108983990" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Competition Law in Crisis: The Antitrust Response to Economic Shocks</em></a>&nbsp;(Cambridge UP, 2022) challenges this notion by examining competition responses to crises past and present. With an analysis that spans the response of UK and EU competition authorities to the economic and commercial fallout of the 2008 financial crisis, the COVID-19 pandemic, and potential responses to the climate crisis, Professor Wardhaugh argues that relaxing competition law is precisely the wrong response. The rigidity of competition rules in the UK and EU has both normative and positive implications for not just the methodology used in competition analysis, but also the role of competition law within the legal order of both jurisdictions.</p><p><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/mark-j-niefer-6b41ba9b/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Mark Niefer</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a lawyer and economist who has served the Antitrust Division of the U.S. Department of Justice in a variety of key roles over the last 25+ years. He presently is an International Advisor at the Antitrust Division, focused on digital market issues; he also is an Adjunct Professor of Law at Antonin Scalia Law School - George Mason University, where he teaches an advanced antitrust seminar on mergers.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/bruce-wardhaugh-competition-law-in-crisis-the-antitrust-response-to-economic-shocks-cambridge-up-2022-xB0wXiGy</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In recent years, government agencies around the world have been forced to consider the role of competition law and policy in addressing various&nbsp;crises, including the COVID-19&nbsp;pandemic and the 2008&nbsp;financial collapse. There is no easy formula that a competition agency can apply to determine the appropriate response to a crisis; indeed, there is substantial debate about the issue. One common criticism of competition law and policy&nbsp;is that usually it is too inflexible to deal with a crisis,&nbsp;prohibiting an adequate response to economic and industrial shocks.&nbsp;</p><p>Bruce Wardhaugh's&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781108983990" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Competition Law in Crisis: The Antitrust Response to Economic Shocks</em></a>&nbsp;(Cambridge UP, 2022) challenges this notion by examining competition responses to crises past and present. With an analysis that spans the response of UK and EU competition authorities to the economic and commercial fallout of the 2008 financial crisis, the COVID-19 pandemic, and potential responses to the climate crisis, Professor Wardhaugh argues that relaxing competition law is precisely the wrong response. The rigidity of competition rules in the UK and EU has both normative and positive implications for not just the methodology used in competition analysis, but also the role of competition law within the legal order of both jurisdictions.</p><p><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/mark-j-niefer-6b41ba9b/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Mark Niefer</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a lawyer and economist who has served the Antitrust Division of the U.S. Department of Justice in a variety of key roles over the last 25+ years. He presently is an International Advisor at the Antitrust Division, focused on digital market issues; he also is an Adjunct Professor of Law at Antonin Scalia Law School - George Mason University, where he teaches an advanced antitrust seminar on mergers.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="67518069" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/0ab060f8-1c02-43c1-bc04-b1e876997d82/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=0ab060f8-1c02-43c1-bc04-b1e876997d82&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Bruce Wardhaugh, &quot;Competition Law in Crisis: The Antitrust Response to Economic Shocks&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2022)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:10:19</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In recent years, government agencies around the world have been forced to consider the role of competition law and policy in addressing various crises, including the COVID-19 pandemic and the 2008 financial collapse. There is no easy formula that a competition agency can apply to determine the appropriate response to a crisis; indeed, there is substantial debate about the issue. One common criticism of competition law and policy is that usually it is too inflexible to deal with a crisis, prohibiting an adequate response to economic and industrial shocks. 
Bruce Wardhaugh&apos;s Competition Law in Crisis: The Antitrust Response to Economic Shocks (Cambridge UP, 2022) challenges this notion by examining competition responses to crises past and present. With an analysis that spans the response of UK and EU competition authorities to the economic and commercial fallout of the 2008 financial crisis, the COVID-19 pandemic, and potential responses to the climate crisis, Professor Wardhaugh argues that relaxing competition law is precisely the wrong response. The rigidity of competition rules in the UK and EU has both normative and positive implications for not just the methodology used in competition analysis, but also the role of competition law within the legal order of both jurisdictions.
Mark Niefer is a lawyer and economist who has served the Antitrust Division of the U.S. Department of Justice in a variety of key roles over the last 25+ years. He presently is an International Advisor at the Antitrust Division, focused on digital market issues; he also is an Adjunct Professor of Law at Antonin Scalia Law School - George Mason University, where he teaches an advanced antitrust seminar on mergers.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In recent years, government agencies around the world have been forced to consider the role of competition law and policy in addressing various crises, including the COVID-19 pandemic and the 2008 financial collapse. There is no easy formula that a competition agency can apply to determine the appropriate response to a crisis; indeed, there is substantial debate about the issue. One common criticism of competition law and policy is that usually it is too inflexible to deal with a crisis, prohibiting an adequate response to economic and industrial shocks. 
Bruce Wardhaugh&apos;s Competition Law in Crisis: The Antitrust Response to Economic Shocks (Cambridge UP, 2022) challenges this notion by examining competition responses to crises past and present. With an analysis that spans the response of UK and EU competition authorities to the economic and commercial fallout of the 2008 financial crisis, the COVID-19 pandemic, and potential responses to the climate crisis, Professor Wardhaugh argues that relaxing competition law is precisely the wrong response. The rigidity of competition rules in the UK and EU has both normative and positive implications for not just the methodology used in competition analysis, but also the role of competition law within the legal order of both jurisdictions.
Mark Niefer is a lawyer and economist who has served the Antitrust Division of the U.S. Department of Justice in a variety of key roles over the last 25+ years. He presently is an International Advisor at the Antitrust Division, focused on digital market issues; he also is an Adjunct Professor of Law at Antonin Scalia Law School - George Mason University, where he teaches an advanced antitrust seminar on mergers.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>209</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">27429eaa-8645-11ee-83c2-fb4f6255b241</guid>
      <title>David J. Brick, &quot;Widows Under Hindu Law&quot; (Oxford UP, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>During British colonial rule in India, the treatment of high-caste Hindu widows became the subject of great controversy. Such women were not permitted to remarry and were offered two options: a life of seclusion and rigorous asceticism or death on the funeral pyre of a deceased husband. Was this a modern development, or did it date from the classical period? In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197664544" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Widows Under Hindu Law</em></a>&nbsp;(Oxford UP, 2023), David Brick offers an exhaustive history of the treatment and status of widows under classical Hindu law, or Dharmasastra as it is called in Sanskrit, which spanned approximately the third century BCE to the eighteenth-century CE.</p><p>Under Dharmasastra, Hindu jurists treated at length and at times hotly debated four widow-related issues: widow remarriage and levirate, a widow's right to inherit her husband's estate, widow-asceticism, and sati. Each of the book's chapters examine these issues in depth, concluding with an appendix that addresses a widow's right to adopt a son-a fifth widow-related issue that became the topic of discussion in late Dharmasastra works and was a significant point of legal contentions during the colonial period. When read critically and historically, works of Dharmasastra provide a long and detailed record of the prevailing legal and social norms of high-caste Hindu society.&nbsp;<em>Widows Under Hindu Law</em>&nbsp;uses lengthy English translations of important passages from Hindu legal texts to present a largescale narrative of the treatment of widows under the Hindu legal tradition.</p><p>This book is available open access&nbsp;<a href="https://academic.oup.com/book/45654?" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a>.&nbsp;</p><p>During British colonial rule in India, the treatment of high-caste Hindu widows became the subject of great controversy. Such women were not permitted to remarry and were offered two options: a life of seclusion and rigorous asceticism or death on the funeral pyre of a deceased husband. Was this a modern development, or did it date from the classical period?</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/david-j-brick-widows-under-hindu-law-oxford-up-2023-xuHinnUK</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>During British colonial rule in India, the treatment of high-caste Hindu widows became the subject of great controversy. Such women were not permitted to remarry and were offered two options: a life of seclusion and rigorous asceticism or death on the funeral pyre of a deceased husband. Was this a modern development, or did it date from the classical period? In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197664544" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Widows Under Hindu Law</em></a>&nbsp;(Oxford UP, 2023), David Brick offers an exhaustive history of the treatment and status of widows under classical Hindu law, or Dharmasastra as it is called in Sanskrit, which spanned approximately the third century BCE to the eighteenth-century CE.</p><p>Under Dharmasastra, Hindu jurists treated at length and at times hotly debated four widow-related issues: widow remarriage and levirate, a widow's right to inherit her husband's estate, widow-asceticism, and sati. Each of the book's chapters examine these issues in depth, concluding with an appendix that addresses a widow's right to adopt a son-a fifth widow-related issue that became the topic of discussion in late Dharmasastra works and was a significant point of legal contentions during the colonial period. When read critically and historically, works of Dharmasastra provide a long and detailed record of the prevailing legal and social norms of high-caste Hindu society.&nbsp;<em>Widows Under Hindu Law</em>&nbsp;uses lengthy English translations of important passages from Hindu legal texts to present a largescale narrative of the treatment of widows under the Hindu legal tradition.</p><p>This book is available open access&nbsp;<a href="https://academic.oup.com/book/45654?" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a>.&nbsp;</p><p>During British colonial rule in India, the treatment of high-caste Hindu widows became the subject of great controversy. Such women were not permitted to remarry and were offered two options: a life of seclusion and rigorous asceticism or death on the funeral pyre of a deceased husband. Was this a modern development, or did it date from the classical period?</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="50373941" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/1aa35ed1-e1e5-4f3b-ab00-0cedd20b6b05/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=1aa35ed1-e1e5-4f3b-ab00-0cedd20b6b05&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>David J. Brick, &quot;Widows Under Hindu Law&quot; (Oxford UP, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:52:28</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>During British colonial rule in India, the treatment of high-caste Hindu widows became the subject of great controversy. Such women were not permitted to remarry and were offered two options: a life of seclusion and rigorous asceticism or death on the funeral pyre of a deceased husband. Was this a modern development, or did it date from the classical period? In Widows Under Hindu Law (Oxford UP, 2023), David Brick offers an exhaustive history of the treatment and status of widows under classical Hindu law, or Dharmasastra as it is called in Sanskrit, which spanned approximately the third century BCE to the eighteenth-century CE.
Under Dharmasastra, Hindu jurists treated at length and at times hotly debated four widow-related issues: widow remarriage and levirate, a widow&apos;s right to inherit her husband&apos;s estate, widow-asceticism, and sati. Each of the book&apos;s chapters examine these issues in depth, concluding with an appendix that addresses a widow&apos;s right to adopt a son-a fifth widow-related issue that became the topic of discussion in late Dharmasastra works and was a significant point of legal contentions during the colonial period. When read critically and historically, works of Dharmasastra provide a long and detailed record of the prevailing legal and social norms of high-caste Hindu society. Widows Under Hindu Law uses lengthy English translations of important passages from Hindu legal texts to present a largescale narrative of the treatment of widows under the Hindu legal tradition.
This book is available open access here. 
During British colonial rule in India, the treatment of high-caste Hindu widows became the subject of great controversy. Such women were not permitted to remarry and were offered two options: a life of seclusion and rigorous asceticism or death on the funeral pyre of a deceased husband. Was this a modern development, or did it date from the classical period?
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>During British colonial rule in India, the treatment of high-caste Hindu widows became the subject of great controversy. Such women were not permitted to remarry and were offered two options: a life of seclusion and rigorous asceticism or death on the funeral pyre of a deceased husband. Was this a modern development, or did it date from the classical period? In Widows Under Hindu Law (Oxford UP, 2023), David Brick offers an exhaustive history of the treatment and status of widows under classical Hindu law, or Dharmasastra as it is called in Sanskrit, which spanned approximately the third century BCE to the eighteenth-century CE.
Under Dharmasastra, Hindu jurists treated at length and at times hotly debated four widow-related issues: widow remarriage and levirate, a widow&apos;s right to inherit her husband&apos;s estate, widow-asceticism, and sati. Each of the book&apos;s chapters examine these issues in depth, concluding with an appendix that addresses a widow&apos;s right to adopt a son-a fifth widow-related issue that became the topic of discussion in late Dharmasastra works and was a significant point of legal contentions during the colonial period. When read critically and historically, works of Dharmasastra provide a long and detailed record of the prevailing legal and social norms of high-caste Hindu society. Widows Under Hindu Law uses lengthy English translations of important passages from Hindu legal texts to present a largescale narrative of the treatment of widows under the Hindu legal tradition.
This book is available open access here. 
During British colonial rule in India, the treatment of high-caste Hindu widows became the subject of great controversy. Such women were not permitted to remarry and were offered two options: a life of seclusion and rigorous asceticism or death on the funeral pyre of a deceased husband. Was this a modern development, or did it date from the classical period?
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>308</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">12b1f6f0-ba36-11ee-9784-0b8c5ffdc92d</guid>
      <title>Loka Ashwood et al., &quot;Empty Fields, Empty Promises: A State-By-State Guide to Understanding and Transforming the Right to Farm&quot; (UNC Press, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Since the late 1970s, Right to Farm Laws have been adopted by states across the US to limit nuisance lawsuits against farmers engaged in standard agricultural practices. But who really benefits from Right to Farm Laws? And what can be done to promote real agricultural, rural, and environmental justice?&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781469674599" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Empty Fields, Empty Promises: A State-By-State Guide to Understanding and Transforming the Right to Farm</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(UNC Press, 2023) offers valuable history and incisive commentary on these questions.</p><p>Since their adoption, there has yet to be a comprehensive analysis of what Right to Farm laws do and who they benefit. This book offers the first national analysis and guide to these laws. It reveals that they generally benefit the largest operators, like processing plants, while traditional farmers benefit the least. Disfavored most of all are those seeking to defend their homes and environment against multinational corporations that use right-to-farm laws to strip neighboring owners of their property rights. Through what the book calls the "midburden," right-to-farm laws dispossess the many in favor of the few, paving the path to rural poverty.</p><p><em>Empty Fields, Empty Promises</em>&nbsp;summarizes every state's right-to-farm laws to help readers track and navigate their local and regional legal landscape. The book concludes by offering paths forward for a more distributed and democratic agrifood system that achieves agricultural, rural, and environmental justice.</p><p>The book is available for&nbsp;purchase or for&nbsp;<a href="https://uncpress.org/book/9781469674599/empty-fields-empty-promises/" rel="noopener noreferrer">FREE as an Open Access eBook from the University of North Carolina Press.</a></p><ul>
<li>Loka Ashwood is associate professor of sociology at the University of Kentucky. Her work develops action-centered methodologies that help frontline communities overcome environmental injustices and strengthen democracy. She is the author of&nbsp;<em>For-Profit Democracy: Why the Government Is Losing the Trust of Rural America&nbsp;</em>(2018) and co-author of&nbsp;<em>An Invitation to Environmental Sociology&nbsp;</em>(6th&nbsp;Edition, 2020).</li>
<li>Aimee Imlay is assistant professor of sociology at Mississippi State University.</li>
<li>Lindsay Kuehn is a public defender in Ramsey County, Minnesota, and a staff attorney with the Farmers' Legal Action Group.</li>
<li>Allen Franco is an assistant federal public defender for the districts of Massachusetts, New Hampshire, and Rhode Island.</li>
<li>Danielle Diamond is a visiting fellow at the Brooks McCormick Jr. Animal Law and Policy Program at Harvard Law School.</li>
</ul><p><br></p><p><a href="http://garrettbroad.webflow.io/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Garrett Broad</em></a><em>&nbsp;is Associate Professor of Communication Studies in Rowan University’s Edelman College of Communication &amp; Creative Arts, where he also serves as Provost’s Fellow in the Catalysts for Sustainability Initiative. His research and teaching explore the connections between contemporary social movements, food systems, and digital media technology. He is the author of More Than Just Food: Food Justice and Community Change, as well as a variety of articles on food's relationship to environmental sustainability, economic equity, and the health of humans and nonhuman animals.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/loka-ashwood-et-al-empty-fields-empty-promises-a-state-by-state-guide-to-understanding-and-transforming-the-right-to-farm-unc-press-2023-YLZHdzLs</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since the late 1970s, Right to Farm Laws have been adopted by states across the US to limit nuisance lawsuits against farmers engaged in standard agricultural practices. But who really benefits from Right to Farm Laws? And what can be done to promote real agricultural, rural, and environmental justice?&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781469674599" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Empty Fields, Empty Promises: A State-By-State Guide to Understanding and Transforming the Right to Farm</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(UNC Press, 2023) offers valuable history and incisive commentary on these questions.</p><p>Since their adoption, there has yet to be a comprehensive analysis of what Right to Farm laws do and who they benefit. This book offers the first national analysis and guide to these laws. It reveals that they generally benefit the largest operators, like processing plants, while traditional farmers benefit the least. Disfavored most of all are those seeking to defend their homes and environment against multinational corporations that use right-to-farm laws to strip neighboring owners of their property rights. Through what the book calls the "midburden," right-to-farm laws dispossess the many in favor of the few, paving the path to rural poverty.</p><p><em>Empty Fields, Empty Promises</em>&nbsp;summarizes every state's right-to-farm laws to help readers track and navigate their local and regional legal landscape. The book concludes by offering paths forward for a more distributed and democratic agrifood system that achieves agricultural, rural, and environmental justice.</p><p>The book is available for&nbsp;purchase or for&nbsp;<a href="https://uncpress.org/book/9781469674599/empty-fields-empty-promises/" rel="noopener noreferrer">FREE as an Open Access eBook from the University of North Carolina Press.</a></p><ul>
<li>Loka Ashwood is associate professor of sociology at the University of Kentucky. Her work develops action-centered methodologies that help frontline communities overcome environmental injustices and strengthen democracy. She is the author of&nbsp;<em>For-Profit Democracy: Why the Government Is Losing the Trust of Rural America&nbsp;</em>(2018) and co-author of&nbsp;<em>An Invitation to Environmental Sociology&nbsp;</em>(6th&nbsp;Edition, 2020).</li>
<li>Aimee Imlay is assistant professor of sociology at Mississippi State University.</li>
<li>Lindsay Kuehn is a public defender in Ramsey County, Minnesota, and a staff attorney with the Farmers' Legal Action Group.</li>
<li>Allen Franco is an assistant federal public defender for the districts of Massachusetts, New Hampshire, and Rhode Island.</li>
<li>Danielle Diamond is a visiting fellow at the Brooks McCormick Jr. Animal Law and Policy Program at Harvard Law School.</li>
</ul><p><br></p><p><a href="http://garrettbroad.webflow.io/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Garrett Broad</em></a><em>&nbsp;is Associate Professor of Communication Studies in Rowan University’s Edelman College of Communication &amp; Creative Arts, where he also serves as Provost’s Fellow in the Catalysts for Sustainability Initiative. His research and teaching explore the connections between contemporary social movements, food systems, and digital media technology. He is the author of More Than Just Food: Food Justice and Community Change, as well as a variety of articles on food's relationship to environmental sustainability, economic equity, and the health of humans and nonhuman animals.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="48612366" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/a6faef5e-2f07-4b9a-a0c8-fbe1d67840d3/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=a6faef5e-2f07-4b9a-a0c8-fbe1d67840d3&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Loka Ashwood et al., &quot;Empty Fields, Empty Promises: A State-By-State Guide to Understanding and Transforming the Right to Farm&quot; (UNC Press, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:50:38</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Since the late 1970s, Right to Farm Laws have been adopted by states across the US to limit nuisance lawsuits against farmers engaged in standard agricultural practices. But who really benefits from Right to Farm Laws? And what can be done to promote real agricultural, rural, and environmental justice? Empty Fields, Empty Promises: A State-By-State Guide to Understanding and Transforming the Right to Farm (UNC Press, 2023) offers valuable history and incisive commentary on these questions.
Since their adoption, there has yet to be a comprehensive analysis of what Right to Farm laws do and who they benefit. This book offers the first national analysis and guide to these laws. It reveals that they generally benefit the largest operators, like processing plants, while traditional farmers benefit the least. Disfavored most of all are those seeking to defend their homes and environment against multinational corporations that use right-to-farm laws to strip neighboring owners of their property rights. Through what the book calls the &quot;midburden,&quot; right-to-farm laws dispossess the many in favor of the few, paving the path to rural poverty.
Empty Fields, Empty Promises summarizes every state&apos;s right-to-farm laws to help readers track and navigate their local and regional legal landscape. The book concludes by offering paths forward for a more distributed and democratic agrifood system that achieves agricultural, rural, and environmental justice.
The book is available for purchase or for FREE as an Open Access eBook from the University of North Carolina Press.
Loka Ashwood is associate professor of sociology at the University of Kentucky. Her work develops action-centered methodologies that help frontline communities overcome environmental injustices and strengthen democracy. She is the author of For-Profit Democracy: Why the Government Is Losing the Trust of Rural America (2018) and co-author of An Invitation to Environmental Sociology (6th Edition, 2020).
Aimee Imlay is assistant professor of sociology at Mississippi State University.
Lindsay Kuehn is a public defender in Ramsey County, Minnesota, and a staff attorney with the Farmers&apos; Legal Action Group.
Allen Franco is an assistant federal public defender for the districts of Massachusetts, New Hampshire, and Rhode Island.
Danielle Diamond is a visiting fellow at the Brooks McCormick Jr. Animal Law and Policy Program at Harvard Law School.
Garrett Broad is Associate Professor of Communication Studies in Rowan University’s Edelman College of Communication &amp; Creative Arts, where he also serves as Provost’s Fellow in the Catalysts for Sustainability Initiative. His research and teaching explore the connections between contemporary social movements, food systems, and digital media technology. He is the author of More Than Just Food: Food Justice and Community Change, as well as a variety of articles on food&apos;s relationship to environmental sustainability, economic equity, and the health of humans and nonhuman animals.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Since the late 1970s, Right to Farm Laws have been adopted by states across the US to limit nuisance lawsuits against farmers engaged in standard agricultural practices. But who really benefits from Right to Farm Laws? And what can be done to promote real agricultural, rural, and environmental justice? Empty Fields, Empty Promises: A State-By-State Guide to Understanding and Transforming the Right to Farm (UNC Press, 2023) offers valuable history and incisive commentary on these questions.
Since their adoption, there has yet to be a comprehensive analysis of what Right to Farm laws do and who they benefit. This book offers the first national analysis and guide to these laws. It reveals that they generally benefit the largest operators, like processing plants, while traditional farmers benefit the least. Disfavored most of all are those seeking to defend their homes and environment against multinational corporations that use right-to-farm laws to strip neighboring owners of their property rights. Through what the book calls the &quot;midburden,&quot; right-to-farm laws dispossess the many in favor of the few, paving the path to rural poverty.
Empty Fields, Empty Promises summarizes every state&apos;s right-to-farm laws to help readers track and navigate their local and regional legal landscape. The book concludes by offering paths forward for a more distributed and democratic agrifood system that achieves agricultural, rural, and environmental justice.
The book is available for purchase or for FREE as an Open Access eBook from the University of North Carolina Press.
Loka Ashwood is associate professor of sociology at the University of Kentucky. Her work develops action-centered methodologies that help frontline communities overcome environmental injustices and strengthen democracy. She is the author of For-Profit Democracy: Why the Government Is Losing the Trust of Rural America (2018) and co-author of An Invitation to Environmental Sociology (6th Edition, 2020).
Aimee Imlay is assistant professor of sociology at Mississippi State University.
Lindsay Kuehn is a public defender in Ramsey County, Minnesota, and a staff attorney with the Farmers&apos; Legal Action Group.
Allen Franco is an assistant federal public defender for the districts of Massachusetts, New Hampshire, and Rhode Island.
Danielle Diamond is a visiting fellow at the Brooks McCormick Jr. Animal Law and Policy Program at Harvard Law School.
Garrett Broad is Associate Professor of Communication Studies in Rowan University’s Edelman College of Communication &amp; Creative Arts, where he also serves as Provost’s Fellow in the Catalysts for Sustainability Initiative. His research and teaching explore the connections between contemporary social movements, food systems, and digital media technology. He is the author of More Than Just Food: Food Justice and Community Change, as well as a variety of articles on food&apos;s relationship to environmental sustainability, economic equity, and the health of humans and nonhuman animals.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>144</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">069c98c2-b7dc-11ee-9cf3-cf4d3fc8b3e8</guid>
      <title>Cornelia Woll, &quot;Corporate Crime and Punishment: The Politics of Negotiated Justice in Global Markets&quot; (Princeton UP, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Over the past decade, many of the world’s biggest companies have found themselves embroiled in legal disputes over corruption, fraud, environmental damage, tax evasion, or sanction violations. Corporations including Volkswagen, BP, and Credit Suisse have paid record-breaking fines. Many critics of globalisation and corporate impunity cheer this turn toward accountability. Others, however, question American dominance in legal battles that seem to impose domestic legal norms beyond national boundaries.&nbsp;</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691250328" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Corporate Crime and Punishment: The Politics of Negotiated Justice in Global Markets</em></a>&nbsp;(Princeton University Press, 2023), Dr. Cornelia Woll examines the politics of American corporate criminal law’s extraterritorial reach. As governments abroad seek to respond to US law enforcement actions against their companies, they turn to flexible legal instruments that allow prosecutors to settle a case rather than bring it to court. With her analysis of the international and domestic politics of law enforcement targeting big business, Woll traces the rise of what she calls “negotiated corporate justice” in global markets.</p><p>Woll charts the path to this shift through case studies of geopolitical tensions and accusations of “economic lawfare,” pitting the United States against the European Union, China, and Japan. She then examines the reactions to the new legal landscape, describing institutional changes in the common law countries of the United Kingdom and Canada and the civil law countries of France, Brazil, and Germany. Through an insightful interdisciplinary analysis of how the prosecution of corporate crime has evolved in the twenty-first century, Dr. Woll demonstrates the profound transformation of the relationship between states and private actors in world markets, showing that law is part of economic statecraft in the connected global economy.</p><p>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose<a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;forthcoming book</a>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/cornelia-woll-corporate-crime-and-punishment-the-politics-of-negotiated-justice-in-global-markets-princeton-up-2023-z_wa5p3_</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over the past decade, many of the world’s biggest companies have found themselves embroiled in legal disputes over corruption, fraud, environmental damage, tax evasion, or sanction violations. Corporations including Volkswagen, BP, and Credit Suisse have paid record-breaking fines. Many critics of globalisation and corporate impunity cheer this turn toward accountability. Others, however, question American dominance in legal battles that seem to impose domestic legal norms beyond national boundaries.&nbsp;</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691250328" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Corporate Crime and Punishment: The Politics of Negotiated Justice in Global Markets</em></a>&nbsp;(Princeton University Press, 2023), Dr. Cornelia Woll examines the politics of American corporate criminal law’s extraterritorial reach. As governments abroad seek to respond to US law enforcement actions against their companies, they turn to flexible legal instruments that allow prosecutors to settle a case rather than bring it to court. With her analysis of the international and domestic politics of law enforcement targeting big business, Woll traces the rise of what she calls “negotiated corporate justice” in global markets.</p><p>Woll charts the path to this shift through case studies of geopolitical tensions and accusations of “economic lawfare,” pitting the United States against the European Union, China, and Japan. She then examines the reactions to the new legal landscape, describing institutional changes in the common law countries of the United Kingdom and Canada and the civil law countries of France, Brazil, and Germany. Through an insightful interdisciplinary analysis of how the prosecution of corporate crime has evolved in the twenty-first century, Dr. Woll demonstrates the profound transformation of the relationship between states and private actors in world markets, showing that law is part of economic statecraft in the connected global economy.</p><p>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose<a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;forthcoming book</a>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="42165129" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/9072c672-d051-4efd-90e6-3908c692aa21/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=9072c672-d051-4efd-90e6-3908c692aa21&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Cornelia Woll, &quot;Corporate Crime and Punishment: The Politics of Negotiated Justice in Global Markets&quot; (Princeton UP, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:43:55</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Over the past decade, many of the world’s biggest companies have found themselves embroiled in legal disputes over corruption, fraud, environmental damage, tax evasion, or sanction violations. Corporations including Volkswagen, BP, and Credit Suisse have paid record-breaking fines. Many critics of globalisation and corporate impunity cheer this turn toward accountability. Others, however, question American dominance in legal battles that seem to impose domestic legal norms beyond national boundaries. 
In Corporate Crime and Punishment: The Politics of Negotiated Justice in Global Markets (Princeton University Press, 2023), Dr. Cornelia Woll examines the politics of American corporate criminal law’s extraterritorial reach. As governments abroad seek to respond to US law enforcement actions against their companies, they turn to flexible legal instruments that allow prosecutors to settle a case rather than bring it to court. With her analysis of the international and domestic politics of law enforcement targeting big business, Woll traces the rise of what she calls “negotiated corporate justice” in global markets.
Woll charts the path to this shift through case studies of geopolitical tensions and accusations of “economic lawfare,” pitting the United States against the European Union, China, and Japan. She then examines the reactions to the new legal landscape, describing institutional changes in the common law countries of the United Kingdom and Canada and the civil law countries of France, Brazil, and Germany. Through an insightful interdisciplinary analysis of how the prosecution of corporate crime has evolved in the twenty-first century, Dr. Woll demonstrates the profound transformation of the relationship between states and private actors in world markets, showing that law is part of economic statecraft in the connected global economy.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose forthcoming book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Over the past decade, many of the world’s biggest companies have found themselves embroiled in legal disputes over corruption, fraud, environmental damage, tax evasion, or sanction violations. Corporations including Volkswagen, BP, and Credit Suisse have paid record-breaking fines. Many critics of globalisation and corporate impunity cheer this turn toward accountability. Others, however, question American dominance in legal battles that seem to impose domestic legal norms beyond national boundaries. 
In Corporate Crime and Punishment: The Politics of Negotiated Justice in Global Markets (Princeton University Press, 2023), Dr. Cornelia Woll examines the politics of American corporate criminal law’s extraterritorial reach. As governments abroad seek to respond to US law enforcement actions against their companies, they turn to flexible legal instruments that allow prosecutors to settle a case rather than bring it to court. With her analysis of the international and domestic politics of law enforcement targeting big business, Woll traces the rise of what she calls “negotiated corporate justice” in global markets.
Woll charts the path to this shift through case studies of geopolitical tensions and accusations of “economic lawfare,” pitting the United States against the European Union, China, and Japan. She then examines the reactions to the new legal landscape, describing institutional changes in the common law countries of the United Kingdom and Canada and the civil law countries of France, Brazil, and Germany. Through an insightful interdisciplinary analysis of how the prosecution of corporate crime has evolved in the twenty-first century, Dr. Woll demonstrates the profound transformation of the relationship between states and private actors in world markets, showing that law is part of economic statecraft in the connected global economy.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose forthcoming book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>144</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">cf4375ca-b56b-11ee-a746-f33f6961c93e</guid>
      <title>Robert C. Post, &quot;The Taft Court (10): Making Law for a Divided Nation, 1921–1930&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Robert C. Post's book&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009336215" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Taft Court (10): Making Law for a Divided Nation, 1921–1930</em></a>&nbsp;(Cambridge UP, 2023)&nbsp;offers the definitive history of the Supreme Court from 1921 to 1930 when William Howard Taft was Chief Justice. Using untapped archival material, Robert C. Post engagingly recounts the ambivalent effort to create a modern American administrative state out of the institutional innovations of World War I. He shows how the Court sought to establish authoritative forms of constitutional interpretation despite the culture wars that enveloped prohibition and pervasive labor unrest. He explores in great detail how constitutional law responds to altered circumstances. The work provides comprehensive portraits of seminal figures such as Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. and Louis Dembitz Brandeis. It describes William Howard Taft's many judicial reforms and his profound alteration of the role of Chief Justice. A critical and timely contribution, The Taft Court sheds light on jurisprudential debates that are just as relevant today as they were a century ago.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/robert-c-post-the-taft-court-10-making-law-for-a-divided-nation-19211930-cambridge-up-2023-aEJhVFrZ</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robert C. Post's book&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009336215" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Taft Court (10): Making Law for a Divided Nation, 1921–1930</em></a>&nbsp;(Cambridge UP, 2023)&nbsp;offers the definitive history of the Supreme Court from 1921 to 1930 when William Howard Taft was Chief Justice. Using untapped archival material, Robert C. Post engagingly recounts the ambivalent effort to create a modern American administrative state out of the institutional innovations of World War I. He shows how the Court sought to establish authoritative forms of constitutional interpretation despite the culture wars that enveloped prohibition and pervasive labor unrest. He explores in great detail how constitutional law responds to altered circumstances. The work provides comprehensive portraits of seminal figures such as Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. and Louis Dembitz Brandeis. It describes William Howard Taft's many judicial reforms and his profound alteration of the role of Chief Justice. A critical and timely contribution, The Taft Court sheds light on jurisprudential debates that are just as relevant today as they were a century ago.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="60727148" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/a514c146-b539-4f06-9b27-60a7020ccbf9/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=a514c146-b539-4f06-9b27-60a7020ccbf9&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Robert C. Post, &quot;The Taft Court (10): Making Law for a Divided Nation, 1921–1930&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:03:15</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Robert C. Post&apos;s book The Taft Court (10): Making Law for a Divided Nation, 1921–1930 (Cambridge UP, 2023) offers the definitive history of the Supreme Court from 1921 to 1930 when William Howard Taft was Chief Justice. Using untapped archival material, Robert C. Post engagingly recounts the ambivalent effort to create a modern American administrative state out of the institutional innovations of World War I. He shows how the Court sought to establish authoritative forms of constitutional interpretation despite the culture wars that enveloped prohibition and pervasive labor unrest. He explores in great detail how constitutional law responds to altered circumstances. The work provides comprehensive portraits of seminal figures such as Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. and Louis Dembitz Brandeis. It describes William Howard Taft&apos;s many judicial reforms and his profound alteration of the role of Chief Justice. A critical and timely contribution, The Taft Court sheds light on jurisprudential debates that are just as relevant today as they were a century ago.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Robert C. Post&apos;s book The Taft Court (10): Making Law for a Divided Nation, 1921–1930 (Cambridge UP, 2023) offers the definitive history of the Supreme Court from 1921 to 1930 when William Howard Taft was Chief Justice. Using untapped archival material, Robert C. Post engagingly recounts the ambivalent effort to create a modern American administrative state out of the institutional innovations of World War I. He shows how the Court sought to establish authoritative forms of constitutional interpretation despite the culture wars that enveloped prohibition and pervasive labor unrest. He explores in great detail how constitutional law responds to altered circumstances. The work provides comprehensive portraits of seminal figures such as Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. and Louis Dembitz Brandeis. It describes William Howard Taft&apos;s many judicial reforms and his profound alteration of the role of Chief Justice. A critical and timely contribution, The Taft Court sheds light on jurisprudential debates that are just as relevant today as they were a century ago.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1405</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e8b2b7c6-b315-11ee-897c-3bab266b4ec9</guid>
      <title>Paul Gowder, &quot;The Networked Leviathan: For Democratic Platforms&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Governments and consumers expect internet platform companies to regulate their users to prevent fraud, stop misinformation, and avoid violence. Yet, so far, they've failed to do so. The inability of platforms like Facebook, Google, and Amazon to govern their users has led to stolen elections, refused vaccines, counterfeit N95s in a pandemic, and even genocide. Such failures stem from these companies' inability to manage the complexity of their userbases, products, and their own incentives under the eyes of internal and external constituencies.&nbsp;</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781108971904" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Networked Leviathan: For Democratic Platforms</em></a>&nbsp;(Cambridge UP, 2023), Paul Gowder&nbsp;argues that countries should adapt the institutional tools developed in political science for platform governance to democratize major platforms. Democratic institutions allow knowledgeable actors to freely share and apply their understanding of the problems they face while leaders more readily recruit third parties to help manage their decision-making capacity.&nbsp;</p><p>This book is also&nbsp;<a href="https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/E6D492A6BECB37DC9D19799244882FCC/9781108838627AR.pdf/The_Networked_Leviathan.pdf?event-type=FTLA" rel="noopener noreferrer">available open access</a>&nbsp;on Cambridge Core.</p><p><a href="https://gowder.io/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Paul Gowder</a>&nbsp;is&nbsp;Professor of Law and Associate Dean of Research and Intellectual Life at Northwestern University's&nbsp;<a href="https://www.law.northwestern.edu/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Pritzker School of Law</a>&nbsp;and a Founding Fellow of the&nbsp;<a href="https://integrityinstitute.org/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Integrity Institute</a>. He is the author of&nbsp;<a href="https://rulelaw.net/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Rule of Law in the Real World</em></a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a href="https://rulelaw.us/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Rule of Law in the United States: An Unfinished Project of Black Liberation</em></a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/paul-gowder-the-networked-leviathan-for-democratic-platforms-cambridge-up-2023-u0UoIT_8</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Governments and consumers expect internet platform companies to regulate their users to prevent fraud, stop misinformation, and avoid violence. Yet, so far, they've failed to do so. The inability of platforms like Facebook, Google, and Amazon to govern their users has led to stolen elections, refused vaccines, counterfeit N95s in a pandemic, and even genocide. Such failures stem from these companies' inability to manage the complexity of their userbases, products, and their own incentives under the eyes of internal and external constituencies.&nbsp;</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781108971904" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Networked Leviathan: For Democratic Platforms</em></a>&nbsp;(Cambridge UP, 2023), Paul Gowder&nbsp;argues that countries should adapt the institutional tools developed in political science for platform governance to democratize major platforms. Democratic institutions allow knowledgeable actors to freely share and apply their understanding of the problems they face while leaders more readily recruit third parties to help manage their decision-making capacity.&nbsp;</p><p>This book is also&nbsp;<a href="https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/E6D492A6BECB37DC9D19799244882FCC/9781108838627AR.pdf/The_Networked_Leviathan.pdf?event-type=FTLA" rel="noopener noreferrer">available open access</a>&nbsp;on Cambridge Core.</p><p><a href="https://gowder.io/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Paul Gowder</a>&nbsp;is&nbsp;Professor of Law and Associate Dean of Research and Intellectual Life at Northwestern University's&nbsp;<a href="https://www.law.northwestern.edu/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Pritzker School of Law</a>&nbsp;and a Founding Fellow of the&nbsp;<a href="https://integrityinstitute.org/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Integrity Institute</a>. He is the author of&nbsp;<a href="https://rulelaw.net/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Rule of Law in the Real World</em></a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a href="https://rulelaw.us/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Rule of Law in the United States: An Unfinished Project of Black Liberation</em></a>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="60410242" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/cd3d07a3-d851-4eba-ae31-044eb54fa85c/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=cd3d07a3-d851-4eba-ae31-044eb54fa85c&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Paul Gowder, &quot;The Networked Leviathan: For Democratic Platforms&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:02:55</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Governments and consumers expect internet platform companies to regulate their users to prevent fraud, stop misinformation, and avoid violence. Yet, so far, they&apos;ve failed to do so. The inability of platforms like Facebook, Google, and Amazon to govern their users has led to stolen elections, refused vaccines, counterfeit N95s in a pandemic, and even genocide. Such failures stem from these companies&apos; inability to manage the complexity of their userbases, products, and their own incentives under the eyes of internal and external constituencies. 
In The Networked Leviathan: For Democratic Platforms (Cambridge UP, 2023), Paul Gowder argues that countries should adapt the institutional tools developed in political science for platform governance to democratize major platforms. Democratic institutions allow knowledgeable actors to freely share and apply their understanding of the problems they face while leaders more readily recruit third parties to help manage their decision-making capacity. 
This book is also available open access on Cambridge Core.
Paul Gowder is Professor of Law and Associate Dean of Research and Intellectual Life at Northwestern University&apos;s Pritzker School of Law and a Founding Fellow of the Integrity Institute. He is the author of The Rule of Law in the Real World and The Rule of Law in the United States: An Unfinished Project of Black Liberation.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Governments and consumers expect internet platform companies to regulate their users to prevent fraud, stop misinformation, and avoid violence. Yet, so far, they&apos;ve failed to do so. The inability of platforms like Facebook, Google, and Amazon to govern their users has led to stolen elections, refused vaccines, counterfeit N95s in a pandemic, and even genocide. Such failures stem from these companies&apos; inability to manage the complexity of their userbases, products, and their own incentives under the eyes of internal and external constituencies. 
In The Networked Leviathan: For Democratic Platforms (Cambridge UP, 2023), Paul Gowder argues that countries should adapt the institutional tools developed in political science for platform governance to democratize major platforms. Democratic institutions allow knowledgeable actors to freely share and apply their understanding of the problems they face while leaders more readily recruit third parties to help manage their decision-making capacity. 
This book is also available open access on Cambridge Core.
Paul Gowder is Professor of Law and Associate Dean of Research and Intellectual Life at Northwestern University&apos;s Pritzker School of Law and a Founding Fellow of the Integrity Institute. He is the author of The Rule of Law in the Real World and The Rule of Law in the United States: An Unfinished Project of Black Liberation.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>184</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">65e5bd6a-b2f3-11ee-b9e2-a7e3b3b7adce</guid>
      <title>Aimee Loiselle, &quot;Beyond Norma Rae: How Puerto Rican and Southern White Women Fought for a Place in the American Working Class&quot; (UNC Press, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In the late 1970s, Hollywood producers took the published biography of Crystal Lee Sutton, a white southern textile worker, and transformed it into a blockbuster 1979 film, Norma Rae, featuring Sally Field in the title role. This fascinating book reveals how the film and the popular icon it created each worked to efface the labor history that formed the foundation of the film's story. Drawing on an impressive range of sources--union records, industry reports, film scripts, and oral histories--Aimee Loiselle's cutting-edge scholarship shows how gender, race, culture, film, and mythology have reconfigured and often undermined the history of the American working class and their labor activism.&nbsp;</p><p>While Norma Rae constructed a powerful image of individual defiance by a white working-class woman, Loiselle's&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781469676128" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Beyond Norma Rae:&nbsp;How Puerto Rican and Southern White Women Fought for a Place in the American Working Class</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(University of North Carolina Press, 2023) demonstrates that female industrial workers across the country and from diverse racial backgrounds understood the significance of cultural representation and fought to tell their own stories. Loiselle painstakingly reconstructs the underlying histories of working women in this era and makes clear that cultural depictions must be understood as the complicated creations they are.</p><p>Aimee Loiselle is assistant professor of history at Central Connecticut State University.</p><p><em>Caleb Zakarin is the Assistant Editor of the New Books Network.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/aimee-loiselle-beyond-norma-rae-how-puerto-rican-and-southern-white-women-fought-for-a-place-in-the-american-working-class-unc-press-2023-UQu13RNN</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the late 1970s, Hollywood producers took the published biography of Crystal Lee Sutton, a white southern textile worker, and transformed it into a blockbuster 1979 film, Norma Rae, featuring Sally Field in the title role. This fascinating book reveals how the film and the popular icon it created each worked to efface the labor history that formed the foundation of the film's story. Drawing on an impressive range of sources--union records, industry reports, film scripts, and oral histories--Aimee Loiselle's cutting-edge scholarship shows how gender, race, culture, film, and mythology have reconfigured and often undermined the history of the American working class and their labor activism.&nbsp;</p><p>While Norma Rae constructed a powerful image of individual defiance by a white working-class woman, Loiselle's&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781469676128" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Beyond Norma Rae:&nbsp;How Puerto Rican and Southern White Women Fought for a Place in the American Working Class</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(University of North Carolina Press, 2023) demonstrates that female industrial workers across the country and from diverse racial backgrounds understood the significance of cultural representation and fought to tell their own stories. Loiselle painstakingly reconstructs the underlying histories of working women in this era and makes clear that cultural depictions must be understood as the complicated creations they are.</p><p>Aimee Loiselle is assistant professor of history at Central Connecticut State University.</p><p><em>Caleb Zakarin is the Assistant Editor of the New Books Network.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="49925094" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/cac709ce-4ce7-41e3-a39b-57ffbab340a0/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=cac709ce-4ce7-41e3-a39b-57ffbab340a0&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Aimee Loiselle, &quot;Beyond Norma Rae: How Puerto Rican and Southern White Women Fought for a Place in the American Working Class&quot; (UNC Press, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:52:00</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In the late 1970s, Hollywood producers took the published biography of Crystal Lee Sutton, a white southern textile worker, and transformed it into a blockbuster 1979 film, Norma Rae, featuring Sally Field in the title role. This fascinating book reveals how the film and the popular icon it created each worked to efface the labor history that formed the foundation of the film&apos;s story. Drawing on an impressive range of sources--union records, industry reports, film scripts, and oral histories--Aimee Loiselle&apos;s cutting-edge scholarship shows how gender, race, culture, film, and mythology have reconfigured and often undermined the history of the American working class and their labor activism. 
While Norma Rae constructed a powerful image of individual defiance by a white working-class woman, Loiselle&apos;s Beyond Norma Rae: How Puerto Rican and Southern White Women Fought for a Place in the American Working Class (University of North Carolina Press, 2023) demonstrates that female industrial workers across the country and from diverse racial backgrounds understood the significance of cultural representation and fought to tell their own stories. Loiselle painstakingly reconstructs the underlying histories of working women in this era and makes clear that cultural depictions must be understood as the complicated creations they are.
Aimee Loiselle is assistant professor of history at Central Connecticut State University.
Caleb Zakarin is the Assistant Editor of the New Books Network.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In the late 1970s, Hollywood producers took the published biography of Crystal Lee Sutton, a white southern textile worker, and transformed it into a blockbuster 1979 film, Norma Rae, featuring Sally Field in the title role. This fascinating book reveals how the film and the popular icon it created each worked to efface the labor history that formed the foundation of the film&apos;s story. Drawing on an impressive range of sources--union records, industry reports, film scripts, and oral histories--Aimee Loiselle&apos;s cutting-edge scholarship shows how gender, race, culture, film, and mythology have reconfigured and often undermined the history of the American working class and their labor activism. 
While Norma Rae constructed a powerful image of individual defiance by a white working-class woman, Loiselle&apos;s Beyond Norma Rae: How Puerto Rican and Southern White Women Fought for a Place in the American Working Class (University of North Carolina Press, 2023) demonstrates that female industrial workers across the country and from diverse racial backgrounds understood the significance of cultural representation and fought to tell their own stories. Loiselle painstakingly reconstructs the underlying histories of working women in this era and makes clear that cultural depictions must be understood as the complicated creations they are.
Aimee Loiselle is assistant professor of history at Central Connecticut State University.
Caleb Zakarin is the Assistant Editor of the New Books Network.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>78</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8911ce1e-ae57-11ee-930e-9f860cf4fbdb</guid>
      <title>Patricio Simonetto, &quot;A Body of One&apos;s Own: A Trans History of Argentina&quot; (U Texas Press, 2024)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>As a trans history of Argentina, a country that banned medically assisted gender affirmation practices and punished trans lives,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781477328606" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>A Body of One’s Own: A Trans History of Argentina</em></a>&nbsp;(University of Texas Press, 2024) places the histories of trans bodies at the core of modern Argentinian history. Dr. Patricio Simonetto documents the lives of people who crossed the boundaries of gender from the early twentieth century to the present. Based on extensive archival research in public and community-based archives, this book explores the mainstream medical and media portrayals of trans or travesti people, the state policing of gender embodiment, the experiences of those transgressing the boundaries of gender, and the development of homemade technologies from prosthetics to the self-injection of silicone.</p><p><em>A Body of One's Own</em>&nbsp;explores how trans activists' challenges to the exclusionary effects of Argentina’s legal, cultural, social, and political cisgender order led to the passage of the Gender Identity Law in 2012. Analyzing the decisive yet overlooked impact of gender transformation in the formation of the nation-state, gender-belonging, and citizenship, this book ultimately shows that supposedly abstract struggles to define the shifting notions of "sex," citizenship, and nationhood are embodied material experiences.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;forthcoming book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/patricio-simonetto-a-body-of-ones-own-a-trans-history-of-argentina-u-texas-press-2024-plTtPycI</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a trans history of Argentina, a country that banned medically assisted gender affirmation practices and punished trans lives,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781477328606" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>A Body of One’s Own: A Trans History of Argentina</em></a>&nbsp;(University of Texas Press, 2024) places the histories of trans bodies at the core of modern Argentinian history. Dr. Patricio Simonetto documents the lives of people who crossed the boundaries of gender from the early twentieth century to the present. Based on extensive archival research in public and community-based archives, this book explores the mainstream medical and media portrayals of trans or travesti people, the state policing of gender embodiment, the experiences of those transgressing the boundaries of gender, and the development of homemade technologies from prosthetics to the self-injection of silicone.</p><p><em>A Body of One's Own</em>&nbsp;explores how trans activists' challenges to the exclusionary effects of Argentina’s legal, cultural, social, and political cisgender order led to the passage of the Gender Identity Law in 2012. Analyzing the decisive yet overlooked impact of gender transformation in the formation of the nation-state, gender-belonging, and citizenship, this book ultimately shows that supposedly abstract struggles to define the shifting notions of "sex," citizenship, and nationhood are embodied material experiences.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;forthcoming book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="53027348" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/f2509b87-5c5d-4747-9cbe-ee64779b155e/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=f2509b87-5c5d-4747-9cbe-ee64779b155e&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Patricio Simonetto, &quot;A Body of One&apos;s Own: A Trans History of Argentina&quot; (U Texas Press, 2024)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:55:14</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>As a trans history of Argentina, a country that banned medically assisted gender affirmation practices and punished trans lives, A Body of One’s Own: A Trans History of Argentina (University of Texas Press, 2024) places the histories of trans bodies at the core of modern Argentinian history. Dr. Patricio Simonetto documents the lives of people who crossed the boundaries of gender from the early twentieth century to the present. Based on extensive archival research in public and community-based archives, this book explores the mainstream medical and media portrayals of trans or travesti people, the state policing of gender embodiment, the experiences of those transgressing the boundaries of gender, and the development of homemade technologies from prosthetics to the self-injection of silicone.
A Body of One&apos;s Own explores how trans activists&apos; challenges to the exclusionary effects of Argentina’s legal, cultural, social, and political cisgender order led to the passage of the Gender Identity Law in 2012. Analyzing the decisive yet overlooked impact of gender transformation in the formation of the nation-state, gender-belonging, and citizenship, this book ultimately shows that supposedly abstract struggles to define the shifting notions of &quot;sex,&quot; citizenship, and nationhood are embodied material experiences.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose forthcoming book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>As a trans history of Argentina, a country that banned medically assisted gender affirmation practices and punished trans lives, A Body of One’s Own: A Trans History of Argentina (University of Texas Press, 2024) places the histories of trans bodies at the core of modern Argentinian history. Dr. Patricio Simonetto documents the lives of people who crossed the boundaries of gender from the early twentieth century to the present. Based on extensive archival research in public and community-based archives, this book explores the mainstream medical and media portrayals of trans or travesti people, the state policing of gender embodiment, the experiences of those transgressing the boundaries of gender, and the development of homemade technologies from prosthetics to the self-injection of silicone.
A Body of One&apos;s Own explores how trans activists&apos; challenges to the exclusionary effects of Argentina’s legal, cultural, social, and political cisgender order led to the passage of the Gender Identity Law in 2012. Analyzing the decisive yet overlooked impact of gender transformation in the formation of the nation-state, gender-belonging, and citizenship, this book ultimately shows that supposedly abstract struggles to define the shifting notions of &quot;sex,&quot; citizenship, and nationhood are embodied material experiences.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose forthcoming book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>58</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2d2d7df4-b2e5-11ee-8504-4745c47455e8</guid>
      <title>Alexandra Filindra, &quot;Race, Rights, and Rifles: The Origins of the NRA and Contemporary Gun Culture&quot; (U Chicago Press, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The United States has more guns than people and more gun violence than any Western democracy. Scholars in diverse fields interrogate&nbsp;<em>why</em>&nbsp;21st century Americans support gun ownership and valorize vigilantism even as they fear gun violence. Many question how the NRA – National Rifle Association – has successfully lobbied for radical gun laws that most Americans don’t support.&nbsp;</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780226828763" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Race, Rights, and Rifles: The Origins of the NRA and Contemporary Gun Culture</em></a>&nbsp;(U Chicago Press, 2023), Dr. Alexandra Filindra highlights political culture. She argues that the NRA depends upon political narratives that can be traced back to the American Revolution. Rather than focus on the constitution, Lockean liberalism, rule of law, or individual rights, she argues that the American Revolution depended upon classical republican ideals – especially the martial virtue of the citizen-soldier – that became foundational to American democracy. American gun culture fuses the republican citizen-soldier with White male supremacy to create what Filindra calls&nbsp;<em>ascriptive martial republicanism</em>. Her book demonstrates how the militarized understandings of political membership prominent in NRA narratives and embraced by many White Americans fit within this broader revolutionary ideology.</p><p>Even as contemporary NRA narratives embrace 18th and 19th century versions of ascriptive martial republicanism, the NRA radically decouples political virtue and military service by associating virtue with the&nbsp;<em>consumer</em>&nbsp;act of purchasing a firearm. Rather than emphasizing military service or preparedness, consumer choice defines the politically virtuous citizen.</p><p>White Amerians embrace this combination of civic republicanism and White male supremacy but Filindra’s research shows that they also hold a competing form of republicanism (<em>inclusive republicanism</em>) that includes a commitment to peaceful political engagement, civic forms of voluntarism and participation, and a strong belief in multiculturalism.</p><p>In the podcast, Susan mentions previous podcasts on Katherine Franke’s&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/katherine-franke-repair-redeeming-the-promise-of-abolition-haymarket-books-2020/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Repair: Redeeming the Promise of Abolition</em></a>&nbsp;and Drew McKevitt’s&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/gun-country#entry:271737@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Gun Country: Gun Capitalism, Culture, and Control in Cold War America</em></a>.</p><p><a href="https://alexandra-filindra.com/?cmp_bypass=1aa5793e69456ddd85c3e2de9ee84e9d" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. Alexandra Filindra</a>&nbsp;is an Associate Professor of Political Science and Psychology at the University of Illinois Chicago. She specializes in American gun politics, immigration policy, race and ethnic politics, public opinion, and political psychology.</p><p>George Lobis served as the editorial assistant for this podcast.</p><p><a href="https://www.sju.edu/faculty/susan-liebell#_ga=2.125106634.1318472952.1578330950-502593983.1578330950" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Susan Liebell&nbsp;</em></a><em>is a Professor of Political Science at Saint Joseph’s University in Philadelphia.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/alexandra-filindra-race-rights-and-rifles-the-origins-of-the-nra-and-contemporary-gun-culture-u-chicago-press-2023-trKzVUNU</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The United States has more guns than people and more gun violence than any Western democracy. Scholars in diverse fields interrogate&nbsp;<em>why</em>&nbsp;21st century Americans support gun ownership and valorize vigilantism even as they fear gun violence. Many question how the NRA – National Rifle Association – has successfully lobbied for radical gun laws that most Americans don’t support.&nbsp;</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780226828763" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Race, Rights, and Rifles: The Origins of the NRA and Contemporary Gun Culture</em></a>&nbsp;(U Chicago Press, 2023), Dr. Alexandra Filindra highlights political culture. She argues that the NRA depends upon political narratives that can be traced back to the American Revolution. Rather than focus on the constitution, Lockean liberalism, rule of law, or individual rights, she argues that the American Revolution depended upon classical republican ideals – especially the martial virtue of the citizen-soldier – that became foundational to American democracy. American gun culture fuses the republican citizen-soldier with White male supremacy to create what Filindra calls&nbsp;<em>ascriptive martial republicanism</em>. Her book demonstrates how the militarized understandings of political membership prominent in NRA narratives and embraced by many White Americans fit within this broader revolutionary ideology.</p><p>Even as contemporary NRA narratives embrace 18th and 19th century versions of ascriptive martial republicanism, the NRA radically decouples political virtue and military service by associating virtue with the&nbsp;<em>consumer</em>&nbsp;act of purchasing a firearm. Rather than emphasizing military service or preparedness, consumer choice defines the politically virtuous citizen.</p><p>White Amerians embrace this combination of civic republicanism and White male supremacy but Filindra’s research shows that they also hold a competing form of republicanism (<em>inclusive republicanism</em>) that includes a commitment to peaceful political engagement, civic forms of voluntarism and participation, and a strong belief in multiculturalism.</p><p>In the podcast, Susan mentions previous podcasts on Katherine Franke’s&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/katherine-franke-repair-redeeming-the-promise-of-abolition-haymarket-books-2020/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Repair: Redeeming the Promise of Abolition</em></a>&nbsp;and Drew McKevitt’s&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/gun-country#entry:271737@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Gun Country: Gun Capitalism, Culture, and Control in Cold War America</em></a>.</p><p><a href="https://alexandra-filindra.com/?cmp_bypass=1aa5793e69456ddd85c3e2de9ee84e9d" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. Alexandra Filindra</a>&nbsp;is an Associate Professor of Political Science and Psychology at the University of Illinois Chicago. She specializes in American gun politics, immigration policy, race and ethnic politics, public opinion, and political psychology.</p><p>George Lobis served as the editorial assistant for this podcast.</p><p><a href="https://www.sju.edu/faculty/susan-liebell#_ga=2.125106634.1318472952.1578330950-502593983.1578330950" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Susan Liebell&nbsp;</em></a><em>is a Professor of Political Science at Saint Joseph’s University in Philadelphia.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="48127371" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/d1ac2d76-2a3e-460a-a0e0-793f6ef671f8/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=d1ac2d76-2a3e-460a-a0e0-793f6ef671f8&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Alexandra Filindra, &quot;Race, Rights, and Rifles: The Origins of the NRA and Contemporary Gun Culture&quot; (U Chicago Press, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:50:07</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The United States has more guns than people and more gun violence than any Western democracy. Scholars in diverse fields interrogate why 21st century Americans support gun ownership and valorize vigilantism even as they fear gun violence. Many question how the NRA – National Rifle Association – has successfully lobbied for radical gun laws that most Americans don’t support. 
In Race, Rights, and Rifles: The Origins of the NRA and Contemporary Gun Culture (U Chicago Press, 2023), Dr. Alexandra Filindra highlights political culture. She argues that the NRA depends upon political narratives that can be traced back to the American Revolution. Rather than focus on the constitution, Lockean liberalism, rule of law, or individual rights, she argues that the American Revolution depended upon classical republican ideals – especially the martial virtue of the citizen-soldier – that became foundational to American democracy. American gun culture fuses the republican citizen-soldier with White male supremacy to create what Filindra calls ascriptive martial republicanism. Her book demonstrates how the militarized understandings of political membership prominent in NRA narratives and embraced by many White Americans fit within this broader revolutionary ideology.
Even as contemporary NRA narratives embrace 18th and 19th century versions of ascriptive martial republicanism, the NRA radically decouples political virtue and military service by associating virtue with the consumer act of purchasing a firearm. Rather than emphasizing military service or preparedness, consumer choice defines the politically virtuous citizen.
White Amerians embrace this combination of civic republicanism and White male supremacy but Filindra’s research shows that they also hold a competing form of republicanism (inclusive republicanism) that includes a commitment to peaceful political engagement, civic forms of voluntarism and participation, and a strong belief in multiculturalism.
In the podcast, Susan mentions previous podcasts on Katherine Franke’s Repair: Redeeming the Promise of Abolition and Drew McKevitt’s Gun Country: Gun Capitalism, Culture, and Control in Cold War America.
Dr. Alexandra Filindra is an Associate Professor of Political Science and Psychology at the University of Illinois Chicago. She specializes in American gun politics, immigration policy, race and ethnic politics, public opinion, and political psychology.
George Lobis served as the editorial assistant for this podcast.
Susan Liebell is a Professor of Political Science at Saint Joseph’s University in Philadelphia.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The United States has more guns than people and more gun violence than any Western democracy. Scholars in diverse fields interrogate why 21st century Americans support gun ownership and valorize vigilantism even as they fear gun violence. Many question how the NRA – National Rifle Association – has successfully lobbied for radical gun laws that most Americans don’t support. 
In Race, Rights, and Rifles: The Origins of the NRA and Contemporary Gun Culture (U Chicago Press, 2023), Dr. Alexandra Filindra highlights political culture. She argues that the NRA depends upon political narratives that can be traced back to the American Revolution. Rather than focus on the constitution, Lockean liberalism, rule of law, or individual rights, she argues that the American Revolution depended upon classical republican ideals – especially the martial virtue of the citizen-soldier – that became foundational to American democracy. American gun culture fuses the republican citizen-soldier with White male supremacy to create what Filindra calls ascriptive martial republicanism. Her book demonstrates how the militarized understandings of political membership prominent in NRA narratives and embraced by many White Americans fit within this broader revolutionary ideology.
Even as contemporary NRA narratives embrace 18th and 19th century versions of ascriptive martial republicanism, the NRA radically decouples political virtue and military service by associating virtue with the consumer act of purchasing a firearm. Rather than emphasizing military service or preparedness, consumer choice defines the politically virtuous citizen.
White Amerians embrace this combination of civic republicanism and White male supremacy but Filindra’s research shows that they also hold a competing form of republicanism (inclusive republicanism) that includes a commitment to peaceful political engagement, civic forms of voluntarism and participation, and a strong belief in multiculturalism.
In the podcast, Susan mentions previous podcasts on Katherine Franke’s Repair: Redeeming the Promise of Abolition and Drew McKevitt’s Gun Country: Gun Capitalism, Culture, and Control in Cold War America.
Dr. Alexandra Filindra is an Associate Professor of Political Science and Psychology at the University of Illinois Chicago. She specializes in American gun politics, immigration policy, race and ethnic politics, public opinion, and political psychology.
George Lobis served as the editorial assistant for this podcast.
Susan Liebell is a Professor of Political Science at Saint Joseph’s University in Philadelphia.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>699</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">eaefa59e-b194-11ee-8636-b3085a5bfaed</guid>
      <title>Justine Nolan and Martijn Boersma, &quot;Addressing Modern Slavery&quot; (UNSW Press, 2019)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Before you left your house this morning, chances are that&nbsp;you used products and consumed goods that were produced by modern slavery. From the coffee you drink, to the clothes and shoes that you wear, to the phone that you use, modern slavery is a pervasive global problem that encroaches into the daily lives of all of us.&nbsp;</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781742236438" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Addressing Modern Slavery&nbsp;</em></a>(UNSW Press, 2019),<em>&nbsp;</em>Professor Justine Nolan and Associate Professor Martijn Boersma provide a comprehensive and accessible account of the role of businesses, governments and consumers in the proliferation of modern slavery. They address both the gaps in protection of workers in the global supply chain, and what more can be done to protect the dignity and human rights who are denied the chance to earn a decent living. In today's conversation, we spoke about the emergence of corporate social conscience, the work that laws can do, the role that civil society can play, and a need for better enforcement mechanisms&nbsp;which will adequately address modern slavery. This is a really important book about a global phenomenon that is unsustainable. A must read for businesses, governments and consumers.&nbsp;</p><p><a href="https://www.unsw.edu.au/staff/justine-nolan" rel="noopener noreferrer">Professor Justine Nolan</a>&nbsp;is&nbsp;the Director of the&nbsp;<a href="https://www.humanrights.unsw.edu.au/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Australian Human Rights Institute</a>&nbsp;and a Professor in the Faculty of Law and Justice at UNSW Sydney. Her research focuses on the intersection of business and human rights, in particular, supply chain responsibility for human rights and modern slavery.</p><p><a href="https://profiles.uts.edu.au/Martijn.Boersma" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. Martijn Boersma</a>&nbsp;is an Associate Professor at the University of Notre Dame Australia and an Adjunct Fellow at the University of Technology Business School. His research focuses on the intersection of business and society, and includes areas such as labour standards in supply chains; corporate governance and social responsibility; gender diversity in corporate leadership; modern slavery; and employment and industrial relations.</p><p><em>﻿Jane Richards is a Lecturer in Law at York Law School, UK.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 14 Jan 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/justine-nolan-and-martijn-boersma-addressing-modern-slavery-unsw-press-2019-hUjN6W_w</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Before you left your house this morning, chances are that&nbsp;you used products and consumed goods that were produced by modern slavery. From the coffee you drink, to the clothes and shoes that you wear, to the phone that you use, modern slavery is a pervasive global problem that encroaches into the daily lives of all of us.&nbsp;</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781742236438" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Addressing Modern Slavery&nbsp;</em></a>(UNSW Press, 2019),<em>&nbsp;</em>Professor Justine Nolan and Associate Professor Martijn Boersma provide a comprehensive and accessible account of the role of businesses, governments and consumers in the proliferation of modern slavery. They address both the gaps in protection of workers in the global supply chain, and what more can be done to protect the dignity and human rights who are denied the chance to earn a decent living. In today's conversation, we spoke about the emergence of corporate social conscience, the work that laws can do, the role that civil society can play, and a need for better enforcement mechanisms&nbsp;which will adequately address modern slavery. This is a really important book about a global phenomenon that is unsustainable. A must read for businesses, governments and consumers.&nbsp;</p><p><a href="https://www.unsw.edu.au/staff/justine-nolan" rel="noopener noreferrer">Professor Justine Nolan</a>&nbsp;is&nbsp;the Director of the&nbsp;<a href="https://www.humanrights.unsw.edu.au/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Australian Human Rights Institute</a>&nbsp;and a Professor in the Faculty of Law and Justice at UNSW Sydney. Her research focuses on the intersection of business and human rights, in particular, supply chain responsibility for human rights and modern slavery.</p><p><a href="https://profiles.uts.edu.au/Martijn.Boersma" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. Martijn Boersma</a>&nbsp;is an Associate Professor at the University of Notre Dame Australia and an Adjunct Fellow at the University of Technology Business School. His research focuses on the intersection of business and society, and includes areas such as labour standards in supply chains; corporate governance and social responsibility; gender diversity in corporate leadership; modern slavery; and employment and industrial relations.</p><p><em>﻿Jane Richards is a Lecturer in Law at York Law School, UK.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="69141341" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/4b3867fc-3f1d-43ea-b391-e953517ed395/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=4b3867fc-3f1d-43ea-b391-e953517ed395&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Justine Nolan and Martijn Boersma, &quot;Addressing Modern Slavery&quot; (UNSW Press, 2019)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:12:01</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Before you left your house this morning, chances are that you used products and consumed goods that were produced by modern slavery. From the coffee you drink, to the clothes and shoes that you wear, to the phone that you use, modern slavery is a pervasive global problem that encroaches into the daily lives of all of us. 
In Addressing Modern Slavery (UNSW Press, 2019), Professor Justine Nolan and Associate Professor Martijn Boersma provide a comprehensive and accessible account of the role of businesses, governments and consumers in the proliferation of modern slavery. They address both the gaps in protection of workers in the global supply chain, and what more can be done to protect the dignity and human rights who are denied the chance to earn a decent living. In today&apos;s conversation, we spoke about the emergence of corporate social conscience, the work that laws can do, the role that civil society can play, and a need for better enforcement mechanisms which will adequately address modern slavery. This is a really important book about a global phenomenon that is unsustainable. A must read for businesses, governments and consumers. 
Professor Justine Nolan is the Director of the Australian Human Rights Institute and a Professor in the Faculty of Law and Justice at UNSW Sydney. Her research focuses on the intersection of business and human rights, in particular, supply chain responsibility for human rights and modern slavery.
Dr. Martijn Boersma is an Associate Professor at the University of Notre Dame Australia and an Adjunct Fellow at the University of Technology Business School. His research focuses on the intersection of business and society, and includes areas such as labour standards in supply chains; corporate governance and social responsibility; gender diversity in corporate leadership; modern slavery; and employment and industrial relations.
﻿Jane Richards is a Lecturer in Law at York Law School, UK.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Before you left your house this morning, chances are that you used products and consumed goods that were produced by modern slavery. From the coffee you drink, to the clothes and shoes that you wear, to the phone that you use, modern slavery is a pervasive global problem that encroaches into the daily lives of all of us. 
In Addressing Modern Slavery (UNSW Press, 2019), Professor Justine Nolan and Associate Professor Martijn Boersma provide a comprehensive and accessible account of the role of businesses, governments and consumers in the proliferation of modern slavery. They address both the gaps in protection of workers in the global supply chain, and what more can be done to protect the dignity and human rights who are denied the chance to earn a decent living. In today&apos;s conversation, we spoke about the emergence of corporate social conscience, the work that laws can do, the role that civil society can play, and a need for better enforcement mechanisms which will adequately address modern slavery. This is a really important book about a global phenomenon that is unsustainable. A must read for businesses, governments and consumers. 
Professor Justine Nolan is the Director of the Australian Human Rights Institute and a Professor in the Faculty of Law and Justice at UNSW Sydney. Her research focuses on the intersection of business and human rights, in particular, supply chain responsibility for human rights and modern slavery.
Dr. Martijn Boersma is an Associate Professor at the University of Notre Dame Australia and an Adjunct Fellow at the University of Technology Business School. His research focuses on the intersection of business and society, and includes areas such as labour standards in supply chains; corporate governance and social responsibility; gender diversity in corporate leadership; modern slavery; and employment and industrial relations.
﻿Jane Richards is a Lecturer in Law at York Law School, UK.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>208</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">0f393b94-b0b0-11ee-acd2-7bb3dd15dde2</guid>
      <title>Sam Lebovic, &quot;State of Silence: The Espionage Act and the Rise of America&apos;s Secrecy Regime&quot; (Basic Book, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781541620162" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>State of Silence: The Espionage Act and the Rise of America's Secrecy Regime</em></a>&nbsp;(Basic Books, 2023), political historian Dr. Sam Lebovic uncovers the troubling history of the Espionage Act. First passed in 1917, it was initially used to punish critics of World War I. Yet as Americans began to baulk at the act’s restrictions on political dissidents and the press, the government turned its focus toward keeping its secrets under wraps. The resulting system for classifying information is absurdly cautious, staggeringly costly, and shrouded in secrecy, preventing ordinary Americans from learning what their country is doing in their name, both at home and abroad.</p><p>Shedding new light on the bloated governmental security apparatus that’s weighing our democracy down, State of Silence offers the definitive history of America’s turn toward secrecy—and its staggering human costs.&nbsp;</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;forthcoming book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/sam-lebovic-state-of-silence-the-espionage-act-and-the-rise-of-americas-secrecy-regime-basic-book-2023-o_R_mPxU</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781541620162" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>State of Silence: The Espionage Act and the Rise of America's Secrecy Regime</em></a>&nbsp;(Basic Books, 2023), political historian Dr. Sam Lebovic uncovers the troubling history of the Espionage Act. First passed in 1917, it was initially used to punish critics of World War I. Yet as Americans began to baulk at the act’s restrictions on political dissidents and the press, the government turned its focus toward keeping its secrets under wraps. The resulting system for classifying information is absurdly cautious, staggeringly costly, and shrouded in secrecy, preventing ordinary Americans from learning what their country is doing in their name, both at home and abroad.</p><p>Shedding new light on the bloated governmental security apparatus that’s weighing our democracy down, State of Silence offers the definitive history of America’s turn toward secrecy—and its staggering human costs.&nbsp;</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;forthcoming book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="57167219" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/5c5514fa-d50f-4128-976a-dedec4655016/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=5c5514fa-d50f-4128-976a-dedec4655016&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Sam Lebovic, &quot;State of Silence: The Espionage Act and the Rise of America&apos;s Secrecy Regime&quot; (Basic Book, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:59:32</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In State of Silence: The Espionage Act and the Rise of America&apos;s Secrecy Regime (Basic Books, 2023), political historian Dr. Sam Lebovic uncovers the troubling history of the Espionage Act. First passed in 1917, it was initially used to punish critics of World War I. Yet as Americans began to baulk at the act’s restrictions on political dissidents and the press, the government turned its focus toward keeping its secrets under wraps. The resulting system for classifying information is absurdly cautious, staggeringly costly, and shrouded in secrecy, preventing ordinary Americans from learning what their country is doing in their name, both at home and abroad.
Shedding new light on the bloated governmental security apparatus that’s weighing our democracy down, State of Silence offers the definitive history of America’s turn toward secrecy—and its staggering human costs. 
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose forthcoming book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In State of Silence: The Espionage Act and the Rise of America&apos;s Secrecy Regime (Basic Books, 2023), political historian Dr. Sam Lebovic uncovers the troubling history of the Espionage Act. First passed in 1917, it was initially used to punish critics of World War I. Yet as Americans began to baulk at the act’s restrictions on political dissidents and the press, the government turned its focus toward keeping its secrets under wraps. The resulting system for classifying information is absurdly cautious, staggeringly costly, and shrouded in secrecy, preventing ordinary Americans from learning what their country is doing in their name, both at home and abroad.
Shedding new light on the bloated governmental security apparatus that’s weighing our democracy down, State of Silence offers the definitive history of America’s turn toward secrecy—and its staggering human costs. 
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose forthcoming book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>245</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">01de5fd8-b0ce-11ee-b9a1-2f66bdcfc188</guid>
      <title>Judith Surkis, &quot;Sex, Law, and Sovereignty in French Algeria, 1830-1930&quot; (Cornell UP, 2019)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://history.rutgers.edu/faculty-directory/489-surkis-judith" rel="noopener noreferrer">Judith Surkis</a>'s&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781501739491" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Sex, Law, and Sovereignty in French Algeria, 1830-1930</em></a>&nbsp;(Cornell UP, 2019) traces the intersection of colonialism, law, land expropriation, sex, gender, and family during the century after the French conquest of Algeria in 1830. Seeking to assimilate Algerian land while differentiating Algerian Muslims from European settlers, colonial authorities developed a system that confined Muslim law to family matters while subjecting Algerian property to&nbsp;French Civil law. Securing and extending French sovereignty over&nbsp;Algeria, this system deprived Algerian Muslims of full citizenship rights while reinforcing&nbsp;French colonial authority.</p><p><em>Sex, Law, and Sovereignty&nbsp;</em>is a&nbsp;rigorous and provocative critical "history of the present" that illuminates the persistence of the "Muslim question" in contemporary France.&nbsp;In chapters focused&nbsp;on polygamy, repudiation, and&nbsp;child marriage, the book traces the ways that the French fantasies of the family, including the&nbsp;sexualization of Muslim women and a preoccupation with the sexual "excesses" of Muslim men, found expression in legislation that segregated the legal control of property from the regulation of&nbsp;bodies, beliefs, and personhood. A fascinating genealogy that understands colonial law and&nbsp;the problem of difference within a broader cultural field, the book is an impressive, compelling analysis with striking resonances for a Franco-Algerian&nbsp;present still shaped by the legacies of&nbsp;the colonial past.</p><p><em>﻿Roxanne Panchasi&nbsp;is an Associate Professor of History at Simon Fraser University in Vancouver, Canada who specializes in twentieth and twenty-first century France and its empire.&nbsp;If you have a recent title to suggest for the podcast, please send her an email (panchasi@sfu.ca).</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/judith-surkis-sex-law-and-sovereignty-in-french-algeria-1830-1930-cornell-up-2019-nXmQiP3T-jc41UOGZ</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://history.rutgers.edu/faculty-directory/489-surkis-judith" rel="noopener noreferrer">Judith Surkis</a>'s&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781501739491" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Sex, Law, and Sovereignty in French Algeria, 1830-1930</em></a>&nbsp;(Cornell UP, 2019) traces the intersection of colonialism, law, land expropriation, sex, gender, and family during the century after the French conquest of Algeria in 1830. Seeking to assimilate Algerian land while differentiating Algerian Muslims from European settlers, colonial authorities developed a system that confined Muslim law to family matters while subjecting Algerian property to&nbsp;French Civil law. Securing and extending French sovereignty over&nbsp;Algeria, this system deprived Algerian Muslims of full citizenship rights while reinforcing&nbsp;French colonial authority.</p><p><em>Sex, Law, and Sovereignty&nbsp;</em>is a&nbsp;rigorous and provocative critical "history of the present" that illuminates the persistence of the "Muslim question" in contemporary France.&nbsp;In chapters focused&nbsp;on polygamy, repudiation, and&nbsp;child marriage, the book traces the ways that the French fantasies of the family, including the&nbsp;sexualization of Muslim women and a preoccupation with the sexual "excesses" of Muslim men, found expression in legislation that segregated the legal control of property from the regulation of&nbsp;bodies, beliefs, and personhood. A fascinating genealogy that understands colonial law and&nbsp;the problem of difference within a broader cultural field, the book is an impressive, compelling analysis with striking resonances for a Franco-Algerian&nbsp;present still shaped by the legacies of&nbsp;the colonial past.</p><p><em>﻿Roxanne Panchasi&nbsp;is an Associate Professor of History at Simon Fraser University in Vancouver, Canada who specializes in twentieth and twenty-first century France and its empire.&nbsp;If you have a recent title to suggest for the podcast, please send her an email (panchasi@sfu.ca).</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="59485906" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/bfdfcbaf-8398-417d-b877-6b707205f90c/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=bfdfcbaf-8398-417d-b877-6b707205f90c&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Judith Surkis, &quot;Sex, Law, and Sovereignty in French Algeria, 1830-1930&quot; (Cornell UP, 2019)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:01:56</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Judith Surkis&apos;s Sex, Law, and Sovereignty in French Algeria, 1830-1930 (Cornell UP, 2019) traces the intersection of colonialism, law, land expropriation, sex, gender, and family during the century after the French conquest of Algeria in 1830. Seeking to assimilate Algerian land while differentiating Algerian Muslims from European settlers, colonial authorities developed a system that confined Muslim law to family matters while subjecting Algerian property to French Civil law. Securing and extending French sovereignty over Algeria, this system deprived Algerian Muslims of full citizenship rights while reinforcing French colonial authority.
Sex, Law, and Sovereignty is a rigorous and provocative critical &quot;history of the present&quot; that illuminates the persistence of the &quot;Muslim question&quot; in contemporary France. In chapters focused on polygamy, repudiation, and child marriage, the book traces the ways that the French fantasies of the family, including the sexualization of Muslim women and a preoccupation with the sexual &quot;excesses&quot; of Muslim men, found expression in legislation that segregated the legal control of property from the regulation of bodies, beliefs, and personhood. A fascinating genealogy that understands colonial law and the problem of difference within a broader cultural field, the book is an impressive, compelling analysis with striking resonances for a Franco-Algerian present still shaped by the legacies of the colonial past.
﻿Roxanne Panchasi is an Associate Professor of History at Simon Fraser University in Vancouver, Canada who specializes in twentieth and twenty-first century France and its empire. If you have a recent title to suggest for the podcast, please send her an email (panchasi@sfu.ca).
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Judith Surkis&apos;s Sex, Law, and Sovereignty in French Algeria, 1830-1930 (Cornell UP, 2019) traces the intersection of colonialism, law, land expropriation, sex, gender, and family during the century after the French conquest of Algeria in 1830. Seeking to assimilate Algerian land while differentiating Algerian Muslims from European settlers, colonial authorities developed a system that confined Muslim law to family matters while subjecting Algerian property to French Civil law. Securing and extending French sovereignty over Algeria, this system deprived Algerian Muslims of full citizenship rights while reinforcing French colonial authority.
Sex, Law, and Sovereignty is a rigorous and provocative critical &quot;history of the present&quot; that illuminates the persistence of the &quot;Muslim question&quot; in contemporary France. In chapters focused on polygamy, repudiation, and child marriage, the book traces the ways that the French fantasies of the family, including the sexualization of Muslim women and a preoccupation with the sexual &quot;excesses&quot; of Muslim men, found expression in legislation that segregated the legal control of property from the regulation of bodies, beliefs, and personhood. A fascinating genealogy that understands colonial law and the problem of difference within a broader cultural field, the book is an impressive, compelling analysis with striking resonances for a Franco-Algerian present still shaped by the legacies of the colonial past.
﻿Roxanne Panchasi is an Associate Professor of History at Simon Fraser University in Vancouver, Canada who specializes in twentieth and twenty-first century France and its empire. If you have a recent title to suggest for the podcast, please send her an email (panchasi@sfu.ca).
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>84</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ae3708f6-b002-11ee-8770-bf7d8020e5a1</guid>
      <title>Eva van Roekel, &quot;Phenomenal Justice: Violence and Morality in Argentina&quot; (Rutgers UP, 2020)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In <a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/1978800274/?tag=newbooinhis-20" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Phenomenal Justice: Violence and Morality in Argentina</em></a><em> </em>(Rutgers University Press, 2020), <a href="https://research.vu.nl/en/persons/eva-van-roekel" rel="noopener noreferrer">Eva van Roekel</a> grounds her research in phenomenological anthropology and the anthropology of emotion to offer readers a novel and compelling perspective on justice proceedings in the aftermath of historical crimes against humanity. Van Roekel approaches the question: how do survivors, victims, and perpetrators of political violence experience justice on their own terms? Focusing on the reopened trials in Argentina for crimes against humanity committed by the military junta that ruled from 1976 to 1983, <em>Phenomenal Justice</em> is a powerful ethnography that establishes a new theoretical basis that remains faithful to the uncertainties of justice and truth in the aftermath of human rights violations. <em>Phenomenal Justice</em>, thus, makes significant contributions to understanding justice beyond what is commonly referred to as transitional justice, and to better understanding of the military dictatorship in Argentina and its aftermath.</p><p><a href="https://www.american.edu/sis/faculty/bachman.cfm" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Jeff Bachman</em></a><em> is a Lecturer in Human Rights at American University’s School of International Service in Washington, DC. He is the author of </em>The United States and Genocide: (Re)Defining the Relationship<em> and editor of the volume </em>Cultural Genocide: Law, Politics, and Global Manifestations<em>. He is currently working on a new book, </em>The Politics of Genocide: From the Genocide Convention to the Responsibility to Protect<em>, contracted by Rutgers University Press for its Genocide, Political Violence, Human Rights series.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/eva-van-roekel-phenomenal-justice-violence-and-morality-in-argentina-rutgers-up-2020-AWlY_fa2-Rp4yNc9N</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In <a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/1978800274/?tag=newbooinhis-20" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Phenomenal Justice: Violence and Morality in Argentina</em></a><em> </em>(Rutgers University Press, 2020), <a href="https://research.vu.nl/en/persons/eva-van-roekel" rel="noopener noreferrer">Eva van Roekel</a> grounds her research in phenomenological anthropology and the anthropology of emotion to offer readers a novel and compelling perspective on justice proceedings in the aftermath of historical crimes against humanity. Van Roekel approaches the question: how do survivors, victims, and perpetrators of political violence experience justice on their own terms? Focusing on the reopened trials in Argentina for crimes against humanity committed by the military junta that ruled from 1976 to 1983, <em>Phenomenal Justice</em> is a powerful ethnography that establishes a new theoretical basis that remains faithful to the uncertainties of justice and truth in the aftermath of human rights violations. <em>Phenomenal Justice</em>, thus, makes significant contributions to understanding justice beyond what is commonly referred to as transitional justice, and to better understanding of the military dictatorship in Argentina and its aftermath.</p><p><a href="https://www.american.edu/sis/faculty/bachman.cfm" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Jeff Bachman</em></a><em> is a Lecturer in Human Rights at American University’s School of International Service in Washington, DC. He is the author of </em>The United States and Genocide: (Re)Defining the Relationship<em> and editor of the volume </em>Cultural Genocide: Law, Politics, and Global Manifestations<em>. He is currently working on a new book, </em>The Politics of Genocide: From the Genocide Convention to the Responsibility to Protect<em>, contracted by Rutgers University Press for its Genocide, Political Violence, Human Rights series.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="64726870" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/a58fe40e-0ee6-4c43-9c6c-913b1e822d71/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=a58fe40e-0ee6-4c43-9c6c-913b1e822d71&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Eva van Roekel, &quot;Phenomenal Justice: Violence and Morality in Argentina&quot; (Rutgers UP, 2020)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:07:25</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In Phenomenal Justice: Violence and Morality in Argentina (Rutgers University Press, 2020), Eva van Roekel grounds her research in phenomenological anthropology and the anthropology of emotion to offer readers a novel and compelling perspective on justice proceedings in the aftermath of historical crimes against humanity. Van Roekel approaches the question: how do survivors, victims, and perpetrators of political violence experience justice on their own terms? Focusing on the reopened trials in Argentina for crimes against humanity committed by the military junta that ruled from 1976 to 1983, Phenomenal Justice is a powerful ethnography that establishes a new theoretical basis that remains faithful to the uncertainties of justice and truth in the aftermath of human rights violations. Phenomenal Justice, thus, makes significant contributions to understanding justice beyond what is commonly referred to as transitional justice, and to better understanding of the military dictatorship in Argentina and its aftermath.
Jeff Bachman is a Lecturer in Human Rights at American University’s School of International Service in Washington, DC. He is the author of The United States and Genocide: (Re)Defining the Relationship and editor of the volume Cultural Genocide: Law, Politics, and Global Manifestations. He is currently working on a new book, The Politics of Genocide: From the Genocide Convention to the Responsibility to Protect, contracted by Rutgers University Press for its Genocide, Political Violence, Human Rights series.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In Phenomenal Justice: Violence and Morality in Argentina (Rutgers University Press, 2020), Eva van Roekel grounds her research in phenomenological anthropology and the anthropology of emotion to offer readers a novel and compelling perspective on justice proceedings in the aftermath of historical crimes against humanity. Van Roekel approaches the question: how do survivors, victims, and perpetrators of political violence experience justice on their own terms? Focusing on the reopened trials in Argentina for crimes against humanity committed by the military junta that ruled from 1976 to 1983, Phenomenal Justice is a powerful ethnography that establishes a new theoretical basis that remains faithful to the uncertainties of justice and truth in the aftermath of human rights violations. Phenomenal Justice, thus, makes significant contributions to understanding justice beyond what is commonly referred to as transitional justice, and to better understanding of the military dictatorship in Argentina and its aftermath.
Jeff Bachman is a Lecturer in Human Rights at American University’s School of International Service in Washington, DC. He is the author of The United States and Genocide: (Re)Defining the Relationship and editor of the volume Cultural Genocide: Law, Politics, and Global Manifestations. He is currently working on a new book, The Politics of Genocide: From the Genocide Convention to the Responsibility to Protect, contracted by Rutgers University Press for its Genocide, Political Violence, Human Rights series.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>111</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">b174d0f2-ad73-11ee-a249-df27a0946751</guid>
      <title>Steven Rogers, &quot;Accountability in State Legislatures&quot; (U Chicago Press, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Political Scientist Steven Rogers’ new book focuses on the deceptively complex question of how it is that voters do or don’t/can and can’t hold their elected state representatives accountable. Rogers takes his jumping off point from the basic understanding of the relationship between the voter and their elected representatives: namely that the election process will, in some way, act as a means of making the elected official in state government accountable to the voters, who cast their ballots for or in opposition to that elected representative. State house elected officials across the United States are, indeed, closer in proximity to the people they are elected to represent and govern; and the legislation and regulations passed by state legislators generally impact us more directly and more frequently than do national-level laws, regulations, or decisions. And while there is a of literature focusing on state and local politics, the unique approach of Rogers’ research focuses specifically on the state legislatures, how the elites and voters act in elections, and if we can actually see accountability demonstrated in these interactions and connections.</p><p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780226827247" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Accountability in State Legislatures</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(U Chicago Press, 2023) is guided by the foundational question of representative democracy—and the connection between voters and their immediate representatives, as opposed to those in Washington, D.C. Rogers has compiled an extensive data set that pulls in general election results across the states, as well as primary election results. The data also includes legislative performance by elected state house representatives and integrates partisanship as well as the roll call votes by elected officials. Rogers also tries to evaluate the effectiveness of elected officials, examining how successful each individual is in getting something through the legislative process.&nbsp;<em>Accountability in State Legislatures</em>&nbsp;ultimately finds that accountability is more absent than it is present, given that state legislators often lack challengers in either the primary or the general elections, their seats tend to be fairly safe, and the decline in media reporting at state houses across the country has made it more difficult for voters to keep an eye on their elected representatives. Federalism has always been a complex and multi-layered form of government, and Rogers work reflects the difficulty that voters have in being able to pay close attention to the action in state houses. But this is not a story about the voters lack of engagement—though there is some of that—it is more that the modes for accountability in state legislatures or the “threats of accountability can create a false sense of security and be dangerous both to everyday life and representative government” (264).</p><p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/hosts/profile/a7ac4af9-1306-463f-baf9-00f1f4187dfd" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books in Political Science</em></a><em>&nbsp;channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of&nbsp;</em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700633883/the-politics-of-the-marvel-cinematic-universe/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe</em></a><em>&nbsp;(University Press of Kansas, 2022), as well as co-editor of the award winning book,&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.kentuckypress.com/9780813141015/women-and-the-white-house/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a><em>&nbsp;(University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached&nbsp;</em><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/gorenlj.bsky.social" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>@gorenlj.bsky.social</em></a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 8 Jan 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/steven-rogers-accountability-in-state-legislatures-u-chicago-press-2023-ndnG_Liz</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Political Scientist Steven Rogers’ new book focuses on the deceptively complex question of how it is that voters do or don’t/can and can’t hold their elected state representatives accountable. Rogers takes his jumping off point from the basic understanding of the relationship between the voter and their elected representatives: namely that the election process will, in some way, act as a means of making the elected official in state government accountable to the voters, who cast their ballots for or in opposition to that elected representative. State house elected officials across the United States are, indeed, closer in proximity to the people they are elected to represent and govern; and the legislation and regulations passed by state legislators generally impact us more directly and more frequently than do national-level laws, regulations, or decisions. And while there is a of literature focusing on state and local politics, the unique approach of Rogers’ research focuses specifically on the state legislatures, how the elites and voters act in elections, and if we can actually see accountability demonstrated in these interactions and connections.</p><p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780226827247" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Accountability in State Legislatures</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(U Chicago Press, 2023) is guided by the foundational question of representative democracy—and the connection between voters and their immediate representatives, as opposed to those in Washington, D.C. Rogers has compiled an extensive data set that pulls in general election results across the states, as well as primary election results. The data also includes legislative performance by elected state house representatives and integrates partisanship as well as the roll call votes by elected officials. Rogers also tries to evaluate the effectiveness of elected officials, examining how successful each individual is in getting something through the legislative process.&nbsp;<em>Accountability in State Legislatures</em>&nbsp;ultimately finds that accountability is more absent than it is present, given that state legislators often lack challengers in either the primary or the general elections, their seats tend to be fairly safe, and the decline in media reporting at state houses across the country has made it more difficult for voters to keep an eye on their elected representatives. Federalism has always been a complex and multi-layered form of government, and Rogers work reflects the difficulty that voters have in being able to pay close attention to the action in state houses. But this is not a story about the voters lack of engagement—though there is some of that—it is more that the modes for accountability in state legislatures or the “threats of accountability can create a false sense of security and be dangerous both to everyday life and representative government” (264).</p><p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/hosts/profile/a7ac4af9-1306-463f-baf9-00f1f4187dfd" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books in Political Science</em></a><em>&nbsp;channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of&nbsp;</em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700633883/the-politics-of-the-marvel-cinematic-universe/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe</em></a><em>&nbsp;(University Press of Kansas, 2022), as well as co-editor of the award winning book,&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.kentuckypress.com/9780813141015/women-and-the-white-house/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a><em>&nbsp;(University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached&nbsp;</em><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/gorenlj.bsky.social" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>@gorenlj.bsky.social</em></a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="43748191" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/21a7d462-ac46-4fa9-be21-16965de3ee3d/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=21a7d462-ac46-4fa9-be21-16965de3ee3d&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Steven Rogers, &quot;Accountability in State Legislatures&quot; (U Chicago Press, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:45:33</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Political Scientist Steven Rogers’ new book focuses on the deceptively complex question of how it is that voters do or don’t/can and can’t hold their elected state representatives accountable. Rogers takes his jumping off point from the basic understanding of the relationship between the voter and their elected representatives: namely that the election process will, in some way, act as a means of making the elected official in state government accountable to the voters, who cast their ballots for or in opposition to that elected representative. State house elected officials across the United States are, indeed, closer in proximity to the people they are elected to represent and govern; and the legislation and regulations passed by state legislators generally impact us more directly and more frequently than do national-level laws, regulations, or decisions. And while there is a of literature focusing on state and local politics, the unique approach of Rogers’ research focuses specifically on the state legislatures, how the elites and voters act in elections, and if we can actually see accountability demonstrated in these interactions and connections.
Accountability in State Legislatures (U Chicago Press, 2023) is guided by the foundational question of representative democracy—and the connection between voters and their immediate representatives, as opposed to those in Washington, D.C. Rogers has compiled an extensive data set that pulls in general election results across the states, as well as primary election results. The data also includes legislative performance by elected state house representatives and integrates partisanship as well as the roll call votes by elected officials. Rogers also tries to evaluate the effectiveness of elected officials, examining how successful each individual is in getting something through the legislative process. Accountability in State Legislatures ultimately finds that accountability is more absent than it is present, given that state legislators often lack challengers in either the primary or the general elections, their seats tend to be fairly safe, and the decline in media reporting at state houses across the country has made it more difficult for voters to keep an eye on their elected representatives. Federalism has always been a complex and multi-layered form of government, and Rogers work reflects the difficulty that voters have in being able to pay close attention to the action in state houses. But this is not a story about the voters lack of engagement—though there is some of that—it is more that the modes for accountability in state legislatures or the “threats of accountability can create a false sense of security and be dangerous both to everyday life and representative government” (264).
Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the New Books in Political Science channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe (University Press of Kansas, 2022), as well as co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached @gorenlj.bsky.social
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Political Scientist Steven Rogers’ new book focuses on the deceptively complex question of how it is that voters do or don’t/can and can’t hold their elected state representatives accountable. Rogers takes his jumping off point from the basic understanding of the relationship between the voter and their elected representatives: namely that the election process will, in some way, act as a means of making the elected official in state government accountable to the voters, who cast their ballots for or in opposition to that elected representative. State house elected officials across the United States are, indeed, closer in proximity to the people they are elected to represent and govern; and the legislation and regulations passed by state legislators generally impact us more directly and more frequently than do national-level laws, regulations, or decisions. And while there is a of literature focusing on state and local politics, the unique approach of Rogers’ research focuses specifically on the state legislatures, how the elites and voters act in elections, and if we can actually see accountability demonstrated in these interactions and connections.
Accountability in State Legislatures (U Chicago Press, 2023) is guided by the foundational question of representative democracy—and the connection between voters and their immediate representatives, as opposed to those in Washington, D.C. Rogers has compiled an extensive data set that pulls in general election results across the states, as well as primary election results. The data also includes legislative performance by elected state house representatives and integrates partisanship as well as the roll call votes by elected officials. Rogers also tries to evaluate the effectiveness of elected officials, examining how successful each individual is in getting something through the legislative process. Accountability in State Legislatures ultimately finds that accountability is more absent than it is present, given that state legislators often lack challengers in either the primary or the general elections, their seats tend to be fairly safe, and the decline in media reporting at state houses across the country has made it more difficult for voters to keep an eye on their elected representatives. Federalism has always been a complex and multi-layered form of government, and Rogers work reflects the difficulty that voters have in being able to pay close attention to the action in state houses. But this is not a story about the voters lack of engagement—though there is some of that—it is more that the modes for accountability in state legislatures or the “threats of accountability can create a false sense of security and be dangerous both to everyday life and representative government” (264).
Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the New Books in Political Science channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe (University Press of Kansas, 2022), as well as co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached @gorenlj.bsky.social
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>698</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">a648b550-ad9a-11ee-b3ea-3b873daa2cd4</guid>
      <title>Rita Kesselring, &quot;Bodies of Truth: Law, Memory, and Emancipation in Post-Apartheid South Africa&quot; (Stanford UP, 2017)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://ethnologie.philhist.unibas.ch/en/persons/rita-kesselring/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Rita Kesselring</a>’s important book <a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/0804799784/?tag=newbooinhis-20" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Bodies of Truth: Law, Memory, and Emancipation in Post-Apartheid South Africa</em></a> (Stanford University Press, 2017) seeks to understand the embodied and everyday effects of state-sponsored violence as well the limits of the law to produce social repair. Of particular interest in Kesselring’s theorizing of the relationship between the body and the law as a mechanism to critique South Africa’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission. Dr. Kesselring’s book is an innovative study of the TRC, with a focus on embodiment and the ways in which formal justice institutions do not consider the everyday violence of injustice. Her study illuminates this tension, of people craving justice from institutions that are not designed to deliver it, leading the women of the civil society organization Khulumani to file suit in the United States under alien tort laws.</p><p>Kesselring recommends three books to listeners keen to dive deeper into issues of reparation, law and justice after Apartheid in South Africa.&nbsp;They are Charles Abrahams’ <a href="https://www.penguinrandomhouse.co.za/book/class-action-pursuit-larger-life/9781776093526" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Class Action: In Pursuit of a Larger Life</em></a> (Penguin South Africa, 2019); Fiona Ross’ <a href="https://www.plutobooks.com/9781783715268/bearing-witness/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Bearing Witness: Women and the Truth and Reconciliation in South Africa</em></a> (Pluto Press, 2002); and Georg Kries’ <a href="https://www.buecher.de/shop/politische-geschichte/switzerland-and-south-africa-1948-1994/kreis-georg/products_products/detail/prod_id/26683350/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Switzerland and South Africa 1948-1994</a> (Peter Lang Publishers, 2007).</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 8 Jan 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/rita-kesselring-bodies-of-truth-law-memory-and-emancipation-in-post-apartheid-south-africa-stanford-up-2017-otAIeX5x-PWNZfHDV</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://ethnologie.philhist.unibas.ch/en/persons/rita-kesselring/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Rita Kesselring</a>’s important book <a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/0804799784/?tag=newbooinhis-20" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Bodies of Truth: Law, Memory, and Emancipation in Post-Apartheid South Africa</em></a> (Stanford University Press, 2017) seeks to understand the embodied and everyday effects of state-sponsored violence as well the limits of the law to produce social repair. Of particular interest in Kesselring’s theorizing of the relationship between the body and the law as a mechanism to critique South Africa’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission. Dr. Kesselring’s book is an innovative study of the TRC, with a focus on embodiment and the ways in which formal justice institutions do not consider the everyday violence of injustice. Her study illuminates this tension, of people craving justice from institutions that are not designed to deliver it, leading the women of the civil society organization Khulumani to file suit in the United States under alien tort laws.</p><p>Kesselring recommends three books to listeners keen to dive deeper into issues of reparation, law and justice after Apartheid in South Africa.&nbsp;They are Charles Abrahams’ <a href="https://www.penguinrandomhouse.co.za/book/class-action-pursuit-larger-life/9781776093526" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Class Action: In Pursuit of a Larger Life</em></a> (Penguin South Africa, 2019); Fiona Ross’ <a href="https://www.plutobooks.com/9781783715268/bearing-witness/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Bearing Witness: Women and the Truth and Reconciliation in South Africa</em></a> (Pluto Press, 2002); and Georg Kries’ <a href="https://www.buecher.de/shop/politische-geschichte/switzerland-and-south-africa-1948-1994/kreis-georg/products_products/detail/prod_id/26683350/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Switzerland and South Africa 1948-1994</a> (Peter Lang Publishers, 2007).</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="47967171" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/5ddf807d-3fda-433d-b006-58f98f673aac/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=5ddf807d-3fda-433d-b006-58f98f673aac&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Rita Kesselring, &quot;Bodies of Truth: Law, Memory, and Emancipation in Post-Apartheid South Africa&quot; (Stanford UP, 2017)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:49:57</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Rita Kesselring’s important book Bodies of Truth: Law, Memory, and Emancipation in Post-Apartheid South Africa (Stanford University Press, 2017) seeks to understand the embodied and everyday effects of state-sponsored violence as well the limits of the law to produce social repair. Of particular interest in Kesselring’s theorizing of the relationship between the body and the law as a mechanism to critique South Africa’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission. Dr. Kesselring’s book is an innovative study of the TRC, with a focus on embodiment and the ways in which formal justice institutions do not consider the everyday violence of injustice. Her study illuminates this tension, of people craving justice from institutions that are not designed to deliver it, leading the women of the civil society organization Khulumani to file suit in the United States under alien tort laws.
Kesselring recommends three books to listeners keen to dive deeper into issues of reparation, law and justice after Apartheid in South Africa. They are Charles Abrahams’ Class Action: In Pursuit of a Larger Life (Penguin South Africa, 2019); Fiona Ross’ Bearing Witness: Women and the Truth and Reconciliation in South Africa (Pluto Press, 2002); and Georg Kries’ Switzerland and South Africa 1948-1994 (Peter Lang Publishers, 2007).
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Rita Kesselring’s important book Bodies of Truth: Law, Memory, and Emancipation in Post-Apartheid South Africa (Stanford University Press, 2017) seeks to understand the embodied and everyday effects of state-sponsored violence as well the limits of the law to produce social repair. Of particular interest in Kesselring’s theorizing of the relationship between the body and the law as a mechanism to critique South Africa’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission. Dr. Kesselring’s book is an innovative study of the TRC, with a focus on embodiment and the ways in which formal justice institutions do not consider the everyday violence of injustice. Her study illuminates this tension, of people craving justice from institutions that are not designed to deliver it, leading the women of the civil society organization Khulumani to file suit in the United States under alien tort laws.
Kesselring recommends three books to listeners keen to dive deeper into issues of reparation, law and justice after Apartheid in South Africa. They are Charles Abrahams’ Class Action: In Pursuit of a Larger Life (Penguin South Africa, 2019); Fiona Ross’ Bearing Witness: Women and the Truth and Reconciliation in South Africa (Pluto Press, 2002); and Georg Kries’ Switzerland and South Africa 1948-1994 (Peter Lang Publishers, 2007).
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>58</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">f5c59036-a8da-11ee-b706-2b02ae303eb1</guid>
      <title>Abdullahi Ahmed An-Naim, &quot;Decolonizing Human Rights&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2021)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In his extensive body of work, Professor Abdullahi Ahmed An-Naim challenges both historical interpretations of Islamic Sharia and neo-colonial understanding of human rights. To advance the rationale of scholarship for social change, An-Naim proposes advancing the universality of human rights through internal discourse within Islamic and African societies and cross-cultural dialogue among human cultures. This book proposes a transformation from human rights organized around a state determined practice to one that is focused on a people-centric approach that empowers individuals to decide how human rights will be understood and integrated into their communities.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781108417136" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Decolonizing Human Rights</em></a>&nbsp;(Cambridge UP, 2021) aims to illustrate the decisive role of human agency on the subject of change, without implying that Islamic or any other society are exceptionally disposed to politically motivated violence and consequent profound political instability.</p><p><em>﻿</em><a href="https://independent.academia.edu/KirkMeighoo" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Kirk Meighoo</em></a><em>&nbsp;is Public Relations Officer for the United National Congress, the Official Opposition in Trinidad and Tobago. His career has spanned media, academia, and politics for three decades.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 3 Jan 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/abdullahi-ahmed-an-naim-decolonizing-human-rights-cambridge-up-2021-4v7iDmsa</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In his extensive body of work, Professor Abdullahi Ahmed An-Naim challenges both historical interpretations of Islamic Sharia and neo-colonial understanding of human rights. To advance the rationale of scholarship for social change, An-Naim proposes advancing the universality of human rights through internal discourse within Islamic and African societies and cross-cultural dialogue among human cultures. This book proposes a transformation from human rights organized around a state determined practice to one that is focused on a people-centric approach that empowers individuals to decide how human rights will be understood and integrated into their communities.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781108417136" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Decolonizing Human Rights</em></a>&nbsp;(Cambridge UP, 2021) aims to illustrate the decisive role of human agency on the subject of change, without implying that Islamic or any other society are exceptionally disposed to politically motivated violence and consequent profound political instability.</p><p><em>﻿</em><a href="https://independent.academia.edu/KirkMeighoo" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Kirk Meighoo</em></a><em>&nbsp;is Public Relations Officer for the United National Congress, the Official Opposition in Trinidad and Tobago. His career has spanned media, academia, and politics for three decades.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="55894866" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/3cb0f9ca-1e08-4db2-a11d-258da475744d/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=3cb0f9ca-1e08-4db2-a11d-258da475744d&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Abdullahi Ahmed An-Naim, &quot;Decolonizing Human Rights&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2021)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:58:13</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In his extensive body of work, Professor Abdullahi Ahmed An-Naim challenges both historical interpretations of Islamic Sharia and neo-colonial understanding of human rights. To advance the rationale of scholarship for social change, An-Naim proposes advancing the universality of human rights through internal discourse within Islamic and African societies and cross-cultural dialogue among human cultures. This book proposes a transformation from human rights organized around a state determined practice to one that is focused on a people-centric approach that empowers individuals to decide how human rights will be understood and integrated into their communities. Decolonizing Human Rights (Cambridge UP, 2021) aims to illustrate the decisive role of human agency on the subject of change, without implying that Islamic or any other society are exceptionally disposed to politically motivated violence and consequent profound political instability.
﻿Kirk Meighoo is Public Relations Officer for the United National Congress, the Official Opposition in Trinidad and Tobago. His career has spanned media, academia, and politics for three decades.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In his extensive body of work, Professor Abdullahi Ahmed An-Naim challenges both historical interpretations of Islamic Sharia and neo-colonial understanding of human rights. To advance the rationale of scholarship for social change, An-Naim proposes advancing the universality of human rights through internal discourse within Islamic and African societies and cross-cultural dialogue among human cultures. This book proposes a transformation from human rights organized around a state determined practice to one that is focused on a people-centric approach that empowers individuals to decide how human rights will be understood and integrated into their communities. Decolonizing Human Rights (Cambridge UP, 2021) aims to illustrate the decisive role of human agency on the subject of change, without implying that Islamic or any other society are exceptionally disposed to politically motivated violence and consequent profound political instability.
﻿Kirk Meighoo is Public Relations Officer for the United National Congress, the Official Opposition in Trinidad and Tobago. His career has spanned media, academia, and politics for three decades.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>55</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6a334986-a9b7-11ee-b144-b31fea5da6d3</guid>
      <title>Gary Shiffman, &quot;The Economics of Violence: How Behavioral Science Can Transform our View of Crime, Insurgency, and Terrorism&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2019)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Dr. Gary Shiffman’s book&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781107465756" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Economics of Violence: How Behavioral Science Can Transform our View of Crime, Insurgency, and Terrorism</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Cambridge UP, 2020) serves as a fantastic introduction to anyone interested in thinking critically about terrorist, insurgency, and criminal groups of all sorts. Using case studies from multiple continents, ideological contexts, and political situations, Dr. Shiffman shows how the language and tools familiar to economists can assist policy makers and security personnel to combat rival ‘firms,’ as he classifies them. Arguing strongly against essentialist labels and stories about why these groups act the way that they do, Dr. Shiffman offers us an approach to understanding ‘illicit’ groups that would be recognizable to leaders of many ‘legitimate’ organizations.</p><p>Dr. Gary Shiffman is a Professor at Georgetown University, the CEO of two software companies, a former Naval Officer and Border Patrol leader, a former Fortune 200 executive, and an engaging writer. His is the author of one other book on the&nbsp;<em>Economic Instruments of Security Policy</em>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 3 Jan 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/gary-shiffman-the-economics-of-violence-how-behavioral-science-can-transform-our-view-of-crime-insurgency-and-terrorism-cambridge-up-2019-W23dCqO8-JED4bpDd</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dr. Gary Shiffman’s book&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781107465756" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Economics of Violence: How Behavioral Science Can Transform our View of Crime, Insurgency, and Terrorism</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Cambridge UP, 2020) serves as a fantastic introduction to anyone interested in thinking critically about terrorist, insurgency, and criminal groups of all sorts. Using case studies from multiple continents, ideological contexts, and political situations, Dr. Shiffman shows how the language and tools familiar to economists can assist policy makers and security personnel to combat rival ‘firms,’ as he classifies them. Arguing strongly against essentialist labels and stories about why these groups act the way that they do, Dr. Shiffman offers us an approach to understanding ‘illicit’ groups that would be recognizable to leaders of many ‘legitimate’ organizations.</p><p>Dr. Gary Shiffman is a Professor at Georgetown University, the CEO of two software companies, a former Naval Officer and Border Patrol leader, a former Fortune 200 executive, and an engaging writer. His is the author of one other book on the&nbsp;<em>Economic Instruments of Security Policy</em>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="53762271" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/31cff10a-07ca-48ad-922f-57facec88490/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=31cff10a-07ca-48ad-922f-57facec88490&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Gary Shiffman, &quot;The Economics of Violence: How Behavioral Science Can Transform our View of Crime, Insurgency, and Terrorism&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2019)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:55:58</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Dr. Gary Shiffman’s book The Economics of Violence: How Behavioral Science Can Transform our View of Crime, Insurgency, and Terrorism (Cambridge UP, 2020) serves as a fantastic introduction to anyone interested in thinking critically about terrorist, insurgency, and criminal groups of all sorts. Using case studies from multiple continents, ideological contexts, and political situations, Dr. Shiffman shows how the language and tools familiar to economists can assist policy makers and security personnel to combat rival ‘firms,’ as he classifies them. Arguing strongly against essentialist labels and stories about why these groups act the way that they do, Dr. Shiffman offers us an approach to understanding ‘illicit’ groups that would be recognizable to leaders of many ‘legitimate’ organizations.
Dr. Gary Shiffman is a Professor at Georgetown University, the CEO of two software companies, a former Naval Officer and Border Patrol leader, a former Fortune 200 executive, and an engaging writer. His is the author of one other book on the Economic Instruments of Security Policy.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Dr. Gary Shiffman’s book The Economics of Violence: How Behavioral Science Can Transform our View of Crime, Insurgency, and Terrorism (Cambridge UP, 2020) serves as a fantastic introduction to anyone interested in thinking critically about terrorist, insurgency, and criminal groups of all sorts. Using case studies from multiple continents, ideological contexts, and political situations, Dr. Shiffman shows how the language and tools familiar to economists can assist policy makers and security personnel to combat rival ‘firms,’ as he classifies them. Arguing strongly against essentialist labels and stories about why these groups act the way that they do, Dr. Shiffman offers us an approach to understanding ‘illicit’ groups that would be recognizable to leaders of many ‘legitimate’ organizations.
Dr. Gary Shiffman is a Professor at Georgetown University, the CEO of two software companies, a former Naval Officer and Border Patrol leader, a former Fortune 200 executive, and an engaging writer. His is the author of one other book on the Economic Instruments of Security Policy.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>75</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">b4fcb4cc-a8d4-11ee-b7e7-77ea3f23564c</guid>
      <title>Stephen M. Engel and Timothy S. Lyle, &quot;Disrupting Dignity: Rethinking Power and Progress in LGBTQ Lives&quot; (NYU Press, 2021)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Scholars Stephen Engel and Timothy Lyle have a new book that dives into the thinking around power, political and cultural progress, and the LGBTQ+ communities in the United States. This book is fascinating and important in examining not only policy developments around rights and full citizenship for members of the LGBTQ+ communities, but also how these discussions and dialogues shape thinking about access to rights and dimensions of full citizenship. The overarching title of the book,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781479852031" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Disrupting Dignity: Rethinking Power and Progress in LGBTQ Lives</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(NYU Press, 2021), gets to the heart of the rhetoric in the debate, specifically this concept of “dignity” and how dignity has become a particularly thorny component of defining out political, legal, and civil rights for the LGBTQ+ community.&nbsp;</p><p>Both Engel and Lyle note that they found the term&nbsp;<em>dignity</em>&nbsp;very clearly associated with the legal reasoning in judicial opinions around LGBTQ+ rights, that it was a celebrated status, and that while it was more commonly used in international political rhetoric or in the legal dialogue in other countries, it is far less common in the United States and the U.S. legal tradition. And yet, it kept getting connected to the expansion of LGBTQ+ rights. Often, we think of dignity as an unalloyed good, but Engel and Lyle, as they start to unpack the way in which this term and concept are used, begin to reconsider exactly how and why this term,&nbsp;<em>dignity</em>, is also so often connected with LGBTQ+ communities, and not as connected to other communities and their legal, political, and civil rights. Engel and Lyle consider the way in which dignity is bestowed by the state, and in this way, how it becomes a tool of power. There is also the question of whether the way in which dignity is integrated into legal decisions helps to widen out equality, or does it instead redefine boundaries of otherness and inequality.</p><p>In exploring the concept of dignity, especially as it has been connected to the expansion of LGBTQ+ rights, Engel and Lyle take the reader through three different case studies that examine the evolving rights status and rhetorical presentations of these kinds of dialogues and representations. These three case studies are kind of dialectics, in that they present two sides, often in tension with each other, wrestling with the power of the state, the individual’s rights, the social and cultural understandings of these situations, and the evolving outcomes. The first case study focuses in on the&nbsp;<em>Politics of Public Health from AIDS to PREP</em>. The second section of the book takes up popular culture representations of dignity—wrestling with the concept of sameness (in&nbsp;<em>Love, Simon</em>) in contrast with queer excess (in&nbsp;<em>Pose</em>). The final section of the book, and the part that might be of most interest to legal scholars, is the role of the courts in defining dignity in judicial opinions. This section also leads into the conclusion, as the authors take up the ongoing tension around the concept, implications, and use of&nbsp;<em>dignity</em>&nbsp;in regard to full citizenship, rights, and LGBTQ+ communities.&nbsp;<a href="https://nyupress.org/9781479899869/disrupting-dignity/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Disrupting Dignity: Rethinking Power and Progress in LGBTQ Lives</em></a>&nbsp;is a compelling exploration of the rights regimes in the United States and how the&nbsp;<em>Constitution</em>, the current cultural milieu, and the historical role of the state and state power have all contributed to this evolving question of full citizenship.</p><p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/hosts/profile/a7ac4af9-1306-463f-baf9-00f1f4187dfd" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books in Political Science</em></a><em>&nbsp;channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of&nbsp;</em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700633883/the-politics-of-the-marvel-cinematic-universe/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe</em></a><em>&nbsp;(University Press of Kansas, 2022), as well as co-editor of the award winning book,&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.kentuckypress.com/9780813141015/women-and-the-white-house/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 2 Jan 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/stephen-m-engel-and-timothy-s-lyle-disrupting-dignity-rethinking-power-and-progress-in-lgbtq-lives-nyu-press-2021-JwbW1TtY</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scholars Stephen Engel and Timothy Lyle have a new book that dives into the thinking around power, political and cultural progress, and the LGBTQ+ communities in the United States. This book is fascinating and important in examining not only policy developments around rights and full citizenship for members of the LGBTQ+ communities, but also how these discussions and dialogues shape thinking about access to rights and dimensions of full citizenship. The overarching title of the book,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781479852031" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Disrupting Dignity: Rethinking Power and Progress in LGBTQ Lives</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(NYU Press, 2021), gets to the heart of the rhetoric in the debate, specifically this concept of “dignity” and how dignity has become a particularly thorny component of defining out political, legal, and civil rights for the LGBTQ+ community.&nbsp;</p><p>Both Engel and Lyle note that they found the term&nbsp;<em>dignity</em>&nbsp;very clearly associated with the legal reasoning in judicial opinions around LGBTQ+ rights, that it was a celebrated status, and that while it was more commonly used in international political rhetoric or in the legal dialogue in other countries, it is far less common in the United States and the U.S. legal tradition. And yet, it kept getting connected to the expansion of LGBTQ+ rights. Often, we think of dignity as an unalloyed good, but Engel and Lyle, as they start to unpack the way in which this term and concept are used, begin to reconsider exactly how and why this term,&nbsp;<em>dignity</em>, is also so often connected with LGBTQ+ communities, and not as connected to other communities and their legal, political, and civil rights. Engel and Lyle consider the way in which dignity is bestowed by the state, and in this way, how it becomes a tool of power. There is also the question of whether the way in which dignity is integrated into legal decisions helps to widen out equality, or does it instead redefine boundaries of otherness and inequality.</p><p>In exploring the concept of dignity, especially as it has been connected to the expansion of LGBTQ+ rights, Engel and Lyle take the reader through three different case studies that examine the evolving rights status and rhetorical presentations of these kinds of dialogues and representations. These three case studies are kind of dialectics, in that they present two sides, often in tension with each other, wrestling with the power of the state, the individual’s rights, the social and cultural understandings of these situations, and the evolving outcomes. The first case study focuses in on the&nbsp;<em>Politics of Public Health from AIDS to PREP</em>. The second section of the book takes up popular culture representations of dignity—wrestling with the concept of sameness (in&nbsp;<em>Love, Simon</em>) in contrast with queer excess (in&nbsp;<em>Pose</em>). The final section of the book, and the part that might be of most interest to legal scholars, is the role of the courts in defining dignity in judicial opinions. This section also leads into the conclusion, as the authors take up the ongoing tension around the concept, implications, and use of&nbsp;<em>dignity</em>&nbsp;in regard to full citizenship, rights, and LGBTQ+ communities.&nbsp;<a href="https://nyupress.org/9781479899869/disrupting-dignity/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Disrupting Dignity: Rethinking Power and Progress in LGBTQ Lives</em></a>&nbsp;is a compelling exploration of the rights regimes in the United States and how the&nbsp;<em>Constitution</em>, the current cultural milieu, and the historical role of the state and state power have all contributed to this evolving question of full citizenship.</p><p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/hosts/profile/a7ac4af9-1306-463f-baf9-00f1f4187dfd" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books in Political Science</em></a><em>&nbsp;channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of&nbsp;</em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700633883/the-politics-of-the-marvel-cinematic-universe/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe</em></a><em>&nbsp;(University Press of Kansas, 2022), as well as co-editor of the award winning book,&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.kentuckypress.com/9780813141015/women-and-the-white-house/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="52994959" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/283b81c7-6cbe-447d-82cc-2b0dc2d7df05/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=283b81c7-6cbe-447d-82cc-2b0dc2d7df05&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Stephen M. Engel and Timothy S. Lyle, &quot;Disrupting Dignity: Rethinking Power and Progress in LGBTQ Lives&quot; (NYU Press, 2021)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:55:11</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Scholars Stephen Engel and Timothy Lyle have a new book that dives into the thinking around power, political and cultural progress, and the LGBTQ+ communities in the United States. This book is fascinating and important in examining not only policy developments around rights and full citizenship for members of the LGBTQ+ communities, but also how these discussions and dialogues shape thinking about access to rights and dimensions of full citizenship. The overarching title of the book, Disrupting Dignity: Rethinking Power and Progress in LGBTQ Lives (NYU Press, 2021), gets to the heart of the rhetoric in the debate, specifically this concept of “dignity” and how dignity has become a particularly thorny component of defining out political, legal, and civil rights for the LGBTQ+ community. 
Both Engel and Lyle note that they found the term dignity very clearly associated with the legal reasoning in judicial opinions around LGBTQ+ rights, that it was a celebrated status, and that while it was more commonly used in international political rhetoric or in the legal dialogue in other countries, it is far less common in the United States and the U.S. legal tradition. And yet, it kept getting connected to the expansion of LGBTQ+ rights. Often, we think of dignity as an unalloyed good, but Engel and Lyle, as they start to unpack the way in which this term and concept are used, begin to reconsider exactly how and why this term, dignity, is also so often connected with LGBTQ+ communities, and not as connected to other communities and their legal, political, and civil rights. Engel and Lyle consider the way in which dignity is bestowed by the state, and in this way, how it becomes a tool of power. There is also the question of whether the way in which dignity is integrated into legal decisions helps to widen out equality, or does it instead redefine boundaries of otherness and inequality.
In exploring the concept of dignity, especially as it has been connected to the expansion of LGBTQ+ rights, Engel and Lyle take the reader through three different case studies that examine the evolving rights status and rhetorical presentations of these kinds of dialogues and representations. These three case studies are kind of dialectics, in that they present two sides, often in tension with each other, wrestling with the power of the state, the individual’s rights, the social and cultural understandings of these situations, and the evolving outcomes. The first case study focuses in on the Politics of Public Health from AIDS to PREP. The second section of the book takes up popular culture representations of dignity—wrestling with the concept of sameness (in Love, Simon) in contrast with queer excess (in Pose). The final section of the book, and the part that might be of most interest to legal scholars, is the role of the courts in defining dignity in judicial opinions. This section also leads into the conclusion, as the authors take up the ongoing tension around the concept, implications, and use of dignity in regard to full citizenship, rights, and LGBTQ+ communities. Disrupting Dignity: Rethinking Power and Progress in LGBTQ Lives is a compelling exploration of the rights regimes in the United States and how the Constitution, the current cultural milieu, and the historical role of the state and state power have all contributed to this evolving question of full citizenship.
Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the New Books in Political Science channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe (University Press of Kansas, 2022), as well as co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Scholars Stephen Engel and Timothy Lyle have a new book that dives into the thinking around power, political and cultural progress, and the LGBTQ+ communities in the United States. This book is fascinating and important in examining not only policy developments around rights and full citizenship for members of the LGBTQ+ communities, but also how these discussions and dialogues shape thinking about access to rights and dimensions of full citizenship. The overarching title of the book, Disrupting Dignity: Rethinking Power and Progress in LGBTQ Lives (NYU Press, 2021), gets to the heart of the rhetoric in the debate, specifically this concept of “dignity” and how dignity has become a particularly thorny component of defining out political, legal, and civil rights for the LGBTQ+ community. 
Both Engel and Lyle note that they found the term dignity very clearly associated with the legal reasoning in judicial opinions around LGBTQ+ rights, that it was a celebrated status, and that while it was more commonly used in international political rhetoric or in the legal dialogue in other countries, it is far less common in the United States and the U.S. legal tradition. And yet, it kept getting connected to the expansion of LGBTQ+ rights. Often, we think of dignity as an unalloyed good, but Engel and Lyle, as they start to unpack the way in which this term and concept are used, begin to reconsider exactly how and why this term, dignity, is also so often connected with LGBTQ+ communities, and not as connected to other communities and their legal, political, and civil rights. Engel and Lyle consider the way in which dignity is bestowed by the state, and in this way, how it becomes a tool of power. There is also the question of whether the way in which dignity is integrated into legal decisions helps to widen out equality, or does it instead redefine boundaries of otherness and inequality.
In exploring the concept of dignity, especially as it has been connected to the expansion of LGBTQ+ rights, Engel and Lyle take the reader through three different case studies that examine the evolving rights status and rhetorical presentations of these kinds of dialogues and representations. These three case studies are kind of dialectics, in that they present two sides, often in tension with each other, wrestling with the power of the state, the individual’s rights, the social and cultural understandings of these situations, and the evolving outcomes. The first case study focuses in on the Politics of Public Health from AIDS to PREP. The second section of the book takes up popular culture representations of dignity—wrestling with the concept of sameness (in Love, Simon) in contrast with queer excess (in Pose). The final section of the book, and the part that might be of most interest to legal scholars, is the role of the courts in defining dignity in judicial opinions. This section also leads into the conclusion, as the authors take up the ongoing tension around the concept, implications, and use of dignity in regard to full citizenship, rights, and LGBTQ+ communities. Disrupting Dignity: Rethinking Power and Progress in LGBTQ Lives is a compelling exploration of the rights regimes in the United States and how the Constitution, the current cultural milieu, and the historical role of the state and state power have all contributed to this evolving question of full citizenship.
Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the New Books in Political Science channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe (University Press of Kansas, 2022), as well as co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>690</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3320ebfa-a8f0-11ee-af84-73cd96386818</guid>
      <title>Martha C. Nussbaum, &quot;Justice for Animals: Our Collective Responsibility&quot; (Simon &amp; Schuster, 2022)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>A revolutionary new theory and call to action on animal rights, ethics, and law from the renowned philosopher Martha C. Nussbaum.&nbsp;</p><p>Animals are in trouble all over the world. Whether through the cruelties of the factory meat industry, poaching and game hunting, habitat destruction, or neglect of the companion animals that people purport to love, animals suffer injustice and horrors at our hands every day. The world needs an ethical awakening, a consciousness-raising movement of international proportions.&nbsp;</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781982102500" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Justice for Animals</em></a>&nbsp;(Simon &amp; Schuster, 2023), one of the world’s most influential philosophers and humanists Martha C. Nussbaum provides a revolutionary approach to animal rights, ethics, and law. From dolphins to crows, elephants to octopuses, Nussbaum examines the entire animal kingdom, showcasing the lives of animals with wonder, awe, and compassion to understand how we can create a world in which human beings are truly friends of animals, not exploiters or users. All animals should have a shot at flourishing in their own way. Humans have a collective duty to face and solve animal harm. An urgent call to action and a manual for change, Nussbaum’s groundbreaking theory directs politics and law to help us meet our ethical responsibilities as no book has done before.</p><p>Martha C. Nussbaum is currently the Ernst Freund Distinguished Service Professor of Law and Ethics at the University of Chicago, appointed in the Department of Philosophy and the Law School.</p><p><em>Caleb Zakarin is the Assistant Editor of the New Books Network (Twitter: @caleb_zakarin).</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 2 Jan 2024 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/martha-c-nussbaum-justice-for-animals-our-collective-responsibility-simon-schuster-2022-9ajQ6S8s-A2APZ2DA</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A revolutionary new theory and call to action on animal rights, ethics, and law from the renowned philosopher Martha C. Nussbaum.&nbsp;</p><p>Animals are in trouble all over the world. Whether through the cruelties of the factory meat industry, poaching and game hunting, habitat destruction, or neglect of the companion animals that people purport to love, animals suffer injustice and horrors at our hands every day. The world needs an ethical awakening, a consciousness-raising movement of international proportions.&nbsp;</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781982102500" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Justice for Animals</em></a>&nbsp;(Simon &amp; Schuster, 2023), one of the world’s most influential philosophers and humanists Martha C. Nussbaum provides a revolutionary approach to animal rights, ethics, and law. From dolphins to crows, elephants to octopuses, Nussbaum examines the entire animal kingdom, showcasing the lives of animals with wonder, awe, and compassion to understand how we can create a world in which human beings are truly friends of animals, not exploiters or users. All animals should have a shot at flourishing in their own way. Humans have a collective duty to face and solve animal harm. An urgent call to action and a manual for change, Nussbaum’s groundbreaking theory directs politics and law to help us meet our ethical responsibilities as no book has done before.</p><p>Martha C. Nussbaum is currently the Ernst Freund Distinguished Service Professor of Law and Ethics at the University of Chicago, appointed in the Department of Philosophy and the Law School.</p><p><em>Caleb Zakarin is the Assistant Editor of the New Books Network (Twitter: @caleb_zakarin).</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="45520674" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/68b0afb3-0df4-4a88-83a6-bec6f768e2a5/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=68b0afb3-0df4-4a88-83a6-bec6f768e2a5&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Martha C. Nussbaum, &quot;Justice for Animals: Our Collective Responsibility&quot; (Simon &amp; Schuster, 2022)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:47:24</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>A revolutionary new theory and call to action on animal rights, ethics, and law from the renowned philosopher Martha C. Nussbaum. 
Animals are in trouble all over the world. Whether through the cruelties of the factory meat industry, poaching and game hunting, habitat destruction, or neglect of the companion animals that people purport to love, animals suffer injustice and horrors at our hands every day. The world needs an ethical awakening, a consciousness-raising movement of international proportions. 
In Justice for Animals (Simon &amp; Schuster, 2023), one of the world’s most influential philosophers and humanists Martha C. Nussbaum provides a revolutionary approach to animal rights, ethics, and law. From dolphins to crows, elephants to octopuses, Nussbaum examines the entire animal kingdom, showcasing the lives of animals with wonder, awe, and compassion to understand how we can create a world in which human beings are truly friends of animals, not exploiters or users. All animals should have a shot at flourishing in their own way. Humans have a collective duty to face and solve animal harm. An urgent call to action and a manual for change, Nussbaum’s groundbreaking theory directs politics and law to help us meet our ethical responsibilities as no book has done before.
Martha C. Nussbaum is currently the Ernst Freund Distinguished Service Professor of Law and Ethics at the University of Chicago, appointed in the Department of Philosophy and the Law School.
Caleb Zakarin is the Assistant Editor of the New Books Network (Twitter: @caleb_zakarin).
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>A revolutionary new theory and call to action on animal rights, ethics, and law from the renowned philosopher Martha C. Nussbaum. 
Animals are in trouble all over the world. Whether through the cruelties of the factory meat industry, poaching and game hunting, habitat destruction, or neglect of the companion animals that people purport to love, animals suffer injustice and horrors at our hands every day. The world needs an ethical awakening, a consciousness-raising movement of international proportions. 
In Justice for Animals (Simon &amp; Schuster, 2023), one of the world’s most influential philosophers and humanists Martha C. Nussbaum provides a revolutionary approach to animal rights, ethics, and law. From dolphins to crows, elephants to octopuses, Nussbaum examines the entire animal kingdom, showcasing the lives of animals with wonder, awe, and compassion to understand how we can create a world in which human beings are truly friends of animals, not exploiters or users. All animals should have a shot at flourishing in their own way. Humans have a collective duty to face and solve animal harm. An urgent call to action and a manual for change, Nussbaum’s groundbreaking theory directs politics and law to help us meet our ethical responsibilities as no book has done before.
Martha C. Nussbaum is currently the Ernst Freund Distinguished Service Professor of Law and Ethics at the University of Chicago, appointed in the Department of Philosophy and the Law School.
Caleb Zakarin is the Assistant Editor of the New Books Network (Twitter: @caleb_zakarin).
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>45</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">a37a070c-a741-11ee-804a-3b5276e71558</guid>
      <title>Justin Marceau, &quot;Beyond Cages: Animal Law and Criminal Punishment&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2019)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>For all the diversity of views within the animal protection movement, there is a surprising consensus about the need for more severe criminal justice interventions against animal abusers. More prosecutions and longer sentences, it is argued, will advance the status of animals in law and society. In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781108405454" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Beyond Cages: Animal Law and Criminal Punishment</em></a>&nbsp;(Cambridge UP, 2019), Professor Justin Marceau demonstrates that a focus on 'carceral animal law' puts the animal rights movement at odds with other social justice movements, and may be bad for humans and animals alike. Animal protection efforts need to move beyond cages and towards systemic solutions if the movement hopes to be true to its own defining ethos of increased empathy and resistance to social oppression. Providing new insights into how the lessons of criminal justice reform should be imported into the animal abuse context, Beyond Cages is a valuable contribution to the literature on animal welfare and animal rights law.</p><p>Mark Molloy is the reviews editor at&nbsp;<em>MAKE: A Literary Magazine</em>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 31 Dec 2023 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/justin-marceau-beyond-cages-animal-law-and-criminal-punishment-cambridge-up-2019-2m1SIgEw</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For all the diversity of views within the animal protection movement, there is a surprising consensus about the need for more severe criminal justice interventions against animal abusers. More prosecutions and longer sentences, it is argued, will advance the status of animals in law and society. In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781108405454" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Beyond Cages: Animal Law and Criminal Punishment</em></a>&nbsp;(Cambridge UP, 2019), Professor Justin Marceau demonstrates that a focus on 'carceral animal law' puts the animal rights movement at odds with other social justice movements, and may be bad for humans and animals alike. Animal protection efforts need to move beyond cages and towards systemic solutions if the movement hopes to be true to its own defining ethos of increased empathy and resistance to social oppression. Providing new insights into how the lessons of criminal justice reform should be imported into the animal abuse context, Beyond Cages is a valuable contribution to the literature on animal welfare and animal rights law.</p><p>Mark Molloy is the reviews editor at&nbsp;<em>MAKE: A Literary Magazine</em>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="59249678" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/b5789e99-27d0-4887-ac17-c1ff9e07e392/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=b5789e99-27d0-4887-ac17-c1ff9e07e392&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Justin Marceau, &quot;Beyond Cages: Animal Law and Criminal Punishment&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2019)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:01:41</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>For all the diversity of views within the animal protection movement, there is a surprising consensus about the need for more severe criminal justice interventions against animal abusers. More prosecutions and longer sentences, it is argued, will advance the status of animals in law and society. In Beyond Cages: Animal Law and Criminal Punishment (Cambridge UP, 2019), Professor Justin Marceau demonstrates that a focus on &apos;carceral animal law&apos; puts the animal rights movement at odds with other social justice movements, and may be bad for humans and animals alike. Animal protection efforts need to move beyond cages and towards systemic solutions if the movement hopes to be true to its own defining ethos of increased empathy and resistance to social oppression. Providing new insights into how the lessons of criminal justice reform should be imported into the animal abuse context, Beyond Cages is a valuable contribution to the literature on animal welfare and animal rights law.
Mark Molloy is the reviews editor at MAKE: A Literary Magazine.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>For all the diversity of views within the animal protection movement, there is a surprising consensus about the need for more severe criminal justice interventions against animal abusers. More prosecutions and longer sentences, it is argued, will advance the status of animals in law and society. In Beyond Cages: Animal Law and Criminal Punishment (Cambridge UP, 2019), Professor Justin Marceau demonstrates that a focus on &apos;carceral animal law&apos; puts the animal rights movement at odds with other social justice movements, and may be bad for humans and animals alike. Animal protection efforts need to move beyond cages and towards systemic solutions if the movement hopes to be true to its own defining ethos of increased empathy and resistance to social oppression. Providing new insights into how the lessons of criminal justice reform should be imported into the animal abuse context, Beyond Cages is a valuable contribution to the literature on animal welfare and animal rights law.
Mark Molloy is the reviews editor at MAKE: A Literary Magazine.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>30</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">686337fa-a5a3-11ee-ada5-03707f2e9326</guid>
      <title>Claudia Smith Brinson, &quot;Stories of Struggle: The Clash over Civil Rights in South Carolina&quot; (U South Carolina Press, 2020)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781643364629" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Stories of Struggle: The Clash over Civil Rights in South Carolina</em></a>&nbsp;(U South Carolina Press, 2020), longtime journalist Claudia Smith Brinson details the lynchings, beatings, bombings, cross burnings, death threats, arson, and venomous hatred that black South Carolinians endured―as well as the astonishing courage, devotion, dignity, and compassion of those who risked their lives for equality.</p><p>Through extensive research and interviews with more than one hundred fifty civil rights activists, many of whom had never shared their stories with anyone, Brinson chronicles twenty pivotal years of petitioning, preaching, picketing, boycotting, marching, and holding sit-ins. Participants' use of nonviolent direct action altered the landscape of civil rights in South Carolina and reverberated throughout the South.</p><p>These firsthand accounts include those of the unsung petitioners who risked their lives by supporting Summerton's Briggs v. Elliot, a lawsuit that led to the historic Brown v. Board of Education decision; the thousands of students who were arrested and jailed in 1960 for protests in Rock Hill, Orangeburg, Denmark, Columbia, and Sumter; and the black female employees and leaders who defied a governor and his armed troops during the 1969 hospital strike in Charleston.</p><p>Brinson also highlights contributions made by remarkable but lesser-known activists, including James M. Hinton Sr., president of the South Carolina Conference of Branches of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People; Thomas W. Gaither, Congress of Racial Equality field secretary and scout for the Freedom Rides; Charles F. McDew, a South Carolina State College student and co-founder of the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee; and Mary Moultrie, grassroots leader of the 1969 hospital workers' strike.</p><p>These intimate stories of courage and conviction, both heartbreaking and inspiring, shine a light on the progress achieved by nonviolent civil rights activists while also revealing white South Carolinians' often violent resistance to change. Although significant racial disparities remain, the sacrifices of these brave men and women produced real progress―and hope for the future. For more information on this book, see storiesofstruggle.com</p><p><em>Matt Simmons is an Assistant Professor of History at Emmanuel University where he teaches course in U.S. and public history. His research interests focus on the intersection of labor and race in the twentieth-century American South. You can follow him on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://twitter.com/matthewfsimmons" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>X</em></a><em>&nbsp;@matthewfsimmons.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2023 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/claudia-smith-brinson-stories-of-struggle-the-clash-over-civil-rights-in-south-carolina-u-south-carolina-press-2020-LU5b5asn</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781643364629" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Stories of Struggle: The Clash over Civil Rights in South Carolina</em></a>&nbsp;(U South Carolina Press, 2020), longtime journalist Claudia Smith Brinson details the lynchings, beatings, bombings, cross burnings, death threats, arson, and venomous hatred that black South Carolinians endured―as well as the astonishing courage, devotion, dignity, and compassion of those who risked their lives for equality.</p><p>Through extensive research and interviews with more than one hundred fifty civil rights activists, many of whom had never shared their stories with anyone, Brinson chronicles twenty pivotal years of petitioning, preaching, picketing, boycotting, marching, and holding sit-ins. Participants' use of nonviolent direct action altered the landscape of civil rights in South Carolina and reverberated throughout the South.</p><p>These firsthand accounts include those of the unsung petitioners who risked their lives by supporting Summerton's Briggs v. Elliot, a lawsuit that led to the historic Brown v. Board of Education decision; the thousands of students who were arrested and jailed in 1960 for protests in Rock Hill, Orangeburg, Denmark, Columbia, and Sumter; and the black female employees and leaders who defied a governor and his armed troops during the 1969 hospital strike in Charleston.</p><p>Brinson also highlights contributions made by remarkable but lesser-known activists, including James M. Hinton Sr., president of the South Carolina Conference of Branches of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People; Thomas W. Gaither, Congress of Racial Equality field secretary and scout for the Freedom Rides; Charles F. McDew, a South Carolina State College student and co-founder of the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee; and Mary Moultrie, grassroots leader of the 1969 hospital workers' strike.</p><p>These intimate stories of courage and conviction, both heartbreaking and inspiring, shine a light on the progress achieved by nonviolent civil rights activists while also revealing white South Carolinians' often violent resistance to change. Although significant racial disparities remain, the sacrifices of these brave men and women produced real progress―and hope for the future. For more information on this book, see storiesofstruggle.com</p><p><em>Matt Simmons is an Assistant Professor of History at Emmanuel University where he teaches course in U.S. and public history. His research interests focus on the intersection of labor and race in the twentieth-century American South. You can follow him on&nbsp;</em><a href="https://twitter.com/matthewfsimmons" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>X</em></a><em>&nbsp;@matthewfsimmons.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="60974527" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/e833b6c1-96b5-4c70-87b1-5b0e50ec94ef/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=e833b6c1-96b5-4c70-87b1-5b0e50ec94ef&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Claudia Smith Brinson, &quot;Stories of Struggle: The Clash over Civil Rights in South Carolina&quot; (U South Carolina Press, 2020)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:03:30</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In Stories of Struggle: The Clash over Civil Rights in South Carolina (U South Carolina Press, 2020), longtime journalist Claudia Smith Brinson details the lynchings, beatings, bombings, cross burnings, death threats, arson, and venomous hatred that black South Carolinians endured―as well as the astonishing courage, devotion, dignity, and compassion of those who risked their lives for equality.
Through extensive research and interviews with more than one hundred fifty civil rights activists, many of whom had never shared their stories with anyone, Brinson chronicles twenty pivotal years of petitioning, preaching, picketing, boycotting, marching, and holding sit-ins. Participants&apos; use of nonviolent direct action altered the landscape of civil rights in South Carolina and reverberated throughout the South.
These firsthand accounts include those of the unsung petitioners who risked their lives by supporting Summerton&apos;s Briggs v. Elliot, a lawsuit that led to the historic Brown v. Board of Education decision; the thousands of students who were arrested and jailed in 1960 for protests in Rock Hill, Orangeburg, Denmark, Columbia, and Sumter; and the black female employees and leaders who defied a governor and his armed troops during the 1969 hospital strike in Charleston.
Brinson also highlights contributions made by remarkable but lesser-known activists, including James M. Hinton Sr., president of the South Carolina Conference of Branches of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People; Thomas W. Gaither, Congress of Racial Equality field secretary and scout for the Freedom Rides; Charles F. McDew, a South Carolina State College student and co-founder of the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee; and Mary Moultrie, grassroots leader of the 1969 hospital workers&apos; strike.
These intimate stories of courage and conviction, both heartbreaking and inspiring, shine a light on the progress achieved by nonviolent civil rights activists while also revealing white South Carolinians&apos; often violent resistance to change. Although significant racial disparities remain, the sacrifices of these brave men and women produced real progress―and hope for the future. For more information on this book, see storiesofstruggle.com
Matt Simmons is an Assistant Professor of History at Emmanuel University where he teaches course in U.S. and public history. His research interests focus on the intersection of labor and race in the twentieth-century American South. You can follow him on X @matthewfsimmons.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In Stories of Struggle: The Clash over Civil Rights in South Carolina (U South Carolina Press, 2020), longtime journalist Claudia Smith Brinson details the lynchings, beatings, bombings, cross burnings, death threats, arson, and venomous hatred that black South Carolinians endured―as well as the astonishing courage, devotion, dignity, and compassion of those who risked their lives for equality.
Through extensive research and interviews with more than one hundred fifty civil rights activists, many of whom had never shared their stories with anyone, Brinson chronicles twenty pivotal years of petitioning, preaching, picketing, boycotting, marching, and holding sit-ins. Participants&apos; use of nonviolent direct action altered the landscape of civil rights in South Carolina and reverberated throughout the South.
These firsthand accounts include those of the unsung petitioners who risked their lives by supporting Summerton&apos;s Briggs v. Elliot, a lawsuit that led to the historic Brown v. Board of Education decision; the thousands of students who were arrested and jailed in 1960 for protests in Rock Hill, Orangeburg, Denmark, Columbia, and Sumter; and the black female employees and leaders who defied a governor and his armed troops during the 1969 hospital strike in Charleston.
Brinson also highlights contributions made by remarkable but lesser-known activists, including James M. Hinton Sr., president of the South Carolina Conference of Branches of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People; Thomas W. Gaither, Congress of Racial Equality field secretary and scout for the Freedom Rides; Charles F. McDew, a South Carolina State College student and co-founder of the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee; and Mary Moultrie, grassroots leader of the 1969 hospital workers&apos; strike.
These intimate stories of courage and conviction, both heartbreaking and inspiring, shine a light on the progress achieved by nonviolent civil rights activists while also revealing white South Carolinians&apos; often violent resistance to change. Although significant racial disparities remain, the sacrifices of these brave men and women produced real progress―and hope for the future. For more information on this book, see storiesofstruggle.com
Matt Simmons is an Assistant Professor of History at Emmanuel University where he teaches course in U.S. and public history. His research interests focus on the intersection of labor and race in the twentieth-century American South. You can follow him on X @matthewfsimmons.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>61</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e499ecb2-a3f3-11ee-a22e-df053bc9c5e2</guid>
      <title>David T. Beito, &quot;The New Deal&apos;s War on the Bill of Rights: The Untold Story of FDR&apos;s Concentration Camps, Censorship, and Mass Surveillance&quot; (Independent Institute, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The legacy of President Franklin D. Roosevelt enjoys regular acclaim from historians, politicians, and educators. Lauded for his New Deal policies, leadership as a wartime president, cozy fireside chats, and groundbreaking support of the "forgotten man," FDR, we have been told, is worthy of the same praise as men like Washington, Jefferson, and Lincoln.... But is that true? Does the father of today's welfare state really deserve such generous approbation? Or is there a dark side to this golden legacy?&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781598133561" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The New Deal's War on the Bill of Rights: The Untold Story of FDR's Concentration Camps, Censorship, and Mass Surveillance</em></a>&nbsp;(Independent Institute, 2023)&nbsp;unveils a much different portrait than the standard orthodoxy found in today's historical studies.</p><p>Deploying an abundance of primary source evidence and well-reasoned arguments, historian and distinguished professor emeritus David T. Beito masterfully presents a complete account of the&nbsp;<em>real</em>&nbsp;Franklin D. Roosevelt: a man who abused power, violated human rights, targeted dissidents, and let his crude racism imprison American citizens merely for being of Japanese descent.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Dec 2023 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/david-t-beito-the-new-deals-war-on-the-bill-of-rights-the-untold-story-of-fdrs-concentration-camps-censorship-and-mass-surveillance-independent-institute-2023-mwGNNnzi</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The legacy of President Franklin D. Roosevelt enjoys regular acclaim from historians, politicians, and educators. Lauded for his New Deal policies, leadership as a wartime president, cozy fireside chats, and groundbreaking support of the "forgotten man," FDR, we have been told, is worthy of the same praise as men like Washington, Jefferson, and Lincoln.... But is that true? Does the father of today's welfare state really deserve such generous approbation? Or is there a dark side to this golden legacy?&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781598133561" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The New Deal's War on the Bill of Rights: The Untold Story of FDR's Concentration Camps, Censorship, and Mass Surveillance</em></a>&nbsp;(Independent Institute, 2023)&nbsp;unveils a much different portrait than the standard orthodoxy found in today's historical studies.</p><p>Deploying an abundance of primary source evidence and well-reasoned arguments, historian and distinguished professor emeritus David T. Beito masterfully presents a complete account of the&nbsp;<em>real</em>&nbsp;Franklin D. Roosevelt: a man who abused power, violated human rights, targeted dissidents, and let his crude racism imprison American citizens merely for being of Japanese descent.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="55555486" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/e5d9e9ef-ce83-4b93-8136-91a8a093bab5/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=e5d9e9ef-ce83-4b93-8136-91a8a093bab5&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>David T. Beito, &quot;The New Deal&apos;s War on the Bill of Rights: The Untold Story of FDR&apos;s Concentration Camps, Censorship, and Mass Surveillance&quot; (Independent Institute, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:57:52</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The legacy of President Franklin D. Roosevelt enjoys regular acclaim from historians, politicians, and educators. Lauded for his New Deal policies, leadership as a wartime president, cozy fireside chats, and groundbreaking support of the &quot;forgotten man,&quot; FDR, we have been told, is worthy of the same praise as men like Washington, Jefferson, and Lincoln.... But is that true? Does the father of today&apos;s welfare state really deserve such generous approbation? Or is there a dark side to this golden legacy? The New Deal&apos;s War on the Bill of Rights: The Untold Story of FDR&apos;s Concentration Camps, Censorship, and Mass Surveillance (Independent Institute, 2023) unveils a much different portrait than the standard orthodoxy found in today&apos;s historical studies.
Deploying an abundance of primary source evidence and well-reasoned arguments, historian and distinguished professor emeritus David T. Beito masterfully presents a complete account of the real Franklin D. Roosevelt: a man who abused power, violated human rights, targeted dissidents, and let his crude racism imprison American citizens merely for being of Japanese descent.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The legacy of President Franklin D. Roosevelt enjoys regular acclaim from historians, politicians, and educators. Lauded for his New Deal policies, leadership as a wartime president, cozy fireside chats, and groundbreaking support of the &quot;forgotten man,&quot; FDR, we have been told, is worthy of the same praise as men like Washington, Jefferson, and Lincoln.... But is that true? Does the father of today&apos;s welfare state really deserve such generous approbation? Or is there a dark side to this golden legacy? The New Deal&apos;s War on the Bill of Rights: The Untold Story of FDR&apos;s Concentration Camps, Censorship, and Mass Surveillance (Independent Institute, 2023) unveils a much different portrait than the standard orthodoxy found in today&apos;s historical studies.
Deploying an abundance of primary source evidence and well-reasoned arguments, historian and distinguished professor emeritus David T. Beito masterfully presents a complete account of the real Franklin D. Roosevelt: a man who abused power, violated human rights, targeted dissidents, and let his crude racism imprison American citizens merely for being of Japanese descent.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>183</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">99c6d93c-a0fd-11ee-ad57-9b560c28abd7</guid>
      <title>The Future of Migration: A Discussion with Hein de Haas</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Immigration has become one of the biggest issues in all western democracies. And the debate is so charged it's hard to know who to believe. Which is why&nbsp;Hein de Haas has written&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781541604315" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>How Migration Really Works: The Facts About the Most Divisive Issue in Politics</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Basic Books, 2023).&nbsp;Listen to him bust some myths with Owen Bennett-Jones.</p><p><em>﻿</em><a href="https://owenbennettjones.com/about/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Owen Bennett-Jones</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a freelance journalist and writer. A former BBC correspondent and presenter he has been a resident foreign correspondent in Bucharest, Geneva, Islamabad, Hanoi and Beirut. He is recently wrote a history of the Bhutto dynasty which was published by Yale University Press.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 23 Dec 2023 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/the-future-of-migration-a-discussion-with-hein-de-haas-h8RYnptv</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Immigration has become one of the biggest issues in all western democracies. And the debate is so charged it's hard to know who to believe. Which is why&nbsp;Hein de Haas has written&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781541604315" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>How Migration Really Works: The Facts About the Most Divisive Issue in Politics</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Basic Books, 2023).&nbsp;Listen to him bust some myths with Owen Bennett-Jones.</p><p><em>﻿</em><a href="https://owenbennettjones.com/about/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Owen Bennett-Jones</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a freelance journalist and writer. A former BBC correspondent and presenter he has been a resident foreign correspondent in Bucharest, Geneva, Islamabad, Hanoi and Beirut. He is recently wrote a history of the Bhutto dynasty which was published by Yale University Press.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="33371719" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/4d691c66-7400-4fc1-90fc-9f70083971f0/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=4d691c66-7400-4fc1-90fc-9f70083971f0&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>The Future of Migration: A Discussion with Hein de Haas</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:34:45</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Immigration has become one of the biggest issues in all western democracies. And the debate is so charged it&apos;s hard to know who to believe. Which is why Hein de Haas has written How Migration Really Works: The Facts About the Most Divisive Issue in Politics (Basic Books, 2023). Listen to him bust some myths with Owen Bennett-Jones.
﻿Owen Bennett-Jones is a freelance journalist and writer. A former BBC correspondent and presenter he has been a resident foreign correspondent in Bucharest, Geneva, Islamabad, Hanoi and Beirut. He is recently wrote a history of the Bhutto dynasty which was published by Yale University Press.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Immigration has become one of the biggest issues in all western democracies. And the debate is so charged it&apos;s hard to know who to believe. Which is why Hein de Haas has written How Migration Really Works: The Facts About the Most Divisive Issue in Politics (Basic Books, 2023). Listen to him bust some myths with Owen Bennett-Jones.
﻿Owen Bennett-Jones is a freelance journalist and writer. A former BBC correspondent and presenter he has been a resident foreign correspondent in Bucharest, Geneva, Islamabad, Hanoi and Beirut. He is recently wrote a history of the Bhutto dynasty which was published by Yale University Press.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>92</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">38718f32-9de3-11ee-b1d3-d721912a4628</guid>
      <title>Emily Horowitz, &quot;From Rage to Reason: Why We Need Sex Crime Laws Based on Facts, Not Fear&quot; (Bloomsbury, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In her book&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781440879395" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>From Rage to Reason: Why We Need Sex Crime Laws Based on Facts, Not Fear</em></a>&nbsp;(Bloomsbury Academic, 2023), Emily Horowitz shows how current sex-offense policies in the United States create new forms of harm and prevent those who have caused harm from the process of constructive repentance or contributing to society after punishment. Horowitz also illustrates the failure of criminal justice responses to social problems. Sharing detailed narratives from the experiences of those on registries and their loved ones, Horowitz reveals the social impact and cycle of violence that results from dehumanizing and banishing those who have already been held accountable.</p><p>Emily Horowitz is professor of sociology and criminal justice at St. Francis College in Brooklyn, NY.</p><p><em>Schneur Zalman Newfield is an Associate Professor of Sociology and Jewish Studies at Hunter College, City University of New York, and the author of Degrees of Separation: Identity Formation While Leaving Ultra-Orthodox Judaism (Temple University Press). Visit him online at ZalmanNewfield.com.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2023 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/emily-horowitz-from-rage-to-reason-why-we-need-sex-crime-laws-based-on-facts-not-fear-bloomsbury-2023-jw7s9t8W</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In her book&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781440879395" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>From Rage to Reason: Why We Need Sex Crime Laws Based on Facts, Not Fear</em></a>&nbsp;(Bloomsbury Academic, 2023), Emily Horowitz shows how current sex-offense policies in the United States create new forms of harm and prevent those who have caused harm from the process of constructive repentance or contributing to society after punishment. Horowitz also illustrates the failure of criminal justice responses to social problems. Sharing detailed narratives from the experiences of those on registries and their loved ones, Horowitz reveals the social impact and cycle of violence that results from dehumanizing and banishing those who have already been held accountable.</p><p>Emily Horowitz is professor of sociology and criminal justice at St. Francis College in Brooklyn, NY.</p><p><em>Schneur Zalman Newfield is an Associate Professor of Sociology and Jewish Studies at Hunter College, City University of New York, and the author of Degrees of Separation: Identity Formation While Leaving Ultra-Orthodox Judaism (Temple University Press). Visit him online at ZalmanNewfield.com.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="58479806" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/f9f4cc39-ae78-415f-8a28-53f9a67eb27e/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=f9f4cc39-ae78-415f-8a28-53f9a67eb27e&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Emily Horowitz, &quot;From Rage to Reason: Why We Need Sex Crime Laws Based on Facts, Not Fear&quot; (Bloomsbury, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:00:54</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In her book From Rage to Reason: Why We Need Sex Crime Laws Based on Facts, Not Fear (Bloomsbury Academic, 2023), Emily Horowitz shows how current sex-offense policies in the United States create new forms of harm and prevent those who have caused harm from the process of constructive repentance or contributing to society after punishment. Horowitz also illustrates the failure of criminal justice responses to social problems. Sharing detailed narratives from the experiences of those on registries and their loved ones, Horowitz reveals the social impact and cycle of violence that results from dehumanizing and banishing those who have already been held accountable.
Emily Horowitz is professor of sociology and criminal justice at St. Francis College in Brooklyn, NY.
Schneur Zalman Newfield is an Associate Professor of Sociology and Jewish Studies at Hunter College, City University of New York, and the author of Degrees of Separation: Identity Formation While Leaving Ultra-Orthodox Judaism (Temple University Press). Visit him online at ZalmanNewfield.com.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In her book From Rage to Reason: Why We Need Sex Crime Laws Based on Facts, Not Fear (Bloomsbury Academic, 2023), Emily Horowitz shows how current sex-offense policies in the United States create new forms of harm and prevent those who have caused harm from the process of constructive repentance or contributing to society after punishment. Horowitz also illustrates the failure of criminal justice responses to social problems. Sharing detailed narratives from the experiences of those on registries and their loved ones, Horowitz reveals the social impact and cycle of violence that results from dehumanizing and banishing those who have already been held accountable.
Emily Horowitz is professor of sociology and criminal justice at St. Francis College in Brooklyn, NY.
Schneur Zalman Newfield is an Associate Professor of Sociology and Jewish Studies at Hunter College, City University of New York, and the author of Degrees of Separation: Identity Formation While Leaving Ultra-Orthodox Judaism (Temple University Press). Visit him online at ZalmanNewfield.com.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>207</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">dd8125ce-9dc4-11ee-8053-af66980f1eac</guid>
      <title>Tom Buitelaar, &quot;Assisting International Justice: Cooperation Between UN Peace Operations and the International Criminal Court in the Democratic Republic of Congo&quot; (Oxford UP, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Although the International Criminal Court (ICC) - as the only permanent international court that addresses crimes against humanity, genocide, and war crimes - has important potential to end impunity and find justice for victims of atrocities, it is dependent on others for almost all aspects of its functioning. The Court has frequently relied on the peacekeeping operations that the UN deploys in the field and, over the past two decades, UN peacekeepers have provided logistical assistance and security to Court investigators, shared large amounts of information, and have even been involved in the arrest of Court suspects. But their track record has been inconsistent: they have sometimes refused to take action against people accused of war crimes and have found it difficult to balance their impartiality with court prosecutions. Despite the empirical importance of this phenomenon, we know preciously little about the circumstances under which it occurs.</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780192872227" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Assisting International Justice: Cooperation Between UN Peace Operations and the International Criminal Court in the Democratic Republic of Congo</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Oxford University Press, 2023), Dr. Tom Buitelaar reveals the conditions under which UN peacekeepers address impunity in their mission areas. He presents an original single-country case study of assistance provided by the UN mission in the Democratic Republic of the Congo and a plausibility probe of other peace operations in ICC situation countries. Relying on new empirical material, including over 130 interviews of key decision-makers, and comprehensive archival research, this scholarly volume explores how the UN navigates the terrain of conflict mediation and punitive accountability and demonstrates the collaborative but contingent relationship between the UN and the ICC.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;forthcoming book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2023 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/tom-buitelaar-assisting-international-justice-cooperation-between-un-peace-operations-and-the-international-criminal-court-in-the-democratic-republic-of-congo-oxford-up-2023-98ZCS7_X</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although the International Criminal Court (ICC) - as the only permanent international court that addresses crimes against humanity, genocide, and war crimes - has important potential to end impunity and find justice for victims of atrocities, it is dependent on others for almost all aspects of its functioning. The Court has frequently relied on the peacekeeping operations that the UN deploys in the field and, over the past two decades, UN peacekeepers have provided logistical assistance and security to Court investigators, shared large amounts of information, and have even been involved in the arrest of Court suspects. But their track record has been inconsistent: they have sometimes refused to take action against people accused of war crimes and have found it difficult to balance their impartiality with court prosecutions. Despite the empirical importance of this phenomenon, we know preciously little about the circumstances under which it occurs.</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780192872227" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Assisting International Justice: Cooperation Between UN Peace Operations and the International Criminal Court in the Democratic Republic of Congo</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Oxford University Press, 2023), Dr. Tom Buitelaar reveals the conditions under which UN peacekeepers address impunity in their mission areas. He presents an original single-country case study of assistance provided by the UN mission in the Democratic Republic of the Congo and a plausibility probe of other peace operations in ICC situation countries. Relying on new empirical material, including over 130 interviews of key decision-makers, and comprehensive archival research, this scholarly volume explores how the UN navigates the terrain of conflict mediation and punitive accountability and demonstrates the collaborative but contingent relationship between the UN and the ICC.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;forthcoming book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="59850242" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/c8cb1775-7015-457e-860b-7a79b70faac5/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=c8cb1775-7015-457e-860b-7a79b70faac5&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Tom Buitelaar, &quot;Assisting International Justice: Cooperation Between UN Peace Operations and the International Criminal Court in the Democratic Republic of Congo&quot; (Oxford UP, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:02:20</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Although the International Criminal Court (ICC) - as the only permanent international court that addresses crimes against humanity, genocide, and war crimes - has important potential to end impunity and find justice for victims of atrocities, it is dependent on others for almost all aspects of its functioning. The Court has frequently relied on the peacekeeping operations that the UN deploys in the field and, over the past two decades, UN peacekeepers have provided logistical assistance and security to Court investigators, shared large amounts of information, and have even been involved in the arrest of Court suspects. But their track record has been inconsistent: they have sometimes refused to take action against people accused of war crimes and have found it difficult to balance their impartiality with court prosecutions. Despite the empirical importance of this phenomenon, we know preciously little about the circumstances under which it occurs.
In Assisting International Justice: Cooperation Between UN Peace Operations and the International Criminal Court in the Democratic Republic of Congo (Oxford University Press, 2023), Dr. Tom Buitelaar reveals the conditions under which UN peacekeepers address impunity in their mission areas. He presents an original single-country case study of assistance provided by the UN mission in the Democratic Republic of the Congo and a plausibility probe of other peace operations in ICC situation countries. Relying on new empirical material, including over 130 interviews of key decision-makers, and comprehensive archival research, this scholarly volume explores how the UN navigates the terrain of conflict mediation and punitive accountability and demonstrates the collaborative but contingent relationship between the UN and the ICC.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose forthcoming book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Although the International Criminal Court (ICC) - as the only permanent international court that addresses crimes against humanity, genocide, and war crimes - has important potential to end impunity and find justice for victims of atrocities, it is dependent on others for almost all aspects of its functioning. The Court has frequently relied on the peacekeeping operations that the UN deploys in the field and, over the past two decades, UN peacekeepers have provided logistical assistance and security to Court investigators, shared large amounts of information, and have even been involved in the arrest of Court suspects. But their track record has been inconsistent: they have sometimes refused to take action against people accused of war crimes and have found it difficult to balance their impartiality with court prosecutions. Despite the empirical importance of this phenomenon, we know preciously little about the circumstances under which it occurs.
In Assisting International Justice: Cooperation Between UN Peace Operations and the International Criminal Court in the Democratic Republic of Congo (Oxford University Press, 2023), Dr. Tom Buitelaar reveals the conditions under which UN peacekeepers address impunity in their mission areas. He presents an original single-country case study of assistance provided by the UN mission in the Democratic Republic of the Congo and a plausibility probe of other peace operations in ICC situation countries. Relying on new empirical material, including over 130 interviews of key decision-makers, and comprehensive archival research, this scholarly volume explores how the UN navigates the terrain of conflict mediation and punitive accountability and demonstrates the collaborative but contingent relationship between the UN and the ICC.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose forthcoming book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>175</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1542cb7a-9e97-11ee-9fc4-d73ca66e7f8b</guid>
      <title>Speech Unbound: A Conversation with Nadine Strossen</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>What (and why) can and can't we say? What do empirical examples both at home and abroad tell us about how we should protect freedom of speech? How do we create an environment where speech is not only permitted but encouraged? Does freedom of speech bring people together or sow discord?&nbsp;<a href="https://www.nyls.edu/faculty/nadine-strossen/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Nadine Strossen</a>, former president of the ACLU and Professor Emerita at New York Law School, brings her decades of expertise to bear explaining why freedom of speech is foundational to so many other fundamental rights.</p><p>Nadine Strossen is Professor Emerita at New York Law School, and was national President of the American Civil Liberties Union from 1991-2008. She is a Senior Fellow with FIRE (the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression) and a leading expert and frequent speaker/media commentator on constitutional law and civil liberties, who has testified before Congress on multiple occasions. She is the author of&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780190089009" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>HATE: Why We Should Resist It with Free Speech, Not Censorship</em></a>&nbsp;(Oxford UP,&nbsp;2018) and&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197699652" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Free Speech: What Everyone Needs to Know</em></a>&nbsp;(Oxford UP, 2023). She is the Host and Project Consultant for&nbsp;<a href="https://www.freetochoosenetwork.org/freetospeak/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Free To Speak</em></a>, a 3-hour documentary film series released in October. You can also find her remarks "Current Free Speech Controversies" with the Madison Program&nbsp;<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=weRVGOmi6Hc" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a>.</p><p>Here are some examples of studies, referenced at the end of the episode, demonstrating links between words a language has for colors and how those colors are perceived by speakers, for&nbsp;<a href="https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/our-language-affects-what-we-see/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Russian</a>&nbsp;and for&nbsp;<a href="https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00551/full" rel="noopener noreferrer">Chinese and Mongolian</a>.</p><p><a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/people/annika-nordquist" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Annika Nordquist</em></a><em>&nbsp;is the Communications Coordinator of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions and host of the Program’s podcast,&nbsp;</em><a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/podcast" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Madison’s Notes</em></a><em>.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2023 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/speech-unbound-a-conversation-with-nadine-strossen-VBeedcAk</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What (and why) can and can't we say? What do empirical examples both at home and abroad tell us about how we should protect freedom of speech? How do we create an environment where speech is not only permitted but encouraged? Does freedom of speech bring people together or sow discord?&nbsp;<a href="https://www.nyls.edu/faculty/nadine-strossen/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Nadine Strossen</a>, former president of the ACLU and Professor Emerita at New York Law School, brings her decades of expertise to bear explaining why freedom of speech is foundational to so many other fundamental rights.</p><p>Nadine Strossen is Professor Emerita at New York Law School, and was national President of the American Civil Liberties Union from 1991-2008. She is a Senior Fellow with FIRE (the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression) and a leading expert and frequent speaker/media commentator on constitutional law and civil liberties, who has testified before Congress on multiple occasions. She is the author of&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780190089009" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>HATE: Why We Should Resist It with Free Speech, Not Censorship</em></a>&nbsp;(Oxford UP,&nbsp;2018) and&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197699652" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Free Speech: What Everyone Needs to Know</em></a>&nbsp;(Oxford UP, 2023). She is the Host and Project Consultant for&nbsp;<a href="https://www.freetochoosenetwork.org/freetospeak/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Free To Speak</em></a>, a 3-hour documentary film series released in October. You can also find her remarks "Current Free Speech Controversies" with the Madison Program&nbsp;<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=weRVGOmi6Hc" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a>.</p><p>Here are some examples of studies, referenced at the end of the episode, demonstrating links between words a language has for colors and how those colors are perceived by speakers, for&nbsp;<a href="https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/our-language-affects-what-we-see/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Russian</a>&nbsp;and for&nbsp;<a href="https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00551/full" rel="noopener noreferrer">Chinese and Mongolian</a>.</p><p><a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/people/annika-nordquist" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Annika Nordquist</em></a><em>&nbsp;is the Communications Coordinator of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions and host of the Program’s podcast,&nbsp;</em><a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/podcast" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Madison’s Notes</em></a><em>.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="55816432" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/985b74ca-6974-4f77-8775-0d8e1630d393/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=985b74ca-6974-4f77-8775-0d8e1630d393&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Speech Unbound: A Conversation with Nadine Strossen</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:58:08</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>What (and why) can and can&apos;t we say? What do empirical examples both at home and abroad tell us about how we should protect freedom of speech? How do we create an environment where speech is not only permitted but encouraged? Does freedom of speech bring people together or sow discord? Nadine Strossen, former president of the ACLU and Professor Emerita at New York Law School, brings her decades of expertise to bear explaining why freedom of speech is foundational to so many other fundamental rights.
Nadine Strossen is Professor Emerita at New York Law School, and was national President of the American Civil Liberties Union from 1991-2008. She is a Senior Fellow with FIRE (the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression) and a leading expert and frequent speaker/media commentator on constitutional law and civil liberties, who has testified before Congress on multiple occasions. She is the author of HATE: Why We Should Resist It with Free Speech, Not Censorship (Oxford UP, 2018) and Free Speech: What Everyone Needs to Know (Oxford UP, 2023). She is the Host and Project Consultant for Free To Speak, a 3-hour documentary film series released in October. You can also find her remarks &quot;Current Free Speech Controversies&quot; with the Madison Program here.
Here are some examples of studies, referenced at the end of the episode, demonstrating links between words a language has for colors and how those colors are perceived by speakers, for Russian and for Chinese and Mongolian.
Annika Nordquist is the Communications Coordinator of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions and host of the Program’s podcast, Madison’s Notes.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>What (and why) can and can&apos;t we say? What do empirical examples both at home and abroad tell us about how we should protect freedom of speech? How do we create an environment where speech is not only permitted but encouraged? Does freedom of speech bring people together or sow discord? Nadine Strossen, former president of the ACLU and Professor Emerita at New York Law School, brings her decades of expertise to bear explaining why freedom of speech is foundational to so many other fundamental rights.
Nadine Strossen is Professor Emerita at New York Law School, and was national President of the American Civil Liberties Union from 1991-2008. She is a Senior Fellow with FIRE (the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression) and a leading expert and frequent speaker/media commentator on constitutional law and civil liberties, who has testified before Congress on multiple occasions. She is the author of HATE: Why We Should Resist It with Free Speech, Not Censorship (Oxford UP, 2018) and Free Speech: What Everyone Needs to Know (Oxford UP, 2023). She is the Host and Project Consultant for Free To Speak, a 3-hour documentary film series released in October. You can also find her remarks &quot;Current Free Speech Controversies&quot; with the Madison Program here.
Here are some examples of studies, referenced at the end of the episode, demonstrating links between words a language has for colors and how those colors are perceived by speakers, for Russian and for Chinese and Mongolian.
Annika Nordquist is the Communications Coordinator of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions and host of the Program’s podcast, Madison’s Notes.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>92</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">41431a0e-9c49-11ee-bc25-9f1c769a955c</guid>
      <title>Sara Chatfield, &quot;In Her Own Name: The Politics of Women’s Rights Before Suffrage&quot; (Columbia UP, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>We often narrate the history of women’s rights in the United States by focusing on the fight for suffrage. Yet starting as early as 1835, states expanded married women’s&nbsp;<em>economic&nbsp;</em>rights. How were these statutes passed at a time when women’s political power was severely constrained, including no right to vote in most states? With limited national coordination?&nbsp;</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780231199674" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>In Her Own Name: The Politics of Women’s Rights Before Suffrage</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Columbia UP, 2023), Dr. Sara Chatfield argues that married women’s property rights reform occurred through a two-level process. Within each state, policy developed and cycled through different state-level institutions. Without explicit coordination, these policies spread throughout the states with institutional actors borrowing, copying, and learning from the successes and failures of other states – such that ALL states passed some reform by 1920. Dr. Chatfield’s important contribution to the American political development literature shows how male legislators pursued legislation that served their own interests and how state legislatures and courts interacted to create property reforms essential to changing economics, the project of permanently seizing land from Native people, and protecting slaveholding women and families from economic instability. The reform of property rights included both property as a commodity and also a means of social control and order. Dr. Chatfield’s book furthers our understanding of how gender, federalism, and liberalism interacted in the development of state power.</p><p>In the podcast, Dr. Chatfield generously cites the works of others including&nbsp;<em>Disenfranchising Democracy: Constructing the Electorate in the United States, the United Kingdom, and France</em>&nbsp;(my NBN interview with Dr. Bateman&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/david-a-bateman-disenfranchising-democracy-constructing-the-electorate-in-the-us-the-uk-and-france-cambridge-up-2020/" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a>), Emily Zackin and Chloe N. Thurston’s&nbsp;<em>The Political Development of American Debt Relief&nbsp;</em>(Chicago), and Alena Wolflink’s&nbsp;<em>Claiming Value:The Politics of Priority from Aristotle to Black Lives Matter</em>&nbsp;(Routledge).</p><p><a href="https://du.digication.com/sara-chatfield/home" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. Sara Chatfield</a>&nbsp;is an assistant professor of political science at the University of Denver, where she teaches classes on American politics and law. Her research interests focus on American politics, especially American political development, gender and politics, and methods.</p><p><a href="https://www.sju.edu/faculty/susan-liebell#_ga=2.125106634.1318472952.1578330950-502593983.1578330950" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Susan Liebell&nbsp;</em></a><em>is a Professor of Political Science at Saint Joseph’s University in Philadelphia.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2023 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/sara-chatfield-in-her-own-name-the-politics-of-womens-rights-before-suffrage-columbia-up-2023-Qno_dz5R</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We often narrate the history of women’s rights in the United States by focusing on the fight for suffrage. Yet starting as early as 1835, states expanded married women’s&nbsp;<em>economic&nbsp;</em>rights. How were these statutes passed at a time when women’s political power was severely constrained, including no right to vote in most states? With limited national coordination?&nbsp;</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780231199674" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>In Her Own Name: The Politics of Women’s Rights Before Suffrage</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Columbia UP, 2023), Dr. Sara Chatfield argues that married women’s property rights reform occurred through a two-level process. Within each state, policy developed and cycled through different state-level institutions. Without explicit coordination, these policies spread throughout the states with institutional actors borrowing, copying, and learning from the successes and failures of other states – such that ALL states passed some reform by 1920. Dr. Chatfield’s important contribution to the American political development literature shows how male legislators pursued legislation that served their own interests and how state legislatures and courts interacted to create property reforms essential to changing economics, the project of permanently seizing land from Native people, and protecting slaveholding women and families from economic instability. The reform of property rights included both property as a commodity and also a means of social control and order. Dr. Chatfield’s book furthers our understanding of how gender, federalism, and liberalism interacted in the development of state power.</p><p>In the podcast, Dr. Chatfield generously cites the works of others including&nbsp;<em>Disenfranchising Democracy: Constructing the Electorate in the United States, the United Kingdom, and France</em>&nbsp;(my NBN interview with Dr. Bateman&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/david-a-bateman-disenfranchising-democracy-constructing-the-electorate-in-the-us-the-uk-and-france-cambridge-up-2020/" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a>), Emily Zackin and Chloe N. Thurston’s&nbsp;<em>The Political Development of American Debt Relief&nbsp;</em>(Chicago), and Alena Wolflink’s&nbsp;<em>Claiming Value:The Politics of Priority from Aristotle to Black Lives Matter</em>&nbsp;(Routledge).</p><p><a href="https://du.digication.com/sara-chatfield/home" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. Sara Chatfield</a>&nbsp;is an assistant professor of political science at the University of Denver, where she teaches classes on American politics and law. Her research interests focus on American politics, especially American political development, gender and politics, and methods.</p><p><a href="https://www.sju.edu/faculty/susan-liebell#_ga=2.125106634.1318472952.1578330950-502593983.1578330950" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Susan Liebell&nbsp;</em></a><em>is a Professor of Political Science at Saint Joseph’s University in Philadelphia.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="50904354" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/de8f16a1-5a59-4cc1-b41f-4eaf8b0ddb7d/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=de8f16a1-5a59-4cc1-b41f-4eaf8b0ddb7d&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Sara Chatfield, &quot;In Her Own Name: The Politics of Women’s Rights Before Suffrage&quot; (Columbia UP, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:53:01</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>We often narrate the history of women’s rights in the United States by focusing on the fight for suffrage. Yet starting as early as 1835, states expanded married women’s economic rights. How were these statutes passed at a time when women’s political power was severely constrained, including no right to vote in most states? With limited national coordination? 
In In Her Own Name: The Politics of Women’s Rights Before Suffrage (Columbia UP, 2023), Dr. Sara Chatfield argues that married women’s property rights reform occurred through a two-level process. Within each state, policy developed and cycled through different state-level institutions. Without explicit coordination, these policies spread throughout the states with institutional actors borrowing, copying, and learning from the successes and failures of other states – such that ALL states passed some reform by 1920. Dr. Chatfield’s important contribution to the American political development literature shows how male legislators pursued legislation that served their own interests and how state legislatures and courts interacted to create property reforms essential to changing economics, the project of permanently seizing land from Native people, and protecting slaveholding women and families from economic instability. The reform of property rights included both property as a commodity and also a means of social control and order. Dr. Chatfield’s book furthers our understanding of how gender, federalism, and liberalism interacted in the development of state power.
In the podcast, Dr. Chatfield generously cites the works of others including Disenfranchising Democracy: Constructing the Electorate in the United States, the United Kingdom, and France (my NBN interview with Dr. Bateman here), Emily Zackin and Chloe N. Thurston’s The Political Development of American Debt Relief (Chicago), and Alena Wolflink’s Claiming Value:The Politics of Priority from Aristotle to Black Lives Matter (Routledge).
Dr. Sara Chatfield is an assistant professor of political science at the University of Denver, where she teaches classes on American politics and law. Her research interests focus on American politics, especially American political development, gender and politics, and methods.
Susan Liebell is a Professor of Political Science at Saint Joseph’s University in Philadelphia.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>We often narrate the history of women’s rights in the United States by focusing on the fight for suffrage. Yet starting as early as 1835, states expanded married women’s economic rights. How were these statutes passed at a time when women’s political power was severely constrained, including no right to vote in most states? With limited national coordination? 
In In Her Own Name: The Politics of Women’s Rights Before Suffrage (Columbia UP, 2023), Dr. Sara Chatfield argues that married women’s property rights reform occurred through a two-level process. Within each state, policy developed and cycled through different state-level institutions. Without explicit coordination, these policies spread throughout the states with institutional actors borrowing, copying, and learning from the successes and failures of other states – such that ALL states passed some reform by 1920. Dr. Chatfield’s important contribution to the American political development literature shows how male legislators pursued legislation that served their own interests and how state legislatures and courts interacted to create property reforms essential to changing economics, the project of permanently seizing land from Native people, and protecting slaveholding women and families from economic instability. The reform of property rights included both property as a commodity and also a means of social control and order. Dr. Chatfield’s book furthers our understanding of how gender, federalism, and liberalism interacted in the development of state power.
In the podcast, Dr. Chatfield generously cites the works of others including Disenfranchising Democracy: Constructing the Electorate in the United States, the United Kingdom, and France (my NBN interview with Dr. Bateman here), Emily Zackin and Chloe N. Thurston’s The Political Development of American Debt Relief (Chicago), and Alena Wolflink’s Claiming Value:The Politics of Priority from Aristotle to Black Lives Matter (Routledge).
Dr. Sara Chatfield is an assistant professor of political science at the University of Denver, where she teaches classes on American politics and law. Her research interests focus on American politics, especially American political development, gender and politics, and methods.
Susan Liebell is a Professor of Political Science at Saint Joseph’s University in Philadelphia.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>696</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1655b40e-9cf4-11ee-abd4-63a461538ced</guid>
      <title>Yasser Kureshi, &quot;Seeking Supremacy: The Pursuit of Judicial Power in Pakistan&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2022)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781316516935" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Seeking Supremacy: The Pursuit of Judicial Power in Pakistan</em></a>&nbsp;(Cambridge University Press, 2022) discusses the emergence of the judiciary as an assertive and confrontational center of power which&nbsp;has been the most consequential new feature of Pakistan's political system. This book maps out the evolution of the relationship between the judiciary and military in Pakistan, explaining why Pakistan's high courts shifted from loyal deference to the military to open competition, and confrontation, with military and civilian institutions. Yasser Kureshi demonstrates that a shift in the audiences shaping judicial preferences explains the emergence of the judiciary as an assertive power center. As the judiciary gradually embraced less deferential institutional preferences, a shift in judicial preferences took place and the judiciary sought to play a more expansive and authoritative political role. Using this audience-based approach, Kureshi roots the judiciary in its political, social and institutional context, and develops a generalizable framework that can explain variation and change in judicial-military relations around the world.</p><p><a href="https://www.osga.ox.ac.uk/people/dr-yasser-kureshi" rel="noopener noreferrer">Yasser Kureshi</a>&nbsp;is a Department Lecturer in South Asian Studies at the Oxford School of Global and Area Studies, University of Oxford. Working at the intersection of political science and public law, his research looks at the politics of unelected state institutions outside democratic contexts. In particular, he studies the military and the judiciary and their impact on constitutional configurations and democratic outcomes in authoritarian and post-authoritarian states.</p><p><em>Syed Muhammad Khalid is a MSc student in Modern South Asian Studies at the University of Oxford as a Rhodes Scholar.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2023 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/yasser-kureshi-seeking-supremacy-the-pursuit-of-judicial-power-in-pakistan-cambridge-up-2022-1hR2JYWi</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781316516935" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Seeking Supremacy: The Pursuit of Judicial Power in Pakistan</em></a>&nbsp;(Cambridge University Press, 2022) discusses the emergence of the judiciary as an assertive and confrontational center of power which&nbsp;has been the most consequential new feature of Pakistan's political system. This book maps out the evolution of the relationship between the judiciary and military in Pakistan, explaining why Pakistan's high courts shifted from loyal deference to the military to open competition, and confrontation, with military and civilian institutions. Yasser Kureshi demonstrates that a shift in the audiences shaping judicial preferences explains the emergence of the judiciary as an assertive power center. As the judiciary gradually embraced less deferential institutional preferences, a shift in judicial preferences took place and the judiciary sought to play a more expansive and authoritative political role. Using this audience-based approach, Kureshi roots the judiciary in its political, social and institutional context, and develops a generalizable framework that can explain variation and change in judicial-military relations around the world.</p><p><a href="https://www.osga.ox.ac.uk/people/dr-yasser-kureshi" rel="noopener noreferrer">Yasser Kureshi</a>&nbsp;is a Department Lecturer in South Asian Studies at the Oxford School of Global and Area Studies, University of Oxford. Working at the intersection of political science and public law, his research looks at the politics of unelected state institutions outside democratic contexts. In particular, he studies the military and the judiciary and their impact on constitutional configurations and democratic outcomes in authoritarian and post-authoritarian states.</p><p><em>Syed Muhammad Khalid is a MSc student in Modern South Asian Studies at the University of Oxford as a Rhodes Scholar.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="57395939" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/ae7cc1e3-a2ca-4594-9ac5-1462526fb2e7/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=ae7cc1e3-a2ca-4594-9ac5-1462526fb2e7&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Yasser Kureshi, &quot;Seeking Supremacy: The Pursuit of Judicial Power in Pakistan&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2022)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:59:47</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Seeking Supremacy: The Pursuit of Judicial Power in Pakistan (Cambridge University Press, 2022) discusses the emergence of the judiciary as an assertive and confrontational center of power which has been the most consequential new feature of Pakistan&apos;s political system. This book maps out the evolution of the relationship between the judiciary and military in Pakistan, explaining why Pakistan&apos;s high courts shifted from loyal deference to the military to open competition, and confrontation, with military and civilian institutions. Yasser Kureshi demonstrates that a shift in the audiences shaping judicial preferences explains the emergence of the judiciary as an assertive power center. As the judiciary gradually embraced less deferential institutional preferences, a shift in judicial preferences took place and the judiciary sought to play a more expansive and authoritative political role. Using this audience-based approach, Kureshi roots the judiciary in its political, social and institutional context, and develops a generalizable framework that can explain variation and change in judicial-military relations around the world.
Yasser Kureshi is a Department Lecturer in South Asian Studies at the Oxford School of Global and Area Studies, University of Oxford. Working at the intersection of political science and public law, his research looks at the politics of unelected state institutions outside democratic contexts. In particular, he studies the military and the judiciary and their impact on constitutional configurations and democratic outcomes in authoritarian and post-authoritarian states.
Syed Muhammad Khalid is a MSc student in Modern South Asian Studies at the University of Oxford as a Rhodes Scholar.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Seeking Supremacy: The Pursuit of Judicial Power in Pakistan (Cambridge University Press, 2022) discusses the emergence of the judiciary as an assertive and confrontational center of power which has been the most consequential new feature of Pakistan&apos;s political system. This book maps out the evolution of the relationship between the judiciary and military in Pakistan, explaining why Pakistan&apos;s high courts shifted from loyal deference to the military to open competition, and confrontation, with military and civilian institutions. Yasser Kureshi demonstrates that a shift in the audiences shaping judicial preferences explains the emergence of the judiciary as an assertive power center. As the judiciary gradually embraced less deferential institutional preferences, a shift in judicial preferences took place and the judiciary sought to play a more expansive and authoritative political role. Using this audience-based approach, Kureshi roots the judiciary in its political, social and institutional context, and develops a generalizable framework that can explain variation and change in judicial-military relations around the world.
Yasser Kureshi is a Department Lecturer in South Asian Studies at the Oxford School of Global and Area Studies, University of Oxford. Working at the intersection of political science and public law, his research looks at the politics of unelected state institutions outside democratic contexts. In particular, he studies the military and the judiciary and their impact on constitutional configurations and democratic outcomes in authoritarian and post-authoritarian states.
Syed Muhammad Khalid is a MSc student in Modern South Asian Studies at the University of Oxford as a Rhodes Scholar.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>213</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">c9f03f6a-9aca-11ee-afb4-5fd76bc52a64</guid>
      <title>Gary J. Bass, &quot;Judgement at Tokyo: World War II on Trial and the Making of Modern Asia&quot; (Knopf, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781101947104" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Judgement at Tokyo: World War II on Trial and the Making of Modern Asia</em></a>&nbsp;(Knopf, 2023), a book ten years in the making, is the definitive account of the postwar trial of Japan’s leaders as war criminals, and the impact it had on the modern history of Asia.</p><p>Written by Gary Bass, Professor of Politics and International Affairs at Princeton University, the book shines a much-needed spotlight on the International Military Tribunal for the Far East, the criminal process historically overshadowed by its namesake in Nuremberg for the senior leaders of the Nazi regime in the Third Reich. In the weeks after Japan finally surrendered to the Allies to end World War II, the victorious powers turned to the question of how to move on from years of carnage and destruction. To them, it was clear that Japan’s militaristic leaders needed to be tried and punished for their crimes. For the Allied powers, the trials were an opportunity both to render judgment on their vanquished foes and to create a legal framework to prosecute war crimes and prohibit the use of aggressive war. For the Japanese leaders on trial, it was their chance to argue that their war had been waged to liberate Asia from Western imperialism and that the court was no more than victors’ justice. Professor Bass tells a meticulously-researched compelling story of wartime action, dramatic courtroom battles, and the epic formative years that set the stage for the postwar era in the Asia–Pacific. It should be required reading for anyone interested in the meaning and morality of international justice, in all its messy complexity and contradiction.</p><p><a href="https://essl.leeds.ac.uk/law/staff/1332/mr-alex-batesmith" rel="noopener noreferrer">Alex Batesmith</a>&nbsp;is a Lecturer in Legal Profession in the School of Law at the University of Leeds, and a former barrister and UN war crimes prosecutor, with teaching and research interests in international criminal law, cause lawyering and the legal profession, and law and emotion.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/batesmith/" rel="noopener noreferrer">LInkedIn</a>. Twitter:&nbsp;@batesmith</p><p>His recent publications include:</p><ul>
<li>
<a href="https://counterpress.org.uk/publications/aesthetics-and-counter-aesthetics-of-international-justice/#1634466943999-1d22caf9-d8076232-5aaf4645-b1c7" rel="noopener noreferrer">“‘Poetic Justice Products’: International Justice, Victim Counter-Aesthetics, and the Spectre of the Show Trial”</a>&nbsp;in Christine Schwöbel-Patel and Rob Knox (eds)&nbsp;<em>Aesthetics and Counter-Aesthetics of International Justice</em>&nbsp;(Counterpress, forthcoming 2023, ISBN 978-1-910761-17-5)</li>
<li>
<a href="https://www.routledge.com/Leading-Works-on-the-Legal-Profession/Newman/p/book/9781032182803" rel="noopener noreferrer">"Lawyers who want to make the world a better place – Scheingold and Sarat’s Something to Believe In: Politics, Professionalism, and Cause Lawyering"&nbsp;</a>in D. Newman (ed.)&nbsp;<em>Leading Works on the Legal Profession&nbsp;</em>(Routledge, July 2023), ISBN 978-1-032182-80-3)</li>
<li>
<a href="https://academic.oup.com/jicj/article-abstract/19/4/803/6459130?redirectedFrom=fulltext" rel="noopener noreferrer">“International Prosecutors as Cause Lawyers"&nbsp;</a>(2021)&nbsp;<em>Journal of International Criminal Justice&nbsp;</em>19(4) 803-830 (ISSN 1478-1387)</li>
</ul><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2023 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/gary-j-bass-judgement-at-tokyo-world-war-ii-on-trial-and-the-making-of-modern-asia-knopf-2023-62XS4QNn</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781101947104" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Judgement at Tokyo: World War II on Trial and the Making of Modern Asia</em></a>&nbsp;(Knopf, 2023), a book ten years in the making, is the definitive account of the postwar trial of Japan’s leaders as war criminals, and the impact it had on the modern history of Asia.</p><p>Written by Gary Bass, Professor of Politics and International Affairs at Princeton University, the book shines a much-needed spotlight on the International Military Tribunal for the Far East, the criminal process historically overshadowed by its namesake in Nuremberg for the senior leaders of the Nazi regime in the Third Reich. In the weeks after Japan finally surrendered to the Allies to end World War II, the victorious powers turned to the question of how to move on from years of carnage and destruction. To them, it was clear that Japan’s militaristic leaders needed to be tried and punished for their crimes. For the Allied powers, the trials were an opportunity both to render judgment on their vanquished foes and to create a legal framework to prosecute war crimes and prohibit the use of aggressive war. For the Japanese leaders on trial, it was their chance to argue that their war had been waged to liberate Asia from Western imperialism and that the court was no more than victors’ justice. Professor Bass tells a meticulously-researched compelling story of wartime action, dramatic courtroom battles, and the epic formative years that set the stage for the postwar era in the Asia–Pacific. It should be required reading for anyone interested in the meaning and morality of international justice, in all its messy complexity and contradiction.</p><p><a href="https://essl.leeds.ac.uk/law/staff/1332/mr-alex-batesmith" rel="noopener noreferrer">Alex Batesmith</a>&nbsp;is a Lecturer in Legal Profession in the School of Law at the University of Leeds, and a former barrister and UN war crimes prosecutor, with teaching and research interests in international criminal law, cause lawyering and the legal profession, and law and emotion.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/batesmith/" rel="noopener noreferrer">LInkedIn</a>. Twitter:&nbsp;@batesmith</p><p>His recent publications include:</p><ul>
<li>
<a href="https://counterpress.org.uk/publications/aesthetics-and-counter-aesthetics-of-international-justice/#1634466943999-1d22caf9-d8076232-5aaf4645-b1c7" rel="noopener noreferrer">“‘Poetic Justice Products’: International Justice, Victim Counter-Aesthetics, and the Spectre of the Show Trial”</a>&nbsp;in Christine Schwöbel-Patel and Rob Knox (eds)&nbsp;<em>Aesthetics and Counter-Aesthetics of International Justice</em>&nbsp;(Counterpress, forthcoming 2023, ISBN 978-1-910761-17-5)</li>
<li>
<a href="https://www.routledge.com/Leading-Works-on-the-Legal-Profession/Newman/p/book/9781032182803" rel="noopener noreferrer">"Lawyers who want to make the world a better place – Scheingold and Sarat’s Something to Believe In: Politics, Professionalism, and Cause Lawyering"&nbsp;</a>in D. Newman (ed.)&nbsp;<em>Leading Works on the Legal Profession&nbsp;</em>(Routledge, July 2023), ISBN 978-1-032182-80-3)</li>
<li>
<a href="https://academic.oup.com/jicj/article-abstract/19/4/803/6459130?redirectedFrom=fulltext" rel="noopener noreferrer">“International Prosecutors as Cause Lawyers"&nbsp;</a>(2021)&nbsp;<em>Journal of International Criminal Justice&nbsp;</em>19(4) 803-830 (ISSN 1478-1387)</li>
</ul><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="30201146" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/feb59e86-d368-46da-ac12-d68ba680f30e/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=feb59e86-d368-46da-ac12-d68ba680f30e&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Gary J. Bass, &quot;Judgement at Tokyo: World War II on Trial and the Making of Modern Asia&quot; (Knopf, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:31:27</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Judgement at Tokyo: World War II on Trial and the Making of Modern Asia (Knopf, 2023), a book ten years in the making, is the definitive account of the postwar trial of Japan’s leaders as war criminals, and the impact it had on the modern history of Asia.
Written by Gary Bass, Professor of Politics and International Affairs at Princeton University, the book shines a much-needed spotlight on the International Military Tribunal for the Far East, the criminal process historically overshadowed by its namesake in Nuremberg for the senior leaders of the Nazi regime in the Third Reich. In the weeks after Japan finally surrendered to the Allies to end World War II, the victorious powers turned to the question of how to move on from years of carnage and destruction. To them, it was clear that Japan’s militaristic leaders needed to be tried and punished for their crimes. For the Allied powers, the trials were an opportunity both to render judgment on their vanquished foes and to create a legal framework to prosecute war crimes and prohibit the use of aggressive war. For the Japanese leaders on trial, it was their chance to argue that their war had been waged to liberate Asia from Western imperialism and that the court was no more than victors’ justice. Professor Bass tells a meticulously-researched compelling story of wartime action, dramatic courtroom battles, and the epic formative years that set the stage for the postwar era in the Asia–Pacific. It should be required reading for anyone interested in the meaning and morality of international justice, in all its messy complexity and contradiction.
Alex Batesmith is a Lecturer in Legal Profession in the School of Law at the University of Leeds, and a former barrister and UN war crimes prosecutor, with teaching and research interests in international criminal law, cause lawyering and the legal profession, and law and emotion. LInkedIn. Twitter: @batesmith
His recent publications include:
“‘Poetic Justice Products’: International Justice, Victim Counter-Aesthetics, and the Spectre of the Show Trial” in Christine Schwöbel-Patel and Rob Knox (eds) Aesthetics and Counter-Aesthetics of International Justice (Counterpress, forthcoming 2023, ISBN 978-1-910761-17-5)
&quot;Lawyers who want to make the world a better place – Scheingold and Sarat’s Something to Believe In: Politics, Professionalism, and Cause Lawyering&quot; in D. Newman (ed.) Leading Works on the Legal Profession (Routledge, July 2023), ISBN 978-1-032182-80-3)
“International Prosecutors as Cause Lawyers&quot; (2021) Journal of International Criminal Justice 19(4) 803-830 (ISSN 1478-1387)
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Judgement at Tokyo: World War II on Trial and the Making of Modern Asia (Knopf, 2023), a book ten years in the making, is the definitive account of the postwar trial of Japan’s leaders as war criminals, and the impact it had on the modern history of Asia.
Written by Gary Bass, Professor of Politics and International Affairs at Princeton University, the book shines a much-needed spotlight on the International Military Tribunal for the Far East, the criminal process historically overshadowed by its namesake in Nuremberg for the senior leaders of the Nazi regime in the Third Reich. In the weeks after Japan finally surrendered to the Allies to end World War II, the victorious powers turned to the question of how to move on from years of carnage and destruction. To them, it was clear that Japan’s militaristic leaders needed to be tried and punished for their crimes. For the Allied powers, the trials were an opportunity both to render judgment on their vanquished foes and to create a legal framework to prosecute war crimes and prohibit the use of aggressive war. For the Japanese leaders on trial, it was their chance to argue that their war had been waged to liberate Asia from Western imperialism and that the court was no more than victors’ justice. Professor Bass tells a meticulously-researched compelling story of wartime action, dramatic courtroom battles, and the epic formative years that set the stage for the postwar era in the Asia–Pacific. It should be required reading for anyone interested in the meaning and morality of international justice, in all its messy complexity and contradiction.
Alex Batesmith is a Lecturer in Legal Profession in the School of Law at the University of Leeds, and a former barrister and UN war crimes prosecutor, with teaching and research interests in international criminal law, cause lawyering and the legal profession, and law and emotion. LInkedIn. Twitter: @batesmith
His recent publications include:
“‘Poetic Justice Products’: International Justice, Victim Counter-Aesthetics, and the Spectre of the Show Trial” in Christine Schwöbel-Patel and Rob Knox (eds) Aesthetics and Counter-Aesthetics of International Justice (Counterpress, forthcoming 2023, ISBN 978-1-910761-17-5)
&quot;Lawyers who want to make the world a better place – Scheingold and Sarat’s Something to Believe In: Politics, Professionalism, and Cause Lawyering&quot; in D. Newman (ed.) Leading Works on the Legal Profession (Routledge, July 2023), ISBN 978-1-032182-80-3)
“International Prosecutors as Cause Lawyers&quot; (2021) Journal of International Criminal Justice 19(4) 803-830 (ISSN 1478-1387)
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>206</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7622bde2-9ab4-11ee-aa20-5711fe9d6949</guid>
      <title>Sally Frances Low, &quot;Colonial Law Making: Cambodia Under the French&quot; (NUS Press, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In 1863 the French established a protectorate over the kingdom of Cambodia. The protectorate, along with Vietnam and Laos, later became part of the colonial state of French Indochina. Part of the French ‘civilizing mission’ in Cambodia involved reforming Cambodian law and legal processes.&nbsp;</p><p>Sally Low’s pioneering study,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9789813252448" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Colonial Law Making: Cambodia under the French</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(NUS Press, 2023), tells the story of the encounter between what she calls two different legal and social ‘cosmologies’: Cambodia’s indigenous legal tradition and modern French legal thinking. While the French claimed they were modernizing Cambodian law, in fact they imposed many elements of French law. Initially, they dispossessed the king of much of his judicial authority. But ironically, the French reform of Cambodian law retained the monarchy as the semi-divine source of law, and royal power was subsequently legally embedded into new national institutions, the law, and the constitutions. At independence in 1953, 90 years after the French began their protectorate, Cambodia’s King Sihanouk inherited this legal apparatus which had done so much to enhance the power of the executive over the judiciary.</p><p><em>﻿Patrick Jory teaches Southeast Asian History in the School of Historical and Philosophical Inquiry at the University of Queensland. He can be reached at: p.jory@uq.edu.au.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2023 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/sally-frances-low-colonial-law-making-cambodia-under-the-french-nus-press-2023-YfBM73kt</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In 1863 the French established a protectorate over the kingdom of Cambodia. The protectorate, along with Vietnam and Laos, later became part of the colonial state of French Indochina. Part of the French ‘civilizing mission’ in Cambodia involved reforming Cambodian law and legal processes.&nbsp;</p><p>Sally Low’s pioneering study,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9789813252448" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Colonial Law Making: Cambodia under the French</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(NUS Press, 2023), tells the story of the encounter between what she calls two different legal and social ‘cosmologies’: Cambodia’s indigenous legal tradition and modern French legal thinking. While the French claimed they were modernizing Cambodian law, in fact they imposed many elements of French law. Initially, they dispossessed the king of much of his judicial authority. But ironically, the French reform of Cambodian law retained the monarchy as the semi-divine source of law, and royal power was subsequently legally embedded into new national institutions, the law, and the constitutions. At independence in 1953, 90 years after the French began their protectorate, Cambodia’s King Sihanouk inherited this legal apparatus which had done so much to enhance the power of the executive over the judiciary.</p><p><em>﻿Patrick Jory teaches Southeast Asian History in the School of Historical and Philosophical Inquiry at the University of Queensland. He can be reached at: p.jory@uq.edu.au.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="44092708" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/60297656-8093-48ba-a037-5a33a9e79c35/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=60297656-8093-48ba-a037-5a33a9e79c35&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Sally Frances Low, &quot;Colonial Law Making: Cambodia Under the French&quot; (NUS Press, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:45:55</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In 1863 the French established a protectorate over the kingdom of Cambodia. The protectorate, along with Vietnam and Laos, later became part of the colonial state of French Indochina. Part of the French ‘civilizing mission’ in Cambodia involved reforming Cambodian law and legal processes. 
Sally Low’s pioneering study, Colonial Law Making: Cambodia under the French (NUS Press, 2023), tells the story of the encounter between what she calls two different legal and social ‘cosmologies’: Cambodia’s indigenous legal tradition and modern French legal thinking. While the French claimed they were modernizing Cambodian law, in fact they imposed many elements of French law. Initially, they dispossessed the king of much of his judicial authority. But ironically, the French reform of Cambodian law retained the monarchy as the semi-divine source of law, and royal power was subsequently legally embedded into new national institutions, the law, and the constitutions. At independence in 1953, 90 years after the French began their protectorate, Cambodia’s King Sihanouk inherited this legal apparatus which had done so much to enhance the power of the executive over the judiciary.
﻿Patrick Jory teaches Southeast Asian History in the School of Historical and Philosophical Inquiry at the University of Queensland. He can be reached at: p.jory@uq.edu.au.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In 1863 the French established a protectorate over the kingdom of Cambodia. The protectorate, along with Vietnam and Laos, later became part of the colonial state of French Indochina. Part of the French ‘civilizing mission’ in Cambodia involved reforming Cambodian law and legal processes. 
Sally Low’s pioneering study, Colonial Law Making: Cambodia under the French (NUS Press, 2023), tells the story of the encounter between what she calls two different legal and social ‘cosmologies’: Cambodia’s indigenous legal tradition and modern French legal thinking. While the French claimed they were modernizing Cambodian law, in fact they imposed many elements of French law. Initially, they dispossessed the king of much of his judicial authority. But ironically, the French reform of Cambodian law retained the monarchy as the semi-divine source of law, and royal power was subsequently legally embedded into new national institutions, the law, and the constitutions. At independence in 1953, 90 years after the French began their protectorate, Cambodia’s King Sihanouk inherited this legal apparatus which had done so much to enhance the power of the executive over the judiciary.
﻿Patrick Jory teaches Southeast Asian History in the School of Historical and Philosophical Inquiry at the University of Queensland. He can be reached at: p.jory@uq.edu.au.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>137</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">32176a64-ecde-11ed-9841-739ae4e0bee6</guid>
      <title>Lynette J. Chua, &quot;The Politics of Rights and Southeast Asia&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2022)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781108719353" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Politics of Rights and Southeast Asia</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Cambridge UP, 2022) offers an empirically-grounded approach to understanding the mobilisation of rights in the region. Instead of deriving definitions of rights from abstract philosophical text, court verdicts or statutes, the book advances a socio-legal approach which considers rights as social practices that take meaning from the various ways in which people enact, mobilise, and practice these rights. In doing so, the book offers a point of view that goes beyond the liberal versus critical rights perspective debate.</p><p>The book is structured in three sections, with each section focusing on (1) the structural conditions that influence the emergence of rights mobilisation in the region; (2) the various ways in which people mobilise these rights; and (3) the consequences of these mobilisations. It concludes with a call to give rights a chance while embracing its incoherence.</p><p>Lynette J. Chua is Professor of Law at the National University of Singapore (NUS).</p><p><em>Like this interview? You may also be interested in:</em></p><ul>
<li>Donald P. Haider-Markel and Jami K. Taylor,&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/donald-p-haider-markel-and-jami-k-taylor-transgender-rights-and-politics-university-of-michigan-up-2014-2#entry:16511@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Transgender Rights and Politics</em></a>&nbsp;(University of Michigan Press, 2014)</li>
<li>Rachel E Brulé,&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/women-power-and-property#entry:134989@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Women, Power, and Property</em></a>&nbsp;(Cambridge University Press, 2020)</li>
</ul><p><br></p><p><em>Nicole Curato is a Professor of Sociology in the Centre for Deliberative Democracy and Global Governance at the University of Canberra. She co-hosts the&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/southeast-asian-studies/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books in Southeast Asia Studies channel</em></a><em>.</em></p><p><em>This episode was created in collaboration with Erron C. Medina of the Development Studies Program of Ateneo De Manila University and Nicole Anne Revita.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2023 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/lynette-j-chua-the-politics-of-rights-and-southeast-asia-cambridge-up-2022-yzJT7L0K</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781108719353" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Politics of Rights and Southeast Asia</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Cambridge UP, 2022) offers an empirically-grounded approach to understanding the mobilisation of rights in the region. Instead of deriving definitions of rights from abstract philosophical text, court verdicts or statutes, the book advances a socio-legal approach which considers rights as social practices that take meaning from the various ways in which people enact, mobilise, and practice these rights. In doing so, the book offers a point of view that goes beyond the liberal versus critical rights perspective debate.</p><p>The book is structured in three sections, with each section focusing on (1) the structural conditions that influence the emergence of rights mobilisation in the region; (2) the various ways in which people mobilise these rights; and (3) the consequences of these mobilisations. It concludes with a call to give rights a chance while embracing its incoherence.</p><p>Lynette J. Chua is Professor of Law at the National University of Singapore (NUS).</p><p><em>Like this interview? You may also be interested in:</em></p><ul>
<li>Donald P. Haider-Markel and Jami K. Taylor,&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/donald-p-haider-markel-and-jami-k-taylor-transgender-rights-and-politics-university-of-michigan-up-2014-2#entry:16511@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Transgender Rights and Politics</em></a>&nbsp;(University of Michigan Press, 2014)</li>
<li>Rachel E Brulé,&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/women-power-and-property#entry:134989@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Women, Power, and Property</em></a>&nbsp;(Cambridge University Press, 2020)</li>
</ul><p><br></p><p><em>Nicole Curato is a Professor of Sociology in the Centre for Deliberative Democracy and Global Governance at the University of Canberra. She co-hosts the&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/category/southeast-asian-studies/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books in Southeast Asia Studies channel</em></a><em>.</em></p><p><em>This episode was created in collaboration with Erron C. Medina of the Development Studies Program of Ateneo De Manila University and Nicole Anne Revita.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="25025663" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/80d34c25-14e7-40af-ab78-45af684ffc94/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=80d34c25-14e7-40af-ab78-45af684ffc94&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Lynette J. Chua, &quot;The Politics of Rights and Southeast Asia&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2022)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:26:03</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The Politics of Rights and Southeast Asia (Cambridge UP, 2022) offers an empirically-grounded approach to understanding the mobilisation of rights in the region. Instead of deriving definitions of rights from abstract philosophical text, court verdicts or statutes, the book advances a socio-legal approach which considers rights as social practices that take meaning from the various ways in which people enact, mobilise, and practice these rights. In doing so, the book offers a point of view that goes beyond the liberal versus critical rights perspective debate.
The book is structured in three sections, with each section focusing on (1) the structural conditions that influence the emergence of rights mobilisation in the region; (2) the various ways in which people mobilise these rights; and (3) the consequences of these mobilisations. It concludes with a call to give rights a chance while embracing its incoherence.
Lynette J. Chua is Professor of Law at the National University of Singapore (NUS).
Like this interview? You may also be interested in:
Donald P. Haider-Markel and Jami K. Taylor, Transgender Rights and Politics (University of Michigan Press, 2014)
Rachel E Brulé, Women, Power, and Property (Cambridge University Press, 2020)
Nicole Curato is a Professor of Sociology in the Centre for Deliberative Democracy and Global Governance at the University of Canberra. She co-hosts the New Books in Southeast Asia Studies channel.
This episode was created in collaboration with Erron C. Medina of the Development Studies Program of Ateneo De Manila University and Nicole Anne Revita.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Politics of Rights and Southeast Asia (Cambridge UP, 2022) offers an empirically-grounded approach to understanding the mobilisation of rights in the region. Instead of deriving definitions of rights from abstract philosophical text, court verdicts or statutes, the book advances a socio-legal approach which considers rights as social practices that take meaning from the various ways in which people enact, mobilise, and practice these rights. In doing so, the book offers a point of view that goes beyond the liberal versus critical rights perspective debate.
The book is structured in three sections, with each section focusing on (1) the structural conditions that influence the emergence of rights mobilisation in the region; (2) the various ways in which people mobilise these rights; and (3) the consequences of these mobilisations. It concludes with a call to give rights a chance while embracing its incoherence.
Lynette J. Chua is Professor of Law at the National University of Singapore (NUS).
Like this interview? You may also be interested in:
Donald P. Haider-Markel and Jami K. Taylor, Transgender Rights and Politics (University of Michigan Press, 2014)
Rachel E Brulé, Women, Power, and Property (Cambridge University Press, 2020)
Nicole Curato is a Professor of Sociology in the Centre for Deliberative Democracy and Global Governance at the University of Canberra. She co-hosts the New Books in Southeast Asia Studies channel.
This episode was created in collaboration with Erron C. Medina of the Development Studies Program of Ateneo De Manila University and Nicole Anne Revita.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>126</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">098bdf0e-9921-11ee-9667-bbf92cc95260</guid>
      <title>Kathy Stuart, &quot;Suicide by Proxy in Early Modern Germany: Crime, Sin and Salvation&quot; (Palgrave Macmillan, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Suicide by Proxy became a major societal problem after 1650. Suicidal people committed capital crimes with the explicit goal of “earning” their executions, as a short-cut to their salvation. Desiring to die repentantly at the hands of divinely-instituted government, perpetrators hoped to escape eternal damnation that befell direct suicides.&nbsp;</p><p>In&nbsp;<em>﻿</em><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9783031252433" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Suicide by Proxy in Early Modern Germany: Crime, Sin, and Salvation</em>&nbsp;</a>﻿(Palgrave Macmillan, 2023),&nbsp;Kathy Stuart shows how this crime emerged as an unintended consequence of aggressive social disciplining campaigns by confessional states. Paradoxically, suicide by proxy exposed the limits of early modern state power, as governments struggled unsuccessfully to suppress the tactic. Some perpetrators committed arson or blasphemy, or confessed to long-past crimes, usually infanticide, or bestiality. Most frequently, however, they murdered young children, believing that their innocent victims would also enter paradise. The crime had cross-confessional appeal, as illustrated in case studies of Lutheran Hamburg and Catholic Vienna.</p><p><em>﻿</em><a href="https://www.sit.edu/sit_faculty/jana-byars-phd/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Jana Byars</em></a><em>&nbsp;is an independent scholar located in Amsterdam.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2023 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/kathy-stuart-suicide-by-proxy-in-early-modern-germany-crime-sin-and-salvation-palgrave-macmillan-2023-2SbN_1s1</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Suicide by Proxy became a major societal problem after 1650. Suicidal people committed capital crimes with the explicit goal of “earning” their executions, as a short-cut to their salvation. Desiring to die repentantly at the hands of divinely-instituted government, perpetrators hoped to escape eternal damnation that befell direct suicides.&nbsp;</p><p>In&nbsp;<em>﻿</em><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9783031252433" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Suicide by Proxy in Early Modern Germany: Crime, Sin, and Salvation</em>&nbsp;</a>﻿(Palgrave Macmillan, 2023),&nbsp;Kathy Stuart shows how this crime emerged as an unintended consequence of aggressive social disciplining campaigns by confessional states. Paradoxically, suicide by proxy exposed the limits of early modern state power, as governments struggled unsuccessfully to suppress the tactic. Some perpetrators committed arson or blasphemy, or confessed to long-past crimes, usually infanticide, or bestiality. Most frequently, however, they murdered young children, believing that their innocent victims would also enter paradise. The crime had cross-confessional appeal, as illustrated in case studies of Lutheran Hamburg and Catholic Vienna.</p><p><em>﻿</em><a href="https://www.sit.edu/sit_faculty/jana-byars-phd/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Jana Byars</em></a><em>&nbsp;is an independent scholar located in Amsterdam.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="63879609" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/b09d8c4e-c3a7-4a29-acc6-dc34ac5cb9c8/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=b09d8c4e-c3a7-4a29-acc6-dc34ac5cb9c8&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Kathy Stuart, &quot;Suicide by Proxy in Early Modern Germany: Crime, Sin and Salvation&quot; (Palgrave Macmillan, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:06:32</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Suicide by Proxy became a major societal problem after 1650. Suicidal people committed capital crimes with the explicit goal of “earning” their executions, as a short-cut to their salvation. Desiring to die repentantly at the hands of divinely-instituted government, perpetrators hoped to escape eternal damnation that befell direct suicides. 
In ﻿Suicide by Proxy in Early Modern Germany: Crime, Sin, and Salvation ﻿(Palgrave Macmillan, 2023), Kathy Stuart shows how this crime emerged as an unintended consequence of aggressive social disciplining campaigns by confessional states. Paradoxically, suicide by proxy exposed the limits of early modern state power, as governments struggled unsuccessfully to suppress the tactic. Some perpetrators committed arson or blasphemy, or confessed to long-past crimes, usually infanticide, or bestiality. Most frequently, however, they murdered young children, believing that their innocent victims would also enter paradise. The crime had cross-confessional appeal, as illustrated in case studies of Lutheran Hamburg and Catholic Vienna.
﻿Jana Byars is an independent scholar located in Amsterdam.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Suicide by Proxy became a major societal problem after 1650. Suicidal people committed capital crimes with the explicit goal of “earning” their executions, as a short-cut to their salvation. Desiring to die repentantly at the hands of divinely-instituted government, perpetrators hoped to escape eternal damnation that befell direct suicides. 
In ﻿Suicide by Proxy in Early Modern Germany: Crime, Sin, and Salvation ﻿(Palgrave Macmillan, 2023), Kathy Stuart shows how this crime emerged as an unintended consequence of aggressive social disciplining campaigns by confessional states. Paradoxically, suicide by proxy exposed the limits of early modern state power, as governments struggled unsuccessfully to suppress the tactic. Some perpetrators committed arson or blasphemy, or confessed to long-past crimes, usually infanticide, or bestiality. Most frequently, however, they murdered young children, believing that their innocent victims would also enter paradise. The crime had cross-confessional appeal, as illustrated in case studies of Lutheran Hamburg and Catholic Vienna.
﻿Jana Byars is an independent scholar located in Amsterdam.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>58</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">d8553932-97a2-11ee-9636-8f8cb30a05c5</guid>
      <title>Julian Go, &quot;Policing Empires: Militarization, Race, and the Imperial Boomerang in Britain and the US&quot; (Oxford UP, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The police response to protests erupting on America's streets in recent years has made the militarization of policing painfully transparent. Yet, properly demilitarizing the police requires a deeper understanding of its historical development, causes, and social logics.&nbsp;</p><p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197621660" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Policing Empires: Militarization, Race, and the Imperial Boomerang in Britain and the US</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Oxford UP, 2023) offers a postcolonial historical sociology of police militarization in Britain and the United States to aid that effort. Julian Go tracks when, why, and how British and US police departments have adopted military tactics, tools, and technologies for domestic use. Go reveals that police militarization has occurred since the very founding of modern policing in the nineteenth century into the present, and that it is an effect of the "imperial boomerang."&nbsp;<em>Policing Empires</em>&nbsp;thereby unlocks the dirty secret of police militarization: Police have brought imperial practices home to militarize themselves in response to perceived racialized threats from minority and immigrant populations.</p><p><em>Jeffrey Lamson is a PhD student in world history at Northeastern University. His research focuses on the history of police technology, its relationship to the history of police reform, and its place at the intersection of U.S. domestic policing and global counterinsurgency.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2023 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/julian-go-policing-empires-militarization-race-and-the-imperial-boomerang-in-britain-and-the-us-oxford-up-2023-fGi6yhYK</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The police response to protests erupting on America's streets in recent years has made the militarization of policing painfully transparent. Yet, properly demilitarizing the police requires a deeper understanding of its historical development, causes, and social logics.&nbsp;</p><p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197621660" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Policing Empires: Militarization, Race, and the Imperial Boomerang in Britain and the US</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Oxford UP, 2023) offers a postcolonial historical sociology of police militarization in Britain and the United States to aid that effort. Julian Go tracks when, why, and how British and US police departments have adopted military tactics, tools, and technologies for domestic use. Go reveals that police militarization has occurred since the very founding of modern policing in the nineteenth century into the present, and that it is an effect of the "imperial boomerang."&nbsp;<em>Policing Empires</em>&nbsp;thereby unlocks the dirty secret of police militarization: Police have brought imperial practices home to militarize themselves in response to perceived racialized threats from minority and immigrant populations.</p><p><em>Jeffrey Lamson is a PhD student in world history at Northeastern University. His research focuses on the history of police technology, its relationship to the history of police reform, and its place at the intersection of U.S. domestic policing and global counterinsurgency.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="51557477" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/a992858c-ed8e-49f2-a620-ed7cc374796f/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=a992858c-ed8e-49f2-a620-ed7cc374796f&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Julian Go, &quot;Policing Empires: Militarization, Race, and the Imperial Boomerang in Britain and the US&quot; (Oxford UP, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:53:42</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The police response to protests erupting on America&apos;s streets in recent years has made the militarization of policing painfully transparent. Yet, properly demilitarizing the police requires a deeper understanding of its historical development, causes, and social logics. 
Policing Empires: Militarization, Race, and the Imperial Boomerang in Britain and the US (Oxford UP, 2023) offers a postcolonial historical sociology of police militarization in Britain and the United States to aid that effort. Julian Go tracks when, why, and how British and US police departments have adopted military tactics, tools, and technologies for domestic use. Go reveals that police militarization has occurred since the very founding of modern policing in the nineteenth century into the present, and that it is an effect of the &quot;imperial boomerang.&quot; Policing Empires thereby unlocks the dirty secret of police militarization: Police have brought imperial practices home to militarize themselves in response to perceived racialized threats from minority and immigrant populations.
Jeffrey Lamson is a PhD student in world history at Northeastern University. His research focuses on the history of police technology, its relationship to the history of police reform, and its place at the intersection of U.S. domestic policing and global counterinsurgency.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The police response to protests erupting on America&apos;s streets in recent years has made the militarization of policing painfully transparent. Yet, properly demilitarizing the police requires a deeper understanding of its historical development, causes, and social logics. 
Policing Empires: Militarization, Race, and the Imperial Boomerang in Britain and the US (Oxford UP, 2023) offers a postcolonial historical sociology of police militarization in Britain and the United States to aid that effort. Julian Go tracks when, why, and how British and US police departments have adopted military tactics, tools, and technologies for domestic use. Go reveals that police militarization has occurred since the very founding of modern policing in the nineteenth century into the present, and that it is an effect of the &quot;imperial boomerang.&quot; Policing Empires thereby unlocks the dirty secret of police militarization: Police have brought imperial practices home to militarize themselves in response to perceived racialized threats from minority and immigrant populations.
Jeffrey Lamson is a PhD student in world history at Northeastern University. His research focuses on the history of police technology, its relationship to the history of police reform, and its place at the intersection of U.S. domestic policing and global counterinsurgency.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>18</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">93982bf0-986b-11ee-826a-53aec126ba63</guid>
      <title>Melinda N. Ritchie, &quot;Backdoor Lawmaking: Evading Obstacles in the US Congress&quot; (Oxford UP, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Civics textbooks focus on how Congress makes policy through the legislative process, but the reality is that members of Congress have limited opportunities to advance their policy priorities. In fact, less than five percent of the bills that are introduced in Congress become law. Even the most tenacious legislators are confronted by bicameralism, partisan gridlock, chamber procedures, leadership's control of the agenda, and the diverse interests of 534 other members of Congress. What strategies do lawmakers have for navigating these challenges?</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197670491" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Backdoor Lawmaking: Evading Obstacles in the US Congress</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Oxford University Press, 2023), Dr. Melinda N. Ritchie reveals how members of Congress use the federal bureaucracy as a backdoor for policymaking. Today, more law in the United States is made by unelected bureaucrats through federal agency regulations than with congressional statute. Ritchie argues that the bureaucracy's growing role in policymaking offers lawmakers a discreet way to represent controversial interests outside of the formal constraints of Congress. Lawmakers overcome obstacles in the legislative process by substituting agency regulations for legislation and pressuring agencies to make policy changes that would not pass Congress.</p><p>Drawing on an original dataset constructed from records obtained under the Freedom of Information Act, Dr. Ritchie traces the interactions between members of Congress and federal agencies to illustrate how these communications function as part of a lawmaker's overarching strategy for policymaking. Original and timely, Backdoor Lawmaking explains how members of Congress exploit the separation of powers and evade the lawmaking process established in the US Constitution.</p><p><br></p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;forthcoming book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2023 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/melinda-n-ritchie-backdoor-lawmaking-evading-obstacles-in-the-us-congress-oxford-up-2023-5oreZn96</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Civics textbooks focus on how Congress makes policy through the legislative process, but the reality is that members of Congress have limited opportunities to advance their policy priorities. In fact, less than five percent of the bills that are introduced in Congress become law. Even the most tenacious legislators are confronted by bicameralism, partisan gridlock, chamber procedures, leadership's control of the agenda, and the diverse interests of 534 other members of Congress. What strategies do lawmakers have for navigating these challenges?</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197670491" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Backdoor Lawmaking: Evading Obstacles in the US Congress</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Oxford University Press, 2023), Dr. Melinda N. Ritchie reveals how members of Congress use the federal bureaucracy as a backdoor for policymaking. Today, more law in the United States is made by unelected bureaucrats through federal agency regulations than with congressional statute. Ritchie argues that the bureaucracy's growing role in policymaking offers lawmakers a discreet way to represent controversial interests outside of the formal constraints of Congress. Lawmakers overcome obstacles in the legislative process by substituting agency regulations for legislation and pressuring agencies to make policy changes that would not pass Congress.</p><p>Drawing on an original dataset constructed from records obtained under the Freedom of Information Act, Dr. Ritchie traces the interactions between members of Congress and federal agencies to illustrate how these communications function as part of a lawmaker's overarching strategy for policymaking. Original and timely, Backdoor Lawmaking explains how members of Congress exploit the separation of powers and evade the lawmaking process established in the US Constitution.</p><p><br></p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;forthcoming book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="38036834" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/7b9209c7-cb77-4ea1-815a-6c624e842c20/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=7b9209c7-cb77-4ea1-815a-6c624e842c20&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Melinda N. Ritchie, &quot;Backdoor Lawmaking: Evading Obstacles in the US Congress&quot; (Oxford UP, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:39:37</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Civics textbooks focus on how Congress makes policy through the legislative process, but the reality is that members of Congress have limited opportunities to advance their policy priorities. In fact, less than five percent of the bills that are introduced in Congress become law. Even the most tenacious legislators are confronted by bicameralism, partisan gridlock, chamber procedures, leadership&apos;s control of the agenda, and the diverse interests of 534 other members of Congress. What strategies do lawmakers have for navigating these challenges?
In Backdoor Lawmaking: Evading Obstacles in the US Congress (Oxford University Press, 2023), Dr. Melinda N. Ritchie reveals how members of Congress use the federal bureaucracy as a backdoor for policymaking. Today, more law in the United States is made by unelected bureaucrats through federal agency regulations than with congressional statute. Ritchie argues that the bureaucracy&apos;s growing role in policymaking offers lawmakers a discreet way to represent controversial interests outside of the formal constraints of Congress. Lawmakers overcome obstacles in the legislative process by substituting agency regulations for legislation and pressuring agencies to make policy changes that would not pass Congress.
Drawing on an original dataset constructed from records obtained under the Freedom of Information Act, Dr. Ritchie traces the interactions between members of Congress and federal agencies to illustrate how these communications function as part of a lawmaker&apos;s overarching strategy for policymaking. Original and timely, Backdoor Lawmaking explains how members of Congress exploit the separation of powers and evade the lawmaking process established in the US Constitution.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose forthcoming book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Civics textbooks focus on how Congress makes policy through the legislative process, but the reality is that members of Congress have limited opportunities to advance their policy priorities. In fact, less than five percent of the bills that are introduced in Congress become law. Even the most tenacious legislators are confronted by bicameralism, partisan gridlock, chamber procedures, leadership&apos;s control of the agenda, and the diverse interests of 534 other members of Congress. What strategies do lawmakers have for navigating these challenges?
In Backdoor Lawmaking: Evading Obstacles in the US Congress (Oxford University Press, 2023), Dr. Melinda N. Ritchie reveals how members of Congress use the federal bureaucracy as a backdoor for policymaking. Today, more law in the United States is made by unelected bureaucrats through federal agency regulations than with congressional statute. Ritchie argues that the bureaucracy&apos;s growing role in policymaking offers lawmakers a discreet way to represent controversial interests outside of the formal constraints of Congress. Lawmakers overcome obstacles in the legislative process by substituting agency regulations for legislation and pressuring agencies to make policy changes that would not pass Congress.
Drawing on an original dataset constructed from records obtained under the Freedom of Information Act, Dr. Ritchie traces the interactions between members of Congress and federal agencies to illustrate how these communications function as part of a lawmaker&apos;s overarching strategy for policymaking. Original and timely, Backdoor Lawmaking explains how members of Congress exploit the separation of powers and evade the lawmaking process established in the US Constitution.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose forthcoming book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>694</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2b747650-96db-11ee-a4b1-af4b74abeeb8</guid>
      <title>Tristan G. Brown, &quot;Laws of the Land: Fengshui and the State in Qing Dynasty China&quot; (Princeton UP, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Welcome to another episode of New Books in Chinese Studies. I am your host, Julia Keblinska, and I am speaking today to Prof. Tristan Brown about his book,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691246734" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Laws of the Land: Fengshui and the State in Qing Dynasty China</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Princeton UP, 2023). Brown’s book considers fengshui, that is, the knowledge of orienting structures, such as graves and houses, in accordance with well-established cosmological principles, as an administrative technology and language of power that was intrinsic to governance through the Qing legal code. Fengshui has long been dismissed as a “superstition” whose historical significance is limited to its obstruction of (narrowly) infrastructural development and (broadly) modernization.&nbsp;<em>Laws of the Land</em>&nbsp;instead pushes us to understand fengshui as a form of knowledge production that allowed the state to govern in an era of increasing resource scarcity and crisis.&nbsp;</p><p>The book covers cases related to land use (and misuse) in relation to graves, examination success, and mining concerns. It introduces readers to a cast of claimants, defendants, and legal “experts,” including clerks who meticulously mapped conflicted landscapes and geomancers who gave evidence in court. In his analysis of fengshui and Qing dynastic collapse, Brown builds upon the work of other scholars who reject narratives of Chinese “reaction” to Western influence and incursion; he posits instead the legal system’s entanglement with fengshui shows a vibrant interaction of various epistemological systems. I am very much looking forward to my conversation with Prof. Brown about the “life and death of Qing landscape.”</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2023 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/tristan-g-brown-laws-of-the-land-fengshui-and-the-state-in-qing-dynasty-china-princeton-up-2023-n8Od1BKN</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Welcome to another episode of New Books in Chinese Studies. I am your host, Julia Keblinska, and I am speaking today to Prof. Tristan Brown about his book,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691246734" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Laws of the Land: Fengshui and the State in Qing Dynasty China</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Princeton UP, 2023). Brown’s book considers fengshui, that is, the knowledge of orienting structures, such as graves and houses, in accordance with well-established cosmological principles, as an administrative technology and language of power that was intrinsic to governance through the Qing legal code. Fengshui has long been dismissed as a “superstition” whose historical significance is limited to its obstruction of (narrowly) infrastructural development and (broadly) modernization.&nbsp;<em>Laws of the Land</em>&nbsp;instead pushes us to understand fengshui as a form of knowledge production that allowed the state to govern in an era of increasing resource scarcity and crisis.&nbsp;</p><p>The book covers cases related to land use (and misuse) in relation to graves, examination success, and mining concerns. It introduces readers to a cast of claimants, defendants, and legal “experts,” including clerks who meticulously mapped conflicted landscapes and geomancers who gave evidence in court. In his analysis of fengshui and Qing dynastic collapse, Brown builds upon the work of other scholars who reject narratives of Chinese “reaction” to Western influence and incursion; he posits instead the legal system’s entanglement with fengshui shows a vibrant interaction of various epistemological systems. I am very much looking forward to my conversation with Prof. Brown about the “life and death of Qing landscape.”</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="55263357" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/b03d55a8-64b7-4dd2-8c64-3b24606a2c0a/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=b03d55a8-64b7-4dd2-8c64-3b24606a2c0a&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Tristan G. Brown, &quot;Laws of the Land: Fengshui and the State in Qing Dynasty China&quot; (Princeton UP, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:57:33</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Welcome to another episode of New Books in Chinese Studies. I am your host, Julia Keblinska, and I am speaking today to Prof. Tristan Brown about his book, Laws of the Land: Fengshui and the State in Qing Dynasty China (Princeton UP, 2023). Brown’s book considers fengshui, that is, the knowledge of orienting structures, such as graves and houses, in accordance with well-established cosmological principles, as an administrative technology and language of power that was intrinsic to governance through the Qing legal code. Fengshui has long been dismissed as a “superstition” whose historical significance is limited to its obstruction of (narrowly) infrastructural development and (broadly) modernization. Laws of the Land instead pushes us to understand fengshui as a form of knowledge production that allowed the state to govern in an era of increasing resource scarcity and crisis. 
The book covers cases related to land use (and misuse) in relation to graves, examination success, and mining concerns. It introduces readers to a cast of claimants, defendants, and legal “experts,” including clerks who meticulously mapped conflicted landscapes and geomancers who gave evidence in court. In his analysis of fengshui and Qing dynastic collapse, Brown builds upon the work of other scholars who reject narratives of Chinese “reaction” to Western influence and incursion; he posits instead the legal system’s entanglement with fengshui shows a vibrant interaction of various epistemological systems. I am very much looking forward to my conversation with Prof. Brown about the “life and death of Qing landscape.”
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Welcome to another episode of New Books in Chinese Studies. I am your host, Julia Keblinska, and I am speaking today to Prof. Tristan Brown about his book, Laws of the Land: Fengshui and the State in Qing Dynasty China (Princeton UP, 2023). Brown’s book considers fengshui, that is, the knowledge of orienting structures, such as graves and houses, in accordance with well-established cosmological principles, as an administrative technology and language of power that was intrinsic to governance through the Qing legal code. Fengshui has long been dismissed as a “superstition” whose historical significance is limited to its obstruction of (narrowly) infrastructural development and (broadly) modernization. Laws of the Land instead pushes us to understand fengshui as a form of knowledge production that allowed the state to govern in an era of increasing resource scarcity and crisis. 
The book covers cases related to land use (and misuse) in relation to graves, examination success, and mining concerns. It introduces readers to a cast of claimants, defendants, and legal “experts,” including clerks who meticulously mapped conflicted landscapes and geomancers who gave evidence in court. In his analysis of fengshui and Qing dynastic collapse, Brown builds upon the work of other scholars who reject narratives of Chinese “reaction” to Western influence and incursion; he posits instead the legal system’s entanglement with fengshui shows a vibrant interaction of various epistemological systems. I am very much looking forward to my conversation with Prof. Brown about the “life and death of Qing landscape.”
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>79</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5e0e090a-978a-11ee-97ba-7f8082092615</guid>
      <title>Paolo Caroli, &quot;Transitional Justice in Italy and the Crimes of Fascism and Nazism&quot; (Routledge, 2022)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Paolo Caroli's book&nbsp;<a href="https://www.routledge.com/Transitional-Justice-in-Italy-and-the-Crimes-of-Fascism-and-Nazism/Caroli/p/book/9781032226224" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Transitional Justice in Italy and the Crimes of Fascism and Nazism</em></a>&nbsp;(Routledge, 2022)&nbsp;presents a comprehensive analysis of the Italian experience of transitional justice examining how the crimes of Fascism and World War II have been dealt with from a comparative perspective.</p><p>Applying an interdisciplinary and comparative methodology, the book offers a detailed reconstruction of the prosecution of the crimes of Fascism and the Italian Social Republic as well as crimes committed by Nazi soldiers against Italian civilians and those of the Italian army against foreign populations. It also explores the legal qualification and prosecution of the actions of the Resistance. Particular focus is given to the&nbsp;<em>Togliatti amnesty</em>, the major turning point, through comparisons to the wider European post-WWII transitional scenario and other relevant transitional amnesties, allowing consideration of the intense debate on the legitimacy of amnesties under international law. The book evaluates the Italian experience and provides an ideal framework to assess the complexity of the interdependencies between time, historical memory and the use of criminal law.</p><p>In a historical moment marked by the resurgence of racism, neo-Fascism, falsifications of the past, as well as the desire to amend the faults of the past, the Italian unfinished experience of dealing with the Fascist era can help move the discussion forward. The book will be an essential reading for students, researchers and academics in International Criminal Law, Transitional Justice, History, Memory Studies and Political Science.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2023 05:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/paolo-caroli-transitional-justice-in-italy-and-the-crimes-of-fascism-and-nazism-routledge-2022-EMg56iu_</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paolo Caroli's book&nbsp;<a href="https://www.routledge.com/Transitional-Justice-in-Italy-and-the-Crimes-of-Fascism-and-Nazism/Caroli/p/book/9781032226224" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Transitional Justice in Italy and the Crimes of Fascism and Nazism</em></a>&nbsp;(Routledge, 2022)&nbsp;presents a comprehensive analysis of the Italian experience of transitional justice examining how the crimes of Fascism and World War II have been dealt with from a comparative perspective.</p><p>Applying an interdisciplinary and comparative methodology, the book offers a detailed reconstruction of the prosecution of the crimes of Fascism and the Italian Social Republic as well as crimes committed by Nazi soldiers against Italian civilians and those of the Italian army against foreign populations. It also explores the legal qualification and prosecution of the actions of the Resistance. Particular focus is given to the&nbsp;<em>Togliatti amnesty</em>, the major turning point, through comparisons to the wider European post-WWII transitional scenario and other relevant transitional amnesties, allowing consideration of the intense debate on the legitimacy of amnesties under international law. The book evaluates the Italian experience and provides an ideal framework to assess the complexity of the interdependencies between time, historical memory and the use of criminal law.</p><p>In a historical moment marked by the resurgence of racism, neo-Fascism, falsifications of the past, as well as the desire to amend the faults of the past, the Italian unfinished experience of dealing with the Fascist era can help move the discussion forward. The book will be an essential reading for students, researchers and academics in International Criminal Law, Transitional Justice, History, Memory Studies and Political Science.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="90510723" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/22dba44c-90de-49ea-8a7d-91c13f14ac8f/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=22dba44c-90de-49ea-8a7d-91c13f14ac8f&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Paolo Caroli, &quot;Transitional Justice in Italy and the Crimes of Fascism and Nazism&quot; (Routledge, 2022)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:34:16</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Paolo Caroli&apos;s book Transitional Justice in Italy and the Crimes of Fascism and Nazism (Routledge, 2022) presents a comprehensive analysis of the Italian experience of transitional justice examining how the crimes of Fascism and World War II have been dealt with from a comparative perspective.
Applying an interdisciplinary and comparative methodology, the book offers a detailed reconstruction of the prosecution of the crimes of Fascism and the Italian Social Republic as well as crimes committed by Nazi soldiers against Italian civilians and those of the Italian army against foreign populations. It also explores the legal qualification and prosecution of the actions of the Resistance. Particular focus is given to the Togliatti amnesty, the major turning point, through comparisons to the wider European post-WWII transitional scenario and other relevant transitional amnesties, allowing consideration of the intense debate on the legitimacy of amnesties under international law. The book evaluates the Italian experience and provides an ideal framework to assess the complexity of the interdependencies between time, historical memory and the use of criminal law.
In a historical moment marked by the resurgence of racism, neo-Fascism, falsifications of the past, as well as the desire to amend the faults of the past, the Italian unfinished experience of dealing with the Fascist era can help move the discussion forward. The book will be an essential reading for students, researchers and academics in International Criminal Law, Transitional Justice, History, Memory Studies and Political Science.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Paolo Caroli&apos;s book Transitional Justice in Italy and the Crimes of Fascism and Nazism (Routledge, 2022) presents a comprehensive analysis of the Italian experience of transitional justice examining how the crimes of Fascism and World War II have been dealt with from a comparative perspective.
Applying an interdisciplinary and comparative methodology, the book offers a detailed reconstruction of the prosecution of the crimes of Fascism and the Italian Social Republic as well as crimes committed by Nazi soldiers against Italian civilians and those of the Italian army against foreign populations. It also explores the legal qualification and prosecution of the actions of the Resistance. Particular focus is given to the Togliatti amnesty, the major turning point, through comparisons to the wider European post-WWII transitional scenario and other relevant transitional amnesties, allowing consideration of the intense debate on the legitimacy of amnesties under international law. The book evaluates the Italian experience and provides an ideal framework to assess the complexity of the interdependencies between time, historical memory and the use of criminal law.
In a historical moment marked by the resurgence of racism, neo-Fascism, falsifications of the past, as well as the desire to amend the faults of the past, the Italian unfinished experience of dealing with the Fascist era can help move the discussion forward. The book will be an essential reading for students, researchers and academics in International Criminal Law, Transitional Justice, History, Memory Studies and Political Science.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1390</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">c062b28a-9204-11ee-9080-ef9d822535f2</guid>
      <title>Monica Huerta, &quot;The Unintended: Photography, Property, and the Aesthetics of Racial Capitalism&quot; (NYU Press, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The end of the nineteenth century saw massive developments and innovations in photography at a time when the forces of Western modernity—industrialization, racialization, and capitalism—were quickly reshaping the world.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781479812424" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Unintended: Photography, Property, and the Aesthetics of Racial Capitalism</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(NYU Press, 2023)&nbsp;slows down the moment in which the technology of photography seemed to speed itself—and so the history of racial capitalism—up. It follows the substantial shifts in the markets, mediums, and forms of photography during a legally murky period at the end of the nineteenth century. Monica Huerta traces the subtle and paradoxical ways legal thinking through photographic lenses reinscribed a particular aesthetics of whiteness in the very conceptions of property ownership.</p><p>The book pulls together an archive that encompasses the histories of performance and portraiture alongside the legal, pursuing the logics by which property rights involving photographs are affirmed (or denied) in precedent-setting court cases and legal texts. Emphasizing the making of “expression” into property to focus our attention on the failures of control that cameras do not invent, but rather put new emphasis on, this book argues that designations of control’s absence are central to the practice and idea of property-making.</p><p><em>The Unintended</em>&nbsp;proposes that tracking and analyzing the sensed horizons of intention, control, autonomy, will, and volition offers another way into understanding how white supremacy functions. Ultimately, its unique historical reading practice offers a historically-specific vantage on the everyday workings of racial capitalism and the inheritances of white supremacy that structure so much of our lives.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 4 Dec 2023 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/monica-huerta-the-unintended-photography-property-and-the-aesthetics-of-racial-capitalism-nyu-press-2023-LNCc0qYl</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The end of the nineteenth century saw massive developments and innovations in photography at a time when the forces of Western modernity—industrialization, racialization, and capitalism—were quickly reshaping the world.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781479812424" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Unintended: Photography, Property, and the Aesthetics of Racial Capitalism</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(NYU Press, 2023)&nbsp;slows down the moment in which the technology of photography seemed to speed itself—and so the history of racial capitalism—up. It follows the substantial shifts in the markets, mediums, and forms of photography during a legally murky period at the end of the nineteenth century. Monica Huerta traces the subtle and paradoxical ways legal thinking through photographic lenses reinscribed a particular aesthetics of whiteness in the very conceptions of property ownership.</p><p>The book pulls together an archive that encompasses the histories of performance and portraiture alongside the legal, pursuing the logics by which property rights involving photographs are affirmed (or denied) in precedent-setting court cases and legal texts. Emphasizing the making of “expression” into property to focus our attention on the failures of control that cameras do not invent, but rather put new emphasis on, this book argues that designations of control’s absence are central to the practice and idea of property-making.</p><p><em>The Unintended</em>&nbsp;proposes that tracking and analyzing the sensed horizons of intention, control, autonomy, will, and volition offers another way into understanding how white supremacy functions. Ultimately, its unique historical reading practice offers a historically-specific vantage on the everyday workings of racial capitalism and the inheritances of white supremacy that structure so much of our lives.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="71252105" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/0f9a85f2-c229-4c2f-acd4-678bdf35023f/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=0f9a85f2-c229-4c2f-acd4-678bdf35023f&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Monica Huerta, &quot;The Unintended: Photography, Property, and the Aesthetics of Racial Capitalism&quot; (NYU Press, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:14:13</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The end of the nineteenth century saw massive developments and innovations in photography at a time when the forces of Western modernity—industrialization, racialization, and capitalism—were quickly reshaping the world. The Unintended: Photography, Property, and the Aesthetics of Racial Capitalism (NYU Press, 2023) slows down the moment in which the technology of photography seemed to speed itself—and so the history of racial capitalism—up. It follows the substantial shifts in the markets, mediums, and forms of photography during a legally murky period at the end of the nineteenth century. Monica Huerta traces the subtle and paradoxical ways legal thinking through photographic lenses reinscribed a particular aesthetics of whiteness in the very conceptions of property ownership.
The book pulls together an archive that encompasses the histories of performance and portraiture alongside the legal, pursuing the logics by which property rights involving photographs are affirmed (or denied) in precedent-setting court cases and legal texts. Emphasizing the making of “expression” into property to focus our attention on the failures of control that cameras do not invent, but rather put new emphasis on, this book argues that designations of control’s absence are central to the practice and idea of property-making.
The Unintended proposes that tracking and analyzing the sensed horizons of intention, control, autonomy, will, and volition offers another way into understanding how white supremacy functions. Ultimately, its unique historical reading practice offers a historically-specific vantage on the everyday workings of racial capitalism and the inheritances of white supremacy that structure so much of our lives.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The end of the nineteenth century saw massive developments and innovations in photography at a time when the forces of Western modernity—industrialization, racialization, and capitalism—were quickly reshaping the world. The Unintended: Photography, Property, and the Aesthetics of Racial Capitalism (NYU Press, 2023) slows down the moment in which the technology of photography seemed to speed itself—and so the history of racial capitalism—up. It follows the substantial shifts in the markets, mediums, and forms of photography during a legally murky period at the end of the nineteenth century. Monica Huerta traces the subtle and paradoxical ways legal thinking through photographic lenses reinscribed a particular aesthetics of whiteness in the very conceptions of property ownership.
The book pulls together an archive that encompasses the histories of performance and portraiture alongside the legal, pursuing the logics by which property rights involving photographs are affirmed (or denied) in precedent-setting court cases and legal texts. Emphasizing the making of “expression” into property to focus our attention on the failures of control that cameras do not invent, but rather put new emphasis on, this book argues that designations of control’s absence are central to the practice and idea of property-making.
The Unintended proposes that tracking and analyzing the sensed horizons of intention, control, autonomy, will, and volition offers another way into understanding how white supremacy functions. Ultimately, its unique historical reading practice offers a historically-specific vantage on the everyday workings of racial capitalism and the inheritances of white supremacy that structure so much of our lives.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>358</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ae11f928-91fb-11ee-9731-3bcea270c724</guid>
      <title>Andrew C. McKevitt, &quot;Gun Country: Gun Capitalism, Culture, and Control in Cold War America&quot; (UNC Press, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The United States has more guns than people – a condition that is “unprecedented in world history.” Scholars often focus on gun culture, the Second Amendment, or the history of gun safety, duties, and rights. Often, people assume that the number of guns is a natural state – the guns were always there. But were the guns always there? What caused the drastic boom in firearms, and when did it happen?</p><p>In<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781469677248" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;<em>Gun Country: Gun Capitalism, Culture, and Control in Cold War America</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(UNC Press, 2023), Dr. Andrew McKevitt investigates how and when the guns arrived – and why so many people bought them. McKevitt argues that what Americans refer to as “gun culture” in the 21st century “emerged out of the intersections of the Cold War and consumer capitalism in the 1950s and 1960s.” A booming consumer market following World War II coupled with a surplus of cheap firearms readily available for American entrepreneurs to resell to citizens laid the groundwork for rampant firearm distribution in the country. War made the United States into a “gun country” but US gun politics – “interwoven with struggles over race and gender” cannot be detached from&nbsp;<em>consumer</em>&nbsp;politics. Gun safety and gun rights organizations&nbsp;<em>both</em>&nbsp;demand consumer regulation and protection.</p><p>Dr.&nbsp;<a href="https://andrewcmckevitt.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Andrew C. McKevitt</a>&nbsp;is the John D. Winters Endowed Professor of History at Louisiana Tech University. His previous book,&nbsp;<em>Consuming Japan: Popular Culture and the Globalizing of 1980s America&nbsp;</em>(2017) was published by the University of North Carolina Press and he received the Stuart L. Bernath Scholarly Article Prize from the Society for Historians of American Foreign Relations.</p><p>George Lobis served as the editorial assistant for this podcast.</p><p><a href="https://www.sju.edu/faculty/susan-liebell#_ga=2.125106634.1318472952.1578330950-502593983.1578330950" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Susan Liebell&nbsp;</em></a><em>is a Professor of Political Science at Saint Joseph’s University in Philadelphia.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 4 Dec 2023 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/andrew-c-mckevitt-gun-country-gun-capitalism-culture-and-control-in-cold-war-america-unc-press-2023-pfvHDJZs</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The United States has more guns than people – a condition that is “unprecedented in world history.” Scholars often focus on gun culture, the Second Amendment, or the history of gun safety, duties, and rights. Often, people assume that the number of guns is a natural state – the guns were always there. But were the guns always there? What caused the drastic boom in firearms, and when did it happen?</p><p>In<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781469677248" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;<em>Gun Country: Gun Capitalism, Culture, and Control in Cold War America</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(UNC Press, 2023), Dr. Andrew McKevitt investigates how and when the guns arrived – and why so many people bought them. McKevitt argues that what Americans refer to as “gun culture” in the 21st century “emerged out of the intersections of the Cold War and consumer capitalism in the 1950s and 1960s.” A booming consumer market following World War II coupled with a surplus of cheap firearms readily available for American entrepreneurs to resell to citizens laid the groundwork for rampant firearm distribution in the country. War made the United States into a “gun country” but US gun politics – “interwoven with struggles over race and gender” cannot be detached from&nbsp;<em>consumer</em>&nbsp;politics. Gun safety and gun rights organizations&nbsp;<em>both</em>&nbsp;demand consumer regulation and protection.</p><p>Dr.&nbsp;<a href="https://andrewcmckevitt.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Andrew C. McKevitt</a>&nbsp;is the John D. Winters Endowed Professor of History at Louisiana Tech University. His previous book,&nbsp;<em>Consuming Japan: Popular Culture and the Globalizing of 1980s America&nbsp;</em>(2017) was published by the University of North Carolina Press and he received the Stuart L. Bernath Scholarly Article Prize from the Society for Historians of American Foreign Relations.</p><p>George Lobis served as the editorial assistant for this podcast.</p><p><a href="https://www.sju.edu/faculty/susan-liebell#_ga=2.125106634.1318472952.1578330950-502593983.1578330950" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Susan Liebell&nbsp;</em></a><em>is a Professor of Political Science at Saint Joseph’s University in Philadelphia.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="55481111" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/664c2e9a-f195-41f4-a02e-d46fdf51e59e/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=664c2e9a-f195-41f4-a02e-d46fdf51e59e&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Andrew C. McKevitt, &quot;Gun Country: Gun Capitalism, Culture, and Control in Cold War America&quot; (UNC Press, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:57:47</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The United States has more guns than people – a condition that is “unprecedented in world history.” Scholars often focus on gun culture, the Second Amendment, or the history of gun safety, duties, and rights. Often, people assume that the number of guns is a natural state – the guns were always there. But were the guns always there? What caused the drastic boom in firearms, and when did it happen?
In Gun Country: Gun Capitalism, Culture, and Control in Cold War America (UNC Press, 2023), Dr. Andrew McKevitt investigates how and when the guns arrived – and why so many people bought them. McKevitt argues that what Americans refer to as “gun culture” in the 21st century “emerged out of the intersections of the Cold War and consumer capitalism in the 1950s and 1960s.” A booming consumer market following World War II coupled with a surplus of cheap firearms readily available for American entrepreneurs to resell to citizens laid the groundwork for rampant firearm distribution in the country. War made the United States into a “gun country” but US gun politics – “interwoven with struggles over race and gender” cannot be detached from consumer politics. Gun safety and gun rights organizations both demand consumer regulation and protection.
Dr. Andrew C. McKevitt is the John D. Winters Endowed Professor of History at Louisiana Tech University. His previous book, Consuming Japan: Popular Culture and the Globalizing of 1980s America (2017) was published by the University of North Carolina Press and he received the Stuart L. Bernath Scholarly Article Prize from the Society for Historians of American Foreign Relations.
George Lobis served as the editorial assistant for this podcast.
Susan Liebell is a Professor of Political Science at Saint Joseph’s University in Philadelphia.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The United States has more guns than people – a condition that is “unprecedented in world history.” Scholars often focus on gun culture, the Second Amendment, or the history of gun safety, duties, and rights. Often, people assume that the number of guns is a natural state – the guns were always there. But were the guns always there? What caused the drastic boom in firearms, and when did it happen?
In Gun Country: Gun Capitalism, Culture, and Control in Cold War America (UNC Press, 2023), Dr. Andrew McKevitt investigates how and when the guns arrived – and why so many people bought them. McKevitt argues that what Americans refer to as “gun culture” in the 21st century “emerged out of the intersections of the Cold War and consumer capitalism in the 1950s and 1960s.” A booming consumer market following World War II coupled with a surplus of cheap firearms readily available for American entrepreneurs to resell to citizens laid the groundwork for rampant firearm distribution in the country. War made the United States into a “gun country” but US gun politics – “interwoven with struggles over race and gender” cannot be detached from consumer politics. Gun safety and gun rights organizations both demand consumer regulation and protection.
Dr. Andrew C. McKevitt is the John D. Winters Endowed Professor of History at Louisiana Tech University. His previous book, Consuming Japan: Popular Culture and the Globalizing of 1980s America (2017) was published by the University of North Carolina Press and he received the Stuart L. Bernath Scholarly Article Prize from the Society for Historians of American Foreign Relations.
George Lobis served as the editorial assistant for this podcast.
Susan Liebell is a Professor of Political Science at Saint Joseph’s University in Philadelphia.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>691</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">0653f08e-8c73-11ee-93b2-2b014c7344ab</guid>
      <title>Rebecca Simon, &quot;The Pirates’ Code: Laws and Life Aboard Ship&quot; (Reaktion Books, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In<em>&nbsp;</em><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781789147117" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Pirate's Code: Laws and Life Aboard Ship</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Reaktion, 2023), Dr. Rebecca Simon presents a rollicking account of pirates’ codes, the strict rules essential for survival at sea.</p><p>Pirates have long captured the imagination with images of cutlass-wielding swashbucklers, eye patches and buried treasure. But what was life really like on a pirate ship? Piracy was a risky, sometimes deadly occupation, and strict orders were essential for everyone’s survival. These ‘Laws’ were sets of rules that determined everything from how much each pirate earned from their plunder to compensation for injuries, punishments and even the entertainment allowed on ships. These rules became known as the ‘Pirates’ Code’, which all pirates had to publicly swear by.</p><p>Using primary sources such as eyewitness accounts, trial proceedings and maritime logs, this book explains how these codes were the key to pirates’ success in battle, both on sea and on land.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;forthcoming book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2023 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/rebecca-simon-the-pirates-code-laws-and-life-aboard-ship-reaktion-books-2023-kTMAV0fv</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In<em>&nbsp;</em><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781789147117" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Pirate's Code: Laws and Life Aboard Ship</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Reaktion, 2023), Dr. Rebecca Simon presents a rollicking account of pirates’ codes, the strict rules essential for survival at sea.</p><p>Pirates have long captured the imagination with images of cutlass-wielding swashbucklers, eye patches and buried treasure. But what was life really like on a pirate ship? Piracy was a risky, sometimes deadly occupation, and strict orders were essential for everyone’s survival. These ‘Laws’ were sets of rules that determined everything from how much each pirate earned from their plunder to compensation for injuries, punishments and even the entertainment allowed on ships. These rules became known as the ‘Pirates’ Code’, which all pirates had to publicly swear by.</p><p>Using primary sources such as eyewitness accounts, trial proceedings and maritime logs, this book explains how these codes were the key to pirates’ success in battle, both on sea and on land.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;forthcoming book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="37724231" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/67f7e85f-babe-44ad-b8f3-12cf4ace06fa/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=67f7e85f-babe-44ad-b8f3-12cf4ace06fa&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Rebecca Simon, &quot;The Pirates’ Code: Laws and Life Aboard Ship&quot; (Reaktion Books, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:39:17</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In The Pirate&apos;s Code: Laws and Life Aboard Ship (Reaktion, 2023), Dr. Rebecca Simon presents a rollicking account of pirates’ codes, the strict rules essential for survival at sea.
Pirates have long captured the imagination with images of cutlass-wielding swashbucklers, eye patches and buried treasure. But what was life really like on a pirate ship? Piracy was a risky, sometimes deadly occupation, and strict orders were essential for everyone’s survival. These ‘Laws’ were sets of rules that determined everything from how much each pirate earned from their plunder to compensation for injuries, punishments and even the entertainment allowed on ships. These rules became known as the ‘Pirates’ Code’, which all pirates had to publicly swear by.
Using primary sources such as eyewitness accounts, trial proceedings and maritime logs, this book explains how these codes were the key to pirates’ success in battle, both on sea and on land.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose forthcoming book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In The Pirate&apos;s Code: Laws and Life Aboard Ship (Reaktion, 2023), Dr. Rebecca Simon presents a rollicking account of pirates’ codes, the strict rules essential for survival at sea.
Pirates have long captured the imagination with images of cutlass-wielding swashbucklers, eye patches and buried treasure. But what was life really like on a pirate ship? Piracy was a risky, sometimes deadly occupation, and strict orders were essential for everyone’s survival. These ‘Laws’ were sets of rules that determined everything from how much each pirate earned from their plunder to compensation for injuries, punishments and even the entertainment allowed on ships. These rules became known as the ‘Pirates’ Code’, which all pirates had to publicly swear by.
Using primary sources such as eyewitness accounts, trial proceedings and maritime logs, this book explains how these codes were the key to pirates’ success in battle, both on sea and on land.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose forthcoming book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1386</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">df22fc2a-8bd8-11ee-8c76-fbd74268d3fe</guid>
      <title>Stephanie Convery, &quot;After the Count: The Death of Davey Browne&quot; (Penguin Australia, 2020)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Today we are joined by Stephanie Convery, inequality editor at Guardian Australia, and author of&nbsp;<a href="https://www.penguin.com.au/books/after-the-count-9781760144289" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>After the Count: The Death of Davey Browne</em></a>&nbsp;(Penguin Australia, 2020). In our conversation, we discussed the history of boxing in Australia, the failures that explain Davey Browne’s death in Sydney in 2015, the nature of violence in sport, and the future of boxing.</p><p>In&nbsp;<em>After the Count</em>, Convery blends the genres of history, reportage, and memoir to explore the death of Davey Browne and shows how this one event illustrates the problems and lacunae inside of Australian men’s boxing. Convery writes from an insider’s perspective – she is a boxer – and her work does not condemn the sport for its brutality but rather asks questions about how to make boxing safer and how to make sure the sport of boxing remains meaningful for its participants. She concludes that some of the same toxic forces that gave boxing its allure now make it hard to regulate and threaten the lives of the people who participate in it.</p><p>The book moves both chronologically and thematically as Convery shifts between a mix of traditional reporting, historical research, and experiential accounts of her own life in the ring. The beginning of the book is devoted to Davey Browne’s death and a significant portion of the end of the book contains Convery’s conclusions about the coronial case and in these places the book reads most like a traditional sports report.</p><p>Some of the most interesting chapters feature her own boxing experiences and these are interspersed in the more chronological reporting. It is a minor spoiler that Convery suffers a concussion while reporting on the book and when she as she recovers, she dives into research on concussion and CTE. The ubiquity of head injury in boxing (and sports in general) shapes her discussion of the nature of violence. Boxing requires people to fight – to throw punches – and to improve as boxers those punches need to be real and be dangerous. At the same time, fighters need to consent to fight, need to understand the rules, and should have more information about head injury, how to avoid it, and what to do if they suffer from it.</p><p>The book defies easy explanations – it’s considerate, even meditative; it swings from a report on Davey’s death in a Sydney club, to discussions of boxings seedy history in gambling dens, and to medical studies on the way to diagnose chronic traumatic encephalopathy. Convery takes readers around the country - to the places in Davey Browne’s life, to gyms in Sydney and Melbourne where Convery practices, and finally to the coronial court where the people involved in the tragedy of Davey’s death face questioning from the government of New South Wales.</p><p>It is a must read for people interested in boxing, Australian sport, and for people interested in the philosophical question of violence in sport.</p><p><em>﻿</em><a href="https://www.mq.edu.au/about_us/faculties_and_departments/faculty_of_arts/mhpir/staff/staff/dr_keith_rathbone/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Keith Rathbone</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a Senior Lecturer at Macquarie University in Sydney, Australia. He researches twentieth-century French social and cultural history.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2023 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/stephanie-convery-after-the-count-the-death-of-davey-browne-penguin-australia-2020-kB2Q0J8v</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today we are joined by Stephanie Convery, inequality editor at Guardian Australia, and author of&nbsp;<a href="https://www.penguin.com.au/books/after-the-count-9781760144289" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>After the Count: The Death of Davey Browne</em></a>&nbsp;(Penguin Australia, 2020). In our conversation, we discussed the history of boxing in Australia, the failures that explain Davey Browne’s death in Sydney in 2015, the nature of violence in sport, and the future of boxing.</p><p>In&nbsp;<em>After the Count</em>, Convery blends the genres of history, reportage, and memoir to explore the death of Davey Browne and shows how this one event illustrates the problems and lacunae inside of Australian men’s boxing. Convery writes from an insider’s perspective – she is a boxer – and her work does not condemn the sport for its brutality but rather asks questions about how to make boxing safer and how to make sure the sport of boxing remains meaningful for its participants. She concludes that some of the same toxic forces that gave boxing its allure now make it hard to regulate and threaten the lives of the people who participate in it.</p><p>The book moves both chronologically and thematically as Convery shifts between a mix of traditional reporting, historical research, and experiential accounts of her own life in the ring. The beginning of the book is devoted to Davey Browne’s death and a significant portion of the end of the book contains Convery’s conclusions about the coronial case and in these places the book reads most like a traditional sports report.</p><p>Some of the most interesting chapters feature her own boxing experiences and these are interspersed in the more chronological reporting. It is a minor spoiler that Convery suffers a concussion while reporting on the book and when she as she recovers, she dives into research on concussion and CTE. The ubiquity of head injury in boxing (and sports in general) shapes her discussion of the nature of violence. Boxing requires people to fight – to throw punches – and to improve as boxers those punches need to be real and be dangerous. At the same time, fighters need to consent to fight, need to understand the rules, and should have more information about head injury, how to avoid it, and what to do if they suffer from it.</p><p>The book defies easy explanations – it’s considerate, even meditative; it swings from a report on Davey’s death in a Sydney club, to discussions of boxings seedy history in gambling dens, and to medical studies on the way to diagnose chronic traumatic encephalopathy. Convery takes readers around the country - to the places in Davey Browne’s life, to gyms in Sydney and Melbourne where Convery practices, and finally to the coronial court where the people involved in the tragedy of Davey’s death face questioning from the government of New South Wales.</p><p>It is a must read for people interested in boxing, Australian sport, and for people interested in the philosophical question of violence in sport.</p><p><em>﻿</em><a href="https://www.mq.edu.au/about_us/faculties_and_departments/faculty_of_arts/mhpir/staff/staff/dr_keith_rathbone/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Keith Rathbone</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a Senior Lecturer at Macquarie University in Sydney, Australia. He researches twentieth-century French social and cultural history.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="53132085" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/1dbe983c-5943-4f04-ad24-894ece388534/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=1dbe983c-5943-4f04-ad24-894ece388534&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Stephanie Convery, &quot;After the Count: The Death of Davey Browne&quot; (Penguin Australia, 2020)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:55:20</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Today we are joined by Stephanie Convery, inequality editor at Guardian Australia, and author of After the Count: The Death of Davey Browne (Penguin Australia, 2020). In our conversation, we discussed the history of boxing in Australia, the failures that explain Davey Browne’s death in Sydney in 2015, the nature of violence in sport, and the future of boxing.
In After the Count, Convery blends the genres of history, reportage, and memoir to explore the death of Davey Browne and shows how this one event illustrates the problems and lacunae inside of Australian men’s boxing. Convery writes from an insider’s perspective – she is a boxer – and her work does not condemn the sport for its brutality but rather asks questions about how to make boxing safer and how to make sure the sport of boxing remains meaningful for its participants. She concludes that some of the same toxic forces that gave boxing its allure now make it hard to regulate and threaten the lives of the people who participate in it.
The book moves both chronologically and thematically as Convery shifts between a mix of traditional reporting, historical research, and experiential accounts of her own life in the ring. The beginning of the book is devoted to Davey Browne’s death and a significant portion of the end of the book contains Convery’s conclusions about the coronial case and in these places the book reads most like a traditional sports report.
Some of the most interesting chapters feature her own boxing experiences and these are interspersed in the more chronological reporting. It is a minor spoiler that Convery suffers a concussion while reporting on the book and when she as she recovers, she dives into research on concussion and CTE. The ubiquity of head injury in boxing (and sports in general) shapes her discussion of the nature of violence. Boxing requires people to fight – to throw punches – and to improve as boxers those punches need to be real and be dangerous. At the same time, fighters need to consent to fight, need to understand the rules, and should have more information about head injury, how to avoid it, and what to do if they suffer from it.
The book defies easy explanations – it’s considerate, even meditative; it swings from a report on Davey’s death in a Sydney club, to discussions of boxings seedy history in gambling dens, and to medical studies on the way to diagnose chronic traumatic encephalopathy. Convery takes readers around the country - to the places in Davey Browne’s life, to gyms in Sydney and Melbourne where Convery practices, and finally to the coronial court where the people involved in the tragedy of Davey’s death face questioning from the government of New South Wales.
It is a must read for people interested in boxing, Australian sport, and for people interested in the philosophical question of violence in sport.
﻿Keith Rathbone is a Senior Lecturer at Macquarie University in Sydney, Australia. He researches twentieth-century French social and cultural history.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Today we are joined by Stephanie Convery, inequality editor at Guardian Australia, and author of After the Count: The Death of Davey Browne (Penguin Australia, 2020). In our conversation, we discussed the history of boxing in Australia, the failures that explain Davey Browne’s death in Sydney in 2015, the nature of violence in sport, and the future of boxing.
In After the Count, Convery blends the genres of history, reportage, and memoir to explore the death of Davey Browne and shows how this one event illustrates the problems and lacunae inside of Australian men’s boxing. Convery writes from an insider’s perspective – she is a boxer – and her work does not condemn the sport for its brutality but rather asks questions about how to make boxing safer and how to make sure the sport of boxing remains meaningful for its participants. She concludes that some of the same toxic forces that gave boxing its allure now make it hard to regulate and threaten the lives of the people who participate in it.
The book moves both chronologically and thematically as Convery shifts between a mix of traditional reporting, historical research, and experiential accounts of her own life in the ring. The beginning of the book is devoted to Davey Browne’s death and a significant portion of the end of the book contains Convery’s conclusions about the coronial case and in these places the book reads most like a traditional sports report.
Some of the most interesting chapters feature her own boxing experiences and these are interspersed in the more chronological reporting. It is a minor spoiler that Convery suffers a concussion while reporting on the book and when she as she recovers, she dives into research on concussion and CTE. The ubiquity of head injury in boxing (and sports in general) shapes her discussion of the nature of violence. Boxing requires people to fight – to throw punches – and to improve as boxers those punches need to be real and be dangerous. At the same time, fighters need to consent to fight, need to understand the rules, and should have more information about head injury, how to avoid it, and what to do if they suffer from it.
The book defies easy explanations – it’s considerate, even meditative; it swings from a report on Davey’s death in a Sydney club, to discussions of boxings seedy history in gambling dens, and to medical studies on the way to diagnose chronic traumatic encephalopathy. Convery takes readers around the country - to the places in Davey Browne’s life, to gyms in Sydney and Melbourne where Convery practices, and finally to the coronial court where the people involved in the tragedy of Davey’s death face questioning from the government of New South Wales.
It is a must read for people interested in boxing, Australian sport, and for people interested in the philosophical question of violence in sport.
﻿Keith Rathbone is a Senior Lecturer at Macquarie University in Sydney, Australia. He researches twentieth-century French social and cultural history.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>262</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">84837f1a-8aed-11ee-9dc6-9bde3cab9f85</guid>
      <title>Fae Garland and Mitchell Travis, &quot;Intersex Embodiment: Legal Frameworks Beyond Identity and Disorder&quot; (Bristol UP, 2022)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>What is intersex and why does it matter? What is the power of law to disrupt dominant narratives?&nbsp;I had a fascinating conversation with authors Dr Fae Garland and Dr Mitchell Travis about their book,&nbsp;<a href="https://bristoluniversitypress.co.uk/intersex-embodiment" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Intersex Embodiment: Legal Frameworks Beyond Identity and Disorder</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Bristol UP, 2023). We got into detail about these groundbreaking human rights issues. We spoke about the very real challenges faced in conducting legal&nbsp;research that has meaningful impact for social change. In research&nbsp;spanning many years,&nbsp;Garland and Travis worked directly with intersex people and&nbsp;their parents to produce this nuanced, sensitive and extensively researched book. Their's is a monograph that challenges dominant medical narratives, particularly with regard to the way that gender binaries are demarcated and identities are constructed. The book has power both beyond its subject matter and beyond&nbsp;the academy: it will bring pause for reflection as to the role of researchers and the work that lawyers can do in the pursuit of the acceptance and emergence of difference, and especially with regard to&nbsp;the enforcement of human rights.&nbsp;</p><p><a href="https://research.manchester.ac.uk/en/persons/fae.garland" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr Fae Garland</a>&nbsp;is a Senior Lecturer in Law at The University of Manchester&nbsp;</p><p><a href="https://essl.leeds.ac.uk/law/staff/234/dr-mitchell-travis" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr Mitchell Travis</a>&nbsp;is a Senior Lecturer in Law and Social Justice at The University of Leeds.&nbsp;</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 26 Nov 2023 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/fae-garland-and-mitchell-travis-intersex-embodiment-legal-frameworks-beyond-identity-and-disorder-bristol-up-2022-m9q2ZhHw</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is intersex and why does it matter? What is the power of law to disrupt dominant narratives?&nbsp;I had a fascinating conversation with authors Dr Fae Garland and Dr Mitchell Travis about their book,&nbsp;<a href="https://bristoluniversitypress.co.uk/intersex-embodiment" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Intersex Embodiment: Legal Frameworks Beyond Identity and Disorder</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Bristol UP, 2023). We got into detail about these groundbreaking human rights issues. We spoke about the very real challenges faced in conducting legal&nbsp;research that has meaningful impact for social change. In research&nbsp;spanning many years,&nbsp;Garland and Travis worked directly with intersex people and&nbsp;their parents to produce this nuanced, sensitive and extensively researched book. Their's is a monograph that challenges dominant medical narratives, particularly with regard to the way that gender binaries are demarcated and identities are constructed. The book has power both beyond its subject matter and beyond&nbsp;the academy: it will bring pause for reflection as to the role of researchers and the work that lawyers can do in the pursuit of the acceptance and emergence of difference, and especially with regard to&nbsp;the enforcement of human rights.&nbsp;</p><p><a href="https://research.manchester.ac.uk/en/persons/fae.garland" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr Fae Garland</a>&nbsp;is a Senior Lecturer in Law at The University of Manchester&nbsp;</p><p><a href="https://essl.leeds.ac.uk/law/staff/234/dr-mitchell-travis" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr Mitchell Travis</a>&nbsp;is a Senior Lecturer in Law and Social Justice at The University of Leeds.&nbsp;</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="54286005" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/7602829a-c210-4492-b91f-b1176ede72ac/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=7602829a-c210-4492-b91f-b1176ede72ac&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Fae Garland and Mitchell Travis, &quot;Intersex Embodiment: Legal Frameworks Beyond Identity and Disorder&quot; (Bristol UP, 2022)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:56:32</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>What is intersex and why does it matter? What is the power of law to disrupt dominant narratives? I had a fascinating conversation with authors Dr Fae Garland and Dr Mitchell Travis about their book, Intersex Embodiment: Legal Frameworks Beyond Identity and Disorder (Bristol UP, 2023). We got into detail about these groundbreaking human rights issues. We spoke about the very real challenges faced in conducting legal research that has meaningful impact for social change. In research spanning many years, Garland and Travis worked directly with intersex people and their parents to produce this nuanced, sensitive and extensively researched book. Their&apos;s is a monograph that challenges dominant medical narratives, particularly with regard to the way that gender binaries are demarcated and identities are constructed. The book has power both beyond its subject matter and beyond the academy: it will bring pause for reflection as to the role of researchers and the work that lawyers can do in the pursuit of the acceptance and emergence of difference, and especially with regard to the enforcement of human rights. 
Dr Fae Garland is a Senior Lecturer in Law at The University of Manchester 
Dr Mitchell Travis is a Senior Lecturer in Law and Social Justice at The University of Leeds. 
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>What is intersex and why does it matter? What is the power of law to disrupt dominant narratives? I had a fascinating conversation with authors Dr Fae Garland and Dr Mitchell Travis about their book, Intersex Embodiment: Legal Frameworks Beyond Identity and Disorder (Bristol UP, 2023). We got into detail about these groundbreaking human rights issues. We spoke about the very real challenges faced in conducting legal research that has meaningful impact for social change. In research spanning many years, Garland and Travis worked directly with intersex people and their parents to produce this nuanced, sensitive and extensively researched book. Their&apos;s is a monograph that challenges dominant medical narratives, particularly with regard to the way that gender binaries are demarcated and identities are constructed. The book has power both beyond its subject matter and beyond the academy: it will bring pause for reflection as to the role of researchers and the work that lawyers can do in the pursuit of the acceptance and emergence of difference, and especially with regard to the enforcement of human rights. 
Dr Fae Garland is a Senior Lecturer in Law at The University of Manchester 
Dr Mitchell Travis is a Senior Lecturer in Law and Social Justice at The University of Leeds. 
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>205</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">a366486a-88bb-11ee-8604-db0486788e26</guid>
      <title>Jenny Benham, &quot;International Law in Europe, 700–1200&quot; (Manchester UP, 2022)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Was there international law in the Middle Ages? Using treaties as its main source,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781526174499" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>International Law in Europe, 700-1200</em></a>&nbsp;(Manchester University Press, 2022) by Dr. Jenny Benham examines the extent to which such a system of rules was known and followed in the period 700 to 1200. It considers how consistently international legal rules were obeyed, whether there was a reliance on justification of action and whether the system had the capacity to resolve disputed questions of fact and law. The book further sheds light on issues such as compliance, enforcement, deterrence, authority and jurisdiction, challenging traditional ideas over their role and function in the history of international law.</p><p><em>International law in Europe, 700-1200</em>&nbsp;will appeal to students and scholars of medieval Europe, international law and its history, as well as those with a more general interest in warfare, diplomacy and international relations.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;forthcoming book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2023 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/jenny-benham-international-law-in-europe-7001200-manchester-up-2022-2yMwh4Vh</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Was there international law in the Middle Ages? Using treaties as its main source,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781526174499" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>International Law in Europe, 700-1200</em></a>&nbsp;(Manchester University Press, 2022) by Dr. Jenny Benham examines the extent to which such a system of rules was known and followed in the period 700 to 1200. It considers how consistently international legal rules were obeyed, whether there was a reliance on justification of action and whether the system had the capacity to resolve disputed questions of fact and law. The book further sheds light on issues such as compliance, enforcement, deterrence, authority and jurisdiction, challenging traditional ideas over their role and function in the history of international law.</p><p><em>International law in Europe, 700-1200</em>&nbsp;will appeal to students and scholars of medieval Europe, international law and its history, as well as those with a more general interest in warfare, diplomacy and international relations.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;forthcoming book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="67555185" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/eac70c0c-b850-4e6c-8755-4981869256b4/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=eac70c0c-b850-4e6c-8755-4981869256b4&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Jenny Benham, &quot;International Law in Europe, 700–1200&quot; (Manchester UP, 2022)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:10:22</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Was there international law in the Middle Ages? Using treaties as its main source, International Law in Europe, 700-1200 (Manchester University Press, 2022) by Dr. Jenny Benham examines the extent to which such a system of rules was known and followed in the period 700 to 1200. It considers how consistently international legal rules were obeyed, whether there was a reliance on justification of action and whether the system had the capacity to resolve disputed questions of fact and law. The book further sheds light on issues such as compliance, enforcement, deterrence, authority and jurisdiction, challenging traditional ideas over their role and function in the history of international law.
International law in Europe, 700-1200 will appeal to students and scholars of medieval Europe, international law and its history, as well as those with a more general interest in warfare, diplomacy and international relations.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose forthcoming book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Was there international law in the Middle Ages? Using treaties as its main source, International Law in Europe, 700-1200 (Manchester University Press, 2022) by Dr. Jenny Benham examines the extent to which such a system of rules was known and followed in the period 700 to 1200. It considers how consistently international legal rules were obeyed, whether there was a reliance on justification of action and whether the system had the capacity to resolve disputed questions of fact and law. The book further sheds light on issues such as compliance, enforcement, deterrence, authority and jurisdiction, challenging traditional ideas over their role and function in the history of international law.
International law in Europe, 700-1200 will appeal to students and scholars of medieval Europe, international law and its history, as well as those with a more general interest in warfare, diplomacy and international relations.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose forthcoming book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>55</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3103c1d4-848e-11ee-8e03-577432168455</guid>
      <title>Earl Lewis and Nancy Cantor, &quot;Our Compelling Interests: The Value of Diversity for Democracy and a Prosperous Society&quot; (Princeton UP, 2016)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Princeton University Press’&nbsp;<a href="https://press.princeton.edu/series/our-compelling-interests" rel="noopener noreferrer">Our Compelling Interests series</a>&nbsp;focuses on diversity, in racial, gender, socioeconomic, religious, and other forms.&nbsp;Some of the titles in this series so far include&nbsp;<a href="https://press.princeton.edu/books/paperback/9780691239194/the-walls-around-opportunity" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Walls around Opportunity:&nbsp;<em>The Failure of Colorblind Policy for Higher Education</em></a>&nbsp;by Gary Orfield,&nbsp;<a href="https://press.princeton.edu/books/paperback/9780691196817/out-of-many-faiths" rel="noopener noreferrer">Out of Many Faiths:&nbsp;<em>Religious Diversity and the American Promise</em></a>&nbsp;By Eboo Patel, and&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/the-diversity-bonus-how-great-teams-pay-off-in-the-knowledge-economy-scott-page/9010430?ean=9780691191539" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Diversity Bonus:&nbsp;<em>How Great Teams Pay Off in the Knowledge Economy</em></a><em>,&nbsp;</em>by Scott E. Page.</p><p>Earl Lewis is the Thomas C. Holt Distinguished University Professor of history, Afroamerican and&nbsp;African Studies, and Public Policy and director of the Center for Social Solutions at the&nbsp;University of Michigan. From March 2013-2018, he served as President of The Andrew W.&nbsp;Mellon Foundation.</p><p>Nancy Cantor is Chancellor of Rutgers University – Newark.&nbsp;A fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences and member of the National Academy&nbsp;of Medicine, she previously led Syracuse University and the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign and was provost at the University of Michigan, where she was closely involved in&nbsp;the defense of affirmative action in 2003 Supreme Court cases Grutter and Gratz.</p><p><em>Caleb Zakarin is the Assistant Editor of the New Books Network.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 18 Nov 2023 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/earl-lewis-and-nancy-cantor-our-compelling-interests-the-value-of-diversity-for-democracy-and-a-prosperous-society-princeton-up-2016-SgPf7gem</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Princeton University Press’&nbsp;<a href="https://press.princeton.edu/series/our-compelling-interests" rel="noopener noreferrer">Our Compelling Interests series</a>&nbsp;focuses on diversity, in racial, gender, socioeconomic, religious, and other forms.&nbsp;Some of the titles in this series so far include&nbsp;<a href="https://press.princeton.edu/books/paperback/9780691239194/the-walls-around-opportunity" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Walls around Opportunity:&nbsp;<em>The Failure of Colorblind Policy for Higher Education</em></a>&nbsp;by Gary Orfield,&nbsp;<a href="https://press.princeton.edu/books/paperback/9780691196817/out-of-many-faiths" rel="noopener noreferrer">Out of Many Faiths:&nbsp;<em>Religious Diversity and the American Promise</em></a>&nbsp;By Eboo Patel, and&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/the-diversity-bonus-how-great-teams-pay-off-in-the-knowledge-economy-scott-page/9010430?ean=9780691191539" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Diversity Bonus:&nbsp;<em>How Great Teams Pay Off in the Knowledge Economy</em></a><em>,&nbsp;</em>by Scott E. Page.</p><p>Earl Lewis is the Thomas C. Holt Distinguished University Professor of history, Afroamerican and&nbsp;African Studies, and Public Policy and director of the Center for Social Solutions at the&nbsp;University of Michigan. From March 2013-2018, he served as President of The Andrew W.&nbsp;Mellon Foundation.</p><p>Nancy Cantor is Chancellor of Rutgers University – Newark.&nbsp;A fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences and member of the National Academy&nbsp;of Medicine, she previously led Syracuse University and the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign and was provost at the University of Michigan, where she was closely involved in&nbsp;the defense of affirmative action in 2003 Supreme Court cases Grutter and Gratz.</p><p><em>Caleb Zakarin is the Assistant Editor of the New Books Network.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="41364591" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/539b49c1-25a7-4f05-a770-cae5abca77d3/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=539b49c1-25a7-4f05-a770-cae5abca77d3&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Earl Lewis and Nancy Cantor, &quot;Our Compelling Interests: The Value of Diversity for Democracy and a Prosperous Society&quot; (Princeton UP, 2016)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:43:05</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Princeton University Press’ Our Compelling Interests series focuses on diversity, in racial, gender, socioeconomic, religious, and other forms. Some of the titles in this series so far include The Walls around Opportunity: The Failure of Colorblind Policy for Higher Education by Gary Orfield, Out of Many Faiths: Religious Diversity and the American Promise By Eboo Patel, and The Diversity Bonus: How Great Teams Pay Off in the Knowledge Economy, by Scott E. Page.
Earl Lewis is the Thomas C. Holt Distinguished University Professor of history, Afroamerican and African Studies, and Public Policy and director of the Center for Social Solutions at the University of Michigan. From March 2013-2018, he served as President of The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation.
Nancy Cantor is Chancellor of Rutgers University – Newark. A fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences and member of the National Academy of Medicine, she previously led Syracuse University and the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign and was provost at the University of Michigan, where she was closely involved in the defense of affirmative action in 2003 Supreme Court cases Grutter and Gratz.
Caleb Zakarin is the Assistant Editor of the New Books Network.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Princeton University Press’ Our Compelling Interests series focuses on diversity, in racial, gender, socioeconomic, religious, and other forms. Some of the titles in this series so far include The Walls around Opportunity: The Failure of Colorblind Policy for Higher Education by Gary Orfield, Out of Many Faiths: Religious Diversity and the American Promise By Eboo Patel, and The Diversity Bonus: How Great Teams Pay Off in the Knowledge Economy, by Scott E. Page.
Earl Lewis is the Thomas C. Holt Distinguished University Professor of history, Afroamerican and African Studies, and Public Policy and director of the Center for Social Solutions at the University of Michigan. From March 2013-2018, he served as President of The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation.
Nancy Cantor is Chancellor of Rutgers University – Newark. A fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences and member of the National Academy of Medicine, she previously led Syracuse University and the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign and was provost at the University of Michigan, where she was closely involved in the defense of affirmative action in 2003 Supreme Court cases Grutter and Gratz.
Caleb Zakarin is the Assistant Editor of the New Books Network.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>75</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3155f6e6-7f45-11ee-b601-6fdea6ad5cf5</guid>
      <title>Heather Smith-Cannoy et al., &quot;Sex Trafficking and Human Rights: The Status of Women and State Responses&quot; (Georgetown UP, 2022)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Human trafficking for the sex trade is a form of modern-day slavery that ensnares thousands of victims each year, disproportionately affecting women and girls. While the international community has developed an impressive edifice of human rights law, these laws are not equally recognized or enforced by all countries.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/sex-trafficking-and-human-rights-the-status-of-women-and-state-responses-heather-smith-cannoy/18509517?ean=9781647122614" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Sex Trafficking and Human Rights</em></a>&nbsp;demonstrates that state responsiveness to human trafficking is shaped by the political, social, cultural, and economic rights afforded to women in that state. While combatting human trafficking is a multiscalar problem with a host of conflating variables, this book shows that a common theme in the effectiveness of state response is the degree to which women and girls are perceived as, and actually are, full citizens. By analyzing human trafficking cases in India, Thailand, Russia, Nigeria, and Brazil, they shed light on the factors that make some women and girls more susceptible to traffickers than others.</p><p>Heather Smith-Cannoy (PhD, UC San Diego, 2007) is a Professor of Political Science/Social Justice and Human Rights at the New College of Interdisciplinary Arts and Sciences at Arizona State University. She is currently serving as the Interim Director of the School of Social and Behavioral Sciences. Her work explores when and under what conditions international law impacts the human rights of the most marginalized populations, focusing on both the opportunities and the challenges associated with this body of law. She has also focused on the role that international law can play in advancing the legal rights of sex trafficking victims. She has published 4 books and more than 15 articles and book chapters.</p><p>Patricia C. Rodda is the Assistant Professor of Political Science at Carroll University in Waukesha, Wisconsin. She teaches international relations, comparative politics, international law, conflict and security and political theory. Her research often focuses on vulnerable populations and the challenges they face seeking human rights protections. She is currently working on a new book project that investigates the institutions and interests that facilitate or obstruct the adoption of women’s rights in Muslim-majority states.</p><p>Charles “Tony” Smith is a Professor in Political Science and Law at the University of California-Irvine (PhD UCSD 2004; JD UF 1987). His research concerns how institutions and the strategic interactions of political actors relate to the contestation over rights, law, and democracy. He has authored or co-authored eight books including&nbsp;<em>Sex Trafficking and Human Rights: The Status of Women and State Responses&nbsp;</em>(Georgetown University Press 2022) and&nbsp;<em>The Politics of Perverts: The Political Attitudes and Actions of Non-Traditional Sexual Minorities&nbsp;</em>(NYU Press 2024) and published over 40 articles and chapters. He is currently the Editor in Chief of&nbsp;<em>Political Research Quarterly.</em></p><p><a href="https://labdelaa.expressions.syr.edu/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Lamis Abdelaaty</em></a><em>&nbsp;is an associate professor of political science at the Maxwell School of Syracuse University. She is the author of&nbsp;</em><a href="https://global.oup.com/academic/product/discrimination-and-delegation-9780197530061" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Discrimination and Delegation: Explaining State Responses to Refugees</em></a><em>&nbsp;(Oxford University Press, 2021). Email her comments at&nbsp;</em><a href="mailto:labdelaa@syr.edu" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>labdelaa@syr.edu</em></a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2023 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/heather-smith-cannoy-et-al-sex-trafficking-and-human-rights-the-status-of-women-and-state-responses-georgetown-up-2022-i5dGOGx7</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Human trafficking for the sex trade is a form of modern-day slavery that ensnares thousands of victims each year, disproportionately affecting women and girls. While the international community has developed an impressive edifice of human rights law, these laws are not equally recognized or enforced by all countries.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/sex-trafficking-and-human-rights-the-status-of-women-and-state-responses-heather-smith-cannoy/18509517?ean=9781647122614" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Sex Trafficking and Human Rights</em></a>&nbsp;demonstrates that state responsiveness to human trafficking is shaped by the political, social, cultural, and economic rights afforded to women in that state. While combatting human trafficking is a multiscalar problem with a host of conflating variables, this book shows that a common theme in the effectiveness of state response is the degree to which women and girls are perceived as, and actually are, full citizens. By analyzing human trafficking cases in India, Thailand, Russia, Nigeria, and Brazil, they shed light on the factors that make some women and girls more susceptible to traffickers than others.</p><p>Heather Smith-Cannoy (PhD, UC San Diego, 2007) is a Professor of Political Science/Social Justice and Human Rights at the New College of Interdisciplinary Arts and Sciences at Arizona State University. She is currently serving as the Interim Director of the School of Social and Behavioral Sciences. Her work explores when and under what conditions international law impacts the human rights of the most marginalized populations, focusing on both the opportunities and the challenges associated with this body of law. She has also focused on the role that international law can play in advancing the legal rights of sex trafficking victims. She has published 4 books and more than 15 articles and book chapters.</p><p>Patricia C. Rodda is the Assistant Professor of Political Science at Carroll University in Waukesha, Wisconsin. She teaches international relations, comparative politics, international law, conflict and security and political theory. Her research often focuses on vulnerable populations and the challenges they face seeking human rights protections. She is currently working on a new book project that investigates the institutions and interests that facilitate or obstruct the adoption of women’s rights in Muslim-majority states.</p><p>Charles “Tony” Smith is a Professor in Political Science and Law at the University of California-Irvine (PhD UCSD 2004; JD UF 1987). His research concerns how institutions and the strategic interactions of political actors relate to the contestation over rights, law, and democracy. He has authored or co-authored eight books including&nbsp;<em>Sex Trafficking and Human Rights: The Status of Women and State Responses&nbsp;</em>(Georgetown University Press 2022) and&nbsp;<em>The Politics of Perverts: The Political Attitudes and Actions of Non-Traditional Sexual Minorities&nbsp;</em>(NYU Press 2024) and published over 40 articles and chapters. He is currently the Editor in Chief of&nbsp;<em>Political Research Quarterly.</em></p><p><a href="https://labdelaa.expressions.syr.edu/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Lamis Abdelaaty</em></a><em>&nbsp;is an associate professor of political science at the Maxwell School of Syracuse University. She is the author of&nbsp;</em><a href="https://global.oup.com/academic/product/discrimination-and-delegation-9780197530061" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Discrimination and Delegation: Explaining State Responses to Refugees</em></a><em>&nbsp;(Oxford University Press, 2021). Email her comments at&nbsp;</em><a href="mailto:labdelaa@syr.edu" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>labdelaa@syr.edu</em></a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="53305106" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/727873c9-c47b-45f5-a110-30ebeb913d51/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=727873c9-c47b-45f5-a110-30ebeb913d51&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Heather Smith-Cannoy et al., &quot;Sex Trafficking and Human Rights: The Status of Women and State Responses&quot; (Georgetown UP, 2022)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:55:31</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Human trafficking for the sex trade is a form of modern-day slavery that ensnares thousands of victims each year, disproportionately affecting women and girls. While the international community has developed an impressive edifice of human rights law, these laws are not equally recognized or enforced by all countries. Sex Trafficking and Human Rights demonstrates that state responsiveness to human trafficking is shaped by the political, social, cultural, and economic rights afforded to women in that state. While combatting human trafficking is a multiscalar problem with a host of conflating variables, this book shows that a common theme in the effectiveness of state response is the degree to which women and girls are perceived as, and actually are, full citizens. By analyzing human trafficking cases in India, Thailand, Russia, Nigeria, and Brazil, they shed light on the factors that make some women and girls more susceptible to traffickers than others.
Heather Smith-Cannoy (PhD, UC San Diego, 2007) is a Professor of Political Science/Social Justice and Human Rights at the New College of Interdisciplinary Arts and Sciences at Arizona State University. She is currently serving as the Interim Director of the School of Social and Behavioral Sciences. Her work explores when and under what conditions international law impacts the human rights of the most marginalized populations, focusing on both the opportunities and the challenges associated with this body of law. She has also focused on the role that international law can play in advancing the legal rights of sex trafficking victims. She has published 4 books and more than 15 articles and book chapters.
Patricia C. Rodda is the Assistant Professor of Political Science at Carroll University in Waukesha, Wisconsin. She teaches international relations, comparative politics, international law, conflict and security and political theory. Her research often focuses on vulnerable populations and the challenges they face seeking human rights protections. She is currently working on a new book project that investigates the institutions and interests that facilitate or obstruct the adoption of women’s rights in Muslim-majority states.
Charles “Tony” Smith is a Professor in Political Science and Law at the University of California-Irvine (PhD UCSD 2004; JD UF 1987). His research concerns how institutions and the strategic interactions of political actors relate to the contestation over rights, law, and democracy. He has authored or co-authored eight books including Sex Trafficking and Human Rights: The Status of Women and State Responses (Georgetown University Press 2022) and The Politics of Perverts: The Political Attitudes and Actions of Non-Traditional Sexual Minorities (NYU Press 2024) and published over 40 articles and chapters. He is currently the Editor in Chief of Political Research Quarterly.
Lamis Abdelaaty is an associate professor of political science at the Maxwell School of Syracuse University. She is the author of Discrimination and Delegation: Explaining State Responses to Refugees (Oxford University Press, 2021). Email her comments at labdelaa@syr.edu
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Human trafficking for the sex trade is a form of modern-day slavery that ensnares thousands of victims each year, disproportionately affecting women and girls. While the international community has developed an impressive edifice of human rights law, these laws are not equally recognized or enforced by all countries. Sex Trafficking and Human Rights demonstrates that state responsiveness to human trafficking is shaped by the political, social, cultural, and economic rights afforded to women in that state. While combatting human trafficking is a multiscalar problem with a host of conflating variables, this book shows that a common theme in the effectiveness of state response is the degree to which women and girls are perceived as, and actually are, full citizens. By analyzing human trafficking cases in India, Thailand, Russia, Nigeria, and Brazil, they shed light on the factors that make some women and girls more susceptible to traffickers than others.
Heather Smith-Cannoy (PhD, UC San Diego, 2007) is a Professor of Political Science/Social Justice and Human Rights at the New College of Interdisciplinary Arts and Sciences at Arizona State University. She is currently serving as the Interim Director of the School of Social and Behavioral Sciences. Her work explores when and under what conditions international law impacts the human rights of the most marginalized populations, focusing on both the opportunities and the challenges associated with this body of law. She has also focused on the role that international law can play in advancing the legal rights of sex trafficking victims. She has published 4 books and more than 15 articles and book chapters.
Patricia C. Rodda is the Assistant Professor of Political Science at Carroll University in Waukesha, Wisconsin. She teaches international relations, comparative politics, international law, conflict and security and political theory. Her research often focuses on vulnerable populations and the challenges they face seeking human rights protections. She is currently working on a new book project that investigates the institutions and interests that facilitate or obstruct the adoption of women’s rights in Muslim-majority states.
Charles “Tony” Smith is a Professor in Political Science and Law at the University of California-Irvine (PhD UCSD 2004; JD UF 1987). His research concerns how institutions and the strategic interactions of political actors relate to the contestation over rights, law, and democracy. He has authored or co-authored eight books including Sex Trafficking and Human Rights: The Status of Women and State Responses (Georgetown University Press 2022) and The Politics of Perverts: The Political Attitudes and Actions of Non-Traditional Sexual Minorities (NYU Press 2024) and published over 40 articles and chapters. He is currently the Editor in Chief of Political Research Quarterly.
Lamis Abdelaaty is an associate professor of political science at the Maxwell School of Syracuse University. She is the author of Discrimination and Delegation: Explaining State Responses to Refugees (Oxford University Press, 2021). Email her comments at labdelaa@syr.edu
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>686</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">a2692678-7db0-11ee-a3b1-7ffce3057aa8</guid>
      <title>Kay Wilson, &quot;Mental Health Law: Abolish Or Reform?&quot; (Oxford UP, 2021)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The debate about whether mental health law should be abolished or reformed is one that is&nbsp;highly charged and to which there are no easy solutions. In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780192843258" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Mental Health Law:&nbsp;Abolish Or Reform?</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Oxford&nbsp;UP, 2021), Dr Kay Wilson does not shy away from these controversial debates. Examining the work that dignity can do, she makes the case for an holistic interpretation of the&nbsp;<em>Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.&nbsp;</em>In thinking about mental health&nbsp;reform, she&nbsp;provides a core framework which may guide support and intervention&nbsp;in a way that compels respect for the dignity of the person. This book makes an important contribution to the literature. Its nuanced approach and fearlessness in delving into the hard issues should be required reading for policy makers, lawyers and mental health practitioners.&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;<a href="https://findanexpert.unimelb.edu.au/profile/621863-kay-wilson" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr Kay Wilson</a>&nbsp;is a postdoctoral fellow at the convenor of The Disability Law Network at Melbourne Law School, University of Melbourne. She is also a co-editor of&nbsp;<a href="https://www.routledge.com/The-Future-of-Mental-Health-Disability-and-Criminal-Law/Wilson-Maker-Gooding-Walvisch/p/book/9781032396071" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Future of Mental Health, Disability and Criminal Law</em></a><em>,&nbsp;</em>(Routledge, 2023).&nbsp;</p><p><em>﻿Jane Richards is a Lecturer in Law at York Law School, UK.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 11 Nov 2023 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/kay-wilson-mental-health-law-abolish-or-reform-oxford-up-2021-gfdakQhe</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The debate about whether mental health law should be abolished or reformed is one that is&nbsp;highly charged and to which there are no easy solutions. In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780192843258" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Mental Health Law:&nbsp;Abolish Or Reform?</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Oxford&nbsp;UP, 2021), Dr Kay Wilson does not shy away from these controversial debates. Examining the work that dignity can do, she makes the case for an holistic interpretation of the&nbsp;<em>Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.&nbsp;</em>In thinking about mental health&nbsp;reform, she&nbsp;provides a core framework which may guide support and intervention&nbsp;in a way that compels respect for the dignity of the person. This book makes an important contribution to the literature. Its nuanced approach and fearlessness in delving into the hard issues should be required reading for policy makers, lawyers and mental health practitioners.&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;<a href="https://findanexpert.unimelb.edu.au/profile/621863-kay-wilson" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr Kay Wilson</a>&nbsp;is a postdoctoral fellow at the convenor of The Disability Law Network at Melbourne Law School, University of Melbourne. She is also a co-editor of&nbsp;<a href="https://www.routledge.com/The-Future-of-Mental-Health-Disability-and-Criminal-Law/Wilson-Maker-Gooding-Walvisch/p/book/9781032396071" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Future of Mental Health, Disability and Criminal Law</em></a><em>,&nbsp;</em>(Routledge, 2023).&nbsp;</p><p><em>﻿Jane Richards is a Lecturer in Law at York Law School, UK.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="59161359" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/8139831b-110a-41a4-bd1c-d11a53a6dce0/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=8139831b-110a-41a4-bd1c-d11a53a6dce0&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Kay Wilson, &quot;Mental Health Law: Abolish Or Reform?&quot; (Oxford UP, 2021)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:01:37</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The debate about whether mental health law should be abolished or reformed is one that is highly charged and to which there are no easy solutions. In Mental Health Law: Abolish Or Reform? (Oxford UP, 2021), Dr Kay Wilson does not shy away from these controversial debates. Examining the work that dignity can do, she makes the case for an holistic interpretation of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. In thinking about mental health reform, she provides a core framework which may guide support and intervention in a way that compels respect for the dignity of the person. This book makes an important contribution to the literature. Its nuanced approach and fearlessness in delving into the hard issues should be required reading for policy makers, lawyers and mental health practitioners. 
 Dr Kay Wilson is a postdoctoral fellow at the convenor of The Disability Law Network at Melbourne Law School, University of Melbourne. She is also a co-editor of The Future of Mental Health, Disability and Criminal Law, (Routledge, 2023). 
﻿Jane Richards is a Lecturer in Law at York Law School, UK.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The debate about whether mental health law should be abolished or reformed is one that is highly charged and to which there are no easy solutions. In Mental Health Law: Abolish Or Reform? (Oxford UP, 2021), Dr Kay Wilson does not shy away from these controversial debates. Examining the work that dignity can do, she makes the case for an holistic interpretation of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. In thinking about mental health reform, she provides a core framework which may guide support and intervention in a way that compels respect for the dignity of the person. This book makes an important contribution to the literature. Its nuanced approach and fearlessness in delving into the hard issues should be required reading for policy makers, lawyers and mental health practitioners. 
 Dr Kay Wilson is a postdoctoral fellow at the convenor of The Disability Law Network at Melbourne Law School, University of Melbourne. She is also a co-editor of The Future of Mental Health, Disability and Criminal Law, (Routledge, 2023). 
﻿Jane Richards is a Lecturer in Law at York Law School, UK.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>204</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1db7c778-7b2f-11ee-87f0-5bd9f1d014d2</guid>
      <title>Malcolm D. Evans, &quot;Tackling Torture: Prevention in Practice&quot; (Bristol UP, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>How big a problem is torture? Are the right things being done to prevent it? Why does the UN appear at times to be so impotent in the face of it?&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781529225693" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Tackling Torture: Prevention in Practice</em>&nbsp;</a>(Bristol University Press, 2023) by Malcolm D. Evans tells the story of torture prevention under international law, setting out what is really happening around the world. Challenging assumptions about torture’s root causes, he calls for what is needed to enable us to bring about change.</p><p>The author draws on over ten years’ experience as Chair of the UN Subcommittee on Prevention of Torture to give a frank account of the remarkable capacities of this system, what it has achieved in practice, or not been able to achieve – and most importantly, why.</p><p><em>This&nbsp;interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;forthcoming book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 8 Nov 2023 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/malcolm-d-evans-tackling-torture-prevention-in-practice-bristol-up-2023-h_5ASYhy</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How big a problem is torture? Are the right things being done to prevent it? Why does the UN appear at times to be so impotent in the face of it?&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781529225693" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Tackling Torture: Prevention in Practice</em>&nbsp;</a>(Bristol University Press, 2023) by Malcolm D. Evans tells the story of torture prevention under international law, setting out what is really happening around the world. Challenging assumptions about torture’s root causes, he calls for what is needed to enable us to bring about change.</p><p>The author draws on over ten years’ experience as Chair of the UN Subcommittee on Prevention of Torture to give a frank account of the remarkable capacities of this system, what it has achieved in practice, or not been able to achieve – and most importantly, why.</p><p><em>This&nbsp;interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose</em><a href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/securing-peace-in-angola-and-mozambique-9781350407930/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;forthcoming book</em></a><em>&nbsp;focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="53827545" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/c7be650a-f3db-474c-b266-175e9d3d4d90/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=c7be650a-f3db-474c-b266-175e9d3d4d90&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Malcolm D. Evans, &quot;Tackling Torture: Prevention in Practice&quot; (Bristol UP, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:56:04</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>How big a problem is torture? Are the right things being done to prevent it? Why does the UN appear at times to be so impotent in the face of it? Tackling Torture: Prevention in Practice (Bristol University Press, 2023) by Malcolm D. Evans tells the story of torture prevention under international law, setting out what is really happening around the world. Challenging assumptions about torture’s root causes, he calls for what is needed to enable us to bring about change.
The author draws on over ten years’ experience as Chair of the UN Subcommittee on Prevention of Torture to give a frank account of the remarkable capacities of this system, what it has achieved in practice, or not been able to achieve – and most importantly, why.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose forthcoming book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>How big a problem is torture? Are the right things being done to prevent it? Why does the UN appear at times to be so impotent in the face of it? Tackling Torture: Prevention in Practice (Bristol University Press, 2023) by Malcolm D. Evans tells the story of torture prevention under international law, setting out what is really happening around the world. Challenging assumptions about torture’s root causes, he calls for what is needed to enable us to bring about change.
The author draws on over ten years’ experience as Chair of the UN Subcommittee on Prevention of Torture to give a frank account of the remarkable capacities of this system, what it has achieved in practice, or not been able to achieve – and most importantly, why.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose forthcoming book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>54</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5b4f38aa-7d96-11ee-85e7-9be1624ead5e</guid>
      <title>Speak Freely: The Princeton Principles</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Kicking off our new monthly series on freedom of speech,&nbsp;<a href="https://politics.princeton.edu/people/keith-e-whittington" rel="noopener noreferrer">Keith Whittington</a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a href="https://polisci.wisc.edu/staff/donald-downs/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Donald Downs</a>&nbsp;discuss the&nbsp;<a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/princeton-principles-campus-culture-free-inquiry" rel="noopener noreferrer">Princeton Principles for a Campus of Free Inquiry</a>. These principles, outlined by a group of scholars convened by Professor Robert P. George here at the&nbsp;<a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/" rel="noopener noreferrer">James Madison Program</a>&nbsp;in March 2023, expand on the well-known Chicago Principles in ensuring campus free speech and institutional neutrality.</p><p>Professors Whittington and Downs are both among the original fifteen participants and endorsers of the Princeton Principles, and played significant roles in drafting the document. Keith Whittington is the William Nelson Cromwell Professor of Politics in the Department of Politics at Princeton University, and the author of&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691191522" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Speak Freely: Why Universities Must Defend Free Speech</em></a>&nbsp;(Princeton UP, 2019).&nbsp;He specializes in public law and American Politics, and will soon join the faculty of Yale Law School. Donald Downs is the Alexander Meiklejohn Professor of Political Science Emeritus at the University of Wisconsin, Madison. His areas of specialty include freedom of speech, academic freedom, and American politics. Since retiring, Downs has been the lead faculty advisor to the Free Speech and Open Inquiry Project of the Institute for Humane Studies in Washington, D.C.</p><p>Princeton's governing document,&nbsp;<a href="https://rrr.princeton.edu/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Rights, Rules, and Responsibilities</em></a>, referenced during the episode.&nbsp;The James Madison Program's&nbsp;<a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/academic-initiatives/initiative-freedom-thought-inquiry-and-expression" rel="noopener noreferrer">Initiative on Freedom of Thought, Inquiry, and Expression</a>.</p><p><em>﻿</em><a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/people/annika-nordquist" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Annika Nordquist</em></a><em>&nbsp;is the Communications Coordinator of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions and host of the Program’s podcast,&nbsp;</em><a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/podcast" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Madison’s Notes</em></a><em>.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 7 Nov 2023 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/speak-freely-the-princeton-principles-r4m2UEmd</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kicking off our new monthly series on freedom of speech,&nbsp;<a href="https://politics.princeton.edu/people/keith-e-whittington" rel="noopener noreferrer">Keith Whittington</a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a href="https://polisci.wisc.edu/staff/donald-downs/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Donald Downs</a>&nbsp;discuss the&nbsp;<a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/princeton-principles-campus-culture-free-inquiry" rel="noopener noreferrer">Princeton Principles for a Campus of Free Inquiry</a>. These principles, outlined by a group of scholars convened by Professor Robert P. George here at the&nbsp;<a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/" rel="noopener noreferrer">James Madison Program</a>&nbsp;in March 2023, expand on the well-known Chicago Principles in ensuring campus free speech and institutional neutrality.</p><p>Professors Whittington and Downs are both among the original fifteen participants and endorsers of the Princeton Principles, and played significant roles in drafting the document. Keith Whittington is the William Nelson Cromwell Professor of Politics in the Department of Politics at Princeton University, and the author of&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691191522" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Speak Freely: Why Universities Must Defend Free Speech</em></a>&nbsp;(Princeton UP, 2019).&nbsp;He specializes in public law and American Politics, and will soon join the faculty of Yale Law School. Donald Downs is the Alexander Meiklejohn Professor of Political Science Emeritus at the University of Wisconsin, Madison. His areas of specialty include freedom of speech, academic freedom, and American politics. Since retiring, Downs has been the lead faculty advisor to the Free Speech and Open Inquiry Project of the Institute for Humane Studies in Washington, D.C.</p><p>Princeton's governing document,&nbsp;<a href="https://rrr.princeton.edu/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Rights, Rules, and Responsibilities</em></a>, referenced during the episode.&nbsp;The James Madison Program's&nbsp;<a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/academic-initiatives/initiative-freedom-thought-inquiry-and-expression" rel="noopener noreferrer">Initiative on Freedom of Thought, Inquiry, and Expression</a>.</p><p><em>﻿</em><a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/people/annika-nordquist" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Annika Nordquist</em></a><em>&nbsp;is the Communications Coordinator of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions and host of the Program’s podcast,&nbsp;</em><a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/podcast" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Madison’s Notes</em></a><em>.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="57455682" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/0658b4ab-79d2-4b01-a81b-5095ba1fa30f/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=0658b4ab-79d2-4b01-a81b-5095ba1fa30f&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Speak Freely: The Princeton Principles</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:59:50</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Kicking off our new monthly series on freedom of speech, Keith Whittington and Donald Downs discuss the Princeton Principles for a Campus of Free Inquiry. These principles, outlined by a group of scholars convened by Professor Robert P. George here at the James Madison Program in March 2023, expand on the well-known Chicago Principles in ensuring campus free speech and institutional neutrality.
Professors Whittington and Downs are both among the original fifteen participants and endorsers of the Princeton Principles, and played significant roles in drafting the document. Keith Whittington is the William Nelson Cromwell Professor of Politics in the Department of Politics at Princeton University, and the author of Speak Freely: Why Universities Must Defend Free Speech (Princeton UP, 2019). He specializes in public law and American Politics, and will soon join the faculty of Yale Law School. Donald Downs is the Alexander Meiklejohn Professor of Political Science Emeritus at the University of Wisconsin, Madison. His areas of specialty include freedom of speech, academic freedom, and American politics. Since retiring, Downs has been the lead faculty advisor to the Free Speech and Open Inquiry Project of the Institute for Humane Studies in Washington, D.C.
Princeton&apos;s governing document, Rights, Rules, and Responsibilities, referenced during the episode. The James Madison Program&apos;s Initiative on Freedom of Thought, Inquiry, and Expression.
﻿Annika Nordquist is the Communications Coordinator of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions and host of the Program’s podcast, Madison’s Notes.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Kicking off our new monthly series on freedom of speech, Keith Whittington and Donald Downs discuss the Princeton Principles for a Campus of Free Inquiry. These principles, outlined by a group of scholars convened by Professor Robert P. George here at the James Madison Program in March 2023, expand on the well-known Chicago Principles in ensuring campus free speech and institutional neutrality.
Professors Whittington and Downs are both among the original fifteen participants and endorsers of the Princeton Principles, and played significant roles in drafting the document. Keith Whittington is the William Nelson Cromwell Professor of Politics in the Department of Politics at Princeton University, and the author of Speak Freely: Why Universities Must Defend Free Speech (Princeton UP, 2019). He specializes in public law and American Politics, and will soon join the faculty of Yale Law School. Donald Downs is the Alexander Meiklejohn Professor of Political Science Emeritus at the University of Wisconsin, Madison. His areas of specialty include freedom of speech, academic freedom, and American politics. Since retiring, Downs has been the lead faculty advisor to the Free Speech and Open Inquiry Project of the Institute for Humane Studies in Washington, D.C.
Princeton&apos;s governing document, Rights, Rules, and Responsibilities, referenced during the episode. The James Madison Program&apos;s Initiative on Freedom of Thought, Inquiry, and Expression.
﻿Annika Nordquist is the Communications Coordinator of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions and host of the Program’s podcast, Madison’s Notes.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>88</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">83902cc0-7a67-11ee-8e7c-b7fee5ffc7f0</guid>
      <title>B Camminga, &quot;Transgender Refugees and the Imagined South Africa: Bodies Over Borders and Borders Over Bodies&quot; (Palgrave MacMillan, 2018)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9783319926681" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Transgender Refugees and the Imagined South Africa: Bodies Over Borders and Borders Over Bodies</em></a>&nbsp;(Palgrave MacMillan, 2018)&nbsp;tracks the conceptual journeying of the term ‘transgender’ from the Global North—where it originated—along with the physical embodied journeying of transgender asylum seekers from countries within Africa to South Africa and considers the interrelationships between the two. The term 'transgender' transforms as it travels, taking on meaning in relation to bodies, national homes, institutional frameworks and imaginaries. This study centres on the experiences and narratives of people that can be usefully termed 'gender refugees', gathered through a series of life story interviews. It is the argument of this book that the departures, border crossings, arrivals and perceptions of South Africa for gender refugees have been both enabled and constrained by the contested meanings and politics of this emergence of transgender. This book explores, through these narratives, the radical constitutional-legal possibilities for 'transgender' in South Africa, the dissonances between the possibilities of constitutional law, and the pervasive politics/logic of binary ‘sex/gender’ within South African society. In doing so, this book enriches the emergent field of Transgender Studies and challenges some of the current dominant theoretical and political perceptions of 'transgender'. It offers complex narratives from the African continent regarding sex, gender, sexuality and notions of home concerning particular geo-politically situated bodies.</p><p><a href="https://www.ici-berlin.org/people/camminga/" rel="noopener noreferrer">B Camminga</a>&nbsp;(they/them) received a PhD from the Institute for Humanities in Africa (HUMA), University of Cape Town, in 2016. They have since held a postdoctoral fellowship at the African Centre for Migration &amp; Society, Wits University, and several visiting fellowships, including at the Universities of Edinburgh and Oxford. They work on issues relating to gender identity and expression on the African continent with a focus on transgender migrants, refugees, and asylum seekers.</p><p><em>﻿</em><a href="https://cjarrard717.wixsite.com/website" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Clayton Jarrard</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a Research Project Coordinator at the University of Kansas Center for Research, contributing to initiatives at the nexus of research, policy implementation, and community efforts. His scholarly engagement spans the subject areas of Cultural Anthropology, Queer Studies, Disability Studies, Mad Studies, and Religious Studies. Clayton is also a host for the&nbsp;</em><a href="https://open.spotify.com/show/0X98h0FENG1hptiHFA1o5b?si=183b40d21ac94919/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Un/Livable Cultures podcast</em></a><em>.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 6 Nov 2023 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/b-camminga-transgender-refugees-and-the-imagined-south-africa-bodies-over-borders-and-borders-over-bodies-palgrave-macmillan-2018-d1lR3kgo</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9783319926681" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Transgender Refugees and the Imagined South Africa: Bodies Over Borders and Borders Over Bodies</em></a>&nbsp;(Palgrave MacMillan, 2018)&nbsp;tracks the conceptual journeying of the term ‘transgender’ from the Global North—where it originated—along with the physical embodied journeying of transgender asylum seekers from countries within Africa to South Africa and considers the interrelationships between the two. The term 'transgender' transforms as it travels, taking on meaning in relation to bodies, national homes, institutional frameworks and imaginaries. This study centres on the experiences and narratives of people that can be usefully termed 'gender refugees', gathered through a series of life story interviews. It is the argument of this book that the departures, border crossings, arrivals and perceptions of South Africa for gender refugees have been both enabled and constrained by the contested meanings and politics of this emergence of transgender. This book explores, through these narratives, the radical constitutional-legal possibilities for 'transgender' in South Africa, the dissonances between the possibilities of constitutional law, and the pervasive politics/logic of binary ‘sex/gender’ within South African society. In doing so, this book enriches the emergent field of Transgender Studies and challenges some of the current dominant theoretical and political perceptions of 'transgender'. It offers complex narratives from the African continent regarding sex, gender, sexuality and notions of home concerning particular geo-politically situated bodies.</p><p><a href="https://www.ici-berlin.org/people/camminga/" rel="noopener noreferrer">B Camminga</a>&nbsp;(they/them) received a PhD from the Institute for Humanities in Africa (HUMA), University of Cape Town, in 2016. They have since held a postdoctoral fellowship at the African Centre for Migration &amp; Society, Wits University, and several visiting fellowships, including at the Universities of Edinburgh and Oxford. They work on issues relating to gender identity and expression on the African continent with a focus on transgender migrants, refugees, and asylum seekers.</p><p><em>﻿</em><a href="https://cjarrard717.wixsite.com/website" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Clayton Jarrard</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a Research Project Coordinator at the University of Kansas Center for Research, contributing to initiatives at the nexus of research, policy implementation, and community efforts. His scholarly engagement spans the subject areas of Cultural Anthropology, Queer Studies, Disability Studies, Mad Studies, and Religious Studies. Clayton is also a host for the&nbsp;</em><a href="https://open.spotify.com/show/0X98h0FENG1hptiHFA1o5b?si=183b40d21ac94919/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Un/Livable Cultures podcast</em></a><em>.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="49003840" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/b49399f7-602a-48e3-b7aa-33d18e1c9ffe/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=b49399f7-602a-48e3-b7aa-33d18e1c9ffe&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>B Camminga, &quot;Transgender Refugees and the Imagined South Africa: Bodies Over Borders and Borders Over Bodies&quot; (Palgrave MacMillan, 2018)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:51:02</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Transgender Refugees and the Imagined South Africa: Bodies Over Borders and Borders Over Bodies (Palgrave MacMillan, 2018) tracks the conceptual journeying of the term ‘transgender’ from the Global North—where it originated—along with the physical embodied journeying of transgender asylum seekers from countries within Africa to South Africa and considers the interrelationships between the two. The term &apos;transgender&apos; transforms as it travels, taking on meaning in relation to bodies, national homes, institutional frameworks and imaginaries. This study centres on the experiences and narratives of people that can be usefully termed &apos;gender refugees&apos;, gathered through a series of life story interviews. It is the argument of this book that the departures, border crossings, arrivals and perceptions of South Africa for gender refugees have been both enabled and constrained by the contested meanings and politics of this emergence of transgender. This book explores, through these narratives, the radical constitutional-legal possibilities for &apos;transgender&apos; in South Africa, the dissonances between the possibilities of constitutional law, and the pervasive politics/logic of binary ‘sex/gender’ within South African society. In doing so, this book enriches the emergent field of Transgender Studies and challenges some of the current dominant theoretical and political perceptions of &apos;transgender&apos;. It offers complex narratives from the African continent regarding sex, gender, sexuality and notions of home concerning particular geo-politically situated bodies.
B Camminga (they/them) received a PhD from the Institute for Humanities in Africa (HUMA), University of Cape Town, in 2016. They have since held a postdoctoral fellowship at the African Centre for Migration &amp; Society, Wits University, and several visiting fellowships, including at the Universities of Edinburgh and Oxford. They work on issues relating to gender identity and expression on the African continent with a focus on transgender migrants, refugees, and asylum seekers.
﻿Clayton Jarrard is a Research Project Coordinator at the University of Kansas Center for Research, contributing to initiatives at the nexus of research, policy implementation, and community efforts. His scholarly engagement spans the subject areas of Cultural Anthropology, Queer Studies, Disability Studies, Mad Studies, and Religious Studies. Clayton is also a host for the Un/Livable Cultures podcast.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Transgender Refugees and the Imagined South Africa: Bodies Over Borders and Borders Over Bodies (Palgrave MacMillan, 2018) tracks the conceptual journeying of the term ‘transgender’ from the Global North—where it originated—along with the physical embodied journeying of transgender asylum seekers from countries within Africa to South Africa and considers the interrelationships between the two. The term &apos;transgender&apos; transforms as it travels, taking on meaning in relation to bodies, national homes, institutional frameworks and imaginaries. This study centres on the experiences and narratives of people that can be usefully termed &apos;gender refugees&apos;, gathered through a series of life story interviews. It is the argument of this book that the departures, border crossings, arrivals and perceptions of South Africa for gender refugees have been both enabled and constrained by the contested meanings and politics of this emergence of transgender. This book explores, through these narratives, the radical constitutional-legal possibilities for &apos;transgender&apos; in South Africa, the dissonances between the possibilities of constitutional law, and the pervasive politics/logic of binary ‘sex/gender’ within South African society. In doing so, this book enriches the emergent field of Transgender Studies and challenges some of the current dominant theoretical and political perceptions of &apos;transgender&apos;. It offers complex narratives from the African continent regarding sex, gender, sexuality and notions of home concerning particular geo-politically situated bodies.
B Camminga (they/them) received a PhD from the Institute for Humanities in Africa (HUMA), University of Cape Town, in 2016. They have since held a postdoctoral fellowship at the African Centre for Migration &amp; Society, Wits University, and several visiting fellowships, including at the Universities of Edinburgh and Oxford. They work on issues relating to gender identity and expression on the African continent with a focus on transgender migrants, refugees, and asylum seekers.
﻿Clayton Jarrard is a Research Project Coordinator at the University of Kansas Center for Research, contributing to initiatives at the nexus of research, policy implementation, and community efforts. His scholarly engagement spans the subject areas of Cultural Anthropology, Queer Studies, Disability Studies, Mad Studies, and Religious Studies. Clayton is also a host for the Un/Livable Cultures podcast.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>54</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2c29e328-78b3-11ee-b644-9f9c56e67cb6</guid>
      <title>Antitrust Policy, The Chicago School Consumer Welfare Standard and The Rise of the New Brandeisians</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Luke Froeb joins the podcast to talk about his career in economics, what it's like to be the chief economist at the FTC and DOJ antitrust division, how these agencies make decisions about merger cases, the history of the Chicago School consumer welfare standard and the types of analytical tools and modeling that underlies the approach, along with the rise of the New Brandeisians and their failures thus far.</p><p><a href="http://www.jonathanhartley.net/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Jon Hartley</em></a><em>&nbsp;is an economics researcher with interests in international macroeconomics, finance, and labor economics and is currently an economics PhD student at&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.stanford.edu/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Stanford University</em></a><em>. He is also currently a Research Fellow at the&nbsp;</em><a href="https://freopp.org/the-freopp-scholar-jon-hartley-e0e9666ac942" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Foundation for Research on Equal Opportunity</em></a><em>, a Senior Fellow at the&nbsp;</em><a href="https://macdonaldlaurier.ca/cm-expert/jon-hartley/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Macdonald-Laurier Institute</em></a><em>, and a research associate at the&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.hoover.org/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Hoover Institution</em></a><em>.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 4 Nov 2023 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/antitrust-policy-the-chicago-school-consumer-welfare-standard-and-the-rise-of-the-new-brandeisians-d54UP7e7</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Luke Froeb joins the podcast to talk about his career in economics, what it's like to be the chief economist at the FTC and DOJ antitrust division, how these agencies make decisions about merger cases, the history of the Chicago School consumer welfare standard and the types of analytical tools and modeling that underlies the approach, along with the rise of the New Brandeisians and their failures thus far.</p><p><a href="http://www.jonathanhartley.net/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Jon Hartley</em></a><em>&nbsp;is an economics researcher with interests in international macroeconomics, finance, and labor economics and is currently an economics PhD student at&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.stanford.edu/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Stanford University</em></a><em>. He is also currently a Research Fellow at the&nbsp;</em><a href="https://freopp.org/the-freopp-scholar-jon-hartley-e0e9666ac942" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Foundation for Research on Equal Opportunity</em></a><em>, a Senior Fellow at the&nbsp;</em><a href="https://macdonaldlaurier.ca/cm-expert/jon-hartley/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Macdonald-Laurier Institute</em></a><em>, and a research associate at the&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.hoover.org/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Hoover Institution</em></a><em>.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="54593652" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/476727bf-74a4-4381-965e-76b0e223e6cf/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=476727bf-74a4-4381-965e-76b0e223e6cf&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Antitrust Policy, The Chicago School Consumer Welfare Standard and The Rise of the New Brandeisians</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:56:51</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Luke Froeb joins the podcast to talk about his career in economics, what it&apos;s like to be the chief economist at the FTC and DOJ antitrust division, how these agencies make decisions about merger cases, the history of the Chicago School consumer welfare standard and the types of analytical tools and modeling that underlies the approach, along with the rise of the New Brandeisians and their failures thus far.
Jon Hartley is an economics researcher with interests in international macroeconomics, finance, and labor economics and is currently an economics PhD student at Stanford University. He is also currently a Research Fellow at the Foundation for Research on Equal Opportunity, a Senior Fellow at the Macdonald-Laurier Institute, and a research associate at the Hoover Institution.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Luke Froeb joins the podcast to talk about his career in economics, what it&apos;s like to be the chief economist at the FTC and DOJ antitrust division, how these agencies make decisions about merger cases, the history of the Chicago School consumer welfare standard and the types of analytical tools and modeling that underlies the approach, along with the rise of the New Brandeisians and their failures thus far.
Jon Hartley is an economics researcher with interests in international macroeconomics, finance, and labor economics and is currently an economics PhD student at Stanford University. He is also currently a Research Fellow at the Foundation for Research on Equal Opportunity, a Senior Fellow at the Macdonald-Laurier Institute, and a research associate at the Hoover Institution.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>25</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2aed8100-75d8-11ee-a3e3-b39f40c70876</guid>
      <title>Wendy H. Wong, &quot;We, the Data: Human Rights in the Digital Age&quot; (MIT Press, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Our data-intensive world is here to stay, but does that come at the cost of our humanity in terms of autonomy, community, dignity, and equality? In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780262048576" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>We, the Data: Human Rights in the Digital Age</em></a>&nbsp;(MIT Press, 2023), Wendy H. Wong argues that we cannot allow that to happen. Exploring the pervasiveness of data collection and tracking, Wong reminds us that we are all stakeholders in this digital world, who are currently being left out of the most pressing conversations around technology, ethics, and policy. This book clarifies the nature of datafication and calls for an extension of human rights to recognize how data complicate what it means to safeguard and encourage human potential.</p><p>Wendy H. Wong is Professor of Political Science and Principal's Research Chair at the University of British Columbia, Okanagan. She is the author of two award-winning books:&nbsp;<em>Internal Affairs: How the Structure of NGOs Transforms Human Rights</em>&nbsp;and (with Sarah S. Stroup)&nbsp;<em>The Authority Trap: Strategic Choices of International NGOs</em>.</p><p><a href="https://labdelaa.expressions.syr.edu/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Lamis Abdelaaty</em></a><em>&nbsp;is an associate professor of political science at the Maxwell School of Syracuse University. She is the author of&nbsp;</em><a href="https://global.oup.com/academic/product/discrimination-and-delegation-9780197530061" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Discrimination and Delegation: Explaining State Responses to Refugees</em></a><em>&nbsp;(Oxford University Press, 2021). Email her comments at&nbsp;</em><a href="mailto:labdelaa@syr.edu" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>labdelaa@syr.edu</em></a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 2 Nov 2023 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/wendy-h-wong-we-the-data-human-rights-in-the-digital-age-mit-press-2023-rA0HUyHM</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our data-intensive world is here to stay, but does that come at the cost of our humanity in terms of autonomy, community, dignity, and equality? In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780262048576" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>We, the Data: Human Rights in the Digital Age</em></a>&nbsp;(MIT Press, 2023), Wendy H. Wong argues that we cannot allow that to happen. Exploring the pervasiveness of data collection and tracking, Wong reminds us that we are all stakeholders in this digital world, who are currently being left out of the most pressing conversations around technology, ethics, and policy. This book clarifies the nature of datafication and calls for an extension of human rights to recognize how data complicate what it means to safeguard and encourage human potential.</p><p>Wendy H. Wong is Professor of Political Science and Principal's Research Chair at the University of British Columbia, Okanagan. She is the author of two award-winning books:&nbsp;<em>Internal Affairs: How the Structure of NGOs Transforms Human Rights</em>&nbsp;and (with Sarah S. Stroup)&nbsp;<em>The Authority Trap: Strategic Choices of International NGOs</em>.</p><p><a href="https://labdelaa.expressions.syr.edu/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Lamis Abdelaaty</em></a><em>&nbsp;is an associate professor of political science at the Maxwell School of Syracuse University. She is the author of&nbsp;</em><a href="https://global.oup.com/academic/product/discrimination-and-delegation-9780197530061" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Discrimination and Delegation: Explaining State Responses to Refugees</em></a><em>&nbsp;(Oxford University Press, 2021). Email her comments at&nbsp;</em><a href="mailto:labdelaa@syr.edu" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>labdelaa@syr.edu</em></a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="51947972" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/480f4397-7f8f-4d68-901c-6e747e488fc6/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=480f4397-7f8f-4d68-901c-6e747e488fc6&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Wendy H. Wong, &quot;We, the Data: Human Rights in the Digital Age&quot; (MIT Press, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:54:06</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Our data-intensive world is here to stay, but does that come at the cost of our humanity in terms of autonomy, community, dignity, and equality? In We, the Data: Human Rights in the Digital Age (MIT Press, 2023), Wendy H. Wong argues that we cannot allow that to happen. Exploring the pervasiveness of data collection and tracking, Wong reminds us that we are all stakeholders in this digital world, who are currently being left out of the most pressing conversations around technology, ethics, and policy. This book clarifies the nature of datafication and calls for an extension of human rights to recognize how data complicate what it means to safeguard and encourage human potential.
Wendy H. Wong is Professor of Political Science and Principal&apos;s Research Chair at the University of British Columbia, Okanagan. She is the author of two award-winning books: Internal Affairs: How the Structure of NGOs Transforms Human Rights and (with Sarah S. Stroup) The Authority Trap: Strategic Choices of International NGOs.
Lamis Abdelaaty is an associate professor of political science at the Maxwell School of Syracuse University. She is the author of Discrimination and Delegation: Explaining State Responses to Refugees (Oxford University Press, 2021). Email her comments at labdelaa@syr.edu
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Our data-intensive world is here to stay, but does that come at the cost of our humanity in terms of autonomy, community, dignity, and equality? In We, the Data: Human Rights in the Digital Age (MIT Press, 2023), Wendy H. Wong argues that we cannot allow that to happen. Exploring the pervasiveness of data collection and tracking, Wong reminds us that we are all stakeholders in this digital world, who are currently being left out of the most pressing conversations around technology, ethics, and policy. This book clarifies the nature of datafication and calls for an extension of human rights to recognize how data complicate what it means to safeguard and encourage human potential.
Wendy H. Wong is Professor of Political Science and Principal&apos;s Research Chair at the University of British Columbia, Okanagan. She is the author of two award-winning books: Internal Affairs: How the Structure of NGOs Transforms Human Rights and (with Sarah S. Stroup) The Authority Trap: Strategic Choices of International NGOs.
Lamis Abdelaaty is an associate professor of political science at the Maxwell School of Syracuse University. She is the author of Discrimination and Delegation: Explaining State Responses to Refugees (Oxford University Press, 2021). Email her comments at labdelaa@syr.edu
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>684</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">78d58400-759a-11ee-8f76-27773142a0fb</guid>
      <title>Paolo Sandro, &quot;The Making of Constitutional Democracy: From Creation to Application of Law&quot; (Bloomsbury, 2022)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>This book is a tour de force. In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781509905225" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Making of Constitutional Democracy: From Creation to Application of Law</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Bloomsbury, 2022),&nbsp;<a href="https://essl.leeds.ac.uk/law/staff/1622/dr-paolo-sandro" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr Paolo Sandro</a>&nbsp;explores the assumed unproblematic&nbsp;tension between the creation and application of law, and the way that this guides constitutional democracy. Crossing both jurisdictional borders and legal traditions, the author draws out the intrinsic relation between law, power and politics, to reveal law's authority. Ten years in the writing, the work is truly interdisciplinary. It&nbsp;integrates jurisprudential methodology, history, anthropology, political science, philosophy of language and philosophy of action. It will be of use to anyone who is serious about becoming a better scholar. It compels reflection on the assumptions that scholars make in writing, in practice, in scholarship and study. All the while&nbsp;Sandro breaks new ground in legal theory and in the study of constitutional democracy.&nbsp;</p><p><a href="https://twitter.com/paolosandro2" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr Paolo Sandro</a>&nbsp;is a lecturer in law at The University of Leeds.&nbsp;</p><p><em>The Making of Constitutional Democracy: From Creation to Application of Law&nbsp;</em>is available&nbsp;<a href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4562656" rel="noopener noreferrer">open access</a>.&nbsp;</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 1 Nov 2023 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/paolo-sandro-the-making-of-constitutional-democracy-from-creation-to-application-of-law-bloomsbury-2022-lVUVnrx4</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This book is a tour de force. In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781509905225" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Making of Constitutional Democracy: From Creation to Application of Law</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Bloomsbury, 2022),&nbsp;<a href="https://essl.leeds.ac.uk/law/staff/1622/dr-paolo-sandro" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr Paolo Sandro</a>&nbsp;explores the assumed unproblematic&nbsp;tension between the creation and application of law, and the way that this guides constitutional democracy. Crossing both jurisdictional borders and legal traditions, the author draws out the intrinsic relation between law, power and politics, to reveal law's authority. Ten years in the writing, the work is truly interdisciplinary. It&nbsp;integrates jurisprudential methodology, history, anthropology, political science, philosophy of language and philosophy of action. It will be of use to anyone who is serious about becoming a better scholar. It compels reflection on the assumptions that scholars make in writing, in practice, in scholarship and study. All the while&nbsp;Sandro breaks new ground in legal theory and in the study of constitutional democracy.&nbsp;</p><p><a href="https://twitter.com/paolosandro2" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr Paolo Sandro</a>&nbsp;is a lecturer in law at The University of Leeds.&nbsp;</p><p><em>The Making of Constitutional Democracy: From Creation to Application of Law&nbsp;</em>is available&nbsp;<a href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4562656" rel="noopener noreferrer">open access</a>.&nbsp;</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="68140762" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/679e1c92-88e5-4bb1-af3b-0ab581dffcc9/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=679e1c92-88e5-4bb1-af3b-0ab581dffcc9&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Paolo Sandro, &quot;The Making of Constitutional Democracy: From Creation to Application of Law&quot; (Bloomsbury, 2022)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:10:58</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>This book is a tour de force. In The Making of Constitutional Democracy: From Creation to Application of Law (Bloomsbury, 2022), Dr Paolo Sandro explores the assumed unproblematic tension between the creation and application of law, and the way that this guides constitutional democracy. Crossing both jurisdictional borders and legal traditions, the author draws out the intrinsic relation between law, power and politics, to reveal law&apos;s authority. Ten years in the writing, the work is truly interdisciplinary. It integrates jurisprudential methodology, history, anthropology, political science, philosophy of language and philosophy of action. It will be of use to anyone who is serious about becoming a better scholar. It compels reflection on the assumptions that scholars make in writing, in practice, in scholarship and study. All the while Sandro breaks new ground in legal theory and in the study of constitutional democracy. 
Dr Paolo Sandro is a lecturer in law at The University of Leeds. 
The Making of Constitutional Democracy: From Creation to Application of Law is available open access. 
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>This book is a tour de force. In The Making of Constitutional Democracy: From Creation to Application of Law (Bloomsbury, 2022), Dr Paolo Sandro explores the assumed unproblematic tension between the creation and application of law, and the way that this guides constitutional democracy. Crossing both jurisdictional borders and legal traditions, the author draws out the intrinsic relation between law, power and politics, to reveal law&apos;s authority. Ten years in the writing, the work is truly interdisciplinary. It integrates jurisprudential methodology, history, anthropology, political science, philosophy of language and philosophy of action. It will be of use to anyone who is serious about becoming a better scholar. It compels reflection on the assumptions that scholars make in writing, in practice, in scholarship and study. All the while Sandro breaks new ground in legal theory and in the study of constitutional democracy. 
Dr Paolo Sandro is a lecturer in law at The University of Leeds. 
The Making of Constitutional Democracy: From Creation to Application of Law is available open access. 
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>203</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4813453a-75a6-11ee-a98e-03ce03c100b7</guid>
      <title>The Future of Cancelling: A Conversation with Greg Lukianoff</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Cancel culture is something all academics are aware of and some are concerned about.&nbsp;&nbsp;Certainly that’s true of Greg Lukianoff who was the co-author (with Jonathan Haidt)&nbsp;of&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780735224919" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Coddling of the American Mind</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Penguin, 2018)&nbsp;and who has now co-authored (with&nbsp;Rikki Schlott)&nbsp;of&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781668019146" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The&nbsp;Canceling of the American Mind&nbsp;</em></a>(Simon and Schuster, 2023). Listen to him in conversation with Owen Bennett Jones.</p><p><a href="https://owenbennettjones.com/about/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Owen Bennett-Jones</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a freelance journalist and writer. A former BBC correspondent and presenter he has been a resident foreign correspondent in Bucharest, Geneva, Islamabad, Hanoi and Beirut. He is recently wrote a history of the Bhutto dynasty which was published by Yale University Press.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 1 Nov 2023 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/the-future-of-cancelling-a-conversation-with-greg-lukianoff-UIzdyzuG</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cancel culture is something all academics are aware of and some are concerned about.&nbsp;&nbsp;Certainly that’s true of Greg Lukianoff who was the co-author (with Jonathan Haidt)&nbsp;of&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780735224919" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Coddling of the American Mind</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Penguin, 2018)&nbsp;and who has now co-authored (with&nbsp;Rikki Schlott)&nbsp;of&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781668019146" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The&nbsp;Canceling of the American Mind&nbsp;</em></a>(Simon and Schuster, 2023). Listen to him in conversation with Owen Bennett Jones.</p><p><a href="https://owenbennettjones.com/about/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Owen Bennett-Jones</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a freelance journalist and writer. A former BBC correspondent and presenter he has been a resident foreign correspondent in Bucharest, Geneva, Islamabad, Hanoi and Beirut. He is recently wrote a history of the Bhutto dynasty which was published by Yale University Press.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="34818820" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/d9750f46-3740-4a4b-bb2d-79dd1bf305e5/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=d9750f46-3740-4a4b-bb2d-79dd1bf305e5&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>The Future of Cancelling: A Conversation with Greg Lukianoff</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:36:16</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Cancel culture is something all academics are aware of and some are concerned about.  Certainly that’s true of Greg Lukianoff who was the co-author (with Jonathan Haidt) of The Coddling of the American Mind (Penguin, 2018) and who has now co-authored (with Rikki Schlott) of The Canceling of the American Mind (Simon and Schuster, 2023). Listen to him in conversation with Owen Bennett Jones.
Owen Bennett-Jones is a freelance journalist and writer. A former BBC correspondent and presenter he has been a resident foreign correspondent in Bucharest, Geneva, Islamabad, Hanoi and Beirut. He is recently wrote a history of the Bhutto dynasty which was published by Yale University Press.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Cancel culture is something all academics are aware of and some are concerned about.  Certainly that’s true of Greg Lukianoff who was the co-author (with Jonathan Haidt) of The Coddling of the American Mind (Penguin, 2018) and who has now co-authored (with Rikki Schlott) of The Canceling of the American Mind (Simon and Schuster, 2023). Listen to him in conversation with Owen Bennett Jones.
Owen Bennett-Jones is a freelance journalist and writer. A former BBC correspondent and presenter he has been a resident foreign correspondent in Bucharest, Geneva, Islamabad, Hanoi and Beirut. He is recently wrote a history of the Bhutto dynasty which was published by Yale University Press.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>84</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">b64fde0c-5ae2-11ee-96dc-17a6642c6b59</guid>
      <title>Marion Gibson, &quot;Witchcraft: A History in Thirteen Trials&quot; (Scribner, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Witchfinder General, Salem, Malleus Maleficarum. The world of witch-hunts and witch trials sounds archaic and fanciful, these terms relics of an unenlightened, brutal age. However, we often hear ‘witch-hunt’ in today’s media, and the misogyny that shaped witch trials is all too familiar. Three women were prosecuted under a version of the 1735 Witchcraft Act as recently as 2018.</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781668002421" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Witchcraft: A History in Thirteen Trials</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Simon &amp; Schuster, 2023), Professor Marion Gibson uses thirteen significant trials to tell the global history of witchcraft and witch-hunts. As well as exploring the origins of witch-hunts through some of the most famous trials from the Middle Ages to the eighteenth century, it takes us in new and surprising directions. It shows us how witchcraft was reimagined by lawyers and radical historians in France, how suspicions of sorcery led to murder in Jazz Age Pennsylvania, the effects of colonialism and Christian missionary zeal on ‘witches’ in Africa, and how even today a witch trial can come in many guises.</p><p>Professor Gibson also tells the stories of the ‘witches’ – mostly women like Helena Scheuberin, Anny Sampson and Joan Wright, whose stories have too often been overshadowed by those of the powerful men, such as King James I and ‘Witchfinder General’ Matthew Hopkins, who hounded them.</p><p>Once a tool invented by demonologists to hurt and silence their enemies, witch trials have been twisted and transformed over the course of history and the lines between witch and witch-hunter blurred. For the fortunate, a witch-hunt is just a metaphor, but, as this book makes clear, witches are truly still on trial.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose doctoral work focused on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2023 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/marion-gibson-witchcraft-a-history-in-thirteen-trials-scribner-2023-GzGZrL4_</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Witchfinder General, Salem, Malleus Maleficarum. The world of witch-hunts and witch trials sounds archaic and fanciful, these terms relics of an unenlightened, brutal age. However, we often hear ‘witch-hunt’ in today’s media, and the misogyny that shaped witch trials is all too familiar. Three women were prosecuted under a version of the 1735 Witchcraft Act as recently as 2018.</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781668002421" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Witchcraft: A History in Thirteen Trials</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Simon &amp; Schuster, 2023), Professor Marion Gibson uses thirteen significant trials to tell the global history of witchcraft and witch-hunts. As well as exploring the origins of witch-hunts through some of the most famous trials from the Middle Ages to the eighteenth century, it takes us in new and surprising directions. It shows us how witchcraft was reimagined by lawyers and radical historians in France, how suspicions of sorcery led to murder in Jazz Age Pennsylvania, the effects of colonialism and Christian missionary zeal on ‘witches’ in Africa, and how even today a witch trial can come in many guises.</p><p>Professor Gibson also tells the stories of the ‘witches’ – mostly women like Helena Scheuberin, Anny Sampson and Joan Wright, whose stories have too often been overshadowed by those of the powerful men, such as King James I and ‘Witchfinder General’ Matthew Hopkins, who hounded them.</p><p>Once a tool invented by demonologists to hurt and silence their enemies, witch trials have been twisted and transformed over the course of history and the lines between witch and witch-hunter blurred. For the fortunate, a witch-hunt is just a metaphor, but, as this book makes clear, witches are truly still on trial.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose doctoral work focused on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="44820495" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/91d89876-cd5a-49bd-af14-3492d7539522/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=91d89876-cd5a-49bd-af14-3492d7539522&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Marion Gibson, &quot;Witchcraft: A History in Thirteen Trials&quot; (Scribner, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:46:41</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Witchfinder General, Salem, Malleus Maleficarum. The world of witch-hunts and witch trials sounds archaic and fanciful, these terms relics of an unenlightened, brutal age. However, we often hear ‘witch-hunt’ in today’s media, and the misogyny that shaped witch trials is all too familiar. Three women were prosecuted under a version of the 1735 Witchcraft Act as recently as 2018.
In Witchcraft: A History in Thirteen Trials (Simon &amp; Schuster, 2023), Professor Marion Gibson uses thirteen significant trials to tell the global history of witchcraft and witch-hunts. As well as exploring the origins of witch-hunts through some of the most famous trials from the Middle Ages to the eighteenth century, it takes us in new and surprising directions. It shows us how witchcraft was reimagined by lawyers and radical historians in France, how suspicions of sorcery led to murder in Jazz Age Pennsylvania, the effects of colonialism and Christian missionary zeal on ‘witches’ in Africa, and how even today a witch trial can come in many guises.
Professor Gibson also tells the stories of the ‘witches’ – mostly women like Helena Scheuberin, Anny Sampson and Joan Wright, whose stories have too often been overshadowed by those of the powerful men, such as King James I and ‘Witchfinder General’ Matthew Hopkins, who hounded them.
Once a tool invented by demonologists to hurt and silence their enemies, witch trials have been twisted and transformed over the course of history and the lines between witch and witch-hunter blurred. For the fortunate, a witch-hunt is just a metaphor, but, as this book makes clear, witches are truly still on trial.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose doctoral work focused on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Witchfinder General, Salem, Malleus Maleficarum. The world of witch-hunts and witch trials sounds archaic and fanciful, these terms relics of an unenlightened, brutal age. However, we often hear ‘witch-hunt’ in today’s media, and the misogyny that shaped witch trials is all too familiar. Three women were prosecuted under a version of the 1735 Witchcraft Act as recently as 2018.
In Witchcraft: A History in Thirteen Trials (Simon &amp; Schuster, 2023), Professor Marion Gibson uses thirteen significant trials to tell the global history of witchcraft and witch-hunts. As well as exploring the origins of witch-hunts through some of the most famous trials from the Middle Ages to the eighteenth century, it takes us in new and surprising directions. It shows us how witchcraft was reimagined by lawyers and radical historians in France, how suspicions of sorcery led to murder in Jazz Age Pennsylvania, the effects of colonialism and Christian missionary zeal on ‘witches’ in Africa, and how even today a witch trial can come in many guises.
Professor Gibson also tells the stories of the ‘witches’ – mostly women like Helena Scheuberin, Anny Sampson and Joan Wright, whose stories have too often been overshadowed by those of the powerful men, such as King James I and ‘Witchfinder General’ Matthew Hopkins, who hounded them.
Once a tool invented by demonologists to hurt and silence their enemies, witch trials have been twisted and transformed over the course of history and the lines between witch and witch-hunter blurred. For the fortunate, a witch-hunt is just a metaphor, but, as this book makes clear, witches are truly still on trial.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose doctoral work focused on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1364</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">f6673a6a-710a-11ee-8b3c-afbe6e28581c</guid>
      <title>Nicole Nguyen, &quot;Terrorism on Trial: Political Violence and Abolitionist Futures&quot; (U Minnesota Press, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Rather than functioning as a final arbiter of justice, U.S. domestic courts are increasingly seen as counterterrorism tools that can incapacitate terrorists, maintain national security operations domestically, and produce certain narratives of conflict.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781517914394" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Terrorism on Trial: Political Violence and Abolitionist Futures</em></a>&nbsp;(University of Minnesota Press, 2023) by Dr. Nicole Nguyen examines the contemporary role that these courts play in the global war on terror and their use as a weapon of war: hunting, criminalising, and punishing entire communities in the name of national security.</p><p>Dr. Nguyen advocates for a rethinking of popular understandings of political violence and its root causes, encouraging readers to consider anti-imperial abolitionist alternatives to the criminalization, prosecution, and incarceration of individuals marked as real or perceived terrorists. She exposes how dominant academic discourses, geographical imaginations, and social processes have shaped terrorism prosecutions, as well as how our fundamental misunderstanding of terrorism has led to punitive responses that do little to address the true sources of violence, such as military interventions, colonial occupations, and tyrannical regimes. Nguyen also explores how these criminal proceedings bear on the lives of defendants and families, seeking to understand how legal processes unevenly criminalise and disempower communities of colour.</p><p>A retheorization of terrorism as political violence,&nbsp;<em>Terrorism on Trial</em>&nbsp;invites readers to carefully consider the role of power and politics in the making of armed resistance, addressing the root causes of political violence, with a goal of building toward a less violent and more liberatory world.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose doctoral work focused on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2023 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/nicole-nguyen-terrorism-on-trial-political-violence-and-abolitionist-futures-u-minnesota-press-2023-QJXuG5YC</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rather than functioning as a final arbiter of justice, U.S. domestic courts are increasingly seen as counterterrorism tools that can incapacitate terrorists, maintain national security operations domestically, and produce certain narratives of conflict.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781517914394" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Terrorism on Trial: Political Violence and Abolitionist Futures</em></a>&nbsp;(University of Minnesota Press, 2023) by Dr. Nicole Nguyen examines the contemporary role that these courts play in the global war on terror and their use as a weapon of war: hunting, criminalising, and punishing entire communities in the name of national security.</p><p>Dr. Nguyen advocates for a rethinking of popular understandings of political violence and its root causes, encouraging readers to consider anti-imperial abolitionist alternatives to the criminalization, prosecution, and incarceration of individuals marked as real or perceived terrorists. She exposes how dominant academic discourses, geographical imaginations, and social processes have shaped terrorism prosecutions, as well as how our fundamental misunderstanding of terrorism has led to punitive responses that do little to address the true sources of violence, such as military interventions, colonial occupations, and tyrannical regimes. Nguyen also explores how these criminal proceedings bear on the lives of defendants and families, seeking to understand how legal processes unevenly criminalise and disempower communities of colour.</p><p>A retheorization of terrorism as political violence,&nbsp;<em>Terrorism on Trial</em>&nbsp;invites readers to carefully consider the role of power and politics in the making of armed resistance, addressing the root causes of political violence, with a goal of building toward a less violent and more liberatory world.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose doctoral work focused on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="53732722" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/10a58410-f985-4786-94e4-b81c0d1472c2/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=10a58410-f985-4786-94e4-b81c0d1472c2&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Nicole Nguyen, &quot;Terrorism on Trial: Political Violence and Abolitionist Futures&quot; (U Minnesota Press, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:55:58</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Rather than functioning as a final arbiter of justice, U.S. domestic courts are increasingly seen as counterterrorism tools that can incapacitate terrorists, maintain national security operations domestically, and produce certain narratives of conflict. Terrorism on Trial: Political Violence and Abolitionist Futures (University of Minnesota Press, 2023) by Dr. Nicole Nguyen examines the contemporary role that these courts play in the global war on terror and their use as a weapon of war: hunting, criminalising, and punishing entire communities in the name of national security.
Dr. Nguyen advocates for a rethinking of popular understandings of political violence and its root causes, encouraging readers to consider anti-imperial abolitionist alternatives to the criminalization, prosecution, and incarceration of individuals marked as real or perceived terrorists. She exposes how dominant academic discourses, geographical imaginations, and social processes have shaped terrorism prosecutions, as well as how our fundamental misunderstanding of terrorism has led to punitive responses that do little to address the true sources of violence, such as military interventions, colonial occupations, and tyrannical regimes. Nguyen also explores how these criminal proceedings bear on the lives of defendants and families, seeking to understand how legal processes unevenly criminalise and disempower communities of colour.
A retheorization of terrorism as political violence, Terrorism on Trial invites readers to carefully consider the role of power and politics in the making of armed resistance, addressing the root causes of political violence, with a goal of building toward a less violent and more liberatory world.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose doctoral work focused on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Rather than functioning as a final arbiter of justice, U.S. domestic courts are increasingly seen as counterterrorism tools that can incapacitate terrorists, maintain national security operations domestically, and produce certain narratives of conflict. Terrorism on Trial: Political Violence and Abolitionist Futures (University of Minnesota Press, 2023) by Dr. Nicole Nguyen examines the contemporary role that these courts play in the global war on terror and their use as a weapon of war: hunting, criminalising, and punishing entire communities in the name of national security.
Dr. Nguyen advocates for a rethinking of popular understandings of political violence and its root causes, encouraging readers to consider anti-imperial abolitionist alternatives to the criminalization, prosecution, and incarceration of individuals marked as real or perceived terrorists. She exposes how dominant academic discourses, geographical imaginations, and social processes have shaped terrorism prosecutions, as well as how our fundamental misunderstanding of terrorism has led to punitive responses that do little to address the true sources of violence, such as military interventions, colonial occupations, and tyrannical regimes. Nguyen also explores how these criminal proceedings bear on the lives of defendants and families, seeking to understand how legal processes unevenly criminalise and disempower communities of colour.
A retheorization of terrorism as political violence, Terrorism on Trial invites readers to carefully consider the role of power and politics in the making of armed resistance, addressing the root causes of political violence, with a goal of building toward a less violent and more liberatory world.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose doctoral work focused on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>201</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5aa6c3cc-728e-11ee-b618-272feee4ab6d</guid>
      <title>Youcef L. Soufi, &quot;The Rise of Critical Islam: 10th-13th Century Legal Debate&quot; (Oxford UP, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Youcef Sufi's book&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197685006" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Rise of Critical Islam: 10th-13th&nbsp;Century Legal Debate</em></a>&nbsp;(Oxford University Press, 2023) is&nbsp;a fascinating and engaging exploration of the history of critique in Islamic legal and intellectual history. It does this specifically through a case study of dispensations and disputations, known as&nbsp;munāẓarāt&nbsp;in Arabic. Dispensations were a practice of debates that were an important feature of a jurist's practice and an opportunity for him to showcase his juristic skills – for instance, they were sometimes tasked with having to defend a position that they disagreed with or that contradicted the opinion of the school they followed and represented. Ultimately, these dispensations serve as an excellent case study of the tremendous diversity of thought and the celebration of difference of opinion in Islamic history and Islamic law; they also show that for Muslim jurists, engaging in these debate was an act of piety, as a part of their personal and intellectual quest to discover God's law.</p><p>In our conversation, we discuss the origins of the book, some of its main points and arguments, a detailed description of these dispensations (such as who participated in them, who was excluded from them, how the debate topic was chosen), the shifts and developments they undergo with time, and the role of ijtihad (or independent reasoning or re-interpretations of Islamic law) and taqlid (or sticking to the past scholarly positions) in these debates. We also discuss specific themes such as child or forced marriage, women’s right to divorce, which are perceived to have been settled matters but it turns out, not quite! And finally, Sufi explains why and how these disputations came to an end and what jurists participating in them may have imagined the role of later generations to be in the process of Islamic law-making.</p><p><em>Shehnaz Haqqani is an Assistant Professor of Religion at Mercer University. She earned her PhD in Islamic Studies with a focus on gender from the University of Texas at Austin in 2018. Her dissertation research explored questions of change and tradition, specifically in the context of gender and sexuality, in Islam. She can be reached at&nbsp;</em><a href="mailto:haqqani_s@mercer.edu" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>haqqani_s@mercer.edu</em></a><em>.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2023 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/youcef-l-soufi-the-rise-of-critical-islam-10th-13th-century-legal-debate-oxford-up-2023-xff__r1G</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Youcef Sufi's book&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197685006" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Rise of Critical Islam: 10th-13th&nbsp;Century Legal Debate</em></a>&nbsp;(Oxford University Press, 2023) is&nbsp;a fascinating and engaging exploration of the history of critique in Islamic legal and intellectual history. It does this specifically through a case study of dispensations and disputations, known as&nbsp;munāẓarāt&nbsp;in Arabic. Dispensations were a practice of debates that were an important feature of a jurist's practice and an opportunity for him to showcase his juristic skills – for instance, they were sometimes tasked with having to defend a position that they disagreed with or that contradicted the opinion of the school they followed and represented. Ultimately, these dispensations serve as an excellent case study of the tremendous diversity of thought and the celebration of difference of opinion in Islamic history and Islamic law; they also show that for Muslim jurists, engaging in these debate was an act of piety, as a part of their personal and intellectual quest to discover God's law.</p><p>In our conversation, we discuss the origins of the book, some of its main points and arguments, a detailed description of these dispensations (such as who participated in them, who was excluded from them, how the debate topic was chosen), the shifts and developments they undergo with time, and the role of ijtihad (or independent reasoning or re-interpretations of Islamic law) and taqlid (or sticking to the past scholarly positions) in these debates. We also discuss specific themes such as child or forced marriage, women’s right to divorce, which are perceived to have been settled matters but it turns out, not quite! And finally, Sufi explains why and how these disputations came to an end and what jurists participating in them may have imagined the role of later generations to be in the process of Islamic law-making.</p><p><em>Shehnaz Haqqani is an Assistant Professor of Religion at Mercer University. She earned her PhD in Islamic Studies with a focus on gender from the University of Texas at Austin in 2018. Her dissertation research explored questions of change and tradition, specifically in the context of gender and sexuality, in Islam. She can be reached at&nbsp;</em><a href="mailto:haqqani_s@mercer.edu" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>haqqani_s@mercer.edu</em></a><em>.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="71570242" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/78f2dbab-a149-4842-a7fb-1eef23b7b63c/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=78f2dbab-a149-4842-a7fb-1eef23b7b63c&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Youcef L. Soufi, &quot;The Rise of Critical Islam: 10th-13th Century Legal Debate&quot; (Oxford UP, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:14:32</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Youcef Sufi&apos;s book The Rise of Critical Islam: 10th-13th Century Legal Debate (Oxford University Press, 2023) is a fascinating and engaging exploration of the history of critique in Islamic legal and intellectual history. It does this specifically through a case study of dispensations and disputations, known as munāẓarāt in Arabic. Dispensations were a practice of debates that were an important feature of a jurist&apos;s practice and an opportunity for him to showcase his juristic skills – for instance, they were sometimes tasked with having to defend a position that they disagreed with or that contradicted the opinion of the school they followed and represented. Ultimately, these dispensations serve as an excellent case study of the tremendous diversity of thought and the celebration of difference of opinion in Islamic history and Islamic law; they also show that for Muslim jurists, engaging in these debate was an act of piety, as a part of their personal and intellectual quest to discover God&apos;s law.
In our conversation, we discuss the origins of the book, some of its main points and arguments, a detailed description of these dispensations (such as who participated in them, who was excluded from them, how the debate topic was chosen), the shifts and developments they undergo with time, and the role of ijtihad (or independent reasoning or re-interpretations of Islamic law) and taqlid (or sticking to the past scholarly positions) in these debates. We also discuss specific themes such as child or forced marriage, women’s right to divorce, which are perceived to have been settled matters but it turns out, not quite! And finally, Sufi explains why and how these disputations came to an end and what jurists participating in them may have imagined the role of later generations to be in the process of Islamic law-making.
Shehnaz Haqqani is an Assistant Professor of Religion at Mercer University. She earned her PhD in Islamic Studies with a focus on gender from the University of Texas at Austin in 2018. Her dissertation research explored questions of change and tradition, specifically in the context of gender and sexuality, in Islam. She can be reached at haqqani_s@mercer.edu.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Youcef Sufi&apos;s book The Rise of Critical Islam: 10th-13th Century Legal Debate (Oxford University Press, 2023) is a fascinating and engaging exploration of the history of critique in Islamic legal and intellectual history. It does this specifically through a case study of dispensations and disputations, known as munāẓarāt in Arabic. Dispensations were a practice of debates that were an important feature of a jurist&apos;s practice and an opportunity for him to showcase his juristic skills – for instance, they were sometimes tasked with having to defend a position that they disagreed with or that contradicted the opinion of the school they followed and represented. Ultimately, these dispensations serve as an excellent case study of the tremendous diversity of thought and the celebration of difference of opinion in Islamic history and Islamic law; they also show that for Muslim jurists, engaging in these debate was an act of piety, as a part of their personal and intellectual quest to discover God&apos;s law.
In our conversation, we discuss the origins of the book, some of its main points and arguments, a detailed description of these dispensations (such as who participated in them, who was excluded from them, how the debate topic was chosen), the shifts and developments they undergo with time, and the role of ijtihad (or independent reasoning or re-interpretations of Islamic law) and taqlid (or sticking to the past scholarly positions) in these debates. We also discuss specific themes such as child or forced marriage, women’s right to divorce, which are perceived to have been settled matters but it turns out, not quite! And finally, Sufi explains why and how these disputations came to an end and what jurists participating in them may have imagined the role of later generations to be in the process of Islamic law-making.
Shehnaz Haqqani is an Assistant Professor of Religion at Mercer University. She earned her PhD in Islamic Studies with a focus on gender from the University of Texas at Austin in 2018. Her dissertation research explored questions of change and tradition, specifically in the context of gender and sexuality, in Islam. She can be reached at haqqani_s@mercer.edu.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>318</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">95b9dbf4-703e-11ee-93e7-f37f21a390c9</guid>
      <title>Greg Glasgow and Kathryn Mayer, &quot;Disneyland on the Mountain: Walt, the Environmentalists, and the Ski Resort That Never Was&quot; (Rowman &amp; Littlefield, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>A fascinating look at Walt Disney's last, unfinished project and the controversy that surrounded it. It was going to be Disneyland at the top of a mountain. A vacation destination where guests could ski, go ice skating, or be entertained by a Disney Imagineer-created band of Audio-Animatronic bears. In the summer, visitors could fish, camp, hike, or take a scenic chairlift ride to the top of a mountain. It was the Mineral King resort in Southern California, and it was Walt Disney's final passion project. But there was one major obstacle to Walt's dream: the growing environmentalist movement of the 1960s.&nbsp;</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781538173671" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Disneyland on the Mountain: Walt, the Environmentalists, and the Ski Resort That Never Was</em></a>&nbsp;(Rowman &amp; Littlefield, 2023), Greg Glasgow and Kathryn Mayer provide an unprecedented look inside the Mineral King saga, from its origins at the 1960 Winter Olympics to the years-long environmental fight that eventually shut the development down. The fight, which went all the way to the Supreme Court, reshaped the environmental movement and helped to put in place long-reaching laws to protect nature. Although the court battle, coupled with Walt's death in 1966, meant the end for the Mineral King resort, the ideas and planning behind it have permeated throughout the Walt Disney company and the ski tourism industry in ways that are still seen today. With firsthand interviews and behind-the-scenes details, Disneyland on the Mountain offers incredible access to a part of Disney history that hasn't been thoroughly explored before, including Walt's love of nature, how the company changed after Walt's death, and of course, the story of Mineral King. It's a tale of man versus nature, ambition versus mortality, and how a gang of scrappy environmentalists took on one of America's most beloved companies.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2023 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/greg-glasgow-and-kathryn-mayer-disneyland-on-the-mountain-walt-the-environmentalists-and-the-ski-resort-that-never-was-rowman-littlefield-2023-Vatb7t4W</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A fascinating look at Walt Disney's last, unfinished project and the controversy that surrounded it. It was going to be Disneyland at the top of a mountain. A vacation destination where guests could ski, go ice skating, or be entertained by a Disney Imagineer-created band of Audio-Animatronic bears. In the summer, visitors could fish, camp, hike, or take a scenic chairlift ride to the top of a mountain. It was the Mineral King resort in Southern California, and it was Walt Disney's final passion project. But there was one major obstacle to Walt's dream: the growing environmentalist movement of the 1960s.&nbsp;</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781538173671" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Disneyland on the Mountain: Walt, the Environmentalists, and the Ski Resort That Never Was</em></a>&nbsp;(Rowman &amp; Littlefield, 2023), Greg Glasgow and Kathryn Mayer provide an unprecedented look inside the Mineral King saga, from its origins at the 1960 Winter Olympics to the years-long environmental fight that eventually shut the development down. The fight, which went all the way to the Supreme Court, reshaped the environmental movement and helped to put in place long-reaching laws to protect nature. Although the court battle, coupled with Walt's death in 1966, meant the end for the Mineral King resort, the ideas and planning behind it have permeated throughout the Walt Disney company and the ski tourism industry in ways that are still seen today. With firsthand interviews and behind-the-scenes details, Disneyland on the Mountain offers incredible access to a part of Disney history that hasn't been thoroughly explored before, including Walt's love of nature, how the company changed after Walt's death, and of course, the story of Mineral King. It's a tale of man versus nature, ambition versus mortality, and how a gang of scrappy environmentalists took on one of America's most beloved companies.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="43348412" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/ec719ff4-1b33-401d-beb4-63f79caaaf2e/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=ec719ff4-1b33-401d-beb4-63f79caaaf2e&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Greg Glasgow and Kathryn Mayer, &quot;Disneyland on the Mountain: Walt, the Environmentalists, and the Ski Resort That Never Was&quot; (Rowman &amp; Littlefield, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:45:09</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>A fascinating look at Walt Disney&apos;s last, unfinished project and the controversy that surrounded it. It was going to be Disneyland at the top of a mountain. A vacation destination where guests could ski, go ice skating, or be entertained by a Disney Imagineer-created band of Audio-Animatronic bears. In the summer, visitors could fish, camp, hike, or take a scenic chairlift ride to the top of a mountain. It was the Mineral King resort in Southern California, and it was Walt Disney&apos;s final passion project. But there was one major obstacle to Walt&apos;s dream: the growing environmentalist movement of the 1960s. 
In Disneyland on the Mountain: Walt, the Environmentalists, and the Ski Resort That Never Was (Rowman &amp; Littlefield, 2023), Greg Glasgow and Kathryn Mayer provide an unprecedented look inside the Mineral King saga, from its origins at the 1960 Winter Olympics to the years-long environmental fight that eventually shut the development down. The fight, which went all the way to the Supreme Court, reshaped the environmental movement and helped to put in place long-reaching laws to protect nature. Although the court battle, coupled with Walt&apos;s death in 1966, meant the end for the Mineral King resort, the ideas and planning behind it have permeated throughout the Walt Disney company and the ski tourism industry in ways that are still seen today. With firsthand interviews and behind-the-scenes details, Disneyland on the Mountain offers incredible access to a part of Disney history that hasn&apos;t been thoroughly explored before, including Walt&apos;s love of nature, how the company changed after Walt&apos;s death, and of course, the story of Mineral King. It&apos;s a tale of man versus nature, ambition versus mortality, and how a gang of scrappy environmentalists took on one of America&apos;s most beloved companies.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>A fascinating look at Walt Disney&apos;s last, unfinished project and the controversy that surrounded it. It was going to be Disneyland at the top of a mountain. A vacation destination where guests could ski, go ice skating, or be entertained by a Disney Imagineer-created band of Audio-Animatronic bears. In the summer, visitors could fish, camp, hike, or take a scenic chairlift ride to the top of a mountain. It was the Mineral King resort in Southern California, and it was Walt Disney&apos;s final passion project. But there was one major obstacle to Walt&apos;s dream: the growing environmentalist movement of the 1960s. 
In Disneyland on the Mountain: Walt, the Environmentalists, and the Ski Resort That Never Was (Rowman &amp; Littlefield, 2023), Greg Glasgow and Kathryn Mayer provide an unprecedented look inside the Mineral King saga, from its origins at the 1960 Winter Olympics to the years-long environmental fight that eventually shut the development down. The fight, which went all the way to the Supreme Court, reshaped the environmental movement and helped to put in place long-reaching laws to protect nature. Although the court battle, coupled with Walt&apos;s death in 1966, meant the end for the Mineral King resort, the ideas and planning behind it have permeated throughout the Walt Disney company and the ski tourism industry in ways that are still seen today. With firsthand interviews and behind-the-scenes details, Disneyland on the Mountain offers incredible access to a part of Disney history that hasn&apos;t been thoroughly explored before, including Walt&apos;s love of nature, how the company changed after Walt&apos;s death, and of course, the story of Mineral King. It&apos;s a tale of man versus nature, ambition versus mortality, and how a gang of scrappy environmentalists took on one of America&apos;s most beloved companies.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>175</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">d9623d3a-6556-11ee-8543-eb057abb6a86</guid>
      <title>Jeff Kosseff, &quot;Liar in a Crowded Theater: Freedom of Speech in a World of Misinformation&quot; (Johns Hopkins UP, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Thanks to the First Amendment, Americans enjoy a rare privilege: the constitutional right to lie. And although controversial, they should continue to enjoy this right.</p><p>When commentators and politicians discuss misinformation, they often repeat five words: "fire in a crowded theater." Though governments can, if they choose, attempt to ban harmful lies, propaganda, misinformation, and disinformation, how effective will their efforts really be? Can they punish someone for yelling "fire" in a crowded theater―and would those lies then have any less impact? How do governments around the world respond to the spread of misinformation, and when should the US government protect the free speech of liars?</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781421447322" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Liar in a Crowded Theater: Freedom of Speech in a World of Misinformation</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Johns Hopkins UP, 2023), law professor Jeff Kosseff addresses the pervasiveness of lies, the legal protections they enjoy, the harm they cause, and how to combat them. From the COVID-19 pandemic to the 2016 and 2020 presidential elections and the January 6, 2021, insurrection on the Capitol building, Kosseff argues that even though lies can inflict huge damage, US law should continue to protect them.&nbsp;<em>Liar in a Crowded Theater</em>&nbsp;explores both the history of protected falsehoods and where to go from here.</p><p>Drawing on years of research and thousands of pages of court documents in dozens of cases―from Alexander Hamilton's enduring defense of free speech to Eminem's victory in a lawsuit claiming that he stretched the truth in a 1999 song―Kosseff illustrates not only why courts are reluctant to be the arbiters of truth but also why they're uniquely unsuited to that role. Rather than resorting to regulating speech and fining or jailing speakers, he proposes solutions that focus on minimizing the harms of misinformation. If we want to seriously address concerns about misinformation and other false speech, we must finally exit the crowded theater.</p><p>Jeff Kosseff is an associate professor of cybersecurity law at the United States Naval Academy.</p><p><br></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2023 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/jeff-kosseff-liar-in-a-crowded-theater-freedom-of-speech-in-a-world-of-misinformation-johns-hopkins-up-2023-0WcXuWJY</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks to the First Amendment, Americans enjoy a rare privilege: the constitutional right to lie. And although controversial, they should continue to enjoy this right.</p><p>When commentators and politicians discuss misinformation, they often repeat five words: "fire in a crowded theater." Though governments can, if they choose, attempt to ban harmful lies, propaganda, misinformation, and disinformation, how effective will their efforts really be? Can they punish someone for yelling "fire" in a crowded theater―and would those lies then have any less impact? How do governments around the world respond to the spread of misinformation, and when should the US government protect the free speech of liars?</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781421447322" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Liar in a Crowded Theater: Freedom of Speech in a World of Misinformation</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Johns Hopkins UP, 2023), law professor Jeff Kosseff addresses the pervasiveness of lies, the legal protections they enjoy, the harm they cause, and how to combat them. From the COVID-19 pandemic to the 2016 and 2020 presidential elections and the January 6, 2021, insurrection on the Capitol building, Kosseff argues that even though lies can inflict huge damage, US law should continue to protect them.&nbsp;<em>Liar in a Crowded Theater</em>&nbsp;explores both the history of protected falsehoods and where to go from here.</p><p>Drawing on years of research and thousands of pages of court documents in dozens of cases―from Alexander Hamilton's enduring defense of free speech to Eminem's victory in a lawsuit claiming that he stretched the truth in a 1999 song―Kosseff illustrates not only why courts are reluctant to be the arbiters of truth but also why they're uniquely unsuited to that role. Rather than resorting to regulating speech and fining or jailing speakers, he proposes solutions that focus on minimizing the harms of misinformation. If we want to seriously address concerns about misinformation and other false speech, we must finally exit the crowded theater.</p><p>Jeff Kosseff is an associate professor of cybersecurity law at the United States Naval Academy.</p><p><br></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="62238683" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/4d93e846-1130-4ba8-a4c4-da3da42cd3ab/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=4d93e846-1130-4ba8-a4c4-da3da42cd3ab&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Jeff Kosseff, &quot;Liar in a Crowded Theater: Freedom of Speech in a World of Misinformation&quot; (Johns Hopkins UP, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:04:49</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Thanks to the First Amendment, Americans enjoy a rare privilege: the constitutional right to lie. And although controversial, they should continue to enjoy this right.
When commentators and politicians discuss misinformation, they often repeat five words: &quot;fire in a crowded theater.&quot; Though governments can, if they choose, attempt to ban harmful lies, propaganda, misinformation, and disinformation, how effective will their efforts really be? Can they punish someone for yelling &quot;fire&quot; in a crowded theater―and would those lies then have any less impact? How do governments around the world respond to the spread of misinformation, and when should the US government protect the free speech of liars?
In Liar in a Crowded Theater: Freedom of Speech in a World of Misinformation (Johns Hopkins UP, 2023), law professor Jeff Kosseff addresses the pervasiveness of lies, the legal protections they enjoy, the harm they cause, and how to combat them. From the COVID-19 pandemic to the 2016 and 2020 presidential elections and the January 6, 2021, insurrection on the Capitol building, Kosseff argues that even though lies can inflict huge damage, US law should continue to protect them. Liar in a Crowded Theater explores both the history of protected falsehoods and where to go from here.
Drawing on years of research and thousands of pages of court documents in dozens of cases―from Alexander Hamilton&apos;s enduring defense of free speech to Eminem&apos;s victory in a lawsuit claiming that he stretched the truth in a 1999 song―Kosseff illustrates not only why courts are reluctant to be the arbiters of truth but also why they&apos;re uniquely unsuited to that role. Rather than resorting to regulating speech and fining or jailing speakers, he proposes solutions that focus on minimizing the harms of misinformation. If we want to seriously address concerns about misinformation and other false speech, we must finally exit the crowded theater.
Jeff Kosseff is an associate professor of cybersecurity law at the United States Naval Academy.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Thanks to the First Amendment, Americans enjoy a rare privilege: the constitutional right to lie. And although controversial, they should continue to enjoy this right.
When commentators and politicians discuss misinformation, they often repeat five words: &quot;fire in a crowded theater.&quot; Though governments can, if they choose, attempt to ban harmful lies, propaganda, misinformation, and disinformation, how effective will their efforts really be? Can they punish someone for yelling &quot;fire&quot; in a crowded theater―and would those lies then have any less impact? How do governments around the world respond to the spread of misinformation, and when should the US government protect the free speech of liars?
In Liar in a Crowded Theater: Freedom of Speech in a World of Misinformation (Johns Hopkins UP, 2023), law professor Jeff Kosseff addresses the pervasiveness of lies, the legal protections they enjoy, the harm they cause, and how to combat them. From the COVID-19 pandemic to the 2016 and 2020 presidential elections and the January 6, 2021, insurrection on the Capitol building, Kosseff argues that even though lies can inflict huge damage, US law should continue to protect them. Liar in a Crowded Theater explores both the history of protected falsehoods and where to go from here.
Drawing on years of research and thousands of pages of court documents in dozens of cases―from Alexander Hamilton&apos;s enduring defense of free speech to Eminem&apos;s victory in a lawsuit claiming that he stretched the truth in a 1999 song―Kosseff illustrates not only why courts are reluctant to be the arbiters of truth but also why they&apos;re uniquely unsuited to that role. Rather than resorting to regulating speech and fining or jailing speakers, he proposes solutions that focus on minimizing the harms of misinformation. If we want to seriously address concerns about misinformation and other false speech, we must finally exit the crowded theater.
Jeff Kosseff is an associate professor of cybersecurity law at the United States Naval Academy.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>200</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1995121c-5fab-11ee-8e4f-b7dd0d26e5b7</guid>
      <title>Aaron Tang, &quot;Supreme Hubris: How Overconfidence Is Destroying the Court--And How We Can Fix It&quot; (Yale UP, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The American&nbsp;<a href="https://news.gallup.com/poll/4732/supreme-court.aspx" rel="noopener noreferrer">public’s confidence in the United States Supreme Court</a>&nbsp;is a historic low – in part based on a belief that the Supreme Court is increasingly behaving as a partisan, political body.&nbsp;</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780300264036" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Supreme Hubris: How Overconfidence Is Destroying the Court--And How We Can Fix It</em></a>&nbsp;(Yale UP, 2023),&nbsp;legal scholar Aaron Tang argues that partisanship is not the best lens for understanding the Supreme Court. He focuses on overconfidence. According to Professor Tang, the legal arguments of both conservative and liberal justices have a tone of uncompromising certainty. As the Court “lurches stridently from one case to the next,” it delegitimizes opposing views and undermines public confidence in the Court itself.</p><p>Restoring the Court’s public legitimacy requires the justices to adopt what Professor Tang calls a “least harm rule.” Examining a range of cases – from LGBTQ rights to immigration to juvenile justice – Tang demonstrates how the least harm principle can provide a promising and legally grounded framework for the difficult cases that divide the US. But this is not work exclusively for the justices. Reform depends on the voters. They must elect representatives who pass legislation that clarifies the public will for the Supreme Court – and consider ways that they can use “private ordering” to assert their rights without the Court.</p><p><a href="https://www.aaronyentang.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Professor Aaron Tang</a>&nbsp;(he/him) is a law professor at the University of California, Davis, and a former law clerk to Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor. He is a frequent commentator about the Supreme Court whose op-eds appear in the&nbsp;<em>New York Times</em>,&nbsp;<em>Los Angeles Times</em>,&nbsp;<em>Washington Post</em>,&nbsp;<em>Slate</em>,&nbsp;<em>The Atlantic</em>, and elsewhere.</p><p><a href="https://www.sju.edu/faculty/susan-liebell#_ga=2.125106634.1318472952.1578330950-502593983.1578330950" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Susan Liebell&nbsp;</em></a><em>is a Professor of Political Science at Saint Joseph’s University in Philadelphia.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2023 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/aaron-tang-supreme-hubris-how-overconfidence-is-destroying-the-court-and-how-we-can-fix-it-yale-up-2023-88C_D_Jl-Vtmo3Y8L</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The American&nbsp;<a href="https://news.gallup.com/poll/4732/supreme-court.aspx" rel="noopener noreferrer">public’s confidence in the United States Supreme Court</a>&nbsp;is a historic low – in part based on a belief that the Supreme Court is increasingly behaving as a partisan, political body.&nbsp;</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780300264036" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Supreme Hubris: How Overconfidence Is Destroying the Court--And How We Can Fix It</em></a>&nbsp;(Yale UP, 2023),&nbsp;legal scholar Aaron Tang argues that partisanship is not the best lens for understanding the Supreme Court. He focuses on overconfidence. According to Professor Tang, the legal arguments of both conservative and liberal justices have a tone of uncompromising certainty. As the Court “lurches stridently from one case to the next,” it delegitimizes opposing views and undermines public confidence in the Court itself.</p><p>Restoring the Court’s public legitimacy requires the justices to adopt what Professor Tang calls a “least harm rule.” Examining a range of cases – from LGBTQ rights to immigration to juvenile justice – Tang demonstrates how the least harm principle can provide a promising and legally grounded framework for the difficult cases that divide the US. But this is not work exclusively for the justices. Reform depends on the voters. They must elect representatives who pass legislation that clarifies the public will for the Supreme Court – and consider ways that they can use “private ordering” to assert their rights without the Court.</p><p><a href="https://www.aaronyentang.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Professor Aaron Tang</a>&nbsp;(he/him) is a law professor at the University of California, Davis, and a former law clerk to Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor. He is a frequent commentator about the Supreme Court whose op-eds appear in the&nbsp;<em>New York Times</em>,&nbsp;<em>Los Angeles Times</em>,&nbsp;<em>Washington Post</em>,&nbsp;<em>Slate</em>,&nbsp;<em>The Atlantic</em>, and elsewhere.</p><p><a href="https://www.sju.edu/faculty/susan-liebell#_ga=2.125106634.1318472952.1578330950-502593983.1578330950" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Susan Liebell&nbsp;</em></a><em>is a Professor of Political Science at Saint Joseph’s University in Philadelphia.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="53886636" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/48d7d2c1-8c87-4d20-96b2-79d9a84247ba/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=48d7d2c1-8c87-4d20-96b2-79d9a84247ba&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Aaron Tang, &quot;Supreme Hubris: How Overconfidence Is Destroying the Court--And How We Can Fix It&quot; (Yale UP, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:56:07</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The American public’s confidence in the United States Supreme Court is a historic low – in part based on a belief that the Supreme Court is increasingly behaving as a partisan, political body. 
In Supreme Hubris: How Overconfidence Is Destroying the Court--And How We Can Fix It (Yale UP, 2023), legal scholar Aaron Tang argues that partisanship is not the best lens for understanding the Supreme Court. He focuses on overconfidence. According to Professor Tang, the legal arguments of both conservative and liberal justices have a tone of uncompromising certainty. As the Court “lurches stridently from one case to the next,” it delegitimizes opposing views and undermines public confidence in the Court itself.
Restoring the Court’s public legitimacy requires the justices to adopt what Professor Tang calls a “least harm rule.” Examining a range of cases – from LGBTQ rights to immigration to juvenile justice – Tang demonstrates how the least harm principle can provide a promising and legally grounded framework for the difficult cases that divide the US. But this is not work exclusively for the justices. Reform depends on the voters. They must elect representatives who pass legislation that clarifies the public will for the Supreme Court – and consider ways that they can use “private ordering” to assert their rights without the Court.
Professor Aaron Tang (he/him) is a law professor at the University of California, Davis, and a former law clerk to Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor. He is a frequent commentator about the Supreme Court whose op-eds appear in the New York Times, Los Angeles Times, Washington Post, Slate, The Atlantic, and elsewhere.
Susan Liebell is a Professor of Political Science at Saint Joseph’s University in Philadelphia.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The American public’s confidence in the United States Supreme Court is a historic low – in part based on a belief that the Supreme Court is increasingly behaving as a partisan, political body. 
In Supreme Hubris: How Overconfidence Is Destroying the Court--And How We Can Fix It (Yale UP, 2023), legal scholar Aaron Tang argues that partisanship is not the best lens for understanding the Supreme Court. He focuses on overconfidence. According to Professor Tang, the legal arguments of both conservative and liberal justices have a tone of uncompromising certainty. As the Court “lurches stridently from one case to the next,” it delegitimizes opposing views and undermines public confidence in the Court itself.
Restoring the Court’s public legitimacy requires the justices to adopt what Professor Tang calls a “least harm rule.” Examining a range of cases – from LGBTQ rights to immigration to juvenile justice – Tang demonstrates how the least harm principle can provide a promising and legally grounded framework for the difficult cases that divide the US. But this is not work exclusively for the justices. Reform depends on the voters. They must elect representatives who pass legislation that clarifies the public will for the Supreme Court – and consider ways that they can use “private ordering” to assert their rights without the Court.
Professor Aaron Tang (he/him) is a law professor at the University of California, Davis, and a former law clerk to Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor. He is a frequent commentator about the Supreme Court whose op-eds appear in the New York Times, Los Angeles Times, Washington Post, Slate, The Atlantic, and elsewhere.
Susan Liebell is a Professor of Political Science at Saint Joseph’s University in Philadelphia.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>678</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">251e8902-6f54-11ee-82ad-53d17a60e789</guid>
      <title>Campbell F. Scribner, &quot;A Is for Arson: A History of Vandalism in American Education&quot; (Cornell UP, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781501770722" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>A Is for Arson: A History of Vandalism in American Education</em></a>&nbsp;(Cornell UP, 2023), Campbell F. Scribner sifts through two centuries of debris to uncover the conditions that have prompted school vandalism and to explain why attempts at prevention have inevitably failed. Vandalism costs taxpayers hundreds of millions of dollars every year, as students, parents, and even teachers wreak havoc on school buildings. Why do they do it? Can anything stop them? Who should pay for the damage? Underlying these questions are long-standing tensions between freedom and authority, and between wantonness and reason. Property destruction is not simply a moral failing, to be addressed with harsher punishments, nor can the problem be solved through more restrictive architecture or policing.&nbsp;</p><p>Scribner argues that education itself is a source of intractable struggle, and that vandalism is often the result of an unruly humanity. To understand schooling in the United States, one must first confront the all-too-human emotions that have led to fires, broken windows, and graffiti. A Is for Arson captures those emotions through new historical evidence and diverse theoretical perspectives, helping readers understand vandalism variously as a form of political conflict, as self-education, and as sheer chaos. By analyzing physical artifacts as well as archival sources, Scribner offers new perspectives on children's misbehavior and adults' reactions and allows readers to see the complexities of education—the built environment of teaching and learning, evolving approaches to youth psychology and student discipline—through the eyes of its often resistant subjects.</p><p><a href="https://education.umd.edu/directory/campbell-f-scribner" rel="noopener noreferrer">Cambell F. Scribner</a>&nbsp;is a&nbsp;scholar of educational policy, history, and philosophy at the University of Maryland.&nbsp;</p><p><a href="https://gse.rutgers.edu/student/max-antonio-jacobs/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Max Jacobs</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a PhD student in education at Rutgers University. He currently sits on the Graduate Student Council for the&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.historyofeducation.org/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>History of Education Society</em></a><em>.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 22 Oct 2023 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/campbell-f-scribner-a-is-for-arson-a-history-of-vandalism-in-american-education-cornell-up-2023-Na_zyWIz</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781501770722" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>A Is for Arson: A History of Vandalism in American Education</em></a>&nbsp;(Cornell UP, 2023), Campbell F. Scribner sifts through two centuries of debris to uncover the conditions that have prompted school vandalism and to explain why attempts at prevention have inevitably failed. Vandalism costs taxpayers hundreds of millions of dollars every year, as students, parents, and even teachers wreak havoc on school buildings. Why do they do it? Can anything stop them? Who should pay for the damage? Underlying these questions are long-standing tensions between freedom and authority, and between wantonness and reason. Property destruction is not simply a moral failing, to be addressed with harsher punishments, nor can the problem be solved through more restrictive architecture or policing.&nbsp;</p><p>Scribner argues that education itself is a source of intractable struggle, and that vandalism is often the result of an unruly humanity. To understand schooling in the United States, one must first confront the all-too-human emotions that have led to fires, broken windows, and graffiti. A Is for Arson captures those emotions through new historical evidence and diverse theoretical perspectives, helping readers understand vandalism variously as a form of political conflict, as self-education, and as sheer chaos. By analyzing physical artifacts as well as archival sources, Scribner offers new perspectives on children's misbehavior and adults' reactions and allows readers to see the complexities of education—the built environment of teaching and learning, evolving approaches to youth psychology and student discipline—through the eyes of its often resistant subjects.</p><p><a href="https://education.umd.edu/directory/campbell-f-scribner" rel="noopener noreferrer">Cambell F. Scribner</a>&nbsp;is a&nbsp;scholar of educational policy, history, and philosophy at the University of Maryland.&nbsp;</p><p><a href="https://gse.rutgers.edu/student/max-antonio-jacobs/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Max Jacobs</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a PhD student in education at Rutgers University. He currently sits on the Graduate Student Council for the&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.historyofeducation.org/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>History of Education Society</em></a><em>.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="55681405" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/e868fe78-eefe-454f-90a4-ac5657201fd0/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=e868fe78-eefe-454f-90a4-ac5657201fd0&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Campbell F. Scribner, &quot;A Is for Arson: A History of Vandalism in American Education&quot; (Cornell UP, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:57:59</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In A Is for Arson: A History of Vandalism in American Education (Cornell UP, 2023), Campbell F. Scribner sifts through two centuries of debris to uncover the conditions that have prompted school vandalism and to explain why attempts at prevention have inevitably failed. Vandalism costs taxpayers hundreds of millions of dollars every year, as students, parents, and even teachers wreak havoc on school buildings. Why do they do it? Can anything stop them? Who should pay for the damage? Underlying these questions are long-standing tensions between freedom and authority, and between wantonness and reason. Property destruction is not simply a moral failing, to be addressed with harsher punishments, nor can the problem be solved through more restrictive architecture or policing. 
Scribner argues that education itself is a source of intractable struggle, and that vandalism is often the result of an unruly humanity. To understand schooling in the United States, one must first confront the all-too-human emotions that have led to fires, broken windows, and graffiti. A Is for Arson captures those emotions through new historical evidence and diverse theoretical perspectives, helping readers understand vandalism variously as a form of political conflict, as self-education, and as sheer chaos. By analyzing physical artifacts as well as archival sources, Scribner offers new perspectives on children&apos;s misbehavior and adults&apos; reactions and allows readers to see the complexities of education—the built environment of teaching and learning, evolving approaches to youth psychology and student discipline—through the eyes of its often resistant subjects.
Cambell F. Scribner is a scholar of educational policy, history, and philosophy at the University of Maryland. 
Max Jacobs is a PhD student in education at Rutgers University. He currently sits on the Graduate Student Council for the History of Education Society.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In A Is for Arson: A History of Vandalism in American Education (Cornell UP, 2023), Campbell F. Scribner sifts through two centuries of debris to uncover the conditions that have prompted school vandalism and to explain why attempts at prevention have inevitably failed. Vandalism costs taxpayers hundreds of millions of dollars every year, as students, parents, and even teachers wreak havoc on school buildings. Why do they do it? Can anything stop them? Who should pay for the damage? Underlying these questions are long-standing tensions between freedom and authority, and between wantonness and reason. Property destruction is not simply a moral failing, to be addressed with harsher punishments, nor can the problem be solved through more restrictive architecture or policing. 
Scribner argues that education itself is a source of intractable struggle, and that vandalism is often the result of an unruly humanity. To understand schooling in the United States, one must first confront the all-too-human emotions that have led to fires, broken windows, and graffiti. A Is for Arson captures those emotions through new historical evidence and diverse theoretical perspectives, helping readers understand vandalism variously as a form of political conflict, as self-education, and as sheer chaos. By analyzing physical artifacts as well as archival sources, Scribner offers new perspectives on children&apos;s misbehavior and adults&apos; reactions and allows readers to see the complexities of education—the built environment of teaching and learning, evolving approaches to youth psychology and student discipline—through the eyes of its often resistant subjects.
Cambell F. Scribner is a scholar of educational policy, history, and philosophy at the University of Maryland. 
Max Jacobs is a PhD student in education at Rutgers University. He currently sits on the Graduate Student Council for the History of Education Society.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>221</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">49129232-6ebd-11ee-b10b-ff4d7fe2302e</guid>
      <title>Matthew Guariglia, &quot;Police and the Empire City: Race and the Origins of Modern Policing in New York&quot; (Duke UP, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>During the years between the Civil War and World War II, police in New York City struggled with how to control a diverse metropolis. In&nbsp;<a href="https://www.amazon.com/Police-Empire-City-Origins-Policing/dp/1478020628" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Police and the Empire City: Race and the Origins of Modern Policing in New York</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Duke UP, 2023), Matthew Guariglia tells the history of the New York Police Department to show how its origins were built upon and inseparably entwined with the history of race, ethnicity, and whiteness in the United States.&nbsp;</p><p>Guariglia explores the New York City Police Department through its periods of experimentation and violence as police experts imported tactics from the US occupation of the Philippines and Cuba, devised modern bureaucratic techniques to better suppress Black communities, and infiltrated supposedly unknowable immigrant neighborhoods. Innovations ranging from recruiting Chinese, Italian, and German police to form “ethnic squads” to the use of deportation and federal immigration restrictions to control local crime—even the introduction of fingerprinting—were motivated by attempts to govern a multiracial city. Campaigns to remake the police department created an urban landscape where power, gender, sexuality, race, ethnicity, crime, and bodies collided and provided a foundation for the supposedly color-blind, technocratic, federally backed, and surveillance-based policing of today.</p><p><em>﻿Jeffrey Lamson is a PhD student in world history at Northeastern University. His research focuses on the history of police technology, its relationship to the history of police reform, and its place at the intersection of U.S. domestic policing and global counterinsurgency.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 21 Oct 2023 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/matthew-guariglia-police-and-the-empire-city-race-and-the-origins-of-modern-policing-in-new-york-duke-up-2023-jOS0OQJs</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>During the years between the Civil War and World War II, police in New York City struggled with how to control a diverse metropolis. In&nbsp;<a href="https://www.amazon.com/Police-Empire-City-Origins-Policing/dp/1478020628" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Police and the Empire City: Race and the Origins of Modern Policing in New York</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Duke UP, 2023), Matthew Guariglia tells the history of the New York Police Department to show how its origins were built upon and inseparably entwined with the history of race, ethnicity, and whiteness in the United States.&nbsp;</p><p>Guariglia explores the New York City Police Department through its periods of experimentation and violence as police experts imported tactics from the US occupation of the Philippines and Cuba, devised modern bureaucratic techniques to better suppress Black communities, and infiltrated supposedly unknowable immigrant neighborhoods. Innovations ranging from recruiting Chinese, Italian, and German police to form “ethnic squads” to the use of deportation and federal immigration restrictions to control local crime—even the introduction of fingerprinting—were motivated by attempts to govern a multiracial city. Campaigns to remake the police department created an urban landscape where power, gender, sexuality, race, ethnicity, crime, and bodies collided and provided a foundation for the supposedly color-blind, technocratic, federally backed, and surveillance-based policing of today.</p><p><em>﻿Jeffrey Lamson is a PhD student in world history at Northeastern University. His research focuses on the history of police technology, its relationship to the history of police reform, and its place at the intersection of U.S. domestic policing and global counterinsurgency.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="58583674" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/a5852d18-b31e-4bd0-8bdb-3dc4110cf014/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=a5852d18-b31e-4bd0-8bdb-3dc4110cf014&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Matthew Guariglia, &quot;Police and the Empire City: Race and the Origins of Modern Policing in New York&quot; (Duke UP, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:01:01</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>During the years between the Civil War and World War II, police in New York City struggled with how to control a diverse metropolis. In Police and the Empire City: Race and the Origins of Modern Policing in New York (Duke UP, 2023), Matthew Guariglia tells the history of the New York Police Department to show how its origins were built upon and inseparably entwined with the history of race, ethnicity, and whiteness in the United States. 
Guariglia explores the New York City Police Department through its periods of experimentation and violence as police experts imported tactics from the US occupation of the Philippines and Cuba, devised modern bureaucratic techniques to better suppress Black communities, and infiltrated supposedly unknowable immigrant neighborhoods. Innovations ranging from recruiting Chinese, Italian, and German police to form “ethnic squads” to the use of deportation and federal immigration restrictions to control local crime—even the introduction of fingerprinting—were motivated by attempts to govern a multiracial city. Campaigns to remake the police department created an urban landscape where power, gender, sexuality, race, ethnicity, crime, and bodies collided and provided a foundation for the supposedly color-blind, technocratic, federally backed, and surveillance-based policing of today.
﻿Jeffrey Lamson is a PhD student in world history at Northeastern University. His research focuses on the history of police technology, its relationship to the history of police reform, and its place at the intersection of U.S. domestic policing and global counterinsurgency.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>During the years between the Civil War and World War II, police in New York City struggled with how to control a diverse metropolis. In Police and the Empire City: Race and the Origins of Modern Policing in New York (Duke UP, 2023), Matthew Guariglia tells the history of the New York Police Department to show how its origins were built upon and inseparably entwined with the history of race, ethnicity, and whiteness in the United States. 
Guariglia explores the New York City Police Department through its periods of experimentation and violence as police experts imported tactics from the US occupation of the Philippines and Cuba, devised modern bureaucratic techniques to better suppress Black communities, and infiltrated supposedly unknowable immigrant neighborhoods. Innovations ranging from recruiting Chinese, Italian, and German police to form “ethnic squads” to the use of deportation and federal immigration restrictions to control local crime—even the introduction of fingerprinting—were motivated by attempts to govern a multiracial city. Campaigns to remake the police department created an urban landscape where power, gender, sexuality, race, ethnicity, crime, and bodies collided and provided a foundation for the supposedly color-blind, technocratic, federally backed, and surveillance-based policing of today.
﻿Jeffrey Lamson is a PhD student in world history at Northeastern University. His research focuses on the history of police technology, its relationship to the history of police reform, and its place at the intersection of U.S. domestic policing and global counterinsurgency.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>17</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1a4cab6a-6c36-11ee-9e7c-5fc68bd8ec6a</guid>
      <title>Alexandre Baril, &quot;Undoing Suicidism: A Trans, Queer, Crip Approach to Rethinking (Assisted) Suicide&quot; (Temple UP, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><strong>Note: This episode contains a discussion of suicide. A list of resources is available below.&nbsp;</strong></p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781439924075" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Undoing Suicidism: A Trans, Queer, Crip Approach to Rethinking (Assisted) Suicide</em></a>&nbsp;(Temple UP, 2023), Alexandre Baril argues that suicidal people are oppressed by what he calls structural suicidism, a hidden oppression that, until now, has been unnamed and under-theorized. Each year, suicidism and its preventionist script and strategies reproduce violence and cause additional harm and death among suicidal people through forms of criminalization, incarceration, discrimination, stigmatization, and pathologization. This is particularly true for marginalized groups experiencing multiple oppressions, including queer, trans, disabled, or Mad people.</p><p>Undoing Suicidism questions the belief that the best way to help suicidal people is through the logic of prevention. Alexandre Baril presents the thought-provoking argument that supporting assisted suicide for suicidal people could better prevent unnecessary deaths. Offering a new queercrip model of (assisted) suicide, he invites us to imagine what could happen if we started thinking about (assisted) suicide from an anti-suicidist and intersectional framework. Baril provides a radical reconceptualization of (assisted) suicide and invaluable reflections for academics, activists, practitioners, and policymakers.</p><p>An&nbsp;<a href="https://temple.manifoldapp.org/projects/undoing-suicidism" rel="noopener noreferrer">open access edition of Undoing Suicidism</a>, made available by the Faculty of Social Sciences at the University of Ottawa, is available&nbsp;<a href="https://temple.manifoldapp.org/projects/undoing-suicidism" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a>.</p><p>Alexandre Baril (abaril@uOttawa.ca) is Associate Professor at the University of Ottawa. His work is situated at the crossroads of gender, queer, trans, disability/crip/Mad studies, critical gerontology and critical suicidology. His commitment to equity has earned him awards for his involvement in queer, trans and disabled communities, including the Canadian Disability Studies Association Tanis Doe Francophone Award, and the Equity, Diversity and Inclusion President’s Award at the University of Ottawa. A prolific author who won the Young Researcher Award from the Faculty of Social Sciences at the University of Ottawa (2023), he has given over 200 presentations at the international level and has over 80 publications.</p><p>Resources:</p><p>SAFE HOTLINES and ONLINE SUPPORT GROUPS:</p><ul>
<li>Trans LifeLine (trans/non-binary): 1-877-330-6366 (Canada) and 1-877-565-8860 (USA)</li>
<li>
<a href="https://autismesoutien.ca/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Autisme Soutien</a>: Online support for autistic people (French Canada)</li>
<li>BlackLine (BIPOC): 1-800-604-5841 (USA)</li>
</ul><p>REGULAR HOTLINES (might trace your call and contact emergency services):</p><ul>
<li>Talk Suicide Canada: 1-833-456-4566</li>
<li>Suicide.ca (Québec): 1-866-APPELLE</li>
<li>The Hope for Wellness Helpline (Indigenous people in Canada): 1-855-242-3310</li>
<li>The Samaritains (USA): 1-212-673-3000</li>
</ul><p><br></p><p>A full&nbsp;<a href="https://d8q167itd1z7d.cloudfront.net/craft3/Undoing-Suicidism-Transcript.pdf" rel="noopener noreferrer">transcript</a>&nbsp;of the interview is available for accessibility.</p><p><a href="https://cjarrard717.wixsite.com/website" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Clayton Jarrard</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a Research Project Coordinator at the University of Kansas Center for Research, contributing to initiatives at the nexus of research, policy implementation, and community efforts. His scholarly engagement spans the subject areas of Cultural Anthropology, Queer Studies, Disability Studies, Mad Studies, and Religious Studies. Clayton is also a host for the&nbsp;</em><a href="https://open.spotify.com/show/0X98h0FENG1hptiHFA1o5b?si=183b40d21ac94919/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Un/Livable Cultures podcast</em></a><em>.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2023 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/alexandre-baril-undoing-suicidism-a-trans-queer-crip-approach-to-rethinking-assisted-suicide-temple-up-2023-VUokSq5X</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Note: This episode contains a discussion of suicide. A list of resources is available below.&nbsp;</strong></p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781439924075" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Undoing Suicidism: A Trans, Queer, Crip Approach to Rethinking (Assisted) Suicide</em></a>&nbsp;(Temple UP, 2023), Alexandre Baril argues that suicidal people are oppressed by what he calls structural suicidism, a hidden oppression that, until now, has been unnamed and under-theorized. Each year, suicidism and its preventionist script and strategies reproduce violence and cause additional harm and death among suicidal people through forms of criminalization, incarceration, discrimination, stigmatization, and pathologization. This is particularly true for marginalized groups experiencing multiple oppressions, including queer, trans, disabled, or Mad people.</p><p>Undoing Suicidism questions the belief that the best way to help suicidal people is through the logic of prevention. Alexandre Baril presents the thought-provoking argument that supporting assisted suicide for suicidal people could better prevent unnecessary deaths. Offering a new queercrip model of (assisted) suicide, he invites us to imagine what could happen if we started thinking about (assisted) suicide from an anti-suicidist and intersectional framework. Baril provides a radical reconceptualization of (assisted) suicide and invaluable reflections for academics, activists, practitioners, and policymakers.</p><p>An&nbsp;<a href="https://temple.manifoldapp.org/projects/undoing-suicidism" rel="noopener noreferrer">open access edition of Undoing Suicidism</a>, made available by the Faculty of Social Sciences at the University of Ottawa, is available&nbsp;<a href="https://temple.manifoldapp.org/projects/undoing-suicidism" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a>.</p><p>Alexandre Baril (abaril@uOttawa.ca) is Associate Professor at the University of Ottawa. His work is situated at the crossroads of gender, queer, trans, disability/crip/Mad studies, critical gerontology and critical suicidology. His commitment to equity has earned him awards for his involvement in queer, trans and disabled communities, including the Canadian Disability Studies Association Tanis Doe Francophone Award, and the Equity, Diversity and Inclusion President’s Award at the University of Ottawa. A prolific author who won the Young Researcher Award from the Faculty of Social Sciences at the University of Ottawa (2023), he has given over 200 presentations at the international level and has over 80 publications.</p><p>Resources:</p><p>SAFE HOTLINES and ONLINE SUPPORT GROUPS:</p><ul>
<li>Trans LifeLine (trans/non-binary): 1-877-330-6366 (Canada) and 1-877-565-8860 (USA)</li>
<li>
<a href="https://autismesoutien.ca/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Autisme Soutien</a>: Online support for autistic people (French Canada)</li>
<li>BlackLine (BIPOC): 1-800-604-5841 (USA)</li>
</ul><p>REGULAR HOTLINES (might trace your call and contact emergency services):</p><ul>
<li>Talk Suicide Canada: 1-833-456-4566</li>
<li>Suicide.ca (Québec): 1-866-APPELLE</li>
<li>The Hope for Wellness Helpline (Indigenous people in Canada): 1-855-242-3310</li>
<li>The Samaritains (USA): 1-212-673-3000</li>
</ul><p><br></p><p>A full&nbsp;<a href="https://d8q167itd1z7d.cloudfront.net/craft3/Undoing-Suicidism-Transcript.pdf" rel="noopener noreferrer">transcript</a>&nbsp;of the interview is available for accessibility.</p><p><a href="https://cjarrard717.wixsite.com/website" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Clayton Jarrard</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a Research Project Coordinator at the University of Kansas Center for Research, contributing to initiatives at the nexus of research, policy implementation, and community efforts. His scholarly engagement spans the subject areas of Cultural Anthropology, Queer Studies, Disability Studies, Mad Studies, and Religious Studies. Clayton is also a host for the&nbsp;</em><a href="https://open.spotify.com/show/0X98h0FENG1hptiHFA1o5b?si=183b40d21ac94919/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Un/Livable Cultures podcast</em></a><em>.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="64781228" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/f93102c7-e094-4795-be5d-88243dfb2560/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=f93102c7-e094-4795-be5d-88243dfb2560&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Alexandre Baril, &quot;Undoing Suicidism: A Trans, Queer, Crip Approach to Rethinking (Assisted) Suicide&quot; (Temple UP, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:07:28</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Note: This episode contains a discussion of suicide. A list of resources is available below. 
In Undoing Suicidism: A Trans, Queer, Crip Approach to Rethinking (Assisted) Suicide (Temple UP, 2023), Alexandre Baril argues that suicidal people are oppressed by what he calls structural suicidism, a hidden oppression that, until now, has been unnamed and under-theorized. Each year, suicidism and its preventionist script and strategies reproduce violence and cause additional harm and death among suicidal people through forms of criminalization, incarceration, discrimination, stigmatization, and pathologization. This is particularly true for marginalized groups experiencing multiple oppressions, including queer, trans, disabled, or Mad people.
Undoing Suicidism questions the belief that the best way to help suicidal people is through the logic of prevention. Alexandre Baril presents the thought-provoking argument that supporting assisted suicide for suicidal people could better prevent unnecessary deaths. Offering a new queercrip model of (assisted) suicide, he invites us to imagine what could happen if we started thinking about (assisted) suicide from an anti-suicidist and intersectional framework. Baril provides a radical reconceptualization of (assisted) suicide and invaluable reflections for academics, activists, practitioners, and policymakers.
An open access edition of Undoing Suicidism, made available by the Faculty of Social Sciences at the University of Ottawa, is available here.
Alexandre Baril (abaril@uOttawa.ca) is Associate Professor at the University of Ottawa. His work is situated at the crossroads of gender, queer, trans, disability/crip/Mad studies, critical gerontology and critical suicidology. His commitment to equity has earned him awards for his involvement in queer, trans and disabled communities, including the Canadian Disability Studies Association Tanis Doe Francophone Award, and the Equity, Diversity and Inclusion President’s Award at the University of Ottawa. A prolific author who won the Young Researcher Award from the Faculty of Social Sciences at the University of Ottawa (2023), he has given over 200 presentations at the international level and has over 80 publications.
Resources:
SAFE HOTLINES and ONLINE SUPPORT GROUPS:
Trans LifeLine (trans/non-binary): 1-877-330-6366 (Canada) and 1-877-565-8860 (USA)
Autisme Soutien: Online support for autistic people (French Canada)
BlackLine (BIPOC): 1-800-604-5841 (USA)
REGULAR HOTLINES (might trace your call and contact emergency services):
Talk Suicide Canada: 1-833-456-4566
Suicide.ca (Québec): 1-866-APPELLE
The Hope for Wellness Helpline (Indigenous people in Canada): 1-855-242-3310
The Samaritains (USA): 1-212-673-3000
A full transcript of the interview is available for accessibility.
Clayton Jarrard is a Research Project Coordinator at the University of Kansas Center for Research, contributing to initiatives at the nexus of research, policy implementation, and community efforts. His scholarly engagement spans the subject areas of Cultural Anthropology, Queer Studies, Disability Studies, Mad Studies, and Religious Studies. Clayton is also a host for the Un/Livable Cultures podcast.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Note: This episode contains a discussion of suicide. A list of resources is available below. 
In Undoing Suicidism: A Trans, Queer, Crip Approach to Rethinking (Assisted) Suicide (Temple UP, 2023), Alexandre Baril argues that suicidal people are oppressed by what he calls structural suicidism, a hidden oppression that, until now, has been unnamed and under-theorized. Each year, suicidism and its preventionist script and strategies reproduce violence and cause additional harm and death among suicidal people through forms of criminalization, incarceration, discrimination, stigmatization, and pathologization. This is particularly true for marginalized groups experiencing multiple oppressions, including queer, trans, disabled, or Mad people.
Undoing Suicidism questions the belief that the best way to help suicidal people is through the logic of prevention. Alexandre Baril presents the thought-provoking argument that supporting assisted suicide for suicidal people could better prevent unnecessary deaths. Offering a new queercrip model of (assisted) suicide, he invites us to imagine what could happen if we started thinking about (assisted) suicide from an anti-suicidist and intersectional framework. Baril provides a radical reconceptualization of (assisted) suicide and invaluable reflections for academics, activists, practitioners, and policymakers.
An open access edition of Undoing Suicidism, made available by the Faculty of Social Sciences at the University of Ottawa, is available here.
Alexandre Baril (abaril@uOttawa.ca) is Associate Professor at the University of Ottawa. His work is situated at the crossroads of gender, queer, trans, disability/crip/Mad studies, critical gerontology and critical suicidology. His commitment to equity has earned him awards for his involvement in queer, trans and disabled communities, including the Canadian Disability Studies Association Tanis Doe Francophone Award, and the Equity, Diversity and Inclusion President’s Award at the University of Ottawa. A prolific author who won the Young Researcher Award from the Faculty of Social Sciences at the University of Ottawa (2023), he has given over 200 presentations at the international level and has over 80 publications.
Resources:
SAFE HOTLINES and ONLINE SUPPORT GROUPS:
Trans LifeLine (trans/non-binary): 1-877-330-6366 (Canada) and 1-877-565-8860 (USA)
Autisme Soutien: Online support for autistic people (French Canada)
BlackLine (BIPOC): 1-800-604-5841 (USA)
REGULAR HOTLINES (might trace your call and contact emergency services):
Talk Suicide Canada: 1-833-456-4566
Suicide.ca (Québec): 1-866-APPELLE
The Hope for Wellness Helpline (Indigenous people in Canada): 1-855-242-3310
The Samaritains (USA): 1-212-673-3000
A full transcript of the interview is available for accessibility.
Clayton Jarrard is a Research Project Coordinator at the University of Kansas Center for Research, contributing to initiatives at the nexus of research, policy implementation, and community efforts. His scholarly engagement spans the subject areas of Cultural Anthropology, Queer Studies, Disability Studies, Mad Studies, and Religious Studies. Clayton is also a host for the Un/Livable Cultures podcast.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>177</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">574d5b82-6b86-11ee-a205-6bd3543b0ed0</guid>
      <title>The Future of Incarceration: A Discussion with Colleen P. Eren</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The United States has long been associated with a very harsh criminal justice system with, in some cases, people serving long sentence for minor crimes. But attempts to reform the system have proven very difficult. In her new book&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781503636736" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Reform Nation:&nbsp;The First Step Act and the Movement to End Mass Incarceration</em></a>&nbsp;(Stanford UP, 2023),&nbsp;Colleen P. Eren explains why.&nbsp;Listen to her in conversation with Owen Bennett Jones.</p><p><a href="https://owenbennettjones.com/about/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Owen Bennett-Jones</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a freelance journalist and writer. A former BBC correspondent and presenter he has been a resident foreign correspondent in Bucharest, Geneva, Islamabad, Hanoi and Beirut. He is recently wrote a history of the Bhutto dynasty which was published by Yale University Press.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2023 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/the-future-of-incarceration-a-discussion-with-colleen-p-eren-NnATSNya</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The United States has long been associated with a very harsh criminal justice system with, in some cases, people serving long sentence for minor crimes. But attempts to reform the system have proven very difficult. In her new book&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781503636736" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Reform Nation:&nbsp;The First Step Act and the Movement to End Mass Incarceration</em></a>&nbsp;(Stanford UP, 2023),&nbsp;Colleen P. Eren explains why.&nbsp;Listen to her in conversation with Owen Bennett Jones.</p><p><a href="https://owenbennettjones.com/about/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Owen Bennett-Jones</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a freelance journalist and writer. A former BBC correspondent and presenter he has been a resident foreign correspondent in Bucharest, Geneva, Islamabad, Hanoi and Beirut. He is recently wrote a history of the Bhutto dynasty which was published by Yale University Press.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="38940674" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/78223313-35a0-4111-8e5a-33f2375b56c4/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=78223313-35a0-4111-8e5a-33f2375b56c4&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>The Future of Incarceration: A Discussion with Colleen P. Eren</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:40:33</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The United States has long been associated with a very harsh criminal justice system with, in some cases, people serving long sentence for minor crimes. But attempts to reform the system have proven very difficult. In her new book Reform Nation: The First Step Act and the Movement to End Mass Incarceration (Stanford UP, 2023), Colleen P. Eren explains why. Listen to her in conversation with Owen Bennett Jones.
Owen Bennett-Jones is a freelance journalist and writer. A former BBC correspondent and presenter he has been a resident foreign correspondent in Bucharest, Geneva, Islamabad, Hanoi and Beirut. He is recently wrote a history of the Bhutto dynasty which was published by Yale University Press.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The United States has long been associated with a very harsh criminal justice system with, in some cases, people serving long sentence for minor crimes. But attempts to reform the system have proven very difficult. In her new book Reform Nation: The First Step Act and the Movement to End Mass Incarceration (Stanford UP, 2023), Colleen P. Eren explains why. Listen to her in conversation with Owen Bennett Jones.
Owen Bennett-Jones is a freelance journalist and writer. A former BBC correspondent and presenter he has been a resident foreign correspondent in Bucharest, Geneva, Islamabad, Hanoi and Beirut. He is recently wrote a history of the Bhutto dynasty which was published by Yale University Press.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>82</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7c714e6a-6a9a-11ee-98d0-db4bc9767510</guid>
      <title>Javier Garcia Oliva and Helen Hall, &quot;Constitutional Culture, Independence, and Rights: Insights from Quebec, Scotland, and Catalonia&quot; (U Toronto Press, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781487505486" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Constitutional Culture, Independence, and Rights: Insights from Quebec, Scotland, and Catalonia</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(University of Toronto Press, 2023), Dr. Javier García Oliva and Dr. Helen Hall coin the term "constitutional culture" to encapsulate the collective rules and expectations that govern the collective life within a jurisdiction. Significantly, these shared norms have both legal and social elements, including matters as diverse as standards of parenting, the modus operandi of police officers, and taboos around sexuality. Using Quebec, Scotland, and Catalonia as case studies, the book delves into what these constitutional battles mean for the rights, identity, and needs of everyday people, and it powerfully demonstrates why the hypothetical future independence of these regions would have far-reaching practical consequences, beyond the realm of political structures and academic theory.</p><p>The book does not present a magic bullet to resolve debates around independence – this is not its purpose, and the text in fact demonstrates why there is no objectively optimal approach in any or all contexts. Instead, it seeks to shed light on aspects of these situations often overlooked in discussions around the fate of nations, and it addresses what the consequences of constitutional paradigm shifts might be for individuals. Constitutional culture is a complex web of interconnected understandings and behaviours, and the vibrations from shaking or cutting a fundamental strand will be felt throughout the structure.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose doctoral work focused on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2023 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/javier-garcia-oliva-and-helen-hall-constitutional-culture-independence-and-rights-insights-from-quebec-scotland-and-catalonia-u-toronto-press-2023-1ZK5WNU_</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781487505486" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Constitutional Culture, Independence, and Rights: Insights from Quebec, Scotland, and Catalonia</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(University of Toronto Press, 2023), Dr. Javier García Oliva and Dr. Helen Hall coin the term "constitutional culture" to encapsulate the collective rules and expectations that govern the collective life within a jurisdiction. Significantly, these shared norms have both legal and social elements, including matters as diverse as standards of parenting, the modus operandi of police officers, and taboos around sexuality. Using Quebec, Scotland, and Catalonia as case studies, the book delves into what these constitutional battles mean for the rights, identity, and needs of everyday people, and it powerfully demonstrates why the hypothetical future independence of these regions would have far-reaching practical consequences, beyond the realm of political structures and academic theory.</p><p>The book does not present a magic bullet to resolve debates around independence – this is not its purpose, and the text in fact demonstrates why there is no objectively optimal approach in any or all contexts. Instead, it seeks to shed light on aspects of these situations often overlooked in discussions around the fate of nations, and it addresses what the consequences of constitutional paradigm shifts might be for individuals. Constitutional culture is a complex web of interconnected understandings and behaviours, and the vibrations from shaking or cutting a fundamental strand will be felt throughout the structure.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose doctoral work focused on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="46143708" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/5fc2d00e-67b7-4beb-b535-24776d084041/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=5fc2d00e-67b7-4beb-b535-24776d084041&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Javier Garcia Oliva and Helen Hall, &quot;Constitutional Culture, Independence, and Rights: Insights from Quebec, Scotland, and Catalonia&quot; (U Toronto Press, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:48:03</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In Constitutional Culture, Independence, and Rights: Insights from Quebec, Scotland, and Catalonia (University of Toronto Press, 2023), Dr. Javier García Oliva and Dr. Helen Hall coin the term &quot;constitutional culture&quot; to encapsulate the collective rules and expectations that govern the collective life within a jurisdiction. Significantly, these shared norms have both legal and social elements, including matters as diverse as standards of parenting, the modus operandi of police officers, and taboos around sexuality. Using Quebec, Scotland, and Catalonia as case studies, the book delves into what these constitutional battles mean for the rights, identity, and needs of everyday people, and it powerfully demonstrates why the hypothetical future independence of these regions would have far-reaching practical consequences, beyond the realm of political structures and academic theory.
The book does not present a magic bullet to resolve debates around independence – this is not its purpose, and the text in fact demonstrates why there is no objectively optimal approach in any or all contexts. Instead, it seeks to shed light on aspects of these situations often overlooked in discussions around the fate of nations, and it addresses what the consequences of constitutional paradigm shifts might be for individuals. Constitutional culture is a complex web of interconnected understandings and behaviours, and the vibrations from shaking or cutting a fundamental strand will be felt throughout the structure.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose doctoral work focused on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In Constitutional Culture, Independence, and Rights: Insights from Quebec, Scotland, and Catalonia (University of Toronto Press, 2023), Dr. Javier García Oliva and Dr. Helen Hall coin the term &quot;constitutional culture&quot; to encapsulate the collective rules and expectations that govern the collective life within a jurisdiction. Significantly, these shared norms have both legal and social elements, including matters as diverse as standards of parenting, the modus operandi of police officers, and taboos around sexuality. Using Quebec, Scotland, and Catalonia as case studies, the book delves into what these constitutional battles mean for the rights, identity, and needs of everyday people, and it powerfully demonstrates why the hypothetical future independence of these regions would have far-reaching practical consequences, beyond the realm of political structures and academic theory.
The book does not present a magic bullet to resolve debates around independence – this is not its purpose, and the text in fact demonstrates why there is no objectively optimal approach in any or all contexts. Instead, it seeks to shed light on aspects of these situations often overlooked in discussions around the fate of nations, and it addresses what the consequences of constitutional paradigm shifts might be for individuals. Constitutional culture is a complex web of interconnected understandings and behaviours, and the vibrations from shaking or cutting a fundamental strand will be felt throughout the structure.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose doctoral work focused on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>681</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8aea92c8-69da-11ee-b31c-77f0535aaa25</guid>
      <title>Vilja Hulden, &quot;The Bosses&apos; Union: How Employers Organized to Fight Labor Before the New Deal&quot; (U Illinois Press, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>At the opening of the twentieth century, labor strife repeatedly racked the nation. Union organization and collective bargaining briefly looked like a promising avenue to stability. But both employers and many middle-class observers remained wary of unions exercising independent power.</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780252086922" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Bosses' Union: How Employers Organized to Fight Labor Before the New Deal</em></a>&nbsp;(U Illinois Press, 2023),&nbsp;Vilja Hulden reveals how this tension provided the opening for pro-business organizations to shift public attention from concerns about inequality and dangerous working conditions to a belief that unions trampled on an individual's right to work. Inventing the term&nbsp;<em>closed shop</em>, employers mounted what they called an&nbsp;<em>open-shop</em>&nbsp;campaign to undermine union demands that workers at unionized workplaces join the union. Employer organizations lobbied Congress to resist labor's proposals as tyrannical, brought court cases to taint labor's tactics as illegal, and influenced newspaper coverage of unions. While employers were not a monolith nor all-powerful, they generally agreed that unions were a nuisance. Employers successfully leveraged money and connections to create perceptions of organized labor that still echo in our discussions of worker rights.</p><p><br></p><p>Vilja Hulden is an historian of the United States and a teaching associate professor at the Department of History at the University of Colorado Boulder whose work focuses on social and labor history around the turn of the twentieth century.</p><p><a href="https://oakland.edu/cj/faculty/discenna" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Tom Discenna</em></a><em>&nbsp;is Professor of Communication at Oakland University whose work examines issues of academic labor and communicative labor more broadly.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 15 Oct 2023 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/vilja-hulden-the-bosses-union-how-employers-organized-to-fight-labor-before-the-new-deal-u-illinois-press-2023-A4XSC24n</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the opening of the twentieth century, labor strife repeatedly racked the nation. Union organization and collective bargaining briefly looked like a promising avenue to stability. But both employers and many middle-class observers remained wary of unions exercising independent power.</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780252086922" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Bosses' Union: How Employers Organized to Fight Labor Before the New Deal</em></a>&nbsp;(U Illinois Press, 2023),&nbsp;Vilja Hulden reveals how this tension provided the opening for pro-business organizations to shift public attention from concerns about inequality and dangerous working conditions to a belief that unions trampled on an individual's right to work. Inventing the term&nbsp;<em>closed shop</em>, employers mounted what they called an&nbsp;<em>open-shop</em>&nbsp;campaign to undermine union demands that workers at unionized workplaces join the union. Employer organizations lobbied Congress to resist labor's proposals as tyrannical, brought court cases to taint labor's tactics as illegal, and influenced newspaper coverage of unions. While employers were not a monolith nor all-powerful, they generally agreed that unions were a nuisance. Employers successfully leveraged money and connections to create perceptions of organized labor that still echo in our discussions of worker rights.</p><p><br></p><p>Vilja Hulden is an historian of the United States and a teaching associate professor at the Department of History at the University of Colorado Boulder whose work focuses on social and labor history around the turn of the twentieth century.</p><p><a href="https://oakland.edu/cj/faculty/discenna" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Tom Discenna</em></a><em>&nbsp;is Professor of Communication at Oakland University whose work examines issues of academic labor and communicative labor more broadly.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="58579128" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/3f03afcf-bdeb-45cb-80f4-96ea0e806b46/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=3f03afcf-bdeb-45cb-80f4-96ea0e806b46&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Vilja Hulden, &quot;The Bosses&apos; Union: How Employers Organized to Fight Labor Before the New Deal&quot; (U Illinois Press, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:01:01</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>At the opening of the twentieth century, labor strife repeatedly racked the nation. Union organization and collective bargaining briefly looked like a promising avenue to stability. But both employers and many middle-class observers remained wary of unions exercising independent power.
In The Bosses&apos; Union: How Employers Organized to Fight Labor Before the New Deal (U Illinois Press, 2023), Vilja Hulden reveals how this tension provided the opening for pro-business organizations to shift public attention from concerns about inequality and dangerous working conditions to a belief that unions trampled on an individual&apos;s right to work. Inventing the term closed shop, employers mounted what they called an open-shop campaign to undermine union demands that workers at unionized workplaces join the union. Employer organizations lobbied Congress to resist labor&apos;s proposals as tyrannical, brought court cases to taint labor&apos;s tactics as illegal, and influenced newspaper coverage of unions. While employers were not a monolith nor all-powerful, they generally agreed that unions were a nuisance. Employers successfully leveraged money and connections to create perceptions of organized labor that still echo in our discussions of worker rights.
Vilja Hulden is an historian of the United States and a teaching associate professor at the Department of History at the University of Colorado Boulder whose work focuses on social and labor history around the turn of the twentieth century.
Tom Discenna is Professor of Communication at Oakland University whose work examines issues of academic labor and communicative labor more broadly.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>At the opening of the twentieth century, labor strife repeatedly racked the nation. Union organization and collective bargaining briefly looked like a promising avenue to stability. But both employers and many middle-class observers remained wary of unions exercising independent power.
In The Bosses&apos; Union: How Employers Organized to Fight Labor Before the New Deal (U Illinois Press, 2023), Vilja Hulden reveals how this tension provided the opening for pro-business organizations to shift public attention from concerns about inequality and dangerous working conditions to a belief that unions trampled on an individual&apos;s right to work. Inventing the term closed shop, employers mounted what they called an open-shop campaign to undermine union demands that workers at unionized workplaces join the union. Employer organizations lobbied Congress to resist labor&apos;s proposals as tyrannical, brought court cases to taint labor&apos;s tactics as illegal, and influenced newspaper coverage of unions. While employers were not a monolith nor all-powerful, they generally agreed that unions were a nuisance. Employers successfully leveraged money and connections to create perceptions of organized labor that still echo in our discussions of worker rights.
Vilja Hulden is an historian of the United States and a teaching associate professor at the Department of History at the University of Colorado Boulder whose work focuses on social and labor history around the turn of the twentieth century.
Tom Discenna is Professor of Communication at Oakland University whose work examines issues of academic labor and communicative labor more broadly.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1370</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">05bbfbc0-65eb-11ee-bb45-d768943a1554</guid>
      <title>Dennis C. Rasmussen, &quot;The Constitution&apos;s Penman: Gouverneur Morris and the Creation of America&apos;s Basic Charter&quot; (UP of Kansas, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Dennis Rasmussen’s new book<em>,&nbsp;</em><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780700634149" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Constitution's Penman: Gouverneur Morris and the Creation of America's Basic Charter</em></a>&nbsp;(UP of Kansas, 2023), is a propulsive analysis of one of the key members of the Founding generation, Gouverneur Morris of New York and Pennsylvania. Morris is quite a character—from his reputation as a lady’s man to his brilliant speeches at the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia in 1787. Rasmussen has pulled together archival research on Morris along with historical and political context to understand the Constitution’s penman, since Morris was responsible for writing the draft of the document that would become the&nbsp;<em>U.S. Constitution</em>.</p><p>Gouverneur Morris was a fascinating fellow—and his exploits were well known among his peers and colleagues. Morris, who had been educated at King’s College (now Columbia), and had become a lawyer, made much of his fortune in land speculation. He was active during the Revolutionary War, especially in helping to manage payment and supplies to the troops fighting for the new country. Morris, like Jefferson and Adams, also represented the United States abroad, particularly in France during the revolutionary period there. His capacity to negotiate through the factions during the French Revolution was vital to the United States since he was able to protect both American citizens and U.S. interests in France. Morris’s diplomatic and political expertise was in sharp relief during this period in France. As a Federalist Morris also served in the U.S. Senate, elected in 1800 as the Jeffersonians were coming into office. He was at Alexander Hamilton’s deathbed with him after Hamilton’s duel with Burr. But the central action of&nbsp;<a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700634149/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Constitution’s Penman</em></a>&nbsp;is during the constitutional convention in Philadelphia in 1787.</p><p>Rasmussen lays out all of the ways that Morris had a hand in the creation of the American constitutional system, even though he was absent from the convention in the early going in June. The bulk of&nbsp;<a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700634149/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Constitution’s Penman</em></a>&nbsp;focuses on each section of the governing structure of the U.S. national system and draws out Morris’ role in shaping these parts of the American system. While some of Morris’ ideas were more extreme than others—including his thinking on the form that the U.S. Senate should take—his ideas and influence are clear throughout the document itself. Rasmussen digs into Morris’ speeches on the floor of the convention, his role in writing up the document—in which he pulled 23 articles into the seven articles that compose the&nbsp;<em>United States Constitution</em>—and his authorship of the&nbsp;<em>Preamble</em>&nbsp;itself. Rasmussen also focuses on Morris’ strident denunciation of slavery at the Convention and elsewhere, becoming, on some level, the Framers’ conscience on the issue of slavery.</p><p>Dennis Rasmussen has written a book where the story truly dances off the page—and while Gouverneur Morris himself provides much of the content because of his cosmopolitan approach to life, his sharp wit and intelligence, and his interesting lifestyle—this is quite a compelling read.</p><p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/hosts/profile/a7ac4af9-1306-463f-baf9-00f1f4187dfd" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books in Political Science</em></a><em>&nbsp;channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of&nbsp;</em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700633883/the-politics-of-the-marvel-cinematic-universe/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe</em></a><em>&nbsp;(University Press of Kansas, 2022), as well as co-editor of the award winning book,&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.kentuckypress.com/9780813141015/women-and-the-white-house/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a><em>&nbsp;(University Press of Kentucky, 2012).&nbsp;She can be reached&nbsp;</em><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/gorenlj.bsky.social" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>@gorenlj.bsky.social</em></a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2023 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/dennis-c-rasmussen-the-constitutions-penman-gouverneur-morris-and-the-creation-of-americas-basic-charter-up-of-kansas-2023-Zbm04sNS</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dennis Rasmussen’s new book<em>,&nbsp;</em><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780700634149" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Constitution's Penman: Gouverneur Morris and the Creation of America's Basic Charter</em></a>&nbsp;(UP of Kansas, 2023), is a propulsive analysis of one of the key members of the Founding generation, Gouverneur Morris of New York and Pennsylvania. Morris is quite a character—from his reputation as a lady’s man to his brilliant speeches at the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia in 1787. Rasmussen has pulled together archival research on Morris along with historical and political context to understand the Constitution’s penman, since Morris was responsible for writing the draft of the document that would become the&nbsp;<em>U.S. Constitution</em>.</p><p>Gouverneur Morris was a fascinating fellow—and his exploits were well known among his peers and colleagues. Morris, who had been educated at King’s College (now Columbia), and had become a lawyer, made much of his fortune in land speculation. He was active during the Revolutionary War, especially in helping to manage payment and supplies to the troops fighting for the new country. Morris, like Jefferson and Adams, also represented the United States abroad, particularly in France during the revolutionary period there. His capacity to negotiate through the factions during the French Revolution was vital to the United States since he was able to protect both American citizens and U.S. interests in France. Morris’s diplomatic and political expertise was in sharp relief during this period in France. As a Federalist Morris also served in the U.S. Senate, elected in 1800 as the Jeffersonians were coming into office. He was at Alexander Hamilton’s deathbed with him after Hamilton’s duel with Burr. But the central action of&nbsp;<a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700634149/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Constitution’s Penman</em></a>&nbsp;is during the constitutional convention in Philadelphia in 1787.</p><p>Rasmussen lays out all of the ways that Morris had a hand in the creation of the American constitutional system, even though he was absent from the convention in the early going in June. The bulk of&nbsp;<a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700634149/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Constitution’s Penman</em></a>&nbsp;focuses on each section of the governing structure of the U.S. national system and draws out Morris’ role in shaping these parts of the American system. While some of Morris’ ideas were more extreme than others—including his thinking on the form that the U.S. Senate should take—his ideas and influence are clear throughout the document itself. Rasmussen digs into Morris’ speeches on the floor of the convention, his role in writing up the document—in which he pulled 23 articles into the seven articles that compose the&nbsp;<em>United States Constitution</em>—and his authorship of the&nbsp;<em>Preamble</em>&nbsp;itself. Rasmussen also focuses on Morris’ strident denunciation of slavery at the Convention and elsewhere, becoming, on some level, the Framers’ conscience on the issue of slavery.</p><p>Dennis Rasmussen has written a book where the story truly dances off the page—and while Gouverneur Morris himself provides much of the content because of his cosmopolitan approach to life, his sharp wit and intelligence, and his interesting lifestyle—this is quite a compelling read.</p><p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/hosts/profile/a7ac4af9-1306-463f-baf9-00f1f4187dfd" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books in Political Science</em></a><em>&nbsp;channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of&nbsp;</em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700633883/the-politics-of-the-marvel-cinematic-universe/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe</em></a><em>&nbsp;(University Press of Kansas, 2022), as well as co-editor of the award winning book,&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.kentuckypress.com/9780813141015/women-and-the-white-house/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a><em>&nbsp;(University Press of Kentucky, 2012).&nbsp;She can be reached&nbsp;</em><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/gorenlj.bsky.social" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>@gorenlj.bsky.social</em></a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="47263342" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/63449200-a2a4-41f9-85f4-36eac789e1bd/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=63449200-a2a4-41f9-85f4-36eac789e1bd&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Dennis C. Rasmussen, &quot;The Constitution&apos;s Penman: Gouverneur Morris and the Creation of America&apos;s Basic Charter&quot; (UP of Kansas, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:49:13</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Dennis Rasmussen’s new book, The Constitution&apos;s Penman: Gouverneur Morris and the Creation of America&apos;s Basic Charter (UP of Kansas, 2023), is a propulsive analysis of one of the key members of the Founding generation, Gouverneur Morris of New York and Pennsylvania. Morris is quite a character—from his reputation as a lady’s man to his brilliant speeches at the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia in 1787. Rasmussen has pulled together archival research on Morris along with historical and political context to understand the Constitution’s penman, since Morris was responsible for writing the draft of the document that would become the U.S. Constitution.
Gouverneur Morris was a fascinating fellow—and his exploits were well known among his peers and colleagues. Morris, who had been educated at King’s College (now Columbia), and had become a lawyer, made much of his fortune in land speculation. He was active during the Revolutionary War, especially in helping to manage payment and supplies to the troops fighting for the new country. Morris, like Jefferson and Adams, also represented the United States abroad, particularly in France during the revolutionary period there. His capacity to negotiate through the factions during the French Revolution was vital to the United States since he was able to protect both American citizens and U.S. interests in France. Morris’s diplomatic and political expertise was in sharp relief during this period in France. As a Federalist Morris also served in the U.S. Senate, elected in 1800 as the Jeffersonians were coming into office. He was at Alexander Hamilton’s deathbed with him after Hamilton’s duel with Burr. But the central action of The Constitution’s Penman is during the constitutional convention in Philadelphia in 1787.
Rasmussen lays out all of the ways that Morris had a hand in the creation of the American constitutional system, even though he was absent from the convention in the early going in June. The bulk of The Constitution’s Penman focuses on each section of the governing structure of the U.S. national system and draws out Morris’ role in shaping these parts of the American system. While some of Morris’ ideas were more extreme than others—including his thinking on the form that the U.S. Senate should take—his ideas and influence are clear throughout the document itself. Rasmussen digs into Morris’ speeches on the floor of the convention, his role in writing up the document—in which he pulled 23 articles into the seven articles that compose the United States Constitution—and his authorship of the Preamble itself. Rasmussen also focuses on Morris’ strident denunciation of slavery at the Convention and elsewhere, becoming, on some level, the Framers’ conscience on the issue of slavery.
Dennis Rasmussen has written a book where the story truly dances off the page—and while Gouverneur Morris himself provides much of the content because of his cosmopolitan approach to life, his sharp wit and intelligence, and his interesting lifestyle—this is quite a compelling read.
Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the New Books in Political Science channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe (University Press of Kansas, 2022), as well as co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached @gorenlj.bsky.social
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Dennis Rasmussen’s new book, The Constitution&apos;s Penman: Gouverneur Morris and the Creation of America&apos;s Basic Charter (UP of Kansas, 2023), is a propulsive analysis of one of the key members of the Founding generation, Gouverneur Morris of New York and Pennsylvania. Morris is quite a character—from his reputation as a lady’s man to his brilliant speeches at the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia in 1787. Rasmussen has pulled together archival research on Morris along with historical and political context to understand the Constitution’s penman, since Morris was responsible for writing the draft of the document that would become the U.S. Constitution.
Gouverneur Morris was a fascinating fellow—and his exploits were well known among his peers and colleagues. Morris, who had been educated at King’s College (now Columbia), and had become a lawyer, made much of his fortune in land speculation. He was active during the Revolutionary War, especially in helping to manage payment and supplies to the troops fighting for the new country. Morris, like Jefferson and Adams, also represented the United States abroad, particularly in France during the revolutionary period there. His capacity to negotiate through the factions during the French Revolution was vital to the United States since he was able to protect both American citizens and U.S. interests in France. Morris’s diplomatic and political expertise was in sharp relief during this period in France. As a Federalist Morris also served in the U.S. Senate, elected in 1800 as the Jeffersonians were coming into office. He was at Alexander Hamilton’s deathbed with him after Hamilton’s duel with Burr. But the central action of The Constitution’s Penman is during the constitutional convention in Philadelphia in 1787.
Rasmussen lays out all of the ways that Morris had a hand in the creation of the American constitutional system, even though he was absent from the convention in the early going in June. The bulk of The Constitution’s Penman focuses on each section of the governing structure of the U.S. national system and draws out Morris’ role in shaping these parts of the American system. While some of Morris’ ideas were more extreme than others—including his thinking on the form that the U.S. Senate should take—his ideas and influence are clear throughout the document itself. Rasmussen digs into Morris’ speeches on the floor of the convention, his role in writing up the document—in which he pulled 23 articles into the seven articles that compose the United States Constitution—and his authorship of the Preamble itself. Rasmussen also focuses on Morris’ strident denunciation of slavery at the Convention and elsewhere, becoming, on some level, the Framers’ conscience on the issue of slavery.
Dennis Rasmussen has written a book where the story truly dances off the page—and while Gouverneur Morris himself provides much of the content because of his cosmopolitan approach to life, his sharp wit and intelligence, and his interesting lifestyle—this is quite a compelling read.
Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the New Books in Political Science channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe (University Press of Kansas, 2022), as well as co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached @gorenlj.bsky.social
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>676</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">b22377b8-63ba-11ee-9c10-731de7885a5d</guid>
      <title>Rhoda Kanaaneh, &quot;The Right Kind of Suffering: Gender, Sexuality, and Arab Asylum Seekers in America&quot; (U Texas Press, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>From the overloaded courts with their constantly changing dates and appointments to the need to prove oneself the “right" kind of asylum seeker, the asylum system in the United States is an exacting and drawn-out immigration process that itself results in suffering. When anthropologist Rhoda Kanaaneh became a volunteer interpreter for Arab asylum seekers, she discovered how applicants learned to craft a specific narrative to satisfy the system's requirements.</p><p>Kanaaneh tells the stories of four Arab asylum seekers who sought protection in the United States on the basis of their gender or sexuality: Saud, who relived painful memories of her circumcision and police harassment in Sudan and then learned to number and sequence these recollections; Fatima, who visited doctors and therapists in order to document years of spousal abuse without over-emphasizing her resulting mental illness; Fadi, who highlighted the homophobic motivations that provoked his arrest and torture in Jordan, all the while omitting connected issues of class and racism; and Marwa, who showcased her private hardships as a lesbian in a Shiite family in Lebanon and downplayed her environmental activism.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781477326381" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Right Kind of Suffering: Gender, Sexuality, and Arab Asylum Seekers in America</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(U Texas Press, 2023)&nbsp;is a compelling portrait of Arab asylum seekers whose success stories stand in contrast with those whom the system failed.</p><p>Rhoda Kanaaneh&nbsp;has taught anthropology and gender and sexuality studies at Columbia University, American University, New York University, and Fordham University. She is the editor of&nbsp;<em>Displaced at Home: Ethnicity and Gender Among Palestinians in Israel&nbsp;</em>and author of&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/surrounded-palestinian-soldiers-in-the-israeli-military-rhoda-ann-kanaaneh/10985039?ean=9780804758581" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Surrounded: Palestinian Soldiers in the Israeli Military</em></a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/birthing-the-nation-strategies-of-palestinian-women-in-israel-rhoda-ann-kanaaneh/6559273?ean=9780520229440" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Birthing the Nation: Strategies of Palestinian Women in Israel</em></a>.</p><p><a href="https://www.alizearican.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Alize Arıcan</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a Society of Fellows Postdoctoral Scholar at Boston University and an incoming Assistant Professor of Anthropology at CUNY—City College, focusing on urban renewal, futurity, care, and migration. You can find her on Twitter&nbsp;</em><a href="https://twitter.com/alizearican" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>@alizearican</em></a><em>.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2023 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/rhoda-kanaaneh-the-right-kind-of-suffering-gender-sexuality-and-arab-asylum-seekers-in-america-u-texas-press-2023-skHi5Qq8</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the overloaded courts with their constantly changing dates and appointments to the need to prove oneself the “right" kind of asylum seeker, the asylum system in the United States is an exacting and drawn-out immigration process that itself results in suffering. When anthropologist Rhoda Kanaaneh became a volunteer interpreter for Arab asylum seekers, she discovered how applicants learned to craft a specific narrative to satisfy the system's requirements.</p><p>Kanaaneh tells the stories of four Arab asylum seekers who sought protection in the United States on the basis of their gender or sexuality: Saud, who relived painful memories of her circumcision and police harassment in Sudan and then learned to number and sequence these recollections; Fatima, who visited doctors and therapists in order to document years of spousal abuse without over-emphasizing her resulting mental illness; Fadi, who highlighted the homophobic motivations that provoked his arrest and torture in Jordan, all the while omitting connected issues of class and racism; and Marwa, who showcased her private hardships as a lesbian in a Shiite family in Lebanon and downplayed her environmental activism.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781477326381" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Right Kind of Suffering: Gender, Sexuality, and Arab Asylum Seekers in America</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(U Texas Press, 2023)&nbsp;is a compelling portrait of Arab asylum seekers whose success stories stand in contrast with those whom the system failed.</p><p>Rhoda Kanaaneh&nbsp;has taught anthropology and gender and sexuality studies at Columbia University, American University, New York University, and Fordham University. She is the editor of&nbsp;<em>Displaced at Home: Ethnicity and Gender Among Palestinians in Israel&nbsp;</em>and author of&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/surrounded-palestinian-soldiers-in-the-israeli-military-rhoda-ann-kanaaneh/10985039?ean=9780804758581" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Surrounded: Palestinian Soldiers in the Israeli Military</em></a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/p/books/birthing-the-nation-strategies-of-palestinian-women-in-israel-rhoda-ann-kanaaneh/6559273?ean=9780520229440" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Birthing the Nation: Strategies of Palestinian Women in Israel</em></a>.</p><p><a href="https://www.alizearican.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Alize Arıcan</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a Society of Fellows Postdoctoral Scholar at Boston University and an incoming Assistant Professor of Anthropology at CUNY—City College, focusing on urban renewal, futurity, care, and migration. You can find her on Twitter&nbsp;</em><a href="https://twitter.com/alizearican" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>@alizearican</em></a><em>.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="40206436" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/13d7c801-284d-4cf1-ab65-9b152507d76a/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=13d7c801-284d-4cf1-ab65-9b152507d76a&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Rhoda Kanaaneh, &quot;The Right Kind of Suffering: Gender, Sexuality, and Arab Asylum Seekers in America&quot; (U Texas Press, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:41:52</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>From the overloaded courts with their constantly changing dates and appointments to the need to prove oneself the “right&quot; kind of asylum seeker, the asylum system in the United States is an exacting and drawn-out immigration process that itself results in suffering. When anthropologist Rhoda Kanaaneh became a volunteer interpreter for Arab asylum seekers, she discovered how applicants learned to craft a specific narrative to satisfy the system&apos;s requirements.
Kanaaneh tells the stories of four Arab asylum seekers who sought protection in the United States on the basis of their gender or sexuality: Saud, who relived painful memories of her circumcision and police harassment in Sudan and then learned to number and sequence these recollections; Fatima, who visited doctors and therapists in order to document years of spousal abuse without over-emphasizing her resulting mental illness; Fadi, who highlighted the homophobic motivations that provoked his arrest and torture in Jordan, all the while omitting connected issues of class and racism; and Marwa, who showcased her private hardships as a lesbian in a Shiite family in Lebanon and downplayed her environmental activism. The Right Kind of Suffering: Gender, Sexuality, and Arab Asylum Seekers in America (U Texas Press, 2023) is a compelling portrait of Arab asylum seekers whose success stories stand in contrast with those whom the system failed.
Rhoda Kanaaneh has taught anthropology and gender and sexuality studies at Columbia University, American University, New York University, and Fordham University. She is the editor of Displaced at Home: Ethnicity and Gender Among Palestinians in Israel and author of Surrounded: Palestinian Soldiers in the Israeli Military and Birthing the Nation: Strategies of Palestinian Women in Israel.
Alize Arıcan is a Society of Fellows Postdoctoral Scholar at Boston University and an incoming Assistant Professor of Anthropology at CUNY—City College, focusing on urban renewal, futurity, care, and migration. You can find her on Twitter @alizearican.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>From the overloaded courts with their constantly changing dates and appointments to the need to prove oneself the “right&quot; kind of asylum seeker, the asylum system in the United States is an exacting and drawn-out immigration process that itself results in suffering. When anthropologist Rhoda Kanaaneh became a volunteer interpreter for Arab asylum seekers, she discovered how applicants learned to craft a specific narrative to satisfy the system&apos;s requirements.
Kanaaneh tells the stories of four Arab asylum seekers who sought protection in the United States on the basis of their gender or sexuality: Saud, who relived painful memories of her circumcision and police harassment in Sudan and then learned to number and sequence these recollections; Fatima, who visited doctors and therapists in order to document years of spousal abuse without over-emphasizing her resulting mental illness; Fadi, who highlighted the homophobic motivations that provoked his arrest and torture in Jordan, all the while omitting connected issues of class and racism; and Marwa, who showcased her private hardships as a lesbian in a Shiite family in Lebanon and downplayed her environmental activism. The Right Kind of Suffering: Gender, Sexuality, and Arab Asylum Seekers in America (U Texas Press, 2023) is a compelling portrait of Arab asylum seekers whose success stories stand in contrast with those whom the system failed.
Rhoda Kanaaneh has taught anthropology and gender and sexuality studies at Columbia University, American University, New York University, and Fordham University. She is the editor of Displaced at Home: Ethnicity and Gender Among Palestinians in Israel and author of Surrounded: Palestinian Soldiers in the Israeli Military and Birthing the Nation: Strategies of Palestinian Women in Israel.
Alize Arıcan is a Society of Fellows Postdoctoral Scholar at Boston University and an incoming Assistant Professor of Anthropology at CUNY—City College, focusing on urban renewal, futurity, care, and migration. You can find her on Twitter @alizearican.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>62</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">f1d41562-62fb-11ee-a859-37e1a8dd12cd</guid>
      <title>Stephanie R. Larson, &quot;What It Feels Like: Visceral Rhetoric and the Politics of Rape Culture&quot; (Pennsylvania State UP, 2021)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780271091440" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>What it feels like: Visceral Rhetoric and the Politics of Rape Culture</em></a>&nbsp;(Penn State Press, 2021) by Dr. Stephanie Larson interrogates an underexamined reason for our failure to abolish rape in the United States: the way we communicate about it. Using affective and feminist materialist approaches to rhetorical criticism, Dr. Larson examines how discourses about rape and sexual assault rely on strategies of containment, denying the felt experiences of victims and ultimately stalling broader claims for justice.</p><p>Investigating anti-pornography debates from the 1980s, Violence Against Women Act advocacy materials, sexual assault forensic kits, public performances, and the #MeToo movement, Dr. Larson reveals how our language privileges male perspectives and, more deeply, how it is shaped by systems of power—patriarchy, white supremacy, ableism, and heteronormativity. Interrogating how these systems work to propagate masculine commitments to “science” and “hard evidence,” Dr. Larson finds that US culture holds a general mistrust of testimony by women, stereotyping it as “emotional.” But she also gives us hope for change, arguing that testimonies grounded in the bodily, material expression of violation are necessary for giving voice to victims of sexual violence and presenting, accurately, the scale of these crimes. Larson makes a case for visceral rhetorics, theorizing them as powerful forms of communication and persuasion.</p><p>Demonstrating the communicative power of bodily feeling, Dr. Larson challenges the long-held commitment to detached, distant, rationalized discourses of sexual harassment and rape. Timely and poignant, the book offers a much-needed corrective to our legal and political discourses.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose doctoral work focused on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 8 Oct 2023 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/stephanie-r-larson-what-it-feels-like-visceral-rhetoric-and-the-politics-of-rape-culture-pennsylvania-state-up-2021-xQrpcFei</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780271091440" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>What it feels like: Visceral Rhetoric and the Politics of Rape Culture</em></a>&nbsp;(Penn State Press, 2021) by Dr. Stephanie Larson interrogates an underexamined reason for our failure to abolish rape in the United States: the way we communicate about it. Using affective and feminist materialist approaches to rhetorical criticism, Dr. Larson examines how discourses about rape and sexual assault rely on strategies of containment, denying the felt experiences of victims and ultimately stalling broader claims for justice.</p><p>Investigating anti-pornography debates from the 1980s, Violence Against Women Act advocacy materials, sexual assault forensic kits, public performances, and the #MeToo movement, Dr. Larson reveals how our language privileges male perspectives and, more deeply, how it is shaped by systems of power—patriarchy, white supremacy, ableism, and heteronormativity. Interrogating how these systems work to propagate masculine commitments to “science” and “hard evidence,” Dr. Larson finds that US culture holds a general mistrust of testimony by women, stereotyping it as “emotional.” But she also gives us hope for change, arguing that testimonies grounded in the bodily, material expression of violation are necessary for giving voice to victims of sexual violence and presenting, accurately, the scale of these crimes. Larson makes a case for visceral rhetorics, theorizing them as powerful forms of communication and persuasion.</p><p>Demonstrating the communicative power of bodily feeling, Dr. Larson challenges the long-held commitment to detached, distant, rationalized discourses of sexual harassment and rape. Timely and poignant, the book offers a much-needed corrective to our legal and political discourses.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose doctoral work focused on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="45171697" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/b15629e6-c2a4-4b2d-bb10-0186bed9c3f4/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=b15629e6-c2a4-4b2d-bb10-0186bed9c3f4&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Stephanie R. Larson, &quot;What It Feels Like: Visceral Rhetoric and the Politics of Rape Culture&quot; (Pennsylvania State UP, 2021)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:47:03</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>What it feels like: Visceral Rhetoric and the Politics of Rape Culture (Penn State Press, 2021) by Dr. Stephanie Larson interrogates an underexamined reason for our failure to abolish rape in the United States: the way we communicate about it. Using affective and feminist materialist approaches to rhetorical criticism, Dr. Larson examines how discourses about rape and sexual assault rely on strategies of containment, denying the felt experiences of victims and ultimately stalling broader claims for justice.
Investigating anti-pornography debates from the 1980s, Violence Against Women Act advocacy materials, sexual assault forensic kits, public performances, and the #MeToo movement, Dr. Larson reveals how our language privileges male perspectives and, more deeply, how it is shaped by systems of power—patriarchy, white supremacy, ableism, and heteronormativity. Interrogating how these systems work to propagate masculine commitments to “science” and “hard evidence,” Dr. Larson finds that US culture holds a general mistrust of testimony by women, stereotyping it as “emotional.” But she also gives us hope for change, arguing that testimonies grounded in the bodily, material expression of violation are necessary for giving voice to victims of sexual violence and presenting, accurately, the scale of these crimes. Larson makes a case for visceral rhetorics, theorizing them as powerful forms of communication and persuasion.
Demonstrating the communicative power of bodily feeling, Dr. Larson challenges the long-held commitment to detached, distant, rationalized discourses of sexual harassment and rape. Timely and poignant, the book offers a much-needed corrective to our legal and political discourses.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose doctoral work focused on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>What it feels like: Visceral Rhetoric and the Politics of Rape Culture (Penn State Press, 2021) by Dr. Stephanie Larson interrogates an underexamined reason for our failure to abolish rape in the United States: the way we communicate about it. Using affective and feminist materialist approaches to rhetorical criticism, Dr. Larson examines how discourses about rape and sexual assault rely on strategies of containment, denying the felt experiences of victims and ultimately stalling broader claims for justice.
Investigating anti-pornography debates from the 1980s, Violence Against Women Act advocacy materials, sexual assault forensic kits, public performances, and the #MeToo movement, Dr. Larson reveals how our language privileges male perspectives and, more deeply, how it is shaped by systems of power—patriarchy, white supremacy, ableism, and heteronormativity. Interrogating how these systems work to propagate masculine commitments to “science” and “hard evidence,” Dr. Larson finds that US culture holds a general mistrust of testimony by women, stereotyping it as “emotional.” But she also gives us hope for change, arguing that testimonies grounded in the bodily, material expression of violation are necessary for giving voice to victims of sexual violence and presenting, accurately, the scale of these crimes. Larson makes a case for visceral rhetorics, theorizing them as powerful forms of communication and persuasion.
Demonstrating the communicative power of bodily feeling, Dr. Larson challenges the long-held commitment to detached, distant, rationalized discourses of sexual harassment and rape. Timely and poignant, the book offers a much-needed corrective to our legal and political discourses.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose doctoral work focused on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>416</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">80b68e44-6221-11ee-9268-e7bba2add562</guid>
      <title>Andrew Monteith, &quot;Christian Nationalism and the Birth of the War on Drugs&quot; (NYU Press, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Many people view the War on Drugs as a contemporary phenomenon invented by the Nixon administration. But as Dr. Andrew Monteith shows in&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781479817917" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Christian Nationalism and the Birth of the War on Drugs</em></a>&nbsp;(NYU Press, 2023), the conflict actually began more than a century before, when American Protestants began the temperance movement and linked drug use with immorality.</p><p>Dr. Monteith argues that this early drug war was deeply rooted in Christian impulses. While many scholars understand Prohibition to have been a Protestant undertaking, it is considerably less common to consider the War on Drugs this way, in part because racism has understandably been the focal point of discussions of the drug war. Antidrug activists expressed—and still do express--blatant white supremacist and nativist motives. Yet this book argues that racism was intertwined with religious impulses. Reformers pursued the “civilising mission,” a wide-ranging project that sought to protect “child races” from harmful influences while remodelling their cultures to look like Europe and the United States. Most reformers saw Christianity as essential to civilization and missionaries felt that banning drugs would encourage religious conversion and progress.</p><p>This compelling work of scholarship radically reshapes our understanding of one of the longest and most damaging conflicts in modern American history, making the case that we cannot understand the War on Drugs unless we understand its religious origins.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose doctoral work focused on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 8 Oct 2023 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/andrew-monteith-christian-nationalism-and-the-birth-of-the-war-on-drugs-nyu-press-2023-2hezmkU7</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many people view the War on Drugs as a contemporary phenomenon invented by the Nixon administration. But as Dr. Andrew Monteith shows in&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781479817917" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Christian Nationalism and the Birth of the War on Drugs</em></a>&nbsp;(NYU Press, 2023), the conflict actually began more than a century before, when American Protestants began the temperance movement and linked drug use with immorality.</p><p>Dr. Monteith argues that this early drug war was deeply rooted in Christian impulses. While many scholars understand Prohibition to have been a Protestant undertaking, it is considerably less common to consider the War on Drugs this way, in part because racism has understandably been the focal point of discussions of the drug war. Antidrug activists expressed—and still do express--blatant white supremacist and nativist motives. Yet this book argues that racism was intertwined with religious impulses. Reformers pursued the “civilising mission,” a wide-ranging project that sought to protect “child races” from harmful influences while remodelling their cultures to look like Europe and the United States. Most reformers saw Christianity as essential to civilization and missionaries felt that banning drugs would encourage religious conversion and progress.</p><p>This compelling work of scholarship radically reshapes our understanding of one of the longest and most damaging conflicts in modern American history, making the case that we cannot understand the War on Drugs unless we understand its religious origins.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose doctoral work focused on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="68992177" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/c37a9802-2ca1-4cd9-bd7b-bbeb668c6da2/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=c37a9802-2ca1-4cd9-bd7b-bbeb668c6da2&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Andrew Monteith, &quot;Christian Nationalism and the Birth of the War on Drugs&quot; (NYU Press, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:11:51</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Many people view the War on Drugs as a contemporary phenomenon invented by the Nixon administration. But as Dr. Andrew Monteith shows in Christian Nationalism and the Birth of the War on Drugs (NYU Press, 2023), the conflict actually began more than a century before, when American Protestants began the temperance movement and linked drug use with immorality.
Dr. Monteith argues that this early drug war was deeply rooted in Christian impulses. While many scholars understand Prohibition to have been a Protestant undertaking, it is considerably less common to consider the War on Drugs this way, in part because racism has understandably been the focal point of discussions of the drug war. Antidrug activists expressed—and still do express--blatant white supremacist and nativist motives. Yet this book argues that racism was intertwined with religious impulses. Reformers pursued the “civilising mission,” a wide-ranging project that sought to protect “child races” from harmful influences while remodelling their cultures to look like Europe and the United States. Most reformers saw Christianity as essential to civilization and missionaries felt that banning drugs would encourage religious conversion and progress.
This compelling work of scholarship radically reshapes our understanding of one of the longest and most damaging conflicts in modern American history, making the case that we cannot understand the War on Drugs unless we understand its religious origins.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose doctoral work focused on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Many people view the War on Drugs as a contemporary phenomenon invented by the Nixon administration. But as Dr. Andrew Monteith shows in Christian Nationalism and the Birth of the War on Drugs (NYU Press, 2023), the conflict actually began more than a century before, when American Protestants began the temperance movement and linked drug use with immorality.
Dr. Monteith argues that this early drug war was deeply rooted in Christian impulses. While many scholars understand Prohibition to have been a Protestant undertaking, it is considerably less common to consider the War on Drugs this way, in part because racism has understandably been the focal point of discussions of the drug war. Antidrug activists expressed—and still do express--blatant white supremacist and nativist motives. Yet this book argues that racism was intertwined with religious impulses. Reformers pursued the “civilising mission,” a wide-ranging project that sought to protect “child races” from harmful influences while remodelling their cultures to look like Europe and the United States. Most reformers saw Christianity as essential to civilization and missionaries felt that banning drugs would encourage religious conversion and progress.
This compelling work of scholarship radically reshapes our understanding of one of the longest and most damaging conflicts in modern American history, making the case that we cannot understand the War on Drugs unless we understand its religious origins.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose doctoral work focused on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>57</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ab3a85ca-5ee9-11ee-9f7e-bb91ea092e10</guid>
      <title>James N. Druckman and Elizabeth A. Sharrow, &quot;Equality Unfulfilled: How Title IX&apos;s Policy Design Undermines Change to College Sports&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The year 1972 is often hailed as an inflection point in the evolution of women's rights. Congress passed Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, a law that outlawed sex-based discrimination in education. Many Americans celebrate Title IX for having ushered in an era of expanded opportunity for women's athletics; yet fifty years after its passage, sex-based inequalities in college athletics remain the reality. James N. Druckman and Elizabeth A. Sharrow's book&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009338325" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Equality Unfulfilled: How Title IX's Policy Design Undermines Change to College Sports</em></a>&nbsp;(Cambridge UP, 2023) explains why.&nbsp;</p><p>The book identifies institutional roadblocks - including sex-based segregation, androcentric organizational cultures, and overbearing market incentives - that undermine efforts to achieve systemic change. Drawing on surveys with student-athletes, athletic administrators, college coaches, members of the public, and fans of college sports, it highlights how institutions shape attitudes toward gender equity policy. It offers novel lessons not only for those interested in college sports but for everyone seeking to understand the barriers that any marginalized group faces in their quest for equality.</p><p><em>﻿Kelly McFall is Professor of History and Director of the Honors Program at Newman University.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 5 Oct 2023 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/james-n-druckman-and-elizabeth-a-sharrow-equality-unfulfilled-how-title-ixs-policy-design-undermines-change-to-college-sports-cambridge-up-2023-xvo8xSv5</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The year 1972 is often hailed as an inflection point in the evolution of women's rights. Congress passed Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, a law that outlawed sex-based discrimination in education. Many Americans celebrate Title IX for having ushered in an era of expanded opportunity for women's athletics; yet fifty years after its passage, sex-based inequalities in college athletics remain the reality. James N. Druckman and Elizabeth A. Sharrow's book&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009338325" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Equality Unfulfilled: How Title IX's Policy Design Undermines Change to College Sports</em></a>&nbsp;(Cambridge UP, 2023) explains why.&nbsp;</p><p>The book identifies institutional roadblocks - including sex-based segregation, androcentric organizational cultures, and overbearing market incentives - that undermine efforts to achieve systemic change. Drawing on surveys with student-athletes, athletic administrators, college coaches, members of the public, and fans of college sports, it highlights how institutions shape attitudes toward gender equity policy. It offers novel lessons not only for those interested in college sports but for everyone seeking to understand the barriers that any marginalized group faces in their quest for equality.</p><p><em>﻿Kelly McFall is Professor of History and Director of the Honors Program at Newman University.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="81872863" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/143293fa-a984-4ed9-84dd-1a3e72101d34/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=143293fa-a984-4ed9-84dd-1a3e72101d34&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>James N. Druckman and Elizabeth A. Sharrow, &quot;Equality Unfulfilled: How Title IX&apos;s Policy Design Undermines Change to College Sports&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:25:16</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The year 1972 is often hailed as an inflection point in the evolution of women&apos;s rights. Congress passed Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, a law that outlawed sex-based discrimination in education. Many Americans celebrate Title IX for having ushered in an era of expanded opportunity for women&apos;s athletics; yet fifty years after its passage, sex-based inequalities in college athletics remain the reality. James N. Druckman and Elizabeth A. Sharrow&apos;s book Equality Unfulfilled: How Title IX&apos;s Policy Design Undermines Change to College Sports (Cambridge UP, 2023) explains why. 
The book identifies institutional roadblocks - including sex-based segregation, androcentric organizational cultures, and overbearing market incentives - that undermine efforts to achieve systemic change. Drawing on surveys with student-athletes, athletic administrators, college coaches, members of the public, and fans of college sports, it highlights how institutions shape attitudes toward gender equity policy. It offers novel lessons not only for those interested in college sports but for everyone seeking to understand the barriers that any marginalized group faces in their quest for equality.
﻿Kelly McFall is Professor of History and Director of the Honors Program at Newman University.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The year 1972 is often hailed as an inflection point in the evolution of women&apos;s rights. Congress passed Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, a law that outlawed sex-based discrimination in education. Many Americans celebrate Title IX for having ushered in an era of expanded opportunity for women&apos;s athletics; yet fifty years after its passage, sex-based inequalities in college athletics remain the reality. James N. Druckman and Elizabeth A. Sharrow&apos;s book Equality Unfulfilled: How Title IX&apos;s Policy Design Undermines Change to College Sports (Cambridge UP, 2023) explains why. 
The book identifies institutional roadblocks - including sex-based segregation, androcentric organizational cultures, and overbearing market incentives - that undermine efforts to achieve systemic change. Drawing on surveys with student-athletes, athletic administrators, college coaches, members of the public, and fans of college sports, it highlights how institutions shape attitudes toward gender equity policy. It offers novel lessons not only for those interested in college sports but for everyone seeking to understand the barriers that any marginalized group faces in their quest for equality.
﻿Kelly McFall is Professor of History and Director of the Honors Program at Newman University.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>258</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7bb8b1c4-5e1b-11ee-a3a4-f34225c1a1f1</guid>
      <title>Adrian Chastain Weimer, &quot;A Constitutional Culture: New England and the Struggle Against Arbitrary Rule in the Restoration Empire&quot; (U Pennsylvania Press, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781512823974" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>A Constitutional Culture: New England and the Struggle Against Arbitrary Rule in the Restoration Empire</em>&nbsp;</a>(U Pennsylvania Press, 2023),&nbsp;Adrian Chastain Weimer uncovers the story of how, more than a hundred years before the American Revolution, colonists pledged their lives and livelihoods to the defense of local political institutions against arbitrary rule.</p><p>With the return of Charles II to the English throne in 1660, the puritan-led colonies faced enormous pressure to conform to the crown's priorities. Charles demanded that puritans change voting practices, baptismal policies, and laws, and he also cast an eye on local resources such as forests, a valuable source of masts for the English navy. Moreover, to enforce these demands, the king sent four royal commissioners on warships, ostensibly headed for New Netherland but easily redirected toward Boston. In the face of this threat to local rule, colonists had to decide whether they would submit to the commissioners' authority, which they viewed as arbitrary because it was not accountable to the people, or whether they would mobilize to defy the crown.</p><p>Those resisting the crown included not just freemen (voters) but also people often seen as excluded or marginalized such as non-freemen, indentured servants, and women. Together they crafted a potent regional constitutional culture in defiance of Charles II that was characterized by a skepticism of metropolitan ambition, a defense of civil and religious liberties, and a conviction that self-government was divinely sanctioned. Weimer shows how they expressed this constitutional culture through a set of well-rehearsed practices--including fast days, debates, committee work, and petitions. Equipped with a ready vocabulary for criticizing arbitrary rule, with a providentially informed capacity for risk-taking, and with a set of intellectual frameworks for divided sovereignty, the constitutional culture that New Englanders forged would not easily succumb to an imperial authority intent on consolidating its power.</p><p><em>﻿</em><a href="https://pure.qub.ac.uk/portal/en/persons/crawford-gribben(9c12859e-6933-4880-b397-d8e6382b0052).html" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Crawford Gribben</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a professor of history at Queen’s University Belfast.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 3 Oct 2023 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/adrian-chastain-weimer-a-constitutional-culture-new-england-and-the-struggle-against-arbitrary-rule-in-the-restoration-empire-u-pennsylvania-press-2023-YaPQvA4C</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781512823974" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>A Constitutional Culture: New England and the Struggle Against Arbitrary Rule in the Restoration Empire</em>&nbsp;</a>(U Pennsylvania Press, 2023),&nbsp;Adrian Chastain Weimer uncovers the story of how, more than a hundred years before the American Revolution, colonists pledged their lives and livelihoods to the defense of local political institutions against arbitrary rule.</p><p>With the return of Charles II to the English throne in 1660, the puritan-led colonies faced enormous pressure to conform to the crown's priorities. Charles demanded that puritans change voting practices, baptismal policies, and laws, and he also cast an eye on local resources such as forests, a valuable source of masts for the English navy. Moreover, to enforce these demands, the king sent four royal commissioners on warships, ostensibly headed for New Netherland but easily redirected toward Boston. In the face of this threat to local rule, colonists had to decide whether they would submit to the commissioners' authority, which they viewed as arbitrary because it was not accountable to the people, or whether they would mobilize to defy the crown.</p><p>Those resisting the crown included not just freemen (voters) but also people often seen as excluded or marginalized such as non-freemen, indentured servants, and women. Together they crafted a potent regional constitutional culture in defiance of Charles II that was characterized by a skepticism of metropolitan ambition, a defense of civil and religious liberties, and a conviction that self-government was divinely sanctioned. Weimer shows how they expressed this constitutional culture through a set of well-rehearsed practices--including fast days, debates, committee work, and petitions. Equipped with a ready vocabulary for criticizing arbitrary rule, with a providentially informed capacity for risk-taking, and with a set of intellectual frameworks for divided sovereignty, the constitutional culture that New Englanders forged would not easily succumb to an imperial authority intent on consolidating its power.</p><p><em>﻿</em><a href="https://pure.qub.ac.uk/portal/en/persons/crawford-gribben(9c12859e-6933-4880-b397-d8e6382b0052).html" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Crawford Gribben</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a professor of history at Queen’s University Belfast.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="35803439" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/2609743e-9a2a-4247-a9ab-fa961a0bb15f/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=2609743e-9a2a-4247-a9ab-fa961a0bb15f&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Adrian Chastain Weimer, &quot;A Constitutional Culture: New England and the Struggle Against Arbitrary Rule in the Restoration Empire&quot; (U Pennsylvania Press, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:37:17</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In A Constitutional Culture: New England and the Struggle Against Arbitrary Rule in the Restoration Empire (U Pennsylvania Press, 2023), Adrian Chastain Weimer uncovers the story of how, more than a hundred years before the American Revolution, colonists pledged their lives and livelihoods to the defense of local political institutions against arbitrary rule.
With the return of Charles II to the English throne in 1660, the puritan-led colonies faced enormous pressure to conform to the crown&apos;s priorities. Charles demanded that puritans change voting practices, baptismal policies, and laws, and he also cast an eye on local resources such as forests, a valuable source of masts for the English navy. Moreover, to enforce these demands, the king sent four royal commissioners on warships, ostensibly headed for New Netherland but easily redirected toward Boston. In the face of this threat to local rule, colonists had to decide whether they would submit to the commissioners&apos; authority, which they viewed as arbitrary because it was not accountable to the people, or whether they would mobilize to defy the crown.
Those resisting the crown included not just freemen (voters) but also people often seen as excluded or marginalized such as non-freemen, indentured servants, and women. Together they crafted a potent regional constitutional culture in defiance of Charles II that was characterized by a skepticism of metropolitan ambition, a defense of civil and religious liberties, and a conviction that self-government was divinely sanctioned. Weimer shows how they expressed this constitutional culture through a set of well-rehearsed practices--including fast days, debates, committee work, and petitions. Equipped with a ready vocabulary for criticizing arbitrary rule, with a providentially informed capacity for risk-taking, and with a set of intellectual frameworks for divided sovereignty, the constitutional culture that New Englanders forged would not easily succumb to an imperial authority intent on consolidating its power.
﻿Crawford Gribben is a professor of history at Queen’s University Belfast.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In A Constitutional Culture: New England and the Struggle Against Arbitrary Rule in the Restoration Empire (U Pennsylvania Press, 2023), Adrian Chastain Weimer uncovers the story of how, more than a hundred years before the American Revolution, colonists pledged their lives and livelihoods to the defense of local political institutions against arbitrary rule.
With the return of Charles II to the English throne in 1660, the puritan-led colonies faced enormous pressure to conform to the crown&apos;s priorities. Charles demanded that puritans change voting practices, baptismal policies, and laws, and he also cast an eye on local resources such as forests, a valuable source of masts for the English navy. Moreover, to enforce these demands, the king sent four royal commissioners on warships, ostensibly headed for New Netherland but easily redirected toward Boston. In the face of this threat to local rule, colonists had to decide whether they would submit to the commissioners&apos; authority, which they viewed as arbitrary because it was not accountable to the people, or whether they would mobilize to defy the crown.
Those resisting the crown included not just freemen (voters) but also people often seen as excluded or marginalized such as non-freemen, indentured servants, and women. Together they crafted a potent regional constitutional culture in defiance of Charles II that was characterized by a skepticism of metropolitan ambition, a defense of civil and religious liberties, and a conviction that self-government was divinely sanctioned. Weimer shows how they expressed this constitutional culture through a set of well-rehearsed practices--including fast days, debates, committee work, and petitions. Equipped with a ready vocabulary for criticizing arbitrary rule, with a providentially informed capacity for risk-taking, and with a set of intellectual frameworks for divided sovereignty, the constitutional culture that New Englanders forged would not easily succumb to an imperial authority intent on consolidating its power.
﻿Crawford Gribben is a professor of history at Queen’s University Belfast.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>231</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9b314eca-5b01-11ee-8b69-3f28f7555764</guid>
      <title>Derk Venema, &quot;Supreme Courts Under Nazi Occupation&quot; (Amsterdam UP, 2022)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Derk Venema's edited volume&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9789463720496" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Supreme Courts Under Nazi Occupation</em></a>&nbsp;(Amsterdam UP, 2022)&nbsp;is the first extensive treatment of leading judicial institutions under Nazi rule in WWII. It focusses on all democratic countries under German occupation, and provides the details for answering questions like: how can law serve as an instrument of defence against an oppressive regime? Are the courts always the guardians of democracy and rule of law? What role was there for international law? How did the courts deal with dismissals, new appointees, new courts, forced German ordinances versus national law? How did judges justify their actions, help citizens, appease the enemy, protest against injustice?&nbsp;</p><p>Experts from all democracies that were occupied by the Nazis paint vivid pictures of oppression, collaboration, and resistance. The results are interpreted in a socio-legal framework introducing the concept of 'moral hygiene' to explain the clash between normative and descriptive approaches in public opinion and scholarship concerning officials' behaviour in war-time.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 1 Oct 2023 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/derk-venema-supreme-courts-under-nazi-occupation-amsterdam-up-2022-nrFeNH_G</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Derk Venema's edited volume&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9789463720496" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Supreme Courts Under Nazi Occupation</em></a>&nbsp;(Amsterdam UP, 2022)&nbsp;is the first extensive treatment of leading judicial institutions under Nazi rule in WWII. It focusses on all democratic countries under German occupation, and provides the details for answering questions like: how can law serve as an instrument of defence against an oppressive regime? Are the courts always the guardians of democracy and rule of law? What role was there for international law? How did the courts deal with dismissals, new appointees, new courts, forced German ordinances versus national law? How did judges justify their actions, help citizens, appease the enemy, protest against injustice?&nbsp;</p><p>Experts from all democracies that were occupied by the Nazis paint vivid pictures of oppression, collaboration, and resistance. The results are interpreted in a socio-legal framework introducing the concept of 'moral hygiene' to explain the clash between normative and descriptive approaches in public opinion and scholarship concerning officials' behaviour in war-time.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="92670499" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/6e78c7fa-5137-40c0-a77a-7e48dec11a66/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=6e78c7fa-5137-40c0-a77a-7e48dec11a66&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Derk Venema, &quot;Supreme Courts Under Nazi Occupation&quot; (Amsterdam UP, 2022)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:36:31</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Derk Venema&apos;s edited volume Supreme Courts Under Nazi Occupation (Amsterdam UP, 2022) is the first extensive treatment of leading judicial institutions under Nazi rule in WWII. It focusses on all democratic countries under German occupation, and provides the details for answering questions like: how can law serve as an instrument of defence against an oppressive regime? Are the courts always the guardians of democracy and rule of law? What role was there for international law? How did the courts deal with dismissals, new appointees, new courts, forced German ordinances versus national law? How did judges justify their actions, help citizens, appease the enemy, protest against injustice? 
Experts from all democracies that were occupied by the Nazis paint vivid pictures of oppression, collaboration, and resistance. The results are interpreted in a socio-legal framework introducing the concept of &apos;moral hygiene&apos; to explain the clash between normative and descriptive approaches in public opinion and scholarship concerning officials&apos; behaviour in war-time.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Derk Venema&apos;s edited volume Supreme Courts Under Nazi Occupation (Amsterdam UP, 2022) is the first extensive treatment of leading judicial institutions under Nazi rule in WWII. It focusses on all democratic countries under German occupation, and provides the details for answering questions like: how can law serve as an instrument of defence against an oppressive regime? Are the courts always the guardians of democracy and rule of law? What role was there for international law? How did the courts deal with dismissals, new appointees, new courts, forced German ordinances versus national law? How did judges justify their actions, help citizens, appease the enemy, protest against injustice? 
Experts from all democracies that were occupied by the Nazis paint vivid pictures of oppression, collaboration, and resistance. The results are interpreted in a socio-legal framework introducing the concept of &apos;moral hygiene&apos; to explain the clash between normative and descriptive approaches in public opinion and scholarship concerning officials&apos; behaviour in war-time.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>198</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">34ab839a-5be3-11ee-823a-ebd090502674</guid>
      <title>Aparna Chandra, &quot;Court on Trial: A Data-Driven Account of the Supreme Court of India&quot; (India Viking, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The Indian Supreme Court was established nearly seventy-five years ago as a core part of India's constitutional project. Does the Court live up to the ideals of justice imagined by the framers of the Indian Constitution? Critics of the Supreme Court point out that it takes too long to adjudicate cases, a select group of senior advocates exercise disproportionate influence on the outcome of cases, the Chief Justice of India strategically assigns cases with an eye to outcome, and the self-appointments process-known as the collegium-is just another 'old boy's network'.&nbsp;</p><p>Building on nearly a decade of original empirical research,&nbsp;Aparna Chandra's book&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780670091584" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Court on Trial: A Data-Driven Account of the Supreme Court of India</em></a>&nbsp;(India Viking, 2023)&nbsp;examines these and other controversies plaguing the Supreme Court today. The authors provide an overview of the Supreme Court and its processes which are often shrouded in mystery, and present data-driven suggestions for improving the effectiveness and integrity of the Court.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 30 Sep 2023 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/aparna-chandra-court-on-trial-a-data-driven-account-of-the-supreme-court-of-india-india-viking-2023-9V3MBJJ5</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Indian Supreme Court was established nearly seventy-five years ago as a core part of India's constitutional project. Does the Court live up to the ideals of justice imagined by the framers of the Indian Constitution? Critics of the Supreme Court point out that it takes too long to adjudicate cases, a select group of senior advocates exercise disproportionate influence on the outcome of cases, the Chief Justice of India strategically assigns cases with an eye to outcome, and the self-appointments process-known as the collegium-is just another 'old boy's network'.&nbsp;</p><p>Building on nearly a decade of original empirical research,&nbsp;Aparna Chandra's book&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780670091584" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Court on Trial: A Data-Driven Account of the Supreme Court of India</em></a>&nbsp;(India Viking, 2023)&nbsp;examines these and other controversies plaguing the Supreme Court today. The authors provide an overview of the Supreme Court and its processes which are often shrouded in mystery, and present data-driven suggestions for improving the effectiveness and integrity of the Court.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="66924208" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/078c4a49-be66-482d-82d8-d3700fcaa1cc/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=078c4a49-be66-482d-82d8-d3700fcaa1cc&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Aparna Chandra, &quot;Court on Trial: A Data-Driven Account of the Supreme Court of India&quot; (India Viking, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:09:42</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The Indian Supreme Court was established nearly seventy-five years ago as a core part of India&apos;s constitutional project. Does the Court live up to the ideals of justice imagined by the framers of the Indian Constitution? Critics of the Supreme Court point out that it takes too long to adjudicate cases, a select group of senior advocates exercise disproportionate influence on the outcome of cases, the Chief Justice of India strategically assigns cases with an eye to outcome, and the self-appointments process-known as the collegium-is just another &apos;old boy&apos;s network&apos;. 
Building on nearly a decade of original empirical research, Aparna Chandra&apos;s book Court on Trial: A Data-Driven Account of the Supreme Court of India (India Viking, 2023) examines these and other controversies plaguing the Supreme Court today. The authors provide an overview of the Supreme Court and its processes which are often shrouded in mystery, and present data-driven suggestions for improving the effectiveness and integrity of the Court.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Indian Supreme Court was established nearly seventy-five years ago as a core part of India&apos;s constitutional project. Does the Court live up to the ideals of justice imagined by the framers of the Indian Constitution? Critics of the Supreme Court point out that it takes too long to adjudicate cases, a select group of senior advocates exercise disproportionate influence on the outcome of cases, the Chief Justice of India strategically assigns cases with an eye to outcome, and the self-appointments process-known as the collegium-is just another &apos;old boy&apos;s network&apos;. 
Building on nearly a decade of original empirical research, Aparna Chandra&apos;s book Court on Trial: A Data-Driven Account of the Supreme Court of India (India Viking, 2023) examines these and other controversies plaguing the Supreme Court today. The authors provide an overview of the Supreme Court and its processes which are often shrouded in mystery, and present data-driven suggestions for improving the effectiveness and integrity of the Court.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>207</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">228a8d86-5c89-11ee-b16a-c3428bc528d6</guid>
      <title>Aaron Tang, &quot;Supreme Hubris: How Overconfidence Is Destroying the Court--And How We Can Fix It&quot; (Yale UP, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Today I&nbsp;talked to&nbsp;Aaron Tang about his new book&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780300264036" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Supreme Hubris: How Overconfidence Is Destroying the Court--And How We Can Fix It</em></a>&nbsp;(Yale UP, 2023).</p><p>The Supreme Court, once the most respected institution in American government, is now routinely criticized for rendering decisions based on the individual justices' partisan leanings rather than on a faithful reading of the law. For legal scholar Aaron Tang, however, partisanship is not the Court's root problem. Overconfidence is.</p><p>Conservative and liberal justices alike have adopted a tone of uncompromising certainty in their ability to solve society's problems with just the right lawyerly arguments. The result is a Court that lurches stridently from one case to the next, delegitimizing opposing views and undermining public confidence in itself.</p><p>To restore the Court's legitimacy, Tang proposes a different approach to hard cases: one in which the Court acknowledges the arguments and interests on both sides and rules in the way that will do the least harm possible. Examining a surprising number of popular opinions where the Court has applied this approach--ranging from LGBTQ rights to immigration to juvenile justice--Tang shows how the least harm principle can provide a promising and legally grounded framework for the difficult cases that divide our nation.</p><p><em>﻿</em><a href="http://www.williamdomnarski.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>William Domnarski</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a longtime lawyer who before and during has been a literary guy, with a Ph.D. in English. He's written five books on judges, lawyers, and courts, two with Oxford, one with Illinois, one with Michigan, and one with the American Bar Association.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 30 Sep 2023 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/aaron-tang-supreme-hubris-how-overconfidence-is-destroying-the-court-and-how-we-can-fix-it-yale-up-2023-0NtNsAaN</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today I&nbsp;talked to&nbsp;Aaron Tang about his new book&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780300264036" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Supreme Hubris: How Overconfidence Is Destroying the Court--And How We Can Fix It</em></a>&nbsp;(Yale UP, 2023).</p><p>The Supreme Court, once the most respected institution in American government, is now routinely criticized for rendering decisions based on the individual justices' partisan leanings rather than on a faithful reading of the law. For legal scholar Aaron Tang, however, partisanship is not the Court's root problem. Overconfidence is.</p><p>Conservative and liberal justices alike have adopted a tone of uncompromising certainty in their ability to solve society's problems with just the right lawyerly arguments. The result is a Court that lurches stridently from one case to the next, delegitimizing opposing views and undermining public confidence in itself.</p><p>To restore the Court's legitimacy, Tang proposes a different approach to hard cases: one in which the Court acknowledges the arguments and interests on both sides and rules in the way that will do the least harm possible. Examining a surprising number of popular opinions where the Court has applied this approach--ranging from LGBTQ rights to immigration to juvenile justice--Tang shows how the least harm principle can provide a promising and legally grounded framework for the difficult cases that divide our nation.</p><p><em>﻿</em><a href="http://www.williamdomnarski.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>William Domnarski</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a longtime lawyer who before and during has been a literary guy, with a Ph.D. in English. He's written five books on judges, lawyers, and courts, two with Oxford, one with Illinois, one with Michigan, and one with the American Bar Association.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="50498638" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/f0c46f91-47c4-4702-989c-db23136ba8ee/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=f0c46f91-47c4-4702-989c-db23136ba8ee&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Aaron Tang, &quot;Supreme Hubris: How Overconfidence Is Destroying the Court--And How We Can Fix It&quot; (Yale UP, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:52:36</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Today I talked to Aaron Tang about his new book Supreme Hubris: How Overconfidence Is Destroying the Court--And How We Can Fix It (Yale UP, 2023).
The Supreme Court, once the most respected institution in American government, is now routinely criticized for rendering decisions based on the individual justices&apos; partisan leanings rather than on a faithful reading of the law. For legal scholar Aaron Tang, however, partisanship is not the Court&apos;s root problem. Overconfidence is.
Conservative and liberal justices alike have adopted a tone of uncompromising certainty in their ability to solve society&apos;s problems with just the right lawyerly arguments. The result is a Court that lurches stridently from one case to the next, delegitimizing opposing views and undermining public confidence in itself.
To restore the Court&apos;s legitimacy, Tang proposes a different approach to hard cases: one in which the Court acknowledges the arguments and interests on both sides and rules in the way that will do the least harm possible. Examining a surprising number of popular opinions where the Court has applied this approach--ranging from LGBTQ rights to immigration to juvenile justice--Tang shows how the least harm principle can provide a promising and legally grounded framework for the difficult cases that divide our nation.
﻿William Domnarski is a longtime lawyer who before and during has been a literary guy, with a Ph.D. in English. He&apos;s written five books on judges, lawyers, and courts, two with Oxford, one with Illinois, one with Michigan, and one with the American Bar Association.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Today I talked to Aaron Tang about his new book Supreme Hubris: How Overconfidence Is Destroying the Court--And How We Can Fix It (Yale UP, 2023).
The Supreme Court, once the most respected institution in American government, is now routinely criticized for rendering decisions based on the individual justices&apos; partisan leanings rather than on a faithful reading of the law. For legal scholar Aaron Tang, however, partisanship is not the Court&apos;s root problem. Overconfidence is.
Conservative and liberal justices alike have adopted a tone of uncompromising certainty in their ability to solve society&apos;s problems with just the right lawyerly arguments. The result is a Court that lurches stridently from one case to the next, delegitimizing opposing views and undermining public confidence in itself.
To restore the Court&apos;s legitimacy, Tang proposes a different approach to hard cases: one in which the Court acknowledges the arguments and interests on both sides and rules in the way that will do the least harm possible. Examining a surprising number of popular opinions where the Court has applied this approach--ranging from LGBTQ rights to immigration to juvenile justice--Tang shows how the least harm principle can provide a promising and legally grounded framework for the difficult cases that divide our nation.
﻿William Domnarski is a longtime lawyer who before and during has been a literary guy, with a Ph.D. in English. He&apos;s written five books on judges, lawyers, and courts, two with Oxford, one with Illinois, one with Michigan, and one with the American Bar Association.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>199</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4a69940c-5aed-11ee-aebd-8355029cce20</guid>
      <title>Traci Cipriano, &quot;The Thriving Lawyer: A Multidimensional Model of Well-being for a Sustainable Legal Profession&quot; (Routledge, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Traci Cipriano's book&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781032258959" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Thriving Lawyer: A Multidimensional Model of Well-Being for a Sustainable Legal Profession</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Routledge, 2023) is based on an innovative model, grounded in science. This book serves as a resource for promoting well-being and culture-change in the legal community by educating about pertinent issues impacting lawyers, and how to address them. It is a roadmap, highlighting the many over-arching and inter-connected aspects of well-being, and enabling readers to identify and target the issues most relevant to their unique situations.</p><p>Along with practical strategies, the book provides a big-picture framework, illustrating how the many intersecting individual and organizational factors which influence well-being are all related, yet separate and distinct. The framework provides a foundation for creating change, and where you focus first will depend on the needs, the situation, and any unique challenges faced by you or your organization.</p><p>The Thriving Lawyer explains why, in addition to self-care, change is needed on the organizational level in terms of workplace culture and policies, as well as normalizing self-care and eradicating stigma. This book is intended to benefit individual lawyers, their organizations, and professionals who support them, by educating, motivating, and promoting self-care and healthy work environments.</p><p><a href="https://karyne-messina.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Karyne Messina</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a licensed psychologist and psychoanalyst at the Washington Baltimore Center for Psychoanalysis and am on the medical staff of Suburban Hospital in Bethesda, Maryland. She is the author of&nbsp;</em><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781032064512" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Resurgence of Populism: A Psychoanalytic Study of Projective Identification, Blame Shifting and the Corruption of Democracy</em></a><em>&nbsp;(Routledge, 2022).</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2023 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/traci-cipriano-the-thriving-lawyer-a-multidimensional-model-of-well-being-for-a-sustainable-legal-profession-routledge-2023-a_wYUNeA</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Traci Cipriano's book&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781032258959" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Thriving Lawyer: A Multidimensional Model of Well-Being for a Sustainable Legal Profession</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Routledge, 2023) is based on an innovative model, grounded in science. This book serves as a resource for promoting well-being and culture-change in the legal community by educating about pertinent issues impacting lawyers, and how to address them. It is a roadmap, highlighting the many over-arching and inter-connected aspects of well-being, and enabling readers to identify and target the issues most relevant to their unique situations.</p><p>Along with practical strategies, the book provides a big-picture framework, illustrating how the many intersecting individual and organizational factors which influence well-being are all related, yet separate and distinct. The framework provides a foundation for creating change, and where you focus first will depend on the needs, the situation, and any unique challenges faced by you or your organization.</p><p>The Thriving Lawyer explains why, in addition to self-care, change is needed on the organizational level in terms of workplace culture and policies, as well as normalizing self-care and eradicating stigma. This book is intended to benefit individual lawyers, their organizations, and professionals who support them, by educating, motivating, and promoting self-care and healthy work environments.</p><p><a href="https://karyne-messina.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Karyne Messina</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a licensed psychologist and psychoanalyst at the Washington Baltimore Center for Psychoanalysis and am on the medical staff of Suburban Hospital in Bethesda, Maryland. She is the author of&nbsp;</em><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781032064512" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Resurgence of Populism: A Psychoanalytic Study of Projective Identification, Blame Shifting and the Corruption of Democracy</em></a><em>&nbsp;(Routledge, 2022).</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="27103593" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/510a6c8c-9157-456c-947b-8e5a0b925906/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=510a6c8c-9157-456c-947b-8e5a0b925906&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Traci Cipriano, &quot;The Thriving Lawyer: A Multidimensional Model of Well-being for a Sustainable Legal Profession&quot; (Routledge, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:28:13</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Traci Cipriano&apos;s book The Thriving Lawyer: A Multidimensional Model of Well-Being for a Sustainable Legal Profession (Routledge, 2023) is based on an innovative model, grounded in science. This book serves as a resource for promoting well-being and culture-change in the legal community by educating about pertinent issues impacting lawyers, and how to address them. It is a roadmap, highlighting the many over-arching and inter-connected aspects of well-being, and enabling readers to identify and target the issues most relevant to their unique situations.
Along with practical strategies, the book provides a big-picture framework, illustrating how the many intersecting individual and organizational factors which influence well-being are all related, yet separate and distinct. The framework provides a foundation for creating change, and where you focus first will depend on the needs, the situation, and any unique challenges faced by you or your organization.
The Thriving Lawyer explains why, in addition to self-care, change is needed on the organizational level in terms of workplace culture and policies, as well as normalizing self-care and eradicating stigma. This book is intended to benefit individual lawyers, their organizations, and professionals who support them, by educating, motivating, and promoting self-care and healthy work environments.
Karyne Messina is a licensed psychologist and psychoanalyst at the Washington Baltimore Center for Psychoanalysis and am on the medical staff of Suburban Hospital in Bethesda, Maryland. She is the author of Resurgence of Populism: A Psychoanalytic Study of Projective Identification, Blame Shifting and the Corruption of Democracy (Routledge, 2022).
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Traci Cipriano&apos;s book The Thriving Lawyer: A Multidimensional Model of Well-Being for a Sustainable Legal Profession (Routledge, 2023) is based on an innovative model, grounded in science. This book serves as a resource for promoting well-being and culture-change in the legal community by educating about pertinent issues impacting lawyers, and how to address them. It is a roadmap, highlighting the many over-arching and inter-connected aspects of well-being, and enabling readers to identify and target the issues most relevant to their unique situations.
Along with practical strategies, the book provides a big-picture framework, illustrating how the many intersecting individual and organizational factors which influence well-being are all related, yet separate and distinct. The framework provides a foundation for creating change, and where you focus first will depend on the needs, the situation, and any unique challenges faced by you or your organization.
The Thriving Lawyer explains why, in addition to self-care, change is needed on the organizational level in terms of workplace culture and policies, as well as normalizing self-care and eradicating stigma. This book is intended to benefit individual lawyers, their organizations, and professionals who support them, by educating, motivating, and promoting self-care and healthy work environments.
Karyne Messina is a licensed psychologist and psychoanalyst at the Washington Baltimore Center for Psychoanalysis and am on the medical staff of Suburban Hospital in Bethesda, Maryland. She is the author of Resurgence of Populism: A Psychoanalytic Study of Projective Identification, Blame Shifting and the Corruption of Democracy (Routledge, 2022).
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>211</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">46f6b9b8-5ad8-11ee-9c2a-ef24f297de69</guid>
      <title>Kashmir Hill, &quot;Your Face Belongs to Us: A Secretive Startup&apos;s Quest to End Privacy as We Know It&quot; (Random House, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>New York Times tech reporter Kashmir Hill was skeptical when she got a tip about a mysterious app called Clearview AI that claimed it could, with 99 percent accuracy, identify anyone based on just one snapshot of their face. The app could supposedly scan a face and, in just seconds, surface every detail of a person’s online life: their name, social media profiles, friends and family members, home address, and photos that they might not have even known existed. If it was everything it claimed to be, it would be the ultimate surveillance tool, and it would open the door to everything from stalking to totalitarian state control. Could it be true?</p><p>In this riveting account, Hill tracks the improbable rise of Clearview AI, helmed by Hoan Ton-That, an Australian computer engineer, and Richard Schwartz, a former Rudy Giuliani advisor, and its astounding collection of billions of faces from the internet. The company was boosted by a cast of controversial characters, including conservative provocateur Charles C. Johnson and billionaire Donald Trump backer Peter Thiel—who all seemed eager to release this society-altering technology on the public. Google and Facebook decided that a tool to identify strangers was too radical to release, but Clearview forged ahead, sharing the app with private investors, pitching it to businesses, and offering it to thousands of law enforcement agencies around the world.</p><p>Facial recognition technology has been quietly growing more powerful for decades. This technology has already been used in wrongful arrests in the United States. Unregulated, it could expand the reach of policing, as it has in China and Russia, to a terrifying, dystopian level.</p><p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780593448564" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Your Face Belongs to Us: A Secretive Startup's Quest to End Privacy as We Know It</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Random House, 2023) is a gripping true story about the rise of a technological superpower and an urgent warning that, in the absence of vigilance and government regulation, Clearview AI is one of many new technologies that challenge what Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis once called “the right to be let alone.”</p><p><a href="https://jakec007.github.io/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Jake Chanenson</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a computer science Ph.D. student at the University of Chicago. Broadly, Jake is interested in topics relating to HCI, privacy, and tech policy. Jake’s&nbsp;</em>work has been published in top venues such as ACM’s CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2023 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/kashmir-hill-your-face-belongs-to-us-a-secretive-startups-quest-to-end-privacy-as-we-know-it-random-house-2023-EA_2Xmio</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New York Times tech reporter Kashmir Hill was skeptical when she got a tip about a mysterious app called Clearview AI that claimed it could, with 99 percent accuracy, identify anyone based on just one snapshot of their face. The app could supposedly scan a face and, in just seconds, surface every detail of a person’s online life: their name, social media profiles, friends and family members, home address, and photos that they might not have even known existed. If it was everything it claimed to be, it would be the ultimate surveillance tool, and it would open the door to everything from stalking to totalitarian state control. Could it be true?</p><p>In this riveting account, Hill tracks the improbable rise of Clearview AI, helmed by Hoan Ton-That, an Australian computer engineer, and Richard Schwartz, a former Rudy Giuliani advisor, and its astounding collection of billions of faces from the internet. The company was boosted by a cast of controversial characters, including conservative provocateur Charles C. Johnson and billionaire Donald Trump backer Peter Thiel—who all seemed eager to release this society-altering technology on the public. Google and Facebook decided that a tool to identify strangers was too radical to release, but Clearview forged ahead, sharing the app with private investors, pitching it to businesses, and offering it to thousands of law enforcement agencies around the world.</p><p>Facial recognition technology has been quietly growing more powerful for decades. This technology has already been used in wrongful arrests in the United States. Unregulated, it could expand the reach of policing, as it has in China and Russia, to a terrifying, dystopian level.</p><p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780593448564" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Your Face Belongs to Us: A Secretive Startup's Quest to End Privacy as We Know It</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Random House, 2023) is a gripping true story about the rise of a technological superpower and an urgent warning that, in the absence of vigilance and government regulation, Clearview AI is one of many new technologies that challenge what Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis once called “the right to be let alone.”</p><p><a href="https://jakec007.github.io/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Jake Chanenson</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a computer science Ph.D. student at the University of Chicago. Broadly, Jake is interested in topics relating to HCI, privacy, and tech policy. Jake’s&nbsp;</em>work has been published in top venues such as ACM’s CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="36411727" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/c2fb6f94-54e2-4a15-bb98-fd99cdc7eb9f/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=c2fb6f94-54e2-4a15-bb98-fd99cdc7eb9f&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Kashmir Hill, &quot;Your Face Belongs to Us: A Secretive Startup&apos;s Quest to End Privacy as We Know It&quot; (Random House, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:37:55</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>New York Times tech reporter Kashmir Hill was skeptical when she got a tip about a mysterious app called Clearview AI that claimed it could, with 99 percent accuracy, identify anyone based on just one snapshot of their face. The app could supposedly scan a face and, in just seconds, surface every detail of a person’s online life: their name, social media profiles, friends and family members, home address, and photos that they might not have even known existed. If it was everything it claimed to be, it would be the ultimate surveillance tool, and it would open the door to everything from stalking to totalitarian state control. Could it be true?
In this riveting account, Hill tracks the improbable rise of Clearview AI, helmed by Hoan Ton-That, an Australian computer engineer, and Richard Schwartz, a former Rudy Giuliani advisor, and its astounding collection of billions of faces from the internet. The company was boosted by a cast of controversial characters, including conservative provocateur Charles C. Johnson and billionaire Donald Trump backer Peter Thiel—who all seemed eager to release this society-altering technology on the public. Google and Facebook decided that a tool to identify strangers was too radical to release, but Clearview forged ahead, sharing the app with private investors, pitching it to businesses, and offering it to thousands of law enforcement agencies around the world.
Facial recognition technology has been quietly growing more powerful for decades. This technology has already been used in wrongful arrests in the United States. Unregulated, it could expand the reach of policing, as it has in China and Russia, to a terrifying, dystopian level.
Your Face Belongs to Us: A Secretive Startup&apos;s Quest to End Privacy as We Know It (Random House, 2023) is a gripping true story about the rise of a technological superpower and an urgent warning that, in the absence of vigilance and government regulation, Clearview AI is one of many new technologies that challenge what Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis once called “the right to be let alone.”
Jake Chanenson is a computer science Ph.D. student at the University of Chicago. Broadly, Jake is interested in topics relating to HCI, privacy, and tech policy. Jake’s work has been published in top venues such as ACM’s CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>New York Times tech reporter Kashmir Hill was skeptical when she got a tip about a mysterious app called Clearview AI that claimed it could, with 99 percent accuracy, identify anyone based on just one snapshot of their face. The app could supposedly scan a face and, in just seconds, surface every detail of a person’s online life: their name, social media profiles, friends and family members, home address, and photos that they might not have even known existed. If it was everything it claimed to be, it would be the ultimate surveillance tool, and it would open the door to everything from stalking to totalitarian state control. Could it be true?
In this riveting account, Hill tracks the improbable rise of Clearview AI, helmed by Hoan Ton-That, an Australian computer engineer, and Richard Schwartz, a former Rudy Giuliani advisor, and its astounding collection of billions of faces from the internet. The company was boosted by a cast of controversial characters, including conservative provocateur Charles C. Johnson and billionaire Donald Trump backer Peter Thiel—who all seemed eager to release this society-altering technology on the public. Google and Facebook decided that a tool to identify strangers was too radical to release, but Clearview forged ahead, sharing the app with private investors, pitching it to businesses, and offering it to thousands of law enforcement agencies around the world.
Facial recognition technology has been quietly growing more powerful for decades. This technology has already been used in wrongful arrests in the United States. Unregulated, it could expand the reach of policing, as it has in China and Russia, to a terrifying, dystopian level.
Your Face Belongs to Us: A Secretive Startup&apos;s Quest to End Privacy as We Know It (Random House, 2023) is a gripping true story about the rise of a technological superpower and an urgent warning that, in the absence of vigilance and government regulation, Clearview AI is one of many new technologies that challenge what Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis once called “the right to be let alone.”
Jake Chanenson is a computer science Ph.D. student at the University of Chicago. Broadly, Jake is interested in topics relating to HCI, privacy, and tech policy. Jake’s work has been published in top venues such as ACM’s CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>355</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">b31c4410-5a0a-11ee-8392-2f3001dc1490</guid>
      <title>Dylan C. Penningroth, &quot;Before the Movement: The Hidden History of Black Civil Rights&quot; (Liveright, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>A prize-winning scholar draws on astonishing new research to demonstrate how Black people used the law to their advantage long before the Civil Rights Movement.</p><p>The familiar story of civil rights goes like this: once, America’s legal system shut Black people out and refused to recognize their rights, their basic human dignity, or even their very lives. When lynch mobs gathered, police and judges often closed their eyes, if they didn’t join in. For Black people, law was a hostile, fearsome power to be avoided whenever possible. Then, starting in the 1940s, a few brave lawyers ventured south, bent on changing the law. Soon, ordinary African Americans, awakened by Supreme Court victories and galvanized by racial justice activists, launched the civil rights movement.</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781324093107" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Before the Movement: The Hidden History of Black Civil Rights</em></a>&nbsp;(Liveright, 2023),&nbsp;acclaimed historian Dylan C. Penningroth brilliantly revises the conventional story. Drawing on long-forgotten sources found in the basements of county courthouses across the nation, Penningroth reveals that African Americans, far from being ignorant about law until the middle of the twentieth century, have thought about, talked about, and used it going as far back as even the era of slavery. They dealt constantly with the laws of property, contract, inheritance, marriage and divorce, of associations (like churches and businesses and activist groups), and more. By exercising these “rights of everyday use,” Penningroth demonstrates, they made Black rights seem unremarkable. And in innumerable subtle ways, they helped shape the law itself—the laws all of us live under today.</p><p>Penningroth’s narrative, which stretches from the last decades of slavery to the 1970s, partly traces the history of his own family. Challenging accepted understandings of Black history framed by relations with white people, he puts Black people at the center of the story—their loves and anger and loneliness, their efforts to stay afloat, their mistakes and embarrassments, their fights, their ideas, their hopes and disappointments, in all their messy humanness.&nbsp;<em>Before the Movement</em>&nbsp;is an account of Black legal lives that looks beyond the Constitution and the criminal justice system to recover a rich, broader vision of Black life—a vision allied with, yet distinct from, “the freedom struggle.”</p><p><em>﻿Katrina Anderson is a doctoral candidate at the University of Delaware.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2023 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/dylan-c-penningroth-before-the-movement-the-hidden-history-of-black-civil-rights-liveright-2023-DDY9csnx</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A prize-winning scholar draws on astonishing new research to demonstrate how Black people used the law to their advantage long before the Civil Rights Movement.</p><p>The familiar story of civil rights goes like this: once, America’s legal system shut Black people out and refused to recognize their rights, their basic human dignity, or even their very lives. When lynch mobs gathered, police and judges often closed their eyes, if they didn’t join in. For Black people, law was a hostile, fearsome power to be avoided whenever possible. Then, starting in the 1940s, a few brave lawyers ventured south, bent on changing the law. Soon, ordinary African Americans, awakened by Supreme Court victories and galvanized by racial justice activists, launched the civil rights movement.</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781324093107" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Before the Movement: The Hidden History of Black Civil Rights</em></a>&nbsp;(Liveright, 2023),&nbsp;acclaimed historian Dylan C. Penningroth brilliantly revises the conventional story. Drawing on long-forgotten sources found in the basements of county courthouses across the nation, Penningroth reveals that African Americans, far from being ignorant about law until the middle of the twentieth century, have thought about, talked about, and used it going as far back as even the era of slavery. They dealt constantly with the laws of property, contract, inheritance, marriage and divorce, of associations (like churches and businesses and activist groups), and more. By exercising these “rights of everyday use,” Penningroth demonstrates, they made Black rights seem unremarkable. And in innumerable subtle ways, they helped shape the law itself—the laws all of us live under today.</p><p>Penningroth’s narrative, which stretches from the last decades of slavery to the 1970s, partly traces the history of his own family. Challenging accepted understandings of Black history framed by relations with white people, he puts Black people at the center of the story—their loves and anger and loneliness, their efforts to stay afloat, their mistakes and embarrassments, their fights, their ideas, their hopes and disappointments, in all their messy humanness.&nbsp;<em>Before the Movement</em>&nbsp;is an account of Black legal lives that looks beyond the Constitution and the criminal justice system to recover a rich, broader vision of Black life—a vision allied with, yet distinct from, “the freedom struggle.”</p><p><em>﻿Katrina Anderson is a doctoral candidate at the University of Delaware.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="103375889" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/77aca41a-628e-4317-8430-d6e1d21846a6/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=77aca41a-628e-4317-8430-d6e1d21846a6&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Dylan C. Penningroth, &quot;Before the Movement: The Hidden History of Black Civil Rights&quot; (Liveright, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:47:40</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>A prize-winning scholar draws on astonishing new research to demonstrate how Black people used the law to their advantage long before the Civil Rights Movement.
The familiar story of civil rights goes like this: once, America’s legal system shut Black people out and refused to recognize their rights, their basic human dignity, or even their very lives. When lynch mobs gathered, police and judges often closed their eyes, if they didn’t join in. For Black people, law was a hostile, fearsome power to be avoided whenever possible. Then, starting in the 1940s, a few brave lawyers ventured south, bent on changing the law. Soon, ordinary African Americans, awakened by Supreme Court victories and galvanized by racial justice activists, launched the civil rights movement.
In Before the Movement: The Hidden History of Black Civil Rights (Liveright, 2023), acclaimed historian Dylan C. Penningroth brilliantly revises the conventional story. Drawing on long-forgotten sources found in the basements of county courthouses across the nation, Penningroth reveals that African Americans, far from being ignorant about law until the middle of the twentieth century, have thought about, talked about, and used it going as far back as even the era of slavery. They dealt constantly with the laws of property, contract, inheritance, marriage and divorce, of associations (like churches and businesses and activist groups), and more. By exercising these “rights of everyday use,” Penningroth demonstrates, they made Black rights seem unremarkable. And in innumerable subtle ways, they helped shape the law itself—the laws all of us live under today.
Penningroth’s narrative, which stretches from the last decades of slavery to the 1970s, partly traces the history of his own family. Challenging accepted understandings of Black history framed by relations with white people, he puts Black people at the center of the story—their loves and anger and loneliness, their efforts to stay afloat, their mistakes and embarrassments, their fights, their ideas, their hopes and disappointments, in all their messy humanness. Before the Movement is an account of Black legal lives that looks beyond the Constitution and the criminal justice system to recover a rich, broader vision of Black life—a vision allied with, yet distinct from, “the freedom struggle.”
﻿Katrina Anderson is a doctoral candidate at the University of Delaware.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>A prize-winning scholar draws on astonishing new research to demonstrate how Black people used the law to their advantage long before the Civil Rights Movement.
The familiar story of civil rights goes like this: once, America’s legal system shut Black people out and refused to recognize their rights, their basic human dignity, or even their very lives. When lynch mobs gathered, police and judges often closed their eyes, if they didn’t join in. For Black people, law was a hostile, fearsome power to be avoided whenever possible. Then, starting in the 1940s, a few brave lawyers ventured south, bent on changing the law. Soon, ordinary African Americans, awakened by Supreme Court victories and galvanized by racial justice activists, launched the civil rights movement.
In Before the Movement: The Hidden History of Black Civil Rights (Liveright, 2023), acclaimed historian Dylan C. Penningroth brilliantly revises the conventional story. Drawing on long-forgotten sources found in the basements of county courthouses across the nation, Penningroth reveals that African Americans, far from being ignorant about law until the middle of the twentieth century, have thought about, talked about, and used it going as far back as even the era of slavery. They dealt constantly with the laws of property, contract, inheritance, marriage and divorce, of associations (like churches and businesses and activist groups), and more. By exercising these “rights of everyday use,” Penningroth demonstrates, they made Black rights seem unremarkable. And in innumerable subtle ways, they helped shape the law itself—the laws all of us live under today.
Penningroth’s narrative, which stretches from the last decades of slavery to the 1970s, partly traces the history of his own family. Challenging accepted understandings of Black history framed by relations with white people, he puts Black people at the center of the story—their loves and anger and loneliness, their efforts to stay afloat, their mistakes and embarrassments, their fights, their ideas, their hopes and disappointments, in all their messy humanness. Before the Movement is an account of Black legal lives that looks beyond the Constitution and the criminal justice system to recover a rich, broader vision of Black life—a vision allied with, yet distinct from, “the freedom struggle.”
﻿Katrina Anderson is a doctoral candidate at the University of Delaware.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>409</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9c7eadaa-5c77-11ee-8f9d-470e2b8a1aaa</guid>
      <title>The Civic Bargain: A Conversation with Josiah Ober on Ancients and Moderns</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Amidst increasing acrimony and political strain, many worry that democratic governance has an expiration date. To answer these concerns, Josiah Ober looks to the ancients. Here, he discusses his recent book (co-authored with&nbsp;Brook Manville),&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691218601" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Civic Bargain: How Democracies Survive</em></a>&nbsp;(Princeton UP, 2023). How did democracies like Athens, Rome, and England overcome the challenges that accompanied wealth and expansion? How did the ancients influence the American Founders? What lessons can they teach us for preserving democracy today?</p><p><a href="https://classics.stanford.edu/people/josiah-ober" rel="noopener noreferrer">Josiah Ober</a>&nbsp;is the Constantine Mitsotakis Professor in the School of Humanities and Sciences at Stanford University and Senior Fellow at the Hoover Institution. In addition to The Civic Bargain, he is the author of&nbsp;<em>The Rise and Fall of Classical Greece</em>,<em>&nbsp;Democracy and Knowledge: Innovation and Learning in Classical Athens</em>, and<em>&nbsp;The Greeks and the Rational: The Discovery of Practical Reason</em>. He is also the Director of the&nbsp;<a href="https://civics.stanford.edu/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Stanford Civics Initiative</a>.</p><p><a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/people/annika-nordquist" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Annika Nordquist</em></a><em>&nbsp;is the Communications Coordinator of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions and host of the Program’s podcast,&nbsp;</em><a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/podcast" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Madison’s Notes</em></a><em>.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2023 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/the-civic-bargain-a-conversation-with-josiah-ober-on-ancients-and-moderns-KJihQOBa</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amidst increasing acrimony and political strain, many worry that democratic governance has an expiration date. To answer these concerns, Josiah Ober looks to the ancients. Here, he discusses his recent book (co-authored with&nbsp;Brook Manville),&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691218601" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Civic Bargain: How Democracies Survive</em></a>&nbsp;(Princeton UP, 2023). How did democracies like Athens, Rome, and England overcome the challenges that accompanied wealth and expansion? How did the ancients influence the American Founders? What lessons can they teach us for preserving democracy today?</p><p><a href="https://classics.stanford.edu/people/josiah-ober" rel="noopener noreferrer">Josiah Ober</a>&nbsp;is the Constantine Mitsotakis Professor in the School of Humanities and Sciences at Stanford University and Senior Fellow at the Hoover Institution. In addition to The Civic Bargain, he is the author of&nbsp;<em>The Rise and Fall of Classical Greece</em>,<em>&nbsp;Democracy and Knowledge: Innovation and Learning in Classical Athens</em>, and<em>&nbsp;The Greeks and the Rational: The Discovery of Practical Reason</em>. He is also the Director of the&nbsp;<a href="https://civics.stanford.edu/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Stanford Civics Initiative</a>.</p><p><a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/people/annika-nordquist" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Annika Nordquist</em></a><em>&nbsp;is the Communications Coordinator of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions and host of the Program’s podcast,&nbsp;</em><a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/podcast" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Madison’s Notes</em></a><em>.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="60943182" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/ac11477a-cd27-4696-9e68-1e47c0f4df33/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=ac11477a-cd27-4696-9e68-1e47c0f4df33&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>The Civic Bargain: A Conversation with Josiah Ober on Ancients and Moderns</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:03:28</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Amidst increasing acrimony and political strain, many worry that democratic governance has an expiration date. To answer these concerns, Josiah Ober looks to the ancients. Here, he discusses his recent book (co-authored with Brook Manville), The Civic Bargain: How Democracies Survive (Princeton UP, 2023). How did democracies like Athens, Rome, and England overcome the challenges that accompanied wealth and expansion? How did the ancients influence the American Founders? What lessons can they teach us for preserving democracy today?
Josiah Ober is the Constantine Mitsotakis Professor in the School of Humanities and Sciences at Stanford University and Senior Fellow at the Hoover Institution. In addition to The Civic Bargain, he is the author of The Rise and Fall of Classical Greece, Democracy and Knowledge: Innovation and Learning in Classical Athens, and The Greeks and the Rational: The Discovery of Practical Reason. He is also the Director of the Stanford Civics Initiative.
Annika Nordquist is the Communications Coordinator of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions and host of the Program’s podcast, Madison’s Notes.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Amidst increasing acrimony and political strain, many worry that democratic governance has an expiration date. To answer these concerns, Josiah Ober looks to the ancients. Here, he discusses his recent book (co-authored with Brook Manville), The Civic Bargain: How Democracies Survive (Princeton UP, 2023). How did democracies like Athens, Rome, and England overcome the challenges that accompanied wealth and expansion? How did the ancients influence the American Founders? What lessons can they teach us for preserving democracy today?
Josiah Ober is the Constantine Mitsotakis Professor in the School of Humanities and Sciences at Stanford University and Senior Fellow at the Hoover Institution. In addition to The Civic Bargain, he is the author of The Rise and Fall of Classical Greece, Democracy and Knowledge: Innovation and Learning in Classical Athens, and The Greeks and the Rational: The Discovery of Practical Reason. He is also the Director of the Stanford Civics Initiative.
Annika Nordquist is the Communications Coordinator of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions and host of the Program’s podcast, Madison’s Notes.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>85</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">c45b3f80-5873-11ee-9391-63e8e38e02c3</guid>
      <title>Laura F. Edwards, &quot;The People and Their Peace: Legal Culture and the Transformation of Inequality in the Post-Revolutionary South&quot; (UNC Press, 2009)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Do individuals have the right to “keep and bear” arms? Do “the people” have any collective rights to public safety? Now that the United States Supreme Court requires each side to argue based on the “history” and “tradition” of 1791 and 1868, what do scholars tell us about legal practices and public understanding in those times? Dr. Laura F. Edwards argues that Americans in the South transformed their understanding of inequality during the half century following the Revolutionary War. Drawing on extensive archival research in North and South Caroline, she outlines the changes in the legal system, highlighting the importance of localized legal practices that favored maintaining the "peace”: a concept intended to protect the social order and its patriarchal hierarchies. Ordinary people, rather than legal professionals and political leaders, were central to its workings. People without rights – even those enslaved – “had influence within the system because of their positions of subordination, not in spite of them.” Edwards documents how, by the 1830s, state leaders secured support for a more centralized system that excluded people who were not specifically granted individual rights, including women, African Americans, and the poor.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780807859322" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The People and Their Peace: Legal Culture and the Transformation of Inequality in the Post-Revolutionary South</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(UNC Press, 2009) concludes that the emphasis on rights affirmed and restructured existing patriarchal inequalities, giving them new life within state law with implications that affected all Americans.</p><p>This award-winning 2009 book is now central to a new Supreme Court case (<em>United States v. Rahimi</em>) dealing with domestic violence and guns – and has been cited in the legal briefs.</p><p><a href="https://history.princeton.edu/people/laura-f-edwards" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Dr. Laura F. Edwards</em></a><em>&nbsp;is the Class of 1921 Bicentennial Professor in the History of American Law and Liberty at Princeton University and the award-winning author of four books. Most recently, she wrote Only the Clothes on Her Back: Textiles, Law, and Commerce in the Nineteenth-Century United States published by Oxford in 2022.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2023 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/laura-f-edwards-the-people-and-their-peace-legal-culture-and-the-transformation-of-inequality-in-the-post-revolutionary-south-unc-press-2009-SwC1lRnZ</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do individuals have the right to “keep and bear” arms? Do “the people” have any collective rights to public safety? Now that the United States Supreme Court requires each side to argue based on the “history” and “tradition” of 1791 and 1868, what do scholars tell us about legal practices and public understanding in those times? Dr. Laura F. Edwards argues that Americans in the South transformed their understanding of inequality during the half century following the Revolutionary War. Drawing on extensive archival research in North and South Caroline, she outlines the changes in the legal system, highlighting the importance of localized legal practices that favored maintaining the "peace”: a concept intended to protect the social order and its patriarchal hierarchies. Ordinary people, rather than legal professionals and political leaders, were central to its workings. People without rights – even those enslaved – “had influence within the system because of their positions of subordination, not in spite of them.” Edwards documents how, by the 1830s, state leaders secured support for a more centralized system that excluded people who were not specifically granted individual rights, including women, African Americans, and the poor.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780807859322" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The People and Their Peace: Legal Culture and the Transformation of Inequality in the Post-Revolutionary South</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(UNC Press, 2009) concludes that the emphasis on rights affirmed and restructured existing patriarchal inequalities, giving them new life within state law with implications that affected all Americans.</p><p>This award-winning 2009 book is now central to a new Supreme Court case (<em>United States v. Rahimi</em>) dealing with domestic violence and guns – and has been cited in the legal briefs.</p><p><a href="https://history.princeton.edu/people/laura-f-edwards" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Dr. Laura F. Edwards</em></a><em>&nbsp;is the Class of 1921 Bicentennial Professor in the History of American Law and Liberty at Princeton University and the award-winning author of four books. Most recently, she wrote Only the Clothes on Her Back: Textiles, Law, and Commerce in the Nineteenth-Century United States published by Oxford in 2022.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="58779826" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/286312ba-db8e-434d-8447-664cb9a87fbb/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=286312ba-db8e-434d-8447-664cb9a87fbb&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Laura F. Edwards, &quot;The People and Their Peace: Legal Culture and the Transformation of Inequality in the Post-Revolutionary South&quot; (UNC Press, 2009)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:01:13</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Do individuals have the right to “keep and bear” arms? Do “the people” have any collective rights to public safety? Now that the United States Supreme Court requires each side to argue based on the “history” and “tradition” of 1791 and 1868, what do scholars tell us about legal practices and public understanding in those times? Dr. Laura F. Edwards argues that Americans in the South transformed their understanding of inequality during the half century following the Revolutionary War. Drawing on extensive archival research in North and South Caroline, she outlines the changes in the legal system, highlighting the importance of localized legal practices that favored maintaining the &quot;peace”: a concept intended to protect the social order and its patriarchal hierarchies. Ordinary people, rather than legal professionals and political leaders, were central to its workings. People without rights – even those enslaved – “had influence within the system because of their positions of subordination, not in spite of them.” Edwards documents how, by the 1830s, state leaders secured support for a more centralized system that excluded people who were not specifically granted individual rights, including women, African Americans, and the poor. The People and Their Peace: Legal Culture and the Transformation of Inequality in the Post-Revolutionary South (UNC Press, 2009) concludes that the emphasis on rights affirmed and restructured existing patriarchal inequalities, giving them new life within state law with implications that affected all Americans.
This award-winning 2009 book is now central to a new Supreme Court case (United States v. Rahimi) dealing with domestic violence and guns – and has been cited in the legal briefs.
Dr. Laura F. Edwards is the Class of 1921 Bicentennial Professor in the History of American Law and Liberty at Princeton University and the award-winning author of four books. Most recently, she wrote Only the Clothes on Her Back: Textiles, Law, and Commerce in the Nineteenth-Century United States published by Oxford in 2022.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Do individuals have the right to “keep and bear” arms? Do “the people” have any collective rights to public safety? Now that the United States Supreme Court requires each side to argue based on the “history” and “tradition” of 1791 and 1868, what do scholars tell us about legal practices and public understanding in those times? Dr. Laura F. Edwards argues that Americans in the South transformed their understanding of inequality during the half century following the Revolutionary War. Drawing on extensive archival research in North and South Caroline, she outlines the changes in the legal system, highlighting the importance of localized legal practices that favored maintaining the &quot;peace”: a concept intended to protect the social order and its patriarchal hierarchies. Ordinary people, rather than legal professionals and political leaders, were central to its workings. People without rights – even those enslaved – “had influence within the system because of their positions of subordination, not in spite of them.” Edwards documents how, by the 1830s, state leaders secured support for a more centralized system that excluded people who were not specifically granted individual rights, including women, African Americans, and the poor. The People and Their Peace: Legal Culture and the Transformation of Inequality in the Post-Revolutionary South (UNC Press, 2009) concludes that the emphasis on rights affirmed and restructured existing patriarchal inequalities, giving them new life within state law with implications that affected all Americans.
This award-winning 2009 book is now central to a new Supreme Court case (United States v. Rahimi) dealing with domestic violence and guns – and has been cited in the legal briefs.
Dr. Laura F. Edwards is the Class of 1921 Bicentennial Professor in the History of American Law and Liberty at Princeton University and the award-winning author of four books. Most recently, she wrote Only the Clothes on Her Back: Textiles, Law, and Commerce in the Nineteenth-Century United States published by Oxford in 2022.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>674</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">975ca222-57e6-11ee-b13e-dbd00a489c0a</guid>
      <title>Kristin Surak, &quot;The Golden Passport: Global Mobility for Millionaires&quot; (Harvard UP, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Our lives are in countless ways defined by our citizenship. The country we belong to affects our rights, our travel possibilities, and ultimately our chances in life. Obtaining a new citizenship is rarely easy. But for those with the means—billionaires like Peter Thiel and Jho Low, but also countless unknown multimillionaires—it’s just a question of price.</p><p>As discussed in&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780674248649" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Golden Passport: Global Mobility for Millionaires</em></a>&nbsp;(Harvard University Press, 2023) more than a dozen countries, many of them small islands in the Mediterranean, Caribbean, and South Pacific, sell citizenship to 50,000 people annually. Through six years of fieldwork on four continents, Dr. Kristin Surak discovered how the initially dubious sale of passports has transformed into a full-blown citizenship industry that thrives on global inequalities. Some “investor citizens” hope to parlay their new passport into visa-free travel—or use it as a stepping stone to residence in countries like the United States. Other buyers take out a new citizenship as an insurance policy or to escape state control at home. Almost none, though, intend to move to their selected country and live among their new compatriots, whose relationship with these global elites is complex.</p><p>A groundbreaking study of a contentious practice that has become popular among the nouveaux riches, The Golden Passport takes readers from the details of the application process to the geopolitical hydraulics of the citizenship industry. It’s a business that thrives on uncertainty and imbalances of power between big, globalized economies and tiny states desperate for investment. In between are the fascinating stories of buyers, brokers, and sellers, all ready to profit from the citizenship trade.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose doctoral work focused on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 24 Sep 2023 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/kristin-surak-the-golden-passport-global-mobility-for-millionaires-harvard-up-2023-q7KqaQXY</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our lives are in countless ways defined by our citizenship. The country we belong to affects our rights, our travel possibilities, and ultimately our chances in life. Obtaining a new citizenship is rarely easy. But for those with the means—billionaires like Peter Thiel and Jho Low, but also countless unknown multimillionaires—it’s just a question of price.</p><p>As discussed in&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780674248649" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Golden Passport: Global Mobility for Millionaires</em></a>&nbsp;(Harvard University Press, 2023) more than a dozen countries, many of them small islands in the Mediterranean, Caribbean, and South Pacific, sell citizenship to 50,000 people annually. Through six years of fieldwork on four continents, Dr. Kristin Surak discovered how the initially dubious sale of passports has transformed into a full-blown citizenship industry that thrives on global inequalities. Some “investor citizens” hope to parlay their new passport into visa-free travel—or use it as a stepping stone to residence in countries like the United States. Other buyers take out a new citizenship as an insurance policy or to escape state control at home. Almost none, though, intend to move to their selected country and live among their new compatriots, whose relationship with these global elites is complex.</p><p>A groundbreaking study of a contentious practice that has become popular among the nouveaux riches, The Golden Passport takes readers from the details of the application process to the geopolitical hydraulics of the citizenship industry. It’s a business that thrives on uncertainty and imbalances of power between big, globalized economies and tiny states desperate for investment. In between are the fascinating stories of buyers, brokers, and sellers, all ready to profit from the citizenship trade.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose doctoral work focused on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="60477344" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/3dbadfa2-5518-482b-b3d4-2ef0ae64e5bd/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=3dbadfa2-5518-482b-b3d4-2ef0ae64e5bd&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Kristin Surak, &quot;The Golden Passport: Global Mobility for Millionaires&quot; (Harvard UP, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:02:59</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Our lives are in countless ways defined by our citizenship. The country we belong to affects our rights, our travel possibilities, and ultimately our chances in life. Obtaining a new citizenship is rarely easy. But for those with the means—billionaires like Peter Thiel and Jho Low, but also countless unknown multimillionaires—it’s just a question of price.
As discussed in The Golden Passport: Global Mobility for Millionaires (Harvard University Press, 2023) more than a dozen countries, many of them small islands in the Mediterranean, Caribbean, and South Pacific, sell citizenship to 50,000 people annually. Through six years of fieldwork on four continents, Dr. Kristin Surak discovered how the initially dubious sale of passports has transformed into a full-blown citizenship industry that thrives on global inequalities. Some “investor citizens” hope to parlay their new passport into visa-free travel—or use it as a stepping stone to residence in countries like the United States. Other buyers take out a new citizenship as an insurance policy or to escape state control at home. Almost none, though, intend to move to their selected country and live among their new compatriots, whose relationship with these global elites is complex.
A groundbreaking study of a contentious practice that has become popular among the nouveaux riches, The Golden Passport takes readers from the details of the application process to the geopolitical hydraulics of the citizenship industry. It’s a business that thrives on uncertainty and imbalances of power between big, globalized economies and tiny states desperate for investment. In between are the fascinating stories of buyers, brokers, and sellers, all ready to profit from the citizenship trade.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose doctoral work focused on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Our lives are in countless ways defined by our citizenship. The country we belong to affects our rights, our travel possibilities, and ultimately our chances in life. Obtaining a new citizenship is rarely easy. But for those with the means—billionaires like Peter Thiel and Jho Low, but also countless unknown multimillionaires—it’s just a question of price.
As discussed in The Golden Passport: Global Mobility for Millionaires (Harvard University Press, 2023) more than a dozen countries, many of them small islands in the Mediterranean, Caribbean, and South Pacific, sell citizenship to 50,000 people annually. Through six years of fieldwork on four continents, Dr. Kristin Surak discovered how the initially dubious sale of passports has transformed into a full-blown citizenship industry that thrives on global inequalities. Some “investor citizens” hope to parlay their new passport into visa-free travel—or use it as a stepping stone to residence in countries like the United States. Other buyers take out a new citizenship as an insurance policy or to escape state control at home. Almost none, though, intend to move to their selected country and live among their new compatriots, whose relationship with these global elites is complex.
A groundbreaking study of a contentious practice that has become popular among the nouveaux riches, The Golden Passport takes readers from the details of the application process to the geopolitical hydraulics of the citizenship industry. It’s a business that thrives on uncertainty and imbalances of power between big, globalized economies and tiny states desperate for investment. In between are the fascinating stories of buyers, brokers, and sellers, all ready to profit from the citizenship trade.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose doctoral work focused on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>310</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7bc651aa-5a0e-11ee-9b26-dfd5ff30f834</guid>
      <title>Megan MacKenzie, &quot;Good Soldiers Don&apos;t Rape: The Stories We Tell About Military Sexual Violence&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Sexual violence is a significant problem within many Western militaries. Despite international attention to the issue and global #MeToo and #TimesUp movements highlighting the impact of sexual violence, rates of sexual violence are going up in many militaries.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009273961" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Good Soldiers Don't Rape: The Stories We Tell About Military Sexual Violence</em></a>&nbsp;(Cambridge University Press, 2023) by Dr. Megan MacKenzie uses feminist theories of 'rape culture' and institutional gaslighting to identify the key stories, myths, and misconceptions about military sexual violence that have obstructed addressing and preventing it.</p><p>The book is a landmark study that considers nearly thirty years of media coverage of military sexual violence in three case countries – the US, Canada and Australia. Dr. MacKenzie’s findings have implications not only for those seeking to address, reduce, and prevent sexual violence in militaries, but also for those hoping to understanding rape culture and how patriarchy operates more broadly. It will appeal to students, scholars and general readers interested in gender, feminism and the military.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose doctoral work focused on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 24 Sep 2023 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/megan-mackenzie-good-soldiers-don-t-rape-the-stories-we-tell-about-military-sexual-violence-cambridge-up-2023-cb9AamoT</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sexual violence is a significant problem within many Western militaries. Despite international attention to the issue and global #MeToo and #TimesUp movements highlighting the impact of sexual violence, rates of sexual violence are going up in many militaries.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009273961" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Good Soldiers Don't Rape: The Stories We Tell About Military Sexual Violence</em></a>&nbsp;(Cambridge University Press, 2023) by Dr. Megan MacKenzie uses feminist theories of 'rape culture' and institutional gaslighting to identify the key stories, myths, and misconceptions about military sexual violence that have obstructed addressing and preventing it.</p><p>The book is a landmark study that considers nearly thirty years of media coverage of military sexual violence in three case countries – the US, Canada and Australia. Dr. MacKenzie’s findings have implications not only for those seeking to address, reduce, and prevent sexual violence in militaries, but also for those hoping to understanding rape culture and how patriarchy operates more broadly. It will appeal to students, scholars and general readers interested in gender, feminism and the military.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose doctoral work focused on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="39686172" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/5254906a-1621-48e9-84d7-99b8d1022f68/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=5254906a-1621-48e9-84d7-99b8d1022f68&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Megan MacKenzie, &quot;Good Soldiers Don&apos;t Rape: The Stories We Tell About Military Sexual Violence&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:41:20</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Sexual violence is a significant problem within many Western militaries. Despite international attention to the issue and global #MeToo and #TimesUp movements highlighting the impact of sexual violence, rates of sexual violence are going up in many militaries. Good Soldiers Don&apos;t Rape: The Stories We Tell About Military Sexual Violence (Cambridge University Press, 2023) by Dr. Megan MacKenzie uses feminist theories of &apos;rape culture&apos; and institutional gaslighting to identify the key stories, myths, and misconceptions about military sexual violence that have obstructed addressing and preventing it.
The book is a landmark study that considers nearly thirty years of media coverage of military sexual violence in three case countries – the US, Canada and Australia. Dr. MacKenzie’s findings have implications not only for those seeking to address, reduce, and prevent sexual violence in militaries, but also for those hoping to understanding rape culture and how patriarchy operates more broadly. It will appeal to students, scholars and general readers interested in gender, feminism and the military.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose doctoral work focused on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Sexual violence is a significant problem within many Western militaries. Despite international attention to the issue and global #MeToo and #TimesUp movements highlighting the impact of sexual violence, rates of sexual violence are going up in many militaries. Good Soldiers Don&apos;t Rape: The Stories We Tell About Military Sexual Violence (Cambridge University Press, 2023) by Dr. Megan MacKenzie uses feminist theories of &apos;rape culture&apos; and institutional gaslighting to identify the key stories, myths, and misconceptions about military sexual violence that have obstructed addressing and preventing it.
The book is a landmark study that considers nearly thirty years of media coverage of military sexual violence in three case countries – the US, Canada and Australia. Dr. MacKenzie’s findings have implications not only for those seeking to address, reduce, and prevent sexual violence in militaries, but also for those hoping to understanding rape culture and how patriarchy operates more broadly. It will appeal to students, scholars and general readers interested in gender, feminism and the military.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose doctoral work focused on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>311</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">73728724-57e0-11ee-bea7-a32051b92cf6</guid>
      <title>Diana Rickard, &quot;The New True Crime: How the Rise of Serialized Storytelling Is Transforming Innocence&quot; (NYU Press, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781479816040" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The New True Crime: How the Rise of Serialized Storytelling Is Transforming Innocence</em></a>&nbsp;(NYU Press, 2023) by Dr. Diana Rickard examines how serialized crime shows became an American obsession.</p><p>TV shows and podcasts like Making a Murderer, Serial, and Atlanta Monster have taken the cultural zeitgeist by storm, and contributed to the release of wrongly imprisoned people—such as Adnan Syed. The popularity of these long-form true crime docuseries has sparked greater attention to issues of inequality, power, social class, and structural racism. More and more, the American public is asking, Who is and is not deserving of punishment, and who is and is not protected by the law? In The New True Crime, Dr. Rickard argues that these new true crime series deserve our attention for what they reveal about our societal understanding of crime and punishment, and for the new light they shine on the inequalities of the criminal justice system. Questioning the finality of verdicts, framing facts as in the eye of the beholder—these new series unmoor our faith in what is knowable, even as, Rickard critically notes, they often blur the lines between “fact” and “fiction.”</p><p>With a focus on some of the most popular true crime podcasts and streaming series of the last decade, Dr. Rickard provides an in-depth analysis of the ways in which this new media—which allows for binge-listening or watching—makes crime into a public spectacle and conveys ideological messages about punishment to its audience. Entertainment values have always been entwined with crime news reporting. Newsworthy stories, Rickard reminds us, need to involve sex, violence, or a famous person, and contain events that can be framed in terms of individualism and conservative ideologies about crime. Even as these old tropes of innocent victims and deviant bad guys still dominate these docuseries, Dr. Rickard also unpacks how the new true crime has been influenced by the innocence movement, a diverse group of organizers and activists, be they journalists, lawyers, formerly incarcerated people, or family members, who now have a place in mainstream consciousness as DNA evidence exonerates the wrongly convicted.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose doctoral work focused on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 23 Sep 2023 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/diana-rickard-the-new-true-crime-how-the-rise-of-serialized-storytelling-is-transforming-innocence-nyu-press-2023-HqljZr_A</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781479816040" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The New True Crime: How the Rise of Serialized Storytelling Is Transforming Innocence</em></a>&nbsp;(NYU Press, 2023) by Dr. Diana Rickard examines how serialized crime shows became an American obsession.</p><p>TV shows and podcasts like Making a Murderer, Serial, and Atlanta Monster have taken the cultural zeitgeist by storm, and contributed to the release of wrongly imprisoned people—such as Adnan Syed. The popularity of these long-form true crime docuseries has sparked greater attention to issues of inequality, power, social class, and structural racism. More and more, the American public is asking, Who is and is not deserving of punishment, and who is and is not protected by the law? In The New True Crime, Dr. Rickard argues that these new true crime series deserve our attention for what they reveal about our societal understanding of crime and punishment, and for the new light they shine on the inequalities of the criminal justice system. Questioning the finality of verdicts, framing facts as in the eye of the beholder—these new series unmoor our faith in what is knowable, even as, Rickard critically notes, they often blur the lines between “fact” and “fiction.”</p><p>With a focus on some of the most popular true crime podcasts and streaming series of the last decade, Dr. Rickard provides an in-depth analysis of the ways in which this new media—which allows for binge-listening or watching—makes crime into a public spectacle and conveys ideological messages about punishment to its audience. Entertainment values have always been entwined with crime news reporting. Newsworthy stories, Rickard reminds us, need to involve sex, violence, or a famous person, and contain events that can be framed in terms of individualism and conservative ideologies about crime. Even as these old tropes of innocent victims and deviant bad guys still dominate these docuseries, Dr. Rickard also unpacks how the new true crime has been influenced by the innocence movement, a diverse group of organizers and activists, be they journalists, lawyers, formerly incarcerated people, or family members, who now have a place in mainstream consciousness as DNA evidence exonerates the wrongly convicted.</p><p><em>This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose doctoral work focused on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="46562699" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/6eb2f483-5c82-441a-b346-2f21b780426a/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=6eb2f483-5c82-441a-b346-2f21b780426a&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Diana Rickard, &quot;The New True Crime: How the Rise of Serialized Storytelling Is Transforming Innocence&quot; (NYU Press, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:48:29</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The New True Crime: How the Rise of Serialized Storytelling Is Transforming Innocence (NYU Press, 2023) by Dr. Diana Rickard examines how serialized crime shows became an American obsession.
TV shows and podcasts like Making a Murderer, Serial, and Atlanta Monster have taken the cultural zeitgeist by storm, and contributed to the release of wrongly imprisoned people—such as Adnan Syed. The popularity of these long-form true crime docuseries has sparked greater attention to issues of inequality, power, social class, and structural racism. More and more, the American public is asking, Who is and is not deserving of punishment, and who is and is not protected by the law? In The New True Crime, Dr. Rickard argues that these new true crime series deserve our attention for what they reveal about our societal understanding of crime and punishment, and for the new light they shine on the inequalities of the criminal justice system. Questioning the finality of verdicts, framing facts as in the eye of the beholder—these new series unmoor our faith in what is knowable, even as, Rickard critically notes, they often blur the lines between “fact” and “fiction.”
With a focus on some of the most popular true crime podcasts and streaming series of the last decade, Dr. Rickard provides an in-depth analysis of the ways in which this new media—which allows for binge-listening or watching—makes crime into a public spectacle and conveys ideological messages about punishment to its audience. Entertainment values have always been entwined with crime news reporting. Newsworthy stories, Rickard reminds us, need to involve sex, violence, or a famous person, and contain events that can be framed in terms of individualism and conservative ideologies about crime. Even as these old tropes of innocent victims and deviant bad guys still dominate these docuseries, Dr. Rickard also unpacks how the new true crime has been influenced by the innocence movement, a diverse group of organizers and activists, be they journalists, lawyers, formerly incarcerated people, or family members, who now have a place in mainstream consciousness as DNA evidence exonerates the wrongly convicted.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose doctoral work focused on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The New True Crime: How the Rise of Serialized Storytelling Is Transforming Innocence (NYU Press, 2023) by Dr. Diana Rickard examines how serialized crime shows became an American obsession.
TV shows and podcasts like Making a Murderer, Serial, and Atlanta Monster have taken the cultural zeitgeist by storm, and contributed to the release of wrongly imprisoned people—such as Adnan Syed. The popularity of these long-form true crime docuseries has sparked greater attention to issues of inequality, power, social class, and structural racism. More and more, the American public is asking, Who is and is not deserving of punishment, and who is and is not protected by the law? In The New True Crime, Dr. Rickard argues that these new true crime series deserve our attention for what they reveal about our societal understanding of crime and punishment, and for the new light they shine on the inequalities of the criminal justice system. Questioning the finality of verdicts, framing facts as in the eye of the beholder—these new series unmoor our faith in what is knowable, even as, Rickard critically notes, they often blur the lines between “fact” and “fiction.”
With a focus on some of the most popular true crime podcasts and streaming series of the last decade, Dr. Rickard provides an in-depth analysis of the ways in which this new media—which allows for binge-listening or watching—makes crime into a public spectacle and conveys ideological messages about punishment to its audience. Entertainment values have always been entwined with crime news reporting. Newsworthy stories, Rickard reminds us, need to involve sex, violence, or a famous person, and contain events that can be framed in terms of individualism and conservative ideologies about crime. Even as these old tropes of innocent victims and deviant bad guys still dominate these docuseries, Dr. Rickard also unpacks how the new true crime has been influenced by the innocence movement, a diverse group of organizers and activists, be they journalists, lawyers, formerly incarcerated people, or family members, who now have a place in mainstream consciousness as DNA evidence exonerates the wrongly convicted.
This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose doctoral work focused on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>110</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">34ec3fd8-57ca-11ee-b07d-3b0fbd1db0d9</guid>
      <title>David Cunningham, January 6th and Asymmetrical Policing (JP, EF)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Recall This Book first heard from the sociologist of American racism&nbsp;<a href="https://sites.wustl.edu/cunningham/" rel="noopener noreferrer">David Cunningham</a>&nbsp;in&nbsp;<a href="https://recallthisbook.org/2020/06/17/36-policing-and-white-power-ef-jp-global-policing-series/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Episode 36 Policing and White Power</a>. Less than a week after the horrors of January 6th, 2021, he came back for this conversation about “asymmetrical policing” of the political right and left–and of White and Black Americans. His very first book (<a href="https://www.ucpress.edu/book/9780520246652/theres-something-happening-here" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>There’s Something Happening Here,</em>&nbsp;2004</a>) studied the contrast between the FBI’s work in the 1960’s to wipe out left-wing and Black protests and its efforts to control and tame right-wing and white supremacist movements. That gives him a valuable perspective on the run-up to January 6th–and what may happen next.</p><p><strong>Mentioned in the Episode</strong></p><ul>
<li>David Cunningham collaborated on<a href="https://www.lawfareblog.com/see-no-evil-hear-no-evil-police-no-evil" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;this article</a>&nbsp;about the “<em>common pattern of underestimating the threat from right-wing extremists</em>.”</li>
<li><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ulster_Defence_Association" rel="noopener noreferrer">Ulster Defence Association</a></li>
<li>Kathleen Belew,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.hup.harvard.edu/catalog.php?isbn=9780674237698" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Bring the War Home: The White Power Movement and Paramilitary America</em></a>
</li>
<li><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ulster_Defence_Association" rel="noopener noreferrer">Ulster Defence Association</a></li>
<li>Timothy McVeigh and the&nbsp;<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oklahoma_City_bombing" rel="noopener noreferrer">Oklahoma City Bombing:</a>&nbsp;<a href="https://www.fbi.gov/history/famous-cases/oklahoma-city-bombing" rel="noopener noreferrer">FBI perspective</a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a href="https://www.amazon.com/American-Terrorist-Timothy-McVeigh-Oklahoma/dp/0060394072" rel="noopener noreferrer">reported book</a>
</li>
<li>Two of the “after-action” reports on Charlottesville that David discusses are:</li>
<li>“<a href="https://www.huntonak.com/images/content/3/4/v2/34613/final-report-ada-compliant-ready.pdf" rel="noopener noreferrer">Independent Review of the 2017 Protest Events in Charlottesville, Virginia</a>” (Hunton and Williams 2017)</li>
<li>“<a href="https://www.pshs.virginia.gov/media/governorvirginiagov/secretary-of-public-safety-and-homeland-security/pdf/iacp-after-action-review.pdf" rel="noopener noreferrer">Virginia’s Response to the Unite the Right Rally: After-Action Review</a>” (International Association of Chiefs of Police, December 2017)</li>
<li>Lessons Charlottesville (should have) taught us: “<a href="https://www.law.georgetown.edu/icap/wp-content/uploads/sites/32/2018/04/Prohibiting-Private-Armies-at-Public-Rallies.pdf" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Prohibiting Private Armies at Public Rallies</em></a>” (Georgetown Law School, Institute for Constitutional Advocacy and protection, September 2020).</li>
</ul><p><br></p><p><strong>Listen and&nbsp;</strong><a href="https://recallthisbookorg.files.wordpress.com/2021/01/rtb-49-cunningham-transcript-jp-ef.pdf" rel="noopener noreferrer"><strong>Read</strong></a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2023 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/david-cunningham-january-6th-and-asymmetrical-policing-jp-ef-7oxj3Eql</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recall This Book first heard from the sociologist of American racism&nbsp;<a href="https://sites.wustl.edu/cunningham/" rel="noopener noreferrer">David Cunningham</a>&nbsp;in&nbsp;<a href="https://recallthisbook.org/2020/06/17/36-policing-and-white-power-ef-jp-global-policing-series/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Episode 36 Policing and White Power</a>. Less than a week after the horrors of January 6th, 2021, he came back for this conversation about “asymmetrical policing” of the political right and left–and of White and Black Americans. His very first book (<a href="https://www.ucpress.edu/book/9780520246652/theres-something-happening-here" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>There’s Something Happening Here,</em>&nbsp;2004</a>) studied the contrast between the FBI’s work in the 1960’s to wipe out left-wing and Black protests and its efforts to control and tame right-wing and white supremacist movements. That gives him a valuable perspective on the run-up to January 6th–and what may happen next.</p><p><strong>Mentioned in the Episode</strong></p><ul>
<li>David Cunningham collaborated on<a href="https://www.lawfareblog.com/see-no-evil-hear-no-evil-police-no-evil" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;this article</a>&nbsp;about the “<em>common pattern of underestimating the threat from right-wing extremists</em>.”</li>
<li><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ulster_Defence_Association" rel="noopener noreferrer">Ulster Defence Association</a></li>
<li>Kathleen Belew,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.hup.harvard.edu/catalog.php?isbn=9780674237698" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Bring the War Home: The White Power Movement and Paramilitary America</em></a>
</li>
<li><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ulster_Defence_Association" rel="noopener noreferrer">Ulster Defence Association</a></li>
<li>Timothy McVeigh and the&nbsp;<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oklahoma_City_bombing" rel="noopener noreferrer">Oklahoma City Bombing:</a>&nbsp;<a href="https://www.fbi.gov/history/famous-cases/oklahoma-city-bombing" rel="noopener noreferrer">FBI perspective</a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a href="https://www.amazon.com/American-Terrorist-Timothy-McVeigh-Oklahoma/dp/0060394072" rel="noopener noreferrer">reported book</a>
</li>
<li>Two of the “after-action” reports on Charlottesville that David discusses are:</li>
<li>“<a href="https://www.huntonak.com/images/content/3/4/v2/34613/final-report-ada-compliant-ready.pdf" rel="noopener noreferrer">Independent Review of the 2017 Protest Events in Charlottesville, Virginia</a>” (Hunton and Williams 2017)</li>
<li>“<a href="https://www.pshs.virginia.gov/media/governorvirginiagov/secretary-of-public-safety-and-homeland-security/pdf/iacp-after-action-review.pdf" rel="noopener noreferrer">Virginia’s Response to the Unite the Right Rally: After-Action Review</a>” (International Association of Chiefs of Police, December 2017)</li>
<li>Lessons Charlottesville (should have) taught us: “<a href="https://www.law.georgetown.edu/icap/wp-content/uploads/sites/32/2018/04/Prohibiting-Private-Armies-at-Public-Rallies.pdf" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Prohibiting Private Armies at Public Rallies</em></a>” (Georgetown Law School, Institute for Constitutional Advocacy and protection, September 2020).</li>
</ul><p><br></p><p><strong>Listen and&nbsp;</strong><a href="https://recallthisbookorg.files.wordpress.com/2021/01/rtb-49-cunningham-transcript-jp-ef.pdf" rel="noopener noreferrer"><strong>Read</strong></a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="27862367" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/e0a33c24-6a80-4554-b76b-54db7e579a54/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=e0a33c24-6a80-4554-b76b-54db7e579a54&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>David Cunningham, January 6th and Asymmetrical Policing (JP, EF)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:29:01</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Recall This Book first heard from the sociologist of American racism David Cunningham in Episode 36 Policing and White Power. Less than a week after the horrors of January 6th, 2021, he came back for this conversation about “asymmetrical policing” of the political right and left–and of White and Black Americans. His very first book (There’s Something Happening Here, 2004) studied the contrast between the FBI’s work in the 1960’s to wipe out left-wing and Black protests and its efforts to control and tame right-wing and white supremacist movements. That gives him a valuable perspective on the run-up to January 6th–and what may happen next.
Mentioned in the Episode
David Cunningham collaborated on this article about the “common pattern of underestimating the threat from right-wing extremists.”
Ulster Defence Association
Kathleen Belew, Bring the War Home: The White Power Movement and Paramilitary America
Ulster Defence Association
Timothy McVeigh and the Oklahoma City Bombing: FBI perspective and reported book
Two of the “after-action” reports on Charlottesville that David discusses are:
“Independent Review of the 2017 Protest Events in Charlottesville, Virginia” (Hunton and Williams 2017)
“Virginia’s Response to the Unite the Right Rally: After-Action Review” (International Association of Chiefs of Police, December 2017)
Lessons Charlottesville (should have) taught us: “Prohibiting Private Armies at Public Rallies” (Georgetown Law School, Institute for Constitutional Advocacy and protection, September 2020).
Listen and Read
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Recall This Book first heard from the sociologist of American racism David Cunningham in Episode 36 Policing and White Power. Less than a week after the horrors of January 6th, 2021, he came back for this conversation about “asymmetrical policing” of the political right and left–and of White and Black Americans. His very first book (There’s Something Happening Here, 2004) studied the contrast between the FBI’s work in the 1960’s to wipe out left-wing and Black protests and its efforts to control and tame right-wing and white supremacist movements. That gives him a valuable perspective on the run-up to January 6th–and what may happen next.
Mentioned in the Episode
David Cunningham collaborated on this article about the “common pattern of underestimating the threat from right-wing extremists.”
Ulster Defence Association
Kathleen Belew, Bring the War Home: The White Power Movement and Paramilitary America
Ulster Defence Association
Timothy McVeigh and the Oklahoma City Bombing: FBI perspective and reported book
Two of the “after-action” reports on Charlottesville that David discusses are:
“Independent Review of the 2017 Protest Events in Charlottesville, Virginia” (Hunton and Williams 2017)
“Virginia’s Response to the Unite the Right Rally: After-Action Review” (International Association of Chiefs of Police, December 2017)
Lessons Charlottesville (should have) taught us: “Prohibiting Private Armies at Public Rallies” (Georgetown Law School, Institute for Constitutional Advocacy and protection, September 2020).
Listen and Read
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>113</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">095911fa-5565-11ee-bd22-3b5b8fe8142f</guid>
      <title>Valentina Capurri, &quot;Not Good Enough for Canada: Canadian Public Discourse Around Issues of Inadmissibility for Potential Immigrants with Diseases And/Or Disabilities&quot; (U Toronto Press, 2020)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Valentina Capurri's book&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781487504298" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Not Good Enough for Canada: Canadian Public Discourse Around Issues of Inadmissibility for Potential Immigrants with Diseases And/Or Disabilities</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(U Toronto Press, 2020) investigates the development of Canadian immigration policy with respect to persons with a disease or disability throughout the twentieth century. With an emphasis on social history, this book examines the way the state operates through legislation to achieve its goals of self-preservation even when such legislation contradicts state commitments to equality rights.</p><p>Looking at the ways federal politicians, mainstream media, and the judicial system have perceived persons with disabilities, specifically immigrant applicants with disabilities, this book reveals how Canadian immigration policy has systematically omitted any reference to this group, rendering them socially invisible.</p><p><a href="https://arts-sciences.buffalo.edu/history/graduate/GraduateHistoryAssociation/GradStudentProfiles/ShuWan.html" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Shu Wan</em></a><em>&nbsp;is currently matriculated as a doctoral student in history at the University at Buffalo. As a digital and disability historian, he serves in the editorial team of Digital Humanities Quarterly and Nursing Clio. On Twitter: @slissw.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2023 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/valentina-capurri-not-good-enough-for-canada-canadian-public-discourse-around-issues-of-inadmissibility-for-potential-immigrants-with-diseases-and-or-disabilities-u-toronto-press-2020-3O1ENKUu</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Valentina Capurri's book&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781487504298" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Not Good Enough for Canada: Canadian Public Discourse Around Issues of Inadmissibility for Potential Immigrants with Diseases And/Or Disabilities</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(U Toronto Press, 2020) investigates the development of Canadian immigration policy with respect to persons with a disease or disability throughout the twentieth century. With an emphasis on social history, this book examines the way the state operates through legislation to achieve its goals of self-preservation even when such legislation contradicts state commitments to equality rights.</p><p>Looking at the ways federal politicians, mainstream media, and the judicial system have perceived persons with disabilities, specifically immigrant applicants with disabilities, this book reveals how Canadian immigration policy has systematically omitted any reference to this group, rendering them socially invisible.</p><p><a href="https://arts-sciences.buffalo.edu/history/graduate/GraduateHistoryAssociation/GradStudentProfiles/ShuWan.html" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Shu Wan</em></a><em>&nbsp;is currently matriculated as a doctoral student in history at the University at Buffalo. As a digital and disability historian, he serves in the editorial team of Digital Humanities Quarterly and Nursing Clio. On Twitter: @slissw.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="27058347" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/9962b793-dd2f-4590-9ff0-f0e1315c2c7f/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=9962b793-dd2f-4590-9ff0-f0e1315c2c7f&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Valentina Capurri, &quot;Not Good Enough for Canada: Canadian Public Discourse Around Issues of Inadmissibility for Potential Immigrants with Diseases And/Or Disabilities&quot; (U Toronto Press, 2020)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:28:11</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Valentina Capurri&apos;s book Not Good Enough for Canada: Canadian Public Discourse Around Issues of Inadmissibility for Potential Immigrants with Diseases And/Or Disabilities (U Toronto Press, 2020) investigates the development of Canadian immigration policy with respect to persons with a disease or disability throughout the twentieth century. With an emphasis on social history, this book examines the way the state operates through legislation to achieve its goals of self-preservation even when such legislation contradicts state commitments to equality rights.
Looking at the ways federal politicians, mainstream media, and the judicial system have perceived persons with disabilities, specifically immigrant applicants with disabilities, this book reveals how Canadian immigration policy has systematically omitted any reference to this group, rendering them socially invisible.
Shu Wan is currently matriculated as a doctoral student in history at the University at Buffalo. As a digital and disability historian, he serves in the editorial team of Digital Humanities Quarterly and Nursing Clio. On Twitter: @slissw.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Valentina Capurri&apos;s book Not Good Enough for Canada: Canadian Public Discourse Around Issues of Inadmissibility for Potential Immigrants with Diseases And/Or Disabilities (U Toronto Press, 2020) investigates the development of Canadian immigration policy with respect to persons with a disease or disability throughout the twentieth century. With an emphasis on social history, this book examines the way the state operates through legislation to achieve its goals of self-preservation even when such legislation contradicts state commitments to equality rights.
Looking at the ways federal politicians, mainstream media, and the judicial system have perceived persons with disabilities, specifically immigrant applicants with disabilities, this book reveals how Canadian immigration policy has systematically omitted any reference to this group, rendering them socially invisible.
Shu Wan is currently matriculated as a doctoral student in history at the University at Buffalo. As a digital and disability historian, he serves in the editorial team of Digital Humanities Quarterly and Nursing Clio. On Twitter: @slissw.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>33</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">f5df0210-54b0-11ee-8d57-c727a40a537a</guid>
      <title>David B. Wong, &quot;Moral Relativism and Pluralism&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Today I talked to David B. Wong about his book&nbsp;<a href="https://www.cambridge.org/core/elements/abs/moral-relativism-and-pluralism/3DA6C896B00ACDFE5A64E5228E797BC3" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Moral Relativism and Pluralism</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Cambridge UP, 2023).</p><p>The argument for metaethical relativism--the view that there is no single true or most justified morality--is that it is part of the best explanation of the most difficult moral disagreements. The argument for this view features a comparison between traditions that highly value relationship and community and traditions that highly value personal autonomy of the individual and rights. It is held that moralities are best understood as emerging from human culture in response to the need to promote and regulate interpersonal cooperation and internal motivational coherence in the individual. The argument ends in the conclusion that there is a bounded plurality of true and most justified moralities that accomplish these functions. The normative implications of this form of metaethical relativism are explored, with specific focus on female genital cutting and abortion.</p><p>You can find out more about Prof. David Wong's works&nbsp;<a href="https://scholars.duke.edu/person/d.wong/publications" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a>.</p><p>The book is open-access and can be freely downloaded&nbsp;<a href="https://www.cambridge.org/core/elements/moral-relativism-and-pluralism/3DA6C896B00ACDFE5A64E5228E797BC3" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a>.</p><p><a href="https://dornsife.usc.edu/cf/faculty-and-staff/faculty.cfm?pid=1097323" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Jessica Zu</em></a><em>&nbsp;is an intellectual historian and a scholar of Buddhist studies. She is an assistant professor of religion at the University of Southern California.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2023 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/david-b-wong-moral-relativism-and-pluralism-cambridge-up-2023-OYAIkSZu</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today I talked to David B. Wong about his book&nbsp;<a href="https://www.cambridge.org/core/elements/abs/moral-relativism-and-pluralism/3DA6C896B00ACDFE5A64E5228E797BC3" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Moral Relativism and Pluralism</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Cambridge UP, 2023).</p><p>The argument for metaethical relativism--the view that there is no single true or most justified morality--is that it is part of the best explanation of the most difficult moral disagreements. The argument for this view features a comparison between traditions that highly value relationship and community and traditions that highly value personal autonomy of the individual and rights. It is held that moralities are best understood as emerging from human culture in response to the need to promote and regulate interpersonal cooperation and internal motivational coherence in the individual. The argument ends in the conclusion that there is a bounded plurality of true and most justified moralities that accomplish these functions. The normative implications of this form of metaethical relativism are explored, with specific focus on female genital cutting and abortion.</p><p>You can find out more about Prof. David Wong's works&nbsp;<a href="https://scholars.duke.edu/person/d.wong/publications" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a>.</p><p>The book is open-access and can be freely downloaded&nbsp;<a href="https://www.cambridge.org/core/elements/moral-relativism-and-pluralism/3DA6C896B00ACDFE5A64E5228E797BC3" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a>.</p><p><a href="https://dornsife.usc.edu/cf/faculty-and-staff/faculty.cfm?pid=1097323" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Jessica Zu</em></a><em>&nbsp;is an intellectual historian and a scholar of Buddhist studies. She is an assistant professor of religion at the University of Southern California.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="61437811" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/27fb0693-42c3-4e42-9cf5-27b783e1567b/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=27fb0693-42c3-4e42-9cf5-27b783e1567b&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>David B. Wong, &quot;Moral Relativism and Pluralism&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:03:59</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Today I talked to David B. Wong about his book Moral Relativism and Pluralism (Cambridge UP, 2023).
The argument for metaethical relativism--the view that there is no single true or most justified morality--is that it is part of the best explanation of the most difficult moral disagreements. The argument for this view features a comparison between traditions that highly value relationship and community and traditions that highly value personal autonomy of the individual and rights. It is held that moralities are best understood as emerging from human culture in response to the need to promote and regulate interpersonal cooperation and internal motivational coherence in the individual. The argument ends in the conclusion that there is a bounded plurality of true and most justified moralities that accomplish these functions. The normative implications of this form of metaethical relativism are explored, with specific focus on female genital cutting and abortion.
You can find out more about Prof. David Wong&apos;s works here.
The book is open-access and can be freely downloaded here.
Jessica Zu is an intellectual historian and a scholar of Buddhist studies. She is an assistant professor of religion at the University of Southern California.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Today I talked to David B. Wong about his book Moral Relativism and Pluralism (Cambridge UP, 2023).
The argument for metaethical relativism--the view that there is no single true or most justified morality--is that it is part of the best explanation of the most difficult moral disagreements. The argument for this view features a comparison between traditions that highly value relationship and community and traditions that highly value personal autonomy of the individual and rights. It is held that moralities are best understood as emerging from human culture in response to the need to promote and regulate interpersonal cooperation and internal motivational coherence in the individual. The argument ends in the conclusion that there is a bounded plurality of true and most justified moralities that accomplish these functions. The normative implications of this form of metaethical relativism are explored, with specific focus on female genital cutting and abortion.
You can find out more about Prof. David Wong&apos;s works here.
The book is open-access and can be freely downloaded here.
Jessica Zu is an intellectual historian and a scholar of Buddhist studies. She is an assistant professor of religion at the University of Southern California.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>195</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3910318c-5405-11ee-a26f-0ba53c5bdb20</guid>
      <title>Beverley Chalmers, &quot;Child Sex Abuse: Power, Profit, Perversion&quot; (Grosvenor House, 2022)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Children of all ages are abused in every country in the world, by members of every society, culture, religion, and socio-economic class. About 120 million children under twenty, or one child in ten, report sexual abuse.</p><p>We often blame children for their own abuse instead of holding the perpetrators responsible for their crimes. When perpetrators are prosecuted, punishments are rarely severe. Remarkably, we sometimes justify child sex abuse, or even facilitate it, allowing it to continue, not only in hidden places, but even in the open. Beverley Chalmers' book&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781839759567" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Child Sex Abuse: Power, Profit, Perversion</em></a>&nbsp;(Grosvenor House, 2022) exposes the stunning extent of child sex abuse in today's world.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 16 Sep 2023 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/beverley-chalmers-child-sex-abuse-power-profit-perversion-grosvenor-house-2022-FeRK3_F3</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Children of all ages are abused in every country in the world, by members of every society, culture, religion, and socio-economic class. About 120 million children under twenty, or one child in ten, report sexual abuse.</p><p>We often blame children for their own abuse instead of holding the perpetrators responsible for their crimes. When perpetrators are prosecuted, punishments are rarely severe. Remarkably, we sometimes justify child sex abuse, or even facilitate it, allowing it to continue, not only in hidden places, but even in the open. Beverley Chalmers' book&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781839759567" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Child Sex Abuse: Power, Profit, Perversion</em></a>&nbsp;(Grosvenor House, 2022) exposes the stunning extent of child sex abuse in today's world.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="53285866" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/c7903bf0-6a9e-4c56-8a57-ea3e36974795/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=c7903bf0-6a9e-4c56-8a57-ea3e36974795&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Beverley Chalmers, &quot;Child Sex Abuse: Power, Profit, Perversion&quot; (Grosvenor House, 2022)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:55:30</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Children of all ages are abused in every country in the world, by members of every society, culture, religion, and socio-economic class. About 120 million children under twenty, or one child in ten, report sexual abuse.
We often blame children for their own abuse instead of holding the perpetrators responsible for their crimes. When perpetrators are prosecuted, punishments are rarely severe. Remarkably, we sometimes justify child sex abuse, or even facilitate it, allowing it to continue, not only in hidden places, but even in the open. Beverley Chalmers&apos; book Child Sex Abuse: Power, Profit, Perversion (Grosvenor House, 2022) exposes the stunning extent of child sex abuse in today&apos;s world.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Children of all ages are abused in every country in the world, by members of every society, culture, religion, and socio-economic class. About 120 million children under twenty, or one child in ten, report sexual abuse.
We often blame children for their own abuse instead of holding the perpetrators responsible for their crimes. When perpetrators are prosecuted, punishments are rarely severe. Remarkably, we sometimes justify child sex abuse, or even facilitate it, allowing it to continue, not only in hidden places, but even in the open. Beverley Chalmers&apos; book Child Sex Abuse: Power, Profit, Perversion (Grosvenor House, 2022) exposes the stunning extent of child sex abuse in today&apos;s world.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>37</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6543e4d6-4ff7-11ee-aca8-fbfad05d7e99</guid>
      <title>Anthony B. Sanders, &quot;Baby Ninth Amendments: How Americans Embraced Unenumerated Rights and Why It Matters&quot; (U Michigan Press, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Listing every right that a constitution should protect is hard. American constitution drafters often list a few famous rights such as freedom of speech, protection against unreasonable searches and seizures, and free exercise of religion, plus a handful of others. However, we do not need to enumerate every liberty because there is another way to protect them: an "etcetera clause." It states that there are other rights beyond those specifically listed: "The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people." Yet scholars are divided on whether the Ninth Amendment itself actually does protect unenumerated rights, and the Supreme Court has almost entirely ignored it. Regardless of what the Ninth Amendment means, two-thirds of state constitutions have equivalent provisions, or "Baby Ninth Amendments," worded similarly to the Ninth Amendment.</p><p>Anthony B. Sanders' book<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780472056156" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;<em>Baby Ninth Amendments: How Americans Embraced Unenumerated Rights and Why It Matters</em></a>&nbsp;(U Michigan Press, 2023) is the story of how the "Baby Ninths" came to be and what they mean. Unlike the controversy surrounding the Ninth Amendment, the meaning of the Baby Ninths is straightforward: they protect individual rights that are not otherwise enumerated. They are an "etcetera, etcetera" at the end of a bill of rights. This book argues that state judges should do their duty and live up to their own constitutions to protect the rights "retained by the people" that these "etcetera clauses" are designed to guarantee. The fact that Americans have adopted these provisions so many times in so many states demonstrates that unenumerated rights are not only protected by state constitutions, but that they are popular. Unenumerated rights are not a weird exception to American constitutional law. They are at the center of it. We should start treating constitutions accordingly.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2023 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/anthony-b-sanders-baby-ninth-amendments-how-americans-embraced-unenumerated-rights-and-why-it-matters-u-michigan-press-2023-VGf29FP2</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Listing every right that a constitution should protect is hard. American constitution drafters often list a few famous rights such as freedom of speech, protection against unreasonable searches and seizures, and free exercise of religion, plus a handful of others. However, we do not need to enumerate every liberty because there is another way to protect them: an "etcetera clause." It states that there are other rights beyond those specifically listed: "The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people." Yet scholars are divided on whether the Ninth Amendment itself actually does protect unenumerated rights, and the Supreme Court has almost entirely ignored it. Regardless of what the Ninth Amendment means, two-thirds of state constitutions have equivalent provisions, or "Baby Ninth Amendments," worded similarly to the Ninth Amendment.</p><p>Anthony B. Sanders' book<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780472056156" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;<em>Baby Ninth Amendments: How Americans Embraced Unenumerated Rights and Why It Matters</em></a>&nbsp;(U Michigan Press, 2023) is the story of how the "Baby Ninths" came to be and what they mean. Unlike the controversy surrounding the Ninth Amendment, the meaning of the Baby Ninths is straightforward: they protect individual rights that are not otherwise enumerated. They are an "etcetera, etcetera" at the end of a bill of rights. This book argues that state judges should do their duty and live up to their own constitutions to protect the rights "retained by the people" that these "etcetera clauses" are designed to guarantee. The fact that Americans have adopted these provisions so many times in so many states demonstrates that unenumerated rights are not only protected by state constitutions, but that they are popular. Unenumerated rights are not a weird exception to American constitutional law. They are at the center of it. We should start treating constitutions accordingly.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="47799309" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/7e2f938b-579b-499d-b059-a7fb54a556da/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=7e2f938b-579b-499d-b059-a7fb54a556da&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Anthony B. Sanders, &quot;Baby Ninth Amendments: How Americans Embraced Unenumerated Rights and Why It Matters&quot; (U Michigan Press, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:49:47</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Listing every right that a constitution should protect is hard. American constitution drafters often list a few famous rights such as freedom of speech, protection against unreasonable searches and seizures, and free exercise of religion, plus a handful of others. However, we do not need to enumerate every liberty because there is another way to protect them: an &quot;etcetera clause.&quot; It states that there are other rights beyond those specifically listed: &quot;The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.&quot; Yet scholars are divided on whether the Ninth Amendment itself actually does protect unenumerated rights, and the Supreme Court has almost entirely ignored it. Regardless of what the Ninth Amendment means, two-thirds of state constitutions have equivalent provisions, or &quot;Baby Ninth Amendments,&quot; worded similarly to the Ninth Amendment.
Anthony B. Sanders&apos; book Baby Ninth Amendments: How Americans Embraced Unenumerated Rights and Why It Matters (U Michigan Press, 2023) is the story of how the &quot;Baby Ninths&quot; came to be and what they mean. Unlike the controversy surrounding the Ninth Amendment, the meaning of the Baby Ninths is straightforward: they protect individual rights that are not otherwise enumerated. They are an &quot;etcetera, etcetera&quot; at the end of a bill of rights. This book argues that state judges should do their duty and live up to their own constitutions to protect the rights &quot;retained by the people&quot; that these &quot;etcetera clauses&quot; are designed to guarantee. The fact that Americans have adopted these provisions so many times in so many states demonstrates that unenumerated rights are not only protected by state constitutions, but that they are popular. Unenumerated rights are not a weird exception to American constitutional law. They are at the center of it. We should start treating constitutions accordingly.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Listing every right that a constitution should protect is hard. American constitution drafters often list a few famous rights such as freedom of speech, protection against unreasonable searches and seizures, and free exercise of religion, plus a handful of others. However, we do not need to enumerate every liberty because there is another way to protect them: an &quot;etcetera clause.&quot; It states that there are other rights beyond those specifically listed: &quot;The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.&quot; Yet scholars are divided on whether the Ninth Amendment itself actually does protect unenumerated rights, and the Supreme Court has almost entirely ignored it. Regardless of what the Ninth Amendment means, two-thirds of state constitutions have equivalent provisions, or &quot;Baby Ninth Amendments,&quot; worded similarly to the Ninth Amendment.
Anthony B. Sanders&apos; book Baby Ninth Amendments: How Americans Embraced Unenumerated Rights and Why It Matters (U Michigan Press, 2023) is the story of how the &quot;Baby Ninths&quot; came to be and what they mean. Unlike the controversy surrounding the Ninth Amendment, the meaning of the Baby Ninths is straightforward: they protect individual rights that are not otherwise enumerated. They are an &quot;etcetera, etcetera&quot; at the end of a bill of rights. This book argues that state judges should do their duty and live up to their own constitutions to protect the rights &quot;retained by the people&quot; that these &quot;etcetera clauses&quot; are designed to guarantee. The fact that Americans have adopted these provisions so many times in so many states demonstrates that unenumerated rights are not only protected by state constitutions, but that they are popular. Unenumerated rights are not a weird exception to American constitutional law. They are at the center of it. We should start treating constitutions accordingly.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>197</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">c1bb8228-50b5-11ee-85d4-8773f389a7a6</guid>
      <title>A Better Way to Buy Books</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Bookshop.org is an online book retailer that donates more than 80% of its profits to independent bookstores. Launched in 2020,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Bookshop.org</a>&nbsp;has already raised more than $27,000,000. In this interview,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/andy-hunter-64484224/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Andy Hunter</a>, founder and CEO discusses his journey to creating one of the most revolutionary new organizations in the book world. Bookshop has found a way to retain the convenience of online book shopping while also supporting&nbsp;independent bookstores that are the backbones of many local communities.&nbsp;</p><p>Andy Hunter is CEO and Founder of Bookshop.org. He also co-created&nbsp;<a href="https://lithub.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Literary Hub</a>.</p><p><em>Caleb Zakarin is the Assistant Editor of the New Books Network.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2023 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/a-better-way-to-buy-books-tUuC2Mb8</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bookshop.org is an online book retailer that donates more than 80% of its profits to independent bookstores. Launched in 2020,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Bookshop.org</a>&nbsp;has already raised more than $27,000,000. In this interview,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/andy-hunter-64484224/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Andy Hunter</a>, founder and CEO discusses his journey to creating one of the most revolutionary new organizations in the book world. Bookshop has found a way to retain the convenience of online book shopping while also supporting&nbsp;independent bookstores that are the backbones of many local communities.&nbsp;</p><p>Andy Hunter is CEO and Founder of Bookshop.org. He also co-created&nbsp;<a href="https://lithub.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Literary Hub</a>.</p><p><em>Caleb Zakarin is the Assistant Editor of the New Books Network.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="33304060" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/1f31394c-e3af-47f8-b8f9-b811f4953e3f/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=1f31394c-e3af-47f8-b8f9-b811f4953e3f&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>A Better Way to Buy Books</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:34:41</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Bookshop.org is an online book retailer that donates more than 80% of its profits to independent bookstores. Launched in 2020, Bookshop.org has already raised more than $27,000,000. In this interview, Andy Hunter, founder and CEO discusses his journey to creating one of the most revolutionary new organizations in the book world. Bookshop has found a way to retain the convenience of online book shopping while also supporting independent bookstores that are the backbones of many local communities. 
Andy Hunter is CEO and Founder of Bookshop.org. He also co-created Literary Hub.
Caleb Zakarin is the Assistant Editor of the New Books Network.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Bookshop.org is an online book retailer that donates more than 80% of its profits to independent bookstores. Launched in 2020, Bookshop.org has already raised more than $27,000,000. In this interview, Andy Hunter, founder and CEO discusses his journey to creating one of the most revolutionary new organizations in the book world. Bookshop has found a way to retain the convenience of online book shopping while also supporting independent bookstores that are the backbones of many local communities. 
Andy Hunter is CEO and Founder of Bookshop.org. He also co-created Literary Hub.
Caleb Zakarin is the Assistant Editor of the New Books Network.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>109</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">d477c9aa-4f46-11ee-869a-8ff8c6b3da24</guid>
      <title>Aleksandra Nicole Pfau, &quot;Medieval Communities and the Mad: Narratives of Crime and Mental Illness in Late Medieval France&quot; (Amsterdam UP, 2020)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The concept of madness as a challenge to communities lies at the core of legal sources. Aleksandra Pfau,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9789462983359" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Medieval Communities and the Mad: Narratives of Crime and Mental Illness in Late Medieval France</em></a>&nbsp;(Amsterdam University Press, 2020)&nbsp;considers how communal networks, ranging from the locale to the realm, responded to people who were considered mad. The madness of individuals played a role in engaging communities with legal mechanisms and proto-national identity constructs, as petitioners sought the king’s mercy as an alternative to local justice. The resulting narratives about the mentally ill in late medieval France constructed madness as an inability to live according to communal rules. Although such texts defined madness through acts that threatened social bonds, those ties were reaffirmed through the medium of the remission letter. The composers of the letters presented madness as a communal concern, situating the mad within the household, where care could be provided. Those considered mad were usually not expelled but integrated, often through pilgrimage, surveillance, or chains, into their kin and communal relationships.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2023 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/aleksandra-nicole-pfau-medieval-communities-and-the-mad-narratives-of-crime-and-mental-illness-in-late-medieval-france-amsterdam-up-2020-NlOotMqi</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The concept of madness as a challenge to communities lies at the core of legal sources. Aleksandra Pfau,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9789462983359" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Medieval Communities and the Mad: Narratives of Crime and Mental Illness in Late Medieval France</em></a>&nbsp;(Amsterdam University Press, 2020)&nbsp;considers how communal networks, ranging from the locale to the realm, responded to people who were considered mad. The madness of individuals played a role in engaging communities with legal mechanisms and proto-national identity constructs, as petitioners sought the king’s mercy as an alternative to local justice. The resulting narratives about the mentally ill in late medieval France constructed madness as an inability to live according to communal rules. Although such texts defined madness through acts that threatened social bonds, those ties were reaffirmed through the medium of the remission letter. The composers of the letters presented madness as a communal concern, situating the mad within the household, where care could be provided. Those considered mad were usually not expelled but integrated, often through pilgrimage, surveillance, or chains, into their kin and communal relationships.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="42147749" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/89efa5e2-25ff-460a-a4a6-7186fc05458c/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=89efa5e2-25ff-460a-a4a6-7186fc05458c&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Aleksandra Nicole Pfau, &quot;Medieval Communities and the Mad: Narratives of Crime and Mental Illness in Late Medieval France&quot; (Amsterdam UP, 2020)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:43:54</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The concept of madness as a challenge to communities lies at the core of legal sources. Aleksandra Pfau, Medieval Communities and the Mad: Narratives of Crime and Mental Illness in Late Medieval France (Amsterdam University Press, 2020) considers how communal networks, ranging from the locale to the realm, responded to people who were considered mad. The madness of individuals played a role in engaging communities with legal mechanisms and proto-national identity constructs, as petitioners sought the king’s mercy as an alternative to local justice. The resulting narratives about the mentally ill in late medieval France constructed madness as an inability to live according to communal rules. Although such texts defined madness through acts that threatened social bonds, those ties were reaffirmed through the medium of the remission letter. The composers of the letters presented madness as a communal concern, situating the mad within the household, where care could be provided. Those considered mad were usually not expelled but integrated, often through pilgrimage, surveillance, or chains, into their kin and communal relationships.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The concept of madness as a challenge to communities lies at the core of legal sources. Aleksandra Pfau, Medieval Communities and the Mad: Narratives of Crime and Mental Illness in Late Medieval France (Amsterdam University Press, 2020) considers how communal networks, ranging from the locale to the realm, responded to people who were considered mad. The madness of individuals played a role in engaging communities with legal mechanisms and proto-national identity constructs, as petitioners sought the king’s mercy as an alternative to local justice. The resulting narratives about the mentally ill in late medieval France constructed madness as an inability to live according to communal rules. Although such texts defined madness through acts that threatened social bonds, those ties were reaffirmed through the medium of the remission letter. The composers of the letters presented madness as a communal concern, situating the mad within the household, where care could be provided. Those considered mad were usually not expelled but integrated, often through pilgrimage, surveillance, or chains, into their kin and communal relationships.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>49</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">88e669bc-4fd5-11ee-9630-c7b47b470027</guid>
      <title>Postscript: How Firearms Fuel Domestic Violence in the US</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In 2019, nearly two-thirds of domestic violence homicides in the United States were committed with a gun. On average, three women are killed by a current or former partner&nbsp;<em>every day&nbsp;</em>in the United States. Between 1980 and 2014, more than half of women killed by intimate partners were killed with guns. Domestic violence affects children, friends, neighbors, peace officers, the abusers themselves, and society as a whole. This fall, the United States Supreme Court will hear a Second Amendment case (<em>United States v. Rahimi</em>) that may affect whether Congress or state legislatures may pass laws to mitigate domestic violence. To unpack what we know about the effect of firearms on intimate partner violence,&nbsp;<em>Postscript&nbsp;</em>brings you two nationally recognized experts on public health and firearms and an attorney who helped assembled&nbsp;<a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/22/22-915/275782/20230821132826195_US%20v%20Rahimi%20-%20Public%20Health%20Scholars%20and%20Lawyers%20Amicus%20Brief.pdf" rel="noopener noreferrer">an&nbsp;<em>amicus&nbsp;</em>brief</a>&nbsp;for the Supreme Court.</p><p><a href="https://publichealth.jhu.edu/faculty/240/shannon-frattaroli" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. Shannon Frattoroli,&nbsp;</a>PhD, MPH,<a href="https://publichealth.jhu.edu/faculty/240/shannon-frattaroli" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;</a>is Professor at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. She is affiliated with the&nbsp;<a href="https://publichealth.jhu.edu/departments/health-policy-and-management/research-and-practice/center-for-gun-violence-solutions" rel="noopener noreferrer">Johns Hopkins Center for Gun Violence Solutions</a>. Her scholarship focuses on how to translate evidence about injury and violence prevention into policies and practices that create safe places for people to thrive. She is a leader on both research and practice efforts to implement firearm dispossession, provisions of domestic violence restraining orders, and the new extreme risk protection order laws (often called “red flag laws”). Policy creation and implementation are crucial components of her research.</p><p><a href="https://sph.umich.edu/faculty-profiles/zeoli-april.html" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. April M. Zeoli</a>, PhD, MPH is Associate Professor of Health Management at the University of Michigan's School of Public Health and also the Policy Core Director at their Institute for Firearm Injury Prevention. Her research focuses on the impact of state-level firearm safety laws on interpersonal firearm violence. She studies domestic violence-related firearm restrictions, such as laws that require or allow firearm restrictions on domestic violence restraining orders. She has particular interest in outcomes (for example reductions in violence, including suicide and intimate partner homicide) and how local implementation affects these outcomes. She is dedicated to using science to create and enforce policy that reduces firearm violence.&nbsp;</p><p>Kelly Roskam, JD, is the Director of Law and Policy at the&nbsp;<a href="https://publichealth.jhu.edu/departments/health-policy-and-management/research-and-practice/center-for-gun-violence-solutions" rel="noopener noreferrer">Johns Hopkins Center for Gun Violence&nbsp;</a>Solutions. She studies the constitutional implications of, advocates for, and works to improve the implementation of firearms laws. She served as the Legal Director of the Educational Fund to Stop Gun Violence and has published on gun violence restraining orders, most recently work highlighting the practical implications of the&nbsp;<em>Rahimi</em>&nbsp;case (e.g., she co-authored&nbsp;<a href="https://www.law.com/nationallawjournal/2022/11/17/a-texas-judge-is-using-originalism-to-justify-arming-domestic-abusers/?slreturn=20230626115236" rel="noopener noreferrer">“A Texas Judge Is Using Originalism to Justify Arming Domestic Abusers</a>” with her colleague at Johns Hopkins, Spencer Cantrell and Natalie Nanasi at SMU-Dedman).</p><p><em>﻿</em><a href="https://www.sju.edu/faculty/susan-liebell#_ga=2.125106634.1318472952.1578330950-502593983.1578330950" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Susan Liebell&nbsp;</em></a><em>is a Professor of Political Science at Saint Joseph’s University in Philadelphia.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2023 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/postscript-how-firearms-fuel-domestic-violence-in-the-us-iiWpaTW9</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In 2019, nearly two-thirds of domestic violence homicides in the United States were committed with a gun. On average, three women are killed by a current or former partner&nbsp;<em>every day&nbsp;</em>in the United States. Between 1980 and 2014, more than half of women killed by intimate partners were killed with guns. Domestic violence affects children, friends, neighbors, peace officers, the abusers themselves, and society as a whole. This fall, the United States Supreme Court will hear a Second Amendment case (<em>United States v. Rahimi</em>) that may affect whether Congress or state legislatures may pass laws to mitigate domestic violence. To unpack what we know about the effect of firearms on intimate partner violence,&nbsp;<em>Postscript&nbsp;</em>brings you two nationally recognized experts on public health and firearms and an attorney who helped assembled&nbsp;<a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/22/22-915/275782/20230821132826195_US%20v%20Rahimi%20-%20Public%20Health%20Scholars%20and%20Lawyers%20Amicus%20Brief.pdf" rel="noopener noreferrer">an&nbsp;<em>amicus&nbsp;</em>brief</a>&nbsp;for the Supreme Court.</p><p><a href="https://publichealth.jhu.edu/faculty/240/shannon-frattaroli" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. Shannon Frattoroli,&nbsp;</a>PhD, MPH,<a href="https://publichealth.jhu.edu/faculty/240/shannon-frattaroli" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;</a>is Professor at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. She is affiliated with the&nbsp;<a href="https://publichealth.jhu.edu/departments/health-policy-and-management/research-and-practice/center-for-gun-violence-solutions" rel="noopener noreferrer">Johns Hopkins Center for Gun Violence Solutions</a>. Her scholarship focuses on how to translate evidence about injury and violence prevention into policies and practices that create safe places for people to thrive. She is a leader on both research and practice efforts to implement firearm dispossession, provisions of domestic violence restraining orders, and the new extreme risk protection order laws (often called “red flag laws”). Policy creation and implementation are crucial components of her research.</p><p><a href="https://sph.umich.edu/faculty-profiles/zeoli-april.html" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. April M. Zeoli</a>, PhD, MPH is Associate Professor of Health Management at the University of Michigan's School of Public Health and also the Policy Core Director at their Institute for Firearm Injury Prevention. Her research focuses on the impact of state-level firearm safety laws on interpersonal firearm violence. She studies domestic violence-related firearm restrictions, such as laws that require or allow firearm restrictions on domestic violence restraining orders. She has particular interest in outcomes (for example reductions in violence, including suicide and intimate partner homicide) and how local implementation affects these outcomes. She is dedicated to using science to create and enforce policy that reduces firearm violence.&nbsp;</p><p>Kelly Roskam, JD, is the Director of Law and Policy at the&nbsp;<a href="https://publichealth.jhu.edu/departments/health-policy-and-management/research-and-practice/center-for-gun-violence-solutions" rel="noopener noreferrer">Johns Hopkins Center for Gun Violence&nbsp;</a>Solutions. She studies the constitutional implications of, advocates for, and works to improve the implementation of firearms laws. She served as the Legal Director of the Educational Fund to Stop Gun Violence and has published on gun violence restraining orders, most recently work highlighting the practical implications of the&nbsp;<em>Rahimi</em>&nbsp;case (e.g., she co-authored&nbsp;<a href="https://www.law.com/nationallawjournal/2022/11/17/a-texas-judge-is-using-originalism-to-justify-arming-domestic-abusers/?slreturn=20230626115236" rel="noopener noreferrer">“A Texas Judge Is Using Originalism to Justify Arming Domestic Abusers</a>” with her colleague at Johns Hopkins, Spencer Cantrell and Natalie Nanasi at SMU-Dedman).</p><p><em>﻿</em><a href="https://www.sju.edu/faculty/susan-liebell#_ga=2.125106634.1318472952.1578330950-502593983.1578330950" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Susan Liebell&nbsp;</em></a><em>is a Professor of Political Science at Saint Joseph’s University in Philadelphia.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="67744255" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/84558e70-8cdb-4b9e-a843-8f144310d99b/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=84558e70-8cdb-4b9e-a843-8f144310d99b&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Postscript: How Firearms Fuel Domestic Violence in the US</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:10:33</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In 2019, nearly two-thirds of domestic violence homicides in the United States were committed with a gun. On average, three women are killed by a current or former partner every day in the United States. Between 1980 and 2014, more than half of women killed by intimate partners were killed with guns. Domestic violence affects children, friends, neighbors, peace officers, the abusers themselves, and society as a whole. This fall, the United States Supreme Court will hear a Second Amendment case (United States v. Rahimi) that may affect whether Congress or state legislatures may pass laws to mitigate domestic violence. To unpack what we know about the effect of firearms on intimate partner violence, Postscript brings you two nationally recognized experts on public health and firearms and an attorney who helped assembled an amicus brief for the Supreme Court.
Dr. Shannon Frattoroli, PhD, MPH, is Professor at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. She is affiliated with the Johns Hopkins Center for Gun Violence Solutions. Her scholarship focuses on how to translate evidence about injury and violence prevention into policies and practices that create safe places for people to thrive. She is a leader on both research and practice efforts to implement firearm dispossession, provisions of domestic violence restraining orders, and the new extreme risk protection order laws (often called “red flag laws”). Policy creation and implementation are crucial components of her research.
Dr. April M. Zeoli, PhD, MPH is Associate Professor of Health Management at the University of Michigan&apos;s School of Public Health and also the Policy Core Director at their Institute for Firearm Injury Prevention. Her research focuses on the impact of state-level firearm safety laws on interpersonal firearm violence. She studies domestic violence-related firearm restrictions, such as laws that require or allow firearm restrictions on domestic violence restraining orders. She has particular interest in outcomes (for example reductions in violence, including suicide and intimate partner homicide) and how local implementation affects these outcomes. She is dedicated to using science to create and enforce policy that reduces firearm violence. 
Kelly Roskam, JD, is the Director of Law and Policy at the Johns Hopkins Center for Gun Violence Solutions. She studies the constitutional implications of, advocates for, and works to improve the implementation of firearms laws. She served as the Legal Director of the Educational Fund to Stop Gun Violence and has published on gun violence restraining orders, most recently work highlighting the practical implications of the Rahimi case (e.g., she co-authored “A Texas Judge Is Using Originalism to Justify Arming Domestic Abusers” with her colleague at Johns Hopkins, Spencer Cantrell and Natalie Nanasi at SMU-Dedman).
﻿Susan Liebell is a Professor of Political Science at Saint Joseph’s University in Philadelphia.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In 2019, nearly two-thirds of domestic violence homicides in the United States were committed with a gun. On average, three women are killed by a current or former partner every day in the United States. Between 1980 and 2014, more than half of women killed by intimate partners were killed with guns. Domestic violence affects children, friends, neighbors, peace officers, the abusers themselves, and society as a whole. This fall, the United States Supreme Court will hear a Second Amendment case (United States v. Rahimi) that may affect whether Congress or state legislatures may pass laws to mitigate domestic violence. To unpack what we know about the effect of firearms on intimate partner violence, Postscript brings you two nationally recognized experts on public health and firearms and an attorney who helped assembled an amicus brief for the Supreme Court.
Dr. Shannon Frattoroli, PhD, MPH, is Professor at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. She is affiliated with the Johns Hopkins Center for Gun Violence Solutions. Her scholarship focuses on how to translate evidence about injury and violence prevention into policies and practices that create safe places for people to thrive. She is a leader on both research and practice efforts to implement firearm dispossession, provisions of domestic violence restraining orders, and the new extreme risk protection order laws (often called “red flag laws”). Policy creation and implementation are crucial components of her research.
Dr. April M. Zeoli, PhD, MPH is Associate Professor of Health Management at the University of Michigan&apos;s School of Public Health and also the Policy Core Director at their Institute for Firearm Injury Prevention. Her research focuses on the impact of state-level firearm safety laws on interpersonal firearm violence. She studies domestic violence-related firearm restrictions, such as laws that require or allow firearm restrictions on domestic violence restraining orders. She has particular interest in outcomes (for example reductions in violence, including suicide and intimate partner homicide) and how local implementation affects these outcomes. She is dedicated to using science to create and enforce policy that reduces firearm violence. 
Kelly Roskam, JD, is the Director of Law and Policy at the Johns Hopkins Center for Gun Violence Solutions. She studies the constitutional implications of, advocates for, and works to improve the implementation of firearms laws. She served as the Legal Director of the Educational Fund to Stop Gun Violence and has published on gun violence restraining orders, most recently work highlighting the practical implications of the Rahimi case (e.g., she co-authored “A Texas Judge Is Using Originalism to Justify Arming Domestic Abusers” with her colleague at Johns Hopkins, Spencer Cantrell and Natalie Nanasi at SMU-Dedman).
﻿Susan Liebell is a Professor of Political Science at Saint Joseph’s University in Philadelphia.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>22</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">07b945a6-4f41-11ee-a6fb-f73af769f183</guid>
      <title>Tiantian Zheng, &quot;Violent Intimacy: Family Harmony, State Stability, and Intimate Partner Violence in Post-Socialist China&quot; (Bloomsbury, 2022)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Based on ethnographic research with victims of intimate partner violence since 2014, Tiantian Zheng's&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781350263420" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Violent Intimacy: Family Harmony, State Stability, and Intimate Partner Violence in Post-Socialist China</em></a>&nbsp;(Bloomsbury, 2022) brings to the forefront women's experiences of, negotiations about, and contestations against violence, and men's narratives about the reasons for their violence. Using an innovative methodology - online chat groups, it foregrounds the role of history, structural inequalities, and the cultural system of power hierarchy in situating and constructing intimate partner violence. Centering on men and women's narratives about violence, this book connects intimate partner violence with invisible structural violence - the historical, cultural, political, economic, and legal context that gives rise to and perpetuates violence against women. Through examining the ways in which women's lives are constrained by various forms of violence, hierarchy, and inequality, this book shows that violence against women is a structural issue that is historically produced and politically and culturally engaged.</p><p><a href="https://arts-sciences.buffalo.edu/history/graduate/GraduateHistoryAssociation/GradStudentProfiles/ShuWan.html" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Shu Wan</em></a><em>&nbsp;is currently matriculated as a doctoral student in history at the University at Buffalo. As a digital and disability historian, he serves in the editorial team of Digital Humanities Quarterly and Nursing Clio. On Twitter: @slissw.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 10 Sep 2023 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/tiantian-zheng-violent-intimacy-family-harmony-state-stability-and-intimate-partner-violence-in-post-socialist-china-bloomsbury-2022-LianL1dK</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Based on ethnographic research with victims of intimate partner violence since 2014, Tiantian Zheng's&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781350263420" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Violent Intimacy: Family Harmony, State Stability, and Intimate Partner Violence in Post-Socialist China</em></a>&nbsp;(Bloomsbury, 2022) brings to the forefront women's experiences of, negotiations about, and contestations against violence, and men's narratives about the reasons for their violence. Using an innovative methodology - online chat groups, it foregrounds the role of history, structural inequalities, and the cultural system of power hierarchy in situating and constructing intimate partner violence. Centering on men and women's narratives about violence, this book connects intimate partner violence with invisible structural violence - the historical, cultural, political, economic, and legal context that gives rise to and perpetuates violence against women. Through examining the ways in which women's lives are constrained by various forms of violence, hierarchy, and inequality, this book shows that violence against women is a structural issue that is historically produced and politically and culturally engaged.</p><p><a href="https://arts-sciences.buffalo.edu/history/graduate/GraduateHistoryAssociation/GradStudentProfiles/ShuWan.html" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Shu Wan</em></a><em>&nbsp;is currently matriculated as a doctoral student in history at the University at Buffalo. As a digital and disability historian, he serves in the editorial team of Digital Humanities Quarterly and Nursing Clio. On Twitter: @slissw.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="22858866" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/eb821482-d806-4a68-9020-6b0168f9c68b/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=eb821482-d806-4a68-9020-6b0168f9c68b&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Tiantian Zheng, &quot;Violent Intimacy: Family Harmony, State Stability, and Intimate Partner Violence in Post-Socialist China&quot; (Bloomsbury, 2022)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:23:48</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Based on ethnographic research with victims of intimate partner violence since 2014, Tiantian Zheng&apos;s Violent Intimacy: Family Harmony, State Stability, and Intimate Partner Violence in Post-Socialist China (Bloomsbury, 2022) brings to the forefront women&apos;s experiences of, negotiations about, and contestations against violence, and men&apos;s narratives about the reasons for their violence. Using an innovative methodology - online chat groups, it foregrounds the role of history, structural inequalities, and the cultural system of power hierarchy in situating and constructing intimate partner violence. Centering on men and women&apos;s narratives about violence, this book connects intimate partner violence with invisible structural violence - the historical, cultural, political, economic, and legal context that gives rise to and perpetuates violence against women. Through examining the ways in which women&apos;s lives are constrained by various forms of violence, hierarchy, and inequality, this book shows that violence against women is a structural issue that is historically produced and politically and culturally engaged.
Shu Wan is currently matriculated as a doctoral student in history at the University at Buffalo. As a digital and disability historian, he serves in the editorial team of Digital Humanities Quarterly and Nursing Clio. On Twitter: @slissw.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Based on ethnographic research with victims of intimate partner violence since 2014, Tiantian Zheng&apos;s Violent Intimacy: Family Harmony, State Stability, and Intimate Partner Violence in Post-Socialist China (Bloomsbury, 2022) brings to the forefront women&apos;s experiences of, negotiations about, and contestations against violence, and men&apos;s narratives about the reasons for their violence. Using an innovative methodology - online chat groups, it foregrounds the role of history, structural inequalities, and the cultural system of power hierarchy in situating and constructing intimate partner violence. Centering on men and women&apos;s narratives about violence, this book connects intimate partner violence with invisible structural violence - the historical, cultural, political, economic, and legal context that gives rise to and perpetuates violence against women. Through examining the ways in which women&apos;s lives are constrained by various forms of violence, hierarchy, and inequality, this book shows that violence against women is a structural issue that is historically produced and politically and culturally engaged.
Shu Wan is currently matriculated as a doctoral student in history at the University at Buffalo. As a digital and disability historian, he serves in the editorial team of Digital Humanities Quarterly and Nursing Clio. On Twitter: @slissw.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>66</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2762e44c-4b28-11ee-ab09-9f58bfd1b077</guid>
      <title>Tomaz Jardim, &quot;Ilse Koch on Trial: Making the &apos;Bitch of Buchenwald&apos;&quot; (Harvard UP, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>On September 1, 1967, one of the Third Reich's most infamous figures hanged herself in her cell after nearly twenty-four years in prison. Known as the "Bitch of Buchenwald," Ilse Koch was singularly notorious, having been accused of owning lampshades fabricated from skins of murdered camp inmates and engaging in "bestial" sexual behavior. These allegations fueled a public fascination that turned Koch into a household name and the foremost symbol of Nazi savagery. Her subsequent prosecution resulted in a scandal that prompted US Senate hearings and even the intervention of President Truman.</p><p>Yet the most sensational atrocities attributed to Koch were apocryphal or unproven. In this authoritative reappraisal, Tomaz Jardim shows that, while Koch was guilty of heinous crimes, she also became a scapegoat for postwar Germans eager to distance themselves from the Nazi past. The popular condemnation of Koch--and the particularly perverse crimes attributed to her by prosecutors, the media, and the public at large--diverted attention from the far more consequential but less sensational complicity of millions of ordinary Germans in the Third Reich's crimes.</p><p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780674249189" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Ilse Koch on Trial: Making the 'Bitch of Buchenwald'</em>&nbsp;</a>(Harvard UP, 2023) reveals how gendered perceptions of violence and culpability drove Koch's zealous prosecution at a time when male Nazi perpetrators responsible for greater crimes often escaped punishment or received lighter sentences. Both in the international press and during her three criminal trials, Koch was condemned for her violation of accepted gender norms and "good womanly behavior." Koch's "sexual barbarism," though treated as an emblem of the Third Reich's depravity, ultimately obscured the bureaucratized terror of the Nazi state and hampered understanding of the Holocaust.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 6 Sep 2023 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/tomaz-jardim-ilse-koch-on-trial-making-the-bitch-of-buchenwald-harvard-up-2023-ylqz7d3v</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On September 1, 1967, one of the Third Reich's most infamous figures hanged herself in her cell after nearly twenty-four years in prison. Known as the "Bitch of Buchenwald," Ilse Koch was singularly notorious, having been accused of owning lampshades fabricated from skins of murdered camp inmates and engaging in "bestial" sexual behavior. These allegations fueled a public fascination that turned Koch into a household name and the foremost symbol of Nazi savagery. Her subsequent prosecution resulted in a scandal that prompted US Senate hearings and even the intervention of President Truman.</p><p>Yet the most sensational atrocities attributed to Koch were apocryphal or unproven. In this authoritative reappraisal, Tomaz Jardim shows that, while Koch was guilty of heinous crimes, she also became a scapegoat for postwar Germans eager to distance themselves from the Nazi past. The popular condemnation of Koch--and the particularly perverse crimes attributed to her by prosecutors, the media, and the public at large--diverted attention from the far more consequential but less sensational complicity of millions of ordinary Germans in the Third Reich's crimes.</p><p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780674249189" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Ilse Koch on Trial: Making the 'Bitch of Buchenwald'</em>&nbsp;</a>(Harvard UP, 2023) reveals how gendered perceptions of violence and culpability drove Koch's zealous prosecution at a time when male Nazi perpetrators responsible for greater crimes often escaped punishment or received lighter sentences. Both in the international press and during her three criminal trials, Koch was condemned for her violation of accepted gender norms and "good womanly behavior." Koch's "sexual barbarism," though treated as an emblem of the Third Reich's depravity, ultimately obscured the bureaucratized terror of the Nazi state and hampered understanding of the Holocaust.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="51157464" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/70b4170c-cf57-47fe-a8a9-0f6d8222b32a/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=70b4170c-cf57-47fe-a8a9-0f6d8222b32a&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Tomaz Jardim, &quot;Ilse Koch on Trial: Making the &apos;Bitch of Buchenwald&apos;&quot; (Harvard UP, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:53:17</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>On September 1, 1967, one of the Third Reich&apos;s most infamous figures hanged herself in her cell after nearly twenty-four years in prison. Known as the &quot;Bitch of Buchenwald,&quot; Ilse Koch was singularly notorious, having been accused of owning lampshades fabricated from skins of murdered camp inmates and engaging in &quot;bestial&quot; sexual behavior. These allegations fueled a public fascination that turned Koch into a household name and the foremost symbol of Nazi savagery. Her subsequent prosecution resulted in a scandal that prompted US Senate hearings and even the intervention of President Truman.
Yet the most sensational atrocities attributed to Koch were apocryphal or unproven. In this authoritative reappraisal, Tomaz Jardim shows that, while Koch was guilty of heinous crimes, she also became a scapegoat for postwar Germans eager to distance themselves from the Nazi past. The popular condemnation of Koch--and the particularly perverse crimes attributed to her by prosecutors, the media, and the public at large--diverted attention from the far more consequential but less sensational complicity of millions of ordinary Germans in the Third Reich&apos;s crimes.
Ilse Koch on Trial: Making the &apos;Bitch of Buchenwald&apos; (Harvard UP, 2023) reveals how gendered perceptions of violence and culpability drove Koch&apos;s zealous prosecution at a time when male Nazi perpetrators responsible for greater crimes often escaped punishment or received lighter sentences. Both in the international press and during her three criminal trials, Koch was condemned for her violation of accepted gender norms and &quot;good womanly behavior.&quot; Koch&apos;s &quot;sexual barbarism,&quot; though treated as an emblem of the Third Reich&apos;s depravity, ultimately obscured the bureaucratized terror of the Nazi state and hampered understanding of the Holocaust.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>On September 1, 1967, one of the Third Reich&apos;s most infamous figures hanged herself in her cell after nearly twenty-four years in prison. Known as the &quot;Bitch of Buchenwald,&quot; Ilse Koch was singularly notorious, having been accused of owning lampshades fabricated from skins of murdered camp inmates and engaging in &quot;bestial&quot; sexual behavior. These allegations fueled a public fascination that turned Koch into a household name and the foremost symbol of Nazi savagery. Her subsequent prosecution resulted in a scandal that prompted US Senate hearings and even the intervention of President Truman.
Yet the most sensational atrocities attributed to Koch were apocryphal or unproven. In this authoritative reappraisal, Tomaz Jardim shows that, while Koch was guilty of heinous crimes, she also became a scapegoat for postwar Germans eager to distance themselves from the Nazi past. The popular condemnation of Koch--and the particularly perverse crimes attributed to her by prosecutors, the media, and the public at large--diverted attention from the far more consequential but less sensational complicity of millions of ordinary Germans in the Third Reich&apos;s crimes.
Ilse Koch on Trial: Making the &apos;Bitch of Buchenwald&apos; (Harvard UP, 2023) reveals how gendered perceptions of violence and culpability drove Koch&apos;s zealous prosecution at a time when male Nazi perpetrators responsible for greater crimes often escaped punishment or received lighter sentences. Both in the international press and during her three criminal trials, Koch was condemned for her violation of accepted gender norms and &quot;good womanly behavior.&quot; Koch&apos;s &quot;sexual barbarism,&quot; though treated as an emblem of the Third Reich&apos;s depravity, ultimately obscured the bureaucratized terror of the Nazi state and hampered understanding of the Holocaust.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>436</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e4677562-49b1-11ee-a2c5-af254abb1475</guid>
      <title>Yanna Yannakakis, &quot;Since Time Immemorial: Native Custom and Law in Colonial Mexico&quot; (Duke UP, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://www.dukeupress.edu/since-time-immemorial" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Since Time Immemorial: Native Custom and Law in Colonial Mexico</em></a>&nbsp;(Duke UP, 2023),<em>&nbsp;</em>Yanna Yannakakis traces the invention of Native custom, a legal category that Indigenous litigants used in disputes over marriage, self-governance, land, and labor in colonial Mexico. She outlines how, in the hands of Native litigants, the European category of custom—social practice that through time takes on the normative power of law—acquired local meaning and changed over time. Yannakakis analyzes sources ranging from missionary and Inquisition records to Native pictorial histories, royal surveys, and Spanish and Native-language court and notarial documents.&nbsp;</p><p>By encompassing historical actors who have been traditionally marginalized from legal histories and highlighting spaces outside the courts like Native communities, parishes, and missionary schools, she shows how imperial legal orders were not just imposed from above but also built on the ground through translation and implementation of legal concepts and procedures. Yannakakis argues that, ultimately, Indigenous claims to custom, which on the surface aimed to conserve the past, provided a means to contend with historical change and produce new rights for the future.</p><p><em>﻿</em><a href="https://www.txstate.edu/history/people/faculty/rivaya-martinez.html" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Joaquín Rivaya-Martínez</em></a><em>&nbsp;es profesor de Historia en Texas State University. Sus intereses académicos incluyen la etnohistoria, los pueblos indígenas de las Grandes Llanuras y el Suroeste de EE.UU., la frontera México-EE.UU. y la América hispánica.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 4 Sep 2023 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/yanna-yannakakis-since-time-immemorial-native-custom-and-law-in-colonial-mexico-duke-up-2023-8CYxR8Fr</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://www.dukeupress.edu/since-time-immemorial" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Since Time Immemorial: Native Custom and Law in Colonial Mexico</em></a>&nbsp;(Duke UP, 2023),<em>&nbsp;</em>Yanna Yannakakis traces the invention of Native custom, a legal category that Indigenous litigants used in disputes over marriage, self-governance, land, and labor in colonial Mexico. She outlines how, in the hands of Native litigants, the European category of custom—social practice that through time takes on the normative power of law—acquired local meaning and changed over time. Yannakakis analyzes sources ranging from missionary and Inquisition records to Native pictorial histories, royal surveys, and Spanish and Native-language court and notarial documents.&nbsp;</p><p>By encompassing historical actors who have been traditionally marginalized from legal histories and highlighting spaces outside the courts like Native communities, parishes, and missionary schools, she shows how imperial legal orders were not just imposed from above but also built on the ground through translation and implementation of legal concepts and procedures. Yannakakis argues that, ultimately, Indigenous claims to custom, which on the surface aimed to conserve the past, provided a means to contend with historical change and produce new rights for the future.</p><p><em>﻿</em><a href="https://www.txstate.edu/history/people/faculty/rivaya-martinez.html" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Joaquín Rivaya-Martínez</em></a><em>&nbsp;es profesor de Historia en Texas State University. Sus intereses académicos incluyen la etnohistoria, los pueblos indígenas de las Grandes Llanuras y el Suroeste de EE.UU., la frontera México-EE.UU. y la América hispánica.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="57086863" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/9b8bf3f4-d014-429d-9159-2ddb0c39ce94/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=9b8bf3f4-d014-429d-9159-2ddb0c39ce94&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Yanna Yannakakis, &quot;Since Time Immemorial: Native Custom and Law in Colonial Mexico&quot; (Duke UP, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:59:27</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In Since Time Immemorial: Native Custom and Law in Colonial Mexico (Duke UP, 2023), Yanna Yannakakis traces the invention of Native custom, a legal category that Indigenous litigants used in disputes over marriage, self-governance, land, and labor in colonial Mexico. She outlines how, in the hands of Native litigants, the European category of custom—social practice that through time takes on the normative power of law—acquired local meaning and changed over time. Yannakakis analyzes sources ranging from missionary and Inquisition records to Native pictorial histories, royal surveys, and Spanish and Native-language court and notarial documents. 
By encompassing historical actors who have been traditionally marginalized from legal histories and highlighting spaces outside the courts like Native communities, parishes, and missionary schools, she shows how imperial legal orders were not just imposed from above but also built on the ground through translation and implementation of legal concepts and procedures. Yannakakis argues that, ultimately, Indigenous claims to custom, which on the surface aimed to conserve the past, provided a means to contend with historical change and produce new rights for the future.
﻿Joaquín Rivaya-Martínez es profesor de Historia en Texas State University. Sus intereses académicos incluyen la etnohistoria, los pueblos indígenas de las Grandes Llanuras y el Suroeste de EE.UU., la frontera México-EE.UU. y la América hispánica.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In Since Time Immemorial: Native Custom and Law in Colonial Mexico (Duke UP, 2023), Yanna Yannakakis traces the invention of Native custom, a legal category that Indigenous litigants used in disputes over marriage, self-governance, land, and labor in colonial Mexico. She outlines how, in the hands of Native litigants, the European category of custom—social practice that through time takes on the normative power of law—acquired local meaning and changed over time. Yannakakis analyzes sources ranging from missionary and Inquisition records to Native pictorial histories, royal surveys, and Spanish and Native-language court and notarial documents. 
By encompassing historical actors who have been traditionally marginalized from legal histories and highlighting spaces outside the courts like Native communities, parishes, and missionary schools, she shows how imperial legal orders were not just imposed from above but also built on the ground through translation and implementation of legal concepts and procedures. Yannakakis argues that, ultimately, Indigenous claims to custom, which on the surface aimed to conserve the past, provided a means to contend with historical change and produce new rights for the future.
﻿Joaquín Rivaya-Martínez es profesor de Historia en Texas State University. Sus intereses académicos incluyen la etnohistoria, los pueblos indígenas de las Grandes Llanuras y el Suroeste de EE.UU., la frontera México-EE.UU. y la América hispánica.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1351</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">51eaffce-48d0-11ee-b632-537960820acf</guid>
      <title>Ben Mattlin, &quot;Disability Pride: Dispatches from a Post-ADA World&quot; (Beacon, 2022)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780807036457" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Disability Pride: Dispatches from a Post-ADA World</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Beacon, 2022), disabled journalist Ben Mattlin weaves together interviews and reportage to introduce a cavalcade of individuals, ideas, and events in engaging, fast-paced prose. He traces the generation that came of age after the ADA reshaped America, and how it is influencing the future. He documents how autistic self-advocacy and the neurodiversity movement upended views of those whose brains work differently. He lifts the veil on a thriving disability culture--from social media to high fashion, Hollywood to Broadway--showing how the politics of beauty for those with marginalized body types and facial features is sparking widespread change.</p><p>He also explores the movement's shortcomings, particularly the erasure of nonwhite and LGBTQIA+ people that helped give rise to Disability Justice. He delves into systemic ableism in health care, the right-to-die movement, institutionalization, and the scourge of subminimum-wage labor that some call legalized slavery. And he finds glimmers of hope in how disabled people never give up their fight for parity and fair play.</p><p>Beautifully written, without anger or pity,&nbsp;<em>Disability Pride</em>&nbsp;is a revealing account of an often misunderstood movement and identity, an inclusive reexamination of society's treatment of those it deems&nbsp;<em>different</em>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 2 Sep 2023 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/ben-mattlin-disability-pride-dispatches-from-a-post-ada-world-beacon-2022-CMo1glQ6</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780807036457" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Disability Pride: Dispatches from a Post-ADA World</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Beacon, 2022), disabled journalist Ben Mattlin weaves together interviews and reportage to introduce a cavalcade of individuals, ideas, and events in engaging, fast-paced prose. He traces the generation that came of age after the ADA reshaped America, and how it is influencing the future. He documents how autistic self-advocacy and the neurodiversity movement upended views of those whose brains work differently. He lifts the veil on a thriving disability culture--from social media to high fashion, Hollywood to Broadway--showing how the politics of beauty for those with marginalized body types and facial features is sparking widespread change.</p><p>He also explores the movement's shortcomings, particularly the erasure of nonwhite and LGBTQIA+ people that helped give rise to Disability Justice. He delves into systemic ableism in health care, the right-to-die movement, institutionalization, and the scourge of subminimum-wage labor that some call legalized slavery. And he finds glimmers of hope in how disabled people never give up their fight for parity and fair play.</p><p>Beautifully written, without anger or pity,&nbsp;<em>Disability Pride</em>&nbsp;is a revealing account of an often misunderstood movement and identity, an inclusive reexamination of society's treatment of those it deems&nbsp;<em>different</em>.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="35341028" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/487e62df-29d9-4421-a727-2d77b199590f/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=487e62df-29d9-4421-a727-2d77b199590f&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Ben Mattlin, &quot;Disability Pride: Dispatches from a Post-ADA World&quot; (Beacon, 2022)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:36:48</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In Disability Pride: Dispatches from a Post-ADA World (Beacon, 2022), disabled journalist Ben Mattlin weaves together interviews and reportage to introduce a cavalcade of individuals, ideas, and events in engaging, fast-paced prose. He traces the generation that came of age after the ADA reshaped America, and how it is influencing the future. He documents how autistic self-advocacy and the neurodiversity movement upended views of those whose brains work differently. He lifts the veil on a thriving disability culture--from social media to high fashion, Hollywood to Broadway--showing how the politics of beauty for those with marginalized body types and facial features is sparking widespread change.
He also explores the movement&apos;s shortcomings, particularly the erasure of nonwhite and LGBTQIA+ people that helped give rise to Disability Justice. He delves into systemic ableism in health care, the right-to-die movement, institutionalization, and the scourge of subminimum-wage labor that some call legalized slavery. And he finds glimmers of hope in how disabled people never give up their fight for parity and fair play.
Beautifully written, without anger or pity, Disability Pride is a revealing account of an often misunderstood movement and identity, an inclusive reexamination of society&apos;s treatment of those it deems different.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In Disability Pride: Dispatches from a Post-ADA World (Beacon, 2022), disabled journalist Ben Mattlin weaves together interviews and reportage to introduce a cavalcade of individuals, ideas, and events in engaging, fast-paced prose. He traces the generation that came of age after the ADA reshaped America, and how it is influencing the future. He documents how autistic self-advocacy and the neurodiversity movement upended views of those whose brains work differently. He lifts the veil on a thriving disability culture--from social media to high fashion, Hollywood to Broadway--showing how the politics of beauty for those with marginalized body types and facial features is sparking widespread change.
He also explores the movement&apos;s shortcomings, particularly the erasure of nonwhite and LGBTQIA+ people that helped give rise to Disability Justice. He delves into systemic ableism in health care, the right-to-die movement, institutionalization, and the scourge of subminimum-wage labor that some call legalized slavery. And he finds glimmers of hope in how disabled people never give up their fight for parity and fair play.
Beautifully written, without anger or pity, Disability Pride is a revealing account of an often misunderstood movement and identity, an inclusive reexamination of society&apos;s treatment of those it deems different.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>29</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">305ef660-48e6-11ee-b7e9-3f65fb9d6150</guid>
      <title>Ari Ezra Waldman, &quot;Industry Unbound: The Inside Story of Privacy, Data, and Corporate Power&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2021)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781108492423" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Industry Unbound: The Inside Story of Privacy, Data, and Corporate Power</em></a>&nbsp;(Cambridge UP, 2021), Ari Ezra Waldman exposes precisely how the tech industry conducts its ongoing crusade to undermine our privacy. With research based on interviews with scores of tech employees and internal documents outlining corporate strategies, Waldman reveals that companies don't just lobby against privacy law; they also manipulate how we think about privacy, how their employees approach their work, and how they weaken the law to make data-extractive products the norm. In contrast to those who claim that privacy law is getting stronger, Waldman shows why recent shifts in privacy law are precisely the kinds of changes that corporations want and how even those who think of themselves as privacy advocates often unwittingly facilitate corporate malfeasance. This powerful account should be read by anyone who wants to understand why privacy laws are not working and how corporations trap us into giving up our personal information.</p><p><a href="https://jakec007.github.io/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Jake Chanenson</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a computer science Ph.D. student at the University of Chicago and an AY23-24 affiliate at the Center for Information, Technology, and Public Life (CITAP). Broadly, Jake is interested in topics relating to HCI, privacy, and tech policy. Jake’s work has been published in top venues such as ACM’s CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 2 Sep 2023 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/ari-ezra-waldman-industry-unbound-the-inside-story-of-privacy-data-and-corporate-power-cambridge-up-2021-PUa81eRX</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781108492423" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Industry Unbound: The Inside Story of Privacy, Data, and Corporate Power</em></a>&nbsp;(Cambridge UP, 2021), Ari Ezra Waldman exposes precisely how the tech industry conducts its ongoing crusade to undermine our privacy. With research based on interviews with scores of tech employees and internal documents outlining corporate strategies, Waldman reveals that companies don't just lobby against privacy law; they also manipulate how we think about privacy, how their employees approach their work, and how they weaken the law to make data-extractive products the norm. In contrast to those who claim that privacy law is getting stronger, Waldman shows why recent shifts in privacy law are precisely the kinds of changes that corporations want and how even those who think of themselves as privacy advocates often unwittingly facilitate corporate malfeasance. This powerful account should be read by anyone who wants to understand why privacy laws are not working and how corporations trap us into giving up our personal information.</p><p><a href="https://jakec007.github.io/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Jake Chanenson</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a computer science Ph.D. student at the University of Chicago and an AY23-24 affiliate at the Center for Information, Technology, and Public Life (CITAP). Broadly, Jake is interested in topics relating to HCI, privacy, and tech policy. Jake’s work has been published in top venues such as ACM’s CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="33956458" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/3a4a5a2c-de27-4d57-a8e7-36f1b5cf7c60/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=3a4a5a2c-de27-4d57-a8e7-36f1b5cf7c60&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Ari Ezra Waldman, &quot;Industry Unbound: The Inside Story of Privacy, Data, and Corporate Power&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2021)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:35:22</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In Industry Unbound: The Inside Story of Privacy, Data, and Corporate Power (Cambridge UP, 2021), Ari Ezra Waldman exposes precisely how the tech industry conducts its ongoing crusade to undermine our privacy. With research based on interviews with scores of tech employees and internal documents outlining corporate strategies, Waldman reveals that companies don&apos;t just lobby against privacy law; they also manipulate how we think about privacy, how their employees approach their work, and how they weaken the law to make data-extractive products the norm. In contrast to those who claim that privacy law is getting stronger, Waldman shows why recent shifts in privacy law are precisely the kinds of changes that corporations want and how even those who think of themselves as privacy advocates often unwittingly facilitate corporate malfeasance. This powerful account should be read by anyone who wants to understand why privacy laws are not working and how corporations trap us into giving up our personal information.
Jake Chanenson is a computer science Ph.D. student at the University of Chicago and an AY23-24 affiliate at the Center for Information, Technology, and Public Life (CITAP). Broadly, Jake is interested in topics relating to HCI, privacy, and tech policy. Jake’s work has been published in top venues such as ACM’s CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In Industry Unbound: The Inside Story of Privacy, Data, and Corporate Power (Cambridge UP, 2021), Ari Ezra Waldman exposes precisely how the tech industry conducts its ongoing crusade to undermine our privacy. With research based on interviews with scores of tech employees and internal documents outlining corporate strategies, Waldman reveals that companies don&apos;t just lobby against privacy law; they also manipulate how we think about privacy, how their employees approach their work, and how they weaken the law to make data-extractive products the norm. In contrast to those who claim that privacy law is getting stronger, Waldman shows why recent shifts in privacy law are precisely the kinds of changes that corporations want and how even those who think of themselves as privacy advocates often unwittingly facilitate corporate malfeasance. This powerful account should be read by anyone who wants to understand why privacy laws are not working and how corporations trap us into giving up our personal information.
Jake Chanenson is a computer science Ph.D. student at the University of Chicago and an AY23-24 affiliate at the Center for Information, Technology, and Public Life (CITAP). Broadly, Jake is interested in topics relating to HCI, privacy, and tech policy. Jake’s work has been published in top venues such as ACM’s CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>157</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">0e7ccf8a-480b-11ee-b90b-1733f401b28c</guid>
      <title>Marion Holmes Katz, &quot;Wives and Work: Islamic Law and Ethics Before Modernity&quot; (Columbia UP, 2022)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In this interview, I speak with Marion Holmes Katz about her latest book&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780231206891" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Wives and Work: Islamic Law and Ethics Before Modernity</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Columbia UP, 2022). This fascinating book explores the question of wives’ domestic responsibilities from a Sunni Islamic legal perspective, covering scholarship from the ninth to the fourteenth centuries. The book addresses questions such as, does the wife have the obligation to provide housework? What counts as housework? And if it is true that the wife is not obligated to perform any household labor, as many western Muslims believe, how did the Muslim tradition reconcile this ruling with the anecdote involving Fatima’s request to the Prophet Muhammad for help with household work because she is overworked? And how did Muslim scholars reconcile this idea with what they understood to be morally, culturally, or religiously correct behavior from a woman? If the wife does choose to perform housework, is she entitled to compensation from her husband?&nbsp;</p><p>For most Muslim scholars historically, answers to these questions involved distinguishing between ethical ideals and legal claims. Katz shows, for instance, that the discourse on women’s household labor evolves with time, context, geographical location, such that, for example, in the formative period, it was widely accepted that wives are not obligated to perform&nbsp;<em>any</em>&nbsp;household chores, but by the time we get to the 14th&nbsp;century, this doctrine is challenged.&nbsp;Overall, then, not only do scholarly views expectedly disagree with each other, but also, scholars are less interested in providing a set of generic rules about wifely duties and more in encouraging the fulfillment of duties as they’re understood in one’s own social location.</p><p>In our conversation today, we discuss the book’s main contributions and its origins; a hadith report describing an incident about Fatima’s request to Muhammad for domestic help; what exactly domestic service means and who is required or obligated to provide it—and what that obligation means; what exactly is so ethical about household work, since this discourse is rooted in ethics for Muslim scholars; and how male scholars have historically treated domestic service. We end with some thoughts on discussions about Islamic law and domestic service from a class perspective; for example, where do poor men and poor wives fit into this discussion? What are their rights?</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 1 Sep 2023 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/marion-holmes-katz-wives-and-work-islamic-law-and-ethics-before-modernity-columbia-up-2022-FVebmTtE</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this interview, I speak with Marion Holmes Katz about her latest book&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780231206891" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Wives and Work: Islamic Law and Ethics Before Modernity</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Columbia UP, 2022). This fascinating book explores the question of wives’ domestic responsibilities from a Sunni Islamic legal perspective, covering scholarship from the ninth to the fourteenth centuries. The book addresses questions such as, does the wife have the obligation to provide housework? What counts as housework? And if it is true that the wife is not obligated to perform any household labor, as many western Muslims believe, how did the Muslim tradition reconcile this ruling with the anecdote involving Fatima’s request to the Prophet Muhammad for help with household work because she is overworked? And how did Muslim scholars reconcile this idea with what they understood to be morally, culturally, or religiously correct behavior from a woman? If the wife does choose to perform housework, is she entitled to compensation from her husband?&nbsp;</p><p>For most Muslim scholars historically, answers to these questions involved distinguishing between ethical ideals and legal claims. Katz shows, for instance, that the discourse on women’s household labor evolves with time, context, geographical location, such that, for example, in the formative period, it was widely accepted that wives are not obligated to perform&nbsp;<em>any</em>&nbsp;household chores, but by the time we get to the 14th&nbsp;century, this doctrine is challenged.&nbsp;Overall, then, not only do scholarly views expectedly disagree with each other, but also, scholars are less interested in providing a set of generic rules about wifely duties and more in encouraging the fulfillment of duties as they’re understood in one’s own social location.</p><p>In our conversation today, we discuss the book’s main contributions and its origins; a hadith report describing an incident about Fatima’s request to Muhammad for domestic help; what exactly domestic service means and who is required or obligated to provide it—and what that obligation means; what exactly is so ethical about household work, since this discourse is rooted in ethics for Muslim scholars; and how male scholars have historically treated domestic service. We end with some thoughts on discussions about Islamic law and domestic service from a class perspective; for example, where do poor men and poor wives fit into this discussion? What are their rights?</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="100867664" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/1669a7a1-df39-42f9-a6ca-c4ad244e9b84/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=1669a7a1-df39-42f9-a6ca-c4ad244e9b84&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Marion Holmes Katz, &quot;Wives and Work: Islamic Law and Ethics Before Modernity&quot; (Columbia UP, 2022)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:45:04</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In this interview, I speak with Marion Holmes Katz about her latest book Wives and Work: Islamic Law and Ethics Before Modernity (Columbia UP, 2022). This fascinating book explores the question of wives’ domestic responsibilities from a Sunni Islamic legal perspective, covering scholarship from the ninth to the fourteenth centuries. The book addresses questions such as, does the wife have the obligation to provide housework? What counts as housework? And if it is true that the wife is not obligated to perform any household labor, as many western Muslims believe, how did the Muslim tradition reconcile this ruling with the anecdote involving Fatima’s request to the Prophet Muhammad for help with household work because she is overworked? And how did Muslim scholars reconcile this idea with what they understood to be morally, culturally, or religiously correct behavior from a woman? If the wife does choose to perform housework, is she entitled to compensation from her husband? 
For most Muslim scholars historically, answers to these questions involved distinguishing between ethical ideals and legal claims. Katz shows, for instance, that the discourse on women’s household labor evolves with time, context, geographical location, such that, for example, in the formative period, it was widely accepted that wives are not obligated to perform any household chores, but by the time we get to the 14th century, this doctrine is challenged. Overall, then, not only do scholarly views expectedly disagree with each other, but also, scholars are less interested in providing a set of generic rules about wifely duties and more in encouraging the fulfillment of duties as they’re understood in one’s own social location.
In our conversation today, we discuss the book’s main contributions and its origins; a hadith report describing an incident about Fatima’s request to Muhammad for domestic help; what exactly domestic service means and who is required or obligated to provide it—and what that obligation means; what exactly is so ethical about household work, since this discourse is rooted in ethics for Muslim scholars; and how male scholars have historically treated domestic service. We end with some thoughts on discussions about Islamic law and domestic service from a class perspective; for example, where do poor men and poor wives fit into this discussion? What are their rights?
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In this interview, I speak with Marion Holmes Katz about her latest book Wives and Work: Islamic Law and Ethics Before Modernity (Columbia UP, 2022). This fascinating book explores the question of wives’ domestic responsibilities from a Sunni Islamic legal perspective, covering scholarship from the ninth to the fourteenth centuries. The book addresses questions such as, does the wife have the obligation to provide housework? What counts as housework? And if it is true that the wife is not obligated to perform any household labor, as many western Muslims believe, how did the Muslim tradition reconcile this ruling with the anecdote involving Fatima’s request to the Prophet Muhammad for help with household work because she is overworked? And how did Muslim scholars reconcile this idea with what they understood to be morally, culturally, or religiously correct behavior from a woman? If the wife does choose to perform housework, is she entitled to compensation from her husband? 
For most Muslim scholars historically, answers to these questions involved distinguishing between ethical ideals and legal claims. Katz shows, for instance, that the discourse on women’s household labor evolves with time, context, geographical location, such that, for example, in the formative period, it was widely accepted that wives are not obligated to perform any household chores, but by the time we get to the 14th century, this doctrine is challenged. Overall, then, not only do scholarly views expectedly disagree with each other, but also, scholars are less interested in providing a set of generic rules about wifely duties and more in encouraging the fulfillment of duties as they’re understood in one’s own social location.
In our conversation today, we discuss the book’s main contributions and its origins; a hadith report describing an incident about Fatima’s request to Muhammad for domestic help; what exactly domestic service means and who is required or obligated to provide it—and what that obligation means; what exactly is so ethical about household work, since this discourse is rooted in ethics for Muslim scholars; and how male scholars have historically treated domestic service. We end with some thoughts on discussions about Islamic law and domestic service from a class perspective; for example, where do poor men and poor wives fit into this discussion? What are their rights?
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>313</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">cb2f6dc2-428e-11ee-ab1f-cf0e934948b7</guid>
      <title>Sarah R. Coleman, &quot;The Walls Within: The Politics of Immigration in Modern America&quot; (Princeton UP, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Sarah Coleman, an historian at Texas State University, is the author of an important and topical book about immigration policy in the United States.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691203331" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Walls Within: The Politics of Immigration in Modern America</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Princeton UP, 2023) focuses much less on the often-discussed physical border between the United States and other countries, and more so on the internal touchpoints where&nbsp;<em>immigration federalism</em>&nbsp;takes place. Coleman does a number of things in this book, including providing a fascinating overview of immigration policies and prohibitions throughout U.S. history, but not in a linear mode—instead, she integrates the historical record into the discussion of the domestic policies that were developed over the past 70 years. These policies are the central focus of the book, since it is the structure, execution, and implementation of these policies that constrain and impact citizens and non-citizens in the United States.&nbsp;<em>The Walls Within</em>&nbsp;examines education policy and court decisions, labor policy and the debate about employer sanctions, welfare policy and questions of immigrant contributions and benefits, and, finally, civil liberties and localized immigration enforcement regimes.</p><p>Given the current political debate around immigration, the complexity of the politics within and around that debate, and the constantly looming image of “the wall” at the southern border, Coleman’s book explains and clarifies so much of the history, political conversations, policies, and implementation of immigration inside the United States. Sifting through demographic changes, economic shifts, congressional legislation, and court challenges, Coleman weaves together the different policies and outcomes, and the different forms of enforcement. This is what contributes to immigration federalism, since restrictions, prohibitions, and denial of opportunities generally happen at a state or local level. Thus, where immigration policy is actually touching people—citizens and non-citizens alike—is not, per se, where a Border Control officer examines a passport or a document, but in implementing sanctions against employers or in denying a second-grader breakfast before school. The exploration of these touchpoints highlights the themes running through&nbsp;<em>The Walls Within</em>: political culture, electoral politics, and political economy. Coleman notes that there are approximately 24 million immigrants in the United States, and about half that number are unauthorized. Most of the unauthorized immigrants are not coming across either the northern or southern border of the United States but are overstaying visas. Thus, the imaginary that often wraps around these questions is disconnected from the reality of authorized and unauthorized immigration in the United States.&nbsp;<a href="https://press.princeton.edu/books/paperback/9780691203331/the-walls-within" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Walls Within: The Politics of Immigration in Modern America</em></a>&nbsp;works to clarify our current situation and how we ended up where we are, while also explaining the policies and actions that were put into place along the way and how those policies and actions shape the actual immigration landscape in the U.S.</p><p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/hosts/profile/a7ac4af9-1306-463f-baf9-00f1f4187dfd" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books in Political Science</em></a><em>&nbsp;channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of&nbsp;</em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700633883/the-politics-of-the-marvel-cinematic-universe/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe</em></a><em>&nbsp;(University Press of Kansas, 2022), as well as co-editor of the award winning book,&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.kentuckypress.com/9780813141015/women-and-the-white-house/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a><em>&nbsp;(University Press of Kentucky, 2012).&nbsp;She can be reached&nbsp;</em><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/gorenlj.bsky.social" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>@gorenlj.bsky.social</em></a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2023 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/sarah-r-coleman-the-walls-within-the-politics-of-immigration-in-modern-america-princeton-up-2023-5E_Bnmu_</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sarah Coleman, an historian at Texas State University, is the author of an important and topical book about immigration policy in the United States.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691203331" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Walls Within: The Politics of Immigration in Modern America</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Princeton UP, 2023) focuses much less on the often-discussed physical border between the United States and other countries, and more so on the internal touchpoints where&nbsp;<em>immigration federalism</em>&nbsp;takes place. Coleman does a number of things in this book, including providing a fascinating overview of immigration policies and prohibitions throughout U.S. history, but not in a linear mode—instead, she integrates the historical record into the discussion of the domestic policies that were developed over the past 70 years. These policies are the central focus of the book, since it is the structure, execution, and implementation of these policies that constrain and impact citizens and non-citizens in the United States.&nbsp;<em>The Walls Within</em>&nbsp;examines education policy and court decisions, labor policy and the debate about employer sanctions, welfare policy and questions of immigrant contributions and benefits, and, finally, civil liberties and localized immigration enforcement regimes.</p><p>Given the current political debate around immigration, the complexity of the politics within and around that debate, and the constantly looming image of “the wall” at the southern border, Coleman’s book explains and clarifies so much of the history, political conversations, policies, and implementation of immigration inside the United States. Sifting through demographic changes, economic shifts, congressional legislation, and court challenges, Coleman weaves together the different policies and outcomes, and the different forms of enforcement. This is what contributes to immigration federalism, since restrictions, prohibitions, and denial of opportunities generally happen at a state or local level. Thus, where immigration policy is actually touching people—citizens and non-citizens alike—is not, per se, where a Border Control officer examines a passport or a document, but in implementing sanctions against employers or in denying a second-grader breakfast before school. The exploration of these touchpoints highlights the themes running through&nbsp;<em>The Walls Within</em>: political culture, electoral politics, and political economy. Coleman notes that there are approximately 24 million immigrants in the United States, and about half that number are unauthorized. Most of the unauthorized immigrants are not coming across either the northern or southern border of the United States but are overstaying visas. Thus, the imaginary that often wraps around these questions is disconnected from the reality of authorized and unauthorized immigration in the United States.&nbsp;<a href="https://press.princeton.edu/books/paperback/9780691203331/the-walls-within" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Walls Within: The Politics of Immigration in Modern America</em></a>&nbsp;works to clarify our current situation and how we ended up where we are, while also explaining the policies and actions that were put into place along the way and how those policies and actions shape the actual immigration landscape in the U.S.</p><p><a href="https://www.carrollu.edu/faculty/goren-lilly-phd" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Lilly J. Goren</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the&nbsp;</em><a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/hosts/profile/a7ac4af9-1306-463f-baf9-00f1f4187dfd" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New Books in Political Science</em></a><em>&nbsp;channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of&nbsp;</em><a href="https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700633883/the-politics-of-the-marvel-cinematic-universe/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe</em></a><em>&nbsp;(University Press of Kansas, 2022), as well as co-editor of the award winning book,&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.kentuckypress.com/9780813141015/women-and-the-white-house/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics</em></a><em>&nbsp;(University Press of Kentucky, 2012).&nbsp;She can be reached&nbsp;</em><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/gorenlj.bsky.social" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>@gorenlj.bsky.social</em></a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="42830795" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/1f28b624-b1e2-4cc4-826d-920a66a88741/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=1f28b624-b1e2-4cc4-826d-920a66a88741&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Sarah R. Coleman, &quot;The Walls Within: The Politics of Immigration in Modern America&quot; (Princeton UP, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:44:36</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Sarah Coleman, an historian at Texas State University, is the author of an important and topical book about immigration policy in the United States. The Walls Within: The Politics of Immigration in Modern America (Princeton UP, 2023) focuses much less on the often-discussed physical border between the United States and other countries, and more so on the internal touchpoints where immigration federalism takes place. Coleman does a number of things in this book, including providing a fascinating overview of immigration policies and prohibitions throughout U.S. history, but not in a linear mode—instead, she integrates the historical record into the discussion of the domestic policies that were developed over the past 70 years. These policies are the central focus of the book, since it is the structure, execution, and implementation of these policies that constrain and impact citizens and non-citizens in the United States. The Walls Within examines education policy and court decisions, labor policy and the debate about employer sanctions, welfare policy and questions of immigrant contributions and benefits, and, finally, civil liberties and localized immigration enforcement regimes.
Given the current political debate around immigration, the complexity of the politics within and around that debate, and the constantly looming image of “the wall” at the southern border, Coleman’s book explains and clarifies so much of the history, political conversations, policies, and implementation of immigration inside the United States. Sifting through demographic changes, economic shifts, congressional legislation, and court challenges, Coleman weaves together the different policies and outcomes, and the different forms of enforcement. This is what contributes to immigration federalism, since restrictions, prohibitions, and denial of opportunities generally happen at a state or local level. Thus, where immigration policy is actually touching people—citizens and non-citizens alike—is not, per se, where a Border Control officer examines a passport or a document, but in implementing sanctions against employers or in denying a second-grader breakfast before school. The exploration of these touchpoints highlights the themes running through The Walls Within: political culture, electoral politics, and political economy. Coleman notes that there are approximately 24 million immigrants in the United States, and about half that number are unauthorized. Most of the unauthorized immigrants are not coming across either the northern or southern border of the United States but are overstaying visas. Thus, the imaginary that often wraps around these questions is disconnected from the reality of authorized and unauthorized immigration in the United States. The Walls Within: The Politics of Immigration in Modern America works to clarify our current situation and how we ended up where we are, while also explaining the policies and actions that were put into place along the way and how those policies and actions shape the actual immigration landscape in the U.S.
Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the New Books in Political Science channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe (University Press of Kansas, 2022), as well as co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached @gorenlj.bsky.social
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Sarah Coleman, an historian at Texas State University, is the author of an important and topical book about immigration policy in the United States. The Walls Within: The Politics of Immigration in Modern America (Princeton UP, 2023) focuses much less on the often-discussed physical border between the United States and other countries, and more so on the internal touchpoints where immigration federalism takes place. Coleman does a number of things in this book, including providing a fascinating overview of immigration policies and prohibitions throughout U.S. history, but not in a linear mode—instead, she integrates the historical record into the discussion of the domestic policies that were developed over the past 70 years. These policies are the central focus of the book, since it is the structure, execution, and implementation of these policies that constrain and impact citizens and non-citizens in the United States. The Walls Within examines education policy and court decisions, labor policy and the debate about employer sanctions, welfare policy and questions of immigrant contributions and benefits, and, finally, civil liberties and localized immigration enforcement regimes.
Given the current political debate around immigration, the complexity of the politics within and around that debate, and the constantly looming image of “the wall” at the southern border, Coleman’s book explains and clarifies so much of the history, political conversations, policies, and implementation of immigration inside the United States. Sifting through demographic changes, economic shifts, congressional legislation, and court challenges, Coleman weaves together the different policies and outcomes, and the different forms of enforcement. This is what contributes to immigration federalism, since restrictions, prohibitions, and denial of opportunities generally happen at a state or local level. Thus, where immigration policy is actually touching people—citizens and non-citizens alike—is not, per se, where a Border Control officer examines a passport or a document, but in implementing sanctions against employers or in denying a second-grader breakfast before school. The exploration of these touchpoints highlights the themes running through The Walls Within: political culture, electoral politics, and political economy. Coleman notes that there are approximately 24 million immigrants in the United States, and about half that number are unauthorized. Most of the unauthorized immigrants are not coming across either the northern or southern border of the United States but are overstaying visas. Thus, the imaginary that often wraps around these questions is disconnected from the reality of authorized and unauthorized immigration in the United States. The Walls Within: The Politics of Immigration in Modern America works to clarify our current situation and how we ended up where we are, while also explaining the policies and actions that were put into place along the way and how those policies and actions shape the actual immigration landscape in the U.S.
Lilly J. Goren is a professor of political science at Carroll University in Waukesha, WI. She is co-host of the New Books in Political Science channel at the New Books Network. She is co-editor of The Politics of the Marvel Cinematic Universe (University Press of Kansas, 2022), as well as co-editor of the award winning book, Women and the White House: Gender, Popular Culture, and Presidential Politics (University Press of Kentucky, 2012). She can be reached @gorenlj.bsky.social
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>669</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9c2e7a08-473f-11ee-9ed8-4f70171543b5</guid>
      <title>Who’s Afraid of the Catholic Integralists? (with Kevin Vallier)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Kevin Vallier is a philosophy professor and author of&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197611371" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>All the Kingdoms of the World: On Radical Religious Alternatives to Liberalism</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Oxford UP, 2023), a new book about Catholic Integralism, a mostly online intellectual movement that thinks the church should take over the state, something that made sense fifteen hundred years ago after the collapse of the Roman Empire, but not so much day in our pluralistic, democratic age. Professor Vallier’s goal is to help us all talk together with patience and grace (which includes really listening) to people we disagree with and regard as eccentric. So why not talk it over on&nbsp;<em>Almost Good Catholics?</em></p><ul>
<li>Kevin Vallier’s&nbsp;<a href="https://www.bgsu.edu/arts-and-sciences/philosophy/faculty-and-staff/kvallie.html" rel="noopener noreferrer">faculty website</a>&nbsp;at Bowling Green University, Ohio.</li>
<li>Kevin Vallier’s&nbsp;<a href="https://www.kevinvallier.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">personal website</a>.</li>
<li>Kevin Vallier’s&nbsp;<a href="https://www.kevinvallier.com/reconciled/" rel="noopener noreferrer">blogs at&nbsp;<em>Reconciled</em></a><em>.</em>
</li>
<li>Fr James Rooney, OP,&nbsp;<a href="https://youtu.be/o2RZo1_xRKo?si=rKx7fowKq0uia46g" rel="noopener noreferrer">critiques Integralism</a>, in the&nbsp;<a href="https://www.youtube.com/@intellectualcatholicism" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Intellectual Catholicism&nbsp;</em>podcast</a>&nbsp;with Suan Sonna.</li>
<li>
<a href="https://www.pillarcatholic.com/p/what-is-integralism-anyway" rel="noopener noreferrer">“What is Integralism, Anyway?” by Charlie Camosy</a>, at&nbsp;<em>the Pillar.</em>
</li>
</ul><p><em>﻿</em></p><p><em>﻿Krzysztof Odyniec is a historian of Medieval and Early Modern Europe; he is also the host of the 'Almost Good Catholics' podcast.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2023 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/whos-afraid-of-the-catholic-integralists-with-kevin-vallier-whzkhllN</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kevin Vallier is a philosophy professor and author of&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197611371" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>All the Kingdoms of the World: On Radical Religious Alternatives to Liberalism</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Oxford UP, 2023), a new book about Catholic Integralism, a mostly online intellectual movement that thinks the church should take over the state, something that made sense fifteen hundred years ago after the collapse of the Roman Empire, but not so much day in our pluralistic, democratic age. Professor Vallier’s goal is to help us all talk together with patience and grace (which includes really listening) to people we disagree with and regard as eccentric. So why not talk it over on&nbsp;<em>Almost Good Catholics?</em></p><ul>
<li>Kevin Vallier’s&nbsp;<a href="https://www.bgsu.edu/arts-and-sciences/philosophy/faculty-and-staff/kvallie.html" rel="noopener noreferrer">faculty website</a>&nbsp;at Bowling Green University, Ohio.</li>
<li>Kevin Vallier’s&nbsp;<a href="https://www.kevinvallier.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">personal website</a>.</li>
<li>Kevin Vallier’s&nbsp;<a href="https://www.kevinvallier.com/reconciled/" rel="noopener noreferrer">blogs at&nbsp;<em>Reconciled</em></a><em>.</em>
</li>
<li>Fr James Rooney, OP,&nbsp;<a href="https://youtu.be/o2RZo1_xRKo?si=rKx7fowKq0uia46g" rel="noopener noreferrer">critiques Integralism</a>, in the&nbsp;<a href="https://www.youtube.com/@intellectualcatholicism" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Intellectual Catholicism&nbsp;</em>podcast</a>&nbsp;with Suan Sonna.</li>
<li>
<a href="https://www.pillarcatholic.com/p/what-is-integralism-anyway" rel="noopener noreferrer">“What is Integralism, Anyway?” by Charlie Camosy</a>, at&nbsp;<em>the Pillar.</em>
</li>
</ul><p><em>﻿</em></p><p><em>﻿Krzysztof Odyniec is a historian of Medieval and Early Modern Europe; he is also the host of the 'Almost Good Catholics' podcast.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="54381818" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/eec4adad-36ee-495c-9ff2-f0fd1ac3722b/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=eec4adad-36ee-495c-9ff2-f0fd1ac3722b&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Who’s Afraid of the Catholic Integralists? (with Kevin Vallier)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:56:38</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Kevin Vallier is a philosophy professor and author of All the Kingdoms of the World: On Radical Religious Alternatives to Liberalism (Oxford UP, 2023), a new book about Catholic Integralism, a mostly online intellectual movement that thinks the church should take over the state, something that made sense fifteen hundred years ago after the collapse of the Roman Empire, but not so much day in our pluralistic, democratic age. Professor Vallier’s goal is to help us all talk together with patience and grace (which includes really listening) to people we disagree with and regard as eccentric. So why not talk it over on Almost Good Catholics?
Kevin Vallier’s faculty website at Bowling Green University, Ohio.
Kevin Vallier’s personal website.
Kevin Vallier’s blogs at Reconciled.
Fr James Rooney, OP, critiques Integralism, in the Intellectual Catholicism podcast with Suan Sonna.
“What is Integralism, Anyway?” by Charlie Camosy, at the Pillar.
﻿
﻿Krzysztof Odyniec is a historian of Medieval and Early Modern Europe; he is also the host of the &apos;Almost Good Catholics&apos; podcast.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Kevin Vallier is a philosophy professor and author of All the Kingdoms of the World: On Radical Religious Alternatives to Liberalism (Oxford UP, 2023), a new book about Catholic Integralism, a mostly online intellectual movement that thinks the church should take over the state, something that made sense fifteen hundred years ago after the collapse of the Roman Empire, but not so much day in our pluralistic, democratic age. Professor Vallier’s goal is to help us all talk together with patience and grace (which includes really listening) to people we disagree with and regard as eccentric. So why not talk it over on Almost Good Catholics?
Kevin Vallier’s faculty website at Bowling Green University, Ohio.
Kevin Vallier’s personal website.
Kevin Vallier’s blogs at Reconciled.
Fr James Rooney, OP, critiques Integralism, in the Intellectual Catholicism podcast with Suan Sonna.
“What is Integralism, Anyway?” by Charlie Camosy, at the Pillar.
﻿
﻿Krzysztof Odyniec is a historian of Medieval and Early Modern Europe; he is also the host of the &apos;Almost Good Catholics&apos; podcast.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>68</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">44be9124-467a-11ee-9716-7fd50994e93d</guid>
      <title>Tomiko Brown-Nagin, &quot;Civil Rights Queen: Constance Baker Motley and the Struggle for Equality&quot; (Knopf Doubleday, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>With the US Supreme Court confirmation of Ketanji Brown Jackson, “it makes sense to revisit the life and work of another Black woman who profoundly shaped the law: Constance Baker Motley” (CNN). Born to an aspirational blue-collar family during the Great Depression, Constance Baker Motley was expected to find herself a good career as a hairdresser. Instead, she became the first black woman to argue a case in front of the Supreme Court, the first of ten she would eventually argue. The only black woman member in the legal team at the NAACP’s Inc. Fund at the time, she defended Martin Luther King in Birmingham, helped to argue in Brown vs. The Board of Education, and played a critical role in vanquishing Jim Crow laws throughout the South. She was the first black woman elected to the state Senate in New York, the first woman elected Manhattan Borough President, and the first black woman appointed to the federal judiciary.</p><p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780525436102" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Civil Rights Queen: Constance Baker Motley and the Struggle for Equality</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Knopf Doubleday, 2023) captures the story of a remarkable American life, a figure who remade law and inspired the imaginations of African Americans across the country. Burnished with an extraordinary wealth of research, award-winning, esteemed Civil Rights and legal historian and dean of the Harvard Radcliffe Institute, Tomiko Brown-Nagin brings Motley to life in these pages. Brown-Nagin compels us to ponder some of our most timeless and urgent questions–how do the historically marginalized access the corridors of power? What is the price of the ticket? How does access to power shape individuals committed to social justice? In Civil Rights Queen, she dramatically fills out the picture of some of the most profound judicial and societal change made in twentieth-century America.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2023 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/tomiko-brown-nagin-civil-rights-queen-constance-baker-motley-and-the-struggle-for-equality-knopf-doubleday-2023-slqBJJGx</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the US Supreme Court confirmation of Ketanji Brown Jackson, “it makes sense to revisit the life and work of another Black woman who profoundly shaped the law: Constance Baker Motley” (CNN). Born to an aspirational blue-collar family during the Great Depression, Constance Baker Motley was expected to find herself a good career as a hairdresser. Instead, she became the first black woman to argue a case in front of the Supreme Court, the first of ten she would eventually argue. The only black woman member in the legal team at the NAACP’s Inc. Fund at the time, she defended Martin Luther King in Birmingham, helped to argue in Brown vs. The Board of Education, and played a critical role in vanquishing Jim Crow laws throughout the South. She was the first black woman elected to the state Senate in New York, the first woman elected Manhattan Borough President, and the first black woman appointed to the federal judiciary.</p><p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780525436102" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Civil Rights Queen: Constance Baker Motley and the Struggle for Equality</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Knopf Doubleday, 2023) captures the story of a remarkable American life, a figure who remade law and inspired the imaginations of African Americans across the country. Burnished with an extraordinary wealth of research, award-winning, esteemed Civil Rights and legal historian and dean of the Harvard Radcliffe Institute, Tomiko Brown-Nagin brings Motley to life in these pages. Brown-Nagin compels us to ponder some of our most timeless and urgent questions–how do the historically marginalized access the corridors of power? What is the price of the ticket? How does access to power shape individuals committed to social justice? In Civil Rights Queen, she dramatically fills out the picture of some of the most profound judicial and societal change made in twentieth-century America.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="59414288" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/6b74b022-0cfe-461d-ace2-b12e8086da36/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=6b74b022-0cfe-461d-ace2-b12e8086da36&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Tomiko Brown-Nagin, &quot;Civil Rights Queen: Constance Baker Motley and the Struggle for Equality&quot; (Knopf Doubleday, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:01:53</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>With the US Supreme Court confirmation of Ketanji Brown Jackson, “it makes sense to revisit the life and work of another Black woman who profoundly shaped the law: Constance Baker Motley” (CNN). Born to an aspirational blue-collar family during the Great Depression, Constance Baker Motley was expected to find herself a good career as a hairdresser. Instead, she became the first black woman to argue a case in front of the Supreme Court, the first of ten she would eventually argue. The only black woman member in the legal team at the NAACP’s Inc. Fund at the time, she defended Martin Luther King in Birmingham, helped to argue in Brown vs. The Board of Education, and played a critical role in vanquishing Jim Crow laws throughout the South. She was the first black woman elected to the state Senate in New York, the first woman elected Manhattan Borough President, and the first black woman appointed to the federal judiciary.
Civil Rights Queen: Constance Baker Motley and the Struggle for Equality (Knopf Doubleday, 2023) captures the story of a remarkable American life, a figure who remade law and inspired the imaginations of African Americans across the country. Burnished with an extraordinary wealth of research, award-winning, esteemed Civil Rights and legal historian and dean of the Harvard Radcliffe Institute, Tomiko Brown-Nagin brings Motley to life in these pages. Brown-Nagin compels us to ponder some of our most timeless and urgent questions–how do the historically marginalized access the corridors of power? What is the price of the ticket? How does access to power shape individuals committed to social justice? In Civil Rights Queen, she dramatically fills out the picture of some of the most profound judicial and societal change made in twentieth-century America.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>With the US Supreme Court confirmation of Ketanji Brown Jackson, “it makes sense to revisit the life and work of another Black woman who profoundly shaped the law: Constance Baker Motley” (CNN). Born to an aspirational blue-collar family during the Great Depression, Constance Baker Motley was expected to find herself a good career as a hairdresser. Instead, she became the first black woman to argue a case in front of the Supreme Court, the first of ten she would eventually argue. The only black woman member in the legal team at the NAACP’s Inc. Fund at the time, she defended Martin Luther King in Birmingham, helped to argue in Brown vs. The Board of Education, and played a critical role in vanquishing Jim Crow laws throughout the South. She was the first black woman elected to the state Senate in New York, the first woman elected Manhattan Borough President, and the first black woman appointed to the federal judiciary.
Civil Rights Queen: Constance Baker Motley and the Struggle for Equality (Knopf Doubleday, 2023) captures the story of a remarkable American life, a figure who remade law and inspired the imaginations of African Americans across the country. Burnished with an extraordinary wealth of research, award-winning, esteemed Civil Rights and legal historian and dean of the Harvard Radcliffe Institute, Tomiko Brown-Nagin brings Motley to life in these pages. Brown-Nagin compels us to ponder some of our most timeless and urgent questions–how do the historically marginalized access the corridors of power? What is the price of the ticket? How does access to power shape individuals committed to social justice? In Civil Rights Queen, she dramatically fills out the picture of some of the most profound judicial and societal change made in twentieth-century America.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>298</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">29d4e3d4-469f-11ee-b042-43523ff29f0b</guid>
      <title>Dagmar Schafer, &quot;Ownership of Knowledge: Beyond Intellectual Property&quot; (MIT Press, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780262545594" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Ownership of Knowledge: Beyond Intellectual Property&nbsp;</em></a>(MIT Press, 2023) provides a framework for knowledge ownership that challenges the mechanisms of inequality in modern society.</p><p>Scholars of science, technology, medicine, and law have all tended to emphasize knowledge as the sum of human understanding, and its ownership as possession by law. Breaking with traditional discourse on knowledge property as something that concerns mainly words and intellectual history, or science and law, Dagmar Schäfer, Annapurna Mamidipudi, and Marius Buning propose technology as a central heuristic for studying the many implications of knowledge ownership.</p><p>Toward this end, they focus on the notions of knowledge and ownership in courtrooms, workshops, policy, and research practices, while also shedding light on scholarship itself as a powerful tool for making explicit the politics inherent in knowledge practices and social order. The book presents case studies showing how diverse knowledge economies are created and how inequalities arise from them. Unlike scholars who have fragmented this discourse across the disciplines of anthropology, sociology, and history, the editors highlight recent developments in the emerging field of the global history of knowledge—as science, as economy, and as culture. The case studies reveal how notions of knowing and owning emerge because they reciprocally produce and determine each other's limits and possibilities; that is, how we know inevitably affects how we can own what we know; and how we own always impacts how and what we are able to know.</p><p><a href="https://linktr.ee/jenhoyer" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Jen Hoyer</em></a><em>&nbsp;is Technical Services and Electronic Resources Librarian at</em><a href="http://www.citytech.cuny.edu/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;CUNY New York City College of Technology</em></a><em>. Jen edits for&nbsp;</em><a href="http://partnershipjournal.ca/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Partnership Journal</em></a><em>&nbsp;and organizes with the&nbsp;</em><a href="https://tpscollective.org/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>TPS Collective</em></a><em>. She is co-author of</em><a href="https://www.abc-clio.com/products/a6435p/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;What Primary Sources Teach: Lessons for Every Classroom</em></a><em>&nbsp;and</em><a href="https://litwinbooks.com/books/6722/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;The Social Movement Archive</em></a><em>.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2023 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/dagmar-schafer-ownership-of-knowledge-beyond-intellectual-property-mit-press-2023-amvMufyD</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780262545594" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Ownership of Knowledge: Beyond Intellectual Property&nbsp;</em></a>(MIT Press, 2023) provides a framework for knowledge ownership that challenges the mechanisms of inequality in modern society.</p><p>Scholars of science, technology, medicine, and law have all tended to emphasize knowledge as the sum of human understanding, and its ownership as possession by law. Breaking with traditional discourse on knowledge property as something that concerns mainly words and intellectual history, or science and law, Dagmar Schäfer, Annapurna Mamidipudi, and Marius Buning propose technology as a central heuristic for studying the many implications of knowledge ownership.</p><p>Toward this end, they focus on the notions of knowledge and ownership in courtrooms, workshops, policy, and research practices, while also shedding light on scholarship itself as a powerful tool for making explicit the politics inherent in knowledge practices and social order. The book presents case studies showing how diverse knowledge economies are created and how inequalities arise from them. Unlike scholars who have fragmented this discourse across the disciplines of anthropology, sociology, and history, the editors highlight recent developments in the emerging field of the global history of knowledge—as science, as economy, and as culture. The case studies reveal how notions of knowing and owning emerge because they reciprocally produce and determine each other's limits and possibilities; that is, how we know inevitably affects how we can own what we know; and how we own always impacts how and what we are able to know.</p><p><a href="https://linktr.ee/jenhoyer" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Jen Hoyer</em></a><em>&nbsp;is Technical Services and Electronic Resources Librarian at</em><a href="http://www.citytech.cuny.edu/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;CUNY New York City College of Technology</em></a><em>. Jen edits for&nbsp;</em><a href="http://partnershipjournal.ca/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Partnership Journal</em></a><em>&nbsp;and organizes with the&nbsp;</em><a href="https://tpscollective.org/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>TPS Collective</em></a><em>. She is co-author of</em><a href="https://www.abc-clio.com/products/a6435p/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;What Primary Sources Teach: Lessons for Every Classroom</em></a><em>&nbsp;and</em><a href="https://litwinbooks.com/books/6722/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>&nbsp;The Social Movement Archive</em></a><em>.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="40509119" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/f34ff388-6225-4869-8901-a893a8ddd1a8/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=f34ff388-6225-4869-8901-a893a8ddd1a8&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Dagmar Schafer, &quot;Ownership of Knowledge: Beyond Intellectual Property&quot; (MIT Press, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:42:11</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Ownership of Knowledge: Beyond Intellectual Property (MIT Press, 2023) provides a framework for knowledge ownership that challenges the mechanisms of inequality in modern society.
Scholars of science, technology, medicine, and law have all tended to emphasize knowledge as the sum of human understanding, and its ownership as possession by law. Breaking with traditional discourse on knowledge property as something that concerns mainly words and intellectual history, or science and law, Dagmar Schäfer, Annapurna Mamidipudi, and Marius Buning propose technology as a central heuristic for studying the many implications of knowledge ownership.
Toward this end, they focus on the notions of knowledge and ownership in courtrooms, workshops, policy, and research practices, while also shedding light on scholarship itself as a powerful tool for making explicit the politics inherent in knowledge practices and social order. The book presents case studies showing how diverse knowledge economies are created and how inequalities arise from them. Unlike scholars who have fragmented this discourse across the disciplines of anthropology, sociology, and history, the editors highlight recent developments in the emerging field of the global history of knowledge—as science, as economy, and as culture. The case studies reveal how notions of knowing and owning emerge because they reciprocally produce and determine each other&apos;s limits and possibilities; that is, how we know inevitably affects how we can own what we know; and how we own always impacts how and what we are able to know.
Jen Hoyer is Technical Services and Electronic Resources Librarian at CUNY New York City College of Technology. Jen edits for Partnership Journal and organizes with the TPS Collective. She is co-author of What Primary Sources Teach: Lessons for Every Classroom and The Social Movement Archive.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Ownership of Knowledge: Beyond Intellectual Property (MIT Press, 2023) provides a framework for knowledge ownership that challenges the mechanisms of inequality in modern society.
Scholars of science, technology, medicine, and law have all tended to emphasize knowledge as the sum of human understanding, and its ownership as possession by law. Breaking with traditional discourse on knowledge property as something that concerns mainly words and intellectual history, or science and law, Dagmar Schäfer, Annapurna Mamidipudi, and Marius Buning propose technology as a central heuristic for studying the many implications of knowledge ownership.
Toward this end, they focus on the notions of knowledge and ownership in courtrooms, workshops, policy, and research practices, while also shedding light on scholarship itself as a powerful tool for making explicit the politics inherent in knowledge practices and social order. The book presents case studies showing how diverse knowledge economies are created and how inequalities arise from them. Unlike scholars who have fragmented this discourse across the disciplines of anthropology, sociology, and history, the editors highlight recent developments in the emerging field of the global history of knowledge—as science, as economy, and as culture. The case studies reveal how notions of knowing and owning emerge because they reciprocally produce and determine each other&apos;s limits and possibilities; that is, how we know inevitably affects how we can own what we know; and how we own always impacts how and what we are able to know.
Jen Hoyer is Technical Services and Electronic Resources Librarian at CUNY New York City College of Technology. Jen edits for Partnership Journal and organizes with the TPS Collective. She is co-author of What Primary Sources Teach: Lessons for Every Classroom and The Social Movement Archive.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>14</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e857dfea-4439-11ee-88aa-53e3e60cc666</guid>
      <title>Kalyani Ramnath, &quot;Boats in a Storm: Law, Migration, and Decolonization in South and Southeast Asia, 1942-1962&quot; (Stanford UP, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>For more than a century before World War II, traders, merchants, financiers, and laborers steadily moved between places on the Indian Ocean, trading goods, supplying credit, and seeking work. This all changed with the war and as India, Burma, Ceylon, and Malaya wrested independence from the British Empire. Set against the tumult of the postwar period,<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781503636095" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;<em>Boats in a Storm: Law, Migration, and Decolonization in South and Southeast Asia, 1942-1962</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Stanford UP, 2023) centers on the legal struggles of migrants to retain their traditional rhythms and patterns of life, illustrating how they experienced citizenship and decolonization. Even as nascent citizenship regimes and divergent political trajectories of decolonization papered over migrations between South and Southeast Asia, migrants continued to recount cross-border histories in encounters with the law. These accounts, often obscured by national and international political developments, unsettle the notion that static national identities and loyalties had emerged, fully formed and unblemished by migrant pasts, in the aftermath of empires.</p><p>Drawing on archival materials from India, Sri Lanka, Myanmar, London, and Singapore, Kalyani Ramnath narrates how former migrants battled legal requirements to revive prewar circulations of credit, capital, and labor, in a postwar context of rising ethno-nationalisms that accused migrants of stealing jobs and hoarding land. Ultimately, Ramnath shows how decolonization was marked not only by shipwrecked empires and nation-states assembled and ordered from the debris of imperial collapse, but also by these forgotten stories of wartime displacements, their unintended consequences, and long afterlives.</p><p><a href="https://history.uga.edu/directory/people/kalyani-ramnath" rel="noopener noreferrer">Kalyani Ramnath</a>&nbsp;is an Assistant Professor of History at the University of Georgia, with research and teaching interests in legal history, histories of migration and displacement, transnational history, and questions of archival method.</p><p><a href="https://foxfellowship.yale.edu/kelvin-ng" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Kelvin Ng</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a PhD candidate at the Department of History at Yale University. His research work brings together the social history of migration and the intellectual history of internationalism in four linked Indian Ocean spaces: British India, Republican China, British Malaya, and the Dutch East Indies. His dissertation examines three intertwined strands of anti-imperial thought—communist internationalism, pan-Islamism, and anti-caste radicalism—in relation to an oceanic political economy of unfree labor and uneven development.</em></p><p><a href="https://nes.princeton.edu/people/ahmed-y-almaazmi" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Ahmed Yaqoub AlMaazmi</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a Ph.D. candidate at Princeton University. His research focuses on the intersection of law, the occult sciences, and the environment across the Western Indian Ocean. He can be reached by email at almaazmi@princeton.edu or on Twitter @Ahmed_Yaqoub. Listeners’ feedback, questions, and book suggestions are most welcome.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 27 Aug 2023 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/kalyani-ramnath-boats-in-a-storm-law-migration-and-decolonization-in-south-and-southeast-asia-1942-1962-stanford-up-2023-8AI86k3O</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For more than a century before World War II, traders, merchants, financiers, and laborers steadily moved between places on the Indian Ocean, trading goods, supplying credit, and seeking work. This all changed with the war and as India, Burma, Ceylon, and Malaya wrested independence from the British Empire. Set against the tumult of the postwar period,<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781503636095" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;<em>Boats in a Storm: Law, Migration, and Decolonization in South and Southeast Asia, 1942-1962</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Stanford UP, 2023) centers on the legal struggles of migrants to retain their traditional rhythms and patterns of life, illustrating how they experienced citizenship and decolonization. Even as nascent citizenship regimes and divergent political trajectories of decolonization papered over migrations between South and Southeast Asia, migrants continued to recount cross-border histories in encounters with the law. These accounts, often obscured by national and international political developments, unsettle the notion that static national identities and loyalties had emerged, fully formed and unblemished by migrant pasts, in the aftermath of empires.</p><p>Drawing on archival materials from India, Sri Lanka, Myanmar, London, and Singapore, Kalyani Ramnath narrates how former migrants battled legal requirements to revive prewar circulations of credit, capital, and labor, in a postwar context of rising ethno-nationalisms that accused migrants of stealing jobs and hoarding land. Ultimately, Ramnath shows how decolonization was marked not only by shipwrecked empires and nation-states assembled and ordered from the debris of imperial collapse, but also by these forgotten stories of wartime displacements, their unintended consequences, and long afterlives.</p><p><a href="https://history.uga.edu/directory/people/kalyani-ramnath" rel="noopener noreferrer">Kalyani Ramnath</a>&nbsp;is an Assistant Professor of History at the University of Georgia, with research and teaching interests in legal history, histories of migration and displacement, transnational history, and questions of archival method.</p><p><a href="https://foxfellowship.yale.edu/kelvin-ng" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Kelvin Ng</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a PhD candidate at the Department of History at Yale University. His research work brings together the social history of migration and the intellectual history of internationalism in four linked Indian Ocean spaces: British India, Republican China, British Malaya, and the Dutch East Indies. His dissertation examines three intertwined strands of anti-imperial thought—communist internationalism, pan-Islamism, and anti-caste radicalism—in relation to an oceanic political economy of unfree labor and uneven development.</em></p><p><a href="https://nes.princeton.edu/people/ahmed-y-almaazmi" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Ahmed Yaqoub AlMaazmi</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a Ph.D. candidate at Princeton University. His research focuses on the intersection of law, the occult sciences, and the environment across the Western Indian Ocean. He can be reached by email at almaazmi@princeton.edu or on Twitter @Ahmed_Yaqoub. Listeners’ feedback, questions, and book suggestions are most welcome.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="86562437" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/c9cf5820-c186-432e-8d64-d2df408f8041/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=c9cf5820-c186-432e-8d64-d2df408f8041&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Kalyani Ramnath, &quot;Boats in a Storm: Law, Migration, and Decolonization in South and Southeast Asia, 1942-1962&quot; (Stanford UP, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:30:09</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>For more than a century before World War II, traders, merchants, financiers, and laborers steadily moved between places on the Indian Ocean, trading goods, supplying credit, and seeking work. This all changed with the war and as India, Burma, Ceylon, and Malaya wrested independence from the British Empire. Set against the tumult of the postwar period, Boats in a Storm: Law, Migration, and Decolonization in South and Southeast Asia, 1942-1962 (Stanford UP, 2023) centers on the legal struggles of migrants to retain their traditional rhythms and patterns of life, illustrating how they experienced citizenship and decolonization. Even as nascent citizenship regimes and divergent political trajectories of decolonization papered over migrations between South and Southeast Asia, migrants continued to recount cross-border histories in encounters with the law. These accounts, often obscured by national and international political developments, unsettle the notion that static national identities and loyalties had emerged, fully formed and unblemished by migrant pasts, in the aftermath of empires.
Drawing on archival materials from India, Sri Lanka, Myanmar, London, and Singapore, Kalyani Ramnath narrates how former migrants battled legal requirements to revive prewar circulations of credit, capital, and labor, in a postwar context of rising ethno-nationalisms that accused migrants of stealing jobs and hoarding land. Ultimately, Ramnath shows how decolonization was marked not only by shipwrecked empires and nation-states assembled and ordered from the debris of imperial collapse, but also by these forgotten stories of wartime displacements, their unintended consequences, and long afterlives.
Kalyani Ramnath is an Assistant Professor of History at the University of Georgia, with research and teaching interests in legal history, histories of migration and displacement, transnational history, and questions of archival method.
Kelvin Ng is a PhD candidate at the Department of History at Yale University. His research work brings together the social history of migration and the intellectual history of internationalism in four linked Indian Ocean spaces: British India, Republican China, British Malaya, and the Dutch East Indies. His dissertation examines three intertwined strands of anti-imperial thought—communist internationalism, pan-Islamism, and anti-caste radicalism—in relation to an oceanic political economy of unfree labor and uneven development.
Ahmed Yaqoub AlMaazmi is a Ph.D. candidate at Princeton University. His research focuses on the intersection of law, the occult sciences, and the environment across the Western Indian Ocean. He can be reached by email at almaazmi@princeton.edu or on Twitter @Ahmed_Yaqoub. Listeners’ feedback, questions, and book suggestions are most welcome.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>For more than a century before World War II, traders, merchants, financiers, and laborers steadily moved between places on the Indian Ocean, trading goods, supplying credit, and seeking work. This all changed with the war and as India, Burma, Ceylon, and Malaya wrested independence from the British Empire. Set against the tumult of the postwar period, Boats in a Storm: Law, Migration, and Decolonization in South and Southeast Asia, 1942-1962 (Stanford UP, 2023) centers on the legal struggles of migrants to retain their traditional rhythms and patterns of life, illustrating how they experienced citizenship and decolonization. Even as nascent citizenship regimes and divergent political trajectories of decolonization papered over migrations between South and Southeast Asia, migrants continued to recount cross-border histories in encounters with the law. These accounts, often obscured by national and international political developments, unsettle the notion that static national identities and loyalties had emerged, fully formed and unblemished by migrant pasts, in the aftermath of empires.
Drawing on archival materials from India, Sri Lanka, Myanmar, London, and Singapore, Kalyani Ramnath narrates how former migrants battled legal requirements to revive prewar circulations of credit, capital, and labor, in a postwar context of rising ethno-nationalisms that accused migrants of stealing jobs and hoarding land. Ultimately, Ramnath shows how decolonization was marked not only by shipwrecked empires and nation-states assembled and ordered from the debris of imperial collapse, but also by these forgotten stories of wartime displacements, their unintended consequences, and long afterlives.
Kalyani Ramnath is an Assistant Professor of History at the University of Georgia, with research and teaching interests in legal history, histories of migration and displacement, transnational history, and questions of archival method.
Kelvin Ng is a PhD candidate at the Department of History at Yale University. His research work brings together the social history of migration and the intellectual history of internationalism in four linked Indian Ocean spaces: British India, Republican China, British Malaya, and the Dutch East Indies. His dissertation examines three intertwined strands of anti-imperial thought—communist internationalism, pan-Islamism, and anti-caste radicalism—in relation to an oceanic political economy of unfree labor and uneven development.
Ahmed Yaqoub AlMaazmi is a Ph.D. candidate at Princeton University. His research focuses on the intersection of law, the occult sciences, and the environment across the Western Indian Ocean. He can be reached by email at almaazmi@princeton.edu or on Twitter @Ahmed_Yaqoub. Listeners’ feedback, questions, and book suggestions are most welcome.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>72</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">84466f4e-4434-11ee-9b8d-1348460d8890</guid>
      <title>Julian Jackson, &quot;France on Trial: The Case of Marshal Pétain&quot; (Harvard UP, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>There was a time when French people put up picture of Marshal Philippe Petain on their walls. He is a figure of immeasurable stature to the country of France. Victor of Verdun, a one-time minister of war, and finally, a traitor to his country. Or was he? Did Petain allow the stain of collaboration to tarnish his reputation, or did he use his figure to guard the French people from worse Nazi atrocities during the Vichy era? The answer to those questions would divide France in the years following World War II. The trial of Petain, which took place during a humid July in 1945, would leave some venerating the figure of Petain while others looked upon him as betrayer of the French people.</p><p>Professor Julian Jackson, is professor emeritus of history with Queen Mary University of London. His latest work is&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780674248892" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>France on Trial: The Case of Marshal Pétain</em></a>&nbsp;published by Harvard University Press in 2023, covers the political trial of Marshal Petain for treason. Dr. Jackson has authored an award-winning biography of Charles de Gaulle and other works on the history of modern France including his next work an exploration of the life of Andre Gide.</p><p><em>Rick Northrop is an ex-journalist and undergraduate student in Calgary, Alberta Canada. He can be reached at&nbsp;</em><a href="mailto:rnorthrop2001@gmail.com" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>rnorthrop2001@gmail.com</em></a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 27 Aug 2023 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/julian-jackson-france-on-trial-the-case-of-marshal-petain-harvard-up-2023-UJ1AsAI4</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There was a time when French people put up picture of Marshal Philippe Petain on their walls. He is a figure of immeasurable stature to the country of France. Victor of Verdun, a one-time minister of war, and finally, a traitor to his country. Or was he? Did Petain allow the stain of collaboration to tarnish his reputation, or did he use his figure to guard the French people from worse Nazi atrocities during the Vichy era? The answer to those questions would divide France in the years following World War II. The trial of Petain, which took place during a humid July in 1945, would leave some venerating the figure of Petain while others looked upon him as betrayer of the French people.</p><p>Professor Julian Jackson, is professor emeritus of history with Queen Mary University of London. His latest work is&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780674248892" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>France on Trial: The Case of Marshal Pétain</em></a>&nbsp;published by Harvard University Press in 2023, covers the political trial of Marshal Petain for treason. Dr. Jackson has authored an award-winning biography of Charles de Gaulle and other works on the history of modern France including his next work an exploration of the life of Andre Gide.</p><p><em>Rick Northrop is an ex-journalist and undergraduate student in Calgary, Alberta Canada. He can be reached at&nbsp;</em><a href="mailto:rnorthrop2001@gmail.com" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>rnorthrop2001@gmail.com</em></a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="56536963" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/cd5eb3fb-db74-4737-99ba-5daeee5f2768/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=cd5eb3fb-db74-4737-99ba-5daeee5f2768&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Julian Jackson, &quot;France on Trial: The Case of Marshal Pétain&quot; (Harvard UP, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:58:53</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>There was a time when French people put up picture of Marshal Philippe Petain on their walls. He is a figure of immeasurable stature to the country of France. Victor of Verdun, a one-time minister of war, and finally, a traitor to his country. Or was he? Did Petain allow the stain of collaboration to tarnish his reputation, or did he use his figure to guard the French people from worse Nazi atrocities during the Vichy era? The answer to those questions would divide France in the years following World War II. The trial of Petain, which took place during a humid July in 1945, would leave some venerating the figure of Petain while others looked upon him as betrayer of the French people.
Professor Julian Jackson, is professor emeritus of history with Queen Mary University of London. His latest work is France on Trial: The Case of Marshal Pétain published by Harvard University Press in 2023, covers the political trial of Marshal Petain for treason. Dr. Jackson has authored an award-winning biography of Charles de Gaulle and other works on the history of modern France including his next work an exploration of the life of Andre Gide.
Rick Northrop is an ex-journalist and undergraduate student in Calgary, Alberta Canada. He can be reached at rnorthrop2001@gmail.com
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>There was a time when French people put up picture of Marshal Philippe Petain on their walls. He is a figure of immeasurable stature to the country of France. Victor of Verdun, a one-time minister of war, and finally, a traitor to his country. Or was he? Did Petain allow the stain of collaboration to tarnish his reputation, or did he use his figure to guard the French people from worse Nazi atrocities during the Vichy era? The answer to those questions would divide France in the years following World War II. The trial of Petain, which took place during a humid July in 1945, would leave some venerating the figure of Petain while others looked upon him as betrayer of the French people.
Professor Julian Jackson, is professor emeritus of history with Queen Mary University of London. His latest work is France on Trial: The Case of Marshal Pétain published by Harvard University Press in 2023, covers the political trial of Marshal Petain for treason. Dr. Jackson has authored an award-winning biography of Charles de Gaulle and other works on the history of modern France including his next work an exploration of the life of Andre Gide.
Rick Northrop is an ex-journalist and undergraduate student in Calgary, Alberta Canada. He can be reached at rnorthrop2001@gmail.com
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>117</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2dd43b16-4423-11ee-901f-039f8ca234fe</guid>
      <title>Asad L. Asad, &quot;Engage and Evade: How Latino Immigrant Families Manage Surveillance in Everyday Life&quot; (Princeton UP, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Because immigration is such a recurring-and divisive-topic in the United States, it is easy to assume that we understand what it means for an immigrant to live under the specter of surveillance and punishment. It is easy to assume, as many scholars and journalists do, that undocumented immigrants live on the run from the authorities, constantly fleeing to the margins of daily life, staying in the shadows beneath the eyes of the law. And yet, while it is certainly true that immigrants are constantly faced with mechanisms of surveillance that function as tools of societal exclusion, this only tells part of the story.&nbsp;</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691182285" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Engage and Evade: How Latino Immigrant Families Manage Surveillance in Everyday Life</em></a>&nbsp;(Princeton UP, 2023),&nbsp;Asad L. Asad show, many people with a sanctionable status cannot-and, in some cases, do not want to-evade surveilling institutions or the formal records they generate: evading the institutions that keep formal records is a luxury that most immigrants (especially those with children) cannot afford. In&nbsp;<em>Engage and Evade</em>, Asad uses a wealth of interviews and ethnographic observations collected in Dallas County, Texas, bolstered and contextualized by original analyses of national survey data, to explore whether, how, and why immigrants engage with surveilling institutions. Presenting the stories of immigrants living in mixed-status families in which at least two members of the household have different legal statuses, and focusing especially on the experiences of immigrant parents, Asad argues that engagement with such institutions stems as much from hope for societal inclusion as it does from fear of exclusion. By paying attention to the ways in which immigrants make sense of, pursue, and use the records that result from these engagements, Asad reveals a variety of ways these individuals reinforce or resist their sanctionable status through the state's own surveillance.</p><p><a href="https://kedinniene.my.canva.site/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Kendall Dinniene</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a PhD candidate in English at Southern Methodist University in Dallas, Texas. Their dissertation will examine how American fiction variously affirms, complicates, and resists dominant notions of fatness, and reveals how these notions are intertwined with and produce ideas about race, gender, sexuality, health, (dis)ability, criminality, and national identity. Their work relies upon queer theory, crip theory, Black feminism, and fat studies scholarship alongside literary criticism to argue that how we understand fatness is crucial to the way we understand (and make) our world.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 27 Aug 2023 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/asad-l-asad-engage-and-evade-how-latino-immigrant-families-manage-surveillance-in-everyday-life-princeton-up-2023-gxKflQKX</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because immigration is such a recurring-and divisive-topic in the United States, it is easy to assume that we understand what it means for an immigrant to live under the specter of surveillance and punishment. It is easy to assume, as many scholars and journalists do, that undocumented immigrants live on the run from the authorities, constantly fleeing to the margins of daily life, staying in the shadows beneath the eyes of the law. And yet, while it is certainly true that immigrants are constantly faced with mechanisms of surveillance that function as tools of societal exclusion, this only tells part of the story.&nbsp;</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780691182285" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Engage and Evade: How Latino Immigrant Families Manage Surveillance in Everyday Life</em></a>&nbsp;(Princeton UP, 2023),&nbsp;Asad L. Asad show, many people with a sanctionable status cannot-and, in some cases, do not want to-evade surveilling institutions or the formal records they generate: evading the institutions that keep formal records is a luxury that most immigrants (especially those with children) cannot afford. In&nbsp;<em>Engage and Evade</em>, Asad uses a wealth of interviews and ethnographic observations collected in Dallas County, Texas, bolstered and contextualized by original analyses of national survey data, to explore whether, how, and why immigrants engage with surveilling institutions. Presenting the stories of immigrants living in mixed-status families in which at least two members of the household have different legal statuses, and focusing especially on the experiences of immigrant parents, Asad argues that engagement with such institutions stems as much from hope for societal inclusion as it does from fear of exclusion. By paying attention to the ways in which immigrants make sense of, pursue, and use the records that result from these engagements, Asad reveals a variety of ways these individuals reinforce or resist their sanctionable status through the state's own surveillance.</p><p><a href="https://kedinniene.my.canva.site/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Kendall Dinniene</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a PhD candidate in English at Southern Methodist University in Dallas, Texas. Their dissertation will examine how American fiction variously affirms, complicates, and resists dominant notions of fatness, and reveals how these notions are intertwined with and produce ideas about race, gender, sexuality, health, (dis)ability, criminality, and national identity. Their work relies upon queer theory, crip theory, Black feminism, and fat studies scholarship alongside literary criticism to argue that how we understand fatness is crucial to the way we understand (and make) our world.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="70034155" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/c209bbc7-807d-48b7-9fce-762a4a9e81dc/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=c209bbc7-807d-48b7-9fce-762a4a9e81dc&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Asad L. Asad, &quot;Engage and Evade: How Latino Immigrant Families Manage Surveillance in Everyday Life&quot; (Princeton UP, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:12:56</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Because immigration is such a recurring-and divisive-topic in the United States, it is easy to assume that we understand what it means for an immigrant to live under the specter of surveillance and punishment. It is easy to assume, as many scholars and journalists do, that undocumented immigrants live on the run from the authorities, constantly fleeing to the margins of daily life, staying in the shadows beneath the eyes of the law. And yet, while it is certainly true that immigrants are constantly faced with mechanisms of surveillance that function as tools of societal exclusion, this only tells part of the story. 
In Engage and Evade: How Latino Immigrant Families Manage Surveillance in Everyday Life (Princeton UP, 2023), Asad L. Asad show, many people with a sanctionable status cannot-and, in some cases, do not want to-evade surveilling institutions or the formal records they generate: evading the institutions that keep formal records is a luxury that most immigrants (especially those with children) cannot afford. In Engage and Evade, Asad uses a wealth of interviews and ethnographic observations collected in Dallas County, Texas, bolstered and contextualized by original analyses of national survey data, to explore whether, how, and why immigrants engage with surveilling institutions. Presenting the stories of immigrants living in mixed-status families in which at least two members of the household have different legal statuses, and focusing especially on the experiences of immigrant parents, Asad argues that engagement with such institutions stems as much from hope for societal inclusion as it does from fear of exclusion. By paying attention to the ways in which immigrants make sense of, pursue, and use the records that result from these engagements, Asad reveals a variety of ways these individuals reinforce or resist their sanctionable status through the state&apos;s own surveillance.
Kendall Dinniene is a PhD candidate in English at Southern Methodist University in Dallas, Texas. Their dissertation will examine how American fiction variously affirms, complicates, and resists dominant notions of fatness, and reveals how these notions are intertwined with and produce ideas about race, gender, sexuality, health, (dis)ability, criminality, and national identity. Their work relies upon queer theory, crip theory, Black feminism, and fat studies scholarship alongside literary criticism to argue that how we understand fatness is crucial to the way we understand (and make) our world.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Because immigration is such a recurring-and divisive-topic in the United States, it is easy to assume that we understand what it means for an immigrant to live under the specter of surveillance and punishment. It is easy to assume, as many scholars and journalists do, that undocumented immigrants live on the run from the authorities, constantly fleeing to the margins of daily life, staying in the shadows beneath the eyes of the law. And yet, while it is certainly true that immigrants are constantly faced with mechanisms of surveillance that function as tools of societal exclusion, this only tells part of the story. 
In Engage and Evade: How Latino Immigrant Families Manage Surveillance in Everyday Life (Princeton UP, 2023), Asad L. Asad show, many people with a sanctionable status cannot-and, in some cases, do not want to-evade surveilling institutions or the formal records they generate: evading the institutions that keep formal records is a luxury that most immigrants (especially those with children) cannot afford. In Engage and Evade, Asad uses a wealth of interviews and ethnographic observations collected in Dallas County, Texas, bolstered and contextualized by original analyses of national survey data, to explore whether, how, and why immigrants engage with surveilling institutions. Presenting the stories of immigrants living in mixed-status families in which at least two members of the household have different legal statuses, and focusing especially on the experiences of immigrant parents, Asad argues that engagement with such institutions stems as much from hope for societal inclusion as it does from fear of exclusion. By paying attention to the ways in which immigrants make sense of, pursue, and use the records that result from these engagements, Asad reveals a variety of ways these individuals reinforce or resist their sanctionable status through the state&apos;s own surveillance.
Kendall Dinniene is a PhD candidate in English at Southern Methodist University in Dallas, Texas. Their dissertation will examine how American fiction variously affirms, complicates, and resists dominant notions of fatness, and reveals how these notions are intertwined with and produce ideas about race, gender, sexuality, health, (dis)ability, criminality, and national identity. Their work relies upon queer theory, crip theory, Black feminism, and fat studies scholarship alongside literary criticism to argue that how we understand fatness is crucial to the way we understand (and make) our world.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>307</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">0415ed5c-412f-11ee-b5be-fb20c6685f0f</guid>
      <title>Beverley Clough and Jonathan Herring, &quot;Disability, Care and Family Law&quot; (Routledge, 2021)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780367232085" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Disability, Care and Family Law</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Routledge 2021)&nbsp;examines the issues at the intersection of disability, care and family law. Professors Beverley Clough and Jonathan Herring&nbsp;challenge dominant narratives in family law, which disadvantage people with disabilities. The book enables the questioning of&nbsp;structural norms&nbsp;in policy and society which situates disability as private&nbsp;familial concern. It calls to the forefront marginalised voices to unveil complexities in seemingly neutral&nbsp;laws when&nbsp;applied to people with disabilities. The book engages with highly topical issues - for example, mothering a child who is in prison and is disabled, children who care for their disabled parents, deprivations of liberty of children with disabilities, and more. By bringing these complex issues together, the book&nbsp;moves beyond&nbsp;the dyad between care and disability relations in the context of family law. This is an important book for disability lawyers, family lawyers and scholars of vulnerability, care theory and relational theory. It will have significant implications for policy makers and practitioners.&nbsp;</p><p><a href="https://www.mmu.ac.uk/law/about-us/staff/profile/professor-beverley-clough" rel="noopener noreferrer">Professor Beverley Clough</a>&nbsp;is a Professor of Law and Social Justice at Manchester Metropolitan University. She is also the author of&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-spaces-of-mental-capacity-law#entry:151870@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Spaces of Mental Capacity Law: Moving Beyond Binaries</em></a><em>.</em></p><p>Professor Jonathan Herring is&nbsp;the&nbsp;DM Wolfe-Clarendon Fellow in Law, Exeter College, University of Oxford. He is the author of several monographs, including&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-right-to-be-protected-from-committing-suicide#entry:165106@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Right To Be Protected From Committing Suicide</em></a><em>.&nbsp;</em></p><p><em> </em><a href="https://twitter.com/janerichardshk?lang=en" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Jane Richards</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a doctoral student at the University of Hong Kong. You can find her on twitter where she follows all things related to human rights and Hong Kong politics @JaneRichardsHK﻿</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Aug 2023 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/beverley-clough-and-jonathan-herring-disability-care-and-family-law-routledge-2021-_mRu_TfA</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780367232085" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Disability, Care and Family Law</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Routledge 2021)&nbsp;examines the issues at the intersection of disability, care and family law. Professors Beverley Clough and Jonathan Herring&nbsp;challenge dominant narratives in family law, which disadvantage people with disabilities. The book enables the questioning of&nbsp;structural norms&nbsp;in policy and society which situates disability as private&nbsp;familial concern. It calls to the forefront marginalised voices to unveil complexities in seemingly neutral&nbsp;laws when&nbsp;applied to people with disabilities. The book engages with highly topical issues - for example, mothering a child who is in prison and is disabled, children who care for their disabled parents, deprivations of liberty of children with disabilities, and more. By bringing these complex issues together, the book&nbsp;moves beyond&nbsp;the dyad between care and disability relations in the context of family law. This is an important book for disability lawyers, family lawyers and scholars of vulnerability, care theory and relational theory. It will have significant implications for policy makers and practitioners.&nbsp;</p><p><a href="https://www.mmu.ac.uk/law/about-us/staff/profile/professor-beverley-clough" rel="noopener noreferrer">Professor Beverley Clough</a>&nbsp;is a Professor of Law and Social Justice at Manchester Metropolitan University. She is also the author of&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-spaces-of-mental-capacity-law#entry:151870@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Spaces of Mental Capacity Law: Moving Beyond Binaries</em></a><em>.</em></p><p>Professor Jonathan Herring is&nbsp;the&nbsp;DM Wolfe-Clarendon Fellow in Law, Exeter College, University of Oxford. He is the author of several monographs, including&nbsp;<a href="https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-right-to-be-protected-from-committing-suicide#entry:165106@1:url" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Right To Be Protected From Committing Suicide</em></a><em>.&nbsp;</em></p><p><em> </em><a href="https://twitter.com/janerichardshk?lang=en" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Jane Richards</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a doctoral student at the University of Hong Kong. You can find her on twitter where she follows all things related to human rights and Hong Kong politics @JaneRichardsHK﻿</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="64479837" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/82dd22d1-b3b9-4209-9891-229884bef805/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=82dd22d1-b3b9-4209-9891-229884bef805&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Beverley Clough and Jonathan Herring, &quot;Disability, Care and Family Law&quot; (Routledge, 2021)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:07:09</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Disability, Care and Family Law (Routledge 2021) examines the issues at the intersection of disability, care and family law. Professors Beverley Clough and Jonathan Herring challenge dominant narratives in family law, which disadvantage people with disabilities. The book enables the questioning of structural norms in policy and society which situates disability as private familial concern. It calls to the forefront marginalised voices to unveil complexities in seemingly neutral laws when applied to people with disabilities. The book engages with highly topical issues - for example, mothering a child who is in prison and is disabled, children who care for their disabled parents, deprivations of liberty of children with disabilities, and more. By bringing these complex issues together, the book moves beyond the dyad between care and disability relations in the context of family law. This is an important book for disability lawyers, family lawyers and scholars of vulnerability, care theory and relational theory. It will have significant implications for policy makers and practitioners. 
Professor Beverley Clough is a Professor of Law and Social Justice at Manchester Metropolitan University. She is also the author of The Spaces of Mental Capacity Law: Moving Beyond Binaries.
Professor Jonathan Herring is the DM Wolfe-Clarendon Fellow in Law, Exeter College, University of Oxford. He is the author of several monographs, including The Right To Be Protected From Committing Suicide. 
 Jane Richards is a doctoral student at the University of Hong Kong. You can find her on twitter where she follows all things related to human rights and Hong Kong politics @JaneRichardsHK﻿
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Disability, Care and Family Law (Routledge 2021) examines the issues at the intersection of disability, care and family law. Professors Beverley Clough and Jonathan Herring challenge dominant narratives in family law, which disadvantage people with disabilities. The book enables the questioning of structural norms in policy and society which situates disability as private familial concern. It calls to the forefront marginalised voices to unveil complexities in seemingly neutral laws when applied to people with disabilities. The book engages with highly topical issues - for example, mothering a child who is in prison and is disabled, children who care for their disabled parents, deprivations of liberty of children with disabilities, and more. By bringing these complex issues together, the book moves beyond the dyad between care and disability relations in the context of family law. This is an important book for disability lawyers, family lawyers and scholars of vulnerability, care theory and relational theory. It will have significant implications for policy makers and practitioners. 
Professor Beverley Clough is a Professor of Law and Social Justice at Manchester Metropolitan University. She is also the author of The Spaces of Mental Capacity Law: Moving Beyond Binaries.
Professor Jonathan Herring is the DM Wolfe-Clarendon Fellow in Law, Exeter College, University of Oxford. He is the author of several monographs, including The Right To Be Protected From Committing Suicide. 
 Jane Richards is a doctoral student at the University of Hong Kong. You can find her on twitter where she follows all things related to human rights and Hong Kong politics @JaneRichardsHK﻿
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>195</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">325efd8c-3e98-11ee-ac72-cbc78ba84418</guid>
      <title>Postscript: Guns, Violence, and the Law: How Federal Courts are Trying to Figure Out the Second Amendment</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Two blockbuster cases came down in June of 2022. The&nbsp;<em>Dobbs&nbsp;</em>decision overturned&nbsp;<em>Roe v. Wade&nbsp;</em>and&nbsp;<em>New York State Rifle &amp; Pistol Association v. Bruen</em>&nbsp;substantially expanded Second Amendment rights and limited the power of states to regulate concealed carry of firearms.&nbsp;<em>Bruen&nbsp;</em>affected thousands of Americans who have had their laws overturned and radically changed the method by which federal judges evaluate firearms law. Two remarkable scholars of the Second Amendment and firearms law explain how law makers, law enforcers, and federal courts have responded. They discuss differences among the conservative justices that produced this fragile holding, the growing dependence on history but disdain for historians, how the&nbsp;<em>Bruen&nbsp;</em>approach hurts laws involving domestic violence or controlled substances, the problem of overreading historical silences, and the ways violence may be addressed through community violence intervention, free markets, etc. – in ways SCOTUS cannot control.</p><p><a href="https://law.pepperdine.edu/faculty-research/jacob-charles/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Jacob Charles</a>&nbsp;is an Associate Professor of Law, Pepperdine Caruso School of Law – a constitutional law scholar focusing on the Second Amendment and firearms law. Before joining the faculty Pepperdine, he served as the inaugural executive director of the Center for Firearms Law at Duke University School of Law. He has a terrific new piece coming out in the Duke Law Journal called “<a href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4335545" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Dead Hand of a Silent Past: Bruen, Gun Rights, and the Shackles of History</a>.” Jake combines ambitious academic scholarship in law journals with public facing work for outlets such as the&nbsp;<em>Washington Post, Los Angeles Times, Slate, The Hill, Bloomberg Law</em>, and other outlets. Besides being a great friend to this podcast, he has been quoted in the&nbsp;<em>New York Times, CNN</em>, and&nbsp;<em>NPR</em>.</p><p><a href="https://www.stcl.edu/about-us/faculty/dru-stevenson/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dru Stevenson</a>&nbsp;is the Wayne Fischer Research Professor at South Texas College of Law Houston. Professor Stevenson joined the faculty in 2003 after a law career that included practicing as a Legal Aid lawyer in Connecticut and serving as an Assistant Attorney General for the State of Connecticut. His publications cover topics ranging from criminal law to civil procedure, with an emphasis on the intersection of law with economics and linguistic theory. His articles have been cited in leading academic journals and treatises, by federal and state appellate courts, and in recent briefs to the U.S. Supreme Court. Professor Stevenson’s current research focus is firearm law and policy. His&nbsp;<em>“</em><a href="https://scholarship.law.missouri.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4611&amp;context=mlr" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Revisiting the Original Congressional Debates About the Second Amendment</em></a><em>”&nbsp;</em>provides a missing analyses of the debates, situating each statement in Congress within the context of the speaker’s background and political stances on issues overlapping with the right to keep and bear arms.</p><p><a href="https://www.sju.edu/faculty/susan-liebell#_ga=2.125106634.1318472952.1578330950-502593983.1578330950" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Susan Liebell&nbsp;</em></a><em>is a Professor of Political Science at Saint Joseph’s University in Philadelphia.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2023 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/postscript-guns-violence-and-the-law-how-federal-courts-are-trying-to-figure-out-the-second-amendment-p7rNHgw4</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two blockbuster cases came down in June of 2022. The&nbsp;<em>Dobbs&nbsp;</em>decision overturned&nbsp;<em>Roe v. Wade&nbsp;</em>and&nbsp;<em>New York State Rifle &amp; Pistol Association v. Bruen</em>&nbsp;substantially expanded Second Amendment rights and limited the power of states to regulate concealed carry of firearms.&nbsp;<em>Bruen&nbsp;</em>affected thousands of Americans who have had their laws overturned and radically changed the method by which federal judges evaluate firearms law. Two remarkable scholars of the Second Amendment and firearms law explain how law makers, law enforcers, and federal courts have responded. They discuss differences among the conservative justices that produced this fragile holding, the growing dependence on history but disdain for historians, how the&nbsp;<em>Bruen&nbsp;</em>approach hurts laws involving domestic violence or controlled substances, the problem of overreading historical silences, and the ways violence may be addressed through community violence intervention, free markets, etc. – in ways SCOTUS cannot control.</p><p><a href="https://law.pepperdine.edu/faculty-research/jacob-charles/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Jacob Charles</a>&nbsp;is an Associate Professor of Law, Pepperdine Caruso School of Law – a constitutional law scholar focusing on the Second Amendment and firearms law. Before joining the faculty Pepperdine, he served as the inaugural executive director of the Center for Firearms Law at Duke University School of Law. He has a terrific new piece coming out in the Duke Law Journal called “<a href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4335545" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Dead Hand of a Silent Past: Bruen, Gun Rights, and the Shackles of History</a>.” Jake combines ambitious academic scholarship in law journals with public facing work for outlets such as the&nbsp;<em>Washington Post, Los Angeles Times, Slate, The Hill, Bloomberg Law</em>, and other outlets. Besides being a great friend to this podcast, he has been quoted in the&nbsp;<em>New York Times, CNN</em>, and&nbsp;<em>NPR</em>.</p><p><a href="https://www.stcl.edu/about-us/faculty/dru-stevenson/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dru Stevenson</a>&nbsp;is the Wayne Fischer Research Professor at South Texas College of Law Houston. Professor Stevenson joined the faculty in 2003 after a law career that included practicing as a Legal Aid lawyer in Connecticut and serving as an Assistant Attorney General for the State of Connecticut. His publications cover topics ranging from criminal law to civil procedure, with an emphasis on the intersection of law with economics and linguistic theory. His articles have been cited in leading academic journals and treatises, by federal and state appellate courts, and in recent briefs to the U.S. Supreme Court. Professor Stevenson’s current research focus is firearm law and policy. His&nbsp;<em>“</em><a href="https://scholarship.law.missouri.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4611&amp;context=mlr" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Revisiting the Original Congressional Debates About the Second Amendment</em></a><em>”&nbsp;</em>provides a missing analyses of the debates, situating each statement in Congress within the context of the speaker’s background and political stances on issues overlapping with the right to keep and bear arms.</p><p><a href="https://www.sju.edu/faculty/susan-liebell#_ga=2.125106634.1318472952.1578330950-502593983.1578330950" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Susan Liebell&nbsp;</em></a><em>is a Professor of Political Science at Saint Joseph’s University in Philadelphia.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="47714632" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/959ac655-0dd1-4afe-9561-665244d0da2a/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=959ac655-0dd1-4afe-9561-665244d0da2a&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Postscript: Guns, Violence, and the Law: How Federal Courts are Trying to Figure Out the Second Amendment</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:49:41</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Two blockbuster cases came down in June of 2022. The Dobbs decision overturned Roe v. Wade and New York State Rifle &amp; Pistol Association v. Bruen substantially expanded Second Amendment rights and limited the power of states to regulate concealed carry of firearms. Bruen affected thousands of Americans who have had their laws overturned and radically changed the method by which federal judges evaluate firearms law. Two remarkable scholars of the Second Amendment and firearms law explain how law makers, law enforcers, and federal courts have responded. They discuss differences among the conservative justices that produced this fragile holding, the growing dependence on history but disdain for historians, how the Bruen approach hurts laws involving domestic violence or controlled substances, the problem of overreading historical silences, and the ways violence may be addressed through community violence intervention, free markets, etc. – in ways SCOTUS cannot control.
Jacob Charles is an Associate Professor of Law, Pepperdine Caruso School of Law – a constitutional law scholar focusing on the Second Amendment and firearms law. Before joining the faculty Pepperdine, he served as the inaugural executive director of the Center for Firearms Law at Duke University School of Law. He has a terrific new piece coming out in the Duke Law Journal called “The Dead Hand of a Silent Past: Bruen, Gun Rights, and the Shackles of History.” Jake combines ambitious academic scholarship in law journals with public facing work for outlets such as the Washington Post, Los Angeles Times, Slate, The Hill, Bloomberg Law, and other outlets. Besides being a great friend to this podcast, he has been quoted in the New York Times, CNN, and NPR.
Dru Stevenson is the Wayne Fischer Research Professor at South Texas College of Law Houston. Professor Stevenson joined the faculty in 2003 after a law career that included practicing as a Legal Aid lawyer in Connecticut and serving as an Assistant Attorney General for the State of Connecticut. His publications cover topics ranging from criminal law to civil procedure, with an emphasis on the intersection of law with economics and linguistic theory. His articles have been cited in leading academic journals and treatises, by federal and state appellate courts, and in recent briefs to the U.S. Supreme Court. Professor Stevenson’s current research focus is firearm law and policy. His “Revisiting the Original Congressional Debates About the Second Amendment” provides a missing analyses of the debates, situating each statement in Congress within the context of the speaker’s background and political stances on issues overlapping with the right to keep and bear arms.
Susan Liebell is a Professor of Political Science at Saint Joseph’s University in Philadelphia.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Two blockbuster cases came down in June of 2022. The Dobbs decision overturned Roe v. Wade and New York State Rifle &amp; Pistol Association v. Bruen substantially expanded Second Amendment rights and limited the power of states to regulate concealed carry of firearms. Bruen affected thousands of Americans who have had their laws overturned and radically changed the method by which federal judges evaluate firearms law. Two remarkable scholars of the Second Amendment and firearms law explain how law makers, law enforcers, and federal courts have responded. They discuss differences among the conservative justices that produced this fragile holding, the growing dependence on history but disdain for historians, how the Bruen approach hurts laws involving domestic violence or controlled substances, the problem of overreading historical silences, and the ways violence may be addressed through community violence intervention, free markets, etc. – in ways SCOTUS cannot control.
Jacob Charles is an Associate Professor of Law, Pepperdine Caruso School of Law – a constitutional law scholar focusing on the Second Amendment and firearms law. Before joining the faculty Pepperdine, he served as the inaugural executive director of the Center for Firearms Law at Duke University School of Law. He has a terrific new piece coming out in the Duke Law Journal called “The Dead Hand of a Silent Past: Bruen, Gun Rights, and the Shackles of History.” Jake combines ambitious academic scholarship in law journals with public facing work for outlets such as the Washington Post, Los Angeles Times, Slate, The Hill, Bloomberg Law, and other outlets. Besides being a great friend to this podcast, he has been quoted in the New York Times, CNN, and NPR.
Dru Stevenson is the Wayne Fischer Research Professor at South Texas College of Law Houston. Professor Stevenson joined the faculty in 2003 after a law career that included practicing as a Legal Aid lawyer in Connecticut and serving as an Assistant Attorney General for the State of Connecticut. His publications cover topics ranging from criminal law to civil procedure, with an emphasis on the intersection of law with economics and linguistic theory. His articles have been cited in leading academic journals and treatises, by federal and state appellate courts, and in recent briefs to the U.S. Supreme Court. Professor Stevenson’s current research focus is firearm law and policy. His “Revisiting the Original Congressional Debates About the Second Amendment” provides a missing analyses of the debates, situating each statement in Congress within the context of the speaker’s background and political stances on issues overlapping with the right to keep and bear arms.
Susan Liebell is a Professor of Political Science at Saint Joseph’s University in Philadelphia.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>20</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ee530f5a-3e94-11ee-9cad-2776ed310762</guid>
      <title>Morgan L. W. Hazelton et al., &quot;The Elevator Effect: Contact and Collegiality in the American Judiciary&quot; (Oxford UP, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Does it matter if judges are nice to each other?&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197625408" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Elevator Effect: Contact and Collegiality in the American Judiciary</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Oxford UP, 2023)argues that&nbsp;<em>how</em>&nbsp;judges interact with each other has an important effect at every stage of their judicial process. Previously, scholars have explained judicial behavior in terms of the law, the ideological attitudes of the judges, external and internal constraints, and the background characteristics of the judges, such as gender, race, or prior professional experiences. The&nbsp;<em>Elevator Effect</em>&nbsp;builds on previous research in political science, political psychology, and linguistics to present the first comprehensive examination of the importance of interpersonal relationships among the judges for judicial decision-making and legal development. Hazelton, Hinkle, and Nelson argue that collegiality affects nearly every aspect of judicial behavior. More frequent interpersonal contact among judges diminishes the role of ideology to the point where it is both “substantively and statistically imperceptible.” The book also shows that collegiality affects both the language judges use when they disagree with each other and the precedents that they choose to support their arguments. The podcast covers the rich findings of the book – and also provides some interesting insights for graduate students who are thinking about collaborative research</p><ul>
<li>Dr.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.morganhazelton.org/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Morgan L.W. Hazelton</a>, J.D. and Ph.D., is an associate professor in the Department of Political Science and School of Law (by courtesy) at Saint Louis University. She studies how features of court systems influence the decisions that both litigants and judges make.</li>
<li>Dr.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.rachaelkhinkle.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Rachael K. Hinkle</a>, J.D. and Ph.D., is an associate professor in the Department of Political Science at the University at Buffalo. Her research agenda focuses on judicial politics with particular attention to gleaning insights into legal development from the content of judicial opinions through the use of computational text analytic techniques.</li>
<li>
<a href="http://mjnelson.org/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. Michael J. Nelson</a>, PhD, is a professor of Political Science at Penn State University. Michael Nelson is Professor of Political Science at Penn State University. He studies judicial politics, especially public attitudes toward law and courts, judicial behavior, and the politics of court reform.</li>
</ul><p><br></p><p><a href="https://www.sju.edu/faculty/susan-liebell#_ga=2.125106634.1318472952.1578330950-502593983.1578330950" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Susan Liebell&nbsp;</em></a><em>is a Professor of Political Science at Saint Joseph’s University in Philadelphia.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2023 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/morgan-l-w-hazelton-et-al-the-elevator-effect-contact-and-collegiality-in-the-american-judiciary-oxford-up-2023-HnkmPj6N</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does it matter if judges are nice to each other?&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780197625408" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Elevator Effect: Contact and Collegiality in the American Judiciary</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Oxford UP, 2023)argues that&nbsp;<em>how</em>&nbsp;judges interact with each other has an important effect at every stage of their judicial process. Previously, scholars have explained judicial behavior in terms of the law, the ideological attitudes of the judges, external and internal constraints, and the background characteristics of the judges, such as gender, race, or prior professional experiences. The&nbsp;<em>Elevator Effect</em>&nbsp;builds on previous research in political science, political psychology, and linguistics to present the first comprehensive examination of the importance of interpersonal relationships among the judges for judicial decision-making and legal development. Hazelton, Hinkle, and Nelson argue that collegiality affects nearly every aspect of judicial behavior. More frequent interpersonal contact among judges diminishes the role of ideology to the point where it is both “substantively and statistically imperceptible.” The book also shows that collegiality affects both the language judges use when they disagree with each other and the precedents that they choose to support their arguments. The podcast covers the rich findings of the book – and also provides some interesting insights for graduate students who are thinking about collaborative research</p><ul>
<li>Dr.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.morganhazelton.org/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Morgan L.W. Hazelton</a>, J.D. and Ph.D., is an associate professor in the Department of Political Science and School of Law (by courtesy) at Saint Louis University. She studies how features of court systems influence the decisions that both litigants and judges make.</li>
<li>Dr.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.rachaelkhinkle.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Rachael K. Hinkle</a>, J.D. and Ph.D., is an associate professor in the Department of Political Science at the University at Buffalo. Her research agenda focuses on judicial politics with particular attention to gleaning insights into legal development from the content of judicial opinions through the use of computational text analytic techniques.</li>
<li>
<a href="http://mjnelson.org/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr. Michael J. Nelson</a>, PhD, is a professor of Political Science at Penn State University. Michael Nelson is Professor of Political Science at Penn State University. He studies judicial politics, especially public attitudes toward law and courts, judicial behavior, and the politics of court reform.</li>
</ul><p><br></p><p><a href="https://www.sju.edu/faculty/susan-liebell#_ga=2.125106634.1318472952.1578330950-502593983.1578330950" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Susan Liebell&nbsp;</em></a><em>is a Professor of Political Science at Saint Joseph’s University in Philadelphia.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="52179140" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/dd72fa01-9d85-432f-982c-3213b822a412/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=dd72fa01-9d85-432f-982c-3213b822a412&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Morgan L. W. Hazelton et al., &quot;The Elevator Effect: Contact and Collegiality in the American Judiciary&quot; (Oxford UP, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:54:20</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Does it matter if judges are nice to each other? The Elevator Effect: Contact and Collegiality in the American Judiciary (Oxford UP, 2023)argues that how judges interact with each other has an important effect at every stage of their judicial process. Previously, scholars have explained judicial behavior in terms of the law, the ideological attitudes of the judges, external and internal constraints, and the background characteristics of the judges, such as gender, race, or prior professional experiences. The Elevator Effect builds on previous research in political science, political psychology, and linguistics to present the first comprehensive examination of the importance of interpersonal relationships among the judges for judicial decision-making and legal development. Hazelton, Hinkle, and Nelson argue that collegiality affects nearly every aspect of judicial behavior. More frequent interpersonal contact among judges diminishes the role of ideology to the point where it is both “substantively and statistically imperceptible.” The book also shows that collegiality affects both the language judges use when they disagree with each other and the precedents that they choose to support their arguments. The podcast covers the rich findings of the book – and also provides some interesting insights for graduate students who are thinking about collaborative research
Dr. Morgan L.W. Hazelton, J.D. and Ph.D., is an associate professor in the Department of Political Science and School of Law (by courtesy) at Saint Louis University. She studies how features of court systems influence the decisions that both litigants and judges make.
Dr. Rachael K. Hinkle, J.D. and Ph.D., is an associate professor in the Department of Political Science at the University at Buffalo. Her research agenda focuses on judicial politics with particular attention to gleaning insights into legal development from the content of judicial opinions through the use of computational text analytic techniques.
Dr. Michael J. Nelson, PhD, is a professor of Political Science at Penn State University. Michael Nelson is Professor of Political Science at Penn State University. He studies judicial politics, especially public attitudes toward law and courts, judicial behavior, and the politics of court reform.
Susan Liebell is a Professor of Political Science at Saint Joseph’s University in Philadelphia.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Does it matter if judges are nice to each other? The Elevator Effect: Contact and Collegiality in the American Judiciary (Oxford UP, 2023)argues that how judges interact with each other has an important effect at every stage of their judicial process. Previously, scholars have explained judicial behavior in terms of the law, the ideological attitudes of the judges, external and internal constraints, and the background characteristics of the judges, such as gender, race, or prior professional experiences. The Elevator Effect builds on previous research in political science, political psychology, and linguistics to present the first comprehensive examination of the importance of interpersonal relationships among the judges for judicial decision-making and legal development. Hazelton, Hinkle, and Nelson argue that collegiality affects nearly every aspect of judicial behavior. More frequent interpersonal contact among judges diminishes the role of ideology to the point where it is both “substantively and statistically imperceptible.” The book also shows that collegiality affects both the language judges use when they disagree with each other and the precedents that they choose to support their arguments. The podcast covers the rich findings of the book – and also provides some interesting insights for graduate students who are thinking about collaborative research
Dr. Morgan L.W. Hazelton, J.D. and Ph.D., is an associate professor in the Department of Political Science and School of Law (by courtesy) at Saint Louis University. She studies how features of court systems influence the decisions that both litigants and judges make.
Dr. Rachael K. Hinkle, J.D. and Ph.D., is an associate professor in the Department of Political Science at the University at Buffalo. Her research agenda focuses on judicial politics with particular attention to gleaning insights into legal development from the content of judicial opinions through the use of computational text analytic techniques.
Dr. Michael J. Nelson, PhD, is a professor of Political Science at Penn State University. Michael Nelson is Professor of Political Science at Penn State University. He studies judicial politics, especially public attitudes toward law and courts, judicial behavior, and the politics of court reform.
Susan Liebell is a Professor of Political Science at Saint Joseph’s University in Philadelphia.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>1172</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">7829c8ba-3f6f-11ee-8924-bf678442124d</guid>
      <title>Liran Einav and Amy Finkelstein, &quot;We&apos;ve Got You Covered: Rebooting American Health Care&quot; (Penguin, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Few of us need convincing that the American health insurance system needs reform. But many of the existing proposals focus on expanding one relatively successful piece of the system or building in piecemeal additions. These proposals miss the point.</p><p>As the Stanford health economist Liran Einav and the MIT economist and MacArthur Genius Amy Finkelstein argue, our health care system was never deliberately designed, but rather pieced together to deal with issues as they became politically relevant. The result is a sprawling yet arbitrary and inadequate mess. It has left 30 million Americans without formal insurance. Many of the rest live in constant danger of losing their coverage if they lose their job, give birth, get older, get healthier, get richer, or move.</p><p>It's time to tear it all down and rebuild, sensibly and deliberately. Marshaling original research, striking insights from American history, and comparative analysis of what works and what doesn’t from systems around the world, Einav and Finkelstein argue for automatic, basic, and free universal coverage for everyone, along with the option to buy additional, supplemental coverage. Their wholly original argument and comprehensive blueprint for an American universal health insurance system will surprise and provoke.</p><p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780593421239" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>We've Got You Covered: Rebooting American Health Care</em></a>&nbsp;(Penguin, 2023)&nbsp;is an erudite yet lively and accessible prescription we cannot afford to ignore.</p><p><em>John Emrich has worked for decades years in corporate finance, business valuation and fund management. He has a podcast about the investment space called&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.ktdpod.com/podcasts" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Kick the Dogma</em></a><em>.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2023 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/liran-einav-and-amy-finkelstein-we-ve-got-you-covered-rebooting-american-health-care-penguin-2023-tg3oZzJ_</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Few of us need convincing that the American health insurance system needs reform. But many of the existing proposals focus on expanding one relatively successful piece of the system or building in piecemeal additions. These proposals miss the point.</p><p>As the Stanford health economist Liran Einav and the MIT economist and MacArthur Genius Amy Finkelstein argue, our health care system was never deliberately designed, but rather pieced together to deal with issues as they became politically relevant. The result is a sprawling yet arbitrary and inadequate mess. It has left 30 million Americans without formal insurance. Many of the rest live in constant danger of losing their coverage if they lose their job, give birth, get older, get healthier, get richer, or move.</p><p>It's time to tear it all down and rebuild, sensibly and deliberately. Marshaling original research, striking insights from American history, and comparative analysis of what works and what doesn’t from systems around the world, Einav and Finkelstein argue for automatic, basic, and free universal coverage for everyone, along with the option to buy additional, supplemental coverage. Their wholly original argument and comprehensive blueprint for an American universal health insurance system will surprise and provoke.</p><p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780593421239" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>We've Got You Covered: Rebooting American Health Care</em></a>&nbsp;(Penguin, 2023)&nbsp;is an erudite yet lively and accessible prescription we cannot afford to ignore.</p><p><em>John Emrich has worked for decades years in corporate finance, business valuation and fund management. He has a podcast about the investment space called&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.ktdpod.com/podcasts" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Kick the Dogma</em></a><em>.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="54117358" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/c396343d-4f1c-4538-9357-bf0fbe7f3457/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=c396343d-4f1c-4538-9357-bf0fbe7f3457&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Liran Einav and Amy Finkelstein, &quot;We&apos;ve Got You Covered: Rebooting American Health Care&quot; (Penguin, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:56:22</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Few of us need convincing that the American health insurance system needs reform. But many of the existing proposals focus on expanding one relatively successful piece of the system or building in piecemeal additions. These proposals miss the point.
As the Stanford health economist Liran Einav and the MIT economist and MacArthur Genius Amy Finkelstein argue, our health care system was never deliberately designed, but rather pieced together to deal with issues as they became politically relevant. The result is a sprawling yet arbitrary and inadequate mess. It has left 30 million Americans without formal insurance. Many of the rest live in constant danger of losing their coverage if they lose their job, give birth, get older, get healthier, get richer, or move.
It&apos;s time to tear it all down and rebuild, sensibly and deliberately. Marshaling original research, striking insights from American history, and comparative analysis of what works and what doesn’t from systems around the world, Einav and Finkelstein argue for automatic, basic, and free universal coverage for everyone, along with the option to buy additional, supplemental coverage. Their wholly original argument and comprehensive blueprint for an American universal health insurance system will surprise and provoke.
We&apos;ve Got You Covered: Rebooting American Health Care (Penguin, 2023) is an erudite yet lively and accessible prescription we cannot afford to ignore.
John Emrich has worked for decades years in corporate finance, business valuation and fund management. He has a podcast about the investment space called Kick the Dogma.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Few of us need convincing that the American health insurance system needs reform. But many of the existing proposals focus on expanding one relatively successful piece of the system or building in piecemeal additions. These proposals miss the point.
As the Stanford health economist Liran Einav and the MIT economist and MacArthur Genius Amy Finkelstein argue, our health care system was never deliberately designed, but rather pieced together to deal with issues as they became politically relevant. The result is a sprawling yet arbitrary and inadequate mess. It has left 30 million Americans without formal insurance. Many of the rest live in constant danger of losing their coverage if they lose their job, give birth, get older, get healthier, get richer, or move.
It&apos;s time to tear it all down and rebuild, sensibly and deliberately. Marshaling original research, striking insights from American history, and comparative analysis of what works and what doesn’t from systems around the world, Einav and Finkelstein argue for automatic, basic, and free universal coverage for everyone, along with the option to buy additional, supplemental coverage. Their wholly original argument and comprehensive blueprint for an American universal health insurance system will surprise and provoke.
We&apos;ve Got You Covered: Rebooting American Health Care (Penguin, 2023) is an erudite yet lively and accessible prescription we cannot afford to ignore.
John Emrich has worked for decades years in corporate finance, business valuation and fund management. He has a podcast about the investment space called Kick the Dogma.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>159</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2aed17a6-3e9c-11ee-a40b-6b27097ba653</guid>
      <title>Becoming Justice Thomas</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>On today’s podcast, we are changing things up a bit. Instead of interviewing the author of a recent book, I am interviewing another podcaster about their recent narrative podcast season. So, today, I’m interviewing&nbsp;<a href="https://slate.com/author/joel-anderson" rel="noopener noreferrer">Joel Anderson</a>, staff writer at Slate, co-host of&nbsp;<a href="https://slate.com/podcasts/hang-up-and-listen" rel="noopener noreferrer">Hang Up and Listen</a>, and the host of Seasons 3, 6, and, most recently, 8 of Slow Burn. On this episode, I chop it up with Joel about Season 8 of Slow Burn, titled,&nbsp;<a href="https://slate.com/podcasts/slow-burn/s8/becoming-justice-thomas" rel="noopener noreferrer">Becoming Justice Thomas</a>.&nbsp;</p><p><em>﻿</em><a href="https://history.rutgers.edu/people/graduate-students/grad-student/1155-mcneil-adam" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Adam McNeil</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a Ph.D. Candidate in History at Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 20 Aug 2023 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/becoming-justice-thomas-9WyYiWdk</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On today’s podcast, we are changing things up a bit. Instead of interviewing the author of a recent book, I am interviewing another podcaster about their recent narrative podcast season. So, today, I’m interviewing&nbsp;<a href="https://slate.com/author/joel-anderson" rel="noopener noreferrer">Joel Anderson</a>, staff writer at Slate, co-host of&nbsp;<a href="https://slate.com/podcasts/hang-up-and-listen" rel="noopener noreferrer">Hang Up and Listen</a>, and the host of Seasons 3, 6, and, most recently, 8 of Slow Burn. On this episode, I chop it up with Joel about Season 8 of Slow Burn, titled,&nbsp;<a href="https://slate.com/podcasts/slow-burn/s8/becoming-justice-thomas" rel="noopener noreferrer">Becoming Justice Thomas</a>.&nbsp;</p><p><em>﻿</em><a href="https://history.rutgers.edu/people/graduate-students/grad-student/1155-mcneil-adam" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Adam McNeil</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a Ph.D. Candidate in History at Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="54728321" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/bdeebe51-714b-4e0f-97c9-7c6d9a65e810/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=bdeebe51-714b-4e0f-97c9-7c6d9a65e810&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Becoming Justice Thomas</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:57:00</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>On today’s podcast, we are changing things up a bit. Instead of interviewing the author of a recent book, I am interviewing another podcaster about their recent narrative podcast season. So, today, I’m interviewing Joel Anderson, staff writer at Slate, co-host of Hang Up and Listen, and the host of Seasons 3, 6, and, most recently, 8 of Slow Burn. On this episode, I chop it up with Joel about Season 8 of Slow Burn, titled, Becoming Justice Thomas. 
﻿Adam McNeil is a Ph.D. Candidate in History at Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>On today’s podcast, we are changing things up a bit. Instead of interviewing the author of a recent book, I am interviewing another podcaster about their recent narrative podcast season. So, today, I’m interviewing Joel Anderson, staff writer at Slate, co-host of Hang Up and Listen, and the host of Seasons 3, 6, and, most recently, 8 of Slow Burn. On this episode, I chop it up with Joel about Season 8 of Slow Burn, titled, Becoming Justice Thomas. 
﻿Adam McNeil is a Ph.D. Candidate in History at Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>393</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">c4f16c0a-3bac-11ee-af34-3ffc8ca01fb4</guid>
      <title>Scott Skinner-Thompson, &quot;Privacy at the Margins&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2021)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Limited legal protections for privacy leave minority communities vulnerable to concrete injuries and violence when their information is exposed. In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781316632635" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Privacy at the Margins</em></a>&nbsp;(Cambridge UP, 2021), Scott Skinner-Thompson highlights why privacy is of acute importance for marginalized groups. He explains how privacy can serve as a form of expressive resistance to government and corporate surveillance regimes - furthering equality goals - and demonstrates why efforts undertaken by vulnerable groups (queer folks, women, and racial and religious minorities) to protect their privacy should be entitled to constitutional protection under the First Amendment and related equality provisions. By examining the ways even limited privacy can enrich and enhance our lives at the margins in material ways, this work shows how privacy can be transformed from a liberal affectation to a legal tool of liberation from oppression.</p><p><em>﻿Jake Chanenson, CS Ph.D. at UChicago</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2023 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/scott-skinner-thompson-privacy-at-the-margins-cambridge-up-2021-VwnxP12h</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Limited legal protections for privacy leave minority communities vulnerable to concrete injuries and violence when their information is exposed. In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781316632635" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Privacy at the Margins</em></a>&nbsp;(Cambridge UP, 2021), Scott Skinner-Thompson highlights why privacy is of acute importance for marginalized groups. He explains how privacy can serve as a form of expressive resistance to government and corporate surveillance regimes - furthering equality goals - and demonstrates why efforts undertaken by vulnerable groups (queer folks, women, and racial and religious minorities) to protect their privacy should be entitled to constitutional protection under the First Amendment and related equality provisions. By examining the ways even limited privacy can enrich and enhance our lives at the margins in material ways, this work shows how privacy can be transformed from a liberal affectation to a legal tool of liberation from oppression.</p><p><em>﻿Jake Chanenson, CS Ph.D. at UChicago</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="21210682" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/76a9530c-7c91-456a-a6d6-a0fb06a63f5d/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=76a9530c-7c91-456a-a6d6-a0fb06a63f5d&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Scott Skinner-Thompson, &quot;Privacy at the Margins&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2021)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:22:05</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Limited legal protections for privacy leave minority communities vulnerable to concrete injuries and violence when their information is exposed. In Privacy at the Margins (Cambridge UP, 2021), Scott Skinner-Thompson highlights why privacy is of acute importance for marginalized groups. He explains how privacy can serve as a form of expressive resistance to government and corporate surveillance regimes - furthering equality goals - and demonstrates why efforts undertaken by vulnerable groups (queer folks, women, and racial and religious minorities) to protect their privacy should be entitled to constitutional protection under the First Amendment and related equality provisions. By examining the ways even limited privacy can enrich and enhance our lives at the margins in material ways, this work shows how privacy can be transformed from a liberal affectation to a legal tool of liberation from oppression.
﻿Jake Chanenson, CS Ph.D. at UChicago
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Limited legal protections for privacy leave minority communities vulnerable to concrete injuries and violence when their information is exposed. In Privacy at the Margins (Cambridge UP, 2021), Scott Skinner-Thompson highlights why privacy is of acute importance for marginalized groups. He explains how privacy can serve as a form of expressive resistance to government and corporate surveillance regimes - furthering equality goals - and demonstrates why efforts undertaken by vulnerable groups (queer folks, women, and racial and religious minorities) to protect their privacy should be entitled to constitutional protection under the First Amendment and related equality provisions. By examining the ways even limited privacy can enrich and enhance our lives at the margins in material ways, this work shows how privacy can be transformed from a liberal affectation to a legal tool of liberation from oppression.
﻿Jake Chanenson, CS Ph.D. at UChicago
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>352</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4ea26032-3b88-11ee-b8ed-cb5c1e24a586</guid>
      <title>Lauren S. Foley, &quot;On the Basis of Race: How Higher Education Navigates Affirmative Action Policies&quot; (NYU Press, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Diversity in higher education is under attack as the Supreme Court limits the use of&nbsp;race-conscious admissions practices at American colleges and universities. In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781479821662" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>On the Basis of Race: How Higher Education Navigates Affirmative Action Policies</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(NYU Press, 2023), Lauren S. Foley sheds light on our current crisis, exploring the past, present, and future of this contentious policy. From Brown v. Board of Education in the mid-twentieth century to the current Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard and University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, Foley explores how organizations have resisted and complied with public policies regarding race. She examines how admissions officers, who have played an important role in the long fight to protect racial diversity in higher education, work around the law to maintain diversity after affirmative action is banned.&nbsp;</p><p>Foley takes us behind the curtain of student admissions, shedding light on how multiple universities, including the University of Michigan, have creatively responded to affirmative action bans.&nbsp;<em>On the Basis of Race</em>&nbsp;traces the history of a controversial idea and policy, and provides insight into its uncertain future.</p><p><em>﻿</em><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/stephenpimpare/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Stephen Pimpare</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a Senior Fellow at the Carsey School of Public Policy at the University of New Hampshire.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2023 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/lauren-s-foley-on-the-basis-of-race-how-higher-education-navigates-affirmative-action-policies-nyu-press-2023-36P6ksvR</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Diversity in higher education is under attack as the Supreme Court limits the use of&nbsp;race-conscious admissions practices at American colleges and universities. In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781479821662" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>On the Basis of Race: How Higher Education Navigates Affirmative Action Policies</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(NYU Press, 2023), Lauren S. Foley sheds light on our current crisis, exploring the past, present, and future of this contentious policy. From Brown v. Board of Education in the mid-twentieth century to the current Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard and University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, Foley explores how organizations have resisted and complied with public policies regarding race. She examines how admissions officers, who have played an important role in the long fight to protect racial diversity in higher education, work around the law to maintain diversity after affirmative action is banned.&nbsp;</p><p>Foley takes us behind the curtain of student admissions, shedding light on how multiple universities, including the University of Michigan, have creatively responded to affirmative action bans.&nbsp;<em>On the Basis of Race</em>&nbsp;traces the history of a controversial idea and policy, and provides insight into its uncertain future.</p><p><em>﻿</em><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/stephenpimpare/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Stephen Pimpare</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a Senior Fellow at the Carsey School of Public Policy at the University of New Hampshire.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="33954302" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/84602716-aea2-4b97-bb9f-c259ca0f4ed5/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=84602716-aea2-4b97-bb9f-c259ca0f4ed5&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Lauren S. Foley, &quot;On the Basis of Race: How Higher Education Navigates Affirmative Action Policies&quot; (NYU Press, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:35:22</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Diversity in higher education is under attack as the Supreme Court limits the use of race-conscious admissions practices at American colleges and universities. In On the Basis of Race: How Higher Education Navigates Affirmative Action Policies (NYU Press, 2023), Lauren S. Foley sheds light on our current crisis, exploring the past, present, and future of this contentious policy. From Brown v. Board of Education in the mid-twentieth century to the current Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard and University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, Foley explores how organizations have resisted and complied with public policies regarding race. She examines how admissions officers, who have played an important role in the long fight to protect racial diversity in higher education, work around the law to maintain diversity after affirmative action is banned. 
Foley takes us behind the curtain of student admissions, shedding light on how multiple universities, including the University of Michigan, have creatively responded to affirmative action bans. On the Basis of Race traces the history of a controversial idea and policy, and provides insight into its uncertain future.
﻿Stephen Pimpare is a Senior Fellow at the Carsey School of Public Policy at the University of New Hampshire.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Diversity in higher education is under attack as the Supreme Court limits the use of race-conscious admissions practices at American colleges and universities. In On the Basis of Race: How Higher Education Navigates Affirmative Action Policies (NYU Press, 2023), Lauren S. Foley sheds light on our current crisis, exploring the past, present, and future of this contentious policy. From Brown v. Board of Education in the mid-twentieth century to the current Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard and University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, Foley explores how organizations have resisted and complied with public policies regarding race. She examines how admissions officers, who have played an important role in the long fight to protect racial diversity in higher education, work around the law to maintain diversity after affirmative action is banned. 
Foley takes us behind the curtain of student admissions, shedding light on how multiple universities, including the University of Michigan, have creatively responded to affirmative action bans. On the Basis of Race traces the history of a controversial idea and policy, and provides insight into its uncertain future.
﻿Stephen Pimpare is a Senior Fellow at the Carsey School of Public Policy at the University of New Hampshire.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>158</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">88cd229e-3ab9-11ee-87e5-938380235a71</guid>
      <title>Benjamin Y. Fong, &quot;Quick Fixes: Drugs in America from Prohibition to the 21st Century Binge&quot; (Verso, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Benjamin Y. Fong is author of the new book&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781804290170" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Quick Fixes: Drugs in America from Prohibition to the 21st Century Binge</em></a>, which was just released in July, 2023 by Verso Books. Ben is an honors faculty fellow and associate director of the Center for Work &amp; Democracy at Arizona State University, and his work has appeared in&nbsp;<em>Jacobin, Catalyst,&nbsp;</em>and the<em>&nbsp;New York Times</em>. Previously, Ben’s work focused on the (usually negative) effects of neoliberal capitalism, writing about&nbsp;<a href="https://catalyst-journal.com/2021/05/ngoism-the-politics-of-the-third-sector" rel="noopener noreferrer">NGOs</a>,&nbsp;<a href="https://jacobin.com/2023/03/john-brophy-cio-john-lewis-labor-leader-history-socialism" rel="noopener noreferrer">labor leaders</a>, and&nbsp;<a href="https://jacobin.com/2020/04/economic-recovery-coronavirus-crisis-health-care" rel="noopener noreferrer">health care</a>.&nbsp;<em>Quick Fixes</em>&nbsp;expands this examination into the world of drugs, examining nine different kinds of intoxicants, and five “orienting claims” that place their use within in larger capitalist histories.</p><p>A bit about the book...</p><p>Americans are in the midst of a world-historic drug binge. Opiates, amphetamines, benzodiazepines, marijuana, antidepressants, antipsychotics--across the board, consumption has shot up in the 21st century. At the same time, the United States is home to the largest prison system in the world, justified in part by a now zombified "war" on drugs. How did we get here?</p><p><em>Quick Fixes&nbsp;</em>is a look at American society through the lens of its pharmacological crutches. Though particularly acute in recent decades, the contradiction between America's passionate love and intense hatred for drugs has been one of its defining characteristics for over a century.</p><p>Through nine chapters, each devoted to the modern history of a drug or class of drugs, Fong examines Americans' fraught relationship with psychoactive substances. As society changes it produces different forms of stress, isolation, and alienation. These changes, in turn, shape the sorts of drugs society chooses.</p><p>By laying out the histories, functions, and experiences of our chemical comforts, the hope is to help answer that ever perplexing question: what does it mean to be an American?</p><p><a href="http://www.emilydufton.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Emily Dufton</em></a><em>&nbsp;is the author of&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.basicbooks.com/titles/emily-dufton/grass-roots/9780465096169/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Grass Roots: The Rise and Fall and Rise of Marijuana in America</em></a><em>&nbsp;(Basic Books, 2017). A drug historian and writer, her second book, on the development of the opioid addiction medication industry, is under contract with the University of Chicago Press.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Aug 2023 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/benjamin-y-fong-quick-fixes-drugs-in-america-from-prohibition-to-the-21st-century-binge-verso-2023-Y_PgMyeu</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Benjamin Y. Fong is author of the new book&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781804290170" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Quick Fixes: Drugs in America from Prohibition to the 21st Century Binge</em></a>, which was just released in July, 2023 by Verso Books. Ben is an honors faculty fellow and associate director of the Center for Work &amp; Democracy at Arizona State University, and his work has appeared in&nbsp;<em>Jacobin, Catalyst,&nbsp;</em>and the<em>&nbsp;New York Times</em>. Previously, Ben’s work focused on the (usually negative) effects of neoliberal capitalism, writing about&nbsp;<a href="https://catalyst-journal.com/2021/05/ngoism-the-politics-of-the-third-sector" rel="noopener noreferrer">NGOs</a>,&nbsp;<a href="https://jacobin.com/2023/03/john-brophy-cio-john-lewis-labor-leader-history-socialism" rel="noopener noreferrer">labor leaders</a>, and&nbsp;<a href="https://jacobin.com/2020/04/economic-recovery-coronavirus-crisis-health-care" rel="noopener noreferrer">health care</a>.&nbsp;<em>Quick Fixes</em>&nbsp;expands this examination into the world of drugs, examining nine different kinds of intoxicants, and five “orienting claims” that place their use within in larger capitalist histories.</p><p>A bit about the book...</p><p>Americans are in the midst of a world-historic drug binge. Opiates, amphetamines, benzodiazepines, marijuana, antidepressants, antipsychotics--across the board, consumption has shot up in the 21st century. At the same time, the United States is home to the largest prison system in the world, justified in part by a now zombified "war" on drugs. How did we get here?</p><p><em>Quick Fixes&nbsp;</em>is a look at American society through the lens of its pharmacological crutches. Though particularly acute in recent decades, the contradiction between America's passionate love and intense hatred for drugs has been one of its defining characteristics for over a century.</p><p>Through nine chapters, each devoted to the modern history of a drug or class of drugs, Fong examines Americans' fraught relationship with psychoactive substances. As society changes it produces different forms of stress, isolation, and alienation. These changes, in turn, shape the sorts of drugs society chooses.</p><p>By laying out the histories, functions, and experiences of our chemical comforts, the hope is to help answer that ever perplexing question: what does it mean to be an American?</p><p><a href="http://www.emilydufton.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Emily Dufton</em></a><em>&nbsp;is the author of&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.basicbooks.com/titles/emily-dufton/grass-roots/9780465096169/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Grass Roots: The Rise and Fall and Rise of Marijuana in America</em></a><em>&nbsp;(Basic Books, 2017). A drug historian and writer, her second book, on the development of the opioid addiction medication industry, is under contract with the University of Chicago Press.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="40694760" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/c798864f-e20d-4657-bafd-8a584badc996/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=c798864f-e20d-4657-bafd-8a584badc996&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Benjamin Y. Fong, &quot;Quick Fixes: Drugs in America from Prohibition to the 21st Century Binge&quot; (Verso, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:42:23</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Benjamin Y. Fong is author of the new book Quick Fixes: Drugs in America from Prohibition to the 21st Century Binge, which was just released in July, 2023 by Verso Books. Ben is an honors faculty fellow and associate director of the Center for Work &amp; Democracy at Arizona State University, and his work has appeared in Jacobin, Catalyst, and the New York Times. Previously, Ben’s work focused on the (usually negative) effects of neoliberal capitalism, writing about NGOs, labor leaders, and health care. Quick Fixes expands this examination into the world of drugs, examining nine different kinds of intoxicants, and five “orienting claims” that place their use within in larger capitalist histories.
A bit about the book...
Americans are in the midst of a world-historic drug binge. Opiates, amphetamines, benzodiazepines, marijuana, antidepressants, antipsychotics--across the board, consumption has shot up in the 21st century. At the same time, the United States is home to the largest prison system in the world, justified in part by a now zombified &quot;war&quot; on drugs. How did we get here?
Quick Fixes is a look at American society through the lens of its pharmacological crutches. Though particularly acute in recent decades, the contradiction between America&apos;s passionate love and intense hatred for drugs has been one of its defining characteristics for over a century.
Through nine chapters, each devoted to the modern history of a drug or class of drugs, Fong examines Americans&apos; fraught relationship with psychoactive substances. As society changes it produces different forms of stress, isolation, and alienation. These changes, in turn, shape the sorts of drugs society chooses.
By laying out the histories, functions, and experiences of our chemical comforts, the hope is to help answer that ever perplexing question: what does it mean to be an American?
Emily Dufton is the author of Grass Roots: The Rise and Fall and Rise of Marijuana in America (Basic Books, 2017). A drug historian and writer, her second book, on the development of the opioid addiction medication industry, is under contract with the University of Chicago Press.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Benjamin Y. Fong is author of the new book Quick Fixes: Drugs in America from Prohibition to the 21st Century Binge, which was just released in July, 2023 by Verso Books. Ben is an honors faculty fellow and associate director of the Center for Work &amp; Democracy at Arizona State University, and his work has appeared in Jacobin, Catalyst, and the New York Times. Previously, Ben’s work focused on the (usually negative) effects of neoliberal capitalism, writing about NGOs, labor leaders, and health care. Quick Fixes expands this examination into the world of drugs, examining nine different kinds of intoxicants, and five “orienting claims” that place their use within in larger capitalist histories.
A bit about the book...
Americans are in the midst of a world-historic drug binge. Opiates, amphetamines, benzodiazepines, marijuana, antidepressants, antipsychotics--across the board, consumption has shot up in the 21st century. At the same time, the United States is home to the largest prison system in the world, justified in part by a now zombified &quot;war&quot; on drugs. How did we get here?
Quick Fixes is a look at American society through the lens of its pharmacological crutches. Though particularly acute in recent decades, the contradiction between America&apos;s passionate love and intense hatred for drugs has been one of its defining characteristics for over a century.
Through nine chapters, each devoted to the modern history of a drug or class of drugs, Fong examines Americans&apos; fraught relationship with psychoactive substances. As society changes it produces different forms of stress, isolation, and alienation. These changes, in turn, shape the sorts of drugs society chooses.
By laying out the histories, functions, and experiences of our chemical comforts, the hope is to help answer that ever perplexing question: what does it mean to be an American?
Emily Dufton is the author of Grass Roots: The Rise and Fall and Rise of Marijuana in America (Basic Books, 2017). A drug historian and writer, her second book, on the development of the opioid addiction medication industry, is under contract with the University of Chicago Press.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>56</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">796d05c0-3484-11ee-adb9-57cc1878988e</guid>
      <title>Sara Beam, &quot;Trial of Jeanne Catherine: Infanticide in Early Modern Geneva&quot; (U Toronto Press, 2020)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In 1686 in Geneva, a single mother named Jeanne Catherine Thomasset is charged with poisoning two young children: her own illegitimate daughter and the son of a rural wet nurse. So begins a harrowing criminal trial during which authorities interrogate Jeanne Catherine several times, sometimes with torture, to determine the truth.</p><p>Sara Beam's<em>&nbsp;</em><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781487587673" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Trial of Jeanne Catherine: Infanticide in Early Modern Geneva</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(University of Toronto Press, 2021) is a suspenseful historical mystery that offers students the opportunity to learn about motherhood, child rearing, gender, religion, local politics, and the practice of criminal justice in early modern Europe. This edition provides the complete trial transcript as well as the deliberations of the Genevan authorities and relevant correspondence.</p><p><a href="https://www.sit.edu/sit_faculty/jana-byars-phd/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Jana Byars</em></a><em>&nbsp;is an independent scholar located in Amsterdam.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2023 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/sara-beam-trial-of-jeanne-catherine-infanticide-in-early-modern-geneva-u-toronto-press-2020-R9Rdjoou</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In 1686 in Geneva, a single mother named Jeanne Catherine Thomasset is charged with poisoning two young children: her own illegitimate daughter and the son of a rural wet nurse. So begins a harrowing criminal trial during which authorities interrogate Jeanne Catherine several times, sometimes with torture, to determine the truth.</p><p>Sara Beam's<em>&nbsp;</em><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781487587673" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Trial of Jeanne Catherine: Infanticide in Early Modern Geneva</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(University of Toronto Press, 2021) is a suspenseful historical mystery that offers students the opportunity to learn about motherhood, child rearing, gender, religion, local politics, and the practice of criminal justice in early modern Europe. This edition provides the complete trial transcript as well as the deliberations of the Genevan authorities and relevant correspondence.</p><p><a href="https://www.sit.edu/sit_faculty/jana-byars-phd/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Jana Byars</em></a><em>&nbsp;is an independent scholar located in Amsterdam.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="51220566" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/fd639027-971f-4410-b437-a59aae6d40c7/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=fd639027-971f-4410-b437-a59aae6d40c7&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Sara Beam, &quot;Trial of Jeanne Catherine: Infanticide in Early Modern Geneva&quot; (U Toronto Press, 2020)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:53:21</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In 1686 in Geneva, a single mother named Jeanne Catherine Thomasset is charged with poisoning two young children: her own illegitimate daughter and the son of a rural wet nurse. So begins a harrowing criminal trial during which authorities interrogate Jeanne Catherine several times, sometimes with torture, to determine the truth.
Sara Beam&apos;s The Trial of Jeanne Catherine: Infanticide in Early Modern Geneva (University of Toronto Press, 2021) is a suspenseful historical mystery that offers students the opportunity to learn about motherhood, child rearing, gender, religion, local politics, and the practice of criminal justice in early modern Europe. This edition provides the complete trial transcript as well as the deliberations of the Genevan authorities and relevant correspondence.
Jana Byars is an independent scholar located in Amsterdam.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In 1686 in Geneva, a single mother named Jeanne Catherine Thomasset is charged with poisoning two young children: her own illegitimate daughter and the son of a rural wet nurse. So begins a harrowing criminal trial during which authorities interrogate Jeanne Catherine several times, sometimes with torture, to determine the truth.
Sara Beam&apos;s The Trial of Jeanne Catherine: Infanticide in Early Modern Geneva (University of Toronto Press, 2021) is a suspenseful historical mystery that offers students the opportunity to learn about motherhood, child rearing, gender, religion, local politics, and the practice of criminal justice in early modern Europe. This edition provides the complete trial transcript as well as the deliberations of the Genevan authorities and relevant correspondence.
Jana Byars is an independent scholar located in Amsterdam.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>46</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">0d9ca074-3616-11ee-8b9d-6fbfa9f2c5a9</guid>
      <title>Len Niehoff and Thomas Sullivan, &quot;Free Speech: From Core Values to Current Debates&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2022)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Why do we protect free speech? What values does it serve? How has the Supreme Court interpreted the First Amendment? What has the Court gotten right and wrong? Why are current debates over free expression often so divisive? How can we do better? In this succinct but comprehensive and scholarly book, authors Len Niehoff and Thomas Sullivan tackle these pressing questions.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781108822138" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Free Speech: From Core Values to Current Debates</em></a>&nbsp;(Cambridge UP, 2022) traces the development and evolution of the free speech doctrine in the Supreme Court and explores how the Court - with varying levels of success - has applied that doctrinal framework to “hard cases” and current controversies, such as those involving hate speech, speech on the internet, speech on campus, and campaign finance regulation. This is the perfect volume for anyone - student, general reader, or scholar - looking for an accessible overview of this critical topic.</p><p>Len Niehoff is a professor from practice at University of Michigan</p><p>Thomas Sullivan President Emeritus and Professor of Political Science at Vermont University</p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Morteza Hajizadeh</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th&nbsp;and 19th&nbsp;Century British Literature.&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>YouTube channel</em></a><em>.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 9 Aug 2023 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/len-niehoff-and-thomas-sullivan-free-speech-from-core-values-to-current-debates-cambridge-up-2022-yYclX9hN</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do we protect free speech? What values does it serve? How has the Supreme Court interpreted the First Amendment? What has the Court gotten right and wrong? Why are current debates over free expression often so divisive? How can we do better? In this succinct but comprehensive and scholarly book, authors Len Niehoff and Thomas Sullivan tackle these pressing questions.&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781108822138" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Free Speech: From Core Values to Current Debates</em></a>&nbsp;(Cambridge UP, 2022) traces the development and evolution of the free speech doctrine in the Supreme Court and explores how the Court - with varying levels of success - has applied that doctrinal framework to “hard cases” and current controversies, such as those involving hate speech, speech on the internet, speech on campus, and campaign finance regulation. This is the perfect volume for anyone - student, general reader, or scholar - looking for an accessible overview of this critical topic.</p><p>Len Niehoff is a professor from practice at University of Michigan</p><p>Thomas Sullivan President Emeritus and Professor of Political Science at Vermont University</p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Morteza Hajizadeh</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th&nbsp;and 19th&nbsp;Century British Literature.&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>YouTube channel</em></a><em>.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="67059723" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/df7133f2-8339-4cf6-99fa-01dc93588669/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=df7133f2-8339-4cf6-99fa-01dc93588669&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Len Niehoff and Thomas Sullivan, &quot;Free Speech: From Core Values to Current Debates&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2022)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:09:51</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Why do we protect free speech? What values does it serve? How has the Supreme Court interpreted the First Amendment? What has the Court gotten right and wrong? Why are current debates over free expression often so divisive? How can we do better? In this succinct but comprehensive and scholarly book, authors Len Niehoff and Thomas Sullivan tackle these pressing questions. Free Speech: From Core Values to Current Debates (Cambridge UP, 2022) traces the development and evolution of the free speech doctrine in the Supreme Court and explores how the Court - with varying levels of success - has applied that doctrinal framework to “hard cases” and current controversies, such as those involving hate speech, speech on the internet, speech on campus, and campaign finance regulation. This is the perfect volume for anyone - student, general reader, or scholar - looking for an accessible overview of this critical topic.
Len Niehoff is a professor from practice at University of Michigan
Thomas Sullivan President Emeritus and Professor of Political Science at Vermont University
Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. YouTube channel.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Why do we protect free speech? What values does it serve? How has the Supreme Court interpreted the First Amendment? What has the Court gotten right and wrong? Why are current debates over free expression often so divisive? How can we do better? In this succinct but comprehensive and scholarly book, authors Len Niehoff and Thomas Sullivan tackle these pressing questions. Free Speech: From Core Values to Current Debates (Cambridge UP, 2022) traces the development and evolution of the free speech doctrine in the Supreme Court and explores how the Court - with varying levels of success - has applied that doctrinal framework to “hard cases” and current controversies, such as those involving hate speech, speech on the internet, speech on campus, and campaign finance regulation. This is the perfect volume for anyone - student, general reader, or scholar - looking for an accessible overview of this critical topic.
Len Niehoff is a professor from practice at University of Michigan
Thomas Sullivan President Emeritus and Professor of Political Science at Vermont University
Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. YouTube channel.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>194</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">07392fea-2ee1-11ee-9eee-3bb53b0d3788</guid>
      <title>Postscript: Protecting the Public? Guns, Intimate Partner Violence, and the US Supreme Court</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><em>Postscript</em>&nbsp;invites scholars to react to contemporary political events and today’s podcast welcomes an expert on domestic violence and firearms law to analyze a controversial Second Amendment case that the United States Supreme Court will hear this Fall,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/united-states-v-rahimi/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>United States v. Rahimi</em></a>. Kelly Roskam, JD is the Director of Law and Policy at the&nbsp;<a href="https://publichealth.jhu.edu/departments/health-policy-and-management/research-and-practice/center-for-gun-violence-solutions" rel="noopener noreferrer">Johns Hopkins Center for Gun Violence Prevention and Policy</a>. She studies the constitutional implications of, advocates for, and works to improve the implementation of firearms laws. She has been writing about the practical implications of the&nbsp;<em>Rahimi</em>&nbsp;case since it came up through the 5th circuit (for example, “<a href="https://publichealth.jhu.edu/2023/opinion-the-fifth-circuits-rahimi-decision-protects-abusers-access-to-guns-the-supreme-court-must-act-to-protect-survivors-of-domestic-violence" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Fifth Circuit’s Rahimi decision protects abusers’ access to guns. The Supreme Court must act to protect survivors of domestic violence</a>” and&nbsp;<a href="https://www.law.com/nationallawjournal/2022/11/17/a-texas-judge-is-using-originalism-to-justify-arming-domestic-abusers/?slreturn=20230626115236" rel="noopener noreferrer">“A Texas Judge Is Using Originalism to Justify Arming Domestic Abusers</a>” (co-authored with Spencer Cantrell and Natalie Nanasi).</p><p>In the podcast, we discuss the specifics of this strange case (a man who assaulted a woman, shot in the air, and later threatened to kill her claims that&nbsp;<em>his</em>&nbsp;constitutional rights have been violated – and the 5th&nbsp;circuit agrees that&nbsp;<em>Congress</em>&nbsp;is the threat to liberty). Ms. Roskam explains how the legal regime Congress created in 1994 to protect survivors of intimate violence also protects the safety of the public at large. She presents some of the data (e.g., that the presence of a firearm increases the likelihood that domestic violence will&nbsp;<a href="https://ajph.aphapublications.org/doi/10.2105/AJPH.93.7.1089" rel="noopener noreferrer">escalate into a homicide</a>). She explains what is at stake, the possible ways the Supreme Court might approach the case, and ways to combat firearm violence beyond the courts.</p><p><a href="https://www.sju.edu/faculty/susan-liebell#_ga=2.125106634.1318472952.1578330950-502593983.1578330950" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Susan Liebell&nbsp;</em></a><em>is Dirk Warren '50 Professor of Political Science at Saint Joseph’s University in Philadelphia.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 7 Aug 2023 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/postscript-protecting-the-public-guns-intimate-partner-violence-and-the-us-supreme-court-Eh94Xs4R</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Postscript</em>&nbsp;invites scholars to react to contemporary political events and today’s podcast welcomes an expert on domestic violence and firearms law to analyze a controversial Second Amendment case that the United States Supreme Court will hear this Fall,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/united-states-v-rahimi/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>United States v. Rahimi</em></a>. Kelly Roskam, JD is the Director of Law and Policy at the&nbsp;<a href="https://publichealth.jhu.edu/departments/health-policy-and-management/research-and-practice/center-for-gun-violence-solutions" rel="noopener noreferrer">Johns Hopkins Center for Gun Violence Prevention and Policy</a>. She studies the constitutional implications of, advocates for, and works to improve the implementation of firearms laws. She has been writing about the practical implications of the&nbsp;<em>Rahimi</em>&nbsp;case since it came up through the 5th circuit (for example, “<a href="https://publichealth.jhu.edu/2023/opinion-the-fifth-circuits-rahimi-decision-protects-abusers-access-to-guns-the-supreme-court-must-act-to-protect-survivors-of-domestic-violence" rel="noopener noreferrer">The Fifth Circuit’s Rahimi decision protects abusers’ access to guns. The Supreme Court must act to protect survivors of domestic violence</a>” and&nbsp;<a href="https://www.law.com/nationallawjournal/2022/11/17/a-texas-judge-is-using-originalism-to-justify-arming-domestic-abusers/?slreturn=20230626115236" rel="noopener noreferrer">“A Texas Judge Is Using Originalism to Justify Arming Domestic Abusers</a>” (co-authored with Spencer Cantrell and Natalie Nanasi).</p><p>In the podcast, we discuss the specifics of this strange case (a man who assaulted a woman, shot in the air, and later threatened to kill her claims that&nbsp;<em>his</em>&nbsp;constitutional rights have been violated – and the 5th&nbsp;circuit agrees that&nbsp;<em>Congress</em>&nbsp;is the threat to liberty). Ms. Roskam explains how the legal regime Congress created in 1994 to protect survivors of intimate violence also protects the safety of the public at large. She presents some of the data (e.g., that the presence of a firearm increases the likelihood that domestic violence will&nbsp;<a href="https://ajph.aphapublications.org/doi/10.2105/AJPH.93.7.1089" rel="noopener noreferrer">escalate into a homicide</a>). She explains what is at stake, the possible ways the Supreme Court might approach the case, and ways to combat firearm violence beyond the courts.</p><p><a href="https://www.sju.edu/faculty/susan-liebell#_ga=2.125106634.1318472952.1578330950-502593983.1578330950" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Susan Liebell&nbsp;</em></a><em>is Dirk Warren '50 Professor of Political Science at Saint Joseph’s University in Philadelphia.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="41636673" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/614f23e1-38d6-4aca-87f5-d56a1c79e1d3/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=614f23e1-38d6-4aca-87f5-d56a1c79e1d3&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Postscript: Protecting the Public? Guns, Intimate Partner Violence, and the US Supreme Court</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:43:22</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Postscript invites scholars to react to contemporary political events and today’s podcast welcomes an expert on domestic violence and firearms law to analyze a controversial Second Amendment case that the United States Supreme Court will hear this Fall, United States v. Rahimi. Kelly Roskam, JD is the Director of Law and Policy at the Johns Hopkins Center for Gun Violence Prevention and Policy. She studies the constitutional implications of, advocates for, and works to improve the implementation of firearms laws. She has been writing about the practical implications of the Rahimi case since it came up through the 5th circuit (for example, “The Fifth Circuit’s Rahimi decision protects abusers’ access to guns. The Supreme Court must act to protect survivors of domestic violence” and “A Texas Judge Is Using Originalism to Justify Arming Domestic Abusers” (co-authored with Spencer Cantrell and Natalie Nanasi).
In the podcast, we discuss the specifics of this strange case (a man who assaulted a woman, shot in the air, and later threatened to kill her claims that his constitutional rights have been violated – and the 5th circuit agrees that Congress is the threat to liberty). Ms. Roskam explains how the legal regime Congress created in 1994 to protect survivors of intimate violence also protects the safety of the public at large. She presents some of the data (e.g., that the presence of a firearm increases the likelihood that domestic violence will escalate into a homicide). She explains what is at stake, the possible ways the Supreme Court might approach the case, and ways to combat firearm violence beyond the courts.
Susan Liebell is Dirk Warren &apos;50 Professor of Political Science at Saint Joseph’s University in Philadelphia.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Postscript invites scholars to react to contemporary political events and today’s podcast welcomes an expert on domestic violence and firearms law to analyze a controversial Second Amendment case that the United States Supreme Court will hear this Fall, United States v. Rahimi. Kelly Roskam, JD is the Director of Law and Policy at the Johns Hopkins Center for Gun Violence Prevention and Policy. She studies the constitutional implications of, advocates for, and works to improve the implementation of firearms laws. She has been writing about the practical implications of the Rahimi case since it came up through the 5th circuit (for example, “The Fifth Circuit’s Rahimi decision protects abusers’ access to guns. The Supreme Court must act to protect survivors of domestic violence” and “A Texas Judge Is Using Originalism to Justify Arming Domestic Abusers” (co-authored with Spencer Cantrell and Natalie Nanasi).
In the podcast, we discuss the specifics of this strange case (a man who assaulted a woman, shot in the air, and later threatened to kill her claims that his constitutional rights have been violated – and the 5th circuit agrees that Congress is the threat to liberty). Ms. Roskam explains how the legal regime Congress created in 1994 to protect survivors of intimate violence also protects the safety of the public at large. She presents some of the data (e.g., that the presence of a firearm increases the likelihood that domestic violence will escalate into a homicide). She explains what is at stake, the possible ways the Supreme Court might approach the case, and ways to combat firearm violence beyond the courts.
Susan Liebell is Dirk Warren &apos;50 Professor of Political Science at Saint Joseph’s University in Philadelphia.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>19</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6d205ad8-33bc-11ee-89b8-dfcddce208d6</guid>
      <title>Sharon Thompson, &quot;Quiet Revolutionaries: The Married Women&apos;s Association and Family Law&quot; (Hart Publishing, 2022)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>This book tells the untold story of the Married Women's Association. Unlike more conventional histories of family law, which focus on legal actors, it highlights the little-known yet indispensable work of a dedicated group of life-long activists.</p><p>Formed in 1938, the Married Women's Association took reform of family property law as its chief focus. The name is deceptively innocuous, suggesting tea parties and charity fundraisers, but in fact the MWA was often involved in dramatic confrontations with politicians, civil servants, and Law Commissioners. The Association boasted powerful public figures, including MP Edith Summerskill, authors Vera Brittain and Dora Russell, and barrister Helena Normanton. They campaigned on matters that are still being debated in family law today.</p><p>Sharon Thompson's&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781509929412" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Quiet Revolutionaries: The Married Women's Association and Family Law&nbsp;</em></a>(Hart Publishing, 2022) sheds new light upon legal reform then and now by challenging longstanding assumptions, showing that piecemeal legislation can be an effective stepping stone to comprehensive reform and highlighting how unsuccessful bills, though often now forgotten, can still be important triggers for change. Drawing upon interviews with members' friends and family, and thousands of archival documents, the book is compulsory reading for lawyers, legal historians, and anyone who wishes to explore histories of law reform from the ground up.</p><p><em>Jeannette Cockroft is an associate professor of history and political science at Schreiner University.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 6 Aug 2023 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/sharon-thompson-quiet-revolutionaries-the-married-womens-association-and-family-law-hart-publishing-2022-hvglEtSn</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This book tells the untold story of the Married Women's Association. Unlike more conventional histories of family law, which focus on legal actors, it highlights the little-known yet indispensable work of a dedicated group of life-long activists.</p><p>Formed in 1938, the Married Women's Association took reform of family property law as its chief focus. The name is deceptively innocuous, suggesting tea parties and charity fundraisers, but in fact the MWA was often involved in dramatic confrontations with politicians, civil servants, and Law Commissioners. The Association boasted powerful public figures, including MP Edith Summerskill, authors Vera Brittain and Dora Russell, and barrister Helena Normanton. They campaigned on matters that are still being debated in family law today.</p><p>Sharon Thompson's&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781509929412" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Quiet Revolutionaries: The Married Women's Association and Family Law&nbsp;</em></a>(Hart Publishing, 2022) sheds new light upon legal reform then and now by challenging longstanding assumptions, showing that piecemeal legislation can be an effective stepping stone to comprehensive reform and highlighting how unsuccessful bills, though often now forgotten, can still be important triggers for change. Drawing upon interviews with members' friends and family, and thousands of archival documents, the book is compulsory reading for lawyers, legal historians, and anyone who wishes to explore histories of law reform from the ground up.</p><p><em>Jeannette Cockroft is an associate professor of history and political science at Schreiner University.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="51994399" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/50beb374-a0fd-41bd-8cbf-065789f450ef/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=50beb374-a0fd-41bd-8cbf-065789f450ef&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Sharon Thompson, &quot;Quiet Revolutionaries: The Married Women&apos;s Association and Family Law&quot; (Hart Publishing, 2022)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:54:09</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>This book tells the untold story of the Married Women&apos;s Association. Unlike more conventional histories of family law, which focus on legal actors, it highlights the little-known yet indispensable work of a dedicated group of life-long activists.
Formed in 1938, the Married Women&apos;s Association took reform of family property law as its chief focus. The name is deceptively innocuous, suggesting tea parties and charity fundraisers, but in fact the MWA was often involved in dramatic confrontations with politicians, civil servants, and Law Commissioners. The Association boasted powerful public figures, including MP Edith Summerskill, authors Vera Brittain and Dora Russell, and barrister Helena Normanton. They campaigned on matters that are still being debated in family law today.
Sharon Thompson&apos;s Quiet Revolutionaries: The Married Women&apos;s Association and Family Law (Hart Publishing, 2022) sheds new light upon legal reform then and now by challenging longstanding assumptions, showing that piecemeal legislation can be an effective stepping stone to comprehensive reform and highlighting how unsuccessful bills, though often now forgotten, can still be important triggers for change. Drawing upon interviews with members&apos; friends and family, and thousands of archival documents, the book is compulsory reading for lawyers, legal historians, and anyone who wishes to explore histories of law reform from the ground up.
Jeannette Cockroft is an associate professor of history and political science at Schreiner University.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>This book tells the untold story of the Married Women&apos;s Association. Unlike more conventional histories of family law, which focus on legal actors, it highlights the little-known yet indispensable work of a dedicated group of life-long activists.
Formed in 1938, the Married Women&apos;s Association took reform of family property law as its chief focus. The name is deceptively innocuous, suggesting tea parties and charity fundraisers, but in fact the MWA was often involved in dramatic confrontations with politicians, civil servants, and Law Commissioners. The Association boasted powerful public figures, including MP Edith Summerskill, authors Vera Brittain and Dora Russell, and barrister Helena Normanton. They campaigned on matters that are still being debated in family law today.
Sharon Thompson&apos;s Quiet Revolutionaries: The Married Women&apos;s Association and Family Law (Hart Publishing, 2022) sheds new light upon legal reform then and now by challenging longstanding assumptions, showing that piecemeal legislation can be an effective stepping stone to comprehensive reform and highlighting how unsuccessful bills, though often now forgotten, can still be important triggers for change. Drawing upon interviews with members&apos; friends and family, and thousands of archival documents, the book is compulsory reading for lawyers, legal historians, and anyone who wishes to explore histories of law reform from the ground up.
Jeannette Cockroft is an associate professor of history and political science at Schreiner University.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>61</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">dbb138f4-316f-11ee-bfa0-b7e2d5aced04</guid>
      <title>The Future of Space Travel: A Discussion with Douglas C. Ligor</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The expansion of space travel is much discussed but always seems subject to delay. Why is that and when will it happen on a much larger scale?&nbsp;<a href="https://www.rand.org/about/people/l/ligor_douglas_c.html" rel="noopener noreferrer">Douglas Ligor</a>&nbsp;has been considering that issue for the Rand corporation – and he talks to Owen Bennett-Jones about the prospects for space travel. Ligor is co-author of&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781977411020" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Assessing the Readiness for Human Commercial Spaceflight Safety Regulations</em></a>&nbsp;(Rand, 2023) and&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781977411419" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>International Space Traffic Management: Charting a Course for Long-Term Sustainability</em></a>&nbsp;(Rand, 2023).</p><p><a href="https://owenbennettjones.com/about/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Owen Bennett-Jones</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a freelance journalist and writer. A former BBC correspondent and presenter he has been a resident foreign correspondent in Bucharest, Geneva, Islamabad, Hanoi and Beirut. He is recently wrote a history of the Bhutto dynasty which was published by Yale University Press.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 5 Aug 2023 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/the-future-of-space-travel-a-discussion-with-douglas-c-ligor-DRbK2c9I</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The expansion of space travel is much discussed but always seems subject to delay. Why is that and when will it happen on a much larger scale?&nbsp;<a href="https://www.rand.org/about/people/l/ligor_douglas_c.html" rel="noopener noreferrer">Douglas Ligor</a>&nbsp;has been considering that issue for the Rand corporation – and he talks to Owen Bennett-Jones about the prospects for space travel. Ligor is co-author of&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781977411020" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Assessing the Readiness for Human Commercial Spaceflight Safety Regulations</em></a>&nbsp;(Rand, 2023) and&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781977411419" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>International Space Traffic Management: Charting a Course for Long-Term Sustainability</em></a>&nbsp;(Rand, 2023).</p><p><a href="https://owenbennettjones.com/about/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Owen Bennett-Jones</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a freelance journalist and writer. A former BBC correspondent and presenter he has been a resident foreign correspondent in Bucharest, Geneva, Islamabad, Hanoi and Beirut. He is recently wrote a history of the Bhutto dynasty which was published by Yale University Press.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="37955775" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/0ab41c19-f0d0-4575-af78-d9a2f155f598/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=0ab41c19-f0d0-4575-af78-d9a2f155f598&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>The Future of Space Travel: A Discussion with Douglas C. Ligor</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:39:32</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The expansion of space travel is much discussed but always seems subject to delay. Why is that and when will it happen on a much larger scale? Douglas Ligor has been considering that issue for the Rand corporation – and he talks to Owen Bennett-Jones about the prospects for space travel. Ligor is co-author of Assessing the Readiness for Human Commercial Spaceflight Safety Regulations (Rand, 2023) and International Space Traffic Management: Charting a Course for Long-Term Sustainability (Rand, 2023).
Owen Bennett-Jones is a freelance journalist and writer. A former BBC correspondent and presenter he has been a resident foreign correspondent in Bucharest, Geneva, Islamabad, Hanoi and Beirut. He is recently wrote a history of the Bhutto dynasty which was published by Yale University Press.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The expansion of space travel is much discussed but always seems subject to delay. Why is that and when will it happen on a much larger scale? Douglas Ligor has been considering that issue for the Rand corporation – and he talks to Owen Bennett-Jones about the prospects for space travel. Ligor is co-author of Assessing the Readiness for Human Commercial Spaceflight Safety Regulations (Rand, 2023) and International Space Traffic Management: Charting a Course for Long-Term Sustainability (Rand, 2023).
Owen Bennett-Jones is a freelance journalist and writer. A former BBC correspondent and presenter he has been a resident foreign correspondent in Bucharest, Geneva, Islamabad, Hanoi and Beirut. He is recently wrote a history of the Bhutto dynasty which was published by Yale University Press.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>72</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">d24f2c98-3148-11ee-9471-1bbd54eaaf89</guid>
      <title>Cause Lawyering and Human Rights in Indonesia</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Why have issues of human rights become so contentious in Indonesia, 25 years after the much-heralded post-Suharto democratic transition? What kind of role has the Indonesian Foundation of Legal Aid Institutes, or LBH, performed in this field? Should those working on human rights try to work with governments and power-holders, or adopt an oppositional stance towards them?</p><p>Timothy Mann is a postdoctoral researcher at the Nordic Institute of Asian Studies, and recently completed his PhD on Indonesian human rights issues at the University of Melbourne. In this podcast, Tim discusses his research on LBH and the dilemmas faced by those campaigning for greater human rights in a rapidly-changing Indonesia.</p><p>Duncan McCargo is Director of the Nordic Institute of Asian Studies and a professor of political science at the University of Copenhagen.</p><p>The Nordic Asia Podcast is a collaboration sharing expertise on Asia across the Nordic region, brought to you by the Nordic Institute of Asian Studies (NIAS) based at the University of Copenhagen, along with our academic partners: the Centre for East Asian Studies at the University of Turku, and Asianettverket at the University of Oslo.</p><p>We aim to produce timely, topical and well-edited discussions of new research and developments about Asia.</p><p>About NIAS:&nbsp;<a href="http://www.nias.ku.dk/" rel="noopener noreferrer">www.nias.ku.dk</a></p><p>Transcripts of the Nordic Asia Podcasts:&nbsp;<a href="http://www.nias.ku.dk/nordic-asia-podcast" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.nias.ku.dk/nordic-asia-podcast</a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 4 Aug 2023 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/cause-lawyering-and-human-rights-in-indonesia-SRny9rqw</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why have issues of human rights become so contentious in Indonesia, 25 years after the much-heralded post-Suharto democratic transition? What kind of role has the Indonesian Foundation of Legal Aid Institutes, or LBH, performed in this field? Should those working on human rights try to work with governments and power-holders, or adopt an oppositional stance towards them?</p><p>Timothy Mann is a postdoctoral researcher at the Nordic Institute of Asian Studies, and recently completed his PhD on Indonesian human rights issues at the University of Melbourne. In this podcast, Tim discusses his research on LBH and the dilemmas faced by those campaigning for greater human rights in a rapidly-changing Indonesia.</p><p>Duncan McCargo is Director of the Nordic Institute of Asian Studies and a professor of political science at the University of Copenhagen.</p><p>The Nordic Asia Podcast is a collaboration sharing expertise on Asia across the Nordic region, brought to you by the Nordic Institute of Asian Studies (NIAS) based at the University of Copenhagen, along with our academic partners: the Centre for East Asian Studies at the University of Turku, and Asianettverket at the University of Oslo.</p><p>We aim to produce timely, topical and well-edited discussions of new research and developments about Asia.</p><p>About NIAS:&nbsp;<a href="http://www.nias.ku.dk/" rel="noopener noreferrer">www.nias.ku.dk</a></p><p>Transcripts of the Nordic Asia Podcasts:&nbsp;<a href="http://www.nias.ku.dk/nordic-asia-podcast" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://www.nias.ku.dk/nordic-asia-podcast</a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="21911616" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/46536e8b-a181-4d0a-8013-217ae5b6f630/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=46536e8b-a181-4d0a-8013-217ae5b6f630&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Cause Lawyering and Human Rights in Indonesia</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:22:49</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Why have issues of human rights become so contentious in Indonesia, 25 years after the much-heralded post-Suharto democratic transition? What kind of role has the Indonesian Foundation of Legal Aid Institutes, or LBH, performed in this field? Should those working on human rights try to work with governments and power-holders, or adopt an oppositional stance towards them?
Timothy Mann is a postdoctoral researcher at the Nordic Institute of Asian Studies, and recently completed his PhD on Indonesian human rights issues at the University of Melbourne. In this podcast, Tim discusses his research on LBH and the dilemmas faced by those campaigning for greater human rights in a rapidly-changing Indonesia.
Duncan McCargo is Director of the Nordic Institute of Asian Studies and a professor of political science at the University of Copenhagen.
The Nordic Asia Podcast is a collaboration sharing expertise on Asia across the Nordic region, brought to you by the Nordic Institute of Asian Studies (NIAS) based at the University of Copenhagen, along with our academic partners: the Centre for East Asian Studies at the University of Turku, and Asianettverket at the University of Oslo.
We aim to produce timely, topical and well-edited discussions of new research and developments about Asia.
About NIAS: www.nias.ku.dk
Transcripts of the Nordic Asia Podcasts: http://www.nias.ku.dk/nordic-asia-podcast
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Why have issues of human rights become so contentious in Indonesia, 25 years after the much-heralded post-Suharto democratic transition? What kind of role has the Indonesian Foundation of Legal Aid Institutes, or LBH, performed in this field? Should those working on human rights try to work with governments and power-holders, or adopt an oppositional stance towards them?
Timothy Mann is a postdoctoral researcher at the Nordic Institute of Asian Studies, and recently completed his PhD on Indonesian human rights issues at the University of Melbourne. In this podcast, Tim discusses his research on LBH and the dilemmas faced by those campaigning for greater human rights in a rapidly-changing Indonesia.
Duncan McCargo is Director of the Nordic Institute of Asian Studies and a professor of political science at the University of Copenhagen.
The Nordic Asia Podcast is a collaboration sharing expertise on Asia across the Nordic region, brought to you by the Nordic Institute of Asian Studies (NIAS) based at the University of Copenhagen, along with our academic partners: the Centre for East Asian Studies at the University of Turku, and Asianettverket at the University of Oslo.
We aim to produce timely, topical and well-edited discussions of new research and developments about Asia.
About NIAS: www.nias.ku.dk
Transcripts of the Nordic Asia Podcasts: http://www.nias.ku.dk/nordic-asia-podcast
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>192</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">cfeb89ea-3087-11ee-be4b-9799b051e664</guid>
      <title>Talking Clarence Thomas: A Conversation with Amul Thapar</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>As the last few months of landmark Supreme Court decisions have showcased, Clarence Thomas is one of the most important men in America. To wrap up our Summer of Law series,&nbsp;<a href="https://fedsoc.org/contributors/amul-thapar" rel="noopener noreferrer">Judge Amul Thapar</a>&nbsp;discusses his recent book,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781684514526" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The People's Justice: Clarence Thomas and the Constitutional Stories that Define Him</em></a>&nbsp;(﻿Regnery Publishing, 2023), digging into Justice Thomas's judicial legacy and some of his most interesting, influential, and surprising decisions.</p><p>Amul Thapar is serves as a judge on the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. He became the first South Asian Article III judge in American history when President George W. Bush nominate him to serve on the Eastern District of Kentucky, where he then also served as the United States Attorney. In 2017, he became President Donald J. Trump’s first appellate court nominee.</p><p>If you enjoyed this episode, you may also enjoy&nbsp;<a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/events/2022/antonin-scalia-constitution-day-lecture-judge-amul-thapar-originalism-theory-and" rel="noopener noreferrer">his most recent speech at the Madison Program</a>.</p><p><em>﻿</em><a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/people/annika-nordquist" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Annika Nordquist</em></a><em>&nbsp;is the Communications Coordinator of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions and host of the Program’s podcast,&nbsp;</em><a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/podcast" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Madison’s Notes</em></a><em>.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 1 Aug 2023 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/talking-clarence-thomas-a-conversation-with-amul-thapar-gJj5WfIj</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As the last few months of landmark Supreme Court decisions have showcased, Clarence Thomas is one of the most important men in America. To wrap up our Summer of Law series,&nbsp;<a href="https://fedsoc.org/contributors/amul-thapar" rel="noopener noreferrer">Judge Amul Thapar</a>&nbsp;discusses his recent book,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781684514526" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The People's Justice: Clarence Thomas and the Constitutional Stories that Define Him</em></a>&nbsp;(﻿Regnery Publishing, 2023), digging into Justice Thomas's judicial legacy and some of his most interesting, influential, and surprising decisions.</p><p>Amul Thapar is serves as a judge on the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. He became the first South Asian Article III judge in American history when President George W. Bush nominate him to serve on the Eastern District of Kentucky, where he then also served as the United States Attorney. In 2017, he became President Donald J. Trump’s first appellate court nominee.</p><p>If you enjoyed this episode, you may also enjoy&nbsp;<a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/events/2022/antonin-scalia-constitution-day-lecture-judge-amul-thapar-originalism-theory-and" rel="noopener noreferrer">his most recent speech at the Madison Program</a>.</p><p><em>﻿</em><a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/people/annika-nordquist" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Annika Nordquist</em></a><em>&nbsp;is the Communications Coordinator of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions and host of the Program’s podcast,&nbsp;</em><a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/podcast" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Madison’s Notes</em></a><em>.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="40770355" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/44bd4ad1-0189-41a9-aa8d-e01b91e94fd3/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=44bd4ad1-0189-41a9-aa8d-e01b91e94fd3&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Talking Clarence Thomas: A Conversation with Amul Thapar</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:42:28</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>As the last few months of landmark Supreme Court decisions have showcased, Clarence Thomas is one of the most important men in America. To wrap up our Summer of Law series, Judge Amul Thapar discusses his recent book, The People&apos;s Justice: Clarence Thomas and the Constitutional Stories that Define Him (﻿Regnery Publishing, 2023), digging into Justice Thomas&apos;s judicial legacy and some of his most interesting, influential, and surprising decisions.
Amul Thapar is serves as a judge on the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. He became the first South Asian Article III judge in American history when President George W. Bush nominate him to serve on the Eastern District of Kentucky, where he then also served as the United States Attorney. In 2017, he became President Donald J. Trump’s first appellate court nominee.
If you enjoyed this episode, you may also enjoy his most recent speech at the Madison Program.
﻿Annika Nordquist is the Communications Coordinator of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions and host of the Program’s podcast, Madison’s Notes.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>As the last few months of landmark Supreme Court decisions have showcased, Clarence Thomas is one of the most important men in America. To wrap up our Summer of Law series, Judge Amul Thapar discusses his recent book, The People&apos;s Justice: Clarence Thomas and the Constitutional Stories that Define Him (﻿Regnery Publishing, 2023), digging into Justice Thomas&apos;s judicial legacy and some of his most interesting, influential, and surprising decisions.
Amul Thapar is serves as a judge on the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. He became the first South Asian Article III judge in American history when President George W. Bush nominate him to serve on the Eastern District of Kentucky, where he then also served as the United States Attorney. In 2017, he became President Donald J. Trump’s first appellate court nominee.
If you enjoyed this episode, you may also enjoy his most recent speech at the Madison Program.
﻿Annika Nordquist is the Communications Coordinator of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions and host of the Program’s podcast, Madison’s Notes.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>81</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">c5a08ffe-2e2e-11ee-9c72-674bf5d365cb</guid>
      <title>Mayur R. Suresh, &quot;Terror Trials: Life and Law in Delhi&apos;s Courts&quot; (Fordham UP, 2022)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781531501761" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Terror Trials: Life and Law in Delhi's Courts</em></a>&nbsp;(Fordham UP, 2022),&nbsp;Mayur Suresh shows how legal procedures and technicalities become the modes through which courtrooms are made habitable. Where India’s terror trials have come to be understood by way of the expansion of the security state and displays of Hindu nationalism, Suresh elaborates how they are experienced by defendants in a quite different way, through a minute engagement with legal technicalities.</p><p>Amidst the grinding terror trials—which are replete with stories of torture, illegal detention and fabricated charges—defendants school themselves in legal procedures, became adept petition writers, build friendships with police officials, cultivate cautious faith in the courts and express a deep sense of betrayal when this trust is belied. Though seemingly mundane, legal technicalities are fraught and highly contested, and acquire urgent ethical qualities in the life of a trial: the file becomes a space in which the world can be made or unmade, the petition a way of imagining a future, and investigative and courtroom procedures enable the unexpected formation of close relationships between police and terror-accused.</p><p>In attending to the ways in which legal technicalities are made to work in everyday interactions among lawyers, judges, accused terrorists, and police, Suresh shows how human expressiveness, creativity and vulnerability emerge through the law.</p><p><a href="https://politics.ucsc.edu/graduate/graduate-student-directory/index.php?uid=ssing176" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Shatakshi Singh</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a PhD student in Political Science at the University of California Santa Cruz. Her research focuses on legal mobilization and claim-making within the context of dispossession and evictions of urban slums in India.&nbsp;</em><a href="https://twitter.com/Singhshatakshi2" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Twitter</em></a><em>. Email: ssing176@ucsc.edu.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 30 Jul 2023 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/mayur-r-suresh-terror-trials-life-and-law-in-delhis-courts-fordham-up-2022-Evcl21yL</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781531501761" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Terror Trials: Life and Law in Delhi's Courts</em></a>&nbsp;(Fordham UP, 2022),&nbsp;Mayur Suresh shows how legal procedures and technicalities become the modes through which courtrooms are made habitable. Where India’s terror trials have come to be understood by way of the expansion of the security state and displays of Hindu nationalism, Suresh elaborates how they are experienced by defendants in a quite different way, through a minute engagement with legal technicalities.</p><p>Amidst the grinding terror trials—which are replete with stories of torture, illegal detention and fabricated charges—defendants school themselves in legal procedures, became adept petition writers, build friendships with police officials, cultivate cautious faith in the courts and express a deep sense of betrayal when this trust is belied. Though seemingly mundane, legal technicalities are fraught and highly contested, and acquire urgent ethical qualities in the life of a trial: the file becomes a space in which the world can be made or unmade, the petition a way of imagining a future, and investigative and courtroom procedures enable the unexpected formation of close relationships between police and terror-accused.</p><p>In attending to the ways in which legal technicalities are made to work in everyday interactions among lawyers, judges, accused terrorists, and police, Suresh shows how human expressiveness, creativity and vulnerability emerge through the law.</p><p><a href="https://politics.ucsc.edu/graduate/graduate-student-directory/index.php?uid=ssing176" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Shatakshi Singh</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a PhD student in Political Science at the University of California Santa Cruz. Her research focuses on legal mobilization and claim-making within the context of dispossession and evictions of urban slums in India.&nbsp;</em><a href="https://twitter.com/Singhshatakshi2" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Twitter</em></a><em>. Email: ssing176@ucsc.edu.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="45253469" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/c2b2f375-800c-4c9c-87e6-b6f94fb8bbd7/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=c2b2f375-800c-4c9c-87e6-b6f94fb8bbd7&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Mayur R. Suresh, &quot;Terror Trials: Life and Law in Delhi&apos;s Courts&quot; (Fordham UP, 2022)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:47:08</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In Terror Trials: Life and Law in Delhi&apos;s Courts (Fordham UP, 2022), Mayur Suresh shows how legal procedures and technicalities become the modes through which courtrooms are made habitable. Where India’s terror trials have come to be understood by way of the expansion of the security state and displays of Hindu nationalism, Suresh elaborates how they are experienced by defendants in a quite different way, through a minute engagement with legal technicalities.
Amidst the grinding terror trials—which are replete with stories of torture, illegal detention and fabricated charges—defendants school themselves in legal procedures, became adept petition writers, build friendships with police officials, cultivate cautious faith in the courts and express a deep sense of betrayal when this trust is belied. Though seemingly mundane, legal technicalities are fraught and highly contested, and acquire urgent ethical qualities in the life of a trial: the file becomes a space in which the world can be made or unmade, the petition a way of imagining a future, and investigative and courtroom procedures enable the unexpected formation of close relationships between police and terror-accused.
In attending to the ways in which legal technicalities are made to work in everyday interactions among lawyers, judges, accused terrorists, and police, Suresh shows how human expressiveness, creativity and vulnerability emerge through the law.
Shatakshi Singh is a PhD student in Political Science at the University of California Santa Cruz. Her research focuses on legal mobilization and claim-making within the context of dispossession and evictions of urban slums in India. Twitter. Email: ssing176@ucsc.edu.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In Terror Trials: Life and Law in Delhi&apos;s Courts (Fordham UP, 2022), Mayur Suresh shows how legal procedures and technicalities become the modes through which courtrooms are made habitable. Where India’s terror trials have come to be understood by way of the expansion of the security state and displays of Hindu nationalism, Suresh elaborates how they are experienced by defendants in a quite different way, through a minute engagement with legal technicalities.
Amidst the grinding terror trials—which are replete with stories of torture, illegal detention and fabricated charges—defendants school themselves in legal procedures, became adept petition writers, build friendships with police officials, cultivate cautious faith in the courts and express a deep sense of betrayal when this trust is belied. Though seemingly mundane, legal technicalities are fraught and highly contested, and acquire urgent ethical qualities in the life of a trial: the file becomes a space in which the world can be made or unmade, the petition a way of imagining a future, and investigative and courtroom procedures enable the unexpected formation of close relationships between police and terror-accused.
In attending to the ways in which legal technicalities are made to work in everyday interactions among lawyers, judges, accused terrorists, and police, Suresh shows how human expressiveness, creativity and vulnerability emerge through the law.
Shatakshi Singh is a PhD student in Political Science at the University of California Santa Cruz. Her research focuses on legal mobilization and claim-making within the context of dispossession and evictions of urban slums in India. Twitter. Email: ssing176@ucsc.edu.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>201</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">51d9cb52-2e34-11ee-9cd8-c771fadd5b1a</guid>
      <title>Alice E. Marwick, &quot;The Private Is Political: Networked Privacy and Social Media&quot; (Yale UP, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Online privacy is under constant attack by social media and big data technologies. But we cannot rely on individual actions to remedy this—it is a matter of social justice.&nbsp;</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780300229622" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Private Is Political: Networked Privacy and Social Media</em></a>&nbsp;(Yale UP, 2023),&nbsp;Alice E. Marwick offers a new way of understanding how privacy is jeopardized, particularly for marginalized and disadvantaged communities—including immigrants, the poor, people of color, LGBTQ+ populations, and victims of online harassment.</p><p>Marwick shows that there are&nbsp;few resources or regulations for preventing personal information from spreading on the internet. Through a new theory of “networked privacy,” she reveals how current legal and technological frameworks are woefully inadequate in addressing issues of privacy—often by design. Drawing from interviews and focus groups encompassing a diverse group of Americans, Marwick shows that even heavy social media users care deeply about privacy and engage in extensive “privacy work” to protect it. But people are up against the violation machine of the modern internet. Safeguarding privacy must happen at the collective level.</p><p><a href="https://jakec007.github.io/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Jake Chanenson</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a computer science Ph.D. student at the University of Chicago. Broadly, Jake is interested in topics relating to HCI, privacy, and tech policy. Jake’s&nbsp;</em>work has been published in top venues such as ACM’s CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 30 Jul 2023 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/alice-e-marwick-the-private-is-political-networked-privacy-and-social-media-yale-up-2023-ISzH8398</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Online privacy is under constant attack by social media and big data technologies. But we cannot rely on individual actions to remedy this—it is a matter of social justice.&nbsp;</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780300229622" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Private Is Political: Networked Privacy and Social Media</em></a>&nbsp;(Yale UP, 2023),&nbsp;Alice E. Marwick offers a new way of understanding how privacy is jeopardized, particularly for marginalized and disadvantaged communities—including immigrants, the poor, people of color, LGBTQ+ populations, and victims of online harassment.</p><p>Marwick shows that there are&nbsp;few resources or regulations for preventing personal information from spreading on the internet. Through a new theory of “networked privacy,” she reveals how current legal and technological frameworks are woefully inadequate in addressing issues of privacy—often by design. Drawing from interviews and focus groups encompassing a diverse group of Americans, Marwick shows that even heavy social media users care deeply about privacy and engage in extensive “privacy work” to protect it. But people are up against the violation machine of the modern internet. Safeguarding privacy must happen at the collective level.</p><p><a href="https://jakec007.github.io/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Jake Chanenson</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a computer science Ph.D. student at the University of Chicago. Broadly, Jake is interested in topics relating to HCI, privacy, and tech policy. Jake’s&nbsp;</em>work has been published in top venues such as ACM’s CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="36181295" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/9a032c60-5042-485c-8443-01749b760f79/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=9a032c60-5042-485c-8443-01749b760f79&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Alice E. Marwick, &quot;The Private Is Political: Networked Privacy and Social Media&quot; (Yale UP, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:37:41</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Online privacy is under constant attack by social media and big data technologies. But we cannot rely on individual actions to remedy this—it is a matter of social justice. 
In The Private Is Political: Networked Privacy and Social Media (Yale UP, 2023), Alice E. Marwick offers a new way of understanding how privacy is jeopardized, particularly for marginalized and disadvantaged communities—including immigrants, the poor, people of color, LGBTQ+ populations, and victims of online harassment.
Marwick shows that there are few resources or regulations for preventing personal information from spreading on the internet. Through a new theory of “networked privacy,” she reveals how current legal and technological frameworks are woefully inadequate in addressing issues of privacy—often by design. Drawing from interviews and focus groups encompassing a diverse group of Americans, Marwick shows that even heavy social media users care deeply about privacy and engage in extensive “privacy work” to protect it. But people are up against the violation machine of the modern internet. Safeguarding privacy must happen at the collective level.
Jake Chanenson is a computer science Ph.D. student at the University of Chicago. Broadly, Jake is interested in topics relating to HCI, privacy, and tech policy. Jake’s work has been published in top venues such as ACM’s CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Online privacy is under constant attack by social media and big data technologies. But we cannot rely on individual actions to remedy this—it is a matter of social justice. 
In The Private Is Political: Networked Privacy and Social Media (Yale UP, 2023), Alice E. Marwick offers a new way of understanding how privacy is jeopardized, particularly for marginalized and disadvantaged communities—including immigrants, the poor, people of color, LGBTQ+ populations, and victims of online harassment.
Marwick shows that there are few resources or regulations for preventing personal information from spreading on the internet. Through a new theory of “networked privacy,” she reveals how current legal and technological frameworks are woefully inadequate in addressing issues of privacy—often by design. Drawing from interviews and focus groups encompassing a diverse group of Americans, Marwick shows that even heavy social media users care deeply about privacy and engage in extensive “privacy work” to protect it. But people are up against the violation machine of the modern internet. Safeguarding privacy must happen at the collective level.
Jake Chanenson is a computer science Ph.D. student at the University of Chicago. Broadly, Jake is interested in topics relating to HCI, privacy, and tech policy. Jake’s work has been published in top venues such as ACM’s CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>346</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">99c5c1f6-2bf4-11ee-a389-4b5736fa17f1</guid>
      <title>Daisy Cheung and Michael Dunn, &quot;Advance Directives Across Asia: A Comparative Socio-legal Analysis&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009152624" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Advance&nbsp;Directives in Asia: A Socio-Legal Analysis</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Cambridge UP, 2023)&nbsp;<em>,&nbsp;</em>edited by Daisy Cheung and Michael Dunn is the first book to consider the concept of advance directives in Asia. It is unique in its depth and breadth as it&nbsp;brings together an extensive number of Asian jurisdictions to draw out the ways that advance directives are regulated in law and practice across the region. In their analysis Cheung and Dunn&nbsp;provide overall observations towards a concept of "generative accomodation". As a concept, generative accomodation has the potential to foreground new explorations of bioethics in Asia and globally. It also seeks to understand the role of the family in medical decision making. These are key concerns that come through in this comprehensive and groundbreaking book. It will be useful for regulators, Asia scholars, students, and practitioners in the field of health-law and ethics, and end of life care. The book has wider application for&nbsp;scholars in law, ethics and healthcare.&nbsp;</p><p><a href="https://www.law.hku.hk/academic_staff/daisy-cheung/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Daisy Cheung</a>&nbsp;is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Law and the Centre for Medical Ethics and Law at The University of Hong Kong.</p><p><a href="https://discovery.nus.edu.sg/21783-michael-dunn" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr Michael Dunn</a>&nbsp;is an Associate Professor and the Co-Director of Education at the Centre for Biomedical Ethics in the Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine.</p><p><a href="https://twitter.com/janerichardshk?lang=en" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Jane Richards</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a doctoral student at the University of Hong Kong. You can find her on twitter where she follows all things related to human rights and Hong Kong politics @JaneRichardsHK</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2023 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/daisy-cheung-and-michael-dunn-advance-directives-across-asia-a-comparative-socio-legal-analysis-cambridge-up-2023-E26FG_uu</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009152624" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Advance&nbsp;Directives in Asia: A Socio-Legal Analysis</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Cambridge UP, 2023)&nbsp;<em>,&nbsp;</em>edited by Daisy Cheung and Michael Dunn is the first book to consider the concept of advance directives in Asia. It is unique in its depth and breadth as it&nbsp;brings together an extensive number of Asian jurisdictions to draw out the ways that advance directives are regulated in law and practice across the region. In their analysis Cheung and Dunn&nbsp;provide overall observations towards a concept of "generative accomodation". As a concept, generative accomodation has the potential to foreground new explorations of bioethics in Asia and globally. It also seeks to understand the role of the family in medical decision making. These are key concerns that come through in this comprehensive and groundbreaking book. It will be useful for regulators, Asia scholars, students, and practitioners in the field of health-law and ethics, and end of life care. The book has wider application for&nbsp;scholars in law, ethics and healthcare.&nbsp;</p><p><a href="https://www.law.hku.hk/academic_staff/daisy-cheung/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Daisy Cheung</a>&nbsp;is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Law and the Centre for Medical Ethics and Law at The University of Hong Kong.</p><p><a href="https://discovery.nus.edu.sg/21783-michael-dunn" rel="noopener noreferrer">Dr Michael Dunn</a>&nbsp;is an Associate Professor and the Co-Director of Education at the Centre for Biomedical Ethics in the Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine.</p><p><a href="https://twitter.com/janerichardshk?lang=en" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Jane Richards</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a doctoral student at the University of Hong Kong. You can find her on twitter where she follows all things related to human rights and Hong Kong politics @JaneRichardsHK</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="52570945" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/46e36bb0-f6b0-421c-849d-19ade3877e76/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=46e36bb0-f6b0-421c-849d-19ade3877e76&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Daisy Cheung and Michael Dunn, &quot;Advance Directives Across Asia: A Comparative Socio-legal Analysis&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:54:45</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Advance Directives in Asia: A Socio-Legal Analysis (Cambridge UP, 2023) , edited by Daisy Cheung and Michael Dunn is the first book to consider the concept of advance directives in Asia. It is unique in its depth and breadth as it brings together an extensive number of Asian jurisdictions to draw out the ways that advance directives are regulated in law and practice across the region. In their analysis Cheung and Dunn provide overall observations towards a concept of &quot;generative accomodation&quot;. As a concept, generative accomodation has the potential to foreground new explorations of bioethics in Asia and globally. It also seeks to understand the role of the family in medical decision making. These are key concerns that come through in this comprehensive and groundbreaking book. It will be useful for regulators, Asia scholars, students, and practitioners in the field of health-law and ethics, and end of life care. The book has wider application for scholars in law, ethics and healthcare. 
Daisy Cheung is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Law and the Centre for Medical Ethics and Law at The University of Hong Kong.
Dr Michael Dunn is an Associate Professor and the Co-Director of Education at the Centre for Biomedical Ethics in the Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine.
Jane Richards is a doctoral student at the University of Hong Kong. You can find her on twitter where she follows all things related to human rights and Hong Kong politics @JaneRichardsHK
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Advance Directives in Asia: A Socio-Legal Analysis (Cambridge UP, 2023) , edited by Daisy Cheung and Michael Dunn is the first book to consider the concept of advance directives in Asia. It is unique in its depth and breadth as it brings together an extensive number of Asian jurisdictions to draw out the ways that advance directives are regulated in law and practice across the region. In their analysis Cheung and Dunn provide overall observations towards a concept of &quot;generative accomodation&quot;. As a concept, generative accomodation has the potential to foreground new explorations of bioethics in Asia and globally. It also seeks to understand the role of the family in medical decision making. These are key concerns that come through in this comprehensive and groundbreaking book. It will be useful for regulators, Asia scholars, students, and practitioners in the field of health-law and ethics, and end of life care. The book has wider application for scholars in law, ethics and healthcare. 
Daisy Cheung is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Law and the Centre for Medical Ethics and Law at The University of Hong Kong.
Dr Michael Dunn is an Associate Professor and the Co-Director of Education at the Centre for Biomedical Ethics in the Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine.
Jane Richards is a doctoral student at the University of Hong Kong. You can find her on twitter where she follows all things related to human rights and Hong Kong politics @JaneRichardsHK
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>193</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">dd25b034-2b0c-11ee-82cb-bff53ee99f40</guid>
      <title>The Texas Two-Step and Johnson &amp; Johnson’s Baby Powder</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>What’s safer than baby powder? Parents have been trusting Johnson &amp; Johnson for over 100 years to powder their baby’s bottoms.</p><p>Yet, numerous studies have revealed the presence of trace amounts of asbestos in this talc-based powder. Thousands of parents now claim that this asbestos is responsible for their cancers. A Reuters&nbsp;<a href="https://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/johnsonandjohnson-cancer/" rel="noopener noreferrer">investigation</a>&nbsp;catalogued this evidence and the fact that J&amp;J knew about the asbestos since the 1950s, yet continued to sell the powder.&nbsp;</p><p>Johnson &amp; Johnson is proposing a $9 billion dollar&nbsp;<a href="https://www.cbc.ca/news/health/johnson-talc-powder-settlement-1.6802018" rel="noopener noreferrer">settlement</a>&nbsp;for the over 38,000 lawsuits brought and all claims into the future. However, it depends on the courts accepting a controversial bankruptcy procedure called “<a href="https://www.ft.com/content/82ee5808-716e-47ae-acfb-2aba4b3d1502" rel="noopener noreferrer">the Texas Two-Step</a>.” This strategy is being used to address a raft of personal injury complaints against a number of companies, but critics call it nothing more than a ‘sham bankruptcy’ that is being used to let corporations off the hook.</p><p>SUPPORT THE SHOW</p><p>You can support the show for free by following or subscribing on&nbsp;<a href="https://open.spotify.com/show/0ySUyzsY8DLsMg63qQbENM?si=31d20a0af00f4b93" rel="noopener noreferrer">Spotify,</a>&nbsp;<a href="https://podcasts.apple.com/ca/podcast/darts-and-letters/id1540893288" rel="noopener noreferrer">Apple Podcasts</a>, or whichever app you use. This is the best way to help us out and it costs nothing so we’d really appreciate you clicking that button.</p><p>If you want to do a little more we would love it if you chip in. You can find us on&nbsp;<a href="https://www.patreon.com/dartsandletters" rel="noopener noreferrer">patreon.com/dartsandletters</a>. Patrons get content early, and occasionally there’s bonus material on there too.</p><p>ABOUT THE SHOW</p><p>For a full list of credits, contact information, and more,&nbsp;<a href="https://dartsandletters.ca/about-us/" rel="noopener noreferrer">visit our about page.</a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2023 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/the-texas-two-step-and-johnson-johnsons-baby-powder-ElGl31q1</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What’s safer than baby powder? Parents have been trusting Johnson &amp; Johnson for over 100 years to powder their baby’s bottoms.</p><p>Yet, numerous studies have revealed the presence of trace amounts of asbestos in this talc-based powder. Thousands of parents now claim that this asbestos is responsible for their cancers. A Reuters&nbsp;<a href="https://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/johnsonandjohnson-cancer/" rel="noopener noreferrer">investigation</a>&nbsp;catalogued this evidence and the fact that J&amp;J knew about the asbestos since the 1950s, yet continued to sell the powder.&nbsp;</p><p>Johnson &amp; Johnson is proposing a $9 billion dollar&nbsp;<a href="https://www.cbc.ca/news/health/johnson-talc-powder-settlement-1.6802018" rel="noopener noreferrer">settlement</a>&nbsp;for the over 38,000 lawsuits brought and all claims into the future. However, it depends on the courts accepting a controversial bankruptcy procedure called “<a href="https://www.ft.com/content/82ee5808-716e-47ae-acfb-2aba4b3d1502" rel="noopener noreferrer">the Texas Two-Step</a>.” This strategy is being used to address a raft of personal injury complaints against a number of companies, but critics call it nothing more than a ‘sham bankruptcy’ that is being used to let corporations off the hook.</p><p>SUPPORT THE SHOW</p><p>You can support the show for free by following or subscribing on&nbsp;<a href="https://open.spotify.com/show/0ySUyzsY8DLsMg63qQbENM?si=31d20a0af00f4b93" rel="noopener noreferrer">Spotify,</a>&nbsp;<a href="https://podcasts.apple.com/ca/podcast/darts-and-letters/id1540893288" rel="noopener noreferrer">Apple Podcasts</a>, or whichever app you use. This is the best way to help us out and it costs nothing so we’d really appreciate you clicking that button.</p><p>If you want to do a little more we would love it if you chip in. You can find us on&nbsp;<a href="https://www.patreon.com/dartsandletters" rel="noopener noreferrer">patreon.com/dartsandletters</a>. Patrons get content early, and occasionally there’s bonus material on there too.</p><p>ABOUT THE SHOW</p><p>For a full list of credits, contact information, and more,&nbsp;<a href="https://dartsandletters.ca/about-us/" rel="noopener noreferrer">visit our about page.</a></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="52954426" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/09b93c21-da8c-4c1d-a05d-f6dd68d4b602/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=09b93c21-da8c-4c1d-a05d-f6dd68d4b602&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>The Texas Two-Step and Johnson &amp; Johnson’s Baby Powder</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:55:09</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>What’s safer than baby powder? Parents have been trusting Johnson &amp; Johnson for over 100 years to powder their baby’s bottoms.
Yet, numerous studies have revealed the presence of trace amounts of asbestos in this talc-based powder. Thousands of parents now claim that this asbestos is responsible for their cancers. A Reuters investigation catalogued this evidence and the fact that J&amp;J knew about the asbestos since the 1950s, yet continued to sell the powder. 
Johnson &amp; Johnson is proposing a $9 billion dollar settlement for the over 38,000 lawsuits brought and all claims into the future. However, it depends on the courts accepting a controversial bankruptcy procedure called “the Texas Two-Step.” This strategy is being used to address a raft of personal injury complaints against a number of companies, but critics call it nothing more than a ‘sham bankruptcy’ that is being used to let corporations off the hook.
SUPPORT THE SHOW
You can support the show for free by following or subscribing on Spotify, Apple Podcasts, or whichever app you use. This is the best way to help us out and it costs nothing so we’d really appreciate you clicking that button.
If you want to do a little more we would love it if you chip in. You can find us on patreon.com/dartsandletters. Patrons get content early, and occasionally there’s bonus material on there too.
ABOUT THE SHOW
For a full list of credits, contact information, and more, visit our about page.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>What’s safer than baby powder? Parents have been trusting Johnson &amp; Johnson for over 100 years to powder their baby’s bottoms.
Yet, numerous studies have revealed the presence of trace amounts of asbestos in this talc-based powder. Thousands of parents now claim that this asbestos is responsible for their cancers. A Reuters investigation catalogued this evidence and the fact that J&amp;J knew about the asbestos since the 1950s, yet continued to sell the powder. 
Johnson &amp; Johnson is proposing a $9 billion dollar settlement for the over 38,000 lawsuits brought and all claims into the future. However, it depends on the courts accepting a controversial bankruptcy procedure called “the Texas Two-Step.” This strategy is being used to address a raft of personal injury complaints against a number of companies, but critics call it nothing more than a ‘sham bankruptcy’ that is being used to let corporations off the hook.
SUPPORT THE SHOW
You can support the show for free by following or subscribing on Spotify, Apple Podcasts, or whichever app you use. This is the best way to help us out and it costs nothing so we’d really appreciate you clicking that button.
If you want to do a little more we would love it if you chip in. You can find us on patreon.com/dartsandletters. Patrons get content early, and occasionally there’s bonus material on there too.
ABOUT THE SHOW
For a full list of credits, contact information, and more, visit our about page.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>58</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9e6fa118-271c-11ee-ba63-abc8e760abba</guid>
      <title>Postscript: Is it Unconstitutional to Take Guns Away from Domestic Abusers?</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The Supreme Court recently wrapped up their term – and announced that they will hear a very controversial case about domestic abuse, the power of Congress, and the right to keep and bear arms called&nbsp;<a href="https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/united-states-v-rahimi/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>United States v. Rahimi</em></a>. The Court will decide whether a Texas man who assaulted his girlfriend in a parking lot and threatened to shoot her if she told anyone has been deprived of his Second Amendment rights. When the assaulted woman later obtained a restraining order against Mr. Zackey Rahimi, federal law made illegal for him to possess a firearm or ammunition while under that order.</p><p>In 2019, Mr. Zackey Rahimi had an argument with his girlfriend in a parking lot. Mr. Rahimi knocked the woman to the ground. As he dragged her back to his car, she hit her head on the car’s dashboard. Later, in a telephone call. Mr. Rahimi threatened the woman that he would shoot her if she told anyone about the assault. Later, a Texas state court entered a domestic violence restraining order against Rahimi. The order also barred Rahimi from possessing a gun based on a part of a federal statute: the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994. Mr. Rahimi claims that the statute violates his Second Amendment rights.</p><p><em>Postscript&nbsp;</em>invites authors to react to contemporary events that engage their scholarship and we have two experts on the Second Amendment to unpack the case.&nbsp;<a href="https://law.duke.edu/fac/blocher" rel="noopener noreferrer">Joseph Blocher</a>, Lanty L. Smith ’67 Professor of Law at Duke University School of Law co-authored&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/books/the-positive-second-amendment-rights-regulation-and-the-future-of-heller/9781316611289" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Positive Second Amendment: Rights, Regulation, and the Future of Heller</em>&nbsp;</a>(Cambridge University Press, 2018) with Darrell Miller and has a forthcoming article in the Yale Law Review (co-authored with Eric Ruben) entitled&nbsp;<a href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4408228" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Originalism-by-Analogy and Second Amendment Adjudication</em></a>. In addition to his numerous influential law review articles and nuanced public facing scholarship in print, radio, and tv, he was one of the attorneys who helped write the brief for the District of C in&nbsp;<em>Heller</em>&nbsp;and he contributed an important brief to&nbsp;<a href="https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/20-843#:~:text=Held%3A%20New%20York%27s%20proper%2Dcause,in%20public%20for%20self%2Ddefense." rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New York State Rifle &amp; Pistol Association v. Bruen</em></a><em>.</em></p><p><em> </em><a href="https://www.sju.edu/faculty/susan-liebell#_ga=2.125106634.1318472952.1578330950-502593983.1578330950" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Susan Liebell&nbsp;</em></a><em>is Dirk Warren '50 Professor of Political Science at Saint Joseph’s University in Philadelphia.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2023 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/postscript-is-it-unconstitutional-to-take-guns-away-from-domestic-abusers-bWgOUNP4</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Supreme Court recently wrapped up their term – and announced that they will hear a very controversial case about domestic abuse, the power of Congress, and the right to keep and bear arms called&nbsp;<a href="https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/united-states-v-rahimi/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>United States v. Rahimi</em></a>. The Court will decide whether a Texas man who assaulted his girlfriend in a parking lot and threatened to shoot her if she told anyone has been deprived of his Second Amendment rights. When the assaulted woman later obtained a restraining order against Mr. Zackey Rahimi, federal law made illegal for him to possess a firearm or ammunition while under that order.</p><p>In 2019, Mr. Zackey Rahimi had an argument with his girlfriend in a parking lot. Mr. Rahimi knocked the woman to the ground. As he dragged her back to his car, she hit her head on the car’s dashboard. Later, in a telephone call. Mr. Rahimi threatened the woman that he would shoot her if she told anyone about the assault. Later, a Texas state court entered a domestic violence restraining order against Rahimi. The order also barred Rahimi from possessing a gun based on a part of a federal statute: the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994. Mr. Rahimi claims that the statute violates his Second Amendment rights.</p><p><em>Postscript&nbsp;</em>invites authors to react to contemporary events that engage their scholarship and we have two experts on the Second Amendment to unpack the case.&nbsp;<a href="https://law.duke.edu/fac/blocher" rel="noopener noreferrer">Joseph Blocher</a>, Lanty L. Smith ’67 Professor of Law at Duke University School of Law co-authored&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/books/the-positive-second-amendment-rights-regulation-and-the-future-of-heller/9781316611289" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Positive Second Amendment: Rights, Regulation, and the Future of Heller</em>&nbsp;</a>(Cambridge University Press, 2018) with Darrell Miller and has a forthcoming article in the Yale Law Review (co-authored with Eric Ruben) entitled&nbsp;<a href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4408228" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Originalism-by-Analogy and Second Amendment Adjudication</em></a>. In addition to his numerous influential law review articles and nuanced public facing scholarship in print, radio, and tv, he was one of the attorneys who helped write the brief for the District of C in&nbsp;<em>Heller</em>&nbsp;and he contributed an important brief to&nbsp;<a href="https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/20-843#:~:text=Held%3A%20New%20York%27s%20proper%2Dcause,in%20public%20for%20self%2Ddefense." rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>New York State Rifle &amp; Pistol Association v. Bruen</em></a><em>.</em></p><p><em> </em><a href="https://www.sju.edu/faculty/susan-liebell#_ga=2.125106634.1318472952.1578330950-502593983.1578330950" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Susan Liebell&nbsp;</em></a><em>is Dirk Warren '50 Professor of Political Science at Saint Joseph’s University in Philadelphia.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="49756651" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/513bcb45-47c0-49ab-91e4-1d1160500252/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=513bcb45-47c0-49ab-91e4-1d1160500252&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Postscript: Is it Unconstitutional to Take Guns Away from Domestic Abusers?</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:51:49</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The Supreme Court recently wrapped up their term – and announced that they will hear a very controversial case about domestic abuse, the power of Congress, and the right to keep and bear arms called United States v. Rahimi. The Court will decide whether a Texas man who assaulted his girlfriend in a parking lot and threatened to shoot her if she told anyone has been deprived of his Second Amendment rights. When the assaulted woman later obtained a restraining order against Mr. Zackey Rahimi, federal law made illegal for him to possess a firearm or ammunition while under that order.
In 2019, Mr. Zackey Rahimi had an argument with his girlfriend in a parking lot. Mr. Rahimi knocked the woman to the ground. As he dragged her back to his car, she hit her head on the car’s dashboard. Later, in a telephone call. Mr. Rahimi threatened the woman that he would shoot her if she told anyone about the assault. Later, a Texas state court entered a domestic violence restraining order against Rahimi. The order also barred Rahimi from possessing a gun based on a part of a federal statute: the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994. Mr. Rahimi claims that the statute violates his Second Amendment rights.
Postscript invites authors to react to contemporary events that engage their scholarship and we have two experts on the Second Amendment to unpack the case. Joseph Blocher, Lanty L. Smith ’67 Professor of Law at Duke University School of Law co-authored The Positive Second Amendment: Rights, Regulation, and the Future of Heller (Cambridge University Press, 2018) with Darrell Miller and has a forthcoming article in the Yale Law Review (co-authored with Eric Ruben) entitled Originalism-by-Analogy and Second Amendment Adjudication. In addition to his numerous influential law review articles and nuanced public facing scholarship in print, radio, and tv, he was one of the attorneys who helped write the brief for the District of C in Heller and he contributed an important brief to New York State Rifle &amp; Pistol Association v. Bruen.
 Susan Liebell is Dirk Warren &apos;50 Professor of Political Science at Saint Joseph’s University in Philadelphia.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The Supreme Court recently wrapped up their term – and announced that they will hear a very controversial case about domestic abuse, the power of Congress, and the right to keep and bear arms called United States v. Rahimi. The Court will decide whether a Texas man who assaulted his girlfriend in a parking lot and threatened to shoot her if she told anyone has been deprived of his Second Amendment rights. When the assaulted woman later obtained a restraining order against Mr. Zackey Rahimi, federal law made illegal for him to possess a firearm or ammunition while under that order.
In 2019, Mr. Zackey Rahimi had an argument with his girlfriend in a parking lot. Mr. Rahimi knocked the woman to the ground. As he dragged her back to his car, she hit her head on the car’s dashboard. Later, in a telephone call. Mr. Rahimi threatened the woman that he would shoot her if she told anyone about the assault. Later, a Texas state court entered a domestic violence restraining order against Rahimi. The order also barred Rahimi from possessing a gun based on a part of a federal statute: the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994. Mr. Rahimi claims that the statute violates his Second Amendment rights.
Postscript invites authors to react to contemporary events that engage their scholarship and we have two experts on the Second Amendment to unpack the case. Joseph Blocher, Lanty L. Smith ’67 Professor of Law at Duke University School of Law co-authored The Positive Second Amendment: Rights, Regulation, and the Future of Heller (Cambridge University Press, 2018) with Darrell Miller and has a forthcoming article in the Yale Law Review (co-authored with Eric Ruben) entitled Originalism-by-Analogy and Second Amendment Adjudication. In addition to his numerous influential law review articles and nuanced public facing scholarship in print, radio, and tv, he was one of the attorneys who helped write the brief for the District of C in Heller and he contributed an important brief to New York State Rifle &amp; Pistol Association v. Bruen.
 Susan Liebell is Dirk Warren &apos;50 Professor of Political Science at Saint Joseph’s University in Philadelphia.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>18</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">bc36cc9e-258c-11ee-b04b-377f57192d0b</guid>
      <title>Mere Natural Law: A Conversation with Hadley Arkes</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>What is natural law, and what does it have to do with originalism? Why does the Right defend religion yet so often struggle to define it? Next up in our "Summer of Law" series, Hadley Arkes, the Edward Ney Professor Emeritus of Jurisprudence Emeritus at Amherst College and the Founder and Director of the James Wilson Institute sits down to chat about his recent book,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781684513017" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Mere Natural Law: Originalism and the Anchoring Truths of the Constitution</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Regnery Publishing, 2023).</p><ul>
<li>More on Prof. Arkes is available&nbsp;<a href="https://jameswilsoninstitute.org/about/about-page-3" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a>.</li>
<li>About the&nbsp;The James Wilson Institute,&nbsp;<a href="https://jameswilsoninstitute.org/" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a>.</li>
<li>The Stanford Review's "religion," referenced during the podcast is&nbsp;<a href="https://stanfordreview.org/hate-the-meal-plan-we-founded/" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a>.</li>
</ul><p><br></p><p><a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/people/annika-nordquist" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Annika Nordquist</em></a><em>&nbsp;is the Communications Coordinator of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions and host of the Program’s podcast,&nbsp;</em><a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/podcast" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Madison’s Notes</em></a><em>. She graduated from Stanford University in 2021, where she studied Classics and Linguistics. She was also Editor-in-Chief of the Stanford Review and a member of the varsity fencing team. Previously, she was a Research Assistant in Education Policy at the American Enterprise Institute.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2023 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/mere-natural-law-a-conversation-with-hadley-arkes-KFIBhgYG</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is natural law, and what does it have to do with originalism? Why does the Right defend religion yet so often struggle to define it? Next up in our "Summer of Law" series, Hadley Arkes, the Edward Ney Professor Emeritus of Jurisprudence Emeritus at Amherst College and the Founder and Director of the James Wilson Institute sits down to chat about his recent book,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781684513017" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Mere Natural Law: Originalism and the Anchoring Truths of the Constitution</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Regnery Publishing, 2023).</p><ul>
<li>More on Prof. Arkes is available&nbsp;<a href="https://jameswilsoninstitute.org/about/about-page-3" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a>.</li>
<li>About the&nbsp;The James Wilson Institute,&nbsp;<a href="https://jameswilsoninstitute.org/" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a>.</li>
<li>The Stanford Review's "religion," referenced during the podcast is&nbsp;<a href="https://stanfordreview.org/hate-the-meal-plan-we-founded/" rel="noopener noreferrer">here</a>.</li>
</ul><p><br></p><p><a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/people/annika-nordquist" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Annika Nordquist</em></a><em>&nbsp;is the Communications Coordinator of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions and host of the Program’s podcast,&nbsp;</em><a href="https://jmp.princeton.edu/podcast" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Madison’s Notes</em></a><em>. She graduated from Stanford University in 2021, where she studied Classics and Linguistics. She was also Editor-in-Chief of the Stanford Review and a member of the varsity fencing team. Previously, she was a Research Assistant in Education Policy at the American Enterprise Institute.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="62287311" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/11828b21-1563-43ee-9bc8-8305f83a8ab2/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=11828b21-1563-43ee-9bc8-8305f83a8ab2&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Mere Natural Law: A Conversation with Hadley Arkes</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:04:52</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>What is natural law, and what does it have to do with originalism? Why does the Right defend religion yet so often struggle to define it? Next up in our &quot;Summer of Law&quot; series, Hadley Arkes, the Edward Ney Professor Emeritus of Jurisprudence Emeritus at Amherst College and the Founder and Director of the James Wilson Institute sits down to chat about his recent book, Mere Natural Law: Originalism and the Anchoring Truths of the Constitution (Regnery Publishing, 2023).
More on Prof. Arkes is available here.
About the The James Wilson Institute, here.
The Stanford Review&apos;s &quot;religion,&quot; referenced during the podcast is here.
Annika Nordquist is the Communications Coordinator of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions and host of the Program’s podcast, Madison’s Notes. She graduated from Stanford University in 2021, where she studied Classics and Linguistics. She was also Editor-in-Chief of the Stanford Review and a member of the varsity fencing team. Previously, she was a Research Assistant in Education Policy at the American Enterprise Institute.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>What is natural law, and what does it have to do with originalism? Why does the Right defend religion yet so often struggle to define it? Next up in our &quot;Summer of Law&quot; series, Hadley Arkes, the Edward Ney Professor Emeritus of Jurisprudence Emeritus at Amherst College and the Founder and Director of the James Wilson Institute sits down to chat about his recent book, Mere Natural Law: Originalism and the Anchoring Truths of the Constitution (Regnery Publishing, 2023).
More on Prof. Arkes is available here.
About the The James Wilson Institute, here.
The Stanford Review&apos;s &quot;religion,&quot; referenced during the podcast is here.
Annika Nordquist is the Communications Coordinator of Princeton University’s James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions and host of the Program’s podcast, Madison’s Notes. She graduated from Stanford University in 2021, where she studied Classics and Linguistics. She was also Editor-in-Chief of the Stanford Review and a member of the varsity fencing team. Previously, she was a Research Assistant in Education Policy at the American Enterprise Institute.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>80</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">e0d15562-226a-11ee-a4bd-03eca28b007f</guid>
      <title>Stephen Bright and James Kwak, &quot;The Fear of Too Much Justice: Race, Poverty, and the Persistence of Inequality in the Criminal Courts&quot; (The New Press, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Glenn Ford, a Black man, spent thirty years on Louisiana’s death row for a crime he did not commit. He was released in 2014—and given twenty dollars—when prosecutors admitted they did not have a case against him.</p><p>Ford’s trial was a travesty. One of his court-appointed lawyers specialized in oil and gas law and had never tried a case. The other had been out of law school for only two years. They had no funds for investigation or experts. The prosecution struck all the Black prospective jurors to get the all-white jury that sentenced Ford to death.</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781620970256" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Fear of Too Much Justice: Race, Poverty, and the Persistence of Inequality in the Criminal Courts</em></a>&nbsp;(The New Press, 2023), legendary death penalty lawyer Stephen B. Bright and legal scholar James Kwak offer a heart-wrenching overview of how the criminal legal system fails to live up to the values of equality and justice. The book ranges from poor people squeezed for cash by private probation companies because of trivial violations to people executed in violation of the Constitution despite overwhelming evidence of intellectual disability or mental illness. They also show examples from around the country of places that are making progress toward justice.</p><p>With a foreword by Bryan Stevenson, who worked for Bright at the Southern Center for Human Rights and credits him for “[breaking] down the issues with the death penalty simply but persuasively,”&nbsp;<em>The Fear of Too Much Justice</em>&nbsp;offers a timely, trenchant, firsthand critique of our criminal courts and points the way toward a more just future.</p><p><br></p><p><em>Omari Averette-Phillips is a History Educator and an Independent Scholar based in Southern California. He can be reached at omariaverette@gmail.com.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 15 Jul 2023 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/stephen-bright-and-james-kwak-the-fear-of-too-much-justice-race-poverty-and-the-persistence-of-inequality-in-the-criminal-courts-the-new-press-2023-CBEiAO4L</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glenn Ford, a Black man, spent thirty years on Louisiana’s death row for a crime he did not commit. He was released in 2014—and given twenty dollars—when prosecutors admitted they did not have a case against him.</p><p>Ford’s trial was a travesty. One of his court-appointed lawyers specialized in oil and gas law and had never tried a case. The other had been out of law school for only two years. They had no funds for investigation or experts. The prosecution struck all the Black prospective jurors to get the all-white jury that sentenced Ford to death.</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781620970256" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Fear of Too Much Justice: Race, Poverty, and the Persistence of Inequality in the Criminal Courts</em></a>&nbsp;(The New Press, 2023), legendary death penalty lawyer Stephen B. Bright and legal scholar James Kwak offer a heart-wrenching overview of how the criminal legal system fails to live up to the values of equality and justice. The book ranges from poor people squeezed for cash by private probation companies because of trivial violations to people executed in violation of the Constitution despite overwhelming evidence of intellectual disability or mental illness. They also show examples from around the country of places that are making progress toward justice.</p><p>With a foreword by Bryan Stevenson, who worked for Bright at the Southern Center for Human Rights and credits him for “[breaking] down the issues with the death penalty simply but persuasively,”&nbsp;<em>The Fear of Too Much Justice</em>&nbsp;offers a timely, trenchant, firsthand critique of our criminal courts and points the way toward a more just future.</p><p><br></p><p><em>Omari Averette-Phillips is a History Educator and an Independent Scholar based in Southern California. He can be reached at omariaverette@gmail.com.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="45066583" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/dad3a1fa-b5fe-4756-8a2c-be69a1b58ccb/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=dad3a1fa-b5fe-4756-8a2c-be69a1b58ccb&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Stephen Bright and James Kwak, &quot;The Fear of Too Much Justice: Race, Poverty, and the Persistence of Inequality in the Criminal Courts&quot; (The New Press, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:46:56</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Glenn Ford, a Black man, spent thirty years on Louisiana’s death row for a crime he did not commit. He was released in 2014—and given twenty dollars—when prosecutors admitted they did not have a case against him.
Ford’s trial was a travesty. One of his court-appointed lawyers specialized in oil and gas law and had never tried a case. The other had been out of law school for only two years. They had no funds for investigation or experts. The prosecution struck all the Black prospective jurors to get the all-white jury that sentenced Ford to death.
In The Fear of Too Much Justice: Race, Poverty, and the Persistence of Inequality in the Criminal Courts (The New Press, 2023), legendary death penalty lawyer Stephen B. Bright and legal scholar James Kwak offer a heart-wrenching overview of how the criminal legal system fails to live up to the values of equality and justice. The book ranges from poor people squeezed for cash by private probation companies because of trivial violations to people executed in violation of the Constitution despite overwhelming evidence of intellectual disability or mental illness. They also show examples from around the country of places that are making progress toward justice.
With a foreword by Bryan Stevenson, who worked for Bright at the Southern Center for Human Rights and credits him for “[breaking] down the issues with the death penalty simply but persuasively,” The Fear of Too Much Justice offers a timely, trenchant, firsthand critique of our criminal courts and points the way toward a more just future.
Omari Averette-Phillips is a History Educator and an Independent Scholar based in Southern California. He can be reached at omariaverette@gmail.com.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Glenn Ford, a Black man, spent thirty years on Louisiana’s death row for a crime he did not commit. He was released in 2014—and given twenty dollars—when prosecutors admitted they did not have a case against him.
Ford’s trial was a travesty. One of his court-appointed lawyers specialized in oil and gas law and had never tried a case. The other had been out of law school for only two years. They had no funds for investigation or experts. The prosecution struck all the Black prospective jurors to get the all-white jury that sentenced Ford to death.
In The Fear of Too Much Justice: Race, Poverty, and the Persistence of Inequality in the Criminal Courts (The New Press, 2023), legendary death penalty lawyer Stephen B. Bright and legal scholar James Kwak offer a heart-wrenching overview of how the criminal legal system fails to live up to the values of equality and justice. The book ranges from poor people squeezed for cash by private probation companies because of trivial violations to people executed in violation of the Constitution despite overwhelming evidence of intellectual disability or mental illness. They also show examples from around the country of places that are making progress toward justice.
With a foreword by Bryan Stevenson, who worked for Bright at the Southern Center for Human Rights and credits him for “[breaking] down the issues with the death penalty simply but persuasively,” The Fear of Too Much Justice offers a timely, trenchant, firsthand critique of our criminal courts and points the way toward a more just future.
Omari Averette-Phillips is a History Educator and an Independent Scholar based in Southern California. He can be reached at omariaverette@gmail.com.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>389</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">757d4718-2282-11ee-9563-f3d127aef48e</guid>
      <title>Samuel Issacharoff, &quot;Democracy Unmoored: Populism and the Corruption of Popular Sovereignty&quot; (Oxford UP, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The 2016 election of Donald Trump focused people's minds on populism, and most of the attention paid to the subject since has been on the threat it poses to wealthy democracies. In Democracy Unmoored, Samuel Issacharoff takes a far wider-angle view of the phenomenon, covering countries from across the globe: Brazil, Poland, Argentina, Turkey, India, Hungary, Venezuela, and more. Just as importantly, he focuses on populism's attack on the institutions of governance.&nbsp;</p><p>Democracy requires two critical features: first, a commitment to repeat play such that political actors understand that what goes around comes around; and, second, institutional constraints so that the majority can prevail, albeit not by too much. Democracies must avoid the doomsday scenario in which the contending parties see the next election as the final choice between salvation and perdition. Issacharoff shows how populist governance undermines each of these two critical underpinnings of stable democracy, first by compressing the time horizon to the immediate, and second by eroding institutional constraints on strongman rule. At the same time, Issacharoff highlights the fact that ascendent populists were pushing in an open door as they found democracies in states of disrepair in the post-2008 world. Electorates around the world had come to see institutional democratic party systems as cabals of elites working against "the people," which anti-institutionalist populists took advantage of in country after country. Global in coverage and featuring a powerful explanation of the true threat populism represents to democracy, this book will be essential reading for anyone who cares about the survival of democratic institutions.</p><p>Samuel Issacharoff is the Reiss Professor of Constitutional Law at New York University School of Law. He is a leading figure in the study of democracy, constitutions, and the courts, and the author of&nbsp;<em>Fragile Democracies: Contested Power in the Era of Constitutional Courts</em>. He is a leading figure in the law of democracy in the U.S. and has written scores of articles on democratic challenges around the world. He served as a senior legal advisor to the presidential campaigns of Barack Obama and is long experienced as an appellate advocate in American courts. He is a member of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences.</p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Morteza Hajizadeh</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th&nbsp;and 19th&nbsp;Century British Literature.&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>YouTube channel</em></a><em>.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 15 Jul 2023 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/samuel-issacharoff-democracy-unmoored-populism-and-the-corruption-of-popular-sovereignty-oxford-up-2023-jiVkHvgh</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 2016 election of Donald Trump focused people's minds on populism, and most of the attention paid to the subject since has been on the threat it poses to wealthy democracies. In Democracy Unmoored, Samuel Issacharoff takes a far wider-angle view of the phenomenon, covering countries from across the globe: Brazil, Poland, Argentina, Turkey, India, Hungary, Venezuela, and more. Just as importantly, he focuses on populism's attack on the institutions of governance.&nbsp;</p><p>Democracy requires two critical features: first, a commitment to repeat play such that political actors understand that what goes around comes around; and, second, institutional constraints so that the majority can prevail, albeit not by too much. Democracies must avoid the doomsday scenario in which the contending parties see the next election as the final choice between salvation and perdition. Issacharoff shows how populist governance undermines each of these two critical underpinnings of stable democracy, first by compressing the time horizon to the immediate, and second by eroding institutional constraints on strongman rule. At the same time, Issacharoff highlights the fact that ascendent populists were pushing in an open door as they found democracies in states of disrepair in the post-2008 world. Electorates around the world had come to see institutional democratic party systems as cabals of elites working against "the people," which anti-institutionalist populists took advantage of in country after country. Global in coverage and featuring a powerful explanation of the true threat populism represents to democracy, this book will be essential reading for anyone who cares about the survival of democratic institutions.</p><p>Samuel Issacharoff is the Reiss Professor of Constitutional Law at New York University School of Law. He is a leading figure in the study of democracy, constitutions, and the courts, and the author of&nbsp;<em>Fragile Democracies: Contested Power in the Era of Constitutional Courts</em>. He is a leading figure in the law of democracy in the U.S. and has written scores of articles on democratic challenges around the world. He served as a senior legal advisor to the presidential campaigns of Barack Obama and is long experienced as an appellate advocate in American courts. He is a member of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences.</p><p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Morteza Hajizadeh</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th&nbsp;and 19th&nbsp;Century British Literature.&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>YouTube channel</em></a><em>.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="53819979" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/c9943cdc-7dc3-4b51-b40b-eef240fb57c5/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=c9943cdc-7dc3-4b51-b40b-eef240fb57c5&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Samuel Issacharoff, &quot;Democracy Unmoored: Populism and the Corruption of Popular Sovereignty&quot; (Oxford UP, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:56:03</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The 2016 election of Donald Trump focused people&apos;s minds on populism, and most of the attention paid to the subject since has been on the threat it poses to wealthy democracies. In Democracy Unmoored, Samuel Issacharoff takes a far wider-angle view of the phenomenon, covering countries from across the globe: Brazil, Poland, Argentina, Turkey, India, Hungary, Venezuela, and more. Just as importantly, he focuses on populism&apos;s attack on the institutions of governance. 
Democracy requires two critical features: first, a commitment to repeat play such that political actors understand that what goes around comes around; and, second, institutional constraints so that the majority can prevail, albeit not by too much. Democracies must avoid the doomsday scenario in which the contending parties see the next election as the final choice between salvation and perdition. Issacharoff shows how populist governance undermines each of these two critical underpinnings of stable democracy, first by compressing the time horizon to the immediate, and second by eroding institutional constraints on strongman rule. At the same time, Issacharoff highlights the fact that ascendent populists were pushing in an open door as they found democracies in states of disrepair in the post-2008 world. Electorates around the world had come to see institutional democratic party systems as cabals of elites working against &quot;the people,&quot; which anti-institutionalist populists took advantage of in country after country. Global in coverage and featuring a powerful explanation of the true threat populism represents to democracy, this book will be essential reading for anyone who cares about the survival of democratic institutions.
Samuel Issacharoff is the Reiss Professor of Constitutional Law at New York University School of Law. He is a leading figure in the study of democracy, constitutions, and the courts, and the author of Fragile Democracies: Contested Power in the Era of Constitutional Courts. He is a leading figure in the law of democracy in the U.S. and has written scores of articles on democratic challenges around the world. He served as a senior legal advisor to the presidential campaigns of Barack Obama and is long experienced as an appellate advocate in American courts. He is a member of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences.
Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. YouTube channel.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The 2016 election of Donald Trump focused people&apos;s minds on populism, and most of the attention paid to the subject since has been on the threat it poses to wealthy democracies. In Democracy Unmoored, Samuel Issacharoff takes a far wider-angle view of the phenomenon, covering countries from across the globe: Brazil, Poland, Argentina, Turkey, India, Hungary, Venezuela, and more. Just as importantly, he focuses on populism&apos;s attack on the institutions of governance. 
Democracy requires two critical features: first, a commitment to repeat play such that political actors understand that what goes around comes around; and, second, institutional constraints so that the majority can prevail, albeit not by too much. Democracies must avoid the doomsday scenario in which the contending parties see the next election as the final choice between salvation and perdition. Issacharoff shows how populist governance undermines each of these two critical underpinnings of stable democracy, first by compressing the time horizon to the immediate, and second by eroding institutional constraints on strongman rule. At the same time, Issacharoff highlights the fact that ascendent populists were pushing in an open door as they found democracies in states of disrepair in the post-2008 world. Electorates around the world had come to see institutional democratic party systems as cabals of elites working against &quot;the people,&quot; which anti-institutionalist populists took advantage of in country after country. Global in coverage and featuring a powerful explanation of the true threat populism represents to democracy, this book will be essential reading for anyone who cares about the survival of democratic institutions.
Samuel Issacharoff is the Reiss Professor of Constitutional Law at New York University School of Law. He is a leading figure in the study of democracy, constitutions, and the courts, and the author of Fragile Democracies: Contested Power in the Era of Constitutional Courts. He is a leading figure in the law of democracy in the U.S. and has written scores of articles on democratic challenges around the world. He served as a senior legal advisor to the presidential campaigns of Barack Obama and is long experienced as an appellate advocate in American courts. He is a member of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences.
Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. YouTube channel.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>394</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1a46cd1e-2279-11ee-a371-570343d4bff9</guid>
      <title>Nikki M. Taylor, &quot;Brooding over Bloody Revenge: Enslaved Women&apos;s Lethal Resistance&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>From the colonial through the antebellum era, enslaved women in the US used lethal force as the ultimate form of resistance. By amplifying their voices and experiences,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009276849" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Brooding over Bloody Revenge: Enslaved Women's Lethal Resistance</em></a>&nbsp;(Cambridge UP, 2023) strongly challenges assumptions that enslaved women only participated in covert, non-violent forms of resistance, when in fact they consistently seized justice for themselves and organized toward revolt.&nbsp;</p><p>Nikki M. Taylor expertly reveals how women killed for deeply personal instances of injustice committed by their owners. The stories presented, which span centuries and legal contexts, demonstrate that these acts of lethal force were carefully pre-meditated. Enslaved women planned how and when their enslavers would die, what weapons and accomplices were necessary, and how to evade capture in the aftermath. Original and compelling,&nbsp;<em>Brooding Over Bloody Revenge</em>&nbsp;presents a window into the lives and philosophies of enslaved women who had their own ideas about justice and how to achieve it.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 15 Jul 2023 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/nikki-m-taylor-brooding-over-bloody-revenge-enslaved-womens-lethal-resistance-cambridge-up-2023-Q5raAbGW</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the colonial through the antebellum era, enslaved women in the US used lethal force as the ultimate form of resistance. By amplifying their voices and experiences,&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781009276849" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Brooding over Bloody Revenge: Enslaved Women's Lethal Resistance</em></a>&nbsp;(Cambridge UP, 2023) strongly challenges assumptions that enslaved women only participated in covert, non-violent forms of resistance, when in fact they consistently seized justice for themselves and organized toward revolt.&nbsp;</p><p>Nikki M. Taylor expertly reveals how women killed for deeply personal instances of injustice committed by their owners. The stories presented, which span centuries and legal contexts, demonstrate that these acts of lethal force were carefully pre-meditated. Enslaved women planned how and when their enslavers would die, what weapons and accomplices were necessary, and how to evade capture in the aftermath. Original and compelling,&nbsp;<em>Brooding Over Bloody Revenge</em>&nbsp;presents a window into the lives and philosophies of enslaved women who had their own ideas about justice and how to achieve it.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="29205939" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/ea26e50d-021f-4bb6-8c0a-b4ab7eef8eda/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=ea26e50d-021f-4bb6-8c0a-b4ab7eef8eda&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Nikki M. Taylor, &quot;Brooding over Bloody Revenge: Enslaved Women&apos;s Lethal Resistance&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:30:25</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>From the colonial through the antebellum era, enslaved women in the US used lethal force as the ultimate form of resistance. By amplifying their voices and experiences, Brooding over Bloody Revenge: Enslaved Women&apos;s Lethal Resistance (Cambridge UP, 2023) strongly challenges assumptions that enslaved women only participated in covert, non-violent forms of resistance, when in fact they consistently seized justice for themselves and organized toward revolt. 
Nikki M. Taylor expertly reveals how women killed for deeply personal instances of injustice committed by their owners. The stories presented, which span centuries and legal contexts, demonstrate that these acts of lethal force were carefully pre-meditated. Enslaved women planned how and when their enslavers would die, what weapons and accomplices were necessary, and how to evade capture in the aftermath. Original and compelling, Brooding Over Bloody Revenge presents a window into the lives and philosophies of enslaved women who had their own ideas about justice and how to achieve it.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>From the colonial through the antebellum era, enslaved women in the US used lethal force as the ultimate form of resistance. By amplifying their voices and experiences, Brooding over Bloody Revenge: Enslaved Women&apos;s Lethal Resistance (Cambridge UP, 2023) strongly challenges assumptions that enslaved women only participated in covert, non-violent forms of resistance, when in fact they consistently seized justice for themselves and organized toward revolt. 
Nikki M. Taylor expertly reveals how women killed for deeply personal instances of injustice committed by their owners. The stories presented, which span centuries and legal contexts, demonstrate that these acts of lethal force were carefully pre-meditated. Enslaved women planned how and when their enslavers would die, what weapons and accomplices were necessary, and how to evade capture in the aftermath. Original and compelling, Brooding Over Bloody Revenge presents a window into the lives and philosophies of enslaved women who had their own ideas about justice and how to achieve it.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>10</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">31378edc-20e9-11ee-b5f0-57bbd42d19f9</guid>
      <title>Nour Halabi, &quot;Radical Hospitality: American Policy, Media, and Immigration&quot; (Rutgers UP, 2022)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>How should we understand contemporary migration policy? In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781978827721" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Radical Hospitality: American Policy, Media, and Immigration</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Rutgers UP, 2022),<em>&nbsp;</em><a href="https://twitter.com/noor_halabi" rel="noopener noreferrer">Nour Halabi,</a>&nbsp;<a href="https://abdn.pure.elsevier.com/en/persons/nour-halabi" rel="noopener noreferrer">an Interdisciplinary Fellow at the University of Aberdeen</a>, explores this question by blending history, media studies, and a range of critical theory to introduce the idea of radical hospitality. Using detailed historical and contemporary case studies- from the 1880s and the Chinese Exclusion Act, through the 1920s and the National Origins Act, up to the 2000s and the Muslim travel ban- the book offers both a rethink of the history of immigration as well as a radical call for a new approach. Rich in detail and broad in scope, the book is essential reading for anyone wishing to see a better world for migrants everywhere.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2023 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/nour-halabi-radical-hospitality-american-policy-media-and-immigration-rutgers-up-2022-_XDPYgYu</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How should we understand contemporary migration policy? In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781978827721" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Radical Hospitality: American Policy, Media, and Immigration</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Rutgers UP, 2022),<em>&nbsp;</em><a href="https://twitter.com/noor_halabi" rel="noopener noreferrer">Nour Halabi,</a>&nbsp;<a href="https://abdn.pure.elsevier.com/en/persons/nour-halabi" rel="noopener noreferrer">an Interdisciplinary Fellow at the University of Aberdeen</a>, explores this question by blending history, media studies, and a range of critical theory to introduce the idea of radical hospitality. Using detailed historical and contemporary case studies- from the 1880s and the Chinese Exclusion Act, through the 1920s and the National Origins Act, up to the 2000s and the Muslim travel ban- the book offers both a rethink of the history of immigration as well as a radical call for a new approach. Rich in detail and broad in scope, the book is essential reading for anyone wishing to see a better world for migrants everywhere.</p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="37425349" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/f5a2f8e0-78d6-4b29-8cf4-d2db5f6d4ffa/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=f5a2f8e0-78d6-4b29-8cf4-d2db5f6d4ffa&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Nour Halabi, &quot;Radical Hospitality: American Policy, Media, and Immigration&quot; (Rutgers UP, 2022)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:38:58</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>How should we understand contemporary migration policy? In Radical Hospitality: American Policy, Media, and Immigration (Rutgers UP, 2022), Nour Halabi, an Interdisciplinary Fellow at the University of Aberdeen, explores this question by blending history, media studies, and a range of critical theory to introduce the idea of radical hospitality. Using detailed historical and contemporary case studies- from the 1880s and the Chinese Exclusion Act, through the 1920s and the National Origins Act, up to the 2000s and the Muslim travel ban- the book offers both a rethink of the history of immigration as well as a radical call for a new approach. Rich in detail and broad in scope, the book is essential reading for anyone wishing to see a better world for migrants everywhere.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>How should we understand contemporary migration policy? In Radical Hospitality: American Policy, Media, and Immigration (Rutgers UP, 2022), Nour Halabi, an Interdisciplinary Fellow at the University of Aberdeen, explores this question by blending history, media studies, and a range of critical theory to introduce the idea of radical hospitality. Using detailed historical and contemporary case studies- from the 1880s and the Chinese Exclusion Act, through the 1920s and the National Origins Act, up to the 2000s and the Muslim travel ban- the book offers both a rethink of the history of immigration as well as a radical call for a new approach. Rich in detail and broad in scope, the book is essential reading for anyone wishing to see a better world for migrants everywhere.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>393</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">f65ace40-2012-11ee-b47c-2b7cdc325e8d</guid>
      <title>Hassan S. Khalilieh, &quot;Islamic Law of the Sea: Freedom of Navigation and Passage Rights in Islamic Thought&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2019)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The doctrine of the modern law of the sea is commonly believed to have developed in Renaissance Europe. The role of Islamic law of the sea and customary practices is often ignored though. In<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781108481458" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;<em>Islamic Law of the Sea: Freedom of Navigation and Passage Rights in Islamic Thought</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Cambridge UP, 2019), Hassan S. Khalilieh highlights Islamic legal doctrine regarding freedom of the seas and its implementation in practice. He proves that many of the fundamental principles of the pre-modern international law governing the legal status of the high seas and the territorial sea, though originating in the Mediterranean world, are not necessarily European creations. Beginning with the commonality of the sea in the Qur'an and legal methods employed to ensure the safety, security, and freedom of movement of Muslims and aliens by land and sea, Khalilieh then goes on to examine the concepts of the territorial sea and its security premises, as well as issues surrounding piracy and its legal implications as delineated in Islamic law.</p><p><a href="https://maritime.haifa.ac.il/dr-hassan-khalilieh/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Hassan S. Khalilieh</a>&nbsp;is a senior lecturer in the Maritime Civilizations and Multidisciplinary Studies departments and a senior research fellow in the Leon Recanati Institute for Maritime Studies, Leon H. Charney School of Marine Sciences at the University of Haifa, Israel. His publications include Islamic Maritime Law: An Introduction (1998) and Admiralty and Maritime Laws in the Mediterranean Sea (ca.800-1050): The Kitāb Akriyat al-Sufun and the Nomos Rhodion Nautikos (2006).</p><p><a href="https://nes.princeton.edu/people/ahmed-y-almaazmi" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Ahmed Yaqoub AlMaazmi</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a Ph.D. candidate at Princeton University, Near Eastern Studies Department. His research focuses on the intersection of law, the occult sciences, and the environment across the western Indian Ocean. He can be reached by email at almaazmi@princeton.edu or on Twitter @Ahmed_Yaqoub. Listeners’ feedback, questions, and book suggestions are most welcome.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2023 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/hassan-s-khalilieh-islamic-law-of-the-sea-freedom-of-navigation-and-passage-rights-in-islamic-thought-cambridge-up-2019-F6dh3uON</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The doctrine of the modern law of the sea is commonly believed to have developed in Renaissance Europe. The role of Islamic law of the sea and customary practices is often ignored though. In<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781108481458" rel="noopener noreferrer">&nbsp;<em>Islamic Law of the Sea: Freedom of Navigation and Passage Rights in Islamic Thought</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(Cambridge UP, 2019), Hassan S. Khalilieh highlights Islamic legal doctrine regarding freedom of the seas and its implementation in practice. He proves that many of the fundamental principles of the pre-modern international law governing the legal status of the high seas and the territorial sea, though originating in the Mediterranean world, are not necessarily European creations. Beginning with the commonality of the sea in the Qur'an and legal methods employed to ensure the safety, security, and freedom of movement of Muslims and aliens by land and sea, Khalilieh then goes on to examine the concepts of the territorial sea and its security premises, as well as issues surrounding piracy and its legal implications as delineated in Islamic law.</p><p><a href="https://maritime.haifa.ac.il/dr-hassan-khalilieh/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Hassan S. Khalilieh</a>&nbsp;is a senior lecturer in the Maritime Civilizations and Multidisciplinary Studies departments and a senior research fellow in the Leon Recanati Institute for Maritime Studies, Leon H. Charney School of Marine Sciences at the University of Haifa, Israel. His publications include Islamic Maritime Law: An Introduction (1998) and Admiralty and Maritime Laws in the Mediterranean Sea (ca.800-1050): The Kitāb Akriyat al-Sufun and the Nomos Rhodion Nautikos (2006).</p><p><a href="https://nes.princeton.edu/people/ahmed-y-almaazmi" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Ahmed Yaqoub AlMaazmi</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a Ph.D. candidate at Princeton University, Near Eastern Studies Department. His research focuses on the intersection of law, the occult sciences, and the environment across the western Indian Ocean. He can be reached by email at almaazmi@princeton.edu or on Twitter @Ahmed_Yaqoub. Listeners’ feedback, questions, and book suggestions are most welcome.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="43965930" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/f9a227b3-9f79-436e-8d1a-3acaec718611/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=f9a227b3-9f79-436e-8d1a-3acaec718611&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Hassan S. Khalilieh, &quot;Islamic Law of the Sea: Freedom of Navigation and Passage Rights in Islamic Thought&quot; (Cambridge UP, 2019)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:45:47</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>The doctrine of the modern law of the sea is commonly believed to have developed in Renaissance Europe. The role of Islamic law of the sea and customary practices is often ignored though. In Islamic Law of the Sea: Freedom of Navigation and Passage Rights in Islamic Thought (Cambridge UP, 2019), Hassan S. Khalilieh highlights Islamic legal doctrine regarding freedom of the seas and its implementation in practice. He proves that many of the fundamental principles of the pre-modern international law governing the legal status of the high seas and the territorial sea, though originating in the Mediterranean world, are not necessarily European creations. Beginning with the commonality of the sea in the Qur&apos;an and legal methods employed to ensure the safety, security, and freedom of movement of Muslims and aliens by land and sea, Khalilieh then goes on to examine the concepts of the territorial sea and its security premises, as well as issues surrounding piracy and its legal implications as delineated in Islamic law.
Hassan S. Khalilieh is a senior lecturer in the Maritime Civilizations and Multidisciplinary Studies departments and a senior research fellow in the Leon Recanati Institute for Maritime Studies, Leon H. Charney School of Marine Sciences at the University of Haifa, Israel. His publications include Islamic Maritime Law: An Introduction (1998) and Admiralty and Maritime Laws in the Mediterranean Sea (ca.800-1050): The Kitāb Akriyat al-Sufun and the Nomos Rhodion Nautikos (2006).
Ahmed Yaqoub AlMaazmi is a Ph.D. candidate at Princeton University, Near Eastern Studies Department. His research focuses on the intersection of law, the occult sciences, and the environment across the western Indian Ocean. He can be reached by email at almaazmi@princeton.edu or on Twitter @Ahmed_Yaqoub. Listeners’ feedback, questions, and book suggestions are most welcome.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>The doctrine of the modern law of the sea is commonly believed to have developed in Renaissance Europe. The role of Islamic law of the sea and customary practices is often ignored though. In Islamic Law of the Sea: Freedom of Navigation and Passage Rights in Islamic Thought (Cambridge UP, 2019), Hassan S. Khalilieh highlights Islamic legal doctrine regarding freedom of the seas and its implementation in practice. He proves that many of the fundamental principles of the pre-modern international law governing the legal status of the high seas and the territorial sea, though originating in the Mediterranean world, are not necessarily European creations. Beginning with the commonality of the sea in the Qur&apos;an and legal methods employed to ensure the safety, security, and freedom of movement of Muslims and aliens by land and sea, Khalilieh then goes on to examine the concepts of the territorial sea and its security premises, as well as issues surrounding piracy and its legal implications as delineated in Islamic law.
Hassan S. Khalilieh is a senior lecturer in the Maritime Civilizations and Multidisciplinary Studies departments and a senior research fellow in the Leon Recanati Institute for Maritime Studies, Leon H. Charney School of Marine Sciences at the University of Haifa, Israel. His publications include Islamic Maritime Law: An Introduction (1998) and Admiralty and Maritime Laws in the Mediterranean Sea (ca.800-1050): The Kitāb Akriyat al-Sufun and the Nomos Rhodion Nautikos (2006).
Ahmed Yaqoub AlMaazmi is a Ph.D. candidate at Princeton University, Near Eastern Studies Department. His research focuses on the intersection of law, the occult sciences, and the environment across the western Indian Ocean. He can be reached by email at almaazmi@princeton.edu or on Twitter @Ahmed_Yaqoub. Listeners’ feedback, questions, and book suggestions are most welcome.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>68</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">0764e674-2029-11ee-b210-47e261b3c0e7</guid>
      <title>J. Logan Smilges, &quot;Crip Negativity&quot; (U of Minnesota Press, 2023)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>In the thirty years since the Americans with Disabilities Act was signed into law, the lives of disabled people have not improved nearly as much as activists and politicians had hoped. In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781517915582" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Crip Negativity</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(U of Minnesota Press, 2023), J. Logan Smilges shows us what’s gone wrong and what we can do to fix it.</p><p>Leveling a strong critique of the category of disability and liberal disability politics, Smilges asks and imagines what horizons might exist for the liberation of those oppressed by ableism—beyond access and inclusion. Inspired by models of negativity in queer studies, Black studies, and crip theory, Smilges proposes that bad crip feelings might help all of us to care gently for one another, even as we demand more from the world than we currently believe to be possible.</p><p>J. Logan Smilges (they/them) is assistant professor of English language and literatures at the University of British Columbia and author of&nbsp;<em>Queer Silence: On Disability and Rhetorical Absence</em>&nbsp;(Minnesota, 2022).</p><p><a href="https://cjarrard717.wixsite.com/website" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Clayton Jarrard</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a Research Project Coordinator at the University of Kansas Center for Research, contributing to initiatives at the nexus of research, policy implementation, and community efforts. His scholarly engagement spans the subject areas of Cultural Anthropology, Queer Studies, Disability Studies, Mad Studies, and Religious Studies. Clayton is also a host for the&nbsp;</em><a href="https://open.spotify.com/show/0X98h0FENG1hptiHFA1o5b?si=183b40d21ac94919/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Un/Livable Cultures podcast</em></a><em>.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2023 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/j-logan-smilges-crip-negativity-u-of-minnesota-press-2023-X_PmKsKl</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the thirty years since the Americans with Disabilities Act was signed into law, the lives of disabled people have not improved nearly as much as activists and politicians had hoped. In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9781517915582" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Crip Negativity</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(U of Minnesota Press, 2023), J. Logan Smilges shows us what’s gone wrong and what we can do to fix it.</p><p>Leveling a strong critique of the category of disability and liberal disability politics, Smilges asks and imagines what horizons might exist for the liberation of those oppressed by ableism—beyond access and inclusion. Inspired by models of negativity in queer studies, Black studies, and crip theory, Smilges proposes that bad crip feelings might help all of us to care gently for one another, even as we demand more from the world than we currently believe to be possible.</p><p>J. Logan Smilges (they/them) is assistant professor of English language and literatures at the University of British Columbia and author of&nbsp;<em>Queer Silence: On Disability and Rhetorical Absence</em>&nbsp;(Minnesota, 2022).</p><p><a href="https://cjarrard717.wixsite.com/website" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Clayton Jarrard</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a Research Project Coordinator at the University of Kansas Center for Research, contributing to initiatives at the nexus of research, policy implementation, and community efforts. His scholarly engagement spans the subject areas of Cultural Anthropology, Queer Studies, Disability Studies, Mad Studies, and Religious Studies. Clayton is also a host for the&nbsp;</em><a href="https://open.spotify.com/show/0X98h0FENG1hptiHFA1o5b?si=183b40d21ac94919/" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Un/Livable Cultures podcast</em></a><em>.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="52179158" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/b5c84026-59fc-422f-a3fe-350adf2fd3c3/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=b5c84026-59fc-422f-a3fe-350adf2fd3c3&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>J. Logan Smilges, &quot;Crip Negativity&quot; (U of Minnesota Press, 2023)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:54:21</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>In the thirty years since the Americans with Disabilities Act was signed into law, the lives of disabled people have not improved nearly as much as activists and politicians had hoped. In Crip Negativity (U of Minnesota Press, 2023), J. Logan Smilges shows us what’s gone wrong and what we can do to fix it.
Leveling a strong critique of the category of disability and liberal disability politics, Smilges asks and imagines what horizons might exist for the liberation of those oppressed by ableism—beyond access and inclusion. Inspired by models of negativity in queer studies, Black studies, and crip theory, Smilges proposes that bad crip feelings might help all of us to care gently for one another, even as we demand more from the world than we currently believe to be possible.
J. Logan Smilges (they/them) is assistant professor of English language and literatures at the University of British Columbia and author of Queer Silence: On Disability and Rhetorical Absence (Minnesota, 2022).
Clayton Jarrard is a Research Project Coordinator at the University of Kansas Center for Research, contributing to initiatives at the nexus of research, policy implementation, and community efforts. His scholarly engagement spans the subject areas of Cultural Anthropology, Queer Studies, Disability Studies, Mad Studies, and Religious Studies. Clayton is also a host for the Un/Livable Cultures podcast.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>In the thirty years since the Americans with Disabilities Act was signed into law, the lives of disabled people have not improved nearly as much as activists and politicians had hoped. In Crip Negativity (U of Minnesota Press, 2023), J. Logan Smilges shows us what’s gone wrong and what we can do to fix it.
Leveling a strong critique of the category of disability and liberal disability politics, Smilges asks and imagines what horizons might exist for the liberation of those oppressed by ableism—beyond access and inclusion. Inspired by models of negativity in queer studies, Black studies, and crip theory, Smilges proposes that bad crip feelings might help all of us to care gently for one another, even as we demand more from the world than we currently believe to be possible.
J. Logan Smilges (they/them) is assistant professor of English language and literatures at the University of British Columbia and author of Queer Silence: On Disability and Rhetorical Absence (Minnesota, 2022).
Clayton Jarrard is a Research Project Coordinator at the University of Kansas Center for Research, contributing to initiatives at the nexus of research, policy implementation, and community efforts. His scholarly engagement spans the subject areas of Cultural Anthropology, Queer Studies, Disability Studies, Mad Studies, and Religious Studies. Clayton is also a host for the Un/Livable Cultures podcast.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>25</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1c2f0bba-1f35-11ee-b710-ff0b2889be4b</guid>
      <title>Jacqueline Kinghan, &quot;Lawyers, Networks and Progressive Social Change: Lawyers Changing Lives&quot; (Bloomsbury, 2021)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Written by a lawyer who works at the intersection between legal education and practice in access to justice and human rights, this book locates, describes and defines a collective identity for social justice lawyering in the UK.</p><p>Underpinned by theories of cause lawyering and legal mobilisation, the book argues that it is vital to understand the positions that progressive lawyers collectively take in order to frame the connections they make between their personal and professional lives, the tools they use to achieve social change, as well as ethical tensions presented by their work.</p><p>The book takes a reflexive ethnographic approach to capture the stories of 35 lawyers working to positively transform law and policy in the UK over the last 50 years. It also draws on a wealth of primary sources including case reports, historic campaign materials and media analysis alongside wider ethnographic interviews with academics, students and lawyers and participant observation at social justice conferences, workshops and events.</p><p>The book explains the way in which lawyers' networks facilitate their collective positioning and influence their strategic decision making, which in turn shapes their interactions with social activists, with other lawyers and with the state itself.</p><p><a href="https://essl.leeds.ac.uk/law/staff/1332/mr-alex-batesmith" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Alex Batesmith</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a Lecturer in Legal Profession at the School of Law, University of Leeds, UK. His research focuses on lawyers, their professional self-identity and their motivations, and how these shape the institutions and the discipline in which they work.&nbsp;Twitter: @batesmith.&nbsp;His latest publication, a chapter in the collection Leading Works on the Legal Profession (edited by Dan Newman, published by Routledge in July 2023) is entitled “</em><a href="https://www.routledge.com/Leading-Works-on-the-Legal-Profession/Newman/p/book/9781032182803" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Lawyers Who Want to Make the World a Better Place – Scheingold and Sarat’s Something to Believe In: Politics, Professionalism, and Cause Lawyering</em></a><em>."</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2023 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/jacqueline-kinghan-lawyers-networks-and-progressive-social-change-lawyers-changing-lives-bloomsbury-2021-LUXW1Mqw</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Written by a lawyer who works at the intersection between legal education and practice in access to justice and human rights, this book locates, describes and defines a collective identity for social justice lawyering in the UK.</p><p>Underpinned by theories of cause lawyering and legal mobilisation, the book argues that it is vital to understand the positions that progressive lawyers collectively take in order to frame the connections they make between their personal and professional lives, the tools they use to achieve social change, as well as ethical tensions presented by their work.</p><p>The book takes a reflexive ethnographic approach to capture the stories of 35 lawyers working to positively transform law and policy in the UK over the last 50 years. It also draws on a wealth of primary sources including case reports, historic campaign materials and media analysis alongside wider ethnographic interviews with academics, students and lawyers and participant observation at social justice conferences, workshops and events.</p><p>The book explains the way in which lawyers' networks facilitate their collective positioning and influence their strategic decision making, which in turn shapes their interactions with social activists, with other lawyers and with the state itself.</p><p><a href="https://essl.leeds.ac.uk/law/staff/1332/mr-alex-batesmith" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Alex Batesmith</em></a><em>&nbsp;is a Lecturer in Legal Profession at the School of Law, University of Leeds, UK. His research focuses on lawyers, their professional self-identity and their motivations, and how these shape the institutions and the discipline in which they work.&nbsp;Twitter: @batesmith.&nbsp;His latest publication, a chapter in the collection Leading Works on the Legal Profession (edited by Dan Newman, published by Routledge in July 2023) is entitled “</em><a href="https://www.routledge.com/Leading-Works-on-the-Legal-Profession/Newman/p/book/9781032182803" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Lawyers Who Want to Make the World a Better Place – Scheingold and Sarat’s Something to Believe In: Politics, Professionalism, and Cause Lawyering</em></a><em>."</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="62963806" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/90af7980-417a-4446-829e-aa16cf8ef7eb/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=90af7980-417a-4446-829e-aa16cf8ef7eb&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Jacqueline Kinghan, &quot;Lawyers, Networks and Progressive Social Change: Lawyers Changing Lives&quot; (Bloomsbury, 2021)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>01:05:35</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Written by a lawyer who works at the intersection between legal education and practice in access to justice and human rights, this book locates, describes and defines a collective identity for social justice lawyering in the UK.
Underpinned by theories of cause lawyering and legal mobilisation, the book argues that it is vital to understand the positions that progressive lawyers collectively take in order to frame the connections they make between their personal and professional lives, the tools they use to achieve social change, as well as ethical tensions presented by their work.
The book takes a reflexive ethnographic approach to capture the stories of 35 lawyers working to positively transform law and policy in the UK over the last 50 years. It also draws on a wealth of primary sources including case reports, historic campaign materials and media analysis alongside wider ethnographic interviews with academics, students and lawyers and participant observation at social justice conferences, workshops and events.
The book explains the way in which lawyers&apos; networks facilitate their collective positioning and influence their strategic decision making, which in turn shapes their interactions with social activists, with other lawyers and with the state itself.
Alex Batesmith is a Lecturer in Legal Profession at the School of Law, University of Leeds, UK. His research focuses on lawyers, their professional self-identity and their motivations, and how these shape the institutions and the discipline in which they work. Twitter: @batesmith. His latest publication, a chapter in the collection Leading Works on the Legal Profession (edited by Dan Newman, published by Routledge in July 2023) is entitled “Lawyers Who Want to Make the World a Better Place – Scheingold and Sarat’s Something to Believe In: Politics, Professionalism, and Cause Lawyering.&quot;
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Written by a lawyer who works at the intersection between legal education and practice in access to justice and human rights, this book locates, describes and defines a collective identity for social justice lawyering in the UK.
Underpinned by theories of cause lawyering and legal mobilisation, the book argues that it is vital to understand the positions that progressive lawyers collectively take in order to frame the connections they make between their personal and professional lives, the tools they use to achieve social change, as well as ethical tensions presented by their work.
The book takes a reflexive ethnographic approach to capture the stories of 35 lawyers working to positively transform law and policy in the UK over the last 50 years. It also draws on a wealth of primary sources including case reports, historic campaign materials and media analysis alongside wider ethnographic interviews with academics, students and lawyers and participant observation at social justice conferences, workshops and events.
The book explains the way in which lawyers&apos; networks facilitate their collective positioning and influence their strategic decision making, which in turn shapes their interactions with social activists, with other lawyers and with the state itself.
Alex Batesmith is a Lecturer in Legal Profession at the School of Law, University of Leeds, UK. His research focuses on lawyers, their professional self-identity and their motivations, and how these shape the institutions and the discipline in which they work. Twitter: @batesmith. His latest publication, a chapter in the collection Leading Works on the Legal Profession (edited by Dan Newman, published by Routledge in July 2023) is entitled “Lawyers Who Want to Make the World a Better Place – Scheingold and Sarat’s Something to Believe In: Politics, Professionalism, and Cause Lawyering.&quot;
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>192</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
    <item>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">8cadb8ae-1d9c-11ee-9663-2f2861e5ba56</guid>
      <title>Morgan L. W. Hazelton and Rachael K. Hinkle, &quot;Persuading the Supreme Court: The Significance of Briefs in Judicial Decision-Making&quot; (UP Kansas, 2022)</title>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>Each June in the United States, scholars, journalists, law makers, law enforcers, lawyers, and members of the public wait for the announcement of major decisions from the Supreme Court. Justices often read a summary of their decision from the bench dressed in their robes. Paper copies are available in a special office – and more recently on the Supreme Court website. This year, the Supreme Court opinions have shaped policy on affirmative action, public accommodation for LGBTQ+ people, voting rights, student loans, and the power of states to control election procedure. Before these cases are decided, the parties, outside individuals, and interest groups invest an estimated $25 to $50 million dollars a year to produce roughly one thousand amicus briefs. These briefs strategically provide information to the justices to convince them to vote in a particular way. How are these briefs produced? Who pays for their research and writing? What impact do they have on the ultimate decisions of the Supreme Court?</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780700633630" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Persuading the Supreme Court:&nbsp;The Significance of Briefs in Judicial Decision-Making</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(UP of Kansas, 2022), Drs. Hazelton and Hinkle draw on political science research on the effects of information on policy making, their original dataset of more than 25,000 party and amicus briefs ﬁled between 1984 and 2015, their interviews with former Supreme Court clerks and attorneys, and the text of the related court opinions to argue that the briefs matter – and they matter more when parties hire experienced attorneys known to the justices to craft excellent information-rich briefs. Hazelton and Hinkle interrogate both the causes and the consequences of providing that information to the justices. They demonstrate how that information operates differently in terms of influencing who wins and what policy is announced.</p><p>Dr.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.rachaelkhinkle.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Rachael K. Hinkle</a>, J.D. and Ph.D., is an associate professor in the Department of Political Science at the University at Buffalo. Her research agenda focuses on judicial politics with particular attention to gleaning insights into legal development from the content of judicial opinions through the use of computational text analytic techniques.</p><p>Dr.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.morganhazelton.org/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Morgan L.W. Hazelton</a>, J.D. and Ph.D., is an associate professor in the Department of Political Science and School of Law (by courtesy) at Saint Louis University. She studies how features of court systems influence the decisions that both litigants and judges make.</p><p>In the podcast, Drs. Hazelton and Hinkle mention their piece in their&nbsp;<a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/10/03/supreme-court-term-rulings-amici/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Monkey Cage on predicting the outcome in the 2023 Voting Rights Case</a>&nbsp;and their new collaboration with Dr. Michael J. Nelson,&nbsp;<a href="https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-elevator-effect-9780197625408?cc=us&amp;lang=en&amp;" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Elevator Effect</em></a>. Their data set is available to the public and can be found on either of their websites (linked above).</p><p><a href="https://www.sju.edu/faculty/susan-liebell#_ga=2.125106634.1318472952.1578330950-502593983.1578330950" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Susan Liebell&nbsp;</em></a><em>is Dirk Warren '50 Professor of Political Science at Saint Joseph’s University in Philadelphia.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2023 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>caleb@newbooksnetwork.com (New Books Network)</author>
      <link>https://new-books-in-law.simplecast.com/episodes/morgan-l-w-hazelton-and-rachael-k-hinkle-persuading-the-supreme-court-the-significance-of-briefs-in-judicial-decision-making-up-kansas-2022-4sDyartW</link>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Each June in the United States, scholars, journalists, law makers, law enforcers, lawyers, and members of the public wait for the announcement of major decisions from the Supreme Court. Justices often read a summary of their decision from the bench dressed in their robes. Paper copies are available in a special office – and more recently on the Supreme Court website. This year, the Supreme Court opinions have shaped policy on affirmative action, public accommodation for LGBTQ+ people, voting rights, student loans, and the power of states to control election procedure. Before these cases are decided, the parties, outside individuals, and interest groups invest an estimated $25 to $50 million dollars a year to produce roughly one thousand amicus briefs. These briefs strategically provide information to the justices to convince them to vote in a particular way. How are these briefs produced? Who pays for their research and writing? What impact do they have on the ultimate decisions of the Supreme Court?</p><p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://bookshop.org/a/12343/9780700633630" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Persuading the Supreme Court:&nbsp;The Significance of Briefs in Judicial Decision-Making</em></a><em>&nbsp;</em>(UP of Kansas, 2022), Drs. Hazelton and Hinkle draw on political science research on the effects of information on policy making, their original dataset of more than 25,000 party and amicus briefs ﬁled between 1984 and 2015, their interviews with former Supreme Court clerks and attorneys, and the text of the related court opinions to argue that the briefs matter – and they matter more when parties hire experienced attorneys known to the justices to craft excellent information-rich briefs. Hazelton and Hinkle interrogate both the causes and the consequences of providing that information to the justices. They demonstrate how that information operates differently in terms of influencing who wins and what policy is announced.</p><p>Dr.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.rachaelkhinkle.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Rachael K. Hinkle</a>, J.D. and Ph.D., is an associate professor in the Department of Political Science at the University at Buffalo. Her research agenda focuses on judicial politics with particular attention to gleaning insights into legal development from the content of judicial opinions through the use of computational text analytic techniques.</p><p>Dr.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.morganhazelton.org/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Morgan L.W. Hazelton</a>, J.D. and Ph.D., is an associate professor in the Department of Political Science and School of Law (by courtesy) at Saint Louis University. She studies how features of court systems influence the decisions that both litigants and judges make.</p><p>In the podcast, Drs. Hazelton and Hinkle mention their piece in their&nbsp;<a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/10/03/supreme-court-term-rulings-amici/" rel="noopener noreferrer">Monkey Cage on predicting the outcome in the 2023 Voting Rights Case</a>&nbsp;and their new collaboration with Dr. Michael J. Nelson,&nbsp;<a href="https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-elevator-effect-9780197625408?cc=us&amp;lang=en&amp;" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>The Elevator Effect</em></a>. Their data set is available to the public and can be found on either of their websites (linked above).</p><p><a href="https://www.sju.edu/faculty/susan-liebell#_ga=2.125106634.1318472952.1578330950-502593983.1578330950" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Susan Liebell&nbsp;</em></a><em>is Dirk Warren '50 Professor of Political Science at Saint Joseph’s University in Philadelphia.</em></p><p>Support our show by becoming a premium member! <a href="https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</a></p><br/> <p>Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See <a href="https://pcm.adswizz.com">pcm.adswizz.com</a> for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <enclosure length="50338247" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://injector.simplecastaudio.com/1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666/episodes/4542ce37-bcf8-4353-b752-4c7deeb457fd/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&amp;awCollectionId=1f13a590-dff7-4da1-a5d6-248c33d89666&amp;awEpisodeId=4542ce37-bcf8-4353-b752-4c7deeb457fd&amp;feed=8d97jnFd"/>
      <itunes:title>Morgan L. W. Hazelton and Rachael K. Hinkle, &quot;Persuading the Supreme Court: The Significance of Briefs in Judicial Decision-Making&quot; (UP Kansas, 2022)</itunes:title>
      <itunes:author>New Books Network</itunes:author>
      <itunes:duration>00:52:25</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:summary>Each June in the United States, scholars, journalists, law makers, law enforcers, lawyers, and members of the public wait for the announcement of major decisions from the Supreme Court. Justices often read a summary of their decision from the bench dressed in their robes. Paper copies are available in a special office – and more recently on the Supreme Court website. This year, the Supreme Court opinions have shaped policy on affirmative action, public accommodation for LGBTQ+ people, voting rights, student loans, and the power of states to control election procedure. Before these cases are decided, the parties, outside individuals, and interest groups invest an estimated $25 to $50 million dollars a year to produce roughly one thousand amicus briefs. These briefs strategically provide information to the justices to convince them to vote in a particular way. How are these briefs produced? Who pays for their research and writing? What impact do they have on the ultimate decisions of the Supreme Court?
In Persuading the Supreme Court: The Significance of Briefs in Judicial Decision-Making (UP of Kansas, 2022), Drs. Hazelton and Hinkle draw on political science research on the effects of information on policy making, their original dataset of more than 25,000 party and amicus briefs ﬁled between 1984 and 2015, their interviews with former Supreme Court clerks and attorneys, and the text of the related court opinions to argue that the briefs matter – and they matter more when parties hire experienced attorneys known to the justices to craft excellent information-rich briefs. Hazelton and Hinkle interrogate both the causes and the consequences of providing that information to the justices. They demonstrate how that information operates differently in terms of influencing who wins and what policy is announced.
Dr. Rachael K. Hinkle, J.D. and Ph.D., is an associate professor in the Department of Political Science at the University at Buffalo. Her research agenda focuses on judicial politics with particular attention to gleaning insights into legal development from the content of judicial opinions through the use of computational text analytic techniques.
Dr. Morgan L.W. Hazelton, J.D. and Ph.D., is an associate professor in the Department of Political Science and School of Law (by courtesy) at Saint Louis University. She studies how features of court systems influence the decisions that both litigants and judges make.
In the podcast, Drs. Hazelton and Hinkle mention their piece in their Monkey Cage on predicting the outcome in the 2023 Voting Rights Case and their new collaboration with Dr. Michael J. Nelson, The Elevator Effect. Their data set is available to the public and can be found on either of their websites (linked above).
Susan Liebell is Dirk Warren &apos;50 Professor of Political Science at Saint Joseph’s University in Philadelphia.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:summary>
      <itunes:subtitle>Each June in the United States, scholars, journalists, law makers, law enforcers, lawyers, and members of the public wait for the announcement of major decisions from the Supreme Court. Justices often read a summary of their decision from the bench dressed in their robes. Paper copies are available in a special office – and more recently on the Supreme Court website. This year, the Supreme Court opinions have shaped policy on affirmative action, public accommodation for LGBTQ+ people, voting rights, student loans, and the power of states to control election procedure. Before these cases are decided, the parties, outside individuals, and interest groups invest an estimated $25 to $50 million dollars a year to produce roughly one thousand amicus briefs. These briefs strategically provide information to the justices to convince them to vote in a particular way. How are these briefs produced? Who pays for their research and writing? What impact do they have on the ultimate decisions of the Supreme Court?
In Persuading the Supreme Court: The Significance of Briefs in Judicial Decision-Making (UP of Kansas, 2022), Drs. Hazelton and Hinkle draw on political science research on the effects of information on policy making, their original dataset of more than 25,000 party and amicus briefs ﬁled between 1984 and 2015, their interviews with former Supreme Court clerks and attorneys, and the text of the related court opinions to argue that the briefs matter – and they matter more when parties hire experienced attorneys known to the justices to craft excellent information-rich briefs. Hazelton and Hinkle interrogate both the causes and the consequences of providing that information to the justices. They demonstrate how that information operates differently in terms of influencing who wins and what policy is announced.
Dr. Rachael K. Hinkle, J.D. and Ph.D., is an associate professor in the Department of Political Science at the University at Buffalo. Her research agenda focuses on judicial politics with particular attention to gleaning insights into legal development from the content of judicial opinions through the use of computational text analytic techniques.
Dr. Morgan L.W. Hazelton, J.D. and Ph.D., is an associate professor in the Department of Political Science and School of Law (by courtesy) at Saint Louis University. She studies how features of court systems influence the decisions that both litigants and judges make.
In the podcast, Drs. Hazelton and Hinkle mention their piece in their Monkey Cage on predicting the outcome in the 2023 Voting Rights Case and their new collaboration with Dr. Michael J. Nelson, The Elevator Effect. Their data set is available to the public and can be found on either of their websites (linked above).
Susan Liebell is Dirk Warren &apos;50 Professor of Political Science at Saint Joseph’s University in Philadelphia.
Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/law</itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:episode>665</itunes:episode>
      <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>